Slashdot Mirror


Webcomics As Business Model

oddjobs writes "It's not the most groundbreaking article, but the Chicago Tribune does a pretty good job of looking at the state of webcomics-as-business-model. They mention the usual suspects (Marvel, McCloud) but most hopeful is Unbound Comics, which is selling comics collected in Adobe's e-book format. Fans of the 80s book Dalgoda take note."

200 comments

  1. Webcomics business?? by FortKnox · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think that most webcomic writers do what they do for the fun they have drawing/writing comics. I don't think its much of a business thing. Take PVP. Scott gets profit from writing actual comic books (although, I'm sure, he probably gets some good money from the site also).
    And then there's Sluggy Freelance (a GREAT comic if you people havne't read it yet) where he puts collections together and sells them as books.

    I don't think there is much profit in the webcomic business....

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Webcomics business?? by MisterBlister · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, in today's current net climate, you HAVE to make your webcomics somewhat of a business, if they get at all popular (PVP is one example).

      Bandwidth sure isn't free these days...

    2. Re:Webcomics business?? by oddjobs · · Score: 1

      True, right now there's no money in webcomics and it's not much of a business thing.

      However, that's today, and things are changing fast. I don't think you can close the book on the subject. It's not going to be webcomics that change the marketplace anyway: It's going to be the big corporations that want to be paid for the content they put out on the web that will force some kind of viable system on the internet.

      Personally, I take the long view: I hope Odd Jobs gradually starts making money so that when I get ready to retire in 20 years or so, it'll suplement my income.

      Regards, Tim Broderick
      http://oddjobs.keenspace.com

      --
      Someday, all jobs will be Odd Jobs
    3. Re:Webcomics business?? by drakee · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Honestly, I think that is one of the things that makes web cartoons better than print-only comics: They aren't controlled by money.

      Syndicated cartoonists must adhere to some pretty strict guidelines. Their comics are printed in mainstream newspapers, where using the word "gosh" will get you angry letters from blue-haired grannies all around the country.

      Web comics are created under no such restrictions. Anything is fair game- mainstream demographics be damned! As a result, the average webcomic is much more interesting and daring (if much less polished looking) than say, Marmaduke or the Family Circus.

      Anyone can create a web comic- there is even a webhost, keenspace, which will host anyone's comic for free.

      Art can only thrive and evolve when there are artists out there who do it purely for the sake of art. If you do it for the money, you aren't so much an artist, you are an entertainer (which isn't to say that you can't make an entertaining comic).

      Drake Emko
      hackles.org (nerdy animal fun!)

    4. Re:Webcomics business?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like a lot of art forms it is only a relative few who sucessfully make large amounts of money from their chosen art form, the art form itself does not nesessarily guarrantee success even with a good business model. Giving the music industry as an example, a relative few number of musicians make it "big" or even make enough money to support themselves when compared with the large number of people who are musically talented or aspire to do such things. I myself run a web comic, Stars and Steel, which most likely will never even pay for itself, but I always hold out hope, and as stated in another post, is an enjoyable past time anyway. The relative few who do make a living from online comics, such as PVP and Penny-Arcade serve as a goal and reminder of what possibly could be achieved, and given the right business model we may even see the bar lowered, with the more successful comics becoming even more so, with the lower end of the spectrum ,insofar as webcomics are concerned, beginning to be able to pay their bills.

      -M@

    5. Re:Webcomics business?? by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      Bingo.

      The best thing about web-based cartoons is the fact not only are you subject to less censorship, you can do things like very, very long serial stories (long serial stories was the hallmark of the best comic strips from the 1920's to 1950's). This is why Sluggy Freelance carries on that tradition--story arcs like the combo about Riff's time machine going haywire and the Stormbreaker Saga took over half a year to complete from start to finish.

    6. Re:Webcomics business?? by generica1 · · Score: 1

      I am the sysadmin and part-time artist for Friend Bear and I agree that there is not much to profit from with the webcomic world. We run our site with unrestricted free access to our content, on our DSL connection in the basement here in Edmonton. Our DSL is on a static IP, we pay for "business-grade" DSL at our house to keep our provider from blocking our port 80 outgoing packets and unfortunately our domain name is registered through Verisign (although I'm working on getting it transferred). We have few expenses. The DSL costs us about $48 CAD a month, although I would be using it anyway if we weren't running the site here so it's not exactly a "true" expense. The domain name is $29 USD a year. We don't have a problem with bandwidth since the strip isn't huge (not everyone can dig surrealist, MS Paint-drawn crudely sketched strips), but there is a problem: We get told all the time about how we should be selling merchandise and/or accepting donations. I have nothing against a donation based system or selling merchandise - the problem is getting merchandise put together. We have a cafepress link up but it doesn't generate much revenue because CafePress is too expensive, especially to the majority of people who read our strip (Canadians, since our marketing is word-of-mouth only and I'm Canadian). I can't convince people a Friend Bear t-shirt is worth over $30 Canadian. I don't think it is. *grin* Anyway - we have been told by many that we need to make a compilation of our strips in book form and get it published, but I haven't got much of a clue how much money it would cost to start this initiative, or where I'd go about doing it. Does anyone have any suggestions? It's funny because I actually work at a publishing company as a graphics artist/page layout guy, but they probably wouldn't go for putting something like Friend Bear out. It would have a limited distribution and would not make a lot of money. I don't really want advertising on our site, and I don't want the strip to be a big capitalist sell-out, but I would love a way to make enough money for Friend Bear to be my day-job and thus have enough time to put new strips up -all the time-. I have no idea where to start, though. Does anyone?

      --
      JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP JUMP IRRIGATE
  2. Spiderman #1 by ender-iii · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd pay a buck to read Spiderman #1 online.
    But then I'd have to pay a buck to read Spiderman #2.
    And then... how many Spiderman issues are there?

    --
    ender-iii
  3. The cynic in me says by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

    that the e-book format won't go over very well. I would like to think it would but thinking hurts and I have done too much of that today already. I have read the e-book format, and I can honestly say I hated it. There is something about being able to pick up the book (comic or otherwise) and flip through the pages. It seems a little more intimate that way. (OK, waiting for +4 funny post to follow that comment)

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:The cynic in me says by Bonker · · Score: 2

      I don't really agree with you.

      For those who visit my website, you would know that I am a big fan of the Ranma 1/2 anime and manga. Recently, I had the opportunity to obtain a complete, free, fan-translated run of the manga in GIF format. Each page was its own image, and had to be read with a web browser or image viewer like IrfanView (free) or ACDSee (not free).

      Despite the fact that I already have it in a digital format, I continue to pay for the 'legitimate' release of Ranma 1/2 as it comes out, month by month, at $3.95 an issue.

      When I want to re-read a story or figure out a particular reference for a fanstory, however, rather than reaching for the stack of manga... I pop in the CDR containing the digital versions. Not only is it easier for me to read than the text version, it's quicker, you don't have to hunt for issues, etc...

      I've also recently obtained the 'Complete MAD Magazine,' which is a 7 CD set containing every issue of MAD magazine between the first issue in the 50's to around 1998 if I'm correct. True, some of them are dogs, especially the newer once. My old stack of MAD's hasn't been touched since, however.

      If you have indexing of any kind, you can search on that. If not, you can search on filenames. While I think that the current e-book formats, all of which are burdened with copy-protection, are inherently flawed, they have a great deal on print books.

      I especially like the PDB (Palm) format, which can be used with or without copy protection, and allows you to read books on your organizer. With the aid of a few utilities, said PDB files can be easily converted to HTML, Star, Word, or ASCII Text.

      I don't think copy protected e-books will go over very well, but I *do* think that the e-book is only going to get more and more popular.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    2. Re:The cynic in me says by Em+Emalb · · Score: 0

      "I don't really agree with you." 'nough said.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
  4. Not Very Collectible.... by IIOIOOIOO · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well, I think that says it all. They should just contract out like the rest of us content providers.

  5. File sharing by Brightest+Light · · Score: 1
    I think you all know how this is gonna work out...the second somebody downloads it, its gonna be out on morpheus in about 3 seconds. Webcomics arent really for profit, anyhow. Some of the best comics are free (Penny-arcade, Jerkcity, UserFriendly, etc). I really doubt that this is going to work out very well.

    1. Re:File sharing by jarodss · · Score: 2

      Actually Penny-Arcade accepts donations from Pay Pal and From Amazon's Honor system.

      When you make a donation you get stuff, wallpaper mostly, but it's cool stuff.

      They also have mugs on Think-Geek and a book has recently been published.

      Go PA!

    2. Re:File sharing by Suppafly · · Score: 2

      Yeh.. Penny Arcade has a much better approach to it than most places.. they give you the comic for free.. and sell things you might want and if you do decide to give them some money they give you some free stuff as a thankyou.. that much better than the comic sites that start out free, get a bunch of halfway dedicated users and then try to screw them over by switching to a totally pay system thereby alienating the original fans.. I'd even go so far as to speculate that PA probably makes more money in the long run off donations than the sites that charge for everything.. people are often more likely to give more and or more often if its of their own will.. plus the PA book idea was hella cool.. even if their publisher isn't really equiped to get it done on time..

    3. Re:File sharing by rnb · · Score: 1

      I wish Jerkcity would sell stuff. I've thought quite a bit in the past about making my own JC t-shirts, but haven't worked up the gumption to actually do it, yet.

      Regardless, if they sold shirts, I'd buy 'em.

    4. Re:File sharing by The+Cat · · Score: 1

      I think you all know how this is gonna work out...the second somebody downloads it, its gonna be out on morpheus in about 3 seconds.

      Yeah, gotta make sure the author gets warezed out of his $1.

      sigh...

    5. Re:File sharing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you get what comics are... these are comics, not comics strips. Very different things.

  6. Merchandising... by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Quoth Piro from MegaTokyo:

    With our hosting change, our hosting expenses have also gone up dramatically. We don't really know where it will settle out at, but we are keeping our fingers crossed. Before people start asking, we will NOT be asking for donations or having a paypal donation button - MT will survive like any other good property, based on it's ability to sell a reasonable amount of merchandise. If you would like to support MT, please visit our store and buy some swag :)

    Also note Scott Kurtz from PVP, who is selling original sketches for $300-$400 a pop on ebay.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Merchandising... by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Before people start asking, we will NOT be asking for donations or having a paypal donation button

      I don't get these comments, it costs them money but they don't ask for any, or they ask people to buy tchotchkes which are secondary to the actual comic product.

      Why not add a PayPal button? Is it some kind of pride or something, that people might think they are begging? They don't seem to have a problem with banner ads.

      The internet makes it possible for you to say "you can pay if you want, and if you don't that's okay too". Public radio has been working like this for while, why not use the model on the internet?

      I don't read any online comics but there are some free things like TidBITS and heroic stories for which I have gotten into the habit of pay $10-20/yr for as if it was a paper subscription (hell I've read Tidbits since freakin' high school and I feel like I owe them a lot). I'd be willing to pay for stuff like /. too, I pay for stuff that adds value to my life, and I don't care if other people don't pay.

    2. Re:Merchandising... by Woko · · Score: 1

      Quoth Piro from MegaTokyo [megatokyo.com]:
      MT wills urvive like any other good property, based on it's ability to sell a reasonable amount of merchandise. If you would like to support MT, please visit our store and buy some swag :)


      The crazy thing with MT is that the only thing they don't sell is the comic itself in dead-tree format.

      --
      ---
      Silence is consent.
    3. Re:Merchandising... by theancient1 · · Score: 1

      The future of web comics is not PayPal, it's not micropayments, it's product placement. In today's Megatokyo comic, one of the characters has apparently purchased takeout from Wendy's. Think of how much money they could have made if they had offered that placement to the highest bidder!

      They do have a pretty cool poster, though. (A limited edition -- which has sold out.) They should sell more stuff like that. A whole lot of places sell shirts and stuff, but I'm not a huge fan of clothes.

    4. Re:Merchandising... by AvatarADV · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're trolling for dollars, you'd darned well better make sure that your site stays up and that it's always got fresh strips up on time. If somebody donates a buck and you proceed to take a week off, that's not so good, is it? At least with swag, you've got a t-shirt (I own two, which I often wear to work... but I have an odd workplace.)

      In the absence of a donation box, if you need some time away from updates, it's no big deal... technically, you don't OWE the fans anything. (This doesn't mean that it doesn't bug Fred when he skips a day, but what hey, you know what I mean.)

    5. Re:Merchandising... by Puhtronium714 · · Score: 1

      Who modded this up? it seems clear to me that this is a troll that is being posted only to get people believing it to initiate some kind of action against megatokyo. Honestly, this day that this libel has been modded up as 'informative' is a very sad day for us all.

    6. Re:Merchandising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right, it *is* libel. It was much longer than six months.

    7. Re:Merchandising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is why I hate the movies Castaway (Fedex), Dracula 2000 (Virgin), and a bunch of others.

    8. Re:Merchandising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (regarding megatokyo, the colo stowaway:)

      "Who modded this up? it seems clear to me that this is a troll that is being posted only to get people believing it to initiate some kind of action against megatokyo. Honestly, this day that this libel has been modded up as 'informative' is a very sad day for us all."

      A sad day? No way!! I can't stop laughing! Why should I be sad? Anyhoo, who needs to initiate action? They already had to move out and get a real colo where they actually charge you money for bandwidth and rackspace and stuff. Maybe I can explain it better in song format (with apologies to Tom Petty):

      He's an employee, he loves his boss
      Loves anime, and calling in sick
      He's an employee, crazy about fansubs
      Love cartoons, and his boyfriend too

      It's a long day, leeching and sponging
      There's Cat-5, running to his rack
      And he's a bad boy, 'cause he don't even pay for it
      He's a bad boy, for breaking your hearts

      Now he's free
      Freeloading
      Ya he's free
      Freeloading

      Now all the auditors, walking through the cabinets
      Move on down, through the co-lo floor
      And all the bad boys are standing in the shadow
      And the anime fans are home with broken hearts

      Now he's free
      Freeloading
      Ya he's free
      Freeloading

      His site was blacked out for over a weekend
      They want to write his name on a reprimand
      Gonna freeload out into nothing
      Gonna be off the net for awhile

      Now he's free
      Freeloading
      Ya he's free
      Freeloading..........

    9. Re:Merchandising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hosting you
      Isn't the right thing to do
      How can I ever charge for things
      That you use

      If I could
      Maybe I'd make you a deal
      How can I
      When you'd rather just steal

      You can get your own host
      Get your own host
      You can call it
      Another hardware failure
      You can get your own host
      Get your own host

      Tell me why
      Everything got shut down
      Racking up
      Shacking up is all you wanna do

      If I could
      Maybe I'd give you a discount
      Open up
      Bandwidth bills are waiting for you

      You can get your own host
      Get your own host
      You can call it
      Moving earlier than expected
      You can get your own host
      Get your own host

    10. Re:Merchandising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hosting you
      Isn't the right thing to do
      How can I ever charge for things
      That you use

      If I could
      Maybe I'd make you a deal
      How can I
      When you'd rather just steal

      You can get your own host
      Get your own host
      You can call it
      Another hardware failure
      You can get your own host
      Get your own host

      Tell me why
      Everything got shut down
      Racking up
      Shacking up is all you wanna do

      If I could
      Maybe I'd give you a discount
      Open up
      Bandwidth bills are waiting for you

      You can get your own host
      Get your own host
      You can call it
      Moving earlier than expected
      You can get your own host
      Get your own host

    11. Re:Merchandising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You woke up this morning
      The switchport was turned off
      Mama always said you'd be
      A big jag-off

      She said: You got eight million
      Hits in one month alone
      But you were born under a bad sign
      And you can't even spell 'fone'

      You woke up this morning
      All the bandwidth's gone
      Your papa never told you
      About right and wrong

      But you're looking good, Largo
      I believe you're feeling fine
      Born under an "all you can eat" sign
      With a big ole chocolate pie

      You woke up this morning
      Megatokyo was down
      Things ain't been the same
      Since it got booted out of town

      But it had a zillion hits
      It had that cartoon shine
      Born under an "all you can eat" sign
      With a big old chocolate pie

      When you woke up this morning "The server could not be found"
      By half past ten your Outlook was going ding-dong
      Ringing like a bell from your head down to your toes
      Like a voice-mail telling you there was something you should know
      Last night it was working but now it won't respond to pings
      Ain't it times like these that make you wonder about free things
      And how expensive they are for others
      Don't you wish you didn't eat so much
      And buy barrels of M-and-M's with your whole next paycheck
      Well you do so make up your mind to move on
      'Cos when you woke up this morning your whole website was gone

      When you woke up this morning...

    12. Re:Merchandising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The crazy thing with MT is that the only thing they don't sell is the comic itself in dead-tree format.

      but havent you been reading Fred's rants? the dead-tree format is next, in all its high-res glory. ^_^

      ~spiku

    13. Re:Merchandising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait till they do a book, I'll be a dozen copies and sell them on ebay after I get them signed and they're out of print...

      then I'll retire :)

    14. Re:Merchandising... by wetwire · · Score: 1

      that's because begging for money (regardless of how fantastic a comic you are giving away, and MT is fantastic) is not a business model. It's a lifestyle.

      --
      sig
    15. Re:Merchandising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was, in fact, a form of humour.

  7. Merchandise. by eAndroid · · Score: 5, Informative

    I run an online web comic. But it's the sunday funnies type, not the comic book/novel type. My business model (once up and running, sigh) is to sell merchandise.

    Thanks to Cafe Press this is really, really easy to do. They are legit to - I've made real money selling merch for my band. Of course with the cut they take, it had better be legit!

    --

    I can't spell or type, but that doesn't mean I'm unusually stupid.
    1. Re:Merchandise. by ywwg · · Score: 1

      geez, you're not going to make any money if you don't even pimp your own comic!

    2. Re:Merchandise. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      I presume it's http://www.cowcomics.com, though it does seem to be transitional.

    3. Re:Merchandise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn that's some brutal "HTML"...

      <body bgcolor='#ff0000'>
      <BR>
      <BR>
      <h1>Where have all the co-ows gone--?</h1>
      check heagy.com -- this stuff is gettin' re designed yall.
      <BR><BR><BR>
      <b>--nathan</b>

    4. Re:Merchandise. by Saeger · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You should also check out Zazzle.com. They'll manufacture and next-day ship your stuff for you.

      They're still in beta atm, so use the "backdoor" to check them out instead.

      I do question their 12% royalty though -- I'd rather they be more upfront about their costs so that you could figure who is getting the shorter end of the profit stick.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    5. Re:Merchandise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, an intelligent business model: Sell real, limited goods while providing intangible, infinitely reproducible information for free.

      Sounds like there are one or two intelligent merchants left in our computerized world...

    6. Re:Merchandise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If zazzle pays out a 12% royalty, then at least 12% of the product's price has to be profit. For it to be a 50/50 profit split, at least 24% of the merchandise you are buying will be margin. In reality, they'll be taking a larger cut in order to cover their costs, rather than it coming out of their half, so the crap they are sell'n will be 50% or more margin, and you get 12% of it. That is still a very good deal unless you would rather go it alone without the benefit of their economy of scale.

  8. DotComics are great by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I must say that Marvel's DotComics are great. There's no way I'd be paying out the monthly $$$ to buy Spiderman Unlimited, X-Men Unlimited and/or any other comics. I'd more likely just forget about following comics. But their DotComics lets me browse select comics for free. I have to put up with a few ads which (with the exception of one that has sound) aren't too annoying. I also get the comics a few months past their release date, but I really don't mind the delay. In return, they get another fan to their line of books and someone who's slightly more likely to buy the actual book. (In my case, probably not, but if I were the comic-buying type I'd definitely add books to my list based on the DotComics.)

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  9. User Friendly by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

    User Friendly is making a decent profit from ads because they get a zillion hits a day.

    By the way, I find it hillarious that someone is selling commics in adobe e-book format. An 8 year old could write a program to decode them.

    1. Re:User Friendly by MisterBlister · · Score: 1
      You dont even have to decode them (though its much easier that way). You just need someone to take screenshots and save the pages as full-color images (tif, tga, png). You could even then re-insert them into PDF or ebook format with no copy protection if you like. Only one person needs to do this, the rest can just share it.

      Judging by your sig, I'm sure you realize the point of using crappy copy-control is mostly to have a DMCA argument when attacking pirates, not to actually stop the copying in the first place.

    2. Re:User Friendly by tph · · Score: 1
      Judging by your sig, I'm sure you realize the point of using crappy copy-control is mostly to have a DMCA argument when attacking pirates, not to actually stop the copying in the first place.

      Yep - double rot-13 ought to do the job ;-)

  10. subscriptions won't work.... by bje2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    paying per download for comic books or any other medium will never work because you'll always have the people who pay their $1 to download and then find some way to distribute the product freely to others (i.e. Kazaa, Morpheus, etc)...

    i'd think that advertising (banner ads, those terrible pop-up ads) are still the way to go...that and having an on-line store selling merchandise, et al., related to the comic...

    but, again, as long as their are ways to freely distribute the subscription material, paying for it will never work...the content wants to be free...and will always find a way to do so....

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:subscriptions won't work.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is an extremely limited perspective, again assuming tech-heavy individuals are the majority of the market when they are barely even a blimp. I don't even know what Kazaa or Morpheus are, and I'm sure most other people looking for the comics on unboundcomics.com don't either. When you're talking about the numbers of people that buy the types of literary comics and graphic novels that seem to be on unboundcomics.com, they're not numbers that would be influenced really by some juvenile thief. They're too small.

      "content wants to be free...and will always find a way to do so...."

      Thieves always want stuff free... and will always find a way to steal... nice slogan. Do you even know anything about the comics industry?

  11. They're missing it by KjetilK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The general idea is to charge readers a few cents for every page they view, or as McCloud put it, to charge "for initial travel through the gate," with the ultimate goal being a subscription.

    Comics is exactly the kind of thing I would use micropayments for. I would never consider a subscription. If they try to fool me into making a subscription, they will loose me. It's as simple as that.

    "Web users are not wanting to pay for what they're already getting for free," warned Strazewski.

    I wouldn't be so sure about that either. I would gladly pay for good, accessible products, that doesn't infringe on my privacy, take away my fair use rights, doesn't try to abuse my trust in any way, and make available a convientent method for making payments.

    Right now, that doesn't exist, and it seems the industry isn't going to make it happen. All the industry care about it making offers that sucks, infringe on my privacy, take away my fair use rights, and abuse my trust in every way. In addition, they all stand behind their little sand castles shouting at each other trying to make different ways of making payments that are not going to work. Instead, they should come together and agree on common, open standards.

    --
    Employee of Inrupt, Project Release Manager and Community Manager for Solid
    1. Re:They're missing it by MeNeXT · · Score: 2
      I would realy like to know how micro-payments will work. Charging a penny per page is just not collectable. CC companies will not pass a $.02 charge on a credit card. If we are required a deposit, say $20.00 to open an account, how many accounts would you open??? If we ask our ISP to charge us, How do you stop spammers from reffering to casini, pr0n, etc...


      Basically ...how do content providers get paid?

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    2. Re:They're missing it by Misch · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I wouldn't be so sure about that either. I would gladly pay for good, accessible products, that doesn't infringe on my privacy, take away my fair use rights, doesn't try to abuse my trust in any way, and make available a convientent method for making payments.

      I did too... so I paid for it, and I got screwed. Lucky for me, I got screwed out of only $10 and the time I invested setting up my photo album and captions and stuff. Lots of people were using it to host images for ebay, and paid a lot more money for a lot of extra storage. They lost a lot more than I did.

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    3. Re:They're missing it by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      Each party has an account with the micropayment company. Customers only are charged when a certain minimum total is built up. Providers are only paid when enough deposits have accumulated to reach a minimum. The time difference between transactions is covered by the company's venture capital until it is self-sustaining.

      It's not complicated, but you need lots of people to buy into it to get it running.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    4. Re:They're missing it by drakee · · Score: 1

      Personally, I don't see how micropayments appeal to anyone psychologically. How would you like to make a million minor financial decisions every time you go online?

      Hmm, I want to read this yahoo news article, but is it really worth $.03? Dilbert could be funny today, but do I want to pay $.02 to take that chance?

      People like subscriptions because they feel they are getting a good deal. For one low price, they can read as many comics as they want. It's like going to a buffet- even though you're not going to eat everything there, it's nice to know that you can if you want to.

      For that reason, I subscribe to Keenspot premium- I pay $40 for a whole year, and I get to read as many ad-free Keenspot comics as I want, no hassles. I don't have to click on payment links every time I want to look at a new comic, and I don't have the psychological burden of making a hundred petty micro-financial decisions every day.

      Drake Emko
      http://hackles.org (nerdy animal fun!)

    5. Re:They're missing it by The+Cat · · Score: 1

      If we are required a deposit, say $20.00 to open an account, how many accounts would you open???

      ..and how is this different from a subscription?

      I think another possibility is to just price reasonably. I really can't imagine that people would complain about a $20 subscription to something, unless it's for only a couple of issues or something.

    6. Re:They're missing it by MeNeXT · · Score: 2
      Yes I agree with your point about minimums but what scares me about micro-payments is that someone opens a site and starts spamming people with embeded/popup pages, (it's been a long day and I can't think of the correct term). If micro-payments a successfull I think we would get these kind of spammers. You would not expect someone to enter his username and passwd everytime he opens your page, would you?


      Either I'm missing something or the system has to be a little better in it's design.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    7. Re:They're missing it by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      Security is always an issue, but I think that one would have to explicitly allow payments to each entity. Maybe not each time, but definitely each provider. An automatic charge incurred by spam, or even just by visiting a new page, would certainly be unacceptable.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    8. Re:They're missing it by Sentry21 · · Score: 2

      only are charged when a certain minimum total is built up.

      And therefore the smart customers create a bunch of new accounts, get as many comics as they can before hitting the limit, and then switch accounts. Then, they set up an fserv on #ecomic on dalnet.

      I hate to say it, but this will happen.

      --Dan

    9. Re:They're missing it by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      AOL and the various CD clubs seem to be doing well, despite this tactic. It can be dealt with.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  12. ok by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I believe this will be similar to online books, and hence, fail. When Stephen King put his book online [ http://www.stephenking.com/ ], he set the rate at one dollar to read it. One would expect the reply to be large, as paperback books run about 6 bucks nowadays. However, extensive reading of on-screen material tires the eyes and readers in the end decided that it wasn't worth it because it was too uncomfortable to read, and they'd rather have a paperback version.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:ok by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

      I feel inclined to mention that Stephen King made about half a million on his Plant experiment, after expenses, which is pretty good considering 1) it was entirely a "virtual" product, 2) he screwed up a lot of stuff.

      The press (owned by big publishers mostly) said it was a failure, and King even send a letter to one newspaper (NYT perhaps it was), explaining that it wasn't really a failure, but of course they didn't publish it.

      I think his experiment was a useful step in the right direction.

  13. Penny Arcade's take by L-Train8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Penny Arcade had a comic on Scott McCloud's take on micropayment systems. Basically they said micropayments are a nice idea, but they don't work now, and that's when artists need them. Bandwidth isn't free, and most sites don't sell enough merchandise to make a profit. So now, it is confined mainly to people who have a passion about it or people for whom it is just a hobby.

    --

    Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
    1. Re:Penny Arcade's take by elbobo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      bollocks they don't work now. i've heard that excuse so many times now, it drives me to anger.

      the only reason "they don't work now" is because nobody can be bothered putting in a little bit of framework!

      i've had micropayments working on my blog of all things, for the last year, and they're worked wonderfully.

      basically all you need is a bit of code that only lets people view so many pages before it stops them and says "you've viewed X pages, to go further you have to pay for those ones. the best bet is to pay up a bit further so you don't see this message again in a while"

      it's not strictly micropayments, as people generally pay in lumps, but it *definately* works. i've been covering hosting costs plus a little on the side via that method for long enough to prove that it wasn't just an initial fluke.

    2. Re:Penny Arcade's take by L-Train8 · · Score: 2

      basically all you need is a bit of code that only lets people view so many pages before it stops them...

      Well, it depends on your target demographic. In addition to code on your webpage, you need to have a readership that is both loyal and has credit cards. Also, you need to deal in monetary amounts that are worth the trouble and cost of accepting credit cards. But if you are a web comic with a teenage readership, most of your readership won't have credit cards. And if you are charging a penny or two for a page view, it might cost you that much in credit card transaction fees.

      I think the current implementation of micropayments works for some sites, but I don't think it scales very well. I think people will pay to support a site to which they feel they belong. Sites with a sense of community make people feel like they are contributing to something that they have a hand in creating. But once a site gets too big, whatever that point is, asking people for donations and using the honor system don't work. People feel like suckers for bankrolling a "big corporation" that doesn't appreciate or acknowledge the contributions of the readership. A brouhaha like the slashdot moderation controversy could decimate a site's paying user base.

      But to talk out of both sides of my mouth, the micropayments system is evolving in internet time. Since Penny Arcade posted their comic slamming Mr. McCloud's viewpoint, they went to a donation/reward system that has apparently been working well for them. Perhaps webcomic publishers will pick up the torch dropped by the venture capatilists, and drive innovation on the internet for a while.

      --

      Don't forget that Friday is Hawaiian shirt day.
    3. Re:Penny Arcade's take by elbobo · · Score: 1

      there's enough people with paypal accounts to cover those that don't have.

      and by collecting up the micropayments until they sum to a reasonable amount, you avoid the losses to transaction fees.

      you let them have enough pages to get a taste, perhaps a daily/weekly allowance of pages, then draw the line there.

      it's not rocket science.

      the reason people say these things don't work, is because they like to spend more time talking about why things won't work, than just sitting down and fucking trying.

      i'm out of patience for people who say these systems don't work.

  14. I'm surprised that... by Teraflops · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...the article didn't mention keenspot.com at all, esp since they host so many different comics.

  15. Adobe's e-book format by sulli · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yeah, I'm sure our friend Dmitry would be delighted that comic artists are using this.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  16. Webcomic -- Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So now, it is confined mainly to people who have a passion about it or people for whom it is just a hobby.

    Sound familiar?

  17. In E-Book Format... by nick_davison · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, Adobe are currently hard at work on the E-Comic format.

    While it's probably a flagrant breach of the DMCA for me to talk about it, the format involves putting the panels in... now here's the cunning bit... reverse order. By using Rot-Pan, the technical name for ROTating PANels, Adobe intends to use the DMCA to prosecute anyone who simply reads them backwards.

    When questioned about using the DMCA to protect such a ludicrously simple encryption technique rather than actually make it genuinely secure, the Bush administration was quoted as saying, "Well, pretzels look simple the surface too but look how complex they really are."

    I would discuss this further but the Feds appear to be knocking at my door with a search warrant signed by yet another large corp.

  18. Micropayments by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 4, Informative
    The article correctly points out that micropayments are one way to fund comics, but that people aren't inclined to pay anything for that which used to be free.

    Although it's over five years old, this Wired article has a nice summary of the challenges that faced and face the idea.

    Ccott McCloud, a prominent comics artist, shares his thoughts in comic form. He humorously addresses these issues from the point of view of an on-line comic artist.

    --

    Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

    1. Re:Micropayments by Chagrin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Penny Arcade had a similarly logical take on McCloud's ideas.

      --

      I/O Error G-17: Aborting Installation

  19. Terrible Adobe formats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adobe products like .pdf are typically extremely slow, hard to use, and really clunky (such has having to slam the + magnifying glass a bunch of times just to read a document when it loads up.... never happens with any other file type).

    Why can't they put these out in .HTML? A lot easier to use, and you also avoid the problem of worthless encrypted files that run across with .PDF.

  20. Comic Business Model by CrazyDwarf · · Score: 1

    Uhm... Webcomics as a business model? This just sounds funny. Since when does the product become/define the business model? I can understand a web business model, because doing business on the web is different than doing business in a store, or by mail order, or by phone, or by infomercials.

    When I read this, my first thought was something stupid about Microsoft. Then I realized there really isn't anything comic about their business model. They're more like a one train thought destruction device. "Must destroy ."

    I'm not saying I have anything against comics. In fact, I'm desperately in search of Lord Pumpkin. But I don't think naming a business model off of the product is right.

    --
    It's easy to stand out when the general level of competence is so low.
    1. Re:Comic Business Model by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      Since when does the product become/define the business model?
      Holy CRAP. It's people who think like this that try to sell 20 pound bags of pet food online.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Comic Business Model by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Looking for a sysadmin in Mississauga/West Toronto? Contact me!

      The job market must suck in Toronto, you've had that same sig forever! :P

    3. Re:Comic Business Model by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1
      The job market must suck in Toronto, you've had that same sig forever! :P
      :-(
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  21. Imagine, three hundred issues of X-Men online by mblase · · Score: 5, Interesting

    7It's no secret that comic book publishers make zero profit on back-issue sales; that's entirely the realm of the collector. So why shouldn't Marvel, DC et.al. get into the business of providing their own back-issue archives in downloadable eBook format?

    It's perfect, really. The publisher gets paid for books they otherwise wouldn't want to reprint. They could even include new advertisements between the pages, although I'd rather pay more for an ad-less eBook myself. Fans get the back issues they want to read at a fraction of the cost and hassle. Collectors will still get top dollar for the most collectible original, physical publication. Store owners don't have to worry as much about sealing their back issues in taped bags. And the entire industry gets a low-cost kick in the butt.

    Of course, there are some losers. Store owners who earn money from non-collectible back issues will have more trouble selling those, even as the collectible back issues become more valuable to fans. Publishers may not make as much money from trade paperbacks collecting popular stories -- then again, there's really no substitute for the printed page, especially where several issues are concerned. But I think the potential increase is worth it. And, of course, the publishers themselves may have to buy back their own back issues in order to make them available online.

    Still, it would be an excellent way for Marvel to cash in on the long-running popularity of the X-Men, or DC and Batman, or Dark Horse and Aliens. I can think of plenty of fans and even not-so-fans who'd happily pay $2 per back issue of a known hit when new paper issues of unknown ones are priced at $3 apiece.

    1. Re:Imagine, three hundred issues of X-Men online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you'reforgetting omething: Comic publishers make money from selling the current issues, and these are not promoted on the web. They are promoted by the store owners. By neighborhood stores.

      If the publishers go ahead with this, many store owners will make less money from back issues, which will some of them out of bussiness, wich decreases the amount of publicity, which decreases revenue, ad nauseum.

      So in the long run, this strategy might be bad for Marvel et al.

      (Personally I like the Japanese Beetle better than X-Men anyway)

    2. Re:Imagine, three hundred issues of X-Men online by alphaseven · · Score: 1
      Still, it would be an excellent way for Marvel to cash in on the long-running popularity of the X-Men, or DC and Batman, or Dark Horse and Aliens. I can think of plenty of fans and even not-so-fans who'd happily pay $2 per back issue of a known hit when new paper issues of unknown ones are priced at $3 apiece.
      Comic companies already do this in the form of trade paperbacks, which is like getting a dozen back issues for $15.

      I suspect there is not a lot of demand for eBook versions of comic books, it's not like there is a lot of comic book piracy out there on usenet (aside from some niche manga). Since the comic industry hasn't had to deal with piracy to the same degree as the music or book industry has, I assume most of the appeal of comics is the collectable aspect, which wouldn't be satisfied by selling by them in eBook format.

    3. Re:Imagine, three hundred issues of X-Men online by mblase · · Score: 2

      Comic companies already do this in the form of trade paperbacks, which is like getting a dozen back issues for $15.

      But trade paperbacks are only available for select, highly-demanded storylines. I'm talking about entire runs of popular titles being available online.

      I suspect there is not a lot of demand for eBook versions of comic books, it's not like there is a lot of comic book piracy out there on usenet (aside from some niche manga). Since the comic industry hasn't had to deal with piracy to the same degree as the music or book industry has, I assume most of the appeal of comics is the collectable aspect, which wouldn't be satisfied by selling by them in eBook format.

      The main advantages of eBooks would be portability -- having the entire book in one file, instead of 22 files for 22 pages -- and scalability -- having the pages automatically change size to fit my screen. Printability would be an added bonus. Piracy isn't a concern, except in the sense that a publisher would want to prevent individuals from (easily) making their purchased copy available to countless others online for no cost.

    4. Re:Imagine, three hundred issues of X-Men online by mblase · · Score: 2

      But you're forgetting something: Comic publishers make money from selling the current issues, and these are not promoted on the web. They are promoted by the store owners. By neighborhood stores.

      Yes, and these current issues would continue to be available in print only for a given length of time, say six or twelve months.

      If the publishers go ahead with this, many store owners will make less money from back issues, which will some of them out of business, wich decreases the amount of publicity, which decreases revenue, ad nauseum.

      Store owners don't make much money on back issues as it is, except for a small percentage of highly collectible ones. Besides, they almost always make it possible for (reputable) customers to flip through the issue before buying it, so people who don't like the art or story don't buy the back issue anyhow.

      However, fans and collectors who know the value of the physical back issue as opposed to a digital copy of it will want to buy and collect those print issues, and it's those people to whom the comic stores today sell most of their back issues. If this approach would do anything, it would improve back issue sales by making it easier for fans to browse back issues they might not normally look at or be able to find.

    5. Re:Imagine, three hundred issues of X-Men online by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      More usually, 6 issues for $20...

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
  22. Start with the classics. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    I'd say start with comics that have been out for a long time.

    Like all those #1's your grandpa used to read that are now worth a fortune.

    Shit, I might subscribe if I could read the comics I own now. They sit there doing nothing but making me money, and I haven't read a one.

    Ok, I read a few.

    [I've got a friend that claims the comic _book_ industry is a huge rip off. He worked at shows and said they gave stuff away, like to each other. This shit was supposed to be real 'collectors items']

  23. This could be a Sluggy Freelance plot . . . by J.+J.+Ramsey · · Score: 1
    . . . like an angry serpent baring its fangs, a horrific vision leapt out at him from the screen. More irritated than frightened, he clicked again. The intrusion vanished, leaving no trace behind. "Stupid pop-up ads," our hero muttered . . .
    There's a silly story here somewhere. . . .

  24. Keenspace by sconest · · Score: 4, Informative

    What about Keenspot?

    You don't subscribe to a particular comic but to Keenspot premium, an ad-free version of all their comics and you get several gifts such as autographed comic books, original artwork, ...

    You still can also donate to authors through paypal if you want to.

    And they often seel original art through auctions

    --
    Guvf vf abg n EBG zrffntr
    1. Re:Keenspace by ethereal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree - this is the way things will really go. Think about it - you don't subscribe to the AP, a regional newsfeed, a city news feed, and a local news feed, do you? No, you just subscribe to a newspaper that contains all of them. Likewise, if all of the comics that I read regularly were in a conglomerate like that, I'd have no problem subscribing to demonstrate how much I've enjoyed Sluggy Freelance, etc. over the years. Keenspot is a good start, at least. You just have to make sure that the money really goes where it needs to go - just like in other artists conglomerates, you don't want the lion's share of the money going to Britney Spears or Scott Adams (better example: Jim Davis); you want your payment to encourage more of the innovative humor that you were looking for in the first place.

      It seems to me that the real gravy train for a comic artist would be breaking into a real paper, though. I wonder why more web comics haven't been picked up by major papers recently - they're a lot more fun than the repetitive blandness of being that is Cathy or Garfield or Family Circus (the non-disfunctional one). Although I imagine that web comic authors get used to being able to vary their use of color, number of panels, and layout on an almost daily basis, combined with intense online interaction with fans that you just wouldn't get with the printed page.

      Maybe reading Megatokyo in the morning paper is the impossible dream, but I'm not giving up hope. After all, my wife actually sat through Cowboy Bebop last night, so anything's possible :)

      --

      Your right to not believe: Americans United for Separation of Church and

    2. Re:Keenspace by 3Suns · · Score: 1

      IIRC, keenspot does not pay the comic authors for their content. It benefits the authors only by providing them hosting, with the burden of having Keen's ads, sidebars, etc. So the "business model" of keenspot doesn't financially benefit the authors, and that's why they have to sell t-shirts, ask for donations, etc.

      The authors probably do get royalties on the special-offer comic books etc that keen sells.

      --

      -3Suns

      ~~~~
      The Revolution will be Slashdotted
    3. Re:Keenspace by vslashg · · Score: 1
      Not according to the Premium servie FAQ on their site:

      WILL THE MONEY I PAY FOR THIS GO TO THE CARTOONISTS? I WANT TO SUPPORT THEM!

      OF COURSE! Just like the ad banners that run on each Keenspot page, profits from the Keenspot PREMIUM service will be split with the Keenspot cartoonists. By being a member of the PREMIUM service, you'll be putting much more money into a cartoonist's pocket than the ad banners are doing in the currently weak ad market (even if you click on them constantly!). For pennies a day, not only can you read great comics with no ads and get lots of cool extras, but you can help to support the cartoonists who's work you enjoy so much.
    4. Re:Keenspace by GodaiYuhsaku · · Score: 1

      Keenspot comic creators do profit. Keenspace comic creators do not. keenspace is the minor league open to anyone. your comic does well enough and the keenspoters will offer you a space on the keenspot.

  25. PDF is obstacle to e-books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember Stephen King's e-book experiments. He got no money from me...

    ... not because I downloaded and refused to pay, but because the books files were in an unusable unportable format and I never downloaded them ever. If they had been .txt or .HTML, I would have downloaded and quickly paid.

    1. Re:PDF is obstacle to e-books by Pituritus+Ani · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention that his "experiment" was rigged to fail. For example, he computed a ratio of users to payments based only on downloads. This ignored the fact that some downloaded the material and never read it, that some downloaded it in more than one format, and (horror or horrors), some didn't find it interesting after the first few lines.

      --

      Another proud carrier of the $rtbl flag

  26. Bad Boys of Computer Science by Alex+Chiranand · · Score: 1

    My favorite webcomic recently came to an end. Apparently, the author decided to get a life. *sniff* Still, I always felt that the lifestyle depicted in there hit a little too close to home.

    http://hotzp.com/badboys/archives/021900.html

    1. Re:Bad Boys of Computer Science by Alex+Chiranand · · Score: 1

      Oh my dear boy. Despite what you may read on the Bad Boys of Computer Science message boards, people were l337 and hacking Rogue back in 1985.

      Rogue Source circa 1985

      It's amusing that l337 speak has been so long out of style so long that it's made a comeback by not only being embraced, but extended. You've missed the whole point of the strip, which resonates with gaming nerds of all ages. For the Steve Wozzes, Roberta Williamses, John Carmacks and the rest of the incidental programmers, it was always about the addiction and the fun. Perhaps it was Pong, Adventure, King's Quest, NetHack, Zork, Neuromancer, Civilization, DOOM, mudding, Quake or Everquest. From the typing of buggy programs out of Byte, to the pre-SLS days of having to port programs your owned damned self to run anything on Linux, to those who painfully create Klingon fonts for LaTeX, there have always been the nerd's nerds, shunned even by the more earnest technical elite. Perhaps they're not always the most technically savvy of folk, and certainly they don't give a damn about contributing to the greater good of open source, but each in their own way a slave to the temple of Turing. BBoCS shows that the spirit is alive and well.

  27. 8-Bit Theatre by JimTheta · · Score: 2

    The guy who does 8-Bit Theatre just started attempting to do the webcomic thing full-time. He's only around 20 years old, so no great risk if he fails, but I certainly expect his non-comic updates to get more amusing.

    Of course, given the nature of the comic (8BT is a webcomic that uses Final Fantasy 1 sprites), I expect Square to sue him if he starts to do okay.

    -Grant/JimTheta

    1. Re:8-Bit Theatre by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

      I think Brian's strips are amazing, but I really wish that he'd update consistently! For example, if he'd prepare his strips a few weeks in advance and get some scripts to automatically update, then we couldn't have to read about how life got in the way again! Bob and George is run by a graduate student in physics (which I know from experience doesn't allow much free time), but he makes them so far in advance that he doesn't face those sort of problems often.

      Again though, I want to say that I do love Brian's strips a lot!

    2. Re:8-Bit Theatre by JimTheta · · Score: 1

      I used to read B&G, and while I thought it was amusing for about the first six months, it really started to suck (my opinion only, of course). It's dumb multiple-timeline-plots weren't good and they were convoluted to the point where I wasn't sure what was going on, and furthermore, I didn't care. So I stopped reading it.

      But I still got to give it props, because (if I remember right) B&G pointed me to 8-Bit Theatre.

      Another one that's pretty funny sometimes is Oldskooled ("THEN you were playing with power!"), though he updates pretty infrequently (sometimes stretching to 3 or 4 weeks).

      -Grant

    3. Re:8-Bit Theatre by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I don't think too much fo B&G these days either. I'm getting ready to give it up anyday now, but old habits die hard...

  28. One reason for King failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I refused to download his e-books since they were in extremely difficult to use non-portable formats. If he made them text files, they would be a lot more accessible, portable, and..... readable.

    Would not work for comics, however. Is there an open source, more secure (You control the files on your machine, not others) format similar to PDF with none of its ease of use problems?

  29. saving this one by Alien54 · · Score: 1
    "Astounding Space Thrills" (www.astoundingspacethrills.com) is profitable by using more traditional Internet methods. A satirical science fiction adventure that takes shots at Microsoft with the villainous "Covert Redmond, CEO of Macroshaft," AST takes the format of a daily comic strip, just like those found in a newspaper. Through syndication, it appears on thousands of Web sites, in addition to its own site

    Adding that one to my bookmarks right now

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  30. Fantagraphics by Mighty-Troll · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Some of the best comics today are produced by Fantagraphics. Not the boring superhero stuff, but more sub-culturish and mature. The artwork of Daniel Clowes is amazing. Rember the Ramones video he did in the 90s?

    I enjoy this in print, however if Clowes or Peter Bagge or Bill Griffith were to do an online version, I'd gladly pay.

    --
    I live under the bridge, in a pile of feces.
  31. I still love the Dilbert model... by dperkins · · Score: 1

    Just create one or two characters that are shameless exploiters of others and use that character to hawk your wares at your site. Scott Adams' site has Dogbert selling anything and everything Dilbert. It seems to be a winning combination.

    --
    My sig hates me. That's ok, I never cared for it much anyway.
    1. Re:I still love the Dilbert model... by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 2

      "Moichandising! Moichandising! Where de REAL money from de movie is made!"

      Hehe, we can learn a lot from Yogurt.

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
  32. Micropayments and other things. by Restil · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Micropayments are being touted as a replacement for ad revenue. And this SHOULD be the case. To pay a few cents to eliminate annoying ads would be worthwhile for some people, but for others who have grown very accustomed to the web being free will probably go on prefering intrusive ads.

    It also differs on the artist's needs. If he's just trying to cover his bandwidth costs, he has more options than if he's trying to use the web as his only source of income. Even with a readership in the 10's of thousands, it can still be a challenge to do much more than break even.

    Ultimately it would work best as a complimentary feature. It's less expensive from the publisher's point of view, and that should certainly be taken into account when considering the per-issue pricing scheme. But as other posters have mentioned, some value of the comic's is the collectable value as well as the content value.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  33. Bring Back the Classics! by xonker · · Score: 1

    I'd really love to be able to get Eerie and Creepy back issues in PDF... I wonder if it'd be possible to resurrect those titles? They had some truly weird, but fun, stories.

  34. There's no money in online comics. by Angerson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been doing an online comic now for just over two years. I have a regular following of readers, manage to get decent traffic and the feedback I receive has generally been good. However, I have not made one dime from this venture and I can't imagine that I ever will.

    This is partly due to the fact that the online advertising model is dead and/or severely flawed. Last year I grossed (yes grossed) around $3 and my poor readers suffered a bevy of pop-ups, pop-unders and other flashing menaces. Likewise the model of pay-per-download just doesn't work -people won't pay to be mildly entertained when then they can get the same stuff for free.

    Ultimately, this caused me to abandon the comic, ending my adventure in online comics just as quickly as it began. Then something unexpected happened. People actually emailed me wondering what happened to the comic. For some unknown reason, they actually cared that my tiny contribution to the world of online comics vanished. And for me, that was enough to try and bring it back. So this February it returns.

    If there's a point to any of this, it's that not everything has to be about money. The internet can be more than a virtual marketplace, if only people are willing to work at it. Sure, I'd love to make money from this, but just knowing that people get some enjoyment out of something I do has its perks. And it's good enough for me.

    1. Re:There's no money in online comics. by drakee · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to hear that you'll be bringing Angerson back. I've read and enjoyed it in the past.

      I have a webcomic too, and it is payment enough that people bother to read it and give us feedback. I look at webcartooning as kind of like starting a rock band- even though it's possible to make money at it, it is the worst sort of venture to engage in if money is your goal.

      There are simply so many web comics out there, that your chances for commercial success are very unfavorable. If you develop a payment system for your comic, why would anyone choose to pay, when they have literally tens of thousands of other comics they can see for free?

      You do it first and foremost because you have a passion for it, and you want to expose your art to appreciative people.

      Anyone who does it for the money won't last long in this field.

  35. Great Idea by Nobody's+Hero · · Score: 1

    I have all my comics in boxes and boxes, baged and borded. I'm afraid to read them in case I hurt the value.... This would allow me to actually read the comics I purchased. Who am I kidding I should just sell the dang things on E-bay and get em gone...

    --
    The Only Person Willing to be Me is ME!
    1. Re:Great Idea by Nobody's+Hero · · Score: 1

      Hey we should open a business together... just think www.bag-an-Ebook.com...

      --
      The Only Person Willing to be Me is ME!
  36. Look at it this way... by CubicallyContained · · Score: 0

    The basic assumption everyone is making is that artists should get paid. Maybe that's totally wrong. Perhaps the whole idea was only a temporary concept and now it's finally ending. So what if we are entering a world where a certain segment of society can't make a living. Big deal. It's happened before to other people. The laws of economics are not here to make everyone happy. Move along to what works (like cooking food) and stop bitching about what has stopped working. Art is much more pure without money anyway.

    1. Re:Look at it this way... by JamesOfTheDesert · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The basic assumption everyone is making is that cooks should get paid. Maybe that's totally wrong ... Cooking is much more pure without money anyway.

      What makes you think art is, or should be, special? It's just another human activity that can be done for pleasure, or for money, or on a dare, or for any number of reasons.

      Being hungry or cold or generally impovished does not make you a better artist, just a hungry, cold, impovished one. If someone wants to produce art, and finds a way to get paid for it, great. Art is not here to make everyone happy.

      --

      Java is the blue pill
      Choose the red pill
    2. Re:Look at it this way... by blkros · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Art is much more pure without money anyway.
      Actually this isn't true, and is more a 20th century myth than anything. Some of the greatest art in the world was made to order. Renaissance art, for instance, was subsidized by great patrons, such as the Medicis. Artists should get paid, they make objects that are worth something, and should be compensated for it. If someone can find a way to make a living from their art, I say good for them, because it's one of the hardest ways that I know of to make a living. That's why I do other stuff to make a living, and, basically do my art for myself--I certainly haven't made a living with it.

      --
      Damnit, Jim, I'm an anarchist, not a F@#$!^& doctor!
  37. Free bandwidth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you know of any free webspace sites that don't get hung up on bandwidth?

  38. no linux ebook reader? by malus · · Score: 1

    pah. count me out then. no windows no comix.

  39. Scott McCloud by zonker · · Score: 0

    Just thought you all would benefit from some of Scott McCloud's writings on comics (he's the author of Understanding Comics and Reinventing Comics as well as a comic artist himself). His work on Online Comics has been really interesting, and informative. You might also enjoy reading Demian5's webcomic "When I Am King" which has been getting a lot of attention. If you are at all interested in self publishing, you must take a look at Dave Sim's "Cerebus' Guide To Self-Publishing".

  40. Web comics *could* work by scubacuda · · Score: 1

    Comic book readers are a completely different demographic than music listeners. They A) aren't already spoiled by free comics, and B) they already pay big bucks to collect them. Buying a download and then printing it out on your own color printer is a small price to pay compared to what you *would* have paid. And besides...many of us would pay a buck to read the first Superman, Spiderman, Batman, etc.

    Pop up ads *are* the way to go (until the subscription models work out). The real question is whether or not these places will get smart and not allow those using ad killers (such as Guard-IE.

    If everyone used these types of programs, then no one would buy ad space.

  41. Great money making idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This gives me the idea to go to eBay and start selling packages of mylar bags to use to protect online comics. Someone is bound to want to buy these. Might as well get in on the ground floor of the online comics revolution!

  42. People say they go to church by sam_handelman · · Score: 2

    Without going on too much of a tangent, people asked by pollsters say they go to church every week but actually they don't.

    Likewise, of course if you ask somebody, "would you pay 3c a page for good content?" They say "well, of course, I support artists, I'd pay that even if I didn't have to bleah bleah fair use bleah bleah." It's practically a religious thing for people, like myself and, lets be frank, everyone else on Slashdot, who download gigs of Mp3s.

    However, when you actually look at the numbers for this - Penny Arcade doesn't get a tenth of a cent in micropayments per pagehit. Now, maybe some people are making that up in buying coffee mugs, whatever, the point is, when you look at how people actually behave, they don't pay the three cents per page when you demand it, they go read something else.

    Is this because PayPal is too bulky? I'm sure that that is part of it, and that if it were easier to make micropayments than half of the people who say they'd make them really would.

    Just my 0.02$ per page.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  43. I'm a bit miffed... by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 3, Insightful

    (Warning: This will look like a plug for a bunch of webcomics. It probably is, but I have a valid point. Mod me into oblivion of you wish.)

    The big players in the print industry seem to be the only guys getting real attention when it comes to producing "comics" on the web.

    What about the Keenspot or the Keenspace groups? They have a valid revenue model, even if they aren't making a ton of money(making money is a secondary concern to them). Heck, they're doing the opposite of the big boys: Moving from the 'net to print media. (Check for Roomies! and Superosity in your local comic store)

    Another group is , which hosts, among other comics, Algernons Dilemma.

    There are the big ones you've probably heard of, PvP and Sluggy Freelance who are actually making a living on their webcomic.

    Heck, /. has Mega Tokyo banners!

    Personally, I'd rather these, and others, than the majority of the junk the syndicates, et al, try to push onto the web. Nevermind X-Men, give me it's Walky!

    Disclaimer: I run a webcomic, so this story pushed my buttons :)

    J. T. MacLeod
    -------------
    UBERGEEK the Comic. Umlauts be danged.
    http://ubergeekthecomic.com
    It's neato!
    -------------

  44. Sounds like a great idea. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2

    Maybe put the first few pages of each issue online for free (to hook the reader). Then when the reader wants more, charge them some small amount ($1 maybe). The costs to DC or Marvel would be minimal. You'd have the cost of transferring all the comics to a web-friendly format and server-related costs. But all in all it'd be cheaper than running off new reprint copies of those issues. And it wouldn't drop the price of the physical back-issues since no collector will be contented to just have a file on their hard drive. If anything, it might spark interest in some old issues and drive the price up a bit. Or even create some extra demand for the current issues. If I'm reading some two year old issues of Spiderman and I'm really getting into the storyline, I'm more likely to buy a new issue to see what's happening with the characters.

    If their costs were low enough, they could offer free/low-cost subscriptions and track member usage to target print offers. Is the user reading the "Death of Superman" storyline? Why not offer them a special online-only deal on the printed book with the entire storyline? (Kind of like an Amazon system. "People who read this comic also liked these comics/books/merchandise.")

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  45. What they forgot to mention RE: Stan Lee Media by UsonianAutomatic · · Score: 1

    Apart from the cofounder's stock scam destroying any chance the company might have had at success, the article fails to mention that the writing for Stan Lee Media's "webisodes" was just awful...

    If you can imagine the most hackneyed plots, stereotypical characters, and stilted dialog of comics published 30 years ago, you've pretty much got the gist of content Stan Lee Media had to offer. Which is a shame, because they had a very talented team of artists and animators.

  46. searchable? by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    I wonder if any of these comics that are sold in pdf are indexable in anyway.. google has this cool search where they somehow highlight your search even if its a word printed in a scanned catalog image. This technology would be great for comics which are generally scanned artwork and not originally digital products.

  47. when i am king webcomic by demian5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    True. You should check out a cool comic by a guy in like sweden or somewhere named Demian 5. It's called When I am King. And while you are at it, sned him a couple of bucks. =)

  48. The best webcomics are free by TheKingOfCowards · · Score: 2

    Just take a look at www.sexylosers.com must be 18 or over. In my opinion the best webcomic ever made. Of course its not a marvel comic or anything like that. It is a comedy strip that comes out once a week.

  49. "Stupid pop-up ads," by jdunlevy · · Score: 1
    "Stupid pop-up ads," our hero muttered before leafing through another tale of wonder and disbelief.

    Hmmm -- exactly what I was wondering when I arrive d at the Tribune web site.

  50. KeenSpot doesn't seem to be mentioned by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I've been reading several keenspot/keenspace comics for a while now. Their model, as far as I can tell, is to give free web space to online comic artists, along with some helpful stuff, like scripts to archive old comics and post new comics. The normal site seems to make revenue off of banner ads, but they have several other revenue making ideas, and presumably they share the profits with the artists. They print up and market collection books, or periodical issues, as well as offering premium no-ads service to people who want it.

    I have no idea how well they are doing, but I frequent:
    www.rpgworldcomic.com
    www.crfh.net
    www.bobbins.org

    and a couple others.

    -If

    --
    Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    1. Re:KeenSpot doesn't seem to be mentioned by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Exploitation Now! is a great one hosted by keenspace.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:KeenSpot doesn't seem to be mentioned by gwalla · · Score: 2
      Exploitation Now! [exploitationnow.com] is a great one hosted by keenspace.

      Exploitation Now isn't hosted by Keenspace. It was when it started out, but it got accepted into Keenspot (spot, not space) a while back and has been on the Keenspot servers ever since.
      --
      Oper on the Nightstar
    3. Re:KeenSpot doesn't seem to be mentioned by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      My bad. I have a flu or something, it's not my fault.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  51. Creative Freedom's the Thing by Zubkavich · · Score: 1
    I think it's a matter of knowing what you want to do web comics for. As a way to get a story told with creative freedom and still be able to find an audience for the work, it's pretty ideal.

    Your audience doesn't have to go to a store or track down a copy. You don't have to pay for publishing and word of mouth can spread your web address quite quickly if the content is good.

    Speaking of which (cheesy plug in effect):
    http://miracle.keenspace.com/d/20010910.html

    Any genre and any style can be represented because it's not limited to shelf space or a particular audience.

    --- Jim Zubkavich
    The Makeshift Miracle
    updated on M/W/F
    http://www.makeshiftmiracle.com

  52. How I would approach this... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    I've been thinking about the online comic book business because one day I want to start one myself. Actually it's an online animated cartoon, but I think the model would be similar. I have issues with things like "what happens if people constantly distribute copies of the animations to each other and bypass my income generator?"

    I think there are people scared of the idea of once they sell a few copies, they propogate virally and nobody pays for it. I know that has me a bit spooked, but I have a few ideas that might be useful.

    - There needs to be new content regularly. The faster, the better. That keeps people checking with the site instead of checking Morpheus every so often.

    - Sell things besides the content itself. You can transmit comics/animations/movies etc around the web, but you cannot transmit T-shirts, coffee mugs, and little figurines etc.

    - Make distributed content worth something. I want to do an animated cartoon, right? One approach is the 'to be continued...' story that requires multiple parts to get the whole thing. If somebody gets only one or two episodes, the best way to get the rest is from my site. I think comics could work this way too, admittedly they'd propogate easier though given their smaller file size.

    - Include a coupon with the content. "Mention this comic and you'll get $2 off a T-shirt, go to our site at www.comicbookname.com." With this approach, even pirated works are of value because it's possible some people will buy some of your merchandise. If the ads/coupons aren't too intrusive (don't put a 30 second commercial in it! >:I ) nobody'll edit them out.

    - Consider a subscription model. Give away a few episodes, ideally so they have some type of cliffhanger that just keeps your eyes glued, and say 'for $x a year you can have unlimited access to downloads' or something like that. Even if that isn't too profitable, at least you have SOME people out there getting vids and getting them around the web.

    - Use the content as a commercial for merchandise. Do you all remember the Transformers cartoon? That cartoon was seriously a 20 minute commerical for toys disguised as a cartoon. If the artwork of the comic/cartoon is interesting and unique enough, turning it into a marketing device for t-shirts/posters/coffee mugs etc really isn't that difficult. I'll give you an example, there was a Dilbert cartoon where Dilbert had a doll of his boss sitting on his monitor. The boss asked what that was about, Dilbert replied "It lifts my spirit to have a likeness of you near by." The boss left, feeling good about what Dilbert told him. As soon as he walked out, Dilbert backhanded the doll off his monitor and said "Stop barging in while I'm working!" From what Scott Adams said in one of his books, a bunch of people wrote in wanting one of those dolls.

    I think one thing Hollywood and the Record Industry needs to learn is that they should care about the money they are getting instead of worrying about the money they aren't getting.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  53. Epic Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not the most groundbreaking article.. (Slashdot.)
    Alright, so let's rewrite it in ambic pentameter!

    Comic artists try to draw on new revenue sources
    By Todd Allen
    Translation into verse by
    Anonymous J. Coward
    Special to the Tribune
    Published January 21, 2002

    A glow, the only light-source his office
    Shone from his computer monitor.
    In the nearly perfect dark he gently
    Clicked his mouse and watched the pages turn.
    And as the saga was unfolding in those words,
    Lo! Like an angry surpent with cruel fangs,
    Horrific sights leapt at him from the screen.
    More irritated than unduly frightened,
    he clicked again. The brief intrusion vanished
    Nor left a trace behind. Our hero frowned
    and muttered "stupid pop-up ads", and then resumed
    his former task of leafing through the wonder,
    the tale to disbelieve before his eyes.
    For with his cunning twists this reader flipped
    Naught but an online comic, like the text
    that others flip through, printed all in color.
    Ah the web -- what natural medium for Comics,
    what the Form!the publishers contend it is the One
    And many -- many, even now fresh blood
    Has seen to venture into that abyss.
    (Online we see the companies persist
    To hawk their art and content, paperless.)
    Consider Marvel! Marvel comics, who of late
    Have sold such selling titles as The X-Men,
    And, too, one arachnoidal hominid,
    (Spider Man) who with these other Titles
    Has served as Subject for a million downloads,
    Nay! A million and three tenths, such is the figure
    Of how many times in but one month
    These "dot-comics" are copied to our hard-drives.
    (One more amazing glory we shall share:
    Astounding Space Thrills, whose aesthetic flair
    Has won it more than three thousand sites
    As paying syndicates with all the rights
    to leech off their own content unconcerned
    Of being by those pesky lawyers burned.
    [The article does not at this point mention
    The greater-numbered bootlegging dimension].)
    And yet the prospect of producing profit
    Eludes these sites, which live (or don't live) off it.
    (The article therefore mentionss: "many an enterprise
    Met from a lack of profits its demise".
    [Your humble bard, the AC, reckons it
    beyond a need to say, "uh, duh. No sh--!])
    "There's no economic model!" adds Strazewski
    About our comic case, "it's rather pesky
    Trying to charge the right amount for stuff
    That only hobbyists need -- yeah, it's tough."
    [Tough, yes, dear Len (for that is his first name)
    But why are online markets to take blame?]
    That's all of Strazewski our story quotes,
    although, in journalistic style, it notes
    that Len is a professor of the college
    Of Columbia, with special knowledge
    in online publishing. Oh, and he wrote
    for "major comic publishers". So we note.

    Continuing then our brave and noble toil
    We reach what seems the first of foreign soil.
    For now we're getting into a recent history
    Of Marvel Comics' woes (though why's a mystery).
    For it was Marvel Comics' lauded Lee
    (Stan Lee) who first tried that troubled sea:
    The online venue. Though we all should know
    He was a luminary and in his show,
    the creator of the likes of Spider-Man, no less
    and yet we have not words to well express
    the fashion (most spectacular!) in which he failed
    --My God, the man was nearly jailed.
    The tale, we are assured is fully "ripe
    for comic book treatment" (though that's tripe,
    we all do know, but, sigh, all journalese
    consists in vapid statements such as these)
    Anyway, to make a long case shorter
    The co-founder of Stan Lee Media was, third quarter
    (June) indicted with in a stock-fix scheme
    (say federal prosecutors), and it would seem
    He (Peter Paul, this samely said co-founder)
    Left his unled company to flounder.
    (Oh, and the allegations were in the amount
    of $25 million [in his stock account?])
    "The company had ceased operations in December"
    (Of 2000, if I do remember)
    Anyway, it shoook out something like this:

    okay, I need to go now. heheh. Somebody else want to finish this up?

  54. It's enough for me too. by locoluis · · Score: 1

    For me, just getting feedback is a great motivation to continue with my work.

    Well, I admit I'm not quite talented as a cartoonist (I'm better off as a computer programmer ^_^), but even if I were, I know how things work here, and so I don't expect to get a dime for it. Ever.

    It's something I wanted to do for fun. That's all.

    1. Re:It's enough for me too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fyi: @ 3:21am EST I was unable to visit your keenspace site -- it's simply not responding. You lost a potential fan (I won't bother going back) because of cheap hosting. Oh well.

    2. Re:It's enough for me too. by spauldo · · Score: 1

      Keenspace does go down now and again...

      But if you're going to be an asshole, then you deserve going without them. There's a LOT of really kick ass comics on keenspot. Guess you'll just never know.

      --
      Those who can't do, teach. Those who can't teach either, do tech support.
  55. That was $1 PER CHAPTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He didn't provide the book for a reasonable $1. He charged the ludicrous amount of $1 per chapter for it!

  56. hmmm by nomadic · · Score: 1

    The main cost in producing webcomics seems to be bandwidth; a lot of them seem to be struggling with it. What I can definitely see happening is a lot of the smaller, no- or low- profit ones moving to P2P. Release it, send it out to a few people, it'll propagate pretty fast over Morpheus.

    1. Re:hmmm by drakee · · Score: 1

      Yes, bandwidth is a huge problem for online comics. Unlike most types of content, comics exist as large, bandwidth-hogging image files. And when a cartoon site has a few years' worth of archived strips that people can look at, the GBs can really add up.

      I don't pretend to know how to make money with online comics, but I can tell you that many webcomics could cut their bandwidth bills in half by optimizing their images:

      1. Stop using GIFs! Fer crying out loud, use PNG images indexed to 256 or less colors. You don't have to worry about Unisys royalties or any such nonsense, and it compresses much more efficiently than GIF.

      2. If you use PNG images, further compress them with pngcrush. It's free and doesn't degrade image quality at all.

      3. If you use JPEG, use jpegoptim to optimize compression losslessly. The results may not be too dramatic, but every byte counts.

      Drake Emko
      http://hackles.org (nerdy animal fun!)

  57. Make money like Disney, et al. by ferreth · · Score: 1
    Toys, Shirts, key chains, stuffed animals such as Dust Puppy http://www.userfriendly.org/ are where the money is.

    Personally, I think the best comics will stay free, and they'll make their dough on concrete items.

    I'm just thinking about myself and my friends, and most of us have bought a shirt or two from their favorite on-line comic. I personally have both User Frendly and GPF wear because the comics are funny enough to follow daily and the shirts are funny enough on their own, and as reference to the comic.

    A note to anyone reading this who has a web-comic: I don't care if I'm paying $15 versus $20 bucks for the shirt: take your profit for your creative output on the shirt, please! Just don't mark them up 200 percent, and I'll buy a shirt if I think it's funny enough.

    --

    W9x:Thanks for the make-work project Bill.

  58. And some of us have filtering... by Kjella · · Score: 2

    For us that want it both free and adfree. Of course it takes some configuration, and some sites it doesn't work all that well with, but I'd say we're winning for now. Should all start to filter I suppose they'd come up with something new.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  59. You cannot collect 0's and 1's by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is not going to work.

    As anyone who's ever collected comics knows, it's the scarcity of comics that helps create their demand and popularity over time, not their wide distribution. How many of you have an X-Men #94? Amazing Fantasy #15? Detective Comics #27? But if you did, you'd cherish it like an heirloom, you'd pass it to your children when they got old enough to know the difference between acid-free backing boards and regular cardboard.

    Sure, widespread distribution will help if all you want to do is read the comics, but that's not where their value comes from. The important thing is that I have an Avengers #3, and you have an Avengers #16, and if we're going to trade, yours better be in mint condition.

    There's just something very visceral and male about holding a rare comic book. What am I gonna do, have a swapable harddrive of Marvel and DC. "Hey, check out KaZaa, they've got the latest Superman story." Bah! There are some things that technology simply cannot improve on.

    1. Re:You cannot collect 0's and 1's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I bite. You got an Avengers #3? What condition? I have a #16 in wrapper. Stored under steril conditions (0% HUMID, 10 degree C, NON ACID). Wanna trade? For a number #3, in mint. I would let go of the #16 if you pay 4200.00 € (can negotiate, but no british pounds pls). Thanks.

    2. Re:You cannot collect 0's and 1's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have sex.

    3. Re:You cannot collect 0's and 1's by oddjobs · · Score: 1

      This is not going to work.

      As anyone who's ever collected comics knows, it's the scarcity of comics that helps create their demand and popularity over time, not their wide distribution.


      You know, this is the kind of thing that pisses me off. Comics are for READING.

      If anything, treating them as collectables has ruined the artform and made it the refuge of obsessive geeks.

      Come on! How many people bag their paperback science fiction novels? Is that Agatha Christie really going to improve in value? And yet, that's the impression the mainstream has of comic books - they're collectables. If anything, I'm glad there's a ton of comics online, and I hope they put all those Avengers online too.

      Regards, Tim Broderick

      --
      Someday, all jobs will be Odd Jobs
    4. Re:You cannot collect 0's and 1's by ChaosDiscordSimple · · Score: 2

      Sure, widespread distribution will help if all you want to do is read the comics, but that's not where their value comes from.

      Bah.

      The value of comics is the same value of books, movies, or other media. Creators want to entertain and make some money. Readers want to be entertained and are willing to pay for privledge. Readers don't care about scarcity. It doesn't matter if ten or a million copies exist, a good comic is a good comic.

      Collectors helped overinflate the comic book industry. Collectors can be thanked for the gluts of special covers, new "Issue #1"s of old series, and other stunts that drove away readers. When the bubble popped, many loyal readers were gone, leaving the industry in a shambles.

      Do comic book readers want many of those collectable comics? Sure. There is the curiosity value and the chance to re-read your old favorite. Scarcity isn't important. A reader will be quite happy with a nice reprint.

      I have a comic book collection, but I'm not a collector. I purchase comics for the love of reading them. They are good comics, so I want to share them with other comic readers. As a result, I try to keep them in good shape. But because what is important is that you can read them, not that's it's "collectable," I don't stress over minor tears, fading, folds, or wear marks.

  60. NNNNRRRGGGHHHH!!!! by The+Cat · · Score: 1

    E-lusive E!! E!!!!!!

    ELUSIVE!!!!

    The word is ELUSIVE!!!

    What is this, the third largest metro newspaper?? sigh... (goes off to weep)

    1. Re:NNNNRRRGGGHHHH!!!! by vroomfondel · · Score: 1

      If you're going to harp, at least get it right.

      elusive, adj. - tending to elude, as a: tending to evade grasp or pursuit b: hard to comprehend or define c: hard to isolate or identify

      illusive, adj. - illusory - based on or producing illusion, deceptive <illusive hopes>

      "Yet the prospect of becoming profitable with Web comics--the downfall of many online enterprises--remains illusive."

      The prospect is not one that is difficult to comprehend or define, nor is it hard to isolate or identify. It's certainly not evading pursuit. Rather, it produces the illusion for webcomic artists that their labor will bear monetary fruit.

      Put more simply, while the profits themselves may be elusive, the prospect of profitability for these artists does indeed remain illusive.

      Do try and give the journalism majors a break once in a while. They might even be right.

    2. Re:NNNNRRRGGGHHHH!!!! by The+Cat · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm aware of the word 'illusive' and its spelling, and in this context, it is misused.

      For one thing, the sentence is poorly constructed. Despite that fact, the word 'illusive' as written, operates on the verb phrase 'becoming profitable', not the noun 'prospect.' It should therefore be 'elusive'

      However, given that major broadcast news programs cannot properly discern the correct usages of "there," "their" and "they're," it is more likely that it is just misspelled.

    3. Re:NNNNRRRGGGHHHH!!!! by vroomfondel · · Score: 1

      Nah, the gerund 'becoming' is the object of the prepositional phrase 'of becoming profitable with webcomics.' The adjective 'profitable' and the prepositional phrase 'with webcomics' both modify 'becoming'. The larger prepositional phrase describes the noun 'prospect,' as does the appositive phrase 'the downfall of many online entrepreneurs' (which I won't bother to break down) and the predicate adjective 'illusive.' The sentence itself suffers only from beginning with the conjunction 'yet.' Diagram it if you really dig this sort of thing. I'm just trying to help fellow grammar bigots everywhere. I don't dispute, however, the possibility that the author indeed meant to misuse the word "elusive," compounded the error by misspelling it, and just lucked out in coming out clean on the other side.

  61. Brilliant by The+Cat · · Score: 1

    Start small, stay small, build an audience, price reasonably, provide value for the price. Sounds simple, but it remains ELUSIVE (nrgh!) for a lot of businesses.

    Many congratulations. Sounds like there's a lot of potential here. Might even start reading a few comics here and there. :)

  62. I've got a vision on this... by zerOnIne · · Score: 1
    I currently run Mad Ink, which is currently home to two online comic strips: Podunk and Chico and Better Living Through Mind Control. PnC updates three times a week, and BLTMC updates in random spurts whenever Zac gets time to draw/write more stuff. The site started off as simply a place to put BLTMC, Zac's comic, with me doing webmastering / programming. Last summer though, a friend of mine (namely the Podunk in Podunk and Chico) started to get really sick of the free hosting (and consequently lousy service) of KeenSpace. I already had a decent archival system, and BLTMC was on a particularly long break anyway. So, he decided to jump on board with Mad Ink. This changed the focus of the site from just promoting Zac's stuff, to being a publication banner under which we could give the public comicy goodness. We don't sell ads, and currently pay for things out of pocket. But since there's a group of us and we're not very popular, the costs aren't all that bad. So that's where we stand today.

    I, however, would like to see this expand further. My idea is a community of comic artists / writers publishing under Mad Ink. Instead of a free-and-crappy service like KeenSpace, I envision Mad Ink's members paying a small amount of money just to help keep the site going, much the same way that PnC help pay our hosting costs. With enough interest, a decent co-located server could support a fairly large community. One other thing that I've thought of is making an archive for the ever-increasing number of dead webcomic backlogs out there.

    Any thoughts on this? Also if you're a comic-writer and would like to join Mad Ink, please contact me. I'd like to know.

    --
    09
  63. Web Comics Where!!??? by BlackHat · · Score: 1

    All I ever see is three small pains(sic) and the ring of fire.

    More professional comic ads and animations surround the tiny drip of content like hemroids.

    If it's not Dancing Spam it's Self promotion and links to more spam sites with zero content and LOADS OF REVIEWS.

    Content is King, and he is very ill, hell the fucker's dead from a barrage of WebRing links to nowhere.

  64. The reason... by neema · · Score: 2

    The reason webcomics will never work is because of the very nature of the thing. While actual, physical comics have been accepted as something you have to pay for, this is not the norm for web comics, and in my opinion, will never be.

    Take the following situation:

    A) Good comic guy A starts charing
    B) New comic guy B scans a few comics he drew in school and puts them up on his site.
    C) New comic guy B's comics become famous.
    D) Increased visiting.

    And that'll be on a loop.

    Of course, I could be wrong.

    1. Re:The reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eventually, it will be accepted as the norm, when Digital Rights Management finally gets it's shit together. The fact is that in a knowledge-based economy, DRM is a necessary evil. Couple that with the reduced production costs and printed material will become relegated to "special order" status, which will make it even more collectable.

      BTW FYI IIRC, the *first* online comic "The Night Flyer" was produced by Aaron Habibipour in the spring of 1994. TNF was based on a character that Ahab had created many years before. It was published on an Excalibur BBS (The Catalyst, in Los Angeles) and was created with Excalibur's vector drawing program, "Merlin". TNF was syndicated and many Excalibur BBS Sysops paid a small fee to carry "The Night Flyer" content on their sites. I think there were 4 issues of the Excalibur version of TNF. Later in 1994, Aaron made a stab at publishing TNF on the web, but back then the graphics were huge and no one had broadband, so it was a painful experience to download TNF.

      Aaron still produces print comics. Currently he is doing contract work (he gets paid to illustrate scripts that someone else wrote) for money, as well as working on his own projects.

      His site is at http://www.ahabmedia.com and is hosted on a DSL by a buddy of his, so don't be surprised if the site comes up slow sometimes.

    2. Re:The reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is a link to a USENET post in Sept. 94 mentioning The Night Flyer.

      Old archives are handy.

  65. Micropayment and personal economy by neonstz · · Score: 1

    As I see it, the problem with micropayment is that you don't have any way to predict your expenses. Spending 10 cent each time you view a comic strip (or reading an article in an online newspaper) adds to the feeling that the money is actually being spent. Before I got broadband, the online-counter was a constant reminder that I actually was spending money. Today I have DSL, and the only variable expenses I have is phone and electricity (and food and other stuff I buy of course). I find it much easier to have a organized personal economy when I don't have to worry about being online too much (or reading too many comics).

    For businesses subscription may be of more interest than micropayments too. Your income won't decrease the moment people stop reading your cartoons, you get some time (by monitoring popularity) to know that popularity is decreasing.

    Just a suggestion, what if the online comic had a subscription service (monthly, quarterly or yearly maybe) where you had the option to get the daily strip/weekly page as email in addition to be able to view it online. The email could either consist of just an gif/jpeg attachement or a link to the comic. The latter could be used to avoid abuse (like people signing up with a mailing-list address). The link in the mail could be unique for each subscriber to monitor abuse (although this may be of some concern to the paranoid people out there :).

    You still can't stop people from downloading the images and putting them their own website though, but I don't think "secure" formats is the way to go. I want to be able to read the stuff I've paid for on my Windows laptop, my Indigo2 and my Sparcstation 5 running Linux. :)

  66. Subscription Services by EddydaSquige · · Score: 0
    I see alot here about putting back issues online for free or around $1 a piece. Well the comic companies won't do it for free, there would be a huge cost incurred in transfering all those comics to digial, new comics no so much since most them end up digital before printing. A dollar sounds good for one comic, but reading a whole run would become costly quick (for the consumer).

    I think that the best way to go is subsciptions. For $10 to $20 a month you could get access to a companies whole library except what published in the last 5 to 10 years. Tht way it would be a resonable cost if your going to read a lot of issues, and the year thing would prevent people from just waiting untill it gets put on the web to read it. They could even give yearly subsriptions to idivdual titles at $12 (half of a mail sub) that let you read a book as it comes out, I'm sure that the money saved on printing would easily cover it.

  67. All well and good but... by dharcombe · · Score: 1
    ... the nasty b***ards are using the Adobe eBook format. So it's no good to many of us then, is it?

    Adobe have no current plans to market a Linux version and lots of plans to sue the ass off of anyone who does... as Dmitri found out...

  68. omfg thank you by pangloss · · Score: 1

    when i first read the headline, i thought it read "webconomics" and i was going to have to shoot hemos.

    and i'm sure somewhere out there, some pundit actually did come up with that one. "hey, 'e-economics' and 'i-economics' just doesn't sound right with that double vowel beginning--but isn't 'webconomics' just grand? doesn't that just capture the spirit of the age?"

  69. Re:8-Bit Theatre [OT] by MJN222 · · Score: 1

    8-Bit Theater is really a great webcomic, if you haven't checked it out, then for the love of all things sacred, do it now.

    --
    ---- Yay! I have a sig!
  70. online comics revenue model by wildcard023 · · Score: 1

    The online comic strip revenue model doesn't work.

    Here is a good indication of that.

    The problem here is that they don't trying to make money. Or they believe that some advertising from companies that are failing will pay for it. If you want to make money, you must sell a product, not just advertise for other people.

    I know that 'tell that to NBC' is going to come up. The problem is that tv/newspapers/etc are accepted places to advertise. Advertisers believe that it makes it to the audience so that it influences them. Most advertisers don't believe that web advertising makes it to anyone. With TV, sometimes people change the channel. With newspapers, sometimes people turn the page. With the web, most people don't even -see- ads anymore.

    Quick. Without looking, can you tell me what the banner ad at the top of the page is for? Can you even tell me what color it is? I can't.

    Without actual products to sell, websites will not be able to make money in the near future.

    --
    Mike

    --
    -- Mike wildcard@illuminatus.org
  71. Varied success by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

    People are working to make this a success, though it seems to vary.

    Kevin and Kell seems to do pretty well. The author, Bill Holbrook, does two other paper strips. I know that he's making a profit - my friend is his colorist, who tells me that Bill is all business, and wouldn't pay my friend if he couldn't afford it. But the strip has a huge variety of revenue sources, like book sales at Plan 9, merchandise, and special "memberships". Most people know Sluggy Freelance, which also does the same thing. It also seems to make a profit.

    But other strips like Bruno the Bandit are just as high quality in art and humor (in my opinion at least), but it seems like Ian McDonald has had just no luck in turning it into a profitable business, even though he's a prominent member of Keenspot and has two collected books published. My friend (who colors Kevin and Kell) has also had trouble keeping his strip Unlike Minerva afloat - he just doesn't have the time to juggle the strip and day-to-day living.

    Anyway, it seems like the very best can survive, but even the very good like Bruno have difficulty making it. I know of one strip right now trying to make it with "tips", 8-bit theater, which seems to be having some success. Hopefully the author, Brian Clevinger, will pull it off. But even then, he's just struggling to meet the costs of bandwidth.

    I don't know what the future of this medium is. But if anybody at all can make it, then I think there's hope for others.

  72. Aaaargh! by Phil+Wilkins · · Score: 1

    Yeah, people who collect, seal, and archive back issues of men-in-tights, won't get anything out of this. However, those of us who actually buy comics to read them will certainly appreciate the the opportunity to catch up on older, otherwise out of print titles.

    OK, OK, so I do lust after a complete collection of the Incal, but I would settle for at least being able to read all of it.

    Similarly Akira, the reissue of which appears to have stalled. AGAIN!

  73. WebComics.com by slashkitty · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Well, I guess I should mention my site, WebComics.com here. Can't believe /. runs a story on Webcomics with out mentioning my site. Ok granted, my site is mostly comics strips where this story seems to be about comic books, but we've been around for 6 years and have a great community of cartoonists. Some have moved on to become syndicated, others have websites that have taken off.

    Anyway, we of course have been trying to deal with this making money thing for 6 years at WebComics. We've had competitors come and go (like toonscape.com and mycomics.com) which all thought they could make lots of money I guess. As with most messed up web companies, the problem is very simple, they just spend too much money. The web lets you do things so efficiently and a company has to take advantage of that.

    --
    -- these are only opinions and they might not be mine.
  74. Penny Arcade by DarkZero · · Score: 2

    Why wasn't Penny Arcade featured in that article? The guys that make that comic are actually making so much money through donations that they both quit their jobs and each have a $1500-$2000 monthly salary.

  75. online comics by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    The question of how to make money is a good one. I write for an online comic myself, www.ghost2138.org It's a rarity in the world of online comics, an actual full-sized comic book sort of thing actually divided into issues. We are currently paying all costs out of pocket and are simply trying to build a fanbase. Primarally this is a means of creative outlet for both myself and the artist. If we could make enough money to cover hosting costs we'd be happy. As is, we can afford to pay for what we're using right now so we can take a wait and see attitude, see if anyone in industry comes up with a decent idea for making money off these things. Personally I find the Penney Arcade story to be a bit fantastic, actually making upwards of $4k per month just on donations. I mean, if that's really the case, then holy hell, somebody is doing something right.

    The one advantage to web comics is that the reader does not have to spend the same kind of cash as they do on phsysical books in order for you to be profitable. Of course, the question is whether they will be willing to even pay that reduced fee. Is PA the exception or the beginning of a new rule?

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  76. a comics business model? by rstevens · · Score: 1

    a comics business model? THIS i'd like to see!

    --
    http://www.clango.org
    1. Re:a comics business model? by Hot+Soup+LD · · Score: 1

      Kind of a contradiction in terms, innit.

      --
      Hot Soup - Lethal Doses
  77. i cant stop thinking~! by Juln · · Score: 1

    A webcomic had a great series on micropayments... if an author gets everyone who reads your comic to pay 1 cent, the authors wudl make much mroe money than they do fromthe current system!! However, the logistics of a payment system for that have yet to be worked out.
    Check out http://www.thecomicreader.com/html/icst/icst-5/ics t-5.html
    and http://www.thecomicreader.com/html/icst/icst-6/ics t-6.html
    for a well presented comic about this.

    --
    Juln
  78. Universities provide free bandwidth by andrel · · Score: 2
    I'm surprised that nobody has mentioned Dave Farley's daily Dr. Fun strip. It's a Far Side style strip that is almost as old as the web (Sept 1993). Dave's business model is to not quit his day job. Bandwith is donated by the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill.

    Another excellent web comic that uses a university to avoid bandwidth expenses is Jorge Cham's PhD.

  79. My favourite line in the article by freeweed · · Score: 2
    "Imagine if you went to a bookstore, asked for `Heart of Darkness' and they said, `Sorry, it's a back issue,'"

    Because of course, we know that books NEVER go out of print... :)

    I guess the person doesn't realize that once the comic market became a *collectible* market (oh, say 20-30 years ago?), fans would never stand for continual reprint after reprint of old/rare issues. The odd trade paperback collection, or reprints of very old and unique issues perhaps. Also, the demand just isn't there for every comic to be in print continuously.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  80. Comics as a collectable medium by prototype · · Score: 2

    I've been collecting comics for over 20 years now. I also drew comics years ago when they were 75c for the book instead of the $5+ that you see now. Never mind that.

    The existance of web comics (i.e. comics in some downloadable medium, say PDF) cannot co-exist with real comics without having diverse effects. If I can download a PDF of X-Men 118 for $1.50 then why is the original $25? Sure it's a collectable, but there's the rub. Let's say a few years/months off in the future Marvel decides to digitize it's entire line. Paper costs are too high and print runs are abolished. All comics are put online for you to download for a minimum fee. Of course now Marvel has a problem that they're not about to recoup any costs from comic shops for the printing since there is none. Sure it's cheap to distribute but now there are also 10,000 copies of it floating around on Morpheus and peoples websites. Where's the collectable value in that?

    Personally I'd like to have my collection in digital form and maybe that's the alternative. Just scan the whole lot of them and stash the originals away until they're worth $10,000 on eBay. The collecting of comics is what is the focus. Sure the content is important to a certain extent, but look at the rush (and increase in value) when a John Byrne, Neal Adams or Michael Turner book goes up on the block. The book has some value and that value is meant to increase because of various things. Resale value, content, character, artist/writer, scarcity, etc. Now imagine again if all books (or even some of them) were in PDF format. There's no real sense in obtaining it except for just reading and admiring the artwork. Anyone can own a copy just by downloading it and wheres the fun in that? Then what happens at conventions when your favorite writer/artist is scheduled? You print off a copy at Kinkos and bring it in to be signed?

    One thing is possible here. The expandibility of the comic book to an electronic medium. Remember when everyone bought VHS movies just to own them? Now everyone is buying DVD to get the extra content. Imagine if you could download your own PDF comic of X-Men and view it in pencil, ink, color or production mode? Maybe even have the pre-production sketches that went into the making of the comic. Now THAT would be something to own. Let's see the media extended rather than transferred.

    Anyways, whatever business model a comic company thinks they can fit into cannot measure up to the collectable value of a true comic book. The online guys that are selling content are doing so because they don't live in the same universe Marvel, DC and others do and don't distribute millions of copies each week.

    Just my 2c

    liB

  81. Coughing up some cash... by SetarconeX · · Score: 1

    Don't get me wrong, I'd love to see some of these comic guys make a buck, but I'm simply not willing to dish out a couple bucks for something I can't actually hold in my hands. Besides that, with the sheer number of comics I read every day, to give everyone a buck or two would add up to a massive amount.

    On the other hand, I have a few very good friends who own Megatokyo t-shirts, and I confess, they're pretty cool things. If authors truly want to make some cash, this is the way to go.

    They won't get rich, but who expects to get rich by drawing pictures, anyway?

    --
    "Isn't that the sweetest little well-balanced undergraduate-level philosophy of life."
    1. Re:Coughing up some cash... by hardcopi · · Score: 1

      I honestly think that micropayments might be a way to go, but actually getting people to pay is another problem entirely.

      I help to run Five Star Comics which sells comics, as well as has ecomics such as Altered Ego and others. We have multiple streams of revenue, but alas no money is made.

      Basically if you are trying to do this to become rich... good luck. :) It has to be a labor of love or forget it.

      Rich.

  82. "Collectors" must die by gwalla · · Score: 2
    I don't understand collectors. Why would you want to own something that you never look at, never even touch?

    Comics collecting started when some people realized that comics readers would get nostalgic for old issues they once read, and would be willing to pay decent (or, in the case of really ancient comics like Action Comics #1, indecent) sums of money to read them again. Then it became a game of speculation, where one collector (thinking that the price has plateaued) would sell to another (betting that the price will rise). At some point, it ceased to be about betting that some comics lover will want to reread a back issue, and became about betting that some other guy will want to resell it. It became just a big pyramid scheme.

    Meanwhile, the major studios catered to the speculators (who would actually buy ten copies of a single issue if they all had different covers) and stopped writing and drawing stories that were fun to read. Hell, at the height of the collecting bubble, Marvel and DC could have printed comics filled with blank pages (after all, once somebody has picked it up without sterile gloves and opened it, it isn't "mint condition" anymore), and idiot "collectors" would have snatched them up as long as there was a woman with breasts the size of Volkswagon beetles in spandex holding an AK-47 on the cover. Fortunately, they still had enough self-respect left to actually print stuff on the inside pages, although it was rarely readable. Then, when some collectors realized that all they were doing was selling these things to each other in circles, the market collapsed, and the studios are now stuck trying to appeal to comic readers, a group they nearly destroyed through neglect.

    In short, collectors do nothing but damage to the comics industry, subsidizing talentless hacks like Rob Liefeld, driving off readers, and generally making life miserable for the rest of us.

    --
    Oper on the Nightstar
  83. Little Help for the Non DC/Marvel crowd by cornjones · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those of you who aren't comic geeks here is a translation of the big time books mentioned above:

    X-Men #94 - Introduction of the new team including Wolverine, Collosus, Storm, NightCrawler, etc...

    Amazing Fantasy #15 - here for more - First appearance of Spider Man.

    Detective Comics #27 - pic First appearance of Batman