Slashdot Mirror


Jeremiah, a New Series from B5 Creator, Debuts Sunday

wka writes "This Usenet post, by J. Michael Straczynski (creator of Babylon 5 ), outlines his new TV series Jeremiah . Based on a graphic novel series, it's a show 'about beginnings' after a killer virus has wiped out most of Earth's population, and it premieres on premium-cable channel Showtime Sunday night (regular airings to follow on Fridays). We can hope that the executives who interfered with Stargate SG-1 don't mess up this show."

215 comments

  1. Re:Windows, a new series from B5 creator... by t0qer · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Another serious setback for Linux is the lack of a journalling file system.

    Yes yes I know it's a troll, but could you at least be a little more accurate?

    --toq

  2. "Survivors" by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds like a similar premise to the excellent 70's BBC sci-fi "Survivors."

    Kind of a depressing theme, tho. :)

    1. Re:"Survivors" by Alan · · Score: 2

      .... or Stephen King's The Stand (an excellent read, and possibly the first SK book-to-movie that didn't completely suck, or change the story a huge amount). Of course, the TV mini-series was hefty, 3 or 4 2 hour episodes IIRC, but it pretty much stayed with the book. I was very impressed with it. This show sounds different of course, as The Stand was about 99.9% of the population being wiped out by a super-virus as well, but there was also a bunch of stuff about magic and monsters (as no SK book would be complete without), and a visit from Flaag :)

      Either way I'm still going to mark this in my Pilot so I don't forget :)

    2. Re:"Survivors" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      and the more recent TV mini series "Last Train"

    3. Re:"Survivors" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Strand was very good.

      God killing off dam near everyone, allways fun.

    4. Re:"Survivors" by ArnoldYabenson · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, here is some "Jeremiah" art by the creator of the comic book series. It doesn't look to me like a clone of either, though YMMV.

    5. Re:"Survivors" by Alan · · Score: 1

      Oh I wasn't suggesting it was, just that it was a similar idea.

    6. Re:"Survivors" by Jaster+Mareel · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yeah, I'm going to have to say this show looks pretty bad. They had star trek episodes based on this plot that never seemed to interesting. Any other show remotely close to this has sucked to, the only production i can think of that did this genre justice was the stand. The book was great, and i have to say the movie itself was pretty good.

    7. Re:"Survivors" by /dev/trash · · Score: 1
      Actually any film that King has direct involvement in is pretty good. Contrast the 1970's "the Shining" which he had no input to the 1990's version.

    8. Re:"Survivors" by niteshad · · Score: 1

      Both Jerimiah and The Stand owe quite a bit to George R. Steward's Earth Abides . EA was first published in 1949 and tells the story of a 1950's America ravaged by a new viral plague that spares only a few people. Much like The Stand the population cross section of the survivors is completely random. However, Earth Abides is truly a gem when it comes to realism; Steward obviously thought very critically about how a world like this would function, and pulls no punches. He includes everything from population spikes of vermin like rats and mice (caused by the plentiful supply of food left behind in grocery stores) to the psychological effects of a culture developed mainly on scavenging all needed items from a past technology level they can't fully re-create.

      For all of this though, Steward tells a very moving story full of complex human characters that one can relate to. His future is "struggling with hope," but that hope is definitely still there. Well worth the read, if you have any interest in this sort of plot line. (I usually don't and enjoyed it immensely.)

      --
      To email me,subtract my nick from my email address, starting with the second character. (hint: adto.uiuc.edu is wrong)
    9. Re:"Survivors" by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      Hell, it sounds like JMS's own "Crusade" series, five years later.

    10. Re:"Survivors" by jms · · Score: 1

      Who is this "JMS" and why is he using my initials?

      :)

    11. Re:"Survivors" by Syberghost · · Score: 1

      You'll have to ask his parents on that one. :-)

    12. Re:"Survivors" by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      You mean like Maximum Overdrive?

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  3. Doesn't sound promising... by maroberts · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..there have been any number of killer virus stories on TV and none of them have been any good. Lets hope Strazynscki (sp?) doesn't end up falling from his divine pedestal like when Gerry Anderson did Space Precinct.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Doesn't sound promising... by ZZane · · Score: 1

      Ummm... Have you seen Legend of the Rangers? Any pedestal this guy was has long since been yanked out from under-neath him. Ugh.

      --
      This sig is worse than my last.
    2. Re:Doesn't sound promising... by Teancom · · Score: 2
      This sounds like it is not a "killer virus story" per se. You can probably replace "killer virus" with "huge nuke" or "alien invasion" or "giant asteroid" and have the same result (maybe a bit more of a stretch to explain the whole "nobody over puperty survives"-angle, but wth. Of course, once JMS ties it all together, the fact that it was a virus will be integral, and you'll sit in amazement going "Wow! So *thats* what's been going on!" But that's just cuz JMS rocks :-) (I have officially forgiven him for the 5th season of B5. Everybody makes mistakes, and I can move past his).

      My point is, this is not an outbreak-clone, but a post-apocalyptic story that uses a virus as the kickoff. I'm waiting anxiously for it to appear on edonkey2k ;-)

    3. Re:Doesn't sound promising... by saw · · Score: 1

      Aw come on, Space Precinct was great. It sure beat
      all the other cop and lawyer shows out there and
      it didn't take itself too seriously. I wish some
      cable network had it in syndication!

    4. Re:Doesn't sound promising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's on Calle 13 right now... weekends

  4. Another Post Apocalistic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know, there have been so many of these 'after the war/virus/plague/meteor/cmdr Taco/etc' stories that they're kind of boring. how about something different? B5 was good because it was a different story then TV has done before.

  5. Pretty interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...when it was called "The Stand!"

    1. Re:Pretty interesting... by juu · · Score: 1

      For those that don't know - "The Stand" is a TV mini-series with a similar premise, based on a book by Stephen King.

      A killer virus breaks out and kills pretty much everyone save a few that for some weird reason have imunity. The film is both scary and touching at times.

      And, it really made me appreciate the acting talent of Gary Sinise.

    2. Re:Pretty interesting... by Heywood+Yabuzof · · Score: 1

      and his work in Forrest Gump didn't? :-)

  6. Never happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    cause designer babies won't get killer viruses...

    ;-)

  7. Haven't we heard of this before? by Saeculorum · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesn't this seem surprisingly similiar to the B5 movie A Call to Arms and the series Crusade? I'd've thought JMS would be just a bit imaginative in thinking of new series.

    1. Re:Haven't we heard of this before? by norton_I · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not to put words in his mouth, but I believe he would say something like "It isn't where you are going, but how you get there"

      And, if you want to get technical, no it isn't. The B5 call to arms/Crusade deal is about searching for a cure that is *going* to wipe out earth if it isn't found.

      This is about rebuilding civilization from the ashes after a major catastrophe. Still, many other people have explored this. However, each is does it in a different way, from a different perspective. I hope jms will do it well (though I don't have showtime, so I won't be able to watch it the first time through)

    2. Re:Haven't we heard of this before? by Flossymike · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but you didn't say why it was different to Crusade.

      Much as I loved B5, Crusade just wasn't up it (what ever it is)

    3. Re:Haven't we heard of this before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess. You're one of those guys who wears dilbert t-shirts, black jeans, black reeboks, and white socks.

  8. Promo Photo Frightens Me by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1, Troll

    I was pretty stoked reading the description so I flipped on over to the show's site.

    Oh my word! Any excitement/interest I had died the moment I say Luke Perry and Malcolm-Jamal Warner on the poster.

    I predict the show will be short lived for very good reasons. No one wants to see Ricky Schroder on NYPD Blue, No one wants to see Doogie Howser all grown up-- and no one will want to see these 2 take a stab at being 'grown up'

    .

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Promo Photo Frightens Me by Terry+Dignon · · Score: 1
      Luke Perry? ::ack:: grabs throat due to horror/disgust/dislodged-food.

      personally, i was never a fan of "B5/Andromeda/Star Trek/Earth Final Conflict"...so I guess I am not too excited about this. not to mention luke perry isn't helping either...

    2. Re:Promo Photo Frightens Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that you never watched "Malcolm & Eddie" which stared Malcolm-Jamal Warner as a very grown owner of a bar/jazz club. This show lasted 5 seasons (and was one of my favorite shows).

  9. Usenet posting? by Second_Derivative · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, that's reliable ;)

    (And this damn Slow Down page has come up four times and every damn time I have to retype this.)

    1. Re:Usenet posting? by SamBeckett · · Score: 1

      Just hit reload after waiting 20-n seconds

    2. Re:Usenet posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More reliable than a Slashdot posting, anyhow.

  10. Why not.. by lowtekneq · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why do you never see any Sci-fi shows about what the near future could really be like (sure a virus COULD wipe out humanity)? Something based on the book snowcrash would be pretty cool.

    --
    Carpe meam simiam!
    1. Re:Why not.. by Fweeky · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Why do you never see any Sci-fi shows about what the near future could really be like

      Because most producers, and indeed, most writers are just too unimaginative to work realism into a series like this.

      Just look at Star Trek; the aliens are all humans with ridged heads and various stereotypes, the society is dull and boring, and the people act completely unlike real people.

      Sure, you can throw in (Sociopathic|Pychopathic|Weird) (Killer|Assimilator) aliens in and have a few dodgy unrealistic unconvincing space battles (when was the last time you saw an "antimatter" powered ship in Star Trek explode and light up half of space and literally melt the hulls of anything nearby? Hell, when was the last time you saw a quantum-photon-xeon-pentium torpedo that did anything but dent a ship?), and have some sickening ultra-transparent "morality" tales, but at the end of the day it's so phoney that there's not a chance in hell anyone's going to go away from watching it thinking they've really seen what the future might be like, or some idea that could make them think for more than 5 seconds.

      There are all sorts of issues that would make for great stuff in sci-fi, but because they require skill and imagination (not to mention a few ounces of clue) they're avoided.

      Thankfully, we still have some decent quality writers in other areas of media..

      [waits to be bitchslapped for dissing Star Trek.. I do like it really, honest]

    2. Re:Why not.. by isorox · · Score: 2

      .

      Thankfully, we still have some decent [amazon.co.uk] quality [amazon.co.uk] writers [amazon.co.uk] in [amazon.co.uk] other [amazon.co.uk] areas [amazon.co.uk] of [amazon.co.uk] media [amazon.co.uk]..

      [waits to be bitchslapped for dissing Star Trek.. I do like it really, honest]


      No, but I'd bitchslap you for linking to amazon eight times and their one click patents if I'd could

  11. To JMS: by jafac · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was a faithful watcher of B5 and even the short-lived spin-off, and Legend of the Rangers.
    What was the point of Legend of the Rangers? was it a pilot for an aborted series? Anyway, I will *not* be watching this new series, even though it sounds fairly interesting, and in the past you have delighted me with your story arcs and special effects, and colorful characters.

    The reason is the network that's picking this up. I'm not going to subscribe to a general movie channel to watch a sci fi series. This show should be on the Scifi channel. Not Showtime. The best of luck to this latest endeavour. . .

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    1. Re:To JMS: by JordanH · · Score: 4, Insightful
      • This show should be on the Scifi channel. Not Showtime.

      I disagree. If it's really good, maybe it'll bring in a wider Scifi audience. Looking at it another way, there may not be any room for another competing Scifi channel, but it's also unhealthy putting all the Science Fiction on one channel. The Scifi channel might take it's target audience for granted if they don't have more competition.

      True, UPN and others put on Scifi, but the more Scifi the better, I think.

      Now, if it's just the case that you won't be buying Showtime for this one program, that's understandable, but complaining because their putting Scifi on a general movie channel? That doesn't seem reasonable.

    2. Re:To JMS: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOTR, was, I think in the same vein as "A Call to Arms", semi-pilot-semi-standalone movie.

    3. Re:To JMS: by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, but Showtime has the resources to do something like this and do it right -- and in "do it right" I include "sell it to another non-subscription network after a year so us freeloaders can see it." Similar to what they've done with Stargate SG-1.

      Most pay TV content that's any good eventually works its way onto a more accessible medium. Heck, even the lousy stuff eventually ends up on DVD in the hope that someone will buy it.

      Oh yeah, and the only explanation for "Legend Of The Rangers" that makes sense is that it was a pilot for a new show. Although if they do decide to go ahead with a new Rangers show I hope it fares better than Crusade did.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    4. Re:To JMS: by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2

      The reason is the network that's picking this up. I'm not going to subscribe to a general movie channel to watch a sci fi series.

      If the show is any good it will probably be syndicated like SG-1 is.

      I was a big fan of B5 but missed most of the first season because of our local channel that aired it. They never could find a slot for it that worked and moved it around too much for me to keep up. It wasn't until TNT finally picked it up that I got to see them all. Its possible that experience with B5 could have been the common place in many markets which might have led him to shop it to cable and Showtime showed the most interest. I'd like to hear JMS's take though. But yeah, I'm not going to subscribe to Showtime for one show. I already do that with HBO.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    5. Re:To JMS: by Quarters · · Score: 2

      Legend of the Rangers was not short lived or a spin-off, it was a one-off movie that just air recently.

      The short lived spin-off, staring Lumberg from, "Office Space" as the captain of the Excalibur was, "Crusade". It had potential, but I don't think it was given the necessary production budget to make it worthwhile.

    6. Re:To JMS: by Arrghman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Crusade was canned by TNT before it ever even aired on TV due to 'creative disparities' (AKA, TNT wanted more scantly clad ladies and fight, JMS said no, plug was pulled).

      And B5:LR is a potential pilot for a new series, which may or may not get picked up by Scifi... the jury's still out on that...

    7. Re:To JMS: by mbourgon · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, JMS said that there were two reasons he decided to do this new show:
      1) Complete creative control
      2) Big budget. He could make "his idea" of the show a reality.

      And, just to be a karma whore... straight from JMS on rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated:

      I haven't talked a lot about Jeremiah here because, basically, I haven't had time to put my thoughts together due to the rigors of actually *making* the
      thing. But we're now closing in on the premiere, and I figured this might be a good time to start laying out some of the information. (This will, however, be kinda brief because I'm fighting a bit of a fever and intend to go lay down after this.)

      The Showtime series tracks the aftermath of the Big Death, which wiped out roughly six billion people, anyone over the age of puberty. It's now 15 years
      later, and people have been ridinng on the ashes of the old world for the most part, the available resources slowly declining and running out. It's a moment of transition: either the decline continues, or now that they are adults, people start to rebuild a new world out of the ashes of the old one. The question is what shape will that world take, and who gets to choose?

      Our lead character, Jeremiah (Luke Perry) is a wanderer, trying to find out what happened to his father, who disappeared during the last days of the Big Death while en route to a locale specified only as Valhalla Sector. He wants to find out the end of the story. Along the way, he encounters our other lead, Kurdy (Malcolm Jamal-Warner), also a drifter, and the two are thrown together by circumstance into a duo. The two-hour premiere follows their lives, the dangers they encounter, establishes the world of our series, and sets the stage for a new dawn.

      Basically, I wanted to do a post-apocalyptic series that wasn't all darkness and grimness...I wanted to tell a story about hope, that this isn't about
      endings, it's about beginnings. When the Black Death hit, lots of people thought it was the end of the world. It wasn't. What followed the Black Death was the Renaissance, a new beginning, as our characters face a new beginning.
      [JMS continued with an episode list]

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    8. Re:To JMS: by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Legend of the Rangers was not short lived or a spin-off, it was a one-off movie that just air recently.

      Well, yes and no. The actual spin-off was Crusade, and this was not that. But there is some thought that SciFi might turn Legend of the Rangers into a running series, which explains why it had a subtitle.
    9. Re:To JMS: by antijava · · Score: 1

      I'm actually kind of glad that it's on Showtime. At least there is *SOME* hope that it will be broadcast in Dolby Digital (SG-1 is). Also, at least via DirecTV, Sci-Fi looks pretty crappy because they overcompress it. The show will most likely look better on Showtime.

    10. Re:To JMS: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actualy, I'm very glad that this is on Showtime, rather than SciFi. I like the SciFi channel, but I have been very dissapointed at censorship that occurs when I watch Science Fiction movies on SciFi. Sections of movies are edited out, and dialog has been overdubbed. Let the writer/producers works show as they intend.

    11. Re:To JMS: by Flossymike · · Score: 1

      Does any one know if Legend of the Rangers made it to TV in the UK?

      Cheers

    12. Re:To JMS: by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

      You act as if he had a choice in this; most likely, he didn't; or that is to say, if it was a choice, it wasn't an equal one. To get a new sci-fi serious on the air is difficult as it is (unless you're Star Trek). Given the tremendous support Showtime has given to Stargate SG-1 (_regardless_ of what you think of the recent episodes; the series wouldn't have happened if it weren't for Showtime, certainly not in such an impressive fashion), accepting a deal with them is simply smart thinking.

      Anyhow, it'll eventually trickle out into syndication like Stargate SG-1 and then we'll all be able to enjoy it (and if some fans care enough to subscribe and show Showtime that there really is a strong audience for sci-fi programming, all the better). Sure, the SG1 episodes I see now may be 2 years old, but I'm just damn glad that such an excellent show exists at all.

    13. Re:To JMS: by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Er, Crusade was canned before the first episode aired? I'd not heard the news of its demise until several episodes had aired (shame too, because reportedly the next episode to be filmed involved Bester)

    14. Re:To JMS: by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      Oh lord. Luke Perry. Do ya think Jenny Garth will show up as a potential love interest?

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    15. Re:To JMS: by JimPooley · · Score: 2

      Does any one know if Legend of the Rangers made it to TV in the UK?

      Not to my knowledge. At least, not unless it slunk out in a 3AM slot with no advance warning...!

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    16. Re:To JMS: by nolesrule · · Score: 1

      Yeah, all 13 episodes had already been filmed when TNT pulled the plug. This was before a single episode aired. Then, when TNT finally aired it to recoup their costs, they advertised it as a limited series or something like that.

      --
      -- nolesrule
    17. Re:To JMS: by balthan · · Score: 1

      The SciFi channel has a very bad track record when it comes to handling original series.

    18. Re:To JMS: by jafac · · Score: 2

      I am NOT a freeloader!!!!
      I fucking pay $40 a month for TV god damn it!

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  12. What I'd love to see.. by red5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'd love to see an animated series based off of the 100 Bullets comic books
    I guess it would have the same target audiance as Spawn.

    --
    I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
  13. Yay by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    The show looks good, and if I had free time and got Showtime I might actually watch it. I think I'll just download it in a few months.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  14. LUKE PERRY?!!! by shut_up_man · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The main guy (Jeremiah) is played by Luke Perry.... sorry, that kinda puts the series waaaaayyyyyy down there to begin with.

    1. Re:LUKE PERRY?!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Jeremiah is Luke Perry. I thought Jeremiah .was a bullfrog...

  15. Read closer by Hammerself · · Score: 5, Funny

    "And the Ground, Sown with Salt"...a very intense episode guest starring Jason Priestley

    Your pain is only beginning.

    1. Re:Read closer by stoolpigeon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Oh my- you are right. This is gonna be bad. We will sit and just wish the virus would hit now.

      And the second week - guest appearance by Shannon Doherty and Bill Cosby.

      -- On a side note-- my original post is flame bait? To who? The 18 year olds that have been in love w/Luke since they were 12? I was so excited to have been modded up to 2 and then I get tagged as flamebait for knocking a post apocalyptic Beveryly Hills 90210?

      Very sad.

      .

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  16. killer virus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'after a killer virus has wiped out most of Earth's population'

    How about 'after a killer virus has wiped out all of the Earth's computers that run Windows'.

    --> Starting weeknights on MSNBC

  17. Kinda reminds of someone... by houston_pt · · Score: 1

    Checking out the few photos on the site, I noticed the Richard Deen Anderson-ish poses of Luke Perry, like in this photo that looks more like some SG1 episode... ;-)

    --
    coffee | nose > keyboard ©
  18. No Bruce Willis? by heybrakywacky · · Score: 1

    I wonder if there will be characters that go back in time to try to get information about the virus, so they know how to stop it in the future, and get back on top, in charge of the planet. Terry Gilliam would be so proud.

    --
    I'm sorry sandwich! --Brak
  19. Maybe I'll try it out, but... by Skyshadow · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I could never really peg down why I disliked B5 so much. I mean, it had a lot of things going for it: a story arc, a vision of a flawed future where some aliens were more powerful than humans, etc.

    But it *bugged* me. And it was beyond just the (extremely) crappy dialog, wooden acting and contrived plot happenings -- hell, if it were just that I wouldn't have liked TNG, either.

    There was just something about the plot and characters that bothered the hell out of me, especially after JMS started writing all of the episodes. It got so bad that I would occassionally watch, but relied on episode guide websites to keep up with the happenings with the story arc.

    Man, B5 bothered me. Yes, I'm aware that I sound a little on the neurotic side.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Maybe I'll try it out, but... by IronChef · · Score: 2

      I have a friend that's the same way. He was able to put his finger on one additional thing: "those guys with the hair." You know who I mean.

      I think that the whole Centauri thing was far and away the best part of the show... the Londo/G'kar relationship, the shenannigans in in the royal court back on Centauri Prime, the mad emperor... Man, that stuff was cool. Too bad my buddy could never see past the hair.

    2. Re:Maybe I'll try it out, but... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      I enjoyed Babylon 5 immensely, but it was a deeply flawed show; it used too many stock sci-fi situations, and the characters could often be pulpish and 2-dimensional.

      I think the problem might have been stretched out too much. The storyline just wasn't enough to sustain that many seasons.

    3. Re:Maybe I'll try it out, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's possible that the problem is with you, not with B5, but you won't consider that possibility, of course.

    4. Re:Maybe I'll try it out, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wanted to like it, I really did. In spite of the fact that it had vision, unlike 99% of the dreck that passes for SF on TV (Star Trek is a freaking soap opera, not SF), I just couldn't love it.

      The Shadow Wars story arc was brilliant, right up to the very end, and then, Jesus Christ, they wrap it up with Sheridan shouting "Get the Hell out of our galaxy!" to the elder races. Fuck me. That was not handled with storytelling grace. Inelegant, dorky, and just downright stupid.

      And the damn Minbari. Sheesh, Delenn has to have been the suckiest faux-wisdom spouting excuse for a member of a "advanced" species that I've yet seen on TV. They even managed to beat out Star Trek on that front. Just awful.

      I think that's the maddening thing about B5 - it sucked on many levels, and yet at the same time it approached greatness on others. The Londo/G'kar relationship, wonderful moments like watching the look of horror spread across Londo's face as he realizes that the Vorlon really would be willing to toast all of Centauri Prime just to kill him, most of the Shadow War, the relationship between Lyta and Kosh, and on and on. Even Chekov's role wasn't bad. The whole series was interesting, but ultimately disappointing.

    5. Re:Maybe I'll try it out, but... by Skyshadow · · Score: 1
      Actually, Londo was the guy who bothered me the least.


      Sheriden, Lyta and pretty much all the Minbari were the ones I couldn't stand watching.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    6. Re:Maybe I'll try it out, but... by Bodrius · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I really liked B5, but I have to admit in the end I watched it out of loyalty for the good parts of the series, rather than because of its final quality.

      I still think it was one of the best SF shows ever, but I can't help but think they went downwards since the first season, even though the story was supposed to actually start much later.

      It seems to me that B5 was at its best before it became an epic story. During the first seasons (the prelude?) the characters were complex and subtle, the politics made sense, the storylines were interesting... you had a great sense of foreboding.

      But when the epic started, the characters became complicated and yes, pulpish. The acting quality decreased. All sense of subtlety was lost, which also killed almost all the sense of mistery in the storylines. It seems their ambitious story made them lose control of the narrative.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    7. Re:Maybe I'll try it out, but... by IronChef · · Score: 2


      I still really liked the show, but I can easily agree that the Space Elve Mystics were the worst part of the ensemble!

    8. Re:Maybe I'll try it out, but... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      a vision of a flawed future where some aliens were more powerful than humans

      Thats the nifty thing, the Humans thought that it was flawed too, aspirations of taking over the galaxy some of them had. Those "advanced destroyers" wern't made to keep the peace. :-)

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    9. Re:Maybe I'll try it out, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I think that the whole Centauri thing was far and away the best part of the show... the Londo/G'kar relationship, the shenannigans in in the royal court back on Centauri Prime, the mad emperor...


      It gave rise to a great Usenet .sig:


      "People who send spam to Emperor Cartagia... vanish! They say that there's a room where he has their heads, lined up in a row on a desk... They say that late at night, he goes there, and talks to them... they say he asks them, 'Now tell me again, how do you make money fast?'"

  20. Hey Theo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  21. It is good hearing but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really liked it Babylon 5 but 'wipes it viruses for are the batch of the world' had been made to the death. Granted, Showtime starts pretty good Sci-Fi generally, but I do not know good all the sample with Luke Perry I can be.

    1. Re:It is good hearing but... by Glock27 · · Score: 2
      [incoherent rambling snipped]

      Cool, Twirlip of the Mists is on Slashdot! =)

      299,792,458 m/s...not just a good idea, its the law!

      --
      Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
      Score: -1 100% Flamebait
  22. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've read a book like this by some famous scifi author, (and that too recently), but cant remember which book it was.

    The cool thing about that book is that only the kids survive, and they become savages. Lots of fucking and shit going on and canniblism. A few older folk surive (though which queery illnesses like Giantisim).

    The guys on the space stations survice (Though during the war below they tried to destroy them). The book takes a look at 8 years of such destruction and how the guys above (adults) have been able to find anti-matter and make a drive that would take them to a new planet, and how the kids below are back to cave age, and how some of them try to destroy the space station and so on.

    Anyone know what the name of this book is? I just read it one day when I was sick so have no idea who wrote it, though it's someone famous. And it was a good read. From what I hear from this series, it seems to be based on this book?!

    Hey, there is some Heinlein kind of stuff in that book.

  23. Postapocalyptic depression by rufusdufus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The main reason to pick a story about postapocalyptic humanity is that the sets are cheap and the costumes are rags. The downside is that no matter what your angle, a story based on the demise of billions of people is depressing.

    William shatner says hes doesn't understand Star Trek's success. [http://www.cnn.com/2002/SHOWBIZ/News/02/22/shatne r.lkl/index.html]
    Well why should he? Is just an actor. But Gene Roddenberry knew.

    Star trek has a very forward view of the future, one where there is hope and success. Based on humanity "working it out", not being "wiped out".

    If you want to make a hit, do a show that is connected to the present, that shows the fruits of out labors and dreams, not the failure of them.

    1. Re:Postapocalyptic depression by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, wars are depressing, but people make good war movies. If done right you could have one hell of a series about the remnants of humanity trying to piece itself back together.

      You also have lots of room to explore. What will we try to recreate? Will we still have baseball and soccer? Will Sun Tzu and von Clausewicz still be relevant? Will we have clean water? Countries? How will we communicate with people in the next town or halfway around the world? What happens to religion? Do we use a near-apocalypse as proof that God exists and has spared us, or as proof that God doesn't exist because He wouldn't have allowed this to happen, or do new mythologies spring up built around the darkest days of the End of the World As We Knew It?

      The trick will be in doing it right. Bad sci-fi is easy. Good speculative fiction is all too rare.

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    2. Re:Postapocalyptic depression by rufusdufus · · Score: 2

      I think you missed part of my point. [probably because I accidently posted before I was finished with the post. Ack!]
      The problem with the idea of mass destruction and worldwide system-failure is that the "we" you mention doesn't include the viewer. Its sort of like a slap in the face that says "you died" and everything you ever did or were amounted to a pile of dust.
      I think war movies are different because the viewer has a historial connection to the story.

      To be compelling, a story must have an emotional impact on the viewer. Its hard to care about characters in the far future who have no association with anything real.

      The best evidence of this is the stunning failure of the slew of post-apocalyptic movies that have been made.

    3. Re:Postapocalyptic depression by Keith+Russell · · Score: 2
      If done right you could have one hell of a series about the remnants of humanity trying to piece itself back together.

      I think that's where he's going. In that post, he made a point of mentioning how the Renaissance grew out of the Black Plague. He sees the Big Death as a similar inflection point in history. This either spurs a new era of growth, or marks the beginning of the end.

      Which is why I have high hopes for this series. Plenty of direct-to-video MST3K fodder has been produced about a declining post-apocalypse. I would expect JMS to have a higher standard. After all, we did tell the Vorlons to bugger off. :-) And I, for one, am glad it's on Showtime, and not on Sci-Fi, TNT, or some other commercial-fed network. Pay-TV networks are more willing to take risks, and I can't imagine JMS accepting the deal if it didn't come with the sort of control he expects.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
    4. Re:Postapocalyptic depression by Rimbo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "If you want to make a hit, do a show that is connected to the present, that shows the fruits of out labors and dreams, not the failure of them."

      If you'd actually READ THE ARTICLE, maybe you'd read that this is precisely what JMS is doing. He points to how people thought that after the Black Death, the world would end. it didn't; in fact, the Renaissance followed on its heels.

      He wants to show how, after this "Big Death," people discover a chance to re-mold the world into a way that maybe is more of a utopia.

      Take the whole world apart piece by piece, look at the lessons learned from the past, and try to put it all back together the right way. That's what JMS says he's after. That's not depressing... that is hopeful.

    5. Re:Postapocalyptic depression by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      The downside is that no matter what your angle, a story based on the demise of billions of people is depressing.

      Depressing or not, sometimes it can be great. A line from one of my favorite movies: "When there's no more room in hell, the dead will walk the earth."

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    6. Re:Postapocalyptic depression by EvilBastard · · Score: 1
      Gene Roddenberry Knew

      Um, based on his state of mind for the 20 years leading up to his death I highly doubt that he knew anything.

      Gene started with a show based on Voyage of the Space Beagle (which he had already optioned), Forbidden Planet and Wagon Train, and then spent the rest of his life congratulating himself on his creativity.

      Look up any non-Paramount reference and you'll see that a lot of hard-working people helped make Trek what it is, like Dorothy Fontana, Sam Peoples, David Gerrold, and Gene was really good at taking the credit and doing the PR work while enjoying a wide variety of recreational pharmaceuticals

      Or for a laugh, have a look at his original series bible for ST : TNG BEFORE it got the heavy workover. Hint : Marina Sirtis was playing the ships Sexual Therapist, and you'll never guess what her therapy was....

    7. Re:Postapocalyptic depression by angelo · · Score: 1

      And in Rising Stars, Joe's one comic book, you see similar themes play out. The 'specials', which are the first superheroes/villians the world has ever actually had, change the world. The cover of the latest issue has a picture of a city street and a poster on a subway exit that says 'Change the world, or we'll do it for you'. One of the characters was one they didn't think was special, but he turned out to have a serious brain on his shoulders instead of something flashy. He ends up solving the world's energy problems, creating the technology to make the first real starships, etc. All the while, an ignorant government is trying to find ways to kill them all.

    8. Re:Postapocalyptic depression by Our+Man+In+Redmond · · Score: 2

      Don't you hate it when that happens? :)

      In my mind a lot of of doing this right would be the scale and the viewpoint. If only three dozen people survive the Apocalypse that's not as interesting as if, say, 10% of humanity survived. In dramatic terms that means there need to be main characters the viewer can identify with, lots of other characters to interact with and lots of interesting things for all of them to do. Of course "I died with everyone I know and cared about and here are these people picking through my remains" is less interesting than "Hey, I could be doing the stuff these people are doing." Done right this goes from a story about people walking across your grave, as it were, to people surviving against incredible odds.

      I'm not saying it would be easy, but I think it's possible if you get the right people doing it.

      By the way, one of the best post-apocalyptic stories I know of had everybody on Earth dying suddenly with only a couple of survivors. But then "The Hitch-Hiker's Guide To The Galaxy" broke so many rules that you can't really use it as an example. :)

      --
      Someone you trust is one of us.
    9. Re:Postapocalyptic depression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, hate to burst everyone's bubble, but the Star Trek's, all iterations, were absolutely the worst science fiction ever made. It is NOT science fiction.

      Blade Runner was science fiction. Bablyon 5 was science fiction, especially the first couple seasons.

      By the way, Star Wars isn't science fiction either. Sorry to break it to y'all.

  24. So I assume this means... by gorsh · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..that Captain Gideon and the crew of the Excalibur were unsuccessful in finding the cure for the Drakh plague.

    1. Re:So I assume this means... by JeffL · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That reminds me, I still have one unwatched episode of Crusade left on my Tivo, from sometime last year, that I still haven't watched. I saw it the first time around, but for as amazing as (the first four seasons of) B5 was, Crusade mostly sucked.

      I think part of the problem with the fifth season of B5, Crusade, and to some degree Legend of the Rangers, was kind of a too-much-of-a-good-thing syndrome. For example, in B5, [what's her name, the woman commander] gives a nice speech before attacking the Earth fleet, about being death incarnate and all of that. The speech was a bit cliche if taken out of context, but for the situation and the character it worked well. Mostly because through the show, she only gave a few speeches like that, maybe one or two a season. When they happened they were pretty cool, but then there are characters on Crusade that only talk in fancy speeches. It's too much, they lose all impact and end up just being cheesy Shatneresque spewing.

      I am sure JMS still has it in him to make a good show, but I think he really needs to go back and watch the third and fourth seasons of B5, and maybe In the Beginning, and see what the balance was that really made them work. Don't just take the best bits and try to only use those in a show.

    2. Re:So I assume this means... by MajroMax · · Score: 3, Informative
      That reminds me, I still have one unwatched episode of Crusade left on my Tivo, from sometime last year, that I still haven't watched. I saw it the first time around, but for as amazing as (the first four seasons of) B5 was, Crusade mostly sucked.

      The B5-fan in me makes me write this reply:

      Crusade sucked because it was _not_ JMS's show. TNT, which had picked up B5 after the dissolution of PTEN (which was responsible for B5 in syndication), also picked up Crusade. Unfortunately, it occured around the same time that TNT decided to "refocus" on its core demographic of 19-23 yo males -- via the ever-popular venue of pro wrestling.

      A high science fiction show, like Crusade, doesn't exactly fit terribly well with that target audience. To correct that fatal flaw, the TNT execs began pushing JMS to add features into the series, and they exercised much more creative control than was appropriate for even network executives.

      All of the Crusade episodes before "Racing the Night" were specificially ordered by TNT to "introduce" viewers to the series -- JMS's plan was to begin the series in media res. The SciFi channel is airing the episodes in a "mostly correct" order, as sanctioned by JMS, but the TNT-ordered episodes are still lin there.

      The uniform switching, by the way, was also a result of the TNT meddling -- any episodes that have the cast wearing uniforms seen in Racing the Night would be JMS-originals.

      As related to Jerimiah, JMS has said that he will never, ever do a series again when he does not have near absolute creative control. When announcing the project, he said that he was happy to work with Showtime because they don't have the limits that network TV imposes on him (so this might be bad news for anyone relying on scifi/network syndication). So far as I've seen him write, he's had no creative issues, and it's his series.

      --
      "Evil company X is threatening to restrict our rights! Let's all get together to stop--OOOH! SHINEY!!!" -- AC
    3. Re:So I assume this means... by JeffL · · Score: 2
      Crusade sucked because it was _not_ JMS's show.

      Thanks, that answered many of my questions. I can certainly see how somebody could have committeed Crusade to death. I can just see the spec sheet now: (semi-)attractive female alien character, (semi-)evil corporate guy, potentially-cool but way overdone guy, etc., the Vorlon ambassador guy with the mysterious past was popular, so every character should have a mysterious past!

      The characters in B5 started out a bit 2-dimensional, but I think that was on purpose. As the motives for all of the characters became clear they took on much more depth, and of course the characters changed in response to the changing situtations, etc.

    4. Re:So I assume this means... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They failed to find the cure before TNN axed the show. ;(

    5. Re:So I assume this means... by Silverhammer · · Score: 2

      ..that Captain Gideon and the crew of the Excalibur were unsuccessful in finding the cure for the Drakh plague.

      It's been moderated "Funny," but I think it's a real question worth asking. Everything I've read about this show kinda sorta vaguely points to that actually being the set-up, and JMS doesn't refer directly to the B5 universe simply because the rights are owned by another company.

      Does anyone know for sure?

    6. Re:So I assume this means... by dstrauss · · Score: 1

      Actually, JMS has noted that they were going to find the cure to the Drakh plague early in the second season. At that point, we would have discovered that Crusade wasn't about the plague at all, but about the questions asked in the show's opening. Who do you serve and who do you trust?

      He posted the scripts from two episodes of season 1 that were unproduced (the season's first primary arc episode, and the season 1 finale) on a web site about a year and a half ago, but the site is now out of business.

      If you look around the web, you can find them. They give very intriguing hints towards where the story was going.

    7. Re:So I assume this means... by nolesrule · · Score: 2, Informative

      Events in Babylon 5 show that a cure for the plague was found. Dr. Franklin was on Mars without being isolated in 2281, even though crusade shows him 15 years earlier infected with the plague in an episode. And the plague was supposed to wipe out everyone within 5 years of the start.

      JMS has also stated that the plague was not going to be the primary focus of Crusade and that a cure would be found in the second season and that Crusade would move in awhole different direction.

      --
      -- nolesrule
    8. Re:So I assume this means... by Monaal · · Score: 1
      Everything I've read about this show kinda sorta vaguely points to that actually being the set-up...Does anyone know for sure?

      Jeremiah takes place in the near future (present day for all intents and purposes), not the 2260's-2280's of the Babylon 5 shows.

      The similarities are coincidental.

  25. The name by LiquidPC · · Score: 1

    Hrm, you don't normally suspect Showtime to be airing a sci-fi series. Guess they're trying to get lucky and pull off what HBO did with The Sopranos. Also, "jeremiah" is an awfully odd name for someone nowadays (i didnt see anywhere it said it was based in the past), doesn't seem very catchy either.

    1. Re:The name by IronChef · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hrm, you don't normally suspect Showtime to be airing a sci-fi series.

      Stargate
      Outer Limits
      Total Recall

      off the top of my head...

    2. Re:The name by RFC959 · · Score: 1

      Also, "jeremiah" is an awfully odd name for someone nowadays...


      85th most common name for boys born in the US in 2001. Ahead of "Miguel", interestingly enough.
    3. Re:The name by gilroy · · Score: 5, Informative
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Also, "jeremiah" is an awfully odd name for someone nowadays

      Besides being the 85th most common name in 2001 (as mentioned by someone else), Jeremiah is also a prophet of the Old Testament. Quoting liberally from The Prophet Jeremiah:

      The prophet Jeremiah was active in Jerusalem during the tragic period of the city's destruction by the Babylonians, which occurred over several stages... Jeremiah prophesied an ineluctable, unavertible disaster... Jeremiah castigated the people bitterly for forsaking God and the Torah and turning to idolatry. With a sense of the inevitability of a terrible punishment, he felt disgusted with his life. Gradually he became the leading exponent of the approach which called for surrender to Babylonian might and not attempting a rebellion against its awesome strength under the auspices of Egypt... Although Jeremiah was saliently a prophet of apocalypse, he emphasized the temporary nature of the destruction and the consolation to be found in the certainty of the nation's return to its land. (emphasis added)

      Not really hard to see a connection to the show's theme, is it?
    4. Re:The name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My name is not awfully odd.

      Thank You!

      Jeremiah Paul McDowell

    5. Re:The name by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

      Guess you don't come from a very religious area. I grew up around lots of people with really hebrew-sounding first names.

      Actually, the character's name is one of the things that made me hope that this was based on "Eden." I figured if that were ever produced, the names would be changed, because they're even weirder.

      some of my translations of Eden

      the first decent ENGLISH "Eden" page

    6. Re:The name by LiquidPC · · Score: 1

      Yeah, however, alot of people just go by Jeremy or Jereme, whichever way you like to spell it.

    7. Re:The name by _xeno_ · · Score: 1
      There's also one other important bit about the name Jeremiah:

      It starts with "J".

      His last name must begin with an "S" just like John Sheridan and Jeffery Sinclair from Babylon 5...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  26. JMS... by anzha · · Score: 1

    ...is looking overrated.

    B5 had me waaaaay wrapped up until the end of the shadow war. *THAT* so pissed me off with its ridiculous anticlimax ending I couldn't watch the end of the series.

    Then there was Crusade...*flinch*

    Then there was Legend of the Rangers...and, umm, bleh. Talk about introducing continuity errors!

    Now. Luke Perry? ummmm...

    Like I said...looking like the Brain Eater got him.

    --
    Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
  27. Sure by Pholostan · · Score: 0

    We can hope that the executives who interfered with Stargate SG-1 don't mess up this show.

    Don't hold your breath buddy.

    --

    Everybody knows that we are the evil boys, making noise with deadly toys.
  28. Re:So do Radio Ad's by MrWinkey · · Score: 1

    They have had radio ad's on one of the clear channel owned radio station for about 2 days now. Luke Perry says something to the effect of "I never thought I would make it this far dad..." or some sappy pesudo poetic junk that is supposed to peak our intrest. Needless to say the DJ's are making constant fun of it.

    --
    Vote early. Vote often. Vote CowboyNeal.
  29. I read everyone elses posts first... by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 1

    So don't you dare moderate me as redundant. No one makes the connection, and I'm not sure if it's there. But is this a Babylon 5 sequel? Nothing about the time period, or technology (except gasoline use, does that count?) rules it out. And we already know that much of earth would be devastated before the shadow virus was contained/fixed/cured.

    Then again, am I getting this confused with the period when the rangers were working covertly to rebuild earth?

    Please let there be a B5 sequel that doesn't suck. Please. Bringing back G'kar for a crappy pilot where you try to invent bad guys badder than the shadows just stinks.

    1. Re:I read everyone elses posts first... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > But is this a Babylon 5 sequel? Nothing about the time period, or technology (except gasoline use, does that count?) rules it out. And we already know that much of earth would be devastated before the shadow virus was contained/fixed/cured.

      This is not a B5 story; same creator, different universe.

  30. Showtime by Mike+Hicks · · Score: 0

    Oh, whee. Showtime. I think that requires digital cable around here. Like I need to deal with set-top boxes..

  31. B5 and H. Ellison by nickynicky9doors · · Score: 2

    Big B5 fan, Big H. Ellison(sp?) fan and so I took note of the credit to Ellison at the end of the B5 episodes. Ellison is a heavyweight writer compared to most of the TV fluff regurgitators. Yes, you can hurl fluff, it comes out soggy but dries quickly. It comes from the dust bunnies most TV writers inhaled when hidding/retreving their pron collections from under their beds. I always whimsically attributed the best of what was B5 to Ellison.

    --

    heuristic algorithm seeks stochastic relationship
  32. based on belgian comic by h0bbes · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's based on the belgian comic "Jeremiah" by Hermann. It's a pretty decent comic imho, but apparently Hermann didn't have a lot of control over the TV adaption... It'll probably be a while before I get to see it here in Belgium anyways... He also published a great comic about the war in Yugoslavia : Sarajevo Tango More info here (in french), here and here (dutch).

    1. Re:based on belgian comic by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      i've been trying to find a place in the states that sells "tango" but haven't been able so far. does anyone know where this gem can be bought?
      and hermann's jeremiah was great IMO, i'm dissappointed to see that hermann doesn't have much controll over the show.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  33. erm I think you've missed something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    as I understand it this isn't all JMS own work. Jeremiah is based on Platinum Studios' graphic novel series by Belgian author Hermann Huppen.

    http://www.comics2film.com/JeremiahArch.shtml

    1. Re:erm I think you've missed something by mvw · · Score: 2

      This comic series is a classic.
      Probably another case of turning art into a commercial mess.

  34. Centauri by garyrich · · Score: 2

    JMS: Lois Bujold called - whe wants her Vor back...

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
  35. Anyone else think this? by moreati · · Score: 1

    I enjoyed B5, despite the hoops you had to jump through to see it all in the UK.

    I always thought JMS would do a good job with the Reality Dysfunction trilogy by Peter F Hamilton, if it was ever televised.

    The books are pure space opera, with a bit of moral and social theme. But the universe and characters are just great. Giving the whole thing a Strazinsky (sp?) twist would work nicely.

    Anyone else care to give there take on this?

    Alex

  36. what if... by drik00 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    could you imagine a beowulf cluster of those stargates off of SG-1? according to einstein's theory, you could travel back in time if you had multiple ones...

    off-topic, sue me.

    --
    Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    1. Re:what if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you can travel back in time using a single stargate if you jump at the same time as a major solar flare. Duh.

  37. Its using my name sooo.... by InfiniteOne · · Score: 1

    It better be damn good. I'm talking so good that chicks will dig me more ;)

  38. Sorry geekdom, but B5 was bad by paiute · · Score: 1

    I love good science fiction, but face it. The acting and writing in the Babylon 5 series was bad. It was painful to watch - some of the most overused and obvious cliches passing for dialog.

    And now what? A killer virus? Post-apocalyptic visions of the world with leather-clad heroes? Give me a break. That's just a lack of imagination.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Sorry geekdom, but B5 was bad by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      So you watch a little Crusade and hang the whole universe for it?

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  39. Sitting at the fire by bill.sheehan · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have just finished watching an episode from the second season of "Earth, Final Conflict." I watched it with the stunned fascination of someone seeing a car wreck. How could a show with so many good ideas have gone bad so quickly?

    Answer: The writers. It's all about the writers. It's always all about the writers. It's about the writers remembering one simple thing: the people sitting around the campfire asking the bard or shaman, "Tell us a story. Tell us a story about noble kings and fearsome battles and tender loves. Tell us a story about ourselves, our secret fears, our greatest hopes. Tell us a story.

    I'm not an SF fanboy, but I do love good SF. There's so little of it about. JMS loves good SF too, and it shows in his storytelling. JMS also loves history, Scripture, legend, fable, and humanity. Humanity most of all. He once said

    "As an atheist, I believe that all life is unspeakably precious, because it's only here for a brief moment, a flare against the dark, and then it's gone forever. No afterlives, no second chances, no backsies. So there can be nothing crueler than the abuse, destruction or wanton taking of a life. It is a crime no less than burning the Mona Lisa, for there is always just one of each.

    "So I cannot forgive. Which makes the notion of writing a character who CAN forgive momentarily attractive...because it allows me to explore in great detail something of which I am utterly incapable. I cannot fly, so I would write of birds and starships and kites; I cannot play an instrument, so I would write of composers and dancers; and I cannot forgive, so I would write of priests and monks and Minbari..."

    I am sitting eagerly by the fireside, awaiting any tale JMS wants to tell. Because when he's good, which is usually, he's one of the finest storytellers of our age.

    1. Re:Sitting at the fire by topham · · Score: 2

      Second season? Oh hell, you have a long way to go, it gets worse; much worse.

      It's so bad now I find it hard to fathom why they continue it.

    2. Re:Sitting at the fire by Genda · · Score: 1

      I agree with everything except the blame. Somebody produces this show, and tells the writers what to write.

      I have friends who write screenplays. A guy come up to you and says I need a script. It's gotta be brown, soft, lumpy, stink to high heaven, and draw flies...

      The writer says "That sounds like shit!" and the producer says, "Yeah, so when can I have it..." The system we have is designed to transport sewage, you might inquire into a system that transports art.

  40. So what could we get rid of? by FFFish · · Score: 2

    A virus wipes out most everyone, giving us a chance to start fresh. What to get rid of?

    RIAA and ICANN. Can certainly do without them!

    Any other (light-hearted) suggestions?

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
  41. We've heard of this before.. so what? by d.valued · · Score: 2

    I hate to keep repeating Aristotle's line about there being only so many ideas.

    The idea of a plague is in many films and shows, like in "12 Monkeys", in which the survivors live in a hermetically sealed underground world and go back in time to figure out how it started. In an episode of "The Outer Limits", a time protection organization goes back to prevent a plague, only to discover that they were in fact its source.

    I'll be frank, I have ideas that are WAY to the 49th weird, out there. However, until we have some way to get past the funks we're in, folks are going to recycle the same ol' ideas in newer and hopefully more interesting and more realistic forms.

    --
    I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
    Real life is underrated.
    1. Re:We've heard of this before.. so what? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      True, there are only so many basic plots- good vs. evil, boy meets girl, civilization dying, civilization rebuild, disaster, aliens, evolution, time travel, fantasy/magic to name a few.

      However, I'm interested in your weird^49 ideas. Could you post a couple? If you don't want to do it here, you could drop an email at my user name @yahoo.com. I'm not a writer or anything, so I'm not going to rip you off, I just like neat ideas.

      Or you can just tell me to bugger off! :)

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  42. They scheduled it specifically to be annoying... by Bartab · · Score: 1

    Showtime is showing the first episode three times. With DirecTV I get both east and west coast showtimes, so a total of six showings.

    All six are conflicted. Coincidence, or a purposeful attempt to make me go buy a dualduner PVR?

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
  43. What will it try to be? by hacksoncode · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I will start by saying that I really liked B5 (a lot... I think it's probably the most amazing science-fiction epic ever attempted).

    Yeah, there were a lot of embarrassing moments in it, and quite a bit of trite dialog.

    What was great about it was the it so devoutly tried to be good. There's so much crap on TV these days, that I just have to give JMS credit for sticking to his guns and telling a story.

    Even if it was a bit of a cheesy space opera when all is said and done.

    I guess what I'm waiting to hear is whether this series also is going to try to be good. I'm skeptical that the Showtime management will allow that.

    But then I was skeptical when it was announced that Bruce Boxleitner was going to be the new lead on B5 too.

    That's really just as scary as Luke Perry being in this one...

    1. Re:What will it try to be? by Dermot+the+Forg · · Score: 1

      >I will start by saying that I really
      >liked B5 (a lot... I think it's probably
      >the most amazing science-fiction epic
      >ever attempted).

      Ahem. Dune?

    2. Re:What will it try to be? by hacksoncode · · Score: 1
      The SciFi channel version was great, but still, we're talking 6 hours of coherent story vs. ~120 hours of (reasonably) coherent story.

      I'm willing to stack up the best 6 episodes of B5 against the Dune mini-series, and I think there's a reasonable argument that they are comparable.

      That leaves the other ~114 episodes of B5. Take off 2 each for the ~20 real losers, and we're still talking ~74 hours of epic story.

      But I'm willing to admit that perhaps I'm easily amazed.

  44. SciFi and Hormones... by Genda · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been watching a steady shift over the last several years from SciFi that had previously been kinda fun and thoughtful... to thinly veiled mastabation fodder for pimply faced boys, who have a small interest in science and a major interest in hot babes in tight rubber suits.

    Some twenty-something executive at MGM, who retired as a teen-something executive at MTV, decides what "SG-1" needs is to off the geek and replace him with hot bods to make the pubescent crowd stay tuned. The last season of "Earth, Final Conflict" has been so nasty it makes peoples brains bleed. The last couple seasons of "Voyager" had degenerated into some kind of soap opera that just happened by chance, to be located somewhere in the galaxy other than Earth. What do all these things have in common? The same push to shift SciFi into some kind of primtime porn-light... all that's missing is the Ka-Chunka-Chunka music... Think about it... silly plots, no cohesive threads, flat acting, and lots of sexual titillation. Of course since it's aimed at young'ens, you got to keep the titillation to just pokes and peeks (you don't want the religious folks chasing you with torches and pitchforks), but the innuendo still lives.

    I am so sick and tired of people doing stupid shit by rote, like there is some kind of magic in the act, without thought or consideration to impact or consequence. Screw with a good show to kick up the pimple demographic and oops there goes the adult and women viewers! Oh, so sorry! Take the brains out of a show, destroy the entire freaking premise, and make it about some foxy chick battling scantily clad sexy aliens. Scuse me while I puke...

    The worst is a whole spate of new shows (most of which were thankfully stillborn), that didn't even bother to suck the brain out of a decent show, but just started off as a sexy SciFi/Fantasy babe doing whatever... They're not even waiting till they've suckered in a crowd of viewers now, they're just going straight after the pimply demographic.

    I'll watch the first few episodes, beause I like to give folks an even break. However, I expect the producers of this show to give me something worth staying for. Something clever, thought provoking, a whole lot more than the tripe that is currently aimed at socially challenged pubescent geeks in dire need of a suitable sexual targets upon which to fixate. Dressing Penthouse Pets up in aluminum catsuits with flashing lights is not my idea of good SciFi...

    Then again, who knows this may be just someone else's cup... all ya need is a little KY and some Oxy-Five?

    1. Re:SciFi and Hormones... by nutshell42 · · Score: 1
      So, silly plots, no cohesive threads, flat acting and lots of sexual titillation?

      I can't help it but that sounds just like Star Trek TOS

      I admit that you're right for at least two thirds of the new shows but the ratio wasn't better 30yrs ago only that we have different standards for shows then and now.

      jm2

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  45. Actually, by Edward+Teach · · Score: 1

    If you watched OZ, you would know that Perry did a pretty good imitation of a grown up. When he gets a good writer, which JMS is, Perry will do just fine. Warner now, I have my doubts.

    --

    Setting his threshold to 5, Sparky eliminated most of the trolls on /.

  46. The Jeremiah characters and story line by descubes · · Score: 3, Informative

    More information about the characters and story line can be found there. The original is in French, and the fish doesn't translate pictures yet, but you can find an example of the artwork on the site.

    --
    -- Did you try Tao3D? http://tao3d.sourceforge.net
  47. B5 so what by cbodine · · Score: 0

    I was never a big fan of B5 so I could care less that this new show is by the same guy.

    So what do we have in the new show to sell it.
    Well we have the creator of B5
    We have Luke Parry
    Post-apocalyptic.
    Basicaly nothing

    So what makes me this mad, that a show can be put on the air just becasue it has a name attached to it. Now I know this happena alot but come on the only reason any one will watch is the because of the name attached to it.

    I still have to watch more then one episode of enterprise because I feel the same way about that as I do about this.

    Any time I state how bad B5 was I always here how it was pushing the edge with CG ships and what not. Well B5 Blow goats went it came to space ships.I have seen better stuff done in poser or bryce.

    --
    Dr. Suess: 'Gandalf, Gandalf! Take the ring! I am too small to carry this thing!' 'I can not, will not hold the One.
  48. Running out of Sci-Fi plots? by SanGrail · · Score: 1

    Because argh! It feels like that sometimes...

    Hmmm,
    a plague wiping out all adults leaving the kids to fend for themselves?
    Woah!
    That's straight off The Tribe.

    But hey, at least it can't be worse, right?
    Ooops,
    hold that thought!
    Luke Perry? Jason Priestly?

    --
    ---- I've fallen, and I can't get up.
  49. Re:SciFi and Hormones... - Andromeda by jswitte · · Score: 1
    I aggree completely (although I don't get SciFi). Yout forgot to mention the most recent Star Trek spinoff (or should it be spinout?) Enterprise.

    I still hold out a little hope for Enterprise, because I personally think the story idea about the first days of deep-space exploration is a good one, it does seem to be succumbing to the hormone craze you mention, in a way that even Voyager didn't (at least not initially). I hope they do more with their semi-coherant story arc of the "temporal cold war" in Enterprise, and it would be nice if they entered the Vulcan Symmetrists movement (Vulcan eco-terrorists trying to protect the "galactic ecology") that's taken up in William Shatner's Ashes of Eden trilogy. I don't know if this is an "official" part of the ST universe (but then, if Shatner writes it, it pretty much could be considered official.

    Another show that has fallen to low heights is the current season of Andromeda. Although there I think there is a continuing arc, as I've read it's based on a "lost script" of Rodenberry's, as EFC was. About EFC, dammit, when is Street going to crack the last level of the riddle and we can be rid of the damn thing!

  50. Long live the Master. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, yes, here come the Star Trek trolls, who complain about Babylon 5's lack of character development (*rofl* - Watch any ST series), corny dialogue ("..nail your head to a table and set it on fire." seems better than, "Waah, prime directive, waah." to me..).. et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.

    There's something that the Star Trek trolls should have figured out by now.

    Star Trek is a space opera.

    JMS creates science fiction.

  51. Damnation by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    From the description, I was hoping it was based on the "Eden," a manga currently running in Afternoon.

    I don't care how good this show ends up being, that would have been better.

  52. JMS badly needs an editor by EvilBastard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    B5 was crusing fine until Season 4

    Since then we had

    - Angstmaster-2000 telepathic poets in space actually called Byron (start of B5 Season 5)

    - Crusade, with special effects *worse* then then those available in computer games at the time. Oh and Technomages. Shudder. One of those shows not so much cancelled as dragged out the back and put out of our misery.

    - The Legends of the Rangers Tae-Bo Weapons System, and a moral creed lifted straight out of "Galaxy Quest" (NEVER GIVE UP! NEVER SURRENDER!)

    Give him a strict budget, some different writers and a pre-planned polished storyline, and he's fine.

    Let him run free, and it's a disaster. I call it FrankHerbertitis (Frank Herbert + John Campbell [ed] = Dune. Frank Herbert on his own = Dune Messiah, Children of Dune, God Emperor of Dune, Heretics of Dune...)

    On the bright side, at least we have Gene Roddenenbury back, in $pirit if not in flesh...

  53. I know exactly what you mean by transcend.ca · · Score: 1

    I was never able to resolve why I hated/loved B5 so much. I think I fell in love with the plot and the "universe" -- that is, the technology (there's something about slow, bulky ships launching those zippy little fighters), the telepaths and general environment of the show. The idea that nothing changes really was interesting against the utopian view of ST-TNG.
    The thing that really brought the show down for me were:
    Falling in love with an alien
    Having that alien have REALLY stupid looking hair
    Having horrible women actors who aren't convincing. Especially when they talk about technology.
    The acting
    The acting
    The acting
    Bruce Boxtleiner(sp?) is a great actor who can do many roles. A couple other good ones like g'kar and the doctor... others are good too. But sometimes it's just so contrived I either have to grimace or flip the channel. Otherwise it's "yes, I know what you're trying to say but man, that delivery sucked ass"

  54. JMS has been murdered by WinPimp2K · · Score: 1

    and secretly replaced by the Borg-resurrected clone of Gene Roddenberry (William Shatner expained this in his famous book cleverly disguised as fiction where he had the Borg resurrect Kirk) Needless to say, there is no danger of "the suits" ruining this series. It will be pronounced DOA.

    Lets see:
    ST:TOS had an episode involving a killer virus that killed everyone when they hit puberty. Things were looking pretty grim for the survivors until the Enterprise showed up.

    Jeremiah: A killer virus wipes out everyone who has gone through puberty. In the premiere episode, we find out that the killer virus may return. (After killing off all the adults, the virus nipped on down to the pub for a quick pint, was delayed brefly by a Vogon contruction crew, but as now returned to hit on all the newly nubile sorts - Hey wait maybe this is just an "edgier" remake of Jimmy Neutron - Boy Genius). It seems obvious that midway through the season Jeremiah will discover clues pointing to a secret hiding place of adult survivors in some form of suspended animation. So his original quest to "relocate" Valhalla will be replaced with his new "Search For (Dr) Spock", or perhaps it will be to find the mysterious "Jay Tee Kur Ok". We will eventually discover that the surviving adults are sleeping out the Apocalypse in orbit aboard the original space shuttle (the one that never flew under power - the one that only did glide tests - the one that was named "Enterprise". But someone forgot to wind their alarm clock so they are oversleeping...

    One note about the cast
    series is set LESS THAN TEN YEARS after the virus did its thing. Now humanity is being led by thirtysomething actors playing at most 23 year old characters. Call me an old fuddy duddy, but why not hire real 20-somethings? They could also have a few former female gymnasts as they would have deliberately delayed the onset of puberty through their strict training regimens, but that would be the only real possibility for using older cast members.

    I'd heard a rumor that JMS might be involved in a series adaption of David Weber's Honor Harrington books. I'd have much rather seen that. Oh well, maybe Weber can get someone decent to do it as an anime series or as all CGI animation...

    --

    You either believe in rational thought or you don't
  55. Battlestar Galactica ( Bring it on ! ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Bring that one to life again instead of giving us more bad Sci-fi !!

  56. Re:They scheduled it specifically to be annoying.. by Pii · · Score: 2

    You should already have a Dual-tuner PVR... The Hughes DirecTivo units are given away for free with a number of promotional deals, and cost around $100.00 even in commercial outlets.

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  57. But I never saw Babylon 4 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, do we need another dreadfully boring Saturday afternoon Sci-Fi show?

  58. Unfortunately.... by kindbud · · Score: 2

    It stars the unwatchable Luke Perry. Of course, I managed to love the first season of Babylon 5 despite the unwatchable Michael O'Hare... so I will give this one a go. Hey, I just upgraded my DirecTiVo to 225 hours, I got room for the entire B5 series and all the B5 movies (will SciFi run it once more so I can do this?) and still have plenty of room left over for Jeremiah, so why not?

    I notice we've managed to /. Google groups... is that a first? By the way, how much do you think I could get on eBay for a TiVo filled with every B5 episode? (j/k :)

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  59. What the...? by PieceMaker · · Score: 1

    Volkswagen is making T.V. shows now?

    Oh, wait. Nevermind... :)

  60. Re:(try to) Read closer by xcomputer_man · · Score: 1

    Hmm...I initially read that as "New Series from BS creator".

  61. But if it's Jeremiah Cornelius... by gila_monster · · Score: 1

    ...you gotta watch.

    Hmmm...but then, maybe we have him to blame for all the tittilation about which an earlier post complained. :)

    gm

    --
    Ad luna, Alicia! Ad luna!
  62. What's that shit ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It has no ressemblence whatsoever with the original graphic novel, which was a romantic, 1970's tasteful neo-celtic style story. This version is a shitty amrican-like mass-product, with the usual mandatory nigers and "hispanic" actors. And on top of all, the style is now much closer to "Battlefield Earth" than the real "Jeremiah". Shit on it.

  63. Re:SciFi and Hormones... - Andromeda by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    "I still hold out a little hope for Enterprise, because I personally think the story idea about the first days of deep-space exploration is a good one, it does seem to be succumbing to the hormone craze you mention, in a way that even Voyager didn't (at least not initially)."

    First off, we should remember that scantily-clad women have been a staple of Star Trek since the beginning.

    However, I'm personally holding out even more hope for Enterprise because I think they might be trying for a coherent series in the same vein of B5. There are what, 8 or 9 episodes out there right now? And we're already seeing quite a few references to previous episodes and some genuine character development. I have the feeling that it will at least be more coherent than DS9 was.

    "I hope they do more with their semi-coherant story arc of the "temporal cold war" in Enterprise"

    I can see that as something that will start to simmer a little more in the future, but Not Right Now. Still working on character development as well as pouring some more gasoline on the Vulcan/Andurian thing.

    "and it would be nice if they entered the Vulcan Symmetrists movement"

    Symmetrists, shymmetrists. Where's the Human-Romulan War? We need at least SOME ass-whipping in this show, and if we can't bitch-slap the Klingons (damn that was fun...) we should at least be allowed to vent our anti-pointy-ear agressions on those green-blooded SOB's. :)

    "as I've read it's based on a "lost script" of Rodenberry's"

    I'm not sure it was even on a script. But it was really a very basic idea at the very least.

    I just wish networks would stop touting all these new sereii from a guy that's been dead for a while now. The longer he's been dead, the less of the new series will actually have been his idea, until we reach some new series (already done with Andromeda?) that's based on some joke Gene told in a bar forty years ago...

  64. Is it playing in Canada? by Nom_Anor · · Score: 1

    If so, on which channel?

  65. Re:HEIL KLERCK !!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAHAHAHAHAH U SO GAY

  66. JMS by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you've been keeping up with JMS's history with series, he doesn't take it up the ass just to ruin the story. He's been fighting the good fight to make sure his series doesn't get vamped up for bigger breasts and more action. If he doesn't like what the producers do, he says no (and it likely gets canned, like Crusade did).

    As JMS has said, he's not going the TNT route again, and will never do a show unless he has complete control, which is why he's on Showtime. (Me wonders about why Showtime is screwing over SG-1, though.)

  67. Re:SciFi and Hormones... - Andromeda by Jerf · · Score: 2

    No, what Shatner writes is not Canon. The only Canon is the shows and the movies, and not even all of the shows; the animated series is basically ignored.

    (Computer graphics will have come of age when a Horta crewmember is shown in a Star Trek series as a normal, every-episode crew member.)

    What I find sad is that the authors have no understanding of Vulcans, which are (or perhaps "were") as finely developed as the Klingons were in TNG. As I understand it, the Vulcans are basically the brain child of D.C. Fontana (I think the first name is Dorothy), who created wonderful back history for the species. For instance, one part that came out in the original series: Why are Vulcans so logical? Because they are extremely emotional, and tend to kill each other in their 'natural' state.

    Perhaps at least that tidbit came out on tonight's episode; I couldn't bring myself to watch it. Apparently, neither could my TiVo; it recorded a re-run of Junkyard Wars, which was probably better anyhow.

    If you ever see the book "Spock's World", by Fontana, pick it up. You'll be impressed by the true story of Vulcan. You'll wish you saw more of them. My greatest hope for Enterprise is that they'll eventually get around to exploring Vulcan, in a way that the original series could oly dream of... but what are the odds? The most nuanced charecterization I've seen of the Vulcan's so far on Enterprise is that they're jackasses.

    Woo, there's some deep charecterization!

    I'm losing interest fast; such damned shallow writing when there is such potential being *handed* to the writers on a silver platter is painful to watch.

  68. Luke Perry by Doktor+Memory · · Score: 2

    He acquitted himself reasonably well in the last season of Oz. I'll give him a chance in this.

    --

    News for Nerds. Stuff that Matters? Like hell.

  69. Parturiunt montes, nascitur ridiculus mus by hyacinthus · · Score: 2

    ("The mountains labored, and gave birth to a ridiculous mouse." From Q. Horatius Flaccus.)

    That line just about sums up my opinion of "Babylon 5". After years of ceremonious buildup, and plenty of self-promotion from JMS on various online forums, after the mountains labored, they gave birth to a rather mean little story about how mankind is grown up now, and doesn't need the guidance of the wicked, bad, nasty, manipulative Shadows and Vorlons. Ugh. Let's not talk about Season Five, or all of the spinoffs from a show which, as an early episode reminded us, wasn't supposed to be just another "deep space franchise".

    Add to this the fact that JMS's ear for dialogue, especially comic dialogue, was often terrible (I cringe at the thought of Bruce Boxleitner saying "Abso-fraggin-lutely"), and suddenly "Jeremiah" doesn't look like anything to get worked up about.

  70. Babylon 5 by Sivar · · Score: 1

    For those not familiar with Babylon 5 (your life is incomplete, by the way) it is a five year saga that takes place in space. I would say what it is about, but there are a large number of extremely complex and well written plots and sub plots, and even some very interesting (and logically plausible) explanations for what people here in the real world call religious experiences, such as seeing angels. The series is not theistic, per se, it is in many ways transcendant above such notions in that it ties many interesting alien and domestic religions in a very unique way, without really making them a central part of the series.
    I very rarely watch any television...Actually, I never watch television, but this series is one that I swear by. It is a glorious masterpiece that, while it does have some flaws, is in my opinion the single best piece of science fiction every written for television or movie screen. (It isn't quite up there with the greatest SciFi books of all time, but it can hold its own)
    The one big, important thing to remember:
    Babylon 5 is a *SAGA*. If you start watching in the middle of a season, or even start watching during any episode but the first, you will have NFI what is going on. That is normal. If you turned to page 162 of the first book in the excellent "Foundation" series, you would similarly have no idea what is going on. Many people fault B5 for this, but I consider it one of its greatest strengths.
    Star Trek, for example, has episodes which are very shallowly connected, in fact, they are very rarely connected at all. (I do like Star Trek quite a bit, though). Babylon 5 is like one ling movie, split into chunks over five years.

    If you have even the slightest spectral of love for good science fiction or a good story, Babylon 5 is a series that you must watch. It is required viewing just like Tolkein, Asimov, and Heinlein is required reading.
    If you are a step further, if you are a adamant fan of science fiction, your life is not complete until you see at least seasons 1-4 of this saga.

    --
    Computer Science is no more about computers than astronomy is about telescopes. --E. W. Dijkstra
  71. Spock's World by Jethro · · Score: 2
    If you ever see the book "Spock's World", by Fontana, pick it up.

    I have read this book, and once you get past the really boring and tedious first half or so, you do get some interesting Vulcan history.

    However, it was written by Diane Duane, rather then D.C. Fontana (who wrote some of the best Trek episodes.
    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:Spock's World by Jerf · · Score: 2

      Oh, then maybe it was Diane who did the Vulcan stuff. I don't know, too many similar names for me to keep track. :-)

      At any rate, I suspect that the Enterprise people are in no danger of seeing the light and inviting either of these two to help them with the Vulcans on Enterprise. :-(

    2. Re:Spock's World by Jethro · · Score: 2

      I'm more than willing to believe D.C. Fontana came up with a lot of the Vulcan stuff. She's a script writer, though, and I don't know that she wrote any books. Her scripts and/or notes might've been the basis for Diane Duane's work.

      Rick Berman seems to have pissed off a lot of the Original Roddenberry people, so yeah, I doubt they'll bring D.C. Fontana back to write for Enterprise. Did she do any work at ALL on any Rick Berman Trek (DS9/Voyager)? I know she wrote three scripts for Babylon 5...

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    3. Re:Spock's World by Jethro · · Score: 2

      Answer my own question: she did write for DS9. My god, she wrote for lots of stuff. Take a look.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  72. Wasn't there a similar series before?? by cybercomm · · Score: 1

    Last year while in Europe i saw a similar series being shown...except they involved 13-17 year olds as actors (plot has been the same) and there were more than 40 episodes...Does anyone know the title?

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
    1. Re:Wasn't there a similar series before?? by Back_in_black · · Score: 0

      It's called "The Tribe" and it's absolute toss. Link was posted somewhere above...

  73. JMS's Writing Skills May Be Lacking by Tom+Veil · · Score: 1

    I don't know, maybe it's just me, but it seems like JMS is far more suited to comic books than television. I don't mean that as any sort of a put down. I LOVE JMS's comic books, from Rising Stars to Spider-Man to the old Star Trek comic he wrote. But much of the dialogue that works so well on the page seems to come off as corny, off-putting, or downright foolish when spoken by actors. (Sadly, I believe the same may be true of another favorite author of mine, Peter David.) Without actors like Peter Jurasik and the great Andreas Katsulas (who can spit out with reasonable dignity whatever garbage he's given), how much of the dialogue on B5 couldn't have been pulled off successfully. Much of it wasn't (i.e., "Abso-fraggin-lutely", "Butt butt butt...", "General Hague is coming, and HELL is coming with him", etc.). Again, don't get me wrong, I loved to watch Babylon 5 and see the story unfold. JMS is a master plotter. But his dialogue is frequently more suited to the printed page. Still don't believe me? Why do so many B5 fans detest Season 5, the movies, Crusade, and now LOTR? We don't see any of the epic plots really unfolding, excepting the excellent last half-dozen B5s. I'll probably watch Jeremiah when it comes to syndication. But my hopes aren't particularly high.

    --

    There's nothing you have that they can't take away: Absolute zero, Gentle Jack, bottom line.

  74. Americanised edition of the comic book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jaremiah is a comic book series from -probably- the best living Belgian comic book artist. It caused a lot of scepsis here in Belgium when we learned that Kurdy, Jeremiah's sidekick, would be black in the TV series, which he isn't in the comic book. Just to finetune the product to the USA market. Pffffff...

    Tom

    ps another Belgian comic book of which the persons and the setting was made into a TV series is Largo Winch. In this case the actors Largo and Simon look remarkably like their comic book heroes.

  75. "adult and women viewers"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there an implication that women are not adults? The term for people who are not yet women is "girls". Perhaps you should meet some.

  76. Just what we need... by Smid · · Score: 1

    A fifty hour version of Stephen Kings "The Stand"

  77. Original comic by ives · · Score: 1

    The tv series is based on an excellent comic by
    Hermann.

    The site of his publisher has some outtakes from the comic strip:

    album 20
    album 21

    --Ives

  78. Nice to see... by JimPooley · · Score: 2

    ...that JMS still has his grudge against SFX magazine. How petty does that look?

    --

    "Information wants to be paid"
    1. Re:Nice to see... by gorgon · · Score: 2

      For those wanting more info on this grudge, see this thread.

      --

      And I'd be a Libertarian, if they weren't all a bunch of tax-dodging professional whiners.
      Berke Breathed
  79. Actually it's adapted from a great comic! by fons · · Score: 1

    I'm a big fan of the comic this is based on: http://www.hermannhuppen.com/intro_english.php3
    It's a really really good comic, I really hope the series will be equally good. But i Doubt it.
    The adaptation of another comic-series i love, Largo winch, was TERRIBLE

  80. He also needs better character designers by Derci · · Score: 1
    The creatures in B5 are awful.. I've never seen anything like that in any sci-fi show (heck, even the characters from Farscape look better). I hope that for this series, he'll hire some character designers from Star Trek.

    The CG effects were bad too, but that's for another comment.

    - Derci
    ________________________
    Ani meod ohev burekasim!

    --

    -- The ballad of arrivederci
  81. The original comic book by Cally · · Score: 2
    My girlfriend grew up "the ghost state of former Yugoslavia" as someone put it. She says there were tons of good quality graphic novels/comics, they were widely read & not just by schoolchildren & morons, but the vast majority of those titles are unheard of outside Europe. As well as Jeremiah, she was a big fan of "Alan Ford", google for it, it's excellent.

    Anyways, I was showing her the Net & demonstrating Google by looking for Jeremiah-related stuff; we found a preview announcement of the film. She read the synopsis / setup for the film & says this is (a) changed a lot, and (b) based on the first half of the first issue. So, original comic book much better than p8in-off TV show / movie... film at 11.


    Anyone have news on the long-awaited Watchmen film? I'm just re-reading it, I always forget how excellent it is. Alan Moore knows the score...

    --
    "None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free." -- Goethe
  82. Luke Perry? Ugh! by shermozle · · Score: 1

    He had complete creative control and chose Luke Perry as the lead?

  83. The coming plague... by lohen · · Score: 1

    The possibility of a virus or other pathogen doing something severe to the world's population is a very serious threat, simply because history tends to repeat itself. The last really big death toll we had was in the 'Spanish flu' epidemic of 1918, which killed something in the region of 80 million people over a couple of years. And the larger the world's population gets, the greater the risk. Here are a few of the potential contenders:

    Influenza: It could happen again, simply because the vast majority of the influenza family have yet to cross over to humans from their pig/avian/other hosts and when a new disease does cross (called a 'zoonosis') it can be extremely lethal, like the Hong Kong 'chicken flu' of 1997 which had a high fatality rate but was fortunately nipped in the bud due to its inability to cross from one human host to another.

    Ebola: Currently a small killer, but a very efficient one. Too efficient, in fact - most people killed by it die within 8 days. All it needs is a slight alteration to its life-cycle involving a longer latency phase and it could be a world beater.

    Smallpox: The possibility of a new outbreak from some unknown source clearly exists. There is also next to no remaining resistance, and it could travel all over the world extremely rapidly with a high fataility rate (just look at what happened when Europeans took it to the Americas). Vaccine stocks do exist in some Western nations, but only enough to cover a small, hermetically sealed population. In the event of a pandemic, more would have to be manufactured and fast, but it would still only save a fraction of the victims. Smallpox also leaves many survivors crippled, creating a burden for the rest.

    HIV: In the unlikely event of this developing a better transmission system, this could be even more disastrous than it has already been and is set to become. But as it stands it's already bad enough.

    I could go on, but I'm starting to depress myself. I don't like to predict the future, but I do think we should try to do something to acknowledge these threats and stave them off. (Despite the slightly sick theory of one of my friends that the only way we could ever attain a utopian society would be if some event happened to indiscriminately wipe out the vast majority of the world's population).

    Let's hope it doesn't happen soon.

    --
    "What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist." Salman Rushdie
    1. Re:The coming plague... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (OT)Posting AC 'cuz I can't remember my pwd ... damn!

      ... the only way we could ever attain a utopian society would be if some event happened to indiscriminately wipe out the vast majority of the world's population.


      No, the only way to attain a utopian society would be if some event happened to very discriminatingly wipe out the vast majority of the world's population. That's the problem, that a random cross section of humanity, as routinely postulated, would contain all the negative non-Utopian traits that caused the original problems.

      It's that discrimination that makes this slightly sick-making. Our (Western/American/whatever you want to call it) culture frowns on the notion of culling our neighbors to achieve a better philosophical/religious/moral state, especially when done in large quantities. (Note, I'm not dissing other cultures in not mentioning them, just reflecting on mine for the moment.) The very thought makes me a little queasy just writing about it. Nevertheless, the historical record indicates that utopian societies which do not select their members fail even faster than those that do, and none of them seem to last for long.

      A great die-off would, however, offer a chance to test the utopian schemes, and that's why it has been so frequently postulated. It's the only way to get started, given the lack of "frontiers" and "empty lands" these days.
    2. Re:The coming plague... by lohen · · Score: 1

      I have a problem with the original contention, which is that the problem is the proportion of humanity with non-Utopian traits in the population. I would counter that at our current level of technological and societal development, we could do extremely well with a small fraction of the present population, allowing for a complicated routine of reeducation etc.

      But running with your idea for now, if you were to discriminatingly wipe out the world's population, who would you discriminate for/against, and on what criteria? IQ? Physical fitness (heh)? Success in life, perhaps with a value-added measure? Agreement with your own political/societal viewpoint? The last is the worst of a very bad set, but also the most popular historically.

      And how would any society that would commit such an act of genocide ever have a hope of becoming truly utopian? Everyone would be worried who would be up for the block next, while hating the system, each other and themselves for being a part of it.

      The only way to avoid genocide and select for a population would be to wait for something or someone to do it for you, and then save a chosen few million or so. And then rebuild from the ground up. But it's passing the buck - you'd still be choosing to let the rest of the world die, which is in practical terms the same as killing them yourself (is there a difference between not reaching out a hand to a drowning man and shooting him in the street, except perhaps that the second is quicker and more merciful?), not to mention massively unutopian.

      The closest to a humane way of decreasing the world's population would be to enforce something along the lines of a global one child policy. Which is deeply f*cked up in itself, because in the long term you'd have a much smaller population of an age to work supporting a larger geriatric one (us). So what would you do then? Cull the pensioners?

      The world is deeply screwed as things stand. But it's very hard to see any sane way of actually sorting it out. I'm inclined to get on with my own life, while things remain good, and live it as well (by which I mean at a good balance of fun and ethics) as I can for as long as I can. And most of the world, luckily, would more-or-less agree with me. So the party has a little while left, and with any luck, we may not make it through to see the morning after.

      --
      "What is freedom of expression? Without the freedom to offend, it ceases to exist." Salman Rushdie
  84. "So I cannot forgive" by hyacinthus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So JMS is "utterly incapable" of forgiveness, eh? What a terrible burden it must be for him, to carry all that resentment around with him. (Certainly this explains why he didn't take criticism of his show too well.)

    An incomparably finer storyteller in a different age once wrote some words which JMS should take to heart, they start like this: "The quality of mercy is not strained..."

    (Oh, and one more thing: "one of the finest storytellers of our age"? Your judgment is abandoning you, Bill. Just because he's an atheist doesn't make him a good writer. And anybody who could write "Thirdspace" isn't that fine a storyteller.)

    1. Re:"So I cannot forgive" by bill.sheehan · · Score: 3, Insightful
      No fault of yours, but I took his quote out of context. What he's talking about is being unable to forgive murder.

      I stand by my assessment of his skills as a storyteller, however. We're talking about writing for television, telling a story in four 12-minute blocks once a week, twenty-odd weeks a year, for five years. Aaron Sorkin is the only other writer I can think of who does it as well, and he's getting his material from the Washington Post.

      He gets no special credit from me for being an atheist. Where he does get credit is for embracing faith, spirituality, and religion in his stories and characters.

      I'm neither a writer nor an English literature major, but if I were to try and pick the one element that puts JMS (and Sorkin) at the top, it is their understanding of resonance. They (like you) refer to Shakespeare, Scripture, myths, and so forth. Those familiar with the references are rewarded by a much deeper understanding of the characters and stories. This is where writers like Brannon Braga (gack!) fail - they don't have the education and background in literature and end up relying on formula.

      In the end, it's all a matter of taste. I like JMS. I like Sorkin. I loathe Braga. I also like A&W Diet Root Beer, so what can you say?

  85. Space Precinct by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

    Officer: "Sorry, chief, I didn't mean to kill him..."
    Chief: "You shot him in a vital organ!"
    Officer: "How was I supposed to know his brain was in his armpit?"

    Space Precinct was a fun show. A lot of people don't know it, but of the people I've met, most of those liked it.

  86. Jeremiah SG-1 | Andromeda by LittleGuy · · Score: 1

    Actually, JMS said that there were two reasons he decided to do this new show:
    1) Complete creative control
    2) Big budget. He could make "his idea" of the show a reality.


    That's it. JMS already _had_ his SG-1/Andromeda with "Crusade". He is not going to have another tussle with the suits like with TNT.

    Older and wiser is the key.

    Unfortunately, Showtime is only available in digital on my cable system, so the analog Luddite cheapskate that I am, I'll wait until it hits syndication and/or video.

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
  87. I'm curious, but pessimistic by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

    After all, they managed to mess up Largo Winch as well. As a Belgian, I've been reading Largo and Jeremiah since the first albums came out, and they (and a lot of other Belgian 'comics' - though I find that word demeaning of the genre in this case) are truly excellent stories.

    When Largo aired overhere, at first I didn't even have a clue that it actually had anything to do with the books - the few previews I'd seen didn't seem to have any relation to them :)
    When I finally caught on, I tried to watch, but it was such junk compared to the books that I didn't last 5 minutes.

    Now they're airing Jeremiah. Just hearing the news made me go 'hmmmm', and now that I've seen the website, I'm not even going to watch the first episode - Luke bloody Perry as Jeremiah ? Goddess, you might just as well try to pass off Hulk Hogan as a ballerina ! I'm not even going to comment on Kurdy...

    The best advice I can give my non-Belgian fellow geeks is this : Get your hands on the original series of the books - learn Dutch or French if you have to, and read those. You'll be reading and re-reading them time and again, and you won't even think of the TV series.

    Just like Manga is a genre in and of itself, that cannot be duplicated by others (presumably due to the totally different culture/mindset), so are Belgian (and French) 'comics' an artform that is very hard to duplicate.

    Just as the name 'Manga' stems from the original japanese word for the art, I would suggest using something other that 'comics' to indicate this very specific genre, something derived of the dutch name 'strip' or the french 'Bande dessinee'. Both mean something like 'band of drawings', and stem from the original format these appeared in in the papers, as a band of several frames from the story - not unlike today's webcomics, but part of a larger story, not standalone skits.

    --
    What a depressingly stupid machine.
  88. Jeremiah, a New Series from B5 Creator, Debuts Sun by devic3 · · Score: 1

    Being as my name is Jeremiah I thought I was getting personalized articles here on /. Way to scare the coffee out of my this morning.
    I can tell you this much, if it directs attention from the "Jeremiah was a Bullfrog" song I'm vexed with I'll watch every day.

  89. Why Crusade sucked by Snotnose · · Score: 1

    OK, it's been a couple years now and I'm fuzzy on the details. But Crusade sucked because the TV executives wanted more action, less thinking. JMS was against this, he wanted to tell his typical stories. But the Powers That Be wanted gunfights. And it showed, big time. You could tell what was JMS, and what was some clueless executive, as you watched the show.

    I suspect details are at The Lurkers Guide

    And FWIW, I'm one who wishes it were on a regular network also. I don't get Showtime, and won't be subscribing just for 1 show. So I guess I'm either stuck with the edited version on regular TV in a year (like Outer Limits), or I can rent the DVDs a year after the fact (Sopranos, Sex and the City).

    snotnose

  90. Priests and monks and Minbari by Guppy · · Score: 1

    "...so I would write of priests and monks and Minbari..."

    BTW, something that fits in with the religious examples used in his comments, the word Minbari comes from minbar, the pulpit in a mosque.

  91. Re:"Survivors" more like the NZ "The Tribe" by ontangent · · Score: 1

    Seems much like the New Zealand series "The Tribe" there a plague wipes out all the parents, the kids in it act very well and it has run 4 series now on Channel 5 in the UK.
    http://213.86.54.16/tribeworld/
    http://www.c hannel5.co.uk/milkshake/the_tribe/spla sh.php

  92. Re:SciFi and Hormones... - Andromeda by d-e-w · · Score: 1

    For instance, one part that came out in the original series: Why are Vulcans so logical? Because they are extremely emotional, and tend to kill each other in their 'natural' state.

    Perhaps at least that tidbit came out on tonight's episode;


    It did--despite having enjoyed the show up until this point, I was mentally cringing after the previews for this episode. The story hinted at by the previews had little relation to the story that actually occured.

    The outcome of the story was that there is a reason for T'Pol (and by extension, Vulcans) to be as they are; that if you think the veiled arrogance they've been getting from the Vulcans is bad, what is possible could be worse. Perhaps some Vulcans (as possibly protrayed in the substory of the engineer with the dying father) can integrate their logic and emotions, but the point of the story was that it doesn't seem desirable/attainable for most other Vulcans (the male that ended up abusing T'Pol and tossing Archer across the room.) The risk of such exploration of emotion is very high, and the question is whether it is too high. The answer I believe the episode gave was a tentative yes.

    And we saw more of the dark side of Vulcans--perhaps the results of the barely under control Vulcan xenophobia hinted at in the original series, and more directly addressed in the novel Spock's World. The bizarre rumours about human behaviors which are detailed and enforced by Vulcan scientists, the way that these rumours have found a place in Vulcan society. They were dealt with in a light-hearted manner, by a character intelligent enough and curious enough to grasp that the stories might be a load of bullshit, but despite using discussion of these rumours to add some humour to the episode, what they point to is disturbing. Logic does not equal common sense. Vulcan logic does not prevent the development of stereotypes, nor the utterly illogical beliefs based upon them.

  93. Ever Hear of the tribe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey all,
    I'm a fan of this series from New Zeland called "the Tribe" and I was just wanting to let you know about it. I read your review of the showtime series Jeremiah and wanted to tell you that this plot seems like a rehash of the series the tribe. If you want more info about this series you can go to the website www.tribeworld.com .
    Also there are many fans of the series here in the US and one website devoted to the tribe is
    www.tribereddragon.com .
    It is a great series and I wanted to inform the rest of the world about it.
    Amit
    Aka Newtype on the Tribe Red Dragon BB.

  94. Wasn't this a movie? by klwood · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the movie 12 Monkeys to me. It does sound interesting though. Now I have to call and see how much Showtime is going to add to my Cable Bill!

  95. ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I just watched it, and it roxked.