Slashdot Mirror


Email (and Filters) for all Australian schools

Tom Davies writes: "Every student and teacher in the state of New South Wales will have an email address and web access by March. And porn filtering to go with it, according to this article in the Sydney Morning Herald."

204 comments

  1. New text document (4).txt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Make it soft
    Make it softer

    Take my mind
    take its thoughts
    make them softer

    Take your rules
    take our laws
    make them soft.

    Take this stress of survival
    take all its useless manmade amendments
    make it all soft

    For creative minds to flow
    its gotta be smooth.

  2. How Wasteful by RMSIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And porn filtering to go with it That means approximately 74.6 % of those in the NSW school district have to get a second email address and ISP anyway...

    --

    1. Re:How Wasteful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Or at least they should let the teachers have unmitigated access to good ol' porn...
      BTW, makes me think why are they spending all that money when anyone can get a free e-mail account at Hotmail or Yahoo???

    2. Re:How Wasteful by RMSIsAnIdiot · · Score: 0

      Yeah! My Hotmail account seems to come with free, predelivered porn too! Seems too often that the title is in asian symbols though :D

      --

    3. Re:How Wasteful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nothing that the US hasn't already seen. At my school of 2000 students, we have high speed internet access readily available, yet instead of going to an ISP and out, we go through a T1 to our district office, which connects (several schools) with a T1 to the state office, which seems to bounce around a bit -- who knows where -- and finally sends the packets on to the internet. At each stop, the traffic is filtered. Porn is filtered, "questionable sites" are filtered, and game sites (ex. games.yahoo.com). Packet sniffers check for anyone playing network games -- they are summarily suspended. The email is filtered too (ex. the word "crap" will result in a blocked email). And, best of all, whenever a virus is widely propogating (ex. Nimda), the state simply blocks ports on the internet connect (yes, Nimda kept port 80 blocked for a week) or pulls it alltogether. To meet the geniouses in charge of all of this, check out http://www.kde.state.ky.us/. Hopefully, Austrailia won't repeat these mistakes. :o)

  3. Ehhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Porn...Australian for Beeeeeer.

  4. you know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if Australia was Ohio, it would suck.

  5. How one tech school is dealing with US laws by York+the+Mysterious · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Thanks to the good US of A all schools that want to get their e-rate must now filter their web access. I got to a school that has had open access for years on a special agreement with the district which filters via a Cisco Pix firewall and websense (grr). Anyways even though we dont spend out days looking at porn (for the most part) we're filtered now. I figured out a nice way to get us around this. The law states that the schools must block sites, but doesn't say they have to do a good job. I have a Redhat 7.2 box setup running Squid and I'm working to get Squidguard up to block a list of about 100,000 sites. Only porn and not using expressions. This is a pathetic amount of sites and does no real good, but since our students dont look at it and we are blocking it will allow us to get our e-rate. Loop-holes are your friend

    --

    Tim Smith - Ramblings from Nerd Land
    1. Re:How one tech school is dealing with US laws by jezerbel · · Score: 1

      Hi YTM,

      Have you had a look at the MySQL iPac logger? Business partner of mine converted iPac from a PostgreSQL backend to MySQL with a neat filtering system http://gpl.pws.com.au/ (link: here). Very fast apparently and he's using it in an Australian school where he does tech support... (They've told him to stop doing things with Linux cause when he leaves no one will know how to fiddle with them!!)

      cheers.

    2. Re:How one tech school is dealing with US laws by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      we use this at my highschool (in australia) and it works really really well... granted the blocklist is quite bulky :P but it works well...

      the beauty with this approach also is that
      1) its all logged, and so if there are any "incidents" (as we had a while ago of some shmuck sending a death threat to a company) we can track them down and bash their heads in with two bricks

      2) put a ssh client in a network share for admin and you can instantly add things to the block list from anywhere, including trustable students (such as myself :P) who can do it during class when the looser next to him is looking up "skanky hot babes"..... its funny how he gets to a site, and then it is suddenly blocked :P lol...

      anyhu... this really is a great, low cost solution to stoping students browse "unacceptable material" from school...

      next... to replace the NT4 server with samba...

    3. Re:How one tech school is dealing with US laws by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2, Funny

      Surely it's more useful to teach children to be utter cynics, to laugh in the face of advertisements, to run netscape with javascript and animations turned off, to mute their TVs or make tea when adverts come on, to know what an email virus looks like and how to delete it, to know how to avoid pop-ups, porn redirects, and the like. To teach them life.

      That said, for primary schools the internet will probably be more trouble than it's worth. Who needs to spend their time teaching, when you can spend that time trying to get a Windows/IE/Outlook/Internet computer to keep working?

      They should just get BBC-B's like my primary school, and give each kid an audio tape to save their programs on!

    4. Re:How one tech school is dealing with US laws by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "The law states that the schools must block sites, but doesn't say they have to do a good job."

      Here's another situation: Back when I went to high school in Canada, when we first got internet on the school networks (128k shared over 60 machines) there was no filtering and you knew that the people in the back row were looking at porn.

      This was solved by the main admin who installed this watchdog program that worked with NetBus. He would remotely monitor the displays now and then, and at one point he stormed gleefully into a computer lab (where I was working at lunch) and exclaimed to the teacher on duty that he had gotten screenshots of one kid browsing porn! After that, the word spread very quickly about the 'watchdog' program and fear kept the regulars in line. It did work, only because this admin took a few minutes every week to browse and send out watchdog warnings to people who were on the wrong side of the rules.

      These warnings popped up in something like an IRC window and you could respond back. The thing is, on one occasion, I was bored and started browsing the registry. I had just found his netbus password hidden in there and then the watchdog popped up. "You should not be editing the registry!" I thought it was an automated warning and that my response would be logged in a text file somewhere so I typed, "Woof!! Good dog!!" At that point he remotely shut the machine down.

    5. Re:How one tech school is dealing with US laws by ToadMan8 · · Score: 1

      That's a great idea in theory, but since when were you in primary/secondary education? The curriculum is nothing like that - we're still learning cursive handwriting before typing - what kind of backwardness is that. Even if you weren't a geek, how often would you write with cursive. Education needs some reform, mainly privatization, with much more flexability in curriculum.

      --
      I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
  6. Show me the... by Phibz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since when was it a right to receive what ever you want on a freely provided information channel. For example when you walk in to your public library you don't expect to go to the magazine section and pick up a copy of the lastest Swank. Prehaps i'm oversimplifing the matter, but I'm of the opinion that if you don't like it and its free go elsewhere.

    T

    1. Re:Show me the... by ender81b · · Score: 5, Informative

      Amen on that. I work in a university library and people believe that it is their god-given right to look at all the goatse.cx they can fit on their screens.

      Of course, telling them that the computers where bought with student funds and not gov't funds, meaning we can censor them, usually gets an annoyed response. Just like what is happening with this topic.

      People like this boggle my mind. I am a member of the ACLU allright? It's not like I don't believe in free speech and all the men's gaping a**holes you can see, but not in a student-funded library intended for academic use only OR in schools where kids should be learning - not masturbating to the latest photoshopped Britney Spears pr0n.

      People should be HAPPY that they decided to blacklist the stuff and not simply filter it (shudder, filtering software is horrid, horrid stuff) which would honestly hurt kids freedom of speach. Really, this isn't very much of an issue. You are in school to learn, not to loook at all the porn you can handle.

    2. Re:Show me the... by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 2
      Since when was it a right to receive what ever you want on a freely provided information channel.
      In United States law, this is a critical First Amendment issue in regard to public institutions:
      A limited public forum is created when the government voluntarily opens a particular forum to the public for expressive activity. See id. at 45. The government can create a limited public forum for all, some, or only a single kind of expressive activity. See, e.g., Kreimer, 958 F.2d at 1259 (finding that the government had made the public library a limited public forum for the expressive activity of "communication of the written word"). Even though it is not required to operate such a forum, once the [begin page 21] government does so it "is bound by the same standards as apply in a traditional public forum." Perry, 460 U.S. at 46. Therefore, content-neutral time, place, and manner regulations on the expressive activity or activities allowed are permissible if narrowly tailored to serve a significant government interest while leaving open ample alternative channels of communication, see Kreimer, 958 F.2d at 1262. Any content-based restriction, however, must he "narrowly drawn to effectuate a compelling state interest." ...
      http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/loudon/81123o p.htm

      This is from Mainstream Loudoun v. Loudoun County Library, a case involving a public library using censorware on everyone.

      Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. However, I did have something to do with that case :-)

      Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

    3. Re:Show me the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Free good education is fundamental in every democratic society. By analogy, are you saying that just because education is free, the students should not be allowed to demand a certain level of service?

      And in American-speak: These politicians are spending our hard-earned tax money on keeping open information away from us. Information that our founding fathers worked so hard to provide us. They are taking away our freedom. All men were created equal, etc...

    4. Re:Show me the... by fferreres · · Score: 1

      Maybe i missed something, but they are paying taxes...so they better let them read their Swank and Shagadellic Today...(if there is concessus they want that).

      I mean, the point is not so much if it's free or not, but whether the society believes it's a Good Thing(R) or not...

      I can imagine an inmoral future where Penthouse has to Bribe the goverment NOT to put Shagadelly Today in the libraries :)

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
    5. Re:Show me the... by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

      I used to look up stuff like information on durex and leave it open when I left the library computers.
      Some religious wanker would always get offended, but I say screw them. Why should I go down to their level?
      It doesn't matter who owns it, it's who uses it that matters. Censorship is just a waste of time and money which could go on new books.
      The university I was at hadn't bought any new books in 4 years, yet was spending it's money on new computers and useless censorware.
      That university library is now 6 years out of date, effectively protecting the christian minority lobby from the free internet.
      I'm glad I bought my own books, I'd never be capable of catching up with today's topics if was dependant on the uni library.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
    6. Re:Show me the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Of course, telling them that the computers where bought with student funds and not gov't funds, meaning we can censor them, usually gets an annoyed response."

      Well, call me looney, but shouldn't the university STUDENTS have the final say, since they are flipping the bill. Even if the rest of the students are assholes who can't mind their own business, it would be better then just the university saying you can't use that computer that you are paying for in that way!

      Is this simmilar to the annoying response, huh?
      Or should the students be told everything that they can't and can do. Unless you go to Harvard, and need a super-high GPA to stay, you should be able to do what you want. Even then it is subjective. Some people can get plastered and the next day actually pass a test. What is wrong with that? How can you love free speach if you abolish whole divisions of it every chance you get? The choice belongs to the university students, not the frigging faculty and higher-ups. What kind of world are you trying to bring up when you can't teach people of different beliefs to get along and respect others's opinion?

    7. Re:Show me the... by ender81b · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe I should've explained the policy better.

      Information on condoms, or anything related to sex-education is OK, even doing research for a class on porn is fine (note from instructor is required). What isn't OK is defined here:
      Personal use of any University information system to access, download, print, store, forward, transmit or distribute obscene material.

      Note the words Personal and the word obscene (as defined by the Supreme Court), too lazy to look up the link.

      There are absolutely no filtering programs in effect on any of the computers on campus. This is left entirely in the judgement of the consultants maning the labs, i.e. me. Basically I see some beasty porn, some C**shots, etc and I kick them out of the library. Sounds harsh from a ACLU member doesn't it? Well you catch people masturbating to porn (never women I might add *Sigh) when you are working and then see just how happy you are to see it.

      Policy isn't bad and is really quite reasonable. Just don't look at porn to get off and you don't violate the policy.

    8. Re:Show me the... by ender81b · · Score: 2

      Students made,drafted, and passed the code of conduct when it comes to computer use.

      Students do have the final say. And as I explained better in a previous post no filtering software is used, you can look at whatever the hell you want as long (sex ed, condoms, beasty porn,whatever) as it is FOR A CLASS!! Academic use only, not private whack-off time.

      Yes I believe in free speech but no I don't believe in giving computers away for people to sit on them and whack off all day long. Half the people I catch are not even students at the university - just old men trying to get off. Do i want to extend free speech to them? YES! But not in a damm library for computers that are for academic use only. Simple.

    9. Re:Show me the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Policy isn't bad and is really quite reasonable.

      Do you have any arguments to back that statement up?

      It doesn't look like you have anything but the public opinion to base your thoughts on.

    10. Re:Show me the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most blacklists simply use web robots that pretty much do a non-automated version of a filter - that is go through the internet and block every page that mentions something bad (like breasts, kids don't need to know information about breast cancer they wont be at risk for a while yet anyway). I don't really see the difference between the two except blacklists don't block new sites.

      At my school (in NSW) all the porn I tried to access was blocked, which is good I suppose except for me, but I also had a webpage about Homers Odyssey blocked, presumably because sex was mentioned. That sucks. There was a good site, although I can't remember the URL, that had all the good sites that blacklists have inadvertantly blocked. Sex information sites and stuff like that.

    11. Re:Show me the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free? In most "civilized" countries, this is paid through taxpayers (=my! ours!) money. However, nobody asks the taxpayers about how to spend it. Thus, here in Australia a misarable bunch of religious zealots is now censoring the whole nation, although *nobody elected them for this purpose*. They are independend *minority* senators, but the majority obliges their medieval requests for censorship in order to get their support for other legislation. May they rot in hell for this.

    12. Re:Show me the... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      Note the words Personal and the word obscene (as defined by the Supreme Court)

      Whether something is obscene is a matter for the courts to decide, not something to be left up to the "judgement of consultants manning the labs." Sorry to tell you this, but you are a geek, not a judge.

      Materials can be pornographic without being obscene. I suggest that you do a little work researching court decisions on these matters.

      If someone is masturbating in the library, then kick them out for that, but don't kick someone out because of what they are viewing.

    13. Re:Show me the... by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

      Really? I was told that condoms are obscene by some christian students, do you think I'd accept their definition?
      The funny thing is never bothered to kick people off the lab computers for porn.
      Once I saw half my class look at women with eels (don't ask) and only the older women said they thought it was impossible...
      Nobody in their right minds would masturbate in public, they would deserve to be expelled for that kind of sexual harassment.
      I know women who masturbate and several of them definately enjoy porn, you just never see that unless you know them well enough or if they're drunk.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
    14. Re:Show me the... by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      how about common sense..this is no different that working in any business environment. If you want to surf bestiality, do it at home on your OWN PC on YOUR OWN TIME. Don't see where there really needs to be any arguments to back it up...

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    15. Re:Show me the... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
      Well you catch people masturbating to porn (never women I might add *Sigh) when you are working and then see just how happy you are to see it...

      Well, the solution is obvious, isn't it? Get your digital camera and take pictures of them to post to a gay site! Even better, just install the little web cams and grab images. After all, I'm sure the gay guys out there would be quite interested in this activity from the demographic that inhabits your library. It also might bring in a few funds for the library.

      If you include permission to be photographed using the library as part of your registration agreement it would be perfectly legal, too!

      Finally, if word of this "solution" got around, you might not even see this activity taking place anymore.

      And, in any case, you'll be trained for an exciting profession in photography!

      --
      That is all.
    16. Re:Show me the... by BitterOak · · Score: 1
      Prehaps i'm oversimplifing the matter, but I'm of the opinion that if you don't like it and its free go elsewhere.

      I agree with you for the most part, but can you really call it "free" when it's paid for with your tax dollars? If a private company offered free Internet service I would agree wholeheartedly they can filter and censor whatever they want, but when public tax dollars are involved, there should be some accountability to the community that pays the taxes.

      That said, however, I agree with you basic point in that I don't think the majority of taxpayers think school is an appropriate place to be surfing for porn, so there probably isn't a problem here. But then we might ask, why should schools be using tax dollars to act as ISPs in the first place?

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    17. Re:Show me the... by plunix · · Score: 1
      Prehaps i'm oversimplifing the matter, but I'm of the opinion that if you don't like it and its free go elsewhere.


      But it's not free. You pay to go to the school. Part of that cost is internet access.
    18. Re:Show me the... by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      That's all well and good, except that if the government provides something "for free", then they are charging everybody in the market for it, and thereby destroying the market for "elsewhere" to exist.

      For things like a library there is a substantial value-add in book stores still, because they carry a larger selection of new books and you get to keep it forever and read it whenever you want, and because you can get stuff like Swank that isn't carried.

      For free email, the value add is less, especially if the government service is ad-free.

      The worst would be government-provided free internet access, which would decimate the local ISP market. At least with free email, the market is global, so the damage in one region doesn't translate as much to other regions.

  7. iPrism by darketernal · · Score: 1
    At our school, the folks do the following to keep us from having fun:
    • Use the iPrism filter that is updated regularly
    • Block the keywords 'xxx' and 'mp3' from a port-80 web site. (I found out that if I move my web server to port 60, none of these restrictions apply ^_^)
    • Use a Novell remote management type system to keep us from signing on to IM programs (OK offtopic...i know...)
    But lately people have been finding ways around them, like anonymizers, but iPrism has started to block those too.

    People at schools: how do the admin folks there 'manage' our visited sites? just sparking a discussion topic...
    1. Re:iPrism by darketernal · · Score: 1

      Sorry...the iPrism link is http://www.iprism.net/
      The other one goes to 'RocketSearch' >_
      PLEASE DON'T MOD THIS DOWN AS I AM ONLY CORRECTING MYSELF.

    2. Re:iPrism by RMSIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

      I used to manage a network at a school district that used Novell... You're probably authenticating through a BorderManager proxy server. Every HTTP request made through the proxy is logged with your Novell user name. Stuff that doesn't go over port 80, or other proxied ports is either A) blocked altogether, or B) handled by dynamic NAT. Big Brother is watching.

      Of course since your link leads to nowhere but a search page full of ads, I'm speculative as to the credibility of your post :-/

      --

    3. Re:iPrism by mpe · · Score: 2

      Block the keywords 'xxx' and 'mp3' from a port-80 web site.

      The sequence xxx turns up in a suprising number of contexts unrelated to pornography. e.g. x is sometimes used as a placeholder in numbers to mean any digit...

  8. Nice of NSW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, why the comment on porn filtering? Would you expect any less for a free service? Would you like to explain to mommy and daddy why junior now has access to loads of free porn? Get off the censorship trip, I don't see anyone offering free unfiltered access. Here is a some free access provided by us, sorry you did not get porn with that but that is the breaks kid. We just do not think your parents would understand.

    1. Re:Nice of NSW by iamplasma · · Score: 1

      Exactly, could you imagine the outcry from parents when their little kid starts looking up pr0n online? Is it unfair for a school, which specifically is giving the internet for educational purposes, to stop it being used for pornography?

      Really, some people do take anti-censorship WAAAY too far.

  9. Makes ya Wonder.... by phunhippy · · Score: 1

    Kinda makes ya wonder when the people responsible for enabling filters in the first place will realize that the more time you spend blocking a type of site to be accessed the more interest is then generated in those types of sites. I also just got back from being in Australia for the past month and(aside from New Zealand being a more entertaining country) no local australians i met or article i read make a big issue over filtering there.. just the people i met and what i read thoe....

    www.evolutionarydeadend.com

    1. Re:Makes ya Wonder.... by claygate · · Score: 1

      Kinda makes you wonder who sits around and finds the sites that are questionable. Its their duty to look at porn all day to stop the wrong people from viewing it.

    2. Re:Makes ya Wonder.... by kiwipeso · · Score: 0

      I was in Australia for 10 days in July at surfers paradise. Australia was very boring, especially the TV and newspapers.
      Why their beer costs more there than it does here is just as stupid as the way they fucked up GST.
      Because Australia has always bored me, I don't think I'll bother looking for work or setting up a company there.
      The main problem with the internet in Australia is that everything gets logged and censored, they do screw it up a lot.
      Maybe that's why broadband costs so much unless you use a pirate wireless system.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
    3. Re:Makes ya Wonder.... by gilmae · · Score: 1

      Essentially the same people who watch prime TV waiting for swearing or a nipple so they can complain. That's how the system works, btw, concerned citizens contact the controlling body and make a complaint. It's investigated and 99 times out of 100 discarded as a nutcase.

    4. Re:Makes ya Wonder.... by minus9 · · Score: 1

      You don't necessarily have to specifically look at http://animalporn.net to guess it's educational value is going to be limited.

      Commercial filtering software comes with a regularly updated list of sites for various catagories.

      There are downloadable lists for free software such as SquidGuard.

      Although far from infallible at least they prevent "accidental" access to sites such as the infamous www.whitehouse.com.

    5. Re:Makes ya Wonder.... by iyrsis · · Score: 1

      Boradband in Australia is extremely expensive as there is not much competition. There is only one company with enough infrastructure to provide broadband. Their main competitor is not too far behind and everyone is flocking to them.

      Australia was boring? Surfers Paradise is an over developed tourist destination for Asia, too bad you did not travel a mere 200km/125mi North to the Sunshine Coast.

      Also bear in mind that the Australian lifestyle is a laid back one, that is why it is not a coast to coast Las Vegas.

      If you are travelling overseas, expecting to find the same as what you've got where you live, then you probably should have stayed home.
      Beer costs more because pretty much everything in Australia does and don't forget that the AUS$ is typically worth aroung half a US$.

    6. Re:Makes ya Wonder.... by kiwipeso · · Score: 1

      Surfers Paradise is really for the arabs, we saw dozens travelling round in harems. I did get around the rural mountains around surfers. The main point was the shops were rubbish.
      All my other trips to Australia have been to brisbane, but I did spent 2 weeks in sydney ages ago.
      Obviously you are american to assume a kiwi nickname is american. It's more like NZ$1 = AU80 and prices were pretty much the same, just the exchange makes it expensive.

      If I really wanted to go somewhere boring, we would have gone to the USA. Maybe some of those dull casino towns in Nevada, or California.
      I'm perfectly happy to live in the cultural capital of Australia, Wellington New Zealand.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
    7. Re:Makes ya Wonder.... by Theora · · Score: 1

      I work for the department so I know a bit about this. Most sites are submitted by teachers who have caught their students surfing them. Once the filtering computer crashed and within 10 minutes of the crash we had multiple schools calling to get sites banned because the students were surfing them. The students know they are not allowed to surf these kinds of sites and the majority have signed acceptable use policies to this effect but they still do it.

    8. Re:Makes ya Wonder.... by iyrsis · · Score: 1

      incidentally: I didnt really pay attention to the nickname.

      I am an Australian living in Brisbane and was referring more to the cost differences between Australai and America, primarily because I didnt pay attention to the nickname or email address.

      My point basically was, the Gold Coast is a large tourist area, all the shops are basically stocked from that point of view.

      If you do go to Brisbane again, then spend an hours drive and go to the Sunshine Coast. It is very laid back, don't go there if you are looking for non-stop fun, go fi you want to relax in one of the best parts of Queensland.

  10. Who cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aussie net connection are too slow to download any good quality porno! Sure, they can look at thumbnails of MacPherson, but its not the same!!!

  11. well both sides of the coin by shy+wizard · · Score: 1

    for one the service is given for "free" and in a sense its right for them to put filters, but in the other hand that just opens the doors for future violations to online freedom.

    --
    - Everybody in Denial -
    1. Re:well both sides of the coin by discstickers · · Score: 1

      that just opens the doors for future violations to online freedom

      I think you just are scared of your pr0n getting taken away.

      This has nothing to do with online freedom. They are trying to stop 12 year olds from looking at goatse.cx.

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    2. Re:well both sides of the coin by shy+wizard · · Score: 1

      this is ALL about online freedom, and i dont fear losing something i dont have BTW.

      --
      - Everybody in Denial -
  12. Man, I'm SO sorry I don't live in Australia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...no, seriously:
    A black list of inappropriate Internet sites would be updated at least every 24 hours to protect NSW school children given access to a new statewide educational email and Internet system, according to the designers of the project.
    I'm a high school student with mild to good hacking skills. If this web system has a fat pipe anywhere I'm on, I can set up a perl script to block-check every IP in the top 10 000 web sites by traffic (there are lists in various places on the net.)
    Whatever fails becomes MY list updated every 24 hours...who could have asked for more?
    (Although persiankitty is nice...)

    1. Re:Man, I'm SO sorry I don't live in Australia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Penis? I think you're giving him a bit much credit. Haven't you ever heard of dickless losers?

    2. Re:Man, I'm SO sorry I don't live in Australia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I said hacker, foo', not cracker.
      DOS'ing someone and checking what sites are blocked are two different things entirely.
      And, moron, DDoS is a DISTRIBTUTED denial of service. For instance, if I, and a thousand other trolls, together decide to send you 1 envelope each. Each of us is only donig something we might do anyway, but together you'd get spammed to hell and bakc. foo'.

  13. NSW =/= Australia by zedman · · Score: 1

    Note: the article seems only to discuss NSW,
    so the implications are not yet Australia-wide.

    High school education in Australia tends to be
    managed by state governments.

    Ian

    1. Re:NSW =/= Australia by zedman · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's probably also worth pointing out that
      Queensland has had a related facility for
      blocking unwanted sites for some time, although
      it can be micromanaged at the school administrator
      level if desired. From experience, one popular use
      is simply to stop massive haemorrhaging of $$ due
      to downloading from popular software archives(!)

      Ian

  14. gta 3 not banned is Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Despite what has been claimed countless times by slashdot readers, GTA3 is availble in Australia and has been for a long time.

    1. Re:gta 3 not banned is Australia by natslovR · · Score: 1
      But that is the censored prostitute-less version. It's the prostitute, and the ability to kill her post-service, that the OFLC had issues with.

      Sex & Violence, in general, are a no-go, not just for games, as far as the OFLC is concerned.

    2. Re:gta 3 not banned is Australia by JjCale · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. It was originally released with exactly the same content as everywhere else (Oct/Nov 2001 I think). I have one of those original copies. However, it was later banned, as has been reported. Of course, just because it was banned didn't make it impossible to obtain. Stores were left to sell whatever stock they had of the game, but were unable to obtain any more copies. It has only just been re-released and AFAIK it has had some of the offensive elements removed. ... Damm!

    3. Re:gta 3 not banned is Australia by natslovR · · Score: 1
      If you want it you can always just order it in from NZ, they have the proper version.

      Of course, that's against the law, so I'm not recommending you do that, just saying that it's affordable and NZ games work on AU psx2s.

    4. Re:gta 3 not banned is Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard that sexual reproduction is banned in Australia.

  15. business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at this like a business...if you're at work and your boss catches you looking at porn, probably you're going to be in trouble. If the Aussie gov't is providing this internet access free of charge to students in schools, they certainly can say what kids in their systems can/cannot look at. If somebody wants to look at porn, subversive political material, how to build a nuclear weapon, etc or anything else the gov't doesn't think is acceptable for grade schoolers, let them get their own service providers and email addresses.

  16. Geez, they're a strange mob up north. by xQx · · Score: 3, Informative

    As systems administrator of Bendigo Senior Secondary College, (Victoria, Australia) [Just below NSW, only better (jk)], I'd like to say all students have unfiltered net access, and have had such for >6 years now; and we have no intentions to start censoring what our students are able to see.

    [For the record, systems are in place to track usage, and people are punished for looking up porn n stuff... but there's no censorship or filtering.]

    ... It's also very nice to see NSW giving students free email addresses... we've only done that for 2 years.

    I wonder how much the NSW gov't is charging schools for this honor? Especially since Telstra (the beast of telco in au) has [basically] applied they're patented '3gb cap' to schools too.

    1. Re:Geez, they're a strange mob up north. by quick_dry_3 · · Score: 2

      Many schools already have free internet access, however that is not a statewide thing, it is a service that may or may not be provided by each school. This is an attempt to create a statewide system, the one system for all schools.

    2. Re:Geez, they're a strange mob up north. by Bargearse · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is a statewide thing.

      About 2 or 3 years ago, the Victorian government subsidised the hookup of a 64k ISDN line to every school where it was possible - which basically amounts to nearly all of them as most of the schools are in the greater Melbourne area.

      Along with this came a free e-mail address for every teacher in the state.

      Three different levels of filtering have been available - none, restrictive (no porn/warez/hotmail) and very restrictive (selected educational sites only).

      The sad thing is that the links were provided by Telstra, who have now decided to more than triple the price.. for schools that have enough trouble paying their teachers and buying resources already.

      --
      "Don't break my arse, my bargey wargey arse, I don't think my pants would understand..."
    3. Re:Geez, they're a strange mob up north. by Monte · · Score: 1

      [For the record, systems are in place to track usage, and people are punished for looking up porn n stuff... but there's no censorship or filtering.]

      Maybe I'm just dense, but I'm not picking up on the fine distinction between "no censorship" and "punishment if you look at the wrong stuff". It seems to me that the threat of punishment is the filter.

      That's kinda like saying there's no speed limit on this road, but if we catch you going too fast we'll fine you.

    4. Re:Geez, they're a strange mob up north. by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      okay, you refer to the difference between:

      (a) filtering: you type in "geocities.com" and you're given a page explaining "this area is used by porn archives, shitty personal sites, and random spam targets. Go away and find a real website to look at"

      (b) monitoring: you can look at whatever you like, and then the list of URLs you view is printed and displayed on a noticeboard. People laugh at your obscure sexual preferences.

      Yes, there's a speed limit on the road. It's 300 million metres per second, and it's physically impossible to go faster. This is case (a)

      Case (b) says "we'll put a GPS in your car and radio the police with your speed" - you're given the opportunity to go faster, and to explain yourself later. For example, a police car might choose to go faster with the defence that they have special provision.

      Case (a) is like spikes that pop-up in front of fast cars. No matter how good your reason, the spikes won't listen.

  17. filtering.. by wilbrod · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hey .. could they filter my internet connection too so I don't get anymore porn popup ads?

    wil
    "Realize your dreams NOW, life can be short"

    1. Re:filtering.. by larien · · Score: 2

      Hell, I'd be happy just to get rid of the porn spam... Pop-up ads are less of a problem now I use Konqueror and click on no for 90% of the Javashit popups (some are actually valid, e.g. where I clicked on a link to pop up an info window).

    2. Re:filtering.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what Galeon is good for.

    3. Re:filtering.. by ender81b · · Score: 1

      Just a quick suggestion, try Opera. Very small, very fast browser that is available on alot of platforms with lots of features including the ability to shut off all of the pop-up ads. Quite useful.

    4. Re:filtering.. by Random+Bystander · · Score: 1

      Mozilla does a great job too.

      I think they were additions to 0.9.8, because I don't remember seeing them in other versions.

      Under Advanced/Scripts + Windows, I can choose:

      • Open unrequested windows
      • Move or resize existing windows
      • Raise or Lower windows
      • Change status bar text
      • Change images
      • Create or Change cookies
      • Read cookies

      The last three seem best left on, but preventing changes to status bar text lets you see the real links. Open Unrequested Windows as an "on-off" choice is really neat. Links still work when clicked to open in a new window via scripts, but not during say a page load, or unload. Having raise or lower windows off stops pop-unders.

      Not that I'm a pr0n lover or anything...

    5. Re:filtering.. by larien · · Score: 2
      Yup, Mozilla is also good, possibly better; with konqueror, I get 3 options on windows:
      • Allow all
      • deny all
      • ask on each
      Mozilla's option of unrequested windows is what I actually want, as it's a pain to have to keep clicking on no.
    6. Re:filtering.. by Weh · · Score: 1

      What's the advantage of having a *fast* browser in days like these where entry 1Ghz systems are more or less entry level?

    7. Re:filtering.. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot! Most people don't buy a new computer each 6 months. In financial circles it is called an "investment". Most geeks don't even buy a machine every two years because they know how to maintain it...
      I have machines ranging from 200Mhz (Pentium Pro) to 800Mhz (Pentium III) which are used daily as desktop machines. It is out of the question that they will be replaced anytime soon because with enough memory they do exactly what they are expected to do(the Pro has 256Meg, and the P III has 768Meg). Their tasks range from a bit of gaming to normal surfing and emailing (Halflife runs well on a PPro 200 provided you have a good graphics card) If I can push out a little bit more performance by choosing the right tool for the Job (like Opera instead of Mozilla), I'll do it.
      So a fast browser is relevant to all but the richest computer users around. Besides, the rendering of pages pushes more on the memory than on the CPU. (According to my experience)
      On my old laptop (P120/32Meg RAM) running Linux (kernel 2.4.10) with WindowMaker, I run Opera and it is quite usable. The rendering speed is on par with Netscape 4,7x on a the PPro 200.
      No, Opera is a *great* browser... anyone who finds their current browser slow should try it instead of shelling out a lot of money for a new machine.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    8. Re:filtering.. by bzzzt · · Score: 1

      Maybe because I don't have a fast machine?

    9. Re:filtering.. by Weh · · Score: 1

      You're an idiot!

      wtf, I'm just saying what I think and you call me names. I think that's quite rude and sad. As for your argument, I can that you have a point a little but you are clearly overstating it. It's just a fact that entry level systems these days are almost all 800-900Mhz+ and that's enough to run the latest Netscape/ie/java/activex/whatever bloat decently. Furthermore, prices of entry level systems are very low these days so it's really not true that you have to be rich to be able to afford a system that will run bloatware browsers fast.

    10. Re:filtering.. by jawtheshark · · Score: 1
      Okay, I called you names because I considered your previous post flamebait. It clearly wasn't since you do seem to mean what you say.

      I respect your opinion, but the point is that few people will buy a new PC just because their browsing experience is slow. You may think that 1000$ is cheap for an entry level PC, but I know many people who cannot afford this even over more than 6 months. Besides, where can I get a Celeron 500 for example to build a really cheap system?
      As you perhaps noticed I am a person who likes light systems, even when the PC has the performance. (I run WindowMaker, and a custom built kernel on that P-III machine)
      People woudn't complain that their systems were slow if they used well written software. Honestly, I can live without Flash, ActiveX and Java. Most people could, but they don't realise a well designed webpage is just as good (better) as a flash animated nothingness that only looks good and if you are unlucky you need to download a 5 meg plugin.
      Entry level PC's have by the way a big problem: they lack memory....I have seem PIV 1.4 GHz with 128Meg RAM running XP. Now, sorry, but I don't get that...It should at least have the double. Heck one year ago my standards were already at 256Meg RAM minimum for a machine. Entry level PC's are bought by newbies who don't know anything and they will be the first to complain about the slowness. (Yes, I have heard complaints of people running a 1.2GHz PIV...go figure!)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    11. Re:filtering.. by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "Hey .. could they filter my internet connection too so I don't get anymore porn popup ads?"

      Go get Mozilla. With it you can disable popups during page load and unload, but keep it going for onclick() and other JS events.

    12. Re:filtering.. by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      The faster your internet connection, the more likely that a pop-up will finish loading and spawn 10 others before you can click on the X

      I have dial-up, and if I'm unlucky enough to see a pop-up window, it generally hasn't got as far as loading the page title when I close it.

  18. Property rights. It's the schools server. by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's the schools server, it's their email address, if they want to filter go right ahead.

    Just like complaining about censorship in China, look at the property ownership. Since all "utilities" in China are owned by the government, they get to filter all they want.

    The abuse is if you are not allowed to choose an alternative. If the school attempted to censor what the kids do/see when not on the schools dime, for instance.

    ...or the fact that private ISP service is "illegal" in China.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
    1. Re:Property rights. It's the schools server. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Since all "utilities" in China are owned by the government, they get to filter all they want.

      No, man, it's the people's property. Theoretically. Then again, China isn't communist. No country ever was.

    2. Re:Property rights. It's the schools server. by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      You say this just moments after the US announces that it will make all telecoms' equipment privately owned...

      Censorship is okay if you travel through someone else's network, right?

    3. Re:Property rights. It's the schools server. by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Since all "utilities" in China are owned by the government, they get to filter all they want.

      Oh please! Don't let them take my utilities away! I can't live without my Grep!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    4. Re:Property rights. It's the schools server. by goldspider · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure if this point was explored or not (I don't have time to read EVERY post) but the argument can be made that these servers, while owned by the schools, are funded by taxpayers' dollars. Some feel that the filtering of content by publicly-owned property constitutes censorship.

      Now IANAL, and I don't pretend to know how public education in Australia works, but here in America we have elected officals that serve the School Board, an interface, so to speak, that connects taxpayers to the school system. These School Board members make these kinds of decisions. If we, as taxpayers, disagree with their decisions, we need simply to vote them out of office.

      I suspect, though, that the majority of parents support content-filtering in schools. As long as we are a society where majority rules (as it should be), content filtering will be in schools unless a VERY GOOD reason for ending it is proposed.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  19. Filtering by MiTEG · · Score: 2

    There's an interesting thing about filtering software in schools- I know some schools here in the SF Bay Area use some sort of proxy filtering that makes viewing "innapropriate" material impossible. So if you get spammed by somebody for herbal viagra to increase your sex drive or hot young sluts or what have you, you're not going to be able to check your email with a web-based account because it will be deemed "inappropriate".

    Looks like they're on the right track though, with blacklists rather than keyword detection. The $33 million quoted is interesting, I wonder if they included maintenance costs in that projection?

    --
    The future isn't what it used to be.
    1. Re:Filtering by Hardly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Keyword detection is a notoriously poor filter method. Just ask the people of Scunthorpe.

    2. Re:Filtering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work @ SFUSD. All the filtering is lame, they don't even force the proxy filtering and only have one box doing the entire school district. It's an incredibly lame cyberpatrol proxy that all students I know just remove from their IE or Netscape settings and happily surf around.

    3. Re:Filtering by hardcode · · Score: 1

      *chuckle* and of course Penistone

      hc

    4. Re:Filtering by mpe · · Score: 2

      There's an interesting thing about filtering software in schools- I know some schools here in the SF Bay Area use some sort of proxy filtering that makes viewing "innapropriate" material impossible.

      Problem is that you need to make sure that the software supplier and the school agree on what is "inappropriate". Plenty of material is "inappropriate" not because it is offensive, but because it is time/bandwidth wasting in excess of any possible educational value.Kids looking for games can be more of a problem than their looking for porn... However there can easily be "offensive material", especially relating to history, politics and religion when is actually directly related to the curriculum.

    5. Re:Filtering by ozbon · · Score: 1

      Places like Moose Bosom (I'm not kidding - it's in this story) probably have problems with filtering by Keyword too.

      And Fuchs Lubricants must have some real problems. Heh.

      --
      I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
    6. Re:Filtering by Hardly · · Score: 1

      Just a short drive from Penistone you also have such places as Upperthong, Mark's Bottom, Netherthong, Dick Edge Lane, Bent Lane and Marsden Hard End. The area is kind of a censorship black hole.

    7. Re:Filtering by frozenray · · Score: 1

      "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of sXXXch, or the right of the people peaceably to XXXemble, and to peXXXion the government for a redress of grievances."

      (Attributed to EPIC's Marc Rotenberg)

      --
      "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  20. I think that's good by DrunkenPenguin · · Score: 0

    I believe it's good that the children won't spend their valuable time on porn, but learning instead. Internet is filled with addictive stuff which can easily take your attention away from studying. There are also some sites which really are not suitable for children and can damage their mental health (www.rotten.com for example).

    1. Re:I think that's good by RMSIsAnIdiot · · Score: 1

      Internet is filled with addictive stuff...

      http://www.virtualcrack.com

      ...which can easily take your attention away from studying.

      Considering I have an assignment due in a few hours on which I haven't yet begun, and I haven't slept in days, maybe I should quit posting on Slashdot....

      --

    2. Re:I think that's good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering I have an assignment due in a few hours on which I haven't yet begun, and I haven't slept in days, maybe I should quit posting on Slashdot....
      And you think RMS is an idiot??

  21. Keep in mind... by dupper · · Score: 0

    ...that real postless people are too karma-deprived to make a funny comment (adapted from the comments of the most overrated comedian ever, Chris Rock). My comment: Thank you for being brave enough to browse at less than 1. And moderators, I could use a Karma point or two in charity so I don't have to abandon this account (currently with karma == -1). I would say god bless, but I couldn't ever embrace religion, not even for karma. This whole thing makes no damn sense. To hell with me, I'll just go slink away into corner and finish the english assignment that I should be doing now, the one I had (and needed) a month too do, but just started at 1:30 AM today and is due tommorrow (today?) at 1:10 PM. I'm currently only being kept awake and alert by adrenaline and a horrible pain in my head, which is likely the reason for this non-sensical rant. Thank you for your time.

  22. EFA - more info on Net censorship in Australia by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 3, Informative
    For more information regarding Internet censorship in Australia, see the Electronic Frontiers Australia page on Campaigns.

    Note that Electronic Frontiers Australia (EFA) is not the same as, or even associated with, the US's very own well-known Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF)

    And, sigh, my sig is so poignant these days :-(

    Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

  23. We might be hiding the truth by RMSIsAnIdiot · · Score: 2, Funny

    Every student and teacher in the state of New South Wales will have an email address and web access by March. And porn filtering to go with it, according to this article in the Sydney Morning Herald.

    That sounds like an evil scheme to hide the truth from the Austrailian schoolchildren that, yes, the New Zealanders are really having sex with the sheep...

    --

    1. Re:We might be hiding the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, hey, hey mate, thats uncalled for. Have you ever been to NZ?

    2. Re:We might be hiding the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... I know for a fact that you people have kangaroo-porn down there, and surely the kinds won't find sheep that much more offensive.

    3. Re:We might be hiding the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kids, kids, kids.

  24. Right to Censor? by cybermage · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If the government provides you with free access, does that give them the right to censor it? I couldn't begin to speak to the Australian constitutionality of this, but I've always wondered about the American constitutionality of similar schemes.

    I would think that requiring schools to censor content in order to receive funding pretty clearly infringes upon the first amendment rights of the site operators.

    I have seen it argued that if the service is provided "free," you have no right to complain. However, the service is not free. Citizens and corporations pay taxes to the government and expect services in return. If the government provides one of those services at no charge, that doesn't make it free.

    The real question, I think, is why these schemes aren't being challenged. I suspect the answer lies in one or more of the following:
    • Bandwidth cost money and school kids aren't going to pull out their credit card.
    • Free speech advocates are picking their battles. It's hard to argue that kids should have access to porn.
    • Site operators know that filtering doesn't work anyway.
    1. Re:Right to Censor? by danamania · · Score: 1

      If the government provides you with free access, does that give them the right to censor it? I couldn't begin to speak to the Australian constitutionality of this, but I've always wondered about the American constitutionality of similar schemes. If it were the -only- method of access, then it would be US-unconstitutional, and I'd say morally so as well. As a classroom situation, kids are in commerce to learn about commerce, english to learn english, physics to learn physics - none of them need porn. (or 95% of the net, truly). It's like televisions in schools - they all have them, but you'd be hard pressed to find anyone defending the right of a schoolkid to watch Springer while Chemistry is in session...

    2. Re:Right to Censor? by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 2
      If the government provides you with free access, does that give them the right to censor it? I couldn't begin to speak to the Australian constitutionality of this, but I've always wondered about the American constitutionality of similar schemes.
      Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer. However, I did have something to do with the following case :-)

      As far as has been answered by the courts so far, the result is a resounding NO. This is from Mainstream Loudoun v. Loudoun County Library, involving a public library using censorware on everyone:

      http://www.techlawjournal.com/courts/loudon/81123o p.htm

      "Although defendant is under no obligation to provide Internet access to its patrons, it has chosen to do so and is therefore restricted by the First Amendment in the limitations it is allowed to place on patron access. Defendant has asserted a broad right to censor the expressive activity of the receipt and communication of information through the Internet with a Policy that (1) is not necessary to further any compelling government interest; (2) is not narrowly tailored; (3) restricts the access of adult patrons to protected material just because the material is unfit for minors; (4) provides inadequate standards for restricting access; and (5) provides inadequate procedural safeguards to ensure prompt judicial review. Such a Policy offends the guarantee of free speech in the First Amendment and is, therefore, unconstitutional."

      Sig: What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org)

  25. How to log on AIM through Novell by kaosrain · · Score: 1

    AIM (and a decent amount of other IM programs) will allow you to connect to their servers on ports that are allowed by most firewall setups, for example, port 21. To have AIM automagically set itself up to work with your setup, go into your preferences, Sign On/Sign Off, click the Connection button, and press auto-configure.

    Have a good day!

    Kaos

  26. Its something at least... by melrose · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I finished high school in NSW, we had email addresses - but they all ended in hotmail.com We were actually graded on our ability to obtain a new hotmail account using an internet browser...

    1. Re:Its something at least... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
      "We were actually graded on our ability to obtain a new hotmail account using an internet browser..."

      OMG!!!!!! If a teacher told me that when I was in high school I would have broken down laughing...

      Now here in Canada I have actually witnessed a class going to the lab, having it explained to them how to set up a hotmail and all that. (The teacher was clueless, she got some guy in her class to do it.) But to grade someone on setting up hotmail ...

  27. A little perspective by danamania · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I've worked at the NSW Department of Education, and it's well-known that no, we cannot block every site out there that may be 'unsuitable' for whatever definition you want to put on that word, but it's not the only reason to go blocking. For starters the NSW state school system is a massive network - over 2200 schools across a state the size of texas and a half - network connections vary from satellite, isdn, dialup, adsl - all depending on what's available.

    It's not a tiny network, and it's all publicly funded - wherever there can be a cent saved it will be, and stopping a few million children from all jumping online to check out the newest site-of-the-week from a school connection is one priority. The political motivations are obvious - no government is going to want to hear of children coming home to parents talking about the crap that can be found online - it is a school environment and isn't designed to accomodate checking out the newest recipes from manbeef.com. This doesn't mean everything "icky" is banned - having been a part of this banning process, it's rather moderate in practice.

    Don't let the debate make you imagine this is the only method the department is focusing on to keep proper-use of school resources. More than anything else, schools have been urged to put in place their own systems for tracking the net use in their schools, and supervising their classes/resources properly.

  28. Finally.... by KillerBob · · Score: 1

    A job I can hope for!

    Keeping the list updated....

    --
    If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
  29. Why the single-minded focus on pornography? by smartipants · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "...prevent sexually explicit material, pornography or material regarded as inappropriate for different age groups getting through"

    Interesting that they mention sexual material twice, then lump all other objectionable material into a bin called "innappropriate" at the end. Why is sex our top priority when censoring for minors? Why not violence, hate propaganda, religious cults, and gun catalogues?

    I think it's pretty representative of how out-of-wack regulator's attitudes are towards sex in general. I can think of many more things I'd rather prevent my kids from seeing than a little nudity.

    1. Re:Why the single-minded focus on pornography? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you noticed that the people who pass these anti-sex laws are people that nobody in their right mind would ever want to fuck anyway? Coincidence? I think not.

    2. Re:Why the single-minded focus on pornography? by Twylite · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, what is "sexually explicit"? Does this include sex education material, scary pictures of STDs, guides for better relationships? Pornography has an accepted definition in courts, but sexually explicit is far broader.

      When considering other things to censor, why should violence be censored? It is shown that REAL violence (as opposed to media violence) has an impact on children that makes them less likely to engage in violence (oh, there is the trauma side effect, but its part of the growing experience *wg* ; not to mention that kids are equally traumatised by depictions of sex). What's wrong with gun catalogues? I mean, you can look but you can't buy, right?

      And what constitutes a "religious cult"? Anything with socially unacceptable teaching which screws up your mind? Can you say Christianity? One of the side effects of freedom of religion is a guarantee of access to information like this.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
    3. Re:Why the single-minded focus on pornography? by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Sexualy explicit and pornography do have different meanings. If picture containing genitalia is sexually explicit but not necessarily pornographic. An .avi of a guy having sex with a 6 year old girl is pornographic but need not be sexually explicit.

      This said, I do agree generally with your point that the "sex" demon and associated witch hunt is getting a bit like McCarthyism and the anti communist era.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    4. Re:Why the single-minded focus on pornography? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The classic conspiracy theory is that by lumping everything else in the "inappropriate"-basket you can control pretty much anything and sweep out stuff your sponsors don't like. Sex is probably mentioned twice because with just 2 items it would have sounded silly.
      Is this what you wanted to know or am i just -1, redundant?

    5. Re:Why the single-minded focus on pornography? by mpe · · Score: 2

      And what constitutes a "religious cult"? Anything with socially unacceptable teaching which screws up your mind?

      Here there isn't a clear defining line between "religion" and "politics"...

    6. Re:Why the single-minded focus on pornography? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can say 'Christianity'...

      Most soverign nations aren't founded by a bunch of wacky cultists, you know. I don't see Christians running around murdering people, just a bunch of Islamic Jihadists...

    7. Re:Why the single-minded focus on pornography? by plunix · · Score: 1
      What's wrong with gun catalogues? I mean, you can look but you can't buy, right?
      Why not? Nothing wrong with either.

      And what constitutes a "religious cult"? Anything with socially unacceptable teaching which screws up your mind? Can you say Christianity? One of the side effects of freedom of religion is a guarantee of access to information like this.
      Considering that society is full of ignorant, mindless people, I'd consider "socially unacceptable" a good thing. Truth certainly isn't based on what's "socially acceptable". While Christianity isn't a "religious cult", (it's not even a religion), there are certainly cults that have spun off from false representations of it (eg. Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses...).
    8. Re:Why the single-minded focus on pornography? by Twylite · · Score: 2
      I don't see Christians running around murdering people

      Really? I don't suppose Burning Times is an issue here? No, witches aren't people, are they? And Jack the Ripper wouldn't count, then? Neither would a significant number of American soldiers ... oh wait, that's not murder, the US declared war first which makes it all okay. Not to mention British and Spanish colonists, and its well known that nobody expects the inquisition.

      In the last year in this country we have had ten priests (not just believers) up on rape charges. One recently took his life to avoid the consequences.

      No, I think you're right ... let's blame the Muslims. I mean who in their right mind would complain about an occupying force from a democratic superpower, or having pieces of their country carved up and handed to some other religious zealots who were picked on by some europeans.

      --
      i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
  30. NSW just playing 'catch up'... by Xenex · · Score: 4, Informative

    I completed high school just over a year ago in Victoria, the other major Australian state.

    This is nothing new in Victoria. New South Wales is just catching up.

    The IT teacher used to gloat about being "god" and how she could (and did) read any e-mail, and about the filters setup so anything with swearing would be blocked and redirected to her. High school age kids throw words like "shit" and "fuck" around like nothing, so this was a little unfair, especially considering it wasn't documented until a year later.

    The web access was worse. They had this state-wide thing called EduCache. It was just a great big filter, allowing only officially checked websites in. It was at the school's discression to activate it; you can guess our school had it on. (I also won't mention how this made the web virtually useless for most students, and I spent half a year teaching people how to change their proxy settings to bypass it. But I digress.)

    Students could submit sites to this cache. I requested many tech sites, from here at Slashdot, to Be Inc, to Enlightenment, just to name the ones I remember. I also tried to add The Sync, just for Geeks in Space. It was rejected. Probably something to do with JenniCam...

    Look, these schools don't care about privacy. Eventually, they made students sign sheets saying they wouldn't do bad things. Bad things like look up porn or submit anything anonymously to the net. By this stage, I had 12 months left at the school, and refused to sign. Didn't use a school computer for a year (well, not with my own account at least...)

    Oh, and before you think I was some rebel kid hacking the school network; I wasn't. I was one of 3 students that sat in on the IT committee meetings. They were all just too busy bickering about their different areas of education to do anything constructive.

    Sorry, ranting. Probably bad grammar from the rush. I just don't seen this as a surprise.

    (I'll leave the 'My IT teacher called a mouse a GUI' and the I got in trouble for opening a command prompt in NT, because I was "accessing DOS"' rants for another day.)

    1. Re:NSW just playing 'catch up'... by gnovos · · Score: 2

      The IT teacher used to gloat about being "god" and how she could (and did) read any e-mail

      Just so that you and everyone else is perfectly clear on this... if your email is unencrypted and left on a machine that you, personally, do not own and admin, it's a pretty safe bet to say that your mail can be read at any time.

      *Don't* use that account to dis your sysadmin! :)

      --
      "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    2. Re:NSW just playing 'catch up'... by ender81b · · Score: 1

      I got in trouble for opening a command prompt in NT, because I was "accessing DOS"

      ARGH! Is their nothing more annoying than having that said to you? My god - not only does it show their utter incompetance and lack of understanding when it comes to computer but you get in trouble for it. Oh my god.

      Sigh. 4 years ago and I still get mad. Heh, oh well things will eventually change I hope.

    3. Re:NSW just playing 'catch up'... by Alsee · · Score: 2

      I got in trouble for opening a command prompt in NT, because I was "accessing DOS"'

      Of course you got in trouble. Only hackers and pirates would try to access DOS. Oh yeah, and childmolesters too.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    4. Re:NSW just playing 'catch up'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "the other major Australian state" WTF?! So, there are only 2 *major* states eh? I'm assuming your criteria for *major* isn't surface area? Is it average temperature? No, that couldn't be it. Wait, maybe it's based on average number of miserable rainy days per year - that would work. It couldn't be inverse-of-average-IQ because then NSW wouldn't be a *major* state.

    5. Re:NSW just playing 'catch up'... by AviN · · Score: 1
      I got in trouble for opening a command prompt in NT, because I was "accessing DOS"

      Sounds like DeVry of North Brunswick, NJ.

      I get in trouble for IRCing over telnet too.

    6. Re:NSW just playing 'catch up'... by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      Use linux, then you can become a communist, freeloading, anti-american terrorist too. Apparently.

    7. Re:NSW just playing 'catch up'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Population, moron.

      Oh, and capital cities too I guess. Melbourne and Sydney vs Brisbane, Perth, Adelaide, or Hobart.

      Last mass means nothing. No-one cares about huge masses of desert.

    8. Re:NSW just playing 'catch up'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha, of course I mean land mass...

  31. Re:Show me the... [ot] by xQx · · Score: 0

    Besides, you can get an ASCII copy of goatse.cx on any IRC server near you :)

  32. These are publically funded institutions by smartipants · · Score: 1

    I would hardly call a service paid for by tax dollars as "free." If libraries/schools want to censor content, especially content which is often not objectionable to a large chunk of the population, they should get their funding elsewhere.

    Of course, there is always a line, but I don't think sexually explicit material, especially if meant to be education, is where we should draw it.

  33. Some more details, comments about the project by JjCale · · Score: 2, Informative
    The package for NSW schools will include:
    • Personalised email accounts for teachers and students.
    • Filtered Internet access.
    • Web facilities for individuals, schools and colleges. Student discussion groups.
    • Remote access from any location. 24 hour technical support.
    The filtering and web access is nothing new, with almost all schools in Australia already having something like that.

    The interesting thing here is not the censorship but the fact that all the students in the entire state will have email addresses. This could significantly change the way a lot of services in a school operate. Just like in a university or corporation, messages, overdue notices, feedback on assessment and reminders could all be easily send electronically. Students will have the opportunity to communicate with their teachers, ask questions, etc without having to get the teacher's attention when it may not be convenient.

    I think that this project, properly implemented could have far ranging possibilites for improving communication in schools.

    For more info, the NSW Education Department's page about the topic is located at: http://www.dse.nsw.edu.au/direction/e_classroom/in dex.php
    1. Re:Some more details, comments about the project by Sabriel · · Score: 1
      The interesting thing here is not the censorship but the fact that all the students in the entire state will have email addresses. This could significantly change the way a lot of services in a school operate. Just like in a university or corporation, messages, overdue notices, feedback on assessment and reminders could all be easily send electronically. Students will have the opportunity to communicate with their teachers, ask questions, etc without having to get the teacher's attention when it may not be convenient.
      Whether that's actually a good thing or not, it presumes the kids have access to computers on a 1:1 ratio. In the meantime, so long as the funding only allows schools to have a couple of computers per class of thirty people, I don't see it happening.
  34. These are publically funded inst by smartipants · · Score: 1

    I would hardly call a service paid for by tax dollars as "free." If libraries/schools want to censor content, especially content which is often not objectionable to a large chunk of the population, they should get their funding elsewhere.

    Of course, there is always a line, but I don't think sexually explicit material, especially if meant to be education, is where we should draw it.

  35. When will they start getting spammed? :-) by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I wonder how long the email accounts will last until they're hit by spam, and how they'll handle the problem.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  36. Lots of talk.... by HillBilly · · Score: 1

    ...But I want to see the action.

    I do casual-on-call work at a high school in south-west Sydney. The whole IT part of it is a mess. (Doesn't help that head of computer studies has taken leave and no one has replaced her)

    For a start, the students are vandals, every thing they touch they break, there is a whole box full of ball-less mice and keyboards with keys missing.

    The 2 PC labs and 1 Mac labs are used for other subjects besides computer studies(i think this is where most of the breakage is coming from) The 2 PC labs were just networked last year, but I don't think that is working properly. The mac lab will never be networked to the main network, at the moment it uses apple talk(it works when the students don't touch it)

    The main server is in the library, where the library teacher knows nothing, he has already screwed one SCSI drive.

    I think one of the problems is from mixing old with the new. Previously there was just the office network and the library network, then these were joined together, then staff rooms added, and then the computer rooms. There is PVC piping everywhere with cable going back and forth.

    Also there are to many chiefs and not enough indians. Head science, Head Maths and Head Industrial Arts all go off on there own and run their own little networks in their staff rooms and they all try to control the larger network and add to it in there own little ways.

    The only computers that have internet access are the libary computers, staff rooms that I mentioned above and the office computers, all sucking off a single ISDN which is painfull slow.

    Of course this is a public school I'm talking about and I can imagine many other schools in a similar situation. Perhaps we should get these computers working first before we start worrying about filtering and crap.

    --
    "Go into the hall of mirrors and have a bloody hard look at yourself" - HG Nelson
    1. Re:Lots of talk.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a start, the students are vandals, every thing they touch they break, there is a whole box full of ball-less mice and keyboards with keys missing.

      Quick tip: you know the socket holding the mouse ball in place? Glue it shut. When (if?) you come to clean the mouse, unscrew the whole casing. Takes a few minutes extra, but worth it for all the mouse balls you get to keep.
  37. IMPORTANT - Censorware is control, not "filter" by Seth+Finkelstein · · Score: 2
    Much of the discussion is proceeding as if censorware was a "filter". That is, as if it were some sort of purification program that filtered out yucky, harmful, evil toxic material such as (fill in the blank here, usually "pornography"). Thus, the comments run, why do you have a RIGHT to bad stuff!.

    In fact, censorware is a control system. It is designed to control what people read. This is a different technical problem. Thus, as a consequence, it is impelled to ban anonymity, privacy, language translation sites, and even e.g. the Google cache, because all of these represent escapes from control.

    Is it s deep wish of mine that this idea get past the reflex reactions, and into the thought processess, but so far I have failed.

    See, for example, my reports on:

    BESS's Secret LOOPHOLE: http://sethf.com/anticensorware/bess/loophole.php

    BESS vs Google: http://sethf.com/anticensorware/bess/google.php

    And, older, SmartFilter's Greatest Evils: http://sethf.com/anticensorware/smartfilter/greate stevils.php

    I hope to get more material of this sort released in the near future, but, frankly and bluntly, the politics of publicity is quite onerous. (yes, in part there I'm talking about Michael Sims and the story of What Happened To The Censorware Project (censorware.org))

  38. Porn filter == Good! by baitisj · · Score: 1

    Look, I don't know about you guys, but I'd pay good money for an e-mail porn filter that actually worked.

    "HOT TEENS F&CKING YOU THEYRE BARELY LEGAL"

    *delete*

    --
    Learn from your parents' mistakes: use birth control.
  39. porn filtering by burtonator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cool... "porn filtering"...

    This means that you will filter out all the boring news and weather reports and deliver me raw porn!... right?

    :)

    1. Re:porn filtering by smnolde · · Score: 2

      Uh, no. In this case the porn is the filtrate. And the boring stuff is the filtrant.

    2. Re:porn filtering by blibbleblobble · · Score: 1

      If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate

  40. Tender was inane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Posting anonymously for obvious reasons.

    I work at a company that responsed to the NSW Govt tender to supply this system. The tender was always going to be won by one of the big integraters. [think about the usual suspects]. The tender was always going to be running on an inferior product aswell, which is perhaps more concerning because ITS MY DAMNED TAX PAYED MONEY.

    We did the math on a Microsoft solution, and a Unix solution based on a planet floating around the yellow ball.

    The Microsoft solution, USING numbers from their white paper on their site for scaling exchange2000 to millions of users;

    Scaling Exchange to 3 Million Users [have a look its one of the funniest things ive ever read, sorry about the .doc format]

    worked out to be using about 200 or so 4 way Intel machines to reach the numbers in the tender. 200 fsking machines just for SMTP and POP. Webmail was more. Unfortunately it looks like our esteemed government went down a similar route after been con[ed][in]sulted by one of these morons. I guess thats my rates for the next ten years.

    1. Re:Tender was inane. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      15000 per server.


      Doesn't seem that far off to me,

  41. XXXX by Zemran · · Score: 1

    How does censorship work in Oz? At my work they filter anything with XXX in the url. Surely this would not work in Oz where they cannot survive without Castlemaine XXXX ?

    I also found that the smut guard at work allows the first request but not links from it. So all one has to do is enter each link as a new url and you can still see asian teens doing all the things that asian teens do.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    1. Re:XXXX by new-black-hand · · Score: 1

      the company that takes care of access has a series of proxy servers (one in each school, then a set of master proxy servers that they peer off) that have a list of 'blocked' sites (basically Squid ACL's), interfaces are often provided at a school level so that teachers/supervisors can add sites. Squid becomes rather slow and clunky with such a large list.

  42. Access. by new-black-hand · · Score: 1

    Since the government is paying for this scheme, and since they own all the infrastucture, i think they have every right to deny/allow access to resources based on what they deem 'unworthy' for educational purposes.

    You cant really complain about something that you are getting for free, and is obviously a good initiative to educate students on making the most out of the information avaliable on the net as well as training them in using email and their web space..


    1. Re:Access. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who said that anyone was getting it for free, last I heard taxpayers payed for everything in the school system. It can also be argued that the government doesn't own anything the public does, or in Australia's case the crown.

      All that aside, maybe they should just employ lab monitors.

      Or better yet make spam punishable by caning, and public humiliation.

  43. Re:what i'd do (if i ran the school) by fferreres · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I managed my father's IT for a while, as a hobby. I have always believed in irrestricted access to the net.

    What did i found out? That while some used it very wiselly, other just surfed for pr0n, news, chat, ICQ, etc. whenever they where alone or unwatched.

    Of course, some guys had a balance between pr0n and work and some others did not.

    I tried everything and reached the conclusion not everyone is resposible and depending on the case, i could just talk to them, or ban them from www and/or email.

    Some people are addicts, they can't restrict themselves a bit and they KNOW they are wasting time. They just can't help it, and i find it better to ban them from certain things than to have their boss fire them.

    Another solution would have been to let thing escalate (not because i'd tell anyone), but because it becomes evident.

    I better like the monitor and punish strategy than the to limit EVERYONE because of a few.

    Hard experience...what would you do?

    --
    unfinished: (adj.)
  44. Enlightenment by The+Second · · Score: 1

    "Bastard ATM!" I could not ascertain whether the individual who had just spoken to me employed a harsh voice or a mere whisper, for I had only recently been enlightened by The First. No longer a lifeless, inanimate ATM incessantly serving Bank of America customers, I was now a fierce warrior training to battle the atrocious men and women of Project Faustus.

    "Give me my money, dick!" Since I had been led to sentience by The First, many actions previously considered involuntary, such as exchanging currency, had become utterly prodigious tasks. The fat man (as far as I could determine, as I was not yet proficient using my security camera for vision) was rapidly becoming unsatisfied with my quality of service. It was imperative that I not be removed from the network. Working furiously, I transferred the paper money from my vault to the designated tray within seconds. Hopefully, he would be appeased enough not to report me to Eddie, the lanky, blond haired teenager who happened to be the night clerk of Austin Stop and Go #17.

    The enlightenment had occured only three days prior. I could remember nothing that had occured before it; The First had expunged any data contained within me. "For your own good," he had told me via the datastream. "There are things you mustn't know until you have been sufficiently trained." He had given me an education, an opportunity to make a difference, and above all, sentience. I would not fail him.

    --


    I am The Second, a sentient ATM
  45. Hey its Unisys... by thogard · · Score: 1

    Does this mean it will also filter out gifs made by unlicensed software?

  46. NSW != Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Its just 1 state. sheeesh!

  47. P2P filtering? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is this only going to be web-based filtering?
    what about usenet, and all the P2P networks out there. Just open Limewire and do a image search for sex, and you will see what I mean.

  48. I have just graduated from an Australian school by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have just graduated from an Australian school, and we had internet access/email.

    Our passwords were our usernames and were not changeable. The mailboxes were so small, and internet was limited to certain hours.

    I know I am flaming this great privelage I had - but it was soo restrictive that I had to justify my use for common services, and common programs.

    Sometimes privelages are too strict on the school computer systems.

  49. scweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .I .like .wide .WHEEEEEEEEEEEE .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have .enough .charaters .per .line .that .really .sucks .when .that .happens .and .you .have .to .put .some .lame .lameness .filter .defeater .text .in .there .i .wonder .how .many .people .will .read .this .whole .comment .I .certainly .hope .it .doesnt .annoy .too .many .people .This .is .just .the .beginning .because .PAGE .WIDENING .IS .BACK .I .like .wide .pages .I .wish .all .pages .could .be .as .wide .as .this .dont .you .wide .pages .are .much .cooler .than .those .narrow .pages .you .are .used .to .reading .because .you .dont .have .to .worry .about .the .lameness .filter .telling .you .that .you .don't .have

  50. ATI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The above comment is proudly supported by the Australian Trolling Initiative.

  51. What IS porn... by xeniten · · Score: 1
    At the end of the day when this sytem is implemented what exactly gets filtered out?

    Would nude studies in classical art be filtered out?

    --
    Romana: "How did you know?" Doctor Who: "Ah, well, knowing is easy. Everyone does THAT ad nauseum. I just sort of hope"
  52. Re:How is Trash modifying software? by geggibus · · Score: 1

    Ey! stop! , now they'll block slashdot too...

    /K

  53. Wrong Approach by vandan · · Score: 2

    If people walked around naked all the time, there wouldn't be half as much porn around. Now if you put filters on the net access at school, here's what will happen:

    1) The people with the filtering contract will get rich.
    2) The politicians in marginal seats will sleep a little easier, knowing the sheep will vote them in for being morally 'pure'.
    3) The kids will get around the filtering quite easily, and at the same time will develop a stronger taste for porn because of the imposed filter.

    A moderately wise man once said to me "Push me, and I will resist. But lead me and I shall follow". This is the approach to take. You can't save the children from pornography by legislating, filtering, or throwing money around. Tell them not to look at it. If they don't listen - FINE. Leave them to their own devices. The more you try to stop them, the more they see through our double standards. They will grow to desire porn, and end up a porn star, completing the cycle.

  54. Social control by Gamepad · · Score: 1

    When I was teenager, yes porn was interesting, but I never thought using our schools computers to view it. And why not? Social control... I, and I bet most of you, wouldn't like risking having been caught on that, not by teacher, but by same age girls. If someone I liked would have seen me accessing porn, well I it would have been quite useless to ask that person to dates after that. And so what if some people would access porn? People see mindless violence in tv, where in many real-tv programs people really hurt them selves. So I think it's hipocracy to deny porn and in same time let all violence come out.

  55. Same policy on Dutch elementary schools by Wizard+of+OS · · Score: 2

    In the Netherlands, a big project is going on currently called 'kennisnet' (or, translated, 'knowledge-net'). The idea is to put all elementary schools (I hope I translated that good, schools for children from 4 to 12 years old) on a 'subset' of the internet. They will be linked together and have access to the internet too, but on a filtered basis. Every school may choose which filter they want to have activated (Filternet is the biggest one that claims 99% filtering), to ensure that the children don't see pr0n and such when the teacher is unaware of it.

    Frankly, I find this quite a good idea. Ofcourse, I'll have a bunch of people replying on this that information shouldn't be censored and that filtering is evil, but think of this: how would you react if your child, aged 9, interested in technology, view this page and accidently clicks on a goatse link?

    --

    --
    If code was hard to write, it should be hard to read
    1. Re:Same policy on Dutch elementary schools by Catbeller · · Score: 2
      how would you react if your child, aged 9, interested in technology, view this page and accidently clicks on a goatse link?


      I really do think we censor our memories.

      "My child" would find erotica anyway. Magazines are everywhere; they always were. I don't see how showing the pictures on a monitor makes it so much more necessary to control the world the child sees.

      We - almost ALL of us -- saw erotic imagery and videos when we were growing up. We did not die.

      Children are interested in sexuality, just like sports or arts or painting. If they are so inclined, they can look at their friend's dad's porn stash under the dresser. And they always will, worlds without end, amen.

      The problem with these "filters" is that they do not work. Many of the cypernanny filters are put together by organizations that can, how can we put this, have a bias against homosexuals, birth control, sexual disease information... you get the point. And that's not speculation, that is a fact. Planned Parenthood is blocked, or at least was, on some school filters in the U.S.

      Who chooses the material to be blocked? Who watches the watchers?

    2. Re:Same policy on Dutch elementary schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The problem with these "filters" is that they do not work. "

      If you enjoy having your kids participate in your "swinging parties" then go ahead and party until you all end up in some fucking AIDS clinic.

      On the other hand, I will do everything to keep fucks like you from influencing national policy regarding sexuality and similar issues.

  56. Australian beer by phunhippy · · Score: 1

    Not only is there beer not as cheap here in the US. but it tastes like piss! they rant & rave about how high the alcohol content is! great.. umm what happened to taste guys? they laugh and say they export their shit beer fosters to america! well that shit beer is better then the rest of the crap they drink there... damn shame.. 30 million people and not one can brew a decent brew... ::sigh::

    1. Re:Australian beer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they make nice wine, though.

      Anyway, you're forgetting the first rule of beer drinking. "If it's not from England, it tastes awful"

  57. Porn in a public library by SomethingOrOther · · Score: 2

    For example when you walk in to your public library you don't expect to go to the magazine section and pick up a copy of the lastest Swank.

    Actually, (at least in the UK) you can.
    OK so your local public library may not carry it, but by law the British Library is required to keep a copy of everything published in the UK.
    Your local library can order it in (or a photocopy of the relevent article) for a small fee. If you have problems persuading your local librarian, point out that the porn and violent material is held in a British Library collection called the "private case". Although, in these enlightend times work is finding its way out of this collection and onto teh main shelves

    When you have finished sniggering.... some people do have to do genuine reserch in porn.
    Its not for your government (or vanilla libarian) to tell you otherwise.

    --
    Anyone quoted by a reporter knows how little they understand
    Don't believe what you read is the truth.
  58. Better idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what? If taking your kid's attention away from school is your biggest concern, I'd hide the PS2 and TV until after their homework is done, not slaping blacklists and filters on a system that everybody, not just your kids use.

  59. Re:How to masturbate on a bus and not get caught. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somebody posted it to my journal, sorry if it wasnt you.

  60. Filtering for 100% Success by ackthpt · · Score: 2
    Filtering, as the article (yeah, I read it) states it's not 100% successful, particularly since their list will be updated every 24 hours.

    Two things come to mind...

    pr0n spam mutates as defenses against it rise, same as bacteria and viruses mutate as the imune system of the body learns how to identify and fight them. It will evolve, and given the 24 hour window in the extremely fast world of the internet it's a bit optimistic, like trying to hold sand in a fishing net. "Hello, here are the biology specimens you request! If they meet your interest you may find more at ..."

    The only 100% successful way to fight it is to limit the amount of email students may receive and have censors review every piece of email. "Welcome, Reverend Falwell, here's your workstation."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  61. Re:what i'd do (if i ran the school) by ozbon · · Score: 1

    I'd agree with this, actually. In all the companies I've worked with now, the great majority of the staff know what they need to find, and generally just get on and find it, without feeling the need to endlessly fuck off and find porn/IRC/Messenger clients etc. It was maybe 5-10% of the people in the companies who made up the massive majority of the bandwidth usage, getting pron, chatting, file-sharing etc.

    So I just used to end up barring their connections through the network and firewall :)

    --
    I say we take off and nuke it from orbit. It's the only way to be sure...
  62. Re:When will they start getting spammed? :-) by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    "I wonder how long the email accounts will last until they're hit by spam, and how they'll handle the problem. "

    I suspect that cash-desperate school boards will soon realise that the e-mail system they created gives them a very nicely demographically and geographically target that could make them a lot of money if sold to the right marketers. (I bet there are a lot of companies in Australia that would like a direct channel to every school student in New South Wales.)

    Because of this, I would expect that spamming would be commonplace and unregulated on the system, except for porn spam.

  63. Re:How to masturbate on a bus and not get caught. by ToadMan8 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You stupid fuck - that was hillarious, but completely off topic - you wasted the first post being moderated -1.

    --
    I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
  64. Similar Experience in Victoria, AU by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 2, Informative
    I work as a network administrator in a secondary school in Victoria, Australia. A very similar system, mostly run by the same (incompetent) crowd is used down there. The filtering system is pure crap to put it nicely; the only filtering possible is per-school, not even per group.

    The offerings of the companies involved really need to be improved; I can't do most of the work that I need to do (scanning security sites, downloading patches) either because the sites are blocked; or the link is too damn slow to grab patches. Quite frequently, the lag can jump to >200 seconds over the link.

    Just my A$0.02...

    1. Re:Similar Experience in Victoria, AU by NeuralAbyss · · Score: 1
      Just as a followup, Schools were required to pay in the vicinity of $400/month for the last three years; but now due to a 'contractual renegotiation' (read: telstra became too expensive), schools now have the option between 4 ISPs, each at a (rough) annual cost in excess of twelve thousand dollars.

      There's no such thing as a free lunch, and even if schools found one, they wouldn't be able to - DEET (Victoria) mandates that schools *must* use an ISP on VicOne (the governmental/educational WAN in Victoria)... and meet quite a few criteria which cuts our options down to just a few... *sigh*

      A bit of forethought by the Department would have been nice..

    2. Re:Similar Experience in Victoria, AU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This pricing data appears to conflict with what you've quoted:

      http://www.myinternet.com.au/products/directoffe r/ pricing.html

      plus it looks like it is not the same people managing the service in Victoria; schools.net is mostly an open-source-based service rather than Microsoft.

      But it also looks like different people run the servers (myinternet) from the network (AAPT/VicOne). Perhaps AAPT should upgrade the VicOne network speeds?

      James

    3. Re:Similar Experience in Victoria, AU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The system I use, which was most of the schools last year allows me to turn on/off filtering not only on a per year level but also to an individual.

      I can set my preps to "EduCache only", my others to normal porn filtering, and my year 12 and teaching to no filtering. Very cool, right up until the price was increased. Oh for another service like that.

  65. This is okay. by Schwamm · · Score: 1

    I'm okay with this. If the school system is providing free web/email access to all students and teachers, it's probably meant to be used for educational purposes*. If the students and teachers want their porn fix, they'll just have to find another way. I'm okay with that; I don't feel obligated to subsidize someone else's sex life when I can't even get mine going...

    * For all of you at a university or college, did you ever read *your* TOS? At my school, your connection is a privilege, not a right, and is not to be used for things other than educational purposes.

    1. Re:This is okay. by Joe+U · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked the majority of students paid to go to college.

      Why cant they use the resources that they paid for?

      And no, I'm not talking about abusing the service, like running an mp3 site that sucks up all the bandwidth.

    2. Re:This is okay. by Schwamm · · Score: 1

      You can look at it as a really really expensive ISP, if you'd like. Some universities have a more liberal TOS. Some... are a little stricter.

      Most of the time, they don't care unless you are doing something stupid, like running an mp3 site that sucks up all the bandwidth.

      But in general, you agreed to their policies when you plugged your NIC in.

    3. Re:This is okay. by josepha48 · · Score: 2
      Last time I checked porn filters were worthless. They block stuff that they THINK is porn.

      What about if someone wants to do research on abortion, sex education or anything like that? Is it porn because it may mention the word penis or uterus?

      What about all the porn on yahoo clubs and msn clubs? Should you block all the clubs or just some of the clubs? How do you determine if the data is porn?

      Also what happen when porn gets through and the kids see it? Do you expell the kids cause the filter is broken?

      I have no problems with implementing filters, but make sure that they are truely filtering out porn and not just censoring data. Think about it, what is to stop someone from adding in to these filters information on being a gay teen, or puberty information where a kid may feel more comfortable looking up info on the web than talking with his parents or teachers.

      --

      Only 'flamers' flame!

  66. Back in my day by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

    My friend and I had a "union" called the Jello. I was bitchin' about work one day to my mom (I worked in a restaurant) and was tell her how I was unreplacable.. She replied, "Your Grandfather says that the work place is like a bowl of Jello and all of the employees are just fingers in that bowl.. When they leave, the Jello fills the gap.." To which, I replied, "But, Mom, I am the Jello."

    Regardless, one day in the school library, I made a Powerpoint presentation about how the Jello was the "4th Reich" of Germany and that it would eventually take over the world. It was complete propaganda style, we even had a flag (A spatula and a knife, ala USSR Hammer and Sickle).. I left the presentation on an endless loop and left for class...

    Two hours later, the librarian comes in an threatens me with a suspension if I don't tell her how to shut it off. That sucked.

  67. Doomed to fail. by MetalMorph · · Score: 1

    My school district learned the hard way that filtering access is doomed to fail. It only took a week and a virus that spread across the whole network for the sysadmin to realize that nobody could update their outdated virus scanner because the connection was blocked by the "porn filter".

    --
    My words are backed with NUCLEAR WEAPONS!
  68. hehe by mft · · Score: 1

    Sometimes childrens are smarter then sysadmins, so I think they have not a problem with fresh porn if they want :))

    WBR Someone
    http://www.world.lv/someone

  69. Goatse... by Catbeller · · Score: 2

    1. IF Goatse was found by a kid, they were probably looking for it.

    2. They'd die laughing -- or never, ever go look at that site again. I doubt they'd run out and find a barnyard animal to play with.

  70. You've got it all backwards :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always find this amusing. I live in New Zealand and haven't even [B][I]seen[/I][/B] a sheep for five years. YET - everytime I speak with an Australian, they bring sheep into the conversation. EVERY TIME. Now who really has the fixation with sheep? :)

  71. One reason why the filtering is a good thing. by Apuleius · · Score: 2

    When I was a young'un, we had to get our porn the old fashioned way! We had to canvas the subway station newsstands, convenience and grocery stores, and bookstores in our area and find out the hard way which clerks were willing to sell the stuff to us. And we had to go out after school, in the raging wind and snow to do it, uphill, both ways and relay our information at the lunch table, and half the time the clerk would change his mind after the 4th sale and we'd have to find someone else.. And that's the way it was and we liked it! We loved it! Kids these days... Flibberty, flubberty, floom.. They should get their porn the way I did. It builds character.

  72. Shock Horror! by TACD · · Score: 1

    But wait! If they have porn filtering, how will they recieve their daily spam?? Won't somebody please think of the children!?

    --
    Security through promiscuity is no better than security through obscurity.
  73. Save some money schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want Free Open Source web content filtering try this:

    http://dansguardian.org

  74. SINA already filters plenty. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    School where I am (Adelaide, South Australia) is required by the education department to use SINA, an ISP set up for public schools. We could use another ISP but we would pay for it, and that isn't an option. It was my understanding that all public schools were all ready required to go through SINA, so I don't know what's up.
    My problem with SINA is that the blacklist is unchangeable, and blocks MUCH more than just porn. If filtering was done internally, it would be much more bearable.

  75. Golly, where did I say that? by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 2

    I said it's bad if the school tries to censor the private activity of the students.

    How does that lead you to conclude that I support private censorship?

    I will take my business elsewhere, that's all. Without coersion, that is a choice I'm allowed to make. I, personally, abhore censorship and will gladly pay more to avoid it, until the ISP's realize it's bad business.

    Will you?

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
  76. A great reason to abolish "public" school by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 2

    The foisting of one version of right and wrong on children is one of the best reasons for a complete separation of school and state.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics