Slashdot Mirror


2.5m Water Scorpion Stalks Southern Africa

MeredihtJT writes: "The giant water scorpion well over two metres long made its way slowly over the sea floor, about 100m to 200m below the surface of the water. It would take another 260 million years for South African Palaentologist, geologist and 'pizza-maker' Roger Smith to find it."

173 comments

  1. Can I have one? by Vardamir · · Score: 0, Redundant

    These would make nice pets.

    1. Re:Can I have one? by Vardamir · · Score: 1

      ass ... knot .... giant scorpion .... hrmmm

  2. Just when you thought it was safe to go swimming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Duun-uh...
    Duuunn-uh...
    Duuuuuuun-uh...
    Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun Dun!

    It was probably tasty. Scorpions have a zing that you just don't get outside of the pepper genus.

  3. Yeouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All I got to say is... yeouch!

  4. Bwhahaha! by susano_otter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Little does the future Los Angeles know that I have already deployed my own Giant Water Scorpion to attack them in their sleep, millenia hence. Crawl, my pretty! Crawl!

    --

    Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    1. Re:Bwhahaha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      imagine a beowulf cluster of these

  5. nightmarish by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know, I'm really glad the human race took so long to get here. It was a good idea to wait until crazy shit like this died off. I get freaked out by cockroaches, can you imagine 2 1/2 meter scorpions cruising around your kitchen? That's the stuff nightmares are made from.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
    1. Re:nightmarish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it seems more like the stuff cheap horror movies are made of

    2. Re:nightmarish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no no, you are confused. The normal stuff died off. We are the true crazy shit left to inhabit the Earth...

  6. Metric System by DonkeyHote · · Score: 0, Interesting

    How big is a meter? I'm an American they don't teach us that kinda stuff.

    1. Re:Metric System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you ask? We're talking about 2.5 milli scorpion, i.e 0.0025 scorpion. "m" stands for milli in the metric system, remember?

    2. Re:Metric System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      About an inch or so shorter than a yard. So, about 3 feet. We're talking 8 foot damned scorpion, here.

      I think I had a dream about one of these once...

      ~a funloving AC

    3. Re:Metric System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We're talking 8 foot damned scorpion, here.

      Reminds me of Daggerfall.

    4. Re:Metric System by Mahonrimoriancumer · · Score: 0

      1 meter = 3.28 feet That would mean that the 2.5 meter scorpion would be 8.202 feet long.

      --
      So climate's changing. So what? It has always changed. The big news would be if it wasn't changing. - Dr. Philip Stone
    5. Re:Metric System by AntiChristX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, it would have to be 2.5mm to be mm not m.. but that's what I thought too when I first saw it. Then I thought, wouldn't that actually be scarier to have 2.5mm scorpions menacing south africa? Imagine, a hoard of killer scorpions the size of pubic crabs...

      --
      AntiChristX
      Daring to remain below 5 karma indefinitely
    6. Re:Metric System by geekoid · · Score: 2

      ahhh.
      Man, this has to be the most misleading headline in the history of slashdot, and thats saying something!
      first I thought "Wow, they found 2.5m scorpians under water near africa?cool"
      then I find out it was 260million years ago.
      then I find out its 2.5mm not 2.5m(~9ft).
      boy, this story got boring in a hurry.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Metric System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not 2.5 mm, it's 2.5 m. That's meters, dood. Yes, about 9 feet. It's not misleading, it's the truth. Read it again.

    8. Re:Metric System by theEd · · Score: 1
      "The metric system is the tool of the devil, my car gets 4 rods to the hogshead and I LIKE THAT WAY" - Abe Simpson.

      I don't know about you, but they taught us both, metric and english, in school. Of course they spent more time on the english system, probably because it's so confusing. 8 fluid ounces in a cup, 2 cups in a pint, 2 pints in a quart, 4 quarts in a gallon. 12 inches in a foot, 3 feet in a yard, 1760 yards in a mile. 16 oz. in a pound, 2000 lb. in a ton. And don't forget that water freezes at 32 F and boils at 212 F.

      And if that wasn't enough, the teachers would torture us with problems like, how many inches in 1/3 mile. Or how many fluid ounces in 10 gallons. Or how many pounds is 125 oz. And no calculators were allowed. Maybe that is why there are so many lunatics out there. Their brains have been fried by the British Engineering System.

      --
      "And now you shall learn the secret of boot to the head"
    9. Re:Metric System by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      A little more than 39 inches.

  7. Ummmmm by Qwerpafw · · Score: 3, Funny

    Today is apparently the day of the funny postings. Gotta love it.

    2.5m Water Scorpion Stalks Southern Africa
    Tabloid headlines indeed :)

    All I can say is: Where can I get mine?

    1. Re:Ummmmm by TheGreenLantern · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tabloid headlines indeed :)

      Almost as good as that one from this morning about Taco getting married. I mean, who believes this stuff?

      --

      It hurts when I pee.
    2. Re:Ummmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What I really get a kick out of is the way they've figured out that 1) it was a water scorion, 2) how long ago it lived, 3) exactly what all of the living conditions were, and 4) what it was eating at the time it passed through.


      I'm sure there are some interesting hints in these directions, but how far do we have to stretch the imagination? Dr. Leaky is probably laughing right about now, thinking about how handy that oversized scorpion footprint stamp came in....

    3. Re:Ummmmm by einhverfr · · Score: 2

      As a former amateur paleantologist, I can cell you that much of this is known.

      1: It was a scorpion (OK, so can you not tell one kind of tracks from another in the mud or snow?)

      2:How long ago it lived: This is done through dating the rock layer in which the tracks were found. These methodologies are well established and include comparison to other rock laters, isotope analysis, and other methods.

      3: Living conditions from fossils can be relatively easily doscovered because one can look at other fosilized remains in the rock-bed. Also some kinds of rock only form from certain conditions (like under water).

      4: What it was eating? OK. Again look at the other fossils in the surrounding rocks.

      This is NOT rocket science. It's not even computer science ;) It is actually relatively simple.

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  8. ACTUALLY NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT IS NOT A SCORPION

    IT IS GLAM ROCK SUPERHEROES SCORPIONS!!!

    1. Re:ACTUALLY NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh. The Scorpions were hardly a "glam rock" band. Perhaps you're thinking of Twisted Sister, Cinderella, et al.

  9. African Swallows by Krusty_Klown · · Score: 1, Funny

    How fast do these scorpions have to beat their wings to cross the ocean. With and without the cocoanut.

    1. Re:African Swallows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >How fast do these scorpions have to beat their
      >wings to cross the ocean. With and without the
      > [coconut].

      Okay, you're now posting Monty Python jokes at 8:23pm on Valentine's day. You are such a .. [ /me checks time of my post ] ... aaarrrggh!!

  10. not a predator by GreenPhreak · · Score: 1

    "...but there is good reason to think that it was not a fearsome predator like many of its smaller terrestrial and aquatic relatives"

    If this thing doesn't have a stinging tail and all the stuff that its terrestrial counterparts have, I wonder what it would look like. A big hard-shelled manatee lumbering along through the deep?

    I drink to prepare for a fight; tonight I'm very prepared. -Soda Popinksi

    --
    I drink to prepare for a fight; tonight I'm very prepared. -Soda Popinksi
    1. Re:not a predator by Zurk · · Score: 1

      yep thats pretty much it. it was supposed to feed by wandering around the bottom and scooping food into its jaws.

    2. Re:not a predator by PyroMosh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I drink to prepare for a fight; tonight I'm very prepared. -Soda Popinksi

      Your sig (and all of the other quotes from that particular Punchout! character) are a lot funnier when you use the character's origional name from the arcade version - Vodka Drunkinski

      Now someone mod me down accordingly, please. ( :

    3. Re:not a predator by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      Ah, it's not necessary. Even when I was 11 years old and playing Mike Tyson's Punch Out on my NES, I knew he wasn't talking about no soda pop. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  11. Hmm... by Scoria · · Score: 4, Funny

    CmdrTaco is probably locating submitted articles that reference small, low-bandwidth websites and Slashdotting them to impress Kathleen.

    This one is already gone, apparently.

    (Congratulations, Taco. :p)

    --
    Do you like German cars?
    1. Re:Hmm... by wraithgar · · Score: 1

      Nope, they just seem to have a HUGE background image, specifically designed to make their server puke when they get slashdotted.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, IIRC, most African countries still have very slow (at least by US standards) overseas links. Basically, we give them the crappy equipment we don't want anymore. It's entirely possible that we've just Slashdotted an entire country.

    3. Re:Hmm... by Scoria · · Score: 2, Funny

      I do believe that John Ashcroft will now refer to Slashdot as a "terrorist entity" if that's indeed factual.

      CmdrTaco and CmdrTacoette, run while you can!

      --
      Do you like German cars?
    4. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh, so thats why our connection sucked... Couldn't even get to Google. Bastards.

    5. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not funny. Rather, gay. Did you miss the whole twelve fucking hundred posts saying exactly the same shit as you have just written? Or are you just a fucking twink?

    6. Re:Hmm... by ryusen · · Score: 2

      i don't think ashcroft would count /. as a terrorist entity until it took out a web site that he cared about.. i mean we are /.ing sites talking about evolution in this case... he might even like the idea...

      --

      I believe sex is highly over rated... unless it involves me
    7. Re:Hmm... by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      The image also appears to be verticaly interlaced, thus ensuring that RLE or even the more advanced compression used in GIF files is rendered almost compleatly useless.

      (or it might just be my cruddy screen that makes it look interlaced. ^_^ )

  12. Parasite Fossil Trails Found by jamesmartinluther · · Score: 2, Funny

    In an astounding discovery, scientists have found wire trails from parasites sunk into carpeting material in an ancient human inhabitance.

    Humans were tricked into making copies of the box-like plastic and metal parasites and brought the parasites into their dwellings for their usefulness and entertainment. The parasites proliferated, began making copies of themselves, and eventually became the dominant organism on Earth.

  13. Speculation as to the cause of extinction. . . by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    seem to center around something known as the dreaded "Slashdot Effect."

    KFG

  14. Read the Article? by Accipiter · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's a pretty misleading headline.

    Before I read the article, the post gave me the impression that this monolith was still down there, clawing at South Africa.

    In reality, all they found were trace fossils of its footprints, because it walked the area 260 million years ago.

    In any case, I keep envisioning a bad, B-movie horror flick starring this dude. "Giant Scorpions Attack!", with sequels taking place in different major US cities. I'd almost say I would want to see Samuel L. Jackson saying "hold on to yer butts!" in the movie every time he's about to unleash his genius plan to stop the mutant scorpions, but I doubt he'd do a B flick.

    I wonder if getting stung by a 3 meter scorpion would provide time to be painful. Probably 20-30 seconds or so.

    --

    -- Give him Head? Be a Beacon?
    (If you can't figure out how to E-Mail me, Don't. :P)

    1. Re:Read the Article? by felipeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In any case, I keep envisioning a bad, B-movie horror flick starring this dude. "Giant Scorpions Attack!"

      Or maybe The Scorpion King ...

    2. Re:Read the Article? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1
      That's a pretty misleading headline.

      Before I read the article, the post gave me the impression that this monolith was still down there, clawing at South Africa.

      Hey, that's the best (or at least most effective) kind of headline, one that grabs your attention and makes you read the article, even if it isn't as good as what you thought.

      Nonetheless, the image of a prehistoric water scorpion over eight feet long is not too much of a disappointment to me.

      -me

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    3. Re:Read the Article? by madenosine · · Score: 1

      Ladies and gentlemen,

      We just got the story, and what we have read speaks for itself. South Africa has apparently been taken over...conquered, if you will, by a master race of giant scorpions.

      It is difficult to tell at this point whether they will kill the captive South Africans or simply enslave them.

      One thing is for certain; there is no stopping them, the scorpions will soon be here.

      And I, for one, welcome our new insect overlords. I would like to remind them that as a trusted slashdot personality, I could be helpful in rounding up other to toil in their underground sugar caves.

      (later)

      Well, this poster was possibly a little hasty earlier, and would like to reaffirm his allegiance to this country, and it's human president. It may not be perfect, but it's still the best government we have......for now....

      (takes down a poster saying "SCORPIONS RULE")

      (shamelessly ripped from The Simpsons...sorry, I couldnt resist)

    4. Re:Read the Article? by Loligo · · Score: 1

      >I'd almost say I would want to see Samuel L.
      >Jackson saying "hold on to yer butts!" in the
      >movie every time he's about to unleash his
      >genius plan to stop the mutant scorpions, but I
      >doubt he'd do a B flick

      What do you call "Deep Blue Sea"?

      Ewwweeee.

      -l

  15. Hey! I've got one of these at my school! by Qwerpafw · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The article says :
    Cape Town-based British palaeontologist John Almond glanced up at a crumbling cliff near Laingsburg in the Karoo and noticed a double set of strange blob-like markings in the rock, starkly outlined in the cross-light of the late afternoon sun.
    At our school, there are similiar strange, blob-like markings on the inside of the bathroom stalls!!

    THERE ARE GIANT WATER SCORPIONS IN OUR TOILETS!

    What are we going to do?!
  16. Don't ask me why.... by BadlandZ · · Score: 1
    I actually read iol.co.za about every other day, not sure why... I guess I just always wanted to visit South Africa, so I look at their news a lot. I have never seen it so slow, guess that post that spawned the "Is South Africa a Third World Country" debate a week ago here seems to show maybe, just maybe they are? Biggest news sited downed by the slashdot effect....

    So, anyone able to see if it's bandwidth between US/Europe and Africa, or just their server?

    1. Re:Don't ask me why.... by I_redwolf · · Score: 2

      Maybe it's because of the slashdot effect? Many sites go down because of it, and they are here in America, so how does this make Africa a 3rd world country, when infact South Africa has the most resources and most precious materials on the face of the earth? The gov't and people are fucked up but if you've ever actually been to South Africa, you'd see that it's far from 3rd world. Different, yes. 3rd world?, there are people in Africa that would make Bill Gates look cheap. As for reported income, that'll just get a corrupt gov't to tax you far more than they already do.

    2. Re:Don't ask me why.... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      The term "third world" is pretty much useless; it lumps too many people into one category.

      South Africa isn't a third world country, but neither is it fully modernized; a large segment of the population live in abject poverty.

      And South Africa does NOT have "the most resources" of any country on Earth. That's just insanely wrong. Good grief, it's not even close.

    3. Re:Don't ask me why.... by BadlandZ · · Score: 1

      Because it's in my bookmarks... ;-P That IS why... Now, as for why the paper is in my bookmarks... I don't remember...

    4. Re:Don't ask me why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to SA. Imagine someone had ripped out chunks of a couple of big prosperous US cities and transplanted them to Mozambique, making only very slight effort to smooth out the join afterwards, and you'll get the picture. It's third and first world.

    5. Re:Don't ask me why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in South Africa and in fact used to work for IOL. Their site seems to be running at a perfectly acceptable speed at the moment (3pm GMT +2) with pages taking about 1 to 5 seconds to load up.

      The slow down is probably due to limited international bandwidth which they had when I worked there (about 1 - 2 years ago) which most likely has not improved much since then.

    6. Re:Don't ask me why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI: in many circles South Africa is classified as Semi-Periphery. The notion of first, second and third worlds has been replaced. One of these replacements labels states as being either Core(US , Western Europe, Japan, etc.) Semi-Periphery(South Africa, Malaysia, etc.) and Periphery (the Sudan, Pakistan, Mongolia, Haiti, etc)

      --An International Relations Major

    7. Re:Don't ask me why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really, the only thing that South Africa really has to import is steel and iron. I suggest you read a book on South Africa.

    8. Re:Don't ask me why.... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Oh really, the only thing that South Africa really has to import is steel and iron. I suggest you read a book on South Africa.

      They have the most resources? MOST? Just because they have a fair amount of resources doesn't mean they have the MOST in the world. They don't have more than the United States, or China, or Russia. They just don't.

    9. Re:Don't ask me why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, you sound like a crying child. Dude, go read a book. South Africa, Africa in general is one of the richest continents resource wise. It does have the most resources, harvesting them from raw materials into something else must be what you're talking about.

    10. Re:Don't ask me why.... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Good lord, does anyone on this board know how to understand simple English, or have even a rudimentary understanding of the world you live in? One, he was not talking about Africa, he was talking about South Africa in particular. Two, as anyone not completely ignorant about the subject knows, Africa in general has a scarcity of natural resources. South Africa probably does have more than the rest of the continent. It may even have as wide a variety as any other country on earth. But for you to claim that it has more, by volume, is idiotic.

  17. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Tracking an ancient denizen of the deep

    February 13 2002 at 05:05PM

    By John Yeld

    About 260 million years ago, a giant water scorpion well over two metres long made its way slowly over the sea floor, about 100m to 200m below the surface of the water.

    This huge, ancient creature may have been making sweeping, brush-like movements with its right feet, collecting small animals like worms and crustaceans from the sediment which it then "combed" with its left feet, pushing the most desirable prey items towards its mouth.

    As the water scorpion, or eurypterid as its now known to palaeontologists, moved across the sea bottom, it left complex footprints or tracks of its activity in the mud.

    Gradually, the mud was covered by more and more layers of sediment and the thick ash of hundreds of massive volcanic eruptions.

    The find is of major scientific significance
    Eventually, over aeons, the sea itself disappeared, and the land which had surrounded it broke and divided into new continents which drifted apart.

    Millions of years later, while travelling with a group of friends towards the end of November last year, Cape Town-based British palaeontologist John Almond glanced up at a crumbling cliff near Laingsburg in the Karoo and noticed a double set of strange blob-like markings in the rock, starkly outlined in the cross-light of the late afternoon sun.

    Miraculously, the blobs were the tracks left by the water scorpion, perfectly preserved as fossilised rock despite the passing of millions of years and the huge re-arrangement of Earth's surface involving massive geological forces like volcanoes and earthquakes.

    The find is of major scientific significance, because it is the largest invertebrate trackway known in the world, and the eurypterid which made it is the largest arthropod ever recorded.

    (Invertebrates are animals without a backbone. Arthropods are invertebrates with a segmented exoskeleton and numerous paired, jointed appendages, or legs, and include modern crustaceans, insects, spiders and their relatives).

    'Probably about 2,5m long'
    The new discovery is also a rare example of a trace fossil - that is, fossilised behaviour of living organism such as tracks, trails, burrows or feeding marks, which can be confidently attributed to a specific group of animals.

    "Most trace fossils cannot be assigned to particular animal, though we can interpret them in terms of what behaviour was involved," said Almond.

    "Trace fossils record the activity of animals while they were still alive and where they actually lived. Body fossils - shells, skeletons and so on - represent dead organisms, and may be transported away from the habitat of the living animal."

    The trackway occurs in what geologists call the Ecca Group of sediments of the Great Karoo.

    These sediments were laid down in an extensive sea which covered large areas of what was then the supercontinent Pangaea - a single continent comprising all the land mass on Earth - for about 25 million years during the early- to mid-Permian Period (around 280-to-255 million years ago).

    "At this time, southern Africa was situated about 50-70 degrees south of the contemporary equator," Almond said.

    Geochemical evidence suggests that when the new trackway was formed, the Ecca seas ranged from brackish to freshwater, and the climate was cold to temperate and highly seasonal.

    The Laingsburg area is well-known to geologists and palaeontologists, and is often visited to study the Ecca Group of ancient marine sediments.

    So it's something of a paradox that so many knowledgeable people have been through the exact area without noticing the trackway before, said Almond.

    "However, on this occasion, by pure chance - the right time of day, the right season of the year - the late afternoon sunlight on the beds of rock was at just the right angle to highlight a clear double series of large blobs on a bedding plane high up on a cliff-like outcrop.

    "Although we were in a hurry to move on, a quick look through binoculars convinced me the suspicious-looking blobs would be worth a closer look.

    "My first impression was that they were very complex impressions of some sort which appeared to form some fossil trackway.

    "But, if so, it was clearly not made by a tetrapod - a four-legged vertebrate - and it was huge!"

    It was only later when the photographs were developed that Almond realised his find was of exceptional scientific interest and that it should be studied further as soon as possible.

    When he and friends revisited the area shortly after Christmas, they found incontrovertible evidence that the traces were a fossil trackway that extended much further than previously realised.

    Almond explained that eurypterids are a fascinating group of extinct aquatic arthropods from the Palaeozoic Era, which lived some 480 to 260 million years ago.

    "In particular, eurypterids are close relatives, and direct ancestors, of the living and almost exclusively terrestrial arachnids: scorpions, spiders and their kin.

    "Like these, eurypterids were almost exclusively predatory in habits, feeding on living prey such as other arthropods, soft-bodied invertebrates, and fish.

    "The front appendages were often specialised as huge grasping claws or pincers, or bore cage-like arrays of spines for capturing prey.

    "In at least some forms, there may have been a venomous sting at the tip of the tail."

    This spectacular trackway, which consists of two parallel series of complex footprints or tracks, is about one metre wide and extends at least 7m across the surface of a single bed.

    "The eurypterid which made it must have been enormous, probably about 2,5m long, but there is good reason to think that it was not a fearsome predator like many of its smaller terrestrial and aquatic relatives," said Almond.

    Well-preserved details of the newly discovered tracks show that while the animal was walking along the sea bed, it raked through the soft bottom muds, almost certainly foraging for food - probably small worms and crustaceans - using specialised comb-like structures on its limbs.

    These combs are preserved in a much older giant eurypterid specimen collected near Prince Albert in the 1980s.

    The Laingsburg trackway is unusually well-preserved.

    "The excellent preservation of details of the eurypterid tracks is probably due to the fact that they were impressed by the limbs into a viscous muddy substrate through a thin overlying layer of volcanic ash," said Almond.

    "The tracks were then infilled from above by ash as soon as the animal walked on.

    "The ash layer subsequently protected the foot prints in the underlying muddy layer from erosion because the latter was no longer exposed at the surface of the sea bed."

    The Ecca trackway is more complex and interesting than all those previously found in that it was formed by a combination of both locomotion and feeding activities, he said.

    Before the trackway can be properly studied scientifically, the priority is to stabilise and cast the specimen in the field.

    "The bed on which the trace fossil is preserved is cracking up into numerous small blocks of rock and is in danger of disintegrating through erosion, with the resulting loss of this unique specimen," said Almond.

    "There's a fair chance that some of it will be gone after just one more winter."

    A cast is being made this week with the assistance of staff of Iziko-SA Museum.

    "Thereafter, ways of permanently preserving the specimen for posterity will have to be seriously considered."

    1. Re:Article Text by Milalwi · · Score: 2

      'Probably about 2,5m long'

      I thought there was a practical upper limit to the size of creatures with exoskeletons? Something about the weight becoming too great.

      ...searching Google... Here it is:

      Animals with an exoskeleton are limited in size because as the exoskeleton becomes larger to accommodate the heavier animal, there is less space for the internal organs.

      I also thought that modern crustaceans were near that limit. If so, isn't this bigger than that?

      Milalwi
    2. Re:Article Text by bofkentucky · · Score: 1

      if the critter was underwater that would allow for greater size, kind of like whales who suffocate upon beaching themselves because of their ribs not being able to support that body at STP

      --
      09f911029d74e35bd84156c5635688c0
    3. Re:Article Text by Thorin_ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      They really need to implement a moderation option called copyrighted. I would like to mod this post down but I want the poster to know why it was modded down.

    4. Re:Article Text by thrig · · Score: 1

      A few million years of corporate downsizing and committee meetings could easily account for the noted loss of maximum exoskeleton size...

    5. Re:Article Text by I.+M.+Bur · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's why this beast was living underwater... Just guessing though.

  18. To quote Dr. Weird from Aqua Teen Hunger Force by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am one can short of a six pack!

  19. i know what its doing by negativethirsty · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That 2.5m scorpion is under there harvesting cod sperm for beauty products.
    No really, it is!

    --

    thirsty*i^2

    "Ya I finished that last week, it just doesn't work"
  20. Eurypterid Park by Skirwan · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can only hope that before they went extinct one of these beasts was trapped in amber, and that somewhere on some privately-owned tropical island a group of scientists funded by a megalomaniacal millionaire are standing on the shoulders of geniuses and thinking more about whether they could than whether they should...

    --
    Damn the Emperor!

  21. Another Slashdot sellout? by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Is this a corporate payoff advertisement for the upcoming Scorpion King movie? What's next? A giant quidditch ball fossil off the coast of Asia?

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  22. African or European? by gibbdog · · Score: 1

    With it being that large, it could be a European in Africa

  23. Damn! They are never going to find it by BoredGuy · · Score: 0

    until 260,000,000 years later, my future 1,000,000th generation grandson finally find it.

    We only have average human life span of 85 years.

  24. Another page by fm6 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's an interesting page on the same topic. Note that water scropions have only a superficial resemblance to their landbound namesakes and aren't particularly nasty.

    1. Re:Another page by Kotetsu · · Score: 3, Informative

      While you did find references to the modern insect sometimes called a water scorpion, it is not at all what is being referred to here. Water scorpion is an alternative name for sea scorpion, both common names for the eurypterids. One type of them also happens to be the state fossil of New York. While we probably can't say with real certainty just how nasty they might have been, I'd certainly be cautious around any 2 meter long, predatory arthropod.

      --

      "Bite me, it's fun!" - Crowe T. Robot
    2. Re:Another page by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

      I found this interesting artist's impression of how the giant fossil creature may have looked.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  25. No, you can't have one by sam_handelman · · Score: 5, Informative

    Before anyone even starts with the Jurassic park stuff, it is not possible.

    260 Million years is long enough for every carbon atom in a piece of bone several feet thick to exchange for silicon. Time(absolute) =~ 20,000 Million yrs.; we're talking about 1% of the age of the universe here, guys. It is a very, very long time.

    So, even if you did recover something that looked like a biological molecule from a sample of this thing, all of the information content would have been destroyed long, long ago.

    Scorpion growth factors, on the other hand, are well understood. In a strict sense, genetically modified scorpions are more like a modern scorpion that the one in the article. However, they are nearly as cool, they give you some idea of how such a creature may have lived, and you can feed fools to them when they've foiled your plans for the last time.

    So, if anyone wants an eight foot long scorpion, I've started making them and I - Get away! No, no, I am your master! Aieeeee!

    Anyway, this critter is weird but it pales in comparison to the real freaky shit in the burgess shale. If you want to know what body types evolution has abandoned (but might take up elsewhere in the galaxy?) check this out. It is a must read for anyone with an interest in writing 'hard' science fiction with aliens in it.

    "Look, if he was dying, he wouldn't bother to carve 'aarrggh'. He'd just say it!" - King Arthur Pendragon

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:No, you can't have one by craw · · Score: 1

      The DNA in Jurassic Park came from specimens encased in amber; amber is carbon based. Amber deposits have been dated back to the Caboniferous period; this is the period preceding the Permian (260 m.y. ago).

      Eurypterids started to rise to dominance during the Ordovican Period (Burgess Shale formation is Cambrian which was before the Ordovician) and peaked during the Silurian Period (next Period). The initial eurypterids were rather small. By the time of the Permian, they had grown in size by one or two orders in magnitude.

      Eurypterids disappeared at the Permian extinction. Then came the Mesozoic, and the dinos.

      It is more educational to look at the evolution of some of these Burgess Shale critters after the Cambrian; check out triobites. Additionally, the body shapes of the critter are not that unusual as many have modern day analogs.

    2. Re:No, you can't have one by sam_handelman · · Score: 2

      The point I was making was that over 260 million years, carbon atoms would have experienced events sufficiently energetic to allow exchange with silicon over several FEET of distance. The events that cause chemical damage to the DNA are considerably less energetic, and they can occur anywhere in the specimen, not just on the surface where the specimen is exposed to rock. Any sample which is old enough to be a fossil is going to have meaningless DNA.

      Over the course of 260 million years, all information content in the DNA would be lost; there might (if it were preserved in Amber, and not in something silicous) be things in the sample that looked like DNA, however, in a process very similar to what happens to old magnetic storage media (random bit flips eventually destroy the data) random chemical changes in the DNA would, absolutely and under any circumstance short of a vacuum at 2 Kelvin, have eroded or altered enough of the bases (after 260 million years, all of them) that recovering any information about the original sequence would be impossible.

      --
      The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    3. Re:No, you can't have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scientists did manage to recover pieces of a dna strand from an un-fossilized dinosaur bone that was found encased in a petroleum-based substance in a coal mine. Saying that it's not possible is a bit like saying we'll never find life on another planet. Just because we think the odds are really, really small, doesn't mean it ain't so.

    4. Re:No, you can't have one by ffoiii · · Score: 1

      IANAP(aleontologist), but I've read/heard that some of Walcott's conclusions in regards to the Burgess Shale site are highly suspect, and Grould's extensions of this work are even more suspect (read "poorly supported").

      IIRC, the source for this info was a PBS documentary disucssing common formations of body styles (segments, legs, heads, etc.).

      Clearly this doesn't discount all of the work, but just something to keep in mind.

  26. I can see Spielbergs mouth watering already by Berserker76 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Paleozoic Park What could possibly go wrong creating a park of extinct giant water scorpions??

  27. suggestion to avoid slashdotting these poor sites by pomakis · · Score: 2

    I'm thinking that Slashdot should temporarily mirror the smaller sites it links to. This slashdot effect is getting ridiculous. Sometimes they don't even last five minutes under the load of traffic that's directed their way.

  28. I don't understand by meggito · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What makes them beleive that these fossilized footprints are directly related to a scorpion that they have no other proof of?
    They talk about finding the fossil and how it means there was a giant scorpion, but not once does it say why they beleive that these trails were left by some giant scorpion. Why do these two long blobs automatically belong to a giant scorpion? Did they find a fossil? Was there some semblance between these footprints and a common day scorpion? They find an impression of a giant tail? I see absolutely 0 in any way tieing the footprints to a scorpion.

    1. Re:I don't understand by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      You seem to be unclear on the timescale. It is not a "giant scorpion" like the ones from "Clash of the Titans". These were creatures that lived 480 to 260 million years ago and were quite different from scorpions.
      "eurypterids are close relatives, and direct ancestors, of the living and almost exclusively terrestrial arachnids: scorpions, spiders and their kin."
      Did they find a fossil? Yes. They found the eurypterid's foot and claw prints.
      fossil: noun
      1 : a remnant, impression, or trace of an organism of past geologic ages that has been preserved in the earth's crust
      Also; "These combs are preserved in a much older giant eurypterid specimen collected near Prince Albert in the 1980s."

    2. Re:I don't understand by bkr1_2k · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That was my first impression as well. How can they suggst eating habits and body distinctions (possible tail stinger or large claws) from foot prints right? Or for that matter, how can they be sure the footprints were produced by anything like a scorpion? Far down in the article, it mentions that a fossilized skeleton of one of these was found in the early '80s. "These combs are preserved in a much older giant eurypterid specimen collected near Prince Albert in the 1980s."
      That may be where all this hype came from, putting a name with a face so to speak.
      I still think that these guys are full of it. Even if you have a fossilized skeleton and foot prints, that doesn't give room for conjecture on subspecies of the same creature. There is no reason to think, for example, that there were some "breeds" that had claws and some that had other methods of capturing prey, as the article suggests.
      Also, the article is somewhat contradictory, calling this thing a predator "like these [modern arachnids], eurypterids were almost exclusively predatory in habits, feeding on living prey such as other arthropods, soft-bodied invertebrates, and fish." Further on the article says; "but there is good reason to think that it was not a fearsome predator like many of its smaller terrestrial and aquatic relatives." It can't be both a predator and a non-predator. This article is pure conjecture without further proof in some other form or confirmation by other paleontologists.

      bkr

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    3. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and are you a paeleantologist? No, didn't think so.
      ...and would you hire a paleantologist as your system admin? No, didn't think so.

      Just because you don't have the knowledge base to draw a conclusion, you shouldn't assume others don't. (Unless you're one of those people who knows everything.)

  29. How many? by Max+the+Merciless · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this giant scorpian have 5 asses?

    --
    * * Always question "the National Interest" - 9 times out of 10 it is a cover for evil
  30. Well... by krmt · · Score: 4, Funny
    I would want to see Samuel L. Jackson saying "hold on to yer butts!" in the movie every time he's about to unleash his genius plan to stop the mutant scorpions, but I doubt he'd do a B flick.

    Well, he did do Episode I...
    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Episode 1 rates a B? You're generous . . .

  31. You sure it's not just ... by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 0

    ... a lost postal worker?

  32. ...or maybe... by MouseR · · Score: 2

    This huge, ancient creature may have been making sweeping, brush-like movements with its right feet

    Maybe it's simpler than than. Imagine yourself 250m years ago. Your a sea roach. On valentines day. Alone

    ...collecting small animals like worms and crustaceans from the sediment which it then "combed" with its left feet

    Valentine "Toys".

    pushing the most desirable prey items towards its mouth.

    Well, maybe not that alone.

  33. A 2.5m water scorpion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dipped in fresh melted butter, with a slice of lemon. For dinner, a large dallop of petridied dinosaur vomit.

  34. pizza maker? by JonWan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hmmmm Giant scoripion, and a pizza-maker. Sounds like it might be a hit in Japan.

  35. Bin Laden by kiwipeso · · Score: 0, Insightful

    This news just in, Osama Bin laden is now rumored to be cloning extinct scorpions to terrorise the united states of america.

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  36. Seeking an answer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot. News for nerds. Stuff that matters. Which category does this one fit into?

  37. From the Garson-Means-Boy dept. by testuser58 · · Score: 1
    ...the post gave me the impression that this monolith was still down there, clawing at South Africa.
    A monolith is a large rock, like the grey matter contained in a troll's skull. Incidentally, here's nothing scary about being stalked by a monolith, unless that monolith happens to represent God in a Kubrick film.

    "you keep using that word... I do not think it means what you think it means"

    1. Re:From the Garson-Means-Boy dept. by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he's talking about the classic B film The Monolith Monsters?

  38. Cool by Lord+Sauron · · Score: 1

    Now all we need is a crazy scientist who can clone DNA and a millionaire entrepeneur to create a park. We can bring tourists, and we can somehow let the animals escape. That'll be sooooo cool.

  39. AV again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adam Venus tried to fuck one of these.

  40. exoskeleton limit by oomcow · · Score: 1

    i thought there were crabs today that were that size or bigger.

    http://www.vlewis.net/page2a.html

    the giant spider crab apparently has been 3.7m.

  41. I have a 3.5 inch scorpion on my arm by CrazyJim0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    My friend has to fill it in, basically it has cool skulls for claws, head and stinger, then its gonna be mechanized.

    On my back, I'm getting a full work:fallen angel with his eyes covered by his hand, fresh with wings cut by a female a angel, and below him a demon reflection of his in a pool.

  42. Don't worry; they do. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Informative

    How do they know it's a giant scorpion? Because they're god-damned smart, that's how.

    Seriously, I'm not being a smart-ass. Have you ever watched a documentary on these people? They're incredible. They'll be at some site, and the paleontologist will come across what looks like a tiny white rock stuck in the ground, and he'll exclaim "Wow! It looks like the pelvis of a juvenile stegosaurous!" And you say "How the hell does he know that?" and then they dig up the fossile, and what do you know... Juvenile stegosaur. Sometimes they actually explain how they figure this stuff out... And while the conclusion seemed odd at the time, by the time they're done explaining, you're sorry you ever doubted them because they're god-damn smart. Frankly, I have no trouble believing that this guy recognized the tracks of an ancient scorpion on sight.

    Though to more directly answer your question -- I'm sure this isn't the -very first- evidence of ancient, giant scorpions they've found. So basically, they're going off what they already know, and this fossil expands that knowledge.

    You should watch more Discovery Channel. It's the best thing on TV.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
    1. Re:Don't worry; they do. by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 2

      Except for the 75% fiction that is the dinosaur series...

      I'm sorry, but with the blatant guessing they presented as fact there...wow. The show looked like it might be interesting at first, but then I just decided to go rent Land Before Time. It's free at Family Video, (hey, it's a kiddie movie), and I can rewind it if I miss something. (This was all before I got my TiVo, of course.) =)

      --
      ± 29 dB
    2. Re:Don't worry; they do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paleoworld was much better. =)

    3. Re:Don't worry; they do. by djmcmath · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you right now, they're not half so smart as you think they are. These are the same people who found a farmer's old pig graveyard and heralded it as the discovery of the missing link. Oh, the embarrassment at discovering that they had re-arranged the bones incorrectly and mis-dated them by a couple million years, and that all they really had were 50 year old pig bones. This happens with fairly moderate frequency, and those are just the times they get caught. There are countless examples of "scientists" who make wild claims that sound halfway reasonable to an uneducated populous.

      You see, when you devote your life to digging up little pieces of old stuff, it's fairly natural to find yourself saying really silly things from time to time. Fortunately, 99% of all people are too lost in the mumbo-jumbo big words they use to really pay attention to how absolutely inane the things they're saying are.

      Next thing you know, we're teaching to our children as law a theory which has only the weakest of circumstantial evidence, mostly made up by people who have spent their lives looking at little pieces of stone and claiming that it's really a stegasaurus.

    4. Re:Don't worry; they do. by Talkischeap · · Score: 1

      I agree! Anyone who "knows their stuff" has no problem knowing what they see.

      Here's my example.

      I'm climbing through this cave with some friends near Cave City, CA, and slowly and carefully, downclimbing a 90 foot pit to see an indian skull at the bottom.

      We arrived at the bottom of the pit, and while waiting for some stragglers, I decided to have a look around and discovered a tooth. So I hold it up to my caver/dentist buddy and say "look what I found."

      He grabs it out of my fingers, looks at it for a few seconds, while twisting it, looking at all sides, and announces, "It's a lower left bicusped from a female between the ages of 13 to 16.".

      We were all blown away by the sureness of his identification, but we knew he was right, even though he didn't know WHY we were all excited by his announcement.

      You see, earlier in the day, before our dentist buddy was around, the cave owner whom I'm aquainted with, told us that when he bought the land, that along with it came an indian legend about a indian maiden who hadn't found a mate, so she went into this cave in search of the "marriage" spirit that supposedly dwelled there.

      Well, she was never heard from again. My friend started to do a systematic search of his cave, and found an ancient skull and other human remains in the mud at the bottom of the 90 foot pit.

      Then he invited some archaeologists from some college (can't remember which) and they identified the skull as belonging to a girl/woman between 13 and 20 years old! The skull dated to about 900 years ago. But the dentist didn't know any of this this, so he was the man of the hour that day.

      People that know their stuff are fun to learn from.


      --
      If it don't GO... chrome it. ~ Frank Banks
  43. Right handed/left handed? by morcheeba · · Score: 2
    The part I found most interesting was that the creature seemed to be 'handed'... it "may have been making sweeping, brush-like movements with its right feet, collecting small animals like worms and crustaceans from the sediment which it then "combed" with its left feet, pushing the most desirable prey items towards its mouth." Of course, I'm presuming the reason they mention the right side and the left side is because it's could be supported by the trial evidence.

    What's interesting is that scorpions are built pretty symetrically, like humans (at least externally - the internal organs that we only have one of are all over the place). I wonder if all the creatures were "right sweepers", or were they mostly "right sweepers" (as 90% of people are right-handed), or if it's a 50-50 toss up (like in lobsters).

    Check out a quote from this site:

    In the cursher claw the closer muscle is composed entirely of slow fibers, and in the cutter claw it has 65 to 75 percent fast fibers and 25 to 35 percent slow fibers. While claw placement in the adult is essentially random, it can be demonstrated in two ways that the muscle fiber properties are not genetically fixed: (i)if one claw is removed in the fourtyh and early fifth stages, the remaining closer muscle develops all slow muscle fibers, and *ii) if the animals are raised in smooth-bottomed containers, both claws can become cutter types, having closer muscles with more than 50 percent fast fibers. Thus, as in vertebrate skeletal muscle, the proprties of lobster closer muscle fibers can be transformed by various experimental manipulations.


    Sure wish I had one of these guys to study and play with, not just their tracks! (ok, maybe not play ball with, but you get the idea)
  44. I just registered the domain by NSupremo · · Score: 1

    giantwaterscorpionse.cx

    --
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2004_U.S._Election_co ntroversies_and_irregularities
  45. Re:suggestion to avoid slashdotting these poor sit by psych031337 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Sometimes they don't even last five minutes under the load of traffic

    ...nor would slashdot...

    Seriously, the expansion of the pipe and the server farm needed to accomodate the mirroring of all of the links posted in stories would pretty quickly ruin OSDN (who own and fund /. last time i checked). Maybe someone could code a google applet (they are still running this programming contest, right?) that checks on /. once a minute and automatically refreshes the cache for the links posted in new stories. And then posts a comment with google cache links that could be used as a mirror even *before* the server is hammered to a clinical death.
    --
    +++ath0
  46. Ohio eurypterids by CactusCritter · · Score: 1

    SW Ohio, near Washington Courthouse, is noted because ~1 meter eurypterid fossils have been found there. That probably makes it the very late Ordovician or very early Devonian period. I never chased down the location, which is probably on private land, when I lived in the Cincinnati area. If anyone wants to look into searching for the fossils, you might be able to get some information from the Geology Department at the U. of Cincinnati.

    BTW. A headline that states "... stalks South Africa" rather than "... stalked South Africa" is really cheap shit.

  47. Re: Slashdot Effect accessing this site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, yes, the site was "slashdot'ed". Our ISP actually had us capped to a 180k International bandwdith. We've complained, and they've removed it. So the site should be a tad faster. Regards.

  48. Roger Smith? by Orre · · Score: 1

    Was he exited about this??

  49. King Crab by Perdo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What happened to the theory that a creature with a chitinous exoskeleton could not support it's own weight if it was much bigger than a modern day king crab? King Crabs are maybe 2 meters across and 25 pounds at best. Once out of the water, an exoskeleton can support much less weight otherwise we would be overrun by 25 lb cockroaches.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    1. Re:King Crab by sweet+reason · · Score: 1

      Once out of the water, an exoskeleton can support much less weight
      so? they never do leave the water.

      --
      Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- A.E.
    2. Re:King Crab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      because the an exoskeleton underwater doesn't have to support much weight... the blue whale's skeleton doesn't have to support it. as for cock roaches Camp lejeune, NC had a 12 inch cockroach that had to be shot with a 9mm. Don't know how much it weighed tho...

  50. "Millions of years" Myopia by superyooser · · Score: 1, Troll
    Yeah, they're so smart they didn't even see evidence of a young earth smacking them in the face.

    Miraculously, the blobs were the tracks left by the water scorpion, perfectly preserved as fossilised rock despite the passing of millions of years and the huge re-arrangement of Earth's surface involving massive geological forces like volcanoes and earthquakes.

    Noooooo, perfectly preserved because they were made only a few thousand years ago. Perfectly preserved because powerful currents from a giant flood of biblical proportions dumped a pile of sediment on them before they could lose their shape. The process of fossilization occurs rapidly and has been observed both in the laboratory and in nature. (The motto of the linked site is: Your window into the Mesozoic. Can you see the incredible, widespread myopia of our culture?) It begins within months and is usually complete in a number of years (usually less then ten) depending on the environment. This is widely known and documented fact, not theory.

    More breathless myopic statements:

    Article by Jame E. Francis. "Arctic Eden," Natural History, January 1991, p.57 and 60:

    "The remains of lush forests near the North Pole give a glimpse of the Arctic's subtropical past....Despite the passage of 45 million years, the wood retains its original color and is still flexible and burns easily. I quickly discovered that my geologic hammer was useless for collecting samples of the fossil wood; the next season I came better prepared with wood saws."

    How do you think a magnolia leaf would change as the result of having been buried for 17-20 million years? Consider this remark from Nature, V.344, April 12, 1990, p. 587:

    "When rocks containing these fossils are cleaved open, the freshly exposed leaf tissues are often bright green or 'deep autumnal' in colour, though they rapidly curl away from the substrate as they oxidize and dry out."

    The author says that it was even possible to isolate the DNA of the leaves:

    "But even the most optimistic estimate of the longevity of this molecule would not have predicted that fragments of substantial length would survive after tens of millions of years at the bottom of an ancient lake." (p. 587)

    The Discovery Channel needs to have the same disclaimer that Miss Cleo has. For entertainment purposes only.

    1. Re:"Millions of years" Myopia by gowen · · Score: 2, Funny
      Perfectly preserved because powerful currents from a giant flood of biblical proportions dumped a pile of sediment on them before they could lose their shape.
      Thats right. The impact of powerful currents caused them not to be disturbed. Thats exactly what powerful currents do, leave everything completely unruffled.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  51. Big O? by skroz · · Score: 2

    What, Mega Deuses weren't enough? Now he's got to hunt scorpions? Good career move, Roger!

    --
    -- Minds are like parachutes... they work best when open.
  52. I guess thats a better headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Than
    "Wierd Bumps Found on Rock"

  53. burgess shale is right outta "Wierd Tales" by Reverend+Gaddy · · Score: 1

    Every time I am reminded of the Burgess shale I think of the fiction of H.P. Lovecraft and the "Great Race of Yith". That multi-tubular bag of protoplasm *must* have been the inspiration for this bit of the Mythos cannon. Thanks for the reminder (shudder...) S.H. Rev. G

  54. Nastyness is relative by fm6 · · Score: 2

    I seem to recall (I mean read somewhere -- I wasn't actually there) that everything was bigger in those days. I doubt if a two-meter insect (sea scorpions are actually insects, unlike land scorpions, which are arachnids) would be very conspicuous.

  55. Dummie! by fm6 · · Score: 2

    That's Cthulu Junior, AKA "Doctor Zoidberg". I think he's actually a kind of mollusc, though he's known to pose as an anthropod.

  56. Want to see one? by yndrd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Go to the Smithsonian. At the Museum of Natural History, they've got a mock-up (and a fossilized segment) of one of these bad boys the size of a largish coffee table. "Scorpion" is something of a misnomer, of course--the thing doesn't have a long curled tail.

    Still, it scares the hell out of me every time I go there, imagining that thing coming clicking out of the ocean at me.

  57. Is it... by pokeyburro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it an EEEEEEVIL giant water scorpion??

    --
    Lately democracy seems to be based on the skybox, the Happy Meal box, the X-box, and the idiot box.
  58. Folks, it wasn't a scorpion by Walter+Wart · · Score: 1

    A bottom-dwelling aquatic filter-feeding crustacean. To all intents what we have here isn't a scorpion. It's a lobster.

    --
    The man who never alters his opinion is like the stagnant water and breeds Reptiles of the Mind -- William Blake
  59. Beowulf? by itwerx · · Score: 1

    Sounds more like a Grendel cluster! :)

  60. OT...Re:Article Text by Drizzten · · Score: 1

    The content providers are listening. Freerepublic.com was sued by the Los Angeles Times and the Washington Post over the whole-article copying that went on.

    --

    "All mankind is at the mercy of a handful of neurotics". - Norman Douglas
  61. Re:"Millions of years" Myopia smopia, dood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God is an invention of man, not the other way around. Is that myopia, or, your opium you're speaking about?

  62. You can smoke 'em though by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2
  63. Re:suggestion to avoid slashdotting these poor sit by sinserve · · Score: 1

    It would be nice to have a "google.com" user in
    /.
    I bet it would be the greatest karma whore of all
    time.

  64. Exo-Weight limit by guiding_knight · · Score: 1

    Before going off on the weight limit issue, lets consider its living environment: Underwater!
    Crabs often crawl up on the beach, out of the water. Obviously, the size limit is proportional to the weight, but in this case, the weight is proportional to this creatures weight and buoyancy. The underwater exoskeleton weight limit would be much larger than the one for today's creatures that come out of the water.

    --
    LOTR: Elijah Wood is a munchkin asshat. Yes, asshat. LOL.
  65. Oh gawd, not another creationist moron... by Abies+Bracteata · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately, what the good Lord giveth in college, He taketh away in sunday school!

  66. hmm.... by msouth · · Score: 2

    ...[checks usage manual]...Yep! "Stalks" is _present_ tense, just like I thought...

    --
    Liberty uber alles.
  67. Paleontology is soooo subjective by msouth · · Score: 2

    "The eurypterid which made it must have been enormous, probably about 2,5m long, but there is good reason to think that it was not a fearsome predator like many of its smaller terrestrial and aquatic relatives," said Almond.

    Well-preserved details of the newly discovered tracks show that while the animal was walking along the sea bed, it raked through the soft bottom muds, almost certainly foraging for food - probably small worms and crustaceans - using specialised comb-like structures on its limbs.


    Yeah, sure, that COULD have been what was going on. Or maybe there had just been a HUGE party because five or so of the 30-foot variety scorpions had killed a herd of mega-ichthyosaur and they were making the LITTLE guy sweep up!

    --
    Liberty uber alles.