Slashdot Mirror


Linux Counter Drops 90.000 Users

hta writes "Over the 7 years that the Linux Counter has been operative, a lot of people have registered who can no longer be verified. We do not want to publish false data to the world. So we have to remove the data when it is too old, and have decided to give two grace periods." See below for more information - but go out and get counted!
  • Two years for entries with an email that might be valid
  • One year for entries without a valid email entry
More technical details are available from the Counter.

Since there has not been any routine for this before, there is a backlog of almost 100.000 entries.
We have decided to pull the whole backlog at once on November 1.
After this date, the aged-out entries will not be included in the Linux Counter user count, and will not receive email notifications from the counter.

If you registered with the Linux Counter long ago, go over there and log in in order to make sure your entry stays counted."

190 comments

  1. Count me! by my+brain+hurts · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Count me in.

    1. Re:Count me! by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Me Too!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  2. Much better numbers... by Unknown+Bovine+Group · · Score: 5, Funny

    May I suggest using the tactic many mass-emailers use: Assume EVERYONE is a Linux user, and force them to opt out if they DON'T want to be counted.

    --
    m00.
    1. Re:Much better numbers... by zpengo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It worked for Microsoft. The world now assumes you use Windows unless you loudly proclaim otherwise.

      --


      Got Rhinos?
    2. Re:Much better numbers... by Dead+Fart+Warrior · · Score: 0, Funny

      Honestly, do you think you had to actually explain that, or do you think everyone here is a complete moron?

      Nope, just you!

      --
      Quality straight pr0n goes here
    3. Re:Much better numbers... by czardonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The world now assumes you use Windows unless you loudly proclaim otherwise.

      Probably because of the overwhelming likelihood that you do use Windows.

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    4. Re:Much better numbers... by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and Microsoft assumes all hotmail users (most of which joined years before the MSFT purchase) are passport users. I hope they aren't including my 15 bogus hotmail accounts that I have made up over the years.... :-)

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    5. Re:Much better numbers... by Stultsinator · · Score: 1
      I think you've overlooked the obvious answer here: Build authentication into the kernel so that everyone installing Win^H^H^HLinux has to register beforehand.


      In fact, we can keep much better numbers if we tie individual registrations to a hardware platform. Of course we'd have to require re-registration if the platform was modified too severely, but I don't think anyone would mind.


      And as the coup d'grace we could have a centralized login logger that could give realtime updates as to how many Linux users are currently logged in worldwide!

    6. Re:Much better numbers... by jsewell · · Score: 1

      And even then it doesn't seem to work...

    7. Re:Much better numbers... by Beamerweb · · Score: 1

      .....WPA? Spoooky

    8. Re:Much better numbers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs windows when you've got webcams, monitors, and fluorescent lights?

  3. it still exists?? by jilles · · Score: 2

    I think I even registered a slackware install way back in '96. I had no idea the linux counter still was alive. In any case I think it safe to say that most people who installed linux over the past few years are not aware of the existence of the good old counter so it must be way of by any standards and removing 90000 unverified users won't do much good.

    --

    Jilles
    1. Re:it still exists?? by dattaway · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm afraid to tell you about the recent tragedy of the counter's death. It happened today.

      It has been slashdotted.

    2. Re:it still exists?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be running linux...

  4. is that 90k or 90.000? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am an American, put a comma in that sucker. God Bless America, D~y

  5. Significant Digits? by jawad · · Score: 2, Funny
    Yea, I didn't expect 90.033 users, or something. Of course it would be a whole number!

    ~stupid american

    1. Re:Significant Digits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europeans (but not all of them, ie people from the UK) switch the , and . characters around. ie:

      1.234,56 is 1,234.56 in `american` format.

    2. Re:Significant Digits? by godscent · · Score: 0

      Completely offtopic, but why?

      Why do Americans use 1,234 and (some? all?) others use 1.234? What was the original form, and how did it change?

    3. Re:Significant Digits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to troll, can't you at least be creative? All these trolls about jews and Taco's fav site (goatse.cx) are getting old.

    4. Re:Significant Digits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afaicr, Napier was the first person to introduce the decimal point, and he wrote it as a comma.

      Of course, back then, there were no programming laguages that made heavy use of comma-separated lists.

  6. Who's next? by sulli · · Score: 3, Funny

    Will slashdot delete all those unused and bitchslapped troll accounts?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Who's next? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2

      If it can keep its database up long enough, sure.... :)

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    2. Re:Who's next? by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 1

      Actually, something like this might really help /. I'm not familiar with their database setup, but clearing out users that haven't logged in in x amount of time (there must be thousands) might save quite a bit of space, and possibly some cpu cycles.

      --

      My other sig is funny!
    3. Re:Who's next? by sulli · · Score: 2, Funny

      I doubt they'd actually want to, though, because high userid numbers make the place look more popular than it is. ("Look Ma, half a million accounts!")

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
    4. Re:Who's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ignore AC posts, and I moderate at a +1 threshold. Sometimes, I even mod down AC posts just because they're ACs!

      So whatcha gonna do you motherfucker? Nothing? I thought so.

      If you see yourself modded down somewhere, it might just be me. And you can't do fuck shit about it either. :)

    5. Re:Who's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I savagely punish you mofos with outright horrible metamoderation -- since you are karma whores extrodinaire, I hit you where it hurts. In your little karma sac.

      There's no rhyme or reason to it, except to punish moderators whom I don't like. I don't even read the posts. But I always 'unfair' anything marked as 'flamebait' or 'troll' or 'offtopic' just out of principal. Stuff like "cmdr grits first post" marked offtopic, well, I mark it unfair, and strip you of some karma.

      You remember that...

    6. Re:Who's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think ICQ has such a large "reported" user base. I know lots of people who have at least 6 - 10 ICQ accounts just because they didn't want to be bothered with getting their old one when re-installing on new or freshly formatted systems. ICQ currently claims over 114 million users worldwide. Are there that many computers hooked up to the internet? What will happen when their user count exceeds the population of the world?

    7. Re:Who's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, what's wrong with modding down useless noise? Oh yeah, you just like being an anonymous jerk. "Heehee, I just pissed off some random guy in Malaysia, and he can't do a damn thing about it! I'm so l33t!!!!"

  7. The Ethics of Slashdot by bperkins · · Score: 4, Offtopic
    Sometimes it seems like slashdot is this raving monster, destroying everything in its path. Small sites with cgi scripts seem particually vunerable to being sent into oblivion.

    Isn't there a better way of doing things?

    Maybe we could remind people to lay off just after the story is posted.

    Maybe we could have a slashdot turnstile where you can wait in line to get into the site. The biggest problem I see is figuring out when people are have finished downloading.

    1. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by DeputySpade · · Score: 3, Offtopic

      Actually, the inteligent thing to do would be for slashdot to cache a copy of the page the way google does (wget, anyone?) BEFORE the article gets posted then make the cache link available as well. Heck. Make the cache link prominent and add a "original story" link at the bottom of the headline posting.

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    2. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by g2g · · Score: 1

      Ouch! This reminds me of Fileplanet. Who wants to see 'You are 3954 of 4132'?
      I know it really peeves me when a company puts all their patches on Fileplanet so I have to wait _forever_ to get them.
      OTOH, a queing system may be better than taking down the site -- I think.

    3. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by pi_rules · · Score: 2

      I read CmdrTaco's reasons... and it seems like a pretty poor excuse. It's simple, use your own judgement as to whether or not the site should withstand the Slashdot effect. If it's in question, mirror it and mark it clearly as a mirror. I don't see anybody complaining that Google is doing it, and we usually end up with a Google link for slashdotted sites anyway.

      If it's commercial, don't mirror it. If it's anything else mirror the darned thing. I don't beleive Slashdot has ever received a complaint about somebody putting the google.com cache link in comments, but I wouldn't doubt in the least somebody was irked when their piddly site got slammed by thousands of Slashdot readers.

      Google's already set a precedent here... doesn't that solve the wishy-washy matter of the whole thing?

    4. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by garcia · · Score: 2

      but then that would end the /. effect! What the hell, that would be as bad as removing "first post".

      Oh wait.

    5. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by hta · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think being slashdotted is fun. (twisted sense of humor :-)
      The counter has been slashdotted twice before, and broke down; this time, it has 10x the processing power and 30x the disk space compared to then. But it seems that the slashdot community has expanded by a similar factor in the meantime - the counter is running at a load of 16, but it is STAYING UP.
      Watching, and enjoying.

    6. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by Havokmon · · Score: 1

      Post Articles by region..

      Eg. 2 articles are queued for 'display' (I obviously have no knowledge of the workings of slashdot).

      Display 1 to the 'left' half of the world, the other to the right half.

      Next hour, flip em.

      At the very least, you could only let .com,.co.uk see this article now, and all others see it in an hour.. Randomize who sees it first..

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    7. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually think that we should slashdot the hell out of anything that moves. ..makes me feel warm all over :-)

    8. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by atrowe · · Score: 2

      Caching external sites is not intelligent at all. Most sites use banner revenue to help fund the site. If Slashdot were to cache a site, they would effectively be removing the site's only source of revenue and "stealing" visitors from the site.

      While it's true that many sites can't stand up to the volume of traffic that a Slashdot link generates, most websites exist with the intent of being seen my as many people as possible. They _want_ the hits, both for revenue, and to increase the site's future popularity.

      This has been discussed here many times before, so I won't go any further.

      And you spelled "intelligent" incorrectly, tristan f.

      --

      -atrowe: Card-carrying Mensa member. I have no toleranse for stupidity.

    9. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) Authors complain when a Score 5 slashdot comment points to an out-of-date Google cached page

      2) Authors complain when content is mirrored in the comments (Scientologists, Microsoft), and they've got the DMCA on their side.

      3) Authors complain when they get slammed and their site goes down

      4) Authors complain if they don't get the banner hits.

      Sounds pretty much like a lose-lose-lose-lose plan.

      The fact is, if you are on the web, anyone can and will link to you. That's the whole damn idea, and that's the accepted standard for referring to external content. If you can't take the heat, get out of the fire, or at the very least install one of the numerous bandwidth throttlers.

      Besides, it's not a flooded/crashed webserver is the end of the world. You can always go back and look at it tomorrow.

    10. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your ideas are dumb. Nobody should use the web. It's back to gopher for me, before the days of cash and slash.

      Let's hear it for the Gophers! Gopherhockey, gophernutsacks, gopherfootball, gopherswimming, gopherlinux, yea!!!

    11. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by Dwonis · · Score: 2

      With IPv6 and/or IPv4-multicast, this wouldn't be much of a problem. Bug your ISP about getting IPv6!

    12. Re:The Ethics of Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you leave external links in there, (ie. to images and adds) the site would not get hit, but the sponsors would get the hits (and suffer the curse of ./)

  8. 90 x 10^5 is nothing... by haxor.dk · · Score: 1

    ...when you consider that the Linux following counts millions of users.

    A drop in the ocean.

    1. Re:90 x 10^5 is nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So are you troll boy ...

      90*10^5 = 9*10^6 = 9,000,000 (9.000.000 EUR)

      or as people who real programming languages such as Fortran & PL/1 say ... 9E6

    2. Re:90 x 10^5 is nothing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Face it folks. You are on your way down! People have to get PAID so they can put food on the table. Maybe we should all be like France and have the unemployed picket because they want more money. That way, Linux can finally get built.

  9. Linux Is Dying by Knunov · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Red ink flows like a...

    Nevermind.

    Where do I sign up?

    --
    Why do users with IDs under 100,000 or over 700,000 usually have the most worthwhile comments?
    1. Re:Linux Is Dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a commercial prospect, yes....there will always be a fringe group that runs it religiously though.

  10. Mostly Useless by Kruemelmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has really become useless, hasn't it. While many geeks would register some years ago, the big majority of Linux users wouldn't ever today.

    In a way, everyone is a Linux user as soon as they surf the net, using apache installations. If the number of non-geek desktop Linux users grows, they certainly won't register there because they just won't care.

    There are more reliable ways to get estimates for numbers of Linux users.

    Finally, the counter is currently slashdotted.

    1. Re:Mostly Useless by czardonic · · Score: 1

      In a way, everyone is a Linux user as soon as they surf the net, using apache installations.

      And in that same way, everyone uses an M$ platform as soon as they surf the net, using IIS installations.

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    2. Re:Mostly Useless by RobNich · · Score: 1

      In a way, everyone is a Linux user as soon as they surf the net, using apache installations.

      In a way, everyone is a Windows user as soon as they surf the net, using IIS installations. ;)

      --
      Hello little man. I will destroy you!
    3. Re:Mostly Useless by Unknown+Bovine+Group · · Score: 1
      In a way, everyone is a Windows user as soon as they surf the net, using IIS installations.

      In a way, everyone is a Mac user as soon as they surf to a design-heavy site full of giant jpgs and rollover animated gifs. ;)

      --
      m00.
    4. Re:Mostly Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I got it! Let's give everybody an incentive to register, like a free download from kernel.org!

  11. Wouldn't it be better... by jd · · Score: 5, Interesting
    ...if the Linux Counter people ran a mass OS fingerprinting campaign, fingerprinted every reachable machine on the Internet and added in any non-reachable address for which a registrant has given some data.


    THEN we might see some real, useful figures.


    Well, until the RIAA sued them for infringing their patent on mass-scans. (See earlier article.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Wouldn't it be better... by JWRose · · Score: 1

      Except that not every Linux user has a persistent connection to the internet. Some of us pathetic users still have dial-up...

      --

      blah blah blah....
    2. Re:Wouldn't it be better... by dgp · · Score: 1

      hmm. fingerprinting... google cache... hmm..
      Ill bet google already has an idea of the OS running on each web server it catalogs. Some interesting statistics could come out of that.

    3. Re:Wouldn't it be better... by AstroJetson · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but the results would be skewed by firewalls. For example, I have three Linux boxen but they're sitting behind an OpenBSD firewall so they don't get counted. At work I used to run a few Linux machines, but they were hidden behind an NT proxy server. But still, these results may be more accurate than what they've got now.

      --
      Admit nothing, deny everything and make counter-accusations.
    4. Re:Wouldn't it be better... by Volta · · Score: 1
      ...if the Linux Counter people ran a mass OS fingerprinting campaign

      Great idea, except that my linux (and other) boxen aren't vulnerable to OS fingerprinting. Some of us actually care about network security...

    5. Re:Wouldn't it be better... by madenosine · · Score: 1

      In all likelyhood, the count would not be accurate at all, as more people start to use network address translation (including large businesses,) many computers would not be counted. Fingerprinting also is not always accurate. In addition, it would take so long that by the time it was done, the actual proportions would probably be very different.

  12. Dang ./ so good that even google's mirror dont wrk by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 2, Informative

    google mirror
    Now this is a proper ./ effect.

    ok, it works after a while, but I guess you cant register yourself since their scripts still are overloaded ..

    hmm just got a flashback..."Amiga forever, forever.. ever ver.. er.. r." :-)

  13. Linux Counter Drops...PERIOD by Knunov · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's been up for 7 years and all it took was 30 seconds on /.'s front page to bring it down.

    On the bright side, I'm sure that 90K will come back in spades.

    --
    Why do users with IDs under 100,000 or over 700,000 usually have the most worthwhile comments?
  14. Better tracking idea by Arethan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't get into the site since it's been slashdotted, but from the sounds of it, the system in place is based on the honor system. You could very easily falsely register yourself as a Linux user, or simply not register at all. What might work a little better is an opensource project to write a piece of software that occasionally contacts a registration server to 'touch' it's record. When you register the machine, you might even want to specify it's use (personal desktop, business desktop, business server, etc). Records that go 'untouched' for over 6 months are considered extinct and are removed.

    This would obviously only work for machines that have internet access, but it's still better then having to manually update your entry...

    1. Re:Better tracking idea by hta · · Score: 2

      The counter contains such a subproject.
      There is a script you can install that will update the data for a machine on email - this is the basis for the "uptime" and "kernel version" statistics.
      So far, a few hundred people have registered machines there; DO install more!!!!!!

  15. Nice headline by wrinkledshirt · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Linux Counter Drops 90.000 Users

    At least that's better than the time they dropped 89.947 users. My buddy still can't find his finger.

    --

    --------
    Bleah! Heh heh heh... BLEAH BLEAH!!! Ha ha ha ha...

  16. Unless we're talking about dropping body parts... by volpe · · Score: 5, Funny

    Might I siggest that it is sufficient to say ninety users have been dropped and that there is no need to specify that to three decimal places? I can't think of 1.000 good reason why it is necessary to be that precise.

    :-)

  17. Not Lost. Ran away by SirStanley · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    They weren't dropped. They actually installed FreeBSD and were much happier because of the existance of decent MM. Im still baffled as to why Linus and Alan are developing with two completely different. MM's. This can only cause problems. Issues like that need to be resolved BEFORE it gets implemented.

    --
    --------========+++Dont Feed The Lab Techs+++========--------
  18. Ahhrrrghhhh!!! by hhe_hee · · Score: 1

    And how am I supposed to register when that darn LinuxCounter already is slashdotted? Couldn't we use snail mail?

    And now the serious part of the comment, how do they do this counting stuff anyway? It's rather clear to me (and to them too???) that just a small part of the Linux users ever would find that page and sign up. I've run Linux for several years now and have never heard about that site until today.
    And do they think about the fact that not all of those who finds it will register? My guess is that many people hesitate to sign up because they just think they will be spammed. Or maybe they just don't bother to get a crapmail-account-to-be-used-for-signing-up-stuff to sign up with. I bet thay haven't thought about that. This counting stuff should be named "Counter for those Linux users who bother signing up when they finally finds this page"

    --
    2 reptiles beneath your current threshold.
    1. Re:Ahhrrrghhhh!!! by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 3

      You must use an inferior Linux distribution. I know that on Slackware, the root user has an e-mail waiting for them after the system is installed to add themselves to the Linux counter.

    2. Re:Ahhrrrghhhh!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.

      And I log onto the Internet with my Root account to send email all the time.

      Heck, it makes it so easy to do everything that I have never even installed a User account.

      And since with Slackware 3.6 and earlier there wasn't a default Root Password, or a warning to install a root password in the install script, and it didn't even PROMPT for a password if the Root account didn't have one yet, I can dispense with Root passwords entirely. Also, telnetd is automatically installed.

      Kewl!

    3. Re:Ahhrrrghhhh!!! by KerrAvonsen · · Score: 1

      Ah, that explains why I'm on the Counter -- my first distro back in '95 was Slackware, and now that you remind me, I remember that email which was automatically plonked into root's email every time you did a new install...
      But RedHat doesn't do this at all. A pity, it seems like a pretty nifty idea to me.
      This could mean that earlier figures were more accurate, as more people were using Slackware back then? (Seeing as there were a lot less distros to choose from then than there are now)

      Linux Counter User #9316 (yes, I'm so ancient I'm in the 4-digit range!) (-8

      --
      -=- Say it with flowers. Send a Triffid. -=-
  19. 90.000 by part!cle · · Score: 0

    90.000 means 90K right? What is everyoune blathering about missing body parts?

    --
    If voting could really change things, it would be illegal.
  20. Who let the dogs out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who? Who who?

  21. Re:Unless we're talking about dropping body parts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Decimal points replace comments in posts by those affected individuals who wish to somehow appear worldly and different but instead look like big dumbasses who can't figure out English conventions.

  22. Consider the source of the news by Version6 · · Score: 1

    Americans who venture outside their native land are often confused by the European convention for decimals and separation of thousands, which are exactly the reverse of those in the United States,
    making 90.000 in fact ninety thousand. I suspect that this was not a typo, simply a lack of conversion to the American "standard".

    1. Re:Consider the source of the news by part!cle · · Score: 0

      yeah very true. Its not just a European standard though.

      --
      If voting could really change things, it would be illegal.
    2. Re:Consider the source of the news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just use a space? "90 000" would be less confusing.

  23. McDonald's should do this by thilmony · · Score: 3, Funny

    Go verify that the billions and billions served were really served... those signs may have to change!

    --
    YES, there is a McDonald's in Hanoi Square.
    1. Re:McDonald's should do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      funny guy, not!

      Important Stuff:

      Please try to keep posts on topic.
      Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads.
      Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
      Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)

    2. Re:McDonald's should do this by sharkey · · Score: 2

      They have to define what they mean by "served" first. Does it mean that x number of consumers paid for and received a somewhat edible substance grudging provided at their stores, or that n number of people were served hot food fast, by friendly, courteous McDonald's employees?

      There has to be several orders of magnitude between x and n.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  24. Re:Unless we're talking about dropping body parts. by volpe · · Score: 2

    setenv ACCENT "Foghorn-Leghorn"
    echo "That's a joke, son. Ah say, ah say, that's a joke"

  25. The Counter should go away. by grytpype · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It may have made sense when the community was small and a there was a reasonable likelihood that the count might be accurate, but now, it just makes no sense. The vast majority of Linux users aren't going to register, so what are you counting? You're just generating an inaccurate, meaningless number.

    --

    - Have a picture

    1. Re:The Counter should go away. by grytpype · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to be purely critical of the counter effort, though. I understand the "Stand up and be counted" impulse. But why not change it into a "Linux success stories" weblog, where admins can provide details about their installations (how many boxes, the kinds of services they run, number of users, etc.) that might inspire others?

      --

      - Have a picture

    2. Re:The Counter should go away. by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2

      ...accurate to three decimal places, according to the story ... good enough for me.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  26. Comes with a neat certificate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I registered when I first got involved with Linux. When you register, you get a neat little certificate you can put on a web page (can see mine at http://gma.sourceforge.net). It is a worthwhile effort.

    1. Re:Comes with a neat certificate by gazbo · · Score: 0, Funny

      I have never felt as sorry for anybody as I do for you now.

  27. It was submitted by the owner of the site by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... so it is hard to fault /. ethically in this case.

    --
    Per Abrahamsen, registered Linux user #367.

    1. Re:It was submitted by the owner of the site by bperkins · · Score: 2

      Good point. I should have looked closer before choosing the title, but I think the point is still valid.

      I was just rather astonished at the amount of time it took for the site grind to a screaching halt.

  28. Re:Dang ./ so good that even google's mirror dont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is ./?

  29. Are they spam-free? by sandler · · Score: 2

    Has anyone here signed up with an email address? Did you receive any unwanted email as a result?

    1. Re:Are they spam-free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I signed up a long time ago (User #139724), and I only received the initial sign-up e-mail.

    2. Re:Are they spam-free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been signed up there for two years with a real email address and have never received any spam.

      Never received any email from them either.

    3. Re:Are they spam-free? by hta · · Score: 2

      well, the reason 139724 hasn't gotten a reminder is that the registered email address doesn't work any more....

    4. Re:Are they spam-free? by Erik+Hensema · · Score: 2

      Yes, they are spam-free. I have never received any mail from them I didn't want (to be more accurate: I can hardly remember getting any mail from them at all). And I'm user #38371, registered back in dec 95.

      What I'm FAR more worried about: I can't remember my password so I think I'm going to lose my registration :-(

      --

      This is your sig. There are thousands more, but this one is yours.

    5. Re:Are they spam-free? by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

      I'm #108731. I only received mail when I realised that the email I signed up with had gone away years ago, and had to send a few messages back and forth to establish my identity and get the entry corrected. Since I *asked* them to mail me, I guess that was acceptable. Oh, and I got the confirmation mail, too. :)

      The image has been on my personal page (http://www.cloudmaster.com/cloudmaster/)
      for a long time... Oh, the memories. Sniff. :)

  30. Daschle got an anthrax letter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just think how this will reflect on his zeal to crack down on free speech...

  31. Re:Anthrax threat is a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep. We destabilized Russia and the *Stans were liberated. Now the shortest pipeline route to America-controlled waters cuts through...[drum roll]...Afghanistan.

    Any bets on how long before we are introduced to Afghanistan's democratically elected "President"?

  32. Read the FAQ by Raunchola · · Score: 2

    They've already answered the questions about caching pages.

    HTH.

    --

    --
    The real Raunchola isn't cool enough to have any imposters
    1. Re:Read the FAQ by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      Okay, so he answered the question about caching the pages. That doesn't mean that it wouldn't be the inteligent thing to do.

      If I cache one of their pages, this will mess with their statistics, and mess with their banner ads. In other words, this will piss them off.

      And if you link to them and give them a hundred thousand hits that they would not otherwise have had, you're messing with their statistics.

      So perhaps we could draw the line at sites that don't have ads. They are, after all, much more likely to buckle under the pressure of all those unexpected hits. But what happens if I cache the site, and they update themselves? Once again, I'm transmitting data that I shouldn't be, only this time my cache is out of date!

      If they change the content the article refers to, then your article is out of date. If you have a cache, you have the original text for readers to refer to and the readers can see the site for the update. Best of both worlds.

      I could try asking permission, but do you want to wait 6 hours for a cool breaking story while we wait for permission to link someone?

      It could take 6 hours for their site to recover for the DDoS slashdot imposes on them. *shrug*

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Read the FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could try asking permission, but do you want to wait 6 hours for a cool breaking story while we wait for permission to link someone?

      I love this line. How many times does Slashdot post a cool breaking story 2 weeks to 6 months after it really breaks.

    3. Re:Read the FAQ by DeputySpade · · Score: 1

      PS.

      If I cache one of their pages, this will mess with their statistics, and mess with their banner ads. In other words, this will piss them off.

      If you DDoS them and their regular customers can't get through to the site, this will also piss them off. You can't prevent pissing off somebody who is looking to get pissed off.

      The other side of the coin is that they might be appreciative of you sparing them the DDoS, or they might be appreciative of the traffic. Six of one, half dozen of the other. Don't walk on eggshells. You aren't doing anybody any favors.

      --


      This space intentionally left blank
    4. Re:Read the FAQ by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

      Don't walk on eggshells. You aren't doing anybody any favors.


      He's doing himself a favor, by not having to deal with the issues presented in the FAQ. Unfortunately for those who think otherwise, the site operator's opinion is all that matters.

      That said, I think that setting up squid and pointing links through a slashdot-operated caching proxy would be a good idea. Not that I see it happening anytime soon...

    5. Re:Read the FAQ by jbreker · · Score: 0

      Who wants to read the ads anyways?
      If anyone gets grumpy we just tell them that we wouldnt have been interested in the ad anyways.

    6. Re:Read the FAQ by J.+Random+Software · · Score: 1
      But what happens if I cache the site, and they update themselves?

      HTTP has already solved this problem. Use their Expires value, with a reasonable default depending on the urgency (hours? minutes?) if they didn't bother to send one. It's not as if they can expect individuals to see their updates if they don't offer correct metadata--our user agents cache by the same rules. Hey, wouldn't squid or something correctly refresh its cache automatically?

      do you want to wait 6 hours for a cool breaking story while we wait for permission to link someone?

      The alternative is a up-to-the-minute link that's effectively useless, and a few hundred comments expressing nothing more than ignorance and wild guesses. Or we start asking those lucky souls that get slashdotted resources to post comments with their freenet IDs for good distributed caching but without any support for updates....

    7. Re:Read the FAQ by Troodon · · Score: 2

      "They've already answered the questions about caching pages."

      Personally if I were to run a little website that was /.'ed and thus incured huge commercial rate data transmition fees, Taco/VA would be hearing form my solicitors/lawyers. Why can Google do what /. cant be bothered? Its not as if page impression data cant be passed back to the site in question or perhaps an account opened with the main adbanner companies, and fresh banner impressions made through the 'cache' credited to the orriginal website author. Obviously there are legal issues to be addressed, but frankly how does /.'ed compare against a DOS attack, one is mediated malicously over IRC or some such and the other via what a cohort of geeks think is cool, or is that the other way around. :)

      Perhaps we should just tack on something to the next HTML standard, rather than robots.txt, slashdot_sod_off.txt. :)

      --
      troodon.net
  33. Counting users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not simply ask the various Linux companies, i.e., Redhat, Suse, Debian etc., how many sales they have had, this should give a reasonable indication of how many CD's have been shipped either directly to people or to stores.

    Its not a particularly scientific way of getting the info, but will yield numbers. More to the point, if numbers can be got for the various versions (i.e., rh6.2 vs rh7.1)..that would be much more interesting to me. I'm interested in who stays on the bleeding edge vs remaining a little behind the curve because of stability, compatibility or whatever reasons

    1. Re:Counting users by powerlinekid · · Score: 1

      The problem is not counting sales (although it would be better than the counter)... the problem is isos. A better way may be if the linux distributers and mirrors installed tracking software on downloads. That might give a more reasonable total on top of the sales. Of course if there was some tracking software everytime a new install is done... then we wouldn't have this problem.

      ps - of course we could just make up numbers like microsoft

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
  34. Way to ./ a site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah, yes post a link here, and get all slashdot viewers to register all at once, why not?

    The site is dead - thanks to slashdot, no one can register. Aside slashdot could've offered technical expertise and hosting space temporarily, instead of just listing a site with measely T1 and badly written Perl CGI scripts up on slashdot.
    Way to go Taco Boy.
    perlpimp

  35. Re:Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe YOUR account should be deleted, asshole. You're OBVIOUSLY not contributing ANYTHING useful to the site.

    Anyone with negative karma should be deleted.

  36. Re:Dang ./ so good that even google's mirror dont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the working directory.

  37. Re:Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes. I agree.

    There should be a 'bandpass' filtering option for posts on Slashdot.

    I'd like to never again see any of the pompous BS comments by people with +1 accounts.

    Rob, get on it. Set it up so I can have a logged in account and filter out all comments with greater than one moderation.

  38. Nazi past of X-Files actor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The actor David Duchovny, aka Fox Mulder of X-Files fame, has an unknown, very dark past. This photo proves that he was, during WWII, a member of the Croatian Waffen-SS legion 'Waffen-Gebrigs-Division der SS "Handschar"' (he is the second from the left). Probably it was fears that this dark fact would become known that prompted his dismissal from the TV-series. One can only speculate about the atrocities he has committed and taken part in, as this particular legion, mainly recruted among Bosnian Muslims, was notorious for it's brutality.

  39. What is the OS distribution for /. readers? by reneky · · Score: 1

    Is the USER_AGENT logged? Any public statistics? Would be interesting to know both web browser and OS ...

    1. Re:What is the OS distribution for /. readers? by Abwh · · Score: 1

      And what about guys like me, who check ./ from work, using w2k???

      At home is linux all the way (tnx to the gatos proj for ati aiw drivers!), but not everyone has the option to switch at work (Yes, I develop sw for windows...)

      Gerry

      --
      Gerry -- #include "ea!.h"
  40. Re:Better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You wus. Post with your real account. At least Strom has the brass to use an account.

    So there, mofo.

  41. Re:Bang! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That, or you should make sure you use a real OS on your server, not a feeble free OS like Linux.

  42. That might be possible using package management by marnanel · · Score: 2

    That could be done, perhaps, using statistics on package requests by package managers. Consider, say, Debian's package server and its mirrors-- every time someone apt-gets the base packages, the server can log this as another installation. It should even be possible to implement your suggestion about the use of the machine in a similar way (is it asking for many daemon packages, or office programs?).

    Of course, if you're running a cache (say, for other users on your network), you'd need to submit your figures separately; but then, users clueful enough to do this perhaps aren't usually the ones who are slipping through the current system.

    --
    GROGGS: alive and well and living in
  43. Send the sites a few hours advance notice by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

    Slashdot already seems to have a queue system for releasing stories at regular intervals - you could just email the owner of the site when the story gets added to the queue.

    This would give them time to go through and reduce the size of their images, call up their provider and order more bandwidth, etc. On the other hand, it would undermine slashdot's sterling reputation for journalistic integrity - you would end up with webmasters making changes to *content* of their site in advance.

  44. Dubya should've used the counter.... by maroberts · · Score: 2

    ..for Florida ballots.

    It could've made his win even more convincing by dropping voters who didn't vote in the last two elections.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  45. Re:Anthrax threat is a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only submission you crave is the kind where your dad reams out yer ass with a sling blade.

  46. Distros Should Add Auto Counters by angry_beaver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why don't the distro's add a counter module, so that when you install you get the option of anonymously being counted?
    Or, maybe they should release a "counter daemon" that would update the Linux Counter page once a day with a simple "yep, I'm a running linux box" sort of message.

    okay....I'm done ramblin...

    1. Re:Distros Should Add Auto Counters by Asgard · · Score: 1

      Uptimes.net sort of did this; their client would keep the database updated and indicated the type of system it is running on. Unfortunately the project got canned since too many firewall products complained about the outbound connections made by the client.

    2. Re:Distros Should Add Auto Counters by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

      Pine used to do this when you first started it. I don't know if it still does, since I've graduated to mutt, but a few years ago I remember sending a bunch of "new linux box" mails to the pine counter. I wonder if those stats are available anywhere...

    3. Re:Distros Should Add Auto Counters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You know, when it was even suggested that Windows95 was doing this, there was a big outcry of invasion of privacy. Maybe you should consider that. How about a module to also upload all the email addresses from your box to auto-add them to the counter? Uploading recently changed files to see if you're "really" using Linux?

      Personally, I don't want my fucking computer telling anyone what I'm doing... Windows, Linux, Macintosh (littlebuddy.apple.com). The snoops can all fuck off.

    4. Re:Distros Should Add Auto Counters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is this irresistable creature who has an insatiable love for the dead?

    5. Re:Distros Should Add Auto Counters by MissMyNewton · · Score: 1

      Should it decrement when the (many) trial(s) is(are) over?

      --

      ---

      Information wants...you to shut your pie hole.

    6. Re:Distros Should Add Auto Counters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem is that all linux users would be jailed for participating in a DDOS attack at the start of each work day :)

      And thats before a typo is made in the IP number....

  47. Re:first posts are gay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    suck my chrusty cock you anal whore

  48. Re:You asshole! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you had taken the time to look at the photo, which depicts this Nazi war criminal together with his "kameraden", perhaps you wouldn't be as quick to rush to the defence of your precious David, or should I say Soldat Duchovny.

  49. Current stats by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    The page in the Google cache is hanging on the graphics files, text only viewing works fine. That said, here are the contents of the page from the Google Cache:

    At Oct 14 2001 16:53:42 GMT, there are
    191444
    users registered
    108009
    machines registered

    My guess at the number of Linux users:
    Eighteen million

    Get Counted!

    Count your Machine!

    98946 dead accounts will be deleted on November 1.
    Rescue an account! Log in today!

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  50. it's been a while... by turbine216 · · Score: 2

    ...since i've even looked at that counter. I remember back in the day when everyone was fighting over who was really responsible for turning the counter to "1337"...it was like some big "day of eternal remembrance" for us fledgling linux h4x0r5...

  51. Another innaccurate, meaningless number.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    53367

  52. Re:Unless we're talking about dropping body parts. by Teun · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but it's the Brits and Americans that for some unfathomable reason dropped the decimal comma for the point.
    I.e. a (very) few foreign cultures do NOT use the comma as decimal.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  53. "please verify your email address" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... "So that we can sell it to spammers"

  54. /. effect bigtime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeez, what are they hosting this site on? A palm pilot?

  55. Re:This IS a Crusade! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We ARE a country under One God. That God is most definitely not the mohammedian
    god...


    We as in... ? Americans? And what "One God" would that be, Chthulhu? Go away, trollboy, and try to come up with something more interesting next time.

  56. Who really gives a shit about this crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a waste of electrons...count this!

  57. I imagine quite a lot of the users... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    that have tried Linux and gone back to windows have done so because of the childish attitude of many Linux users when asked for help. From personal experience I can say that I have found the 'linux community' to be highly arrogant, unhelpful, and intolerant of people trying to get to grips with an unfamiliar system.


    Sad thing is that most of these dullards don't realise that their attitudes play right into the hands of MS et al, and allows Linux to be dismissed as a geek niche OS used by mal-ajusted saddos.

    1. Re:I imagine quite a lot of the users... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yep, same here. Most unhelpful bunch of arrogant lusers I have ever had the misfortune to seek assistance from.


      Frankly I was disgusted. I am paraliysed from the waist down, and I explained this to someone who suggested I go to X,Y and Z and read A,B and C. No fewer than 7 people in the channel insulted me and made a joke of my disability.


      I am sure apologists will no doubt say that these people represent a small fraction of linux users-and this may be true. However, it is the case that linux seems to attract some very poor examples of humanity.

  58. Count the webservers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As everyone with two cents will tell... the best way to measure the linux usage is thru netcraft stats... pure and simple...

  59. 90 users? by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

    Why is a 90 user drop significant?

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  60. Count me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #1
    ?

  61. Linux is dying! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh yes it is true

  62. where is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the bsd counter... I want to be counted!

    Linux sucks as does GPL and GNU.

  63. Re:Unless we're talking about dropping body parts. by Dwonis · · Score: 2

    What do you use to separate the numbers in a coordinate? (5,3)

  64. Re:Yeah, well... my entry is moot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HOW IN THE HELL WAS THAT POST NOT FUNNY!!!!!!!!!!
    I DESERVED +5 funny! I thought it was funny.
    and just because you lame ass moderators don't, doesn't mean others won't

  65. Re:Nope. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't tell the moderators. They'll take it all.

  66. Re:Metamod, baby! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad Taco seems to have removed the metamod link from the front page when they switched to Slash 2.0. I wonder how many people still remember to metamod occasionally? Judging from the increasing number of Unfair moderations, not enough.

  67. Hold on, are these Slashdot readers? by kimihia · · Score: 1

    A lot of Slashdot people are such alarmists about this sort of thing, and yet here it is suggested. Here should be a fairly comprehensive list of suggestions as to why it isn't a good idea:

    • Not every box has an internet connection
    • Privacy (anonymity)
    • Security (through obscurity, typical paranoid geeks)
    • Conensus (each distro will have its own server to ping)
    • Hardware overload (things like Distributed.net get enough hits as it is, without having EVERY Linux box doing it)
    • Minimalist design (Yet Another cron script? Or even worse - another daemon?)
    • Security
    • ... your reason here

    So ... no. :-(

  68. 90.000, eh? by coldshado · · Score: 1

    Thats quite a bit of precision for just 90 users. :)

  69. Since he hates M$ so much... by Shanep · · Score: 1

    and has (or had:) net access, I guess this must be Osama Bin Laden!

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  70. The right to link by Raunchola · · Score: 2

    "Personally if I were to run a little website that was /.'ed and thus incured huge commercial rate data transmition fees, Taco/VA would be hearing form my solicitors/lawyers."

    And why is that? Because your site couldn't handle the traffic? This was covered before, when Slashdot linked to a story on Something Awful, and Lowtax ended up redirecting people to goatse.cx, because he couldn't handle the traffic.

    I felt bad for him, but in all honesty, if you don't want people to visit your website, make it password protected, or take your server offline. You put your site up so people could visit, right? Just because your server can't handle legitamite traffic doesn't mean it's a DOS attack. It means your server can't handle the traffic, plain and simple.

    If your logic held true, then maybe the guys at kernel.org should be suing Rob and Co. for every time they link to a new kernel update. Sorry, that doesn't work. Sure, maybe Slashdot should cache pages. And if they don't, do you suggest that they e-mail the site beforehand and say, "Hi, I'd like to link to you, can your server handle the load?" Do you want to do that if you want to link to somebody?

    --

    --
    The real Raunchola isn't cool enough to have any imposters
    1. Re:The right to link by Troodon · · Score: 2

      Id look closely (well I would ask to consider the case) at whether I could recover my costs against the money they made from ad impressions.

      Say I set up a little park bench on my lawn, a place for my neighbours, the occasional visitor and I to sit upon, then someone comes along and parks an elephant on top of it. Not right that I should request that they pay for a replacement?

      Kernel.org and so forth awknowledge, accept and take messures for such load? So is my little 486 on a 56k modem that might happen to catche the attention of /. in the same league?

      --
      troodon.net
    2. Re:The right to link by Troodon · · Score: 1

      Ack, sorry about that unclosed link, its early.

      Hmm, so am I liable for linking to them here if their server flops over? Im just speculating here and in the above comment, hopefully prompting someone (as you yourself did) with more insight to illuminate matters.

      --
      troodon.net
  71. Re:Unless we're talking about dropping body parts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (5,5; 3,3)

  72. Pine usage stats by epsalon · · Score: 1

    You can get the Pine usage stats on the official webpage.

  73. Most of us change ISPs often, that's why. by MrJerryNormandinSir · · Score: 1

    Most of us.. including myself, change ISPs often.
    When I registered through the Linux Counter I was
    with ici.net, Now... a few years later I have
    Cable Modem access and I am with mediaone.net
    I am sure we will see that the number of users will be higher.

  74. Re:Unless we're talking about dropping body parts. by Dwonis · · Score: 2

    Fair enough.