Slashdot Mirror


Episode II Gets Rave Review

Astin writes: "Dark Horizons has obtained a copy of what it believes is the script for Attack of the Clones, and has posted a review. Apparently they got this one right, with epic battles, lots of action, and that sense of adventure that was missing from Episode I. Canoe.ca is also carrying a synopsis from the site."

167 of 272 comments (clear)

  1. So, maybe sucky title != sucky movie? by joebp · · Score: 1, Troll
    I'd be surprised a movie with such a horribly bad title actually turns out to be a decent production. It kinda tarnishes the whole thing from the beginning.

    I bet the 'queuers' are happy right now.

    "Hey bill, according to this, the film we're queuing for doesn't suck!"

    1. Re:So, maybe sucky title != sucky movie? by ASCIIMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "a movie with such a horribly bad title"

      ... like Star Wars?

    2. Re:So, maybe sucky title != sucky movie? by MisterBlister · · Score: 1

      All the Star Wars movies have cheesy serial-pulp like titles. Why do people bitch every time? I remember lots of bitching at the TPM name, and lots of bitching at the Return (er Revenge) of the Jedi name... Get over it.

    3. Re:So, maybe sucky title != sucky movie? by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      `return of the jedi`?

      They are all just pulp fiction. I cant believe people take it so seriously! I can imagine people over 30 who saw it the first time around may have some sort of emotional attachment...or a highly developed sense of irony, but the idea that intelligent, grown men are going to queue up and pay good money to see `star wars 5 - attack of the clones` is a little disturbing.

    4. Re:So, maybe sucky title != sucky movie? by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      I think the point many people are trying to make, however, is as bad as "Star Wars" and "Return of the Jedi" may have sounded initially, they don't sound nearly as bad now. Whereas "Attack of the Clones" can't help but bring up images of "Attack of the Killer Tomatoes" to me, or a number of other bad movies that simply deserve to be MiSTed.

      And as a personal note, I still hate the title "The Phantom Menace". But we are still allowed our own opinions.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    5. Re:So, maybe sucky title != sucky movie? by sdo1 · · Score: 1
      I'd be surprised a movie with such a horribly bad title actually turns out to be a decent production. It kinda tarnishes the whole thing from the beginning.

      Well, the reviewer disagress with you, at least from his review of the script. He writes...

      When they eventually attack, this film is going to look so amazing that any other name except for Attack of the Clones will seem utterly inappropriate...

      Time will tell...

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    6. Re:So, maybe sucky title != sucky movie? by MrFredBloggs · · Score: 1

      You`d think that were obvious! For a moment there i`d thought renegade Pedants Anonymous members had hacked the SlashDot database :)

    7. Re:So, maybe sucky title != sucky movie? by TheMightyZog · · Score: 1

      "Anakin, you have grown."; "So have you, Princess. In more ways than one.", or "What if something you want is really here."

      So basically he's making porn.

    8. Re:So, maybe sucky title != sucky movie? by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2
      We've been through this before...AOTC fits every other title we've seen from SW and Indiana Jones flicks. This is not high art - Lucas just likes making movies...

      Man, everybody's a critic...

    9. Re:So, maybe sucky title != sucky movie? by forgetmenot · · Score: 1

      Well, "Attack of the Clones" makes you think of some low-budget 50's era matinee. Ahhh... but those are great entertainment. I believe the original star wars was not big-budget flick either - Just a very well done one.

      So, given that, I hope "Attack Of the Clones" lives up to the "name"... hee hee.

      Along the same lines, I remember laughing my a** off in the theatre when I saw the trailer for "The Replacement Killers" which at the time seemed like a most hokey movie title. Turned out to be a great movie.

      Hmmm... do I detect a trend.

    10. Re:So, maybe sucky title != sucky movie? by Squeeze+Truck · · Score: 2

      No, Star Wars 5 is "The Empire Strikes Back".

      Yeesh, I'm almost 30 too...

      --

      "Reactionaries must be deprived of the right to voice their opinions; only the people have that right." - Mao

  2. I don't think so. by BadDoggie · · Score: 2, Informative
    Jar-Jar's not dead? I ain't watching.

    woof.

    1. Re:I don't think so. by Llywelyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      I thought this too, then I thought to myself self:

      "Self, who am I fooling? I would go see it if it was titled `Episode II: Jar Jar's Revenge'"

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    2. Re:I don't think so. by kigrwik · · Score: 1

      > Jar-Jar's not dead? I ain't watching.

      Would you have preferred him dying without us knowing ?

      This way we have the hope of seeing him dye a long slow and painfull death,
      a just revenge on what *he* inflincted on *us* in TPM.
      :)

      --
      -- don't discount flying pigs until you have good air defense
    3. Re:I don't think so. by nzhavok · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lets start a fund to hire Jango Fett to assasinate Jar Jar, it's the only way.

      --

      He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    4. Re:I don't think so. by mgv · · Score: 5, Funny

      I thought it would show Jar-Jar's progress towards enlightenment and progression to a Jedi Knight himself. Similar to that which we saw with Luke Skywalker starting as a simple farm hand ....

      I can see it now, by episode 3 a master in his own right, wielding a light sabre and slicing those from the dark side into pieces (To the cutting victory cries such as "yousa going to be twosa")

      Michael

      --
      There is no cryptographic solution to the problem where the intended receiver and the attacker are the same entity.
    5. Re:I don't think so. by yobbo · · Score: 2, Funny

      or "Episode II: Revenge on Jar Jar"

    6. Re:I don't think so. by drachenfyre · · Score: 1

      How to make this movie into the highest grossing film of all time. Open to the Star Field - scroll by some words about a massive army building on a distant planet. Cut to the forest of the planet. Place Jar Jar Binks in front of some massive piece of machinery. Watch him get splattered. Cut to the rear of the machine as the giant Jar Jar stain is shown on the ground. Run End Credits - Collect Billions from Star Wars Fans (Myself included) And they'd save a fortune on production costs.

    7. Re:I don't think so. by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't worry about it; I'm not even sure if JarJar is really going to be a senator or not; one plot work-up that I've seen has him as Amidala's bodyguard. I'd post the link for that work-up, but it seems the site is gone now; it was out back in 2000, and partially based on what the stage crew saw (i.e. most things done in CGI will be a wild guess until this spring).

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    8. Re:I don't think so. by MaufTarkie · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I thought it would show Jar-Jar's progress towards enlightenment and progression to a Jedi Knight himself. Similar to that which we saw with Luke Skywalker starting as a simple farm hand ....

      Of course Jar Jar will be a Jedi (look at all the "blind luck" he had in the first film -- the force is strong, if not blatently obvious, in him). I predict Jar Jar will make the ultimate sacrifice trying to help to separate the Skywalker twins from the Empire.

      --
      Without you I'm one step closer to happiness without violence.
    9. Re:I don't think so. by buckeyeguy · · Score: 2
      Aha... this link has pretty much the same info I saw before. More detail than the above review.

      Episode 2 Spoilerage

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    10. Re:I don't think so. by mav[LAG] · · Score: 2

      This page shows what could happen if Jar Jar is seduced by the Dark Side...

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    11. Re:I don't think so. by jokrswild · · Score: 1

      Yes.. I agree. I'll start the fund! Just paypal your contribution to waltnat@bgnet.bgsu.edu!!!

    12. Re:I don't think so. by Not2Bryt64 · · Score: 1

      I am not 100% sure about this, but I believe that I saw Jar-Jar in the background of one scene of the "forbidden Love" trailer before LotR. It was a quick flash of Amidala doing something with Anakin. Since I prefer to check backgrounds for errors, I noticed him. Anyone wanna support or object that sighting?

      --
      -These aren't my pants.
    13. Re:I don't think so. by JWW · · Score: 2

      Yep, he comes in following Anakin and Obi-wan.

      That trailer is an absolutely awesome trailer by the way. Comparing EP I and II trailers shows how much more potential this film II has over the first one.

    14. Re:I don't think so. by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2

      I actually think you're on the nose with the sacrifice part. My argument all along has been that Jar-Jar will stay behind and try to "reason" with Vader as he is chasing (the pregnant) Padme. Vader will cut him down in cold blood, of course. But it will give Obi-wan enough time to get Padme on a ship and away from Vader...

    15. Re:I don't think so. by Moonshadow · · Score: 2
      I was under the impression that he had already been seduced by the Dark Side.

      How else could he cause so much collective misery?

    16. Re:I don't think so. by ahde · · Score: 2

      I thought it was

      "Who framed Jar-Jar Binks?"

    17. Re:I don't think so. by The_Real_Zar · · Score: 1

      Jar Jar doesn't stay alive long... The gungans will be wiped out during the clone wars.

    18. Re:I don't think so. by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2

      Exactly. Lucas knows how to play the emotion card - don't forget that. If Jar-Jar represents an innocent quality, it would make sense that innocence dies as Vader and the Emperor take power...

  3. Epic Battles? by Thnurg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Epic Battles eh? I hope so, since from the trailer that is currnetly doing the rounds at the cinema it looks like an over blown love / teenage angst story.

    --
    The months are just too short. I can count the number of days on one hand.
    1. Re:Epic Battles? by albino+eatpod · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's way the trailer you're referring to is called "Forbidden Love". The other two trailers "Mystery" and "Breathing" hint at the battles to come.

  4. (Star Wars) history repeating itself? by Zocalo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hmm. Cheesy first film, somewhat like Star Wars (be honest), and what looks like a cracking second film (just like ESB). Just what is it with Lucas and trilogies anyway? It always seems to take him a film to get upto speed, then he makes another that rocks, and then runs out of steam for the third and throws in things like Ewoks.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:(Star Wars) history repeating itself? by KITT_KATT!* · · Score: 1

      Nothing wrong with Return of the Jedi in my book.

    2. Re:(Star Wars) history repeating itself? by jejones · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe Lucas is doing it backwards this time. After all, it's Episode I that has the smarmy character thrown in to appeal to children, blatant "let's throw this in so we can base a video game on it" stuff, etc. So...we can expects a "cracking second film" and then a cheesy third. (After all, it will in the SW chronology be closest to the cheesy first film, right?)

    3. Re:(Star Wars) history repeating itself? by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Except for the whole Temple of Doom sucking thing, that is.

      The Indy trilogy stands in sharp contrast to your theory. 1st movie - top flight, didn't think it could get any better. 2nd movie - suspicions re: not getting any better confirmed. 3rd movie - a pleasant surprise, almost as good as the first, except for the (slightly) annoying series featuring River Phoenix. Explains his chin scar and the fedora, but did it have to be so bloody annoying in doing so?

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    4. Re:(Star Wars) history repeating itself? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Oh, that is *so* inviting a good flamewar!

      Ewoks. Lucas' original vision for Endor was supposedly Wookies, but the concept of a tall, hairy, lanky co-pilot for Solo was so appealing, he brought the Wookie forward to ANH. When he got to RoTJ he "couldn't" do Wookies, so he "cut them in half" and made them Ewoks.

      Now, he could have probably made that work. I'm sorry, but the way they ended up looking like stuffed teddy bears with spears really was dissapointing.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    5. Re:(Star Wars) history repeating itself? by jmauro · · Score: 1

      Actually the Wookies of Endor were supposed to be the ending for ANH, but it was cost prohibitive at the time. So the space battle was used instead. But then again, if Chewbacca is from Endor you must aquit.

    6. Re:(Star Wars) history repeating itself? by Spamuel · · Score: 1


      "All Jedi had was a bunch of muppets."

      - Dante Hicks, Clerks

    7. Re:(Star Wars) history repeating itself? by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      I'll have to go back and watch the Lucas interview on my RoTJ tape tonight. I am almost positive he says that he had wookies in mind originally for the ground battle on Endor.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    8. Re:(Star Wars) history repeating itself? by KITT_KATT!* · · Score: 1

      I could live without the ewoks, but I wouldn't go so far as to call the entire movie "cheesy". And I was about six when I first saw the movie, so I don't think I was terribly offended by ewoks at the time. It was actually the first in the trilogy that I saw, cos I was too young for SW and ESB.

    9. Re:(Star Wars) history repeating itself? by jmauro · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree with the Wookies, only with the film the battle was to originally apear in.

    10. Re:(Star Wars) history repeating itself? by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Hmm. Cheesy first film, somewhat like Star Wars (be honest), and what looks like a cracking second film (just like ESB). Just what is it with Lucas and trilogies anyway?

      I'll reserve judgment until I see the film. BTW, ESB was probably helped out by the fact that it was NOT directed by Lucas, whereas ANH WAS directed by Lucas!

      You do the math.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  5. I can see the headlines now... by Eskimo+Bob · · Score: 1

    From Variety:

    Clones are IN!
    Hollywood Loves Clones!
    Clones Boom, Phantoms Bust!
    Everyone loves a Clone!

    then 50 movies come out with "clones" in the title, or some derivitave of the word (Clone-o-saur, Clone Stampede, The Clone I Loved). They will all flop. Then, in Variety...

    Clones are DEAD!
    Clones Bad, Non-Clones GOOD!

    Remember kids, just because the title is a giant pile of fuck doesn't mean the movie will be (Just look at Cybercity... errr... wait, don't. that movie sucks donkey dong).

    --
    I am a big, fluffy, cute, cuddly bunny. fear me.
  6. Jar Jar - Unfortunately Not Dead by alister · · Score: 1

    From the link:

    "Jar Jar Binks represents the Gungans in the Senate. "

    1. Re:Jar Jar - Unfortunately Not Dead by hughk · · Score: 3, Funny
      Hey you should take a visit over to this side an interactive story version of Episode 3.

      In one hilarious finale, Anakin dies, Jar Jar Binks becomes a new Sith apprentice as "Darth Jar Jar". Jar-Jar having something to do with the dark-side would explain a lot!!!!

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    2. Re:Jar Jar - Unfortunately Not Dead by direktor · · Score: 1

      That's almost as good as the Powderpuff Girls Gameboy game called: Mojojojo A-Go-Go No shit.

    3. Re:Jar Jar - Unfortunately Not Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Buttercup: Ugh! Can't anyone get that right?

      Blossom: It's Powerpuff!

      Bubbles: No "D"!

      Your line, Mr. Luthor...

      :-)

  7. Re:Script - director... by Neuticle · · Score: 2

    Two things to consider:
    One: The director of Attack of the Clones is the same person who directed The Phantom Meanace, so we can assume that the directing style and quality will not change much.

    Two: We should compare both scripts, and see if this script is actually better.

    If the Attack of the Clones script is better than the Phantom Meanace script, then I think we have cause for exitement. If it turns out that the Phantom Meanace scrip is just as good or, God forbid, better, then we should all just form a good ol' fashioned mob and storm Lucas's ranch. I'm sure my wiffle bat could beat some sense into him...

    TIMMMMMAY!!!!!

    --
    "Cheeze it!" - Bender
  8. You Might Think... by Kibo · · Score: 3

    Appearently he his. Once more Watto, the stupid flying thing, has taken to wearing a beret in an attempt to be yet more queer. To say nothing of what some people are calling the "Forbidden Love" trailer that some saw before Fellowship of The Ring. It looks like it will go past bad. The question is will it stop at bad, but funny, or head straight for The Alien From L.A. bad. At least Nsych is back in it, without them I'd wonder if George Lucas would be able to ever completely defile his creation.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  9. Re:I believe we made our point by m2 · · Score: 2
    JAR JAR MUST DIE!!!

    Oh, that's an easy one... just don't go to see the film... wait until it runs for the nth time on TV. That way, Jar-Jar dies.

  10. !Scoop by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A short, shallow review of something that might be the script for Episode II hardly qualifies stopping th presses.

    A decent script is neither a guarantee of quality, nor necessary for it. The script for Episode IV looks like a fourth grader wrote it, and yet it produced a film that both children and adults loved. The magic happens in the casting, sets, costume, makeup, acting, lighting, camerawork, direction, FX and post production editing. Even if it's a genuine script (what reason have we to believe that? There must be dozens of fan scripts doing the rounds) then the final product might be almost unrecognisable.

    It's an interesting bit of speculation, but I'm giving it no more credence nor weight than any other fan generated hype.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:!Scoop by chancycat · · Score: 3, Interesting
      ...casting, sets, costume, makeup, acting, lighting, camerawork, direction, FX and post production editing...


      And **Music*** - It makes IV, V, and VI work, and I hang in there.

      --
      Evan - needs to hit preview before submitting
  11. Its not the battles, it's not the action... by xxSOUL_EATERxx · · Score: 5, Funny
    What made STAR WARS a great film is that it was a synthesis of all the aspects of moviemaking, not only special effects space battles, but polt, acting, a great script, and even the details like music (try to imagine STAR WARS witout that glorious theme!), and even the credits: think about the famous screen crawl at the start of the film.

    But the heart and soul of STAR WARS is undeniably the characters: rakish Han Solo the rogue with a heart of gold, trading insults with spunky Princess Leia, so beautiful and so brave; gung-ho Luke Skywalker, the hero right out of Joseph Campbell, who manages to be annoying and inspiring at the same time; even characters like R2-D2 and Chewbacca, who don't have a coherent line in the script, are developed as recognizable personalities! A cast straight out of Shakespeare or Dickens is what makes Lucas' film an immortal classic.

    Don't get me wrong, Space battles and lightsaber duels are great, but let's hope Lucas is able to inject some life into the two-dimensional caricatures who pranced around onscreen during Episode I (name three differences between Obi-Wan and Kwi-Gon-Jinn's personalities, or for that matter, between Obi-Wan and Queen Amidiala), otherwise those of us for whom the STAR WARS flame burns bright in our hearts may be in for another ho-hum prequel.

    1. Re:Its not the battles, it's not the action... by Milalwi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ...and even the credits: think about the famous screen crawl at the start of the film.

      I'm no Lucas lover, but the opening credit crawl is brilliant! And Lucas had to fight the directors guild to get it in there:

      The Director's Guild of America (DGA) didn't like the fact that there were no specific credits at the beginning of the film. They "ordered" Lucas to re-cut the film and put some credits at the beginning. Lucas refused, claiming that this would destroy the opening of the film. The DGA fined Lucas, who paid up, and promptly quit the DGA.

      Milalwi
    2. Re:Its not the battles, it's not the action... by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The characters sucked in Episode I. In fact, and I hate to say this, the most interesting character was probably Jar Jar. If you want the other stuff, just go to CrewOfTwo to see some cool Star Wars effects in action.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    3. Re:Its not the battles, it's not the action... by CaseyB · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I'm no Lucas lover, but the opening credit crawl is brilliant!

      You can continue hating Lucas then, because he borrowed it from Flash Gordon.

    4. Re:Its not the battles, it's not the action... by jamesmrankinjr · · Score: 1

      You can continue hating Lucas then, because he borrowed it [jitterbug.com] from Flash Gordon.

      Great artists steal.

      -jimbo

    5. Re:Its not the battles, it's not the action... by Grue · · Score: 1
      Great artists steal.

      And then they add to what they steal and send it back out there. I think the question should be then did Lucas add enough back?

      The answer is no! Clearly not! He should have mapped the scrolling text to a sine wave! And added in disco lights! Made the text neon! With a pulsating background!

      Oh! Star Wars.. not Star Trek. Sorry, wrong conversation.

  12. Probably a hoax. by netsharc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I doubt the script is real.. and seeing how much of a freaking lunatic George Lucas can be, he'd probably decide to change the script if the real one that got leaked out were the real one.

    I saw the trailer of Episode 2, and I can't believe how fucking cheesy the dialog is. "Anakin, you have grown."; "So have you, Princess. In more ways than one.", or "What if something you want is really here.", said while they're holding hands before Anakin has to go fight some aliens. fffUUUCCCKKK!!! In contrast, Dawson's Creek may not have realistic dialog, but at least it's better than watching a dialog that looks like it was stolen from a conversation between a Britney Spears-listening, boyband-loving bimbo teenager and his duh football-jock boyfriend.

    Stupid Hollywood shit, I can't stand watching most films nowadays, goddamn unrealistic plot development and fucked-up acting of unrealistic dialogs...

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:Probably a hoax. by Tryfen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Stupid Hollywood shit, I can't stand watching most films nowadays

      Then don't watch films from Hollywood! There are pleanty of films from Britain, France, India etc. etc.

      Broaden your horizons - don't just eat what the commercials force feed you.

      --
      If a square is really a rhombus, why aren't all triangles purple?
    2. Re:Probably a hoax. by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      I agree, vote with your wallet and let Lucas Inc. know you won't pay to see crap. At this time I'm boycotting Episode II (or hell, III). Lucas Inc. (I would like to believe George wasn't totally responsible for Episode I) clearly has become about marketing and targetting audiences than making a good film. I admit, I might change my mind after the movie is released, but Lucas Inc. is going to have to earn my money rather than count on me seeing it at least once.

      Fellowship of the Rings shows how it should have been done, with careful attention to detail and a great respect for the books and the fans. Episode I was all about selling Darth Maul action figures.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    3. Re:Probably a hoax. by Tomster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Advantages of watching older movies:

      1. No trailers or commercials to fast forward through. Just a few seconds of the FBI's you-better-not-copy-this-tape.

      2. A storyline developed by someone over the age of 10.

      3. Characters who act like human beings, instead of ludicrous puppets being jacked around by plot devices and ridiculous situations.

      4. A soundtrack that supports the movie, instead of screaming "here's what you should be feeling".

      5. Less makeup and other artifices to create the "perfect" visual image.

      6. Characters who show good principles and morals, instead of "oh, well, I just felt like it" ethics.

      I could go on. The point's been made.

      Are there still good films being made? Sure. Are all older films better than today's? No. But the quality of the "average" film has IMO declined considerably.

      -Thomas

    4. Re:Probably a hoax. by SarekOfVulcan · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of films from Britain, France, India etc. etc. Don't forget Japan!

    5. Re:Probably a hoax. by drik00 · · Score: 1
      Fellowship of the Rings shows how it should have been done, with careful attention to detail

      kinda like the part where you see the car drive across the back of the scene? I bet it was Frodo's ride.

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    6. Re:Probably a hoax. by geekoid · · Score: 2

      between a Britney Spears-listening, boyband-loving bimbo teenager and his duh football-jock boyfriend
      ummm...isn't that who is saying it?
      Harrison Foir said it best "George, this stuff reads great on paper, but its shit to say."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Probably a hoax. by Steveftoth · · Score: 1, Troll

      India? You say that good films are made in India? Well, maybe you've seen the unpopular, off beat, only seen by a million indians movies, but every movie that I've seen from India was like ten disney movies in one. All musicals, all love stories / action with the same girl singing all the songs ( over all the movies ).

      I'll agree that many good movies are NOT made in the USA, but not India, AFAIK they are 10x worse then hollywood.

  13. Leaked Episode III Script. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Jar Jar: me go eat some donuts and talk to the Jedi.

    (Zwoosh!)

    Jedi: oops, sorry there. Shouldn't walk behind me with your neck exposed when Im swinging around my light saber.

    Oh yes, this *will* be in the script. {/me Pounces fist to palm}
  14. Spoilers and Notes for Episodes 2, 3 and 7 by phil_atk · · Score: 1, Insightful
    The review for EpII is quite informative from a storyline perspective. Anyone interested in viewing the final script (which ties in with this review) should go to www.supershadow.com where there are also (preliminary) scripts for episodes III and VII.

    What is interesting from looking around the supershadow site and reading reviews such as this one is that Lucas is, if nothing else, a very smart business man. EpI was designed to attract a new generation of fans and epII was designed to build on this base and reinvigorate the older generations. This is obviously contrary to the utopian desires of the older generation, but if this movie is as much of a success within that demographic as it could be, would you have done anything different?

    While it is fair to give Lucas respect for being such a astute profiteer, it is a great disappointment that a man with such wealth would feel the need to have to use characters like JaJa to make more quick bucks. Surely there is a line to be drawn between a new ivory back-scratcher and a creative legacy?

  15. Re:How about? by smaughster · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    Lazy bum! if you want real news for nerds, find interesting bit that you think are worthwhile and submit em here, instead of just whining. I get sick and tired of people who complain about news here but who do not contribute themselves. If you are not part of the solution, you are part of the problem. Kudos to all who do post news here.

    --
    I intend to live forever, so far so good.
  16. N'sync in script. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1

    What about all the dead boy band members we were promised earlier?

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:N'sync in script. by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      They were sent to /dev/null where they belong, because of upset fans.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  17. Re:Rave Reviews? by PoshSpod · · Score: 1
    ...or if he was he was horribly killed straight after the opening credits. :)

    --

    This is my sig.

  18. Re:All I have to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    You should have mentioned Natalie Portman. She's actually in the movie, so it might have been considered on-topic.

    Who knows... maybe at the end of the trilogy, she'll be naked and petrif^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H frozen in carbonite.

  19. Re:Sadly, it's a hoax. by darien · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All Slashdot says is that "Dark Horizons has obtained a copy of what it believes is the script for Attack of the Clones" (emphasis added); and there's a link to the site and the relevant page. Unless you think Dark Horizons is simply trolling, you can hardly say Slashdot is being taken in. It's just publicising something interesting, which is pretty much what it's supposed to do.

    And anyway, if it is a hoax, how are the editors supposed to know? The synopsis is perfectly plausible, and Dark Horizons is a well-respected site, which reviews many scripts ahead of release. It's not (AFAIK) normally given to perpetrating hoaxes or excessive credulity. In the absence of any "official" material, this is about as convincing it's going to get until the thing's released.

    If you start blasting Slashdot for running reports like this then where does it end? Olaf Christ running TCP/IP on Mindstorms? Uncorroborated. Linux for the PS2? We only have Sony's word for it. Judge grants request to bar the media from the MS trial? That's what he says. Etc. etc.

  20. Can we take this seriously when.... by AntipodesTroll · · Score: 3, Informative

    The "review" seems to be written to so obviously make Ep2 everything people wanted Ep1 to be? "This time, its great, fantastic, its perfect!" Bit too obvious.

    They havent seen the movie, even if the script is fine, it dosent guarentee a good movie. This has to be a hoax, and even if its not, you should take it with a grain of salt. Its not a review of the movie, its a review of a questionably-authentic script, of unknown revision.

    --
    Anyone who considers arithmetical methods of producing random numbers is, of course, in a state of sin.-John von Neumann
    1. Re:Can we take this seriously when.... by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      "The `review' seems to be written to so obviously make Ep2 everything people wanted Ep1 to be? `This time, its great, fantastic, its perfect!' Bit too obvious."

      It is missing one critical element to make it "perfect," and this lends the tiniest shred of possiability that this is a real script (however unlikely that might be).

      Jar Jar Binks does not "die slowly, cut into a thousand pieces." :-p

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    2. Re:Can we take this seriously when.... by fr2asbury · · Score: 1

      "The "review" seems to be written to so obviously make Ep2 everything people wanted Ep1 to be? "This time, its great, fantastic, its perfect!" Bit too obvious. "

      Yeah, and I suppose you don't believe Microsoft when they say "This time Windows won't crash."

      Sheesh, skeptics!

      Jonathan

  21. SuperShadow's site is known to be fake by Jugalator · · Score: 5, Informative

    SuperShadow's site is known to be 100% bogus. Do a search at Google on "supershadow" to find out for yourself.

    1. SuperShadow doesn't personally know Lucas.

    2. SuperShadow doesn't work at LucasFilm.

    3. The "script" for Episode II he says he got himself, was actually made by TheForce.net fans and others collecting spoilers/leaks from various sites and compiling them into a speculative "script".

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:SuperShadow's site is known to be fake by lugonn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, according to supershadow's site he has a small role in 'Attack of the Clones' (alien in 'Dexter's Diner'?). So if he's not in it, then you know it's bogus for sure.

      But, I've been visiting the site since before ep.1 came out, and the script summary he posted way back for then ep.1 was accurate. So, who really knows...uh...the shadow i suppose.

  22. Re:Hypocrisy by karmma · · Score: 2
  23. Post predictions for this story by karmma · · Score: 5, Funny

    14 posts about Natalie Portman (petrified or otherwise)

    23 posts calling for the death of Jar Jar

    18 posts wondering if CG was done on Linux boxen, and if not, why not

    12 posts arguing whether or not Boba Fett is the coolest Star Wars character of all time

    Written the way Yoda speaks, 9 posts there will be

    6 links to fan fic that are remarkably similar to the plot in the affore-mentioned script

    1. Re:Post predictions for this story by shaunak · · Score: 1

      "Written the way Yoda speaks, 9 posts there will be "

      Right you are not.

      Written the way yoda speaks, 9 posts will there be.

      --
      -Shaunak.
    2. Re:Post predictions for this story by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1
      * 23 posts calling for the death of Jar Jar

      Well so far I only count seven, so here are a few more:
      1. Jar Jar Must Die!
      2. Jar Jar Must Die!
      3. Jar Jar Must Die!
      4. Jar Jar Must Die!
      5. Jar Jar Must Die!
      6. Jar Jar Must Die!
      7. Jar Jar Must Die!
      8. Jar Jar Must Die!
      9. Jar Jar Must Die!
      10. Jar Jar Must Die!
      11. Jar Jar Must Die!
      12. Jar Jar Must Die!
      13. Jar Jar Must Die!
      14. Jar Jar Must Die!
      15. Jar Jar Must Die!
      16. Jar Jar Must Die!
    3. Re:Post predictions for this story by artemis67 · · Score: 2

      Put a zero after each one of those numbers, and I think you just about have it...

  24. Re:The preview... by larien · · Score: 2

    Yup, saw that one. My friend summed it up in 4 words: "Less sex, more fighting!"

  25. Re:you have ewan Mc gregor, you have liam neeson, by Andux · · Score: 1

    Episode 2 takes place ~22 years before the original trilogy. Han Solo would probably be a teenager, at the oldest, and Harrison Ford is almost 60 now; while they could probably work around that for Indiana Jones 4, or something based on the New Jedi Order books, no amount of movie magic is going to put him in Episode 2.

    --
    (Do not sign anything.) -- Fell, Planescape: Torment
  26. Not so fast by kentrel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Bear in mind everybody that when I read Phantom Menace script I too thought it was going to be a great movie because it was such a great script. The two things that ruined Phantom Menace were Jake Lloyd's bad acting and Jar Jar Binks irritating voice. On paper, it would be impossible to tell what they were like. I thought Binks was going to be a Chewbacca type character, loveable without being too Disney. I was wrong. Not even Disney would associate themselves with that guy! Attack of the Clones has a terrible name. That was a bad choice on Lucas' part. It just seems like he's jumping on the cloning bandwagon we've been seeing lately in sciencefiction. However, Hayden Christian looks good in the role of Anakin, and Natalie Portman looks well...fabulous as she always does. It's a pity that this looks like it's going to be romance heavy, so I really hope there's a good twist in there somewhere, a la Empire Strikes Back.

    1. Re:Not so fast by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It just seems like he's jumping on the cloning bandwagon we've been seeing lately in sciencefiction.

      Perhaps you've heard of a little movie from 1977, called "Star Wars?" Later retitled "Star Wars - A New Hope?"

      There's this little plot piece in there that goes soemthing like this:

      Luke: "You fought with my father in the Clone Wars?!?"

      Obi-Wan (Ben) Kenobi: "Yes, your father was one of the best fighter pilots in the Galaxy..."

      I'd hardly think that coming up with a premise twenty-five years ago qualifies as "jumping on the cloning bandwagon" of today.

      :P

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    2. Re:Not so fast by Mupp252 · · Score: 1

      I agree Jake Lloyd's acting and Jar Jar's dialoge left alot to be desired but consider the following:

      "It just seems like he's jumping on the cloning bandwagon we've been seeing lately in sciencefiction."

      Sure Lucas is jumping on the bandwagon... if that started almost 30 years ago! The clone wars were mentioned as early as "A New Hope" and were then documented in the "Behind the magic" CD that came out around the time of the "Special Edition" theatrical releases. If anything Lucas has perfect timing. Cloning is just now coming into perspective in real life. It will either help or hinder us. That's what these movies were originially meant to be about. On topic for modern day issues but happening "A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away..."

    3. Re:Not so fast by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Err, exactly. The entire rise of the Empire has always ridden on the idea of a clone army. Ever wonder why every stormtrooper has exactly the same voice? The emperor himself is rumored to be a clone.

      I think we all knew that this episode and the next would be dealing with the fall of the republic at the hands of Palpatine, aided by the army of clones, and Anakin's eventual transformation into Vader.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    4. Re:Not so fast by jandrese · · Score: 3, Funny

      I always figued that all of the Stormtroopers were cloned from the same guy. Unfortunatly the Empire choose a severly retarded guy to clone, who was a terrible shot to boot.

      Remember in episode 4 where Obi-Wan talks about how the blaster marks are "too precise" for sand people, they had to be imperial stormtroopers? Either Sand People don't believe in actually pointing their blasters at anything, or Obi-Wan was making an ironic observation about all of the blaster marks spread all across the landscape (off frame :)

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:Not so fast by sphealey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The two things that ruined Phantom Menace were Jake Lloyd's bad acting
      Jake Lloyd may not be the best actor in the universe, but he had at least the potential to do the job right. The failure there was 100% one of directing. Using children in movies/plays is always difficult. There are a number of reasons for this, but the primary one is that childen with the traits you are trying to portray won't sit still on a movie set 6 days a week for 12 months. Children who will sit still and take direction must be directed so that they appear right for the character. 101% the adults fault.

      I would have forgiven TPM everything, even two fart jokes, if it had just included an adult conversation between Qui-Gon and Anniken's mother about how she came to be in that prediciment. Oh well.

      sPh

    6. Re:Not so fast by kentrel · · Score: 1

      That's not the point. I know they've mentioned cloning in Star Wars befor but using it in the title just SEEMS like he's jumping on the bandwagon.

      Appearences in the movie industry are everything, and if it appears he's just cashing in on the cloning craze (maybe he is, maybe he isn't) then many people will believe it to be so. It's also a bad name because it's way too cacophonic.

    7. Re:Not so fast by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Oh, exactly. Leia seems to be the only one they have ever hit (and then they had to use a wide-dispersal stun gun at close range).

      Precision my @ss. Obi-Wan was a funny guy.

      Sand People are expert marksmen compared to Stormtroopers (remember they bounced one off Anakin's speeding pod from a high cliff?) I'd like to see a stormtrooper do that. The standard issue ST rifle is wildly inaccurate. Every play JKII? The empire obviously traded off rate of fire for any kind of accuracy.

      Of course, when you have millions of troopers on a battlefield, who cares how accurate any one soldier is, right?

      >the Empire choose a severly retarded guy to clone

      My theory was that the only way the empire was able to succees in mass cloning viable humans was to do serious modification to the genes to make them more resistant to mutations, disease, uprisings, etc. Unfortunately, the trade off is that they are incredibly thick, have slow reflexes and terrible aim (not to mention that being hit on the head with a rock easily incapacitates them).

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    8. Re:Not so fast by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's also a bad name because it's way too cacophonic.

      You know, you're right. I think based on all the StarWars FanBoy talk I've seen since 1983, they should have called this one

      Star Wars Episode II - Boba Fett is the awesomest ever!!!!

      :P

      --
      SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    9. Re:Not so fast by colbaz · · Score: 1

      ...So is "A New Hope" and "The Phantom Menace".Cacophonic titles are par for the course and probably intended!

    10. Re:Not so fast by Winged+Cat · · Score: 1

      "The Imperial Stormtrooper Marksmanship Academy" has been referenced in so many places, for its outstanding lack of quality... ;)

  27. JarJar binks. Groan. by Alsee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok, JarJar's going to be a main character again. May as well put the 'nSync footage back in. Expand it even. Write Briteny Spears into the script. Perhaps even petrify her. And what the heck, why not re-unite Menudo and give them a role too.

    -

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:JarJar binks. Groan. by Llywelyn · · Score: 1

      You forgot the hot grits.

      ::nog me::

      Okay, I am *way* too tired for my own good.

      --
      Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
    2. Re:JarJar binks. Groan. by stubear · · Score: 2

      You know, whenI heard N'Sync was going to be in Episode II I was pissed off. However, once I heard what part they play in the movie I didn't care anymore. They play a group of jedi knights in the backgroudn and they die quickly. I believe their onscreen time is about 15 seconds. Big fucking deal. If you get all worked up ovr this little bit of news then you need to seek therapy. Did I happen to mention the good news? George Lucas gets to kill N'Sync.

    3. Re:JarJar binks. Groan. by AtariKee · · Score: 1

      "And what the heck, why not re-unite Menudo and give them a role too."

      YEAH! That way, we could kill off Ricky Martin for good!!

      (Actually, Menudo is an on-going entity, even tlo this day).

      --
      "You're getting brutal, Sark. Brutal and needlessly sadistic."
      "Thank you, Master Control"
      -Sark and the MCP
  28. Suckered again! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
    The media (and /.ers) have been suckered again. Obviously, this is an INTENTIONAL leak of false information, either just to stir up interest, or to simply gauge public reaction to some elements of the plots, in order to re-adjust it according to responses.

    Tinseltown has shown remarkable ability in playing with people's brains, and this is yet another example of it.

  29. Bad trailer != bad film by Maran · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, the trailer I saw was full of teenage forbidden love and sappy-cuteness. But I doubt that's going to be the content of the whole film. I mean, it wouldn't be a Star Wars movie without a decent space battle and lightsaber duel. Even Lucas realises this.

    [rant]
    Besides, I'm _very_ glad that the trailer doesn't reveal everything - The Ep 1 trailer showed far too much. Like Darth Maul and his double bladed lightsaber. Go back in your mind to the first time you saw the film. Now replay the scene where Maul lights the second blade - as if you _didn't_ know he had one from the trailer. That could have been a "holy f*cking sh*t!!!" moment that would have made the entire film. Who cares about Jar Jar when you've got a scene like that? But no. They had to go and spoil it...
    [/rant]

    IIRC, Lucas said that Ep 1 was an introduction to the characters and time period. 2 is _mostly_ a love story, while 3 is much darker. I for one can tollerate a little glucose content in 2, as long as it doesn't detract from the story (or get in the way of some bad-guy ass-kicking Jedi style).

    And as for the title, I am still holding out hope that it's a ploy to screw all the fake merchandise that's bound to appear. I'm not sure, but I don't recall the trailer explicitly calling it "Attack of the Clones" - it was just "Episode 2". Am I right?

    Maran

    1. Re:Bad trailer != bad film by merz · · Score: 1

      Thats exactly why my friend and I took 'a vow of purity' and avoided all trailers, merchandise, reviews, and whatnot in order to not 'spoil' the movie for us. I have some fond memories or sprinting out of movie theatres when the trailer was unexpectantly played =]

    2. Re:Bad trailer != bad film by geekoid · · Score: 2

      I have the same rant about most movies.
      Nothing like sitting in the theater and thinking that would have been the funniest thing I have ver seen, if ti hadn't been played to death in the trailors..
      I would love to make the trailors for movies, they would be damn cool.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Bad trailer != bad film by Yecti · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the trailer I saw was full of teenage forbidden love and sappy-cuteness Perhaps I'm wrong in assuming so, but I got a trailer WAAAAAAAAAAAY before Thanksgiving that ISN'T the Forbidden Love one from StarWars.com that portrays Jango Fett, a group of Mandalorian soldiers, a crap load of sabers and battle, and the council. Unfortunately, no title other than "Ep II Trailer". Alas, when I checked back 2 days later, the trailer had been pulled, and some poor sap who posted it had lost his job according to the news. At any rate, my point. That trailer, (be it "Mystery" or the other) kicks some major ass, and hinted to me that Ep II would actually be worth waiting for 16 days in line like I did for Ep I. To comment on another notion that's been mentioned within the topic, if Lucas keeps to his tried and true formula for the Trilogy aspect of his films, then he won't direct Ep. II. He didn't direct ESB, rather, was an on-set advisor or something of the sort. Which might explain why the two movies that he did direct are never as fun to watch. {/me shrugs}

      --
      Microsoft® made my software; Microsoft® made my hardware; now if only I could get them to make my bed.
  30. Re:The preview... by jgerman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Wow, that's odd, let's think about it. Anakin is a teenager, Amildala is a teenager they fall in love. HOLY SHIT you're right, how dare he make a movie about two teenagers falling in love when he's telling the story about how two teenagers fell in love which eventually results in Episodes 4,5, and 6. It would be SO much more satisfying if Amidala just has Luke and Leia with no explanation.

    --
    I'm the big fish in the big pond bitch.
  31. "Leaked" Scripts by TechnoLust · · Score: 1

    Yes, I remember downloading the "Script" for the Star Trek Generations off the net before it came out. It was so accurate! It seems every big "geek" movie or movies that have a big following have these things pop up that are usually not close to the REAL script. I don't know if it is someone being an ass, or the movie studio trying to create hype, but either way, it's pretty stupid.

    --
    "Da ist ein Technölüst in mein Unterpanten!"
  32. Let not your heart be troubled..... by nixadmin · · Score: 1

    There is a place, a wonderful place, where you can watch Jar Jar die over and over again. Experience the magic of ASCIImation HERE...

  33. Still might hurt.... by Nagash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Even if the script is good, we're still gonna get clubbed over the head with wooden acting on this one, if the trailers are any indication.

    I saw Life As A House with Hayden Christensen. He can act. Here's to hoping Lucas remembered how to direct on this one.

    Woz

  34. "Mystery" Trailer by count_dooku · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Even if this script isn't the real one, pretty much everyone involved in Episode II has remarked that this one has the potential for greatness. Ewan McGregor, not exactly silent on how bad Episode I was, remarked early on that this script was great. In fact, last week on the Today show, while promoting Black Hawk Down, Ewan again remarked how good he thought Episode II was going to be. There was genuine sincerity in his voice, not the usual Hollywood bullshit.

    If you really want to see the promise in Episode II, you'll need to view the "Mystery" trailer. Yeah yeah, I know, only available to Phantom Menace DVD owners, only available to Windows users, whatever. It's a good trailer, and shows the sense of adventure much better than the "Forbidden Love" trailer.

    --
    For the book says, "We may be through with the past, but the past ain't through with us."
    1. Re:"Mystery" Trailer by Score0,+Overrated · · Score: 3, Funny

      There was genuine sincerity in his voice,

      Ewan McGregor? He's that actor bloke isn't he?

    2. Re:"Mystery" Trailer by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Psst. If he wasn't exactly silent about how bad Episode I was, then what makes you think he hasn't been chastisized by Lucas & co., and is just making it up to them by praising this film?

    3. Re:"Mystery" Trailer by Sebastopol · · Score: 2, Funny

      There was genuine sincerity in his voice, not the usual Hollywood bullshit.

      Um, that's called "acting". ;-) Seriously, who in their right mind is going to pan a potential cash cow?! I'm sure the stars from "Big Mommas House" and "Dude, Where's my Car?" were all pitching raves before their respective releases.

      Ewan and the rest of the cast stand to make in the 10^7 US$ range off this one, especially if they help pump up the public with good tidings that the script will be better than EpisodeI, even if it truly isn't.

      Good or bad, you won't be making any money off this movie, but lots of people will be getting very, very rich off your dollar. To me, this reaffirms the message to hollywood that as a society, we're OK with their bad movies. But if you like movies like this, than I guess it is a good thing.

      However, I recently noticed that my local Tower Video rental store has all three "Porky's" movies, but not a single Otto Preminger film. I consider that a bad thing.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    4. Re:"Mystery" Trailer by ppanon · · Score: 1

      The actor that plays Obi-Wan is expected to complain about the quality of the movies :-)

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    5. Re:"Mystery" Trailer by count_dooku · · Score: 1

      He doesn't have to "make it up to them," because he already signed a three-picture deal. If they fire him because they don't like his opinions, it's their loss, not his. Plus, as many Sar Wars actors have pointed out, the pay scale for Star Wars is much lower than other big-budget productions. I'll bet Ewan made more money on Black Hawk Down then he did on Episode I. Plus, it's not like he's Mark Hamill, with no future beyond Star Wars.

      All I'm trying to say here is that here's a vocal Ep. I critic, and he's not that happy with the title eaither, yet from the very beginning, he's saying that the script for Episode II is far better than the last movie. And he's not the only one.

      --
      For the book says, "We may be through with the past, but the past ain't through with us."
  35. Re:The preview... by Maran · · Score: 1

    The sarcasm meter's red-lining here:

    "How dare he make a movie about two teenagers falling in love when he's telling the story about how two teenagers fell in love which eventually results in Episodes 4,5, and 6. It would be SO much more satisfying if Amidala just has Luke and Leia with no explanation."

    What, you mean like how Shimi had Anakin without him having a father (casting no aspertions here, but I'd hesitate to say "virgin birth")?

    Let's see, born (presumably) in some relative hovel somewhere, 3 strangers turn up, and bring him gifts (like freeing him, training him, etc). Dies "to save us all" (killing the Emperor). Comes back from the dead (sort of) and can only be seen by certain people...

    Jesus == Darth Vader?

    Geez, if religion was as cool as Star Wars, I might be a believer ^^;

    Maran

  36. But...but...but... by iceT · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    It's gonna have n'Sync in it...

    eeeeeuuuuuwwwww......

    --
    -- You can't idiot-proof anything, because they're always coming out with better idiots.
  37. Stupid assassins by Internet+Stranger · · Score: 3, Funny

    ""Queen Amidala (Natalie Portman) and the animated character Jar Jar Binks are both members of the Senate, representing their respective planets, while Obi Wan (Ewan McGregor) and the now-adolescent Anakin Skywalker (Hayden Christensen) have been off training and becoming involved in a variety of adventures.

    Anakin and Obi Wan are called upon to act as bodyguards for Amidala after she is the subject of a foiled assassination.""

    Stupid Assassins, they never aim for the right one.

    --
    ------------- I didn't know she was your sister I swear!
    1. Re:Stupid assassins by Maran · · Score: 1

      "Queen Amidala (Natalie Portman) and the animated character Jar Jar Binks are both members of the Senate, representing their respective planets..."

      Huh? They're both from the same planet!

      Maran

    2. Re:Stupid assassins by mgblst · · Score: 2

      "Queen Amidala (Natalie Portman) and the animated character Jar Jar Binks are both members of the Senate, representing their respective planets..."

      Arent they on the same planet? I mean, i only
      saw TPM once, but im pretty sure!

  38. What the heck did you say about LOTR ? :P by Smuffe · · Score: 1

    Fellowship of the Rings shows how it should have been done, with careful attention to detail and a great respect for the books and the fans. Episode I was all about selling Darth Maul action figures.

    Come on!
    Careful attention to detail? What detail? Certainly not the books. There are so many changes made I almost walked out of the theater after an hour the first time I saw it. I agree its a great movie, but I don't agree it has that kind of detail.
    /Smuffe

    1. Re:What the heck did you say about LOTR ? :P by Datafage · · Score: 2

      It had hoards and hoards of detail. No, it didn't have as much detail as the book. A movie can't; they're different media and have different strengths. All the characters looked exactly as they should have (ok, the hobbits were too thin, that's minor though), and all the scenery was gorgeous. The movie would have been much, much worse if they had tried to make it a perfect rendition of the book, it works much better this way.

      --

      Nicotine free Amish .sig.

    2. Re:What the heck did you say about LOTR ? :P by RedHat+Rocky · · Score: 1

      Details like all the careful craftsman work, most of which you wouldn't be able to see onscreen. But having those sorts of details helped the ACTORS quite a bit. Many of the cast have commented on how much the sets seemed like real places instead of "just a set".

      Now, your comment on the changes from the book is right on. They changed a lot and cut a lot. For those who don't think so, watch FotR and then read the book again. My question is this: why did you go see the movie? You know the story, you have all the characters in your head, why bother? Because you wanted to See it, Hear it and Feel it in a way the book couldn't do. And the movie certainly accomplished that, IMO.

      --
      Anything is possible given time and money.
    3. Re:What the heck did you say about LOTR ? :P by ahde · · Score: 2

      They could have put in alot of details with the time they spent having Vigo stare at the statue.

    4. Re:What the heck did you say about LOTR ? :P by ahde · · Score: 2

      and all the time spent showing Fraggle Rock

    5. Re:What the heck did you say about LOTR ? :P by friscolr · · Score: 2
      Details like all the careful craftsman work, most of which you wouldn't be able to see onscreen. But having those sorts of details helped the ACTORS quite a bit. Many of the cast have commented on how much the sets seemed like real places instead of "just a set".

      Not to knock LOTR (though i didnt think it was Spectacular, just good), but Blade Runner and 2001 (among others, these are the first i know that did this) both spent a lot of time creating an environment for the actors, not just the viewers; creating such an environment is not revolutionary to LOTR. Blade Runner featured newspapers and magazines with actual falsified articles in them, in locations unseen by the viewers and 2001 had fake futuristic brand names sewn into underwear, to name a couple of unseen details.

      oh, and to keep this post on topic, Harrison Ford rocks. if they want E-II to be as good as the originals they need him in them. HARRISON FORD I LOVE YOU AND WANT TO HAVE YOUR BABY!!!!!
      well, as long as you tell me you regret having done Six Days, Seven Nights.

      er, sorry, my head cold 0w3nz me.

  39. Rave review? by fliptout · · Score: 1

    Complete with ecstasy, flashing lights, and deafening drum beats? ...I suppose that would be necessary to enjoy Ep II.

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  40. Humph...Doesn't sound like the ad I saw by z7209 · · Score: 1

    The longest advertisement I saw in a cinema just looked like one long love story / soap opera to me. I was appalled. I hope it was just an extreme advertising faux pas.

  41. I Still Think by motox · · Score: 1

    That the series was complete with The Return of the Jedi and that these new movies don't add nothing. They take out something actually, because the past in the original movies was something mysterious , something unknown that left to the imagination, casting a big shadow on the "present". Instead now we have 2 movies that are supposed to be in the past but where , because in reality our technology advanced, the special effects and the overall technlology appears much more advanced than the "future", even if they dress them in a "70s" style to make them look funky and old. Episode 1 was much more a Disney movie than a Star Wars movie, they could have replaced Jar Jar with Donald Duck and it would have been funny at least :)

    1. Re:I Still Think by julesh · · Score: 1

      I can't say I entirely agree that the technology looks more advanced.

      If you ignore obvious failings, like the clunky big buttons in the cockpit of the X wings in New Hope (a sign of a fairly low budget film when you set it against other sci-fi films of a similar period - remember Alien?), then the tech looks pretty similar.

      If anything, I would say it portrays an image that the direction intended to get over: technology may have advanced a little by the time the original trilogy occurred, but everyone was *poorer*. Things weren't as shiny, but they were more functional. Even down to the 'battle droids'. Robotic armies must be expensive to maintain: Much better to throw a few cheap people in, especially as they will be better than the droids...

  42. Big deal by cnkeller · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is the same script that has been out for months here. What's new about it? From what I've read and seen, it's dead on accurate with the officially released trailers, and was posted long before they were released.

    --

    there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

  43. Whatever by Crouching+Turbo · · Score: 1
    Here's an idea. Instead of complaining about all the crap in the new Star Wars movies, just don't go see them. Vote with your wallet.

    I felt ripped off at Episode I, and I'm certainly not paying anything to see the next one.

  44. repeat of history? I hope not (long) by Stalcair · · Score: 3, Interesting
    if you know of the story of Ultima: Ascension, then skip down, the next section is about the setup and a little history lesson


    back around the time when Episode I was about to be released, was still the time when another 'Epic' (touted by the creators) entertainment event was unfolding. That event was the conclusion of the Ultima series. For just under 6 years, fans and even new initiates to the series had eagerly awaited not just the release but any snippet of news, screenshots, story, etc. The excitement built up this mere game both amazed and scared some who did not understand the game (hey, what do THEY know). Literally hundreds of sites devoted themselves to this next epic conclusion known as Ultima IX, and then Ascension later. Many fan sites had a ton of fiction and story lines, many a serious (and often very nasty) discussion on forums was held about what the origin of blackrock, the guardian and this whole mess really was. There where even rumors of published books. (I for one never saw them) In a stated attempt by Origin|EA to not scare off potential new customers they would stealthily release tidbits of information to select organizations (usually in other countries than most of the fan sites, but that is merely a demographic issue). It was touted as just another action adventure game, and the title changed to reflect that no player had to have any existing experience with the series.

    However, things began to go sour. Long time devoted fans (made obvious by their volunteer time and effort given so generously to the community) found that they where THE ONLY source of information about the upcoming game. Questions about why they, the fans, must volunteer their time (as in free) to promote and advocate the game, ask questions that never where answered, be put off by EA|Origin staff, yet not get paid or compensated for it. (In case you don't know, free is not accurate. The fans in fact take a loss from the costs to bandwidth and hardware, not to mention loss of real life productivity) EA|Origin obviously did not care about this issue, and could not seem to spend the money to either help out some sites, through direct assistance or just providing a few hours here and there for knowledgable employees to act as liasons. Soon, many web sites began to disappear, feeling dejected that they would not only be denied any information, but where often lied to. (as evidenced by answers from staff that where directly contradicting a press release that would be released a day later to a gaming magazine, usually in a foreign language) It soon became apparent that EA|Origin either where taking the existing fan base for granted (in a VERY extreme case), or simply did not wish to make a game that appealed to them and thus felt some sort of guilt or shame, leading to the alienation treatment of the fans.

    While the term 'understand' can be used to describe how the vast majority of fans felt in relation to the game appealing to a larger market, many where worried that if the development/producing team did not have the integrity necessary to first produce a game that answers the call of the fan base (regardless of whether they dress it up later a bit to appeal to others) then it would manifest as a bad game that appeals to none (neither the new crowd or the existing fans). This was warrented not only because of this situation happening so many times in other games and even non entertainment and/or computer industries... but more importantly, was the fact that when it had been tried with Ultima 8, it only ended in disaster. No one liked the game (by no one and none used earlier I mean a significant enough sized group to justify expenses, much less keep people interested in later releases). Like a restaruant that serves fecal matter and wonders why no one ever comes back and why negative word of mouth travels faster than positive word, EA|Origin proved that they refused to comprehend this basic lesson of life and business (on any level) by releasing Ascension as a... well... it didn't seem like an "Ultima" at all to me and many others. Some will argue pro or con of its merits as a stand alone game, that is not my concern here. The fact was, it not only continued a series and a story line, but was a very eagerly anticipated final wrap up of the entire series. Just looking back at that time period, you see how eagerly people where to once again travel to Britania and face its perils. Fan art, fan fiction, fan news sites, fan organizations of real life events and sub-press conferences... all of this translated to a very easy market for Origin and EA. They could have layed off their marketers for this. Or in efficiency and logical terms, they could have better applied their resources to the tasks that most made sense. Put that marketing (including marketing management, oversite, corporate interaction, overhead, etc) into development of code, art and story. (not to mention QA) Not to go into a rant on the futility of and inefficiency of corporate/bureaucratic mentality and processes... they simply did not prioritize correctly. End result was yet another game and public relation status that angered many and alienated many more.

    But wait, theres more... if you order now we include this guide, "How to take your one saving grace and flush it down the toilet". One of the most devestating (now seen in hindsite and admited by many ex employees including Garriot himself) was the mistake that trully relates to the Star Wars issue here. First, the comparison. Obviously many had awaited a long and often frustrating yet exciting time for Episode I to come out. Any news was lapped up like a marooned man in the Saharra laps up the dew off of a blade of grass if he finds it. Fans dressed up in silly costumes and acted out there favorite scenes from books and movies alike. Like with Ultima, fans devoted huge amounts of time, bandwidth, hardware and good ol fashion brain power to present news, art, rumors, facts and even fan based fiction. Even more than Ultima, Star Wars spawned an entire (and sometimes frightening) sub-culture of its own.

    However, some began to see signs of impending doom in the commercials, trailers, interviews and art. I for one remember a particular ad on TV that scared the bones from my body... it was narrated by this woman who's inflections, voice tenor and choice and timing of words where obviously of the sort used by advertising agencies to appeal to small children. Complete with the choicest tidbits of scenes that all featured everyone's favorite CGI loon, Jar Jar. If no one had ever hear of Star Wars, then they would have been left with the impression that this 'new movie' was merely a fun and cute childrens flick, much like a Disney animated film (well, not just animated, and no that is not necesarilly a bad thing on its own). This seemed to contrast the existing movies, books, story, etc that made up the fantasy universe of Star Wars.

    Now back to Ultima... the biggest single issue that destroyed the game and its effect on fans and newbies alike was the botched PR of the leak of the original game plot/script. (no, it is not ironic, at least not from a historical and 'Big Picture' perspective) Due to most likely a lack of consistent (or I should really say, just a sheer lack of PR in the first place) PR policy, growing tensions within the Origin camp and against its 'overlords', EA... a very large mistake happened. Besides the first mistake of leaking the script, the real issue was how they handled it. First they denied it, in an attempt to (as a prankster would perform if his joke was beginning to be suspected) turn the tide away from the discovery of the plot, Origin (whether directed or not) decided to redo the story. The result was a simplistic story with no real substance, much less any tie in with past releases and 'unanswered questions'. Very much less than any 'Epic' feel to the grand conclusion of one of the most popular and succesful (by various definitions) game series of all times.

    Now fast forward to the present... now we hear of a release/leak of the plot. Should we be concerned at all that they would change it, not really. I doubt any film studio would ever throw away its existing film already recorded, not to mention the CGI already in place in most parts. Even though it has happened in the past (like when an actor/actress dies before completion), I doubt personally anything major COULD be changed. However, I just hope (as in 'New Hope'?) that this next movie will break the 'cycle'. I look forward to it, and hope that it returns to the Episode 5 look and feel.

    Note that this was meant to really be silly to a large degree, so this does not necessarily reflect the internal ramblings of my rational mind... I know it is around here somewhere.

    --

    I seek not only to follow in the footsteps of the men of old, I seek the things they sought.

  45. Face it LOTR is an order of magnitude better... by justin+sane · · Score: 2, Insightful

    more creative, more interesting characters, better acted, better plot and allegory, uses technology to enhance the story instead of technology *being* most of the story.
    Watch Star Wars again and youll see that even it was cheesy and sucky--it just sucked less that most Hollywood drivel.

    Me, I'll wait for the DVD on Netflix like I do for most dogs. LOTR was worth a trip to the theater.

    1. Re:Face it LOTR is an order of magnitude better... by zzyzx · · Score: 1

      And they had 2 Jar Jar's (Merry and Pippen) instead of just the one that The Phantom Menace could deliver.

  46. Eyes *%&#$ killing you? by fishboy · · Score: 1

    Damn I hate it when an article (the review in question) is coded across the full screen as light text on a dark background.

    Couldn't finish it.

    Now my eyes are fucked up for days.

    Dammit, there should be laws about this.

  47. Trilogy Theory by lostboy2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Cheesy first film, somewhat like Star Wars (be honest), and what looks like a cracking second film (just like ESB). Just what is it with Lucas and trilogies anyway?

    In the "Special Edition" VHS series of the original Star Wars movies (not the remastered versions), Leonard Maltin interviews G.Lucas. Among other things, Lucas describes the first Star Wars trilogy as a "three-act play". He goes on to say that, in a three-act play, you introduce the characters in the first act (Star Wars), put them in the worst possible situation in the second act (Empire Strikes Back), and then get them out of it in the third (Return of the Jedi).

    So, I guess if Lucas stays true to this formula, then Ep2 will be a dark cliffhanger. Anyway, I'll be there, if only to see Natalie Portman and Ewan McGregor. :-)

    -- D

    "The Bastards have landed!" -- Peter Jackson, Bad Taste

  48. Acting??? by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Sure, Harrison Ford was great as usual, but Mark Hamill whined his way through the trilogy, and Carrie Fisher was too wasted to put on a decent performance.

    What made the original trilogy great was the "human" aspect of the characters. Han's scoundrel-turned-reluctant hero. Leia calling Han a "scruffy-looking nerfherder" and Chewy a "walking carpet." While the fate of the galaxy hung in the balance, the main characters were really just a bunch of crazy kids having a good time. It was light-hearted in the face of impending doom.

    That element was utterly missing from TPM. Qui-Gon was serious and dour. Obi-Wan was serious and dour. There was no sense of fun in the face of grave danger, but rather a sense of solemness in the face of bland political intrigue and trade embargoes. Jar-Jar was an attempt to inject the needed element into the movie, but it was forced and stale. If Jar-Jar had been a human, or at least a live actor, it might have worked.

    I also have a great fear about AOTC: the trailers clearly are geared towards the "WB crowd." A cheezy romance story (unlike the childish and subdued Luke-Leia-Han triangle that was not the focus but rather a "fleshing out") isn't going to fit well into the arc of the Star Wars saga in general. I fear it's going to be forced, stale, and drag down a trilogy that already shows deep flaws.

    --
    dinner: it's what's for beer
    1. Re:Acting??? by b0r0din · · Score: 1

      >I also have a great fear about AOTC: the >trailers clearly are geared towards the "WB >crowd."

      I can see it now:

      "From the makers of Smallville comes a tale of longing and obsession. For the teens at Tattooine High, nothing will ever be the same again. For a young Jedi, this will be the beginning...for a young princess, this could spell the end..."

      "I hate you, Anakin!"
      "Why, God, Why!!!"
      [insert Jawa noises]
      "Was that you?"

  49. Aint it Cool News' Review by Batou · · Score: 1

    Harry from Aint it Cool News had a review of the script earlier this week. From the sounds of it, it looks like Lucas is making up (somewhat) for the TPM debacle. I, for one, am hoping for the best.

    --
    "Oh my God! The dead have risen! And they're voting Republican!" - Bart Simpson
  50. I HAVE READ THE SCRIPT AND CONCUR by kingmanor · · Score: 1

    I have read the script of Ep2, and it really is a success. Of course people say that the script will not determine quality of the final product, but look at Ep1: its script was terrible (midi-chlorians, fatherless birth), but Lucas did execute it well, even if he can't write for his life. But from what goes on in Ep2, and if anyone's been watching the behind the scenes movies on starwars.com they'll see that it is looking great.

    If you want a copy of the script email, mmanor@optonline.net

    1. Re:I HAVE READ THE SCRIPT AND CONCUR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If you want a copy of the script email, mmanor@optonline.net

      I could really use a good script. Could you send it to me please?

      george_lucas@lucasarts.com

  51. Amazing by NiftyNews · · Score: 4, Funny

    A Star Wars fan site is psyched about an upcoming Star Wars movie?

    Color me amazed.

  52. Now it makes sense by WillSeattle · · Score: 1

    I can see why those guys are camped out at the Cinerama two blocks from me now.

    Sounds like a cool flick - especially Ewan McGregor's role in it.

    Concept: wish they had JarJar fight with a Dark Clone of himself - think of the fight scene! Man, you'd be rolling in the aisles and weeping at the same time. And they could Matrix it even, with the ears used to attack like bullets ...

    -

    --
    --- Will in Seattle - What are you doing to fight the War?
  53. What I am looking for by bstrahm · · Score: 2

    Why can't we have N'Synch singing at a cantina bar when Jar Jar Binks walks in - Hears the music and has his big floppy ears explode from the sonic disodence...

    Oh well maybe it is just time to go back to alt.ensign.crusher.die.die.die and read about the klingon rape fantasies...

  54. Re:Script - director... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2

    Hmmm...so, he also directed American Graffitti and THX 1138, and the original Star Wars. Coming from that argument, Saving Private Ryan was no better than Hook...

  55. The most amazing thing I saw in the plot synopsis by alumshubby · · Score: 3, Funny

    Queen Amidala (Natalie Portman) and the animated character Jar Jar Binks are both members of the Senate, representing their respective planets, while... [emphasis mine]

    I thought Jar Jar was fine for comic relief, but I can't buy him as an Imperial Senator. But then, I've found Bill Clinton and George W. Bush to be a succession of entertaining US Presidents, so anything's possible.

    --
    "How many light bulbs does it take to change a person?" --BMcC-->
  56. how did they get a copy of the script? by ahde · · Score: 2

    The only reason the were able to give the advance review is so that they could give a positive one.

    They wouldn't have seen the script if their opinion hadn't been determined before seeing it.

  57. Re:Script - director... by KewlPC · · Score: 1
    Actually, most people who know what they're talking about regard American Graffitti as fairly lackluster in general. It has almost no plot, the dialog is cheesy, and George Lucas' directing is subpar.

    It is commonly known by people who actually _make_ films that George Lucas is a bad director. He doesn't know how to direct actors very well and his movies are all throwbacks to 50's sci-fi crap.
    Most directors' favorite part of the moviemaking process is the actual production. George Lucas hates the production phase.
    Most directors try to pay attention to their actors and give them good motivation. George Lucas couldn't care less.
    The biggest thing, to me, is that most of the directors that I know can't stand to go for more than a few months without at least directing something. Mr Lucas went 20 years.

    It doesn't matter how good the script is, because if Georgie Boy screws up the execution (again), the movie is still going to be bad.

  58. Harrison Ford was great as usual by ahde · · Score: 2

    As usual:

    from GUNS OF NAVARRONE:

    INT. NAZI OFFICE (Is. of Crete)

    FORD: "Yes, Sir"

  59. /. stories getting bad by jeff13 · · Score: 1

    I got moded into Flamebait so I thought I'd post again. It's the only way I can feel close to another human being.

    This story is bad [sentence simplified for /. readers] We see a bit of "geek news" on Slashdot. Movies or authors who's work has inspired geeks and nerds for a generation. Star Wars included. However, posting a story about a fake/stolen script is not proper. If you were a journalism student, you would be suspended if not kicked out entirely. Instead, the /. geeks have posted all their inane opinions regarding the so called stories merits! Grow up!

    How about this opinion. You are all participating in the destruction of the Star Wars stories. Way ta go Slashdot. [sarcastic remarks left in]

  60. Just get rid of Jar Jar! by Morocco+Mole · · Score: 2, Funny

    And make it painful... --Richard

  61. Jar-Jar is a senator? by Trickster+Coyote · · Score: 2

    Is this character based on a real person?

    --
    Ideology is for ideots.
    1. Re:Jar-Jar is a senator? by CYberPhreak · · Score: 1

      Just curious... which senator did you have in mind?

      --

      Buy the ticket, take the ride.

  62. You must have seen a different trailer by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    The one I saw up here in the Frozen Ass North (or not so Frozen this year!) looked like a trailer for some sort of (ick!) romantic drama rather than a kick-keister-and-take-names sci-fi action flick....

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  63. Not the first time the trailer has sold the estate by kaladorn · · Score: 2

    Now replay the scene where Maul lights the second blade - as if you _didn't_ know he had one from the trailer. That could have been a "holy f*cking sh*t!!!" moment that would have made the entire film.

    Terminator II was much the same. If you look at the way it was filmed, you'll realize that up until the T1000 and T800 go at each other to save Sarah Connor's son (name escapes me), you don't know that Arnie is a good guy. He walks like the original T1000, talks like him, and as you see him coming down the corridor discarding the box of roses to pull out his shotgun, you would have _assumed_ he was the same bad-ass-bastard come to whack the young'un. Until the other guy and he started going at it, and then you'd have said "WTF?" and the movie would have been a neater experience. But the trailers sold that hold plot device.... I hate people who make movie trailers or write novel covers... they either are so formulaic as to be painful or they spit out the whole story or they do both.

    I'd mod the trailers that are produced like that -1 Revealing....

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  64. Re:Script - director... by yellowjacket03 · · Score: 1

    How can a subjective viewpoint about a movie have anything to do with being "person who knows what he talking about"? This guy knows what he's talking about when he gives his opinion of movies that he enjoys.

    Is George Lucas a bad director? I suppose so, and a bad writer of dialogue to boot. But his strength is in his editing skills. And his contribution to the special effects branch of the industry cannot be overlooked either.

  65. I heard similar talk before Epi 1 by aztektum · · Score: 1

    There were a lot of people who said they had read the script, one being Steven Spielberg, and he said it was so incredibly intelligent and blah blah blah. Look what we got. There's a lot that can happen between script and screen

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  66. Obviously a fake script by SlayerDave · · Score: 1

    This review mentions that Queen Amidala and Jar-Jar represent their respective planets in the senate. Which is interesting, considering that they are both from the same planet, at least in the mediocre Episode I that I saw. I'm looking forward to the scene in Episode II when Naboo is split in two by some cataclysmic force. Or maybe this so-called reviewer is just an idiot. You be the judge.

    1. Re:Obviously a fake script by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

      I understood it as that they where representing their respective cultures.

      The article doesn't say that they represents their respective planets, but that "Queen Amidala is now a senator to her planet and no longer the reigning monarch. Jar Jar Binks represents the Gungans in the Senate.".

  67. "Mystery" Trailer: Skip the DVD, go here by Soulfader · · Score: 1

    http://www.pocketmovies.net/

  68. Re: Menudo by KickKat · · Score: 1

    Mesa hungry, moy mucho hungry.

    --
    ----- I was not elected to watch my IP packets fragment and collide while you discuss this routing policy in a committe
  69. She's busy with other stuff by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    Britney Spears is in some schlop called "Crossroads" - a movie about growing up as a teen.

    *yawn*

    Of course, I'll go see it as a matinee, hoping for the swimsuit scene. :P

  70. Re:Palpatine == Sidious by Mozo · · Score: 1

    Gee, and NOBODY figured out that Padme and the Queen were the same people either.

    Or does NOBODY == EVERYBODY on your planet? :-)

    --
    -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= John Reinert Nash -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
  71. Re:Script - director... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 2
    If you watch the excellent Biography of Lucas on A&E, you'll learn he never really liked actors - his heart was more in the editing area (he wanted to be an editor and a cameraman).

    Now, I personally think that for what Lucas is doing with the SW series it works. The series is a space opera - don't even think of it as SF or you'll hurt your head. It's a fantasy told in space, end all and be all. Its roots are in the serials like Flash Gordon, which are really bad (trust me). BTW, they're from the 30s and 40s, not the 50s.

    Nobody's accusing Lucas of being a good director - he's decent, nothing more. I liked TPM because I was able to bear in mind that it is Act I of a six act play (basically). Last time I looked, the first act of anything never really worked well on its own. I'm looking forward to AOTC because I realize its place in the series.

    My mother and wife also look at me and call me the tallest four-year-old they've ever known when it comes to SW. Maybe it's because I can watch movies (note, I said movies, not films - I do know the difference...my minor was film studies...) and know they aren't designed to be great art. I can seperate BASEketball from Citizen Kane and enjoy both because I realize the levels they're working on...

    Nothing from the SW series will match, let's say, 2001 or Blade Runner because they are more in the vein of Time Bandits, Legend or The Princess Bride (and all of them, except for ROTJ, are much better than Legend, IMHO).

    In the end, it's strong moviemaking...not filmmaking.