Slashdot Mirror


HP DVD100i DVD+RW Burner Tested

An anonymous reader writes: "I'm fairly sure this is the first review of a DVD+RW drive. Looks like it fared well in testing. The only downsides to the 100i are slow DAE with audio CD's, lousy manuals, and it can't read DVD-RW (note the dash instead of the plus) discs. Still a tad expensive at 599USD though. Are you reading, Santa?" I want this as a heavy-duty *external* drive :)

209 comments

  1. Macrovision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Does it encode Macrovision or region coding into discs?

    1. Re:Macrovision by fishebulb · · Score: 2, Informative

      that can always be taken care of with a "video clarifier"
      Does anyone know if that affects quality though?

    2. Re:Macrovision by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Does anyone know if that affects quality though?

      Yes, it improves it.

      Really. Macrovision is a degradation to the signal. The video stabiliser removes the degradation, leaving you with a cleaner picture.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:Macrovision by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Very true, Macrovision degrades the signal by altering the time base of the 3.57MHz video signal, a methoed intended to screw with automatic gain controls found in recording circuits of a VCR, but does not have visible affects on TV playback.

      A video clarifier will help immensly, but for the truly anal, and deep-of-pockets, I'd suggest going to a professional video outfit and buying a Time Base Corrector, works much better.

  2. Santa is listening... by Xenopax · · Score: 5, Funny

    An anonymous reader writes: "... Are you reading, Santa?"

    Yes, but who do I deliver to?

    -Santa

    1. Re:Santa is listening... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but to whom do I deliver?

    2. Re:Santa is listening... by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      The true Santa knows. That's one of the many reasons why Satan =~ Santa.

    3. Re:Santa is listening... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully this will never have linux support otherwise all you MORONS with your "im a cool linux hax0r" will think your all so cool with your "elite dvd burners"

    4. Re:Santa is listening... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your base are belong to Santa Claus.

    5. Re:Santa is listening... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all your img-timeline are belong to us

  3. Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by Outlyer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Just for a point of comparison... how does this differ from the Apple SuperDrive DVD writer (you've seen the ads) which is included in high end Powermacs? According to Apple's website the SuperDrive is a DVD-R drive, which I was told, couldn't write DVD-Video... so how are they accomplishing it?

    --
    ----------------- "I have a bone to pick, and a few to break." - Refused -------------------
    1. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by yipyow · · Score: 4, Informative

      there are many different formats of dvd recordable/rewritable formats: dvd-rw, dvd-r, dvd+rw, dvd-ram...

      http://www.brouhaha.com/~eric/video/dvd/

      chris

    2. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by martin-k · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Well, there is:

      * DVD-R & DVD-RW (Pioneer/Apple)

      * DVD+RW (HP, Ricoh et al.)

      * DVD-RAM (Panasonic)

      Ignoring DVD-RAM (it needs cartridges and is not really DVD at all), and DVD-R (there are no DVD-Rs available AFAIK, but all DVD-R recorders can also burn DVD-RWs), it boils down to deciding whether to go with DVD-RW or DVD+RW.

      If I had to decide NOW, I'd choose DVD+RW for the simple fact that it can burn at 2x while DVD-RW will always be written at 1x.

      Better of course to wait for a couple of months for prices to come down and speed to go up ...

      -Martin

    3. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by Spencerian · · Score: 3, Informative

      The SuperDrive is Pioneer's DVD-RW/CD-RW drive. It does it all, including burning of DVD video (up to 2 hours with iDVD 2, Apple's free software for assembling video with a DVD interface that works on any DVD player or DVD-equipped computer).

      There's still lots of infighting for standards, and the SuperDrive is list priced at $899, so I wonder which is the better bargain. "Combo" drives (plays DVDs, read/writes CDs) are used a lot with Apple hardware, and should be easily available for PCs, so I wonder what makes this drive so special.

      --
      Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
    4. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by bigdavex · · Score: 3, Informative

      and DVD-R (there are no DVD-Rs available AFAIK, but all DVD-R recorders can also burn DVD-RWs),

      This isn't true. We have a Pioneer S201 which burns only DVD-R, not DVD-RW. Perhaps you mean the other way around?
      --
      -Dave
    5. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by jerrytcow · · Score: 1

      Ignoring DVD-RAM (it needs cartridges and is not really DVD at all)

      I'm not sure what you mean by not really DVD, but type II DVD-RAM discs can be removed and played in DVD drives.

      They only need the cartridge to write, I used to have an external Panasonic drive, and it played CDs and DVDs fine (including movie DVDs, not just data discs) without cartridges.

    6. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by eAndroid · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by, "there are no DVD-Rs available"? Surely you don't mean drives that are only DVD-R since you state that they, "can also burn DVD-RWs". Do you mean
      DVD-R Media? Because that is clearly available.

      --

      I can't spell or type, but that doesn't mean I'm unusually stupid.
    7. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by martin-k · · Score: 2, Informative

      See? I got all those acronyms mixed up, too ...

      What I meant to say is that there are no DVD+Rs available (although specced), not DVD-Rs.

      In any case, with the prices of DVD(+/-)RW media going down, there is not much of a point in buying DVD-R media (which are available) or DVD+R media (which are not yet available).

      -Martin

    8. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by martin-k · · Score: 1
      type II DVD-RAM discs can be removed and played in DVD drives.

      Sure about that? I read some article that said that DVD-RAM drives can read DVDs, but DVD drives cannot read DVD-RAM.

      Panasonic seems to be planning DVD drives that can also read DVD-RAM, but generic, run-of-the-mill DVD drives probably cannot. (It's hard to imagine how they could, with the completely different layout of the sectors).

      -Martin

    9. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note this drive does NOT support write once +R disks!!! I would not buy it yet as some people
      are saying even a firmware wont fix it and have had bad service from HP.

      I did a search on google and came up with:

      http://www.dvdwriters.co.uk

    10. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can the apple superdrive really do dvd-rw?? also, can someone clarify the difference between DVD-x and DVD+x (the difference between the plus and minus variants)?

    11. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by eXtro · · Score: 1
      I don't know if its true that there's no point to DVD-R. I've yet to purchase a CD-RW disc for instance. I don't see the point. CD-R media is dirt cheap and there's multisession recording. For small archives of stuff I can just rewrite it as a new session. For larger volumes of stuff I can just toss the CD-R and burn a new one.


      DVD-R and DVD-RW will be much the same way for a long time. A DVD-R is about 4 bucks, a DVD-RW is about 9 bucks. As DVD-RW drops so will DVD-R, if it has multisession (not at all sure it does) then I'd be inclined to stick with DVD-R.

    12. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by giberti · · Score: 1

      Although I have never shopped here, TigerDirect has some good prices on DVD-RAM's as well as DVD-R & DVD+RW, well below the $25.00 / disc prices of last year.

      --

      AF-Design, web development.
    13. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by SuzanneA · · Score: 1
      *Some* DVD-ROM drives will read Type II cartridge-less DVD-RAM drives, many of the newer ones in fact.

      *Some* DVD players will even read them, but its fairly rare since there is little incentive to add it as a feature unless you're using a common DVD mechanism that just happens to support DVD-RAM.

    14. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by SuzanneA · · Score: 1
      Many DVD-RAM drives don't even need the cartridge to write a Type-II disc, I know my Hitachi will write Type-II with or without the cartridge.

      Since only one DVD-ROM i have will read DVD-RAM Type II's, and its the DVD-ROM in the same machine, it makes no sense to remove the disks from the cartridge though for me, as the cartridge adds a little extra dust/scratch protection.

    15. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by elinenbe · · Score: 1

      Mod this parent down!

      This is complely incorrect. I have a Pioneer DVR-103 which is also known as the DVR-A03 and it burns both DVD-R and DVD-RW media at 2x. This is the same drive that shipped with the Compaqs and Apples. Currently, I am using Nero Burning Rom, but it will burn at 2x in Sonic DVDit, and other DVD applications. Full DVD's only take 26 minutes.

      For more information (correct information that is) check out these sites.

      www.cdfreaks.com (CD Freaks)
      http://perso.club-internet.fr/farzeno/firmware/ (Firmware upgrades -- pretty important)
      http://www.cdrinfo.com/ (CDR Info)
      http://www.dvdwriters.co.uk/ (DVD Writers)

      -eric

      --
      -eric
    16. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      The same drive (Pioneer DVR-A03) is available for about 599$ pretty much anywhere these days. The Superdrive is just an OEM version of the DVR-A03 with Apple's markup.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    17. Re:Comparison to Apple SuperDrive? by cdh · · Score: 1

      In fact, you can get them pretty easily for around US$435.00 now. Search for it at newegg, they have it for $435.

      Yes, in six months it will be half that, but I want one NOW :)

  4. $600? we'll all own one in three years by Frothy+Walrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this is great. $600 now means they'll be $150 three years down the line, and they'll be as ubiquitous as CD-RWs are now.

    boy there's gonna be some piracy problems :D

  5. Heavy Duty External? by InnereNacht · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Uhm, why? I always wondered what it was about people and external drives. Do you plan on swapping this across multiple systems? Or do you just want to be "cool" for having an external DVD+RW? From what I've seen, most external CD-like solutions are enormous, unless you get a PCMCIA slimline version, but I don't see any slimline DVD burners coming out any time soon, heh.

    1. Re:Heavy Duty External? by sphealey · · Score: 2

      So that when it freezes up you have some hope of resetting it without having to reboot the file server to which it is attached. You always need the greatest archive capacity on your most critical system!

      sPh

    2. Re:Heavy Duty External? by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There are plenty of advantages to an external. First: an external must by SCSI, 1394, or USB, so it won't use up one of your limited motherboard IDE ports. Second: you can swap an external between many systems -- beats having to transfer gigabytes of data over a network. Third: you can turn an external off when you aren't using it. My external CD-RW has probably been on for less than 2 days in the three years I've owned it. This will extend its life. It also saves energy. Fourth: with all external drives, you can have a pizza-box computer. If you want hard disks, cd, cd-rw, dvd, and dvd-+rw in the same case, it has to be an enormous tower.

    3. Re:Heavy Duty External? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

      My internal CD-ROM drive turns itself off when not in use.

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    4. Re:Heavy Duty External? by hrieke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your second point goes against the reason why you would have a network in place. It might make it easier if you had to transfer between two systems that are not on a network.

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    5. Re:Heavy Duty External? by InnereNacht · · Score: 1

      "You always need the greatest archive capacity on your most critical system!"

      Okay, so use a tape drive. They're a bit more proven in the industry IMO, and you can pick up a 20/40 drive for about half the price of the DVD+RW.

    6. Re:Heavy Duty External? by InnereNacht · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which is why I asked if he was going to swap across multiple systems.. But you may want to snip USB out of there; burning 5 gigs of data over a 1.2Mbps pipe is most likely not the most efficient way of doing it, hehe.

      SCSI/IEEE1394 would be a ton better, but I just don't see an instance where you'd need a 5 gig storage device to be "portable". Unless you have a LOT of systems that you need to copy huge amounts of data/raw graphics/movies/etc off of... And in that case I'd still think some form of network attached storage would be optimal.

      As for using this for a dedicated backup system, it doesn't seem like it would really fit the build ;/

    7. Re:Heavy Duty External? by xinit · · Score: 1

      Maybe for those of us who work predominantly on laptop computers perhaps.

      --
      --- http://foo.ca
    8. Re:Heavy Duty External? by InnereNacht · · Score: 1

      I work mostly on my Toshiba S353-3000 actually, but I'm almost always around a network of some sort. Unless you've got 1+gig cad files or something on your *laptop* of all places (if that's the case, I'm very sorry, and will gladly admit my fault) I really don't see why one would come in too handy. I have about 5 DIVX's on here, that's the only thing I could think of using one for... But I'd have trouble justifying spending $600 on something to make a backup of 5 movies.

    9. Re:Heavy Duty External? by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 2

      Please, try running something from a tape drive... it ain't happenin.

      I remember a while ago there was some "special" tape drive that would allow immediate access to a certain 125mb or so on the tape, but I have no idea who made it.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    10. Re:Heavy Duty External? by fwankypoo · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but he said transferring gigabytes of data over the network... On a 10megabit connection this can literally take hours, sometimes even overnight. It would be very convinient to be able to do something like swapping an external drive.

      --
      The time of day is 29:33.
    11. Re:Heavy Duty External? by InnereNacht · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about running it directly off the media? I'm sure that would be ideal, but for the most part this threads implication was "backup-only device".

      Either way, I still think NAS or even a fire-wire hard drive would be more efficient.

    12. Re:Heavy Duty External? by amigabill · · Score: 1

      There's good reasons for this. Say my family gets a video camera compatible with computers & burning DVDs of home-movies. If family goes on vacation down my way, they can burn a DVD for me before leaving. If I go to them, I can burn a DVD to bring home with me, and not have to tote my entire system around, just the drive. And make a few copies at once to save mailing disks around, just hand them out when everyone is in the same place...

      Or I could lend it to a friend who can't afford the drive but does have a suitable camera. Or to use it to make hard drive backups of various machines around the house (currently 3 systems of my own and 3 systems belonging to roommates) Lend it to friends for backups, etc. Not to mention the potential backup use for computer repairs places to restore data in case "something bad/worse" happens, backup usage for bigger companies that only want to buy one drive, etc.

    13. Re:Heavy Duty External? by SuzanneA · · Score: 1
      While others have replied with other good reasons, there is one important reason that everyone has missed.... PSU dependance...

      With an internal DVD-R drive you're talking about quite a lot of extra power drain on your PC's PSU. Not a big deal if you're using a P2, but on a P3/P4/Athlon with a power hungry video card, it can make enough of a difference to need a new PSU. I know PSU's aren't that expensive, but the hassle of disassembling a working system to replace the PSU IS. And yes, its a lot more hassle than adding an IDE drive would be.

      An external drive means an external/seperate PSU. When you have 3 or 4 external drives, the advantage is probably close to 200W of power dependance removed from the PC's PSU.

      Also, as I understand it, DVD-R's can run quite hot, another good reason to remove them from the 'main' PC case if possible.

    14. Re:Heavy Duty External? by InnereNacht · · Score: 1

      Thanks...

      That's a much better reason than anything else I've listened to so far. ;)

    15. Re:Heavy Duty External? by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of good reasons for wanting an external. The biggie for me is the convenience being to able to put the drive and computer in different places, i.e. the (noisy) computer in a cabinet below my desk and the drive on top of the desk where I can get to it quickly.

      As others have mentioned, it also saves your IDE connectors for other things as well as letting you have a smaller case.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    16. Re:Heavy Duty External? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      you're wrong. my G4 has the "superdrive" (Pioneer DVR A-03) which reads CD s at 8X (ie slowly), writes CD-R at 8x (moderately - but not ONE coaster yet!!), writes CDRW at 4x (slowly) reads DVDs at 4x (nicely!), writes DVD-R at 2x (very nicely) and DVD-RW at 2x (never use 'em). That's why they call it a "superdrive" - you don't need any others - it's built beautifully as well.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  6. PC Magazine Review by wiredog · · Score: 5, Informative
    Right here. They compare it with the Sony dvd+rw.

    Note that dvd+rw and dvd-rw drive can both write dvd-r disks that can be played in a standard dvd player. So it's not quite vhs vs. betamax.

    1. Re:PC Magazine Review by elinenbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ug! Why don't people do research before they blindly post. The DVD-R drives burn DVD-R disks that can play in a MUCH greater number of players then a DVD-RW disk.

      Here are some compatibility charts:
      DVD-R compatibility in DVD standalone players (apple.com)
      http://www.apple.com/dvd/compatibility/

      DVD-RW compatibility in DVD standalone players (ricoh.com)
      http://www.ricoh.co.jp/dvd/cope/video.html

      Personal test of DVD-R, DVD-RW, and DVD+RW compatibility (labdv.com)
      http://www.labdv.com/en/hardware/dvd_player.php

      -eric

      -eric

      --
      -eric
    2. Re:PC Magazine Review by xski · · Score: 1
      Dude, at least make real links!


      Here are some compatibility charts:
      DVD-R compatibility in DVD standalone players (apple.com)
      http://www.apple.com/dvd/compatibility/

      DVD-RW compatibility in DVD standalone players (ricoh.com)
      http://www.ricoh.co.jp/dvd/cope/video.html

      Personal test of DVD-R, DVD-RW, and DVD+RW compatibility (labdv.com)
      http://www.labdv.com/en/hardware/dvd_player.php

    3. Re:PC Magazine Review by diz · · Score: 1

      UGH! When will people learn the difference between then (a temporal transition) and than (a comparison)?

  7. Apple got there first by Andy_R · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe the poster of this article should look for reviews of Apple's G4 desktop macine, it's been shipping with a Panasonic DVR-103 DVD-RW drive as standard for quite a while now.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:Apple got there first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I guess that means that PANASONIC got there first, doesn't it?

    2. Re:Apple got there first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No! No! Mr. Steve said that Apple is the best!

      Yay! Apple is the best!

      Apple is also colorful! I'm so happy!

      Yay!

      - Andy R

    3. Re:Apple got there first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That Panasonic is a DVD-RW drive, not DVD+RW.

    4. Re:Apple got there first by pyros · · Score: 1

      Actually it's a Pioneer drive

    5. Re:Apple got there first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      been shipping with a Panasonic DVR-103 DVD-RW drive as standard for quite a while now

      As you pointed out, Apple is shipping a DVD-RW drive, this is about a DVD+RW drive.

    6. Re:Apple got there first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical Apple booster. Ignorant and agressive. This is a DVD+RW rather than a DVD-RW. Different standards, different techniques. So, Apple wasn't first, and they didn't make it, Panasonic did, didn't they?

  8. NO REAL STANDARD YET! by Medievalist · · Score: 2, Informative

    /.
    While DVD+RW may eventually become the industry standard, you're still gambling until a true standard unequivocally (sp?) emerges.
    Look at what 56Kb modem prices did once the v.90 standard was published.

    SO, I'm still waiting!
    --Charlie

  9. Price of Media, Price of Hardware by Bonker · · Score: 1

    I went to Bestbuy last night and saw a generic CD-RW drive for $79 before rebate. If you shop around, you can get CDR's or CDRW's for about $.50 apeice, usually with a rebate that makes them more or less free.

    You can also get a DVD-Rom drive for about $100.

    All this considered, it would literally be cheaper to buy both drives than the all-in-one combo. Even if it did manage to burn DVD-RW, it would still be cheaper in terms of media cost to have both drives and burn data onto CDR or CDRW... that is... unless you actually *need* an entire DVD-RW's worth of storage capacity in contiguous media.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Price of Media, Price of Hardware by sacremon · · Score: 3, Informative

      CD-RW drives cannot burn DVD-RW or DVD+RW.

      DVD+RW drives cannot burn DVD-RW, and visa-versa (until someone makes a drive that does both).

      DVD-R media can be had for as little as $5USD apiece. Given that is 4.7GB, that is the equivalent of about 7 CDR's. Not too bad, in terms of price/MB.

      Ever try to back up a 40GB drive to CDR? That's about 60 disks - a real pain. Eight or nine DVD-R's would be much easier and quicker.

      --
      If you can't beat them, embrace and extend them.
    2. Re:Price of Media, Price of Hardware by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      Don't know about DVDs, but for a CD-RWs, you don't necessarily want the cheapest drive you can find. In the long run, you can save yourself quite a bit of grief and money if you do some research before you buy.

      Stephan

    3. Re:Price of Media, Price of Hardware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know Linux-using dorks have trouble understanding this, but convenience is worth paying for. If you're that much of a cheapass, why don't you go and get yourself a fucking floppy drive and use that for all your storage needs? You could save yourself another 50 bucks beyond your dumb CDR idea.

    4. Re:Price of Media, Price of Hardware by ZxCv · · Score: 2

      Granted I don't know exactly what a DVD-R records per second, but would a 2.4x DVD-R burner really be much faster than a 24x CD-R burner? I can understand dealing with 8 or 9 disks being easier than dealing with 60, but I think it would probably actually take longer to do.

      --

      Perl - $Just @when->$you ${thought} s/yn/tax/ &couldn\'t %get $worse;
  10. Recordable DVD format chaos = more dead media by Artifice_Eternity · · Score: 5, Informative

    First DVD-RAM, then DVD-RW, then DVD+RW... the industry's parade of new and different recordable DVD formats has got to be awfully confusing to consumers. Until this article, I certainly couldn't keep them straight.

    The funny thing is that the faster they crank out these new formats, the faster the previous ones become obsolete. We are accumulating dead media at a faster and faster pace. Will anyone own a working DVD-RAM drive in 10 years? Woe to those businesses, individuals or organizations who chose this as their archival medium...

    1. Re:Recordable DVD format chaos = more dead media by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Woe to those businesses, individuals or organizations who chose this as their archival medium...

      While the article is informative, certainly helping me understand what's what, I wouldn't rule out DVD-RAM drives as a serious backup solution for information shops. I seriously doubt many people have a 9 track 6250BPI tape drive at home, but it's still an accepted standard, tho probably few use one for backups, usually they're for data exchange. There's also 4mm DAT tapes specifically for backups, which are certified, tho we used to buy the regular ones at the discount store, if one got eaten and the service tech found it in the drive they could cancel our service countract (it was written in the terms.) So if these media survive because they have value, I'd expect DVD-RAM to survive in niches, as well.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  11. 2.4x = ? by joebp · · Score: 1

    I hope I'm incorrectly calculating that a full 4.7GB write would take 3.6 hours.

    1. Re:2.4x = ? by Oily+Tuna · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are incorrect. It will take about 24 minutes.

      2.4x = approx 3Mb/s

      --
      Mmmmmmm ... sushi.
    2. Re:2.4x = ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's using 2.4x CD speeds, i'd hope it's 2.4x DVD speeds

    3. Re:2.4x = ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you aren't correct. It's 2.4x DVD speed. 1x DVD is around 8x CD-ROM speed. So it would take +/- 30 minutes to burn a 4.7 GB DVD disk.

    4. Re:2.4x = ? by agdv · · Score: 1
      I hope I'm incorrectly calculating that a full 4.7GB write would take 3.6 hours.


      I'm not sure, but I think they may be using a different x. When you say your CD-ROM drive is 24x, the x means 115 kB/s or something to that effect. When you talk about a 2x DVD drive, the x has a different (bigger) meaning. I think. Anybody know details?

    5. Re:2.4x = ? by global_diffusion · · Score: 1

      So it would take +/- 30 minutes to burn a 4.7 GB DVD disk.

      I hope that mine takes -30 minutes to burn :)

    6. Re:2.4x = ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IT took me 32 minutes to burn a 4.2 gig DVD of digital video, complete with menus etc saturday.

  12. Question by octane097 · · Score: 1

    Can you write data onto a DVD+RW disc and then read it with a DVD reader?

    1. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVD+RW data discs are readable by *most* DVD-ROMS.

  13. Re:$600? we'll all own one in three years by ryanflynn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    nothing guarentees ubiquity except time.

  14. VHS to DVD by wiredog · · Score: 4, Informative
    Now you can move your vhs tapes to dvd for less than $1,000. The Dazzle Hollywood DV-Bridge is $300 (it comes with a ieee 1394 card (Lucent chipset)) and converts analog inputs (from the composite video jack on the tape deck) to digital video, which goes over the 1394 link. The VCR looks like a digital camcorder to the card. Be advised that DV takes up about 15Gb/hr.

    I have one of those (DVD recorder is on the list to get) and it works fairly well. Get the Pinnacle DVD authoring software ($40 at Best Buy) because the bundled software isn't any good.

    1. Re:VHS to DVD by Anders+H�ckersten · · Score: 1
      Oh do you mean like this software that I keep getting e-mail about.

      And don't forget that if you buy it today you'll get the Playstation wizard today. I hate spam...

  15. DVD+RW by House+of+Usher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmmm, so all the hype here really is over a drive that is rewriteable and has the capability to hold how much data? 18 GB total maybe? Plus they're sort of slow. Then again, the first CDR drives were painstakingly slow as well.

    My feelings are two folded. I guess I am happy that the DVD+RW is finally around, mostly because I don't want to see DVDs go to the wayside like many economists were saying that they would (then again, what do they know really?). But at the same time, with companies like Constellation 3D out there with their Flourescent technologies out there, I'm wondering why this sort of media storage hasn't been developed more. Constellation 3-d uses a flourescent technology to store up to 140 GB of data on a single disc. This would be more than enough to be like that of HDTV :o) Alas, such things are not in the forefront of the news as I guess most companies are scared to invest in something so powerful.

    Oh well, like others I'd love for Santa to bring me an external unit... :-)

    --
    I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw.
    1. Re:DVD+RW by roystgnr · · Score: 1

      Alas, such things are not in the forefront of the news as I guess most companies are scared to invest in something so powerful.

      I would think that the prospect of storing 140GB on a single disc could threaten to drive technology company CEOs mad with the lust for power, perhaps even awakening a long-imprisoned ancient evil that threatens to consume us all.

      Also, I've been playing the new Wolfenstein too much.

    2. Re:DVD+RW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Return to Castle Wolfenstein has that effect...

    3. Re:DVD+RW by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
      It's spelled "fluorescent", it will hold "20 - 100 Gigabytes of pre-recorded data" and you can't put one in your DVD player.

      Still, 100 GB per disc ain't bad at all. They do have a WORM version, no rewritable yet it seems. However, I'm still waiting (and waiting) for them to produce a real product...

      --
      Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  16. Cost by hether · · Score: 3, Informative

    At $15.99 a disk, the cost they mention in this CNet article http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1006-200-6909288.html from August 19, I don't think its all that affordable. With the drive costing $600, the total costs would just be too high. Sure you can record repeatedly for each $16, but you're going to want to have more than one thing on disk at any one time, requiring additional disks. I realize that's cheaper than competing DVD rewritables so far, but still too much.

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
    1. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well, if you're comparing the cost to CD-R's right now, then yes. But as an affordable option for archiving data, these things beat the pants off of the alternatives. We generate large amounts of test data from multi-channel high frequency sampling. The current method of archiving is to use magneto-optical disks, also from HP. The drives will set you back $3k a pop, and each 5.2 gig disk will run you another $75. Those $600 DVD+RW drives and $15 media look pretty cheap in comparison eh?

    2. Re:Cost by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Still though - back when I bought my first cdr writer it cost 595$ and disks cost around 8$ a piece. I was still in bliss. I noticed I wasn't so frivolous with what I wrote to them then.

    3. Re:Cost by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      It might be a requirement for some people to be able to store a file larger than 700Mb on one disk. Besides, maybe the cost of $16 is worth the convience of having all of your data on one DVD instead of a set of 5 or more CD's.

      I probably won't be purchasing a DVD+RW drive any time soon because I have yet to use up that much data. I have 8 years of files that can still fit on a 100Mb zip disk.

    4. Re:Cost by XLazarusX · · Score: 1

      the discs can be had for $11 online.

    5. Re:Cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The DVD+RW discs are actually fairly cheap, at $9/piece on average. The prices are bound to drop as drives reach critical mass. With the emergence of DVD+R (which is a subset of DVD+RW) next year, I expect to see cost become less of an issue. For now, it sure beats backing up to CD or tape. Not to mention how cool it is to archive my home movies on DVD.

      (P.S. see taperesources.com for cheap media)

  17. DVD Demystified by Agave · · Score: 4, Informative

    The best site I've found that goes through all the differences between DVD formats is in the DVD FAQ at DVD Demystified

  18. just think GIG output as standard!!!!! by waitdyahoo.com · · Score: 0

    I cannot wait till 4+ gig DVD-RW and such are standard on all computers.

    I remember way back to the 1st time I used a 1.44 meg disk and how big it seemed back then.

    I had a friend that had a early DVD-RAM drive about 2 years ago.. it was unbeleivable to put 2.7 on each side of those disks.. Never mind they were like $30 to $40 a disk or more and only would work in that one drive.. LOL

    Anyone want to take a guess what we will concider normal storage on a computer a year from now??

  19. Waiting for standards unification by jpostel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I waited on the 56k v.90 standard for a while and I can wait on this to get sorted out too. If it were something a little bit cheaper then I would not mind spending the money on this, but since they cost >$500 I will wait.

    --
    Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)
  20. DVD Movie bit-by-bit copy? by xjerky · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can this drive make perfect copies of DVD movie disks? For backup purposes, of course.

    --
    A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    1. Re:DVD Movie bit-by-bit copy? by 1ridium · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dont know but with the price of blank DVD media right now it would probably be cheaper to just go buy the dvd at the store than to bother burning your own copy.

      --
      Make it idiot-proof and someone will build a better idiot.
    2. Re:DVD Movie bit-by-bit copy? by firebomb · · Score: 1

      depends on hte movie.
      if the drive is a 4.5 gig version...then all it can fit is 4.5 gig of vob files(roughly an hour and a half video). or u can always downsample and recreate the dvd(SVCD comes to mind)
      A 4.5 gig svcd can reach some pretty high bitrates(probably up to the max of 2.5 Mb a sec, which would look pretty damn nice, along with high quality sound(unfortinatly cant be higher than 44.1KHz, svcd standard)

      so, if the movie is short(Pi comes to mind), then it can be done
      but if ur thinking of doing a bit to bit with pearl harbor.....think again

    3. Re:DVD Movie bit-by-bit copy? by FasterThanLight · · Score: 1

      As a DVD can hold 14GB, and DVD rewriteable are no where near that capacity... the short version is "no". Add to that CSS(content scrambles system) encryption.... and well no you can't just make a bit for bit copy.. AFAIK. Anyone care to correct me?

      --
      They're a little melty, but damn are they exquisite!
    4. Re:DVD Movie bit-by-bit copy? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      what kind of dvd can hold 14 gigs? As far as I know double layered disks can do around 10.

    5. Re:DVD Movie bit-by-bit copy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.dvdwriters.co.uk/reviews/pioneer/dvr103 p1.htm This drive can.. because it supports DVD-R which is more comaptible IMO.

    6. Re:DVD Movie bit-by-bit copy? by DougM · · Score: 1

      Consumer DVD-R, DVD-RW and DVD+RW are all "general use" formats. This means that you cannot write to the area of the disk that would normally contain copy protection and region codes. This limitation is designed into the player and media.

      This is to prevent straight bit copying of encoded discs. It also prevents these drives from being used to master DVDs for mass duplication. You can buy DVD-R solutions that do not have this limitation. They cost six times as much and the media is specialist, therefore much more expensive.

      There are ways of decoding DVD movies such that they could be written to general use media and played back on consumer DVD players. It is just straight copying that would fail.

    7. Re:DVD Movie bit-by-bit copy? by DougM · · Score: 1

      'fraid not. The DVR-103 is a consumer writer that only supports "general use" media. This prevents it writing to the area of the disc that would normally contain the region coding and copy protection information.

      Therefore a bit copy would actually be incomplete resulting in players unable to access the encoded contents (i.e. the movie).

      This restriction is designed into all consumer writers specifically to prevent bit copying. You would need to decode the contents first (e.g. DeCSS).

    8. Re:DVD Movie bit-by-bit copy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      As stated elsewhere you can't create a 100% copy of a comercial DVD. First you you have to remove the region encryption. Then because most films are now more than 4.7Gb you either have to split the disc or re-sample at a lower bitrate (so reducing video quality). A third option may be to drop the 'extras' that many DVD disc's come with.

      Tools to rip and re-encode at a lower bitrate already exist and are used for the creation of VCD's/SVCD's from DVD.

    9. Re:DVD Movie bit-by-bit copy? by XLazarusX · · Score: 1

      not bit-by-bit, but you can rip a dvd and write it back to a blank.

    10. Re:DVD Movie bit-by-bit copy? by FasterThanLight · · Score: 1

      DVD-18 will hold up to 17. I think a typical feature length movie and "special features" usually eats up 14GB. http://www.nswc.navy.mil/cosip/nov97/cots1197-1.sh tml

      --
      They're a little melty, but damn are they exquisite!
  21. Re:$600? we'll all own one in three years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Privacy...hell...no...remember...they are outlawing DeCSS....no way we can copy dvd's without DeCSS

  22. Re:$600? we'll all own one in three years by House+of+Usher · · Score: 1

    So will this drive be able to get past the Super Audio CD protection that Sony is imposing on consumers? What about that law that says pretty much that you're allowed to make a back up of everything you own? Hmmm, I don't like the looks of this. I mean sure, piracy = bad. I guess you could say that I'm not the most careful person with my coasters, err, cds, so if one bites the bullet, that's what the backup is for. Maybe DVD+RW will come to the rescue :o)

    --
    I am but mad north-north-west: when the wind is southerly I know a hawk from a handsaw.
  23. Re:$600? we'll all own one in three years by yipyow · · Score: 1

    it's not like these things haven't been around for a while. check pricewatch. i got someone a refurb toshiba dvd-ram in february 2001 for $200.

    chris

  24. With SCSI this wouldn't be a problem by hodeleri · · Score: 2

    Just slap the drive into an external SCSI case and off you go. Some of my friends use external SCSI cases with a CD-ROM drive as a CD player.

  25. it's a good piece of pie by myrth · · Score: 2, Informative

    hi,

    i've had one of these for the last month and have found it to be an incredibly reliable and useful tool.

    i haven't run across a bad cd/dvd write yet with it, and while the software is very vanilla, it is still quite useful.

    installation was very simple, and with media prices dropping, i'm happily looking forward to finally feeling secure about having enough back-ups...

    -myrth

    --
    -- ABAP Guy
  26. Info by hether · · Score: 1

    http://www.thetechnozone.com/pcbuyersguide/hardwar e/storage/HP-dvd100i.html

    --

    Most people would die sooner than think; in fact, they do.
  27. Use a 1394 enclosure by anser · · Score: 1

    If you want the HP DVD+RW drive as an external, get a Firewire external chassis like the ones from http://www.apdrives.com . I have not specifically tested the HP drive in one of these, but everything else I've tried works great.

  28. Pioneer DVD-RW drive cheaper by Visoblast · · Score: 2, Informative

    It looks like Pioneer's drive is now cheaper than the new HP one, and I think the disks are cheaper, too. Plus, it is readily available, and so are the DVD-R's and DVD-RW's. It also works with Linux, at least to write CD's. I've done it.

    --
    "Luncheon meats make the sawdust in your stomach explode."
    • -- Crow T. Robot
    1. Re:Pioneer DVD-RW drive cheaper by xTK-421x · · Score: 1

      The Pioneer A03 is available here at Newegg:
      Pioneer A03 for $435 shipped

      Very nice burner, you can find media cheap here:
      4.7GB DVD-R for $3 a pop

      --
      "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
  29. Re:$600? we'll all own one in three years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC, you dont need DeCSS to read the files, just need DeCSS to decrypt the mpeg streams.

    direct disc to disc copy should work just fine though.

  30. Fine... by CoolVibe · · Score: 1
    I'm still waiting for two things:
    • Until the empty media becomes cheaper,
    • The drives become cheaper...

    Otherwise, this _would_ make a nice backup medium though. For personal use it seems to expensive for me still, although CD-R/CD-RW's give me headaches sometimes (they're well... too small and stuff). Actually, I use 'em almost as floppies somewhat.

    Also, the thing is that there is also an RIAA tax (am I right here?) that makes all of this even more expensive... I don't see myself switching over to DVD-R or DVD-RW just yet, nor do I see others do it, for the concerns expressed above.

  31. how about 40 GB per disk for $100? by turbine216 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...It's called a hard drive. They're REALLY cheap these days, and they have INCREDIBLY FAST seek times. Oh, and they can be written to and read from without any additional software. Oh, and they're compatible with ANY operating system.

    Seriously, though...these things are still WAY too expensive to justify buying one, unless you're one of those guys making a six-figure salary who buys everything, no matter the cost. Then again, i guess they have to go through this phase before they're going to bring the price down anyway, so whatever. But for now, I'll take a bunch of hard drives over a DVD-RW or DVD+RW any day.

    1. Re:how about 40 GB per disk for $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ...It's called I only have 4 IDE ports and wasting them on small hard drives is not what im gonna do... And besides everytime I want to take some data to a friends house im not gonna want to open up my pc to take out my harddrive and then bring it with me - a small dvd would be a hellova lot easier...

    2. Re:how about 40 GB per disk for $100? by deanj · · Score: 1

      Then get hot-swappable drives. Don't even have to take the machine down.

    3. Re:how about 40 GB per disk for $100? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any PC you use would also have to have the hot swappable drive bay as well. A better solution would be USB or Firewire external drives.

    4. Re:how about 40 GB per disk for $100? by Rew190 · · Score: 1

      They're worth it for the guy who wants to start making high quality media he can watch on his DVD player, though.

      I'm more interested in the DVD-video aspect and transferring my DVDs onto backup DVDs instead of DIVXd CDs. I also have a digital camera that is begging to be paired with tech like this.

      As soon as the prices reach the point where I can spend less than 400 USD on a burner and less than 5 dollars per disc, then I will definitely pick one up. Until then, though...

    5. Re:how about 40 GB per disk for $100? by e40 · · Score: 1

      When you can put a hard drive into a DVD player, let me know...

  32. HP optical products are crap, IMHO by nsayer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I have had very bad luck with HP Optical products in the past. The net effect really is that you're not buying the product in question, you're renting it for the warranty period. This is because they self destruct at day # (warrenty + 1), and their out-of-warranty repair charge is (price of new drive * 0.99).

    1. Re:HP optical products are crap, IMHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second that emotion! HP = NOPTICAL

    2. Re:HP optical products are crap, IMHO by renehollan · · Score: 2

      I don't deny what you are saying, but I have had exactly the opposite experience, at least with HP CDRW drives.

      --
      You could've hired me.
    3. Re:HP optical products are crap, IMHO by joejoejoejoe · · Score: 1

      I have owned 2 burners, and the external HP one is DEAD. I used it for about 6 months and now all I get is a hardware error, which won't go away, no matter what system I hook it up to...

      HP is a cool company, but my experiences have all been kinda weak...Their servers had (and may still) PLASTIC wire management for the power, kvm and network cables. I am sure they saved a buck on that, but it showed.

      --
      Silly Rabbit: tricks are for kids.
  33. That is not correct by cqnn · · Score: 4, Informative

    AFAIK DVD+RW drives cannot write to DVD-R media.

    There will be a supplemental media released
    "early" next year... DVD+R which will fill the
    cheap recordable gap in the media line for
    DVD+RW drives.

    For the time being the only media you will be able to
    get for the HP, Phillips, and so forth drives will be DVD+RW.
    Which is one of the reasons I am holding off (saving up) for
    a drive in a few months.
    1. It will be clearer which standard is more compatible.
    2. The media selection for both should be better at that point.

    1. Re:That is not correct by aderusha · · Score: 1

      actually, you are not correct. dvd-rw and dvd+rw drives will both write to dvd-r media. read the review.

    2. Re:That is not correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a HP DVD100i. It will not write a DVD-R disk. It might be able to write a DVD+R disk with a firmware update when DVD+R becomes available next year.

      I just bought it on Dec 9 thinking that it could do DVD+RW and DVD-R. I think I will return it to BestBuy because it can't do DVD-R and I don't know if it will be able to do DVD+R.

  34. Moore Strikes Again! by fm6 · · Score: 2
    Yup. Plus obnoxious anti-piracy measures on commercial DVDs.

    When DeCSS first appeared, I remember pundits saying, "Oh well, no biggie, nobody has that much disk space to spare." Repeat after me: Moore's Law. Moore's Law. Moore's Law.

    1. Re:Moore Strikes Again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Moore's Law"

      Okay... so what does doubling the ammount of transistors in a microprocessor have to do with DVD? Probably nothing. Yet another mis-representation of Moore's "law" brought to you by the posters at slashdot. Thank you, have a nice day.

    2. Re:Moore Strikes Again! by Pope · · Score: 1

      Not.

      Moore's so-called Law had nothing to with anything beyond the density of transistors. Stop citing it for everything from hard disk size to the number of pr0n pictures on the net!

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    3. Re:Moore Strikes Again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean "Murphy's Law".

    4. Re:Moore Strikes Again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Moore's so-called Law had nothing to with anything beyond the density of transistors.

      And what is there more of in virtually everything you buy for your computer?

      Transistor parts, or non-transistor parts?

    5. Re:Moore Strikes Again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... which has absolutely nothing to do with the density of hard disk platters.

    6. Re:Moore Strikes Again! by timbck2 · · Score: 1

      > Not.
      >
      > Moore's so-called Law had nothing to with anything
      > beyond the density of transistors. Stop citing it
      > for everything from hard disk size to the number
      > of pr0n pictures on the net!

      So call it a corollary to Moore's Law. Sheesh!

      --
      Absurdity: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion. -- Ambrose Bierce
  35. modem standandards? by Pyromage · · Score: 1

    Look at what the prices did once the standard was published, eh? Nothing! They didn't go anywhere! The reason modemn are so cheap is because they are winmodems! The good modems, such as the USRs, haven't ever changed in price, from the $99.99 I paid about 4 years ago, to the $99.99 they are charging now. Or $119.99 for their "gaming" modem. No, there's a bit more volume on modems, but the prices didn't change a bit, not because of the standard.

    1. Re:modem standandards? by Medievalist · · Score: 1

      Pyromage wrote:
      Look at what the prices did once the standard was published, eh? Nothing!

      That's simply not true. I priced the USR 56 Kbps "sportster" modem less than two months before the V9.0 standard was published and then again six months or so later - the price drop was, as I recall, quite noticeable - especially compared to the way the 56-flex and 56x2 had been holding their prices for the previous year.
      The sportster is not a *great* modem, but it's a good modem, to use your terminology - I have close to a hundred of them on site here and they have always worked just fine. And of course the price of crappy winmodems is down to about $10 now. I got one for free ($10 - $10 rebate) at Best Buy, but I haven't found any use for it as yet.
      Sorry I haven't any non-anecdotal evidence to post...
      --Charlie

  36. Linux test so far ... by dltaylor · · Score: 2, Informative

    I put one in one of my Linux boxes last week. So far, I have read CD-Audio (grip) and CD-ROM (iso9660), DVD-ROM (iso9660), and a Video DVD ("Chicken Run") with no problems. I have written to CD-RW media, both CD-Audio and CD-ROM, with cdrecord.

    As soon as I get some time, I will test DVD-Video and DVD-ROM formats on DVD+RW media. Any idea where I should post the results?

  37. Reliable Testing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else notice their "reliable" testing box was overclocked?

  38. Re:Warning!!! Santa == SATAN...GOD==DOG? by ekpil_2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I couldnt help but respond in this way to a post like this sorry for the off topicness but isn't a dog the best place for the lord to hide weed never assume that the things our loyal pets do had anything grander in mind but think of all the heroic kind and loving things dogs do so I choose now to start a list that I hope others will add to 1. Dog is mans best freind, man is gods best freind...I hope.

  39. Other reviews (prior art :-) by eddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    cdrinfo reviewed the Ricoh 5120A (CDRW and DVR+RW) months ago. Then they did the Philips DVD+RW 208.

    The current review is of a 32x writer, the Mitsumi CR-480ATE, so no need for a "Woow! First review of a 32x writer" in two months :-)

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Other reviews (prior art :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real good reviews can be found @ http://www.cdfreaks.com, they don't review much drives, but when they do ;))) 17 pages !! But this is for the burning pro's I guess

      Plextor 24/10/40: http://www.cdfreaks.com/document.php3?Doc=53

      Liteon 24/10/40: http://www.cdfreaks.com/document.php3?Doc=59

      Gimme that Lite-On ;)

  40. Worst Review I've ever read by monkeydo · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Where do these reviewers come from? This review reads like a 5th grade book report.

    You would think the DVD-RW format would sound like the perfect solution. Unfortunately, there are some limitations. Probably the biggest issue right now is that not all DVD video players or DVD-ROM drives can play these discs. The other problem is recording video. This format does not support efficient encoding of video using variable bit rates. This limits the recording speed to only 1x and it can take a good 1 or 2 hours to write a DVD movie.

    You would think there would be a better solution. So did a few other companies. These companies got together and formed the DVD+RW Alliance. The DVD+RW Alliance was originally formed by Dell, HP, Mitsubishi Chemical, Philips, Ricoh, Sony, Thomson Multimedia and Yamaha. You can see that this group was made up of leaders in the optical storage industry as well as in many other aspects of computing. Their solution was the DVD+RW format.

    If these companies would give _me_ free equipment, I guarantee reviews that are at least written by someone with a better grasp of the written language.

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum
    The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    1. Re:Worst Review I've ever read by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Monkey see, monkeydo. Monkey's got no point of view. Captain points and she points too. Clever monkey! Monkey's got to know her place. No future in the master race. Monkey spat in Captain's face - they cut her tongue out. Threw it to a doberman named Rover.

  41. Not a cost effective storage solution by asv108 · · Score: 1
    I've been waiting for affordable DVD recordables for a long time. In a previous life, I spent a lot of time taping Phish and other bands that allow taping. I have over 500 DATS that I want to transfer to another format. DAT tapes start to degrade around five years after they are recorded on. CDR works but it takes 3 CD's for one concert. What I would prefer to do is use a lossless compression format such as SHN and put 10+ DATS on one DVD-R.

    The technology is there but the media prices are ridiculous. DVD-R prices hover at around 15 to 25 bucks. The drives are not too bad, the HP drive goes for around $560 street but until the media comes down to earth it doesn't seem worth it for me. Now if I had an interest in video, I would pick it up in a heartbeat.

    1. Re:Not a cost effective storage solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DVD-R prices are $3-5. Check www.pricewatch.com

  42. Alternative option for removeable mass media by athlon02 · · Score: 1

    I personally want to see CDs and DVDs eventually (meaning I know they won't die off tomorrow) be faded out in favor of say 1394b buses + compact flash, smartmedia cards, SSDs, or <insert_your_fave_really_fast_non_volatile_mem_ type_here> :)

    I mean think of the access times, Megs/sec, the size of the media, reliability, possible applications... It just seems the intelligent choice to make (and if not flash memory, maybe IBM's magnetic RAM or some similar non-volatile mem)!

  43. Region Code by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Informative
    To answer the other half of your question, from the article:

    The HP dvd100i also uses RPC-2 for region protecting. This means that the drive's region is stored in the firmware itself. You can change the drive's region five times and after that you cannot change it anymore.

    Bummer.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  44. http://www.dvdwriters.co.uk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.dvdwriters.co.uk

    This web site has some info on dvd recorders.

  45. Get back under your bridge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple troll

  46. Re:Welp, im turning my filter back on -thanks by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Heh. With witty comebacks like that, I can imagine Oscar Wilde will soon be forgotten. That poor AC will never know that you burned him so bad behind his back.

    Seriously, though. Why do some of you troll? I'm asking you for a serious thought out answer. Can you give me one? Is there some story in the backgruond about why you do it?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  47. Importsnt questions not answered. by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What is best for writing dvd video discs?
    the only reason I want a DVD-R or RW or +rw or a r*(rw/r)^rw or whatever they want to call it this week is to make my own DVD flicks (Ok and maybe backup my PS2 DVD's..) but mainly for taking my DV cam's video and spitting it to a nice disc for friends, relatives, archival... basically to completely remove any need for VHS.

    What drives will write a disc that is readable in any DVD player I wander up to?

    what drives are supported under linux?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Importsnt questions not answered. by xpromache · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pioneer A03 (DVD-R) is supported using this patch for cdrecord
      HP DVD+RW drive is supported using this patch .

  48. Re:how about 80 GB per disk for $120? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fry's is selling 80 GB harddrive for $120 albeit after $50 main-in rebate. These are Seagate 7200 rpm barracuda drives.

  49. Linux Support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For DVD+RW check this site For DVD-R(W), check this one: http://www.abcpages.com/~mache/cdrecord-dvd.html mache

  50. Thank you Inspector Clouseau! by TobyWong · · Score: 1

    The legions of anal retentive grammar nazis rise to salute you! All hail the king and master of the English language. May the sun never set on your perfectly parsed and formatted kingdom! I pine for the day when one so masterful as you can have full editorial control over all of the content across this vast network.

    Please accept my apologies in advance for the shoddiness of this post. Alas I am just a poor grammar serf. I don't have the same divine control over the English language as your Royal Grammar Highness.

    --
    - Toby
  51. More stuff at dvdplusrw.org by ackthpt · · Score: 2

    Checkout the DVD+RW Alliance's page for more info.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  52. My few cents by quark137 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have the Pioneer DVR A03. It records DVD-R, and DVD-RW both. I also have a 3 year old Pioneer consumer DVD player. I assumed that DVD-R's will play on the DVD player, but what surprised me is that I was even able to play DVD-RW media on my DVD player!

    A little off-topic: From experience, Dazzle DVC II is a great card for capturing TV/VHS video. I also have the higher end Dazzle "Dv Now.AV," and it's simply superb. To top it off, it comes with the full version of Adobe Premiere 6.0!

  53. Re:$600? we'll all own one in three years by elinenbe · · Score: 1

    Again, people are commenting who are completly misinformed. Blank DVDs (unless you get a double sided disc, which will not be released at least for another month) only can fit 4.7Gb and most movies take up a much greater amount of space then that. None of the current conumer DVD writers can write the dual-density disks, so you are forced to chop out extras, trailers, vocal tracks, etc. Not to mention that you need to DeCSS the disk first. Even with the best software out there currently this is a very time consuming process.

    -eric

    --
    -eric
  54. Re:$600? we'll all own one in three years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So people will recompress movies to a lower bitrate to fit them in 4.7GB using the MPEG-to-MPEG transcoding tools that are already out there.

    The last time I ripped a DVD it went about 2x, which isn't fast but you could easily rip a movie on your lunch break.

  55. 599$ isn't so bad by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

    I paid around that for my first CDR drive - seriosly. It was Yamaha CRW4001T.

  56. Re:Welp, im turning my filter back on -thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Is there some story in the backgruond about why you do it?

    b0red@work, MEEPT!!!, and Signal 11 would make some good starting points.

    Look them up and I think you'll be able to fill in the rest.

  57. Pioneer DVR-A03 DV - $400, available now by Hobart · · Score: 3, Informative

    I believe that this is the one bundled in the PowerMacs.

    Since it burns DVD-R at 2x, DVD-RW at 1x, CDR at 8x, and CD-RW at 4x, and is available for what looks like a relatively cheap price right now, it looks like what I'd put on my christmas list. :-)

    Especially since Nero now supports burning VideoCD (mpeg1) and MPEG2 DVDs.

    --
    o/~ Join us now and share the software ...
  58. Re:Welp, im turning my filter back on -thanks by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Thank you.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  59. Lots of good info on the DVD+RW format and drives by Namarrgon · · Score: 2

    ...here.

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  60. DVD+RW by drhemi · · Score: 1

    DVD+RW is physically able to write to the content protection area of the disk. So with some firmware hack or something it could be done. The problem is that most commercial DVD's use a dual layer format and switches to the other layer part way through. No recorders support this right now so you'd end up with half a movie

  61. FAWKIN' mods are gonna get COAL for xmas! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know in your hearts my joke was funnier than the parent!

  62. It doesn't really matter by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
    It's not so bad. Since DVD+RW drives can read DVD-R and DVD-RW discs (as well as vice versa), it doesn't matter much which you go for. They can't write to each other's media, but reading is fine.

    The main things to consider are the drive itself (speed etc), price (drive & media), and perhaps availability. DVD+RW is supposedly a little more compatible that DVD-RW, but the difference isn't apparently that large in users' experiences.

    That said, I'm personally holding off until DVD+RW drives can also write to DVD+R media. That'll be cheaper than rewritable media, and more compatible (rewritable discs - of either standard - have different reflective properties, which confuses some older players into thinking it's a double-layer disc).

    HP don't have a clear position on whether current dvd100i drives will be firmware-upgradeable to support DVD+R (Ricoh make the drive unit itself for HP, and they won't say either). When I know that the drive I buy will do this too, I'll be first in line :-)

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  63. ...or the ATI Radeon 8500DV by Namarrgon · · Score: 2
    ... which will not only record DV (via 1394) and analog video (via S-Video or composite), but also includes a TV tuner, EPG, PVR functions, S-video/composite out, RF remote control, Ulead Video Studio (not too bad) and a pretty darn good 3D card too :-) Price: $399, available RSN.

    Or you can just go for a $50-100 analog capture card (with no DV support).

    --
    Why would anyone engrave "Elbereth"?
  64. Why lossless recodings of live sets? by swb · · Score: 1

    If you're doing open-air miking of live sets, why go through the effort of lossless compression?

    I would think that some of the higher bitrate MP3 stuff would give you all the audio quality you need.

    If you were doing soundboard stuff it might be different, but I have a hard time seeing an amateur open-air recording being good enough to require lossless compression.

    1. Re:Why lossless recodings of live sets? by asv108 · · Score: 1

      I patch off rigs that cost anywhere from 3-7k and generally consist of very high end mics, ususally Scheops or B&K, a preamp, and portable DAT usually a tascam DA-P1. Anyway, quality is of the upmost in importance. Check out Etree to see what I mean. Click here to check out some equipment.

  65. Yes, but who do I deliver to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And give me the complete address.

    Love,
    Osama, I mean, Santa.

  66. 1x on CD and DVD. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the multiplication factor for DVD is 8 or 9 times faster than that for CD.

    In other words, while 1x equates to 150-KBps on CD, it is about 1.25-MBps (or 1250-KBps) on DVD.

    This is just what I think. The truth should be along these lines, but forgive me if I err.

  67. One, two, four, eight, sixteen... by fm6 · · Score: 2
    I knew I'd get this "correction".

    First, metaphor and usage have extended the application of of the term "Moore's Law." If it were a real scientific law, that would be uncool (thought still inevitable). But it's not. It's just a observation about manufacturing costs.

    Second, the number of transistors you can pack onto a chip has everything to do with the cost and power of electronic products. Prove me wrong: build a DVD player using vacuum tubes!

  68. In praise of DVD Backup (Was: Heavy Duty External) by Snafoo · · Score: 2

    Um. Unless you're running a *serious* corporation's IT section, the degree to which DVD-RW\? is *already* proven is more than sufficient.

    For a small business, you have the following options:

    (1) Tape drive storage. More space than you probably need in the immediate future, high-ish price, proprietary format (usually) and the usual incompatibilities between various OSes. Large, but not infinitely so, MTBF. Unusual drivers. Exotic hardware. High TCO.

    For instance, at work we used to have a setup with a DP-30 Onstream parallel port 'Windows Tape Drive'. Terrible story: When the drive died, we lost access to 2 years of backups. Furthermore, even before its demise, it never really worked right. The W2k drivers were almost completely broken, and in fact the blasted thing would refuse to install itself on W2k-server, apparently because the included software (incl. driver!) was intended for 'personal backup' (read: had crippled fileperm/ownership handling) and therefore wished us to buy a 'real' archiving package in order to store the measly ~4gb of critical data. Evil! Bad!
    Since the dratted thing also wouldn't talk dirty to WinME, we eventually ended up re-installing 98SE on a machine in the corner, which would drag 4gb of server-side data across the network every friday night. I was almost in tears from the aesthetic trauma alone, not to mention frustration.

    (2) DVD storage. Improved versatility, cheap-ish media (esp. if you're re-writing). Reliable media with a very nice lifespan. :) shorter MTBF, but high probability that the next one you're going to purchase will be $200 at Wal-Mart rather than $900 from a reseller specializing in obsolete media formats. Additionally, your media that can read from almost any modern computer, which can SAVE YOUR BACON during a serious crisis.

    Yes, I hear you say, but what about that time when you *really* *really* need capacity? Well, with compression -- which is what all the tape drive figures are assuming, BTW -- you get ~9G of storage; having to swap CD's a couple of times for a large backup isn't that onerous.

    Only when you're at the 5-6 swap-per-backup point -- that is, ~50gb+ -- do you really need to consider a more industrial solution. And at that point, you're interested in a $1700 tape drive, not a $400 model.

    But what about Moore's law? Surely in a couple of years, your capacity needs will (at least) double?

    Well, aside from being an incorrect application of Moore's law, this 'law' simply fails in the face of fact. We've been in business ten years, and in that time our data requirements have gone up from virtually nil to 4gb. Another 4gb in ten years is credible, so that's the figure we run with. (We're not a dot-bomb; no explosive growth, no explosive fall, just steady improvement in sales.)

    Also, don't forget that a DVD backup solution (once the drives are cheaper) will allow 'localized' or 'workgroup' backups, wherein five or six computers handle their own data storage and backup. Rather than driving the whole wad of data over the LAN, we can just use cron to burn to disc in each workgroup, and collect those.

    AAR, the small company I work for has had no problem with our DVD-backup solution. I should know; I'm the one who advocated and installed it. :)

    --
    - undoware.ca
  69. Correction...HP makes both by systemaster · · Score: 1

    HP makes both DVD-RW and DVD+RW...make sure you know what you are talking about...the DVD+RW is the individual drive, DVD-RW is what they put in their built systems. Go to any circuit city and check out the build it yourself station, and build an HP P4, no price limit, the top system will have a DVD-RW drive.

    --
    LinuxWorx
    Spelling errors are intentional as are gramatical error
  70. What I wanna know is by drix · · Score: 2

    Alright, so I'm lazy. Can someone please answer me this: is it possible yet for me to take my DivX ;-) movies, turn them into VOB files, burn them, and play them in my DVD player? Last I checked the answer was an uncertain "no." Or, more accurately, I tried to figure this question once before and was unpleasantly surprised to discover the myriad of formats out there: DVD-R, DVD-RW, DVD-RAM, DVD+RW, blah blah. Every player seems to be incompatible with about half of them, but it's never the same half. So I assumed no. Has anything changed?

    --

    I think there is a world market for maybe five personal web logs.
    1. Re:What I wanna know is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Three separate steps:
      1. Transcode DivX into DVD-compatible MPEG-2. DVD players do not understand MPEG-4-ish stuff like DivX. Dunno if there's direct transcoders available; if not, you could go DivX to AVI, then AVI to MPEG-2
      2. With the MPEG-2s, you then author the DVD. This creates the VOBs. Easy enough; several authoring packages out there, ranging from cheap&simple to absurdly expensive but supporting the full DVD spec
      3. Burn onto disc format of choice. Later versions of DVD authoring packages burn directly to the Pioneer DVD-R/RW drive, which has been out for months now. In any case, you should always be able to write a disc image onto the hard drive, then use whatever came with the drive to burn that on the disc. As for compatibility, I'd say DVD-RAM (single-sided so that you can take it out of its cartridge) is least likely, +RW is a question mark, and -R/RW actually pretty likely. Of course, YMMV.
      So the second and third parts are are definite yes. The only question is the first part.
  71. CD-RW DVD-/+RW.... by Trillian_Angel · · Score: 1

    .... I'm still wanting a CD-RW, forget the DVD anythings! I have 2 cd rom drives (One being a DVD drive but anyway) and I still don't have a CD burner,..

    Now, I'm still thinking that why don't we just stick with the poor buck a piece CDs which hold plenty of data, instead of trying out this newer technology just yet... I know I still have to be really careful with my DVD drive, as afaik, DVD drives have a tendancy to break after relatively short time spans, especially when you start using the cd rom AND dvd drive capabilities.

    The fuss is simple, people just have big egos which they like to primp up using their computers. Well... well... fine then! I have a gig athlon with cd dvd and a ls120 drive! (

    Seen it once seen it twice... if you want to have muscle matches boys (and girls!), get a 64-1/2 ford mustang all original parts... then you can boast. (or sell it and make 200k...)

    --
    -- RJ
  72. Re:Welp, im turning my filter back on -thanks by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Interesting. Thank you for giving me a thoughtful answer. I have to admit, my assumption about what I was going to hear back was ill concieved. I was expecting to hear something along the lines of "because so and so is gay", with really nothing more insightful than that.

    Bad of me to make assumptions. Good luck. :)

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  73. Re:In praise of DVD Backup (Was: Heavy Duty Extern by uspsguy · · Score: 1

    And, of course, you are a totally impartial reviewer of the benifits of this solution.

    --
    Profanity - The sign of a small mind trying to express itself.
  74. Prices for Competitor by dstrauss · · Score: 1

    The Pioneer DVRA03 is available, for those interested in a DVD-R drive, for around $430. You can get it for $400 if you look around enough. (Try eBay.)

    The firewire version of the drive runs around $575, though it's tougher to find.

    (And many tv DVD players won't recognize DVD+RW discs, as the HP creates. Make sure you find out before you buy one.)

    For me, it's not a question of backing up my HD or making MP3 discs. I want one so I can burn DVD videos of the stuff I record and edit on my D8 camcorder. For that purpose, a DVD-R drive is magnificently suited.