Slashdot Mirror


Portable Mini-CD MP3 Player / Burner

An Anonymous Coward writes: "Here is a neat new toy. It is an MP3/CD portable that not only plays music files, it burns them. Called the RipGO, it was just released by Imation and runs about $400. The article includes a photo of the player."

180 comments

  1. Heh, And iPod naysayers... by HerrNewton · · Score: 2

    Will be bitching because they can get a portable, more functional CDRW for a few hundred bucks cheaper.

    --

    ----
    Am I the only one who thinks Microsoft is a misnomer? Perhaps Macrosoft would be a better fit?
  2. It burns mini CDs... by swordboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I haven't seen any mini CD-R media laying around but I would imagine that it costs more than regular sized CD-R media. At this point, you'd be better off buying a portable CD burner and getting a separate MP3 player. Neat concept though.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:It burns mini CDs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mini CD-R more expensive? This can't be. Anyone can transform a CD-R into a mini CD-R with a round cookie cutter and a hammer.

    2. Re:It burns mini CDs... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > I haven't seen any mini CD-R media laying around but I would imagine that it costs more than regular sized CD-R media. At this point, you'd be better off buying a portable CD burner and getting a separate MP3 player. Neat concept though.

      I've seen mini-CDR media at Fry's Electronics. It's not fantastic stuff, but it is available.

      But for $400, as cool as the small form factor is, I really don't need it to burn CD-Rs for me. For $400, I'll buy a CD-RW and use the money left over for a full-size (650M/disc) player-only portable unit.

      Big question left unanswered in the review: Do you rip/encode/burn the MP3s with some grotty proprietary DRM-hobbled application that ships with the device, or do you actually just shovel MP3s onto it like you would a regular CD-R?

    3. Re:It burns mini CDs... by KosovoYankee · · Score: 1

      It actually costs the same or less, as it holds less info....It's not too hard to come by.

      --
      - If This Peace Is Fictious, I Shall Destroy It
    4. Re:It burns mini CDs... by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing when I first saw this. Mini CDR isn't as rare as you might think (doesn't Sony make a stand-alone mixer/burner?)

      here's a site with media for sale ranging from $0.79 each (100 on a spindle for $79) to $1.09 each in jewel cases (pack of 5 for $10.90).

    5. Re:It burns mini CDs... by pi+radians · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you know where to go and get them in bulk, they can be really cheap. We use them all the time at the graphics firm I work at. The only problem is that they only hold 185MB.

      On a side note, the band Bullfrog has released three singles on this media.

      --

      sin(6cos(r)+5A)
    6. Re:It burns mini CDs... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      comp-usa, best buy, everyone....
      I can buy mini-cd blanks almost anywhere... Sony forced them into the market by making that damned Digital camera that burns the mini-CD's.

      Yes they cost about a buck a CD right now (a far cry from my $0.19 a cd for standard CD-R blanks.) but are neat.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:It burns mini CDs... by gorgon · · Score: 2

      From the Imation site it sounds like you don't have to hobble the files. " * Record six hours WMA-quality music or three hours of MP3 in less than five minutes." It also sounds like it doesn't do the encoding either - just transfers files from computers.

      --

      And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners.
      Berke Breathed
    8. Re:It burns mini CDs... by psychalgia · · Score: 1

      its cheaper, but only slightly

      --

      ________________________________________________

    9. Re:It burns mini CDs... by Bonker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ranging from $0.79 each (100 on a spindle for $79) to $1.09

      Hmmm... Regular 700MB CDR costs about $20.00/100 (or free, if you can find a good enough rebate). A MP3 CDrom player costs around $99.00 at BestBuy and a decent CDRW Drive costs about the same at the same place.

      Sure, this new toy is possibly more convenient, but not $200 convenient, especially when you figure in a higher 'cost of ownership' per MB of storage.

      Sorry, please play again.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    10. Re:It burns mini CDs... by Cheetah86 · · Score: 1

      It's because they're a novelty. I saw a 10 pack of them for 10 dollars at compusa, which is pretty expensive compared to a 100pack of name brand cdrs for 30 dollars.

  3. RIAA will have their panties in a bunch over this! by Anton+Anatopopov · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is the development I have been waiting for. Imagine, you take this thing round to your friends house, and he/she lets you loose on his/her CD collection. In the space of a couple of hours, the damn machine has paid for itself in the savings you could make by ripping CDs instead of buying them.

    No doubt the morons at the RIAA will complain that this device violates the DMCA, but in reality it will encourage people to buy CDs, because they will listen to the music in very low quality MP3 format, and later on they will buy the genuine CD, to get the extra sound quality.

    I just hope these guys stay under the RIAA's radar.

  4. Sounds like it has potential by blumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But 185mb doesn't sound like it's enough to really hold that much. Also a CD-RW version would be a little nicer. They're probably saving that for v2.

    1. Re:Sounds like it has potential by ekrout · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Awww, come on man, 160kbps is pretty good quality and is pretty much error-free as far as the majority of non-audiophiles are concerned. A "workout cd" of 40 songs, or a "day trip cd" or two of 40 songs is fine with me, and should please most people. Hey, it beats an iPod if nothing else in terms of all its features.

      --

      If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
    2. Re:Sounds like it has potential by phloda · · Score: 1

      ?? "...beats an iPod if nothing else..."???

      Jeeze, why not trot out some more tangentially related to bash Apple with?

      Product is a piece of crap:
      1. Can't play miniCD format in your car changer.
      2. Hooking it up to stereo negates purpose of putting the music bytes onto plastic CD bits.
      3. Using USB mass storage is like Chinese water torture.
      4. RipGo requires special fruity colored and $10 ea. media.
      5. Add another brick to the powerstrip Ma! Is not bus powered.

      Links:
      http://www.tomshardware.com/technews/technews-20 01 1025.html
      http://www.imation.com/en_US/products/product_ge ne ric_1.jhtml?Id=IM_PRD341

    3. Re:Sounds like it has potential by turbine216 · · Score: 2

      damn...do some research!!

      1. Can't play miniCD format in your car changer

      ...you most certainly can! a miniCD can be played using a full-size adapter in ANY (read: ANY) CD player, be it tray-loading, slot-loading, or magazine-loading.

      4. RipGo requires special fruity colored and $10 ea. media

      ...not so. Memorex sells miniCD's in 5 packs for $10, and in 50-packs for $35. That's to say nothing of the prices to be found on Pricewatch.

  5. Cool gadget by crumbz · · Score: 1

    Unlike the Sony MD player, this one is truly digital. Can you say bye-bye RIAA. I want one that also does DVDs. Maybe X-mas 2002?

    1. Re:Cool gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      im not really sure what you mean there.

      cut&paste: http://www.minidisc.org/very_faq.html#dontget

      i dont usually post here, but i see uninformed stuff like this and it kind of ticks me off

    2. Re:Cool gadget by crumbz · · Score: 1

      My understanding of the ATRAC format (Sony's compression system) is that it converts the digital signal to an analog format. Hence the copying time of the MD player is the same playing time of the music. I.e. if you record 65 minuted of music, it takes 65 minutes to record it to the player.

      As written in the FAQ you so pointed to, the MD ATRAC format does not support data unless you use the MD-10 with a SCSI interface.

      That was the point I was making. It does not reproduce the audio fidelity digitally. It simply stores an analog input in a digital format. What you get out is not necessarily what you put in.

    3. Re:Cool gadget by YouAreFatMan · · Score: 1
      One question: does it have mic input?

      I bought a MD recorder for live recording. I would much rather have something that I could pop into my CD-ROM drive rather than having to record it from my MD to my PC in real time. At the time, I looked all over the net for a portable standalone CD-R with mic input. A bit too late for me, I suppose...

      --
      Robotiq.com is heavily tested on animals
    4. Re:Cool gadget by Rashomon · · Score: 0

      uhm.... you can record digital to digital if you have a deck with optical i/o. Alas the newer ones aren't shipping with optical out unless you get a high end one.

    5. Re:Cool gadget by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends what model you use. Both the MD recorders that I have owned have had optical digital inputs, I just rip stright from my CD player to MD - optical digital all the way. To my poor old wrecked ears, the sound sound is as good as the original, far better than any MP3 that I've heard, and the disks are for all practical purposes infinitely re-recordable at about $2 a piece.

    6. Re:Cool gadget by Rashomon · · Score: 0

      Well, I was talking about optical outputs. I bought one of the first ones that Sony made. It had a digital output as well. If my memory serves me right, I think that it didn't allow you to make a second generation digital copy. Then again, if one copies from MD to MP3, the sound will degrade anyways, so analog output is good enough.

  6. Really? by usermilk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As far as I can tell, this device sells for $400 (same price as the iPod) and holds 185 MB per cd versus the iPod's 5 GB. I am not saying that the iPod is worth it's price but it can also be used as a portable FW hard drive. I think that this device is much less useful than an iPod. I personally use a 16x FW CD burner and my Rio Volt and am fine with that, this device like the iPod is a little overpriced.

  7. I'm Not Impressed, Really... ;-) by ekrout · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If Apple(TM)(R) had made this, it would be either translucent indigo or arctic white, and cost a mere $19.95 a month for 20 months, or, if you act now, $9.95 a month for 39 months. ;-)

    --

    If you celebrate Xmas, befriend me (538
  8. Bah, I'd rather have the iPod... by Nijika · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although it's still too expensive as well. My portable MP3 player right now consists of a 10 year old walkman with a tape deck.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
  9. And this is better than iPod, how? by dnorman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Posts slamming Apple for releasing a $399US 5GB Firewire hard drive-based MP3 player that weighs 6 ounces...

    Posts lauding a mini-CD-burning 160MB player that does... Oh, wait, that's all it does. For $400US...

    I'll gladly take an iPod, thanks... And thanks to the Firewire Disk mode, I can write it off as capital equipment that I can use while consulting... Tax writeoff = free... Wait, I guess I could do that with this teeny CD burner, too... Or is it MP3 only?

    --


    It is pitch dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:And this is better than iPod, how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, unless you're in the 100% income bracket, tax writeoff != free.

    2. Re:And this is better than iPod, how? by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

      I agree on the Apple comments, but a quick perusal of the article does answer the last question you posed:

      The unit is not limited to digital music files, allowing it to simultaneously serve as a backup unit for your PC

      That makes it a bit handier for the techie-on-the-go, as Firewire is nowhere near as ubiquitous as USB, and these CD's should play in anything. Wonder if you can burn a (small) ISO or other bootable CD on 'em?

    3. Re:And this is better than iPod, how? by dnorman · · Score: 1

      True... Although, you can write off 1/3 of the value of the equipment per year, so after 3 years... == free

      --


      It is pitch dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    4. Re:And this is better than iPod, how? by gorgon · · Score: 2
      Wonder if you can burn a (small) ISO or other bootable CD on 'em?
      Yes, you can. One example is the Bootable Business Card and its sibling the Linuxcare Bootable Toolbox.
      --

      And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners.
      Berke Breathed
    5. Re:And this is better than iPod, how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is correct, but you forgot to point out that dnorman == poofter.

    6. Re:And this is better than iPod, how? by RollingThunder · · Score: 2

      Sorry, didn't mean "is is possible to make a bootable miniCD", I meant "can this player burn a bootable miniCD itself, or is it crippled in some way". My bad, I wasn't precise. :)

    7. Re:And this is better than iPod, how? by MrEfficient · · Score: 2
      Well, this thing is better because you don't have to have a mac to use it. It looks like it should work with linux, mac, or windows. So it should appeal to a much wider audience. Now, if the ipod would work with other OSes, then this cd burner would either have to die or drop it's price drasticly to survive. I think the ipod is a really cool device, but as long as it's mac only, it's useless to most people.

      I think this burner is supposed to transfer any type of file, not just mp3s.

      --
      Check out AbiWord.
    8. Re:And this is better than iPod, how? by vanguard · · Score: 1

      Aren't you the same troll who said I couldn't pass the CPA exam?

      Do a little research before you put your ignorance on display. You can write off 20% of the cost of the good per year over five years. However, a writeoff is not a credit. If you spend $1 on this thing you'll get about 20% of $0.28 per year for five years. (assuming 28% tax bracket)

      After five years (not three) you'll have $0.28 back, not your dollar.

      --
      That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
  10. Usefulness? by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 1

    This seems like yet another device where more things are rolled into one. Given the fact that market is already saturated, and that the number of people without burners is on the decline, and the fact that they use a special Mini-CD format (which means that it probably won't be compatible 100% or the time or it won't have a very large capacity - this is just speculation, of course) means that this might not be the best product right now...

    Is anyone else reminded of the Kodak Digital Camera/MP3 Player? Granted, this thing has more features for the same purpose now, but...

  11. Re:RIAA will have their panties in a bunch over th by crumbz · · Score: 1

    Nothing stays under their radar for long. I'd like to see this gadget for sale at Coconuts or Musicland.
    Vinyl is the way to go anyway....

  12. Sony by atrowe · · Score: 4, Informative
    Sony has had a similar product out for a while now.

    And their's is only $250.

    --

    -atrowe: Card-carrying Mensa member. I have no toleranse for stupidity.

    1. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with a Sony product is that when I think Sony, I think of gonads. And penii.

    2. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, it works like a charm under Linux!

    3. Re:Sony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony Digital Relay: full-size CD, 650 MB, under 1 pound, 3 hour battery life, $250
      Imation RipGO!: mini-CD, 185 MB, 8 ounces, 5 hour battery life, $400

      Both: USB (4x / 4x / 6x max), WMA, MP3, CDDA.

      Apple iPod: hard drive, 5 GB, 6 ounces, 10 hour battery life, $400

      iPod: FireWire ( 32x ), MP3, VBR, WAV, AIFF.
      (Firmware upgradable to future formats. Built-in video games. Charges over FireWire.)

    4. Re:Sony by sacherjj · · Score: 1

      Does that work as a stand alone MP3 player? There really isn't any info for that feature on the site you listed.

  13. this will never sell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sweet jesus in a birchbark canoe!!! why on earth would I pay $400 for 185MB of storage, when i can get 6GB for $250?! Even with a cd burner for my home unit, I still come out ahead!

  14. not-really - i use a lathe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    and grind down regular cdr discs into mini cdr discs

  15. Durability? by KosovoYankee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How long will the writer last if it is constantly being dropped, banged against your thigh when you walk/jog, or piled under a stack of books on a desk or a schoolbag? I mean, the mechanism to write cd's must be fairly delicate....

    --
    - If This Peace Is Fictious, I Shall Destroy It
    1. Re:Durability? by Monte · · Score: 1

      How long will the writer last if it is constantly being dropped, banged against your thigh when you walk/jog, or piled under a stack of books on a desk or a schoolbag?

      That's why you buy the no-questions-asked "extended warranty" from the retailer for another 20 or 30 bucks. You're right, something like can become trash with one little mishap.

      My rule of thumb: never get the extended warranty on something that's going to sit on a shelf all it's life. Do get it if what you're buying is small, expensive and meant to be carried around, because eventually you'll probably drop it.

      Then again, maybe I'm just clumsy...

  16. i'll wait until the reviews come out, thanks by krog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    seeing the issues all the current portable mp3 tech seems to have (some combination of: not enough space, not fast enough to reload, 2-sec gap between songs, bitrate restrictions, etc), i would certainly recommend waiting for a few reviews to come out.

    i hate thinking, "this would have been so cool had they taken another four days to design it!"

  17. Crap... by atrowe · · Score: 0
    From the article: "By leveraging the mini CD format, Imation was able to keep the player's size down for those who want to use it as their main portable player. The cost is smaller disk capacity - 185 MB versus the 600+ MB a standard CD can hold - but that still holds plenty of tunes when your on the go. "

    Sounds just like a minidisc player to me. What is the advantage of this over 10-year-old minidisc technology?

    --

    -atrowe: Card-carrying Mensa member. I have no toleranse for stupidity.

    1. Re:Crap... by M_Talon · · Score: 2

      What is the advantage of this over 10-year-old minidisc technology?

      The difference is mini-cds can be played in a regular CD player too. Ever noticed the indention in the middle of a CD player's tray? That's for a mini-CD. Minidisc is proprietary and requires you use a Sony licensed player.

      --
      Electronic Frontier Foundation for online civil rights information
    2. Re:Crap... by RAruler · · Score: 2

      Minidisc is proprietary and requires you use a Sony licensed player.
      It's not as if Sony is forcing you to use a Sony Player/Recorder.. far from it... there Panasonic/JVC/Awia/Sharp minidisc players/recorders.. if Sony was really evil, they'd start saying that you couldn't play minidiscs correctly because you don't have Sony MiniDisc Explorer 6.. err.. :)

      --

      --
      Insert Witty Sig Here
    3. Re:Crap... by John_Booty · · Score: 2

      The difference is mini-cds can be played in a regular CD player too

      My car has a slot-load CD player. Guess that's not "regular"....

      --

      OtakuBooty.com: Smart, funny, sexy nerds.
    4. Re:Crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check the manufacturer's documentation for your slot-load CD player. You'd be surprised ... a lot of slotloaders DO accept the 3-inch mini-CD format. But check your manual BEFORE trying ... it'd suck if it turned out yours wasn't one of them.

    5. Re:Crap... by jooniqzb1tch · · Score: 1

      well, AFAIK MD devices only play back ATRAC encoded music, if someone comes up with a tiny MD player that plays 300 mb of mp3 it would be a success, but I doubt this is even possible considering how cripled the MD storage system is ..

    6. Re:Crap... by Kris_J · · Score: 2

      The small discs also won't work in those old caddy-loading CD drives, although there is an adapter that comes with the Sony CDr cameras that may cope with slot-loading and caddy-loading drivers...

  18. Re:RIAA will have their panties in a bunch over th by Anton+Anatopopov · · Score: 1
    Vinyl sounds better, but the problem is that it deterioirates over time, as you get dust and scratches on it.

    The best audio format would be some kind of analog laser disc, which would combine the indestructability of the CD with the analog 'warmth and humanity' of vinyl.

    Mind you, looks like the dumb consumer has spoken. I cannot remember the last time I saw a mainstream release (apart from dance music) come out on vinyl. I think vinyl is all but dead.

    SACD seems to be the latest pretender to the vinyl throne, but with players costing over $1000 I think they make take time to catch on.

  19. Does it work with Win2k? by guru_steve · · Score: 1

    Called the RipGO mini CD-R burner and digital audio player, the unit works on both Macintosh and Windows (except 95 and NT), machines.

    So let's get this straight... It doesn't work with Windows 95. Nor does it work with NT. Win2k is based on NT. So I guess you need Win98, or ME. Ick.

    1. Re:Does it work with Win2k? by CmdrPaco · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It doesn't (yet) work with Linux, BSD, QNX, or Amiga, it seems...

      --
      I bet this is not "First Post."
    2. Re:Does it work with Win2k? by giverson · · Score: 1

      According to the article, it uses USB to connect to the computer. I would guess that is the reason why it doesn't work with NT and 95. USB support with Win95OSR2 is pretty horrible and it is nonexistant with other revisions.

      In Conclusion, Win2000 is supported. I'm 98% certain.

      Prove me wrong.

      --

      Capitalism does not lead to corruption, lack of character does.
  20. Compatibility? by Ssolstice · · Score: 4, Funny

    the unit works on both Macintosh and Windows (except 95 and NT)

    So, it only works on XP and WFW 3.11?

    1. Re:Compatibility? by Publicus · · Score: 1

      Ha, that's funny. Wish I could mod you up. But wait, isn't XP just a collection of bug fixes on 95 and added NTFS support?

      --

      My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

    2. Re:Compatibility? by FigWig · · Score: 1

      Actually it should work on any windows that supports USB. That includes win 98, win 2k, win me, and win xp.

      --
      Scuttlemonkey is a troll
    3. Re:Compatibility? by Kris_J · · Score: 2

      Win 95b w/OSR2.x and Win 95c both support USB and I have gotten such things as USB scanners and Palm USB adapters running under 95, however USB support was dramatically improved under 98 and few companies bother to write 95 drivers for their USB devices (which is a shame).

  21. INteresting "target audience" by Sawbones · · Score: 1

    The article/ad says the target audience is people who haven't yet bought a CD Burner or don't have space in their computers. I can't imagine anyone with 200+ megs of MP3s to trade not already having a better way to shuffle bits around.

    I wonder how the RIAA feels about a company marketing to those damned illegal Traders.

    --

    Ad in classifieds: Pandora's Box (no box) $5
  22. It's weakness is USB by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do you guys think USB is too slow for stuff like this? I know USB 2.0 is quicker but I assume this is using USB 1.0.

    It seems like devices like this would benefit a ton from firewire. USB 1.0 works great for mice and printers and other low bandwidth devices but in my experiences, it seems too slow for transferring large amounts of data.

    That being said, I have noticed that my Sony PIII 650 MHz laptop running WinME is quicker than my Athlon at 550 MHz running Win2k, so maybe chipset or OS has more to do with it than anything.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:It's weakness is USB by gorilla · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't see it to be a problem. The bottleneck in terms of speed here will be the burner, not the host connection.

    2. Re:It's weakness is USB by nsrbrake · · Score: 1

      Single spin cd players tranfer data at 150KB/s so let's go out on a limb and say that this thing is a 4x burner, that's a whole 600KB/s. I think USB will hold up just fine under that...

      Out of curiosity when did Sony start making PIIIs?
      Sorry had to...

      Oh and here is the url for the Imation site...
      http://www.imation.com/en_US/products/product_ge ne ric_1.jhtml?Id=IM_PRD341

      --

      Bah!
    3. Re:It's weakness is USB by jooniqzb1tch · · Score: 1

      I'll take a slower but more standard format anyday for a mobile device .. I'd hate having firewire only and not beeing able to use it AT ALL when I need it because the box doesn't support it.

    4. Re:It's weakness is USB by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      I've got a 4x USB CD burner - that seems to be the top speed for USB. So, a 150MB disc will take (at 600KB/sec) 250 seconds, or, in other words, about 4 1/2 minutes is the most you'll have to wait to burn a disc.

  23. Fragility and Utility by nyquist_theorem · · Score: 5, Interesting

    First thing, its a CDR drive. In my experience, CDR drives are fragile and flaky and prone to sudden death even while standing still (I'm on my 8th in 5 years). MP3 players are also fragile and flaky and prone to sudden death (scratch two PMP300s and two NJBs - my RioVolt shows up next week along with the replacement HD for my NJB).

    Second thing, related to the first. Who makes it? Assuming IMation has OEM'd the thing out, who did the fab? I would suspect the thing is far from durable.

    Third thing, I have seen mini CDR media but no mini CDRW. Who wants to backup their stuff onto a 180MB mini CDR? I mean once in a while its cool, but if you can't use your CDR to back up CDs, whats the point? The mini media is nice, but a mini burner that wont take fullsize media at all is useless IMHO.

    Fourth thing, its $400. That's enough for an NJB($220), a RioVolt 90 ($89, for when the NJB breaks) and an internal CDR for your computer ($89).

    Based on point four - what advantage does this thing really have over the NJB+Riovolt+CDR-in-your-computer? And if you don't have room in your computer for a CDR, and you're gonna buy this contraption, could you not just buy a USB CDRW and a Riovolt for less? Of course you could. And that way you're not banging your CDR drive around.

    Seems like a silly idea to me. Now if only it had restrictive rights management! :)

    --
    -- "Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge." (Charles Darwin)
    1. Re:Fragility and Utility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CDR drives are fragile and flaky and prone to sudden death even while standing still (I'm on my 8th in 5 years) .

      You eat them for breakfast or what?

    2. Re:Fragility and Utility by Dino-Bob · · Score: 1

      If you have not seen miniature CD-RW discs, you obviously have not looked at all. Point 3 invalidated.

      --
      "There is no surer way to ruin a good discussion than to contaminate it with the facts." -- Cecil Adams
    3. Re:Fragility and Utility by Mike+the+Mac+Geek · · Score: 1

      CDRW Minis are out there. I picked up another spindle today at Best Buy. 20$ for a 10 pack of 185MB 21minute CDRW's. Not bad, Memorex makes em.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- ---- The man, the myth, the something or other.
    4. Re:Fragility and Utility by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      I have seen mini CDR media but no mini CDRW. Who wants to backup their stuff onto a 180MB mini CDR? I mean once in a while its cool, but if you can't use your CDR to back up CDs, whats the point? The mini media is nice, but a mini burner that wont take fullsize media at all is useless IMHO.
      That would be me. As I collect data from the 'Net (MP3s, images, web pages, programs, etc) and as I create my own content (digital photos, personal multimedia projects), I group the files into 180MB volumes and then use a friend's burner to burn them onto 8cm CDr discs. I don't have any desire to copy complete CDs and I have an ultralight portable with limited expansion options. For me, this is the idea CD-burner, even before you get to the point where it can play MP3s.

      However, while I am without a job, the US$400 price tag is way out of my budget.

    5. Re:Fragility and Utility by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      In my experience, CDR drives are fragile and flaky and prone to sudden death even while standing still (I'm on my 8th in 5 years).

      Maybe you should be buying better hardware. I've had three in five years, and the second one was Not As Advertised; Then the company I bought it from folded. Big shock. The first was a philips omniwriter 2600, which was a wonderful drive at the time. I think I paid like $350 for it or something. The second was a reconditioned 8x yamaha, which died within two months. The third is the burner I have now, a plextor plexwriter 12/10/32S. It is by far the best burner I have ever used. I'm having a problem where it keeps underrunning under nero CD, but it has burn-proof so it doesn't matter.

      what advantage does this thing really have over the NJB+Riovolt+CDR-in-your-computer?

      Well, for one, it's only one device. It's pretty useless as a burner IMO since it's only 3", but then again, it works fine as a burner for itself.

      For two, it's more portable than your computer and accompanying CDR - If you have a friend who has some data you want, you can go to their house with a 3" CD with the drivers/software on it, put it in their CDROM, load the drivers, and burn a CD, all without even using 'net access.

      What would really make this an ideal device to me is if it had some facility for getting data from digital cameras, or even from one digital camera. That way, even an 8MB flash would be sufficient; Just offload whatever else you've got, and burn it. If there were a matching camera, I'd buy both devices. Well, if I had a job right now. The camera could cost up to $400, which is a pretty reasonable price for a multi-megapixel camera anyway.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  24. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's about the size of a regular portable CD player. You'd think that a solid-state device would be a much better tack for these companies to take.

  25. Go see one in person. by booch · · Score: 2

    It's already in stock at CompUSA. It was in their ad this weekend.

    --
    Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  26. Obligitory MiniDisc Plug by FatRatBastard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You might as well go the MiniDisc route. Cheaper/Available media, etc. Yeah yeah yeah, I know its a closed format and such, but the damn thing works, and it works well. They're (finally) making a bit of a dent here thanks to some Mp3->ATRAC software.

    I love the MD!

    1. Re:Obligitory MiniDisc Plug by Rashomon · · Score: 0

      MInidisc is much better in terms of sound quality. Also, MD now has MDLP recording mode, that will allow you to put 320 mins of music on a single disc. It does this by reducing the quality to roughly that of MP3.

  27. I guess the only question is by Publicus · · Score: 1

    Does it play *real* mp3s, or crippled mp3s? It's my opinion that the players that force proprietary encryption on mp3 files in order to work shouldn't get to advertise as "mp3 players," because, in reality, they aren't.

    But then, what am I going to do about it besides rant on /.?

    --

    My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

  28. iPOD is probably better by kawaichan · · Score: 0

    iPOD sounds like a better deal if somoene would get it to work on PC. I mean, who needs a burner when you have a 5gb drive on to go? HD's price has gone down so much now CD just are just not that attractive no more but then again, I have 5PCs at home, none of them has a firewire port.

    --

    kawai
  29. Re:RIAA will have their panties in a bunch over th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine, you take this thing round to your friends house, and he/she lets you loose on his/her CD collection. In the space of a couple of hours, the damn machine has paid for itself in the savings you could make by ripping CDs instead of buying them.

    And if it happened in Canada, would be completely legal

  30. Re:long play minidisc's by non_linear · · Score: 1

    For the past year (6 mos?), long play encoding for minidiscs has been available. 4 hours on a 60 minute minidisc. Not too shabby! Check out http://minidisc.org/ for more info. as for minidisc being proprietary, what about MP3? ;)

    Sony is not the only source for minidisc recorders. sharp is another big supplier.

  31. Re:RIAA will have their panties in a bunch over th by Jburkholder · · Score: 1

    I wonder how well that would work, though.

    The interface to the PC is USB. How long would it really take to rip and encode a CD, transfer it to your RipGo via USB and burn a miniCDR? I'm guessing it would take quite a bit longer than a couple hours to rip/encode/transfer/burn $400 worth of CDs.

  32. Archos 6gb Recording Drive by Degobah · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just picked up this <A HREF='http://www.archos.com/us/products/product_50 0201.html'>puppy</A> that has 6 Gigs of storage and can rip directly from any audio source. And it's $350. Seems to me to be the best of the IPod and this thing, for 50 bucks less. You can take that cash and buy 2 Rocco DVD's

    1. Re:Archos 6gb Recording Drive by Tucan · · Score: 1

      Your point is good, but I hope you got the 30 day price-matching guarantee. Harmony is selling the Jukebox 6000 for $219+SH.

    2. Re:Archos 6gb Recording Drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is the best of the iPod, minus Size and Firewire. 5~6gb transfer on USB must take ages compared to the 10minutes on Firewire. Also this beasty looks a lot bigger than the iPod.

    3. Re:Archos 6gb Recording Drive by pamasters · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Jukebox 6000 is a different product, without the real-time MP3 encoder (check out the specs - it has stereo out only; the recorder has analog & digital stereo in). Seems to me a real-time 160kbps encoder would be worth the extra $$

  33. You'd know the answer to this... by PhilMills · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...if you'd just read the article.

    It's USB. Win95 or WinNT can't deal with USB in any reasonable fashion. Win2K supports USB just fine.

    Y'know, WinME was based on Win98 was based on Win95, so, by process of elimination, it looks like it'll only work on Macs.

    PhilMills

    -Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, will be taken out of context and posted on /.

    --
    Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, will be quoted out of context on
  34. Re:long play minidisc's by M_Talon · · Score: 1

    Hmmm...MP3 is pretty much a standard, as is the CD format. Mini-CDs are just a smaller capacity version of a CD, and they play on >90% of the CD players out there. I can't put a minidisc in my standard CD-ROM drive, so that makes a difference. :)

    Thank you for correcting me on the Sony thing though. I do appreciate a level-headed correction.

    --
    Electronic Frontier Foundation for online civil rights information
  35. Yep. by megaduck · · Score: 3, Informative

    I imagine that they disqualify 98 and NT because neither of those have USB support. Any Windows released after '98 should have the requisite USB support (that includes Windows 98 and Win2K).


    Of course USB is dog slow for this kind of product. For the same amount of scratch you can get an iPod with a five gig capacity and FireWire connectivity. Just my $0.02.

    --
    This .sig for rent.
    1. Re:Yep. by mahtaaaain · · Score: 0
      "I imagine that they disqualify 98 and NT because neither of those have USB support. Any Windows released after '98 should have the requisite USB support (that includes Windows 98 and Win2K)."


      you mean 95 and NT....any windows after 95 has the usb support....

      --
      you a winna , ha ha ha
  36. Uhh... by Transcendent · · Score: 2, Informative

    What about minidisks??? They're smaller, you can burn on the go, and re-burn whenever you want. You don't have to worry about gettin the disk scratched or anything either. The capacity of an MD is pretty much the same too. So why is everybody getting all hyped up about this when MD's do it better?

    1. Re:Uhh... by Tucan · · Score: 1


      Because MDs (no matter how many times you reburn them) are limited to use in MD players.

    2. Re:Uhh... by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Yah, really.

      What I want is an all-inclusive Minidisc setup. I want a device that plays MP3, lets me xfer data, can record voice through a mic, and has a decent video stillcam. It needs a car audio interface, so I can slam it in the dash and play MP3. It needs a home stereo interface, so I can slam it in and play MP3. It needs a computer interface, so I can slam it in and record MP3 and xfer out the voice recordings, data, and images.

      If it had a bit of PDA in it, so much the better. If it also had a reliable but slow and common connection, good: I can then stuff it onto any computer and xfer data.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:Uhh... by jooniqzb1tch · · Score: 1

      do you think this is even possible considering the rights management and the ATRAC audio encoding and such ? a MD based storage solution would be great but I wonder if the MD's file system would permit that.. anyone having some info on that ?

    4. Re:Uhh... by Transcendent · · Score: 1

      So... CD's are limited to CD players... floppy's are limited to floppy drives, tapes are limited to tape decks. The point you made was pretty weak. The real point you should have made was that MD's aren't as popular as CD's (at least in the US... Europe its great I've heard). The world needs to realise how great MD's are in terms of size verse storage capacity. You can put on 80mins of sound on a 140mb disk using the ATRAC music compression (which is just as good as CD audio... i've put it to my own personal test), and 320mins with ATRAC3... All in a 3in square that can't be scratched easily or by laying around like a CD can. The track managing is great, and labeling is easy and useful. If they made it where they could put MP3 files on it, then it would sell a whole lot better... and I'm sure that a good percentage of the world population would make the switch...

    5. Re:Uhh... by Tucan · · Score: 1

      You asked the question. You got an answer. You seem to get it now.

  37. Remember how it goes with Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typically, with any Apple product, you can go elsewhere and find something for half the price that is fast and has a lot more extras. Might not look as good, though!

    1. Re:Remember how it goes with Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, Charlie. No one else makes a FireWire MP3 player. FireWire is 32x faster than USB.

      iPod: 6 ounces, 5 GB hard drive, deck-of-cards size, 10 hour battery life, FireWire interface with built-in charging.

      Find that elswhere. At any price...

      It also doubles as an external FireWire hard drive for data transport. Think digital wallet.

  38. Re:RIAA will have their panties in a bunch over th by ichimunki · · Score: 1

    I don't know if you consider them mainstream or not, but they do get radio play, and they recorded a theme song for a recent James Bond film. Garbage's latest release "beautifulgarbage" is available on vinyl from cdnow.com. Of course, this is not a common practice. And sadly, they are on an RIAA affiliated label, so I can't recommend buying the album, no matter what format it comes on.

    --
    I do not have a signature
  39. Re:RIAA will have their panties in a bunch over th by Cujo · · Score: 1

    My guess is that it would take a couple of days, non stop. And $400 worth of CDs hardly qualifies as a collection.

    --

    Helium balloons want to be free.

  40. 185MB *each* is plenty... by krog · · Score: 1

    ...because you can easily carry 5 or 10 of these things with you in a pocket, or far more if you're packing a bag. small media is good.

    and considering the cost of CD-Rs these days, CD-RWs seem more and more needless.

  41. Someone show me a decent MP3 player by Scutter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh goody. Another over-priced MP3 player with too many bells and whistles. And a price that's way higher than it should be.

    All I want is a decent MP3 player. I want one that supports some sort of smart media card, supports at least 128MB, and has USB. And most importantly, doesn't cost $400! Is that too much to ask? The Diamond Rio 500 came closest to that, but of course it's not made anymore (and cost too much anyway). Instead, SonicBlue produces the vastly inferior Rio 600 or the way over-priced 800. If I can buy a camcorder for $300, a freaking MP3 player oughta be under $100.

    I don't need a built-in CD player (that's why I have MP3's fer crissakes!) I don't need a built-in hard drive. I don't need a goddamn built-in toaster oven. I just want a little MP3 player that holds more than 5 songs that I can stick in my pocket when I go for a walk. I certainly don't need to put my entire MP3 collection on it all at once.

    Let's see a cheap MP3 player that does one thing exceptionally well, instead of an overpriced MP3 player that does half a dozen things poorly.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:Someone show me a decent MP3 player by Deslock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The RioVolt is reasonably priced. Personally, I bought a new RIO500 for $70 on Ebay and a 128MB Smartmedia card for $40 (techbargains.com). It's a great little device:

      1. solid state!
      2. lightweight: 3 oz
      3. small size: 0.6x3.5x2.4"
      4. 13 hour battery life on a single AA
      5. 192 MB!

      Sure I can't store my whole collection on it, but I can fit 2.5 hours using VBR or 3+ hours at 128 kbps. That's more than adequate for most uses and doesn't require any screwing around with CDRs or Minidiscs.

      As far as the RipGo goes, are they on crack? It's a cool device, but at $400 I'll pass. Recording abilities or not, this thing is way overpriced... since most users don't need recording, they should come out with a player-only unit similar in price to the RIO-Volt.

    2. Re:Someone show me a decent MP3 player by Willis+Wasabi · · Score: 0
      Ok, how about a Rio One? $100 (actually I got mine free after rebate at BestBuy along with Windows XP and a trunkload of other free stuff), actually loud enough that I turn down the default startup volume cause it's too loud. Sounds pretty decent, weighs less than 3 ounces, and is deck of cards sized.

      Downside: drop the cheap-ass headphones, they sound awful, I replaced them with a pair from Philips for $10. Only 32MB of memory, but it's SmartMedia expandable to 160MB (I went to 96 over the weekend). Internal and expansion memory are separate volumes, and therefore you could lose a couple megs due to internal fragmentation. Bundled RealJukebox sucks unbelievably. Build quality leaves a little to be desired. Froze once or twice when I did stupid stuff.

      Upside: USB. Mountable under Win2k and WinXP, probably under Linux etc since there were no drivers, just USB mass storage already in both. And did I mention I got it free? :)

      Gulp, now for the embarassing part. It plays WMAs, and I can't really tell the difference between 64Kbps WMA and 128Kbps MP3, but wow, 64 Kbps MP3 is full of compression artifacts. Really, I swear I love Linux. :) Oh, well it's not like MP3s were completely unemcumbered. This will do until there's an Ogg player (and Ogg works well at 64K). Who knows, the Rio One is flashable, maybe someday.

      I have had it less than a week though, I'm sure I could still grow to loathe it.

      --
      All true wisdom can be found in sigs.
    3. Re:Someone show me a decent MP3 player by emars · · Score: 1

      Man, I read this and it seemed so familiar. Then I looked here.

      Collecting karma with the same post in different threads! Ingenious!

      --
      ...18...19...20 Submit
    4. Re:Someone show me a decent MP3 player by Scutter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I recycled it for the same reason that /. recycled their story (they just changed the name of the MP3 player in question). Personally, I thought it was amusing that I didn't have to change a word of the post and it still fit.

      --

      "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  42. Format is Sony's, though by M_Talon · · Score: 2

    As far as I can tell, the format is still Sony's to control. They're just letting others use it. Technically, they could do the whole proprietary thing (as you joked), but it's really not in their best interests. One really can learn a lesson from Microsoft in how NOT to do business in the longterm :)

    --
    Electronic Frontier Foundation for online civil rights information
  43. Not really by yesthatguy · · Score: 1

    Win98 and WinME were just bug fixes and added "features" onto 95. WinXP is actually coming off of the NT Kernel, and isn't a successor (code-base-wise) to 95.

    --
    Yes! That guy!
  44. Where's the mic input!? by sadclown · · Score: 4, Informative
    Am I the only one who misses the audio input on these things? We haven't had a new portable digital recording device superior to the DAT walkman in 15 years! Why don't they just put 1 $15 analog mic input in this thing or the iPod and give musicians, audio engineers and reporters a fantastic new toy.


    I know, minidisc does it already, but minidisc players don't have digital output for PC post-production work and actually doesn't sound as good as plain old WAV files.


    If this had a mic input, you could burn directly to MP3 and have 6 hours of digital recording - 6 times that of a minidisc.


    If the iPod had a mic input, you could burn 10 hours of uncompressed audio or 100 hours of MP3s. Portable 2 track recording studio!

  45. Burn this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Yabbo make me lose my mind


    Armpit hair, armpit hair.

  46. MD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is bull. Why would this be ANY better than MD [which is cheaper and more functional].

  47. Almost the same thing by cmoney · · Score: 1
    For $119 from Easybuy2000.com, you can get a player-only model that's just as small. Who cares about having a portable CD-R drive that only writes to 3" CDs?

    Get the small player and a regular CD-R drive that writes both large and small CDs and you save $100 and get a faster burner to boot.

  48. Ugh. by BoarderPhreak · · Score: 2
    This is about as useful as the Apple iPod...


    Who buys a $400 walkman? They're too small and fragile and easily stolen, not to mention outdated fairly quickly by the next "big thing."


    Besides, I'd rather have a burner where I can use it most efficiently - at home, attached to my RAID, where my 4,000+ MP3s are!

  49. But what if... by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    What if it's a 16x burner...
    I guess if they make it burn slow enough for USB to keep up. I don't think USB 1.0 can keep up with 16x burn speeds can it?

    Call me impatient, but when I burn CDs I don't want to wait. 4x doesn't cut it. Granted, when I'm burning I'm usually not making audio cds that might be worth listening but instead I'm backing up data from a webserver. Maybe I'd be more patient if it were something fun like audio cds.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:But what if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thing is tho, 185MB at 4x doesn't take a lot of minutes..

  50. Re:HELP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  51. How about this one? 128MB, palm-sized, $135. by corky6921 · · Score: 2

    Check out MyDivaPlayer.com. They have a 128MB player that also supports CompactFlash for $135 shipped after discount. It is extremely small -- about 3"; fits in the palm of your hand. I haven't had any experience with it, but the few reviews I could find are raves. I plan to buy one for Christmas. The coolness factor of having a mini "Zip drive"/MP3 player/voice recorder for $135 is really what attracted me to this one. --Erica

  52. iPod = $399 + Apple PC by swordboy · · Score: 2

    The problem with iPod is that you need to buy an Apple PC to go with it. The bottom line is that Apple and Imation have subsidized their product for the sake of other interests! In the case of Imation, they are supporting an open standard so I will take their product over Apple's (technologically superior) product any day.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:iPod = $399 + Apple PC by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 2

      Bzzzt. Apple is selling it that way, but that doesn't mean that's the way it is. Wait 'til they ship, then we'll know whether you're kneejerking or on to something.

      --
      --Matthew
    2. Re:iPod = $399 + Apple PC by swordboy · · Score: 1

      There's no "bzzzt" about it. Apple lists the requirement for the Apple Computer in the specs at the official iPod site. To quote:

      Requirements - Apple computer with built-in FireWire port
      - Mac OS 9.2.1 (or later) or Mac OS X v10.1 (or later)
      - iTunes 2 software (included)

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    3. Re:iPod = $399 + Apple PC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPod runs in FireWire Disk Mode (as an external FireWire hard drive) by holding down the Fwd and Rev buttons on the unit at the same time (when you turn it on). This means the iPod can be used as external hard drive with any operating system which supports external FireWire disks. The music files which the iPod plays are stored in an invisible folder on this external FireWire hard drive. Placing your MP3's from your PC into this folder is all that is necessary to get full music functionality out of the iPod. FireWire Disk Mode means you get full tax write-off functionality also, even without a Mac.

      It is amazing how much misinformation is propagating about this little device. Yes, it has a 5 GB hard drive (a 1.8 inch Toshiba). Yes, you can move MP3 files between different computers (Macintoshes even) over the iPod (by using manual mode in iTunes, or FWDM on PC's). Yes, this device rocks and is priced exactly right for the market to which it will initially sell.

      I apologize for those people who think that just because a configuration is not specifically supported, that it is not possible.

    4. Re:iPod = $399 + Apple PC by Matthew+Weigel · · Score: 2

      They also say it's a regular Firewire hard drive. No iTunes necessary to use it as such. It's entirely possible, whether they say so or not, that it just does the Right Thing with any media files stored on it (it's also possible it's proprietary and broken). Until the units are shipping, or people start really exploring their 'review' units, we don't know.

      It''s entirely possible that you're right, but web page blurbs are not the way to know.

      --
      --Matthew
    5. Re:iPod = $399 + Apple PC by sirinek · · Score: 1
      Um there is no end to hardware that only lists Windows as a compatible operating system, yet we've all found a way to run Linux using said hardware. Why should apple's ipod be any different?


      siri

  53. Have these guys ever heard of Minidisc? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol.

  54. 3 months? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do I win somehting?

  55. Only about 150mb on mini CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Except their Mini CDrs, whichr a lot more expensive than normal ones, and only hold 150mb, so thats like 2 Albums.
    Not that I'm bothered about RIAA, being in Euroland anyway

  56. I'm still waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for one that supports CP/M.

  57. nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .wav and midi files only, sorry.

  58. What about copy protection and DRM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm getting VERY tired of product announcements of music and video recording devices that simply do not disclose what, if any, copy protection and digital rights management (DRM) schemes they embody.

    Reviewers and consumers need to start getting assertive if we don't want to buy a pig in a poke--or, worse yet, buy a device on the basis of what reviews say it will do, then discover that a required firmware "upgrade" has disabled those capabilities. "Oh, we didn't actually SAY it would record ANY music..."

    Vendors have a perfect right to sell devices with any restrictions they like, but they need to DISCLOSE these restrictions.

    The specifications for the iPod have ALREADY mutated--to more restricted capabilities--and it isn't even out yet!

  59. "The problem is..." by mblase · · Score: 2

    The problem with iPod is that you need to buy an Apple PC to go with it.

    True, and no doubt Apple knows this is a downer. This and the price makes it obvious they're currently selling the iPod as a Mac peripheral, rather than a general-purpose MP3 player.

    However, I expect Apple will: (1) bring down the price on the device after a few months, (2) develop and/or partner for non-Apple compatability for the device. If people like it, no doubt third-party attachments for non-FireWire computers will become available. The FireWire is one of the best features about the iPod, though, so I don't expect that to ever go away.

    Just my thoughts. Sony sells all their portables with Memory Stick compatability; Apple sells for Mac compatability; Microsoft sells for Windows compatability. It's normal for the industry to at least *start* with closed compatability and open it as time goes on. Smaller companies benefit from open technologies, like MP3 CDs, because they don't have to develop as much.

    But as has been said, Apple is profitable *because* they target a niche audience, and the only reason to complain that they're focusing on that niche is if you aren't yet part of it. So I'd expect the iPod price drop and wider compatability to arrive at about the same time. Best thing you ("you" meaning "all Slashdot's readers") can do to hasten that process: WRITE APPLE AND TELL THEM YOU WANT LINUX COMPATABILITY. It's got to be easier than Microsoft compatability, right?

    1. Re:"The problem is..." by swb · · Score: 2

      Just my thoughts. Sony sells all their portables with Memory Stick compatability; Apple sells for Mac compatability; Microsoft sells for Windows compatability.

      It half makes sense, but many of Sony's products that are memory stick compatible are still usable even if you never own a memory stick as long as you live.

      I wouldn't own a Macintosh (space+money mean the 5 PCs I own and use for business must stay), but I would own an iPod. But I can't because I'm not buying a $900 computer to own a $400 MP3 player.

  60. Correction! by megaduck · · Score: 2

    I meant "Any Windows released after '95..."


    I knew that "preview" button was there for a reason!

    --
    This .sig for rent.
    1. Re:Correction! by Fredpro · · Score: 1

      Actually I believe Windows '95C had USB support, but I guess they disqualify it because 95% of Windows '95 users would be using an older version. That is, if you said "Windows 95 Revision C or later" you would probably just confuse people.

  61. I have an MD, I like it, but.... by SethJohnson · · Score: 2


    Minidisc is terrific for being able to record in the field, but the whole thing is still a closed-digital thing. Like what I mean is that if you want to load a minidisc with sound to listen to, you gotta play all the music in real-time to transfer it. And if you want track numbers in there, it requires a lot of manual intervention.

    The article, unfortunately, focuses on the size of this player and not how you get the music on the disc. I'm wondering if it's firewire or USB.. It would be very cool if this thing recorded in the field, too. That's one feature I think they could add to the iPod 2.0 to make it just a tad bit more appealing: Recording.
    1. Re:I have an MD, I like it, but.... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      A good MD will take the track and title data off the CD automatically anyway. Even if you use analogue transfer they do a good job of automatically finding the tracks. As far as 'a lot of manual intervention' goes, in the worst case where you've used analogue to transfer the data just find the odd occasion where the automatic detection has got it wrong and add/remove the track mark. Takes about 3 seconds.
      Best thing about MD for me is 320 minutes per disk (MDLP4). At that compression I wouldn't plug it into a hifi but you can't hear the difference with a pair of bog standard headphones.

  62. Wow.. Taco is freelancing... by SethJohnson · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    still holds plenty of tunes when your on the go.


    And I thought Slashdot was the only publisher who was trying to eradicate the apostrophe from the english language.
  63. Battery Life? by jeeryg_flashaccess · · Score: 1

    I would imagine that the battery life would suck from burning cd's AND playing music!

    --
    Life is like pants... fit in or you don't fit in.
  64. Not a tax writeoff by vanguard · · Score: 1

    Well, at least not a legal one. If you use a computer for mixed personal/professional you can only write off the professional portion of the expense.

    Disclaimer: I am not a CPA but I do have an accounting degree and I've spent several years as a professional tax preparer working in a CPA's office.

    --
    That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
    1. Re:Not a tax writeoff by vanguard · · Score: 1

      This is a troll but I'll respond anyway.

      I never took the exam. I worked as a junior account for two years while going to school at night. I realized that I didn't like accounting and that I loved computers. I added a second major, MIS, and started coding. I've been doing that for about 8 years now and I'm almost finished my comp sci master's degree. I work as a "tech lead" in the IT dept of a huge networking company (Cisco Systems).

      I'm not an idiot that couldn't pass the exam, I made a career change.

      --
      That which does not kill me only makes me whinier
  65. OT: Kid Koala vs Bullfrog by jovlinger · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Kid Koala kicks ass!

    I've been trying to figure out where that sample comes from: "However, as a beginner, it's often best to just kill everyone as fast as you can with the pump action"

    And now that we have halloween, the Charlie Brown sample "I got a rock!" is cool.

    I am aware that Kid Koala is more Nija Tune than Bullfrog in general, but I thought perhaps you might know.

  66. OT: Tax Writeoff Free by dgb2n · · Score: 1

    That is a major misconception.

    actually depending on your tax bracket a tax writeoff translates into a 10% - 34% reduction in the price of the item.

    For example. Your $400 iPod reduces your taxable income by $400. That decreases your tax bill by $400*Highest marginal tax rate = about $100 (in my case).

  67. Re:long play minidisc's by statusbar · · Score: 2

    yes mp3 is a standard. so is minidisc.

    The similarity is that both are proprietary standards.

    See:
    http://www.mp3licensing.com/help/developer.html

    I want to support mp3/mp3PRO in my products. Do I need a license? YES

    I have my own/third party mp3 software. Do I need a license? YES

    Do I need a license to stream mp3/mp3PRO encoded content over the Internet? YES

    Do I need a license to distribute mp3/mp3PRO encoded content? YES

    Time to read up on http://www.vorbis.org/ and support them instead.

    --jeff

    --
    ipv6 is my vpn
  68. hmm by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    why would anyone want to bring a portable burner? isnt this what it is essentially? this really implies that the person carrying this device is going to bring with him a few blank CDs. CDs itself arent small (except mini CDs - if this device is able to burn them that would be great). and does this thing take 30 mins to burn up each CD? talk about unusability!

  69. Whatever........ by Sean+Johnson · · Score: 1

    How is this better than say a Minidisc? As far as I can tell it is not. A Minidisc is still more versatile. THe only advantage this might have over Minidisc is a slightly higher (very slight) recording capaicity, and that it may be able to record faster tha nreal time. Granted I took a fleeting look at the article, but it didn't seem to have much REAL info at all, besides a couple of really neato! pictures. The problem is that when any company comes out with a new watch-what-I-can-do product, they don't seem to realize that the consumer needs, and wants a lot of info about the technical aspects of thier product. The consumer is more aware than ever, and they want to know exactly how and so-and-so's product is better than any others. Some lame blurb about the coolness, of fashion factor does not suit the average consumer one iota! As far as I can tell, this is a predictable manifestation stemming from the x-Pandium form factor which does nothing to improve upon what is already available through the Minidisc. I already burn all my MP3's to regular sized CD-ROM's, and have been doing so for a while. If this player can double as a general data storage medium for a computer, then it might have something going for it. As of now, I have no idea whether it can or not, but I tend to think not.

    --
    >>>>>> Chewie, take the professor in the back and plug him into the hyperdrive.
  70. DVD-RAM by pagercam · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure what the density of a 3" DVD-RAM, would be bu it would definately store enough music to be more interesting 185MB is only 3hrs at 96Kbit and many people use 128Kbit. Flash is cheap at the moment I think you can get 128MBs (memory stick, CF) for the $60-70 range if you shop arround. The battery life would be much better as well. If this is small enough people start to putv them in thier pockets, I'm not sure that I want a CD spinning up in my pocket, but it has been a while since she left me so it maynot be that bad either.

  71. portable ripper wanted by defective · · Score: 1

    i want a portable device that you can put an audio cd into and, in addition to being able to to listen to the cd, rip the cd to mp3 using the on-board storage. this way, i can go to a party and say "hey, that's a kewl song, can i borrow the cd for four minutes?" then put the cd in the portable device, rip it and hand it back.

    then when i go home, i can add it to my mp3 library, maybe even burn my own copy.

    what do you think?

  72. interesting but useful? by seda · · Score: 1

    Seems like kind of a neat gimick, buut I don't know how useful it is in real life. I mean combining a burner with your cd player doesn't seem all that important. Now I do like the size of mini cds, but you can buy a minicd player that doesn't burn for under $200 . Check out the philips for example. http://hardware.mp3.com/hardware/individual/3730.h tml THen you have normal burners being more an more ubiquitous and going for around $100. Unless you really need to burn on the go I don't see much of a need for this. Even if you need something of comparable size and portability where you can record on the go I'd rather buy something like one of the 384 ibm microdrive players which hover around the same price. You get the same size and recordign ability although you would lose the removing ability of mini cd's I'll admit. On summation it sounds like a cool device, but of limited use.

  73. Archos 6GB recorder, Creative/Nomad Jukebox, ... by Chris.Boyle · · Score: 1

    The Archos 6GB recorder mentioned further up the page does exactly that. The Creative/Nomad Jukebox also has a mic input, but (AFAIK) only records to WAV.

  74. Re:RIAA will have their panties in a bunch over th by twinpot · · Score: 1

    Well there is a laser "pickup" turntable available
    from these guys (http://www.elpj.com/). A tad expensive mind.....

  75. Re:long play minidisc's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    miniDisc is 100% proprietary, down to not being able to make more than 1 copy of anything in miniDisc format and having to wait real-time to make those copies (Thanks Sony!)

    MP3 is proprietary if you choose to use or buy the licenses to proprietary software and codecs. You do not have to do this with the LAME MP3 encoder.

    That being said, use Ogg Vorbis.

  76. Steel by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who would rather have this made out of steel and weigh about 3 pounds? I miss steel made consumer appliances. Damnit those types of products rocked. Anything that could double as a anchor for a boat and be used to prop up a wobbly table is Ok by me.

    Darn friggin plastic small sized pieces of crud, GIVE ME STEEL!