Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek TNG DVDs

pgudge writes "startrek.com had a post about the paramount release of Star Trek The Next Generation on DVD. Claimed a around $100 for the season pack, including 7 DVD's. And that other season are to be released every other month thereafter. all done in Dolby Digital 5.1. Release date expected 26th march" Good way to watch them without suffering through TNN's ridiculous image squashing technology (Proudly proving that in the future everyone is either a pro wrestler, or shaped like a pear!)

141 of 416 comments (clear)

  1. what about B5, Buffy, Simpsons by jd142 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Now if only Babylon 5 could get the same treatment. Buffy is on the way. And Simpsons 1st season is out.

    Anyone have any more info?

    1. Re:what about B5, Buffy, Simpsons by gibodean · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, we've already got Buffy DVDs seasons 1 to 3, and Angel season 1 in Australia.

      Just get yourself a region free player, and order from here (or New Zealand). I think the UK has them too.

    2. Re:what about B5, Buffy, Simpsons by thegrommit · · Score: 2

      Yes, at least those three "franchises" have maintained their cachet. Post-TNG Trek has devolved into mediocrity to the point where I don't get upset about missing an entire season.

    3. Re:what about B5, Buffy, Simpsons by rodgerd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've been waiting in eager anticipation of the Babylon 5 DVD sets, but Warners have started releasing everything in Region 4 as cheap, shittily made NTSC DVDs, for chrissake.

      Shitheads.

    4. Re:what about B5, Buffy, Simpsons by lunadude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The first B5 disk was released back in November! The two-sided disk contained:

      The Gathering (Pilot)
      In the Beginning (1993)

      No great extras, they are testing out the waters. If this disk sells well (read: buy one), they will release the entire series.

    5. Re:what about B5, Buffy, Simpsons by cancrman · · Score: 2

      Warner has been really shitty about releasing their TV properties on DVD. Which is surprising because they were the leaders in putting shit out on DVD in the beginning.

      Take their releases of Friends for instance (Shut up, I know it sucks. Yes I own them). Instead of releasing full seasons they have put out 2 lame 'best of' collections.

      Perhaps they think that they can make more money off of the syndication rights rather than the DVD releases. They need to take a lesson from Fox. They know how to do DVD right. X-Files, Buffy, & The Simpsons have all been top notch releases.

      Pete

      --
      The sole purpose of the Internet is to get porn and bomb making plans into the hands of children.
    6. Re:what about B5, Buffy, Simpsons by Dante_H · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the UK, WB have released Friends as entire seasons on both VHS and DVD. Not sure why WB America would drag their feet.

      Up until fairly recently the studios didn't seem to appreciate that custs would want entire seasons, rather than "best ofs". Again, in the UK, we had themed best of's (which were generally lame) of the Simpsons, which was eventually followed by the Box-Sets. One migth cynically say that they did this to squeeze yet more money out of us...

    7. Re:what about B5, Buffy, Simpsons by dannyspanner · · Score: 2

      I'll only buy it if they release it in anamorphic widescreen. There used to be a petition site somewhere to this effect, but it's disappeared as far as I can tell. Fat chance of WB taking any notice, 7000 "signatures" or no. Their production on film DVDs is lackluster to say the least.

    8. Re:what about B5, Buffy, Simpsons by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      I just got the shipment notice this morning for Buffy season 1.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    9. Re:what about B5, Buffy, Simpsons by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      I'll only buy it if they release it in anamorphic widescreen.

      What are you on? All the Star Trek series were shot in academy ratio (4:3) for the TV. If you want to watch them in the wrong ratio almost any wide screen TV will oblige by either stretching the picture horizontally so Picard fatter than Kirk did or by chopping off the top half of everyone's head.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    10. Re:what about B5, Buffy, Simpsons by dannyspanner · · Score: 2
      I'll only buy it if they release it in anamorphic widescreen.
      What are you on? All the Star Trek series were shot in academy ratio (4:3) for the TV.

      Apologies; I was referring to B5 and should have quoted the comment I was replying to. Of course I don't want to see Picard stretched to 16:9! I have a hard enough time explaining widescreen to the family. B5 was filmed in widescreen although it looks like much of the CGI wasn't, which causes problems.

  2. I forget.... by DAldredge · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do we hate the MPAA this week or not???

    1. Re:I forget.... by Rayonic · · Score: 5, Funny

      FYI, we hate it Monday, Wednesday, and Friday
      We like it Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday
      and we alternate Sundays.

      Get with the program.

  3. great! by Syre · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Great!

    This means I'll be able to download the shows real soon now on Morpheus, Gnutella or EDonky2000!

    1. Re:great! by ywwg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      unless of course you want the picture quality, 5.1 sound, and extra features, not to mention no downloads that take all night, crap out, and have some Hax0rs watermark all over them

      and for 100$, it's a bargain

    2. Re:great! by WNight · · Score: 2

      A 600MB divx DVD rip of a 1-hour (or less, usually) show is going to be incredible quality. Anything where the source is widescreen is going to be ripped that way. The 5.1 it might not do (You can rip the audio streams directly, but I dunno if standard players will recognize and play them...)

      As for downloads taking all night... that matters? Why? Just queue a few up and let them go.

      And watermarks? I've never seen watermarks on a divx movie except for screeners. (You know, some guy with a handy-cam in the theatre.) Nobody bothers to watermark DVD rips, anyone with the DVD can do them, there's no glory.

  4. DVD Only Special Feature: by Nathdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    DVD Only Special Feature:

    *Skip Holodeck Episodes.

    :)

    1. Re:DVD Only Special Feature: by Rayonic · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about:

      *Skip First Season?

      ;)

    2. Re:DVD Only Special Feature: by wo1verin3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hrm..if we couple that feature, with the ability to skip over Episodes centered around transporter accidents, we could fit the entire series on to an 8-track.

    3. Re:DVD Only Special Feature: by servasius_jr · · Score: 5, Funny

      DVD Only Special Feature:

      *Skip Holodeck Episodes.


      Yeah, it's really easy to pick out those end-of-season low-on-cash episodes: "Data's cat suffers from distemper and Worf learns a lesson about sharing when he takes square-dancing lessons on the holodeck. Picard gets a haircut. Wesley shaves for the first time."

    4. Re:DVD Only Special Feature: by Spackler · · Score: 2

      I can't believe I'm going to say this, but the very first holodeck episode (I'm not talking about Farpoint where Riker finds Data in the holodeck), the one with the Binars and Minuet, was not bad. It used it as a prop to deceive, and not technology gone crazy (and NOT Captain Proton! What was Berman thinking?).

      Spackler

    5. Re:DVD Only Special Feature: by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2
      How about:

      * Skip Entire Silly Series

      ST just Ain't That Great, folks. Poor writing, poor economics, poor physics, poor philosophy: a poor show.

      Now, Blackadder and Red Dwarf: those are shows!

    6. Re:DVD Only Special Feature: by brogdon · · Score: 3, Funny

      What, and miss Counselor Troi in the short skirt and knee-high boots they stuck her in through the first season? I guess they thought they needed some thigh to keep the borderline geeks coming back, so they added a splash of "Sex Kittens go to Mars" to the series. :)

      --


      This tagline is umop apisdn.
    7. Re:DVD Only Special Feature: by dunstan · · Score: 2

      And sets Riker up for the later episode where the reappearance of Minuet is the telltale sign that his mind has been ripped and an artificial world created around him.

      Dunstan

      --
      The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
    8. Re:DVD Only Special Feature: by crsgrg · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about skip all episodes where:

      Picard appears to be made of wood, or

      Riker has that shit eating "I get *lots* more than the Captain" grin on his face, or

      Dr. Crusher appears to be the most masculine crew member, or

      Weasely appears to be the most feminine crew member, or

      Troi fails to show any cleavage.

    9. Re:DVD Only Special Feature: by CaseyB · · Score: 5, Funny
      Yeah, it's really easy to pick out those end-of-season low-on-cash episodes

      Three words: "Shades of Grey".

      I can't recall the exact details, but one of the writers/producers' own comments on the show was "It's shit. Utter shit.".

  5. TNN is bad? by spacefem · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I kinda like watching TNG on TNN, it's weird, I know, but it adds to the atmosphere. So much of Star Trek is like a big party, a community, I don't always feel right watching it myself in the comfort of my own home, I like the feeling that millions of losers are watching it with me. Anybody else catch techTV's little stints at the Star Trek Experience lately? Excellent, nothing like an interview with a real Klingon to remind you that the culture is out there, not on your DVD shelf.

    1. Re:TNN is bad? by nomadic · · Score: 2

      That is a gross misuse of the word "culture".

    2. Re:TNN is bad? by kilrogg · · Score: 2

      Can you explain this "image squashing technology" for us non-Americans? Do they change the aspect ratio? Why would they need to do that? thanks.

    3. Re:TNN is bad? by Phexro · · Score: 4, Funny

      "That is a gross misuse of the word "culture"."

      nonsense.

      From Webster's Revised Unabridged Dictionary (1913) [web1913]:

      Culture \Cul"ture\, n.
      1. (Biol.)
      (a) The cultivation of bacteria or other organisms in
      artificial media or under artificial conditions.

      for example, not showering for eight full days because you're too busy watching star trek.

  6. Macrovision? AntiCopy process. by dasheiff · · Score: 2, Insightful
    All seven discs are encoded with the Macrovision? AntiCopy process.

    Yeah, right! All this really means is that there will now be DIVX copies of Next Gen online.

    1. Re:Macrovision? AntiCopy process. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Macrovision is a protection mechanism that works only on a standard TV signal (PAL/NTSC/SECAM). It screws with the AGC on your VCR and projection TV, causing it to fade from white to black.

      A simple "video stabiliser" or (more expensive) time base corrector will fix the problem.

      Since it only works in the analog domain, you have nothing to worry about should you want to watch the episodes on your computer. The only time macrovision will prevent you from using the content on your computer is when you try to capture video from brain-damaged cards and drivers.

      I don't think linux could give two shits about detecting it, but YMMV.

    2. Re:Macrovision? AntiCopy process. by cockroach2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      macrovision tries to stop people from copying their dvds to vhs.

      1) who would want to do that? the only answer can be: people who don't have a dvd player yet. and i don't really see why they shouldn't do it. "professionals" will have ways to circumvent those protections anyway, which leads us directly to

      2) the matrox g550's tv out apparently ignores macrovision, and for TNT2 cards there's a 'tv tool' to disable it.

  7. Will they play on your machines? by -douggy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All seven discs are encoded with the Macrovision(TM) AntiCopy process. The above information pertains to the North American release only.

    When are we getting them in region 2? Will ours be macrovision free? As we know only you US guys copy them to VHS for leet pirate salez :o)

    This post is not serious

    1. Re:Will they play on your machines? by Foddrick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seem's like region 2 will be coming out.

    2. Re:Will they play on your machines? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dumping to video is pretty easy - get an nVidia geForce based card with TV out, enable TwinView mode, and send the video and audio out to your VCR. Voila. Macrovision gone; and your tape is ready.

    3. Re:Will they play on your machines? by AntiNorm · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Why the heck would they want to region-protect STTNG DVDs anyway? The industry claims that region coding is there so that they can control the release of movies, etc. -- but STTNG is no movie. If they use region coding on something like this, the MPAA's argument for having region coding gets flushed down the drain. It becomes quite apparent (as if it wasn't already) that region coding is there for more than what they claim it is.

      --

      I pledge allegiance to the flag...
      of the Corporate States of America...
    4. Re:Will they play on your machines? by snicker · · Score: 2

      I would suspect that ST:TNG falls under the category you describe as etc.. Seriously, though, I don't think using region incoding on a television series invalidates the MPAA's argument - it doesn't stop people from still using the encoding to "protect" movies.
      This should not be viewed as an endorsement of idiotic abuses of media rights.
      *n

    5. Re:Will they play on your machines? by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 2
      Why the heck would they want to region-protect STTNG DVDs anyway? The industry claims that region coding is there so that they can control the release of movies, etc. -- but STTNG is no movie. If they use region coding on something like this, the MPAA's argument for having region coding gets flushed down the drain. It becomes quite apparent (as if it wasn't already) that region coding is there for more than what they claim it is.

      One of the reasons *I* always heard given, along with the MPAA reasons, were that it would allow studios to implement price controls for different regions of the world (obviously, regions with low income and so forth will be priced differently than the USA, where people (except for right now, anyways) make oodles of cash). Sucks, but there's no legal reason I can think of for them to NOT do this. Of course, I don't see that there's a legal reason for people NOT to hax0r their DVD player to play all regions/etc. Ditto for firmware hacks and so forth..

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    6. Re:Will they play on your machines? by leuk_he · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good that you posted as ac.

      get an nVidia geForce based card with TV out, enable TwinView mode, and send the video and audio out to your VCR. Voila. Macrovision gone;

      1. Macrovision isn't gone. your video will like S****
      2. Tvout on most geforce cards is not that good: it will be in letterbox format. And the image quality is not DVD quality in lots of cases. But it depends on the card.
      3. Some DVD play software does not play "twinview" it show the dvd only on the monitor.

    7. Re:Will they play on your machines? by -douggy · · Score: 2

      That doesn't mean you cannot turn it off.

    8. Re:Will they play on your machines? by dr00g911 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There will be a separate set for the UK for a variety of reasons, but there's one reason in particular that comes to mind. The episode (I forget the title) dealing with Tasha's homeworld and terrorism was banned in the UK because it contains a line stating that terror attacks lead to Irish independence. So, in effect, there's a season that's one episode shorter in the UK. FWIW...

    9. Re:Will they play on your machines? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2


      According to that reasoning us europeans are doing pretty darn well. At least, if you look at the pricetag on the R2 Simpsons -box.

      R1 Box [play.com] £17.99 Delivered
      R2 Box [play.com] £31.99 Delivered


      That ignores that the fact that the UK is a much smaller market to pay back on the production start-up costs, that the BBFC charges ludicrous amounts of money to "rate" videos, a requirement to be legally sold in the UK, and also the high VAT taxes among other things.

  8. This is better... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    then the way they packaged the original series, by putting 2 episodes per DVD and charging $20-$30 per 2 episodes.

    I'll be collecting these, and hoping the original series, as well as Voyager is released in this fashion.

    I can't imagine DS:9 would sell quite as well... :)

    1. Re:This is better... by Masem · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I've read they've committeed to doing the full TNG run as series packaging, and will decide if the same is merited for DS9 and VOY depending on sales (and compare with TOS). If this method works, then they'll rerelease TOS in series format as well.

      I hope more TV series are released in this fashion. For example, Farscape is still 2eps a disk, making it unweldly to get. If you consider that you can cut the cost of production by having one large inset booklet and combined packaging, it's much more reasonable on both end of the sale.

      --
      "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
      "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    2. Re:This is better... by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2

      In TN, at least at Best Buy, they were only $14.00 per DVD set.. still steep. They could have at -least- fit a 3rd episode onto each DVD. Or a fourth. Better than the $12.99 for a video tape with one episode on it they did in the early 90's, though.

    3. Re:This is better... by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 2

      Shrug, I actually preferred DS9 episodes (mid to end series run, the first one or two seasons weren't that great) to Voyager episodes and was sad to see it go. Voyager only had a handful of episodes I *truely* loved, and once the met the Borg it went uphill from there. =)

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    4. Re:This is better... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      This is better? $4.5 per episode? For a 14 year old TV show?

      Better than $7.50 an episode for the original series, which is about 30 years old, isn't it?

      So? What does age really have to do with it?

      That's still on TV!

      Maybe where you are. It's not on the broadcast anywhere near me, and I'd rather pay for this than buy cable.

      Believe it or not, I'd personally rather pay for the DVDs than pay for cable, as cable and over the air broadcasting has ads that get in the way of the actual show.

      Then that's also discounting the possibility that the DVD video could easily be better in quality, and has the 5.1 audio to boot.

      Stop buying this crap!

      That is only your opinion. And I wish slashdotters would lighten up and quit being so damn opinionated, but then it wouldn't be Slashdot without it.

  9. YES ! Now just a few more shows ... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's about time bloody time Paramoun! Who would pay $20 for 2 episodes on a VHS/DVD ?? X-Files on DVD did it right from the beginning. Each season for ~ $120.

    Now we just need Babylon 5, Futurama, Deep Space 9, and Red Drawf on DVD and I'd be a happy sci-fi geek! Oh yeah, and the complete Lord of the Rings. ;-)

    1. Re:YES ! Now just a few more shows ... by Gid1 · · Score: 2

      Now we just need Babylon 5, Futurama, Deep Space 9, and Red Drawf on DVD and I'd be a happy sci-fi geek!

      Well, B5 is already on Region 1 DVD, and will (allegedly) be coming to R2 in March. However, it looks like Warner UK is being a bit clueless... one TV movie per £20 disc?!?

    2. Re:YES ! Now just a few more shows ... by Gid1 · · Score: 2

      Okay, before I get flamed, *some* of B5 is on DVD =)

    3. Re:YES ! Now just a few more shows ... by glwtta · · Score: 2

      Now we just need Babylon 5, Futurama, Deep Space 9, and Red Drawf on DVD and I'd be a happy sci-fi geek!

      I have pretty much every single episode of Futurama (some not great quality, though) - it's all over the net. (Hey, it's not sealing if the won't even take your money by not releasing it)

      but yeah B5, DS9 and Red Dwarf - sign me up!

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:YES ! Now just a few more shows ... by etceteral · · Score: 2


      I would pay damn good money if they ever released Max Headroom DVD's....

      --

      ------------
      "...and Maddest of all, to see Life as it Is, and not as it Should Be."

  10. I'll wait for now... by supernova87a · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Although I enjoy watching Star Trek TNG (and none of the other series for some reason), I won't be rushing out to buy this set. I just watched one of the first series episodes on TNN last week, and it was awful -- just like I remember.

    If you want to see bad dialog, melodramatic music, poor lighting, etc. then buy this set. Honestly, I feel a little embarassed for the cast and producers when these first episodes are shown on tv...

    Whenever I watch one of these first episodes, I feel like they were trying so hard, yet it just didn't come out right. There were cheesy props, outlandish plot lines, and the thoughtful issues that made later episodes a success weren't yet developed. I enjoy it more when the stories and cast were subtle and nuanced. These episodes stand out like an ugly sore in TNG's generally good later work.

    I'll wait till the uniforms change -- that's one of the turning points!

    1. Re:I'll wait for now... by Ataeagina · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As you corny as you say the first episodes were (I disagree, but I digress), they are still better than half of the damn crap on tv today.

      --
      We're siamese children created by heart. Nothing, nothing can tear us apart.
    2. Re:I'll wait for now... by glwtta · · Score: 2

      Isn't that a big part of the appeal of the various treks - if they weren't so bad, it just wouldn't be as much fun.

      That btw, does in no way apply to the new one - that's just bad. (Though I've seen all of 20 minutes, so I guess this is a fairly uninformed judgement) I don't know, maybe the difference is the blatant, "relevant" propaganda - the bit I did see had to do with some Vulcan, pacifist temple being overrun by (absolutly ridiculous looking) blue aliens - for some reason it reminded me of a very Huxleyish book I read in highschool, forget the name ("The Giver"? maybe - don't quote me on that) - anyway, the whole thing just reeked of a new low.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    3. Re:I'll wait for now... by yoink! · · Score: 2

      Whenever I watch one of these first episodes, I feel like they were trying so hard, yet it just didn't come out right. There were cheesy props, outlandish plot lines, and the thoughtful issues that made later episodes a success weren't yet developed. I enjoy it more when the stories and cast were subtle and nuanced. These episodes stand out like an ugly sore in TNG's generally good later work.

      Why is it that people always seem to forget how it was that they first learned to like and expect certain behaviours from characters. It seems that for many shows, especially STTNG and The Simpsons, even the most diehard fans hate the first seasons. I still love the first seasons, at times badly done and off the wall, it was during the first two seasons of these shows which people fell in love with; becoming 7 (and 13 respectively) season fans. Admittedly the budgets got higher and since the characters were more developed and understood by the audience there was more room for plot, but it was those critical first few episodes, when we were introduced to our heroes. They are still valuable in this respect.

      And for laughs.

  11. Cost? by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    Has anyone else really thought about these DVD tv episode deals?

    Seems to be a little too much. And when do we get Seinfeld, News Radio, or Night Court?

  12. Complete Seasons on DVD by Champaign · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was really excited initially when I saw they started releasing complete seasons of shows on DVD. Since getting a couple, truth be told, I hardly watch them at all... There's some things that I'm willing to invest the energy to put on and watch, and other things that I'm only willing to pick up when channel surfing.

    The only thing I've found them really valuable for is when someone hasn't seen a series, and I want to show them a few episodes (e.g. The Sopranos). I was delighted to get the first season of "The Simpsons" and tore through the special features, but haven't watched a single episode from it. Something like TNG everyone's seen and I really can't see myself getting a craving to see "Data's Day" and throwing it on...

    Am I a freak or do other people buy these things and not watch them?

    1. Re:Complete Seasons on DVD by Masem · · Score: 2

      I figure that, at some point, I'll have the urge to just watch one episode from the series set, and this makes it easier to find it than VHS and much easier to store. Sure, I might only watch some episodes once ever, but, there will be others that I will watch over and over again.

      --
      "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
      "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
    2. Re:Complete Seasons on DVD by smallpaul · · Score: 2

      No, you're not a freak. I'm the same way. There is something about knowing you can watch it whenever you feel like that makes you never feel like watching it. Part of it is that I feel like I spent money on so I should watch more carefully than I would "regular" TV (e.g. surfing Slashdot over 802.11b while watching).

    3. Re:Complete Seasons on DVD by weave · · Score: 2
      Or worse, owning it (er, licensing it) and then one day flipping channels and finding you're watching it on a broadcast or cable channel anyway.

      Now that's really stupid...

    4. Re:Complete Seasons on DVD by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 2
      This is where you need one of Pioneer's 301 DVD changers, so you can plop in all of the discs and just watch them as the mood strikes (the only inconvenience might be trying to find a specific episode amidst all of the discs). Plus, if this is like their 301 CD changers, you can link them together for a total of 602 DVD's. I agree though, normally when I buy TV shows on DVD, I usually might watch one or two episodes + all the extras, but I figured I'd provide the other option above for those who want to make their investment worthwhile. =)

      (Oh and BTW, the MSRP on that 301 changer is $1100 right now, but I'm sure you can a) find it cheaper on StreetPrices.com or b) wait for them to realize that the technology is the same as they used in their 301 CD changer, and lower the price accordingly.)

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
  13. Months TNG DVDs will be released by bigdreamer · · Score: 3, Informative

    A new season will be released every other month

    March 2002: Season 1
    May 2002: Season 2
    July 2002: Season 3
    Septemeber 2002: Season 4
    November 2002: Season 5
    January 2003: Season 6
    March 2003: Season 7

    I can only afford 1 season. Which one should I get for my Dad? He likes them all.

    1. Re:Months TNG DVDs will be released by bytor4232 · · Score: 5, Informative
      I would say season 5 has to be one of the best:
      1. "Unification" with Leonard Nemoy was great. I love Picard calling Spock a "Cowboy Diplomat.".
      2. "Cause and Effect" is great as well, wonderful concept of "causality" loop made for a great story.
      3. "First Duty" was another good one, if for nothing but seeing Wes in the hot seat.
      4. "I Borg" with the borg "Hugh" becoming an individual was a great episode
      5. "The Next Phase" is another good episode, as much of a weenie Geordi was, this was a good one with Geordi as one of the primary stars.
      6. "The Inner Light" is my all time favorite episode. This is the one where a probe imprints Picard with all the experiences and trials of an entire society by making Picard live a life of one of the peoples.
      There are other episodes as well. I felt this was the pinnacle of their acting and story development. Don't get me wrong thou, seasons six and seven are awesome as well.
      --
      -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
    2. Re:Months TNG DVDs will be released by Restil · · Score: 2

      "Disaster" was one of my favorite episodes. Any event where EVERYTHING breaks down, massive confustion, and the simple issues of rank vs. experience, brings out more development in the characters and shows how people really hold up in a crisis.

      Dianna taking command of the ship because she was the senior officer present, although she had no idea what to do.

      Worf having to deliver a baby because he was the only one present with the necessary basic medical training.

      Data having to sacrifice himself (potentially) in order to achieve their goal.

      And Picard being stuck in a turboshaft, wounded with three crying children. Ultimately his worst nightmare come true.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    3. Re:Months TNG DVDs will be released by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which one should I get for my Dad? He likes them all.


      Well, I'm not exactly objective here, but I think the 4th season was the best one. I can't quote you titles and guest stars (and I'm sure I'll catch hell for that), but I thought we had more winners than losers that year.

      And, of course, in a flash of brilliance, I chose to celebrate that streak of great shows by quitting.

    4. Re:Months TNG DVDs will be released by dbolger · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can't quote you titles and guest stars (and I'm sure I'll catch hell for that)...
      Wil you need to learn the art of the "Google search". Without it, I'd appear at least 50% stupider on Slashdot than I already do ;)

  14. I was such a TNG addict back in the day by Y-Crate · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But somehow, watching them years later, especially after going through the entire run of B5 and being a bit older, I find that many of the episodes really, really suck badly.

    They simply don't hold up well at all.

    And while the first season of most shows usually pretty weak, I find it took a long time for TNG to really get anywhere. The early episodes of the first season are especially painful and I find them completely unwatchable.

    I'll just pass on the DVDs and remember TNG for how I saw it then and avoid any reruns. Let the pleasent memories remain.

    1. Re:I was such a TNG addict back in the day by slavetrade55 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, TNG had some poor, poor moments. Does anyone remember:

      "Ach! lassie, ye canna keep that haunted candle!"

      ;)

      --RMT

    2. Re:I was such a TNG addict back in the day by Restil · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the problem, primarily with the next generation, is it's just too..... campy. There's no internal conflict. Concepts of a 14 year old boy at the helm seem to go over perfectly with the rest of the crew, many who have spent years and years in training for just such a privalage. People that spend 7 years doing the exact same job and never getting promoted.

      At least DS9 had elements to it which made it more realistic (as realistic as sci-fi can get anyways) and had more interesting story arcs around several common themes. It allowed them to have more character development, and people actually went somewhere.

      We see Nog start the series as a juvinile delinquent and over the years become a respected officer in startfleet. The most growth that any characters show in TNG is Data, and thats for little more than very poorly done comic relief.

      The battles are more intense. Civilians actually get scared when things start blowing up around them. Children of captains somehow don't always aspire to join Starfleet. And sometimes, your most powerful allies are dishonest assassins who used to work for the other side, and if not for exile would gladly join up with them again.

      MUCH more realistic in my opinion.

      -Restil

      --
      Play with my webcams and lights here
    3. Re:I was such a TNG addict back in the day by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Why the hell is everyone cheesing TNG so much?


      Well, it was OK, but then ST:Voyager came along and raised /hack/ the bar /gasp/...


      Oh, darn, I almost said it with a straight face... :)

    4. Re:I was such a TNG addict back in the day by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Funny
      "We see Nog start the series as a juvinile delinquent and over the years become a respected officer in startfleet. The most growth that any characters show in TNG is Data, and thats for little more than very poorly done comic relief. "

      And what about Data's cat Spot? That cat had more changes than any other character since it seemed to change gender more than once! In the episode "Genesis" it gave birth, but then again in "Generations" they refer to Spot as "he" several times.

    5. Re:I was such a TNG addict back in the day by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Well, it was OK, but then ST:Voyager came along and raised /hack/ the bar /gasp/.. Nah, that was 7 of 9, and Torres running around in her Starfleet Issue tank top...

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    6. Re:I was such a TNG addict back in the day by Junta · · Score: 2

      Ok, so you are saying seeing Wesley at the Helm of the enterprise caused you to skip class and work instead? Now either this is really stupid, and if true, well, I have no idea what to think of you... I would imagine that the scenario in TNG was more along the lines of how time worked in the Simpsons. Aside from the unavoidable aging of the real actors, it seems that while time passes and there is some cause and effect between episodes, the structure is in a sort of suspended animation and time doesn't really pass that much, or at least time doesn't factor into the writing that much.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  15. Damn. by lnxslak · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    We are the MPAA, We will add your money and individuality to our own. Resistance is futile.

    damn.

    lnxslak.

    --
    Fighting for Peace, is like Fucking for Virginity.
  16. Advantages of TNN image squashing by yerricde · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can you explain this "image squashing technology" for us non-Americans? Do they change the aspect ratio?

    TNN (The National Network, formerly The Nashville Network before Viacom bought it, moved all its programming to CMT, and turned TNN into a TBS/USA clone) vertically scales the image on many of its shows into the top 6/7 or so of US TV's 240 visible scanlines. In the bottom 1/7, TNN displays its logo and unobtrusive textual advertisements. Good points: It lets TNN go longer without a commercial interruption, it moves the captions out of the way of the picture, and it's easily switched off for broadcasting letterboxed feature films. Bad point: It modifies the image.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Advantages of TNN image squashing by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3

      If you use something like dscaler to watch TV and combine that with a window resizing program that can stretch windows off-screen like YxY, then it would be trivial to stretch the image back to the right proportion and then put the "ad-bar" off the bottom of the screen. If you don't watch TV on your computer you are probably SOL, but lots of people have got them hooked up to their projection systems and HDTV sets. This is an MS-Windows based solution though....

      dscaler
      YxY

      (you might not even need YxY with the more recent versions of dscaler).

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  17. Can we can an official comment... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    from Will Wheaton?

    How does he feel about bringing back those childhood nightmares of being Mr Crusher?

  18. Legality Issues by LeiraHoward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    What in the world are you people thinking? One of the reasons these companies have to make their products cost so much is so they actually make a profit. Every illegal copy takes away from that.

    I know Star Trek is a huge enterprise (pun intended) now, but there are still a lot of people out there who worked really hard on the project, and deserve to get a bit of reward for their work.

    My general rule of thumb for file copying is this: do I take income away from the owners of the copyright? For instance, when you watch TV and videotape an episode, the television company has already paid for the rights for the episode to be shown. So you're not taking anything away from the company. However, if they make a special high-quality DVD edition, and you just copy it, they are losing the money they would have gotten if you rented or *gasp* even bought it.

    $100 for a season isn't that unreasonable. It works out to something like $3.50-$4.50 per episode, which is not that hard for you all to do. If you really want them, save your money and buy it! It works out to less than $2/day if each season comes out every two months. Not that hard to do, folks. I know some people who put more than that in the vending machines at work!

    Besides which, once you figure in the price of your internet connection, and purchasing CDs to burn the data on, you really aren't saving that much money, but you're getting an inferior quality ripped file!

    As for me, I think I'll start saving my money now. That extra footage bit sounds cool!

    1. Re:Legality Issues by Dudio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of the reasons these companies have to make their products cost so much is so they actually make a profit. Every illegal copy takes away from that.

      Let's not forget production costs, which I seem to recall reading were in the range of $1 million/episode for TNG. Also, I think the actual monetary loss to the studios as a result of personal copying is a lot less than the industry would have you believe. The people who d/l ripped copies generally do so for one of three reasons: (1) they can't afford to buy the commercial product; (2) they refuse to buy the commercial product, but wouldn't mind having a copy lying around; (3) they want to check out the product before deciding whether to buy it. Generally, people who want the product and can afford it will buy it. Granted, there are people who will decide not to buy the product if they can get a reasonable copy for free, but with TNN running two episodes of TNG a day, most of those people will just set their VCRs and be done with it.

    2. Re:Legality Issues by Phexro · · Score: 4, Insightful
      what in the world are you thinking? there are only a few reasons to buy a tv series on dvd:

      • extra features
      • higher quality than tv
      • you're a rampaging collector


      the extra features usually aren't pirated, just the main feature.

      the difference in quality between cable (or digital cable) broadcasts and the dvd probably isn't noticeable after it's been compressed with divx, and if you're a rampaging collector, you'll buy the dvd anyways. and in most cases it would be to replace the collection of vhs tapes that the shows were recorded on, or to pick up that one episode from season n that they're missing.

      they broadcast the episodes for free for chrissakes. i'd feel just as bad about downloading the episodes as i would asking a friend to tape the show for me.
    3. Re:Legality Issues by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      You forgot the best two reasons: uncut episodes, and THE OTHER SERIES YOU WANT ON DVD LATER.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:Legality Issues by cancrman · · Score: 2

      Word.

      You might classify me as the 'rampaging collector' type, but I love DVD TV collections. Sitting on my shelf I have Sopranos, Simpsons, X-Files, Sex and the City, Friends, Robotech and The Awful Truth (Buffy season 1 comes on Tuesday). I would love to add more to that collection. I want to see '24', the Tick animated series and other such things out there.

      I'm not against 'piracy' per se. I've bought literally 100x more CDs in the past two years because of Napster/Morpheus than I would have bought with out them. TV is different becuse you can see TNG episodes every day if you want to but Trek fans are rabid. Anyway I'm rambling so....

      Pete

      --
      The sole purpose of the Internet is to get porn and bomb making plans into the hands of children.
  19. Uh huh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful



    Slashdot (to MPAA): You fucking fascists. We hate you.
    MPAA: But look at these shiny colors!
    Slashdot: Oooh! How much?

    1. Re:Uh huh. by HydroCarbon10 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and then there's the ever popular:

      Slashdot (to Microsoft): We hate you, go away!
      Microsoft: But we've got DOA3 with realistic bouncing women
      *slashdot hands over it's collective soul

      Go ahead, mod this down. You know, deep down, that you are spineless and have sold out your beliefs for entertainment.

      --
      The best way to accelerate a windows box is at 9.8 meters per second square.
  20. Why so much? by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 2

    DVDs of the 2nd season of Sex In The City (from HBO), 18 episodes, is $37.48 at Amazon.com (and fits on 3 DVDs). Sorry, but 26 episodes should under no circumstances cost this much. I would love to own some of the later seasons, but $100 is ridiculous. Making the licensee even more greedy is the fact that HBO is selling at that price without any additional income coming in on the show's balance sheets from syndication rights. Paramount, on the other hand... Sigh.

    1. Re:Why so much? by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 2

      Ok, comment withdrawn. I thought Sex In The City was an hour show. It's not. I still think they could knock $25-30 off the price by not putting it in "collector" packaging, but it's not as much of a rip-off as I thought. :-)

  21. *$700* for the entire run? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would probably be cheaper to put together a cheap computer and a month of broadband internet to download them all in divx...

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  22. Re:THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS!! by erpbridge · · Score: 2, Informative

    Chain Of Command, parts 1 and 2
    Season 6

  23. Re:Paramount gets it right. by servasius_jr · · Score: 4, Informative

    Is Enterprise still on? Did it even make it past the first six episodes?

    Um, yes. This is an honest question.


    Yup. New episodes in January, I believe. I think those pouty Vulcan lips will keep the show going long enough to hit its stride and attract a following. With some luck, they'll rethink the music.

  24. Can't they count? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why can't they manage to get the shows in order on the DVD's?

    Disc 1: Encounter at Farpoint Parts 1 & 2 (episodes 101, 102), The Naked Now (103), Code of Honor (104)

    Disc 2: The Last Outpost (107), Where No One Has Gone Before (106), Lonely Among Us (108), Justice (109)

    Disc 3: The Battle (110), Hide and Q (111), Haven (105), The Big Goodbye (113)

    Disc 4: DataLore (114), Angel One (115), 11001001 (116), Too Short a Season (112)

    Disc 5: When the Bough Breaks (118), Home Soil (117), Coming of Age (119), Heart of Glory (120)

    Disc 6: The Arsenal of Freedom (121), Symbiosis (123), Skin of Evil (122), We'll Always Have Paris (124)

    Disc 7: Conspiracy (125), The Neutral Zone (126), Special Features

    1. Re:Can't they count? by glwtta · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, syndicated shows are often not show in order (various issues with production schedules and the individual stations broadcasting them) and that order is often corrected when they come out on video.

      I certainly don't know if that's the case here, but it's not unheard of.

      What I am wondering is why they only put 4 episodes per disc - minus the commercials an episode is what, 40 minutes or so? They gotta be able to fit more on a DVD, or did they leave the commercial in? ;)

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    2. Re:Can't they count? by SirNarfsALot · · Score: 2, Informative

      The order the shows are listed in is the order in which they originally aired. The numbers attached to each refer to the order in which they were filmed. For example, Symbiosis (123) was filmed after Skin of Evil (122) and Denise Crosby appears in both, despite Yar's death in Skin of Evil. If the shows were in order of production there would be many more continuity problems to whine about. The first season is generally the worst about this sort of thing; later seasons were filmed more or less in order.

    3. Re:Can't they count? by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 4, Informative
      A dual layer DVD can (according to DVD Demystified) hold over 4 hours of high quality video-- each episode was 45 minutes (commercial free). 240 minutes / 45 minutes = 5.333. They could have fit 5 episodes per disc, with room to spare for the teaser commercials as a per-disc extra. And actually, the author says "over 4 hours" but not by how much.. if it was 4.5 hours, they could have fit 6 episodes possibly per disc. =)

      The only problem is that dual layer discs have that 'layer transition' effect on certain older or low-cost DVD players (the images freezes for a split second while it switches layers).

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    4. Re:Can't they count? by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 2

      Uh, the BOOK (which is what I was referencing) says "four hours of high quality video". He was, in that context, discussing high-quality DVD-quality video (the 720x480 variety at a good bitrate). Four hours, with my friend Math, is very reasonable and still uses a decent bitrate (only if you're using CBR, not VBR, would you only be able to fit 107 minutes of content at 10.08 Mbps). VBR takes into account the large amount of static content that can sometimes appear in video, and reduces the bitrate to conserve space.

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    5. Re:Can't they count? by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 3, Informative

      Shrug, the guy only wrote the DVD-FAQ, and the books been copyrighted for 2001. His FAQ is updated regularly, and has in fact been updated in the past week or so. I direct you to these FAQ entries, and you can decide from there if I'm right or wrong (I really could care less either way, I'm happy ST:TNG is making it out on DVD, be it 3 episodes per disc, 4, or 5)--

      http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html#1.21 - [1.21] Why do some discs require side flipping? Can't DVDs hold four hours per side?

      You might also find this question educational--

      http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html#3.3 - [3.3] What are the sizes and capacities of DVD?

      Yes, there are situations where this is false, after all, it IS VARIABLE BIT RATE encoding; but generally speaking, four hours of high quality video is possible on a single side dual layer DVD. If The X-Files has poor quality, I'd lay this at the feet of poor encoding practices (or simply someone lazy at Fox). As you said, it's definately not something that's easy (encoding MPEG2 properly) but it has been done. Plus, and I've noticed this on a number of DVD titles (movies and TV shows), for whatever reason, MPEG2 ruins dark sequences (which I imagine The X-Files has a lot of-- I stopped watching after the sixth season or so). This might be the nature of the beast, or it might be lazy encoders. =) I'm not going to pretend to know.

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
  25. Cliffhangers. by bytor4232 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a great concept, if for nothing else but the marketing involved. At the end of every season after the second one, there was a season finale cliffhanger. You will get to the last DVD in the series and go, "well dang, I gotta have the next season!" Then you run out and pop down another C-note!

    --
    -- 4 8 15 16 23 42
  26. So the upshot is... by glwtta · · Score: 2

    that every episode will be divxified and all over gnutella (and the like) within days after each season's release, right?

    Hey, I am all for supporting stuff I like, but close to $1K (how many seasons were there, anyway?) is a bit much to rewatch TNG again... Now, DS9 I'll pay for, if/when they put that out on DVD.

    Incidentally, this would be perfect for digital distribution though - I doubt many people will buy even several seasons at this price, and $100 is probably as low as they can get, all things considered (most shows are about $160-$180/season if I recall correctly; but that's all from VHS days - 7 DVDs gotta be less expensive than 12 tapes), but I am sure a lot more people would pay, let's say, $30ish per season to download (that's download, not stream) high quality mpegs (let's say VCD compliant, to make that road to the DVD player from the PC that much easier) of one season, from a reasonably fast server. Hell, I would, and I am willing to wager that in fact they'd end up making a lot more money off of it that way.

    If only there was a way to sort out this digital distribution/rights management debacle without making it feel like the consumer is taking it up the ass.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
    1. Re:So the upshot is... by glwtta · · Score: 2

      ...or is this one of those "I don't like it enough to buy it" deals?

      Yes, most definitely it is. I would never, ever (ever) spend $700 to watch TNG again (btw, they got theirs by cramming the commercials in there the first time I watched it), but if there's another way to do it - win it in a giveaway or maybe a friend has it, or maybe it's all over the net - then yeah I'll do it. And since the first option is unlikely and I don't have any friends, then the last one it is.

      Fucking theft justifiers. You make me sick.

      I wasn't justifying jack, if you'd care to pay attention - if it's theft, fine (though in my case they don't loose anything by it, but I won't really say that since you might see it as an excuse or something). A nice bonus is that I think television is a scourge on society and hate the guts of most companies behind it, but that's probably besides the point.

      In any case, like I said during that rant in my original post - until this whole digital media debacle (from now on referred to as the DMD) is sorted out to everyone's reasonable satisfaction (which is possible, but highly unlikely) it's a free for all out there - they (media "copyright holders") fuck us with horizontal, and soon, vertical monopolies and exorbitant prices, we fuck back by stealing their shit. So fuck 'em. And I am sure as hell not justifying anything I do or not do, to you - so, fuck you too!

      (was that expressive enough of my feelings on the subject?)

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  27. Re:No widescreen? by hogsback · · Score: 2, Informative

    According the this it was filmed full-frame.

  28. Re:TNT does not maintain aspect ratio by JohnG · · Score: 2
    This is part of the reason that I quit watching MTV years ago, the other reasons include that I grew up and oh yeah the music went to shite.


    MTV Plays music?! ;-)

  29. Where's the postscript TNG Episode Guide? by Deagol · · Score: 2
    Funny this topic should come up. After making the TNN Star Trek think a regular habit, I hunted down an old resource: http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/st-tng

    This episode guide has been a great thing, at least while I'm online.

    But I can't find the old Vidiot Postscript version that killed so many trees while I was in college. I mean, printing that puppy up on a nice color laser would be a great companion to this DVD set!

  30. Outtakes / Bloopers? by instinctdesign · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't see them on the feature list, dang... that would have made this one really worth having. Perhaps we might get lucky and see some on the upcoming sets.

    I'm not sure if this is true or not, but I kinda remember reading that there are a host of licensing issues surrounding outtakes and bloopers hence the lack of any released tapes. I have a short mpeg of a few from Voyager, DS9, and TNG and they are great! You can find them on Kazaa (gotta love spyware...) since I doubt my host would be too impressed if I were to host them off my site.

    --
    forma3
    1. Re:Outtakes / Bloopers? by bnavarro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know about TNG, but apparantly with each season of Voyager's bloopers, these were compiled onto a tape, played at the season wrap party, and then destroyed. They decided that the bloopers would be reserved for the cast & crew's (one time) enjoyment only.

      A shame too. I read an interview with Jeri Ryan (7 of 9) once, and she gave an anecdote of an amusing blooper where Garret Wang (Ensign Kim) was supposed to grab her elbow to get her attention. She miscued and turned to face him too early, and Garret wound up accidentally grabbing her boob! Apparantly there were many "That's not an elbow" jokes on the set from that point on...

  31. Re:No widescreen? by AnalogBoy · · Score: 2
    Enterprise is presented in Widescreen.

    • UPN is showing Enterprise in the 16 x 9 ratio in anticipation of the advent of High Definition television. This format, with more picture and better clarity, will eventually replace TV viewing as it exists now in the more limiting 4 x 3 aspect ratio.
      -- from FAQ at www.startrek.com
  32. Re:More Wil Wheaton! by tunesmith · · Score: 2
    Didn't you hear? Wil is cool now. You are sooooooo out of touch. ;-)

    --
    skkkoooonnnggggkkk ptui
  33. Actor hopes to do DVD commentary track by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if they'll return my calls on this one?
    *grin*

    1. Re:Actor hopes to do DVD commentary track by sid_vicious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hmmmm.. here's an idea...

      Rent the DVD and while watching it, simultaneously record your *own* commentary track on your PC. MP3 it and sell it to geeks on your website for oh, I dunno, $7. Then we can just hit 'mute' and queue up the MP3 while watching the DVD.

      Heck, I'll pay $10 if you'll do an imitation of Marinia Sirtis. Make it $15 if you throw in a passable William "F'ing" Shatner.

      :-)

      --
      If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet.
    2. Re:Actor hopes to do DVD commentary track by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I don't mean to be rude, and I do enjoy your posts around here (particularly on Star Trek-related subjects), but the "actor seeks work" joke is getting pretty old. This is what, like the fifth time?

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    3. Re:Actor hopes to do DVD commentary track by CleverNickName · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're right...I think it's the fourth time, and it's really played out...I just couldn't resist, this time...all things considered, and what not. :)

    4. Re:Actor hopes to do DVD commentary track by Monkeyman334 · · Score: 2

      Heck, I'll pay $10 if you'll do an imitation of Marinia Sirtis. Make it $15 if you throw in a passable William "F'ing" Shatner.

      Wait, I think your job search ends here! I like this idea. I'd pay $20 if you do a good impression of my chemistry teacher. I'll give you $30 if you do .. my ex girlfriend. But I don't think you should do a flat rate thing. You could auction it off on your site. If someone offered to pay $21 for their chemistry teacher, I would do $21.50, maybe. Think about it.

    5. Re:Actor hopes to do DVD commentary track by DoorFrame · · Score: 2

      in all fairness, this isn't the sad out-of-work-actor joke, this is an entirely new dvd-related commentary joke... not neccessarily related to being out of work.

      i'll give him credit, it was pretty funny.

    6. Re:Actor hopes to do DVD commentary track by merlin_jim · · Score: 3

      That is where you are wrong my friend! The actor seeks work joke will never be old!!!

      Sorry, just had to pipe in real quick.

      --
      I am disrespectful to dirt! Can you see that I am serious?!
    7. Re:Actor hopes to do DVD commentary track by daeley · · Score: 2

      Do we really want Wil -- heck, anybody -- to reprise the infamous spoken-word 'Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds'? :)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    8. Re:Actor hopes to do DVD commentary track by daeley · · Score: 2

      I don't know, Wil. Not after that Roxanne Dawson / Weakest Link incident. ;-)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    9. Re:Actor hopes to do DVD commentary track by yamla · · Score: 2

      This is _brilliant_! What a wonderful idea! Really, I'd pay money for this. Low production costs, low distribution costs (the MP3s would compress really well), low overhead. I like it a lot!

      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    10. Re:Actor hopes to do DVD commentary track by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, what are you trying to do? Corner the market on yourself? Or maybe you're hoping to buy up all this stuff, so future generations won't know it ever existed?


      Dude.

      How could I pass up the opportunity to own one of the worst movies ever made? It's like finding "Plan 9 from Outer Space" or the remakes of "Planet of the Apes" or "Psycho"...like a terrible car crash, I can't tear my eyes away...I just happen to be involved in this particular pile of stinking crap, and, believe it or not, I don't already own it...and I'm pretty sure that a DVD version is not on the way.

      ObTrek: Tonight on TNN, I got to hear Worf say my favorite Worfism of all time: "I am not a merry man!"

  34. Re:Rejection is one thing... by Sethb · · Score: 2

    That would be handy, but then you'd be twice as pissed when the same moderator who disses your story on Thursday posts the story two days later. At least I can understand two people having different opinions of whether or not a story is news, but when it's the same person, it just seems so arbitrary...

    --
    When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout. --Robert A. Heinlein
  35. The worst part of the new show by Pope+Slackman · · Score: 2

    Is the new theme song.

    Rock
    the
    fucking
    mullet.

    C-X C-S

  36. Re:No widescreen? by Macgruder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The order on the CD's match the order the episodes were written, not produced.

    In other words, this is the sequence the writers thought they should be.

    --
    I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
  37. Re:Months TNG DVDs will be released (OT) by etceteral · · Score: 2

    Season 5 *was* definitely one of the best seasons, (though I think you missed Darmok on that list :) )...

    .. But my all-time favorite episode had to have been "Frame of Mind." (When Riker is convinced he's going insane.) I loved the surreal ones - and that one definitely takes the cake for that label!

    --

    ------------
    "...and Maddest of all, to see Life as it Is, and not as it Should Be."

  38. Re:Bab5 coming? by Leeto2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Step 1. www.warnerbros.com
    Step 2. Do a search for Babylon 5 under DVD heading.
    Step 3. Fork over dough for intro movie. Cost = 14 + 4 Shipping. $18.00 total.
    Step 4. Begin saving dough to buy Seasons if / when they come out.
    L2

    --



    "That's no moon"... Obi-Wan Kenobi
  39. Re:Idea by KILNA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I may want to watch the boob tube and have it serve up content I may actually want to watch (i.e., from my collection), but maybe not something I want to bother to choose specifically (how often do you really set out to watch something like first season TNG, but one cannot help entranced by it when it comes on, if only for the mockery factor). Its just plain un-American to not enjoy flipping channels.

    Regarding not having a life, think about how much less of a life I have than you, seeing as you're going around pointing fingers at all the people who supposedly don't have a life. On a slashdot article. Regarding Star Trek. Anonymously.

    Yeah, I may be a geek, but at least I realize it. :)

    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  40. Re:Paramount gets it right. by Alsee · · Score: 2

    With some luck, they'll rethink the music.

    I want them to do something to the music alright,
    but I'd have said something much more elaborate and graphic than "rethink".

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  41. Widescreen TV shows by sph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    About the only Widescreen TV show I can think of is B5. Are there many others?

    Yes there are, though B5 was basically the first one, the other pioneer being Lois & Clark. Some other shows that I know of include ER (from season 6, I think), NYPD Blue (from season 8), Sopranos, Buffy (from season 4), Angel... Neither TNG, DS9 nor Voyager were widescreen, Enterprise is the first one in Star Trek franchise. Come to think of it, most of recent television shows with budget have been moving to widescreen, though television broadcast versions may still be pan&scan. Widescreen is the future way, and now there no point making shows that will have black bars on left and right in 5-10 years.

    Actually, most of European TV productions, even low-budget ones, have been widescreen for years already.

    And back to B5... It's a rather complicated example when it comes to widescreen. While live action was filmed widescreen with Super35 process, almost all CGI and composite shots were done in 4:3 (except for the last few episodes). Therefore all the CGI and composite shots must be cropped from top and/or bottom for widescreen version. Also there will be definite resolution loss when making anamorphic widescreen masters, because the original rendering was made for NTSC resolution. There is a long analysis of all the problems involved here.

  42. [OT] Lord of the Rings by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 2

    I HOPE when they do this movie that they AVOID what was done with Pearl Harbor-- splitting the movie across two discs. That was inexcusable in my mind, and could have been avoided (there's what, three audio tracks for Pearl Harbor? DROP one or two of them, and include only the Dolby Digital 5.1 and the Dolby Stereo 2.0 (release a seperate DTS DVD, if need be)). Blech, icky.

    --
    All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
    1. Re:[OT] Lord of the Rings by DarkEdgeX · · Score: 2

      Shrug, the problem isn't with their video encoding method, the problem is with the numerous audio tracks packed along-- had they left only the bare minimum in audio tracks (and subsequently offered a seperate DTS release) the whole damn thing would have likely fit. Hell, here's what I got from DVD Empire for an audio track listing--

      Audio:
      ENGLISH: Dolby Digital 5.1 [CC]
      ENGLISH: DTS 5.1 [CC]
      FRENCH: Dolby Digital 5.1

      So, they included the DTS version of the audio and the FRENCH version of the DD 5.1 audio.. both of which could have easily been dropped in favor of 1) a seperate DTS release (other DVDs do this, why not this one?) and 2) a seperate French release for Canadians that might be buying it.

      I haven't done the math, but I'm willing to guess that with those dropped, the other discs content might have fitted (that and a less liberal use of bitrate). Dual sided would have made more sense, I agree, but when you can fit 4 hours of high quality video on a single-sided dual layer DVD, it makes no sense to span sides OR discs...

      --
      All I know about Bush is I had a good job when Clinton was president.
  43. To be or not to be... by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 2

    Coolness! I've been waiting for this for a long time, and it even looks like they're doing it right by not putting a mere 2 episodes on a disk. (It's still a bit pricy, but not as extortionary as it could have been.)

    Oh, wait, I don't buy DVDs on principle. Damn you moral code!!!

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

  44. impersonation by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'd pay 20 to hear you dub over the DVD's with your own special impersonation of Picard.

    Still, my personal favorite Picard impersonation still goes to Jon St. John (The guy behind Duke Nukem) found here

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  45. Re:Why $100? by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    Why charge 50$ a season when you can charge 100$ for a season by your logic. Releasing DVD collections of highly sought after syndicated shows makes you lose money. How many people are going to watch FX every day (theoretically making FX money being subjected to their advertisements) to see their favourite X-Files episode when they can go out and buy it on DVD. The theoretical shrinking of the syndication market by releasing DVD or VHS copies of an entire season needs to be made up for in the eyes of the executives. It is unfair but that is why they do it.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  46. Pear? by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    I thought avacado! Am I alone in this, or is "pear" the consensus?

    Seriously though, why does TNN do the banner-squishing thing? Why can't they just display their logo in the lower right corner, like everybody else?

    More to the point, why do I get the disturbing feeling they're tarketing their trek airings at the - erm - less educated market? I watch star trek: tng, and I see ads for Baywatch, monster trucks, and conspiracy "news" shows. Is the Star Trek demographic changing, or is TNN just on crack? Or are both true?

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  47. No, Tasha Yar's Death is the turning point by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    As soon as she died, I just knew the show would get better! Ugh, butch tomboy who hits on androids - spare me. (Note: I don't care what you say, no one who isn't really drunk would think Yar was sexy in the "Everyone is Wasted" episode.)

    Also, LaForge's promotion greatly improved the quality of the show.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  48. Morality is pointless by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    "Damn you moral code!"

    See, that's why I've adopted the solution I have: Bitch about the MPAA constantly, then buy the DVDs, turn off my brain, and complain on slashdot about how crappy the DVDs are, how eveil copy protection is, and how much I hate the MPAA. It's the best of both worlds! (And not in the bad assimilation way.)

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  49. Oh yeah, of course it does by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    What's low-end soft-core porn without a cheesy soundtrack?

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  50. Re:Paramount gets it right. by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    The music point is dead on... they need to use Creed's latest hit for the theme music. with a smattering of Prodigy and a bit of older NiN.

    Although when they hit the "holodeck episodes" (by finding an alien ship with a holodeck) they can do things like jamming with ICP or the Mansons... Marylin meets the real manson family could be a funny one.

    they NEED to take it out of a death time-slot. and put reruns of that weeks episode on later in the week. (Sunday at 1pm would be a great position)
    oh and do some fricking cross channel advertising! cable adverts cost almost nothing... basically if you have $1500.00 you can get your spot on every high visibility cable channel at a nauseating level for 2 weeks.

    if they dont srart promoting it and paying attention to it..... its dead.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  51. DS9 by akandels · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'd rather see a DS9 release. Baby steps, I guess.

  52. We are not Borg by ajs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hate to be topical, here, but we are not Borg. The "Slashdot Community" is no more a single hive-mind with but a single thought than any other broad-based subculture (I remember someone explaining to me that this is why the gay community has such a hard time getting anything done).

    When you see one article with folks flaming the MPAA and saying that they (MPAA) needs to be stopped, and another which raves about some new DVD, why would you assume that the same people are interested? Slashdot is correctly reporting on "News for Nerds", it's not censoring "cool MPAA stuff" because it would hurt some particular cause any more than its censoring anti-MPAA stuff; nor should they!

    Now, I very much see the value in pointing out to the "ooh, shiny thing" audience that these brand new nifty DVDs are brought to you by the folks who want to stamp out fair use as if it were a plague, but let's not expect that EVERYONE will listen. Many folks who are geeky enough to care about what Slashdot says have no interest in fair use and what it means to them. I consider this their loss, but it's a valid point of view.

  53. X-files DVD collection by Peter+Dyck · · Score: 3, Informative
    Sopranos, Simpsons, X-Files

    I bought X-files 2nd season a while ago but was thoroughly disappointed in it. The package was nice and audio and visual quality was good, but the "usability" of the disc set was abyssmal.

    First of all, when you start watching an episode you're forced to watch the equivalents of the "FBI warning" in at least four languages. After the episode ends, you get to see another four warnings before you get back to the main menu.

    The main menu is my second gripe. I like to watch TV DVDs like I listen to music. I play them in the background, mostly listening and occasionally watching. What I don't want to do is to click through menus every time an episode ends. I want the all episodes to play consequently without any interaction from me. Unfortunately the X-files collection doesn't let you do that. After watching the episode (and the damn warnings) you have to travel all the way back to the main menu and click on the next episode (and watch the warnings again).

    1. Re:X-files DVD collection by friedo · · Score: 2

      That's odd. I have seasons 1 - 4 of The X-Files on DVD and I'm pretty sure the FBI warning only shows up when I first put the disc in, and not when I start each episode.

      I agree it would be nice to have the episodes show continuously though.

    2. Re:X-files DVD collection by Kymermosst · · Score: 2

      I think it might depend on the DVD player... as far as I know, it just has to play them once at disc insertion to meet the MPAA's requirements.

      Some players might do it every time you press play, however, or every time you go to the main menu.

      I could be wrong, though.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.