Slashdot Mirror


VA Linux Dropping "Linux" From Name

Several folks noted that VA is changing its name to "VA Software" to reflect the fact that they aren't a Linux company anymore. VA of course owns OSDN which runs various Linux and Open Source web sites including amusingly enough Linux.com. Can't say it matters much to me what they call the thing as long as they let us keep running Slashdot, but it really is sad knowing that most of the cool open source hackers no longer work there. My bad. Anyone have a link to the press release that doesn't require a login?

197 of 378 comments (clear)

  1. They just... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...didn't want to call it VA GNU/Linux.

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    1. Re:They just... by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      That, and:

      > but it really is sad knowing that most of the
      > cool open source hackers no longer work there.

      Well, they have to productize things and stabilize them, so they need a different kind of programmer.

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  2. Not Linux anymore? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Have the top brass figured out the next big buzzword?

    VA XML?
    VA Java? (haha, I'm just joking)
    VA Unlimited Freedom?
    VA USA?
    VA Voom?
    VA cancy?

    1. Re:Not Linux anymore? by J'raxis · · Score: 5, Funny

      VA.NET, of course.

    2. Re:Not Linux anymore? by Lionel+Hutts · · Score: 1

      VA Hospital? VA Benefits?

      --
      I Can't Believe It's A Law Firm, LLP does not necessarily endorse the contents of this message.
    3. Re:Not Linux anymore? by Brian+Knotts · · Score: 2
      VA Stuff.

      Can't go wrong with that one.

      DISCLAIMER: I am a (very small) VA Linu^H^H^H^HSoftware stockholder.

      CLARIFICATION: I'm not particularly small...I just own a small amount of LNUX stocks.

    4. Re:Not Linux anymore? by surflorida · · Score: 1

      VA C#

    5. Re:Not Linux anymore? by Bobo+the+Space+Chimp · · Score: 1

      Let's also not forget:

      VA GNU Interface Network Applications

      --
      I am for the complete Trantorization of Earth.
  3. Are they still LNUX? by Galvatron · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess it doesn't matter, they're within spitting distance of being delisted anyway, but are they going to keep LNUX as their stock ticker? That seems sort of silly to me.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    1. Re:Are they still LNUX? by jlitvin · · Score: 3, Informative

      You did follow the link, didn't you? Anyway, the WSJ article says, "If shareholders approve the proposed name at the company's annual meeting Dec. 5, the company said it intends to change its Nasdaq trading symbol."

    2. Re:Are they still LNUX? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Good point. And then there's the OSDN banner. Perhaps the name-chaneg and the banner was some sort of a management-logic equivilant of a compromise.

    3. Re:Are they still LNUX? by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 2

      Considering that LNUX was nothing more than a stupid scam to convince stupid daytraders that they were "Linux", let's hope they drop they symbol and quick

      The scary thing is that the scam nearly succeeded before backfiring.

      The even scarier thing is that Linus Torvalds licenced his trademark to these guys so that they could pull this thing. Wonder if he was able to sell his shares in time?

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  4. Other than OSDN what does VA do? by FatRatBastard · · Score: 3, Redundant

    The subject asks it all. They (apparently) don't do much development (above and beyond sourceforge) and they don't sell hardware. As far as I can tell they sell services for Sourceforge and ads for OSDN sites.

    Exactly what business is VA in now?

    1. Re:Other than OSDN what does VA do? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I was wondering that too, but according to the press release, "The Sunnyvale, Calif., company said the name VA Software better identifies the company's primary business of developing its SourceForge collaborative software development platform."

      So they are apparently hanging their hat on selling SourceForge software. What I find interesting is that apparently the "enterprise edition" of the SourceForge software is closed source and proprietary (correct me if I'm wrong...). Does that mean they have clued in that OSS is not a winning business model?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    2. Re:Other than OSDN what does VA do? by duffbeer703 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are in the business of running through the last of the VC cash, then going out of business.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    3. Re:Other than OSDN what does VA do? by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 2

      They sell subscriptions to WSJ. They could have just pointed to this article that doesn't require registration. But nooo. Also, here's another article that says SourceForge is proprietary. And had this to say about the VA Linux SourceForge: "The site was an adjunct to its now-abandoned Linux computer sales strategy." So yes, I guess they're stuck with SourceForge, banners, and ThinkGeek.

  5. So? by hatter3bdev · · Score: 1

    I don't think that it really matters that they change their name, as long as it's not a move away from linux but a move to broaden their open source presence.

    1. Re:So? by kalleanka2 · · Score: 1, Troll

      HeheHe, You seem to have misunderstood something.

      It is a move away from linux and a move away from open source.

      Open source as a businessmodel is failing.

    2. Re:So? by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem here is that LINUX is the poster child in the mainstream/financial world. The appearance of this is (IMHO) a blow to open source in the mainstream, especially on the heels of M$oft releasing XP.

      --

      "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    3. Re:So? by dreamquick · · Score: 1

      Talso seem interested in broadening their presence by removing support for sites like kuro5shin.

      Doubt me? Read the front page on www.kuro5hin.org for the details...

  6. VA Research by Andy+Tai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I believe VA Research was one of the former names of VA. Maybe VA shall adapt it again?
    It sounds cool and VA can still sell services.

    --
    Free Software: the software by the people, of the people and for the people. Develop! Share! Enhance! Enjoy!
    1. Re:VA Research by red_dragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Quite right. And before that, they're named Fintronic. I recall seeing a review of one of their workstations in Byte Magazine sometime around 1995. The reviewer seemed to be quite impressed with the machine, and Fintronic went on to quoting the article in their ads for many years. Unless I'm wrong, these are the names they've had so far, in chronological order:

      • Fintronic
      • VA Research
      • VA Linux
      • VA Software
      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
  7. Where can they make a profit now? by thesolo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I always thought the VA linux hardware was a good route for them, and they discontinued that line and sold off all their machines (I picked one up for cheap on ebay, btw).

    So what do they have now? Just sourceforge, thinkgeek, some misc. ads & services? Honestly, does anyone know what kind of move they are planning here, because this seems like another step in the wrong direction to me.

    1. Re:Where can they make a profit now? by sigwinch · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I always thought the VA linux hardware was a good route for them,...
      Except that their hardware was rather expensive. I kept checking their prices, but they were always hundreds of dollars too expensive.

      IMHO, their mistake was trying to go from a niche market (nice Linux-running boxen) straight to a megacorporation with a wide range of products (a la IBM). They tried to make that jump by maximizing the burn rate, but burn rate can only buy green employees and hardware. It cannot buy an experienced engineering and development staff, mature software products, and all-important customer relationships and business partnerships. It is possible to build a large diverse company, but you have to expand in stages with attention to profitability every step of the way. E.g., like how Microsoft came from no where and dethroned IBM and DEC. The whole 'Instant IBM' approach was just doomed.

      If you look at VA, their strategy was 100% Instant IBM. They tried to dominate the hardware market before they had the mature software and hand-holding support to make the extra cost worthwhile. They bought Slashdot to preach to the converted and shill house products. (Remember the Adfu days when /. banners occassionally had interesting products that actual geeks might buy? The only thing even vaguely interesting these days is Think Geek.) They threw *huge* amounts of money at bandwidth, hosting, and server administration in the hope of increasing the amount of free software. Nevermind that VA would have neither licenses nor expertise in the software thus developed, and could therefore not directly profit from it.

      So what are they left with? Banner ads (ha!) for things I don't want to buy (ha! ha!) and SourceForge. SourceForge support and cusom development can probably be made profitable by itself -- it's a useful tool -- but even if it is maximally successful and they get a CEO with a winning strategy, it'll take a decade to recover the capital they pissed away. I don't see them getting such a CEO (although the board could surprise us), so don't see VA even being a software powerhouse.

      If I was part of the /. crew, I'd be thinking hard about how to turn what they have into something sustainable. Random ideas: banner ads for tech products I might actually buy, paid placement of a few stories a week, paid Slash hosting (product support sites, religious/political sites, government sites), closed-source turn-key Slash installer, ...

      --

      --
      Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

  8. Re:should name it... by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nasdaq doesn't delist until you go under $1.

    And even then, they aren't delisting anyone until January, due to the events of 9/11.

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
  9. Did they work there? by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

    I don't really follow this sort of thing, but I don't recall ever having the impression that "most of the really cool open source hackers" did work there. Did they?

    1. Re:Did they work there? by HitchHik · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well lets see, as far as I know at least:
      Thodore Tso - ext2 and kernel
      Stephen Tweedie - file systems
      and I belive
      Rasterman - enlightenment
      worked for VA

      --
      -- &&
  10. Great for the stock price!!! by toupsie · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "VA Software"? Damn I am calling my broker right now. Not! This is a sign that end times are near for "VA Whatever". We have seen it time and time again in the Internet market. The second a company changes its name in this market, they are on the road to oblivion. Confuse the investors so they are not focused on the business plan.

    I am really scared that Slashdot will be dumped real soon by "VA Whatever" and my personal data will be thrown into the wind for the company with the most pennies to snatch up. As we have seen in the past, its real tuff to control your own personal data held by a third party under extreme financial trouble.

    I am sure that Pud at Fucked Company will be reporting the demise of "VA Whatever" in the near future. Dump the stock if you got it.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by aridhol · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sounds really intelligent there! The company's going to fail, so sell off all your stock so it'll fail sooner! Self-serving people make me sick.

      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    2. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by 13013dobbs · · Score: 1

      What should they do? Ride the stock into the ground?

      --

      No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.

    3. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by ahem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It never fails to surprise me when someone infers a causal relationship between stock price and company survival.

      One way to assess what a stock price represents is that it is the consensus of the investing public regarding what the current value of all future cash flows for the company in question will be.

      Stated more simply as two questions: 1. how much do you think this company will net over your lifetime? and 2. how much are you willing to pay today in cash for the rights to receive a fraction of that total future net?

      The multiplicative Pozni-like "loaves and fishes" effect of squandered venture capital led to the recent trend of tech companies being in a business other than producing technology, namely the production of securities and the paper they were printed on. Because of this loss of focus on actually making a product and a profit, these securities are no longer worth the paper they're printed on.

      In the wake of this effect, you get people asserting that a stock price dropping to zero will make a company fail. In fact, most investors thinking that there will be no future stream of income, and there being a commensurate lack of buyers for the stock representing that income stream, is what causes the stock price to drop to zero.

      --
      Not A Sig
    4. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by JanneM · · Score: 2

      Welcome to the stock market reality. Fundamentals are only one factor driving it; perception - and even more important - perceptions of everybody elses perceptions are just as important (in the short to medium term at least).

      /Janne

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Redundant
      I am really scared that Slashdot will be dumped real soon by "VA Whatever" and my personal data will be thrown into the wind for the company with the most pennies to snatch up.

      Get some freaking perspective. We're involved in a WAR with extremist muslims and you're scared that some company is going to find out that "toupsie" posts 13 times a day at Slashdot. Sheesh.

    6. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by aka-ed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Self-serving people make me sick.

      You don't buy stock for the purpose of underwriting your favorite failing business. If you were fool enough to do so, your ability to serve others will quickly dwindle, along with the means to maintain your own well-being. Your statement is short-sighted, and whoever modded it up is insane.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    7. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by Kymermosst · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sounds really intelligent there! The company's going to fail, so sell off all your stock so it'll fail sooner! Self-serving people make me sick.

      What?! If I put money into a company, it's on the supposition that I will receive dividends from that company, eventually totalling more than the initial investment in the company, or it is on the supposition that the company's stock will be in so much demand that the paper value of my investment will increase.

      When neither one of those is happening, and it is clear that the company's future is in question, I have the right to take my investment back. When I buy stock, I do not give that money to the company, I loan the money to it. Since it is MY fscking money in the first place, invested on the faith that it will give me an income, I can take it back whenever I feel that my interests are not being met. (Read: interest.)

      So, if it's so self-serving to invest money wisely only in successful companies, on the basis of earning a living and planning for my retirement in the future, well, I suppose I'll continue to make you sick, because you can bet your bleeding heart that I'm not going to ride stock into the ground and lose ALL of my investment. Why do this when I can sell it off?

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    8. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by aridhol · · Score: 1

      No. You don't buy to underwrite a failing business. However, you also shouldn't pull out as soon as it looks like it might go bad. That's how stock crashes happen.

      --
      I can't say that I don't give a fuck. I've just run out of fuck to give.
    9. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by _xeno_ · · Score: 2
      Yeah, I know: with VA Linux listed as a 1 out of 10 as a "good purchase" via StockScouter, I know I feel confident in investing my future in a company that has no known future direction.
      VA Linux Systems, Inc., a micro-cap value company in the technology sector, is expected to significantly underperform the market over the next six months with very high risk.

      They recognized it too!

      Seriously, though, does /. have a backout plan? I hope some other company thinks it's worthwhile, but it's fairly obvious that VA $WHATEVER isn't going to be around much longer.

      I believe this also spells impending trouble for Kuro5hin, Freshmeat, NewsForge, obvious SourceForge (good thing I'm not hosting anything there), and I'm sure other people can list other things.

      I wonder what will happen to all these sites when (or if) VA goes under? Will they be liquidated the highest bidder? I wonder what happens to code on SourceForge? (I wonder if a Linux distro would be interested in picking up SourceForge - seems like it could only help them...)

      Many things may happen to the Open Source community should VA die...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    10. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by aka-ed · · Score: 1

      Yes. But the original poster was predicting doom, not bad times. Riding a stock down to worthlessness helps neither the economy nor the specific company.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    11. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      If things have REALLY gotten that bad, you CAN'T take your investment back. It simply doesn't exist anymore as far as the market is concerned. Selling those shares might be a futile gesture at this point.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    12. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You should be more concerned that it's entirely undeclared. That so-called war is the least of our problems presently. We have more to fear from our own politicians than a few religous zealots.

      Bush or the Senate can do some serious permanent damage to the entire nation.

      6000 dead civilians is trivial in a real war. This applies equally well to the US as it does to Afghanistan.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    13. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by StenD · · Score: 1
      When I buy stock, I do not give that money to the company, I loan the money to it.
      Ah, no. If you buy stock directly from a company, you are giving money to the company, in return for a share of ownership in the company. (If you bought it from a third party, you gave money to someone who gave money to someone [...] who gave money to the company. Still no loan here.) When you loan money to a company, it's called a bond, and you're in line ahead of the stockholders if the company goes under and the assets are divvied up.
      Since it is MY fscking money in the first place, invested on the faith that it will give me an income, I can take it back whenever I feel that my interests are not being met.
      If you own stock, you have no rights to take anything back from anyone. You can try finding someone to buy the stock from you, but there's no guarantees. If you own bonds, you might have some rights to cash them in before they mature, but you're more likely to have to find someone else to buy them, with the same lack of guarantees (aside from being ahead of the stockholders).
    14. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by KingAdrock · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what you said, but I'm pretty sure the stock price dropping below $1 and being delisted is not a good thing. I don't think it much matters if it is the cause or the effect of the company's impending doom.

    15. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by leonbev · · Score: 2, Informative

      Having your stock delisted also has a signifigant impact on a company's credit rating. The company would then have a harder time getting a loan if it runs low on cash, and will pay a higher interest rate for that loan if it is necessary.

      It should also be mentioned that many businesses are afraid to work with a company that has the perception of going out of business in a few months. They will sign fewer long-term contracts or partnerships for their products and services, and almost no one will want to count on them as a support provider.

      This is why over 90% of all companies fail after being delisted from a major stock exchange. It often starts a devistating chain-reaction which ultimately leads to bankruptcy.

    16. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by haruharaharu · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      And if one of those 6000 was someone close to you

      I suppose i could be a dick and mention another war that the US has declared - The War on Drugs (tm). An actual bodycount is probably out of the question, but consider that every time a swat team hits the wrong address and shoots some random person dead, that's one more casualty. Whenever some gangs have a turf war, those are more casualties (if politicians had the freedom to actually address the problem instead of doing what keeps them from being recalled, there would be fewer drug turf wars). Oh, and there's the small matter of the corruption of our government in the name of fighting drugs. Tell me again why I don't have the right to walk down the street with $20,000 cash?

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    17. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by bteeter · · Score: 1

      I think Slashdot's backout plan is to move the servers back into CmdrTaco's basement, and to run the site off of his DSL line. :-)

      Seriously though, it will be interesting to see what does happen to this place if/when VA goes under. I would miss this site. I've been coming here for a long time now.

      Time will tell...

      Brian
      100% Linux Web Hosting...

    18. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Because the IRA doesn't claim that Jesus wants them to kill British civilians. They are a blatantly nationalist organization. The fact that they are Catholic is more or less incidental. Al Qaeda on the other hand talks about killing the Jews (the "Little Satan", Israel) and the evil supporters of Zionism, the US (the "Big Satan"). Given that everything is couched in terms of religious extremism, it's fairly natural to characterize them as _muslim_ extremists. The IRA are Irish nationalist extremists, first and foremost. David Koresh was a Christian extremist - a religious nutcase who killed people and hoarded arms on the basis of an extreme interpretation of the Bible.

    19. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by dudle · · Score: 2
      what is scary is the the post above was rated as funny. Are you that stupid?

      D.

      --
      Looking for a great online backup: Green Backup
    20. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Actualy to put it more acurately your involved in a war with extremist starving oppressed people in a country no one has pretended to give a fuck about in 10 years.

      Extremist - the most extreme thing most of the people in afghanistan did today was try to find food.

      The US are a bunch of fucking morons and if you think you can win a 'war' (and thats another bullshit word as well) by bombing people who have nothing then youre even more fucked up than the world thinks.

      You would think that after 2 land wars in asia the US might have learned something by now.

      Oh and im not american and i dont support one thing your country is doing at the moment - you are acting like a bully in a schoolyard by picking on those weaker than you - where was the US when argentina was murdering thousands, and Chile, and Bolivia etc etc

      The world is only evil when someone threatens YOU people DIRECTLY - everyone else can get fucked - so i say this - the whole rotten american system can get fucked - we dont want your war and your bullshit

    21. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by Stonehead · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      (biting the troll) Your perspective is not mine. I don't live in the USA and I don't feel involved in any "WAR" at all. Your comment comes up in all Slashdot stories and I do *not* find it funny. I don't have any respect for terrorists, but I don't have respect for your war either. I think it's kind of pointless to bomb a country and then gather money to rescue those innocent inhabitants. Why does everyone have to think like Yankees? Go troll somewhere else and let me live my own life.
      Sigh. Surely off-topic, but I felt I had to write this..

    22. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by Ralph+Bearpark · · Score: 2
      I believe this also spells impending trouble for Kuro5hin, [...]

      Indeed, The Register is reporting that Kuro5hin are indeed being kicked out of the VA stable.

      Funny that wasn't mentioned in /.'s version of the story, ain't it?

      Regards, Ralph.

    23. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      Personally, when a company has nothing better to do than change their name, that spells the end. I can see the meetings like I was there...

      "We need to differentate ourselves and prevent consumer confusion. I know, let's change the company name, that should enhance our mind share!"

      Fools. I'd sell what stock I have left, but it would cost me more to dump it then to just let it waste away like the crap it is.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    24. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by alexburke · · Score: 2

      The multiplicative Pozni-like "loaves and fishes" effect of squandered venture capital

      I wasn't aware the Buzzword Generator had been updated to include financial jargon. Thanks for the heads-up!

    25. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that didn't come out quite right, did it?... but I think I got my point across.

      That's what I get for letting someone piss me off right after work. :)

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    26. Re:Great for the stock price!!! by Troed · · Score: 1
      Of course it is. Any broad generalisation over a group of people might be ground for rasism. I.e, the issue here is about _terrorists_, not whether they call themselves Muslims, Christians or Jews.

  11. Re:Open Source Maketplace Insights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am switching to a Visual Basic kernel and drivers immediately.

    Thank you for saving me a lot of time wasted with Linux.

  12. VA XP by luugi · · Score: 1

    VA XP
    I wouldn't be surprised.Lately it feels that they are going to need to sell there soul to the devil soon

    --
    Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.
    1. Re:VA XP by number+one+duck · · Score: 1

      Hey... the last Vax I worked with was a hell of a machine. Not sure what p model you are referring too, but don't knock good hardware... not on slashdot, anyway.

    2. Re:VA XP by luugi · · Score: 1


      I meant VA XP as in Windows XP! I guess the joke wasn't funny.

      --
      Think like a man of action, act like a man of thought.
  13. All wrong... by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    VA XP.

  14. Dead pool for VA Linux^WSoftware Corp. by Yankovic · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Anyone want to start taking odds?

    Seriously though, what does this say about two crucial things:

    A) What's going to happen to slashdot [if|when] VA Software Corp. goes under? It'll be incredibly hard to maintain the servers/routers/etc. with volunteers only.

    B) Is there anyone left from a commercial standpoint other than IBM and Redhat who are willing to stand behind Linux?

    1. Re:Dead pool for VA Linux^WSoftware Corp. by trilucid · · Score: 2


      How about the thousands of web hosting companies out there that use Linux in all its varied distros?

      How about software companies that are beginning (and some that have been for some time) to offer *nix software development services?

      How about the embedded folks and various appliance devices that use variants on Linux?

      I don't think Linux will be vanishing anytime soon if one company bites the dust. Just because the (literally) thousands of companies out there supporting Linux aren't necessarily "household names" doesn't mean they don't have significant impact.

      At first glance, your post seemed to smell of troll... upon further consideration, it just seems dumb. Sorry to be harsh.

    2. Re:Dead pool for VA Linux^WSoftware Corp. by blang · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even if both VA and Linux disappears, Linux as such will always have a prominent place in the corporate world.

      Linux experts will still be in demand. Linux will still be the preferred platform for doing software development for many organisations. Some companies think it's OK to fork out $10K+ in licences for developer seats, and insist on using only MS tools, or other even more expensive solutions. A frugal software shop would develop on Linux, and deploy on whichever platform the customer wants.

      The only thing that's changing is the rock star mentality . Tomorrow's Linux professionals will not expect to retire when they're 30, they'll expect to retire at a normal age. The days of "Money for nothing, chicks for free" are no more,
      except if you're singing in one of those boy bands, that is.

      --
      -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
    3. Re:Dead pool for VA Linux^WSoftware Corp. by Yankovic · · Score: 1
      Though there are thousands of companies out there, and I cede that point to you without argument, very few of them have the ability or cash to execute a huge marketing campaign, a branding effort, or to walk into a CIO of a Fortune 1000 company and make a difference. This is not a small point. The process to selling into a large company is so much different than selling to a 50 person company... it's six months long, you have to have a hundred demos, you have to get sign off from 5 different BDMs and THEN you get the chance to insert your software. The reason that small companies generally don't sell to large ones isn't that they aren't technically capable, it's that they don't have the realistic bandwidth to handle a number of these accounts and wait to get paid for a year.

      Linux may become a decent choice for the PHB in certain arenas, but that's only because of an overwhelming majority (60%) of people use for that purpose (i.e. web serving). It is not possible to overvalue the handholding relationship in the sales process. Novell still has 18% of the market for server OSes, largely due to their sales force. When someone comes along to oust a Linux solution (MS for example) who is the PHB going to call on Linux's end and say "How does your product compare to these new whiz-bang features?" Unfortunately, no one will be available.

    4. Re:Dead pool for VA Linux^WSoftware Corp. by Yankovic · · Score: 1

      Many many many many many enterprises demand exactly this. It's the way of the world. GM will never buy something they have to support out of mailing lists and FAQs. They sign huge corporate deals where the amount they pay in support dwarfs the amount they pay for the licenses over time. The fact that VA Software didn't make it doing this is not indicative of anything, other than the fact that it may have taken longer to get Linux into the support mix than originally planned.

      If there is one thing that could be written on the eventual tombstone, it will be "longer than expected sales cycle".

    5. Re:Dead pool for VA Linux^WSoftware Corp. by Arandir · · Score: 2

      If I start an overnight delivery service and use Chevy vans, that doesn't make me a Chevy company. If I build houses using Stanley tools, that doesn't make me a Stanley company.

      Just because I use Linux as an end user product doens't mean that I am a Linux company.

      Companies will continue to make money by *using* Linux, but I don't see too many making money by selling or developing Linux.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    6. Re:Dead pool for VA Linux^WSoftware Corp. by ninewands · · Score: 1

      Well, DEC ... oops ... Compaq ... oops, again ... HP, and SGI as well, are all hanging in with Linux support/development/marketing projects, so I don't think I'm ready to pull the plug on Linux yet.

  15. Thanks for the news by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
    Too bad I can't read the WSJ without subscribing.

    Another post suggests that you and /. will "survive"

    I only ask that you fix the server's time stamp - unless you've moved your farm to Central Time. What's the command? rdate [-something] tic (or toc).usno.navy.mil in the cron...?

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  16. Pathetic.. by guacamole · · Score: 2, Interesting

    VA Started as a Linux hardware company.. failed.
    Tried being a Linux support company (ala Linuxcare) and.. failed.
    I am bit suspicious of companies that keep on changing their business strategy as if it was a pair of gloves at a first sign of economic trouble..

    1. Re:Pathetic.. by NullAndVoid · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I'm much more impressed with companies that stick with unprofitable strategies no matter what. Adaptability is for losers!

      Not that I think selling enterprise sourceforge software will support a company larger than 5-10 people. But at least they're trying.

      --


      -- Sigs are for losers
    2. Re:Pathetic.. by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm more impressed with companies who have profitable strategies. They last longer...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  17. What's next? by hartsock · · Score: 5, Funny

    Source Developer's Network?

    Dot instead of SlashDot?

    Meat instead of Freshmeat?

    --
    Live to Code, Code to Live!
  18. OT by Shimmer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You know, the interesting thing about this sig is that nursing is actually a learned (not instinctive) behavior. At least that's what they told us at the hospital when my first was born.

    -- Brian

    --
    The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
  19. Re:Did they work there?-correction by HitchHik · · Score: 2, Informative

    I messed up:
    Tweedie works for Redhat.

    --
    -- &&
  20. Maybe VA should get into pr0n... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and call itself VA gina. it'd probably turn a profit :)

  21. Distance from the Linux label? by ll5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have to wonder if that is what they are realling interested in doing? It is damn hard to make money with Linux services and support. Most of the people who are capable of using Linux in a production arena do not need or require support contracts and consulting services. Until there exists an enterprise level killer app for Linux the only people who are going to be interested in running linux are geeks anyway. Think of an exchange killer for the enterprise, that is when the conservative management types will become interested in Linux. That is also when companies will be able to survive offering up expertise and service contracts. Till then, good luck hitching your wagon to the Linux money train because it just does not exist. Quite possible it never will either.

    --
    Wanna get high?
  22. The Question that Begs Asking by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Supposing VA Software decides to cut off Slashdot... What's the Slashdot operating budget and can it stand on its own (ad revenues being what they are and whatever other revenue there might be)?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:The Question that Begs Asking by jon_c · · Score: 3, Informative

      If taco's smart then yes.

      a site I won't mention is run by a friend of mine, he actually makes his living off it. Its just a gamers news site, but he actually makes enough money off it to have a car (BMW btw), have a nice apartment and live life.

      The catch is he has about 1 1/2 employees. so his revenue pretty much comes down to:

      $income = $bandwidth + $other_guy - $ad_revenue;

      ..there isn't much in the way of other costs.

      So if taco decides he and someone else can run the show (which they should be able too) slashdot should be able to get by, it won't be glorious and may not be able to sponsor guest writers like Mr. Katz, but they should able to keep the site up and maybe buy some food.

      -Jon

      --
      this is my sig.
    2. Re:The Question that Begs Asking by ShaunC · · Score: 3, Funny

      >$income = $bandwidth + $other_guy - $ad_revenue;

      No wonder he shows a "profit" from his site, if he's subtracting his revenue from his expenses instead of the other way around...

      Typical sneaky dot-com accounting ;)

      Shaun

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
  23. Worried about open-source funding by CmdrTroll · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This change bothers me. A lot. VA is Just Another Software Company(tm) now. Not a Linux company and not a company that has a vested interest in promoting open source. Back in the day, VA's success rested on the success of the Open Source movement. Not any longer - as a software company, they are going to be producing commercial wares that compete with open source solutions. Overnight, they have changed from our friend to our enemy.

    Many of us saw this coming, but that's beside the point. But personally, I'd rather see VA fold than become a commercial software house. What does VA's new focus mean to us? Well:

    • Say goodbye to OSDN. And I don't just mean OSDN, as in, "VA hires a bunch of people to write Linux software." I mean, VA has no reason to support Slashdot, Sourceforge, Themes.org, and other very expensive sites that produce zero revenue. They will probably just sell the sites off to the highest bidder (who will just want the accumulated customer data, and shut the sites down). As we have seen in the past, privacy policies mean squat after a business has been sold.
    • Say goodbye to UNIX support. It's expensive to develop for UNIX compared to Windows. VB programmers are a dime a dozen and can be hired for $30k a year, so why would a software company want to hire anyone else? The former "LNUX" will soon be in bed with Microsoft before we know it.
    • The removal of the "LNUX" ticker symbol will be another vote of non-confidence in Linux to pointy-haired managers who watch CNBC all day but don't have a clue about technology. Really. The business community will believe "Linux is dead" and it will be an uphill struggle to regain their confidence.
    • Augustin et al are willing to sell out their friends and scam anyone in order to make a quick buck. One needs to look no farther than the unscrupulous activities that happened on LNUX opening day to see what a shady company VA is. Our trust has been misplaced.

    The future is looking bleak. Our biggest cheerleader has switched sides on us and we are going to be in serious trouble. I certainly hope the Linux community can survive this ordeal.

    -CT

    1. Re:Worried about open-source funding by WildBeast · · Score: 1

      oh yes you're right, they were pretty effective in marketing their OS/2 and DB2 products so they must be qualified to market Linux.

    2. Re:Worried about open-source funding by aka-ed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree with the fellow who spots this as a troll, nevertheless...

      VA has no reason to support Slashdot, Sourceforge, Themes.org, and other very expensive sites that produce zero revenue. They will probably just sell the sites off to the highest bidder (who will just want the accumulated customer data, and shut the sites down).

      What customer data? /.'s demographics-gathering is minimal, barely worth anything. OTOH, it's clear just viewing the site that /. does attract a very valuable demographic of working techs and engineers. /. is a brand name, well known to the tech industry, and one that exists with no content costs. There are tons of ways that /.'s free content can survive and prosper without VA, should it come to that. Even discounting ad revenues or corporate sponsorship to provide bandwidth, there are other ways /. and other useful resources of OSDN could be distributed than the old client/server paradigm.

      We have the technology -- we can rebuild you!

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    3. Re:Worried about open-source funding by trilucid · · Score: 2


      "I mean, VA has no reason to support Slashdot, Sourceforge, Themes.org, and other very expensive sites that produce zero revenue."

      Hmm... not too sure about this one. I haven't looked at the financials for these sites/the business units that run them (and the ad market is admittedly in sad shape these days), but I would hesitate to say they bring in zero revenue. This is probably least true of Slashdot and ThinkGeek.

      "Our biggest cheerleader has switched sides on us and we are going to be in serious trouble."

      I really don't see how the name change says they're "switching side on us"; you're right that they've done some shady stuff related to their opening day, but this goes a bit overboard. It's not like they're completely dropping anything and everything to do with Linux to run off and write software for Windows XP only.

      "VB programmers are a dime a dozen and can be hired for $30k a year, so why would a software company want to hire anyone else?"

      I don't know any decent VB programmers (and there are those who can do amazing stuff with the language... I happen to have done extensive VB work in my time) who would be willing to work for $30K a year. Any manager hiring such a person has to know s/he's setting him/herself up for a disaster.

      When you're talking about software development, it's the developers that determine the expense these days (as opposed to the environment). Your statement may have been true 5 years ago, but not anymore. It all depends on what your developers are most comfortable with using.

    4. Re:Worried about open-source funding by aka-ed · · Score: 1
      Their profiles are meaningless, because they are not attached to any real demographics. I was never asked about my income, my zipcode, my phone number, were you? An email address and a bunch of IPs mean nothing to marketers.

      As "demographic data" they are worthless.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
    5. Re:Worried about open-source funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's a simple fact: if open source made VA any money, they'd not be in the situation they're currently in. And don't give me a bunch of hooey about the downturn in the economy either. That's like everyone blaming all their problems on the tragedies on September 11th. VA was doing poorly before 9-11, and as far back as a year ago I recall hearing people wondering what the hell VA's business strategy was (they seemed to throw money at Linux developers without any real expectation of a return. That may sound like a sweet deal, and to some of you that may sound like the way it's supposed to be, but now you see that it's quite a bad plan for sustaining a business).

      VA screwed up by not having any direction. Acquisitions and willy-nilly funding of anything that has "open source" tacked onto its manifesto is driving them down. That, coupled with the FACT that most Linux users seem to want everyone ELSE to spend $$ on Linux (but they never seem to think they themselves are obligated to do so) is contributing to a downturn in the Linux biz that has little to do with economic conditions.

      In other words, I'm not surprised one iota that VA is falling apart, and I will not be surprised when they eventually fall down. It'll be sad -- I wanted them to succeed, being a former stock holder -- but they had no clue. May other companies use their rise to fame and rapid descent into oblivion as a lesson on how NOT to do business.

    6. Re:Worried about open-source funding by fferreres · · Score: 1

      I bought a VA Linux Server in June 2000 for my company. The thing was:

      - It was respectable
      - The price was fair (not the cheapest)
      - It was Linux based (like Penguin)
      I would have always bought the hardware there. They would have earned at least the basic "support" contracts.
      Now that they destroyed their Bussiness Model, they should close Slashdot and everything and distribute whatever cash if left to the investors.

      The revenue model of selling SourceForge is stupid. Windows developers will NOT USE IT, they have other tools and way of working. And Linux/whatever can't afford to pay it if they are not selling they OS work.
      IF anyone at VA Whatever shareholder is reading this, please go to shareholders meetings and fire the CEO. Else, dump your shares while they valued more that $0.0000001

      --

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    7. Re:Worried about open-source funding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So we go back to the 95-96 era, when Linux was only known if someone in your organization had brought it in to solve a problem. We've had the past 4-5 years worth of hype to get penguins in the door of places that didn't have the first vector. Once that's gone, the systems will have to stand on their own merits.

      If Linux gets the boot after that, it's simply because the people in command are going based on something other than technical merit. If that was the only reason for it to be used in an organization, then it was already doomed there.

      Personally, I used the boom period to install a couple dozen turnkey systems based on Linux in my organization, and they are now used by hundreds or thousands of schoolkids every day. They would be hard pressed to do without those boxes.

      So, stock issues aside, VA's latest troubles won't affect me. It won't be flashy and shiny, but it will be good where it really matters.

    8. Re:Worried about open-source funding by Amokscience · · Score: 2

      The community will have no problem. Whether as a rag-tag bunch of freelance programmers, teenage elitists, or as (ex)businessmen, it doesn't need money to survive. It will survive because it is no one singular community. It's diversity is it's strength (and often a weakness). Talk of doom is premature. You'll have to pass some serious world reaching legislation before that sort of talk becomes reality.

      --
      Fsck cluebie moderators. I'll say what I want, offtopic or not. And fsck having to qualify every bloody statement just
    9. Re:Worried about open-source funding by Roundeye · · Score: 2
      If I had mod points at the moment you'd be getting them.

      The open source / free software community has made almost incomprehensible strides. I can barely believe how badass the offerings are. I used to add "... compared to {a year, six months, etc.}" to that, but it's not a relative term any more. We're about 1-2 major releases away from having the best OSs w/ tools on the planet (that's Linux and the various BSDs). It doesn't matter if anyone else makes money off that, or whether we "dominate the world", since the software that's already been created is Free, free, and isn't going away.

      It's a shame that VA isn't selling their hardware any more, as I quite liked it. They converted a lot of evil VC funds into quality open source man-hours. If they did it on purpose they deserve a place in free software valhalla. If they didn't, we still got the benefits from it.

      --
      "Cause there's 40 different shades of black, so many fortresses and ways to attack, so why you complainin'?"
    10. Re:Worried about open-source funding by Ozx · · Score: 1

      >> An email address and a bunch of IPs mean nothing to marketers.

      Haha.

    11. Re:Worried about open-source funding by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      I'd rather see VA fold than become a commercial software house.

      I'm sure all the people who work for VA must share your concern...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    12. Re:Worried about open-source funding by aka-ed · · Score: 2

      Okay, they can be sold for a pittance to spammers, who, for the most part, are entrepreneurial suckers. The people filling random mailboxes with spam are mostly "make money fast" victims, not genuine marketers.

      --
      I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  24. Not to be confused with .... by pjones · · Score: 1

    VA the state or with Virgin Airlines

    --
    Certified Black Helicopter Pilot *** Unwitting Dupe of One World Gov'ment
  25. Dot instead of SlashDot? no... by abe+ferlman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dot instead of SlashDot?

    no, it will be backslashDot (c)

    The bill gates borg icon will get a stylish makeover and a heroic background to boot.

    free passport account with your backslashdot registration!

    --
    microsoftword.mp3 - it doesn't care that they're not words...
  26. Can I Sell My Karma? by quakeaddict · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    My Karma is worth more than VA Linux err VA Software errr VA DOA.

    Brush up your resumes guys. They have no money, and they dont have a clue.

    It must really suck just waiting for them to pull the trigger.

    Funny...Microsoft is making money hand over fist. Do you think its because they have a business model? A clue?

    --
    I'm still working on a clever footer.
    1. Re:Can I Sell My Karma? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Actually, I think it's because they have a monopoly. But YMMV..

    2. Re:Can I Sell My Karma? by geomcbay · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah but ask yourself how they got that monopoly?
      It wasn't granted by God or the government.

    3. Re:Can I Sell My Karma? by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 2

      well if you had a
      And for that matter, I agree. VA is going down the tubes fast and if this were my site I'd be thinking exit strategy. Slashdot needs to start selling subscribtions now, and start thinking about ways to sell advertising. Personally, I would subscribe, and I bet most daily readers of this site would. If 20% of the users on this site subscribed that would equal 100,000 subscribers. I think Slashdot could pay for itself.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

    4. Re:Can I Sell My Karma? by Pinball+Wizard · · Score: 1

      oops should have said "less than" instead of using the less than symbol. I meant to say "well, if you had a less than 1000 uid account, you could probably sell it. Others have. Just don't get caught or that account might get banned.

      --

      No, Thursday's out. How about never - is never good for you?

  27. Yup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Yup by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      Vee Eh Software or Vah Software??? Could we get their CEO to record an MP3 of the correct pronunciation?

      The correct Canadian pronunciation would be:

      Vee Eh? Software

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  28. But how is it pronounced? by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

    Vee Eh Software or Vah Software??? Could we get their CEO to record an MP3 of the correct pronunciation?

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
    1. Re:But how is it pronounced? by OpCode42 · · Score: 2

      hello, this is Linus Torvalds, and I pronounce VA Linux, Dead-in-the-water.

  29. Open source business is incomparable to closed by defile · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The open source business model is not:

    Lets sell an alternative to Windows, but using open source! This will erode Windows marketshare and open source companies will make billions!

    What other possible software market is there besides that, you ask? Look up job offers for programmers. 95% of them have nothing to do with working on a commercial software product. Most programmers develop custom systems. These are seldom sold on store shelves and never exist outside of the environment they're created in.

    It just so happens open source software and custom developed systems go hand-in-hand. This is the market the open source business model targets. This market alone is far larger than the commercial software market.

    This is exactly what IBM's core business is involved with, and exactly why they're so behind open source.

  30. This blows big-time. by Lac · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The thing that really gets to me is what this says about free software businesses, and about our understanding of it. Most people agreed, making a business from free software was supposed to go like this:

    1. Give the software, sell support: this, as we all know, doesn't work. If the software is that good, no-one needs support. If it isn't, no-one wants it. This is what RedHat does.
    2. Give the software, sell the hardware: now this works! Just look at IBM. Okay, okay, they don't actually give DB2 or OS/2 away, but you get the idea. It works! IBM, VA Whatever. VA Whatever, IBM. Profit!

    Yet VA Whatever has gone down in flames in a major way while RedHat is mostly going strong. Zope Corporation is doing very well too. So was Cygnus before it was bought out. And etc. ad nauseam. I guess we were flat-out wrong.

    Or maybe it was VA Whatever's fault. They had it all: big visibility, a whole shitload of cash, and many of the smartest people in the business. The only snag, I think, was that Direction didn't realize that they actually needed a plan, too.

    I think they still don't realize that. Someone should tell them and tell them now. Will you do it, or should I? How about you, Taco? You know the guys. GO TO THEIR OFFICE AND CLUB THEM OVER THE HEAD REPEATEDLY WHILE SCREAMING "YOU FRIGGING MORONS".

    Thank you.

    1. Re:This blows big-time. by Saeger · · Score: 3, Funny
      1. Give the software, sell support...
      2. Give the software, sell the hardware...

      3. Give the software away, and eat FREE food from your vegetable garden, and live rent-FREE in your van down by the river...

      :-)

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    2. Re:This blows big-time. by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      This didn't work for sun so well :(.

    3. Re:This blows big-time. by istartedi · · Score: 2

      I think they still don't realize that. Someone should tell them and tell them now. Will you do it, or should I? How about you, Taco? You know the guys. GO TO THEIR OFFICE AND CLUB THEM OVER THE HEAD REPEATEDLY WHILE SCREAMING "YOU FRIGGING MORONS".

      Horse. Barn. Door.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    4. Re:This blows big-time. by TheRealSlimShady · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Give the software, sell the hardware: now this works

      Only if you're selling highly proprietary hardware. There's not much margin in Intel based hardware...

    5. Re:This blows big-time. by sydb · · Score: 2

      Precisely. Please mod up.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
  31. Re:should name it... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Informative
    "Nasdaq doesn't delist until you go under $1."

    Actually, before 9/11, Nasdaq would, in theory, delist a company if it traded for under $1 for more than 30 days. In reality, they did allow many companies trading for under a buck to be listed for a lot longer (like Caldera for example).

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  32. it's still ... by dsb3 · · Score: 1

    va research in my bookmark file.

    --

    Slashdot? Oh, I just read it for the articles.
    1. Re:it's still ... by dudemaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      115 posts (by the time I read this), and only a couple of people mentioned VA Research. I wonder how many actually remember the days when the company was named this (and it wasn't too long ago). I hated when they switched it to VA Linux. I thought the original name was way better, and they should go with it again if they're gonna switch again.

  33. What Microsoft Has by arfy · · Score: 1

    Microsoft has what it has always had:

    Marketing.

    1. Re:What Microsoft Has by ByTor-2112 · · Score: 1

      No, Microsoft didn't get marketing until the first few threats to their monopoly arose -- DR-DOS, OS/2, and (arguably) the Mac.

  34. makes disturbing sense by zerOnIne · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this makes sense in a disturbing way considering what they've done with sourceforge... i'm currently working to get an internal SF system running at my company and VA hasn't been too much help (btw, if anyone here has had luck with it please email me or reply here)... what they basically did when they closed SF was to go and completely rewrite a lot of the backend scripts and relicense them as commercial... now they charge insane amounts of money (at least insane in my opinion) for companies to have them come set up a system for them... since their pricing scheme really didn't click well with what we wanted to set up (they charge per log-in account, and we were going to need a few hundred of those, though not nearly as many concurrent users) we're installing it on our own (using the sf-genericinst package, available on sourceforge.net)... the so-called "SourceForge OpenEdition" is still vapor, and when it does get released it will be missing huge chunks of code... namely things like the database tie-ins, and such...

    so basically this all makes sense with the name change... VA (s/Linux/Software/) is no longer the open-source-focused company it once was... it's sad to see things go this way...

    --
    09
    1. Re:makes disturbing sense by dbc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ah ha! You've discovered the one real opensource business model that has been proven to work -- the ugly underbelly of opensource software, so to speak. Cygnus was successful because they did exactly this. They charged multiple companies big $$ for the same patch. Hell, they even charged different divisions of the same large company big $$ for the same patch (divisions that didn't talk to each other much, obviously). They *never* did *thing 1* that was not precisely spelled out in the contract. They threw incoming free lance patches on the floor. They hoarded patches as *loooooong* as they possibly could, in order to extract patch fees from as many multiple customers as possible before releasing to the open code tree.

      I'm sure this post will be labeled a troll... so be it. It is not intended as such. It is a report of my experience watching an employer write multiple 5 and 6 figure checks for exactly such "services" (in the Will Rogers sense of the word).

      I love the OpenSource ideal. I hate seeing Cygnus held up as an example of how to be successful, it sickens me. It saddens me to see SF go the same way, but this has been a long time coming, and is no surprise to me. It started happening about a month after SF went live. VA tried to sell me exactly such *services* when my employer explored bringing SF inside (a few weeks after SF went public). The open code tree at that time sucked. Building a successfull SF behind your own firewall at that time required either putting up with the marginal packages that were released, or signing up for consulting.

      Let's hope OpenSource doesn't disintregrate into a band of rich pretenders taking advantage of a community of naive idealists.

      (note to self: next time, remember the tags)

    2. Re:makes disturbing sense by tim_maroney · · Score: 2

      Cygnus was successful because they did exactly this.

      Cygnus was "successful" only in that it managed to sell itself for an obscene figure during the short-lived Linux bubble. It had been posting doubling losses ($1.5M, $3M, $6M) for three years previous to the sale.

      I hate seeing Cygnus held up as an example of how to be successful, it sickens me.

      Then don't. It was a money-losing company that went on to become part of another money-losing company. Not much of a success story....

      Tim

  35. Re:The free OS by technos · · Score: 2

    Nope.. You can't sue Apple, nor Microsoft. Or haven't you been reading your EULA?

    Open Source is no more of a liabiliy than the "big boys"

    Oh, and your warranty? Disclaims all 'consequential damage'. The most you can get IBM for is the price of the hard drive. MS and Apple will not opay you a cent.

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  36. Re:Are they still LNUX? No by ecampbel · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to their press release:

    If the proposed name change is approved, the company intends to change its Nasdaq trading symbol. Shareholders will vote on the proposal at the company's annual meeting on Dec. 5.

    --

    Sig goes here
  37. There in too much of a hurry by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They expect to make money, hand over fist Immediatly. Most business need 3 -5 years to becoime profitable, a rule of thumb that got tossed by the wayside during the .com hysteria.
    VA will not suddenly start makinging Billions of dollars because of its name, clearly some exec is trying to blame there association with Linux as the reason for not making tons of cash. each move they have made is a panic move, sure to loose in the long run.
    I see many opportunities for VA to increase revenue, but they seem to unable to see the forest from the trees.
    On a personal note, I hope that if they do go under, the /. gang retains the rights to /.
    Of course they could fire Jon. Clearly he makes more then he's worth.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  38. o� voulez-vous aller aujourd'hui? by narfbot · · Score: 1

    The real reason is that VA is a conjugation of ALLER in French. Some Frenchie's thought it was contridictory to have a name VA Linux, because Linux isn't going anywhere.

    In other news, Microsoft merged French versions of IE 6.0 smart tags and French versions Microsoft Word's Thesauraus together. In an effort to bring a better web experience, Microsoft deleted entries of terms that do not exist in their dictionaries as they may confuse people. They did it in English, why not French?

    où voulez-vous aller aujourd'hui?

  39. Is it really that surprising? by nvs · · Score: 1

    I'm with CmdrTaco on the "seen it coming" bit. I was sort of a fan of VA.. Yet there was a few things about them that bugged me.

    Back before the dot-bomb bubble burst, the co. I worked for gave me a huge budget, and pretty much allowed me to order whatever I needed. These orders included a number of Sun and VA servers. Here's the thing:

    Why did they HAVE SOUNDCARDS?
    Why did they have hardcore 3d cards?

    It was basically like paying a bloated few thousand dollars for a Linux Hack's gaming box. Plus a little extra for a rackmount case. I like linux, and I do gaming (on my windows box)... But for a rackmount machine, I don't want a sound card. I dont want a 3d card. I don't want all this novelty bullsh*t (X, games, etc) installed into my kernel by default.

    They should have spent some more time accelerating the console administration kernel module. They should have wasted less money on lame 3d graphics chipsets and sound. And, maybe, they should have hired more people with better business sense than ones who basically marketed a rackmountable PC. Oh yeah... What in the heck possessed them to do celeron?

    For the former employees: sorry about your misfortunes. For traders who lost exorbitant amounts of money: HAHAHAHAHA. Idiots. Serves you right.

    Regards,

    -l

  40. Re:Open Source Maketplace Insights by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

    --Windows 98/NT/2K are your only choices-- Uh huh, right. That's why POS Win 2k servers are always going down, getting rebooted, etc... The entire New England Sports Network's sites including The Boston Bruins, The Red Sox, and their e-commerce stores were all hosted on Linux (I'm sure they still are but the last development I did for them was last year). We never had any problems with our linux servers and we were serving millions of dynamic pages a month. The Micro$oft school of thought is the buy the most expensive machine possible so it can clunk along with IIS and SQL Server hogging all the resources. Oh let's not forget the monthly fun ppl with IIS get to have when they get taken down from the latest worm. Show me an instance of a Win machine outperforming a Linux machine with the same hardware setup. Show me hard evidence. D'

  41. What's in a name? by detritus. · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What really constitutes a name anyway? Take the communications giant Motorola for example, a name derived from the beginning automotive era. Victrola record players were popular for the home, so Motorola was made a record player for the car. It didn't work that well (naturally) but they kept the name.

    IMO, what establishes your image as a business should stay the same. The name "Linux" itself can mean so much than just an operating system. Linux has allowed them to build a decent-sized business with little overhead. Why not just give Linux credit?

  42. Not only too much of a hurry, they changed before by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    My first system was a VA, but that was before it was VA Linux. But you're right, it normally takes 2-3 years of slim margins (and usually losses) with any new firm.

    When I did a small game design business I expected to lose money for three years and planned accordingly. To my surprise, I broke even the first year and made money from the second year on (a small profit at first, then a bigger one). Not bad for what started as a hobby.

    Most businesses fail due to cash flow. That was true before the .com effect, and is still true now.

    The reason I bought into Red Hat at IPO was that the prospectus showed they understood what it takes to get ahead in business. I seem to recall not getting into VA Linux due to the high multiple for not very great rewards.

    Even after selling some of my initial Red Hat shares, I still own 400, which is about the same as my original 100 presplits. And I made money on the trades, when people got too crazy and offered insane multiples, and then buying back in on the inevitable drops.

    VA can survive. I would hope that /. will continue to do well, due to the loyal base of /.ers, but for VA to survive and prosper, they need to stop trying to shift with the wind.

    That doesn't mean that VA might not want to reposition a little bit, but only for sound business reasons.

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  43. Re:Perfect april fools posting. by WildBeast · · Score: 1

    and I almost thought we were in April because of your subject. Beware of what you post dude.

  44. Interesting lookup on LNUX finds this... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I scoot over to Yahoo/Finance to lookup LNUX and find this story, dated today, celebrating Slashdot: Four years, 2,000,000 Visits Per Month Nice article. So is timing everything, or what? ;-)

    Notable quote: "Four years and they haven't fired me?" said Rob "Cmdr Taco" Malda, director of operations, Slashdot. "Now that's a record."

    Careful you don't jinx yourself, Rob.

    Internet Wire is a PR service and the article is from VA Linux Systems. Notably lacking is any mention of VA dropping the 'Linux Systems' part.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  45. Re:Are they still LNUX? Perhaps SDOT or SLSH? by poopie · · Score: 1, Troll

    What is VA other than Sourceforge and Slashdot?

    SFRG?

    SDOT?

    SLSH?

  46. How Bout by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

    If Chevrolet decided to stop making cars would they still be in business? If McDonalds decided "No More Hamburgers" would they still be in business?

    /. is going to be left paying the tab for a company that never really had a business plan other than: "We are a hardware company that in the course of 6 months will stop selling hardware..."

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  47. Beginning of the end of /. ? by earthforce_1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This could be the beginning of the end for /. They may just decide it isn't worth it and divest all non core businessess, the way corel divested their linux business and spun off rebel.com to die an ignoble death. (Though I heard somebody is picking up a tiny piece of the Rebel.com corpse)

    But methinks /. better be prepared to go it alone in a few months time if the worst comes to pass. That would indeed be a sad day, but a lot of other once famous online portals have folded their tent and gone 404...

    (Hoping I am dead wrong on this)

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  48. Re:how much longer until delisting? by aka-ed · · Score: 1
    Ah, a rare instance of genuine flamebait, properly moderated.

    OUCH, down from more than $200! way to burn money, guys.

    You have a dim grasp of capital financing if you think this sentence makes a damn bit of sense. You can't "burn" stock value. You're thinking of venture capital. And your post goes downhill from that low point.

    --
    I survived the Dick Cheney Presidency 7 to 9 AM 7-21-07
  49. What if Microsoft makes a bid? by 2Bits · · Score: 1

    Taco, what if VA goes under (hope not), and what if Microsoft makes a bid on /.? Would you sell?

  50. A Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer ... by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
    Just so this is not immediately modded Offtopic: I use and maintain several Linux servers, and am quite pleased with the implementation. I enjoy the "free" discussion on /., and sometimes even learn something useful from the pages browsed. That said...

    I - for one, and am not alone, I'm sure - take exception to your sig. I was making personal computers "talk" to each other when you were learning to talk and say "mama" and whatever. Did you ever hear of CP/M? Ward Christenson and XModem? Montezuma Micro? Didn't think so. Maybe you've heard of SCO Xenix...Never mind Atari DOS, C64 Sprites, TRS-DOS & granules, acoustic couplers @ 110 and 300 baud - you were still in diapers, but I was making it work - In fact I had implemented Novell networks well before you broke your arm at age 8.

    I personally don't eat at McDonald's. The cheese, for one thing, is not *real*. But I don't blast people for their chosen speciality, just because I don't approve of the product.

    One thing that is *real* is the dominance of Microsoft, and I need to make a living. I did not pay for my MCSE - I was "lucky" enough to have a greedy employer whose network I had maintained as a consultant for 12+ years prior who paid for the the courses, Sylvan tests, etc. - so they could hang the "prestigious" MCSP shingle and charge 4x what they paid me for my services.

    I can't say I would have saved and done it myself; my reputation for making PCs work spoke for itself. This can be chalked up to experience. My MCSE expires in November, I hear. Big deal - I won't renew it. The coursework was the equivalent of Cliff's notes for the busy professional tech. Without almost twenty years of "on the job" training, I would have been an idiot with no business hanging a shingle. However, every other tech who I studied with was a *real* tech, and would not fit into your generalization criteria.

    Point is, you should be modded as a troll on the basis of your sig. When I find the other malicious poster with a similar sig, I'll tell them the same thing.

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
    1. Re:A Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer ... by Azghoul · · Score: 1

      Aw, weep weep weep. Someone takes a shot at something you like and you piss about it. Congrats.

      Gimme a friggin' break you asocial reject.

    2. Re:A Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer ... by bwalling · · Score: 1

      Maybe you missed it. It's not all that inaccurate.

      As far as IS goes, an MCSE is the bottom rung. There are security certifications (Checkpoint, etc), network certifications (Cisco, etc), and an actual CS/EE degree. The only rung below MS cert is A+/N+.

      The analogy works. It may be demeaning, but it works.

    3. Re:A Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer ... by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
      Look Asshole:

      This has nothing to do with what *I* like. It's about the antisocial sig used by the person I commented about.

      If it's wrong to have *experience* (which is what I claim to have), then I don't wanna be right.

      You'll get your break when you stop reading slashdot. Meanwhile, it's a good example as to why we are at war - zealots expressing themselves in a hurtful way, on all scales.

      M$ bashing is ok. People bashing causes hurt, and that's wrong. You just made yourself guilty of the same.

      --
      db
      Cig:
      ôô
      /`
    4. Re:A Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer ... by defile · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, the title "Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer" sounds a lot more prestigous than it really is.

      I'm just making an analogy that computer illiterate people can better understand. MCSE doesn't mean much inside the industry.

      This was not meant to insult people who hold MCSEs, unless they actually believe that the title means something. Many appear to know better.

  51. CAD == Perfect job for OSS developers. by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1

    I have to say that you hit the hammer right on the nail by the CAD statement.

    One thing I have seen during the years, and foresee will be the case for the foreseeable future as well, is that Custom Application Development will always be required. In the future even more so, when the companies realize that all of a sudden application servers and their hosted business logic and services have become the heart of the companies.

    Since you all remember the "buzzwords of the year" a while back "Core business" and "outsourcing" of non-core activities, it's easy to envision the current state. Today many companies have become very streamlined and as a result they work almost exclusively with their core business. Now there is not much more to put externally and soon each business wig will wake up and realize that they DO NEED application developers (architects and design /implementation people).

    Why?
    Because the companies' business processes have become more tightly coupled with computer systems than ever before. This trend is shifting fast. The companies I have worked with (mostly larger like the F100s) are vacuuming the market for technical people. People who can model and implement the business into software and utilize the latest features / 'buzzwords' (Web Services, XML, SOAP etc..).

    Having used a fair amount of OSS in later projects, I have come to see the fine talents that many OSS projects apparently possess (like the fine folks in the Apache projects) and as a result, you people should have a golden future!

    Doing CAD is pretty much the same as working on OSS (albeit in a different work form... more 'companyish').

    Profitizing on OSS have never tasted good in my mouth and I have never believed in it. OSS as a driving force for standards, compromizes between rivaling proprietary technologies, an alternative for those not having millions of $$$ to spend on software is something I do believe in.

    There is absolutely nothing stopping OSS developers from having "regular" jobs at "regular companies". In fact, I do believe many (most?) OSS developers already do work in these kind of companies.

    If VA, RedHat, Caldera, SuSe or what-not goes under is of minor or no importance to OSS. Hammering the dooms day drums whenever a small OSS exploiting company goes under is something which will cease on ./ in due time I hope.

    --
    In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
  52. Re:OSDN Websites... by F5 · · Score: 1

    Where on OSDN.com is .asp code being used?

    A quick check of OSDN.com shows:

    Server: Apache/1.3.12 (Unix) mod_perl/1.22

    And there are .pl extensions on some of the links to apps on OSDN.com.

  53. OT: ASP != by belg4mit · · Score: 1

    As someone else pointed out the are running mod_perl

    Apache:ASP is a module for mod_perl
    to allow you to use the ASP "paradigm"
    with much more wholesome software.

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  54. Last post! by sulli · · Score: 1

    Is this it?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  55. OT: ASP != M$ by belg4mit · · Score: 1

    D'oh! Jumped the gun and cropped thte title there

    --
    Were that I say, pancakes?
  56. Hahahaha by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    Nice troll. DUH - if you post to a PUBLIC site on the INTERNET expect that your ip will be logged...hell, they'd have to turn off Apache logs to erase the record. If you have problems with this, post from an Internet Cafe or something. Or just keep it to yourself. Jeezus.

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  57. In related news... by edashofy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft is dropping 'Micro' from their name...

    1. Re:In related news... by wholesomegrits · · Score: 1

      Which makes about as much sense as Peter North dropping 'North' from his name, you assclown.

      --
      No sig is worth reading.
    2. Re:In related news... by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

      Hey man Microsoft can't live without the "Micro". After all, Bill Gates' penis is still both "Micro"scopic and "soft".

      --

      eTrade SUCKS
  58. Naming via domain registration... by doorbot.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps VA has followed in many of the former "dot bomb" naming conventions where one thinks up a good list of names, then determines which are available. As most are probably taken, a domain name, and thus company name, are easily chosen.

    So, they found vasoftware.com" was available and went for it. Looks like the record was updated today, too.

    So what else might they switch to in the future? Domain squatters are already on the hunt for their next possible name...

  59. www.vasoftware.com resolves by crimoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The hostname www.vasoftware.com resolves yet there isn't a press release or anything to that effect on the VA website.

    I always find it interesting when News sites get press releases like this before the Company itself updates their own website. It's quite telling about who is important, Wall Street (Journal?!) or clients/customers/fans of the Company itself.

    Makes me wonder: Are they in business to hype the stock price or are they in business to make good products?

  60. Might as well.... by kindbud · · Score: 2

    We gave the country away to John Ashcroft, might as well give the TLD away to NeuLevel.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
    1. Re:Might as well.... by kindbud · · Score: 2

      WTF?! Parent was supposed to go to another story....

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    2. Re:Might as well.... by unitron · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I don't think it's happened to me yet, but I've seen other comments in the past few weeks that looked as though they belonged in a different current story, so I guess it's a "feature" of the latest Slashdot code update.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  61. Subscriptions by sigwinch · · Score: 2
    Slashdot needs to start selling subscribtions now, and start thinking about ways to sell advertising. Personally, I would subscribe, and I bet most daily readers of this site would.
    I would definitely pay a few bucks a month to support Slashdot (as I do for Kuro5hin.org). I find that /. consistently keeps me weeks ahead on the most important tech news topics, and that's worth at least the price of a magazine subscription to me. (Sure, I could read Wired, C-Net, The Register, blah blah fucking blah, but I don't have the time.)
    --

    --
    Kuro5hin.org: where the good times never end. ;-)

  62. If VA goes out of business, does this meant that. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    If VA goes out of business, does this meant that slashdot will actually deserve that .org in their domain name (nonprofit status).

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  63. Why the urge for getting Linux mainstream? by chris_7d0h · · Score: 1
    Agreed, this post is not exactly talking about VA, but it is about Linux (which was also in the title *grin*).

    What I have failed to grasp is why so many people, junk magazines et.al. so badly want to see Linux on everyone's desktops and in each company's server farm.

    I can make some vague guesses, but would like them confirmed if possible:

    1. For desktops I have no clue why "you" want to shove it down everyone's throat. If people are happy with MacOS X, Win32 or other, why the urge to "force" them to adopt Linux?

    2. Corporate computing / servers. Here I can see some benefits to those already handy with Linux, that is; more handy than any other Unix they currently use at work such as AIX and Solaris. Is this the reason? That a few want their specific "hobby" *nix dialect on all systems at work? Note I am aware that some companies run only Linux/FreeBSD or what not, but most companies still use commercial versions

    3. There are yet other reasons?
    Personally, I like different OS' depending on what I do. For graphics, I prefer Mac or MS Windows. For business apps, I use MS Office (as do all my clients), for development I use *nix and MS Windows, mostly MS Windows since I consider the latter to currently be the best client OS for my needs. For deployment Unix is the natural choice (including Linux and S/390 Open Unix).

    Am I the only one seeing merits of operating systems other than Linux?

    --
    In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
    1. Re:Why the urge for getting Linux mainstream? by sinster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know anyone who is trying to force Linux, in specific (or any particular distribution of Linux) onto every computer.

      Most of the die-hard Linux evangelists (of which I am one) are pushing Linux because we see that as the best means to our ends. And those ends are to get Windows /off/ of all computers. I don't care what goes back onto the computer so long as it isn't a Microsoft product. The fact that every OS that I'm familiar with is technologically superior to Windows (in its various flavors) means that I don't have to be particularly picky about which OS I push. But as far as I can see, Linux is the OS that's easiest to get people to accept. And so I push Linux.

      Hell, before I got involved with Linux, I was writing my own OS (Syrinx) specifically for this purpose. Then 386BSD (or was it BSD386? don't remember) and Linux were both starting up at the time. I generally prefer BSD flavors of UNIX to SysV flavors (I'm addicted to ^Z, and my early experience with SysV stuff -- SCO UNIX and AT&T SysV -- didn't support a posteriori backgrounding), so I took a look at 386BSD. It didn't support my ESDI drives, so I couldn't even test it. Linux did. So I could play with it. And it was quite spiffy. So I abandoned Syrinx and jumped in with both feet and have been there since. If 386BSD had supported ESDI drives when I tested it, I'd probably be a *BSD bigot instead of a Linux bigot. Sure, some of you can argue that I should've just added support for ESDI mysqlf, but in those days 386BSD wasn't accepting patches from the general public, and the developers told me that they had no interest in supporting ESDI. To top it all off, I couldn't even play around with it enough to see if it was interesting enough to warrant the effort of adding that support myself.

      (To this day, Linux is the only operating system that understands the Syrinx partition type, and there is only one computer running Syrinx: an old 25MHz 286 that I sold to a buddy many years ago).

      --
      -- Nolite audere delere orbiculum rigidum meum.
    2. Re:Why the urge for getting Linux mainstream? by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      Did you, by any chance, also work on MIT/Cesium? :)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    3. Re:Why the urge for getting Linux mainstream? by sinster · · Score: 1

      hehe.

      Ummm. No.

      --
      -- Nolite audere delere orbiculum rigidum meum.
  64. VA Researh by rogerl · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember when they were VA Research and changed their name to VA Linux. Ah, how life comes full circle. And for the time being their stock symbol is still LNUX.

  65. Link to the press release by MSBob · · Score: 2

    Here's the link that doesn't require a login but it's only about VA requesting that the shareholders allow them to change the company name. Here

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  66. I thought RedHat was doing okay... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 2

    At least that's what I thought those end of financial quarter results were saying...

  67. Maybe they'll sell OSDN to IBM by Macka · · Score: 1


    I'm sure IBM wouldn't mind hosting it as Linux is very much their strategy these days, and the cost is peanuts to them.

  68. Anyone else notice... by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...that all anti-VA posts, such as "Will they change their stock symbol" or "Who cares" have all been modded down as redundant?

    ...that there are very few "Good idea, VA!" posts?

    ...that the very few "good idea"s that there are are modded up?

    ...that they're all biased?

    ...that CmdrTaco is the only one who seems to care and post articles about the OSDN?

    ...that adding "Now mod me down for being a troll" at the end gets about "+5, Funny" or "+3, Interesting"?

    With saying that....

    Mod me down for being a troll, just wanted to put these out...

    --joshua :)

    1. Re:Anyone else notice... by Pyrosz · · Score: 1

      ...that adding "Now mod me down for being a troll" at the end gets about "+5, Funny" or "+3, Interesting"?

      At the time of this posting, your modded as +3 Interesting... I soon expect to see you as +5 Funny if your theory holds.

      --

      An optimist believes we live in the best world possible; a pessimist fears this is true.
  69. Motorola by BarefootClown · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Actually, Motorola didn't take the name from a record player, they took it from the Victrola radio. Motorola (Motor Victrola) marketed the first successful car radio. Incidentally, the unit was designed by the same man (Bill Lear) who invented the eight-track player, the Learjet, and a long list of other devices.

    --

    "Make it ten--I am only a poor corrupt official."
    --Captain Louis Renault (Claude Rains), Casablanca

    1. Re:Motorola by starman97 · · Score: 1

      IIRC Motorola started out as Galvin Mfg.
      They made a battery pack so that you could take your house radio with you in your car.

      --
      Starman97@Gmail.com (bring it on spammers)
    2. Re:Motorola by detritus. · · Score: 1

      My mistake, you're right, it was a radio. Apparently attempts were However the name's concept was from Victrola.

      [..]William Lear teamed with Galvin in 1934, and successfully developed the automobile dashboard radio they named the "Motorola," the motorized Victrola. Galvin demonstrated the prototype model in his Studebaker. Motorola produced millions of car radios, followed by two-way radio systems for police and fire services. [..] Source

  70. Re:Are they still LNUX? Perhaps SDOT or SLSH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Definitely:

    FCKD

  71. Bottom Rung? by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
    I'm afraid *you* missed it. MCP is the bottom rung. One test. At the time it was on installing & maintaining Win95, or some mindless thing like that - I recall. I also purported *experience*, of which I have twenty years.

    My point that you missed is the phrase: I personally don't eat at McDonald's. The cheese, for one thing, is not *real*. But I don't blast people for their chosen specialty, just because I don't approve of the product. Shameless persecution of people who are proclaimed "inferior" is not-so-indirectly what we are at war about.

    The *sig* sucks, and so does profession-bashing (unless you're talking about lawyers...;-)

    ...demeaning...hmmm study that word - isn't it an oxymoron unto itself?

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
    1. Re:Bottom Rung? by bwalling · · Score: 1

      I have an MCSE and I still bash it. Yes, I know that MCP is the bottom rung, but it has less recognition.

      You shouldn't be so defensive of the MCSE. You aren't the type of MCSE that his/her sig is lambasting. Your employer provided you with the resources to obtain it (and may have made it a requirement - you made no mention). The sig was referring to the person that passes a few (relatively easy) tests, and then expects a good job.

      Besides, the sig is mostly humorous. There is a lot of MCSE bashing around here, but no one honestly bashes skilled individuals. There is an implied 'Paper' in many of the comments. It is done frequently enough around here that I just crack a smile and move on.

      I bash certain aspects of people that I have great respect for all the time. People do it to me. I can take it. Take a little ribbing, and give a little back. Being an MCSE is not worse than being a Linux zealot...

    2. Re:Bottom Rung? by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
      Good points - all things considered. Guess I'm in a bad mood lately. After seeing this and other sigs similar, I just got to a mild "breaking point" and let off some steam. Normally, I also crack a smile and move on.

      Maybe I'm p/o'd that I soon won't be *legally* able to use the moniker - mainly because I'm not going to follow the mainstream tracks of WinXP - or 2k for that matter. I *do* maintain NT4 and Win2k networks that aren't *notworks*. No way I'm going to succumb to the *one* M$ way - I just refuse to go the way of the lemming.

      I should have done what my 20 yr old son did, and go for Cisco certs...but if hindsight were foreskin, very few of us would be circumcized ;-)(my bad joke)

      Thanks for your kind comment.

      --
      db
      Cig:
      ôô
      /`
  72. you are a troll, but you said something useful by Erris · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The sky is always falling.

    Say goodbye to UNIX support. It's expensive to develop for UNIX compared to Windows. VB programmers are a dime a dozen and can be hired for $30k a year, so why would a software company want to hire anyone else? The former "LNUX" will soon be in bed with Microsoft before we know it.

    This is stupid stuff. Do you really know what the cost of using Windoze junk is? I work at a company that M$ is deep into. The productivity lost is astounding. We have spent fortunes on closed source junk that can never cross comunicate, never works that well and sits on a crippled OS. VB apps that get broken with every change in M$ Office, IE and service pack are the least of our problems. At least we can throw co-ops at maintaining that junk. A larger problem comes from custom applications that never talk to each other, much less the M$ Office the company delcared "standard". Consultants and new hires are astounded at the Byzantine complexity of the tools we are expected to use to get our jobs done. In the end, you find your workers hanging around the printers for jobs that may or may not come through. VA can die, but that won't make closed source junk any better. The alternatives to free software are less and less atractive.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  73. The future of slashdot? by Bat_Masterson · · Score: 1

    Does this mean we'll all have to go back to getting our "geek" news via Usenet??

    Hey, there's an idea for SlashCode -- hang a Usenet gateway and an NNTP server off of Slashdot. If they make it advertisement free (or relegate all advertisements to ONE newsgroup!), they could make it a pay service (a la Clarinet [what ever happened to them?]). As long as their subscription rate is low, many hackers might sign up.

    Possibilities?

  74. V.A.I.O.U. by heroine · · Score: 2

    I voted for I.O.U. to replace Linux .

  75. Wake up people by Ogerman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you thought all along that the Open Source movement needed:

    - big name corporate sponsors

    - its very own news relay site

    - a big centralized FTP/WEB hosting site

    - software companies to pay its developers

    ..then you were missing the point all along.

    Granted, all of these things have been very nice, but the fact is the VA leadership proved themselves incapable of reliably providing us with such services because they lacked entrepreneurial direction. (or they were just dot-com'ers looking to make a quick buck and high-tail.. who knows) Had they focused solely on top quality hardware at reasonable prices, they could have stayed in business for years, even if only marginally profitable until a truly brilliant idea came along. But apparently they weren't satisfied with this. Instead they just threw in the towel and blew out all their VC on worthless crap. Thanks but no thanks.

    In light of the inevitable future and to prevent any major disturbances to Open Source developers worldwide, I suggest that we quickly, calmly, and intelligently find replacements for the services that SourceForge provided us before it disappears. Until the US internet infrastructure becomes more robust wrt bandwidth and switches over to IPv6, I suggest something of a large-and-permanent-node-only P2P network to share the load of a SF-style (but more lightweight) web interface for project hosting and management. Such a network would, as most of our major FTP sites, be hosted primarily in academia or by generous ISP's or corporate entities. From a security and reliability standpoint, I think this might not be such a bad idea anyhow. Any comments or takers?

    1. Re: Wake up people by Random+Walk · · Score: 1
      This is in fact one of the weakest spots of current open source development: the dependency on a very small number of commmercial supporters.

      - a big centralized FTP/WEB hosting site ... boosts VA's profile, but is completely the contrary of what open source development really needs.

      While sunsite/metalab/ibiblio/(whatever it will call itself next) does not provide the many services of sourceforge, it has much more mirrors, and thus avoids the primary problem of SF: being a single point of failure (remember themes.org ?).

      SF is nice for development, but software should be stored elsewhere. Even metalab still has the problem of being US-based, and thus is subject to the obscure US crypto laws. In an ideal world, open source software would be stored on a distributed non-US system (and also protected by PGP signatures instead of reliance on SF not getting cracked). Unfortunately, for many developer kiddies, SF is just too convenient.

  76. Your Reply by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
    And did you get the point I was making? The MCSE "title" does not mean *shit* to me. I thought I made that clear.

    MY POINT IS: Don't defile professions - yours could turn to *shit* at any time. Some poor, non-technical sap with the McDonalds cert (didn't check - might not exist) you asserted in your sig will be hurt by the sig itself.

    I can't feel insulted - my wife is the only one to effectively do that. And, I can't see why you'd make an analogy for the benefit "computer illiterate people" on slashdot. Try that on AOL. A much more gullible audience.

    Anyway, keep your sig. I'm over it. It's just slashdot, after all. It could be worse - I could catch anthrax. Thank God the small town/county in which I live and work is M$-centric and appreciative of a tech who puts 3-in-one oil on their Colorado QIC40 120mb tape drive's stepping motor shaft to give it another year of life, not to mention the only spores coming in will be from SS checks mailed from DC or wherever.

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  77. Name changes by motox · · Score: 1

    It's sad that a company tries to solve their problems blaming their name. Maybe we should all change our names to William Gates Jr and become billionaires ? =)

  78. Moderation experiment by sulli · · Score: 2
    Good idea, VA!

    OSDN and closedSourceForge are the future!

    Who cares?

    Now mod me down for being a troll.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  79. The sky is falling... the sky is falling ... (not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Folks, there have been many posts about the end of this or that in Linux.

    First off, VA changing focus again for the umpteenth time is not an indictment of Linux. It is an indictment of an ill-concieved/executed business model. Would anyone say that web-commerce is a flop even though the dot-bomb went off?

    Second off, VA (in the hardware area) was well out of its league. Playing with the big boys means you get the crap beat out of you on occasion. I had the chance to compete against VA a number of times, and most of the time we won, in part due to VA not knowing how the hardware was really going to be used.

    Third off, in software, who the F*** is VA? What do they have? Why should I risk placing my data on Sourceforge, as VA is in trouble, and the ownership of that data would be in question during bankruptcy proceedings? The ASP model as promolguated by several types over the last several years is so full of horse puckey as a business model, it deserves a rapid anonymous burial. Several friends went to CA to seek their fortune building up ASPs, only to have dot-bomb wipe out any value/confidence in their product, and leave them with no ability to make money.

    So where the hell does that leave VA?

    1) need a real business plan fast. For this you have to hire grown ups. Sorry folks, but the vast majority of 18-35 year old kids have not brought a sustainable business to market, and grown it year after year. Those that have, have grey hair (voice of experience).

    2) find a buyer fast. There is cachet in the brand name. Sell yourself to IBM. Or Compaq/HP. Let them figure out the business portion for you.

    3) Ch 7/11. Well, it would be horrible to see this route, but it could come to this if debt is in the picture.

    The market is tough. It is brutal. It is unforgiving. Some may protest the capitalistic nature of this analysis saying it ain't fair.

    Welcome to the real world. Is the Antelope brought down by the lion going to argue fairness? Will the lion care?

    Reality check: Life is cruel. It is not easy. You must struggle to survive. Fairness is an illusory concept developed by humans. Great in discourse so we dont kill each other, but not relevant for most capitalist societies.

    VA will not survive if it does not learn how to compete. Pure and simple. Doesnt mean a thing for Linux. If you hire experience, you often get good results. If you apply patronage, you get a VA. Or an SGI.

    If anyone asked me what to do with VA, I would think real hard about a niche that they could make money in. Slashdot is a name, a brand. It has value. Think about deploying Slashdot internally at companies as a searchable weblog community builder. It is an enabler of free flow of information which is needed at many companies.

    Sure, some geek can download Slashcode and set it up. As much as you may believe in open source providing freedom, ask yourself if you are giving away all of the value that you can provide, for free. If this is true then you need to think carefully as to how to make money off of it.

    No folks, GPL is not the be-all-end-all. You have to build value and brand around it to make it work, as people will buy value, and will buy brands. GPL is not an IP destroyer. It just doesn't fit well as the central theme of the business plan. Sure you can do GPL, but you damned well better have a way to pay your programmers in the end. Some of them have families, and need to eat.

    So in the end, you have to build value. A value proposition. Something customers actually want. The last thing (actually one of the dumbest things) that a company wants to do is build a product, toss it over the wall, and hope that someone will buy it. This is the better mousetrap concept, and folks, it doesnt work.

    If it did, then explain why all those Sun servers are out there, when they suck in comparison to other stuff. Has nothing to do with system quality. Has a great deal to do with branding, value proposition, etc.

    VA needs to ask very carefully: "What is it that our customers want? What market niche do we wish to play in? What expertise do we have that will enable us to bring a product to market that customers will buy, and will enable us to survive and possibly even grow?"

    I havent heard anyone there try to answer this question. VA needs a grey hair in there now, steering the company. Larry, sorry, but you need to step aside. Find someone with a clue, who knows how to turn companies around, and who wants a challenge.

    Dont go the SGI route of "strategy X du jour will save us... no it didnt? Ok, layoffs and move to strategy Y to save us.... no? oh ..." They are at the end of their cash, maybe a quarter+ left for them. Dont go that route. Park the egos. The company goes under if you cannot.

  80. In hardware its all about SCALE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Dell could push out intel boxes cheaper than VA ever could. At the end of it all, it really boild down to this.

  81. Weren't they... by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

    ...Originally called VA Research anyways?

    Heh...any guesses on the severity rating this'll get on FuckedCompany?

    C-X C-S

  82. Here we go... by Deus+Ex+Machina · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In a relativistic sense, this could be bad for Slashdot - the website. However, if CmdrTaco and the others who run this site really love doing it, I can't imagine them not figuring out another way to support this, or some other site with a similar purpose. You have to remember that it is the people who made this site in the first place, and the thousands of people who come here every day, that make this site what it is.

    I don't mean to sound "peppy" or anything, but let's be realistic, rather than freaking out because a company ruled by suits (which all companies are) makes a decision that sheds a negative light upon the marketability of Slashdot, or of Linux. Yeah, the suits probably never understood Linux - they don't teach OS design and the fundamentals of software engineering at schools of management (unless it is a really odd school). And frankly, if their hearts aren't in it (yeah, sappy again), then why the hell should we want their help, and why should we bitch when they jump ship? I come to Slashdot every day, and post very rarely. I would be very sad to see it go, but if this site dies because VA {ARGV0} no longer supports it, it isn't entirely the fault of VA - this site existed well before VA was a glint in the eye of someone, and will exist long after if we keep our heads. And for God's sake, don't worry about how this will affect Linux's development or acceptance. Clued individuals who need the power of Linux already use Linux, and they aren't going to suddenly use Windows (which they can't work with for whatever reason) because Linux suddenly doesn't have much (or any) presence on Wall Street.

    --
    Know ye not that ye are Gods???
  83. Clarinet by don.g · · Score: 1

    Clarinet still exist, afaik: IIRC Actrix still gets a feed from them.

    --
    Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  84. it doesn't matter by mj6798 · · Score: 2
    Say goodbye to UNIX support. It's expensive to develop for UNIX compared to Windows. VB programmers are a dime a dozen and can be hired for $30k a year, so why would a software company want to hire anyone else? The former "LNUX" will soon be in bed with Microsoft before we know it.

    That makes no sense. If UNIX support were as expensive as you say, it would be a highly attractive business proposition for a support provider. The reality is that UNIX/Linux support costs about as much as Windows support, but that companies need a lot less of it. Our support costs for UNIX systems are a tiny fraction of those for Windows, for example.

    VA has no reason to support Slashdot, Sourceforge, Themes.org, and other very expensive sites that produce zero revenue.

    I don't see why themes.org or Slashdot should be particularly expensive sites, at least in principle.

    The business community will believe "Linux is dead" and it will be an uphill struggle to regain their confidence.

    Who cares? If company A wants to pay several times as much for their software, maintenance, and support because it runs MS Windows than company B that runs Linux, let company A face the financial consequences. It's a free market, and stupidity has its costs.

    Not a Linux company and not a company that has a vested interest in promoting open source. Back in the day, VA's success rested on the success of the Open Source movement. Not any longer - as a software company, they are going to be producing commercial wares that compete with open source solutions.

    Who cares? VA Linux was not needed for the growth of open source software, and if they go away, life will go on. The nice thing about open source software is that contributions are, and remain, public and available no matter what happens to the companies involved.

    We better get used to the fact that most open source software will have been created and supported by failed companies. That's not because open source strategies make companies fail, but because closed source software doesn't survive the failure of its creators.

    So, let's stop belly-aching and get on with life. If VA Software keeps contributing to open source, great. If not, it doesn't matter.

    1. Re:it doesn't matter by spudnic · · Score: 2

      > I don't see why themes.org or Slashdot should be particularly expensive sites, at least in principle.

      I'm assuming that you don't have to write checks for bandwidth and colo services each month. The article about /.'s birthday said they receive 2,000,000 UNIQUE visitors (or ip's) a month. I know I eat up quite a bit of bandwidth here myself.

      The article "Do Digital Photos Endanger History" page 1 currently weighs in at ~667K. I know that I open (including reloading articles to see new replies and "slashdot overload" pages 2,3,etc.) story pages about 15 times a day. That's 10Meg a day not including all the (hundreds?) of refreshes of the main page to see when new stories are added.

      So, ~10Meg a day, say 25 days a month (to be fair) is ~250Megs a month. Just for me. Now say that out of those 2 million visitors, 100,000 have about the same reading habits as me. I know that most of the people reading /. for years have never posted once, so there are a lot more folks out there than you imagine. That's 25,000Gig a month...

      Maybe my numbers are WAY off, but bandwidth isn't free. Nor is the physical space in a facility that could provide that much bandwidth. Not to mention the hardware that has to be behind it to generate pages from the database.

      My point is, it can't be cheap. I certainly hope that /. goes to a enhanced services pay model before they do anything stupid like selling out or shutting down.

      --
      load "linux",8,1
  85. Rob & Taco: ouch! by NineNine · · Score: 1

    I suppose that you guys got lots of VA stock when you sold out to VA. Damn. I hope you guys cashed out a long time ago, or asked for CASH. Otherwise, you guys have built this huge website, and you'll be back to nothing as soon as VA goes under.

  86. Sourceforge has how long to live? by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

    No one is talking about Sourceforge, has everyone already moved away from Sourceforge? The clock is ticking, the whole schbang is not going to live for much longer, those who depend on Sourceforge are in for a rude awakening.

    Sounds like a good time to make sure all the offsite backups are in good order to me.

    --
    Anything is possible given time and money.
  87. Re:Did they work there?-correction by GigsVT · · Score: 2

    Now they all work for Red Hat, RHAT hired all of the good VA Linux Open Source programmers a couple weeks ago.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  88. me too! by AssFace · · Score: 1

    I too am dropping "Linux" from the end of my name. I had it legally added in the late 90's when it was all so hip, fresh, and cool. But now in the 21st century it has just become passe. Just like heroin.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  89. Your question by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1
    As I ranted about at the near-top of this thread, there is no substitute for experience. As far as a cert of choice, I have no idea what the job market is in your region, or wherever you'd be willing to relocate.

    My MCSE hasn't done me much good since I left the employer who funded it, even to the point of the largest local employer's IT dept called *me* overqualified. I won't/can't relocate, and don't really think I can work for anyone else but myself - so I'm *not* raking in the $$$, I just get by.

    The course you linked to seems to be quite comprehensive, but it should be for $7000 and 250 hours. I guess you could check for requirements on a Canadian equivalent of monster.com or whatever, and then supplement your credentials accordingly. I'm really not that familiar with the job market in the US, let alone up there.

    OTOH, I *could* have attained the M$ cert by studying from the Transcender tests and paying $100 each to take the 6 (?) M$/Sylvan tests, provided I had the hardware and OS (NT4 in my case) to hook up to break and fix. If you do, that's the cheapest way to go, and get the damned piece of paper the PHBs want to see.

    Good luck...

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  90. Wrong URL by Merk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wrong URL. The link to the register article is: http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/22559.html. Or you could just read the article at Kuro5hin: http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2001/10/31/15654/175

    According to Kuro5hin's story, it was Roblimo who informed them they were getting the boot too. Inneresting.

    1. Re:Wrong URL by Ralph+Bearpark · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Me bad.

  91. Re:YHBT. YHL. HAND. by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

    Right....
    Actually, I was posting to the post above that one, that may have confused you.

    Get a life, maybe you could lose some of that aggression if you spent more time having a social life instead of posting flames all day.

  92. The Register article by 13013dobbs · · Score: 1

    Something from the The Register

    --

    No replies made to AC posts. Please log in.

  93. The Market Will Decide by Not+A+Democrat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One thing that these companies did not realize just a few years ago is that the supply of venture capital is limited. They can not keep on losing money for as long as they want. One thing they should know is that a large change in direction in this stage of a company's life doesn't reassure investors, it scares them.

    VA looked like a company that was devoted to a buzz-word, "open-source", rather than to a goal or a business plan. They went out and made expensive acquisitions that had nothing at all to do with their core business. They didn't need to support a pile of open-source developers, and they had no use at all for Sourceforge, or Slashdot or the rest of Andover. Those seemed to be vanity moves with little effort to focus their business or make money.

    Their more recent moves look like the last, desperate actions of a dying company. Eliminating their core business basically meant giving up any hope of becoming profitable, in favour of slowly wasting away. Now they want to put big advertisements all over Slashdot because it is losing too much money. Watch most of those ads be for ThinkGeek or OSDN and wonder why.

    Way back when, VA appeared to be a sound company, with a well-executed business plan. We all had big hopes that they would be the ones to break through and show that you could make a profit with Linux. Then they went on a completely pointless shopping spree and forget about what they did best. Now, it seems very fitting that their name is VA, which is French for "go", because they are quickly going away.

    --

    Being Liberal should be a Crime!

  94. The lesson: by dmelomed · · Score: 1

    Do not trust a business a community website like slashdot.

  95. Re:YHBT. YHL. HAND. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

    Ha. ha. ha. Dude, you quoted the troll in your original reply. You can't do that and still cover your ass.

    I suggest that you learn to laugh at yourself...because we all are. It's like that time those jokers at work cut up a piece of chalk, put it in an Altoids tin, and asked me if I wanted a mint.

    I fell for it too! I ate it! But I laughed too. Because chalk is a good source of calcium, and while their teeth were rotting, mine were growing stronger...harder...tranforming me into...
    CAPTAIN ZOMBO-TEETH

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)