Slashdot Mirror


Data Glove That Turns Gestures Into Commands

ravidew writes: "Three students at Berkeley Sensor and Actuator Center, University of California, have built a motion-sensing glove that can transmit hand gestures to a PC. Within 3 years they hope to build sensors that are no bigger than 1mm and can be glued to each fingernail. Now you can really tell Windows what you think ..." While you're at the Sensor and Actuator Center, check out Kris Pister's smart dust.

212 comments

  1. Oklahoma, OK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be funny to flip off the computer, heh.

    1. Re:Oklahoma, OK! by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

      Giving the finger could run fsck on your active partition...the words are close enough...

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
  2. thjis was a damn Dilbert Cartoon!!! by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 3, Funny

    where the point was made that you might not want your pc to know where you hands are at all time... Dave, about last night...

    --

    Shift happens. Fire it up.
  3. Oh dear god... by nurightshu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only one who remembers where this will go? Check Douglas Adams' Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy and remember -- in the future, you'll have to sit reeeeeaaaaally still to keep your PC from reformatting itself.

    --
    They that would sacrifice their .sig space for that cliched Franklin quote deserve neither.
    1. Re:Oh dear god... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not just joke, it can happen to anybody. In fact, it happened to me, when I used the factory supplied driver for my laptop's touchpad. It supposed to have all sorts of shortcuts for scroll and even gesture, but the truth was different. My laptop got AI, and started doing things on it's own: first restarted itself with tochpad double clicks, touchpad dragging, and later whenever it felt like it, even without me touching anything. This is not as serious as reformatting the hard disk, but if the computer restarts just before you manage to hit the save button, I can tell you is pretty annoying.

      /* insert cool stuff here */

  4. Me like.... by Kencordia · · Score: 1, Informative

    f/p?

    Anyone remember Nintendo's glove-thingy? That was *awesome* for Punch-out!

    --
    "Forty-two," said Deep Thought, with infinite majesty and calm.
    1. Re:Me like.... by Johnycomel8ly · · Score: 1

      FOR THE LOVE OF MIKE, WHY WON'T IT PUNCH WHEN I PUNCH?! That would make the most sense, wouldn't it? I mean what kind of sadistic bastard makes a man go through things like that? And it looked so sweet in "The Wizard" with the always entertaining Fred Savage.

      --

      - Don't get in fights with ugly people, they've got nothing to lose. -
    2. Re:Me like.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Power Glove for the NES. Actually that was my first thought and that thought scared me.

  5. just what we need. by macsox · · Score: 1

    now when mom walks by her 14-year old boy's room, all she has to say is, "why is the cursor going up and down so fast?" and >boom no more internet porn.

  6. Ahh, the possibilities by FireFlux · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Tactile pornography, online boxing matches and virtual crocheting, the list just goes on. Now we can implement real skills into all those rpgs so people can make their godly platemail of the minotaur with their "own hands". Though I have this strange feeling that we'll see a lot of script kiddies doing the whole Johnny Mnemonic thing: "I can crash your system from here man" and skinning over their gloves with claws.

    --
    With a couple of nukes and all the tea in China, we could make this world a British paradise.
  7. While scratching my butt.. by Guillaume+Ross · · Score: 2, Funny

    fdisk deleted my ext2 partition! crap!

    1. Re:While scratching my butt.. by istartedi · · Score: 3, Funny

      That reminds me of the one about voice recognition. A sales rep is in the middle of doing a presentation for such a system when somebody in the audience stands up and shouts "FORMAT SEE COLON" and then another guy stands up and yells "YES RETURN".

      And yes, the moderators are humor impaired.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:While scratching my butt.. by Guillaume+Ross · · Score: 1

      Oh well I guess *I* should stop smoking illicit stuff before posting to slashdot...I feel all stupid now that I read it, while it was a wonderful sentence a few minutes ago!

    3. Re:While scratching my butt.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry asshole moderator, but this just isn't off topic. Perhaps you don't find it funny, but that's an entirely unrelated issue.

  8. This is great! by Kallahar · · Score: 1

    Great! Now when playing WolfTest I can actually grab the teamkillers and slap them silly! Woo hoo!

  9. Nintendo Power Glove, anyone? by fifthchild · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This looks familiar...

    Can I play Super Mario Bros. with this one? :)

    One a serious note, while it looks pretty cool, you can't help but think it will prove to be less useful than the traditional methods "used to decipher and translate hand gestures into computer interepreted symbols". Still, it's only there to prove it could be done. Who among the programmers out there wants to tell me if they;d find this useful?

    --
    Sham on
    1. Re:Nintendo Power Glove, anyone? by Steev · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had one of those stupid gloves. I remember *begging* my parents to buy one for me. It ended up in the closet after about two weeks. it took an amazing amount of stamina to hold your arm pointed straight at the screen for the entire length of a game, and most of the glove-motion commands worked so badly you ended up using the built-in controller anyway!

    2. Re:Nintendo Power Glove, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a piece of shit it is. I still have mine. About the only "useful" game for it was Mike Tyson's Punch Out. Other than that, you couldn't easily kick arse in Double Dragon or play Mario with it. At least you gotta give em credit for having some cool ideas..

  10. That's nice... by Cutriss · · Score: 1

    But couldn't they have just hacked a Mattel Power Glove?

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:That's nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love the Power Glove... It's so bad.

  11. Dismissing pop-ups by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Of course, the gesture command for dismissing annoying pop-up ads should be obvious, depending upon whether you are using LOCALE=en_US or LOCALE=en_UK.

    1. Re:Dismissing pop-ups by passion · · Score: 2

      The American gesture is pretty easy to figure out for someone learning the culture, but can anyone explain to me the history of the British gesture? I once heard a crazy rumor that it had something to do with the French and archers.

      --
      - passion
    2. Re:Dismissing pop-ups by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      The archers story is that during the 100 Years War, the British longbowmen were among the most feared troops. Of course, you need your first two fingers to draw a bow, and so whenever the French would take British prisoners, they'd chop off the middle finger, so that they would never be able to draw a bow again. And so, in turn, the British would show the French their middle fingers as a taunt.


      Well, there you go, that's the story anyway. Take from it what you will.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  12. Say Goodbye to the Keyboard by Trekie8472 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If this catches on, we'll be typing with sign language.

    1. Re:Say Goodbye to the Keyboard by Quizme2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually I saw an experimental device that was a glove that wrote out sign language to a LED screen and also had voice recongition. A 13yr old kid made(?) it for a science fair. His idea was that deaf people could "talk" to others.

      --
      "Get them before they get....
    2. Re:Say Goodbye to the Keyboard by phalse+phace · · Score: 1, Insightful
      If this is the end of the keyboard, why would anyone choose to use a glove over speech recognition software for typing? I'm sure that by the time this glove technology is perfected, speech recognition technology will have advanced even further.

      Besides, typing using sign language would also mean that millions of people would then have to learn sign language first before they could type. Whereas with speech recognition, there would be no time wasted in retraining people (i.e. employees).

    3. Re:Say Goodbye to the Keyboard by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1

      Until speech recognition has advanced to the point where the computer hears my profanity, which is directed at it, and is able to interpret it as what i intended it to do in the first place, I doubt i will be using voice recognition. :)

  13. I've seen these before.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ever see the movie Johnny Mnemonic? Keanu Reeves's character used a pair of "data gloves" that looked and worked much like these. I wonder if they got the idea from the movie?

    Anyway, I guess their next project should be an implantable chip that lets you store 80GB of data in your brain. Damn, that actually seemed like a lot of data back then..

  14. Ergonomics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is potentially a revolution in ergonomics especially for Windows admins. Just imagine how much less carpal tunnel syndromes when the three finger salute is replaced with just one finger.

  15. Finger nail.... by BLAG-blast · · Score: 1, Funny
    I hope they are cheap, I keep hit my finger with a hammer (miss use of screws and nails normally). But I can't imagine hammering a silicon chip into your finger nail would be fun...

    But, they would have to be cheap anyway, since fingers nails grow and move and chips which didn't get damaged would fall off.

    Of course a whole cyberborg army is no match for a couple of really powerful magnets....

    I'm not getting the chip.....

    --
    M0571y H@rml355.
    1. Re:Finger nail.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isn't your sig supposed to be "what would jenna drink" (wwjd?)

      just askin'...

  16. applications for lonely computer professionals by mike_the_kid · · Score: 2, Funny

    What you need is a way to program the glove to recognize certain rythmic motions and to interpret that as writing code. Back and forth, side to side, whatever, it would have to conform to certain preferences of the user. These motions are then interpreted and translated into functions and subroutines for whatever application you are writing.

    "Few, I am exhausted. I just pulled off 10 lines of code!"

    "I just do not have any more code in me for today..."

    Now you can get back to your own sick mind.

    --
    Troll Like a Champion Today
  17. New? by Red+Moose · · Score: 1
    So like Johnny Mnemonic yeah? Surely this can not be a new thing.......I thought those gyroscope things have been around for ages (e.g., that joystick that you held in mid air that detected where it was and whether it was upright, etc., ).

    Well done to them but unless they provide armrests my arms will get tired real quick. Think of the bodyguards in Payback if you don't see my point.

    It would look very cool to use them, but only if there was some 3D holographic display.......and it was....er....tactile...or something.

    --

    Acting stupid isn't much fun when there's someone around who knows better

    1. Re:New? by agentk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, NASA Ames and VPL have been doing this stuff for years...

      --

      VOS/Interreality project: www.interreality.org

  18. Give Windows the finger... literally? by bahtama · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gives new meaning to the "three fingered salute!"

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

    1. Re:Give Windows the finger... literally? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zaphod could've done it....

    2. Re:Give Windows the finger... literally? by nick_burns · · Score: 0

      Maybe you could give it the one fingered salute and it would have the same effect. Also could be used for dismissing those M$ EULAs.

  19. Not very useful by Quasar1999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I rather have voice recognition than hand gesture recognition... Its such a pain to gesture to a computer... Remember the 'Black and white' (game) gesturing thing... it took so long to get it to actually recognize the gestures... and there were only a few and they were only 2D... a human uses hundreds if not thousands of gestures that are very similiar... I really wouldn't want to be the person designing the software to interpret the gestures...

    Anyone out there do this sort of programming? How hard is it to get a computer to understand complex gestures???

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Not very useful by Quizme2000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It could be useful for a mobile input device for PDAs and Laptops. I mean voice recon is fine, problem is you still have to talk out loud. If you're on a plane with a laptop and start shouting computer commands, your gonna get thrown off, maybe while it's still flying!

      --
      "Get them before they get....
    2. Re:Not very useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume a glove or even a pen would be better for gestures than a mouse.

  20. Here's some other, slightly more useful links. by Cutriss · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:Here's some other, slightly more useful links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really suck don't you

  21. Haven't we seen this before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, I remember this. It always made playing super mario difficult....

  22. Smart Dust by torpor · · Score: 2

    Interesting stuff. Power supply, optical and processing capabilities, sensory systems, all in a 1.2mm package.

    Massively manufactured, at large scales could make for some very interesting deployment opportunities...

    Of course, the nefarious applications for this sort of thing are pretty obvious.

    And yet, that still shouldn't be a reason not to develop this technology.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:Smart Dust by devphil · · Score: 2

      A friend of mine was a grad student there for a time, working with this prof. He said that the amount of power you could pump through a cubic meter of these puppies was serious impressive.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    2. Re:Smart Dust by abulafia · · Score: 1

      Does this remind anyone else of _A Fire Upon The Deep_ by Vernor Vinge? He coined a great phrase for this sort of thing as an enabling technology - "Ubiquitous Law Enforcement".

      --
      I forget what 8 was for.
    3. Re:Smart Dust by JChris · · Score: 1

      And in Deepness in the Sky he used
      smart-dust-like devices explicitly.

  23. Useful bit of code by term0r · · Score: 1

    if ((finger2 == up) && (other_fingers == down)) {
    reboot -t now }
    else if ((finger2 == up) && (finger1 == up) && (other_fingers == down)) {
    rm -rf /* }

  24. Interfacing, the real computer bottleneck by migstradamus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Attacking human-comp interfacing on all fronts is surely good, but optical and voice control are higher on the evolutionary scale than ever-more sophisticated manual data entry devices. Pyramidal keyboards, data gloves, et al are all variations on an inferior theme. Keyboards, mice, trackballs, joystics, are incredibly inefficient compared to how fast our minds and our computers can process data. That's the real bottleneck right now, not the bus or platter rotation. This glove is just a new and improved way to get carpal tunnel.

    There are already experiements with direct patching into the brain, and just think of the virus possibilities of running Outlook on that platform.

    1. Re:Interfacing, the real computer bottleneck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point, but I do not want any sort of direct link between my box and my cortex. I'm a full on geek, but inefficient interface devices that must be manipulated by my hands will always be my only choice. If those would become unavailable, well, how fast my box compiles a kernel will be a moot point.

    2. Re:Interfacing, the real computer bottleneck by kaladorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems to me people who can type 120 wpm can probably type faster than they can speak. Try saying 120 wpm. And people have been known to type 180 wpm.

      --
      -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
    3. Re:Interfacing, the real computer bottleneck by unitron · · Score: 2
      "Try saying 120 wpm."

      You never heard any of the car dealer or furniture store spots I used to have to record where the client writes out about 90 seconds worth of copy and the station's salesperson adds about 30 seconds worth more and then expected me to do it as a 60 second spot.

      When I took a breath before hitting "record", the production room door bowed in.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    4. Re:Interfacing, the real computer bottleneck by migstradamus · · Score: 1

      I thought about that, that's why I said efficiency and not speed. I type much faster than what voice-recognition can handle these days, and probably faster than anyone can speak at a comprehensible level. But it's extremely inefficient. I have to focus (and burn) energy in the typing itself, reading the screen, and I have to be sitting at the keyboard and screen to do it.

      Anyone with a cordless phone and headset knows how much more productive you are when you and your hands aren't tied to the phone. (I would never do dishes at all if it weren't for phone calls.) The ability to write a document verbally with a wireless headset is fantastic, but very primitive right now. Add having your e-mail read to you on the same headset and you dictate your reply and send... Typing will practically disappear as soon as things like that become commonplace and of high quality.

      Mice and their ilk will last longer, but optical recognition and voice commands are much faster for typical tasks. Of course design work and other precision drawing and command controls will extend manual control in those fields.

    5. Re:Interfacing, the real computer bottleneck by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      There are times when dealing with a keyboard is overkill, but that doesn't mean it's inefficient for its purpose, just that you're using it for the wrong purpose.
      I don't know what you mean by burning energy in the typing itself. In my experience, typing becomes trivial and secondary to the task I have to be focused on: what am I typing. The typing itself shouldn't require any more focus than, say, walking down the street.
      However, I agree completely with the statement that you should not need to sit in front of a keyboard to do any simple task. You should be able to get on with your life and actually multi-task: check your e-mail while having lunch, open your mp3 player without going through more or less the same steps you need to create a business document.
      The keyboard will always be king for specialized tasks whose input needs a high bandwith of pure, unambiguous data, such as programming or, if you can type, write a document.
      But fore things that do not require that much input from the user, such as simple instructions or macros ("messages?; send that file to Bill; burn that to the CD-RW;") it's ridiculous to have to stand up and walk to your computer and sit down just to click the mouse a couple of times.
      This technology has the same function and would solve the same problems as voice recognition. Of course, it has the advantage that you can keep a conversation without interrupting, and more important without compromising, your task.
      It also has the same problems: dictating code is not practical, it's potentially very annoying, and since you should give all your atention to the workstation anyway, has no inherent advantage over typing your code on a keyboard. Idem for any non-trivial document.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    6. Re:Interfacing, the real computer bottleneck by arkanes · · Score: 1

      It all depends on what you train yourself to. I spend alot (a LOT) of time typing, and not just code, but actual sentences and conversations and what not (mudder :P). I don't even think about the typing, to me having my fingers move to type what I want to say is as natural as actually saying it, sometimes even more so. And of course for technical documents, like code, or even for formatting, vorec just isn't as efficent - the work thats being done with optical icons (using laser optics to track what you're looking at) is alot more exciting, imo. As for people having to learn to sign - people have to learn to type right now - read Tad Williams Otherland for an example of this kind of technology combined with VR.

  25. I remember those things. by corvi42 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was called a Nintendo Power-Glove.
    I've also seen schematics & drivers so that you can connect your power glove to a serial port & use it as a mouse replacement.

    --

    There are a thousand forms of subversion, but few can equal the convenience and immediacy of a cream pie -Noel Godin
    1. Re:I remember those things. by hackerhue · · Score: 1
      Close. You had to hook it up to the parallel port, though. The Power-Glove transmits at a different speed than what you can get with a serial port. You could only get it to talk to the parallel port with some hacking (they called it "bit banging").

      I tried it out. It seemed to have a lot of trouble detecting what I was actually doing. Perhaps it was because the receivers were so close to a wall, that it was getting echoes.

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

    2. Re:I remember those things. by hackerhue · · Score: 2, Informative
      As an add-on to my last post, this also seems to be quite different from the Power-Glove. IIRC, the Power-Glove used metal strips to detect the bending of the fingers. It also required an L-shaped set of three receivers to be attached to the side of your TV, and used audio signals (sub-sonic frequencies, IIRC) to determine the location of the hand in 3-space.

      This thing, on the other hand (no pun intended, honest!), uses accelerometers, which are probably more reliable than the metal strips, and don't require any receivers. The down-side is that it won't give you an absolute position, unless you do some calibration (but the Power-Glove didn't do that either).

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

    3. Re:I remember those things. by ktakki · · Score: 2
      Close. You had to hook it up to the parallel port, though.


      Nope. Serial port. I had one hooked up to a Mac (RS-422A) to make a "MIDI theremin". The Glove's resolution was too coarse for melodic use, but it was good enough for drum samples ("Drum Kit Descending a Staircase: a Musical Homage to Buddy Rich and Marcel Duchamp").

      k.
      --
      "In spite of everything, I still believe that people are really good at heart." - Anne Frank
    4. Re:I remember those things. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sort of reminds you of those things that you see around LA.

    5. Re:I remember those things. by hackerhue · · Score: 1

      You could be right. I might have been thinking about the SEGA glasses, that had a build-your-own interface in the same book.

      --

      To get something done, a committee should consist of no more than three persons, two of them absent.

    6. Re:I remember those things. by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      I suppose there could have been a serial interface as well, but the main way of hooking it up, as was shown in the Byte magazine article was via the parallel port.

      And if I remember right, it didn't use metal in the fingers, but some sort of resistive ink that would change the amount of electricity based on the bend.

    7. Re:I remember those things. by Doctor+Memory · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that's a Mac serial port. RS422 is a balanced line interface, and capable of much higher speeds than the RS232 interfaces on PCs. ISTR that they pushed AppleTalk up to close to 1Mb/sec on those, while RS232 was limited to 38.4K or something (up to 115K now with 16550 UARTS, but still slower).

      --
      Just junk food for thought...
  26. Haiku by 575 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The blue screen of death,
    My middle finger extends:
    Control-Alt-Delete

    1. Re:Haiku by cd_Csc · · Score: 2

      Glad to see you're back!

  27. Ewww by Maskirovka · · Score: 0, Troll

    Great....now porn will be even more interactive! I don't even want to know what implications this will have more Freddie Got Fingered 2.

    Maskirovka

  28. Wow... by chronos2266 · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is going to revolutionize XXX games. Talk about a whole new level of 'interactivity'

  29. I think I played with this: by Migelikor1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know if anyone else remembers the powerglove, one of the silliest things nintendo ever released. The original nintendo system had the ability to accept remarkably versatile input, from a whole range of weapons (actually crappy cameras) to the tactile sensative power glove, power pad, and even a device that sensed hand position in midair with infrared(it folded open like a laptop and sensed the airspace above it.) I actually had the powerglove, and you know what? It was rather useless. No way making gestures is simpler than well placed keys. Anyone here who codes should understand that more mouse movement=less efficiency. I'd say that for now, we have to play on the computers' terms, and use a simple system relying on muscle memory that contains no ambiguity. Maybe eventually the computers can learn to understand subvocalized commands (like in the ender Quintet by Orsen Scott Card) or even mental ones, but until then, I'm afraid that the simpler the system, the better it will work. Mike Tyson's Punch Out really sucked when you actually had to punch with the glove!

    --
    My Karma is so good, I'm the Dalai Lama...or something.
    1. Re:I think I played with this: by WinterSolstice · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Wow, I haven't thought of that game in a few years :)


      I seem to recall REALLY stinking at it...


      On topic, however, I think these have a lot more use than a power glove. I can see where major motions might be needed at first, but eventually they could detect millimeter finger travel, allowing for a 2.1 Million Key Keyboard, or some such.


      Of course, the best use is for operator controlled surgical/mechanical machines. Being able to duplicate the finesse of an expert in an environment that a human could never operate in would be wonderful.


      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    2. Re:I think I played with this: by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The difference here is that this won't suck. You can get very precise movements from sensors like this, and very accurately to boot. The power glove, well, it sucked. The IR controller of which you speak was even worse. X-Force or something silly like that, maybe?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:I think I played with this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should I feel bad that I remember all of those devices clearly?

      Should I feel even worse that I wanted each of them at one point?

    4. Re:I think I played with this: by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      > I don't know if anyone else remembers the
      > powerglove, one of the silliest things nintendo
      > ever released.

      Nintendo didn't release it, a third-party did (ISTR Mattel...?)

      > from a whole range of weapons (actually crappy
      > cameras)

      Well, in the sense that rudimentary photoreceptors are sort of like cameras, yes.

      > Anyone here who codes should understand that
      > more mouse movement=less efficiency.

      And anyone who uses a graphical web browser should understand exactly the opposite. So?

      > Mike Tyson's Punch Out really sucked when you
      > actually had to punch with the glove!

      Primarily because the game was designed to be played using a digital game pad, not a glove that could sense 3 discrete axes of motion. If games had been programmed specifically for the Power Glove, they would have felt a lot more natural than trying to make Mario walk to the right by moving your arm slightly to the right of an imaginary home position.

    5. Re:I think I played with this: by Migelikor1 · · Score: 1

      >Nintendo didn't release it, a third-party did (ISTR Mattel...?)
      I am looking at the Powerglove, and it carries the Nintendo logo, with no mention of Mattel or any such other company.
      >Well, in the sense that rudimentary photoreceptors are sort of like cameras, yes.
      The official instruction booklet from Nintendo says "the concept under which Nintendo guns work is essentially comparing a very basic photograph to what is seen on the screen." The guns snagged an ultra low resolution digital image, and saw whether the gap in the white was in the center. The screen flashed white, except around targets, each time the gun fired. That's why the gun didn't work to close, too.
      >And anyone who uses a graphical web browser should understand exactly the opposite. So?
      I use a graphical web browser, and if buttons are scattered all over the place, it's pretty damn inneficient. Selecting from a dense menu, or better yet, using keyboard based shortcuts is much faster.
      >the game was designed to be played using a digital game pad
      Punch out was actually designed specifically for the Power Glove. It failed, and no more games were produced in that line. By the way, it is hard to emulate because of the wacky 3Desque actions made to accomodate the glove.
      In conclusion, I appreciate your response, but disagree with your points. obviously, the "new technology" is better, and has some potential. I was pointing out that a previous implementation didn't work so well, and this one probably isn't there yet either.

      --
      My Karma is so good, I'm the Dalai Lama...or something.
  30. Computer input devices going in two directions by Bastian · · Score: 2

    When it comes to video games, the wave of the future is force feedback, because when we get input from the input devices it makes them more intuitive to use.

    When we're actually trying to get something done with computers, we wave our hands in the air because it removes contact from devices, gets rid of all force feedback, and. . . well. . . er. .

  31. been there done that. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    Nintendo Power Glove.

    Used more for VR and hacking than any other interface in the early 90's. I was able to map commands to gestures in DOS, and to some limit in linux around 1996.

    The fact that it isn't bulky or cyber-looking like the powerglove was and hopefully it doesn't have that nasty Ultrasonic rangefinding.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  32. Windows? by twitter · · Score: 2
    Now you can really tell Windows what you think

    I like the one that looks out the back window.

    Oh, the software! I thought XP could read my mind and phone home about it.

    Really though, do you think the company that has yet to embrace multiple virtual screens and mice with three buttons properly, will ever use this? Sure, the prototype uses Win95 (at least they knew better than to use MS for web stuff. quoth the page, "meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.75 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u) [Netscape]"") Will MS really pick it up and make it available with their GUI? I think not. Xfree86 will beat them to real and invovative uses for the interface by years!

    Kudos to Hollar et al. This is a cool glove. MJ wants to know if you have one with rhine stones.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah! Just like XFree beat Microsoft to:

      1) Scroll-mouse support.
      2) USB support.
      3) A usable GUI.

      Give XFree developers fifteen years and they'll have that glove moving the mouse cursor across the screen like crazy (horizontally only, of course). Hooray!

    2. Re:Windows? by twitter · · Score: 1

      This NT user is still waiting for USB support. We shall see, ignoramous coward.

      --

      Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  33. power by lavaforge · · Score: 1

    Just use the body heat powered thermoelectric system from a few articles back for power and you have an always-on, ubiquitous interface solution. Just think of the possibilities that this could have in public.

    1. Re:power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use the body heat powered thermoelectric system from a few articles back for power and you have an always-on, ubiquitous interface solution. Just think of the possibilities that this could have in public.

      Yes! We can make toilets that'll flush at the gesture of a hand!! No more manual flushing!

      ..wait...
  34. Great keyboard replacement for handhelds by jwkane · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Think about it. You have these sensors in each of your fingertips and any flat surface becomes an instant full-size keyboard.

    It also one-ups the mouse-keyboard combination, no more mouse/touchpad. Just lift your forefinger off the virtual keyboard and move the mouse pointer by pointing at the screen. Your fingers never have to leave the home-row.

    For those that can't touch-type, unroll a cheat-sheet and type on it.

    This will be a GREAT technology once it matures.

    1. Re:Great keyboard replacement for handhelds by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 3, Informative

      Now that I think about it, I don't think this will replace keyboards until they can simulate some kind of tactile feedback to the user. (force-feedback smart dust?)

      Those roll-out mat keyboards have been around for some time. They drive touch typists nuts because they don't "feel" anything like typing.

      I personally still use an 8-pound IBM PS/2 keyboard because I crave the clickety-clack of those wonderful mechanical switches.

      --

      "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

    2. Re:Great keyboard replacement for handhelds by jwkane · · Score: 1

      Hence the "for handhelds", I'm not giving up my keyboard anytime soon for exactly the reasons you've described. At the desktop it would still be nice for mouse control, and there are a few gestures that can be make without moving your fingers from the keyboard that might be really useful. (point toward the escape key with your 'j' finger and hold that gesture for a moment to go 'back' in your browser, point toward the backspace with your 'f' finger (hehe) to go forward, press non-existant buttons below your space bar to scroll down, add non-existant buttons above your F-row with assigned macros..

      There are clearly tons of ways in which this kind of technology can augment a traditional keyboard.

      You could just as easily add virtual-buttons to your monitor, your desk, whatever is within the sensitivity of the hardware.

      As far as direct operation of a device with gestures, it's quite possible that a computer is (in it's current form) too complex a device. But it sure would be easy to work out the necessary gestures to comfortably operate a TV, VCR and/or Tivo.

    3. Re:Great keyboard replacement for handhelds by eh2o · · Score: 1

      I've got one of those hunks-o-steel right here next to my desk... I used to think it was like the sports car of keyboards... now I am using the Logitech wireless split keyboard ... very nice feel.

      Anyways, the risk of carpel tunnel and other complications of the hand/wrist are actually greater when enganging in typing activity without force feedback. Fingers were designed to push and manipulate things, not to swipe at empty nonexistant 'phantom keys'.

    4. Re:Great keyboard replacement for handhelds by battjt · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the acceleration of touching a flat surface be enough feedback? My problem with keyboards that don't have any feedback is that the signalling mechanism is not the acceleration of my finger tips, but instead some applied force that may or may not be the results of the acceleration of my finger tips.

      Joe

      --
      Joe Batt Solid Design
  35. There goes my job... by gokubi · · Score: 1

    "Good Amy, reboot the computer...you get a bannana if the service pack fixed the problem...good Amy, good monkey!"

    --
    I'm much funnier now that I'm a subscriber.
  36. Ahh, the powerglove by rhinoX · · Score: 1

    Or maybe it was because the powerglove was pretty much a piece of crap, and rarely worked with the hardware it was intended for (NES). Let alone a real PC with some trickery in between.

    --
    The copper bosses killed you, Joe. 'I never died', said he.
  37. Been there, done that, love it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I did the same thing at UIUC back in '97...

    I used dual 3-axis accelerometers for the hand motion, and discrete switches to determine
    finger joint position. The wires were sewn into the glove directly.

    The result was very accurate hand movement, with the trade off of less complex finger movements.

    Needless to say, I like the idea. It is a _very_ natural interface for a lot of applications. The glove is a little unwieldy, but for some reason beyond comprehension, everyone who does this seems to build theirs around the heaviest winter glove they can find... What someone needs to do is to build this using discreet sealed components, on the outside of thin, air-holed neoprene (similar to a bicyclist's glove.)

    Also, the software is the key to whether this really works out. You need a virtual keyboard app (similar to what pen laptops use), plus a gesture pad (a la grafitti or CAD gestures), plus a standard mouse driver. (I never got around to polshing my software beyond anywhere other than manipulating a Rubik's-style 3D Cube. No, you couldn't acutally solve it.)

    1. Re:Been there, done that, love it! by faeryman · · Score: 1

      Hi. I'm very interested in what you designed and have a few questions. First, what kind of accellerometer did you use, and what (if any) kind of microprocesser did you use to gather the data from the accelerometer and switches? Also, did you publish any source code for the microprocessor or found any good documentation for finding positions in 3D via accellerometes, etc?

      I really hope the posting AC reads this ;(

      --


      ,
      faeryman
    2. Re:Been there, done that, love it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The accelerometers were Analog Device's3-axis evaluation modules. The outputs were fed via a tether to a custom interface card which plugged directly into the host PC. A set of six 20Mhz high-speed Motorola video ADC's (sorry, can't find link) converted the acceleration data. The host PC was responsible for querying the card.

      The software used freshman-level kinematic equations to integrate/interpolate the data to the the position. There was a fair amount of hysteresis in the software, but I attirbute that to only having functional hardware for a week before the project had to be presented...

  38. Useful to programmers by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1
    Sure, I could use one. Not to replace typing, perhaps, but to augment. I would love to have phrases like 'foreach', 'while(', etc... mapped to a 'virtual key' of some sort.


    I'd use it more like a macro keyboard, really.


    -WS

    --
    An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    1. Re:Useful to programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are an engineered primate? Pot, Kettle, [nondiscriminatory Other reference elided by the thought police].

    2. Re:Useful to programmers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see you worked hard to earn your -1 status.

  39. The future of user input by Sanity · · Score: 2
    I often ask myself how we will communicate with our technology in the future. People usually assume that it will be voice, however this is inappropriate in many circumstances, English has so much fluff that is unnescessary when communicating with a machine - "Hello Computer, please open my email client and show me new emails for today" might be fun the first time, but doing it every day would rapidly grow tiresome.

    The strange thing is that in keyboards and WIMP user interfaces, we seem to have reached a point where it is far from obvious where we can progress next. There hasn't been significant progress in user interfaces since the 1970s when Xerox Parc developed the mouse based interfaces which we all use today - oh sure, we have colour, and that paper clip, and skinability, but none of these are anything other than incremental enhancements.

    Many people are betting on 3D user interfaces, but I remain unconvinced that these will actually be useful, or that a 2D representation of objects in 3D would be better than the 2D representation of objects in 2D which we have now.

    Most new input devices are also variations on the mouse theme, be they light-pens (hardly new, I remember them in the mid-80s), touch screens, or these gloves.

    So the question is, have we reached a global optimum in user interface design, or is there some other approach that I haven't even considered that we will all be using in 30 years?

    1. Re:The future of user input by Omerna · · Score: 2

      I often ask myself how we will communicate with our technology in the future. People usually assume that it will be voice, however this is inappropriate in many circumstances, English has so much fluff that is unnescessary when communicating with a machine - "Hello Computer, please open my email client and show me new emails for today" might be fun the first time, but doing it every day would rapidly grow tiresome.

      I agree completely. However, saying, "Open E-Mail. New. Open 4. Reply. Blah Blah Blah. Send. Close E-Mail. Open Browser. www.slashdot.org" is really easy. (Except for Slashdot... maybe consider a name change soon?)

      For me, this interface would be much better then mouse/ keyboard, because it's so fast. That's faster then now (I think) and it's no more, or even less, boring stuff. (Saying Open E-Mail is equivalent to clicking an icon).

      That's going to be the future interface, for most basic programs, in a few years... Heck, we already have voice recognition typing software! How hard can it be to step it up a notch?

      Oh, I'm also envisioning personalized commands, ie: "1" is analagous to "Open E-Mail" or something.

      --


      No sig for you.
    2. Re:The future of user input by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      English has so much fluff that is unnescessary when communicating with a machine - "Hello Computer, please open my email client and show me new emails for today" might be fun the first time, but doing it every day would rapidly grow tiresome.

      I agree. English as a language is too ambiguous for computer use. And the way Americans (like myself) speak it makes it even worse as American English is fraught with homonyms.

      I know it will never be tried, but classical Latin would be far better for computer input, as it is the least ambiguous language I am aware of.

      Back on the subject of gesture input though, I think the Chinese will be able to put this technology to practical use sooner than anyone else. I count at least half a dozen fully-mature products from Hong Kong and Taiwan (I use Power Pen) that use a wacom pad to enter Chinese and English (and Japanese) language text into Windows PC's. With Power Pen, you can use the stylus as the only interface to the PC.

      The neat thing about Chinese is, if you draw the characters with the proper stroke order, you can enter entire sentences on the fly without lifting your pen.

      So if the glove mentioned could be rigged to run Power Pen, or something like it, so one could just write characters on the desk with their fingers, a Chinese person could use it as the only interface to their PC pretty much immediately.

      --

      "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

    3. Re:The future of user input by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1

      As long as I never have to ask my computer to open any pod bay doors, we'll be fine...

      "Dr Floyd, There is a message for you."
      "Who sent it?"
      "There is no identification"
      "What's it say?"
      "ILOVEYOU"...

      And so the saga begins, again.

      "ALL THESE WORLDS ARE BELONG TO YOU, EXCEPT EUROPA. ATTEMPT NO LANDING EVERY ZIG THERE"

  40. Immersion Corp already sells em by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2
    Well more technically, Virtual Technology made 'em til Immersion bought them. Still it's available for purchase.

    What's more, they combine this idea with haptics, attaching motors so that when you interact with objects, they push back on you. You can even rest your hand on an object and have the motors support the weight of your arm. Very Cool.

    http://www.immersion.com/products/3d/intera ction/o verview.shtml

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  41. fingernail communications? by faeryman · · Score: 1

    I see on the site the proposed fingernal size design has a very small RF Communication with Anntena chip. Do such things exist today? I'm working on something similar to this - ADXL 202 talking to a microprocessor, then to a central computer. RF communication is the next step, and Id like to use that rather than say...Bluetooth or XISPIKE to do the wireless communications. Anyone know?

    --


    ,
    faeryman
  42. Perfect for banner ads! by Klowner · · Score: 1

    if (hand.middlefinger == TRUE) {
    close(freakinAnnoyingBannerAd);
    }

    I can't wait.

    1. Re:Perfect for banner ads! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, even I can see this is a joke.

      Secondly, I write my code like that. I make my code as clear as possible, even if it means adding code that is obvious. It's gay meat packers like you that write incomprehensible code that give this business a bad name.

      Go and boil your bottom, you empty headed animal, food troth wiper.

    2. Re:Perfect for banner ads! by diadem · · Score: 1

      That would make for a sore middle finger after a while. I hope there would be a macro so I could just twitch my figner or something.

      Its not lazy, its effecient!

      --
      Liquid Gaming - Your daily dose of gaming news
  43. Unlimited commercial potential by Greyfox · · Score: 5, Funny
    A commercial company could come up with a plug in which takes your gesture data and analyzes it for certain well defined movements. Think about it:

    If:

    The crotch-scratching motion is detected on a regular basis, you might get more pop-up ads for Gold Bond Medicated Powder.

    Likewise, another common motion among those who sit all day might put some Preparation H commercials in your future.

    Your typical 13-year-old might get more porn adverts, 'tis true...

    The common nose-picking gestures might queue some Kleenex adverts up for your viewing.

    Yes indeed, we should all sign up for this technology as there is no doubt that it will improve our lives beyond measure.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  44. Up yours M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know the first gesture I would like to make to my microsoft box:)

  45. They should get together with the battery guys by timinspace · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From todays earlier piece on Thermoelectrics.. So eventually you have the fake fingernails that never need replacing and can control your T.V.. I just know what gesture I'd program for Jerry Springer.

    1. Re:They should get together with the battery guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ehh, you beat me to this.

      And don't put it in your fingernail -- it'll just grow out. Put it under it (ugly) or under the skin somewhere.

  46. Smart liquid... by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Forget smart dust, I want smart liquid!

    I want to be able to DRINK an upgrade and have it interface with me directly. A pint of CPUs on the house! That way I can drink and actually get SMARTER instead of the current opposite result.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  47. The next level of interface. by Nijika · · Score: 2, Interesting
    We have to get away from these keyboards. If you think about it, it's not as natural as gestures. Imagine coding in sign-language...um, you'd get used to it.

    Anyway, I have a feeling, like gasoline, television and so many other legacy tools that are so entrenched in our lives, this will be slow to catch on. I'd like to be an early adopter but I'm not smart enough, heh...

    Our natural communication tools should be our interface to our machines...

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  48. Johny Mnemonic, Anyone? by ColGraff · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, I know it wasn't the best movie ever made, but it had the goofiest dataglove gestures I've even seen or imagined. Gave new meaning to pointlessness. (Much like this post).

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  49. oh come on, that's old by liquidsin · · Score: 1

    I had one of these in the late 80's.
    It was called the Nintento Power Glove.
    It let me beat up Glass Joe, the Hippo, and Mike Tyson.
    And it was grand.

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  50. uhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no offense to these academic weeners but nintendo released one of those things in the 80s. Using hand gestures really isn't as great as it sounds. I'd rather using fingure gestures (typing) than go swinging my hand around and practically learning sign langauge, when i could just type it up in 2 seconds.

    1. Re:uhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multiple comples hand chords optimized for letter creation, combined with a few dozen of the most common words given their own, and you could probably "type" as fast as you think.

  51. Re:Let me get this straight... by conebrid · · Score: 1

    "You should all be glad that you are alive and well and able to masturbate as frequently as you like while looking at goatse.cx, and not stuck under 100 stories of a collapsed building with your penis sliced off from shrapnel."

    Apparently, we are.

    The 9/11 tragedy was terrible. Last I saw on CNN, over 300 people have been confirmed dead, and over five thousand are missing. But, how many people do you hear going around saying the same basic thing you said, but about Pearl Harbor? The atomic bomb? World War I, the "war to end all wars"? The Civil War? The American Revolution? Or even OKC? Until now. I haven't heard many people on the street cursing others for going on with their daily lives when only a few years ago several people died in the OKC bombing. Why? Because we moved on.
    And even now, we (and by "we", I mean Joe Average, like me) need to move on. Our best hope to defeat the intent of these terrorists is to go on with our daily lives. I'm not saying we should forget the people who died for no other reason than being in the wrong place at the wrong time, or their families and friends, or the totally awesome police, firemen, and volunteers who are still out there, weeks after it all happened, searching for survivors and digging through the wreckage. Slashdot is a technology news site and *nix advocacy site, not a typical news site/organization like CNN, AP, Reuters, etc. Therefore, it should not be expected to just drop everything and keep updating the site with news about the rescue efforts.
    On that note, what do YOU think Slashdot should be doing? I notice nowhere above where you posted what you think Slashdot should do to correct itself. Your post came off sounding more like a flame against "computer-playing-linux-geeks".
    I know nothing about you. Maybe someone you know and love is still missing. Maybe you just live in NY. Maybe you have loved ones in the Armed Forces who may be in danger in the future should this whoel situation escalate. Maybe you are just a concerned American who is only affected by the attacks patrioticly and symbolicly, like me. (excuse my spelling if it's incorrect, please)

    This whole damn situation should not be forgotten. But we have to move on eventually.

  52. other uses for this by uXs · · Score: 1

    Whatever you could do with this for computer input, I think it would also be very nice if you could use this for everything else. To give a simple example, turning the lights, the tv, whatever,... in your house on and off. More complicated example: lock/unlock your car. Off course, the last one (and possibly the in-house ones too, why not?) would require encryption.

    All this would be very neat though... remember that all tech that doesn't look like it's magic, is not advanced enough... /me thinks we're taking a big step in the right direction here :-)

    uXs

    --
    What our ancestors would really think, if they were alive today, is: Why is it so dark in here? (Terry Pratchett)
  53. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... here at PSU they've been working on something similar. It is essentially a prototype for a map that visitors can ask questions to and gesture.

    http://www.engr.psu.edu/news/News/1999%20Press%2 0R eleases/August/sharma.html

  54. This is dumb. by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    Joyd does essentially the same thing... why have a sensor when you can just move a stick?

    Prove to your local NT guy that Joysticks aren't just for Quake! http://freshmeat.net/projects/joyd/
    You can map a very large amount of commands to different joystick functions, from pushing one button, or moving 1 direction - to moving to corner, and pushing several buttons at once. You can also execute more than one command with just one function.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  55. The Wizard 2? by kooldood · · Score: 0

    Maybe George Lucas can stop making dumb Star Wars' and return to being cool and do another Wizard.
    As I recall, in the first Wizard there is a data glove that controlls the NES, where you move your hand around and then your character dies. Sadly in the Wizard the forces of good did not hold this all mighty power glove, and nothing will change in the sequel.
    In the Wizard 2, which I am now copyrighting as my own, the new data glove will fall into the evil hands of mr Bin Laden, who will suddenly control all the combine wheat harvesters at the whim of his hand.
    In a mastery of diplomatic relations, spear headed by Jessie Jackson, a croquet match is secured between bin Laden and OJ Simpson. "The Murderers Duel" as it's called, plays for the mighty power glove and indirectly the awesome power of the worlds wheat harvesters. With bin Laden in the lead, OJ becomes desperate and quits the game to head for the airport. He soon finds out that bin Laden is dead by a mystery assasin and hops in a white Ford Bronco and drives around with a gun to his head.
    In the end Simpson is aquited, but with everyone knowing what really happened he celebrated as a hero, and eventually gets a TV show on UPN.

  56. Accidents... by BMazurek · · Score: 2

    The first time you sneeze or cough or answer the phone you could end up with all sorts of gibberish, or maybe even rebooting your computer.

    It seems to me that you need some sort of disconnect override. Maybe some sort of camera that can tell when you're looking at the screen. (I seem to recall hearing something about that on here in the past...)

  57. Re:Great keyboard replacement [for gaming] by Omerna · · Score: 2

    Let's say I'm playing CS. Not only would this help me position keys anywhere I wanted but instead of a mouse just point at the guy you want to shoot.

    I've seen, somewhere, a keyboard made for gaming (central arrowkeys with conveniently placed programmable buttons around it) but this would be that all hollow. Just think about it for a second... any key, any where you wanted it! Programmable, personalized, keyboards!

    (Damn, now I want one of these things sometime tomorrow).

    --


    No sig for you.
  58. Nostalgia by MouseR · · Score: 2

    Any other Mac users out there remembers MacPlaymate?

    1. Re:Nostalgia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, but i remember a game like it...i bought a MacPlus from a friend like 8 years ago and he gave me some of his dads disks..one of them has this porno game on it. you would undress the girl, then choose dildos and what not to try and get her off. her legs would shake, it was pretty funny in a perverse way. i installed it on a powemac 6100/66 a few years later, and her legs would shake into just a blur because of the "speed" of that comp.

    2. Re:Nostalgia by MouseR · · Score: 2

      That was MacPlayMate.

      By looking into it (with the URL I gave above), I actually downloaded a colorized version of it. It ran fine under Classic. It's as perverted as I remembered it.

  59. Major Implications... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 1
    This is huge, once it works. Not only does it have applications in gaming, ie., imagine picking up the BFG and actually feeling the weight and the feedback (can it be those simulations be that far behind?), but imagine how it could change the entire way we actually operate our computers. Instead of GUIs, we'll be speaking of TUIs (Tactile User Interfaces). You'll be able to pick up that folder on your desktop (if folders are even used any longer). This is cool.

    Yet, I still think of Ender's Game and Infocom's A Mind Forever Voyaging and their ideas of immmersive technology. Leaps in AI (well, game AIs would create a reasonable personality to interact with), voice recognition, these controls and even the thermoelectrics in the earlier story means that we're stepping into territory where we have to take care.

    Still, imagine your PDA in 15 years...

    1. Re:Major Implications... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd find it mostly very distressing to not be able to use a weapon in a game because it was too heavy for us non-marine types.

      And anyone who's ever stabbed anyone knows they aren't going to want a tactile simulation of that. Icky.

      :)

    2. Re:Major Implications... by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Of course, the first thing any serious Quake player will do is disable force feedback, how much the gun weight, etc. In fact, I doubt it would do much against the "Thresh" configuration, with independent fingers controlling each of f, b, strafe l, strafe r.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  60. No way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone completely disproves this argument at tacoinspector.com.

  61. The p0rn apps . . . by evilroot · · Score: 1

    My god, can you imagine the implications for the p0rn industry?

    The battle of the sexes will never be won . . . there's too much fraternizing with the enemy.
    --Randal

  62. Battlebots, anyone? by mttlg · · Score: 2

    I can see devices like this used to control complicated Battlebots, combined with a headmounted display and voice commands. Forget a bunch of joysticks, buttons, and switches, just assign different functions to different hand movements. Or just put some robotic hands on it and literally grab and toss your opponent... There must be some weapons configurations that haven't been practical due to control system limitations. Now if I could just figure out a way to get them to let me start a project on this at work...

    1. Re:Battlebots, anyone? by JatTDB · · Score: 2

      I think most people would nix the idea due to more things being on the "stuff that can go wrong" list. Simple buttons and switches like those found in joystick controllers are much simpler than accelerometers and other things necessary for a glove controller to really work well. I've seen at least one match where the controller died...I think we'd see a lot more if people tried to make the controller's systems more complex than is really needed.

      Gestures have problems usage-wise as far as I'm concerned...most people don't move their hands exactly the same way every time. So you have to make the range of motion for each gesture fairly wide so it includes enough of the common mistakes to work reliably. But those wide ranges start to add up fast, so you have to make the gestures themselves bigger so you can reliably differentiate between gestures. A finger hitting a button or a hand throwing a stick to the right has very little room for error. No "is that really right, or is it up and right?" problems. Not to mention the innate tactile feedback of a button is a great thing.

      --
      "That's Tron. He fights for the Users."
  63. science and magic by FrenZon · · Score: 1

    So with the combination of this and wireless control, we're going to start seeing people waving their hands around, controlling remote devices - really, it's going to look like (and I cringe when I say this) .. magic.

  64. Just Imagine by drrobin_ · · Score: 1

    Just imagine this glove with force feedback. I'm not sure how it could be done, but that'd be freakin cool. An actual tactile ability to feel virtual objects.

    Of course, the first industry to adopt this will be pornogrophy. Imagine the new possibilities for cybersex!

    --
    to accept the praise of personal wisdom is an affront to the very ideal i hold dear.
    1. Re:Just Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No..the porn industry will be the first to pick up the full body suit version of this. (supposing it to have tactile yaddayadda)

  65. And the 16-year-olds get all the jobs... by GlobalEcho · · Score: 2

    ...as if there were not enough discrimination against older programmers already.

  66. So... by J.C.B. · · Score: 1

    What does this thing have that the Nintendo Power Glove doesn't?

  67. This could make EMACS usable! by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just assign different "hand positions" to all the meta-keys the editor uses. i.e.:

    palms-down = normal
    palms-45-degrees = ctrl
    palms-sideways = alt
    palms-up (yikes) = meta (or whatever)
    etc.
    and "type" normally.

    And for vi, just turn your wrists sideways a bit to enter "edit mode."

    Never mind, this is a stupid idea.

    --

    "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

    1. Re:This could make EMACS usable! by ez76 · · Score: 1

      That would be kind of cool, but in all seriousness, continually rotating your wrist to reorient your palm would be no better for your carpal tunnel than those diabolical emacs key chords.

  68. it has to be said... by Ikari+Gendo · · Score: 1

    "I love the Power Glove."

    Now, if only I can keep my kid brother from trying to get to a huge dinosaur statue in California...

  69. A better input device? by jinx90277 · · Score: 2

    Although the technology is certainly impressive, I have to wonder if this really would produce a better input device than the manual devices we now have:

    Can it be used to input text more rapidly than a keyboard?

    I doubt it. The example which comes to mind is how Palm decided to deal with the difficulties in handwriting recognition; that is, by devising their own alphabet and forcing the users to learn it, rather than designing software which attempted to understand each individual's idiomatic writing style. The designers of this glove interface would face the same decision -- and it's important to remember that many attempts at user-adaptive recognition have failed. So, assuming that users would have to learn a gesture alphabet to use the glove, how fast could they "type?" Although I've practiced Graffiti diligently, I seem to top out around the 30 wpm which Palm claims is the maximum. On the other hand, I can easily type 90-100 wpm on a keyboard.

    Can it be more intuitive and/or more precise than a mouse?

    Again, I doubt it. The screen, the tabletop that the mouse moves on, and the desktop software (X, Windows, Mac, etc.) are all designed for 2-D interactions. What's the use of having an extra degree of freedom with the controller? I'm sure that it would be possible to develop a 3-D desktop environment, but what about all of the 2-D standard applications? I doubt that I could get the same precision drawing objects in PowerPoint, for instance, using my whole arm (or at least my forearm) for hours a day than I can with a mouse. Fatigue would eventually cause a lot of inaccuracy.

    Speaking of fatigue...will this input device be more helpful for avoiding repetitive motion injuries?

    I'm not an ergonomics expert, but it seems as if you would be prone to repetitive motions of a different kind. Yes, using keyboards and mice for hours a day is a bad thing in the long run. But is trading carpal tunnel syndrome for, say, tendinitis in the elbow any better of a situation?

    I'm sure there would be SOME use for this kind of technology. But I don't see it as being a wholesale improvement over current input methods for the kinds of systems we have. Although I usually hate to use the word "paradigm" in polite company, I think it's fair to say that our whole notion of computing is built on a "flat paradigm", for better or worse. Ultimately, we will have to design different displays and ways of thinking in order to restructure our interactions with computers. It will take more than a glove.

    (Whew...got through the whole post without making one Michael Jackson joke...)

    --
    "she says i'm lousy conversation. as if that's supposed to help."
  70. Virtual keyboards by nemesisj · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that this might be useful in situations where a keyboard is needed sometimes but is inconvenient in other situations. If anyone here saw the Final Fantasy movie, you'll know what I mean - one of the characters prompted a holographic keypad/interface to come up which she typed on, and then caused it to dissapear when the bad guys came and action was needed.

  71. Will anybody flip off Windoze? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2

    Now all we need is a new clause in the Mafiasoft Windoze license agreement in addition to some innovative technology. The clause would state that you shall not flip off Mafiasoft Windoze. The technology would be a double-barreled shotgun mounted to a robotic base on top of the computer monitor. This shotgun would be fired by a solenoid controlled by Mafiasoft Windoze. Every time Mafiasoft Windoze detects that it's being flipped off, it will simultaneously perform two innovative actions:

    1. It will fire the shotgun at the user's head, roadrage-style.

    2. It will reboot and display the following message:

    Because Mafiasoft Windoze was not properly engineered, one or more of your hard disks may have errors on it. To avoid seeing this message again, uninstall Mafiasoft Windoze and use a quality alternative to this defective software. Don't call tech-support because they'll just tell you to Retry, Reboot, Reinstall. Do not make illegal copies of this error message.

    Mafiasoft: Where do you want to pay today?

    1. Re:Will anybody flip off Windoze? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 2

      As a side note, Mafiasoft could license these technologies to the MPAA and RIAA. Every time Mafiasoft Windoze or an application detects that the user is trying to play a copyrighted song, the user will be shot in the head. This will be stated in the license agreement, which every person in the world, upon birth, will be required to accept (Mafiasoft's monopoly will cover the right to breath oxygen by the time this is implemented--if you do not accept the terms of this license agreement, well, let's just say you have to accept the terms of this license agreement).

      For innovation's sake and added convenience, Mafiasoft will implement hooks for VBS files to fire the shotgun as well. By leveraging these innovative technologies, virus providers will streamline compelling virus solutions.

      (You know what? I wouldn't be the least bit surprised if something retarded like this actually got released by that company.)

      Mafiasoft: Where do you want to pay today?

  72. Great! ... but *FAR* from first!!! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2


    Sounds like what Jaron Lanier was doing 30 years ago. You can read all about it in Howards Rheingold's excellent book Virtual Reality circa 1991. (not to take away from their efforts.)

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  73. New paradigm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gives a new meaning to the phrase "chipping a nail" doesn't it.

    Either the marketers are already active setting the paradigm of buying more as the nail grows and gets clipped off, rather than using a glove (or something similar, not bonded to a body part) or I am getting too cynical.

  74. Whats new about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The 5DT Data Glove has had gesture recognition built into the driver for years (and has a mouse emulation layer built into the hardware), and other gloves have had gesture recognition software available for longer.

    The only "new" thing I can see in this project is their (currently not realised) longer term "smart dust" remote sensor technology. Gesture recognition is old though.

  75. Force feedback... by x136 · · Score: 2

    Imagine one of these things with force feedback. Online Arm Wrestling. :)

    On a more serious note: More accurate long distance surgery.

    --
    SIGFEH
    1. Re:Force feedback... by AnalogBoy · · Score: 1

      Less accurate, in some cases. Current technology, as showcased on numerous shows on Discovery Health Channel, show that the current robot they use for liproscopic long distance surgery is able to translate less-precise actions made by the doctor into more-precise robotic movements. For instance, it eliminates slips and tremor.

  76. More applications of Smartdust by bear777 · · Score: 1

    There are more applications of Smartdust at http://basics.eecs.berkeley.edu/sensorwebs.

    The most salient feature is that the small size and capability for independent operations allow Smartdust motes to be used just about anywhere, to enhance/complement existing tools.

    --
    L'etat n'a pas besoin des savants.
    - Robespierre, refusing clemency for Lavoisier
  77. Back in my days at the BBS... by novakane007 · · Score: 1

    This isn't exactly a nifty new idea. I made one of these in Junior High. +) way to go nintendo. The glove on top of the frensel optic displays made descent a gut wrenching game!

    --

    WURD!!
  78. Just what I've been waiting for!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now my computer will _KNOW_ when I'm flipping it off!!!

  79. Feeding the trolls... by conebrid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hrm. I suppose that is all I'm really doing isn't it? Well, it felt good to say what I did anyway.

  80. Enough about power glove and middle finger jokes by kcomplex · · Score: 1

    I think something like this would be really cool for browsing with something like Opera. Just wave your hand and go back.

    How about Black and White anyone?

  81. clickety-clack by legLess · · Score: 2

    You might want to check out the SmartBoard by Data Desk. It's a nicely laid-out split keyboard with low-force mechanical keys. It's a little loud, but boy does it feel beautiful. The layout might look odd to begin with, but I found it very easy to adapt and I'm a fucking fast typist. Plus it's only $70, which in these days of cheap Microsoft Natural knock-offs and $300 UberErgo boards is a pretty good deal.

    --
    This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
  82. But can anyone bring it to market? by Sabalon · · Score: 2

    Over the last 10 years or so, I've seen tons of this lowend VR stuff try to pop-up and fizzle right away. The PowerGlove is about the only glove device - IIRC this is due to some patent that VPL has on "using a glove device for input".

    And there have been tons of 3d glasses that have come and gone - I've even got a video card in my machine that has a special hookup for 3d glasses and of course you can't find any.

    So, is there any chance of this stuff ever making it onto the shelves of Best Buy or CompUSA?

  83. Star Wars games. by Jarvo · · Score: 1

    Now you can really 'use the force' in star wars games!

    mmmmm Darth Vader's strangling gesture....

  84. Air guitar! Well no actually... by ectoraige · · Score: 1

    Lots of people posting comments about 'free-movement' gesture reading systems replacing keyboards, and being used as part of our day-to-day operation of computers. I beg to differ...

    I believe such a system to be unsuitable for non-specialised input.
    By this, I mean I can't see keyboards being replaced with 'free-movement' gesture readers.

    The reason for this is that, as human beings, we make a hell of a lot of unconscious gestures. It is very difficult to exert total self-control over your body - ask any cop who's been trained to spot lies. We tend to make the smallest gestures without thinking or realinsing it.

    For example, when you are typing an email, you probably pause between words, thinking of how to phrase a sentence, or even checking spelling in your head. As you pause, your fingers may tap lightly on the keyboard. The actual movements between 'thinking' on a key, and depressing the key, vary only in force and depth. If you were 'air-typing', the difference in depth would be negligible, and it could be very difficult to spot the force difference.

    The ability to obtain the high levels of self control required to avoid such a scenario would be, I fear, beyond the ability of most. It is true that surgeons, pilots, artists etc. all develop such a level of self-control or steady-handedness, but this is generally limited to the key moments when precision is called for.
    Have a look at the scrawl on your next doctor's prescription if you doubt me.

    One possibility would be to have a control gesture - one which toggles 'input mode' on and off. a control gesture would have to be complex, to avoid it's accidental execution. However, we would then have to train ourselves to wrap a and around all our subconscious movements. Which I think may require the skills of a few KGB hypnotists. Even in the best case, I think that most people would not put the effort in. Look at the decline of true touch-typists since the development of photocopiers and printers.

    When speculating on future technology, *sometimes* it's interesting to see what the science-fiction authors think about it. Most don't seem to go beyond the concept of 'touch screen' consoles, coupled with voice recognition. Earth: Final conflict, is about the most intersting. First, they do have those trendy holo-consoles, but still the operators have to 'touch' particular areas to do particular things. Secondly, one of the characteristics developed to make the Taelons appear alien is the high levels of self-control they display. Yet even they, with their peculiar gestures don't appear to apply this to input devices. This of course, doesn't prove anything, but it is interesting that nobody seems to have considered it viable.

    Anyway, I suspect that gesture based HCI systems are only really suited for specialist cases, generally when the gestures translate into another motion of some kind. Such systems will never be in general use as input devices.

    But gimme a Battlemech to control... :)

    --
    Vs lbh pna ernq guvf, ybt bss abj. Tb bhgfvqr. Syl n xvgr.
  85. Yeah man by Verne · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    let's see some force feedback on these puppies...

    --


    There are only two things in this world that smell like fish. And one of them's fish...
  86. Great! by lastninja · · Score: 1

    Now I can finally play realistic Rock-Paper-Scissors against the computer.

    --
    John Carmack fan, browsing at +5 since 1999.
  87. The Power Glove Lives.... by plagiarist · · Score: 1
    --begin shameless plug--
    b0timati0n.
    --end shameless plug--

    In this case, serial port, not parallel. Used in addition to the mouse (as opposed to a mouse replacement), by reverse engineering the bytes in the serial data stream and using the Director Serial Xtra.

  88. NES Glove by Buzzwang · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of a device for the Nintendo Entertainment System from like 10 or 15 years ago. It was a glove styled as a controller that didn't go over very well with the kids, so was discontinued. Later it was found that they were perfect for home-brew Virtual Reality systems. With a few bucks and some minor modifications, you'd connect it to the serial port on a PC and go to town. I had one that I modded, but I ended up destroying it when I moved a few years ago. It was pretty cool, glad to see the pro's doing it again.

    --
    Things you can say to your dog that you can't say to a girl: "How about a nice bone?"
  89. ...when he was in 5th grade? by schepers · · Score: 1

    Lanier was born in 1960. Inventing a data glove in 1971 when he was eleven, only shortly after the first mouse was built, would have been impressive indeed. ;)

    On the other hand (sorry), you're right to point out his idea. Though his working prototype for the Data Glove (the first of its kind) worked sorta like GPS, with various transceivers placed around the room (IIRC), he knew that it would ultimately have to use accelerometers, and provide haptic feedback for best use. It's just that the proper MEMS wouldn't be around for a couple of decades.

    Here's an interview with him about it.

    1. Re:...when he was in 5th grade? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 2


      "Sounds like what Jaron Lanier was doing 30 years ago"

      " Lanier was born in 1960. Inventing a data glove in 1971 when he was eleven, only shortly after the first mouse was built, would have been impressive indeed. ;) "


      OK, admittedly I exagerrated, and I should have said 'working on' , not 'doing.' was trying to remember back to 1991, when I read "Virtual Reality" in all fairness though.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    2. Re:...when he was in 5th grade? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Is this substantially different from Heinlein's waldos?

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  90. A Glove that Turns Gestures into Commands?!? by errxn · · Score: 1

    This was done at least 15 years ago with the release of the seminal Spinal Tap album Smell the Glove.

    Hello, Cleveland!

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
  91. Re: nice peace of hardware by Karoshi · · Score: 2, Informative

    Some more information can be found at the FAQ.
    And some images are located there:

    --
    Don't answer me. Moderate. Slashdot is about moderation, not discussion.
  92. slightly OT, but I've always wondered. by Vidmaster_Steve · · Score: 1
    Everybody and his mother's been bringing up the old Nintendo Power Glove when replying to this article.

    I'm curious, just how the hell did the old Nintendo Power Glove work?

    I've seen one once, in a pawn shop. I didn't have the 4 bucks to buy it, nor the old NES to operate it with.

    It appears to have to IREDs in the front, but these could very well simply be LEDs. Also, it has the (kickass) old square NES controller on top of it.

    So, anybody want to tell me how the hell this stupid thing worked? To me, it looks like you have to like, use the controller with your left hand only.

    My hypothesis, is that the little IRED/LEDs on the front, pick up the light emitted from the screen, much in the way that the old Zappers did, and moves your character sprite up/down/left/right as neccesary.

    Another amusing point, remember that stupid flick The Wizard, in which said asinie peripheral was a plot contrivance? I was about thiiis |--|close to being cast as the little autistic kid in said shameless, hour and a half Nintendo commercial.

    Much of the movie was shot in Garnderville and Mound House (NV), and the keen-eyed local will notice the casino floor and arcade at Sharkey's and the Pizza Barn and that one restarunt in Mound House that was recently a gay nightclub (called The Spectrum), and I think is now some "family dining" joint now (called something lame like Sugars or some crap, I dunno, shit, after I graduated from high school, I never gave Dayton and Moundhouse a second look). But then again, it was kinda cool going to middle and high school 2 miles from the world-famous Moonlight Bunny Ranch...

    But I ramble on, I'm good at that.

    Steve, out

    --
    Why is it when I hit ^R that ZSH calls me a cocksucker?
  93. Really... by Breace · · Score: 2

    Now you can really tell Windows what you think ...

    That would be like giving sight to the blind. I've yet to come up with wording to describe what I think when I use Windows. let alone a gesture that would do suffice. ;o)

  94. OpenCV may be the thing for you... by Eg0r · · Score: 1
    I'm not the AC you replied to (I wish I could play with stuff like that, though ;)...

    Have a look at this, though: Intel Open CV library. The guy has a "no glove approach" to gesture recognition.

    Especially, have a look at Gestscal.avi (AVI of detecting static hand position gestures using gradient histograms 5.1M) and of course the manual.

    Hope you find some ideas in there (the lib is opensource).

    --
    "Hasta la victoria siempre!" El Comandante
  95. Nothing new by Hasie · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a little company in Pretoria (in South Africa) called 5DT that has been producing data gloves that can be used as a mouse for quite a while now. Check out these links.
    Their homepage.
    Their hardware page (includes data gloves).
    One of the data glove pages.

    1. Re:Nothing new by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Ack! Gaa! Look at the prices! $500 for a glove, $1000 for a wireless version. And that's the budget glove! The good one is $3950/$4450 for the tethered/wireless versions.

      You have got to wonder exactly who they are selling these devices to. University research departments, probably. ;)

      That said, this is a really informative post. Thanks for it, I'm thinking good karma thoughts your way.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  96. Anyone else have a problem.... by diadem · · Score: 1

    glued to each fingernail

    Call me odd, but does anyone else have a problem gluing electronics to themselves? I may be old fassion, but it would make me feel just a little less human knowing they were on.

    Granted pacemakers and such are the norm, but those and similar devices are intended to replace broken parts, not enhance the body.

    --
    Liquid Gaming - Your daily dose of gaming news
    1. Re:Anyone else have a problem.... by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Ehh, like wearing seat belts, it'll be the generation that grows up with this that will look upon you as an oddball.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  97. Ah, rebooting made easy.... by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2

    Now in order to reboot Windows, all you have to do is flash your computer the bird.

    --

    GreyPoopon
    --
    Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

  98. WAIT A MINUTE!!! by skrowl · · Score: 1

    Did I have a powerglove with my Nintendo like 6 years ago? How is this new?

    --

    Prevent linux based DDOS's!
    http://linux.denialofservice.org/
  99. Can we please move on? by neowintermute · · Score: 1

    For god's sake it is not a virtual keyboard! We need interfaces that go beyond point and click, aka, point and grunt.

    Devices like this can bring us into the future where you can have many many gestures at your command, and have a rich language in your interface.

  100. Can You say AIR GUITAR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perfect for playing an air guitar. Or for other virtual instruments. I learned to play a clarinet in grade school, almost applied to a conservatory instead of going to college. It would be great to be able to put all those years of playing to use with the 'glove' to control a virtual instrument without having to learn how to play a keyboard.

    As an input for 3D graphics there is great potential. It would need a 'foot switch' to do mode changes from manipulation to keyboard modes.

    RB

  101. Medical Use? by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

    Could this tech be used for medical uses? Such as the way they are using robots to perform surgery from a distance. Could this lead to better control? I know it doesnt have any tactile feedback but for certain things it could work.

    Also, what about those who are crippled? If you have very limited movement of your arms/hands you could use these to move robotic arms or to control a computer. What about putting the sensors on their heads? I think the idea of using the glove mixed with a robotic arm would do wonders for those who can not even move enough to bring a drink to their own lips. Mix this with eye and head sensors and you really start things moving.

    --

    An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  102. Why use a glove? by MuValas · · Score: 1

    We've been doing optical gesture recognition tech for several years now. Funded by various grants from various organizations, we have one product (Use Your Head) that uses a normal USB camera (only on Windows though, sorry) and turns a person head motions into keystrokes. The intent of that product is to turn the normal head-bobbing and weaving seen by people playing FPSs into actual movements. It uses &lt 5% CPU and is completely customizable including sensitivity.

    If you want, check it out at:

    Main Gestures Site

    Use Your Head Site


    Ron Hay
    Turing Machinist
    Cybernet Systems Corp.

  103. I dont think you could tell window whatfor... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be against the EULA to write the code to interpret that particular gesture.

  104. The real use here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As computers move into voice recognition, this is ideal for those deaf computers out there.

  105. Typing on your fingers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tap your thumb with your fingers. Wear one smart dust (more like sand, really) on each nail. Your primary hand (right for most) taps out combinations for letters and numbers, your secondary hand (left) is for function/2nd keys (shift, mouse operation, ctrl, etc.) I think this would be much more usable/learnable than waving type gestures. Seems like the sharp deceleration of a tap would be more easily differentiated than pauses between gestures.

  106. Wonderful! by talks_to_birds · · Score: 1
    Add this to voice recognition, and soon offices everywhere will be filled with the sounds and sights of staff muttering odd phrases while performing odd contortions!

    WTF is wrong with a keyboard, anyway?

    (And yes! yes! yes! I *am* aware that some miniscule percentage of the population doesn't have hands...)

    Let's face it: *something* is wrong with just about *everybody* -- get over it and get on with life.

    t_t_b

    --
    I'm on PJ's "enemies" list! Are you?
  107. So Where's the Beowulf Post for the Smart Dust? by billstewart · · Score: 2

    I can't find the obligatory Beowulf post :-) It's actually applicable here - one of the more interesting things to do with Smart Dust and similar locator technologies is for them to talk to each other about where they are and to detect changes in their relative positions. It's not just a server thing. Vernor Vinge's book "A Deepness In The Sky" has a lot of discussion about what you could do with locator smart-dust; it's obviously speculative fiction, but it does a great job of looking at the potential for technology.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  108. Smart Dust and Vinge's "Deepness in the Sky" by billstewart · · Score: 2

    Vernor Vinge's book "A Deepness In The Sky" has a lot of discussion about what you could do with locator smart-dust; it's obviously speculative fiction, but it does a great job of looking at the potential for technology. Think about the effects of small (fictionally nanotech, but really small is probably enough) devices that communicate with their neighbors, have some computing power, and can do relative location detection. What could you do with that?

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  109. Gee, they're soo smart... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are doing 20yr old research and don't know when to use a gif/png instead of a jpg.

    http://bsac.eecs.berkeley.edu/~shollar/fingeracc /g estapp.jpg

    What is this? Am I supposed to be able to see something here?

  110. Not Haiku by vectro · · Score: 1

    You're missing the kigo. It's a senryu, not a haiku.