Slashdot Mirror


Loki Goes Postal

xwred1 writes: "Loki has announced a new port today, up to now known as "Secret Project Q": They are going Postal! Press release is here, and the game product page/overview is here. Seems to be a healthy sign of life from Loki, they are obviously still getting good things done despite the chapter 11."

192 comments

  1. Old Game? by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    IIRC Postal is very very old, either from the days of Windows 95 or earlier. Anyone know why Loki would pick something this aged up?

    Not that I've a problem with it; I was intrigued by POSTAL when it was first released and may now check it out when it is released.

    1. Re:Old Game? by Root+Down · · Score: 1

      IIRC Postal is very very old, either from the days of Windows 95 or earlier.

      It's not old, it's classic. Maybe they can port over versions of Commander Keen!

    2. Re:Old Game? by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      Umm... IIRC Postal was banned throughout the US and maybe other countries as well. After playing it I completely understood why it would be banned.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
    3. Re:Old Game? by drsoran · · Score: 1

      Maybe in 6 more years we may get a native port of Half-Life from Loki. :-)

    4. Re:Old Game? by joshua_doesnt_know · · Score: 1

      First of all I would like to say... Why not port this sucker? It's a fun game to mess with and doesn't involve any fancy 3D. And it isn't _that_ old. The date on it is 1997. You can read all about the controversy over here http://gopostal.com along with screenshots etc. It is funny how some people say we port "old games" but then theres this whole group of people asking us to port counter-strike/half-life which isn't exactly new.

    5. Re:Old Game? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Don't hold your breath :) Some loki guys and friends of Loki, I know for certain have been working on an interpreter for the text-based Keen games..

      The problem with doing a port of the later Keen games is that iD and 3DRealms can't get along. But who knows what the future holds?

    6. Re:Old Game? by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Main reason Loki hasn't ported Half-life is because of Valve... also I personally would be much more likely to purchase Postal then Half-life.

      Postal is one of those games that I REALLY wanted to buy when it came out, but it didn't run on linux. I'll finally have my chance !

  2. When I first seen this... by StarbuckZero · · Score: 0


    I was thinking it wouldn't be long before someone at Loki goes Postal.

    --
    From Zero to Hero... Starbuck Zero
  3. Postal by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

    Not sure about Postal Plus, but I ran Postal when it first came out on my Mac, and it was a bad game.

    It's good to see more games for Linux, but if they are bad games that no one wants, it's not that good of a thing. See when the bad game doesn't sell, then people will say that Linux won't support a game maker and you get into that spiral that Macintosh was in back in '96-'98.

    But maybe Postal Plus is better than regular Postal.

    1. Re:Postal by ackthpt · · Score: 2
      Understandably they've been working on this project for some time and couldn't anticipate the events of one month ago, still, I can't get into enjoying the idea of a splatterfest. I'm not sure how many other game players are now tuning out of such games, and it would be interesting to see a scientifically conducted poll (as much as these still have errors, they're more accurate than the average slash poll ;)

      These days I take out my stress with a different method of going Postal, by getting off my chair and hitting the road for a few dozen miles. The USPS has put a significant amount of money into sponsoring pro cycling and I think the efforts of Lance Armstrong, George Hincapie, Levi Leipheimer and team have gone a long way to boost moral and paint a more positive image of the Postal Service.

      Kind of a bummer that Loki didn't redo the art and make it something more appropriate for today, such as Catching Up With Bin Laden, but I suppose being in a Ch. 11 pickle they didn't have the bucks to cover the time and logistics.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Postal by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know what you thought was bad about it, besides it's overly simplistic "kill everything" objective.

      Don't say control. That's always bugged me when people bitch about Postal's control...it controls like an FPS, but is done in an overhead perspective. Why does it seem like I am the only person who can handle it?

      Anyhow, I like Postal.

    3. Re:Postal by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      "Going postal" is a term that is in use, and will be no matter what the USPS tries to do to "improve it's image." It now exists completely independent of any postal service.

      And what exactly does this game have to do with current events? Nothing. Just like every other movie or TV show or game or whatever that people are deeming "inappropriate," because they might frighten somebody...oooohhh... Please, give it a rest.

    4. Re:Postal by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I didn't like the graphics.

      I didn't like it, plus it's from late '97, kind of an old game for Loki to start publishing now.

    5. Re:Postal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can't say that I totally disagree with the people who called this one inappropriate. Not because I have issues with violence in video games (Aliens vs. Predator, one of the gorier FPSs, is my current favorite) but violence for its own sake was the only point of Postal. No mazes to escape, no humanity to save, not even any keys to find to open the door to the next level. Just a guy, a shotgun, a bunch of innocent civilians, wanton destruction and (given the time and technology) pretty realistically gruesome carnage.

      May be some people's idea of entertainment, but it sure ain't mine.

  4. Postal & Linux & Loki == Joy! by digitalmuse · · Score: 1

    Yaaay!
    I remember this one back in the day, and now we've got the double-header of it being ported to Linux and even more importantly, visable signs of life from Loki. Get out the good word and force your friends to pre-order this little jem. I spent many a night hunched over a screen, slaughtering mailmen and innocent bystandards.
    I wonder if they have toned down the gib-factor at all? Then again, with America's recent blood-lust, this may sell quite well.

    hmmm...

    --
    "If I wanted your input on my pet project, I'd stick my hand up your ass and use you like a sock-puppet." - Muse
    1. Re:Postal & Linux & Loki == Joy! by alkali · · Score: 1
      I wonder if they have toned down the gib-factor at all? Then again, with America's recent blood-lust, this may sell quite well.

      Actually, to the extent this was ever funny, it's less so now. There's a difference between cleverly subversive and pointlessly distasteful; "Postal" wasn't even close to the line. (And I did give it a try, once upon a time -- I d/l'ed the demo and played a game or two. I have a dark sense of humor, and this didn't make me smile, not once.)

      Don't get me wrong; I don't want Congress to pass a law or for Kyle's mom to march on Washington, etc. But at the end of the day, your time is more precious than you know; don't waste it on pretentious cooler-than-thou crap like Postal.

    2. Re:Postal & Linux & Loki == Joy! by zuvembi · · Score: 1

      I think my favorite level was "The Parade". Tossing a molitov cocktai into the middle of the band members or using the napalm launcher always amused me greatly. That and the protesters outside the gaming studio offices in the city.

      I'm definitely going to have to buy this one.

    3. Re:Postal & Linux & Loki == Joy! by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      You do not have a dark sense of humor. I laughed my balls off.

      And I don't see how it's pretentious. Do Running With Scissors pretend this game is anything other than what it is? Do they slap some ridiculous story on it to try and make it seem more interesting? If you want pretentious, try Final Fantasy, or Serious Sam. Where is the pretense with Postal?

    4. Re:Postal & Linux & Loki == Joy! by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      That is pretty much the only way to get them before they scatter.

    5. Re:Postal & Linux & Loki == Joy! by alkali · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to pick a fight, but your comment illustrates exactly why it's pretentious. "Look at me, I'm hipper and edgier than you, I 'get' it and you don't." I don't think there's anything to "get" in this game other than an extremely fleeting thrill of violating a taboo. RWS think they're being quite clever, but there's nothing really clever going on there.

    6. Re:Postal & Linux & Loki == Joy! by EvlPenguin · · Score: 1

      Also my favorite level.

      I never liked using the flamethrower or molotovs because it was just too easy (and back when I ran this on my 233 MHz Win95 box, it brought the thing down to around 3 FPS). Personally, I liked to place three or so timed mines set to detonate as the band members walked over them, then as they scatter whip out the automatic shotgun and MOW them down. "I can't feel my legs!"

      Ah... memories...

      --

      --
      #nohup cat /dev/dsp > /dev/hda & killall -9 getty
  5. Linux and Video by Wind_Walker · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Now that we're getting more OpenGL games than ever coming out for Linux, I think it might be a good time to address the problem of video card hardware support.

    Many of us don't have 3D accelerators that work under Linux. While I'd like to have my hardware working under Linux, I realize that it's probably not going to happen any time this millenium.

    So instead, I have a suggestion. Mesa currently has only one mode for software rendering--high quality. Is there any way that a low-quality software rendering mode could be introduced into Mesa? How difficult would it be to add this to the libraries, maybe have it switched on/off by an environment variable? How much of a slow-down would it introduce into the libraries, by having forked logic like this?

    Because honestly, if I were to buy a copy of Quake III right now (this example would work the same with Postal once it comes out), I'd have to buy the Windows version because I haven't the "right" hardware 3D-accelerator. A sped-up, but much less visually correct, version of Mesa might make it easier for someone like me to bite the bullet and buy the Linux version, so that when I upgrade/if I upgrade to a 3D accelerated card, I'll have it under the OS I prefer.

    (I realize this is pretty selfish, but it's also one of the reasons why you're not going to see many Windows users switching over to Linux any time soon. If I can't install Linux on someone else's 600Mhz Athalon, and be able to show them a kick-ass 3D game with a frame rate higher than 1.5/s...)

    1. Re:Linux and Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what exactly are you trying to run? Most anything nVidia makes is supported, and that's almost all there is out there. I know my Savage4 supports Mesa fine. Unless you're running something old, you shouldn't really have this problem.

    2. Re:Linux and Video by eddison_carter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you mean "most Windows users" or "most Windows gamers" ? Most gamers will have a decent 3d card, and most of the "major" cards (Nvidia, ATI, Matrox, 3dfx) will work, at least most of the time. The Kyro chips will probally have support
      soon too.
      As for a "low-quality" software rendering, what do you mean? Less detail, lower resolution? Its not really possible to have lower detail levels then whats in the game, and you can't run a game in less then the lowest resolution the game supports. Most of what you're looking for could only be done in the game's code itself, and to be honest, mean, cruel, blunt (whatever you want to call it), if you don't have a 3d card, you're pretty far off from the target audience for a 3d game. Games need to constantly be innovative and use new technology, and that needs more 3d power. Basicly, a 3d card thats 2 years old (or more) should be replaced if you want to play the latest 3d games. The good news is that the price of cards goes down as well, so you can get a still decent but 6 month old card for a lot less then what it would have cost new. If 3d is annoying you enough, you could (probally) find a decent 3d card for ~ $50-100, or a pretty good card for ~ $100-125.

      --
      I always prefer to start the year off with a bang - or, to be more precise, a series of loud hums, a crackle or two, and
    3. Re:Linux and Video by adewolf · · Score: 0

      I have a Sony C1VN with a ATI Mobility M1 and 8 MB VRAM. I am able to run all the OpenGL games under linux (except Tribes 2 is really slow). True I have to use X 3.3.6 and UTAH-GLX, but it works, on this low-end 3D card.The X developers are working on PCI DRI support for Mach64 chips for 4.X releases of X. I can't get Winders to do the same.
      Alex DeWolf

      --
      "The Brady Bunch is back...working homicide"
    4. Re:Linux and Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just bought Quake III for Linux (wow), and you can download the files from a website (address is in the documentation) to run it on Windows. So, if you are thinking of buying Quake III, get the Linux version (in a metal box).

    5. Re:Linux and Video by httptech · · Score: 1
      I found a 16M AGP nVidia Riva TnT 128 card on Pricewatch a few months ago for $29. Using nVidia's XFree86 driver, here is the output of the Mesa "gears" demo running on a Linux 2.4/XFree86 4.1.0/Celeron 800 system:

      At default 256x256 DRI window size:
      4253 frames in 5.000 seconds = 850.600 FPS

      Full screen (DRI windowed) 1024x768
      589 frames in 5.000 seconds = 117.800 FPS

      Obviously the frame rate numbers aren't going to be as high in Quake as in a simple demo, and this is not the ultimate "gamer" card, but still, that's a lot of bang for 29 bucks, and would be very acceptable for your average user.

    6. Re:Linux and Video by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Go to ebgames.com
      Buy Q3T for 9.99
      Spend the rest on a Voodoo2 card and join the 3D revolution.

      Less than $79.00 and you are 3D gaming.
      Get an ATI Rage 128 for even less money.
      (Note these are for PCI or AGP cards)

      Today there is no excuse for not having a decent 3D card, unless you spent that money on a 3Dlabs card and then discovered it isnt linux supported.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Linux and Video by vecna_99 · · Score: 1

      Games need to constantly be innovative and use new technology, and that needs more 3d power.

      no they don't. games need to be fun to play, engaging, challenging, well-written, and able to run on hardware that the average user owns.

      consider that Star Trek Voyager: Elite Force game. it featured "innovative" extensions of the Q3 engine that required more 3d power.

      was it a better game than, say, Thief, or Oni, or even hoary old Aliens vs. Predator? no! it was a truly moronic room-by-room shoot-the-enemies game, with a thin veneer of star trek sprayed over the outside. possibly the only redeeming feature of the entire game was the fact that for some inexplicable reason, you had the option of playing the entire thing in German, with subtitles.

      more 3d does not a better game make. more 3d wealthier hardware manufacturers makes. the widespread failure of gamers to realize this fact, and then to force game designers to change their priorities, is in no small part responsible for the general suckage of the current PC gaming scene.

      -vecna_99

      --
      --- "We also were guided by the unlikelihood that anyone would face supernatural evil armed only with technology."
    8. Re:Linux and Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that Voodoo2 is really cutting edge. I hear they make a great card for your old 486 in the closet.

    9. Re:Linux and Video by joshua_doesnt_know · · Score: 1

      This game requires NO 3d. And, if you read the specs it hardly requires a Pentium to run. Score 5? I would say this is offtopic, and the person didn't read the product page to boot.

    10. Re:Linux and Video by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      Postal doesn't require 3D accelleration. (I'm not even sure it can take advantage of it)

    11. Re:Linux and Video by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      It is on topic if the topic includes linux and gaming.

      But yeah, seriously...

    12. Re:Linux and Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what card do you have that runs quake3 in windows but not linux?

      linux has 3d support for damn near every important 3d card out there. all nvidia, 3dfx, ati, matrox... what else is there?

    13. Re:Linux and Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic? Article about games and #d acceleration... Post answer about said question it's maked as offtopic?

      Only a true Dookie eater would mark that as offtopic...

      America at war topic, posting about american war, -1 offtopic...

      typical slashdot...

    14. Re:Linux and Video by EvlPenguin · · Score: 1

      Hey, the lack of support for my Voodoo 3 3000 was just enough motivation for me to put down the money for a GeForce II Ultra. >:)

      See, a lack of support can be a good thing...

      --

      --
      #nohup cat /dev/dsp > /dev/hda & killall -9 getty
    15. Re:Linux and Video by eddison_carter · · Score: 1

      Well, to be honest, I didn't quite make that point earlyier. Sure, in many cases, a game thats pure eye candy is not as much fun as a game thats got a lot of depth, but older graphics. But I'd say both are important, if you make a game with the proper mix of good graphics and good gameplay, you have a classic. Look at a games like System Shock 2, Deus Ex, or Max Payne, more powerfull 3d can be good for gamers. Then again, look at all the crappy 3d shooters that came out, and it seems bad. The key here is to buy games from a place that lets you return them if they suck, or at least try the demo and read a review or 2 first.

      --
      I always prefer to start the year off with a bang - or, to be more precise, a series of loud hums, a crackle or two, and
    16. Re:Linux and Video by deano · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I've got a Matrox g400, and I've never been able to get the 3d support to stick, under any version of X... Dualhead has been similarly elusive. I think the guy's original point is this: Windows users only have to worry about in-game tweaking to improve their output... On Linux, you usually need to hand-recompile your kernel, get it wrong 4-5 times, and lose sound support just to get it right. Linux gaming will happen when 3-d is considered as important as basic 2-d graphic support as a 'built-in', need-to-have functionality.

      --
      http://www.shonenjump.com The world's most popular manga, now in English!
    17. Re:Linux and Video by dinivin · · Score: 1

      Wow... You had to recompile your kernel, got it wrong 4-5 times, and lost sound support in an effort to get 3d going? Funny, all I did was download some tarballs from the Matrox website, type make install, and restarted X.

      Dinivin

    18. Re:Linux and Video by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Most of what you're looking for could only be done in the game's code itself, and to be honest, mean, cruel, blunt (whatever you want to call it), if you don't have a 3d card, you're pretty far off from the target audience for a 3d game

      not really...A lot of people I know who buy games don't have 3d cards -- right now, myself included (I'm using a laptop as my main system, so no 3d card), not to mention that a lot of relatively old cards can't even play todays games (UT only works on new cards -- the ATI rage LT doesn't run it except in software mode)

      I'd say that the ultra hardcore gamer who bought a new card in the last few months are a minority compared to the people who have crappy computers yet still play games.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    19. Re:Linux and Video by tkanerva · · Score: 1

      i'd like to point out that the current crop of 2.4 kernels wants AGPGART with drm on r128 so I cannot use my Powerbook's ATI Mobility M3 for OpenGL acceleration. the same problem with PCIGART, it isn't (yet?) supported, so our Celeron system with a PCI-based Radeon doesn't do 3d either in XFree86 4.1.0 ... now you might want to ask why use PCI-based graphics cards, but the system is a specially designed one and accomodates more than 1 graphics controller, that's why PCI.

      --
      still running a x86? dinosaurs do exist!
  6. shame about the webserver though by hkon · · Score: 1

    Let's all jump on the webpage so that Loki's gotta use what little cash they have left to buy a new webserver....
    Nothing to see there anyway. If it doesn't have screenshots, it's worth nothing :)

    1. Re:shame about the webserver though by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yea. I couldn't faind any screenshots anywhere...

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  7. Updated? by dopplex · · Score: 1

    Since I understand that Postal is a tad aged (circa 1998 IIRC), and the name of the game is Postal Plus, rather than simply Postal, is it possible that the version of the game that we see on Linux could be significantly updated from the 1998 version? For my money, I'd love to see a commercial entertainment package with mainstream appeal that comes out for Linux and not Windows...

    --
    "You can take our lives, but you can never take our Flerbage!!!!"
    1. Re:Updated? by NineNine · · Score: 1

      For my money, I'd love to see a commercial entertainment package with mainstream appeal that comes out for Linux and not Windows...


      Basic economics dictate that this will never happen.

    2. Re:Updated? by FortKnox · · Score: 1

      True, but to release on Linux a few days or a week before the windows version would boost the Linux userbase. Especially for highly anticipated games (ie - Starcraft 2)

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  8. this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by ebbv · · Score: 5, Insightful


    as much as i love loki and all they've done, this is not a good sign. i'd love to see loki become as successful as any of the really big game houses. porting old, mediocre (at best) games is not how it's going to happen. even i have a limit to the number of games i'll buy that i have no intention of playing just to support the company.

    loki should be porting diablo 2, planescape torment, total annihilation, warcraft 3, etc. big, mainstream games that lots of people want to play. the question is, why aren't they? that's almost certainly due to the original authors not being interested in a linux version.

    as much as i hate to admit it, i think linux's chances as a game platform have gone down the drain. the linux hype has gotten considerably less prevelant, and i'm willing to bet there are fewer people running it as their main home OS than in recent memory and that number is only going down.

    there have not been any major improvements in this area which would draw people to it recently.. ease of installation hit the point where anyone able to install windows could do it a while ago. however, once the system is up and running, it's not so easy to get new things (like Mesa) set up. this has not improved.

    and as i said, it's been a while since a big game was ported to linux.

    all in all i don't see any light at the end of this tunnell. it pains me to say so because i've been using linux as my main desktop OS for years and years and always was really optimistic about it.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by BradleyUffner · · Score: 4, Insightful
      ..."big, mainstream games that lots of people want to play. the question is, why aren't they? that's almost certainly due to the original authors not being interested in a linux version. "
      Thats' easy, it's a licensing issue. If they decide to port a new game who gets the money for it? The orriginal authors, or Loki? If Loki gets the money for it then the orriginal author ends up not making as much money for the windows version because of sales lost to the linux version. If the orriginal author gets the money then Loki loses out. If the money is split then the orriginal author still end up not making as much money.
    2. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      the linux hype has gotten considerably less prevelant, and i'm willing to bet there are fewer people running it as their main home OS than in recent memory and that number is only going down.

      I recently broke down and got a computer for home (I work with/on them all day, and have resisted for years). I set it up with Linux because I don't feel like giving MS any of my cash, and I believe that pirating their software is hypocritical. Part of this decision was that I felt that Linux has gotten to the point where it was useable as a main home OS.

      When I first set up the system, my son wanted to know how we were going to run Red Alert on it. My wife wanted to know how we were going to do word processing, etc. on it.

      Then, just in the nick of time, along comes the StarOffice 6.0 beta, and Loki ports some of their games!

      OK, StarOffice has some bugs, and the Loki games aren't all necessarily the ones that my son wants to play, but it is a move in the right direction. My family is now far less sceptical about Linux, and are starting getting enthusiastic about it. Keep it up Loki and Sun. I can feel the momentum starting to build up...

    3. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by vecna_99 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i couldn't disagree more. i don't want diablo ii ported to linux because i've already played it on my mac, and discovered that it more or less sucks. same with TA. haven't played planescape torment, so i can't comment on that.

      it's pure folly for the linux game market to try to compete head-to-head with the PC game market; there's no reason why your average gamer would buy the same big mainstream game for linux when he can buy it for windows.

      here are the priorities that loki should adopt:

      1) port games that are mod-friendly and have a thriving mod community! we already have Q3 and UT. how about Bungie's Myth or Myth II? what about Half-Life?
      loki should have a decent shot at getting companies to license ports of these games, mostly because they're all older games and are no longer a major revenue source for the owners.

      2) port GOOD games that fail in the PC market due to insufficient promotion. it must be very frustrating for the owner of a game see the game sell poorly because everybody's buying this year's Tribes 2 instead. these games will be good opportunities for Loki to take advantage of.
      (Postal, incidentally, falls into this category. for such a simple game, it's loads of fun. i played the demo for more hours than i've played two or three other games combined.)

      as long as the linux gaming experience is just a clone of the PC gaming experience, it'll never flourish. while it's important to have good linux ports of popular network-only games, so linux gamers can attend LAN parties, the world of linux gaming should be a new lease on life for high-quality games that weren't pushed hard enough by their publishers.

      -vecna_99

      --
      --- "We also were guided by the unlikelihood that anyone would face supernatural evil armed only with technology."
    4. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by rutherford · · Score: 1

      @ebbv: This is not completely true what you say. There are still improvements especially in the sector you criticize. Look at the latest Mandrake release. It autodetects your graphic card and installs Xfree/Mesa/DRI correctly. You can play 3D Games just after the start. Or the new SuSE 7.3 it has easy configuration utilities for Scanners and TV-Cards which is also important for the desktop.
      The real problem I see are the recent layoffs of the DRI crew from VA Linux. There is no one left to pay for the extremely difficult 3D driver development. Perhaps it would be good to establish a possibility for users to fund the DRI project.

    5. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by Jburkholder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >that's almost certainly due to the original authors not being interested in a linux version.

      I think it depends on how the license/port is arranged financially, who assumes the risk and who pays who for what, no?

      If the original author (publisher, really) hires Loki at a fixed price to make a port, and then assumes the risk of making a return on that expense by selling x copies of the Linux version, then yes - I agree with your point. (and Loki would have a much more successful business as they would get paid for their work regardless of how successful a Linux version was).

      However, that isn't what I read into the way they do business from the article on thier bankruptcy filing a little while ago. I seem to recall that they pay a fixed licensing fee to the owner/publisher of the game, then they port the game and take the risk of selling x copies in order to make a profit on the money they have laid out. (Carmack said a lot of the money Loki owes is to id).

      In that case, the high cost of obtaining a license for current titles such as Diablo 2, warcraft 3, etc is going to prevent Loki from taking on a port, not the author's interest. (afterall, the author gets paid up front.)

    6. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by woggo · · Score: 2
      port games that are mod-friendly and have a thriving mod community! we already have Q3 and UT. how about Bungie's Myth or Myth II?

      Myth2 for Linux has been available for a LONG time (see here), and is currently available for $6.99 from ebgames.com. It's a good game, and Loki has written an OpenGL renderer for it as well (the windows version is either Glide or software, IIRC)

    7. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      As always, the proof (for or against) will be in the sales figures.

      It doesn't matter to me that the game is "old"; I'm going to buy it. And not because I want to support Loki. I'm going to buy it because I remember the amusing hype concerning Postal, but I never got to play it.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    8. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      Remember this is not a religion or principle we are talking about here but just another product.
      You bought computer and installed OS that doesn't have games your son wanted and doesn't do stuff your wife wanted and you call it a good start ?

    9. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 1

      I think this stems from the fact that in the gaming world, PC games are at the bottom of the heap.

      Games like Zelda 64 sell in the *millions*, where an outstanding selling game like diablo for the PC is proud to sell a million, period.

      IMHO, the problem is the envelope that games 'have' to push to make it big in the PC market. Of course, this envelope leads to users purchasing more hardware, and less games, so only the 'big' games sell.

      The guy who buys the $300 console has a good 2-3 years to just spend his money on GAMES. Of course, this doesn't even account for the disgustingly *HUGE* rental market which accounts for a good portion of these sales. As you may recall, PC software titles have a lot of laws surrounding them which restrict rentals (if not ban them outright, IANAL).

      How much do you think people are going to spend to see DOOM 3 on their computer, not counting the price of software alone? Frankly, if it weren't for games, I have a nice k6-300 that works as a workstation rather well, it's gotten to a point where cutting-edge hardware just isn't required for the average user.

      And for those who are 'out of the loop', a cutting-edge graphics card starts at around $250, a processor/mobo around $200 (if you buy AMD), and RAM around $70/256M DDR. If I bought my $300 console, I could get at least 6 games plus the console for that price.

    10. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by Rix · · Score: 1

      and as i said, it's been a while since a big game was ported to linux.

      Wolfenstien 3D was, what, 2 weeks ago?

    11. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by tmark · · Score: 2

      By this argument we should see Linux ports of Karateka, Ancient Art of War, and Lemonade coming out from Loki very shortly.

    12. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Loki needs support right now. Bypass the liquidator and buy direct.

    13. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2
      I think this stems from the fact that in the gaming world, PC games are at the bottom of the heap.

      Actually, where I think Loki would do best would be to build, say, a Playstation or Playstation2 emulator port for Linux. I'd pay a reasonable chunk of money to get access to the comparatively huge library of games (both purchase AND rental) on my Linux box.

      "Postal" seems like a bad choice for Loki, to me. Glad I got my copy of Kohan now, while Loki's still in business. If they're spending their precious money on "Postal" I can't say that I'm real confident their next few offerings are likely to be popular enough to pull them out of their slump...

    14. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by joshua_doesnt_know · · Score: 1

      It isn't a matter of what to port, its who will let us port it! Do you people all forget that we did Tribes2 at the same time as the windows version? Kohan, similar deal.

    15. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by GiMP · · Score: 1

      I already told my fiancee' that she will be running linux, at least with dual-boot or on her second computer.

      I also sort of "forced" linux on my sisters.. of course they don't play many games. They were annoyed because their AOL Instant Messager in linux (gaim) didn't look identical to the advertisement-laden windows version. They were annoyed by some other things, like the high-quality 16bit anti-aliased icons which didn't look identical to the 8bit ones in Windows.

      They realized it was better, but it was different and it took them time. But considering their hardware and their expectations, Windows just wouldn't cut it. Their harddrive was too small to fit any windows applications on, as commercial software and drivers are bloated.

      BTW: I personally use linux for my gaming boxen and FreeBSD for my workstations and servers.

    16. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Loki already ported Myth 2, and (AFAIK) all the mods work with it. (The ones I've tried have, anyways.)


      Loki also ported SoF, Tribes 2, and Heretic 2, all three of which have active mod communities.


      The problem with AAA titles (you know, like Diablo 2) is that they cost LOTS of money to secure. Betcha that the current Linux consumers aren't buying enough to recover the costs...

    17. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by Cyno · · Score: 1


      I couldn't agree with you more. Linux IS ready for the gaming market. Currently many distributions are adding the finishing touches to configure 3D graphics correctly. However with XFree86 4.0, DRI and Mesa are integrated into the X window system, making it nearly as easy as windows to configure. You have to edit a text file, /etc/X11/XF86config-4, preferrably with vi, but it isn't as hard as you think and soon there will be GUI configuration tools to do all the work for you.

      Linux isn't targetted at the mainstream gaming market. It doesn't need to be. It has support for the latest graphics hardware and all the free libraries and tools you need to build your own games.

      My favorite things about Linux gaming are you don't have to deal with all that copyright bullshit and 99.9% of the time your game will run stably and NOT take out your OS if it decides to crash. What I meant about the copyright stuff is all the games I've purchased from Loki don't require you to insert the CD to play the game, as long as you do a full install. They don't even require you to grab an illegal patch off the net or anything. They run directly off your harddrive. Even Tribes 2 or UT do this. My CDRW will last at least twice as long if I only have to use it for installs and burns instead of reading constantly whenever I play my games. That alone is worth the wait. I guess I'll just have to suffer and play Quake 3, UT, Tribes 2, Postal, Alpha Centauri, Descent 3, Heretic, Rune, Civ 3, Deus X, etc. until Linux is finally recognised as a gaming platform.

    18. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by joshua_doesnt_know · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it isnt even about the high cost. Blizzard is not interested in having linux ports... period. They do not see it as profitable and hence, it won't happen! It's not like we go around picking games out of the blue and porting them. These things have to be arranged beforehand and even if we try, sometimes we cant port a game.
      Half-Life or Any Blizzard Game are not and will not be ported to linux, so please stop asking. Go help improve wine to run these games if you really want them.

    19. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by IpalindromeI · · Score: 1

      Actually it was principle. If you would perhaps read a post you reply to, you'd see that he said he went for Linux instead of Windows because he didn't want to support Microsoft, on principle. It may surprise you, but sometimes people care about what the company behind a product does and how it acts, and don't just take the products at face value.

      --

      --
      Promoting critical thinking since 1994.
    20. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      Please read my post again and perhaps you will understand that issue is precisely what I responded to.

    21. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      "Their harddrive was too small to fit any windows applications on, as commercial software and drivers are bloated. "

      I am not claiming that Linux is not usable or anything, just that , at this point, Windows is much better OS for most of people.
      BTW.
      Sorry, but I refuse to believe that running X is less resource intensive than running Win32 OS (Win 95 etc)
      It has been my experience that on the same hardware Windows consistently outperforms Linux as far as GUI responsiveness and overall feel of graphical environment is concerned.

    22. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by On+Lawn · · Score: 2

      Lemonade need not be ported. It runs well under Apple ][ emulation.

      I played that game for hours until my older brother (a mathmatician) figured out the optiman prices for every condition. It wasn't fun any more.

    23. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by GiMP · · Score: 1

      Well, that often depends on one's window manager.. And although X is a resource hog, some applications for X are just less bloated then the Windows counterparts.

      X isn't for everyone, nor is Windows. But I see no advantage in using windows for anything.. but maybe I'm just an arrogant bastard :)

    24. Re:this is neither healthy nor a sign of life by vecna_99 · · Score: 1

      i'd pay $10-$15 for a solid linux port of AAoW. i might even go as high as $30 for bundled Starflight/Starflight II (with, of course, reproductions of the galactic maps and the code wheel).

      plus, it seems to me that Loki should be able to crank out titles like these in next to no time. these games must be much less complex than modern titles, and i can't imagine the publishers would charge exorbitant prices for the right to port.

      -vecna_99

      --
      --- "We also were guided by the unlikelihood that anyone would face supernatural evil armed only with technology."
  9. I do not understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not understand what the .... this Go Postal thing is all about!!

    It is explained neither on Slashdot nor on Loki's website nor on www.gopostal.com .

    Is anybody going to inform us what it's all about? :)

  10. Signs of life... by Hagabard · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Seems to be a healthy sign of life from Loki, they are obviously still getting good things done despite the chapter 11.

    A port of a three year old game does not look healthy to me. Perhaps we can soon expect a port of Commander Keen?

    1. Re:Signs of life... by Jethro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know, I might actually buy a CD with Linux ports of all the ol' Apogee games. Maybe if they had the graphics updated a bit. I think that'sa wonderful idea.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    2. Re:Signs of life... by kdgarris · · Score: 2

      Yeah, how about Cosmo's Cosmic Adventure? That one was a blast. :-)

      -Karl

    3. Re:Signs of life... by dangermouse · · Score: 2
      Hear, hear!

      Port 'em to SDL or something, maybe bundle 'em with a Gravis analog joystick (or gamepad, if that was your thing).

      I'd drop $50 pretty happily for a disc with native ports of the Keen games.

    4. Re:Signs of life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can expect a port once John Romero finally releases the source code.

    5. Re:Signs of life... by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      I'd buy a CD full of old Amiga Ports, I.E. the entire Bitmap brothers and Team 17 efforts (not to mention others). And you don't even need to update the graphics!

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
  11. Why Postal? by Anixamander · · Score: 1

    Postal was a decent game...I played it on the mac and quite enjoyed it, especially the holiday expansion pack ("Don't shoot Santa!") but I have to think Loki is doing this to raise their PR level...even bad PR is good PR when you're stuck in chapter 11.

    Or perhaps its just a harbinger of things to come from their programmers.

    --
    Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball(TM)
  12. corect, however by ebbv · · Score: 1


    if they truly believed they could make *any* money they'd do it. it's very hard to make money with games, the margins for the authors and publishers are smaller than most people realize.

    the issue is they do not believe there is even a market, and right now i tend to agree. (that was the point of my post, sorry if i wasn't totally clear.)
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:corect, however by Genom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's basically a catch-22 -- game developers want to make games using the latest and greatest hardware support - hardware manufacturers release windows-only drivers, and refuse to release either a linux driver, or the specs by which a third party could release a linux driver.

      So the hardware doen't perform to it's full potential under linux. Game developers see that there's no support for the hardware - and don't develop the software.

      Places like Loki are doing what they can with the games they can. I'll agree, though, that they could have better choices of games. IMHO the concentration should be on successful, long-lasting games - games that a year after release still have a large following. Games like Diablo II, the Baldur's Gate games, Starcraft, Everquest, etc... Those are the kinds of games that will sell well. Those are the kinds of games a lot of people are still playing - and quite a few of those people dual-boot to linux. I'd gladly pay for a linux version of Diablo II or Baldur's Gate II -- right now they're the only reasons I boot back to Windows.

      There *is* a market out there - they're just hitting it with the wrong games.

  13. In case you didn't notice their home page... by Outland+Traveller · · Score: 2, Informative

    It clearly says on Loki's web site that Tribes2 and Deus Ex are in the works. How much more mainstream can you get? I've been playing Heavy Gear II for the past few days and think that it is very impressive under linux.

    1. Re:In case you didn't notice their home page... by dinivin · · Score: 4, Informative


      Tribes 2 is done and out... You can order it from any of Loki's usual distributors.

      Dinivin

    2. Re:In case you didn't notice their home page... by skepticult · · Score: 1

      Continually porting the big games of the year from a year other than the current one isn't going to be a big money maker. The people who really wanted to play the latest "big" game have probably already played it on a windows box. For the people that didn't play it on another platform, it's probably no longer (if it was ever) on their priority list. Loki is the dollar movie theatre of the gaming world.

    3. Re:In case you didn't notice their home page... by PapaZit · · Score: 2
      Tribes 2 is done and out

      Yes, it is. Don't get it if you're using a 3dfx card unless you enjoy updating significant chunks of your video software from CVS. At least, that was the situation when it came out.

      Tribes 2 was enlightening for me. I enjoy using Linux. In fact, I provide Linux support as part of my job (and I still enjoy Linux ;). I spent weeks getting it working properly. Aadmittedly, I was only spending a little bit of time on it each day, but I knew what I was doing and it took a while. For a user who's just taken the Linux plunge, perhaps using a burned copy of Red Hat 6.2 (7.x is still suckful, and a new user's likely to grab an old version from the bargain bin anyway), I sure as hell wouldn't want to talk them through the steps they'd have to follow to run the game. In fact, before I had it working under Linux, I'd given up and purchased the Windows version to play until I could un-kink the Linux version.

      It was the first time in a while that I stopped and said "This is why people aren't buying linux games."

      I think it's good that Loki's staying away from 3d acceleration right now. It's the latest trend in games, but 3d under Linux is still growing too fast for "normal users" to keep up.

      --
      Forward, retransmit, or republish anything I say here. Just don't misquote me.
    4. Re:In case you didn't notice their home page... by dinivin · · Score: 1


      Well, given that 3dfx cards (and their linux drivers) were never all that great to begin with (under XFree86 4.*) when 3dfx was alive, I certainly wouldn't expect them to be any better now that 3dfx is dead.

      Dinivin

    5. Re:In case you didn't notice their home page... by Muggins+the+Mad · · Score: 2

      >
      > [Tribes 2]
      >
      > It was the first time in a while that I >stopped and said "This is why people aren't
      >buying linux games."

      I bought Tribes 2 for windows a little while back, unaware that the Linux version was available.

      I've *still* been unable to get it working on
      Windows. Lots and lots of patches from Sierra
      later it still crashes 4 or 5 minutes into the game.

      I suspect T2 is a poor example :)

      I've stopped buying Sierra games as a result anyway. I'm
      undecided if this includes Loki or not.

      - MugginsM

  14. these are good steps by ebbv · · Score: 1


    actually i hadn't seen those, and they will help.. but i do still worry why they are wasting time and resources on a game like postal.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:these are good steps by joshua_doesnt_know · · Score: 1

      Our coders lost a whole week or two porting this...

  15. Porting Postal is a good portent? by dave-fu · · Score: 1

    Give me a break. For an independent release 4-ish years ago, it was playable. Which isn't by any stretch of the imagination to say that it was "good".
    Lavishing praise on the re-release of a tired old second-rate-even-in-its-primetime game is no way to woo Joe Everyday User to install Linux on his computer.

    --
    Easy does it!
    This comment has been submitted already, 276865 hours , 59 minutes ago. No need to try again.
  16. agreed by ebbv · · Score: 1


    but the market is smaller than it could be, and i think it is shrinking instead of growing, mainly because Mesa is non-trivial to install and set up for most people, and as you point out, hardware support is not the best.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  17. Postal sucks and Loki is screwed by Schnapple · · Score: 1

    I played this game a long time ago - it was BAD. It's akin to saying "we got the rights to Daikatana!"

    For that matter, it's a sign Loki is going away, if this is as good as they can do. Most recent popular games either don't want to touch Linux, want to port the games themselves, or just don't want to go through another publisher.

    Part of Loki's problem is the intentional segregation. It was originally impossible to patch Quake 3 Windows to the Linux version, and the Linux and Mac versions were sold separately. Loki's tactics were intended to get them the money they were due and to gauge Linux support. However, it didn't work - Linux copies sold a tiny fraction of the number sold. Loki blamed it on most Linux users also being Windows dual-booters and that they settled on the Windows version and could wait for the patch. Furthermore, Loki's contract only allow for binary patches (which are a pain apparently) and make it so that the developer is paying the publisher (instead of the ideal vice versa).

    Couple that with the fact that we have a company whose lone claim is that they're trying to make money off of a free operating system with freeloading users and the fact that the best they can do in most cases is to port old tired games (and the occasional Quake engine title) and it's doom for Loki.

    Had they been smart they would have ported Half-Life, negotiating that deal at any cost.

    Schnapple

    1. Re:Postal sucks and Loki is screwed by Svartalf · · Score: 4, Interesting


      "Part of Loki's problem is the intentional segregation. It was originally impossible to patch Quake 3 Windows to the Linux version, and the Linux and Mac versions were sold separately. Loki's tactics were intended to get them the money they were due and to gauge Linux support. However, it didn't work - Linux copies sold a tiny fraction of the number sold. Loki blamed it on most Linux users also being Windows dual-booters and that they settled on the Windows version and could wait for the patch. "

      Originally impossible? Yes and no. The Q3A Windows versions weren't patchable until the Linux version shipped. When it shipped, Id offered the downloads- and it was all she wrote for the Linux version. Had they NOT offered a "patch" (or delayed it even further...), while it was not in keeping with their philosophy with prior games, it would have helped the sales of the game on the Linux front.

      Also, as an attempt to gauge Linux gaming support, it was a failure, less due to there not being support and more due to the patch being out and a severe lack of physical avaialability of the game in the storefronts. When it shipped, I tried to purchase the game- in one of the largest software markets in the country and one of the largest Linux userbases in the country and in the world (Dallas, TX). I couldn't- at least not off of a store shelf. Why? Because the retailers that were supposed to stock it on the shelves didn't. The ones that did deliberately choked off sales by not stocking anywhere near enough (6-10 copies on the shelf of a release such as this doesn't cut it and insisting on taking pre-paid orders for more isn't any better) and by the time one of the stores had enough in stock (Fry's) the damage was already done.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    2. Re:Postal sucks and Loki is screwed by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong but I remember the deal was that the patch wasn't available until after Christmas (after buying season, in other words) so that it wouldn't cannibalize sales. Loki's lack of distribution abilities (compared with Activision's anyway) hurt that quite a bit.

      At the time I was working at a Babbage's and we had the occasional person looking for the Linux port of "X" and what out manager told them (as was told to him by corporate) was that Babbage's had carried the Linux port of "Civilization: Call to Power" and it didn't sell for shit, and neither did a box of Quake 2 ports of the mission packs and such, so carrying a port of game "X" was unlikely. It seemed stupid to me - CtP wasn't a big seller for Windows, either, plus a lowsy game all around, and anyone who wanted to play Quake 2 in Linux had done so before they came out with in in a box, but this is the logic Bean Counters go by and it's hard to argue with.

      I walked into Half Price Books the other day and I saw dozens of copies of Quake 3 and Soldier of Fortune for Linux at $10 each. I guess this is where Loki ports go when they die.

      Schnapple

    3. Re:Postal sucks and Loki is screwed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Had they been smart they would have ported Half-Life, negotiating that deal at any cost.


      Wouldn't work -- Valve CANCELLED the Mac port when it was almost done. They don't want a Linux version (or, for that matter, any non-Windows version).


      No matter how good you think HL is, buying it is supporting one of MS's most ardent supporters -- and one that is actively trying to destroy non-Windows platforms.


      DON'T support Valve.

  18. Yeah, sure... by Cave+Dweller · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's great and all, but why is there a "Five Star Adult Dating - Amour - Sexy Chat" banner on that page?

    Hrm..

    1. Re:Yeah, sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They gotta make money somehow, what with the size of the linux market and all

  19. Has less to do with 3D support and more to do... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    ...with a lack of capital. At least part of the enduring games don't use 3D accel or can use what's already there- Diablo II is an example of one that doesn't use much in the way of 3D acceleration.

    As for Mesa being non-trivial, every distribution installs it for XFree86 4.0 and usually pre-configures it (it's actually rather trivial to configure for a DRI driver that's not in alpha...) and at least Mandrake makes it easy to install for Mesa with Utah-GLX. It's non-trivial if you're installing completely from scratch (Which, if you're doing that, you're skilled enough to manage it anyhow!)

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  20. i have no problem with your bizarre taste in games by ebbv · · Score: 1


    but you should be aware that your taste in games is not in-line with most of the world.

    whether or not you like diablo 2 you should be aware it is a fantastically popular game. tens of thousands of people play it every day.

    your thinking is also skewed in that porting games to linux is not 'competing' with windows. i suppose it would be if there were any possibility of competition, but linux games are for people who want to avoid having to boot into windows to play their games, because they're in linux the rest of the time.

    as far as mod-friendly games for linux, half-life is the only one i can think of out of the 'holy trinity' (q3, ut and half-life) that is not currently under linux.

    the idea (which you almost kind of brush against) that there should be original linx-platform games is a great one and there are lots of amateur games under development, but almost no one who wouldn't be running linux anyway is going to install it just to play one or two games.

    the whole underlying issue to this entire discussion (which i've addressed several times now in this thread) is that linux is NOT ready for Joe Q. Gamer to put on his machine and play all his games, even if they WERE all available. the main failing is hardware support and Mesa's ease-of-use. (i also tend to think that most of the KDE/Gnome setups on the main distros are very clunky and fugly by default.)
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  21. Postal was never a good game in the first place by Junks+Jerzey · · Score: 2

    Postal rode off of the hype from day 1. There was the hope that it was still a good game regardless, but no, it turned out to be poor to mediocre.

    Since those days, there has been a realization that releasing intentionally over-the-top games could severely hurt the game industry. You know how DOOM and Mortal Kombat keep getting brought up as examples of violent games, even though they are each at least 8 years old? Just be glad the much worse examples aren't noticed by bored senators, like Kingpin, Soldier of Fortune, and Postal. No one, and I mean no one, wants a PC running Postal to show up on the floor of the senate. We'd immediately get hit with all sorts of regulations.

    But in any case, Postal is still a poor to mediocre game :)

    1. Re:Postal was never a good game in the first place by Time+Doctor · · Score: 1

      I've played it, I don't believe it to be poor-to-medicore. The fact is, it's got some very funny levels, and what might not appeal to you might appeal to someone else.

      --
      Check out ioquake3.org for a great, free, First-Person Shooter engine!
    2. Re:Postal was never a good game in the first place by staplin · · Score: 2

      I agree that Postal does have some very funny levels, but it also takes a bit of a warped sense of humor to see that. ;-)

      On the other hand, I agree with the original poster that it wasn't a great game. After a few weeks I had to turn down the sound because I just couldn't take one more voice saying "I can't feel my legs..." And eventually I couldn't get past a couple levels without cheating, so they game has been shelved for a couple of years.

      Maybe I'll go get it back out and blow away the marching band again...

    3. Re:Postal was never a good game in the first place by Time+Doctor · · Score: 1

      Nod, it isn't some brilliant piece of work. And, yeah, that parade level rocks :D
      However, I bet you aren't playing in Linux?
      Even if you are, you're probably using wine as there aren't that many beta testers.
      This is what hurts Loki, and in the end, hurts Linux on the desktop.

      --
      Check out ioquake3.org for a great, free, First-Person Shooter engine!
    4. Re:Postal was never a good game in the first place by Monkey · · Score: 1
      Postal reminds me strongly of the Deer Hunter genre.

      Not actually an outstanding game, technically or creatively, it relies on novelty appeal to generate any sort of interest in it.

    5. Re:Postal was never a good game in the first place by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

      But in any case, Postal is still a poor to mediocre game :)

      It was bad when it came out. And it hasn't gotten better with age, I promise. I admit, mindless shooters are often fun. But at the time Postal was released it was very obviously trying to ride off of the hype of being "so violent it should be banned." I don't think it should be banned. I'm not about to tell someone what they can and can not put in a video game/song/movie/etc. I'm all for their freedom of speech. I do however question their gaming priorities. Are they making a game or are they making a political statement?

      If it's a political statement, okay. Point made. Nobody needs to play the game now. We get the point. If it's a game, I think they really should try to be a little more creative.

      They brag about how successful the game has been, and how it's reached cult status but I think what they're really trying to say is that several years later they still haven't given up trying to push it down people's throats. They're still injecting it into whatever market will absorb it, and now they're gunning for the Linux users. They don't think they've exposed enough people I guess.

      Whatever the reason, I think this says more about Running With Scissors than it does about Loki. It means that RWS is so desperate to make a few more fans of the franchise that they're even aiming for the Linux users. Somehow I doubt the "Sick and Twisted" Linux users are going to bite, though. But then agian, I suppose there might just be enough game-starved users out there that they'll buy it just because it's from Loki (something I don't consider a good thing.)

      And for those who have never played the game, it's a 2D shooter. Not 3D. It has very low system requirements. You can find screenshots here. Now I think you've seen enough you can pass up the game.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    6. Re:Postal was never a good game in the first place by staplin · · Score: 2

      Nope, not on Linux. I got this for the mac several years ago, and had no idea it was still around. I just assumed that when it went off the shelves it died a quiet death.

  22. Loke and the Mystic Hexagram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Loki, the god of Norse mythology may be no match for the glory of mathematics. With this we may associate the baffled sense of mystery produced by certain mathematical theorems, the beauty of which is accompanied by an initial feeling of the inadequacy to explain such remarkable results.

    An example is Pascal's ``Mystic Hexagram'':

    If a hexagon is inscribed in a conic, then the intersections of the three pairs of opposite sides are collinear.
    A beautiful theorem! Pascal (1623-1662) proved it when he was only sixteen years old and gave the figure its name.
  23. maybe it's easy on mandrake by ebbv · · Score: 1


    but last time i checked (and admittedly it was not in the last 3 months), it was not so easy on Red Hat, SuSE or debian. It was SUPPOSED to be very straight-forward but due to incorrect library dependancies, mis-placement, etc. it was not the simple it matter it should/could have been.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
    1. Re:maybe it's easy on mandrake by Uerige · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, it was very easy to install and setup XFree86 and DRI on debian. You just install the package, then select the driver, and everything is O.K. Even when I installed from source on RedHat (because XFree86 v4 rpms weren't available) it wasn't so hard. In the past these things _were_ hard to setup with utah-glx but since XFree86 v4 things have improved alot.

  24. Not looking good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Postal is so ancient. A company in the business of porting games from windows faces a bleak future nowadays. The only good shot at Linux gaming would be to get the platform in good enough shape so that the gaming companies themselves would develop for the platform, porting companies could turn into competition for the original maker if it was too new a title. Linux can now be a competent office system, can playback a great deal of multimedia well, even Sorenson if you pay money to codeweavers, and KDE will probably be able to embed ActiveX Quicktime for Windows. But gaming has not gotten to a good appealing level. Even the multimedia support demonstrates problems. A lot of avi support and the sorenson support is dependant on Windows components, as companies will not port... Unless drastic things happen, the future of gaming lies in projects like Wine, unfortunately.

  25. Going Postal is a very good term. by CaptIronfist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Postal is good, but not THAT good.
    2. Postal is 20 minutes of fun, after that you switch to the expansion pack, which is another 20 minutes of fun.
    3. Postal is even older that Loki itself.
    4. Postal has an interresting engine that runs on pentium 166, meaning it's worthless. Nobody ever re-used that crap. Or somebody did and he's an idiot.

    5. Tribes 2 is a lot more interresting and it still doesn't fuckin work on Linux + Matrox G450.

    Conclusion: Loki makes games and 5 minutes later, they don't care about what they made. So you know what, maybe i don't really care Loki anymore or maybe i don't really care about playing games under Linux.

    Linux = 'For Workin'.
    Ouindoze = 'For Playin'.

    1. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by dinivin · · Score: 1

      5. Tribes 2 is a lot more interresting and it still doesn't fuckin work on Linux + Matrox G450.

      Works fine with my Matrox G400. Are you sure it's not just user error?

      Dinivin

    2. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1

      Yes. The game starts and you can configure all your settings and when you actually try to play the game it's just like watching a cad model with 3 billion polygons on pentium 166.

      I don't know! ( As in 'I tried everything and it didn't work.' )

      If it's a user problem, then we are 4 users + 1 sysadmin in our office who can't make the game work properly.

      Plus, I read all Loki faqs, sent plenty of e-mails, got no answers. This why i made this point, they barely care about what they make.

    3. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 2

      Yes. The game starts and you can configure all your settings and when you actually try to play the game it's just like watching a cad model with 3 billion polygons on pentium 166.

      Sounds like you're using software OpenGL. Are you sure you have the drivers and libraries installed and set up properly?

    4. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1

      Yup I configured DRI just like they suggested it in the docs and it is 3D rendering, I can see it with the glxgears demo.

      I really tried everything, upgraded all matrox modules, upgraded my kernel a few times, tried all possible gl libs on my machine and the game still runs choppy. Like I said before, I even sent e-mails to Loki support and they never answered back. Ok! I admit I'm fairly new to linux, about a year or so, but I'm an experienced developper and I know when I'm facing a problem that is not 6 inches from the monitor. Although, sometimes, I get nasty surprises ;)

      I might try again to install it on another machine at some point, but up to now, the game doesn't run properly on 4 of our office machines. And well, you know offices, they buy bundles of machine these days.

    5. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by dinivin · · Score: 1

      Plus, I read all Loki faqs, sent plenty of e-mails, got no answers. This why i made this point, they barely care about what they make.

      That's interesting... I have an entire folder dedicated to e-mail from Loki. They've been extremely responsive to all my messages.

      Dinivin

    6. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by Dr.+Sp0ng · · Score: 2

      Yup I configured DRI just like they suggested it in the docs and it is 3D rendering, I can see it with the glxgears demo.

      Hrm. Are you sure the game doesn't come with its own libGL.so somewhere? I've never played it myself, but I know that some Linux games do, and it may be incompatible with your particular video card.

      Like I said before, I even sent e-mails to Loki support and they never answered back.

      Really? That's odd... must be because of their financial difficulties. I've always gotten great tech support from Loki.

      Ok! I admit I'm fairly new to linux, about a year or so

      Well, I'd be happy to help you out some more if you want, but this isn't really the place for it. Feel free to email me (spong@baked.net) or IM me (see .sig).

    7. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by theoddone33 · · Score: 1

      I don't understand your logical progression. Besides that, not all your points are factually correct. DooM runs on a P166, does this mean it is useless? WordPerfect 5 runs on a P166, does this mean it useless? The Postal engine is not crap, and it has been used in around 20 games. The fact that Tribes 2 doesn't work on anything but NVidia cards is not Loki's fault.

    8. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you ask me, WordPerfect 5 is less than useless: It's a PITA to support old legacy crap like that.

      Doom is now useless for fun, unless you are stuck on a remote island and you only have a 486. Since I don't believe there's anyone in that situation, I consider the software useless as a game. Maybe a good learning exercise for looking at the code, but past that, nahhh, not interesting.

    9. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "now useless for fun": What the fuck does that mean? Only the most recent games are fun? The amount of fun in a product decreases with time? The age of a game does not determine its fun; it's you playing it and enjoying the experience. I like Postal, and I think it is fun. Same with Doom, Wolfenstein 3D, Aliens vs Predator, Kohan, etc etc.

    10. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by Cyno · · Score: 1

      4. Postal has an interresting engine that runs on pentium 166, meaning it's worthless. Nobody ever re-used that crap. Or somebody did and he's an idiot.

      Well, unix was originally designed back in the '70s and Linux runs on 386s. Does that mean they are worthless? The value in a game or any piece of software is what is does for the user, not does it require the latest hardware to run. Postal is a fun game to play for my sadisticly twisted mind. You may not be so sadistic, and that's good. But it doesn't make Postal any less fun for me. Oh, and you can get the G450 to work with tribes 2 if you grab the latest CVS snapshot of XF86 4.1.0. They added a patch to fix some problems with tribes 2 as posted on www.linuxgames.com a couple months ago.

      Oh now stop it. You care about games and linux. You're just frustrated because its taking so long for everything to work right. Have faith, we'll get it to install and configure itself correctly and eventually be much better than windows. Although I doubt you'll ever be able to run the cutting edge M$ games or graphics apps, but who really needs those anyway. We have 3D audio and video and Gigs of games to take the edge off when we've been working those long hard hours. Linux is there, just give the distros 6 months, they'll figure it out.

    11. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1

      Postal is a fun game to play for my sadisticly twisted mind. You may not be so sadistic,

      Believe me when i say you are wrong. You better ;)

      You're just frustrated because its taking so long for everything to work right.

      You are right and don't you think it's one of the main reason Loki has so many financial problems, i mean the fact that most linux users spend hours trying to make their games work isn't really interresting for a potential investor. (The 'Out-of-the-box' problem).

      I gave the distro chances for 12 months ;) Nah! Sorry i'm just being hard on you. I agree it's not because something is old that it's useless, the unix example is a very good one, however if there is something better shouldn't you at least look at the other option.

      In the case of Postal, sure it's a good game, like i said in my first comment, but it's only a lot of fun for 40 minutes or so, and they could have thought about making a new engine for it, since there's a bunch new ones on the market, that are really better. Plus, I don't know for you, but my Postal discs have been stored in my closet for more than a year, they're dusty and i don't plan to open them in a near future. ( The 'Pong is fun, but there things more interresting right now' argument. )

      I don't really picture why Loki chose this game as their 'Secret Project Q'. Banishment from the U.S. isn't banishment from the world and it's certainly not more interresting to play a banished game. Seriously, I give them one finger for chosing this one.

      Thanks for the tip on XFree, mine is 4.1.0, but it's the official release.

    12. Re:Going Postal is a very good term. by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Look at how far the distros have come in the last 12 months. They aren't perfect yet, but they've definitely made improvement.
      I just wanted to comment once more on Postal. If they don't need to write much code to port that game, and it looks like it should be pretty easy to port/write, then Loki could have it out the door and potential revenue from sales real soon. Plus Postal should be easy to customize for individual contributors like myself. But y'know the best thing about Loki games? They don't require you to go to your closet and dig out your CD to play the game. You can install them somewhere on your 100+GB harddrive and play them whenever you feel like it. Imagine having a game arcade filled with all the modern and classic games you could ever want, sitting on your harddrive waiting for you. That's linux in a nutshell! And I would repurchase postal just to have it sitting on my harddrive for those days when I really need to toss malitav cocktails into marching bands. I've been getting those a lot lately. Can't wait for carmageddon 2 or black and white to be ported. I love Loki!

  26. i'm glad your experience is good by ebbv · · Score: 1


    i don't even do word processing or any of that, i only use my computer for web browsing, e-mail, coding and games at home. so if i had all the games i wanted to play in linux i'd be set, but i don't so... i still keep win2k on my machine.
    ...dave

    --

    Think different? I'd be happy if most people would just think...
  27. Re:i have no problem with your bizarre taste in ga by vecna_99 · · Score: 1

    ok, i see where our fundamental difference is.

    i don't think that linux games should be designed with the aim of recruiting john q. windowsgamer to install linux on his machine instead of windows. even if there were good linux ports of all his favorite games, there are other non-gaming-related issues (which you mention, such as the butt-arse-ugly desktop defaults) that would militate against his making the switch.

    i think linux gaming should be oriented towards people who are already running linux. thus, Loki should be trying to supply us with games that are actually GOOD (as opposed to games that are simply played by many thousands of people).

    and while i'm aware that my taste in games is not exactly mainstream (the game i'm currently most looking forward to is the Harpoon 3 cd that's being fedexed to me as we speak), i think that there are a large number of fringe gaming markets that a) it would be much easier for Loki to penetrate (compared to the mainstream gaming market) and b) that have games that are languishing unappreciated, that could do with some more exposure.

    as for linux games competing with windows games, as long as you have to pay twice to own the windows version and the linux version of a game, there's competition.

    -vecna_99

    --
    --- "We also were guided by the unlikelihood that anyone would face supernatural evil armed only with technology."
  28. Re:i have no problem with your bizarre taste in ga by jspaleta · · Score: 2
    whether or not you like diablo 2 you should be aware it is a fantastically popular game. tens of thousands of people play it every day

    Millions of people run windows.........

    I run linux, and something tells me the types of games people like me like to play is different than the types of games all the M$ sheep like to play.

    Billions of people live in China......

    Doesn't mean there isn't money to be made selling american flags to americans.



    Should Loki be trying to market the popular windows games to Linux users...I don't think so.
    I think, porting games well suited for linux and linux users is what Loki needs to do. There are a lot of chinese people, but you'd have a hard time making a lot of money selling chinese flags to americans. Better to sell american flags to US citizens even though they are not the majority of the world's population.



    Loki needs to pick a good product for the Linux market...Loki doesn't need to try to emulate the success of the most popular games of the windows market...it just won't work. Taking older less popular games in windows that would make sense in Linux (ie network and customizable games with a community base) makes a lot more sense.



    -jef

  29. New games by Diabolical · · Score: 2

    I would like to see Loki create new games instead of porting older windows based games to Linux.

    Let the porting to be done by the original creators... give them some incentive to do their own ports.

    Why not try to create that one blockbuster we need ? The people at Loki should be inventive enough. At least they had alot of examples of great games.

    1. Re:New games by Time+Doctor · · Score: 1

      It's considerably more costly to get enough folks to make a game, than it is to port a relatively good code base. Art quality is especially important these days and I don't think it should be Loki creating Linux original titles. This enormous cost of man-hours is most likely why they don't.

      --
      Check out ioquake3.org for a great, free, First-Person Shooter engine!
    2. Re:New games by joshua_doesnt_know · · Score: 1

      start sending in the donations then cause creating a game costs a whole hell of a lot more than porting them. You think linux users would shell out the cash to buy us a production studio?

    3. Re:New games by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2

      How about a "commercial-quality" emulator for an existing game platform, such as the Playstation2? No artwork or sound effects needed, but I'll bet it'd sell at least as well as any individual game is right now...

      Heck, if you did that, and needed more individual games, perhaps Loki could then later license popular titles for the emulator and create enhanced Linux versions by adding new features (better network play, etc?) without having to recreate the whole thing from scratch.

      Just a thought.

  30. Linux Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only thing that I use Windows for is playing games. I believe many Linux users keep their computers dual-booted for the same reason. I would really like to help out companies like Loki, but the problem is 3D acceleration video card support. I downloaded couple of Loki demos at home and it all looked like crap. I did the same thing at work, and it was absolutely beautiful. You know why? Because at work I have GeForce2 Ultra DVI card running under NVIDIA's drivers. I played Soldier of Fortune demo and it was absolutely perfect. Of course at the same time I was burning a CD in background without affecting the action. That's why Linux could be much better gaming platform, but until Linux games can run with wide variety of video hardware, I'll still keep that good ol' windows on a small partition.

  31. In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Loki announced the pending availability of Pong for Linux. "We just wanted to give something back to the community", said the CEO of Loki. "With support for the latest 2-D cards, Pong will be the killer app for Linux."

    "It was just so lifelike, I had tears in my eyes", says 51-year old Pong creator Nolan Bushnell. "I never thought I would be able to play Pong at home, let alone on a Free operating system."


  32. Anyone Hankering For Civilization III? by Totally_Tux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just noticed that CivIII went gold today (press release [Firaxis]).

    Personally I think that this title would be very popular on the Linux platform, a 3D accelerator is not even required. I don't know how well SMAC did on Linux, but this title would be a logical step for turn-based strategy fans.

    The slated platforms are WIndows and Mac, I hope Loki will consider a port for this title.

    1. Re:Anyone Hankering For Civilization III? by mimbleton · · Score: 1

      "a 3D accelerator is not even required"

      Does Linux allow use of switch able screen/off-screen graphics memory buffers?
      If not then even 2d games will take a hit doing unnecessary blit ( as compared to Windows.)

  33. Re:i have no problem with your bizarre taste in ga by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    but you should be aware that your taste in games is not in-line with most of the world.

    Competition for "most of the world"'s attention is fierce. Loki is targeting a market with few competitors, and it looks like their decision is mostly working.

    If you think they're not making the right decisions, then compete with them. Get a Half-Life license and work on it. Probably what you'll find is that the license costs plus the porting labor cost, exceeds what you'll get in sales. Then you'll realize that Loki has a real business plan and knows what they're doing.

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  34. all the M$ sheep like to play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would anyone want to port games to a platform to satisfy a small bunch of condescending halfwits such as yourself? What would be more work: writing the software or listening to your constant complaining about the tiniest little thing?

  35. Postal is fun, but I'd rather have Half Life by Arcturax · · Score: 1

    Half life is a far better game and you can download Scientist Hunt if you feel the need to go Postal. Scientist hunt is by far more amusing than Postal ever was.

    --

    --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    1. Re:Postal is fun, but I'd rather have Half Life by joshua_doesnt_know · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have a million dollars and world peace

  36. LA Postal? :-P by Omnifarious · · Score: 2

    One of the few Loki games I won't buy. I have no problems with its being produced, but everything I've heard about the game tells me that it will disgust me. I don't need a game like that.

  37. I thought Loki was a C++ library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't Loki a C++ library?

  38. Are you using Utah-GLX or DRI? by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    If it's Utah-GLX, not everybody handles it for you and, yes, it's difficult because it's a hack on top of XFree86 3.3.X to begin with. If it's DRI, I don't know what your issues are because it's just pretty much dropping in the drivers in the appropriate places, creating a /dev/dri/video0 entry and running X.

    (By the way, before you comment further, you might want to know that I'm the maintainer of Utah-GLX and a DRI developer... :-)

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  39. Myth II already ported... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    Check their products page and purchase it if you've got the cash...

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  40. What framerate with Gears? by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    Execute gears from a command line and wait, it'll tell you which framerate.

    On a PIII 600, a G400 should be clocking nearly a 1000fps with gears at it's default size, etc.

    Also of note is that you've got to cripple the game back pretty heavily because the G400 and other cards don't have enough silicon muscle to do what the game asks for so it falls back to software in a LOT of places if you don't cripple the game's renderer.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:What framerate with Gears? by CaptIronfist · · Score: 1

      The glxgears snippet ran at more than 1000fps which is way enough.

      Also of note is that you've got to cripple the game back pretty heavily because the G400 and other cards don't have enough silicon muscle to do what the game asks for so it falls back to software in a LOT of places if you don't cripple the game's renderer.

      I drew the same conclusions as you, I ran the game with all graphic options at minimum or off, and it was still choppy as hell. Blaming the G400 or G450 is easy and i did this also, but the game runs perfectly on Ouindoze with the same graphic card, as some other people informed me.

      Yeah thanks anyways, maybe i'll try to run the game in a near future with a new kernel, but i spent enough time on that for now.

  41. It takes a Lot by Greyfox · · Score: 2
    It's not just good programmers, it's good artists, good musicians, good writers and a shitload of luck. Like the movie and music industry, the majority of the games out there fail and lose money. It's only the rare blockbusters that keep the industry rolling. What Loki tries to do is capitalize on those blockbusters rather than betting the farm that they can create one themselves. And if they were betting the farm, it would make much more business sense to write for Windows (I am a die hard Linux fanatic. This is not a troll, it's just the truth.) Loki's niche is that they provide a fairly small segment of the population with something they want.

    That being said, I would like to see some original game development on Linux. If you look at the Linux Game Tome, there's a lot of promising stuff out there. Hell, why not add GL interfaces to some existing games like Nethack and Angband? Those games are still engaging despite their interfaces. There's a lot that could be one. Whether it'll work in an open source (or even Commercial on Linux) remains to be seen.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  42. Re:i have no problem with your bizarre taste in ga by tmark · · Score: 2

    porting games well suited for linux and linux users is what Loki needs to do.

    I defy you to name games that are 'well suited for linux and linux users'. Since presumably linux users are such because of the superiority of the product, rather than some feature/quirk/defect of their personality, what do you propose defines Linux users ? Is it our ability to read source code and unpack tar files ? Is it our interest in arguing about distributions and editors ? Our fervor in arguing that some forms of intellectual property are wrong while others inviolable ?

    Get real, Linux users are as heterogeous as any other group of computer enthusiasts and hobbyists; Chinese nationals are unified in their culture and language and history. The only kind of game that I can imagine appealing "Linux users" as a group would involve shooting/killing/maiming/ridiculing Bill Gates in effigy. Which, I believe at least one of which has already largely been done and ships with some distributions.

  43. Wanted: Linux Half Life + Counterstrike mod by horza · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Counterstrike is the major reason I will always have a Windows installation. Though if old classics are order of the day then Command&Conquor:Red Alert (and series) would win a lot of converts.

    Phillip.

    1. Re:Wanted: Linux Half Life + Counterstrike mod by steveha · · Score: 3, Informative
      But WINE makes it possible to run Counter-Strike under Linux! Not just CS but any Half-Life game should work.

      If you check the Linux Half-Life page you will find the HOWTO.

      Full disclosure: I tried this once and I couldn't get it to work. However, I run a bleeding-edge Debian "unstable" system, and perhaps WINE was unstable that day. I plan to try this again soon.

      By the way, Starcraft and other fun games run well under WINE. You can check the WINE app database to see if other people have had success running a particular game.

      Good luck and happy gaming!

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  44. Re:LA Postal? :-P by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2
    everything I've heard about the game tells me that it will disgust me.

    I have little problem, myself, with violence in games (hey, I actually think the characters in Heretic II, for example, are kind of funny as they run around with their arms cut off as if puzzled about why their weapons aren't working...), but I played the demo of Postal for about 10-15 minutes long, long ago when it first came out...

    The problem, as I see it anyway, is that the violence in Postal is...tasteless. The focus isn't on pretty graphics or gameplay, but on 'realistic' suffering and dying of the wounded. This is the ONLY game I can recall ever playing that actually somewhat digusted me (and I've been playing for a while - I still vaguely recall a driving game on my old C-64 where you scored points by running over puppies and little old ladies...)

    And, somehow, I just can't imagine that in the current anti-terrorism frenzy the world is in that this game is going to do anything but (ahem) bomb completely in the market when Loki re-releases it, unless maybe they replace all of the original levels with "shoot the terrorists, spare the civilians" levels set in Palestine, Afghanistan, Iraq, etc...and even then it'll only sell until the frenzy dies down...

  45. See you in MetaMod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid moderators don't even know that Spy Hunter and Buck Rogers are games and therefore ontopic. Wow. Another few points off the slashdot IQ. Soon we'll be digging for it.

  46. Jesus Christ by niekze · · Score: 1

    I don't care if Loki has to give their children away, JUST FUCKING PORT COUNTER-STRIKE. You know how many dual-boot win/linux systems would become 100% linux systems if they could play COUNTER-STRIKE? Sure, they probably don't want to license it to them. KIDNAP THEIR CHILDREN IN THE NIGHT. I don't care. All i care about is being able to deagle the CT's on a linux box.

    There is a certain theory my friend proprosed though. If people could play counter-strike on windoze, programming would stop for everything. No new linux kernels (unless it improved CS), no new mozilla, no new anything (unless it improved CS). Now...one has to ask one's self: would that really be a bad thing?

    --


    Chaos, Mayhem, and Destruction: Not
    1. Re:Jesus Christ by GiMP · · Score: 1

      And what do you think Valve's say is in this? You can't just port something you don't have the source-code to!

      Think before you type.. because what you want will not happen, and it isn't Loki's decision.

      You aren't very faithful if you run windows just for a stupid game. Linux IS on my gaming box, my other boxen are running FreeBSD. We don't need no stinkin' windows.

    2. Re:Jesus Christ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't really matter what game you play. Fun is a scalar quantity and can be obtained in many ways! Try something else! There are plenty games for Linux (commercial and non-commercial). But all I see are requests for the same three or four games to be ported to Linux (NoLife/Starcruft/Diablow 2).

    3. Re:Jesus Christ by niekze · · Score: 1

      that's why i said they should sell their kids if they have too. I meant selling them to Valve if they had to. Silly Man. Think before you type.

      --


      Chaos, Mayhem, and Destruction: Not
  47. Games ported to get servers not players by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see people mentioning high profile games like Quake and Tribes as success stories but what most fail to realize is that these games are not ported because of Linux gamers. These games are ported so that game servers can be setup under Linux.. Linux ports of some games are all about the servers.

  48. Why? by maxxon · · Score: 1

    This is puzzling. What is Loki thinking? Postal is a very old game, but more importantly, it wasn't very good and it wasn't very successful either.

    --
    max
    1. Re:Why? by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2
      What is Loki thinking?

      My personal theory is that they (Loki) are desperate for a game with "guaranteed" sales. Their marketing on the press release and website seems to imply that the whole reason for buying the game would be to support freedom of speech, or if you just like "realistic" violence with plenty of suffering while dying. I suspect there's a small hard core of people who will definitely buy this port based on one or both of these two reasons. There won't be many of them (at least, I don't THINK there will be), but there would seem to be a definite guarantee that there will be SOME sales. If Loki didn't pay too much to license this, then this is a very low risk investment (though with only a small return compared to what they MIGHT get on a less certain, better [and more tasteful] game that would cost them more to port.)

      It may be that they just NEED to be able to say to the next prospect "See, we said it'd sell, and it did, and now we're saying YOUR game will sell, so let us port it please."

    2. Re:Why? by Sheetrock · · Score: 1

      The most logical possibility that I can come up with is that they got it for a very reasonable price and are relying on a revival of the controversy surrounding the original product to boost sales and get free advertising for their company in the mainstream press.

      --

      Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
      -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




  49. Gosh, I guess Linux IS just for fringe whackos... by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 2

    Not a flame (nor even my actual opinion) - it's just that I just looked at the press release. A choice quote from it:

    "There's something just plain sick and wrong about Linux users," said Vince Desi, Running With Scissors' tetanus-tempered edge. "That's why we`re so excited to be able to bring these gaming misfits a Linux version of POSTAL - They're our kind of people!"

    Gee, thanks. I'm sure this'll do WONDERS for the image of Linux users. We've been fighting against this "fringe whacko lawbreaking rebel misfit" image, all this time I guess that's what we were anyway...

    No, I don't actually think the game should be banned, nor should Loki be forbidden from porting it, nor should Running With Scissors be forbidden to SAY such things, nor should Loki be forbidden to agree with it and reprint it...but I DO think it's a BAD decision...

    (The implication that a game where the main character is, effectively, a "terrorist without a cause" is perfect for "our kind of people" downright disturbs me...)

  50. Re:i have no problem with your bizarre taste in ga by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 2

    I run linux, and something tells me the types of games people like me like to play is different than the types of games all the M$ sheep like to play.

    Funny you should say that.

    Most of the people I know who are most fanatical about Diablo II are Linux users who cuss because they have to keep Windows around just to play it.

    If anything, Diablo II is MORE the type of game that a Linux user would like than the 1st person shooters of the minute...

    Just because something is popular doesn't mean it's good. But just because it's good doesn't mean it can't be popular.

    The "Sheep" who use Microsoft, as you put it, are sometimes Wolves who violently refuse to compromise their gaming experience.

    --

    "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

    Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
  51. it's hard to buy Loki products in Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    before developing/porting new games, Loki should really do something to help us buy their games.
    I live in Paris/France and it's very hard to find loki games at usual linux friendly places.
    Of course, you can buy online but then you have to add shipping costs, tax to be paid at custom and the delay.
    Last week, I asked for games at the linux stand at Surcouf (the biggest computer store in paris) and they had only one last myth2 box left. they never could order games normally, it took months for games to be delivered to them (I never saw most of loki games on their stands). Somebody told them Loki was not selling anymore so they don't even try to contact Loki.
    some other places selling linux are in fact mostly bookstores so I don't think they wan't to sell games.It could also be good to be able to order games online on a French website so shipping cost will be low and delay minimal

  52. Old Tech rules! by iplayfast · · Score: 1

    The old games were innovative and interesting. Newer games are (for the most part) just remakes of older games. (Diablo II is a much enhanced version of Wizardry, which I saw first on an Apple 2). So why not port the old great games to Linux. Quite often the older games were more fun then newer games are now. I'm sick of twitch games, with fancy 3d graphics.Bring on some games that rely more on game play and less on graphics!

  53. Re:Gosh, I guess Linux IS just for fringe whackos. by Toddarooski · · Score: 1

    Heck, it doesn't just make Linux users look bad. It makes all computer game players look bad.

    If you read your average newspaper, it would appear as though the computer game industry has been responsible for all violent acts committed during the last 10 years. And a game where the whole point is to go around shooting innocent civilians ain't gonna improve that image. It seems like RWS decided if they couldn't make a good game, they'd just make a controversial game and ride the wave of publicity from their local news stations.

    I was glad that this game faded into obscurity. The last thing we need now is for this thing to resurface and be picked up by Good Morning America.

    --

    "Do you expect me to talk?" "No, Mr. Bond. I expect you to die!"

  54. Re:Gosh, I guess Linux IS just for fringe whackos. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think RWS said what they wanted to say in that press release because they knew how people would react. Don't take things so seriously. After all, Slashdot does worse for the image than one little game and its press release.

  55. Postal is one big hunk of outdated crapp. by Qbertino · · Score: 0

    see subject

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  56. Re:Gosh, I guess Linux IS just for fringe whackos. by Cyno · · Score: 1

    There's something just plain sick and wrong about Linux users

    God I love that quote, don't you? Yes, there is something sick and wrong with linux users. Just like there's a lot sick and wrong with TV watchers and the popular media/news. Specially when Time magazine is willing to print full color pictures of real people dying. All in the name of terrorism. At least fictional characters in games like Postal will allow me to take my frustration with my government and people out on my computer keyboard and a few burning pixels. And perhaps if we directed our general disgust with gore towards the media and entertainment industry during a time like this we wouldn't be so sick and wrong.
    But you know what I think? Do you really want to know? I think Americans actually like the gore. I think they enjoy the entertainment of watching death and destruction, even if it is real, on TV. Then why am I so sick and wrong for being entertained by it in a virtual setting? At least I'm no hypocrite about it. I admit it. I'm sick and wrong.

  57. GTA? by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    It would be cool if they ported GTA to Linux. I found it much better than postal. If they beefed up the multiplayer(eg. co-op), I'd have to delete my windows partition once and for all. :)

    --
    It's been a long time.
  58. DUUUUUDE! by Sj0 · · Score: 1

    shit! Got a URL? The only reason I don't use linux is because I can't use my savage4(I use my computer for programming and gaming). Where can I find a savage4 mesa? I couldn't find anything like that when I searched for it!

    --
    It's been a long time.
  59. Now support Loki by haeger · · Score: 1

    I believe that one of the resons why MS-Windows is so widely used is that it's a decent gaming platform.
    (Yeah, I know what you're going to say, it suxx...yadda yadda) The fact's still there. You buy a PC and mommy and daddy can do grown up stuff with it like paying bills and the kids can use it for gaming.

    If you can put games on Linux (a lot) then a few more might switch.
    "Hey, it does all that Windows does, Office, Internet and everything. And there's even games. Wohoo"

    Support Loki, buy the game if you're even remotly interested in playing it. Prove that there is money in games for Linux. Prove that it's worthwile to invest in Linux and that it's not an "Unamerican" Hippie OS.

    But then again, what the hell do I know?

    //H

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
  60. Why the name 'Postal'? by Taurine · · Score: 2

    Where does the name come from? There isn't any obvious reason why a game that appears to be about urban terrorism is called 'Postal'. Can anyone explain it?

    1. Re:Why the name 'Postal'? by scrytch · · Score: 2

      Where does the name come from? There isn't any obvious reason why a game that appears to be about urban terrorism is called 'Postal'. Can anyone explain it?

      Noting your .uk address: in the USA, an employee of the United States Postal Service tends to go berzerk on average of about once a year (no smartasses, it's a different guy each time), goes into work with more firepower than hizballah, and proceeds to engage in the american pastime of a shooting rampage. It happens so often the term "going postal" was coined to refer to such rampages.

      --
      I've finally had it: until slashdot gets article moderation, I am not coming back.
    2. Re:Why the name 'Postal'? by Taurine · · Score: 1

      Wow! Thanks for the info. I'd never heard of that before. Delivering mail in the US must be pretty stressful... Over here postmen and postwomen are generally smiling, happy friendly people. Its always nice to have a chat with the postman - especially when he's dropping off my latest eBay win ;-)

  61. What card do you have? by Nailer · · Score: 2

    AFAIK the only major 3D card unsupported on Linux is the Kyro, for whom drivers are coming. All the other people who produce cards fast enough to play current 3D games on any platform, thats:
    * NVIDIA
    * ATI
    * Matrox
    * Crusty old 3DFX
    has drivers. Laptops can be a problem there, buit massive headway has been made into this area in the last six months.

    What card do you actually own?

  62. Why I will or won't buy by Jebediah21 · · Score: 1

    I loved playing Postal back when I ran Windows (we all make mistakes). Is the game worth $40 to me? Nope. If this comes out at a reasonable price I will buy it. If it comes out overpriced (Postal has been out for quite a while) I won't be getting it. I'll stick to free games (Maelstrom, Circus Linux) for my limited gaming time.

    I want Loki to succeed, but I don't want to pay absurd prices for them to succeed.

    --

    Everytime you look at porn a devil gets their horns.
  63. How about some Kids Educational Games by frodriguez · · Score: 1

    Hey Loki, I am a father of three. I need some educational games ported to linux for my kids. I love your other games but I really think there is a big market for kids educational games.

  64. Chapter 11 by Julz · · Score: 1

    Don't forget that "Chapter 11" just allows a company to separate their current debts up to the "Chapter 11" from their future earnings/debts. This is to allow them to say to their creditors that they will be paying the debts but that they require time to do it. Another way of saying we haven't forgotten that we owe you.
    It doesn't indicate that Loki is going under or anything of the such.

    --
    When shit hits the fan get some of these https://youtu.be/pY-GncsZ-UE