Slashdot Mirror


Limewire Gets Ads, And Accusations of Spyware

Gerard J. Pinzone writes: "Limewire 1.8 now comes with mandatory banner ads. The reasons given by one of their developers, Christopher Rohrs, for the new ads are that 'Bandwidth alone from www.limewire.com, www.limewire.org, and router.limewire.com is around $10,000 month! And we need to pay developer's salaries--like mine--to keep driving innovation on the Gnutella network.' On top of all this, the banner ad software Limewire is using is "Cydoor". Many users are complaining that this is spyware. Here is a link to the message in the Gnutella forums where this topic is being discussed"

288 comments

  1. WAS around 10k, now is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Bandwidth alone ... is around $10,000 month!

    That's the pre-SlashdotEffect figure, right?/p.

  2. *sigh* by mrseigen · · Score: 1

    ...and we lose another free service to the megacorporations.

    1. Re:*sigh* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a megacoporation? Yeah, I'd put Limewire up there with the Microsofts and IBM's of the world

    2. Re:*sigh* by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Megacorporations? That just sounds like another redundant socialist remark. Who said that bandwidth/music/internet/software should be free? I know that I won't be writing software for a living for free.

  3. Installation of Cydoor is OPTIONAL! by MarcQuadra · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well I installed LimeWire 1.8 a few days ago and it ASKS you if you want to install Gator and/or cydoor. I said no and LimeWire is essentially the same as 1.7 (but with a banner)

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:Installation of Cydoor is OPTIONAL! by johnnyproton · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, I also declined to install the 3rd party software. However, it still installed a program called EzStub which consistently begs my firewall to access the internet.

      There is no mention of this program in the Windows Registry, either.

    2. Re:Installation of Cydoor is OPTIONAL! by FFFish · · Score: 3, Informative

      Those of you using Windows boxen may wish to use InCtrl5, which monitors the registry and various directories for any and all changes.

      You can then go through its list and ferret out the shite that Cydoor has installed.

      Anyone know of an uninstaller that can use InCtrl files? It'd be a snap to replace Windows' rather piss-poor uninstaller.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    3. Re:Installation of Cydoor is OPTIONAL! by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

      OK. I just searched my entire machine for *stub*.* and it didn't show any spyware programs, only files from various projects I'm working on and a few files in /winnt (but they all appear to be from Microsoft, and all appear to be valid windows files). I think you may have mis-installed LimeWire.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    4. Re:Installation of Cydoor is OPTIONAL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No cd_*.dll That's Cydoor and if you remove the file guess what no ads in limewire and limewire fails to work.

  4. Screw Limewire... by J.C.B. · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    ...use gnut like the real men. There's no way in hell it's going to get banner ads.

    1. Re:Screw Limewire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to suspend your normal witty banter and engage in a brief bout of sarcasm wil.

      Were i a retard i would be impressed. Looks like you're stuck impressing yourself again.

    2. Re:Screw Limewire... by darketernal · · Score: 1

      Wait until someone starts taking time to make giant 80x25 ascii banner ads for something like gnut...I made one but obviously it encountered the lameness filter.

      -d

      Crap flows thru my Open Source. Hey, it's true.

  5. Fantastic. by dave-fu · · Score: 0, Troll

    They install adware to help offset the costs of bandwidth so what do you do but drive 10,000 lemmings to their site to jack the prices of bandwidth up even higher. Wonderful.
    Not that including spyware (if it is) in their product is much more salubrious, but still.

    --
    Easy does it!
    This comment has been submitted already, 276865 hours , 59 minutes ago. No need to try again.
    1. Re:Fantastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Salubrious. Tha's a big word, weild it with caution. You may poke someone's eye out!

    2. Re:Fantastic. by DarkZero · · Score: 1
      They install adware to help offset the costs of bandwidth so what do you do but drive 10,000 lemmings to their site to jack the prices of bandwidth up even higher. Wonderful. Not that including spyware (if it is) in their product is much more salubrious, but still.

      I think you're missing the point. The person put links to two of their sites, instead of just one, with explicit intention. This person is using Slashdot as a tool of revenge against LimeWire, and I just wish I'd thought of it first.

  6. Geez by LS · · Score: 5, Funny

    Non-story. Limewire is open source. Go download it and remove any ads if you want, whiny bitches:

    http://limewire.limewire.org/servlets/ProjectHom e

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    1. Re:Geez by big_hairy_mama · · Score: 1

      Exactly, and if you can't figure out how to do that, then there are a dozen other servents that you can download and run -- many of which I like better than LimeWire anyway. That's the beauty of both the gnutella network and open source in general - *choice*.

    2. Re:Geez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its just a topic of conversation. Lighten up. Go have some sex, or is it a non-issue?

    3. Re:Geez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Shut Up, Wesley!

      You and that clever nickname of yours.

    4. Re:Geez by KwisatzHaderach · · Score: 1

      Um. No. It isn't open source, at least last time I looked at the jar file. The class files were obfuscated. Whatever...

    5. Re:Geez by rbeattie · · Score: 5, Informative


      I was about to call you names back. But then I CVSed the source and low-and-behold, if you download it and compile it yourself (very, very easy with Apache Ant - there's even a batch file to do it) it's the same version (1.8) but WITHOUT the ad stuff. You don't even have to muss with the code.

      http://core.limewire.org/servlets/ProjectSource

      Very nice. (Thanks for being a jerk.) ;-)

      -Russ

      --
      Me
    6. Re:Geez by jilles · · Score: 2

      I have the source code on my hardrive, licensed under the GPL accessible through CVS (what do you want more?). Pretty interesting to look at too. Well written, pretty well documented. I'm actually considering playing with it if I can find the time.

      I don't mind Limewire showing some banners. I don't see how they can make money otherwise at Limewire. The spyware is more of an issue and I will block/remove it if I encounter it. I must warn the people from limewire that knowledgeable software users, open source developers in particular *hate* spyware. As such I think that such a move would be counterproductive since those very same people are also limewire's core users.

      --

      Jilles
  7. falling lemons by Jingle+Returno · · Score: 1

    Spyware is an ethical concern, with impediments to privacy and entailing much.

    But what is also of note is the lousy java coding, notably the lax java installer. Even compiling it from source is a time. Segmentation faults (fixed with ulimit) is still not enough.

    As a minor suggestion, try gtk-gnutella.

    (http://gtk-gnutella.sourceforge.net)

    Works great, open development: a better sort of karma.

    . . .this is merely opinion

    1. Re:falling lemons by kz45 · · Score: 0


      Whether we like it or not, companies like limewire and bearshare really make or break the stablility of the gnutella network. (they run the servers for the host caching).

      Getting the open-sourced version, and ripping out the ads will just push gnutella's stability closer to what it was about a year ago. (remember the slashdot articles about the death of gnutella? This is also due to the "open-ness" of the network. Any joe programmer can create a client, no matter how poorly designed. In the case of limewire and bearshare, it was for the better.).

  8. They should passport for verfication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That way it can be secure and we all can conceal our identities.

  9. Limewire == spyware -- duh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought this was common knowledge? Kazaa, Morpheus, Limewire, most of them install spyware. I think Aimster is an exception, but its software is a piece of utter cockshit, and its company is run by the queen douchebag of them all.

  10. just... by bricriu · · Score: 2

    ... all the more reason to use the open-sourced version... remember?

    I notice that limewire.org still advertises 1.7 as the most recent version.

    --

    AHHHHHHH! I'm burning with goodness again!
    - Reakk, Sluggy Freelance

  11. Problems by Raven42rac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have absolutely no hard feelings against using banner ads, they may be a nuisance, but you know, these people have families, and they need to eat, but spyware is the most insidious, dispicable, underhanded way of making a profit, and any company who uses such "utilities" should be sued for theft of our bandwidth, in my humble opinion, i wonder how much money in bandwidth has been stolen from Joe Consumer by these numerous programs that employ spyware, i would like to see that statistic.

    --
    I hate sigs.
  12. Bearshare has it too by MxTxL · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bearshare pops up to an immediate ad, and also usually spawns a browser window to show an ad. Pretty annoying, but it's not a big deal to just close the spawned window and get on with your business... not really a big deal if limewire does it... besides, if it helps keep them in business, then i say go for it!

    1. Re:Bearshare has it too by matt[0] · · Score: 1

      Bearshare alse puts unwanted icons in your start menu asking you to install the optional software you declined, which in my mind is unethical. What is with these coders, have they no honor?

      --
      --------- Matt
    2. Re:Bearshare has it too by tcc · · Score: 5, Informative

      Aside from the fact that when I tried bearshare last year, it DIDN'T ASK me if I wanted to install extra stuff, I was running norton internet security, and guess what I found? A nice little program that was running in the background, ALWAYS pluging EVERY site I was visiting in a database somewhere before going to connect to that typed site I sent, all this transparent if you didn't have any firewalling software installed. (I kept seeing a connection to some place that I didn't know of), I uninstalled bearshare, guess what, it stayed there! (standard uninstaller, not cleansweep or any advanced cleaners).

      What pissed me off the most about this is NOWHERE in the install process or the website from front page to download link was this indicated.

      I was happy to see alternative to napster, but I was REALLY angry at the fact that people are installing spying crap on my system not EVEN with small notices anywhere in the install or download process! That happened after the REAL.COM spyware fiasco, I thought people learned, I'm sure today it's not doing it anymore for that precise example (after a zillion complain probably)

      But WHY do we have to go thru this?? these people should be treated the same way VIRUS WRITERS would be, heck, you can get jailed in some contries just to try to log in a .mil site for fun or do portscanning on any major sites, why the heck do these people install stuff that tracks your every moves and gets out of it with not even a scratch? 20$ you'd write something like that and treat it with a virus label, you'd get fined and jailed! I stopped using bearshare from that day and told all my friends, sent an article here about it and all the specs but it got rejected.

      Anyways, I can't beleive people are still pulling that stunt, mandatory banner adds, it's okay in my book, even if it's totally useless and normally it means that the application will die (because who click these adds anyways?! the only advertising system I saw working were porn sites and some loyal people on a specific site (i.e. Here probably). The fact is they SAY so, they WARN you, if you go thru the process and something slows down your system or tracks your moves, at least you know! that's the BIG difference and even if it's almost ironic to say, I guess with all the spycrap around, people being honnest about the stuff they install on your system should get a praise. (yike!!)

      ----
      | Bearshare pops up to an immediate ad, and also usually spawns a browser window to show an ad. Pretty annoying, but it's not a big deal to just close the spawned window and get on with your business... not really a big deal if limewire does it... besides, if it helps keep them in business, then i say go for it!

      --
      --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    3. Re:Bearshare has it too by seann · · Score: 0

      How Ironic, they install icons on your computer, that must in some way stop you from pirating the stuff you steal.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    4. Re:Bearshare has it too by Hal-9001 · · Score: 1

      There's a good chance that all of its ads come from one domain (I know this was true of the popups for KaZaA; they all came from twistedhumor.com, IIRC), so you could just add that domain to your restricted sites under Internet Explorer, turn off all privileges (Java, Javascript, yada yada) for all restricted sites, and curb the epidemic of popup windows.

      --
      "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
    5. Re:Bearshare has it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bearshare is a terrible piece of software anyway.

      Use Gnucleus instead. It's just a better client with all kinds of sweet features you didn't even know you needed.

    6. Re:Bearshare has it too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What is with these coders, have they no honor?

      Marketing people write their paychecks...

    7. Re:Bearshare has it too by andrewski · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Anyways, I can't beleive people are still pulling that stunt, mandatory banner adds, it's okay in my book, even if it's totally useless and normally it means that the application will die (because who click these adds anyways?"

      You're assuming that they are making money on clickthroughs exclusively and not on all the other data that they collect from you. Who really knows how much data mining these things do on your PC, without your knowledge or consent?

      I am as paranoid about this kind of software as I am about people cracking into my machine. They are both non-consensual, and offer no information about their motives.

      TREAT ADWARE / SPYWARE WITH EXTREME CAUTION!!!!!!!

    8. Re:Bearshare has it too by the_olo · · Score: 1

      >I was happy to see alternative to napster, but I was
      >REALLY angry at the fact that people are installing
      >spying crap on my system not EVEN with small notices
      >anywhere in the install or download process!

      What, are you crazy or something? If there were notices you probably wouldn't install that software, would you?

    9. Re:Bearshare has it too by theCoder · · Score: 1

      Easy way to fix that: add the line

      64.28.67.150 home.bearshare.com

      to your hosts file (on windows it's in \windows\system32\drivers\etc\hosts). Now when you start Bearshare, you don't get the Bearshare ads, you get /.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    10. Re:Bearshare has it too by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Better: 127.0.0.1 home.bearshare.com

    11. Re:Bearshare has it too by marick · · Score: 1

      "But WHY do we have to go thru this?? these people should be treated the same way VIRUS WRITERS would be..."


      Ok, three things:

      1)They're called MSTDs (MicroSoft Transmitted Diseases, and no, I didn't invent that).

      2)One difference here is that the USA is a capitalist country, and these people (the people who write parasitic products like Webhancer and the like) are trying to make money. They are a corporation, and therefore, given some privledges that VIRUS WRITERS don't have - namely, they can't particularly be arrested for writing software. They can only be sued. Don't like it? Then sue them. Or help to fix the system. These people are just taking advantage of a system that exists already.

      3)Furthermore, the software is hardly viral. It installs itself with other software you install. You probably agreed to it in a click-through license agreement. Did you read the click-through license agreement? Most people don't. Just remember, you get what you pay for, and paying in TIME and EFFORT up front can save you in TIME and EFFORT down the road.

    12. Re:Bearshare has it too by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      Marketing people write their paychecks...

      Interesting...
      So does the payroll department do the marketing then?

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
    13. Re:Bearshare has it too by pa-guy · · Score: 0

      A nice little program that was running in the background, ALWAYS pluging EVERY site I was visiting in a database somewhere before going to connect to that typed site
      IE does this as well. On a slower machine you'll see it access redir.dll before taking you to your requested site.

    14. Re:Bearshare has it too by drsquare · · Score: 1

      But then you wouldn't go to Slashdot!

  13. Mandatory, eh? by Erik+Fish · · Score: 1

    Yeah, "mandatory" unless I filter them out the way I filter out Grokster's banners and eDonkey 2000's banners and the banners of every single web page I visit.

    As for spyware, that's bad mojo. While I don't doubt that initially my kung-fu would best it, how do I know that it doesn't detect that the spyware is missing and redownload it in the background? Sure, I could scan my system regularly with OptOut but that would mean trusting Steve Gibson...

    1. Re:Mandatory, eh? by K8Fan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sure, I could scan my system regularly with OptOut but that would mean trusting Steve Gibson...

      Two problems with this though:

      1. Steve Gibson no longer produces OptOut.
      2. Who would have a problem trusting a guy who has expended so much effort pointing out the problem in the first place?
      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    2. Re:Mandatory, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Ad Aware

    3. Re:Mandatory, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seriously hope that was a joke about trusting Steve Gibson. I believe this guys is a crusader for the little people.

      I want to elect this guy for president!

  14. Gator by matt[0] · · Score: 1

    I remember sniffing my connection with Gator running and noticed that it was sending lots of statistics back to the Gator collective. Bad, Bad, Bad. I don't know if it is still like that, but I for one won't touch it or any app that includes it with a ten foot pole.

    --
    --------- Matt
    1. Re:Gator by DarkZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The entire POINT of Gator is to be spyware, much like the Comet Cursor. It offers a free and stupid little feature to attract as many people as possible for the purpose of getting spyware on their computer. Of course it still uses it, because it still exists!

  15. As if... by x136 · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    ...it wasn't slow enough.

    Damn Java.

    --
    SIGFEH
    1. Re:As if... by jeffy124 · · Score: 2, Informative

      actually, it aint java that's slow (unless you have an old JVM). It's the network connections going from point to point along the network combined with the fact that the guy who coded Limewire didnt know how to use Java effectively, hence the code is very ineffecient.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:As if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have an example of a similar sized Java program that is fast?

    3. Re:As if... by Adam+Fisk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apparently you have not looked at the LimeWire source. If you had, you would know that LimeWire was coded by a team, and that the LimeWire source is quite well engineered and well documented. I would recommend giving it a look at www.limewire.org. If you find specific performance bottlenecks, please feel free to e-mail me anytime at afisk@limewire.org. (think profiler). Thanks. Adam Fisk LimeWire Team

      --

      Adam Fisk

  16. Editor by VA+Software · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well at least we didn't get a Slashdot editor adding a witty comment about how terrible advertising is.

    --

    ---
    http://slashdot.org/moderation.shtml
  17. spyware by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 1

    it won't be long before spyware is considered an act of terrorism, unless it's the government's spyware!

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
  18. No excuse for dishonesty by OmegaDan · · Score: 2

    Regardless of server costs -- or whatever ... Spyware is wrong -- it should be illegal. I also dont trust the "wolf" here submitting a story about their being no wolves in sheeps clothing.

    1. Re:No excuse for dishonesty by magicslax · · Score: 0

      >>>Spyware is wrong -- it should be illegal.

      What sort of troll is this? Do you want the government mandating what software can or cannot be produced? Of course, once we have spyware out of the way, we should start hunting down those dirty open source terrorist types.

    2. Re:No excuse for dishonesty by TurboRoot · · Score: 1

      Of course I do.

      If I write it, its a virus.

      If some corporation writes it, its spyware.

      I don't see the difference, anytime a program subvertly installs itself to my computer without me asking, and THEN violates my privacy pisses me off. If someone wrote a virus that did this, they would be in jail, but since as I said.. Corporations wrote this, we can't do shit about it.

    3. Re:No excuse for dishonesty by dadragon · · Score: 1

      This IS illegal in Canada. It's a violation of the Privacy Act. Not that our courts or government do anything about it... it is still illegal and I believe one could sue them for it.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    4. Re:No excuse for dishonesty by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      They could probably get sued in the US too since they are collecting information about children under 16 years of age.. no to mention the programs they bundle the spyware with are facilitating the spread of illegal software and music.

    5. Re:No excuse for dishonesty by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Well? What are you waiting for? Sue them!

  19. MSN sure has great software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    You know! I can get great music over at MSN. There is a free media player called the Microsoft Media player which has a special format called WMA. With WMA you can get cd quality over music at only 64k bit-rates! According to the link inside teh the media player settings, its far supperior to mp3! Microsoft also confirms its better as do the major record labels. The record labels recommend it? Wow! This is some great stuff. ALmost as good as AOL. Now AOL is for real hackers. Too bad it doesn't have free music. I am concerned about the thieves who use gnutella. At least I am legal by trusting Microsoft. You should all trust them more often.

    1. Re:MSN sure has great software by matt[0] · · Score: 1

      Go away MSFT troll. You have the wrong crowd, we-don't-want-yer-WMA.

      --
      --------- Matt
    2. Re:MSN sure has great software by man_ls · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      I'd have modded this +1 Funny if you'd logged in. Nice job.

    3. Re:MSN sure has great software by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Funny
      Wow! Your smart enough to program in Visual Studio.NET and create UML documents yet you can't even terminate an AHREF link. I trust you really know what your talking about.

    4. Re:MSN sure has great software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If I had mod points, you'd get them. Too bad you were AC.

      This is the sort of post that shows the need for a "+1, Troll" rating.

      A well written troll is rare, and deserves to be acknowledged.

    5. Re:MSN sure has great software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I found out who he is:

      http://geraldholmes.freeyellow.com/

  20. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut up, fake Wesley!

  21. I swear to g*d..... by HarrisonSilp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Peer to Peer programs seem to be developed for no reason at all but to hide the fact that usenet is still the best way to get all of this stuff that the MPAA and RIAA don't want us to have. Just wait long enough and you're fav. p2p program will be sued, then along comes another one and they have to sue them too, hopefully this cycle will continue on and on into the future and they'll never notice my 24/7 leeching off of alt.binaries.movies.divx......... btw, Monsters Inc. anyone?

    1. Re:I swear to g*d..... by HarrisonSilp · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      D: regardless of me not believing in a god (I guess you could say I'm more agnostic, I think as silly to say that there is no possibility of a god as it is to say it's a certainty), I had a religious friend who would always spell it that way, to mock the ppl who got mad when he brought up the issue. D: and it just kind of took over and that's how i wrote it.

    2. Re:I swear to g*d..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, till your news provider stops carrying alt.binaries.foobar because that group is costing THEM $10,000 (or more) per month and doing nobody but warez pups a bit of good.

      The bandwidth's got to come from somewhere, and nobody's going to pay for you to sit at your computer and freeload. Any exceptions to this rule exist only in a transient state, whether a company (that eventually becomes a FuckedCompany) or an individual (who goes to slam-me-in-the-ass prison for YOUR freeloading).

      That's the power of P2P, if you're a w4r3z kiddie at least; the bandwidth is decentralized, and you can l33ch to your heart's content without costing anyone money -- except for yourself and your fellow kiddies, of course.

      Not that you'd care about such things, being that it doesn't mean you'll get more w4r3z or m0v13z or mp3z. Living in the here and now is just so easy, isn't it?

    3. Re:I swear to g*d..... by TGK · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Horridly offtopic, but what the hell.

      Which part do you object to? His failure to capitalize God or his insertation of an asterix where the o goes? Perhaps I should explain.

      god = Any power higher than what we see as mortal. Zeus, for example, was/is a god. Thus, god (no caps) usualy takes the indeffinate article.

      God = A specific god. Usualy this refers to "the one true God" AKA the God of Jewdisasm ("I Am") and Christianity. Muslims refer to their God as Allah, but He would also be capitalised and would also take the definate article.

      G*d or g*d = A traditional Jewish way of writing God. Typicaly this would be capitalised, but lets call it a typo. G*d (or more accurately G-d) is a method of communicating the idea of God without writing the word. Traditional Jewish Kabalistic law holds that writing God or the name of God is a Bad Thing (tm) and that you shouldn't do it. Thus, religious scholoars apapted and wrote G-d rather than God so they could communicate with each other about God without annoying him.

      Hope this clears things up!

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    4. Re:I swear to g*d..... by HarrisonSilp · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Not too bright are we?

      Sure, till your news provider stops carrying alt.binaries.foobar because that group is costing THEM $10,000 (or more) per month and doing nobody but warez pups a bit of good.

      Not that much at all.

      The bandwidth's got to come from somewhere, and nobody's going to pay for you to sit at your computer and freeload. Any exceptions to this rule exist only in a transient state, whether a company (that eventually becomes a FuckedCompany) or an individual (who goes to slam-me-in-the-ass prison for YOUR freeloading).

      That's the power of P2P, if you're a w4r3z kiddie at least; the bandwidth is decentralized, and you can l33ch to your heart's content without costing anyone money -- except for yourself and your fellow kiddies, of course.

      Jesus what the hell am I paying my ISP for? I swear to god it was the bandwith I'm using every day

      Not that you'd care about such things, being that it doesn't mean you'll get more w4r3z or m0v13z or mp3z. Living in the here and now is just so easy, isn't it?

      That makes no sense, and if anything if everyone leeched off of news servers (which I hope not because that would mean they'd got shut down pronto fast) it would SAVE bandwith because you'd have a centralized file that could be downloaded by many, from the ISP straight to your DSL line, not back and forth between users clogging up the ISP's bandwith anymore. Am the only one who read all of the "Gnutella can't scale" articles? There's a reasons it can't and if Guntella-type networks keep growing at the rate they are you can't be bitching about how much bandwith I'm taking up from my ISP (which I freaking paid for in the first place, DSL, 640 kbps, that's what it said in the contract and that's what I got), when you're clogging the whole goddamn internet just so you can use your fancy p2p network. Good job.

    5. Re:I swear to g*d..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too bright are we?

      As long as "we" includes "you".

      >> costing THEM $10,000 (or more) per month ......
      Not that much at all.


      "or more", ad infinitum, isn't much to you? Well, it's not YOUR pocket, so it can't be much. Right?

      Jesus what the hell am I paying my ISP for? I swear to god it was the bandwith I'm using every day

      Are you paying your ISP for the
      - machine that is serving you somewhere out on the Net
      - the server's bandwidth to THEIR ISP
      - their administrator's salary
      ... etc

      Think again. The overall costs aren't only what comes out of _your_ wallet.

      when you're clogging the whole goddamn internet just so you can use your fancy p2p network.

      You're missing the entire point. P2P decentralizes and removes authority over resources. The bandwidth that P2P uses is only a secondary concern, because if a single point gets hosed, failover is in its DESIGN. So what if $mp3leech wants to take his node offline because he can't afford the bandwidth? There's plenty of other nodes to get the same files from, and you won't even miss his presence on the network. In contrast, if your news server stops carrying binaries, your web-warez disappears, or your ftpz get shut down, you're screwed.

      Maybe it doesn't concern you _today_ that your news server won't carry your precious binary groups a year from now, or that web-warez won't exist anymore, or @Home 128K cable ftpz won't exist anymore, but you'll sure as hell care THEN! And, since you didn't give two shits about it today, some industry lobby will have bought a law making P2P illegal.

      NOW where will you go to get your daily dose of w4r3z?

      NOTE: I'm not advocating w4r3z at all. I simply hate seeing narrow-minded comments spouted about, because they tend to end up breeding myths and FUD. Warez-pups just tend to be a very narrow-minded bunch by nature.

    6. Re:I swear to g*d..... by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      That makes no sense, and if anything if everyone leeched off of news servers (which I hope not because that would mean they'd got shut down pronto fast) it would SAVE bandwith because you'd have a centralized file that could be downloaded by many, from the ISP straight to your DSL line, not back and forth between users clogging up the ISP's bandwith anymore. Am the only one who read all of the "Gnutella can't scale" articles?

      you're not the only one.. my school just put on some new router rules that managed to break most of the p2p file sharing clients and our useable bandwidth increased about 10x from what we had before.. turns out morpheus likes to make fast connections into supernodes or something so everyone on the campus connection got instant supernode status and our bandwidth usage about killed our isp..

    7. Re:I swear to g*d..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Jesus what the hell am I paying my ISP for? I swear to god it was the bandwith I'm using every day

      Are you paying your ISP for the
      - machine that is serving you somewhere out on the Net
      - the server's bandwidth to THEIR ISP
      - their administrator's salary
      ... etc

      Erm.. YES! What do you think he is paying for - the sysadmin's doughnuts?

      However, the points you make re' decentralizing are valid and true....

  22. slashdot effect? by necromaedian · · Score: 1

    is linking them on the frontpage supposed to be some sort of punishment? it definatly not going to keep the bandwidth budget down.

  23. Gnutella? by npietraniec · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Who's still using Gnutella? GiFT just had a breakthrough with the development of ShadowFT

    Download it. Give it a try...

    1. Re:Gnutella? by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      Where's the breakthrough? The latest news update as of two weeks ago indicates they still haven't found a way around being blocked from the FastTrack network.

    2. Re:Gnutella? by juju2112 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Check out the Introduction part of the README

      Here's an exerpt:


      There are some efforts to create a completely open FastTrack alternative,
      under the name "openFT". However, any such new network would require large
      amounts of popular content before people will switch to using it. The FT
      network, with on average 500,000+ users online, provides enormous amounts
      of readily available content, but the closed nature of it seems to prevent
      transferring this content to other networks' search facilities.

      Fortunately, the FT protocol apparently specifies that every FT "node"
      (i.e. computer running FT software) should have a small HTTP-like server
      running on port 1214 that can produce a plaintext list or index of shared
      files on that node, when asked for it. So, when the IP address of a FT
      node is known, the index can be requested and shared via different means
      than the FT network. This is what shadowFT is all about.

    3. Re:Gnutella? by trilucid · · Score: 2


      Well, last time I check, GiFT had severe issues due to the ever-changing FastTrack protocol. This appears to be largely to keep open source clients that don't want to connect to a central "authorization server" from working, but I can't say for certain.

      Anyhow, here is the press release giving a better picture of the gory details.

    4. Re:Gnutella? by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      Ah, sounds rather interesting in that case. The major problem is that this scheme eliminates anybody who cannot accept incoming connections on port 1214, which is a rather large number of high-bandwidth college students who on the current FastTrack network serve as one of the primary groups of content providers. That and the apparent lack of a Windows client.

    5. Re:Gnutella? by peter_gzowski · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, as of 3 days ago, they developed a program that scans ips at random to find FT nodes, and then compiles a list of those nodes' files. It can then initiate a search of the FT network. This is the shadowFT program that the parent talked about. Perhaps you should take a minute to look at the link provided before you go critisizing.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
  24. So? by man_ls · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    I haven't used LimeWire since I discovered the KaZaa family of networks. LimeWire seems to have the same problem Gnutella did about two years ago - the network is *SO* huge that it fragments and you can't find anything. Most things >100MB (i.e. DivX movie trailers, etc...) are either interrupted due to dropped routing, or killed by the other host. The only thing I get in the "search monitor" is:

    (this is a snippit of my LimeWire 1.07 search monitor I fired up just for this post. 5 seconds generated these queries):
    xxx
    kiddy f*ck
    *.mp3
    "Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back" [vv].avi
    nudist
    Windows XP Professional.iso
    how to hack
    *.mp3
    porn.jpg
    l33t warez
    ts.wasco*.avi
    12 year old
    *.mp3
    GOD DAMNIT PEOPLE USE THIS AS A CHAT CLIENT
    a.gif
    kazaa

    and it continues.

    Conclusion: There's nothing good ON the Gnutella network. (!= The Gnutella Network is not good.)

    1. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Gnutella is not slow at all; transfer are arranged directly between nodes. Finding a fast one is another issue (but this doesn't depend on the Gnutella protocol), though transfers at 10 -> 50 kb/sec are not uncommon.
      Also, if you don't want the search monitor to show you such crap, just turn it off.

    2. Re:So? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL a +3 Flamebait post!!!!! Thats the funniest thing I've ever seen. +1 funny! MOD PARENT UP! muhahahahahahahhahh

      He's so right.

  25. well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we're not really helping their bandwidth cost situation by slashdotting them now are we! :P

  26. Better way to do Ads by Alien54 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Pud of Fucked Company has a better way to do ads. You can see how he does it here:

    www.httpads.com

    Basically he allows other people to do impulse buying of ads on his website. Very Interesting, and useful

    And yes, he is making money on this angle.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Better way to do Ads by Dasein · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Google does the same thing:

      Here is more info.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
    2. Re:Better way to do Ads by jesser · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I gave Google $50 to advertise my site on some uncommon keywords and keyword combinations. I was surprised when I learned which keywords and which ads were doing best, but I was able to drop the keywords that were getting the lowest clickthrough rates. If I had been trying to advertise a revenue-generating site, I think that would have been a well-spent $50 for just the knowledge of the clickthrough rates for various keywords and various text ads. Since my site doesn't generate revenue, it was just a fun way to give my favorite search engine some money and learn a little about how advertising works.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    3. Re:Better way to do Ads by Dasein · · Score: 1
      Yep, I know what you mean. I advertised with Google Adwords on a bunch of computer skils that I specialize in. You see -- I'm a computer consultant. CHose to emphasis the skills that I though were both fun and did well at driving
      traffic. It's an excellent market research tool.


      I once worked on a software project with a very high advertising budget. The people that ran it always talked about the importance of trying something, testing the results, and adjusting. Things like this give us little guys a really easy way to do it without breaking the bank.

      --
      You are not a beautiful or unique snowflake -- but you could be if you got off your ass.
  27. Still put crap on my desktop by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I said no and had crap on my desktop. I believe it installed something besides limewire as well. I quickly uninstalled it and went back to 1.7.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  28. The biggest problem is that it was all PORN ads! by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    Playboy.com was the biggest ad. "Get a subscription for $1."

    Too bad they didn't integrate their ads with their software for people that filter out adult content.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  29. Why are they spending so much on bandwidth? by brett42 · · Score: 1

    Looking at the dslreports ads, a T1 costs about $500/month. A T1 has about 200kB/s bandwidth, and $10,000 should get around 20 T1s, so they should be using around 4MB/s. Why do they need that much bandwidth for one-time 5MB downloads? Why don't they just ask people to mirror the files?

    1. Re:Why are they spending so much on bandwidth? by magicslax · · Score: 0

      Limewire also hosts a major artery for the gnutella network. I'm willing to be he included router.limewire.[com?org?] as part of that statement.

    2. Re:Why are they spending so much on bandwidth? by JimRay · · Score: 1

      I imagine it has more to do with router.limewire.com. When you first fire up limewire, it looks to the central router to find other hosts--a fairly practical solution to the "who is my nearest neighbor" problem. Thousands (millions?) of limewire users pinging this server==lots of bandwidth. PLUS the download and website. Just a thought.

      However, it seems to me that adding advertising is only going to increase their bandwidth (high cost) for very little return (is anyone still buying ads on the web?). I guess porn sites will find a niche, but that's about it. Seems like a dumb move to me.

      --
      My other computer is your Windows box
    3. Re:Why are they spending so much on bandwidth? by magicslax · · Score: 0

      willing to bet. willing to bet. preview, stooopeeed. stupid me.

    4. Re:Why are they spending so much on bandwidth? by Phork · · Score: 1

      $500 a month is proably the fee for the isp, there is also the loop fee that you pay to your ILEC, so more realisticly, it will be between $800 and $1600, depending on your location.

      --
      -- free as in swatantryam - not soujanyam.
    5. Re:Why are they spending so much on bandwidth? by swb · · Score: 2

      I've recently been quoted just over $2k per month for a multilink dual T1 connection. The sales engineer told me that beyond 6 T1s it was cheaper to go with fractional DS3. So I figure that $10k has to be buying a lot of bandwidth. I'd guess that it'd be something like 18Mbps, which is a lot of bandwidth.

      Still, once you get into DS3 land the local loop has to be crushingly expensive.

    6. Re:Why are they spending so much on bandwidth? by walt-sjc · · Score: 3, Informative

      I had a Qwest DS3 full bandwidth for $16K at my last company. Local loop was waived. Installation was waived. Same deal for T1's, but $1K - anywhere qwest serviced (can't do some states cause they are the LEC there... FCC shit.) Don't do a circuit with "burstable" or any limits / usage charges - that's crap.

      You have to know how to negotiate. The major carriers are hungry. They will deal. Direct lines are ALWAYS cheaper / Mbit than colo hosting.

  30. Older LimeWire Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone know where i could get old LimeWire versions for the Macintosh?

    1. Re:Older LimeWire Versions by Mister+Black · · Score: 1

      Anyone know where i could get old LimeWire versions for the Macintosh?

      Me too. 1.8 has been a major disappointment; it seems slower and it returns less hits. Plus I have no need for their mp3 player. I have a copy of LimeWire 1.7c for OS 9/Classic but I need a copy of 1.7c for OS X. Anyone out there know where I can get it?

      --

      You are standing in an open field west of a white house, with a boarded front door. There is a small mailbox here.
    2. Re:Older LimeWire Versions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well... Am using 10.1 and LimeWire 1.8 and it is far superior to the previous versions in performance. And it is not so damned butt ugly if you use it under OS X. Don't like the player feature? Don't use it. And banners? Ain't none. Ditto spyware.

  31. An Obsession with Spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems like "everyone" these days is paranoid about spyware lurking in their software, programs designed to monitor your precious packets as they bounce around the internet.

    Either don't install these add-ons (most installers ask these days) or set up your firewall to deny outgoing connections to them (you do have a firewall, right?). Failing that, run a filtering proxy like Proxomitron (Windows only, Linux equivalents exist). If you're not to scared to compile the source yourself, get the latest build of LimeWire's source and customize it the way you like, as was mentioned in a previous post.

    When you send and receive e-mail messages through your ISP, they could easily figure out what times of day you get the most mail, when you send the most mail, your average file attachment size, etc. just by doing a statistical analysis of the mail server's log files; but no one talks about how SendMail could be spyware!

    What's wrong with a little data mining? A lot, most would say. Every time you purchase something with your debit card or use coupons at the grocery store, you're telling some large corporation about your habits (this is old news to most). What's the difference if a piece of spyware watches what you do in Internet Explorer? You lose a little privacy? You lose your sanity? You lose your favourite box of rusty nails? ..

    Seems pretty silly to me to worry about things like that when you could just uninstall the software, kill the spyware with Ad-Aware (or your axe of choice) and try a different product. Even better, write your own client and be done with it :)

    1. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by TurboRoot · · Score: 1

      >What's wrong with a little data mining?

      Gebus, some of us write web based software.

      What may be casual statistics of YOUR browsing habbits, would be theft of my IP and source code to projects i'm working on.

      Even if I use HTTPS, it doesn't matter, cause these proggies are directly part of Internet Explorer.

      How does this affect the casual browser? What stops one of these programs from collecting a lot of credit card data?

    2. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by H310iSe · · Score: 5, Insightful
      1) spyware is sneaky - you can't just kill it / uninstall it unless you know ... about as much as your average 1st year tech support guy.

      2) as The Register recently reminded me outbound filtering is useless against any program that has executed on your computer (because it's easy to piggyback your information on another service that already has outbound permissions) - I'm not sure any spyware does this but...

      3) it's fine if someone want to try to track me from somewhere else but my computer in my home is ... well, it's mine, and in my home, it's my private home thing and it's a castle or something (under american law, after all, I can shoot someone if they break into my home so if a spyware sneaks into my computer and stealthily steals (?) from me can't I shoot the CEO of Disney who buys the information to see if I'm a good candidate for the re-release of Snow White?) so THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE HERE UNLESS I INVITE THEM IN (kinda like a vampire, no?)

      4) have I mentioned spyware is sneaky? real sneaky - it won't tell you it's installed, it won't (always) register w/ uninstall, it runs all sneaky like and sneaks and stuff.

      Poor limewire - they should make money but why can't they do it like NPR, just bug all the limewire users for a week a year for donations?

      --
      closed minded is as closed minded does
    3. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by (void*) · · Score: 2

      You are 100% right. That's why I use Free Software.

    4. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by snake_dad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll give you one reason: I'm a software developer, and one of those nasty hidden programs fucked up my system at work so bad that certain tools I have to use would not even start anymore.

      It cost me 2 days to find that it was caused by something called newnet2_*.dll (IIRC), which appeared to do something with alternative TLD's. I was damned lucky to find it at that point because by chance I noticed this funny dll-name in the \winnt directory. It came with either Getright or Gozilla, programs that allowed me to resume a rather large download. More info on newnet at counterexploitation.

      I did not know about ad-aware at that time. I now run it often, and I use Proxomitron as well. I found proxomitron here, 'official' site is here. Oh, and don't forget to get new definition files for Ad-Aware regularly!

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    5. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by thenerd · · Score: 1

      >What's wrong with a little data mining?

      Gebus, some of us write web based software.

      What may be casual statistics of YOUR browsing habbits, would be theft of my IP and source code to projects i'm working on.


      Can you explain how statistics on hits of certain sites is theft of your IP AND source code?

      --
      The camels are coming. I'm in love.
    6. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by Mike+Schiraldi · · Score: 2

      THEY'RE NOT SUPPOSED TO BE HERE UNLESS I INVITE THEM IN

      Someone didn't read their EULA.

    7. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by bluebomber · · Score: 2

      under american law, after all, I can shoot someone if they break into my home

      Uhhh... I'm not sure what "american law" you're thinking of, but (to my knowledge) there is no uniform law across all 50 states regarding how you may treat home invaders. Be careful spreading this type of misinformation around unless you have facts. OTOH, I'll quicly admit I'm wrong if you can show me a section of the USC that deals with this issue. As far as I know, this issue is left up to the various states, each of which treats it differently.

    8. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      IMHO, ad-aware should merge with certain popular anti-virus tools...

    9. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by PW2 · · Score: 1

      When you send and receive e-mail messages through your ISP, they could easily figure out what times of day you get the most mail, when you send the most mail, your average file attachment size, etc. just by doing a statistical analysis of the mail server's log files; but no one talks about how SendMail could be spyware!

      The difference here is that mining sendmail data would occur on their servers using their processing time; my computer is already slow with the OS and my programs, I see no need to slow it down further for someone else's gain with this spyware; really, I paid for my machine, they didn't; Next!

    10. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard plenty of complaints against ad-aware, and it's even rumoured to be spyware itself these days.

      Be careful doze users!

    11. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've heard plenty of complaints against ad-aware, and it's even rumoured to be spyware itself these days.

      Funny, I've heard nothing but praise for ad-aware. Do you have any evidence to the contrary besides unsubstanciated rumors?

    12. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i stand corrected.

      for the record the post was intended to be more humerous (sp?) than informative - that is, informative through humor, erm, but still, you're right, I'd hate to have someone shoot the poor milkman because I said they could. Please. Don't shoot the milkman. He's nice. Don't shoot anyone. Think mace. Or something.

    13. Re:An Obsession with Spyware! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ok I looked it up - the only time you can shoot someone in all 50 states (so far as my 10 minute parousal indicates) is in self-defense (you know, grave and imminent danger of bodily harm, no escape, etc.). Some states consider a home invasion to be almost automatically a self-defense situation, many do not. Remember that exchange student who was ... how did the story go, confused about which house he was going to, walked up to some guys door, asked something in broken english and was shot dead? The shooter got off if I recall... anyway, we now return you to your regularly scheduled program...

  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. Bandwidth problems? by Saeger · · Score: 2
    10 grand/mo eh? That buys something around 5,000 Gigs/mo on the cheap side; what a waste.

    You'd think that just maybe that would be an incentive to USE the distributed network itself to distribute your digitally signed app in order to cut costs.

    Anyway, I recall that BearShare eventually got around to forcing various kinds of "adware" (spyware) down your throat, but after the bitching got to be too much, Vinnie grew half a conscience and instead begged you to Opt-In to the scheme.

    Of course, there's a big difference between LimeWire (open but SLOW as snot), and BearShare (closed but the fastest).

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:Bandwidth problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Only $2 per gig? Where do I sign up? Oh thats right.. your lying out your ass. $2.50 is the best deal Ive ever heard of for high adult volume.

      Troll

    2. Re:Bandwidth problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how do you download a client to access a distributed network from the distributed network? Do you see the problem?

    3. Re:Bandwidth problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't talking about bandwidth used for downloading the client. They are talking about router.limewire.com which handles a lot of the search traffic on the gnutella network.

      Now if the protocol compressed that traffic (which is all text), they could greatly reduce bandwidth usage.

    4. Re:Bandwidth problems? by arkanes · · Score: 1

      You'd think that just maybe that would be an incentive to USE the distributed network itself to distribute your digitally signed app in order to cut costs.

      Maybe I'm just really, really stupid, but how exactly are you supposed to distribute the client for this network over the network it supports to people who don't have the client? Seems rather like a chicken and egg problem.

    5. Re:Bandwidth problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinda reminds me of seeing pkz204g.zip on BBSes.

    6. Re:Bandwidth problems? by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      Put a simpler version of the client. Less GUI, no search monitoring, no uploads, etc. You'd be surprised how much you can cut down. No options screen, no network monitoring, etc...

  34. Deja Vu all over again by Overcoat · · Score: 1
    Ths sounds suspiciously like the controversy last year over Cydoor adware being clandestiely installed when a user set up the antivirus app InVircible (anybody remember that?). People would find Cydoor on their systems and not know how it got there.

    It eventually turned out that Cydoor was causing urlParse errors on some users' machines, and there followed a big to-do about whether it was possible to remove Cydoor without having to remove InVircible. Wotta mess. The Cydoor people really ought to go back to honest work, like developing those porn-site popup windows that keep reappearing

  35. Invasion of the brain snatchers by stox · · Score: 1

    Is it me or are a lot of pod-people posting lately?
    Are the pods actually disguised as XP boxes or as X-Boxes? Will I wake up tomorrow, and feel the uncontrollable urge to load XP?

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
  36. Ads EVERYWHERE!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, you people are aware that humans are subjected to like 10000 ads per day right? What the hell does 4 or 5 repeating ads mean? NOTHING!!!!!!!!!! Here is a solution for you complainers. Go to the back of your computer, pull out the little square headed big phone cable, turn off your computer, and go to bed!

  37. Sending data by rockwood · · Score: 1

    Sending personal data isn't bad, it's the means of collection.
    I strongly believe that if most people were given an option to send data back to companies to offest their costs.. they would! Providing they new exactly what they were sending and had options/selections to choose from. In other words.. I would allow it if I had a menu that I could grant permission to send my physical address, and what type of OS I am using, but not my phone number or email address or my reg codes of my software (looking for piracy.) I have no problem indentifing my gender, age, HS, height, weight, interests ect..

    While some poeple may not want to offer as much as I do, at least it would give everyone an opt in/out and cause the spy-ware to become offer-ware

    And have a much better reputation in the process!

    --
    Never try to beat a professional at his own game!
  38. mod this up, not down by bluecalix · · Score: 1

    Why was this comment modded down? It is TRUE and ONTOPIC. Looks like abuse to me. Someone should suspend the moderator.

    --
    e x p e c t d e l a y . c o m
    1. Re:mod this up, not down by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Unfortunately you cannot mark a moderation as `crap, please keep an eye on this moderator and disallow them in future if it continues`.

    2. Re:mod this up, not down by morie · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You can metamoderate however...

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
    3. Re:mod this up, not down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I fail to see how a solution to the problem stated before can be "offtopic". Makes me want to metamoderate as well...

  39. Whine! by Jailbrekr · · Score: 1

    There is an economic reality to these free software packages. First, it is a program that allows the sharing of files; files which you may have to pay for in any other circumstance. Second, it is only a banner ad.

    Now, the company they chose to use for adverts may be using some sort of spyware applet. So why isn't someone coming out with a program to prevent these applets from sending accurate information? So what if the company advertising knows that a white male btw. the ages of 25-30 in the pacific northwest is viewing the ad?

    Blargh.

    --
    Feed the need: Digitaladdiction.net
    1. Re:Whine! by DarkZero · · Score: 1

      Dude, the point of spyware is not to match the personal information you signed up with to the banner ad you're viewing. It's to watch every single website you visit in your web browser so it can match its advertising to your habits, as well as develop a large consumer database that it can sell off to another company during the execution of its Dot Com Exit Strategy.

  40. Spies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I heard Linux is spyware. Why, with a simple one letter command

    $ w
    ....

    I can see what anybody on a system is doing, in REAL TIME! Imagine what this would mean for marketroids who got ahold of this information!

    The only solution is to delete Linux from your systems now. Here's how:

    $ DELETE LINUX.EXE
    bash: DELETE: command not found

    It's even nice enough to tell you that it's not found anymore. Hope this helps everyone rid their systems of spyware!

  41. Sick of entitlement by PureFiction · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And we need to pay developer's salaries--like mine--to keep driving innovation on the Gnutella network.

    Gnutella and peer networks in general are going to continue evolving and innovating regardless of whether you specifically are involved.

    If there is one thing I hate about all these projects it is the lame excuses for significant and broad invasions of privacy by people who cannot build a decent business model.

    Instead they take a short cut, sell privacy invasion for a quick fix, and say that it is all for the good of the user.

    Just because it makes money does not mean spyware is a proper or even tolerable method of funding work on your project or business, regardless of what it is.

    Peer networks are about empowering and utilizing individuals communicating at the edge of the network. Invading their privacy like this defeats the purpose and sells everyone short.

  42. Re:The biggest problem is that it was all PORN ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The biggest problem is that it was all PORN ads!

    Dude, what are YOU searching for on gnutella? Those ads arn't a problem for some of us - they're an apitizer!

  43. Try KaZaA by truesaer · · Score: 2
    KaZaA has banner ads too, but they're barely noticable. Its not open source either. BUT, I suggest this because sometimes you just want what works, and my experience with kazaa has been great. I thought that napster pretty much sucked...it had a bad interface, my connections were unreliable, and I would get bad download speeds. Half the time I would end up with a partially recorded song once the file was downloaded. So far, kazaa has been fast, I always get the whole thing, and they have a much better selection and quantity than AIMster, etc.


    So, I can see why a lot of people want to use limewire...but if this spyware thing rules it out for you, give kazaa a shot.

    1. Re:Try KaZaA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigh... what exactly is driving people to Kazaa? Just use Morpheus instead (musiccity.com). It's the same client (sans spyware), same network, and allows you to look for mp3s over 128kbs. There is also an OpenSource client to this network (FastTrack) going by the name GiFT.

  44. I just tried this by lanner · · Score: 1


    This is good timing. I was looking for a good Win32 based Gnutella client to use at work and so started looking around at what was available. I was pretty much unimpressed with everything that I tried. It was either addware, spyware, or just bad.

    Limewire did not really impress me. It is Java based. On Windows, that means slow, unresponsive, and buggy. For functionality, I was unimpressed.

    What is the Winamp/xmms of Win32 for Gnutella?

    A lot of people at work seem to use Kazza, but from the NT logs that I see I can tell that it crashes -- a LOT. I do not know much about Morphus.

    1. Re:I just tried this by spongman · · Score: 3, Informative
      morpheus works just fine for me (win2k, xp) it crashes occasionally (rarely), but it doesn't matter - the downloads are continued when you start it up again...

      if you have a broadband connection and you're looking for a good gnutella client, try Xolox it does simultaneous, restartable downloads. it's not as good as morpheus for identifying identical content, and the gnutelly network doesn't support the rich metadata that morpheus has, but it's the best gnutella client i have found, nothing fancy..

  45. Kazaa is spyware infested by Indy1 · · Score: 0

    kazaa is loaded with spyware too. Install ad-aware (from www.lavasoftusa.com) and do a scan, You'll find Spyware all over the place from Kazaa.

    Thats why i use winmx (www.winmx.com). No spyware, and it works pretty good.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  46. Worse, actually... by DarkZero · · Score: 1

    The installation of Cydoor and Gator is optional, but one thing it doesn't ask you about is whether or not you want tons of crap about casinos and big purple ape spyware on your desktop. I installed LimeWire yesterday, and before I even opened the program, I became so annoyed with what it does to my comp that I immediately uninstalled it and used AdAware to make absolutely sure the damn thing was gone.

  47. Isnt a bitch giving things away for free? by rebelcool · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, if they charged for their software, then there would be no need for ads or spyware.

    --

    -

    1. Re:Isnt a bitch giving things away for free? by tonywong · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just like Linux and BSD...um, never mind.

  48. AdAware, ZoneAlarm, Popup Stopper by stonecoldt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the old days you worried about viruses. Now, the companies themselves try to take control of your desktop in order to shove ads down your throat. It's a shame you can't trust software developers anymore but at least there's programs like Ad Aware, ZoneAlarm, Popup Stopper, etc that help you fight back. (And negative ratings on download.com help punish spyware-pushing companies too.)

    1. Re:AdAware, ZoneAlarm, Popup Stopper by srand · · Score: 1

      Limewire is GPLed. Ads are pretty much the only way they can get any money coming in. Most investors are scared of investing in P2P networks because they are afraid of the RIAA/MPAA are going to nuke them.
      And if the ads are really such a big hastle, you can still download the source and compile it yourself. Sheesh - what's with all the whining going on?

  49. WinMX by DarkZero · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try WinMX. It seems to be one of the last P2P programs left that doesn't put Spyware on your computer. It uses the OpenNap, Napster, WinMX, and other networks to search for files, and my experience with it has been pretty good. It's not as popular as the others, but it gets the job done and it does it without spyware.

    1. Re:WinMX by robogun · · Score: 1

      On windows it put a program which spawned popup ads in IE5+ despite running popup stopper. Use CTRL+ALT+DELETE to find the damn thing and disable it, and you will find WinMX is the best out there right now. It COULD use anti-leech and anti-bot functions to stop all those French assholes who try to download all 1,700 of your files while sharing 0.

  50. No porn for mustang matt? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Quit being such a fucking fag.

    Porn rules.

  51. I knew this would happen� by Snarks · · Score: 1

    After downloading and installing 1.7c a while back, I noticed that there was a BonziBUDDY icon in the Limeware directory on my win 98 machine. I can't remember what the extension type the file was, the file just had that dumb purple ape's image for its icon and the description said something to the effect of "download/install BonziBUDDY". I ran the latest spyware checker and it did not detect anything, so I just deleted the file and kept on using Limeware with no problems.

    At the time I figured that this was a sign of things to come, soon Limeware would be using spyware and ads. Oh well, I was planing on looking for a better client anyway.

  52. If it bothers you so much, quit the habit... by coupland · · Score: 2

    I havent run LimeWire in a long time but I've gotta say that if this article bothers you please stop using LimeWire. They have every right to make money, if you don't like it simply stop using the service. However to even hint that their new marketing strategies are unethical is the height of ignorance. You have choice, exercise it.

    1. Re:If it bothers you so much, quit the habit... by thenerd · · Score: 1

      I agree with the crux of your point, i.e. if it bothers you, stop using it, however:

      They have every right to make money

      ...is just plain wrong. Of course they don't, nobody does. They can certainly try, but money isn't a right.

      thenerd

      --
      The camels are coming. I'm in love.
    2. Re:If it bothers you so much, quit the habit... by coupland · · Score: 2

      "They have a right to make money" ...is just plain wrong. Of course they don't, nobody does. They can certainly try, but money isn't a right

      Ha, ha. I think it's obvious I meant "they have a right to try". Otherwise I could just declare that I have a right to make money and then sue when it doesn't happen...

  53. You wouldn't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all of us need porn. Some of us have the real thing.

    1. Re:You wouldn't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, wow, someone got laid for the first time! If you're getting enough, you're either lying or have a very low sex drive.

  54. NO junk in the Mac version... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I use OS 10.1 and the latest LimeWire (1.8)... NO banners and no spyware... as usual. Just another reason to use the best there is. Thanks.

    1. Re:NO junk in the Mac version... by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      who modded this as interesting?

    2. Re:NO junk in the Mac version... by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ehh... well it all boils down to Cydoor not being ported to MacOS, Linux, etc. It's wintel spyware.

      Don't get me wrong, I can live without this software, but it is also a symptom of developers not making the effort to port their work to other platforms.

      The LimeGroup should just query for banner ads via their Java Client. I see no real reason for a thrid party, and I do support their use of ads. The new "super node" beta is freek'n awesome... instant access to tons of files. No more long connects. Ads are a small price to pay to keep development going.

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
    3. Re:NO junk in the Mac version... by dun0s · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Adverts are a small price to pay
      Yep, that works in two ways... they are a small price for us to pay to use software, but they also pay a small price to the developers... very small. I doubt they are getting paid on a per impression basis, more likely on a per click. As no one clicks on adverts any more incorporating adverts alone into a software product is useless. Therefore (apply paranoia now) there is a very strong motivation to introduce spyware as this is likely to provide a higher return to the developers.

      You gets what you pays for. If the developers can't afford to support and run software, be it high bandwidth requirements or just needing to feed their kids then they need to find money somewhere. Adverts != money. Spyware == money. Registration fee == money.
    4. Re:NO junk in the Mac version... by kilgore_47 · · Score: 1

      I'm confused. So what if they have ads? The code is GPL'd! How hard is it going to be to recompile it without the ads?

      --
      ___
      The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  55. But LimeWire is Open Source . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A while back it was posted that LimeWire was converted to the GPL . . . if yer worried about gettin spied on, go check the source yourself . .

  56. then try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use Gnucleus 1.4.5

    quite faster than limewire, no spyware/banners, and GPL'd.
    Kazza and Morpheus are on a different network than Gnutella.

    Brian

    1. Re:then try this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf/?? it'd be ncie if they had a client for something besides lame ass windows. just look at that FAQ. thats the kind of brainless questions you get when you make a program for windows users.

  57. Kazaa did it to me... by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 4, Informative

    I see people saying try Kazaa instead, but on my system it was Kazaa that installed Cydoor. When I used Ad-aware to remove Cydoor, Kazaa refused to run and told me I had removed files it needed and should reinstall.

    1. Re:Kazaa did it to me... by AnimeFreak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Morpheus is basically the same thing as Kazaa (it's in the same network), but Morpheus allows you to download >128 Kbit MP3s. As and added bonus, there is no spyware in Morpheus.

    2. Re:Kazaa did it to me... by Sarcasmooo! · · Score: 2

      I should mention that I'm running Win98. I forget which P2P programs have Linux versions and which don't. Hell I'm not even sure if spyware works on Linux, but if it does then I'm just clarifying. If it doesn't; that'd make a nice sales pitch for Linux advocates.

    3. Re:Kazaa did it to me... by Trepidity · · Score: 2

      So run a different Gnutella client. Gnucleus is a good Free Software one.

      Or download the source code to LimeWire (it is open source you know) and take out the ads.

  58. they ought to do a public radio style thing by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

    And on a regular basis send out an ad for themselves, through the software perhaps, asking for donations. If the donations don't come, or they aren't enough, take the server(s) down once a week, or twice a week, or permanently, whatever, until the donations reach the necessary level.

    Anything but ads! Ads on the computer are just like white noise to me now, my brain has somehow learned to half-ignore them, not registering what they are about, but being annoyed by their presence.

    If they die off because of lack of funds, then, well, natural selection in full effect. Something better will come along.

  59. erm... s/ad (for themselves)/message $1/ by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

    See the subject, but as an aside:

    Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    Stupid lameness filter...There wasn't a single cap letter in the first version of this post????????

  60. Fork, fork, for the love of god, fork by QuoteMstr · · Score: 0

    Limewire is GPLed. Is this not a reason to fork the damn thing, or at least maintain a set of patches (and of binaries compiled with these patches)?

  61. awww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poor guy wants to get paid for all his hard work. Soon my favourite muscians will have to include ads in their next CD just to make a few bucks.
    "This CD brought to you by Gator!"

  62. Linux version by NX-01 · · Score: 1

    I installed the Linux version of 1.8 and there are no banner ads here either. Maybe you all shouldn't be using Windows. As far as Java being slow, it runs just as fast as any of the others such as Kazaa or Napster( R.I.P.) did in Winslows.

    1. Re:Linux version by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

      Ya. Cydor is wintel only spyware.

      I have LimeWire on both my Redhat 7 box and my OS X 10.1 box. It runs great. Quick & stable.

      The new super node beta is the bomb. It connects as fast as napster now. Instant files. ;)

      --
      "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  63. I used to agree with you by Entropy_ah · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I know this is gona sound like an advertisement. But here goes...
    I've toyed around with all sorts of Gnutella clients ever since it was created. And despite some fancy tricks, none of them could compare with a good centralized file sharing program. The most recent one i tried is called XoloX(MSWin only, sorry). And i havent used a different program since. I know it sound crazy, but you really cant tell your using a gnutella client, and you get good search results and reasonably consistent downloads. I found it really annoying at first that they hide everything about the gnutella network from you, but the creators seem to know what they're doing. Give it a shot if you dont believe me.
    There may be hope for gnutella's future after all.

    --
    my other penis is a vagina
  64. Time for Mirrors? by Josuah · · Score: 1

    Christopher mentions three domains which have bandwidth costs of $10,000/mo. Seems to me like this is a good time to start mirrors of www.limewire.com and www.limewire.org. Not sure how router.limewire.com is used (I haven't read up on the Gnutella network's behavior), but couldn't that be distributed as well?

  65. Funny and ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Limewire: a company that expects us to sympathize and allow them to makes profits because they enable people to gain the fruits of musicians work for free.

    WHAT HYPOCRISY! pirating is one thing .. being a hypocrit is another.

    We are expected to believe that starving limewire developers deserve compensaation for their hard work. If music should be free ..shouldnt limewire be free also?

    Limewire wants to make money? Why should they make money if they feel musicians shouldnt make money? Sorry but not all musicians want to make money by concerts, why cant this choice be respected?

    If limewire doesnt care about ethics .. why should we.
    To hell with limewire's ads. Boycott products advertised on there.

    Switch to musiccity.

  66. Don't use gnutella... by ddy4vi · · Score: 1

    that's why i don't use gnutella..i use edonkey =)

  67. If you're running Windows try this program!!! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    The program is Ad-Aware. It's a freeware program available at www.lavasoftusa.com Ad aware looks for spyware on your computer and then allows you to (selectively) delete it. You'll be amazed how much can be there. The first time I ran it it found over 200 (!) files on my computer. Needless to say, the computer not only was a lot faster once I deleted all these trojans, but more stable as well. Try it, you'll like it.

    1. Re:If you're running Windows try this program!!! by Hanno · · Score: 2

      The first time I ran it it found over 200 (!) files on my computer. Needless to say, the computer not only was a lot faster once I deleted all these trojans, but more stable as well.

      AdAware calls Cookies "spyware", which is a little bit overly paranoid. Cookies are used for data mining, AdAware is right about identifying and removing them, but they are not "trojans".

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
    2. Re:If you're running Windows try this program!!! by J'raxis · · Score: 1

      I think that depends on how you are defining a trojan. Cookies certainly fall under that category if youre defining a trojan as any kind of computer program (or data) that is performing actions on your computer that you are not aware of. Cookies placed by, say, Slashdot, are not trojans as these are necessary for log-in purposes (maintaining state in a stateless protocol, HTTP). Cookies placed by advertisers to see what youre doing with your computer what sites you are visiting certainly are.

    3. Re:If you're running Windows try this program!!! by Hanno · · Score: 2

      Yes, it depends on how to define a trojan.

      IMHO, a trojan is computer code that is doing things behind the user's back.

      A cookie is just state information, nothing more, nothing less.

      If a user has lots of Cookies and AdAware tells him that these are "spyware components", it is misleading, feeding paranoia and fear.

      See the original statement of the user who said he had "200 files" that he called "trojans".

      AdAware is right about detecting and removing Cookies of well-known user-tracking ad-sites. But it should be a bit more exact when explaining the risks to avoid paranoid users.

      --

      ------------------
      You may like my a cappella music
  68. crazy.. by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    just because gpl'd stuff wants to be free yada yada, doesn't mean that copyrighted stuff in general wants to be free.. if you are going to use p2p warez programs, don't bitch when they bite you in the ass.

  69. Many users are complaining that this is spyware??? by automatic_man · · Score: 1
    Who the fuck feels they have the right to complain when they use software they downloaded FOR FREE to download music/software/videos, FOR FREE, while the developers spend their own time to write this software and distribute it FOR FREE???? The first thing these assholes that complain about invasion of their privacy probably do when they install something like LimeWire is throttle their bandwidth so they don't have to worry about exceeding their upload bandwidth. They are complete leaches who show no fucking gratitude and probably only want anonymity because they do nothing but download child porn all fucking day.


    Sorry. Just had to get that out.

    --
    "On the Internet, everyone is an equal until they prove themselves to be a moron." - Emmanuel Goldstein
  70. Limewire as an Ad medium? by cgenman · · Score: 1

    Hmm... A large group of people who know how to get what they want for free and who have enough time to sit through dozens of failed and / or remotely disconnected transfers in order to watch a movie without just paying the $1.50 rental fee. That sounds like the perfect target market for my product... Where does my company sign up for one of those banner ads?

    I can't seriously see anyone jumping at the potential to advertise to this group of people. Don't get me wrong... I've limed a few episodes of Tenchi Muyo in my day. But quite frankly I wouldn't bother pitching to me either.

    The spyware should steal the user's address, e-mail, and telephone number and send it straight to the "don't bother" list. That alone could save companies hundreds of thousands in telemarketer fees.

    -Chris

    "An ad for the Shrek DVD? I should go download that."

  71. Well... by wedg · · Score: 1

    In this situation, you luck out, because there are many clients to browse the Gnutella network to choose from. And if you don't think Limewire's features are enough reason to pay (or lend eyespace to a banner add), head on over to the Gnutella homepage, one of them, at least, and track down a new client. I use Qtella, myself, a handy little client written in Qt (because I didn't want to install Java at the time), which handles all the needs I have: connecting, searching for music, and downloading music. Do you really need more? (Qtella has more built in, actually, but I've used BearShare, LimeWire and Qtella, and they're all pretty much the exact-same-thing, so no need to be picky when one starts needing that revenue thing.)

    It's nothing to fret over. Just choose a different client if you don't like it.

    --
    Jake
    Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
  72. Gnutella's future looks bright by mlinksva · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, Fastrack has better features and content right now. Still, gnutella will always be around, and it's going to get better soon. Check out this writeup of the gnutella developer meeting at last week's O'Reilly P2P conference and also this one. With the addition of hash searches/results (which can enable swarm downloads) and supernodes, gnutella will be competitive with KaZaa and its Fasttrack cohorts.

  73. Why not just use Qtella? by Moritz+Moeller+-+Her · · Score: 3, Informative

    GPL, for linux and QT/KDE. Has everything I need and looks prettier. Faster too.

    A new version (0.3) was released two days ago.

    I have no sympathy for all the losers on /. who whine about the spyware on their Windows machines. GO AWAY!

    Here is the URL: http://www.qtella.net/

    Description:

    Qtella is a new Gnutella client for Linux written in C++ using the Qt libraries. It should be no problem to use Qtella on any platforms where Qt with thread support (library qt-mt must exists) is installed.

    The following features are part of Qtella 0.2.1:

    multiple search
    continue interrupted downloads
    uploads
    limit number of downloads and uploads
    limit upload bandwidth
    separate unfinished downloads from finished ones
    download of several files at once
    test whether file allready exists
    identification of download server
    automatic retry if error, busy, closed
    auto connect list
    KDE integration
    save host list
    handle extended gnutella protocol
    status lines and statistics
    accecpt incoming connections
    download from firewalled hosts
    pong cache to reduce network traffic

    --
    Moritz
    1. Re:Why not just use Qtella? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of little problems make it really painful to use in comparison to gnut or gtk-gnutella.

      For example, I hate the way it insists on using Cable/DSL, ISDN, etc for speeds instead of numbers. Why does it do this!? The terms are too ambiguous to be useful and 99 percent of the "ISDN 2x" people are really on a ripoff DSL. It pisses me off so goddamn much.

      Also, I hate the way it adds incoming search results at the top. This makes the whole list scroll, so you have to stop the search before you can look at the results if there are a lot of them coming in.

      Let's not forget that it makes you set the forced IP every time the program is opened! They could've put an option in the configuration file or a command line arg, but nooo, I have to type the damn thing in every fucking time.

    2. Re:Why not just use Qtella? by brunes69 · · Score: 2

      I totally agree with your entire post. Mod up +1 Insightfull.

    3. Re:Why not just use Qtella? by Toy+G · · Score: 1

      For windows, try GNUCLEUS.
      Under Gpl, and it works great.

      btw, has been used for MyNapster engine. Probably one of the best win-app under GPL ever seen :)

      --
      -- Let's go Viridian.
    4. Re:Why not just use Qtella? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      It's the 0.3 release, so expecting perfection is a bit unreasonable.

      OTOH, your complaints sound like trivial things to fix, if anyone thought it worth the effort. Probably the people working on the project don't even know what is bothering you. If you can be polite about it, they would probably want to hear what you think would make things better. Of course, they'd prefer if you could submit a patch proposal ....

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  74. The cure for Cydoor, 2.4 kernel version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 216.34.209.10 -j DROP
    /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 209.10.17.134 -j DROP
    /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 209.73.225.8 -j DROP
    /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 209.73.225.9 -j DROP
    /sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 207.69.194.219 -j DROP

    At least that worked for Opera, it may well work
    for LimeWire too.

  75. for us win32 losers, there's winmx :) by Indy1 · · Score: 0

    ok, i am a luser...i use win2k and winXp (but at least i dont give uncle bill money for it, so dont flame me too much :) ). Winmx, from www.winmx.com is great for getting mp3's and its also spyware free, as determined by ad-aware. Most of the other p2p programs on the win32 platform are infested with trojans like Kazaa is. Now i only why Norton AV, Mcafee, etc dont scream MURDER when spyware tries to get on your machine...only seems fair.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
  76. Xolox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I personnaly use xolox (http://www.xolox.org) for the gnutella network but with bad results.

    The best results i have is with the fasttrack network (Kazaa,Morpheus,Grokster) for files under 100 Mb and with eDonkey2000 for bigger files and iso.

    I think a spyware or a banner isnt that bad for all the free software and free music that is available...

  77. Why don't we kill spyware ourselves? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, it shouldn't be that hard. Reverse-engineer the protocol used by that damned stuff, and then make it send completely bogus statistics to the main server (i-hate-spyware.net, you-are-an-idiot.com, i-reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeally-love-using-space-in-your-d atabase).

    If they somehow complain, just explain that you didn't ask the stuff to be installed in your computer, and therefore you're just using your right to 'shoot' it, as you could do with intruders in your house.

    If we send enough bogus information their databases could suddenly stop being valuable. It's almost like registration forms. For all those companies that want to know my info so much, I'm a 165 year old woman living in Afghanistan who works as a doctor and is really interested in the internet :-)

  78. They _do_ have a valid business model. by athmanb · · Score: 2

    > If there is one thing I hate about all these projects it is the lame excuses for significant and broad invasions of privacy by people who cannot build a decent business model.

    Their business model is selling the privacy of their users to ad-companies.
    You might not like this (hell, I don't either) but you have to accept that it is a pretty decent one, certainly superior to other ideas like pure banner ads or asking for voluntary contributions.

    If you don't like spyware, simply don't use any program that deploys it. Your inane ranting however will do nothing about the mindset of the common Internet user, which is that they accept every oh so damned advertisment scheme as long as they don't have to pay for site content or program licensing.

    And since you have been taking the decision to play the "holier-than-thou" side of this discussion, I invite you to either try to make up a better business plan, or to educate an average 15 years old that paying $5 per month for a service they like isn't so bad...

  79. VA Larry Goes Greed, George & Bill Go SpyWare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, U.S. 'government'/BiG 'business' use war powers act to extinguish/ASPhyxiate good GNUs/pardon felons/rescue the 'bull'

    Now lemming sea, what WAS the 'net supposed to be about? A weigh for billy to get more money? A big stock fraud/kode heist scam for va larry et al? sheesh!@#$% .

    Don't forget to check out our web address giveaway. Includes a year's free hosting. Somewhere to hang your hack, Just in case FraUD doesn't prevail.

    Warning: Your sites may become unreachable by users of XP/IEaaaggghhh, if your content is not acceptable to the kingdumb's softwar gangsters.

    The bottom line is now the ONLY line, gaud help us.

  80. Too bad giFT hasn't worked in ages on linux... by brunes69 · · Score: 2

    since Kazza changed their protocol to a server-centric model (go read the link you just posted). Besides, QTella kicks Limewire's butt anays.

  81. There's NapShare.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quite new but it i havent found a bug.
    Works faster,better than LimeWire by a leap.

    Really LimeWire is and should be out
    There are better,free and bannerless,spyware
    less software replacing it.

  82. Decompile and modify? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Limewire is Java, can't the .class files be found and decompiled back to source and modified to remove banner ads and anything else you find annoying?

  83. Re:An Obsession with Spyware!(Who is inktomi.com?) by TurboRoot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its a pretty simple concept, we have a program that allows us to edit all .html/.php/.jsp/etc files on any of our web servers with a web based interface.

    If one of these "stastical" programs captured my entire POST when I updated lets say... a PHP or JSP page, they would have source code to one of my other web based porgrams.

    And furthermore, there are servers that access files on my web server that are DEFIENTLY not linked from ANYWHERE on the WWW or my index.html.

    216.35.116.58 - - [11/Nov/2001:16:43:33-0600] "GET /developers/file.php HTTP /1.0" 302 0

    Which resolves to
    j3018.inktomi.com

    Curiously, I found a few spyware programs on my computer that I got from using Gamespy (ironic huh?). Lavasoft is cool, and helped me get rid of all those programs.

    Fortuantly, that has a password on it, and it won't even let you in unless you access via HTTPS. BUT, what if I was using security through obscurity?

    What if one of these spyware programs searches for username/password combinations and sends them encrypted with what "looks" to be statistical data?

    The fact of the matter is, this is crap, and no one should try to even defend these people.

  84. Linux version? by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

    Does it have ads?

    1. Re:Linux version? by Adam+Fisk · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Linux version does not have ads. Niether do the MacOS (pre-9.4 and all OSX versions), Solaris, SunOS, HP-UX, etc. versions for that matter.

      Thanks.

      Adam Fisk
      LimeWire

      --

      Adam Fisk

  85. Re:Mac version by CdotZinger · · Score: 1


    The Mac version may not install any spyware, per se, but, ever since I installed 1.8--though I don't use it because 1.7 gets more results on the same searches (why?)--my firewall's blocked four or five mystery outgoing connection attempts on various ports in the Limewire range (between 6352 and 6421, thus far) while 1.7 has been running. So, watch your connections; it's trying to do *something* without asking.

    --
    Your mouth is like Columbus Day.
  86. Re:Many users are complaining that this is spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, if you got a free car, you wouldn't mind if it had equipment sophisticated enough to record, visually and audibly, everything that you did in yor house?

    Do you develop spyware or something?

  87. Re:Many users are complaining that this is spyware by shepd · · Score: 1

    >Who the fuck feels they have the right to complain when they use software they downloaded FOR FREE to download music/software/videos, FOR FREE, while the developers spend their own time to write this software and distribute it FOR FREE????

    (Ahem... Clearing throat... Need to speak LOUDLY because we're in a SHOUTING match)

    Maybe the reason why people feel they have the right to complain about free stuff is because (in most free countries) you have the right to:

    - Sue for false advertising
    - Sue for wasted computing resources
    - Sue for privacy invasion
    - And many, many, many more rights

    No matter what fee a company charges.

    If you got a box of corn flakes in the mail (FOR FREE) and they turned out to contain, oh I dunno, a secret spy camera that tracked your every move, would you not feel entitled to a LARGE CASH SETTLEMENT?

    Spyware is no more acceptable if it is free or not.

    And you should know better than that by now. The whole idea that the level of your ethics depends on the price you pay for something is damn low.

    BTW: I just sent you a free copy of Windows XP. Included (secretly) is every single piece of spyware ever made, all wrapped up (secretly) on the CD in a tight little package. When you install it (FOR FREE!) don't be a whiny asshole ("LIKE THEM!").

    [Ok, so I didn't really do the above, but think about it for a tiny little moment]

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  88. Ok, can someone compile it.. by DrPayOut · · Score: 1

    and set up a site for download?

    There are other semi-computer illiterate people here, such as lawyers :P

    1. Re:Ok, can someone compile it.. by rbeattie · · Score: 1

      Try GnuWire.

      This is sort of a joke. I'm not trying to take away from LimeWire's hard work. This is just version lw1.8 compiled with a new name. You'll need to install the JRE to run it, it doesn't have an install, but once you unzip it, just run the run.bat or run.sh files.

      -Russ

      --
      Me
  89. Sharing is never a bitch. by Erris · · Score: 1
    Of course, if they charged for their software, then there would be no need for ads or spyware.

    You presume too much. Peer networks will continue to evolve because there are people who don't NEED income from software. They will continue to work as their reward is the product. "Services" that use adverts will die as they are replaced by free versions. When the greed heads try to impose tolls, freedom loving people will leave them behind everytime.

    There never was a need for adverts and spyware.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  90. Ad-Aware by thumbtack · · Score: 1

    Ah, but the beauty of Ad-Aware is that you have the choice to remove those cookies or not. Check the box beside the cookie it and it will remove it. If you don't check it then it remains. Simple, easy and fast. After all we don't want to have to identify ourselves everytime we visit Mike's World Wide Web of Barfbags?

    Ad-Aware is from Lavasoft and can be found here.

  91. If adware/spyware is a problem... by nowt · · Score: 2
    stick with open-source software.


    MS may have forced OEM's to preinstall windoze on your pc (clue in Dept. of Justice), but thereafter, the choice is yours.

    --
    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess? - Joshua (Wargames)
    1. Re:If adware/spyware is a problem... by mattyohe · · Score: 1

      Limewire IS open source... remove the ads yourself

      --
      - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    2. Re:If adware/spyware is a problem... by nowt · · Score: 2
      I was referring to adware/spyware. Not Limewire.


      If you read earlier posts, you'll see that the non-windows version has no ads.

      --
      A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess? - Joshua (Wargames)
  92. why complain? so others learn. by Erris · · Score: 1
    I have no sympathy for all the losers on /. who whine about the spyware on their Windows machines. GO AWAY!

    It's important to point the about out. Not having any M$ junk, I'm oblivious to the new stupid tricks. When someone asks, now I know. Sure, the conversations can be tiresome. Trolls post all sorts of stupid thing along the lines of, "you have no choice", "see, even open source is greedy", blah blah blah. Hopefully, the M$ and music articles will keep them all busy. To compensate for them, the whiners come back to tell us that other software plays the same game. Sometimes someone even mentions something useful like QTella, and that's what this place is all about. Hell, they might even recomend an OS built on the concept of free software like Debian. Thanks! but be kind.

    I don't want to build a server to share comercial junk. I want to share my own work.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  93. The Solution? by Peale · · Score: 1

    Use v.1.7. I'm still using it, no prawblems here.

  94. limewire sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All they have on their is a bunch of mislabelled porn and a few crappy mp3s. Mainly its the midlabeled porn that pisses me off. They'll have normal pictures that I want to look at labelled as "TEEN FUCKED UPNTHE ASS BY HER 12 YEAR OLD BROTHER PEDOPHILE RAMA INCEST WHILE HER DAD WATCHES AND TAKES NOTES.jpg" and all it is is chasey lain and a dildo. Or say "16 year old takes it up the ass slut sex sexy fucking incest.jpg". You know, all I want is some pics, not some bullshit.
    And the mp3s suck too.

  95. KAZAA is Spyware! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    Morpheus (which is the same thing) is not.

  96. Just DLed GNUCLEUS by night_flyer · · Score: 2

    Im impressed... limewhat?

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  97. No, I MEANT 200 adware FILES, NOT cookies!! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 0

    Believe me, I know the difference between a spyware file and a cookie! I MEANT 200 spyware trojans!! Believe me, no one was more surprised then I!

    1. Re:No, I MEANT 200 adware FILES, NOT cookies!! by Fjord · · Score: 1

      Each cookie has its own file.

      --
      -no broken link
  98. Try the new F2F network, works for me. by GISboy · · Score: 2

    The new face to face network involves talking to real people, is kind of scarey and unintuitive at first and yes there are some ppl that could be considered "spyware".

    However we have figured it is a simple as a two click (boom) uninstall.

    The transfer rates are fast! Get cd's from your "network of friends" and as your cd-burner can go you'll have whatever you're looking for.

    And best of all, nobody is excluded from joining unless you don't want them to! FTP and IRC protocols allow you to deny/allow whomever you wish. No banners, no ads and you (w)get whatever you deserve.

    One cavet in all of this is you will have to upgrade your wetware to better versions of commonsense.libs, intelligence.exe conversations.dll's.

    Thank you.

    Visits us at www.internet dinosaurs r us.com

    --
    If it is not on fire, it is a software problem.
  99. A Bit off-topic by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

    But in this day and age of all the content providers going down fast, it is pretty evident that the people who sale the bandwidth have just got to be rolling in the cash...I am always seeing stories like "THis site cost $$ K per month in bandwidth fees to operate"...The people who sale bandwith have to be saying: "What do you mean this economy sucks -- we are soooo rich"

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  100. Re:Many users are complaining that this is spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Let me get this straight...

    You're going to sue a company for false advertising and privacy invasion, a company that writes a software product with the (implied) purpose of allowing you to download pirated music/videos/software for free?

    Isn't that kinda like suing your drug dealer for not providing you with a high enough grade of coke for your tastes? Or suing your hitman for poor customer service?

    C'mon...

  101. Thiefware by ThesQuid · · Score: 3, Informative

    A great website about all this is ThiefWare.
    They have comprehensive descriptions of all the companies and the spyware they install.

    I discovered this site after being called by a "representative" wanting to sell our company keywords for $30,000! My boss was psyched about it until I impressed upon him that we did not want to be associated with such scum. The bizarro thing was that this salesman didn't even work for Cydoor Networks...they seemed to be parasites of the parasites.


  102. Distribute Bandwidth! by Orion2 · · Score: 1

    "The bandwidth is too expensive" is what the posting says. Now I assume that the outgoing traffic is much higher for Limewire than the incoming, since their main traffic are downloads of the client and people connecting to the router. On the other hand, there are (still?) a number of broadband providers who typically have ample of outgoing bandwidth left (I'm working for one, we have a few 100Mbps left). They are spending a lot of money on buying incoming bandwidth and would (among other things) be interested in establishing new peerings with other providers but sometimes get refused by them just because the traffic is too asymmetrical (meaning they are pulling too much).

    So you try very hard to get folks that generate a lot of outgoing traffic as your customer in order to level things a bit. That's where Limewire would come in: Why not change the location of their servers to (or add additional ones at) a broadband providers location?

    To give you an example: We did install a Quake Arena Server for two purposes: The one mentioned above and to raise customer satisfaction (Low ping round trip time to server = happy Quake gamer = happy customer).

    Just my two cents of opinion of course.

  103. It is open source by CTho9305 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The normal download does not provide source code. You can get it using CVS, or through the developer section.

  104. Limewire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I played bumdarts with Christopher Rohrs. He's a good "shooter."

  105. Note: Limewire 1.8 on Mac OS X is banner free! by slashbrent · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just so ya know... I downloaded Limewire 1.8 this weekend and installed it on OS X 10.1 - no ad software, no banners, just like 1.7 only with different tabs/widgets. :-)

    --

    Moderators need an additional choice: "Karma Whore" for people who cut-and-paste articles as their comments!
  106. Re:Many users are complaining that this is spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That was a great post!!!

  107. Stupid, stupid, stupid by Velex · · Score: 2

    Napster makes money off distribution of copyright information. Napster gets sued and shut down. Fasttrack makes money off distribution of copyright information. Fasttrack gets sued. LimeWire makes money off distibution of copyright information. At least Gnutella isn't a sueable entity.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  108. Linux Limewire does not work in user accounts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently i installed Limewire 1.8 on my redhat 7.2 box. Before this i never had used any file sharing program. I can use Limewire fine as a root, but as normal user i cannot download anything, eventhough i could search and connect. I thought it must be be some security issue. Anyway until i figure out what is wrong i am not going to use this program as a root.

  109. Bandwith costs justify adding more load? by sapped · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Exactly how does it benefit them by adding more strain to their bandwith (with resulting increased costs) with adverts? Will the income from the ads really offset the additional costs of the extra bandwidth requirements?

  110. I need more than ZoneAlarm by 87C751 · · Score: 1
    I'm a confirmed ZoneAlarm user, but there's a problem with its paradigm. Once a program is granted access, it has net access with no further restrictions. Piggyback attacks like Firehole can still get through easily.

    What I'd like is something that will log all net access on a Win98 box, and will note the program doing the accessing. I chased a phantom on my box for 3 days last week. Every 8-10 minutes, it woke up the router with a DNS query but I could never catch the offender on netstat. Went away on a reboot, but I'd sure like to be prepared the next time something decides to lurk like that.

    --
    Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
  111. Re:Many users are complaining that this is spyware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For me, the problem is not the spyware itself, or the spyware being included with other software. The problem is software not telling me that it is installing extra crap on my system.

    If the webpage, or installation instructions, tell me that the software includes spyware, I have the choice to not install the ads/spy programs by not using the software. My choice. Fan-fucking-tastic. I don't want the extra crap, so I don't use their software. That is the way it should be. I'll even have a degree of respect for the company for being honest, which means I'm more likely to register the software/make a donation/recommend them to others.

    If they don't tell me that they are installing spycrap, it's instant download a crack time once I find out. They've sneaked shit onto my system without my consent. They won't get a penny for the software, and they won't get a penny from the spyware they tried to hide on my computer either. And I'll use their bandwidth. Fuck them.

  112. Re:very bright indeed by jilles · · Score: 2

    I just browsed the limewire developer website. The next version (1.9) will include cool new download technology and meta search technology (XML based). This stuff just missed the 1.8 release but is expected to be released soon.

    In addition, the major gnutella problem (scalability)is going to be addressed in a beta release shortly after that. Historically, Limewire has releases every few weeks so I suspect a 2.0 could be here before the end of this year. With the introduction of supernodes, gnutella will be as scalable as fasttrack (essentially supernodes are the key difference between the fasttrack protocol and the gnutella protocol). Only it will be open (both the protocol and the implementations). This is very good news.

    I'm increasingly annoyed with the crappy/buggy morpheus interface (kazaa is exactly the same but includes spyware). I experience random crashes and the UI seems to be assembled by a couple of morons. My little sister could do a better job given a 3 day course in VB for dummies.

    I always liked the limewire interface, with the improved search ability it will be a worthy competitor to kazaa/morpheus and with the supernodes in place it will be as scalable as the fasttrack network.

    I really like the way this is evolving. Just as the RIAA is starting to sue Fastrack licensees, something else they deemed irrelevant before is given a new chance. It must drive them nuts. Gnutella must have at least a dozen different clients. No one owns the protocol and most clients are open-source. The only way to ban it is to start sueing on the client side. Luckily, freenet is still improving too :-). Internet time is just passing too soon for them I guess. Next thing you know, you're irrelevant and your business model blows up in your face.

    --

    Jilles
  113. So stop using Windows... by Grizelmac · · Score: 0

    So this is yet another reason to use a Mac or Linux machine.

    These ads are only for Windoze..

    --
    Your Technology General Contractor http://www.birddogdigital.com
  114. Lime Wire Linux Client and Gnutella by actappan · · Score: 1

    The Linux Client doesn't seem to include either the banners or (quite obviously) the nasty windows spyware. I think overall, LimeWire's done some pretty impressive work. It's a pretty nice client, and a vast improvement over some of the early Gnutella clients. Granted - the content has gone to hell - but lets face it - it's a distributed network and we, as users provide the content.

    Get it? If you're sharing garbage - it's your fault that gnutella has gone to hell.

    --
    \Drew National Data Director, John Edwards for President
  115. Gnucleus by evilmonkey_666 · · Score: 1

    Gnucleus works great for me under win32.

    --


    - PS. This is what part of the alphabet would look like if Q and R where eliminated.
  116. Adware is optional on Bearshare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You installed it a year ago? I installed if 2-3 monthes ago, and installing the 'spyware' or ad software was completely optional. I just downloaded the newest version off their site and installed it. Again, it was optional. So what your saying may have been true a year ago, but it no longer is.

    puck

  117. Re:very bright indeed by mlinksva · · Score: 1
    I'd guess there are dozens of gnutella clients, maybe a dozen with active developers. Only thing I'd disagree with is that most aren't open source, but I see that changing as well. There's definite strength in gnutella's openness and diversity.

    And you're right, Freenet is slowly improving (as is Mojonation). I'd estimate they're both a year or two from being ready for prime time, but that's not a terribly long time for innovative software to evolve.

    In addition, robust and/or secure and/or anonymous P2P networks are a hot topic in academia now, which should translate into much improved systems (new ones and existing ones) in the next few years.

    The future is very bright for gnutella and for open and hard to attack P2P protocols in general. I'm excited! :)

  118. Lime wire has broken its promise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the limewire FAQ's a while ago, it said lime wire would Never include this feature.
    I even shared i file called 'bearshare contains spyware, use limewire instead, share this file.txt' but its not the ads that get me annoyed. ITS THE FUCKING BASTARD SOFTWARE GATOR! GATOR IS NOT NEEDED AS I USE OPERA AND I DON'T HAVE IE! NETSCAPE 6/MOZILLA NOW HAS ITS OWN PASSWORD SYSTEM SO FUCK THE GATOR! Uninstall gator now!

  119. Spyware is defeated easily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In order to get rid of fucking spyware do the following



    Use a tweaking tool to distable spyware (by the system configuration editor, just uncheck stuff like web3000.exe advert.exe etc,



    Lavasoft has developed a comprehencive spyware removal utillity, and i am running spyware apps *without ads*. Which is good.



    Send death threats to the software developers

  120. Have you ppl... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have any of you not tried XoloX, its my favorite. Grab it here http://www.zeropaid.com/xolox/

  121. Use Morpheus!! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 1

    It works just like Kazaa and on the Kazaa network, but does not hasve spyware.

  122. it should be noted that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    right along with limewire's new 1.8 version, they are also promoting their supernode alpha which contains no ads, no popups, and enables you to monitor all supernode connections. I tried both and dropped 1.8 after the first 3 minutes in favor of the other.