Slashdot Mirror


Keeping Alien Samples Safe For Study

Metrollica writes: "Space.com features an article describing NASA's plans to prepare the Johnson Space Center that could one day house extraterrestrial life." An excerpt from the article: "It's human nature to clean for company more thoroughly than one would for oneself, but nowhere is this truth taken to greater extremes than at the Johnson Space Center. NASA's setting new standards of cleanliness in its labs that handle samples returning from space. And their efforts are laying the groundwork for samples that might some day contain evidence of extraterrestrial life from Mars, Europa, and other points little known."

219 comments

  1. CowboyNeal... by B00yah · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the lost episode, or just those who are lost, like me, too poor for cable/sattelite :(

    1. Re:CowboyNeal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had to vote Crichton, he's way hotter than Coyboyneal.

      -AC Slashdot Guy Person

    2. Re:CowboyNeal... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      I have cable, I get the sci-fi channel. I've even seen one or two episodes. I just feel like I missed the whole premise having never seen the first episodes and I've never made time to sit down and catch up.

      My favorite character, then, would be based solely on superficial qualities. Whichever one is the cat-like female with white hair is my fav!

      Seriously, this show always looked interesting. Now that I have a tivo, I keep my eyes peeled for a marathon or something where I can record enough episodes to sit down and catch up. (and no, sorry - I'm *not* ready to start buying season one episodes on video. I still have the first season of Sopranos on DVD unopened, I missed out on that show too!)

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    3. Re:CowboyNeal... by phyxeld · · Score: 1

      I think by cowboyneal's clear victory in this poll, we can conclude that most slashdotters don't watch farscape. Heck, most of us probably don't even get it.

      I used to get it, when I got scifi, but then I moved 20 miles away and my new cable company doesn't have scifi. We get comedy central instead.

      (nobody I know gets both scifi and comedy central... even though every cable company within a hundred miles has been bought by AT&T, the channel lineup still has to be different from city to city. Becuase they're fuckers.)

      --
      __
      Choose mnemonic identifiers. If you can't remember what mnemonic means, you've got a problem. - Larry Wall
    4. Re:CowboyNeal... by KewlPC · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've got Dish Network (which really sucks; I've had nothing but trouble with it, and the compression artifacts are awful), and get both Comedy Central and Sci-Fi.

      Back when I used to have Cable America (again, very awful; why do I keep getting stuck with shitty providers? Qwest.net for shitty 'net access, Cable America for shitty cable television, and now Dish Network for shitty satelite television), I got both Comedy Central and Sci-Fi.

      You just have to be careful as to what package you sign up for. For both cable TV and satellite I had to sign up for something above the "basic" package to get all the channels I wanted. Despite getting hundreds of channels, there is still almost nothing worth watching on, and I still hate television for the most part (and I almost always miss the shows that are actually worth seeing).

    5. Re:CowboyNeal... by s0l0m0n · · Score: 1

      nobody I know gets both scifi and comedy central...

      that is completely lame.

      If I could watch battle bots, southpark and uh... whatever is on Scifi.. Hey.. wait a minute here.. I don't really like anything on Scifi..

      I guess most of thier programing is just so much badly serialized pulp that I'd just rather read a book (dead tree variety).

    6. Re:CowboyNeal... by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      Yes, but CowboyNeal doesn't follow the "blue green or white[1] chicks in SF series" rule. OR DOES HE?....

      Therefore, I voted for Chiana, Trance and Orion Slave Girls. Or something...

      [1] White as in completely, utterly pale. Sometimes this trait goes along with partial or total baldness.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    7. Re:CowboyNeal... by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      At first, I thought I was too poor, then I realized I wasn't, but that I spend too little time in front of the t00b to justify the expense, now I just don't think much about it because it would cut into my time doing other things, and it seems I have very little spare time for it anyway. Probably why I haven't got a TiVo yet, tho I do lust after having one on a regular basis. I just saw a neat 18" LCD monitor I might have to get, so that means probably another year without cable.

      Lately I've been watching Michael Palin's Full Circle, tapes I bought about 2 years ago and have finally gotten around to watching. Good stuff.

      Something CmdrTaco will no doubt have less of ;) See previous poll.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    8. Re:CowboyNeal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      solution: unplug your TV and buy some books.

      you can get quite a few books for the $40-$60 a month you'll save

    9. Re:CowboyNeal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Full Circle? Is that like a circle jerk or something?

    10. Re:CowboyNeal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get both :P (And thats on the 24 channel campus cable)

    11. Re:CowboyNeal... by uweber · · Score: 1

      My advice, watch the Sopranos DVD first and then worry about Farscape.

      --
      --Ulrich
      On no accounts allow a Vogon to read poetry at you
    12. Re:CowboyNeal... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      Bah, I've got dss. I always manage to find something more interesting to watch. For example, I'd rather stare at my coffee table's reflection in the blank tube than watch another sci-fi "series." As far as I'm concerned, that's time that could be better spent showing MST3K reruns or some kind of cartoon. :)

    13. Re:CowboyNeal... by H310iSe · · Score: 1

      You say 'based soley on superficial qualities" as if it were a bad thing. Chiana is the BEST reason to watch farscape and it's because she's SO DAMN SEXY - my (gay) housemate and I watched it transfixed throughout the first season, we talked about nothing but her.

      Of course it could be argued that the qualities that make her so entrancing aren't exactly superficial, but whatever. The fact that Chiana got so low a score on this pole indicates the relative paucity of Good American Testosterone (c) in the male slashdot readership. Shame on you all!

      --
      closed minded is as closed minded does
    14. Re:CowboyNeal... by Karma+Sink · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, I used to think that people like you were just being elitist, until I actually fucking did it. I killed the cable, have nothing but network, and put a picture in front of the TV... I watch a movie maybe 2-3 times a week, and watch some sporting events, occasionally.

      I've not felt better in quite some time. Television is a fucking drain, and a waste.

      --

      When encryption is outlawed, ?o'AZ-,++o+i++##4AoA+-/-C++bI+/.+~
    15. Re:CowboyNeal... by the+phantom · · Score: 2

      I can totally feel for you, though I did have the opportunity to watch Farscape for the first time this fall. I ended up working through the fall semester after getting a job with the Forest Service. One of the perks was free housing with cable. Farscape struck me as a rather good show, and I seem to remember advertising for DVDs, though they cost money too... My stratagy: find a rich friend who wishes to buy your friendship, and exploit them. Or you could just work for the government...

    16. Re:CowboyNeal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whats farscape?

      see america is not the only country

      FUCK THE USA

      qegoitqey2@yahoo.co.uk

    17. Re:CowboyNeal... by sargon666777 · · Score: 1

      Agreed Im the same way... give me a book any day over TV. I noticed the same thing when I stopped watching it

      --
      Am I lying when I tell you that im telling the truth? Or am I telling the truth when I say that Im lying?
    18. Re:CowboyNeal... by Mathness · · Score: 1

      I gave my TV away, and I have never regreted it :)

      This could be an interesting poll; how many do not watch TV (excluding VHS/DVD).

      --
      Carbon based humanoid in training.
    19. Re:CowboyNeal... by hardburn · · Score: 1

      I think by cowboyneal's clear victory in this poll, we can conclude that most slashdotters don't watch farscape. Heck, most of us probably don't even get it.

      Personally, I really couldn't choose between these characters, so CowboyNeal was the easy way out.

      nobody I know gets both scifi and comedy central

      I do, although everything else about my local cable monopoly sucks.

      --
      Not a typewriter
    20. Re:CowboyNeal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but THIS male slashdotter's testosterone is stimulated by Crichton! He is totally hot, totally masculine, and totally easy on the eyes. Watching him is the main reason I ever watch this show.

    21. Re:CowboyNeal... by FinsGirl · · Score: 1

      No one, I repeat NO ONE, is hotter then Cowboy Neal

    22. Re:CowboyNeal... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      I also don't watch TV anymore, but now I waste my time on the net, including reading slashdot. Can't have a poll on that one heh? "Do you find not reading slashdot saves you time?" I sometimes think I should edit /etc/hosts and redirect slashdot.org and everything2.com to some webpage that would yell at me to go studying, but alas, I'm still here!

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    23. Re:CowboyNeal... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2

      yeah, TV is definitely wasted on you if you spend your time watching Children's TV like Farscape. Does the Slashdot demographic comprise a majority of kids under the age of 12 now?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    24. Re:CowboyNeal... by IronChef · · Score: 2


      She would have gotten more votes if she was listed as "the all-white chick." Channel flippers who have never watched the show (me) may still know her by sight.

    25. Re:CowboyNeal... by CmdrPinkTaco · · Score: 1

      I have one TV in the house that my room mate watches. I don't make a conscious effort to not watch TV, I just don't have time for it. When I do turn it on, it usually means that it is college football season and there is a CU game on. Other than that, every once in a while I watch HBO signature shows (6 ft under, Band of Bros). I don't fee any more elite, I just have more time to do other things - whatever they may be. And it isn't all that bad not knowing or caring what people are talking about at the office the next day. There are so many TV shows on now (especially if you have cable) that almost no one is watching the same show as you, so it has become less of a conversation piece for the following day and more of an entertainment supplement.

      --
      Please give your mod points to others, Im at the cap. They will appreciate it more
    26. Re:CowboyNeal... by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      no michael palin (monty python) did several series of traveling programs for the BBC. In which he travelled to various places. From pole to pole, Around the world in eighty days, and full circle in which he travelled round the pacific ring.

    27. Re:CowboyNeal... by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      Farscape is from Australia not the USA

    28. Re:CowboyNeal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get gays who fawn over sexy women. This proves gay men want to be women. You never here of Lesbians fawning over men.

      And this person has the nerve to comment on the "paucity" (yep-she/he checked an online thesaurus before she/he wrote that) of American Male Testosterone. If the writer is a woman, the point is moot. If it's a guy, well, he bonds with gay men and cannot comment on the dilution of the male macho/testosterone. For the record, as sexy as Chiana is, has it ever dawned on you maybe she is annoying and THAT subtracts from the sex appeal
      of anyone.

      And anyone notice the similarities between Chiana and the chick with the tail on 'Andromeda'? Both of these characters are ripoffs of the "All-white" chick from X-Men's 'Starjammers', and the Starjammers/Blake's 7, in my opinion are the templates for both series. (they both have the 'big monster guy',and swashbuckling captian)

      And no I am not an Anonymous Coward. I just dont need a password, cuz i dont need to come here often. My name's TIM

    29. Re:CowboyNeal... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I disagree, Aeryn is definately the best reason to watch farscape :)

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    30. Re:CowboyNeal... by MjDascombe · · Score: 1

      It's still crap. And americans watch a lot of crap. I can see where he was coming from.

    31. Re:CowboyNeal... by GTRacer · · Score: 2
      So is it Farscape you have a problem with, or is all Sci-Fi/Fantasy TV children's rubbish to you?

      GTRacer
      - I've found that Voyager is actually better in late-night re-runs...

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    32. Re:CowboyNeal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK

    33. Re:CowboyNeal... by zaffir · · Score: 1

      I get SciFi and Comedy Central. But i doubt i live near you.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    34. Re:CowboyNeal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree and would add that you all need to get lives...

    35. Re:CowboyNeal... by mstrjon32 · · Score: 1

      I get both channels with RCN Cable.

    36. Re:CowboyNeal... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2

      oh, is there some Sci-Fi on TV now? Kids' TV is great for KIDS, I have been known to watch a bit of kids TV in my time (mostly during my childhood funnily enough). From what I've seen of Farscape, it's a decidedly inferior product - a kind of feeble Buck Rogers / Star Trek / Space Precinct cross breed. It certainly isn't Sci-Fi, certainly IS for kids, and certainly doesn't hold a candle to even Captain Scarlet, let alone anything better.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
  2. Farscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Id only watch that show if I were drunk

    1. Re:Farscape by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you've seen them all... haven't you?

  3. I don't watch Farscape, but... by rxs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Given the results of the last poll, in which CowboyNeal lost horribly to the option of 'yes', I voted for his option this time in hopes that it will raise his possibly near-obliterated self-esteem. :_D

    --



    ---
    I could've sworn I disabled .sig viewing. . .
  4. Download where? by surph · · Score: 1

    anyone know where to download the CowboyNeal ep? you can download "anything".. right?!?!?

    --

    --------
    Don't Get Caught
    1. Re:Download where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm selling bootleg copies of the lost episode, "Cowboy Neal Saves the Universe, Only to be Eaten by a Space Slug", on european VHS along with my "William Shatner sings the Blues" cd.
      Contact me at bigfatliar@sarcasm.net.no-ip.co.uk..

    2. Re:Download where? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your mail bounced =( contact me at oeee@airborneexpress.com and we can work out a deal. serious inquiries only, will pay cash order or VISA

  5. The CowboyNeal Bellweather... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    you can always tell a poll's in trouble when he's got a 60% majority...

    1. Re:The CowboyNeal Bellweather... by geggibus · · Score: 1

      Ey! there's nothing wrong with ComboyNeal..hm eh..uh. *ponders* .. eh never mind... ;)

      /K

    2. Re:The CowboyNeal Bellweather... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IOW, next poll please.

      This would have made a nice option in the recent when-to-dump-a-poll-poll:
      - Immediately, if CowboyNeal is the dominating choice

    3. Re:The CowboyNeal Bellweather... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Farscape is crap anyways.

      I'd rather look at Cowboy Neal's hairy ass than watch Farscape.

      It is even worse that Futurama, and that's saying ALOT.

      But then again, it's all just TV for the Xena / Baywatch generation

  6. Uhm? by NWT · · Score: 1

    What is Farscape? I've got no idea what it is, perhaps a TV show? Any information?

    At least now I know what my teacher meant when he told me that i'd got "a lack of education" ;-)

    --
    Life sucks.
    1. Re:Uhm? by surph · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.farscape.com/ still no sign of CowboyNeal appearance.. yet

      --

      --------
      Don't Get Caught
    2. Re:Uhm? by duskfalls · · Score: 5, Informative

      Farscape is a continuing series on the Sci Fi Channel. Currently on the third series. It revolves around the story of John Crichton an astronaut who while testing a vehicle, designed to use the gravity well as propulsion, accidentally gets tossed into a wormhole.
      Ok while the story is really good and all, THEY DON"T HAVE ANY BLOODY NEW EPS! Then next new ep, is supposed to air sometime in april. relevent links: Official Web Site

    3. Re:Uhm? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      actually, from their site you linked to, they write:

      "Fractures"
      Moya encounters another group of escaped Peacekeeper prisoners including a Nebari, a Scarran and a female Hynerian.

      Air Date: Friday, March 29, at 9PM & 12AM ET/PT"


      so i guess, technically, you only have to wait 42 days or so. on a completely random note, my girfriend's birthday is on april first

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:Uhm? by Coward,+Anonymous · · Score: 1

      Fractures is a repeat, it won't be until a week later that a new episode is on.

    5. Re:Uhm? by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      ah. my bad. knee-jerk post. i don't follow the series, and checked out your link

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    6. Re:Uhm? by SupremeOverlord · · Score: 1

      The last episode aired in the US was season 3, episode 18, "Fractures". However, season 3 episodes 19 through 22 have already aired in the UK and Israel... you can find them floating around your favorite farscape channels in IRC.

      Of course, those of us who have seen the extra 4 episodes still long for more...

      --

      ---- "A programmer is a person who solves a problem you didn't know you had in a way you don't understand."

    7. Re:Uhm? by marcop · · Score: 1

      alt.binaries.tv.farscape

      already saw the last few episodes of season 3. At least I think "Dog With Two Bones", ep.3/22 is the last one. Stupid creators released the episodes in other countries but not the US. BTW, before someone jumps on the "you're stealing" bandwagon I will say that I have cable and would have seen these episodes later anyways, and will probably watch them again when they come out.

    8. Re:Uhm? by mdwebster · · Score: 1

      It's not the "stupid creators", it's the stupid Sci-Fi Channel. Originally the episodes were slated to air in January but some brilliant exec decided to wait until April in order to minimize the gap between the end of the third season and the beginning of the fourth for whatever dumbass reason ....

    9. Re:Uhm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahhh, so that's what it is. I know I was wondering about what the heck it was also. I've never seen nor heard of it before. But I don't have cable, soooo....

      (I do have cable modem though!) LOL

  7. Marry him! by sulli · · Score: 2, Funny

    Offtopic, but who cares?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:Marry him! by McD!ck · · Score: 2, Funny

      LOL! In a poll where CowboyNeal is leading, NOTHING is offtopic! ;)

      --
      People who are against human cloning must be bitter they are not good enough to be cloned.
    2. Re:Marry him! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now there is an FAQ update I would like to see.

  8. Which one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    was the cute one?? I would have voted for her, but alas, I had to go with CowboyNeal option for the lack of knowing.

    1. Re:Which one by Aerog · · Score: 5, Informative

      That would be Chiana if you're into sex with aliens who don't look like us, or Aeyrn if you're into sex with aliens who do look like us.

      --

      - Relativistic? That's barely Newtonian!
    2. Re:Which one by Kphrak · · Score: 1

      If you really wanted to go for "the cute one", the CowboyNeal option was NOT the one to pick. Even if you didn't know any of the other candidates. :)

      --

      There's no sig like this sig anywhere near this sig, so this must be the sig.
    3. Re:Which one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, that didn't say a lot. Do you mean the Blue chick, the white w/ dark shadowing chick (my favourite), or the other white chick? And in what order?

      Oh, yeah, there is another babe who was introduced last season, I think.

    4. Re:Which one by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Chiana isnt bad looking, found a nude of her, not sure if its real. Space Babes

    5. Re:Which one by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      Humm, better results in google if you type nude in front of someones name. Nude Pics

    6. Re:Which one by zerocool^ · · Score: 2



      That would be Chiana if you're into sex with aliens who don't look like us, or Aeyrn if you're into sex with aliens who do look like us.

      Re:Which one (Score:4, Informative)


      Only on slashdot would this be moderated as informative and not funny. Only here are we so serious about sex with aliens.

      ~z

      --
      sig?
    7. Re:Which one by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure at least one of them is fake, because, although I could be wrong, I don't remember Campbell's soup making "venom-soup" any time recently.

    8. Re:Which one by spray_john · · Score: 1
      I think you'll find that most religious organisations take it
      • quite
      seriously...
  9. Blake's 7 / Farscape by FatRatBastard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've always thought Farscape and Blake's 7 were both similar in character makeup and plot arc (which is a good thing.. they're both awesome SciFi). My vote has to go to Rygel because he's such an unapologetic self centered sonofabitch, and he reminds me a lot of Avon. A refreshing change from the normal "lets help humanity (alienity???), be a nice guy/girl/amorphous blob" type of central character in your average SciFi claptrap.

    1. Re:Blake's 7 / Farscape by belroth · · Score: 1

      I watched all of Blake's 7 when it came out, I was at University so that's some excuse. It wasn't bad for a BBC no-budget job, except for the truly execrable last episode-no make that series, but it was never that wonderful.
      Farscape on the other hand is becoming seriously interesting, from a pretty good start it keeps getting better. Admittedly for the first few episodes I was aware of the Henson connection but then I just saw Rygel and Pilot. The F/X are very good for a TV series, better than any trek series, and where another series would spend time explaining every last detail Farscape expects you to be able to keep up.
      Another thing I really like is that the plot development isn't predictable, nasty things happen and the characters have to live with the consequences. Even with the best intentions they screw up royally. Given the genre, it's believable. I'm not really someone who has 'favourite' series, but if I did Farscape would be my fave SciFi.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
    2. Re:Blake's 7 / Farscape by hardburn · · Score: 1

      Another thing I really like is that the plot development isn't predictable, nasty things happen and the characters have to live with the consequences.

      Yeah, that's my favorite thing about this series. You never can be quite sure who is a friend and who is an enemy. A long-time enemy, like Scorpious (or however you spell his name) may turn out to be the good-guy in the next episode (how many times did the Scorpy-in-Chriton's-head save them all?).

      --
      Not a typewriter
    3. Re:Blake's 7 / Farscape by sckeener · · Score: 1

      I'm glad someone else noticed that! All we need is a computer with an on/off switch that can control the galatic internet and it'll be the same show!

      IMHO it's a shame that the US can't seem to create Sci-Fi shows of such depth as Doctor Who, Blake's 7, or Red Dwarf. Other than Star Trek, what have we got? Sliders? That's just a lame Doctor Who with too many supporting charaters.

      It has been interesting though with the minor networks (such as SciFi channel, WB,UPN, & FOX) and their attempts to create quality SciFi. The successful shows on those networks seem to be created outside the us or have a more international cast&crew. It seems whenever the US networks try to recreate a show they go for below the belt. Take the US version of Red Dwarf....a female cat sounds nice to my ears, but it misses the point of the originals character...I can only image the jokes....

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
  10. My favorite... by David+M.+Sweeney · · Score: 5, Funny
    The poll options suck, as usual. My favorite is the backslash, followed closely by ctrl-V.

    Wait, I thought the poll said favorite escape characters. Never mind.

    1. Re:My favorite... by jaredcat · · Score: 1

      well you can't forget the classic ^]...

  11. thinking like a true nerd... by CRAssEsT · · Score: 1

    id go with Chiana, just cuz shes hot in a Natasha Yar kinda way

    --
    --rock me like a huricane? NO rock you
    1. Re:thinking like a true nerd... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gigi Edgley (Chiana) is even cuter out of makeup...very, very cute....

      But I prefer Claudia Black (Aeryn), who has got one of the most interesting and captivating faces I have ever seen; she isn't "cute" but I just can't stop watching her....

      Claudia Black will be in the new Rice vampire movie, "Queen of the Damned", btw, playing one of the vampires.

  12. Re:Like I know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And yet you have the time to post your banal comment.

    Bravo doofus!

  13. confused for a sec... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Funny

    I clicked on the 'results' link on the main page expecting to still see the 'marry me' poll, and momentarily thought there was a second incidence of ballot stuffing making CowboyNeal the fiance of the hour...

  14. Chiana & Tasha Yar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chiana is about the hottest thing since Tasha Yar.
    (Did you see the Red Shoe Diaries with Denise Crosby? Yum!)

    However, I voted Aeryn, because they asked best character not hottest character. And Aeryn is still damn hot.

    I haven't seen any new episodes (if there are any) but I really hopes she gets over the one Chriton dying, and just falls for the other. :)

    -RMB

    1. Re:Chiana & Tasha Yar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's just say that the last four episodes are well worth the wait.

      Don't worry about Aeryn and Crichton. They are destined to be together, aren't they ?

      I won't start giving any spoilers, but just wait for the last episode, "Dog with two bones". No matter what you expect, you will get a few surprises :-)

    2. Re:Chiana & Tasha Yar by CheezyD · · Score: 0

      Tasha Yar?? She was OK looking, but her acting needed serious work. Thank The Great Gods of SciFi they killed her off and made Worf Security Chief. Her acting tough is like Pamela Anderson playing Mother Theresa. My all around super space babe pick would be Nana Visitor (Colonel Kira Nerys) from DS9, multiply that by 10 after she had the baby (her ass got WAY big after that AND she maintained the slim waist). Gotta love that... My second pick would be one of the sidekicks on Dr. Who, but I forgot her name. It was one of the newer ones with the young Doctor. Big ass, big boobs. Yum.

  15. Gods!! How Right You Are! by the+phantom · · Score: 2

    Gods! Its been years since I've seen Blake's 7. It used to be on when I was in middle school, but public televison couldn't get the money to show it, Dr. Who, and Red Dwarf all in the same year, so they dumped Blake's 7. I really liked the show, though I have a feeling I missed quite a bit of it, due to the fact that it didn't come on until 1:00 am, Friday night.
    At any rate, the comparison between Blake's 7 and Farscape is rather striking, now that you mention it. Strong, hero type leader (Blake/Chriton); manipulative, greedy sneak (Avon/Rygel); there seem to be similarities between Pilot and the Liberator's computer (and the computer the picked up later... what was that called?... damn! its been a while!). And the constant pursuit by the authorities. Really, Farscape seems to be Blake's 7 with a budget and American accents. How interesting...

    1. Re:Gods!! How Right You Are! by Error27 · · Score: 2
      >>American accents.

      Except for the aliens who tend to have Australian accents.

    2. Re:Gods!! How Right You Are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're looking, the computer's name was Orac (posted from a computer named Zen... I saw just a few episodes)

    3. Re:Gods!! How Right You Are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget Slave....the computer on the ship they had after The Liberator....

  16. The computer in Blake's 7 by twoshortplanks · · Score: 1

    The Liberator's computer (big ciruclar thing with horizontal stripes) was called "Zen".

    The computer they picked up later on (funky clear box thing with blinkenlights) was called "ORAC".

    I really, really, shouldn't be able to remember this.

    Oh, and the they both had a mad nutter chasing after them who was part of the authoriries but slightly nuts and out for revenge above all else

    --
    -- Sorry, I can't think of anything funny to say here.
    1. Re:The computer in Blake's 7 by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      ORAC!! Yes, thank you, that's the one. Thank you.

    2. Re:The computer in Blake's 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you missed out slave the computer in the ship they used after the liberator was destroyed

  17. Actually it HAS been in the UK by dag2001 · · Score: 1

    The BBC did run Farscape for a while. I know that because I saw it.

    You just made a fool of yourself.

    1. Re:Actually it HAS been in the UK by lga · · Score: 1

      The BBC has shown all of the farscape series to date. I know this because it's the only way I get to see it. I think the BBC may even be part financing the series.

      Steve.

  18. "Dog with two bones"??? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

    Is it just me, or could that actually be a title of an XXX-rated movie?

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  19. Natasha Yar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh YUCK!

    Give me Aeryn any day, she's the hottest.

  20. Perhaps one day by RoLlEr_CoAsTeR · · Score: 1

    someone WILL marry CowboyNeal, and then he'll have no reason to appear in the polls anymore.

    Oh wait, if that happens, the polls will never be the same again! ACK

    --

    Insert mind here.
  21. FP by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

    they must have the cleaning crew from Wright-Patterson there for a weekend getaway

  22. Contamination by SkywalkerOS8 · · Score: 0

    I was amazed when they reported that they found bacteria on equipment that was on the Moon's surface for months.!! BTW, First Post!

  23. Andromeda Strain... by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was no air on the moon or in high earth orbit, so there was no reason to keep the astronauts quaranteened.

    HOWEVER, it was a good idea, because they didn't know everything they were dealing with yet.

    On Mars, Europa, and Io, there exists a remote possibility for life. Retreival missions should be geared to keep this life hermetically isolated from the Earth's biosphere.... Just in case.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:Andromeda Strain... by Perdo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There was no air on the moon or in high earth orbit, so there was no reason to keep the astronauts quaranteened.

      This is sort of recent but there was fungus on the outside of mir's glass

      google cache of article

      Mir crashed and this crap is in the ocean now after spending millions of life cycles in had cosmic radiation

      Nature at it's best through evolution and man doing stupid things to himself.

      --

      If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

    2. Re:Andromeda Strain... by kawaichan · · Score: 2

      Now all they need to do is find a way to grow them and sell them.

      Imagine instead of owning your very own moon rock, you can now grow a patch of spacial goodness of "Space Fungus"!

      --

      kawai
    3. Re:Andromeda Strain... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since there are no longer manned missions to anything except high Earth orbit anyway, why bother. It's not like the shuttle can put a booster inside the cargo bay for going to the nearest rock - the Moon or further.

      We all know Intel is up to something. They have people in space suits dancing in fab lines and aliens hotswapping CPU (with no heatsinks BTW) on TV commericals. If anyone has spare clean rooms for their alien friends, it would be these guys. ;)

    4. Re:Andromeda Strain... by juhaz · · Score: 0, Troll

      Evolution is the key here - space fungus would not benefit from same traits than its the earthbound predecessor, if cosmic radiation by change mutated something that would've done well on Earth, it would lose those quite fast to save energy and give way to strains with new charasteristics better fitted into space. Now when that thing crashed down there, it has zero change of taking over the world, because it has specialized into very different environment, it's very ancestors will outcompete it with ease.

  24. If they find any alien microbe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope they'll organize a televised deathmatch between it and some Earth microbe, seen through a microscope. That'd be cool.

    1. Re:If they find any alien microbe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They could inject it into you instead for a more interesting death match :>

  25. Server down? by quantaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The story went up ~5 minutes ago and I can't get anything, surly it can't have been /.ed this quickly? I would have really liked to see what kind of measures they would take to house extraterrestrial samples. How would you be able to remove all microbes from the air in a lab? Would you even use air, just keep it in a vacuum. That still leaves the problem of microbs on the equipment and and lab environment. They have experience keeping things in with viral labs but I don't think it's entirly applicable to this situation where you'd have to keep things out. All I can think of is shortly after building it roasting the entire lab to destroy every last trace of life than doing the same thing to the lab suits when coming in, which would of course have to be fire proof AND impermeable to moisture, anything come to mind? Are there any other more practical ways to effectivly destroy all cellular matter in an environment?

    --
    I stole this Sig
  26. this is sad by elite+lamer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    closest ive ever been to fp...

    --
    Oops!
  27. Humor alert by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

    OK, I'm taking bets on the first post to make a joke about a nuclear self-destruct device. Any takers?

    1. Re:Humor alert by buffy · · Score: 2

      MESSAGE READS:

      PROJECT WILDFIRE. STOP.

      Ok...what the hell is this lameness filter crap all about. I try to reply with a simple teletype-ish reply, and...grr...

      Now I understand what people have been complaining about.

  28. Uh... sterility? by thecarson · · Score: 0

    Then why can we touch "moon rock" at the Johnson Space Center in Clearlake, Texas? For more info and pictures of moon/mars rock, go to HolyRock.com.

  29. It'll be used sooner then you think... by S-prime · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If all goes well the Stardust mission will be returning to Earth with cosmic dust particles from the comet WIld 2 sometime in 2006

    From what is mentioned on the project webpage it seems that they plan to return the sample to Earth via a capsule to be jettisoned from the space probe when it returns.

    While the chances for contamination are relatively low, it certainly can't hurt to be prepared.

    More info at
    http://stardust.jpl.nasa.gov/index.html

    --
    -- Your local friendly mad scientist-in-training
  30. Dangerous stuff by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Imagine if there was once advanced, possibly even intelligent, life on Mars.

    Would it be too far-fetched to speculate that perhaps that all higher life forms were wiped out by some virus or bacterial disease?

    With the plant and animal life gone, the climate of the planet would change radically -- to the extent that we see today - but the cause of the catastrophy could stil be lurking in the soil.

    What guarantees do we have that bringing back a sample of soil or rock from Mars wouldn't expose this planet to the same catastrophic outcome?

    From what I read, scientists are still debating whether those odd fossil-like oddities discovered in meteoric fragments from Mars are actually petrified bacteria.

    I think it makes a lot of sense to take every possible precaution when it comes to bringing stuff back from Mars. It might even be a good idea to do the initial analysis up in the ISS just in case it's really bad news. After all, how do we know that we could actually contain a pathogen such as that which might be returned from the red planet?

    Is it really worth the risk?

    1. Re:Dangerous stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it really worth the risk?

      Maybe, maybe not. The implications of what you're saying involve many different parameters. For example, is it worth the risk to click this link?

    2. Re:Dangerous stuff by vandan · · Score: 2

      Interesting point.
      I have considered the same thing, and also this:
      Do we already have Martian bacteria on Earth?

      Bacteria is very light and travels well through space.
      I remember seeing somewhere that the sun's "atmosphere" extends out past Saturn.
      Imagine what would happen to bacteria on Mars after a meteor shower.

      I would think that by now we have been exposed to pretty much everything bacterial Mars has to offer. If it (Mars) was still alive & evolving, there would be a problem, but not now.

      Well that's what I think anyway!

    3. Re:Dangerous stuff by Skirwan · · Score: 2
      Imagine if there was once advanced, possibly even intelligent, life on Mars.

      Would it be too far-fetched to speculate that perhaps that all higher life forms were wiped out by some virus or bacterial disease?
      I hate it when people post intelligent scary things. Now I'm all paranoid.

      Man, I have got to stop reading Slashdot at three AM...

      --
      Damn the Empteror!
    4. Re:Dangerous stuff by LadyLucky · · Score: 4, Interesting
      See, I tend to think the opposite. Life on earth has spent millions of years adapting to our environment, adapting to be more and more efficient at doing bad stuff to us. I think it would be highly unlikely that any given virus would have any potency in a terrestrial environment. After all, there is nothing inherent about a particular virus that makes it deadly, it is just that its interactions with our bodies cause ill effects.

      I would have thought extra-terrestrial life is likely to have the same kind of effect on us as we would on them. If we can't survive over there, why could they survive here? All in all, it is more like a roll of the evolutionary dice, in a game where the possibilities are huge, and the successful species very few. Not only that, but they have to be more successful than the ones on earth that have evolved already.

      --
      dominionrd.blogspot.com - Restaurants on
    5. Re:Dangerous stuff by ender81b · · Score: 2, Interesting

      WARNING: long post

      A virus dangerous enough to destroy an entire planet would defeat itself - it would be a evolutionary phreak and oculdn't survive. Consider this:

      Most scientists rightly consider Ebola virus a 'defunct' virus - not a good one. Ebola will kill a victim in 3 days (or so, maybe a week depending on the strain). By doing so it lessons it chances of infecting the next host. The only reason Ebola is such a (possible) problem today is b/c of things like airlines. In actuality, a ebola 'outbreak' will occur and then will rapidly die out as the hosts die faster than the virus can spread. IN a sense Ebola does one thing perfectly (reproduce extremely fast by consuming bodily tissues) but another very, very badly (destroys the hosts too fast).

      A far more 'perfect' virus would be something along the lines of AIDS/HIV. These virus spread very, very slowly and can remain inside their hosts for 10-20 years in some cases. Remember the point of a virus is to Duplicate itself and survive. Ebola just isn't as effective as AIDS in doing so. I.E. 100-200 Ebola deaths a year compared to 5-6 million AIDS deaths a year (and rising with an infection rate of around 60% in some African countries).

      Indeed, it would be nearly impossible for a virus to do as you say (wipe out a planet) nor would it make evolutionary sense (no, not a perfect theory but do you really want to argue creationism?). It would most likely burn itself out. No virus ever discovered can travel between more than a few species or genus that I can ever recall hearing about. And don't forget that life has been evolving on this planet for 3-4 billion years far longer than martian life would've had time to evolve and probably a higher mutation rate (due to larger amounts of radiation - closer to sun).

      The difference in the organisms make travel impossible between them. Not only that but remember people *Do* survive Ebola and other types of doomsday virus's. The mortality rate may be 90% but that 10% will be immune to the virus from then on.

      Ok, so your perfect virus wiped out 90% of the life on a planet (we will discuss why this is nearly impossible ina second). 10 % remaining. Planet screwed right? Nadda. During the.. oh crap can't remmeber the eon.. I think it was phanerozic - something transition around *98%* of all species on earth died (most likely due to a huge meteor impact). NINETY EIGHT PERCENT. Within 50 mil years afterwards life had recovered, if I am wrong on any of this please some geologist correct me but I think I got the time frame pretty close.

      Yet we are still here and the earth fine. You see life expands expotentially (sp?). You oculd wipe out everything on the earth except for a few bacteria (and I mean a FEW one or two) and the earth woudl be ship-shape in a say 100 million years.

      At the height of the cold war if the soviet/us/china released all their nuclear weapons at once distrubuted evenly over the earths surfact they wouldn't destroy life on earth. B/c of things like aneorabic bacteria just discovered living miles underground, or deep-sea vent colonies living 10's of kilometers under the sea or mold spores perserved in rock, etc, etc ad nausem.

      The final point is this: why the hell would the bacteria be dangerous to us? TO do so martian life would've had to have had a DNA/whatever structure incredibly close to ours. SOooo here we go:

      Your virus has to:

      A.) Somehow destroy all life on a planet within a relatively short timeframe (say 10,000 years) otherwise life will adapt, and fast.

      B.) Be able to infect every single species of life and mutate fast enough to overcome any changes between the species.

      C.) Be able to survive for oh, 1 billion or so years on the martian surface blasted by UV, in near freezing conditions with no life to prey upon to reproduce.

      D.) Be able to adapt to EARTHS lifeforms somehow.

      E.) Somehow this has to make sense evolutionary-wise (remember life always expands, not contracts)

      Anyways sorry for the long post.

    6. Re:Dangerous stuff by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      odd fossil-like oddities discovered in meteoric fragments from Mars are actually petrified bacteria.

      I would be petrified too if I was chased into a piece of rock by a killer virus. Scary stuff.

      But wouldn't NASA just have to send a few guys on a field trip into Area 51 and see how they solved the problem? (Training for this mission would of course consist of all-day playing of Half-Life 'til they got it right)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    7. Re:Dangerous stuff by rtaylor · · Score: 2

      Actually, thats probably the exact reason why it'll be deadly.

      You see, a well evolved virus will NOT kill the host. If it kills the host it kills itself (difficult to spread from a dead patient).

      Atleast, it won't do so immediatly. The black plague worked so well as it's primary carriers were unaffected, easily spread and quite plentiful. Had adverse affects on humans though :)

      --
      Rod Taylor
    8. Re:Dangerous stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Had adverse affects on humans though "

      you just got the understatment of the year award

    9. Re:Dangerous stuff by not_cub · · Score: 2
      See, I tend to think the opposite. Life on earth has spent millions of years adapting to our environment, adapting to be more and more efficient at doing bad stuff to us.


      European settlers in America gave the natives all sorts of nasty diseases that they had no natural immunity too. Just as they had no natural immunity to our diseases, so we might not have to "space-diseases". In addition, earth virii tend to moderate their lethality. If a virus kills too quickly then it will not be passed on before it has done so. If it kills too many then it will wipe its hosts. Alien virii have not had a chance to tailor themselves to us. Ok, so these are remote possibilities, but you'd only need to be wrong once for it to be a big problem.


      not_cub

      --
      q='echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"';s=\';b=\\;echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"
    10. Re:Dangerous stuff by juhaz · · Score: 1

      That would be because the natives were, and still are, every bit as much humans as the settlers were - microbes will not care about your skin color. Those diseases affected only the species they've been evolving for, humans, and certaily did not jump into a plants, or even animals for example - and plants and animals are quite a bit more nearly related to us than anything from different planet would be.

      There are rather few inter-species pathogens, and even those are results of thousands or millions of years of evolution, with those same host species present. Space microbe cannot infect human, or any other earthling, because it has never adapted into living in one.

    11. Re:Dangerous stuff by kalyptein · · Score: 1
      I am inclined to agree with you on the subject of viruses. Bacteria or multicellular life might be a different issue. Since they are free-living organisms, unlike a virus, they would not need to match our biochemistry as closely to survive, if they can make use of things like sugars, amino acids, etc. The concern would be then if the kinds of defenses developed by terrestrial life were not well suited to coping with ET.

      Random example: a lot of our antibiotics (and natural ones employed by a variety of organisms) function by disrupting the formation of the bacterial cell wall, causing the internal pressue of the cell to rupture it. Bacteria are developing resistance by making slight changes in the sugars the use and their arrangement in the cell wall. Our imaginary ET bug might not even have a cell wall, or may use a protein-analog, or some totally different system, against which the earthly one is worthless.

      Just my thoughts, but given how little we can say with certainty about anything we bring home, why not overdose on precaution. The worse that happens is we laugh at our paranoia in fifty years.

      --
      Entropy gets everyone.
    12. Re:Dangerous stuff by Graabein · · Score: 1
      Imagine if there was once advanced, possibly even intelligent, life on Mars. Would it be too far-fetched to speculate that perhaps that all higher life forms were wiped out by some virus or bacterial disease? What guarantees do we have that bringing back a sample of soil or rock from Mars wouldn't expose this planet to the same catastrophic outcome?

      This has already happened - we're it.

      --
      And remember kids: Never trust a computer you can actually lift.
  31. Once something leaves a state by 1155 · · Score: 1

    Once something leaves a state, it changes. No ifs, ands, or buts. Wouldn't it make more sense to create these labs in the environments that the samples would be taken from. A sample in it's native environment would make it that more viable.

    On further examination, creation of jobs, further research in foreign regions, and the fact that the proof of the existence of life in other areas besides earth Would be beneficial to this. Also, contamination of the earths population is somewhat... imaginable, but it is still possible. If there was habitation on Mars and Europa, would it be lack of certain things, or the fact that something was there that would cause their extinction.

    1. Re:Once something leaves a state by wackybrit · · Score: 2

      Which is exactly why I don't understand why we haven't got a base of some sort on the moon yet. Think of the benefits.. we could test all sorts of new space engines and thrusters, and perhaps perfect easy Moon -> Mars flights. We could also dig up any minerals that are there, and maybe even find the Monolith :-)

      Am I just nuts, or would a moon base really be helpful as well as awe inspiring for the entire planet?

  32. Yahoo has story if site is Slashdotted by Metrollica · · Score: 2, Informative

    Alternate link to story on Yahoo! News. The Yahoo site has the text of the story, but not any images of the room. I should have included that link when I submitted the story.

    --



    --Metrollica
  33. these preparations are futile... by bovril · · Score: 3, Funny
    ...because as we all know, the first alien brought back to earth from outer space will be a naked hottie with a thirst for human blood. while the security guards are busy ogling her supernaturally luscious boobies, she'll walk straight out the front door and commence her rampage of death and destruction.

    we may as well give up now.

    --

    ---
    Yeah, well, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
    1. Re:these preparations are futile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, lets pray nothing like that does happen... but if it did - god i hope i get to have sex with her!

  34. No beautiful women should work there... by vandelais · · Score: 2

    that have red hair.

    "The truth is IN there."

    --
    Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
    1. Re:No beautiful women should work there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No men should work there as the alien & human female hybid wants to mate & kill men...

  35. Oh well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sites is slashed or something but i couldnt read the article after trying several times, anyway, i read a good book time ago by Arthur C. Clark where humans started to live in a planet with life, but they instead of die about new virus the human body used to all our biodiversity was overdone there and could manage the primitive alien virus easly, so there where no infections at all, not even with open wonds.

    Off course alien virus coming to the earth could end mutating, but was a good book ;)

  36. I wonder by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    Do you think aliens have storage areas for Earth things. Cuz they don't know what a cork screw is for, so they'd want to lock it away. Maybe that's why they think we won't mind the probes.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  37. This sound foolish by qpt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What justification is there for intentionally housing possibly dangerous extra-terrestrial life forms? The curiosity of a few academics is surely not reason enough to put the entire human race at potential risk!

    After all, no matter how carefully they may store these organisms, there is always the possibility that they may somehow escape. Once the terrestrial biosphere is contaminated with foreign organisms, who can say what the result will be? History is rife with examples of non-native species decimating populations of unprepared organisms.

    I am not worried so much about macroscopic life forms as microscopic ones, such as bacteria and viruses. Having evolved for millions of years apart from terrestrial macro-organisms, these creatures could devastate our maladapted immune systems.

    --

    --
    Domine Deus, creator coeli et terrae respice humilitatem nostram.

    1. Re:This sound foolish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, troll.

    2. Re:This sound foolish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a f*cking troll

      What justification is there for intentionally housing possibly dangerous extra-terrestrial life forms

      well, if they were bigger and stronger they'd be doing it to us

      I am not worried so much about macroscopic life forms as microscopic ones, such as bacteria and viruses

      consider this: until we do study alien life we can't even know for sure it has DNA let alone virus' that can interact with us. For all you know, we could be the only carbon based life in this sector!

    3. Re:This sound foolish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, you are the absolute last person who should be demanding more on topic posts, you dope-smoking, soup-eating, boyfriend-whining, tantrum-throwing, troll-inviting, stargate-loving, mathematically challenged, logically challenged, and just plain challenged lump of protoplasm, possessing the likability of a crying redhead at Kmart and the dishonety of Al Gore and Baron Munchausen put together. Your signal-to-noise ratio can be outdone by a hand radio wrapped in tin foil. In short: Here's your sign.

    4. Re:This sound foolish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop replying to the troll. If we learned nothing from the recent Voyager episode it's that annoying people go away if you ignore them, and Q has a foot fetish.

    5. Re:This sound foolish by ab762 · · Score: 1

      Tons of space dust and comet debris fall to earth every day. Fred Hoyle and Chandra Wickramsinghe speculated that extra-terrestrial microbes routinely cause disease outbreaks.

      The elaborate precautions are to keep earth life from contaminating the sample and messing up the science.

  38. What if? by KanSer · · Score: 1

    What if we find, and bring back, really dirty jabba the hutt-esque aliens? And why worry about microbes, if that's all we bring back. Personally I'd like 5 minutes alone in there with ms. Henstridge. Underrated movie really. (Erm... no it wasnt)

    --
    • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
  39. I imagine they cleaned it first... by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 1

    I know I've seen it and touched it. I'd personally be more worried about all the snotty-nosed kids groping the thing than any Lunar space boogies.

    --
    My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
  40. Roswell, anyone? by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although I am seriously skeptical of any actual Alien beings already in captivity (or storage) by the government, I do tend to think that they know somewhat more about the space program in general than they're letting on.

    Is it possible that some of this news could be gradually preparing the public to accept the idea that there is proof of life elsewhere in the universe? I imagine most people would not have much of a difficult time accepting this, but there are groups (I believe) that would have a difficult time dealing with the fact that life exists anywhere beyond Earth.

    I just wonder if they're preparing for something they might get, or preparing us for what they've already got.

    (I could also be listening to Art Bell too much...)

    --
    My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
    1. Re:Roswell, anyone? by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      Seriously, Id like to be the president just to know the answer to that and other questions ... Could you imagine the first few days of being president, you must get one *hell* of a briefing! Im sure being the president means your privy to alot of really cool secrets :) This is not to say I think there are aliens on earth, but I sure wish there were because that would be cool!

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

  41. Didn't you learn anything... by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 1

    from War of the Worlds, dear?

    Maybe they aren't adjusted to our biosphere and will just die after decimating a few cities.

    --
    My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
  42. Nope by qpt · · Score: 1

    Is that a television show?

    --

    --
    Domine Deus, creator coeli et terrae respice humilitatem nostram.

    1. Re:Nope by Atrahasis · · Score: 1
      Is that a television show?

      You are joking, aren't you? You've never heard of War of the Worlds? Go here and here.

      HGWells book, radio show, film, and countless ripoffs. War of the Worlds is possibly the most famous alien invasion film in history - Independance Day was a poor copy of it (I think they called it an homage).

    2. Re:Nope by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Well, actually it is/was a TV Show and it showed us that they didn't just die.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  43. Nice place you got here! by meth88 · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't we really just be setting the aliens up for a letdown?

  44. So maybe by Thakandar2 · · Score: 1

    ...aliens are really our genetic in-laws, in a 2001ish sense. That would make sense, seeing as I have to clean for mine whenever they come over...

  45. One day? by Kanasta · · Score: 2

    Hrm, so where did they hold the stuff from them 50s? ;)

  46. Silly by HanzoSan · · Score: 2


    Seems Nasa expects to only find bacteria and other simple life.

    How are you going to deal with intelligent life, i mean come on bacteria????????? We shouldnt worry about that stuff, we should be worried about how to deal with contact with REAL alien life, meaning stuff that we've never seen before and wont know how to deal with which is as intelligent or more intelligent than us.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How are you going to deal with intelligent life, i mean come on bacteria?????????

      Are you a moron? There is no other intelligent life in the universe. God created the Earth and us in his image. Why would he go off and create more worlds when we are his children?

    2. Re:Silly by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0

      There are OTHER scientific groups at NASA working on universal translator technology. So relax.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  47. Now if only... by mrbrown1602 · · Score: 1

    If only the government stopped covering up the existance of alien-beings would this be useful! :-P

  48. Well as far as life on mars goes, by HanzoSan · · Score: 2


    Do we really know now if life is on mars or not? no air or water on the surface, what about under the surface?? When they drill on mars, or can get a probe to actually land on mars, we will find out.

    As far as life on other planets, I'm 99 percent sure theres life on europa, that planet is like the south pole is on earth, alot off ice, and alot of water under the ice, meaning theres bound to be life under the ice, and the life could be intelligent life at that.

    Europa would be the planet to check for contact with aliens, the fact that we havent even a probe planned for Europe must mean Nasa isnt trying to discover intelligent life, they wouldnt know how to handle it if they did.

    bacteria, thats a life form simplee enough for us to properly handle.

    Imaginee us going to Mars or Europa, and bringing back some unknown alien lifeform, will that lifeforms friends send ships to earth and attack us, who says they arent as intelligent as us, now they could be like aliens on earth but some of these other planets had life on them long before earth.

    Who knows.

    In my opinion i dont see why we need to bring stuff back at all, we can do all of our tests in space to make sure its safe, bring it to a space station. Let astronaughts deal with it.

    IF its a live alien why tell the people about that? so they can panic? Let the astronaughts in space interview the alien or run some tests, then send it back to its friends.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
    1. Re:Well as far as life on mars goes, by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Funny
      Do we really know now if life is on mars or not? no air or water on the surface, what about under the surface?? When they drill on mars, or can get a probe to actually land on mars, we will find out.

      No Comment ;-)

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:Well as far as life on mars goes, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "no air or water on the surface, what about under the surface?? When they drill on mars, or can get a probe to actually land on mars, we will find out."
      In fact, there is air on Mars. The atmosphere is far thinner than here on Earth, but it is there. The make-up is 95.3% carbon dioxide, 2.7% nitrogen, 1.6% argon , 0.13% oxygen and the rest of the content is only in trace amounts. There is also water on Mars, it is simply not in the liquid state.
      That being said, it is possible ( though not very ) that life existed on Mars at some point. When taking Earth life into consideration, particularly organisms that can survive in INCREDIBLY harsh conditions, like microbial life in Antartica for instance, it seems possible that IF life ever did exist on Mars, it still might though it may presently be frozen in one of the polar caps. This is an almost incalculable improbability, but improbable things happen.
      Anyone know what the odds are on life springing up twice within the same solar system? Given that bacteria might be capable of interstellar transmition, it may be even more likely that life would find its way to more than one planet in a system.....

  49. I don't think so by xX_sticky_Xx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep, I think you've been listening to too much Art Bell.

    Roswell was most likely just a smokescreen to divert attention from the fact that Nazi scientists were working for the US to develop their rocketry program. They probably realized that if they produced "evidence" of a crashed saucer and then quickly backtracked and denied it (substituting a weather balloon for the saucer) that people would think there was a conspiracy to cover up the alien crash. Worked pretty damn good. Meanwhile, no one is even thinking about having the former enemy on the public payroll.

    That, my friend, is the real conspiracy.

    --

    ---

    I didn't want to leave this space blank.
    1. Re:I don't think so by Leven+Valera · · Score: 2
      Roswell was most likely just a smokescreen to divert attention from the fact that Nazi scientists were working for the US to develop their rocketry program. They probably realized that if they produced "evidence" of a crashed saucer and then quickly backtracked and denied it (substituting a weather balloon for the saucer) that people would think there was a conspiracy to cover up the alien crash. Worked pretty damn good. Meanwhile, no one is even thinking about having the former enemy on the public payroll.


      Your explanation, sir, is simple, makes perfect sense and is quite reasonable. I'm sure you'll understand that myself and others will have to discredit you by screaming "The truth is out there!" and refusing to listen. :)
      --
      Woot w00t w007.
  50. You are a dirty little whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And so is your mom.

  51. What happens if we screw up the containment rooms by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 4, Funny

    Zoltar: "Home Planet: these earthlings had a really crappy waiting room. The Nation Geographics were ten years old, they had no dish of candies on the coffee table, and from watching "Nick at Nite" we have determined that the next season of "I Love Lucy" you all have been waiting for is really going to suck. I suggest we destroy their planet now."

  52. This is a job for the space station by corebreech · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why bring it to Earth? Just bring it to the Space Station.

    Specifically, you have the returning space probe enter Earth orbit. A service vehicle is then dispatched to dock with the probe. Part of the service vehicle is designed to serve as a containment module for whatever beasties the probe brought back.

    Then the service vehicle navigates back to the space station and docks. The containment module remains off-limits to personnel, all observation/experiments are performed using machines preinstalled in the containment module.

    If the beasties start pulling an Andromeda on us, you jettison the module and send it on its way to the Sun.

    1. Re:This is a job for the space station by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is a job for a full-blown lab with actual human involvment. If the Viking landers taught us anything, it's that we cannot anticipate all of the kinds of tests we might need and results (false and real) that we will see. There is no way you'll launch a full-sized, fully equiped biological lab into orbit, espeically not one where humans can really work (gravity is pretty popular amoung biologists, silly people).

      The whole point of bringing these samples back is to bring the full arsenal of our scientific abilities against them. You can't do that via remotely controlled robots, either on Mars or in the next room of the space station.

    2. Re:This is a job for the space station by corebreech · · Score: 2

      > You can't do that via remotely controlled robots, either on Mars or in the next room of the space station.

      Of course we can, and more importantly, it's the only safe way of proceeding. Robots can be controlled easily when they're in the next room and there's no round-trip lag in telemetry/communications and the bandwidth is whatever you want it to be, and any tests not anticipated can be sent up on the next shuttle flight.

      And I tell you what, if you want to be a biologist that specializes in the study of alien lifeforms you have better start getting used to the idea of working in zero-g.

      To insist otherwise isn't too different than being a marine biologist who refuses to get wet.

      Stick to the Discovery Channel.

    3. Re:This is a job for the space station by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2

      In as much as NASA has set up this facility for studing potential alien lifeforms on Earth, not in zero-G, I'd have to call your assertion into question. It's pretty sweeping statment, given the evidence against it.

      And if you do your research, you'll learn that most marine biologist spend most of their time on shore. Particularly when they're trying to do lab work. There is no reason for an astrobiologist to go into space, given the costs and the fact that any organisms on the space station would already be out of their habitat (which is why a marine biologist goes into the water, to study critters in their native environments).

      And, no, no robot is as good as having a human in there. Ask any lab scientist you know, and they'll confirm: there is no substitute for having a person running the experiments. Machines don't have all of our sense. Half of good science is serendipity, often resulting from someone noticing something really subtle. Machines don't notice things, and by design, have restricted senses.

      And it isn't like Mars rocks are more scary than, say, smallpox or e. coli. We let biologists work with known hazardous organisms (under careful conditions, much like NASA astrobiology lab) here on Earth. And we know for a fact that they are dangerous. Odds are highly weighted against there being any danger in Mars rocks.

    4. Re:This is a job for the space station by corebreech · · Score: 2

      In as much as NASA has set up this facility for studing potential alien lifeforms on Earth, not in zero-G, I'd have to call your assertion into question.

      If you read the article carefully, you will note that the facility being constructed is not slated for analyzing alien samples but is, rather, simply "laying the groundwork."

      And if you do your research, you'll learn that most marine biologist spend most of their time on shore.

      This will be true with astrobiologists as well; they will spend most of their time on Earth.

      There is no reason for an astrobiologist to go into space, given the costs and the fact that any organisms on the space station would already be out of their habitat...

      The organisms being studied are going to be out of the habitat regardless of whether they are here on Earth or on the Space Station.

      And there is a reason to send biologists into space to perform these studies... to reduce the risk of accidental contagion here on Earth to zero.

      And, no, no robot is as good as having a human in there. Ask any lab scientist you know, and they'll confirm: there is no substitute for having a person running the experiments.

      Most if not all lab scientists have never had the opportunity to work with the kind of robots I'm talking about. Recent achievements in minaturization and computer technology can produce an experience that is as good, if not better, than actually being there.

      Machines don't have all of our sense. Half of good science is serendipity, often resulting from someone noticing something really subtle. Machines don't notice things, and by design, have restricted senses.

      We wouldn't be using the machines to design experiments or analyze the results. And machines have far greater sensory capabilities than we do, and are able to communicate this information to us in ways far more useful than what the unadorned eye or ear otherwise could.

      And it isn't like Mars rocks are more scary than, say, smallpox or e. coli.

      How do you know this?

      And if we really do know this, why spend the money to bring the stuff back?

      We let biologists work with known hazardous organisms (under careful conditions, much like NASA astrobiology lab) here on Earth.

      Organisms that evolved on Earth.

      I've got some movies I'd like you to go see, um, Alien, um, Andromeda Strain, er, War of the Worlds, the Martian Chronicles...

      Odds are highly weighted against there being any danger in Mars rocks.

      So if the choice is between low, but real, risk and zero risk, you want to take the risk, even if it means that if you are wrong all of humanity might be threatened?

      If NASA were really smart, they'd use the return of alien samples as a way of bolstering the funding for the Space Station. We spent the money to put it up there, now let's put it to use!

    5. Re:This is a job for the space station by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2

      I think I see our problem. You're basing your fears on Hollywood horror/SciFi movies.

      I'm basing mine on biology. If life on Mars evolved independently of Earth, odds are that it won't infect humans or any other terrestrial species. If you want to see why this is likely, just look at all of the bacteria and virii on Earth today. Only a small fraction of these can infect a human. Now imagine that the bacteria had never as much as seen a human before. What are the odds that it can even live in our systems, let alone thrive and infect?

      Organisms that have evolved on Earth are far more likely to be dangerous than Mars rocks (which probably don't even have life to begin with, based on Viking findings). And organism like e. coli which has been SHOWN to infect humans is much scarier than some phantom boogieman from Mars you may have once seen in a movie.

      As for the space station: it already gets the lion's share of the NASA budget.

    6. Re:This is a job for the space station by corebreech · · Score: 2

      For the record, SciFi predicted rockets, satellites, geostationary orbit, that little trip from the Earth to the Moon... let's not start dissing SciFi, and let's not ignore the other more salient points made in that last post.

      You argue that it is unlikely that any alien organism can pose a threat here, but your arguments are the same as might have been made in years past, when instead of visiting alien worlds we travelled to undiscovered countries.

      Look at all of the bacteria and virii on Earth today! Only a small fraction of these can infect a human! So no need to take precautions before we visit these natives over here, or this tribe or that tribe.

      And of course, what happened? Whole populations were decimated, and why? Because that one seemingly insignificant bacteria or virii that we didn't give a second thought too was something that the people who lived in these parts of the worlds had never encountered.

      History is replete with examples of our causing great destruction borne of nothing but our arrogance.

      If we know everything already, then why spend so much money bringing this stuff back?

    7. Re:This is a job for the space station by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2

      This is getting silly, so this will be my last response. However:

      You are still ignoring the point. Bacteria carried by humans to other populations is still bacteria adapted to humans. To compare it to potential Mars life is silly.

      No one is saying that we should take any precautions. That's what this NASA facility is all about. But there are precations and there are undo, overly expensive precautions that cut the amount of viable science dramatically. I am of the opinion that putting the facility on the Space Station is in the latter category.

    8. Re:This is a job for the space station by corebreech · · Score: 2

      Bacteria carried by humans to other populations is still bacteria adapted to humans.

      You are so wrong.

      The question isn't whether the bacteria has adapted to humans.

      It's whether the humans have adapted to the bacteria.

      I'm going to guess you're either a biologist, or a scientist of some other persuasion. One of the more sobering facts in this life concerns the relative ease with which we award such credentials upon people, regardless of whether they are possessed with the faculties necessary to administer their responsiblities.

      All too often they are not.

      And more often than not, this is how disaster occurs.

      I don't say this in reference to you. Necessarily. It's more of a point aimed at the current crop of "scientists" who inhabit NASA these days. You're right when you point out that they appear ready to sign off on this.

      More frightening than even the movie 'Alien'.

  53. The Alien by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In one of the buildings I occasionally worked in at JSC (medical facility - forget the building number), there is an underground room. Pretty far underground. I've been told it was origionally used to examine astronauts before and after flights free from stray radiation, etc from the atmosphere (a combination of an insulated room and earth). Of course, we liked to claim that was where The Alien was housed.


    Of course, that fell in line nicely with rumors that JSC was actually a Hanger 18 site. And that's why JSC property includes lots of undeveloped land (all those underground facilities). Now days there's a major road and a magnet school along one of the borders that used to be closed off NASA territory.


    Of course - its all bunk anyway. But it fit nicely with the Alien Room at the bottom of the (sometimes) locked elevator.

    1. Re:The Alien by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      Are you so sure about that? I live pretty much next door to JSC, and the house's foundation as at sea level. If you dig a hole, it fills with water. You don't go very far down.

  54. Disclosure by inKubus · · Score: 1

    Check this out, a little piece at ABC news for kids. This is kindof scary.

    Perhaps they are slowly making the world ready for disclosure of the truth.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  55. extraterrestrial life from Mars, Europa, and other by malana-cream · · Score: 1

    >extraterrestrial life from Mars, Europa, and >other points little known I knew you Americans do know very little about Europe. But at least you should know, that it's located on Earth. malana

  56. extraterrestrial life from Mars, Europa, and by malana-cream · · Score: 1

    >extraterrestrial life from Mars, Europa, and
    >other points little known

    I knew you Americans do know very little about
    Europe. But at least you should know, that it's
    located on Earth

    malana

    1. Re:extraterrestrial life from Mars, Europa, and by cygnusx · · Score: 1

      Um, I think the original poster meant Europa the moon, not Europa the union.

    2. Re:extraterrestrial life from Mars, Europa, and by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that some kind of joke, or are you feeling really stupid after that iddiocy?

    3. Re:extraterrestrial life from Mars, Europa, and by javaDragon · · Score: 1

      Europe is located on Earth, yes, but who knows, maybe US are not located on Earth, if you take a look at the strange attitude of the american govt towards the rest of the world, lately...

      --
      -- javaDragon is an instance of JavaDragon.
  57. Great use of tax dollars... by Jormundgard · · Score: 1

    Maybe they should wait until there's an actual need for this before wasting my tax money on it. Unless I missed the news about the manned mission to Europa.

    1. Re:Great use of tax dollars... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2

      You missed the news that NASA is planning a sample return mission to Mars within the decade. Actually, they've been planning it for quite a while now, at least 10 years. It has been delayed by several years by the Polar Lander and Climate Orbiter debacles, but it is still on.

  58. It's all futile.... by Rouven · · Score: 1

    It's a queen. She'll breed. You'll die.

  59. MIB? by 1D10T · · Score: 1

    So finally earth will become a harbor for aliens without a home as in Men in Black?

  60. What's Really Depressing by uptownguy · · Score: 1
    ...ok, so mod me down for being off-topic here...

    So, I checked out the ABC News for Kids link... interesting news site for kids. The alien "story" raised an eyebrow or two...

    But what was really depressing to me were the 4 headlines for kids...

    Alien Secrets

    America Attacked!

    Anthrax!

    Happy Holidays!

    Sort of makes me yearn for the good old days when I was growing up. Nothing to worry about back then... except for the 'nukes. Ahhh, the good old nukes...

    BR
    Sigh...

    --


    I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
  61. Step-by-step by con1 · · Score: 1
    Government is preparing us to show the truth:

    They have alien species captured and contained in your facilities, but must preparing civils step-by-step, because the cultural,religious and social impact will be unprecedent in human history.

    Tha lab is marketing to something that already exists for a long time...
  62. Now I know why I always felt like an alien in USA by jschrod · · Score: 1
    And their efforts are laying the groundwork for samples that might some day contain evidence of extraterrestrial life from Mars, Europa, and other points little known.
    It's nice to see someone else addressing the fact that US folks know almost nothing about Europa. Coming from the other side of the pond, I'm just wondering if they can really cram all European visitors into the Johnson Space Center. I think my next visit should be scheduled before they have finalised this plan.
    --

    Joachim

    People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

  63. Houston not a safe location by texchanchan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Johnson Space Center is just south of Clear Lake City, between the city of Houston and the Gulf of Mexico. The land it is on is already sinking. Every year, local roads disappear for days at a time under high water after heavy rains.

    Houston locals, including the people at NASA-JSC, entertain themselves by betting on where the hurricanes are going to hit. Locals track them on maps--and everybody has maps with latitude and longitude, because they are distributed by local businesses printed on placemats, grocery bags, and such.

    Clear Lake has a straight section running directly from the Gulf of Mexico to the south side of Johnson Space Center. Topo map A big hurricane, hitting at the right point in the tidal cycle, could create a storm surge that would flood everything at JSC up to, maybe including, the second floor.

    When I worked there (a long time ago) high-water preparedness consisted of putting the equipment up on tables and desks.

    It seems to me that a place which could be sloshing with seawater is not the best location for this lab.

  64. I touched the moon by Wag · · Score: 2

    I remember as a kid going to the Smithsonian Air & Space museum, and they had an Apollo exhibit with a slice of a moon rock exposed for anyone to touch.

    Well, I did what kids normally do, I touched it and I turned out ok, except for that X-Files episode they based on my life. Dirty bastards...

  65. So... by pimpinmonk · · Score: 1

    Anyone ever played HALO?

  66. Way's to detect life without samples by argoff · · Score: 2

    This is sorta of a continuation of discussion started the other day. ( see here) Basically the premise is that if intellignet life exists out there then there is a high probability that it's millions of years more advanced than us and that they would probably be engaged in massive civil engineering projects (such as arranging stars for pratical benefit) that would be observable from earth. The question is what would we look for that would be out of the ordinary?

  67. Re:The Alien: Underground in Houston? by texchanchan · · Score: 1

    When I worked there, there was a rumor of an "underground vault" where they kept everything that had ever been in orbit (small objects, that is--old space suits, etc.), in order to prevent a black market developing. Have no idea what the truth of this is. Probably there is a vault somewhere, but underground in Houston is a neat trick. Sometimes, when I'd walk across the lush JSC lawns, I'd see water squish up around my feet. As the other reply says, the water table is at roughly 0 inches underground.

    There is an underground tunnel complex in Houston, with shopping, movies, and parking, so it's possible, using a lot of pumps going all the time I suppose. Last year the entire city got horribly flooded, including those tunnels. Flood maps. Think about floodwater deluging a clean room full of alien samples and then surging out across the Texas countryside--which does not drain very well either, and is plenty moist and warm for growing any sort of microbe you want. Heck, they had 2 cases of cholera in Houston when I lived there. Supposedly it arrived in bilge.

    Also, the entire region is saturated with noxious chemicals from the petroleum industry. With this witches' brew already in place, I'd rather have the samples go to Iowa or some such high-and-dry location.

  68. well then by HanzoSan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    If we are gods children why do christians also believe god only had one son.

    religion lol

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  69. Re:The Alien: Underground in Houston? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2
    Yep. Houston is swamp land. Especially the Clear Lake area (I used to be able to see JSC out my back porch - now I live on the other side of the lake itself).


    You think there's a witches brew from the Petroleum industry. Just think about all the chemicals and biological agents dumped in to Houston's bayous from flooded university labs last year.


    In any case - JSC does have some degree of underground structures. I'll have to dig up some info on that room and find out exactly how deep it goes. But otherwise, JSC has a somewhat extensive network of underground utility tunnels (although they don't got THAT deep, but I understand they're very wet).


    Having said all that - The Alien Room is labled as such because of our sense of humor. Not because of its actual use. :)

  70. Europa != Europe by shaldannon · · Score: 1

    Sheesh. Europa is a moon of Jupiter. Europe is a continenton, as you put it, "the other side of the pond." Sounds like the "European" can't tell the difference.

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
    1. Re:Europa != Europe by jschrod · · Score: 1
      Ah, someone who is humor-impaired.

      Listen, in my part of the world the continent where I live is definitively called Europa. And not only in my part (Germany), but in many other parts as well (Spain, Portugal, etc.) You may visit europa.eu.int to learn more about us.

      You see, my joke was meant for readers with a tiny bit of cultural background on the Old Continent. Obviously, you don't belong to that group.

      --

      Joachim

      People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

  71. Keeping alien samples safe for study by Sir+No+Name · · Score: 1

    Okay. Here is my 2 cents worth. Every article here focuses on the following: alien hoax/gov. conspiracy(old hat), microbial death, and extra-terrestrial intelligence. Point 1: There are still plenty of aliens on this planet. Point 2: Microbe handling is dangerous but who cares...we are going to wipe ourselves out first. Point 3: When do I get to come across some intelligent life FROM this planet???? If there is sentient life out there, we would be too inane for them to even care. We are the worst version of a virus on this planet( the self destroying type). NASA's ability to come up with anything beyond rocks, dust, and rather uninteresting petrified crap is remote at best. And heaven forbid that we did find intelligent life else where in the universe because that would send every modern religion scrammbling to rewrite their indoctrinations to include such a slight oversight as divine providence placing life elsewhere. Peace and well being to all!