Slashdot Mirror


Lab-Grown Meat Chunks - It's What's For Dinner

jonerik writes "CNN has this story on a NASA-funded project being conducted at Touro College in New York. In the experiment, segments of muscle are cut from large goldfish and placed in a vat of 'nutrient-rich liquid,' with the fish chunks growing by 16% within a week. It is hoped that future developments will permit astronauts on long-term missions to include fresh meat in their diet without having to bring along actual animals and fish into space. New Scientist is also reporting the story."

152 of 483 comments (clear)

  1. The Matrix? by dimer0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Getting closer to the "single-celled protiens packed with amino acids" that the guys from the Matrix were eating..

    Why don't we just skip all this inbetween crap and go straight to that? .. As long as it has a zesty orangle flavor, I'm all over it.

    1. Re:The Matrix? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but at least it doesn't taste like "Tasty Wheat".

      I figure one day there will be a big market for vat-grown filet mignon at one-third the price of the real thing. Of course, it will probably be cost-prohibitive for many years.

      Forget Soylent Green, just reach into the vat and scoop out a couple of pounds of boneless filets, grill and eat. I'm sure the animal rights fanatics would like that.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:The Matrix? by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Interesting
      > I figure one day there will be a big market for vat-grown filet mignon at one-third the price of the real thing. Of course, it will probably be cost-prohibitive for many years.

      I could go for that -- for non-steakeaters, the filet is a prized cut because it's tender. The filet's tenderness is a function of the fact that it's a muscle that doesn't get much use.

      Before I commit to a lunch of vat-grown meat, I'd like to know how the hunks of meat develop a grain or texture.

      Part of what makes "fish" meat good is the flaking and separation of the rows of flesh created by the intervening bones; likewise, the fibers of muscle that comprise the filet are organized in a grain. Steak are cut across the grain to allow any spices/marinades the maximum ability to penetrate the steak, and so that (after cooking), the chunks you cut off the steak are more easily-processed by the molars.

      Cuts of meat cut cross-grain (i.e. steaks) are also perceived as more tender because the grain is parallel to the direction of the motion of your teeth, facilitating the work of your molars. (This also applies to your incisors; if you're hungry enough, skip the fork, and if you're really hungry, skip the cooking.)

      I have no idea what kind of structure a large mass vat-grown steak (fish or beef) would develop, but I suspect it wouldn't be too hard to induce the cells to create their own structure by passing electric currents through the chunk as it forms, and/or to use a ceramic rod as a substitute for a bone to provide an initial alignment.

    3. Re:The Matrix? by ottffssent · · Score: 2


      Why don't we just skip all this inbetween crap and go straight to that [single-celled beasties]?


      Nasty little buggers have DNA in them that has to be filtered out. Of course, muscle tissue has DNA in it too, but the ratio of DNA to usable protein and other nutrients is much lower, and one can get an actual meal without stones (I think that's what it is you're trying to avoid here...) if it's made from meat rather than single-celled organisms. I assume that's what you meant by "single-celled proteins" which is obviously wrong. One way to tackle the problem is to take the excess DNA out (something about a gram per day max rings a bell), and the other way is to make something without that much in it to start with. A logical way to go about it would be to grow bigger cells (have you seen how much bigger animal tissue cells are than your average bacteria? That's why macrophages can eat 'em up by the hundreds.), and as it turns out meat is something people want and it has nice big cells too.

    4. Re:The Matrix? by GungaDan · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Induce the cells to create their own structure by passing electric currents through the chunk as it forms, and/or to use a ceramic rod as a substitute for a bone..."

      Woohoo! Inanimate carbon, er, ceramic rod! Is there anything this guy can't do?

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    5. Re:The Matrix? by borzwazie · · Score: 2
      here's another thought:


      Part of the reason that meat tastes good (to those of us that like it) is the fat content. Would vat-grown meat have fat content?


      If it didn't, it would be pretty dry and nasty-tasting.

      --

      "We apologize for the inconvenience."

    6. Re:The Matrix? by lkaos · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I could go for that -- for non-steakeaters, the filet is a prized cut because it's tender.

      Screw the traditional cuts of meat. Just by analyzing what makes meat taste good (as you point out in your post), we could make _even_ better tasting meats. It seems reasonable to me that in the future, meat the highest quality meats would be lab-grown.

      I don't know about the whole vegan thing though, the culture has to be organic in some way so animals would still be killed probably...

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    7. Re:The Matrix? by BlueJay465 · · Score: 2

      Just by analyzing what makes meat taste good (as you point out in your post), we could make _even_ better tasting meats. It seems reasonable to me that in the future, meat the highest quality meats would be lab-grown.

      Going slightly OT here, but isn't this what the majority of the agriculture industry doing this to some degree already? Talking to my roommate who is an agri major at our school, I found out the most common fruits and vegitables we find in the supermarket are direct clones of each other. The same corn plant that produces one stalk will be the exact same strain that another grower uses in the next state over.

      Now if they start using the same type of technique for producing meats, wouldn't it get rather bland after a long time? One of the best things is the slight differences in taste from one plate to the next, to compare one meal to the previous one. If everything tastes the same after awhile, it no longer becomes a treat to have a nice medium-rare filet mignon.

    8. Re:The Matrix? by PhotoGuy · · Score: 2
      I have no idea what kind of structure a large mass vat-grown steak (fish or beef) would develop, but I suspect it wouldn't be too hard to induce the cells to create their own structure by passing electric currents through the chunk as it forms, and/or to use a ceramic rod as a substitute for a bone to provide an initial alignment.
      I think it'd be simpler than that; post-processing of chopping it up minutely and repacking it in familiar textures should be the easy part. Sounds gross, but in practice, I bet it could be pretty good :-)

      -me
      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    9. Re:The Matrix? by lkaos · · Score: 2

      Since plants are also organic, you might be able to make the culture out of soybeans or something.

      So is coal but that doesn't mean you can grow meat in coal.

      The point is that since the culture medium is not inorganic, it must come from a living source. I would expect the /. crowd to be smart enough to figure out that the only via organic culture medium would come from some kind of animal by-product.

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    10. Re:The Matrix? by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      They could just retexture it. Have you ever had retextured turkey? (I'm sure you have. Deli turkey, cafeteria turkey, all retextured) When done well, retextured turkey is just about indistinguisable from regular turkey.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    11. Re:The Matrix? by spike+hay · · Score: 2

      Nasty little buggers have DNA in them that has to be filtered out.

      DNA itself isn't harmful in any way, shape or form. I don't care if you eat the DNA from anthrax bacteria. All the base pairs are broken down by enzymes. After your enzymes get through with it, it is only base pairs of adenine and thymine, or cytosine and guanine.
      In fact, we need DNA to provide us with valuable bases, phosphates, and deroxyribose so we can make more DNA for cell replication.

      One way to tackle the problem is to take the excess DNA out (something about a gram per day max rings a bell)

      Actualy, unless you are an anorexic, you are gettin WAY more than a gram of DNA a day. DNA is about 10% by weight of all living organisms. If you eat 2 pounds of food a day, you get over 3 ounces of DNA. Don't worry about it. You need it anyway.

      Anyway, I think using single-cell bacteria or other microorganisms as food is a great idea. In the future, perhaps we will be able to take raw protein and carbs from an abundant source such as kelp, and transform it into just about any food. Like in 2001: A Space Oddesey. We may have to work up somthing like that. The world population will be over 10 billion in 2050.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    12. Re:The Matrix? by lkaos · · Score: 2

      Actually you make tofu out of soybeans.

      The simply fact is that it far easier to provide essential proteins via meat than it is to provide them through plants.

      More importantly, we have evolved to eat meat. It is part of being human. Embrace it, enjoy it.

      --
      int func(int a);
      func((b += 3, b));
    13. Re:The Matrix? by Arker · · Score: 2

      Part of the reason that meat tastes good (to those of us that like it) is the fat content. Would vat-grown meat have fat content?

      Absolutely. In fact, care would likely have to be taken to stimulate the growing tissue relatively, working it to keep it from getting TOO fat. Depending of course on the initial genes selected, but every animal has fat, and conditions like being grown in a sea of nutrients, with no need to work for food, would surely cause any of us to get fat, no?

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  2. Oh great... I can see my next year spam header... by tcc · · Score: 3, Funny

    GROW YOUR PENIS 16% BIGGER IN JUST A WEEK WITH THIS NEW HIGH-TECH CREAM DEVELOPED BY NASA blablabla

    The scary part about this is... you know it will happen :).

    --
    --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
  3. First of all... by kaimiike1970 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This doesn't have to be for 'astronauts and the like'. How about hungry people right here on earth? I imagine these meat cubes would be easy to store and cook (due to the uniform size and shape) and no bones = no waste...

    --


    Do a google search before posting.
    1. Re:First of all... by Amarok.Org · · Score: 2

      And you think this will be less costly than the other method of meat production - you know, actually breeding the bloody fish?

      Uniform size and shape isn't an issue... just ask Van De Kamps or Gorton's.

      --
      -- "Other than that, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln?"
    2. Re:First of all... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

      The problem isn't food supply, it's distribution.

      --

      You're using her as bait, Master!

    3. Re:First of all... by GMontag · · Score: 2

      If you can get the armed thugs that are starving people right here on earth to stop:

      1. Attacking UN and other humanitarian organizations from delivering the PLENYFUL food we already have

      2. Stop the other nonsensical organizations that keep blaming the West for every ill in the world as they watch us attempt to feed the world

      then...

      You will not need this new process right here on earth and it can go into space where it belongs!

    4. Re:First of all... by Eryq · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It would probably be cheaper and easier to just give those hungry people soybean products, which:

      - contain protein (the best thing about meat),
      - can be textured/flavored in a number of ways, and
      - are a hell of a lot cheaper/easier to produce in large quantities than 'fish muscle in a can'.

      But in agreement, I do think it would be a great way to create meat products which are cruelty-free, untainted by BGH (one would hope), and free of bacteria picked up on the killing floors.

      --
      I'm a bloodsucking fiend! Look at my outfit!
    5. Re:First of all... by jheinen · · Score: 2

      "are a hell of a lot cheaper/easier to produce in large quantities than 'fish muscle in a can'"

      Why would it be easier to grow soybeans than to cultivate meat in a vat? It strikes me that you would need a lot more space to grow soybeans hydroponically that you would need to grow blobs of meat to get the same amount of protein. The meat would probably need less user intervention as well. Open the vat, cook, and eat. With soybeans there are other time and energy intensive processes that must occur in order to turn soybeans into those textured/flavored forms.

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    6. Re:First of all... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      It's a common misconception that there isn't enough food in the world to go around. According to a recently published book the name of which I've forgotten (sorry), world food output averages out to something like 4 pounds of food per day per person, worldwide. That statement is grossly oversimplified, of course, but the point is that the world, on average, has a pretty significant food surplus.

      The problem with hunger is that there are places in the world where one of two things is true: either the place is so far from arable lands that getting food to the people there is expensive and difficult, or the people who live there are so poor that they can't acquire the food that's already available to them.

      So finding new ways to produce food isn't really going to help the problem much, unless we reach a point where food production is so cheap that you can literally give food away to anybody that asks for it. (If you look at the segment of the world's population that is directly engaged in food production activities, it sinks in what an unthinkable economic disaster it would be to make food production that cheap. Something like three billion people would be immediately without income.)

      The real solution to the world's hunger problem is going to be one of distribution. If we can get food from Buttwad, Iowa, to Mogadishu, Somalia, for fractions of a cent per pound, the hunger problem suddenly gets a lot easier to solve.

    7. Re:First of all... by MouseR · · Score: 2

      There was a Dilbert anime episode where he accidentally discovered a growing meat substitute which, on top of it, resembled a cow furr, which he thought could be mass-produced and sold to poor countries like Elbonia (the mud-covered country).

      Anyhow, from that story, growing meat substitute would be unmarketable.

    8. Re:First of all... by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      i've read alot of things along the same lines, in (recent) high school text books even (not alot, but some). most talk about how the kansas/plain states are the "breadbasket of the world", and that area alone could feed/meet the entire world's supply of carbohydrates/sustinance. and that doesn't even count california's orange and fig crops, and god knows how many acres of untilled land in montana, where the government PAYS farmers not to produce more food, as to keep prices about right.

      get the farmers to do more soy farming, package the soy up in 5 gal. square plastic buckets (plentiful, we used to pick them up from behind grocery stores, clean out the "frozen" egg whites, and use them for packing food/clothing for scouting trips, and as "cheap" drybags for boyscout/personal canoe trips.

      pack these buckets up, attach an extremely cheap parachte to the top, and an oversized kazoo on the outside so people don't accidentally get hit by these things falling @ ~10-15mph out of the sky. oh yeah, and 2 sporks per bucket, preferably near the top. fly them to somolia in our currently sitting on the ground fleet of b-2/b-52 bombers, and toss them out the back as they fly over impovershed countries.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    9. Re:First of all... by jheinen · · Score: 2

      The ingredients for soy might be simpler, however the real limiting factor in space flight is going to be space and weight. The question is, for a given volume of space, which method returns a product with the greatest nutritional density? I think the meat vats would be more efficient in this regard. Also, I don't think the meat vat compounds are that exotic. It's just a nutrient bath, which could be prepackaged before flight. The whole system could be self-maintining. It might even be possible to package the nutrients in a powder form, so you just add water and you get nutrient soup for you meat blobs.

      Question - would astronauts name their growing meat blobs and feel affection toward them?

      --
      -Vercingetorix
      "Necessitas non habet legem." -St. Augustine
    10. Re:First of all... by colmore · · Score: 2

      You're forgetting the bizarre engineering constraints that NASA faces.

      It's cheaper for them to use 1 pound of $10,000 material than 10 pounds of free material

      Lifting a hydroponic greenhouse large enough to sustain a whole ship's crew into orbit would be ridiculously expensive, not to even mention the inertia it would add, making actually getting anywhere that much harder.

      so yes, a 100 pound multi-million dollar experimental meat vat makes a lot more sense than a cheap, regular, garden.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    11. Re:First of all... by RFC959 · · Score: 2
      And, honestly... do you think that someone who can master all the necessery skills to be an astronaut can't do this?
      Come on. There's a big damn difference between "learning how to fly the space shuttle" and "changing what foods you like to eat" and you damn well know it. Yes, you can acclimate yourself to things, but this is not necessarily desirable, for reasons I'll go into below...
      Sure, it may be harder for some, but astronauts should be dedicated to their work. If you won't go to space without your BigMac, you are not fit to be an astronaut.
      OK, so if this applies to meat, why doesn't it apply to everything? Why don't you tell them, "If you won't go to space without any reading material, you are not fit to be an astronaut"? After all, they don't really _need_ it. How about, "If you won't go to space without anything but flavorless (but nutritious) paste from a tube, you are not fit to be an astronaut"?

      Fact is, morale is important, and it's only going to get more so as trips get longer. Keeping people happy is an important factor in getting them to work well, and if we want space travel to ever be anything more than the domain of a very select few, we've got to work at making it less of a chore. If I were given the opportunity to go to Mars, but I couldn't have any meat for the whole trip...I'd do it, but I'd be pretty cranky about having to eat mother-loving SOY PROTEIN the whole damn time.

  4. hydroponic meat? by myc · · Score: 5, Interesting

    would any vegans care to comment on what your views would be on "hydroponic" meat? That is, meat grown from cloned cells and/or DNA, instead of that harvested from live animals. I think that hydroponic meat will be the wave of the future. "Growing" meat using livestock is simply not environmentally cost effective.

    --
    NO CARRIER
    1. Re:hydroponic meat? by ari{Dal} · · Score: 2

      Vegetarian-approved meat.
      Now there's a fascinating concept.
      It might help with the moral vegetarians (who, i'm sorry but sometimes are just totally obsessive), but not much with the ones who just don't like meat.
      Sounds weird... but most of the vegetarians I know fall into the latter category. They're just grossed out by the taste and texture of meat.
      On a personal note, this article turned my stomach.. I'm allergic to seafood and the thought of chunks of goldfish brewing in nutrient broth makes my stomach churn.

      --
      Moral indignation is jealousy with a halo - H. G. Wells
    2. Re:hydroponic meat? by mattdm · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd probably be just like tofu.

      Hmm. Bringing new meaning to the phrase "you are what you eat", I see.

    3. Re:hydroponic meat? by Schlemphfer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, since I publish Vegan.com, that request for comment seems tailor made for me.

      You know, I'm not sure there are any ethical considerations to growing "hydroponic" meat. The stuff would not have a brain or the ability to feel pain and fear any more than plants do. It'd be creepy, for sure. But not nearly as creepy as having to kill an animal back here on earth.

      The better question is, why would NASA want to create this stuff in the first place? It's obvious that, barring undreamable technology breakthroughs, putting livestock into space is unworkable -- sheesh...it's practically unworkable keeping livestock on earth once the population starts approaching 10 billion ;)

      One thing that's also obvious is that space food is gonna suck...no matter if it's vegan or made from synthetic veal calves. There are some superb vegan recipes available now, and I think NASA would be better advised to experiment with some of the great flavors that contemporary vegan cooking can produce. It's not like the 1970s, when plant-based foods were blobs of tasteless brown rice and tofu. I think this NASA meat idea is a holdover from 1950s thinking, when everyone thought meat had to be the center of the meal, for both taste and nutrition.

      I'd like to see NASA devote its (too scarce) resources to making plant-based foods taste fantastic in a space environement. It sure beats the thought of microwaved synthetic meat. Spending money developing weird meat substitutes seems like a gross misappropriation of this agency's funds, when better and cheaper food alternatives are available. After all, shouldn't Nasa's money, as much as possible, go to space exploration?

      --
      I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    4. Re:hydroponic meat? by sane? · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Simple really, would you like to share a confined space with someone who only would only eat beans and pulses?

      I mean really ?

      Confined space; says it all really.

    5. Re:hydroponic meat? by EFGearman · · Score: 4, Informative

      1) Meat is not unhealthy. A balanced diet is the one of the keys factors to a long and healthy life. As a matter of fact, meats contain several key protiens that the body uses in maintaining healthy skin, hair, and nails.

      2) Fats are a useful dietary substance, containing a good amoung of 'food energy'. But like with all things, it is important not to consume too much.

      3) Cholesterol, which comes in 'good' and 'bad' forms, does exist in plants. And eating just fruits and vegatables without understanding the amounts and levels of plant cholesterols can be unhealthy as well.

      Eric Gearman
      --

      --
      Atomic batteries to power! Turbines to speed!
    6. Re:hydroponic meat? by Chundra · · Score: 2

      I don't know which gives me a stronger feeling of disgust: Classifying myself as a lacto-ovo vegetarian, or as someone who eats slabs of lab grown flesh.

      Me, I'm a vagitarian. :-P (|)

    7. Re:hydroponic meat? by ocelotbob · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The better question is, why would NASA want to create this stuff in the first place?

      Face it, people like meat. To a large portion of the population, it tastes good, and is an easy way to get a large amount of protein.

      it's practically unworkable keeping livestock on earth once the population starts approaching 10 billion ;)

      I don't think so. You do realize that right now an incredibly large amount of food goes to waste due to a number of sociopolitical reasons. I'd say that a huge amount of hunger is caused by corruption, not livestock.

      There are some superb vegan recipes available now, and I think NASA would be better advised to experiment with some of the great flavors that contemporary vegan cooking can produce...I think this NASA meat idea is a holdover from 1950s thinking, when everyone thought meat had to be the center of the meal, for both taste and nutrition.

      I partially agree with you here. Most meals for long space trips are going to be plant-based, and justifiably so. Once again, though, most people like meat, and so a low-impact way to create something that will more than likely be an occasional treat will be a great morale booster.

      I'd like to see NASA devote its (too scarce) resources to making plant-based foods taste fantastic in a space environement. It sure beats the thought of microwaved synthetic meat. Spending money developing weird meat substitutes seems like a gross misappropriation of this agency's funds, when better and cheaper food alternatives are available. After all, shouldn't Nasa's money, as much as possible, go to space exploration?

      The people working for NASA are no fools, they're not putting all their eggs in one basket. Sure this one research lab is working on ways to create meat suitable for space travel, but the lab down the hall is probably working on good tasting vegetable-based meals. It's all a matter of personal preference and taste.

      Besides, there are people who do develop allergies to plant-based proteins as well; I think you'd agree that it's a good idea to have a contingency plan in place before any problems develop. This, if anything else, could be a contingency plan if someone were to develop an allergy to the primary protein source - just move them over to a fish-based diet and let the mission continue without many worries about allergic reactions.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    8. Re:hydroponic meat? by RobertAG · · Score: 2

      I would imagine it's because that meat is higher in energy, pound for pound. With spacecraft, weight/storage considerations are of paramount importance.

      When you talk about sending people to live in space (either in the ISS or on a trip to Mars), you want to be able to pack as much nutrition into as small a space as possible. With launch costs somewhere around $10000 per pound, taking several extra pounds in vegetables means NOT taking several extra pounds in fuel, air or equipment more so than it means spending more money.

      When you're in as hostile an environment as space, survival dictates what you do. Tastiness takes a back seat to that.

      As for the ethical considerations of killing animals, you could just as easily take tissue samples. As for the nutritional downsides of eating meat, that's where genetic engineering (still in the future) comes in.

    9. Re:hydroponic meat? by Preposterous+Coward · · Score: 2
      No, cholesterol does not exist in plants. Eating just fruits and vegetables can be unhealthy if you don't balance them carefully to make sure you get proper amounts of the eight amino acids that the human body needs but can't make on its own.

      I'm not a vegetarian, BTW.

      --

      "Biped! Good cranial development. Evidently considerable human ancestry."
    10. Re:hydroponic meat? by GTRacer · · Score: 2
      +1, Insightfully Funny

      There's a reson I don't go to the bathroom for #2 purposes whilst at work...

      ...there's nothing like going into a bathroom right after someone who had 2 double-bacon cheeseburgers for lunch and washed them down with Pabst.

      Ahh yes, that was it...

      GTRacer
      - It's bad enough standing at a urinal and having to make stupid small talk with a clueless V.P....

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    11. Re:hydroponic meat? by cperciva · · Score: 5, Funny

      it's practically unworkable keeping livestock on earth once the population starts approaching 10 billion

      Once the population reaches 10 billion, we don't have to *keep* livestock any more. It's already there. 10 billion worth, in fact.

    12. Re:hydroponic meat? by JohnGalt42 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Meat is not unhealthy. A balanced diet is the one of the keys factors to a long and healthy life. As a matter of fact, meats contain several key protiens that the body uses in maintaining healthy skin, hair, and nails.

      There are several problems with your statement. First, here in the midwest, most meat eaters do not eat balanced diets. Meat quickly becomes the focal point of the meal to the exclusion of virtually everything else.

      Second, research has shown that you do not need nearly as much protein in your diet as you have been led to believe. Most of the research in this field has been funded by the meat and dairy industries (see "Diet for a New America" by John Robbins for some excellent sources). Regardless, all forms of protein required by humans are available in plant forms.
      Third, meat is unhealthy when consumed in normal portions. It contains large amounts of saturated fat and is high in cholestoral. The rate of heart disease is 3-5 times higher in meat eaters than in strict vegetarians (vegans).


      Cholesterol, which comes in 'good' and 'bad' forms, does exist in plants. And eating just fruits and vegatables without understanding the amounts and levels of plant cholesterols can be unhealthy as well.

      Unfortunately, that is a blatantly false statement. Cholesterol only exists in two plant products: palm oil and coconut milk.

    13. Re:hydroponic meat? by wedg · · Score: 2

      Strangely enough, synthetic meat is the same meat as regular grown meat. Hopefully they'll perfect it.

      What I think it mostly is directed to is the idea of getting a little variety. If I were stuck in space for 6 months, I wouldn't want to be living off freeze dried neopolitan icecream and protein paste.

      I think NASA would be better advised to experiment with some of the great flavors that contemporary vegan cooking can produce.

      Oh yeah. You'd be amazed at how incredibly difficult it is to do something like a stirfry without gravity. Or even cook a piece of tofu (why would it even stay against the pan? They couldn't velcro it). It's one of those fundamental problems that makes it so bloody difficult to cook anything resembling real food for astronauts. They basically end up living off of the equivalent of frozen dinners and ramen.

      --
      Jake
      Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
    14. Re:hydroponic meat? by EFGearman · · Score: 2

      Me:
      "Cholesterol, which comes in 'good' and 'bad' forms, does exist in plants. And eating just fruits and vegatables without understanding the amounts and levels of plant cholesterols can be unhealthy as well."

      Him:
      "Unfortunately, that is a blatantly false statement. Cholesterol only exists in two plant products: palm oil and coconut milk."

      Yes and no. I wasn't attempting to be misleading. It's what happens when you code and think about food at the same time. Plants contain fats.

      Borrowed from Indiana University Health Center Page (and no, I can't include a link, as I went through AskJeeves to get there, and I can't break the link out.

      Saturated fat is the main dietary component associated with raising cholesterol. Saturated fats are found mainly in animal products and the tropical oils. The following foods are high in saturated fat and should be used sparingly in the diet: beef fat, lamb, pork fat (lard), butter, cream, whole milk dairy products (whole milk and cheeses) coconut oil, palm oil, palm kernel oil, and cocoa butter

      Monounsaturated fats are the best fats to consume. They can help decrease total cholesterol without affecting HDL cholesterol. The two fats highest in monounsaturated fats are canola and olive oil.

      Polyunsaturated fat tends to lower total cholesterol but high intake has been associated with increased risk for cancer. It is recommended that these fats be consumed in moderation. Examples of fats high in polyunsaturated include: corn, cottonseed, sunflower, safflower, and soybean oil.

      Hydrogenated fats are formed by adding hydrogen to unsaturated fats. This makes the fat more firm and makes the fat more durable. Hydrogenation increases the saturation and therefore makes it more harmful to the body. Therefore limiting the use of hydrogenated oils is recommended. Hydrogenated oils are commonly found in fast foods, margarine, peanut butter, and snack crackers.

      Eric Gearman
      --

      --
      Atomic batteries to power! Turbines to speed!
    15. Re:hydroponic meat? by btellier · · Score: 2

      Really? Funny how they can make things like corn oil and olive oil.

    16. Re:hydroponic meat? by btellier · · Score: 2

      BZZZT. As I stated in an above post many vegetables have fat (and thus cholesterol). Ever cook with Olive Oil? Ever eat an avocado? From an above poster:

      Nutritional Value: Florida avocados are lower in calories and fat than other varieties and are rich in vitamin A and potassium. However, avocados are one of the highest sources of fat (unsaturated) in the fruit and vegetable group. One-fourth of a Florida avocado (approx. lb) contains: 85 calories, 6.8 gm fat, 1.3 gm saturated fat, 1,2 fm protein, 6.8 gm carbohydrate, 371 mg potassium 1.6 gm fiber, 465 IU vitamin A. An interesting nutritional value comparison of Florida and California avocados showed for 3.5 oz of each: calories - FL avocado 112 calories, CA avocado 177 calories; fat grams FL avocado 8.87 gm, CA avocado 17.3 gm. Other nutrients were of similar value between the two.

    17. Re:hydroponic meat? by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      Take a look at the nutrition labels on your corn and olive oil.

      "A cholesterol free food."

    18. Re:hydroponic meat? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Um, dunno about you, but I lift weights. I enjoy lifting large, heavy things. And in order to do so and thrive, I need to consume 1+g of protein per day per pound of bodyweight. That as it stands right now is 250g/day.

      Notwithstanding the fact that soy protein has a crap amino acid balance, and the fact that in order to get any reasonable amount of protein I'd have to become one of those guys who can eat 50 hot dogs in 5 minutes to cram that much bean into my face per meal, I am NOT eating that much ESTROGENIC substance. That's right, ESTROGENIC.

      Meat, on the other hand, builds heme levels, red blood, you know, the kind that gives you a real man's build.

      So carry on with your tofu ice cream or whatever. Just by breathing, you're killing billions of bacteria. You can't win. As far as I am concerned, it is evil to cause suffering to an animal. But rearing it, caring for it, and then SUDDENLY killing it is not evil.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    19. Re:hydroponic meat? by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      ...it...is an easy way to get a large amount of protein.

      But remember, we're talking about hydroponic space meat. They are growing meat by immerse it in fluid that contains nutrients.

      Why not drink the fluid?

      There are taste concerns, of course, but setting those aside, all you are doing is wasting energy - converting sugars to CO2 and H2O. 2nd law of thermodynamics tells you this, and any student of ecology (SURELY a required discipline for anyone studying long-term space trips, since you have to build a small ecology) could tell you that there is energy and nutrient loss everytime something (ie fish slabs) eats something else (ie broth).

      Drink the broth.

    20. Re:hydroponic meat? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      RE: Third, the idea that you need to consume 1+ grams of protein per pound of bodyweight to maintain weight and thrive is a myth.

      Well, if you sit around all day doing nothing, sure. But WEIGHT TRAINING ATHLETES participating in STRENUOUS EXERCISE have been shown in RECENT studies to need AT LEAST 1g/1lb bodyweight PER DIEM.

      RE: scientific calculations fall within the range of "2.5% of our total daily calories up to a high estimate of over 8%" (Robbins 173). Who benefits from higher estimates of protein needs?

      Weightlifters, powerlifters, football players, manual laborers.... people who don't sit around on hemp mats all day living off rice and ambient moisture in the air.

      RE:Fourth, meat is far from being the only source of large amounts of protein.

      I agree. I prefer fish. It's leaner. And chicken. And whey protein, which is 92% protein. http://www.proteinfactory.com

      RE: Spinach, for example, provides 49% of its calories from protein.

      Excellent! But you have to understand that just saying "protein" isn't enough. There are lots of amino acids, and you have to have them all.

      RE: At this point, it truly isn't known whether or not these theories hold true for humans, since most of the related research has been funded by the meat/dairy industries.

      So what? So long as the research is sound...

      RE: That may be true fom some soy protein supplements, but there is absolutely no basis for that when examining natural plant sources.
      In "Diet for a Small Planet", Francis Moore Lappe demonstrated that eating combinations of vegetables can easily provide the same pattern of amino acids as found in animal sources.

      I don't have the time and energy to go out and eat fifty kinds of bean. A steak tastes better, is more filling, provides heme iron, balanced amino acid profiles...

      RE:Frankly, I'm not sure where you got this idea.

      Research. That's why soy protein is out of favor with weightlifters. They're trying to max testosterone and be manly, not mince around with tons more estrogen in their systems. Maybe that's why vegans are more in touch with their feelings, and don't know how to use a car in reverse gear.

      RE: Indeed, it is very healthy for women to consume and has been shown to help reduce the risks of breast and cervical cancer,

      So's the birth control pill, which is pure estrogen and progesterone.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    21. Re:hydroponic meat? by Wolfier · · Score: 2
      I'm not sure there are any ethical considerations to growing "hydroponic" meat.
      The stuff would not have a brain or the ability to feel pain and fear any more than plants do.
      For more information on this, I recommend the following lyrics: Carrot Juice Is Murder
    22. Re:hydroponic meat? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      I'm not trolling you, I'm just curious.

      What's your max for the bench press/squat/deadlift/snatch/clean and jerk?

      Any other stats?

      Interested to hear the result

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    23. Re:hydroponic meat? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      RE: I'll do my best to ignore the flamebait in your response...

      But you won't succeed (see below)

      RE: You need to look at who sponsored the studies you are referring to.

      You don't. All you need to do is look at the science. And strangely enough, even back in the 20s, weight trainers realised if they upped their protein intake, they'd also up their body size. Grimek et. al. did this. They drank gallons of milk, ate tons of meat and fish, and bulked up.

      RE:Since you don't cite a paticular source,

      Because I don't have the time or trouble to remember it. It wasn't the egg council in the 20s, though.

      RE: In fact, I am a 150#,

      That's proved vegan=anemic stick boy better than I ever could

      RE: vegan triathlete; in the summer I generally bike 10-30 miles a day, swim 1/2-1 mile every other day, run 5 miles every other day, as well as basic weight training every day for my upper body.

      Dutch, you're not a hardcore weight trainer. You're mostly an ENDURANCE ATHLETE. And guess what? You guys need a more vegetable based diet. Vegetarians do WAY better in endurance sport. But weightlifting, powerlifting etc is NOT an endurace sport.

      RE: Most people do not need really high intake levels of protein.

      Nor did I say they did.

      RE: Most people who want to increase their protein intake by 30% generally increase the consumption of meat, dairy and eggs. If a supposed study suggests that people need a 30% increase in their protein intake, who benefits? The meat, dairy and egg industries benefit because people go out and buy 30% more of their products then before.

      Actually, I get most of my protein from supplements.
      RE: If a study is published by a research group funded and supported by these industries, it becomes very difficult to believe that the study does not have an inherent bias.

      Look up "ad hominem". Then get back to me.
      RE: And as I said before, you can derive any and all of these amino acids from plant sources.

      Or you can just eat meat like a normal person.

      RE:The research on rats simply doesn't transfer to humans.

      Gosh, then I guess all animal testing is pointless!

      RE: Classic food combinations include: rice and beans, tortilla and beans, bulgar wheat and garbanzo beans, pita bread with hummus (made from garbanzo beans), rice chapatis with dal (lentils), soy with rice, soy with millet, and soy with barley. Instead of eating a steak, have two bean burritos.

      I have cubicle mates, a life, and that's too much starch. I have type O blood, that stuff makes me ill.

      RE: Furthermore, it's just not healthy to eat a steak and nothing else. This is especially true of someone with an active lifestyle. Amino acids should not be your only concern. A person also needs to be heavily concerned with their intake of other nutrients: Vitamin A, Vitamin C, the Vitamin B complex, Calcium, Iron, etc. Eating a steak does not provide you with necessary levels of all of these nutrients.

      I didn't say that either.

      RE: I don't know if you were abused or neglected as a child or if you have difficulty satisfying your partner sexually,

      Told you so. I knew it :) (see above)

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    24. Re:hydroponic meat? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > First, here in the midwest, most meat eaters do not eat balanced diets. Meat quickly becomes the focal point of the meal to the exclusion of virtually everything else.

      True.

      > Second, research has shown that you do not need nearly as much protein in your diet as you have been led to believe. Most of the research in this field has been funded by the meat and dairy industries (see "Diet for a New America" by John Robbins for some excellent sources).

      You mean

      Virtually all the advocates of "alternative" medicine share this view. In Reclaiming our Health, John Robbins, a New Age devotee, vegan, and animal rights activist, states that "many conditions, including most forms of cancer, viral infections, allergic and autoimmune disorders, and most chronic degenerative diseases . . . are more effectively handled with alternative approaches." This is statement is startling, but he provides no evidence to back it up.
      ...that John Robbins?

      I look forward to the Quackwatch review of Reclaiming Our Health.

      (Before you accuse the maintainer of quackwatch.com as being some kind of protein industry co-conspirator, he's just as hard on the low-carbohydrate diets (e.g. Atkins Diet) as he is on other forms of quackery.

      > Third, meat is unhealthy when consumed in normal portions. It contains large amounts of saturated fat and is high in cholestoral. The rate of heart disease is 3-5 times higher in meat eaters than in strict vegetarians (vegans).

      But you just finished telling us that most meat-eaters don't eat balanced diets! So even if there were such a thing as a "normal portion" (odd, I'd define "normal portion" as "that portion of meat which makes a balanced diet - it's rather tautological, no?), you've just finished telling us that the typical carnivore overconsumes it anyways. So of course they're not going to have a normal heart disease profile.

      Perhaps the risk of heart disease among meat-eaters is higher, not due to something inherent in meat, (a normal portion of which causes ventricular fibrillations!), but due to other factors in the lifestyle of the typical carnivore -- such as an unbalanced diet, or a higher tendency of health-conscious people to do other things that reduce the risk of heart disease.

      When was the last time you saw a vegan come home from work to plunk himself down in front of the TV before lighting up a cigarette, cracking open a six-pack of beer, and munching on a bag of potato chips for dessert?

      While I'll agree that the typical American doesn't eat a balanced diet, if that's the strength of his evidence, John Robbins is hardly a source to be taken seriously.

    25. Re:hydroponic meat? by Sabriel · · Score: 2
      But remember, we're talking about hydroponic space meat. They are growing meat by immerse it in fluid that contains nutrients.

      Why not drink the fluid?

      There are taste concerns, of course, but setting those aside, all you are doing is wasting energy -

      Ask yourself what eventually happens when all you do is drink liquids...
    26. Re:hydroponic meat? by Decimal · · Score: 2

      1) Meat is not unhealthy. A balanced diet is the one of the keys factors to a long and healthy life. As a matter of fact, meats contain several key protiens that the body uses in maintaining healthy skin, hair, and nails.

      Right. As simple as it may seem, a lot of people don't understand that humans are *supposed* to be omnivores. Not herbavores, not carnivors, omnivores. It's the diet that humans evolved on. If eating meat did happen to be extremely unhealthy and thus impaired our chances for survival, we would have abandoned meat as soon as developments like farming allowed us to.

      Strangely and disturbing enough, the healthiest meat that a human could find to eat would be from other humans. I wonder if several thousand years down the line, a product called HumoBurger (Lab Grown!) will be available in stores.

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
  5. Re:reminds me of something by majestyk2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dunno, but I read a story once about a single fish and a loaf of bread expanding to feed a whole community...wait, that was the Bible.

  6. cut out the middle man! by totro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why don't the astronauts just drink the "nutrient-rich liquid" and save some effort?

  7. For how long? by bravehamster · · Score: 2
    cut from large goldfish and placed in a vat of 'nutrient-rich liquid,'

    And how will these astrounauts replenish this supply of 'nutrient-rich liquid'? I don't know how long one vat will keep a piece of goldfish flesh growing, but you're gonna run outta nutrients sooner or later. There are some things you can't get from recycling your own feces. Let's face it: any manned long-term space missions are gonna be munching on algae steak.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:For how long? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      The idea is to get "fresh" meat into the mission.
      algae steak would also require a vat of nutrients.
      Your going to have to take the nutrients with you some how, cearly a vat of netrients(algea or otherwise)is a very eonomical way to go.

      Of course you could always just take a bunch of chikens with you, but there noice will give you away to the fire giants..oh wait, thats DnD..

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  8. Why not use full grown cattle? by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    I thought if you made a large trip in space, having cattle would be like a biosphere. You would grow plants and tend animals, which would also keep you sane doing routine chores.

    And wouldnt you want to have the ship spin, so you can have some artifical gravity? Then you could slaughter the animals, and not worry about the mess.

    BTW, slaughtering might sound bad, but doesnt stop you from eating at McDonalds.

    1. Re:Why not use full grown cattle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Would that be the first herd shot around the world?

      Sorry, could not resist!

    2. Re:Why not use full grown cattle? by gatekeep · · Score: 2, Informative

      >> BTW, slaughtering might sound bad, but doesnt stop you from eating at McDonalds

      Actually, for quite a few of us it does. Scroll down to the part about vegetarians and vegans.

  9. Just what I've always wanted. by Kibo · · Score: 2

    Spam 2.0, another white meat.

    --
    --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  10. Oh yeah!! by Havokmon · · Score: 3, Funny
    You think this "Nutrient rich" fluid for growing muscles is just for food... Wait till the spammers get a hold of this!

    Forwarded mail follows:

    From: bigwhopper@yahoo.com
    Subject: Increase your penis size by %16 in one week!!

    Ever take a shower? Now you can give your penis a bath, and have it grow 16% in one week!! How does it work? We don't know! But we're all REALLY happy around here!

    WARNING! Don't leave penis unattended. Potential side affects include: Better Sex, Longer Sex, and mothers no longer saying "There's plenty of room in the crotch."

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  11. Practical Growth Limits? by RobertAG · · Score: 2

    Aren't there limits to how many times an animal cell can divide, before it just stops dividing, lives out it's life and dies?

    IANAB (I am not a biochemist), but there have been different articles on this subject over the years. Wouldn't that be an impediment to large scale implementation of this?

    Just asking....

    1. Re:Practical Growth Limits? by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, I had the same problem. There are two ways around this that I can think of:

      a) take multiple biopsies of animals and grow from that, as the animals are still alive and healthy, most of the ethical issues go away.

      b) find a cancerous growth and grow from that- cancers are immortal

      I have a feeling that b) is pretty safe; but I have a stronger feeling that nobody would allow you to feed fish cancers to humans, even though humans immune system would deal with it with ease.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  12. They'll tell you it's "Fish" by maggard · · Score: 2
    Sure they'll tell the folks it's "fish", bit it'll really be Soylent Green.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  13. Kibo has prior art on this one by caffeineboy · · Score: 2

    Anyone who reads a.r.k will see this as pepsico finally admitting that they have Animal 57

    This is freaking creepy. Maybe less creepy than Quorn, which is made from slime mold (mycoprotien) but it's far too creepy for me.

    --
    +++ ATH0 +++
  14. no waste? by donutz · · Score: 2

    The CNN article makes it sound as if this technique produces no waste whatsoever. Now correct me if I'm wrong, but won't these muscle cells be generating plenty of waste as they use up the nutrients provided to them. Granted, you won't have fecal matter to dispose of, but you're still going to need to filter the cell waste out of this serum that the muscles are grown in...

  15. Red or White by blamanj · · Score: 3, Funny

    This presents a serious problem. Since they started with fish muscle tissue, you might assume that the resulting "tissue" was fish, but since it was grown in "a vat of fetal bovine serum", would that make it beef?

    What to serve, red wine or white?

    1. Re:Red or White by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      Does it matter? It'll still *taste* like chicken.

    2. Re:Red or White by sharkey · · Score: 2

      And can Catholics eat it on Fridays or not?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  16. Miracle my eye!! by crawdaddy · · Score: 2, Funny

    So THAT'S how Jesus did it! Now I'm all anxious for the scientific procedure that shows us how to turn water into wine!

    -Craw

    1. Re:Miracle my eye!! by glwtta · · Score: 2

      use the water to water your grape vinces, press out the juice from the grapes, store the juice in wooden barrels for a while - voila, water to wine!

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  17. I hope that McDonalds doesn't see this by wackysootroom · · Score: 3, Funny

    When burgers are dropped on the floor, the meat is usually thrown away. Maybe instead they will break them up and put them into the 'Burger Vat'.

    Oh well, the food can't get *that* much worse, can it?

    1. Re:I hope that McDonalds doesn't see this by Calle+Ballz · · Score: 2

      Thrown away? You've never worked fast food before. I'll just say don't be so trusting next time you bite into your 1/4 pounder w/cheese... you have no idea where it's been.

  18. Vegetarian, but not vegan... by GeekLife.com · · Score: 2

    People are vegetarian (and vegan) for lots of reasons. Cloning clearly would not help solve any of the health problems associated with meat-eating.

    It does seem to help solve a lot of the ethical problems, although there are definitely animals being killed to research the technology, as well as initial animals that are killed to begin the meat farms.

    Most likely, the crossover between the animal rights crowd and the anti-food-modification crowd is large enough that there won't be much of a decrease in veganism/vegetarianism.

  19. The real question is... by nochops · · Score: 2

    The real question is:
    What do you get if you let the meat continue to grow?

    With 16% growth in 1 week, I wonder what you'd have in a year? A huge blob of "living" meat, or something similar to a complete fish?

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
  20. Re:reminds me of something by maggard · · Score: 2
    Wasn't there a Science Fiction story in which a major plot element was a large hunk of chicken flesh grown to feed a community?

    It's a SF cliché; any number of stories refer to vat-grown meat blobs. Asimov, Heinlein, Bova, Niven, Pournelle, lots of folks have this in stories from the 1950's on, maybe before.

    --
    I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  21. Re:reminds me of something by MythoBeast · · Score: 2

    Yes. I think the Title was The Merchant's War by Fredrick Pohl.

    An advertising executive gets kidnapped and shanghi'd into working at a factory in a third world country where they tend to a great mass of chicken muscle, which is fed by a lot of pipes.

    One of my favorites - it identifies what would happen in a world where advertisers were let run rampant.

    Mythological Beast

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  22. Tofu?! by Cadre · · Score: 3, Funny
    eat tofu?

    Eww

    Sorry. :-) I couldn't resist...

    --
    All editorial writers ever do is come down from the hill after the battle is over and shoot the wounded.
    1. Re:Tofu?! by Chundra · · Score: 2

      Tofu can be good if it's prepared well. Chinese Buddhist vegetarian style is generally regarded as the best. It's pretty much indistinguishable from real meat, including the texture. Unfortunately, most people eat it in the slimy, scrambled egg style...which is definitely an acquired taste.

    2. Re:Tofu?! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      I recommend only getting packages of 'extra-firm' tofu. Cut them into cubes or strips and fry them in some peanut oil over medium-high heat until golden-brown (this takes a while). Add to your favorite recipie.

      It comes out better in flavor and texture than the mystery chicken that a lot of restaurants put in oriental dishes.

  23. What's the point?? by multipartmixed · · Score: 2

    Okay, so you take some fish up, and it gains in mass by 14%.

    But, you also took up a bunch of cow abortions, which lost the equivalent mass, if not more.

    So, where's the savings? Seems to be they'd be better off shipping up 14% more freeze-dried goldfish.

    During launch, you put in a big box full of ice. After launch, you tie the fish to the outside of the spaceship (like beer, when ice fishing), melt the ice to use as drinking water, and collapse the box into a corner somewhere.

    Seems pretty straightforward to me.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:What's the point?? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      you relized there is no tempurature in space?
      and when the particle from a star hit it, it will get hot?
      the advantage ot this is, its easier to maintain a vat of nutrients.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:What's the point?? by mikeee · · Score: 2

      you also took up a bunch of cow abortions, which lost the equivalent mass, if not more.

      If the lost mass *isn't* exactly equivalent, then this research is definately worth NASA's time...

    3. Re:What's the point?? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      But, you also took up a bunch of cow abortions, which lost the equivalent mass, if not more.

      The final aim of the project is to grow these in a mushroom based growth medium. Mushrooms could possibly feed on the waste product of both the humans and the growth vats, and you have a cycle (I'm sure not lossless, but you're just looking at trying to minimize loss, not eliminate it).

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  24. in other news... by llamalicious · · Score: 2

    researchers finally got up the nerve to try some... and it tastes like chicken.

  25. Eh? by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    without having to bring along actual animals and fish into space.

    Fish aren't animals?

    --
    Why bother.
  26. Re:Oh great... I can see my next year spam header. by Telastyn · · Score: 2

    Though NASA's probably one of few orginizations I'd expect to actually enlarge my penis 16%

    Maybe then they could fund ISS! =]

  27. Just a little heads-up about Chicken McNuggets by Lendrick · · Score: 2

    Next time you buy some mcnuggets, take a good look at them. You might notice that they only come in three different shapes. Chicken McNuggets are actually made out of smaller chunks of meat, which are then "glued" together using a special enzyme. (You may have noticed that the grain of the meat inside a mcnugget goes in all weird directions).

    At any rate, the point of all this is that they're not likely to start making them cube-shaped. They could do it now--they just don't, because it betrays the fact that their meat isn't entirely natural. Go fig. :)

    1. Re:Just a little heads-up about Chicken McNuggets by GoRK · · Score: 2

      They also cook faster and more evenly being flat. As far as a special enzyme goes, there's really no need to do that. Just take the liquefied chicken, press it together, batter, fry. It will hold its shape after that. They ship nuggets to area distributors liequefied in buckets since it's cheaper - they press and freeze the nuggets and send them the 'last mile' to McDonald's.

  28. SMEAT by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    "SMEAT, its whats for dinner!"

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  29. Nah -- let's go with 2001. by Deagol · · Score: 2
    I like the food David Bowman discovers in 2001 (the novel). If I remember correctly, it was a blue-colored stuff that takes on the properties (taste, texture) of the food you think it is. It's been maybe 15 years since I read it, so my recall might be off.

    I thought it was pretty cool, anyway.

  30. Re:reminds me of something by MythoBeast · · Score: 2

    I believe that the Space Merchants was the sequel to The Merchant's War. That's the one where the advertising executive gets addicted to Moke cola and winds up stopping the fleet of ships attempting to addict Venus to various products. He spends a bit of time in a rehab camp, but it's the previous book where they first send people to Venus.

    Mythological Beast

    --
    Wake up - the future is arriving faster than you think.
  31. Human Flesh? by kramer · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, what happens when we can vat-grow large amounts of meat from small pieces of human flesh? Will human flesh become an item on the menus? Eh, it'll probably taste like chicken -- everything else does.

  32. Self Defeating by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    They say that this chunk of tissue was kept in a nutrient rich liquid. I don't understand. The tissue would then be composed of the nutrients in this liquid. Therefore, consuming the tissue would be the same as consuming the meat. However, it would much less wasteful to consume the nutrient liquid rather than the meat - which people would desire to cook and of course, would not be as well digested.

    So for a space mission, you're talking about bringing a few thousand liquid tons of nutrient to produce a substantially lower quantity of food. Am I getting this wrong?

    Why not just consume this nutrient liquid directly - something I'm sure a human body would digest better than meat. Space travel requires practical designs. I'm sorry the astronauts will not get a juicy Texas steak every now and then. :)

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Self Defeating by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
      So for a space mission, you're talking about bringing a few thousand liquid tons of nutrient to produce a substantially lower quantity of food. Am I getting this wrong?

      Yes. As I pointed out earlier, the eventual aim is to use a fungus based nutrient medium - which would be replenishable, presumably off of the wastes of the people and growth tank.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  33. Re:Smells like.... by multipartmixed · · Score: 2

    Carp, actually, goldfish is a kind of carp.

    I suppose now would be a good time to point out, however, that the only difference between carp and crap is a vowel movement.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  34. Annotation by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    Therefore, consuming the tissue would be the same as consuming the meat.

    Yes, obviously this is true. I meant to say "consuming the tissue would be the same as consuming the liquid."

    Sorry... my revision skills are lacking... but no more than CmdrTaco's.

    --
    Why bother.
    1. Re:Annotation by geekoid · · Score: 2

      there is the issue of taste and texture. This would be for long trips, and you do have to try to keep the astronauts sane.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  35. Bill Cosby by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    What's next? Growing a chicken heart in a vat?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    1. Re:Bill Cosby by Speare · · Score: 2

      Growing a chicken heart in a vat?

      It's OUTSIDE YOUR DOOR.

      And it's going to eat YOU up!

      ... when Bill was pitchman for Jello, I always wanted him to have a great big Philco radio (with 675 knobs, of which only two worked) somewhere in the background of a scene. Just enough for the inside joke.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Bill Cosby by sharkey · · Score: 2

      It's OUTSIDE YOUR DOOR.

      Oooooohhhh! I got my Jello, start smearing! I set the sofa on fire! You won't come near a smoking fire and Jello!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  36. Illegal? by jhines0042 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The U.S. Food and Drug Administration must approve the mutant meat before people can legally consume it, according to NewScientist.com, which first reported on it on Wednesday.

    Does that mean that it is actually _illegal_ to eat crayons, glue, boogers, pieces of carpet, lead paint chips and dirt?

    Time to start arresting some children if you ask me.

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
    1. Re:Illegal? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2

      Does that mean that it is actually _illegal_ to eat crayons, glue, boogers, pieces of carpet, lead paint chips and dirt?

      Eh, no, because those things are not sold as food. By "legally consume", the article is implying that it can be legally sold as food.

    2. Re:Illegal? by Glorat · · Score: 2
      "Does that mean that it is actually _illegal_ to eat crayons, glue, boogers, pieces of carpet, lead paint chips and dirt?"

      +1 Funny... just. Since it's currently marked interesting by mods who haven't thought too far ahead, I suspect the Food administration must approve the stuff to be safe before people can legally advertise and sell the stuff as food. Crayons and the like are sold for a different purpose and whether or not you eat them is a "fair use" of your purchase.

      Hmm... wonder if there will ever be a FMCA (food millenium copyright act) making it illegal to circumvent anti-eating restrictions such as disgusting tastes and protective wrapping to actually eat certain food stuffs (-1 Offtopic) Apologies

  37. Re:The Matrix?, yeast, [sic] by sam_handelman · · Score: 2

    Because yeast tastes wrong, and mushrooms are cheaper. When quoting bad science from movies, the thing that goes after the close-quote is [sic]. Yeast, incidentally, is eukaryotic (big cells, like what we're made of). Blue-green algae, an even faster growing variety of slime, is prokaryotic/bacterial (little cells, such as cause diptheria and the beubonic plague.) Although we (almost entirely) share our genetic code with bacteria, after the code is used to generate protein sequences, the proteins undergo post-processing which is very different, so a given gene (a sequence of DNA that codes for a particular protein) from, say, a Cow, may not "work" in yeast and probably will not "work" in blue-green algae; i.e. the gene will not produce the same result-protein as in Bessy.

    Actual meat has blood cells and blood vessels; it has proteins (with distinctive scents/tastes) which are unique not only to animals, but to animal muscle tissues (likewise liver or kidney, if that's your taste). It contains a highly distinctive mix of small molecules. It has a texture which it is difficult to duplicate (even ground), especially if you start out with powder or ooze. If you want to know the state of meat-texture duplication technology, from powder, buy a can of Hormel chili and see if you can differentiate the meat and the textured vegetable.

    Anyway, you could clone the proteins into a yeast or a mushroom (see above). You'd have approximately the same chance of success either way. However, mushroom's already form tissues, which single celled organisms (yeast, pond scum) don't. Ground, textured, flavored mushroom products don't taste a whole lot like meat, but the approximation of the texture is pretty good.

    Now, Yeast or Algae is easier to cultivate in (say) hydroponics. So, if you wanted to duplicate the (much derided, unfairly to my mind) nutritional properties of meat, and did not concern yourself with taste or texture, it would be the way to go. However, the post-processing to texture it into something meat like (instead of a slime, powder or slurry) would, almost certainly, take up more space than the extra support facilities to grow a mushroom.

    The best solution, from a synthetic meat standpoint, would be a cube of fillet minion that just kept growing forever in a nutrient bath, complete with blood vessels and whatever components you throught your meat needed (not, for example, nerves). Tumor, it's what's for dinner. This is a (probably) technologically easier proposition that churns out beef grown in tanks. I presume that this is what the group in the article is moving towards.

    Of course, trying to do any of this in space is pretty silly. It seems like a frivolous thing to use up weight/space on; unless the beef industry is willing to pay for the space program as an advertising stunt.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
  38. Or even Quorn by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's also Quorn, which according to NPR is a popular european meat-substitute. It's made from fungus (not mushrooms, lower than that), and doesn't even require being farmed like soy beans. It can simply be made in a fermentation plant.

    Sounded interesting, and apparently it tastes pretty good.

    (Mmmm... Quorn Dogs...)

    mark

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    1. Re:Or even Quorn by cowbutt · · Score: 2
      Quorn's OK. I've been eating meat almost continuously (bar a period during mid-1995 when I lived off cheese for 6 months before I stopped worrying about BSE :).

      Quorn works pretty well in Bolognese and Chilli, though you need to add a fair amount of seasoning and PLENTY of tomato juice & puree for it to have any flavour. That said, chilli made using Quorn seems to have a harsh chilli heat that beef chilli doesn't.

      Quorn used as chicken works quite well, too, but like chicken, doesn't really taste of much apart from the marinade/coating.

      --

    2. Re:Or even Quorn by UncleFluffy · · Score: 2

      Quorn is really good if you marinade it in lemon juice and garlic for an hour or so then chuck it in a frying pan. Anyone know where you can get it in the US ?

      --

      What would Lemmy do?

  39. Soilent Green is made of people!!!!! by plasticpixel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Soilent green is made of people!!!

    :)

  40. Re:Oh great... I can see my next year spam header. by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > Though NASA's probably one of few orginizations I'd expect to actually enlarge my penis 16%

    "Sure, just stick it out this airlock. The cold hard vaccuum of space will do the rest!"

    (One problem with this approach is that when you're done with the space's cold hard vacuum, your hardness will vary inversely with your hardness' coldness :-)

  41. Remember "The Shining"? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2

    This sort of research and experiments would apply to manned missions to other planets: Places the trip would be measured in years.

    If I'm not a vegan (and I'm not) on this trip, and all I get is vegan food, no beef, chicken, or fish, I'm gonna' go ape shit. I mean, it's gonna' be one ugly scene. Sorry, but I'm making a big enough sacrifice (possibly even dying in the effort) to go on this 3 year journey to Mars. Come Saturday night, I want a goddamn steak. Period. More meat, for the meat eaters.

    Also, (offtopic) a good way to keep the population from reaching 10 billion is to bomb Africa and South America with condoms. Maybe the odd instructional pamphlet.

    --
    Who did what now?
    1. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by maxpublic · · Score: 5, Interesting

      But me, the American who loves meat of all kinds and isn't planning on going to Mars, *wants* Mr. Astronaut to have nice juicy steaks whenever the fuck he feels like it.

      A forced Vegan diet undoubtedly qualifies as 'cruel and unusual punishment', at least to anyone who isn't a blazing PETA fanatic. God knows, I'd probably flip out and eat a fellow astronaut if I didn't have any meat for three freakin' years.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    2. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by Mr.+Neutron · · Score: 2

      I think that crappy food and the like probably go with the territory when it comes to space. The astronauts are in it for the glory, honor, and adventure. I think they can tolerate eating veggies for a few years.

      The key issue is getting enough complete protein, but soy pretty much solves that problem.

      Personally, I love my meat, have no problem raising and killing animals for food, and understand that the entire population of the word can live comfortably in the state of Texas. But that's not the issue. The issue is how to get the astronauts the nutrition they need in an economical way.

      --
      dinner: it's what's for beer
    3. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      Harvard professor and medical dude showed that dietary cholestorol is negligible. The real problem is that the body tries to plug its own leaks if it's vitamin deficient.

      So yeah, you can eat that steak.

      Besides, we want our astronauts to be the kind of guys who are tough and ready to get the job done, not some anemic sandal-wearing pond scum drinkers.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    4. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by MulluskO · · Score: 2
      There are still vast regions on this planet which are still inhabited.


      Deapite the best efforts of scientists and world leaders, despite birth control, vast regions of the planet remain populated.

      If we're going to reach your goal, we'll need bombs of another variety.
      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    5. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      and understand that the entire population of the word can live comfortably in the state of Texas.
      The following is simply some math to help people in their analysis of the above statement. I'm not rendering an opinion on it, but I know this thread will erupt into a flame war in which no one bothers to actually DO any math on it. so here is the math, now you guys can flame each other.

      Here are the relevant numbers:
      261,914 square miles of LAND (that does not include the 5K odd square miles of water)
      Population of the earth: Roughly 6,200,000,000.
      That is 23671 people per square mile. By contrast, Tokyo has a population density of 33,232 people per square mile.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    6. Re:Remember "The Shining"? by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      The area is for TEXAS, thought I had made that clear but as I go back it seems that I am implying that the area of the earth is that. Which is not true. That is the square mileage of TEXAS ONLY.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  42. Re:Stroutrup suggests ADA! [OT] by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

    If you just go to his website, all those questions and more will be answered. Be prepared though, the answers are completely dull and without controversy...

    http://www.research.att.com/~bs/homepage.html

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  43. Dear Mr. Stupid Moderator by Emugamer · · Score: 2

    FLAMEBAIT? He answers the question then adds a truthful insightful addition... you should be dragged out and shot. please read up on some basics of Systems Theory it does make a lot of sense...

  44. Re: zero-g pens? by johnrpenner · · Score: 2

    | I'd like to see NASA devote its (too scarce) resources to
    | making plant-based foods taste fantastic in a space
    | environement. It sure beats the thought of microwaved
    | synthetic meat.

    NASA spent several million dollars and years of research
    to make a Pen that works in Zero-G...

    the russians just used a pencil...

    typical. :-\

    storm's nest

  45. Your Turn To Cook by nickynicky9doors · · Score: 2

    Why not just cut out the middle man (or fish):)? With stem cell research, couldn't one of our multi-generational space cadets just give up an arm or leg for dins and then regen the limb?

    --

    heuristic algorithm seeks stochastic relationship
  46. They expect people to eat this carp? by iabervon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems to me that this is a promising idea. The various foods we like to eat are often made in the bodies of animals, but there's no reason that the cells that do it have to be in something with a nervous system. Of course, it couldn't have evolved that way, but the reason that meat is an inefficient food source is that it tends to wander around and look for food. We've just replaced the rest of the fish's body with a vat.

    If this sort of research continues, we ought to be able to build what amounts to an ecosystem with the routing between various animal organs done with pipes instead of the rest of the animals.

  47. funny by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    reading this - I just had a vision of some student rubbing this nutrient liquid all over his privates hoping for that 16% in a week....

    but maybe im just sick....

  48. Re:Effect on Fast Food? by JabberWokky · · Score: 2
    For anywhere near terms (many decades), this will be far more expensive than simply raising cows. Kinda like the amusing urban legend that KFC uses "headless, feetless, featherless mutant chickens fed by IV". I'd buy that urban legend if KFC's chicken suddenly cost $500 a piece.

    Then there's the really frikkin annoying "fact" taught by a local community college (I thought the guy telling me had taken bad notes, but it was in the professor's handouts) that "all deli meats are pureed into a thin fluid and packed into cubes", and are thus unhealthy (this is from a heath class. While many classic deli meats *are* prepared that way (dating back hundreds of years, so what's so sinister about it), I held out a piece of niceley grained and threaded roast beef and said "how do they get that texture back into the meat, then?". The guy refused to believe me, insisting that "the professor told him so". (FWIW, I went to a US college, and they aren't all that bad - but the so called "community colleges" seem to be of a rather lower quality)

    --
    Evan

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  49. Vat-grown stuff? by Kaa · · Score: 2

    "Because he had a good agent, he had a good contract. Because he had a good contract, he was in Singapore an hour after the explosion. Most of him, anyway The Dutch surgeon liked to joke about that, how an unspecified percentage of Turner hadn't made it out of Palam International on that first flight and had to spend the night there in a shed, in a support vat.

    It took the Dutchman and his team three months to put Turner together again. They cloned a square meter of skin for him, grew it on slabs of collagen and shark-cartilage polysaccharides They bought eyes and genitals on the open market The eyes were green."

    William Gibson Count Zero

    --

    Kaa
    Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
  50. PEOPLE MY GOD ITS PEOPLE. by CDWert · · Score: 2

    Goldfish my butt,

    Remeber Soylent Green,

    There was also Soylent Red and some other colors I dont remeber,

    This is the first step, Soylent GOLD !!!!

    Soylent-Green for the masses

    Its people my god, SOYLENT GREEN IS PEOPLE !

    Does this mean human self cannibalism is a profitable possibility, they say the meat is kinda sweet and all.

    Seriously, Do you want to eat something thats GROWN in a "nutrient rich" (thats the people part I bet) , this is just so wrong to my pallete, mind, and sense of what is natural I cant see it.....

    --
    Sig went tro...aahemmm.....fishing........
  51. Re: zero-g pens? by Grayraven · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry, but that's an urban myth. See this for more information.

    --
    "Source... The Final Frontier" -- keepersoflists.org
  52. Hmm... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2

    Dude, this is like living spam.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  53. No more Chopped and Pressed? by Zapdos · · Score: 2

    Will they will grow chicken nuggets in the shape of dinosaurs, and fish that is square.

  54. Save A Step by 4of12 · · Score: 2

    Place the humans into the nutrient rich broth.

    It's probably more efficient.

    Any activist vegetarian could probably give you a full lecture about the relative efficiencies, probably in terms of acres/hectares required to feed humans different diets.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  55. Soylent Yum! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2, Redundant

    Mmm... Soylent Green...

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  56. Perfect! by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 5, Funny
    They basically end up living off of the equivalent of frozen dinners and ramen.
    ...which is why NASA needs to start launching geeks into space!

    Really, we're used to freeze-dried diets, Tang and total isolation from the rest of humanity!

    --grendel drago
    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Perfect! by wedg · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but eating all that Ramen gives you the schlitz, and you really don't want that in zero gravity.

      --
      Jake
      Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
  57. Meat Trees Anyone? by SkewlD00d · · Score: 2

    It would be so right, meat grown on trees.

    --
    The biggest trick the devil pulled was letting lawyers become politicians so they can write the laws.
  58. Re:reminds me of something by slickwillie · · Score: 2

    It's not SF, but I heard that the Carib Indians (the first settlers of the Caribbean islands) were cannibals. Since they didn't have refrigeration, and meat tends to spoil quickly in that climate, they would tie up their victims, and hack off non-vital pieces as needed, thus keeping their food source alive as long as possible.

  59. Enough all-fscking-ready! by cmkrnl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Listening to self righteous Vegans is nearly as bad as having to put up with the bollocks spouted by the wilder christian sects, endless moronic repetition that we are all destined for hellfire because we are catholic, protestant, gay, black, white, jewish, hindu, moslem, having sex before marriage, single mothers, shopping on Sundays/whatever.

    You cannot rationally argue with these headcases, its a religion, an article of faith, they are fscked in the head every bit as bad as members of the LCC, CoS, Moonies or any other cult.

    The nonsense that we cannot be meat eaters if the planets population reaches [INSERT LARGE FIGURE HERE] has been repeated by their ilk for well over 150 years now. I believe the figure originally started at a billion and has to be adjusted up each time the the past assertions have been exposed as utter bollocks.

    Any person who would take the rantings of Peter Singer seriously should be made to pay dearly for advocating the fascism of the 'animal rights' movement.

    No animal tested drugs, no medicines, no welfare benefits paid out of taxes raised by folks and their businesses you would destroy in the name of cute little animals, for you or any hellspawn you breed.
    You want to condemn the world back to a medieval hell where a simple infection ment death, its only fair that you should be hoisted on your own petard and try that road yourself first.

    The cure for the comfortable urban middle classes who make up the vast majority of proselytizeing Veganism (Note I did not say vegetarian), is to be dumped say for 18 months onto an Ant/Artic island full of 'Ohhh So Cute' seals/penguins armed with nothing but a blunt hatchet.

    Homo-Sapiens, like a lot of members of the ape family is an omnivore, live with it.

    Curmudgeon

  60. Re:one ethical viewpoint by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

    Cutting off a pig leg kills the pig leg.

    Pig legs are animal byproducts.

    He clearly states we will not eat animal byproducts that are killed.

  61. Healthy vs. healthful by hyacinthus · · Score: 2

    "Meat is not unhealthy."

    Meat (or any other inanimate thing) _can't_ be "unhealthy", or "healthy". What you're saying is that "Meat is not ill", which is wrong. The correct word is "unhealthful".

  62. Soylent Green is People! by cryptochrome · · Score: 2

    I was thinking the same thing. Guess we've both got sick minds. I suppose the only real worry would be that if some deranged person acquired a taste for it, they might get the urge to try the real thing (One instance of cannibalism and that stuff is off the market so fast it'll make your head spin).

    Steve Varley suggested something similar in The Ophiuchi Hotline, except that they were growing meat on trees there (including an illegal human variety).

    --

    ---If you can't trust a nerd, who can you trust?

  63. "Venus, Inc" by DrCode · · Score: 2

    This is straight out of Pohl & Kornbluth's "Venus, Inc" story from, I think, the late 50's. There was a giant hunk of chicken culture sold as "Chicken Little".

  64. Re:one word... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    Ignoring soy allergies for the moment, wouldn't it be easier (and maybe safer) to eat tofu?

    Considering that tofu is nutritionally inadequate (there are essential proteins that you just can't get from vegetable sources), it's probably "six of one, half-a-dozen of the other." (This also assumes that the test-tube fish is nutritionally equivalent to one that was raised in the normal manner.)

    I don't think the nutrient solution they're using would be particularly harmful as long as you're not getting it from Europe (that's where all the BSE problems have popped up). This process doesn't sound all that appetizing, but neither does the idea of processing excrement (among other things) to get the water out for other uses (which I think is something they're already doing).

    It seems strange that they used goldfish, though...why not a fish that's more commonly used for food? (Yes, I know there are some people who are into swallowing whole live goldfish, for sport, entertainment, or whatever...these people are commonly known as "freaks." :-) )

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  65. Using protein to grow protein by Guppy · · Score: 2

    Even if we ignore the cost of media components such as hormones and growth factors (requirements that can probably be engineered out at our current tech level), there are basic problems with the metabolism of animal tissues (requirements that cannot be engineered out at our current tech level).

    Probably the biggest stumbling block is that animal cells lack the ability to synthesize many amino acids, and even some of the ones that can be synthesized require other amino acids as the starting material. So, you end up needing protein to grow protein. From an efficiency standpoint, you'd be much better off just drinking the growth media.

    In the case of growth factors (hormones, cytokines, etc), a change in one or two proteins can take care of things. For some growth factors, you can even see this happen spontaneously if you serially passage cells repeatedly. The problem with amino acid requirements is that you'd need to engineer in whole new metabolic pathways, which is much more difficult. Probably one of the most sophisticated examples of putting in a new pathway was in the example of beta carotene synthesis in "golden" rice. This was barely doable with something like three steps. I don't know how many steps would be required to cover all amino acids, but I'm guessing it would be several dozen at least.

    A much better idea is to use lower organisms that can manufacture all 20 essential amino acids already. A good example is Quorn, a fungal meat substitute that is already available. To grow Quorn, all you need is water, ammonia, some minerals, and a carbon source such as glucose. The fungus can synthesize all necessary amino acids from carbohydrates, with the ammonia supplying the necessary nitrogen. What's more, it can be grown in a continuous process (as opposed to batch), which you can get a huge amount of a small reactor.

  66. Re:one word... by spike+hay · · Score: 2

    MMMMMMMmmmm. Animal protein grown in bovine amniotic fluid! Just like mom used to make!

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  67. Cooking in space - needs more research by meldroc · · Score: 2

    What NASA really needs to do to make space journeys livable is bring a master chef to the space station with a Progress ship full of raw ingredients and some space-adapted cooking tools. You can't stir ingredients together in a bowl, so you'll have to have a closed sphere with openings to add ingredients and a cranked stirrer thingy. You can't stir fry in zero-G, so maybe you can spin fry - have a hot cooking surface shaped like a cylinder & spin it so the food is held onto the surface by centrifugal force. You can't bake bread in zero-G and expect it to come out the same as it does on earth, so you may have to make bread spheres that "rise" outwards as they bake. The space kitchen is going to have to have a killer fume hood & ventilation. It also needs lots of fire supression (kitchen fires in a closed environment are BAD!!!)

    --

    Meldroc, Waster of Electrons
  68. Cornell is working on space food by sunhou · · Score: 2

    I remember reading in various Cornell newsletters/newspapers that some people here are doing research on foods for space, mainly vegetable-based stuff.

    A quick search turned up two articles: the first one, with photos, and a more recent follow-up.

    Among other things, they're trying to develop taco-like things, carrot drumsticks, and some kind of chocolate substitute. Oh well, I don't think astronauts are expecting gourmet meals...

  69. The real question is... by wedg · · Score: 2

    Who would want to eat GOLDFISH?

    OH NO! MR. FLIPPER! Noooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo...
    etc.

    --
    Jake
    Dating: while( 1 ){ call_girl(); get_rejected(); drink_40(); } return 0;
  70. taste? by Kanasta · · Score: 2

    does unused cultured muscle taste better or worse than muscle that has been used by the animal in question?

  71. Re:Here's an idea by RFC959 · · Score: 2

    Maybe for the same reason we feed the grass to the cows instead of eating it directly ourselves... (Assuming a cow that gets fed grass these days, as opposed to soybeans, fish, and bits of other dead cow. :-P )

  72. Meat is fine, you I'm a little worried about. by Arker · · Score: 2

    An even easier way is to use TVP. You can rehydrate it and cook it however you wish. Excellent vegan Chinese restaurants soak TVP and then use it for fake beef, chicken, etc. All the flavoring is in the spices and preparation -- real chicken and fake chicken don't taste like much by themselves.

    Maybe it tastes close enough to fool you, but for many people the above is utterly false.

    The fact is that if you're not poor, and you don't mind some work, you can now get a good, balanced diet without meat. This is good. It doesn't mean that some of us don't prefer meat though, and it doesn't mean that it's healthy to go vegetarian if you can't or won't spend extra time and money to make sure that your diet has enough of the right proteins.

    There's no way to justify meat-eating on ethical, moral, health, or practical grounds, so you do so solely due to custom.

    Absolutely false. Ethical? Moral? Wtf are you talking about? Health - it's healthy to eat less meat than most americans do. That doesn't mean that no one should ever eat meat. Huge jump. Practical? It's quite practical, it provides not only a lot of protein (we don't really need a lot after all) in a small package, it's also a good mix of proteins - something often difficult to assemble from plant sources. It's not difficult to get, and most of us like the taste, at least if it's cooked right.

    If you don't like it, that's just fine, but enough with the silly overdramatic oversimplified juvenile nonsense about how everyone who doesn't agree with your taste in food is unhealthy and immoral.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.