Slashdot Mirror


Review: Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back

What the Internet is really for, explains one sage in Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, the latest in Kevin Smith's continuing series featuring the two drug-dealing, sex-obsessed slobs from central New Jersey, is so kids can slander other people anonymously. In his previous movies -- Dogma, Chasing Amy, Clerks -- Smith chronicles work, sex and blasphemy. This time the sub-theme is the Net and the waves of brainy but obnoxious adolescent jerks who have helped set its sometimes nasty tone in recent years. Many readers of this website will especially love the ending, one of the few Hollywood got right this summer. Spoilage warning: plot is discussed, but not ending.

In a way, Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back is a series of inside jokes, albeit some very funny ones. Smith gets that movies are a universal experience of his young audiences. Still, only attentive, die-hard movie buffs will get them all. The cast, plots and references are closely tied to other Smith films, lines, scenes, actors and plots, along with some that aren't his. (There is a hilarious spoof of Good Will Hunting which Ben Affleck and Matt Damon good-naturedly join in.) Smith's studio Miramax is continuously ridiculed (Bob Hope also used to poke fun at Paramount in some of his road-trip comedies with Bing Crosby). Chris Rock pops up with some riffs on race.

The movie's director, Gus Van Sant (CT:Good Will Hunting, not J&SBSB of course), has a funny bit part, and Smith parodies Charlie's Angels, The Fugitive (so specifically he includes a reference to Provasic, the drug that nearly destroyed Richard Kimble's life), Scooby-Doo,Hannibal, and even Star Wars (Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill appear, the latter in a loopy take-off on the mythic brawl between Darth and Luke.

The Net figures heavily in this sometimes hilarious if uneven movie, yet another comedy that self-referentially uses pop culture as humor, reference point and plot line. Jay (Jason Mewes) and Silent Bob (Smith) are outraged to learn that kids online are flaming the movie based on the comic book -- Bluntman and The Chronic -- that the pair inspired. Besides, they're not getting a dime out of any of it. Jay, who's never even heard of the Net, is astonished to learn that people can call you names online, and he flames them back, urging them to lick his private parts. He and Bob set out for Hollywood to stop the movie's production and end the besmirching of their alleged reputations. They have various misadventures along the way, including dust-ups with a nun, the Utah State Police, animal rights activists, federal wildlife officials, and nasty child geeks.

There is, of course, the inevitable moment when Bob speaks -- as always, finally provoked by the genial stupidity and crudity of his "hetero-life mate" Jay. This movie backs off from the controversial religion-bashing of Dogma, which triggered some boycotts and threats on Smith and the movie's producers. If the movie is frequently gross in the now-standard scatalogical way of studio films aimed at the hip and the young, it is good-natured and easy-going, not even remotely controversial. Jay is still obsessed with getting laid and with his and everybody else's masculinity, but this round is much more relaxed about it.

Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back is less of a coherent movie than a series of one-liners, set gags, set-ups and cultural in-jokes and spoofs. There are moments of genius and of stupidity, also flashes of satire and comic genius. It works best if you've seen a substantial chunk of the Smith canon. If you haven't, a lot of it will sail over your head. But it will still probably be the funniest movie you've seen all summer.

310 comments

  1. how do you filter Katz? by xah · · Score: 1, Funny

    I have my Katz filter on, but then he appears under a different category, like "Reviews." Is there any justice left in the world?

    --
    I am not a lawyer. Do not take my words as legal advice. If you need legal advice, consult an attorney.
    1. Re:how do you filter Katz? by heptapod · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Come on, I've had Katz filtered for months because I can't stand his self-important and dreary writing. Practically ruined my whole Sunday.

    2. Re:how do you filter Katz? by LordSaxman · · Score: 1

      Filtering Katz is simple: read the "Posted by [NAME]" in each article description and then don't click on "Read More..." if [Name]=JonKatz

    3. Re:how do you filter Katz? by heptapod · · Score: 1

      Meh, I don't want to see him at all nor do I want to see his name or anything he writes in my eye space. That's why I have him checked under "exclude stories from homepage". It didn't work this time, I hope it doesn't happen again or I'll... I'll... complain again.

      Yeah, that's it.

    4. Re:how do you filter Katz? by SilentChris · · Score: 2
      Uh, if you didn't want to read him, why did you click-through on the front page? You're only adding to his page view totals.

      Unless, of course, you came here just to complain, which is what I'm expecting.

    5. Re:how do you filter Katz? by dtobias · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is getting really tiresome, that every time Katz writes an article, an ungodly degree of the commentary is solely devoted to bashing Katz, discussing how to filter him, or bashing the people who are bashing him. (And now I'm contributing to that myself... :)) Somebody perhaps needs to get a life. And can't anyone try to actually discuss the topic of the article, instead of the author???

      --
      --Dan
      Web Tips
    6. Re:how do you filter Katz? by fmaxwell · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Get a life. Jon Katz wrote a movie review that you clicked on and chose to read! He is an insightful, talented author with many book reviews to prove it. The fact that you cannot appreciate his writing does not mean that you need to attack the man personally every time he posts something on Slashdot. You remind me of the stupid troll that keeps posting the "*BSD is dying" crap every time an article about BSD appears. If you don't want to read stuff by Jon Katz, then don't read it. But don't subject Jon Katz and his readers to your childish insults and whining.

    7. Re:how do you filter Katz? by Prong · · Score: 0, Troll

      You are welcome to your opinion, of course.

      Mine is that Katz is a highly derivative, pandering, clueless freak who somehow continues to get published. I don't even want to know when he produces another hairball, which is why I very carefully selected the "exclude Jon Katz" option on my profile. It doesn't seem to work anymore, and I would like it fixed. I suspect a significant number of others would, too.

    8. Re:how do you filter Katz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like it fixed.

      I don't think this is the place for bug reports, troll.

    9. Re:how do you filter Katz? by Prong · · Score: 1

      Do you know whether I reported it or not, prick? As to trolling, if I am, you responded. Note that you wouldn't have had the opportunity to get sarcastic if the filter was working.

    10. Re:how do you filter Katz? by fmaxwell · · Score: 2
      Whether you like him or not, Jon Katz is a person who has never, to the best of my knowledge, uttered an unkind work to or about you. For you to publically insult him speaks ill of your upbringing.


      If you feel that something on Slashdot is not working, submit a bug report. Don't post public messages that are abusive and insulting about some person who is not responsible for the bug.


      I am guessing that you will respond with a rude posting to/about me, but why don't you try surprising us all and just admit that you were out of line. It might even earn you some Karma points.

    11. Re:how do you filter Katz? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to read shit by Katz, that's why I set the filter. But this shitty movie review got through anyway, THATS what people here are bitchin about. Even in this remarkably short artical (I bothered reading it since I just got back from the movie in question), Katz demonstrates ignorance of the subject at least 6 times. Ok, maybe he hasn't read as much shit about this movie and kevin smith films in general, but if there's one type of opinion that I don't tolerate, its an uniformed- wait wtf was I talking about? Oh yeah, When I check the Katz filter I don't ever want to see another fucking Katz artical again! Yet there it sits on /., right where I said I didn't want it. If all you Katz-suckers don't wanna read my drivel, then, uh, wait how the hell are they supposed to fix it, I mean its not their fault...

    12. Re:how do you filter Katz? by fmaxwell · · Score: 2
      If all you Katz-suckers don't wanna read my drivel, then, uh, wait how the hell are they supposed to fix it, I mean its not their fault...


      Ding! So just report it as a bug. Thank you.

    13. Re:how do you filter Katz? by Prong · · Score: 0

      I'll admit to being rabid on the subject of Katz, to posting in such a way sure to get me modded down, but not to being out of line. Unless, of course, slashdot is not the place for people who have different opinions from the majority of posters. Whether or not Katz has ever said anything unkind to me or about me is completely irrelevant. His articles are published on a forum which, by its nature and design, invites instant feedback. I'm sure he's used to being slammed.

      Please note that I at least identified the comments as my opinion, something I'm surely entitled to. Perhaps it could have been expressed with less vitriol, but I'll stand by the substance of what I wrote. And frankly, I'm little suprised to be getting the "if you can't say anything nice" treatment on this forum.

      I'm really not sure how you've managed to connect how I feel about Katz's work to his not being responsible for the bug (I was aware that it was reported and assigned at the time of my post, and had been for some time), but I notice that you responded well after I had been modded down. Did it occur to you that the message might have been delivered already? Or were you just piling on? Pimping for points?

      As for slashdot karma, I expect that's gone forever. I noticed that a more recent posting has been modded down, despite being on topic and non-abusive (as far as I can tell).

  2. Askew-niverse by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Informative

    This movie is mainly a continuation of Chasing Amy, and tries to tie up the rest of the movies; Clerks, Mallrats and Dogma.

    It will also be the last live-action movie featuring these characters. There is, however, a new animated movie on the way, supposedly. Clerks: Sellout, the story of Dante and Randall being offered lots of money to make a movie about a day in their lives.

    As with a lot of Smith stuff, you'll either love it or hate it, and a lot of it is fan service for people who've seen his previous movies.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    1. Re:Askew-niverse by Wonko42 · · Score: 3, Informative
      This movie is mainly a continuation of Chasing Amy, and tries to tie up the rest of the movies; Clerks, Mallrats and Dogma.

      I think you may have seen a different movie than I did. Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back is most definitely not a continuation of Chasing Amy, nor does it wrap up all Smith's other films. Although you do have a point, in that this movie does get most of its plot from the characters and events in Chasing Amy.

      SPOILERS BELOW. STOP READING NOW IF YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH.

      .

      .

      .

      .

      .

      At the end of Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, we see Alyssa Jones talking to her friend/lover and we also see Hooper LaMont talking to Banky Edwards, who we learn is his friend/lover (!!!). This wraps up Chasing Amy to some extent, but what little we saw of Holden McNeil in the beginning of the movie still doesn't wrap up his character. Furthermore, Mallrats, Clerks, and Dogma were not at all wrapped up in this movie, except that we learn that Dante and Randal are still working at the Quik-Stop and that God has closed the book of the View Askewniverse and done a little dance for us.

    2. Re:Askew-niverse by cac0f0ny · · Score: 1

      Alyssa Jones isn't with her friend/lover. She sees the movie with her sister, Trisha Jones. You may remember her from mallrats. She was sleeping with people for her book.

    3. Re:Askew-niverse by sdo1 · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm not sure we know that Dante and Randal are "still" working at the Quik-Stop (and video store respectively). The opening scene is a scene directly from Clerks. ("I'm not even supposed to BE here today!") I think the timeline of Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back starts in the middle of Clerks... though there would be some inconsistency there as Jay and Bob appear at the end of Clerks.

      Who knows.... it was a damn funny movie though.

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    4. Re:Askew-niverse by mal3 · · Score: 1

      If you watch the animated series you'll know that Dante is often working when he's not supposed to be there. It's apparently a common occurence.

      --Bruce

      --
      Non gratis rodentus anus
    5. Re:Askew-niverse by cicatrix · · Score: 1

      Chasing Amy takes place two years past Clerks/Mallrats--you can peg together the timeline on the three movies by the references to Julie Dwyer (the girl who died of an embolism in the pool). I think that Kevin Smith talks about this in the liner notes of the Chasing Amy laserdisc, too...

      From Holden's comments, I'm thinking this is at least 1-2 years after Chasing Amy, actually...

    6. Re:Askew-niverse by aztektum · · Score: 1

      HULLO Alyssa was talking to her SISTER Tricia "The Dish" Jones the writer of the book entitled "Bore-gasm" from MALLRATS.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
  3. What about the filter? by dinivin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Any particular reason the Katz filter didn't catch his usual crap this time?

    Dinivin

    1. Re:What about the filter? by ColdGrits · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I agree completely.

      What is the point of a Katz filter if it doesn't freaking work?

      Mind you, reading this "review" reminded me why I chose to filter out Katz's
      crap in the first place - full of factual errors which are so elementary it
      makes one wonder whether Katz ever watched the film or even did ANY research
      before writing.

      I mean, come on Katz - you get the name of the director wrong; you get the
      name of the comic wrong; you get the circumstances under which "Silent" Bob
      speaks in his other films wrong; you get the residence of the REAL director
      wrong;

      Please, slashdot-team, fix the Katz filter so we don't have to put up with
      this lameass ill-thoughtout un-researched rubbish again.

      Please?

      --
      People should not be afraid of their governments - Governments should be afraid of their people.
    2. Re:What about the filter? by chad_r · · Score: 1

      This is just a Me Too reply. I am hoping that if this entire discussion constists of people asking to filter Katz, someone will take the hint. Not Katz himself,though--being flamed to hell for each article hasn't stopped him yet.

      Please, fix the filters! Just seeing his article headline on the main page is annoying. Slashdot was more enjoyable when all traces of Katz are filtered.

  4. Breaking Expectations... by Lawen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, a jonkatz review that I agree with...hope Satan is enjoying the day and making a snowman.

    From the test screening of Jay&Silent Bob I saw a month ago, as well as the final version I saw last week, I'd compare this movie more to Mallrats than any of Smith's other flicks...lots of dick adn fart humor, and even more rhetoric. A formula that has only been pulled off successfully by the New Jersey "Trilogy".

    If anyone's really interested, go check out the "Chasing Dogma" comic book graphic novel, published by Oni press (and written, of course, by Smith). About half of the movie is ripped, or at least inspired, by the comic.

    And go see the movie, so that Miramax will throw more money at View Askew, and Smith can keep churning them out.

    Lawen

    1. Re:Breaking Expectations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd compare this movie to Mallrats? Wow, sounds like a must-see!

      I saw Mallrats on cable not too long ago, and it was fucking stupid. There's practically nothing I remember about its stupidity, except for some fucking moron pretending he was a superhero or something. Lame.

      No wonder you and Katz liked it.

    2. Re:Breaking Expectations... by sopwath · · Score: 0

      Its no Mallrats, but its still funny if you get the rips on Smith's other movies.

      There's something wrong with you if you don't understand why Mallrats is good.

      good luck,
      sopwath

    3. Re:Breaking Expectations... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, looks like society has sucked all the life outta you. You're now a lost cause.

      I pity you.

  5. You know what's REALLY sad? by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back" is a better movie name than "Attack of the Clones."

    1. Re:You know what's REALLY sad? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      "Anakin and Silent Jar Jar Strike Back"

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:You know what's REALLY sad? by Alan · · Score: 1

      That's the one form that I'd approve of jarjar.

    3. Re:You know what's REALLY sad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Avenge me Hemp Knight!

      Starring Mark Hamill as COCK KNOCKER!

      The blunt saber fight alone is worth the price of admission.

    4. Re:You know what's REALLY sad? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      >That's the one form that I'd approve of jarjar.

      The other form being orange goo. I will _NEVER_ forgive Manequin, errr.. Anakin for intervening.

      TPM would have been a much better movie if we had gotten to see the pod racer creature (Sebulba?) pounding his fist through Jar-Jar's face and reducing him to a few liters of liquified amphibian remains.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    5. Re:You know what's REALLY sad? by Pxtl · · Score: 2

      No, even better was Carrie Fisher as a nun.

    6. Re:You know what's REALLY sad? by jafac · · Score: 2

      Yeah, that just crushes all my fantasies about her in that slave girl outfit in Jedi. Now I have to fantasize about her as a nun.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  6. Gus Van Sant? by b0r3d · · Score: 1, Redundant
    The movie's director, Gus Van Sant

    WTF?

    You obviously aren't one of those aforementioned fans of movies, especially Kevin Smith's. He's the writer/DIRECTOR.

    1. Re:Gus Van Sant? by R-66Y · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was indeed a terrible reference, but in his own little world, Katz was probably referring to the "director" of the Good Will Hunting spoof, who indeed was Gus Van Sant.

      Later,
      Patrick

    2. Re:Gus Van Sant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I know everyone loves to hammer Katz, but hammer him for the right thing. If you read carefully, the problem is that the reference to Good Will Hunting is so weakly made that it is easy to miss. It is the weakness of Katz's writing that you see working here -- it doesn't appear that he thinks that Van Sant is the director of Jay and Silent Bob...he just writes in a way that would make you think so.

    3. Re:Gus Van Sant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The movie's director, Gus Van Sant (CT:Good Will Hunting, not J&SBSB of course), has a funny bit part...

      He (Katz) was talking about the movie-within-the-movie. He even clearly states, as I've pasted above, that he knows Van Sant ISN'T the director of the actual film. You should read things more carefully in the future, instead of simply searching for excuses to bash on Katz (or anyone else).

      -R

      Questions, comments, hate mail can be forwarded to: dunno at sosbbs dot com.

    4. Re:Gus Van Sant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the (CT:...) tag means that CmdrTaco made the edit after the story was posted. So Katz is still a moron.

    5. Re:Gus Van Sant? by rj-eleven · · Score: 1

      Grammar is to blame on this one. Look:

      Gus Van Sant (CT:Good Will Hunting, not J&SBSB of course)

      Anyway, the movie rocked and Smith is even giving signed mini-posters to those who send him ticket stubs from friday(8/24) and sat(8/25). See viewaskew.com for details.

    6. Re:Gus Van Sant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad there isn't a +1 Factual that we could assign to this post.

  7. Misinformation by shanek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Kevin Smith directed the film, not Gus Van Sant. The latter directed Good Will Hunting and that's why he's in that area of the film.

    The pair is called Bluntman and Chronic, not Bluntman and The Chronic.

    Of all the times Silent Bob speaks, this is the only time it's provoked by Jay's stupidity. In Clerks, he speaks to Dante to convicne him that Veronica loves him. In Mallrats, he delivers his Jedi line. In Chasing Amy, he tells the story of Amy to Ben Affleck's character. And in Dogma, neither of his two lines are delivered to Jay; one is to an extra, the other Chris Rock.

    Isn't there something that requires movie reviewers to actually know something about the movie they're discussing?

    I saw it on the sneak preview and laughed my ass off. There were some people there who hadn't seen any Kevin Smith movies and they laughed their asses off. It's just a funny movie. Go see it.

    1. Re:Misinformation by Threads · · Score: 1

      Umm, no, he didn't speak to Chris Rock's character.

    2. Re:Misinformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The movie's director, Gus Van Sant (CT:Good Will Hunting, not J&SBSB of course)...

      He did acknowledge that Gus Van Sant did not direct J&SBSB.

    3. Re:Misinformation by sbeitzel · · Score: 2

      You tell him, pal. Of course, being Katz, he's unlikely to listen -- he's more interested in being cool and edgy than in being correct. It's why there are so many people who filter Katz out.

      And yet, like a demon bent on possession, he manages to claw his way into our minds nonetheless. I filter Katz -- I've got many better things to do than spend my energy on being irritated by his writing. And yet this story showed up, presumably because of the whole Kevin Smith thing. I love Kevin Smith's movies. But showing Jon Katz' writing about something I love when I've asked not to see anything from him ever is sort of like offering me the opportunity to watch a porn video of him and my mother. Bleargh!

      --
      Oh, go on, check out my job.
    4. Re:Misinformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Umm, no, he didn't speak to Chris Rock's character.

      In Dogma, he certainly did speak to Chris' character. The 13th apostle said he'd put in a good word for him if he cleaned up his language (actually talking to Jay). Silent Bob said "Thanks".

    5. Re:Misinformation by Pasty69 · · Score: 1

      Commander Taco did actually, I believe that's what the 'CT' denoted in that little correct.
      Katz uses big words, but he can't write for shit.
      (don't flame me accusing me of the same, I'm not writing reviews and books, asshole)

      --
      -Pasty
    6. Re:Misinformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you notice how close to the argument between Bartleby and Loki that Smith and Damon were on the set of Good Will Hunting 2 was?

      Amazing.

    7. Re:Misinformation by szcx · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I saw it on the sneak preview and laughed my ass off. There were some people there who hadn't seen any Kevin Smith movies and they laughed their asses off. It's just a funny movie. Go see it.

      Fight the MPAA!

      Is that your way of "fighting" the MPAA? Recommending that people go and see a Disney-owned film?
    8. Re:Misinformation by Syberghost · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You tell him, pal. Of course, being Katz, he's unlikely to listen -- he's more interested in being cool and edgy than in being correct.

      That's funny; he's responded to every email I've ever sent him.

      Perhaps you're just not saying anything worth listening to.

    9. Re:Misinformation by DoomHaven · · Score: 1

      Yes, he said "Thank you" to Rufus (Chris Rock) after Rufus offered to put a good word in with God on Jay and Silent Bob's behalf.

      --
      "Don't mind me cutting myself on Occam's Razor"
    10. Re:Misinformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny; he's responded to every email I've ever sent him.

      He listens to you because you're slipping him the high hard one.

    11. Re:Misinformation by fleener · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out how Katz could claim "the sub-theme is the Net." Sure it was used as a pretext for the trip to Hollywood, but the Internet has a total of three scenes. You could just as easily say gay jokes were the sub-theme or marijuana was the sub-theme or sex-in-general was the sub-theme or comics books were the sub-theme. Oh, but those hooks wouldn't be as good to hang the review on when you post your review on a web site. Oh well.

    12. Re:Misinformation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The review mentions that Gus Van Sant directed GWH, not J&SBSB.

      Silent Bob actually speaks twice in the movie, once near the beginning, and again at the end.

      Make sure you read the review before flaming, thanks, come again.

      -gleaaaaaaaaaaam.

    13. Re:Misinformation by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should read the review Katz did. He clearly says that Gus Van Sant directed Good Will Hunting and not J&SBSB. Do you read inside parentheses?

      --
      What?
    14. Re:Misinformation by bigchris · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he was just not saying anything he agreed with?

    15. Re:Misinformation by jjshoe · · Score: 1

      correction

      Silent Bob does talk in dogma

      "No ticket" after he threw someone out of/off of a train

      --
      -- botsex is {grep;touch;strip;unzip;head;mount} /dev/girl -t {wet;fsck;fsck;yes;yes;yes;umount} {/de
  8. Smith Ain't Hollywood by well_jung · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "..one of the few Hollywood got right this summer. "
    Smith isn't Hollywood. He's New Jersey. And BTW, is there anything you read/see Mr. Katz, in which you don't infer some type of "'net" related subtext?

    --
    Carl G. Jung
    --
    "With one breath, with one flow, You will know Synchronicity" -La Policia
    1. Re:Smith Ain't Hollywood by Nathan+Brazil · · Score: 1

      Hey, you got your causality backwards... If he doesn't see a "net" subtext, he doesn't write about it.

      --
      echo Prpv a\'rfg cnf har cvcr | tr Pacfghnrvp Cnpstuaeic
    2. Re:Smith Ain't Hollywood by Radrik · · Score: 1

      Obviously you haven't seen the movie. The "net subplot" in actuality drives the movie. The net is J&SB's reason for "striking back."

      Anyway, I'd just like to say that the movie had some very funny moments, but like Katz says, it leaves you feeling like you just watched a series of one-liners. The ending is great, too.

      "Shit naw, Jersey reppin' proud" -Jay

    3. Re:Smith Ain't Hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont know if you noticed, but miramax produced the film, which would make it a hollywood movie.

    4. Re:Smith Ain't Hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miramax picked up the film after it was already completed and shown a few times, then spent a quarter million dollars to touch things up/add popular music tracks and released it again.

      clerks was filmed in new jersey, mallrats was filmed in minnesota.

  9. Confusing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > The movie's director, Gus Van Sant, has a funny
    > bit part ..

    Hasn't Jon ever heard of actually reading this stuff before posting it? Shouldn't this sentence be up in the paragraph actually about Good Will Hunting (whom Gus van Sant actually directed) rather than making it seem like "The movie" (ie Adventures...) was his work?

  10. It Really is too bad. by UpeoWaMacho · · Score: 1

    The talk in the theater after i saw the movie last night is that this is the last View Askew production - with various quotes at the end of the movie (as us cult followers knew there would be) and the closing of the View Askew Book by "god".... Why i haven't heared anything directly saying that this is the last one, it would be sad if it was.

    Other than that - J+SBSB is the best of all of them! Go Jersy Trilogy! (5!)

    --
    Upeo
    1. Re:It Really is too bad. by BRock97 · · Score: 2

      The talk in the theater after i saw the movie last night is that this is the last View Askew production

      Not entirely true. What JSBSB represents is the end to the Jersey series, in live action form. There is a cartoon movie version of Clerks, in the same style as the to-quickly-canceled TV series was, but the live action stuff is done.

      From what I have heard, Smith wants to do more serious movies (even though Chasing Amy was one of the best drama type movies I have seen in some time). Case in point is that IMDB had printed an article that said Smith has already signed Ben Affleck to play a character based on Smith's life as a father. Sounds pretty serious.

      --

      Bryan R.
      The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
    2. Re:It Really is too bad. by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      Smith has already stated he wants to do a Fletch movie. He's got an option on one of the books (Fletch Won?) and no, it will not star Chevy Chase.

  11. Going to miss Jay and Bob by Shrug · · Score: 1

    The movie I think was a good close to the series of movies that have been going on for years now. I was just surprised to hear that no one in the theater that I was in didn't get the space balls reference. Also, is it just me or is there a Mac in every movie that I have seen this year.

  12. Saw the Sneak Preview on 8/17 by jgrumbles · · Score: 1

    The movie is some funny shit. Although the fact that it does have a bad plot like Dude Where's My Car, at least the humor in it is not juvenile. This and Dogma are up there as some of the funniest movies from Kevin Smith that I have seen. I also love the cameo appearances from characters from previous movies. You definitely have to see this movie.

  13. Hilarious... but... by Outlyer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My girlfriend and I found it outright the funniest, and most outright clever movie in a summer full of duds. But... I'm a big Kevin Smith fan, and I've got all his flicks on DVD, so I wonder how the movie would be recieved by a Smith Virgin.

    Jason Mewes actually carries this movie, which is remarkable, since I think no one was more surprised than him that it went so well. He's hardly the mainstream movie star like Affleck or Jason Lee.

    Also, while 'movie parody movies' have been a subgenre for ever (see: Scary Movie to Naked Gun) there hasn't been one done well in ages. This one is both bang on in it's attacks on those movies, but it's obviously done with love and respect, which makes it all the more clever.

    At it's core, it's a road trip movie, which, since Capra invented the genre, has always proven to be a treat; the potential for unpredictable characters and situation is hard to exceed, and Kevin Smith handles it admirably.

    All in all, after a summer full of disappointments (see: A.I. Kiss of the Dragon, Evolution, et al.) this was refreshing, fun and Smith's most inside joke, and simultaneously, most accessible movie yet.

    If you have some patience for a seemingly offensive movie - but with a lot of heart - you couldn't do better this summer.

    --
    ----------------- "I have a bone to pick, and a few to break." - Refused -------------------
    1. Re:Hilarious... but... by MusingHalfwit · · Score: 1

      I am a big Kevin Smith fan as well but this movie falls at the bottom of the list in Smithville. Did everyone miss the fact that he ask's on several occasions why the audience is even at the movie? (Read The Simpsons "worst episode ever")The actors turning and looking at the audience should be a clue. Also is it not possible that the Damon-Affleck banter did have some truth about this movie in it (read "have to do the safe movie so you can do the art movie") these things on top of the constant riduculing of Mirimax makes me wonder if he didn't have to throw this one together for the studios sake. Don't get me wrong I enjoyed myself but the movie just wasn't very good.

      MusingHalfwit
      -----------------
      I believe in feet

    2. Re:Hilarious... but... by mcspock · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting way to look at it.

      This movie was queued. At the end of mallrats (i think it was?) they refer to jay, silent bob, and an ape, then mention that's another story. hmm..

      I liked the fact that he tied together a lot of random bits and pieces from other movies, plus brought closure to his jersey series. All the jokes about the audience watching the movie, and mirimax sucking were just jokes. Look at how Matt Damon and Ben Affleck panned each others' movie performances - they're just a bunch of psuedo-inside jokes about movies, actors, and studios. Jay mentions "I hate hollywood. Everything here is so fake." It has to be a joke - if it was really true, would they be making movies?

      And i totally agree about jason mewes driving this movie. He doesn't do it because he's a good actor, but because he's very tangible.

      --
      -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
    3. Re:Hilarious... but... by Peyna · · Score: 1

      Scary Movie isn't worthy of being considered a parody, it just took scenes from other movies and redid them, shitty-style. It isn't even worthy of being in the same sentence as Naked Gun. Leslie Nelson and Mel Brooks have done great parodies. Scary Movie was not a parody. I just say Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back, and while it parodied better than Scary Movie, I wouldn't really call it a parody either. Ah, I'm just being picky. Mostly, I hate seeing good movies and bad movies compared as if they were on the same level!

      --
      What?
  14. It blew chunks.. by _LORAX_ · · Score: 1


    I'm sorry, as a long time fan of the Kevin Smith films ( including having all three of the J&SB stash signed copies of the other films ) I though this one sucked. There was too much happening, and the whole movie bordered on ego stroking for each member of the film. You could see the gags comming a mile away, and most were not funny.

    I have and continue to watch the other three movies, but this latest one was a waste of time. It lacked and decent plot development, or charm of his other films and the endless slow motion girl shots, dick and fart jokes, and re-use of old over used one lines really just got annoying.

    Go see it if you like Bluntman and Chronic "Dick and fart jokes", but if you are looking for the charm and humor from his other films just pass on this one.

    1. Re:It blew chunks.. by Steev · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I'd say "it blew chunks," but I'll definately say that it was the worst of the View Askew movies thus far, and I *do* agree with most of your sentiments. Although I'll still pick up the DVD for the great Kevin Smith extras, and completeness of my collection.

    2. Re:It blew chunks.. by MKalus · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the point here, it was a very good satire on the state of Hollywood.

      Exactly what you complain about in the movie is what happens constantly in every single Hollywood movie.

      What Smith did with this movie was to take the Hollywood instant movie mixture and "forgot" to add some water.

      The end result is one of the best Hollywood farces I've ever seen, and I haven't laughed this much in a movie in quite a while.

      Maybe not his best movie, but definetly one of the more funnier ones (that is, if you can laugh about the stupidity that Hollywood is).

      Michael

      --
      If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
    3. Re:It blew chunks.. by FattusAnthony · · Score: 1

      There's 4 VA movies. Clerks, Mallrats, Chasing Amy, and Dogma. 5, now, with J+SBSB.

      I also think that you're wrong in your assessment of this movie. The slow mo shots, reuse of old stuff, etc was all part of the satirization of Hollywood by a reluctant insider. It's almost as if Smith was saying, "I'll make a clever movie, but I'm going to put in all the parts of other movies that I think suck, just so I can show you how and why they suck."

      --
      --FatTony
    4. Re:It blew chunks.. by binarybits · · Score: 2

      I dunno, the slow-mo girl shots seemed pretty straight-forward to me. The girls were attractive and Kevin Smith did them the same way any other movie would. He did make them longer and a bit more exaggerated than most movies do, but that hardly counts as biting satire. I think he was just kind of lazy when writing the script, and so he threw in some mindless titilation to keep people interested.

      The whole movie was like that-- he was too lazy to come up with clever or original jokes or gags, so he used lots of "dick and fart jokes," celebrity cameos, homophobic humor, and in jokes to his previous movies and to the hot movies of the last couple of decades.

      Look, I was amused by many of the jokes, but it wasn't brilliant humor. It was in the same intellectual ballpark as "dude, where's my car." The only difference is that this movie had more big-name stars in it and was more pretentious.

    5. Re:It blew chunks.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      homophobic humor

      You bird-brained idiot, did you completely forget Van Der Beek's critisisms of Biggs use of the word "gay"?? This is the first movie I've ever seen that took a stand against the 90% of males age 10 to 25 who think calling something or someone gay as an insult is cool.

      The movie is almost pro-gay, making it clear, that just because some of us are hetero and others are homo, there's nothing wrong with that lifestyle choice, some of us just swing that way. Embrace your lifestyle, and let others embrace theirs.

  15. Re:Going to miss Jay and Bob by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

    To which Spaceballs reference are you referring? I was paying pretty close attention, but maybe I missed it, as there was a lot of laughter from the crowd and quite a few of the lines ended up getting drowned out.

    As for funniest movie of the year, well, maybe, but I still think some of the funniest stuff I've seen in a theater this year was the outtakes from RushHour 2. I guess you could take that as some sad commentary on the state of Hollywood/etc., if you were so inclined.

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  16. Join another discussion by Steev · · Score: 1

    I've had a review of this movie on my site (Spine.cx) since last wednesday, albeit a much less popular site than this one :)

    Come join that discussion, not already tainted by Katz :)
    http://spine.cx/article.php?sid=9.

    1. Re:Join another discussion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your review blows fucking chunks. Fatty.

  17. Re:Going to miss Jay and Bob by Shrug · · Score: 1

    side note: people if you can not get the titles right or the order of the movies complain don't complain about them.

  18. Not the last flick? by AgentUSA · · Score: 1

    Kevin made of couple of comments in the View Askew hinting that this probably will not be the last we see of Jay and Silent Bob:

    "Well, there's a surprise in store for ya'll if we win the weekend. A very nice surprise, if you like Jay and Silent Bob."

    "I know this may come off as desperate, but there's one more thing I'd like to do with Jay and Bob before I put 'em to bed, and in order to do that, we need to win the weekend."

    1. Re:Not the last flick? by AgentUSA · · Score: 1

      The comments are from the View Askew message board.

    2. Re:Not the last flick? by BIGJIMSLATE · · Score: 2

      It won't. There's a planned Clerks animated movie before Smith finally gives up his NJ movies (and is working on a Fletch...prequel?).

      Check the IMDB for the info.

    3. Re:Not the last flick? by AgentUSA · · Score: 1

      No, after reading his comments, I don't think he's talking about Clerks: Sell Out.

      He is going to do Fletch after a smaller "Chasing Amy" type movie about fatherhood.

    4. Re:Not the last flick? by _Wrath_ · · Score: 1

      If you listen at the end of the movie... You can hear Jay say, "Snoogins..." Which as we know, means he is joking.

  19. Stay for the Credits by KingJawa · · Score: 1

    The disclaimers are really funny. I'll stop there and not ruin them for you.

  20. Disclaimers by joel8x · · Score: 1

    If you stick around through the credits to catch a glimpse of Alannis Morrisette, check out the diclaimer right after the "No animals were harmed..." one to see how Smith addresses the the accusatioins he's been recieving from GLAAD that the film is homophobic - its the little things that make his movies great.

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
  21. disapointed at what they left out by loydcc · · Score: 1
    I was surprised to see they made no mention of the dead guy in the toilet or the rooftop hockey game. But otherwise I thought the movie was funny.

    Anyway, it's nice to see Shannon Elizabeth has opened two movies in two weeks. Perhaps we'll see more of her in the future.

    1. Re:disapointed at what they left out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CCCP Hockey Jersey is the same that Randal wore in goal on the roof top hockey game.

      Reference was made.

    2. Re:disapointed at what they left out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would like to make love to her asshole.

    3. Re:disapointed at what they left out by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 2

      Just a little didja notice..

      This was the first of his movies that doesn't reference hockey..?

    4. Re:disapointed at what they left out by BassGuy23 · · Score: 1

      As noted above, Randal was wearing a HOCKEY jersey. And just for the record, the busline was Derris (Like the one in Dogma named after Rick Derris), the Arena Diner in Utah was set in a place that looked like the set of the Star Trek episode "Arena", and the girls were celebrating their 37th heist. Just my two scents.

      --

      ~Mike

      A big enough hammer fixes *anything*
    5. Re:disapointed at what they left out by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2

      Randal was wearing his CCCP hockey jersey. Does that count?

  22. Wow by abrink · · Score: 1

    Wow. Katz actually did something halfway right. He still needs to head back to journalism school (read: How to be a bigger idiot school) though.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he has to go back to "How to be a bigger idiot school", then I guess you're saying that he's not much of an idiot.

      Either that, or you're just an idiot.

  23. If you are a Smith fan. by ian_po · · Score: 1

    You should stay to see the end of the credits

    'nuff said

    1. Re:If you are a Smith fan. by Freshman · · Score: 1

      I would have, but man, did I ever have to piss!

      --

      ----------
      "They misunderestimated me." --George W Bush, Nov. 6, 2000
  24. anonymous slander exemplified by referee · · Score: 1

    If the internet is for slandering people anonymously than I think I have a pretty good example. Here you can find one of Kevin's production assistants venting about what an A-hole he is. If you're a fan or not, this is a pretty good read.

    1. Re:anonymous slander exemplified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! Might be a good read but the site layout is so awful that it causes headaches.

    2. Re:anonymous slander exemplified by FlickFilosopher · · Score: 1

      Naw, that's just Kevin Smith pulling our legs. That J&SB "hate" site is owned and runned by ViewAskew, Smith's company. Check out the whois entry on it.

      MaryAnn
      http://flickfilosopher.com
      http://cinemarati.org
      http://movie-a-day.com

    3. Re:anonymous slander exemplified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, dude you realize that whole site was written by Kevin right?

      Z-.

    4. Re:anonymous slander exemplified by spudnic · · Score: 2

      That site is the funniest thing I've seen in a long time! It's great! I mean, what can you say about a guy who would put something like that up to mock his own film. He always said that the best way to keep people from ridiculing you was to do it yourself first.

      To those of you who don't know, Kevin really supports his Internet fans. He regularly participates in the discussion forums on the View Askew website to keep us all up with whats going on. Not many directors (or public figures of any kind) would do that. He also kept a guy on the set the whole time J&SBSB was being filmed to create a weblog of everything that was going on.

      He's even had special screenings and get togethers for the people who frequent his forums. Not to mention the Internet only trailers that he put together for us.

      That's just pretty cool in my book.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
  25. A Great Movie by Tranvisor · · Score: 1

    This movie was for all the Kevin Smith fans out there first and everybody else second. And in that way it was a successful movie. I don't imagine it will be a smash hit or anything, but it is so far my favorite movie of the summer. Go see this one if you haven't already!

  26. proof of sex-obsession by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The subject title for this story had a line saying "3107 bytes in body". If that's not over-active sexual-activity, I don't know what is.

  27. Something missing by neilest · · Score: 1

    "In his previous movies -- Dogma, Chasing Amy, Clerks.."

    You've forgotten Mallrats.

    1. Re:Something missing by lucius · · Score: 1
      You've forgotten Mallrats.


      And with good reason.

    2. Re:Something missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all Mallrats rocked.
      Secodn of all he said those 3 I belive since he mentions sex, work, and religion which was those three movies.

    3. Re:Something missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody agrees with this but mallrats IS his (kevin smith) finest work to date not accounting for jay and silent bob strike back because i have yet to see it!!

      and i wish he, more than anyone would recognize that movie for what it IS, the greatest intelligent comedy of the 90s.

  28. Remark about Dogma incorrect by Private+Essayist · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "This movie backs off from the controversial religion-bashing of Dogma..."

    Wrong. That is the accusation that was lobbed against Kevin Smith, but I'm disappointed to see this mainstream misinformation repeated here. (Yes, I know, there's plenty of misinformation on /., but it's usually off-center geek misinformation, not repeated mainstream misinformation).

    Dogma was a funny movie that parodied religious dogma, not religious beliefs. Kevin Smith was and is a Catholic, and the movie was actually respectful of Catholic beliefs -- just not rigid dogma. Typically, this flew right over the Catholic church's head and they protested, looking ignorant in the process. I'm surprised to see Katz repeating this untrue accusation here.

    --
    ________________
    Private Essayist
    1. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Panaflex · · Score: 2
      Yeah, having Alanis Morissette as God was actually respectful. Picking two dumbasses as "prophets" was just like God.. yep.

      I'm not saying that God didn't use murders, taxmen, and womenizers as tools.. but when they came to do God's work they worked in faith and respect. Kevin turns that on it's head..

      It's really funny.. witty.. but it is not respectful.

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    2. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Private+Essayist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Yeah, having Alanis Morissette as God was actually respectful..."

      Actually, I thought it was. I could think of few concepts of a deity more appealing than the charming personality exibited by Morissette's God. This was not making fun of God, it was saying warmly, 'Wouldn't it be nice if God were like this?' Quite a difference from the usual stern, harsh, bearded authority figure.

      But hey, if even daring to come up with an alternative image for God is insulting to you personally, then I can understand why you would find Dogma disrespectful. I didn't see it that way. I saw it as Smith's funny riff on all the beliefs he not only grew up with, but believes to this day.

      --
      ________________
      Private Essayist
    3. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I can't believe so many religous people completely missed the fact that Dogma was actually a very pro-religion film, just anti the stupid things people have done in its name.

    4. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised to see Katz repeating this untrue accusation here.

      I'm not. After all, this is Katz that we're talking about.

    5. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't the Catholic church that protested, it was the "Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights". The "League" is pretty conservative and easy to offend.

    6. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Panaflex · · Score: 2
      I'm not necessarily saying that alanis' character was offensive.. alanis herself was my point.

      But hey, if even daring to come up with an alternative image for God is insulting to you personally...

      Waa waa waaa.. get off yer horse. If you wanna get personal, I wouldn't be nearly so nice.

      Pan

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    7. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but the essence of the plot of Dogma was based around the concept of general absolution, a practice which is heavily frowned upon by the Catholic church. And the thirteenth apostle was Judas.

      Lotsa things wrong here, boys.. still, the new movie was pretty funny.

    8. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by jimsxe · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Like you know what or God is like! Sheesh! Just shut up you sanctimonius idiot.

      --
      This is not a Sig.
    9. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by jimsxe · · Score: 1

      God Dammit I forgot to review! What it should say is: Yeah! Like you know who or what God is! Sheesh! Just shut up you sanctimonius idiot.

      --
      This is not a Sig.
    10. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typically, this flew right over the Catholic church's head and they protested, looking ignorant in the process.

      The Catholic Church did not say anything about the movie. Certain self-appointed individuals with a rather large (and obnoxious) agenda did. They do not speak for the Catholic Church any more than Jon Katz can be said to speak for the readers of Slashdot. The mistake is of course understandable.

      In the past, the Catholic Church used to criticize artistic work. This was the purpose of the "Index of Forbidden Books." However, that went out of fashion over a hundredy years ago, and it was totally abolished in the 1960s.

      So please do not take the words of controversy-seekers at face value. The official pronouncements from the Catholic Church come from the Vatican or from councils of bishops, not from Joe Blow, William Donohue, or whomever.

    11. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please read the story of Jonah.

    12. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Private+Essayist · · Score: 1

      "The Catholic Church did not say anything about the movie. Certain self-appointed individuals with a rather large (and obnoxious) agenda did. "

      Point taken. Thanks for the correction.

      --
      ________________
      Private Essayist
    13. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Private+Essayist · · Score: 2

      Wasn't trying to be personal or offensive, and I thank you for correcting my misunderstanding. I wasn't sure to what degree you found the movie offensive, and was merely suggesting one possible view you may have held.

      --
      ________________
      Private Essayist
    14. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Balinares · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Gotta agree. :)

      What was amazingly smart, in Dogma, is that while it mercilessly made fun of the letter of Christianity, it was very respectful of its spirit. The simple allusion to all the doubts, all the fears of a young Jesus bound to a terrible destiny, and still accepting it, probably did more for Christianity than all the biggots who whined about the movies put together.

      Smith is great. I didn't know of his other movies, but I'll be sure to look them out.

      --

      -- B.
      This sig does in fact not have the property it claims not to have.
    15. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by binarybits · · Score: 2

      Speaking of things being wrong, Judas was one of the original 12 apostles. There was no "thirteenth apostle." Look it up...

    16. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Funny

      If ye want a real laugh, go read capalert, a 'Christian' movie review site. If this guy rated his own bible the way he rates movies, humans wouldn't be allowed to read it.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    17. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Mr.+Bubbles712 · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. I know this is one thread that is going to be a long one, and I'm a little late for it, but here goes without reviewing Dogma...

      I spoke with some of the protesters when I saw dogma. It was an interesting time. I'm not known to shide away from conflict, hell, even Kevin protested his own movie. It's somewhere on www.viewaskew.com. I spent many a night speaking with people who thought that Dogma was just a big middle finger infront of the popes face, which it's not. Somepeople even had inteligent thoughts on why it shouldn't be seen by them. Intersting enough, some of the plackerts(sp?) that they were using looked vagly familure to the abortion office montage. Very Funny.

      One onlast note, I was interviewed by a news crew that night, and I said something that I deeply want to forget. While searching for an adverb to use with heracy, I came up with "HAIRYTITICLE". That inspired laughs, and I realised that I would have to wait a little longer until I get my 15 min.

      Well, enough of that, about the flick, it was great to see it, sad to see it go. Just a word of caution to all would be reviewers that view just the trailer and not the movie, people like Stephanie Zacharek of Salon.com. Don't watch what you don't get.

      Mark

      --
      Alas, poor clippy, I loath him so.
    18. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      burn in hell

    19. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by nomadic · · Score: 2


      Actually, I thought it was. I could think of few concepts of a deity more appealing than the charming personality exibited by Morissette's God. This was not making fun of God, it was saying warmly, 'Wouldn't it be nice if God were like this?'

      I found her totally lacking in charm myself. Kind of a dumb idea, though the director seemed delighted with his own cleverness here.

      Quite a difference from the usual stern, harsh, bearded authority figure.

      I wasn't particularly insulted, but I think a supreme deity with a little dignity would have been better. You have all these people who have gone through a terrible ordeal, and a God who doesn't really seem to realize or care what happened.

    20. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by egerlach · · Score: 1

      What? No thirteenth apostle! You're just puttin down the black man like all the white men before you. The other twelve wrote him out! He probably even wrote his own gospel, but no, the white men couldn't have it 'cause he was a black man!

      Come on, there were proabably a lot of people who travelled with Jesus for some time whilst he was alive who didn't make the bible. You think that thost four books are enough to explain his whole life? There's a lot more to God and Jesus than what's in those books. Looking for it may be the best part of faith.

      Discalimer: I'm a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant. i.e. I'm making fun of me as much as you.

      --

      "Free beer tends to lead to free speech"
    21. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 1

      In the movie, Alanis' character was just one form that God took, the other being that of a skeeball playing old homeless guy (the john doe).

      Second, I think the point in having Alanis play God was to help dismiss the stereotypical/dogmatic view of God. The idea viewers are supposed to come away with from this aspect of the movie is not that God is like Alanis, but that he/she/it is not necessarily what people/humans have built up their expectations for him to be.

      Finally, in a movie created to present an alternate perspective to religious dogma, think about who can play God? Is Alanis such a bad choice?

    22. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by ameoba · · Score: 1

      I saw God once...

      ...and she was black.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    23. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judas was one of the 12; however, there also was a 13th. His name was Matthew. The Original 12 (um 11) "voted him" him in after Jesus assended I think, might have been after he died.
      Anyway there were 13 apostles in the Bible (not including Rufus).

    24. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by merchant_x · · Score: 1

      Mathias could be considered the thirteenth apostle he was selected to take over for Judas. Although when he was selected they called filling the position of the 12th apostle. So you are indeed correct that there never was a position of thirteenth apostle but there were indeed thriteen apostles. See the first chapter of Acts for clarification.

    25. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by ungerware · · Score: 1

      Not so much worse than George Burns.

      --

      -----
      Kvetch is Yiddish for "throw an exception" --Dr. Ron Cytron
    26. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by erc · · Score: 1
      --
      -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
    27. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I kind of find it funny you accuse someone of being a sanctimonious idiot and then blaspheme at the same time! :)

    28. Re:Remark about Dogma incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If this guy rated his own bible the way he rates movies, humans wouldn't be allowed to read it


      You know, that's a really great idea. If I get lots of time, I'll do just exactly that. I expect Genesis alone to bottom out the Murder/Suicide category.

  29. hello? by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

    Late?? Lame?? YES!!! This brings down the already sketchy content of /. Can you do me a favor....and try?

  30. makes you wonder.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if katz had even seen dogma..
    probably not, i think he was just parroting what some others had said, aka typical katzspeak.

  31. Tied everything together by Squib · · Score: 1

    In a sense, I thought that the movie nicely tied everything together (if by everything, you mean Jay and Silent Bob walking off with Suzanne at the end of Mallrats)...

    But seriously, if this truly was the last Jay and Silent Bob flic, I'd say that it was a nice finale. I laughed so hard for the second half of the film, once everything got rolling. And the cameo's were terrific (Jason Biggs and James Van Der Beek as themselves, Joey Lauren Adams playing Amy, and her "friend" Trish, who was played by Renee Humphrey, of Mallrats notariety; Carrie Fisher playing the nun, that Harvard bastard from Good Will Hunting playing himself, etc). And what about Mark Hamill playing a Batman-type villian in something other than just voice (for those who don't know, he plays the Joker on Batman the Animated Series)...

    Call me easy to please, but I loved it simply because I like paying attention to silly, tiny details and seeing references to them in later films. That, and simply put, Kevin Smith put forth a funny-ass picture. Kudos...

    --
    First winter rain-
    even the monkey
    seems to want a raincoat.
    -Basho
    1. Re:Tied everything together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joey Lauren Adams playing Amy, and her "friend" Trish,

      I'm pretty sure that Joey Lauren Adams plays Alyssa Jones, which makes Tricia Jones (who was writing "Boregasm" in Mallrats) her sister. The third of the Jones sisters is the girl who went off to the beach with Rick Derris near the end of Clerks.

    2. Re:Tied everything together by Squib · · Score: 1

      True, it could have been the third Jones sister, but I thought it was Amy 1.) because they talked about her relationship with Holden being made into a comic (from Chasing Amy) and 2.) (dagnabbit, the IMDB Entry doesn't agree with me)...

      Oh well, mebbe you're right...

      --
      First winter rain-
      even the monkey
      seems to want a raincoat.
      -Basho
    3. Re:Tied everything together by lar · · Score: 1

      Joey Lauren Adams' character in Chasing Amy was named Alyssa (which I'm sure is what IMDB says). The name Amy in the title is in reference to the story Silent Bob tells Holden at the coffee shop.

      --
      ==
      I don't know exactly what that means, but I'm sure it means something....
    4. Re:Tied everything together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Joey Lauren Adams played Alyssa Jones, and the chick from Mallrats played Trish Jones, her little sister. I'm not sure if the girl who walks out with Rick Derris in Clerks was supposed to be Trish or Alyssa or another sister...it's been a while.

    5. Re:Tied everything together by Squib · · Score: 1

      And we can see that I haven't seen the dang movie since my Freshman year of college. My bad; I stand corrected...

      --
      First winter rain-
      even the monkey
      seems to want a raincoat.
      -Basho
  32. Re:Going to miss Jay and Bob by sopwath · · Score: 1

    Yes, but the Mac in this movie was hurled to the floor where it belongs!

    good luck,
    sopwath

  33. What the f**k's wrong with /. ? by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    The last few days the site is hosed half the time. Now, I can handle not being able to login, or links not working correctly, but now today my config choices are ignored and I'm getting this John Katz shite again. Unacceptable.

    1. Re:What the f**k's wrong with /. ? by gravityZ · · Score: 1

      maybe you should demand your money back

    2. Re:What the f**k's wrong with /. ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey asshole - your getting what you paid for!

    3. Re:What the f**k's wrong with /. ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah - and it's worth every penny!

  34. Hrrm... by kypper · · Score: 1
    ...and he flames them back, urging them to lick his private parts.

    Never thought I'd hear Katz say that.

  35. The real purpose of making this film... by weez75 · · Score: 1

    As many have noted, this movie includes a truckload of references to Smith's earlier works as well as other films. Most of them are great in-jokes and a way to pay homage to his greatest characters. The one thing you walk away from the film feeling however is that Kevin Smith made this movie so he could hang out with people he likes. In fact, it almost seems like the entire purpose of the movie was to get to dance with Morris Day and the Time.

    To me, it's a much-needed slap in the face to people that make all the hideous stuff that gets churned onto the screen these days. Finally, a guy having fun with a movie...

    --
    Of course we torture people, we need the information --Gen. Pinochet
  36. now.. by jrsmith · · Score: 1

    i'd just like to say, the funniest movie i've seen this summer has to be rat race. the premise may be stupid, but there are a LOT of hilarious setups in this movie. in fact, i'm going to go see it again tonight.

  37. Katz does it again... by inc0gnito · · Score: 1

    Suprise, Suprise... Katz missed the point. He seems to have a real knack for missing the point of whatever movie he is bashing/reveiewing on a given week.

    Maybe it's that Katz is just out of touch with today's movie going public (as much as he tries to seem like the opposite), Dogma did not bash the catholic church, it merely pointed out some of its more absurd practices and policies.

    Mall Rats (which didn't even get mentioned by Katz), Clerks, Dogma, and Chasing Amy, and now Jay and Silent Bob Strike back are more movies for the teen/college age group, and most people who fall out of that category (cough...Katz...cough) don't seem to get it.

  38. Kevin Smith Canon by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 1

    As Katz said it, if you have not seen the other Kevin Smith movies, Dogma, Chasing Amy, Mallrats, Clerks, then you will miss some/a lot of the jokes. There are also seens from the short comic book series called Jay & Silent Bob: Jay & SB with the monkey in the tunnel with the Wildlife Marshall (parody The Fugitive).

    --
    ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
  39. All about the net? by singularity · · Score: 1

    This time the sub-theme is the Net and the waves of brainy but obnoxious adolescent jerks who have helped set its sometimes nasty tone in recent years.

    Did Katz see the same movie I did? Saying that "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back" is about the Net the same way that Dogma is about religion is just plain wrong.

    "JASBSB" seems to be Kevin Smith striking back at Hollywood after making four feature length films. The entire movie is about making movies, from Affleck's early comment of "Who would go pay to see a movie about Jay and Silent Bob?" to the sequel to "Good Will Hunting" being an action flick.

    It is interesting to note that "JASBSB" knocks Mirimax who has helped distribute most of Kevin Smith's previous works.

    In the end, the movie is about making movies, not about the Net. It is very humorous at times, and is full of cameo appearances (Carrie Fischer as a nun?). It even makes fun of the four previous films at times and cleans up some loose ends.

    And how did Katz get passed my Katz-filter?

    --
    - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  40. Great Ironic Humor in this Movie *Spoilers* by cybermage · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Smith pokes fun at about everything in arms reach in this movie including the audience and himself. You can measure how many Smith fans are in the audience by the laugh response to:

    "I wonder if Mirimax will option Holden's comic."
    "What, Chasing Amy? That'll never work as a movie."

    Also, Holden's line:

    "Who would go and see a movie about Jay and Silent Bob?" [Smith, Mewes, and Affleck turn to look at camera. Smith smiles.]

    The best irony in the film is a joke on many levels. Jay and Silent Bob become incensed about posting on moviepoopshoot.com which is registered to:

    Registrant:
    View Askew Productions
    PO Box 400
    Red Bank, NJ 20902
    US

    Registrar: Dotster (http://www.dotster.com)
    Domain Name: MOVIEPOOPSHOOT.COM
    Created on: 09-JAN-01
    Expires on: 09-JAN-03

    At a deeper level though, Smith is ranting about postings on Internet message boards, made even more ironic by the focus of his site which contains an extensive message board, to which he posts. (And occasionally answers questions.)

    I found the irony and asides to the camera to be great fun in this movie and would highly recommend it on the basis of in-jokes alone (Of which the material I mention is only a tiny part.)
    1. Re:Great Ironic Humor in this Movie *Spoilers* by Portax · · Score: 1

      At a deeper level though, Smith is ranting about postings on Internet message boards, made even more ironic by the focus of his site [viewaskew.com] which contains an extensive message board, to which he posts. (And occasionally answers questions.)


      Well, that's not really true because while he is ranting about message boards, he's only specifically ranting about message boards filled with people who say nasty things about people just because they can.
    2. Re:Great Ironic Humor in this Movie *Spoilers* by angelo · · Score: 1

      on This page I saw the name "Harry Balls"... I wonder if that is a swipe at Harry Knowles? The page format of MPS looks a lot like the massive-text, ALL CAPS style of the 800 pound gorrilla of pay-per-spew reviews..

    3. Re:Great Ironic Humor in this Movie *Spoilers* by Peyna · · Score: 1

      What is more amusing is that moviepoopshoot.com is identical to what is shown in the movie.

      --
      What?
    4. Re:Great Ironic Humor in this Movie *Spoilers* by Alexius · · Score: 2

      While it's fairly obvious he's being intentionally vauge about which site he is bashed on, during the credits he thanks the people at aintitcool for giving him subject material for the movie.

      --
      `Lex - Find Me Here: Text Appeal
  41. Watch Out by waltmarkers · · Score: 1

    In the movie Jay and Silent Bob orignally go to hollywood because people just like us were talking smack about them on a website just like this. They then proceed to try to stop the movie. Along the way Jay and Silent Bob find out that with all the money they get they can travel to everyone's house and beat the crap out of them. So all I have to say is watch out and, you rock Jay and Silent Bob, just in case!

  42. Re:(OT) Aaliyah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well then, i guess we should expect to see two or three new albums from her any day now just like 2pac.

  43. Ah! Katz! Plus, Smith is overrated by osgeek · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Dammit, I thought I had jon katz filtered out. What is this crap? I want a refund.

    Anyway, while I'm here, I thought I'd throw out a reference to Affleck and Damon from the Filthy Critic in his review of Dogma, which was right on the money.


    Ben "I still can't act" Affuck and Matt "My friend can't act" Damon are two fallen angels [...]


    I semi-admired Smith's work before Dogma. Clerks was a diamond in the rough, and Chasing Amy dealt fairly intelligently with a sensitive subject. Even Smith panned Mall Rats as being the product of a studio that wouldn't let him have creative control.

    Finally, Dogma came out. Here was Smith's opportunity to shine. He had the money to hire some big names, the clout to make the film he wanted, and it was based on a pointed look at religion and Catholicism -- a favorite subject of mine. But he blew it! Smith was okay when he was pushing the limits to gain some credibility, but now that he's made it, his self-congratulatory, 7-11 pseudo-intellectual rants are just lame.

    I really wanted to like Smith's movies so much. There's a kernel in his work that I want to see flourish, but Smith's execution just leaves too much to be desired. The Filthy Critic really hits the nail on the head when he describes the problems with Dogma. I would recommend reading the review. It really rates a +5 Insightful.

    I think I'm going to pass on JASBSB and maybe see it when it airs on HBO. Smith doesn't get me out to the theatres again until he gets a little hungrier.

  44. it sucked by FrostedChaos · · Score: 1

    the movie really sucked folks. I mean blew the big one.

    --
    "Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental." -Slashdot
  45. Dogma by ShinyObjectsAndYarn · · Score: 1, Insightful
    This movie backs off from the controversial religion-bashing of Dogma

    It's as if he sat down and thought about what statement he could possibly get the MOST wrong.

    Dogma is anything but bashing religion. What Dogma criticizes is the way some people choose to blindly worship the church. This, like most things, upset the church. Dogma is actually a very pro religion film, albeit one with plenty of good dick and fart jokes. The message Kevin wanted you to take away from the film is believe in god because you think it's right, not because some old institution tells you to.

  46. Smith and Good Will Hunting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kevin Smith and Scott Mosier were both executive producers on Good Will Hunting.

  47. Why was this moderated as a troll, you jackass? by osgeek · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Criticize Kevin Smith, and I'm a troll? Piece of shit moderator you are.


    Reminds me to metamoderate more often.

    1. Re:Why was this moderated as a troll, you jackass? by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      Hehehehe.
      What else would you expect.

      BTW.
      You were right on the money with this litle rant about Smith.

  48. You know it's not a nerd site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when idiots like Katz get to post crap all over it

  49. It's more of a sequel to Mallrats than Chasing Amy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While the movie continues some of the plot elements of Chasing Amy, the tone of the movie is a sequel to Mallrats. All five of the movies are good but Mallrats and Strike Back are full of juvenile humor while Chasing Amy and Dogma are trying to make statements. Clerks is just plain weird...

  50. Katz is an idiot by desmodromic · · Score: 0, Troll

    Katz is an idiot. That is all. Thank you.

  51. You forgot ... by nachoworld · · Score: 2

    The movie's director, Gus Van Sant (CT:Good Will Hunting, not J&SBSB of course), has a funny bit part, and Smith parodies Charlie's Angels, The Fugitive (so specifically he includes a reference to Provasic, the drug that nearly destroyed Richard Kimble's life), Scooby-Doo,Hannibal, and even Star Wars (Carrie Fisher and Mark Hamill appear, the latter in a loopy take-off on the mythic brawl between Darth and Luke

    You forgot all the great references that Jay and Silent Bob make to itself in the movie.

    As I would say, the movie was meta-funny.

    --

    ---
    I'm just an ordinary man with nothing to lose.
  52. Re:Ah! Katz! Plus, Smith is overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because it was a troll you jackass! smith didn't blow it with dogma. Noman was a bit much, but otherwise it was a great flick. The rest of your drivel is just too pathetic to reply to.

  53. Dogma _are_ beliefs by eweaver · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Yes. Religious dogma are religious beliefs. No kidding - try looking it up next time.

    PS. Any serious Catholic - in fact, almost any serious Christian - would tell you that that film was extremely offensive. Are you saying Catholics thought they were offended, but were actually mistaken ("typically flew over their head")? I mean, what makes you the arbiter of offense all of a sudden? One would expect that the Catholic Church, since it is Catholicism, can say whether the movie was respectful or not.

    Besides, you appear are prejudiced against the Church anyway, so you wouldn't be the greatest judge, I don't think...

    1. Re:Dogma _are_ beliefs by alienmole · · Score: 2
      Any serious Catholic - in fact, almost any serious Christian - would tell you that that film was extremely offensive.
      ...
      I mean, what makes you the arbiter of offense all of a sudden?

      And what makes you the arbiter of what a serious Catholic or Christian is?

      Do you think Jesus would have "taken offense" at these movies? If so, why? Was he "a serious Christian"?

      Perhaps you object to these movies because they too accurately skewer your own irrational use of dogma to back up your bigoted opinions?

    2. Re:Dogma _are_ beliefs by Radrik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I just got back from church, so I'm feeling especially qualified to comment at this point. Every person I've seen Dogma with (I've seen it at least 3 times), including my aunt who has a doctorate in theology, has enjoyed it and agreed that it's a great movie. In fact, Catholics appreciate the movie more than anyone else. As with any parody, the more familiar you are with the original, the better you appreciate the parody.

    3. Re:Dogma _are_ beliefs by Vajramukti · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Any serious Catholic - in fact, almost any serious Christian - would tell you that that film was extremely offensive.
      that's a pretty huge generalization to make. my parents are really hardcore Catholics, and they loved Dogma for being so pro-religion and anti-dogma. but if you really meant "serious" as to mean "so-blindly-fanatic-that-they-no-longer-have-a-sen se-of-humor-about-anything,", then yes, i agree with you that they'd see it as offensive
    4. Re:Dogma _are_ beliefs by Private+Essayist · · Score: 2

      "Yes. Religious dogma are religious beliefs. No kidding - try looking it up next time."

      I did, and you're wrong. Oh sure, on a surface level you could say dogma = beliefs, but that totally misses the nuances of the words. And totally misses the point of the film Dogma, which is that religious beliefs are fine, but watch out for any group that wants to impose their dogma on you. Look it up.

      "Are you saying Catholics thought they were offended, but were actually mistaken ("typically flew over their head")? "

      Typically, the Catholic spokespersons who did speak out against the film (not the church itself, but individuals) did not see the film. So they got offended based on hearsay, and not on reality. That's how it "flew over their head." They had the same wrong-headed ideas about what 'dogma' is than you seem to have. To repeat, Kevin Smith was NOT attacking Catholic beliefs. He was parodying dogma.

      --
      ________________
      Private Essayist
    5. Re:Dogma _are_ beliefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus was a jew, retard.

    6. Re:Dogma _are_ beliefs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? Religious people are stupid anyway.

  54. disapointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was very dissapointed that Alyson Hannigan didn't appear in this movie.

    Even if she didn't appear with hot grits(tm), then she could of stood around and been cute. That would be worth the price of admission for me.

    1. Re:disapointed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She has a nice clit.

    2. Re:disapointed by BassGuy23 · · Score: 1

      Remember: Residents of Utah are urged not to stimulate the CLIT.

      --

      ~Mike

      A big enough hammer fixes *anything*
  55. Meta-Meta Movie Marketing of Meta-Meta Movie . . . by McChump · · Score: 1

    . . . about marketing of meta movie. Whoo boy, have we crossed a self-referential line here or what?

    To see what I mean, check out http://www.jayandsilentbobstrikeback.com/, which is supposedly an ANTI-Kevin Smith site that is in fact registered to:

    Registrant:
    View Askew Productions
    12610 Braddock Dr 107-d
    Los Angeles, CA 90066
    US

    Registrar: Dotster (http://www.dotster.com)
    Domain Name: JAYANDSILENTBOBSTRIKEBACK.COM

    This is some sort of reverse-astroturfing or something. I can't even keep this self-referencing straight anymore. Sheesh.

    -J

    p.s. I thought the movie was hysterical, though.

    --
    I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners. - Berke Breathed
  56. Contradiction by flikx · · Score: 1

    You encourage people to go see a movie, and then your sig tells us to fight the MPAA.. make up your mind!

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
  57. Don't compare ... by OmegaDan · · Score: 0, Troll
    Please don't compare these comedy-rejects to Bob Hope or Bing Crosby...

    I haven't seen this movie ... and Im not gonna ... and heres why: I've seen all the other Kevin Smith movies, and for awhile I thought they were really great ... but the more KS you see -- the more you start to really hate the guy. His plots are a vehicle for the dialog between his characters ... which wouldn't be a bad thing *IF THE DIALOG WASN'T SO CONTRIVED*.

    KS movies aren't in touch with anyone and aren't in tune with anything or anyone. A great remark I heard on PBS "The difference between Steven Speilberg and Martin Scorsese (sp?) is that Steven Spielberg wants to make a movie that touches everybody, Martin Scorsese wants to make a movie that touches Martin Scorsese."

    Which is really what this comes down to -- this movie is prolly a masterpiece to KS, but to me its a heaping pile of ...

    Lastly, Id like to pose the question, where does katz get off liking these guys then panning something like the final fantasy movie ... both were devoid of meaning and were generally awfull movies. The difference though, is jon katz is incapable of liking an "insider" film and is incapable of hating an "outsider" film. The glass is half empty for FF and half full for J&SB. Tried and convicted john.

    1. Re:Don't compare ... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 5, Funny

      The irony being that a major subplot of J&SBSB is morons on the Internet insulting movies they haven't seen...

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    2. Re:Don't compare ... by Spectra72 · · Score: 1

      That was priceless.

    3. Re:Don't compare ... by OmegaDan · · Score: 2

      KS perdicting that people will dog his movie on the internet should tell you something ... I don't see any irony here.

    4. Re:Don't compare ... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2
      Again, you totally missed the point:

      ...is morons on the Internet insulting movies they haven't seen...


      The irony here being somebody insulting comments he hasn't read about a comment regarding him insulting a movie he hasn't seen...
      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    5. Re:Don't compare ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I might agree with you but you make absolutly no sence, so lick my nut sack 8P

    6. Re:Don't compare ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there isn't an option for "-1, Retarded", so i just modded you as overrated...

  58. Re:Going to miss Jay and Bob by Shrug · · Score: 1

    The Spaceball ref is in the part when they are in the van. and Jay calls Stiffler (from american pie I and II, thats the only name I know him by :o) ) Prince Valient.

  59. Why this wasn't a great movie. by zzyzx · · Score: 1

    This movie was presented as giving a gift to the VA fans. That it was. It was completely designed to be what they would want to see... and that's why it was so bad. Some artists evolve this way - first they write creative works with new ideas and then they go back and pander to the people who liked their earlier creative works. If it weren't for the fact that this was the final View Askew universe movie, Kevin Smith would have taken a huge step down that path with this one.

    Here's an example. In Chasing Amy, the "You're not an artist, you're a tracer" joke was funny because it was carefully set up. In J&SBSB, it was funny because it was set up in the other movie. This wasn't a movie as much as 90 minutes of repeating jokes from his other movies. It was more like a fan fiction set in the View Askew universe than anything.

    This isn't to say that the movie is a complete waste. There are some funny bits in it. Every now and then a spot of brillance peaks through. In general though, Smith went for the easy joke every time. The Velma is a lesbian gag was trite years ago after all.

    I'm looking forward to his next picture though. For the first time in a while, he'll have to create a picture without his usual crutches. It'll be interesting to see how that goes.

  60. Incorrect Spaceballs reference by Seeth42 · · Score: 1

    I dont' think that was a Spaceballs reference.

    The Spaceballs character Prince Valium was a double reference to that character - he was as boring as Valium and he also had the look of Prince Valiant (a medieval-set comic strip that originated in 1937 by Harold R. Forster).

    Kevin Smith was probably referencing this to make fun of the character in the van - both to rip on his really bad and really outdated haircut, and his "Heroic" animal rights ideals.

    plus referencing the source of a pop culture nod is totally in line with Smiths attitudes.

    1. Re:Incorrect Spaceballs reference by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      In Spaceballs, they have a charecter with those exact quanities. If I remembered correctly, the Spaceballs charecter had an overdose of those, so he's perpetualy under the influance of Valium.

  61. Iron monkey! by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 1

    Sure the movie was good overall, it had alot of jump cuts, but it had an air to the cheesiness of comic books so its cool...

    But Iron monkey, ROFLMAO, theres a preview for this supposedly kick ass martial artist, but his name is Iron Monkey HEHEHEH. Can you beat the monkey, or will he spank you?

    This movie was damn good, last good movie I saw before it that had me laughing was Fight Club. Kevin Smith movies rock.

  62. Re:JonKatz strikes back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Moderation Totals: Troll=1, *Insightful=1*, Total=2.
    Moderation Totals: Troll=1, *Insightful=1*, Total=2.
    Moderation Totals: Troll=1, *Insightful=1*, Total=2.
    Moderation Totals: Troll=1, *Insightful=1*, Total=2.
    Moderation Totals: Troll=1, *Insightful=1*, Total=2.
    Moderation Totals: Troll=1, *Insightful=1*, Total=2.
    Moderation Totals: Troll=1, *Insightful=1*, Total=2.

  63. Hilarious by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    Saw it last week at a sneak preview, and will go see it again to catch any pop-culture references or anything else I might have missed the first time.

    Great performances by all involved-- not 'master thespian' quality, but good enough to entertain, which is what' s important. Probably the funniest parts were Affleck & Damon ripping into each other, and much the same from the two actors set to play Jay & Silent Bob (I'm trying not to give away anything for those who haven't yet visited IMDB's J&SBSB entry).

    Only thing I didn't care for was Will Ferrell's character-- even for this movie, it went beyond so-stupid-it's--funny and landed in just-plain-stupid. But his name was good for a chuckle if you grew up watching Sid & Marty Krofft stuff and got the reference.

    ~Philly

  64. This sounds familiar by KidSock · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ... the Net and the waves of brainy but obnoxious adolescent jerks who have helped set its sometimes nasty tone ...

    Mmmm ...

  65. Oh, yeah... by phillymjs · · Score: 1

    The only other thing I didn't like was that there wasn't nearly enough of Shannon Elizabeth and Eliza Dushku, parading around in those black latex outfits....<drool>

    ~Philly

  66. Lookin' it up by timster · · Score: 2

    Plagairaised from Merriam-Webster:
    dogma, noun:
    1 a : something held as an established opinion; especially : a definite authoritative tenet b : a code of such tenets c : a point of view or tenet put forth as authoritative without adequate grounds
    2 : a doctrine or body of doctrines concerning faith or morals formally stated and authoritatively proclaimed by a church

    According to the actual dictionary, then, "dogma" is what the church tells you to believe for no reason. "Believe this because we say so." "Dogma" is where a church considers itself to have a monopoly on truth.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    1. Re:Lookin' it up by Peyna · · Score: 1

      definition 1.a is the one most commonly used. Dogma is an opinion someone holds so strongly that they refuse to consider the possibility that their opinion might be wrong.

      For instance, if I tell you that what you say looks like red, is really the color blue, you would be dogmatic in your belief that it is red, because you probably argue it with me forever, since it would be impossible for you to believe that it is blue.

      Dogma has nothing to do with religion, it is just alot of people tend be dogmatic with their religious beliefs. It is also does not usually refer to something someone was told to believe without reason.

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Lookin' it up by kel-tor · · Score: 1

      if belief is like buying material goods, then dogma is the equivalent of marketing.

      --

      ---

  67. Two of my fave references *spoilers* by mbadolato · · Score: 2

    Spoilers below

    I don't recall seeing Smith make references to the old Kroft shows before, and I'd have to say that I loved the two references to Land of the Lost.

    I didn't notice many people laughing at them, so I was kind of thinking they may have been more obscure.

    Chris Rock's character's name was Chaka (LoL's little monkey boy that hung out with the lost family)

    Will Ferrell's character's name was Marshell Willenholley (LoL's lost family. I was in hysterics when I heard that one)

    Loved the movie! Was exactly what I expected it to be, and was lots of laughs. Can't wait for the DVD.

  68. I'm Gonna Miss Those Two... by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 1

    It's too bad that Kevin Smith is retiring the characters (he doesn't want his daughter to think he's a "walking, non-talking cartoon"), but what a way to go. Having the only two recurring characters hit the road for a picture of their own!

    I met Smith and Mewes while they were filming Dogma in Pittsburgh. Both are fun guys to chill with, and are alot like their on-screen counterparts in many repsects (though Smith talks alot more than "Bob"), but more down to Earth in alot of other ways. I'm gonna miss seeing these two nuts tear it up on the screen. Snoochie Boochies!

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
  69. The Bluntman & Chronic Movie by Wampa-One · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bluntman and Chronic and their stupid alter egos Jay and Silent Bob only work in small doses, if at all. They don't deserve their own movie.

    1. Re:The Bluntman & Chronic Movie by SubconsciousSeraphim · · Score: 1

      Noting the discussions above, I'm guessing that the majority of people here aren't going to get the intended irony of your post.

    2. Re:The Bluntman & Chronic Movie by Wampa-One · · Score: 1

      I figured someone would though.

    3. Re:The Bluntman & Chronic Movie by datarat · · Score: 1

      Hat's off to you both! :D

      Where the hell IS Magnoliafan?

      --
      If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  70. Violation of the DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, a lot of stuff you mention was not seen on movie posters and other press material. Did you circumvent some protection device to watch the movie? Like a movie projector?????? If so, you are in violation of the DMCA! Officers from the movie studio will be moving in shortly to take down ./ and JonKatz as well.

  71. Why does everyone do this... by LordSkippy · · Score: 1

    "In his previous movies -- Dogma, Chasing Amy, Clerks -- Smith chronicles..."

    Why does everyone always forget about Mallrats? Just because the critics panned it, doesn't mean it should be forgotten. It's a toss up between Mallrats and Dogma for Kevin Smith's best picture.

    --
    My karma is in a nose dive
  72. THIS guy disagrees with Katz big-time... by tommut · · Score: 1

    Check out jayandsilentbob.com to see some guy who is vehemently against this movie, the characters Jay and Silent Bob, and Kevin Smith in general. Sheesh, there were much worse movies this summer to direct all of your energy into starting a small rebellion against, than Kevin Smith's latest work...

    1. Re:THIS guy disagrees with Katz big-time... by tihleigh · · Score: 1

      Hrm, actually, http://www.jayandsilentbob.com is registered to View Askew--Kevin Smith's production company. It's just one of the parody sites that they put up for the movie.

  73. JonKatz get off my homepage! by litheum · · Score: 1

    I excluded this blabbering idiot from my homepage on purpose, yet his shit still shows up. What is the deal with that?

  74. "... we are going to..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...make them eat our shit, and then we will make them shit their shit, and then eat the shit that they shit; a combination of or shit."

  75. Wrong about Good Will Hunting? by LazLong · · Score: 1

    "Still, only attentive, die-hard movie buffs will get them all. The cast, plots and references are closely tied to other Smith films, lines, scenes, actors and plots, along with some that aren't his. (There is a hilarious spoof of Good Will Hunting which Ben Affleck and Matt Damon good-naturedly join in.)"

    In the above quote it appears that Katz is saying that Good Will Hunting isn't Kevin Smith material. Kevin Smith is a co-executive producer for the film.

  76. I went to see this movie... by Guillaume+Ross · · Score: 1

    Because I was high, because I was high...

  77. Not Funny? The ones in the theathre disagree! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the theathre I went to, everybody was laughing.

  78. Re:All his movies suck by spiny · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    10 quid says the last two posts are by the same person...

    --

    Fry: heh, Yakov Smirnoff said it
    Leela: No he didn't.
  79. Re:Going to miss Jay and Bob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was that dig really necessary? my mac, running os x, worked out of the box with ALL the hardware i have installed. my pc with linux/*bsd didn't. patches, kernel updates, or dealing with windows to use some hardware. Windows sucks, Linux will stay in the server and appliance market because OS X brings functional UNIX to the desktop. -something Linux is STILL trying to do.

  80. Marshal Wilenholly (sp?) by LazLong · · Score: 1

    I cracked up when "Marshal Wilenholly" introduced himself, but I'm afraid most of the audience was too young to get it. Marshall (the family's last name, but also how the father is often refered to, besides Rick), Will, and Holly are characters from Land of the Lost, a Seals and Krofft show that aired in the early '70's.

  81. Bug alert! by BillyGoatThree · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Posted by JonKatz

    I have this idiot filtered out, why are his "stories" appearing on my front page? Maybe he's coming out with a new book again, like last time this happened.

    --
    324006
  82. Self Congratulatory Mainstream Crap by Spicy+Bisquit · · Score: 1

    Blah, blah, fuck, blah, fuck, blah. Look at me: I just wrote a Kevin Smith movie.

    Smith is over-rated by the older sub-culture and by the mainstream "cool to like this stuff" college kids. In the words of a genius, (the filthy critic): Kevin Smith is a fucking presumptuous cocksucker.

    1. Re:Self Congratulatory Mainstream Crap by datarat · · Score: 1

      I promised I wouldn't do this. I promised I wouldn't do this.

      Nice bit of commentary, chum. If that's all you got out of the movie, I'm truly sorry. Maybe if you paid attention to the words that came between FUCK you'd have gotten more out of it, but if you chose to focus on one four letter word with the semantic value of noise and assume that it was the sum, total, and point of the movie, I can see where you got your impression.

      At least I know how to keep you from understanding fucking posts. Just put fuck in a few fucking times and it all comes out the same.

      --
      If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    2. Re:Self Congratulatory Mainstream Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it's insider - he's using it to shut down the franchise - it's a big wet monkey kiss goodbye - get over it.

      This is the same thing that happened with "Animal House", "Beavis & Butthead", "The Simpsons", "South Park" and now all 5 of Kevin Smith's movies - a bevy of kids will think "OK - we're supposed to act like this? here we go!", a gaggle of adults will scream blue murder that this promotes the featured activities, and a tiring band of no-talent cynics will also reduce the work to the obvious first sensory level - no analysis - no thinking, no joy invloved - what do these people live on? Food and water? Lighten up and look at what's been created. Anyone can trash a movie. Look between the lines.

  83. correction... by Boost+Ventilator · · Score: 1
    I believe you mean "Bluntman and Chronic"..."Bluntman and The Chronic" would be Jason Mewes playing Jay playing Blunman with a copy of Dr. Dre's "The Chronic" LP.

    But don't feel bad...I spotted two errors in Ebert's review. Can you?

    --
    [boostventilator]
  84. Re:All his movies suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    20 quid says the last three posts are by the same person... 50 quid says the last three posts were by a UKian...

  85. pro-intellectual property propaganda by regexp · · Score: 1
    Jay (Jason Mewes) and Silent Bob (Smith) are outraged to learn that kids online are flaming the movie based on the comic book -- Bluntman and The Chronic -- that the pair inspired. Besides, they're not getting a dime out of any of it.

    Don't patronize this movie; it is subliminally advocating strong intellectual property rights. Everyone on Slashdot knows that Jay and Silent Bob have no "natural right" to determine what others can do with their creations. Intellectual property protection is evil! Information wants to be free!

  86. I'm a "serious" Christian by YouAreFatMan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I consider myself a serious Christian, that is, I seek to devote my life to being a disciple of Jesus Christ, and living by His word.

    My pastor was the one who told me about Dogma. Yes, it pokes fun at religion, but it does not challenge faith.

    It was actually very moving at times. Take the scene where Linda Fiorentino was struggling with being up to the task of saving the world, and the angel tells the story of having to be there when a young Jesus was starting to understand his mission. Or the scene in the parking garage where Ben Affleck is letting loose about being kicked out of heaven and missing the presence of God, and that the humans don't even realize what they are missing.

    If that's offensive, it is only so because of the very rigid, do-my-thinking-for-me dogma that the movie is about.

    Remember, that Jesus himself was one who challenged the "dogma" of his age. He was a lawbreaker in the minds of many because he healed on the Sabbath and touched the unclean and let prostitutes pay him honor. What he did was more offensive as the movie Dogma.

    It was not that long ago that Anabaptists, some of the most Christ-like people of their age, were persecuted by the Catholic Church for being offensive - by practicing adult baptism (rather like the baptism Jesus had, I suppose). Just because people take offense at something does not mean that it is bad; it is often an indication that it is good.

    Dogma challenged the beliefs of Catholics who go to chuch, say the prayers, do the ritual, but have not faintest idea of what they are saying, and live no differently than those who reject the Church. I would suggest that those people need their belief challenged. And I would say that it's too bad Kevin Smith has to do it, but that is only because their priest won't.

    --
    Robotiq.com is heavily tested on animals
  87. Re:this movie sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice, but no-one else will get it.

  88. I didn't realize this director had a series going by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    I saw dogma but I didn't know that the dude who did it did it as part of a series, nor did I pay any attention to who did do it. Just another nameless faceless Hollywood type to me (somebody said he lives in Jersy, oh well, not like I'd get that from the movie).

    HTF are people supposed to know that it is part of a series?

  89. read this before seeing the movie!!! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    Some interesting tidbits:

    1) baby Silent Bob is portrayed by Smith's infant daughter, Harley Quinn Smith (aweome job of naming, btw)

    2) One of the four animal activists ("Missy") is married to Kevin Smith

    last, and MOST IMPORTANT - make sure you stay to the very end of the movie - I mean the VERY END - right before the screen goes dark - and you'll get a nice surprise.

    1. Re:read this before seeing the movie!!! by Peyna · · Score: 1

      after the very last scrolling credits? i missed it, what happened?

      --
      What?
    2. Re:read this before seeing the movie!!! by datarat · · Score: 1

      Let's just say they close the book...:)

      --
      If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  90. Re:Meta-Meta Movie Marketing of Meta-Meta Movie . by mrbill · · Score: 2

    Look at the address. Its different from the
    "real" View Askew:

    View Askew Productions (VIEWASKEW-DOM)
    P.O. Box 400
    Red Bank, NJ 07701-0400
    US

    Domain Name: VIEWASKEW.COM

  91. ARGH by mrbill · · Score: 2

    Anybody care to email me and tell me what
    happened in the last scene with Alanis as
    God? Due to stupid people wanting to leave
    the theater as soon as they saw credits on a
    black screen, I missed it.

  92. Mallrats better than 2001's junk! by smagruder · · Score: 2

    Well, Mallrats beats most of the lame movies (of any genre!) released this summer. And the version you saw on cable was probably the lame-o dub-over that removed the original, critical dialogue that made this movie so damned funny. I'm not saying it's the funniest comedy ever made, but I'd still say it's a must-see in terms of 90's comedies.

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  93. Re:Smith Ain't Hollywood (its MN) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually.. they claim they are from New Jersey but if you watch from details, Mallrats and Clerks
    were filmed in Minneapolis, MN. Just check out the license plates on all the cars in them.

  94. Re:Going to miss Jay and Bob by DrPascal · · Score: 1

    > was that dig really necessary?
    > Windows sucks, ... {snip}

    Was THAT dig really necessary? How about you Preview your post before submission to save yourself from sounding like a complete hypocrit? Just because Slashdot is Linux favored doesn't mean people on here don't enjoy Windows.

    --
    DrPascal: Not the language, the mathematician.
  95. What About Mallrats? by dcshoes · · Score: 1

    "In his previous movies -- Dogma, Chasing Amy, Clerks -- "


    Hey Katz, You forgot to mention my personal favorite, Mallrats. There is this funny thing called "research" and it really helps when writing those "article" thingys.


    'Man, they were lightweights!'

  96. Whatever man... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    Excuse the typos...this is fast...

    First of all, there are 4 Kevin Smith movies that include Jay and S.Bob. Clearks, Mall Rats, Amy, and Dogma.

    All 4 of these movies play a big role in the humor embeded within JSBSB. In my mind this is what makes the movie so great. JSBSB is the hub of Smiths other movies, it adds a new time frame to the past 4 movies, links everything together, and makes you recall some of the best jokes of the old movies. ie Snow Ball, Bob & the force, the fact that Donde is getting screwed on that day at work, Chocolet covered pretzels, the "amy story," the "inker" jokes...yada yada yada.

    As for the dick and fart jokes. JSB are dick and fart characters. Period. I went to this movie knowing there were going to be a lot of slap stick dick and fart jokes.

    Furthermore, a lot of these dick and fart jokes were only there to build upon what you knew from the past 4 movies, and to entertain an viewers that had not watched the past view movies.

    This movie was great... it made me think, and yet it didn't at the same time. JSBSB saved summer for me ;)

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    1. Re:Whatever man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 4 J&SB movies prior to J&SBSB, there are only 3 signed J&SB Stash movies.

  97. Why did s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Kevin Smith managed to get Hamil and Fisher and did not put them into some sexual

  98. The inside jokes MADE this movie...GREAT FLICK by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    Like the subject says...the inside jokes made this movie. You NEED to see Clerks, Mall Ratts, Amy, and Dogma before you see this movie...or your not going to get 75% of the jokes. And these are by far the smartest jokes.

    This movie was awesome...if you don't get the humor within it your missing a few brain cells if you ask me. And no, I'm not talking about the dick and fart jokes. (some of which were quite funn though).

    Anyone glad that the movie started out with Jays rap from clerks? I love the fact that they kind of went into his head this time and gave him a phat beat. hehe...that was awesome.

    And on a side note. Man..Donte got fat.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  99. Re:Meta-Meta Movie Marketing of Meta-Meta Movie . by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    You just completely missed the joke. Now go watch the movie.

    Ben

  100. Dammit Slashcode by God_Retired · · Score: 1

    Kept hearing about people bitching about the new slashcode. Never really saw what they were talking about. Then I see this Katz article. Dammit, I'm sure that I set my preferences so that I wouldn't have to read this guy. I check the preferences. Yep, it's still checked. Damn. I guess that I will just stay away until that is straightned out.

  101. Re:Smith Ain't Hollywood (its MN) by blhath · · Score: 1

    you dumb bastard
    clerks was filmed in an actual convenience store that smith had worked in

    --
    "So this is what it feels like ... when doves cry." -Milhouse Van Houten
  102. Um, HELLLOOOOO by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1
    there hasn't been one done well in ages.

    You even mentioned Scary Movie, which came out last year (2000)

  103. Saw it Friday by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2, Informative
    Review is OK.
    Reviewers in general take on a Howard Cosell tone. They need to emit words to justify themselves.
    Nutshell: this movie is sophomoric entertainment. If you want that, you will be pleased. I laughed, I cried, it was a part of me.
    If drug glorification, homoerotic obsession, notional plot, and obsequious in-jokes offend you, your entertainment dollar is best spent elsewhere.

    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
  104. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  105. Evolution by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    I object to your calling Evolution a disapoinment.

    I mean, what did you expect from an alien invasion movie starring Muld..I mean, David Duchovny? From that synopsis, I think they managed to do something pretty darn good.

    + its got the greatest product placement ever! :)

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  106. one of my favorite lines in the movie by emf · · Score: 1

    "That was the biggest mistake since Gweedo shoots first"

  107. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  108. Re:I didn't realize this director had a series goi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Because the director is Very Important and has the right to make movies that you have to be retarded to laugh at.


    The only thing funny is how pathetic he is... in 50 years, nobody at all will remember or care... at all.

  109. Can I get an "Amen"? by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1
    Totally agree that the Dogma-bashing is warranted. The movie sucked. It also proved the one drawback about satire -- it's the only avenue of comedy open to those with no sense of humour. Here's a bunch of not-very-well-though-out-clever-and-novel-ideas-ab out-the-church. Didn't find them funny? Oh, well, that's because it's supposed to be satirical. You're supposed to go "Hmmmmm!" and then laugh. Gag.

    And now it's Hollywood, eh? If Katz is saying that this is a satire in the same way that Dogma is a satire, that's all the info I need to make an informed choice to skip this movie.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

    1. Re:Can I get an "Amen"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. Don't see it, you whining little bitch.

  110. Re:(OT) Aaliyah by MatthewLovelace · · Score: 1

    Another mediocrity bites the dust. Praise Arioch and break out the Hawkwind records.

    --

    ******
    "What makes you think I care about your opinions?"

  111. Re:Contradiction by holloway · · Score: 1

    Curse me and my lack of moderation points.

  112. Internal dialog of a /. troll by theNeophile · · Score: 1

    "Hmm... here's an article by Jon Katz, who I hate. Lets see, I could: A) Scroll down a couple inches and read the next story, or B) Read the article, in depth, noting every little error. Then, take the time to post a comment saying that having to scroll that extra 300 pixels a couple of times a month is an intolerable waste of my time, instead of doing something that might actually fix this, like sending an email to someone in charge."

  113. Who is John Katz? by Cowboy+Bill · · Score: 1

    This is John Katz spe... aaargh! DCMA

    --
    --> Your Wisecrack Here
  114. Who are these guys??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I like the only 20 something who doesn't know who these guys are?? I never even heard of them until recently.

    Perhaps this is a sign that I'm spending way too much time with my computers??? :) lol

  115. Re:I didn't realize this director had a series goi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well gee, sorry, retard, I guess you'll just have to write to the MPAA and ask them to make sure to number the movies that comprise a series, so idiots like you can tell that it is a series.

    Were you equally flummoxed to find out that, say, Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, and Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade were preceeded by Raiders of the Lost Ark? You probably shouldn't watch any James Bond movies, they might make your head explode!

  116. Help Us Jay and Silent Bob You Are Only Hope by Ranger · · Score: 1

    Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back was my last hope for a good summer blockbuster. And it succeeded. All the rest were from OK to mediocre to bad to worse: A.I., Shrek, Planet of the Apes, Jurasic Park III, Atlantis, Lara Croft, The Mummy Returns, Final Fantasy and even the execrable Pearl Harbor (As Kyle in South Park said, "There is no God ... Michael Bey keeps making movies."). Though the best low key movie I saw this summer was The Dish.

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  117. Religion bashing? by seebs · · Score: 2

    I wouldn't call Dogma "religion bashing". It got a lot of protests, but the movie itself was not actually particularly "bashing" religion. It may not have had the literary punch of _Last Temptation_, but it was still a movie with a lot to say to religious people, and very little of it hostile.

    --
    My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    1. Re:Religion bashing? by datarat · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is that most people don't see the difference between bashing an organization and bashing a set of ideals.

      Of course, most organized religions don't see that difference either...

      --
      If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  118. Re:Going to miss Jay and Bob by pbur · · Score: 1

    I think he is referring to the guitar playing guy played by Sean William Scott (Stifler from American Pie) being called Prince Valium as he is being thrown out of the van. They had him dressed up to look like Prince Valium from Spaceballs.

  119. Prooobabbly not by ukyoCE · · Score: 2

    Sorry man, but they even had the freakin' Asbury Park Press in the convenience store in Clerks. That's just a couple miles from where my parents grew up in NEW JERSEY.

    While I suppose they could have brought a stack of newspapers to MN to film it, they could have just as easily brought license plates from MN to NJ. I'm inclined to trust the director...

  120. AARGH! AM I THE ONLY SANE ONE IN THE ROOM?!?!? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    I just watched "Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back."

    As my friends may know, I had very high hopes for this film. Indeed, it was the only film I was going to pay for this summer.

    Wow.

    We've lost another one.

    Much like Lucas, Kevin's brain appears to have melted as well.

    What a lousy, LOUSY film. One giant, vulgar joke. It made me wince to see how he managed to get so many cool names throughout Hollywood to make cameo appearances; he burned up all the positive Karma he'd earned with his first films in 98 minutes. What a terrible shame.

    All the good stuff I've come to expect from Smith was missing; the lucid & witty observations about society and culture made from an X-Gen perspective contained within impossibly clever dialogue. Totally gone. It was all just retarded sex-humor and Muppet style physical gags which serve only to widen the gap between real world observations and hokey magic land bullshit film making. It made Dumb & Dumber look like pure genius. Heck, that fucking nothing film had a plot, direction and sense of balance. This thing was just self-congratulatory and juvenile.

    I really hope Kevin can get past this turkey, because I suspect that he's not actually been replaced by a pod-person; he's just a guy who made a terrible misjudgement and is now probably feeling about as low as it's possible to feel.

    Anyway, what I heard after seeing the film was that despite some initially promising screen tests, it ran into some really bad tests. In a last minute panic, they bumped it from opening on Wednesday as planned to opening Friday, providing less time for word of mouth to travel before the big weekend cash grab.

    So much for movies this year. At least we got the Cohen brother's film, so it wasn't a total waste. (Or was that last year. . ? Hmm. . .)


    -Fantastic Lad -Dazed and Ill from bad film Ju-Ju.


    I guess Jason and Kevin will be knocking on my door anytime now. Except I know Lad-Fu.

  121. Re:AARGH! AM I THE ONLY SANE ONE IN THE ROOM?!?!? by datarat · · Score: 1

    I have to disagree. I think the bit that threw you is that he had 2 points on this one, both of which were very personal to Kevin.

    1. It's damned easy to criticize when you don't have to face the consequences, or even the target, of your criticism. This is both the internet's greatest strength and weakness, as it allows us all to voice our opinions, but anonymity also has the drawback of taking away our credibility.

    2. Hollywood is a weird, weird place, where your life and career can hinge on which studio exec shows up for work on any particular day.

    There was a lot of other minor satire. Let's face it, though. Dogma was pretty heavy, if you REALLY watched it. I think Kevin probably decided not to beat us over the head with this movie, and give us all a chance to laugh and relax.

    But if you look real close, there's that hidden meaning...

    --
    If you do something right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  122. Re:Ah! Katz! Plus, Smith is overrated by erc · · Score: 1

    The only thing I thought was worse than Dogma was that idiotic, verbal jerk-off-session that called itself a "critique" over on Filthy Critic.

    --
    -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
  123. Scary Movie... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He said, "...done well...".

  124. First Thing's First... by Andrew+Miklos · · Score: 1

    I thoroughly enjoyed this film.

    Second of all, I found its "wrap-up" of the View Askew Universe to be fairly good. My only question is, where was Brodie's girlfriend, and why is he no longer the host of the Tonight Show?

    But anyways, if they can manage to get suzanne the orangutan linked in, then it's definitely covering most bases in terms of a wrap-up.

    damned shame it didn't make top box office, even with the "see it twice" promotion.

    --
    This tastes like granma! By george, you're right! it DOES taste like granma! We'll take a box of it!
    1. Re:First Thing's First... by funkboy3 · · Score: 1

      I didn't notice anything explaining what happened with Brodie and Renee, but as far as Brodie leaving the Tonight show goes: In the scend with Brodie in Brodie's Secret Stash, there are a few shots where you can see a poster-sized blow-up of the front page of "Variety" proclaiming "Brodie Walks!" with a picture of Brodie on the Tonight Show. I imagine if you looked really really closely you could probably read parts of the article off the blow-up, but suffice it to say, he apparently left of his own volition.

      --
      Love, Andy
  125. Clerks 2 is on IMDB. It's in production. by Philipv1 · · Score: 1

    They ain't done with 'em yet!

  126. Re:AARGH! AM I THE ONLY SANE ONE IN THE ROOM?!?!? by Philipv1 · · Score: 1
    >>>It was all just retarded sex-humor and Muppet style physical gags which serve only to widen the gap between real world observations and hokey magic land bullshit film making. It made Dumb & Dumber look like pure genius.


    What? Like Clerks? Mallrats? All the fecal humour in Dogma? All his movies are stuffed full of sex humour and gross out jokes.


    You haven't seen a Kevin Smith flick yet, have you? That's okay. He was making fun of you the most.

  127. You forgot Mallrats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, he wrote and directed Clerks, Chasing Amy and Dogma. But you forgot mallrats. =P

  128. Huh? by oneiros27 · · Score: 2

    Now, the original poster, I'd say qualified as insightful, or interesting, as he went and explained in some details what he found objectionable about Kevin Smith's work in Dogma. [I'll admit, however, that some people might find it off topic, as the article was Jay & Silent Bob Strike Back, not directly Kevin Smith, but I'll accept it, as it's an intelligent, well thought out message.]

    The one which I'm replying to right now, however, I would qualify as a troll in the blink of an eye. Dogma does make a few good points about the concept of dogmatic teachings, and Rufus [Chris Rock] explains the critical difference between beliefs and ideas. To some, the movie may provide insight, and make you think [much like the lasagne line from Clerks], however, I will agree that there was a significant waste of talent in the movie.

    Cameos for the sake of cameos can ruin any movie with a real message in it. Luckily, Jay Silent Bob Strike Back had no set message to it (unless you qualify 'fast food can give you gas' or 'beware of what you way on the internet').

    The only justification for the cameos in Dogma would be that the provided additional comic relief, to help to lighten up what has always been a touchy subject. Unfortunately, you run into problems if people don't understand what's going on, and see comedy, and just assume that it's satire.

    Even Shakespeare, when directing other people's works that he ripped off [yeah, okay, it's still up for debate...I couldn't care less, probably just because I know I wasn't the one who wrote 'em], left in the comedy parts, so as not to overwhelm the stories in one direction or the other. You can look it as a sort of 'yin-yang' approach to story telling -- much like in asian food, you don't try to completely overwhem with one flavor, one texture, one color, one shape -- hot is contrasted with sour, soft chicken with crunchy cashews, orange carrot flowers with a brown garlic chicken, round sushi served on square plates.

    Is Kevin Smith doing it subconciously, and I'm just reading too much into it, or did he really intend to do it? Only he knows. [As well, I don't believe in Alanis Morisette]. Did he pull it off? Well, it depends on what exactly he was trying for. In this case, you have to balance getting the point across, with making people like the story, identify with the characters, and not decide that the story's so powerful that they're going to go and kill themself. However, the director as to decide which things are more important to them.

    If you don't like something, saying 'it sucks' is one of the greatest disservices that you can do. Explain why you think it sucks, at the very least. If you can't take the time put some thought and effort into your criticism, you're wasting everyone's time who reads your post.

    As someone who's been on BBSes, usenet, muds, and these damned 'internet messge boards', I can say that the anonymity created can be a very bad thing, as people don't have to be held accountable for their messages. With BBSes, you could get your access revoked, with usenet, you'd get your mailbox flooded, with muds, you could get your character removed, but with a message board of this size, there's no repercussions -- you just get another throwaway e-mail address, and start over again.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
    1. Re:Huh? by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1
      If you don't like something, saying 'it sucks' is one of the greatest disservices that you can do. Explain why you think it sucks, at the very least.

      I wholeheartedly disagree. Part of the reason Dogma infuriated me was because it spent so much time trying to be an intelligent and novel movie, even though it came up absolutely zero on the profound scale. Its excuse for this, of course, is to say that it's satire and blame the lack of depth on the subject that it's satirizing.

      It's a Catch-22. If you love the ideas in the satire, then you love the satire. If you detest the ideas in the satire, then what you're really detesting is the object of the satire. It's a cop-out that skilled storytellers don't engage in. Kevin Smith, who's done some good work, shouldn't have fallen into this trap.

      Beyond this, it just wasn't very funny. I've read enough satire that isn't funny in writing workshops to fill a canyon. Dogma got made because of his successes with Chasing Amy and Clerks, not because of its own inherent value. There's more insight into religion in C.S. Lewis's belly-button lint than there is in this movie.

      As far as I'm concerned, intelligent criticism of a movie that cowardly tries to hide behind various excuses for its mediocrity is effort wasted. Dogma is such a film.

      --

      --------
      Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  129. Re:AARGH! AM I THE ONLY SANE ONE IN THE ROOM?!?!? by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    What? Like Clerks? Mallrats? All the fecal humour in Dogma? All his movies are stuffed full of sex humour and gross out jokes.

    You haven't seen a Kevin Smith flick yet, have you? That's okay. He was making fun of you the most.


    Yes, I've seen a Kevin Smith film; Have you? While not stoned?

    I KNOW his other films used base humor. But it WORKED in those films. It wasn't the sum total of their substance. It enriched something greater. But in Jay & Silent Bob, it seemed to be the sole point.

    As well. . . All his other films could have taken place in the real world, (with the exception of those muppet style swinging from the rafters antics in Mall Rats). --His first four films were like stage productions of real life, with excellent observations. This film had far too much dumb shit, cheapening the effect of the already non-existent observations.

    Oooh. Hollywood is artificial? Who the fuck doesn't know that?

    Oooh. The Internet is the internet? Again, who cares?

    Dogma was about religion. Chasing Amy had plenty of new things to say about relationships. Clerks had a lot to say about life in Teenage Wasteland. Mall Rats wasn't ground breaking, and it had the dumbest shit of the first four films, but it at least at least didn't break the rules! --Silent Bob thought he used the Force. He wasn't actually USING the Force. One is clever. The other is stupid.

    A film which ignores the physical & logical rules of our reality cannot with any integrity contain social and cultural commentary from this reality either.

    Now don't go thinking that I'm some stick up the ass film critic type. When I say 'social and cultural commentary', I mean the same scenes everybody was quoting to each other after they saw and loved the earlier films. This film had NOTHING memorable about it, except perhaps for the very end and the 'What the fuck is the Internet' line.

    Now, go smoke yourself. And learn the new Slashcode already. Your paragraph spaces are too big.


    -Fantastic Lad

  130. Kevin and Jay are gay lovers by mshurpik · · Score: 1

    I haven't seen the movie, but I saw a half-hour promo show called Reel Comedy, with clips from the movie and interviews with Kevin, Jay, and the other cast members. It was very revealing.

    The first time I watched it, I thought something really weird was going on. They were openly admitting that the movie was complete trash. Why would they do that? Why would a cast of 50 recognizeable names agree to appear in such a bomb? Why would they make the movie at all?

    The movie is clearly a public celebration of something, and at first I thought maybe it was Kevin's coming out as an actor. It's not. It's his coming out as a gay man.

    Kevin Smith and Jason Mewes are gay lovers. They were hanging all over each other in the interview, being cutesy, and cracking jokes about their relationship that were...well, they didn't seem like jokes.

    I think I was lucky to have seen the promo show, with Kevin talking and pretending to joke about which one of them takes it in the rear. It must have been less obvious in the movie itself, because only one commenter pointed out that the movie has an openly gay theme. I think we are right...it's the only explanation for what I saw.

  131. Re:Smith Ain't Hollywood (its MN) by joekool · · Score: 1

    Actually, Mallrats was filmed at the mall of america or some crap in MN, Clerks was filmed in Jersey, at the store that Kevin Smith was working at the time (I believe, he may not have been working there anymore when the film was made) They had to film the movie after the store closed for the night, which is why the shutters are always shut in interior shots, etc

    --

    Slackware: old school feel, new school gear.
  132. Jay and Bob sucked big time... by ncstockguy · · Score: 1

    Disagree completely with Katz. This movie was a shallow half-assed vanity piece by what's his name. We liked most of Smith's earlier productions, but will now think twice before we darken the doorstep of another Smith movie.
    It was lame, trite, simple-minded, cartoonish, but without any of the benefits of cartoons. And Jay and Bob just cannot sustain a full length feature.

  133. Re:AARGH! AM I THE ONLY SANE ONE IN THE ROOM?!?!? by liquidweb · · Score: 1

    Filthy critic says it best with his review of Dogma:

    Dogma" is the story of second-tier characters of the Bible and Catholic doctrine subjected to a comic book geek's love for minutiae. It's a tedious exercise in mental masturbation by a guy who loves hearing himself talk, made by an industry with so few new ideas that they're afraid to edit him. The movie tries real hard to be funny, but unless piles of talking poop and the same joke ad nauseum is your idea of hilarious, you'll be sadly disappointed. And, if there is a message, it's completely lost under the lame jokes, clunky plotting, and non-stop yammering.

    http://www.filthycritic.com/

    --
    --- Matthew Hill
    "To quote the self is an act of the self riteous and uninitiated sub-moronic" - Matthew Hill
  134. Re:Smith Ain't Hollywood (its MN) by ozbon · · Score: 1

    And which is conveniently established at the start of the film when the shutters can't be opened....

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  135. Re:Going to miss Jay and Bob by Lt.Hawkins · · Score: 1

    i heard it as Prince Valient, replayed it in my mind to see if it was a spaceballs reference, and decided he really did say Valient and not valium.

    could be wrong though

    --
    -- My Sig is a P228.
  136. Last Post! by Dr.Altaica · · Score: 1

    Nuff said.