Slashdot Mirror


"The Chronicles of Amber" and "The Forever War" For TV

DarkRabbit writes "i just noticed at the Futon Critic that the Sci-Fi channel announced April 2nd that amongst other popular pieces of fiction, Zelazney's "The Chronicles of Amber" and Haldeman's "The Forever War" will be getting the mini-series treatment by them sometime in the next year. I'm sure their adaptions will be just as contentious here as was their version of "Dune." Oh, and "Tripping the Rift" arrives as an 'Edgy-South-Park-esque' half-hour cartoon series..."

213 comments

  1. Continuity. by saintlupus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Zelazney's "The Chronicles of Amber"

    I sure hope they let Corwin keep his black and silver leisure suit. It goes so well with the sword.

    And I also hope that Eric's beard is "moist" throughout the entire series, because that and the fact that Corwin hates getting little hairs down his shirt are quite possibly the most bizarre details included in the whole series.

    --saint

    1. Re:Continuity. by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The Chronicles of Amber" is my favorite book series, hands-down. I've honestly feared the day that Hollywood or some TV producer finally got their hands on this series, because I have no doubt that they will completely ruin it like they have so many other of my favorites. I just can't stand having everyone's opinion of a book based off of some hack-job movie, like "Starship Troopers."

      It's not like it would be hard to do the series right with modern moviemaking technology -- it is just completely unlikely. No good book gets made into a screenplay without something getting screwed. Parts will be cut out and minor scenes and characters will be made much more important, like Irulan in the new "Dune" mini-series. You can expect every sex scene Zelazny puts off to the side to get about 5 good minutes in each episode, while Corwin and Merlin's various solioquys will probably be cut.

      I mean, why bother expecting continuity to the letter with the little details when they'll be too busy raping the spirit of the books like they do with everything else.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    2. Re:Continuity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wonder if he'll be chain smoking in the series ?

    3. Re:Continuity. by Control+Group · · Score: 2

      Not necessarily. As a fellow Zelazny fan (Amber in particular, but all his novels are pretty damn good...Lord of Light in particular), I admit to being guardedly hopeful about this. If I heard they were going to make a movie out of it, I'd hope the financing fell through. A miniseries, though, they might manage. I'll gladly trade away the top-notch special effects only available to major-film budgets (I've been seeing Mandor at the Keep without special effects for years now) in order to have more time available with a miniseries format.

      It all depends on how long it's going to be: if they're going to try to squeeze it out in 4 hours, it's a lost cause: they'll no doubt cut and mutate all my favorite scenes. If they get this up to a 10-12 hour effort, they could do a reasonable job. To be honest, I can probably read the whole series in not much more than 10 hours, if I was a mind. I have to think they could present it on-screen in that time.

      --

      Reality has a conservative bias: it conserves mass, energy, momentum...
    4. Re:Continuity. by CorwinOfAmber · · Score: 1
      Oh come on, there are much better details than that. My favorite is the cat licking its asshole, pausing to watch Merlin, leg vertical the whole time.

      And I never wear leisure suits.

      --
      My future's determined by Thieves, thugs, and vermin -- The Offspring
    5. Re:Continuity. by Frank+Grimes · · Score: 1
      You can expect every sex scene Zelazny puts off to the side to get about 5 good minutes in each episode...
      That might be a good thing. In the first five books, the sex was completely missing, which bothered me. I was surprised when I got to the point where Corwin meets his son and I thought he had been celibate the whole time.
      --
      CfkRAp1041vYQVbFY1aIwA== RV/hBCLKKcSTP5UFK3kqsg==
    6. Re:Continuity. by oren · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, if they were doing Amber as a series - *long* series - it could work, *with continuity*. The trick is to treat it in the spirit it was written. A *soap opera*.

      Think about it... what other type of production faithfully captures the endless bizantine plots, discoveries, shifting coalitions, dramatic situations with sex and/or violance, mysterious relatives popping up from nowhere (and disappearing at the same speed) around the same core *family*? Go on and on and on and on with variations on the same theme?

      I can imagine the little blurbs in the guide... "Chapter 117: Corwin impersonates father and discovers that his grandfather is the mad scientist and his grandmother is a single-horned goat.". Admit it, that's *classic* soap opera.

      Alas, since it would be produced by the SF channel, it will turn into a "Lord of the Rings" wannabe. Sigh. I guess it will have to stay as another classic "could have been", like "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" done by the Monty Python group.

    7. Re:Continuity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the sci-fi channel's webpage :

      The Chronicles of Amber . Based on Roger Zelazny's best-selling 10-volume series, this four-hour miniseries tells the story of a royal family with amazing powers over time and space, which is plagued by in-fighting as it tries to unite against a sinister enemy. Richard Christian Matheson will write the screenplay. Tom Patricia of Patriarch Pictures will serve as executive producer.

      IMHO, four hours to do all ten books is a travesty. There's no way they'll be able to keep any level of the complexity of the story.

    8. Re:Continuity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "The Chronicles of Amber" is my favorite book series, hands-down.

      I'm not sure I would go quite that far. I like a lot of others, too, and with the addition of books 6-10, Amber has gotten pretty inconsistent--but that's another debate.

      What Amber really kicks butt in is the beginning. The first three chapters of Nine Princes are the BEST introduction to a series I've ever read, bar none. Every year or so, I go back to read about Corwin waking up in the mental hospital. It's no use--I always keep going and read the whole first five books in rapid succession; they're that good, they always draw me in.

    9. Re:Continuity. by dillon_rinker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the sex was completely missing

      So you missed the scene in the first book with the queen of Rebma? And the entire first half of of the second book with Lorraine? And the interlude with Merlin's mother? And the attempted seduction by a creature of chaos on the black road? Or the lady near the end of the world?

      Did you even read the same book I read?

    10. Re:Continuity. by wass · · Score: 1
      What are your opinions of books 6-10? I completely agree, regarding books 1-5.


      I read 1-5 back in high school, and just recently bought the 10-volume compendium to re-read. I loved 1-5, but I was less pleased with books 6-10. I couldn't make it past book 8, I felt the Merlin series lacked some of the charm of the first 5, and felt like a chore to read.


      does anyone else agree or disagree?

      --

      make world, not war

    11. Re:Continuity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (I am the same AC, FWIW)

      The second series is clearly inferior. It pollutes the simple premises of the first. You can tell that it was evolutionary, that Z was kinda just making up new stuff as he went along. I picked up copies of 6-10 on eBay last year, just to complete it, but I have the two volume Chronicles of Amber set (with the Vallejo dust jacket art), and that's all you really need.

      Things like pattern ghosts, ghostwheel, sentient signs, the church of the Unicorn... it's all so much rot if you ask me, which you, in fact, did.

      Some worlds are not harmed by the author or his heirs finishing out the details--Tolkein's Middle Earth, for one. No matter how dreadfully boring you may find all the Lost Tales, they don't detract from the central stories that everyone knows and loves. In Amber's case, however, Zelazny's expansion into ill-thought-out new realms just didn't seem to have the charm after the "wrap" of book 5. Clearly, there was evolution even within the first series--the idea of chaos as a rival power served by a different branch of the same family certainly wasn't evident until long after Nine Princes was over.

      The second series reminds me of John De Chancie's Castle Perilous series, and not just because both of them ended up interfacing computers and magic. That's a huge sin on both their parts, though: adding computers to fantasy and coming up with a fantasy world that this computer geek finds, well, unappealing. Take a simple premise with lots of unknowns. Then fill in all the blanks with less inspired writings. Lather. Rinse. Repeat. Ugh.

      This is part of the reason why short stories are so often better than novels, novels better than series, and SNL skits so much better than full length comedy movies: The minimal forms allow you to cut to the chase, get to the point, and not deal with the questions you can't answer in the time alotted. If you have a good flash of inspiration and frame it well, good for you. But if you're really a mediocre writer and expand it to a full-length book, shame on you for dressing up your inspiration in rags. Leave it nude, rather than clothing it unsuitably, if your inspiration and skill run dry.

    12. Re:Continuity. by codeslut · · Score: 1

      I seem to be in the minority, but I liked the second series. It may, as you say, have lacked the charm of the first, but that might just be because it's told in someone else's voice. Merlin is a different person after all.

      --
      "Do you think there are answers to everything here? Is that true in the place you come from?" - Agia
  2. Ohh, even better... by laeraun2 · · Score: 1, Informative

    (from the article) NEW YORK (Variety) -- A remake of the TV series "Battlestar Galactica" as a four-hour miniseries, the transformation of the mini "Firestarter: Rekindled" by Stephen King into an hourlong series Maybe I'm not as hard core manga geek type as everyone else but those two excite me more than the article topic. Imagine if they had produced Battlestar with today's computer graphic capabilites and the hype that you can generate by using the net... Oh wait, what am I doing now?

    --
    Error: Erection reset by beer.
    1. Re:Ohh, even better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They could reanimate Lorne Green!!!

    2. Re:Ohh, even better... by Chasuk · · Score: 2

      Battlestar Galactica was perhaps one of the worst things ever to happen to science fiction, or to television. It completed the "cutification" of science fiction as a genre (can anyone say "daggit," Noah "Boxey" Hathaway, and mock swearing?), a process begun by Star Wars, and also elevated non-actors to dubious stardom (Richard Hatch, Dirk Benedict). It took a B-grade actor from a fondly remembered Western series and tried to invest him with somber grace (Lorne Greene), all the while borrowing its storyline from Mormon mythology.

      Complete, utter crap, unless filtered through the non-discerning lens of a 6 - 12 year old's mind.

    3. Re:Ohh, even better... by cliff+judge · · Score: 1

      Couldn't resist a chance to join in the fun. Battlestar was less than a Mormon Myth rip-off -- and that's saying something. I get peeved thinking about it. A couple of real pulp sf guys good have turned that into a grand space opera. Somebody like Harlan Ellison could have made it a fascinating and painful look at human nature under incredible stress.

      As it turned out, the series was worse than Disney-Eisner's lowest brand of G-rated pap. Christ, all of humanity adrift in space in ships short of supplies and with no destination known. And the writers sit around, asses filled with their thumbs, thinking "Gee, how can we find stories in that premise?" And what do they come up with? Dirkie babe trying to broker a deal with a tri-breasted female rock singing group.

      Why the pee would sci-fi even want to dredge that offal up?

  3. Forever War by TwoStep · · Score: 1

    Wow, great! Forever war was a really good book. I also liked the sort of seqel, Forever Peace.

    It is good to see Sci-Fi find and exploit their niche. Network TV will not be willing to risk making miniseries out of hard core sci-fi.

    Twostep

    --
    There are 10 different types of people in this world... those who understand binary, and those who don't.
    1. Re:Forever War by CaseyB · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think Forever Peace would have been a much more "TV friendly" novel. It's a bit less deep, and the soldierboy sequences would have been amazing!

    2. Re:Forever War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forever Peace wasn't a sequel to Forever War. Haldeman says so himself.

    3. Re:Forever War by Genom · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, great! Forever war was a really good book. I also liked the sort of seqel, Forever Peace.

      I'm a fan of the spinoff show, Forever Knight ;P

    4. Re:Forever War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forever war (great read it like 5 time over the
      years)
      forever peace (good read read it 1 time could read it again,though not really a sequel)

      forever free (WTF, this book was horrible, I
      barely finished it and it is one of the few
      books that I won't even donate to the library, threw all of the mystery of Forever War out the window for some stupid GOD crap)

      As far as my brain is concerned forever free
      never happened and forever war stands on its own. Just like Alien 3.

    5. Re:Forever War by Grab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Just been bought FW for by birthday. Not bad, some interesting stuff, but it didn't seem like great or anything. Just another Vietnam-era "fighting-a-pointless-war" thing, plus teenage male fantasy stuff with compulsory promiscuity. Interesting ideas in changing society over time, but nothing outstanding ("Brave New World" but gay).

      Trouble is, most SF authors are good at coming up with ideas but crap at writing. Witness Clarke, Asimov, Bova, Bear (and Crichton just about makes SF too) - all got great ideas and concepts, but lousy execution.

      Off the topic, anyone know anything about Laurence M Janifer? I've got his book "Survivor", and that seems pretty good - pretty well-written, decent characterisation, basically an intelligent SF action book. Anyone know what his other stuff is like? I reckon that kind of thing would translate pretty well to screen.

      Grab.

    6. Re:Forever War by stu_ajh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Just been bought FW for by birthday. Not bad, some interesting stuff, but it didn't seem like great or anything. Just another Vietnam-era "fighting-a-pointless-war" thing, plus >teenage male fantasy stuff with compulsory promiscuity. Interesting ideas in changing society over time, but nothing outstanding ("Brave New World" but gay).

      The book is really about how the experience of war seperates the poor bastards made to fight in it from the rest of society. The time-dilation plot device (tours of duty last a few month subjectively, but hundreds of years pass back on earth) is just an exaggerated metaphor for what the author felt like after returning from his own stint in Vietnam.

      I found it to be a really moving, an rather well written book. Definitelyone of the best anti-war novels I have ever read and a good contender for a place in the top ten SF novels.

    7. Re:Forever War by kashani · · Score: 1

      You should check out John Stakely's _Armour_ if you liked Forever War. Similiar themes and well written.

      kashani

      --
      - Why is the ninja... so deadly?
    8. Re:Forever War by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      Um ... what you may not realize is that The Forever War was the first "Vietnam-era 'fighting-a-pointless-war' thing" to be done in SF, and for that matter one of the first significant Vietnam novels in any genre. Haldeman wrote it just a couple of years after he came home, and his tour of duty was one of the worst I've ever heard of.

      As for "lousy execution" ... I can understand your criticism of the prose styles of Asimov, Bova, Bear, and Crichton, but if you really think Haldeman and Clarke are "crap at writing," then I have to wonder what writers you consider good stylists. Haldeman, particularly, writes with grace and precision which other writers in all genres would do well to emulate.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    9. Re:Forever War by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      If you're hungry for good sci-fi concepts, well-executed, there's always Iain (M.) Banks, C. J. Cherryh, and Vernor Vinge.

      Actually, I'm not too sure about Vinge yet, having only just discovered him, but so far he's incredible.

      HTH!

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    10. Re:Forever War by estes_grover · · Score: 1
      Um ... what you may not realize is that The Forever War was the first "Vietnam-era 'fighting-a-pointless-war' thing" to be done in SF, and for that matter one of the first significant Vietnam novels in any genre.

      For the non-SF version, see Haldeman's 'War Year'

    11. Re:Forever War by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait for the training camp scene:

      "Fuck YOU, Sir!..."

    12. Re:Forever War by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      Just to chip in on this little section of conversation:

      My favourite two sf autors (who excel in both ideas and execution) are Frank Herbert (just finished collecting all his books! Any first-timer should read The Dosadi Experiment before Dune to get a better feel of Herbert's style) and Robert Heinlein (slightly odd, but well-written novels).

      -Nano.

    13. Re:Forever War by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      Definetly Herbert, though I have a place in my heart for this review of Dune.

      And I found Heinlein's style to be all over the board--some of it is good, some of it is just abysmal. At this point in my life, Heinlein holds little draw for me. He's light on advanced science, and Iain Banks does a better job with advanced societies. IMO, of course. YMMV, &c.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    14. Re:Forever War by Grab · · Score: 2

      Check out Rama for a really clunky read. I know there's some decent Clarke stuff. But to me it all seems too clinical, too much like he'd prefer to be writing a paper on it instead of telling a story.

      I see what you mean about FW being the first out - sure, there wasn't anything to judge against. But I'm not sure it stands up too well against later versions of the theme (cf. Lord of the Rings which compares favourable to any other fantasy book).

      Grab.

    15. Re:Forever War by Grab · · Score: 2

      Yeah, Herbert's good. I used to like Heinlein at school, but since I've started re-reading, it all looks a bit too space-opera with added male-fantasy elements (nudity, freely-available sex, freely-available guns and knives).

      Donaldson's Gap series is good in parts - trouble is, he really does tend to go on a bit! And the same old phrases crop up throughout which makes it a bit repetitive sometimes. But on a characterisation and plot level the Gap series is outstanding, with a dozen main characters, each with their own agendas and all trying to work out what the others are planning. Pretty awesome, if you've got the stamina to work through it.

      Grab.

    16. Re:Forever War by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      Well, yeah, Rama was an info-dump, not a novel. But works like The City and the Stars and Fountains of Paradise (if I'm remembering the titles right -- it's been a while) are masterpieces of style as well as of ideas. And his short stories, which are numerous, tend to be even better than his novels.

      As for FW not stacking up well against later variations on the theme ... well, I honestly can't think of any works along those lines I've enjoyed as much. I'm fond of David Drake's work, but it's very different in tone from Haldeman's, and he's not the stylist Haldeman is by any means.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    17. Re:Forever War by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      And don't forget how chic it is for the young and wet-behind-the-ears to criticize the giants in SF for their 'crap' writing.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  4. New Advertising Slogan by mrgaribaldi · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Never underestimate the power of a dark..."

  5. But.. by carlosjordao · · Score: 0, Interesting

    my biggest Dune fans friends didn't like 'Dune' they did at all

    1. Re:But.. by jlower · · Score: 1

      While I don't think it did justice to the book, the mini-series was way better than that god-awful movie version.

      Their treatment of Dune definately gives me hope that they'll do at least a passable job with The Forever War. Just don't let Dino have anything to do with it - please!

    2. Re:But.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm perplexed that on the upcoming
      Children of Dune mseries they have
      replaced the following character's actors.
      Stilgar and Lady Jessica.
      Weird, because I though sasha reeves was hot.
      (ok I'm approaching 40)

    3. Re:But.. by carlosjordao · · Score: 1

      The problem is my friends love the Book,
      but hate the mini-series.
      I guess the first episode they liked, but the others
      they just hated!

      As a big fans as they are, they expected to see
      a lot of details, presented in the book, into the mini-series too. For example, some dialogues were ignored (that is the first 'why' they were pissed off), or passed by without a major attention given
      or the actors didn't interpret such dialogues as good as they expected.
      I guess all this hate come from the greatest richness of scenario and characters. Such dialogues were very important to give the right pace to story.
      My friends want a great mini-serie based on Duna. It's almost a pleasure see such book on screen.
      They don't want prevent director adapt the script,
      but they expect he pay attention on key dialogues.
      I saw the mini-series. I liked, but I felt it missed some key points, and left other more or less unexplained, but I did like it.

    4. Re:But.. by OgdEnigmaX · · Score: 0

      I dunno. Between the two of them, I think the various media powers that be have done a good job of portraying Dune. Admittedly, the original movie was...shall we say incomprehensible. So it can't really stand on its own story-wise. I still think its visual presentation was superior. The Sci-Fi series did a much better job of portraying the transition from Paul the child to Paul the ruthless revolutionary (I mean, duh...it was totally glossed over in the film). The movie, however, had a much more mythical tone to it...and it wasn't as *clean* as the Sci-Fi version, which I thought was a little visually sterile. The Bene Gesserit in the Sci-Fi version were total pushovers, nowhere near the force they represented in either the book *or* the film. No weirding in the Sci-Fi version...also not a good thing.
      So, to summarize, the film was not all that "god-awful;" it did a lot right that the miniseries did wrong. The miniseries succeeded in portraying the political elements of the story (not having Princess Irulan as a character in the film was kind of inexcusable), while the film did a much better job of, well, being mysterious and mythical and cool. There is much to like in both.

  6. Hello! by j0nkatz · · Score: 0

    More worthless news here on /.!

    --
    Don't mod me, bro'!!!!
  7. Forever War not on TV by nuggz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well I thought it was a great book, good story.
    But I don't see how they could make it a miniseries.
    You can't communicate the same sense of irrelevance on TV that you can in a book.

    For me the fact that the characters felt so separated from the world, "They didn't know what they were fighting for".
    This is a common concern in books & movies, and would be lost. (Enders game, he goes and spends a month in his boat, Armageddon, they go out for a wild party)

    I just don't see it working.

    1. Re:Forever War not on TV by MrZaius · · Score: 1

      Why can't you show the irrelevance of life in film? I seem to remember Seinfeld and such doing it quite well.

      When I read this article, I started seeing pictures of a confused, out of place individual at home. I saw a detached, indifferent character at war. I heard the clones explaining the futility of the whole earlier war.

      I personally feel and have always felt that Haldeman will translate wonderfully into film.

    2. Re:Forever War not on TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially if they send in "real time" :-)

    3. Re:Forever War not on TV by gksil · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The Forever War is happening here and now as can be read in this article.http://cryptome.org/us-war-inc.htm

      --
      "rationality and science over superstition and religion" "got root? get some!!"
    4. Re:Forever War not on TV by hrieke · · Score: 2

      Just wondering how they will make it PG-13. Tons of sex and foul language in the book should be any standards a headache (let alone the poor guy who has to re-write the book for TV).

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    5. Re:Forever War not on TV by richieb · · Score: 2
      Well I thought it was a great book, good story. But I don't see how they could make it a miniseries. You can't communicate the same sense of irrelevance on TV that you can in a book.

      Oh, come on. Think how closely "Starship Troopers" followed the book.

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    6. Re:Forever War not on TV by Royster · · Score: 2

      You can't communicate the same sense of irrelevance on TV that you can in a book.

      Ever seen Catch-22?

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous sig, unfortunately the sig limit is too small to contain i
    7. Re:Forever War not on TV by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      • You can't communicate the same sense of irrelevance on TV that you can in a book

      Do you mean irrelevance or irreverance? For those who haven't read it, the training regime in Forever War involves trainees responding to orders with "Fuck you, sir!" to promote independent thinking. ;-)

      I know, you do mean irrelevance, the whole futile Vietnam in Space feel. To be fair, "Space: Above and Beyond" had a good stab at that. It very nearly succeeded, but then it got canned after two series because the viewing figures were tanking. Complex morality plays don't generally go down well with Joe Sixpack. And right now, doing the story of a war based on a cultural misunderstanding might be particulary unpopular. It took a 20 year break for the Klingons to become the good guys, remember?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:Forever War not on TV by Golias · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Complex morality plays don't generally go down well with Joe Sixpack.

      That's because "Joe Sixpack" can usually tell when he's being preached to instead of entertained.

      Let's face it, most of us who fell in love with morality-ladden Sci Fi stories did so when we were in our early teens and still growing into our own world-views. To be a 12 year-old and grok Heinlein might make you a little smarter than your peers... It's flattering to a kid's ego: you're not just another nerd, you're '1337! However, once you reach a certain age, it's time to stop kidding yourself that understanding the message behind Asimov's "Darwinian Pool Table" short story makes you any smarter that somebody who instead chose to spend his Sunday afternoon watching NFL games, and realize that the story you just read was kind of crappy, and even preachier than the feminist pablum your dingbat sister watches on the Lifetime channel.

      For my own part, I prefer sci-fi that asks interesting questions (like "2001") over sci-fi that crams answers down our throats ("Cube"). To each his own, but there's no need for us to go on imagining that our tastes for movies about aliens, robots, and outer-space wars makes us any better than the average slob.

      And right now, doing the story of a war based on a cultural misunderstanding might be particulary unpopular.

      Doing a "story about a war" will never be as popular as a story about people. That's why "Glory" (a nice little film about an all black regement) did much better, both critically and commercially, than "The Civil War" (a four-hour movie which did a pretty good job of re-enacting some of the major battles, but never really got you to care about anybody on the screen).

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    9. Re:Forever War not on TV by mpe · · Score: 2

      Oh, come on. Think how closely "Starship Troopers" followed the book.

      How many times do movies follow the book anyway? IIRC the original title was "The Starship Soldier" which IMHO better fits the story.

    10. Re:Forever War not on TV by richieb · · Score: 2
      Actually the "Dune" miniseries followed the book pretty closely. I guess as close a a movie can.

      --
      ...richie - It is a good day to code.
    11. Re:Forever War not on TV by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Man, I hope you get really modded up for this one, because this is exactly the reason I left Sci-Fi. Once you have matured, you don't like anyone to get on their soap box and work you over, all the while trying to disguise their debate as prose. We don't see very many passion plays these days, and that's how I view about 95% of the Sci-Fi genre now. The other 5% is really worth reading, though, and asks open ended ethical questions without the author claiming to know the answers. (I thought AI was a great movie for that reason)

    12. Re:Forever War not on TV by mpe · · Score: 2

      Actually the "Dune" miniseries followed the book pretty closely. I guess as close a a movie can.

      A miniseries is rather longer than the average movie. Dune is rather longer than the average length novel too.

    13. Re:Forever War not on TV by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      "Space: Above and Beyond" tanked because the series was continually moved around from day to day and time to time, often given the worst viewing slots and with very little warning.

      Why? Because, behind the scenes, one of the two primary people involved in the series managed to *really* piss someone off high in management, so in revenge he fucked with the programming to make it impossible for people to look foward to seeing it at the same time, on the same day, every week. It was one of the most blatant power ploys in TV going on at the time.

      And it worked.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  8. Surprise? by j_hirny · · Score: 1

    It's a little bit of surpise to me, because at least some time ago, domain nineprincesinamber.com was owned by Warner Bros (and redirected to their site). So, the concept has changed? Or will WB make the series for Sci-Fi? We'll see.

    Still, I hope they'll make a good movie. The book's worth it.

    1. Re:Surprise? by arivanov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In either case it will suck.

      Compared to this one Lord of the Rings is a child's play. I just do not see how you can make the Courts of Chaos or the GhostWheel in a movie today. Even having the budget for all Star War flicks combined with the budget for Titanic and Independence Day.

      I still get shudders remembering how did they vandalise Heinlein's "Starship Troupers". Dunno about Forever War but a miniseries on the Amber Chronicles will make that debacle seem like a work of high art by comparison...

      Shudder... Shudder...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Surprise? by j_hirny · · Score: 1

      Naah, I wouldn't be so pesimistic. To be honest, I like the way "Starship Troopers" were made. They were good satire about war propaganda movies, war propaganda itself, and although I agree it's different from the book, I wouldn't disregard this movie.

      Back to the topic; there's a non-zero chance that ACh will be a good movie. Sci-fi has some experience with making TV series and although ACh budget may not be as high as LoTR's one, it doesn't have to mean that the movie will suck. Remember the Dune? If Amber will be only as good as it, it'll be good.

    3. Re:Surprise? by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      I just do not see how you can make the Courts of Chaos or the GhostWheel in a movie today. Even having the budget for all Star War flicks combined with the budget for Titanic and Independence Day.

      1) Forget about the Merlin Chronicals(they were crap compared to the Corwin books anyway). Merlin and Ghostwheel will have to get their own miniseries.

      2) There really isn't anyting in Corwin's stories that is all that extravagent. Near all of it occurrs in non-fantastic settings (in rooms/tents/clearings etc). The bits that are fantastic (battles, shadow shifting, pattern walking) won't really require any more CGI work than Dune did.

    4. Re:Surprise? by i0lanthe · · Score: 2

      I agree, the first five Amber books seem pretty feasible in terms of technology. They're not even all that long. Herewith I express guarded hopefulness. It really depends on whether they preserve the "attitude".

      --
      "The Crystal Wind is the Storm, and the Storm is Data, and the Data is Life"
    5. Re:Surprise? by bobol6 · · Score: 1

      Compared to this one Lord of the Rings is a child's play. I just do not see how you can make the Courts of Chaos or the GhostWheel in a movie today. Even having the budget for all Star War flicks combined with the budget for Titanic and Independence Day.

      I still get shudders remembering how did they vandalise Heinlein's "Starship Troupers". Dunno about Forever War but a miniseries on the Amber Chronicles will make that debacle seem like a work of high art by comparison...

      Yeah. Maybe someday when we can produce n-th generation special effects with only the effort required for Disney animation, but not now. I don't understand why they don't stick to the more filmable sci-fi.

      Neuromancer, for instance. That would be fantastic.

  9. Re:nicht verstanden by j0nkatz · · Score: 0

    STFU!

    --
    Don't mod me, bro'!!!!
  10. What will be the popular response to Haldeman? by MrZaius · · Score: 1

    While /. may or may not approve of the film, I think it'll be most interesting to see what everyone else thinks of their adaptation of the Forever War. I can't think of ANYTHING to hit the airwaves that deals with homosexuality in such a manner, and it's sure to raise more than a few eyebrows.

    Hope they can pull it off without watering it down.

    1. Re:What will be the popular response to Haldeman? by nuggz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They'll cut it out.

      Forced sex & conscription? That will be good, might as well get the pleasure platoons out. (Moon has a harsh mistress - heinlein)

      Star Ship Troopers was a decent book, but the movie just skipped all that "stuff" that didn't make a flashy movie.
      Heck they didn't even have battle suits in it.

    2. Re:What will be the popular response to Haldeman? by jlower · · Score: 1

      If Comedy Central can get away with what they do on South Park (and obviously they do), there's NO reason the SciFi channel can't deal with the homosexuality, forced sex, etc of The Forever War.

    3. Re:What will be the popular response to Haldeman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll cut out the homosexuality.

      They'll cut out the forced sex.

      They'll cut out the drugs.

      They'll cut out the required cussing.

      In short, it'll be a short, dull and disappointing miniseries.

      Oh well, guess I'll go re-read the book.

    4. Re:What will be the popular response to Haldeman? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      IIRC James Cameron on being told that Verhooven was making Starship Troopers asked if he was going to have the battle suits. When he learned that SsT didn't have the powered armor his response was "I already made that movie" (Aliens).

    5. Re:What will be the popular response to Haldeman? by mpe · · Score: 2

      That will be good, might as well get the pleasure platoons out. (Moon has a harsh mistress - heinlein)

      Can't see either "The Moon is a Harsh mistress" or Ben Bova's "Moonwar" (which is very similar) being made into a movie or a miniseries right now...

  11. The forever war? by GigsVT · · Score: 1

    Which one is that, the "War on Terrorism", or the "War on Drugs"?

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    1. Re:The forever war? by Bearpaw · · Score: 2
      The "War on Poverty"?

      No, wait, I got it -- it's the "War on Lame War Metaphors Used for Political Posturing". That's a Forever War.

  12. "edgy" like south park? by d0s · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Tripping the Rift" will be Sci Fi's first animated series. Produced by Cine Groupe and Film Roman, the show is about a misfit group of cabinmates aboard a spaceship. Created by Chuck Austen and Chris Moeller, the series "will have the kind of edgy feel that makes 'South Park' a hit on Comedy Central," said Hammer.

    Will it have an animated piece of fecal matter called "captain's log"?

    1. Re:"edgy" like south park? by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      Undoubtedly. And it won't be funny then, either.

    2. Re:"edgy" like south park? by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      Um, if you check out their webpage, they've already used that joke. : P

    3. Re:"edgy" like south park? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will it have an animated piece of fecal matter called "captain's log"?

      Given the moral standards South Park displays, I certainly hope so.....

      WileECoyote.

    4. Re:"edgy" like south park? by doggo · · Score: 1

      "the show is about a misfit group of cabinmates aboard a spaceship."

      Yeah. Don't we already have an "edgy like South Park" SF series? It's called Red Dwarf.

      Though, it's not animated.

    5. Re:"edgy" like south park? by doggo · · Score: 1

      I apologize for disparaging Tripping The Rift. I'd seen this a long time ago and thought it was brilliant, but didn't remember the name.

      God I hope they can keep the cussing, it adds to the mood.

      And the nipples. And the party favor.

    6. Re:"edgy" like south park? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Will it have an animated piece of fecal matter called "captain's log"?"

      You're surprisingly close. I found a cartoon called 'Tripping the Rift' on Kazaa, heh it was very funny. You should hunt that down and watch it!

      One little concern tho, the cartoon was a little too adult oriented, they'd have to soften it a bit for TV.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  13. Re:NO WAY!!!! by Foss · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Finally we get to experience the REAL power of a dark clown! Now let's hope they show it here in the UK. I doubt it'll happen, but someone's bound to record each episode and put it online. Maybe they'll even release a DVD!

    It's great to see an underground(ish) cartoon like Tripping The Rift get some real recognition instead of them just showing another program invented by a major TV company 'cause their marketing stats say it'll do well.

    --
    You've got mail. Pattern baldness. - Crow
  14. Tripping the Rift? by Doctor+Fishboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My God, how the heck will they get that on TV? The original animation had enough sexual innuendo to give any Conservative American a heart attack. Mind you, it had some excellent quotes:

    Why don't you fight without using your faggot clown powers, son? -- Chode

    Come on you lipstick wearing felch monkey! -- Chode

    Never underestimate the power of a dark clown!! -- Darph Bobo

    I'm looking forward to it!

    Dr Fish

    1. Re:Tripping the Rift? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have the mpeg of it and NO DOUBT, how the hell are they going to keep it on the air, it makes southpark look like seasame street!

      mindrape

    2. Re:Tripping the Rift? by IlIlIlIl · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sexual innuendo? She had a clown on her ass! That's more than innuendo, IMO.

    3. Re:Tripping the Rift? by benjymous · · Score: 2, Informative

      The original website http://www.trippingtherift.com/ seems to currently be down (I'd guess it's getting a sci-fi channel revamp, or something, since a via-google slashdotting seems unlikely) but it can still be reached thanks to the wayback machine

      or you can visit Google's cached version of the downloads page to download the episode 1 movie

      --
      Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
    4. Re:Tripping the Rift? by SandSpider · · Score: 1

      They played it on the Sci-Fi channel already. It was on a late night show (the one where they play sci-fi shorts submitted from a variety of sources). They had to censor a few words, and they definitely reduced the resolution of a certain character's nether-region, but for the most part, it was there.

      =Brian

      --
      There is nothing so good that someone, somewhere, will not hate it.
  15. Red Dwarf! by puto · · Score: 1

    Tripping the Rift sounds like a rip off of the brit classic Red Dwarf. We tried to steal the original with an American Cast and it did not work. A white rimmer.

    Nope Sc-Fi can pull it off. Hell Lexx is just plain nasty.

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
    1. Re:Red Dwarf! by billy_troll · · Score: 0

      er rimmer is white in the original.
      (played by Chris barrie)
      you may be thinking of cat
      (danny john jules.)

      --
      -----im billy troll----- im better than you at everything you do.
    2. Re:Red Dwarf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you meant a white Cat...

    3. Re:Red Dwarf! by Golias · · Score: 1
      By the way, am I the only one out there who hates the remastered effects and music that was added to the first 2 seasons of Red Dwarf when the show was re-released?

      I thought that the sparse soundtrack of the original production really underscored Lister's the vast emptiness of space, making the show feel much darker (and the jokes that much funnier). IMHO, The new soundtrack really jazzed things up, and ruined the deliberate, plodding pace which made the show so unique.

      Can I get an "Amen" on that?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:Red Dwarf! by Golias · · Score: 1
      Gotta learn to hit the ol' preview button once in a while. That should have read:

      "I thought that the sparse soundtrack of the original production really underscored Lister's isolation, and the vast emptiness of space, making the show feel much darker (and the jokes that much funnier).

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    5. Re:Red Dwarf! by doggo · · Score: 1

      AMEN

    6. Re:Red Dwarf! by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      I gotta say Red Dwarf & Tripping the Rift don't have very much in common at all...

      Not unless I have compeltely misssed the fact that Red Dawrf is a Star Trek/Star Wars spoof with a truly tastless american style (not that the style wasn't funny, but)...?

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  16. Nice to see more sci-fi on sci-fi by dachshund · · Score: 1

    It's really gratifying to see a cable channel that's becoming more serious about its stated mission as the audience grows. It's a nice counterexample to certain music television stations that seem to have entirely forgotten about the music...

    1. Re:Nice to see more sci-fi on sci-fi by seann · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more, our canadian station "Much Music" now plays 99% Black music. I'm not saying I hate black people in any manor, but I can't stand the sound of these guys talking about banging chicks and lifting cars.

      However, since thats the mainstream music right now, once where we only had to put up with "Da Mix" now it's 24/7!

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  17. The sequal to Forever War by dpilot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    wasn't Forever Peace, but Forever Free.

    Both very good books, IMHO.

    Part of the feeling of irrelevance came from Joseph and Marygay's feeling of being stranded in time. ST:TNG touched on this topic one episode, though with a different treatment - the soldier who fought for a society, and is no longer able to return. In Forever War, the alienation is from cultural drift exaggerated by time dilation. In ST:TNG is was from the violence conditioning the people received in order to become soldiers.

    Which brings us back to Forever Peace, in an odd way.

    I also preferred the SciFi Dune miniseries to the old movie. I hope they do good treatments of both Forever War and Amber.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  18. memories by hymie3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I first read the Chronicles of Amber in the 3rd grade. I did a book report on it. And one of those shoebox things (diorama?) My diorama was from the cover of the first (second?) book: Corwin, sword in one hand, bloody severed head of talking shadow cat in the other hand.

    I can remember being puzzled why my third grade teacher kept asking me if anyone had tried to touch me in an uncomfortable way....

    1. Re:memories by harshaw · · Score: 1

      I go back and read the Chronicles of Amber every year or so. For some reason, Zelazny's writing is completely engrossing and satisfying. It will be interesting to see if the TV version can capture the magic of the books as well as some of the fantastic imagery.

    2. Re:memories by rot26 · · Score: 1

      Yep, IF you don't count the last couple of books which he wrote after he got sick.

      --



      To ensure perfect aim, shoot first and call whatever you hit the target
    3. Re:memories by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Yeah, things seems to get a little disjointed at that point. But I imagine he was probably in a lot of pain at the time.
      One has to admire his dedication.

    4. Re:memories by hymie3 · · Score: 1

      Me too. I tend to stop at Trumps of Doom, however.

  19. More crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering their abysmal failure in making the Dune miniseries I am dreading anything that has the SciFi channel stamp on it.

    Of course more science fiction work needs to be filmed. But not by them. It will be a travesty, I assure you.

  20. Good Plan for Sci-Fi Network by billtom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hope that the Sci-Fi network keeps this up. Whatever one's opinions about particular TV adaptations, I think that it would be a very good idea for Sci-Fi network to make bringing classic SF literature to television as part of their mandate.

    That's a lot better reason for the channel to exist than to show continuous repeats of the same old serieses.

    1. Re:Good Plan for Sci-Fi Network by Suidae · · Score: 2

      Yup. There are tons of great sci-fi books and shorts out there. Even if they don't put blockbuster effort into it, it would be great to see some of them adapted for TV. Thats one of the things I love about Outer Limits, good and great sci-fi, and none of the limitations of being stuck with the same characters and situations.

  21. Speeling by OgdEnigmaX · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Zelazny. Zelazny. Zelazny.

    1. Re:Speeling by OgdEnigmaX · · Score: 0

      Off-topic how? It was and continues to be spelled wrong in the story. Things like this don't fix themselves. It takes a little coaxing, I imagine. Oh well.

  22. reader's dissapointment by sdflkgfljdqshgjkqsfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure about this one. I'm usually pretty skeptical when it comes to series/mini-series/movies based on books I've read and liked. I'm not saying thy are all worthless of course and some very decent adaptations have been made, yet I'm allways a little disappointed. I read a lot and love the way imagination is used when reading, something that is totally devoid in videos/TV etc...
    Because of this, I'm dissapointed when I see a movie after reading the book and at the same time I'm usually not as enthralled when reading the book after seeing a movie (as it was the cas for Jurassic Park for example).
    What I'm trying to get at is that these series are cool, yes but who are they targeted to? The readers who may be dissapointed? or the people who hav'nt read the books (lots of them running about) and that may be dissapointed if tey decide to do so after? Or probably your average viewer who hs'nt read the book, will like the series and will not read the book?
    Who's a winner in this situation?

    --
    how does one change his /. id?
    1. Re:reader's dissapointment by seann · · Score: 1

      Ever see Sci-Fi's version of "Cold Equations".
      Pretty good remake of the short story in "Astounding Science Fiction) 1956 August edition. Same publication as Starship Troopers was in, btw.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
  23. Pathetic by Pussy+Is+Money · · Score: 0, Troll

    Science fiction, computer games and cartoons. Stunted children? You decide.

    --
    Pushin' 'n dealin', shovin' 'n stealin'
  24. Just Great by Ariven · · Score: 1


    Sci fi will get it, show four episodes, then wait six months to show the rest all while re-running the FIRST four episodes over and over.. then cancelling the series halfway into showing the rest...

    sigh.

  25. Oh dear by oren · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Imagine Amber as a 2-hour mini-series. It is enough to cover the first *book*, maybe. If anyone had the feeling that Lord of the Rings was rushed, this will be ten times worse.

    Then 'Forever War'. One word: Battlesuits. Certainly the special effects technology is up to showing them... but *you can't see the actor's face* in a battlesuit. My bet is they'll throw away any part the book which doesn't relate to combat action, and botch that by throwing away the suits. Result: a 'Starship Troopers' clone. Enough Said.

    WHY can't the movie industry *build* on the great SF out there? Imagine "Snow Crash" done with the technology used for "Final Fantasy". Imagine Lord of the Rings as a *series* - say, 5 hours for each book. Imagine a production of "Bridge of Birds" on the same lines as "Princes Bride". I could go on for *hours*.

    Maybe "we" ("the guild of paying movie-goers and ad-watchers") don't deserve any better. Even when a good production gets made (by accident or thanks to the courage of some producer), it tends to be a commercial flop.

    Take for example the animation move done based on "The Last Unicorn" by Peter S. Beagle. Can you believe it? serious fantasy, in animation, not targeted at kids! In a word: a flop. You probably never even heard of it, but trust me, you won't regret seeing it, even if you've read the book.

    BOOK. That's the answer, *read a good book*. Come to think of it... it doesn't have ads, it costs very favorably compared to a movie ticket, and you don't need Tivo to time-shift it!

    1. Re:Oh dear by MtViewGuy · · Score: 2

      Take for example the animation move done based on "The Last Unicorn" by Peter S. Beagle. Can you believe it? serious fantasy, in animation, not targeted at kids! In a word: a flop. You probably never even heard of it, but trust me, you won't regret seeing it, even if you've read the book.

      Fortunately, I've seen it on video and it is surprisingly quite good. :-) Hopefully, one of these days they'll transfer it to DVD and market it properly, because it is a much-underrated movie.

    2. Re:Oh dear by Rogerborg · · Score: 2
      • My bet is they'll throw away any part the book which doesn't relate to combat action, and botch that by throwing away the suits.

      Or they could have a lot of glum people staring at the stars and making psuedo-profound statements about the futility of war. Think "Space: Above and Beyond", and think how quickly that got canned.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Oh dear by seann · · Score: 1

      totaly off topic, but I loved that show to death when It was on.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    4. Re:Oh dear by eudas · · Score: 1

      or, any episode of star trek.

      eudas

      --
      Blessed is he who expects the worst, for he shall not be disappointed.
    5. Re:Oh dear by shren · · Score: 2

      Imagine Amber as a 2-hour mini-series.

      I saw a post on usenet that says it's going to be 4 hours. (It was a series list, not an individual post, so it's a little bit more authoritive than just an opinion.) So, if you do the first 5 books, that's a little less than an hour per book. The list of what you have to cut is staggering.

      You'll have to cut the story down to it's barest elements. It might be an interesting watch for non-fans, but Zelazny fans will hate it.

      --
      Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
    6. Re:Oh dear by Dexx · · Score: 1

      I was reading through the previous comments and was reminded of the television from Farenheit 451. Everything had become remade for TV to the point where it's all happy endings.

      So when do these air? Maybe I can have the series memorized by then..

      --
      Feel the fear and do it anyway.
    7. Re:Oh dear by mpe · · Score: 2

      Then 'Forever War'. One word: Battlesuits. Certainly the special effects technology is up to showing them... but *you can't see the actor's face* in a battlesuit. My bet is they'll throw away any part the book which doesn't relate to combat action, and botch that by throwing away the suits. Result: a 'Starship Troopers' clone. Enough Said.

      There is also the sexuality aspect. Can you really see that making it through a US based production company?

    8. Re:Oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Can you believe it? serious fantasy, in animation, not targeted at kids!"

      Sounds like Neon Genesis Evangelion to me.

    9. Re:Oh dear by powerlinekid · · Score: 2

      People don't want to sit and watch a 5 hour show or movie. Yes they have no problems watching tv for 5 hours, but even the best shows lose your interest after 2 hours. Again which is why we people complaining about how long a movie is when its longer than an hour and a half. Anyway, the last unicorn is an excellent movie. When i was a little kid (80s) i used to watch it all the time, and about 6 months ago i saw it again for the first time in about 15 years. It wasn't as good as i used to think it was, but it was still pretty amazing.

      --

      can't sleep slashdot will eat me
    10. Re:Oh dear by raoulortega · · Score: 1

      Then 'Forever War'. One word: Battlesuits. Certainly the special effects technology is up to showing them... but *you can't see the actor's face* in a battlesuit.

      I'd prefer that these sorts of scifi adaptions be done with animation. That way they can be true to the vision of the author without the compromises imposed by such things as having your star hidden for half the film. Since most of the films these days seem to consist of CGI, why not just go all the way, and replace the actors, too.

      (And good animation, not some anime crap where everything is static but lips synced to Japanese. Think Pixar or even Disney cel.)

  26. Re Starship troopers by Mike+Connell · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Star Ship Troopers was a decent book, but the movie just skipped all that "stuff" that didn't make a flashy movie.

    As was said at the time: "Starship troopers: Based on the back of a book by Robert A Heinlein"

  27. What's next, then? by leshert · · Score: 2

    I guess I can hope against hope that they will do the same for Daniel Keys Moran's _The Continuing Time_ series, starting with Emerald Eyes...

    1. Re:What's next, then? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      One can hope, yes. There's even a screenplay, which IIRC covers both Emerald Eyes and The Long Run, which has the distinct advantage of having been written by the author of the books. I don't know if there are any current plans for production, though. Check out QueenOfAngels.com for the latest DKM info, if you don't know about the site already.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  28. The game by digitalhermit · · Score: 2

    There was once an Infocom-like game based on the Chronicles of Amber; does anyone recall it?

    I've been a Roger Zelazny fan for a long time, somewhere around 1985 when another student gave me "Lord of Light" to read. About that time, after reading the Chronicles, I adopted "Dworkin" as a BBS handle (and that has since morphed into my present moniker).

    Though the first Amber novels are good reads, I think his true talent was in the short story. Pick up "Unicorn Variations" if you'd like a fairly representative anthology. And of course, read "Lord of Light", one of the seminal (heh heh, he said seminal) novels of Science Fiction.

    And if you are a Chronicles fan, stay far away from the Second Chronicles -- they're horrible. There were some really interesting ideas in it such as the Ghostwheel -- a hyper computer that was designed with the assumption that different laws of physics applied, but they were written near to his end, and I think it shows.

    1. Re:The game by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Your opinion of the Second Chronicles aside, if you have them and don't like them/want them, contact me!! I've been trying to get a hold of them for YEARS!

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:The game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of the Amber Chronicles can be found in an omnibus volume called the Great Book of Amber.

    3. Re:The game by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Which I've never ever seen in bookstores ANYWHERE (online or otherwise)!

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    4. Re:The game by sammy+baby · · Score: 3, Informative
      There was once an Infocom-like game based on the Chronicles of Amber; does anyone recall it?


      I do. I never had the opportunity to play it, though. It was one of those games which was text input only, a la the Infocom games, but had still images representing wherever you were.

      There was also a tabletop roleplaying game, called Amber Diceless Roleplay, by the now-defunct (I think) Phage Press. Like the rules suggest, you played it without dice. I own the core rules - it was an interesting game, that I still hope to run sometime, after I find someone else who actually enjoyed the Amber books.
    5. Re:The game by GearheadX · · Score: 1

      The largest problem of the Merlin Cycle is that, from the look of things, it was never actually finished. Judging from the short stories that got published in Amberzine and other places, he had something else cooking...

    6. Re:The game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMFG. Open up your eyes, jackass.

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/038080906 0/ qid=1017937955/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_67_1/104-2051063-00 95167

    7. Re:The game by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      I still hope to run sometime

      I don't suppose you live anywere near me, do you?

    8. Re:The game by DrPhred · · Score: 1

      Try searching on Limewire. I found all of them there as well as the Amber short stories.

    9. Re:The game by GodInHell · · Score: 1

      "There was also a tabletop roleplaying game, called Amber Diceless Roleplay [rpg.net], by the now-defunct (I think) Phage Press."

      I can't speak for Phage Press' continuing existence directly, but new copies of the Amber game keep showing up at the game store I shop at.. then being bought.. then replaced.. etc. About a year ago I went in there and picked up the core book, as well as shadow-knight, I wanted to pick up extra copies for the rest of my group, but they unfortunatly only keep one on hand.. implying that someone is still shipping books sold by Phage.

      Anyway, if you live anywhere near chicago, I'll always kill to jump in a game of Amber.. or you can go to Gen Con and play in one of the pick-ups Wujcik runs there.

      -GiH

    10. Re:The game by sammy+baby · · Score: 2

      It appears that Phage still exists, although I don't see that they have a website anywhere. (Eric! Get a site! It'll make you feel good good good...)

      For the record, I live in a suburb of Philadelphia, PA. And unfortunately, I'm kinda gamed out at the moment, but drop me a line if you're interested. :)

    11. Re:The game by Davorama · · Score: 2

      Yes, I played it. About the best RPG experience I ever had. So many possibilities because of the nature of Zelazny's creation. A group of about 10 got together to start things off and then treated it as a sort of interactive story writing thing. We'd write a few pages about what we where up to then the GM would through in a plot twist and we'd have to respond with a few more pages or get together for an IRC session. Worked great for a couple month until grad school got in the way.

      --

      Davo -- Free speech, free software, AND free beer.

    12. Re:The game by digitalhermit · · Score: 2

      I own the core rules - it was an interesting game, that I still hope to run sometime, after I find someone else who actually enjoyed the Amber books.

      Wow, I haven't played an RPG since somewhere around 1992. I seem to recall playing a Call of Cthulhu module on one of the local BBS's at the time, but none since then. What's involved in setting up something across the 'Net?

    13. Re:The game by Tom · · Score: 2

      I've been running an amber campaign for over a year now, and I can really recommend it. Just one thing that needs to be taken care of: More so than any other RPG you need to choose the right people to play with.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    14. Re:The game by cthulhubob · · Score: 1

      One recommendation - when you read something in the rulebook that doesn't make sense or seems to conflict with Roger Zelazny's presentation of things, stop reading the rulebook, think it through yourself and play it by ear if necessary :)

      I found a bunch of places like that in my copy... But I've got the second edition - there might be a 3rd edition out by now that fixes some of it.

      As an example of what I'm talking about, one of the examples it gives of why a high Warfare score is good is Benedict supposedly being able to parry a sword thrust by an invisible attacker that he wasn't warned of? Come on, he *did* get his arm cut off twice in the series didn't he? He's the best out there, but he's not omnipotent!

      Also, the artifact point system is totally fucked. Just because beginning players might *want* something like Grayswandir or Ghostwheel does *not* mean you should give it to them! And certainly not for only 12 points!!

      Aside from things like that, the basic premise of the game system is very solid. If you're playing with "traditionalist" AD&D types, you might want to devise a dice-based combat system though, because otherwise it becomes basically "the player can get out of any situation because he only has to keep track of what one person is doing whereas the GM has to keep track of 20, and the player will argue that he should have been able to dodge that".

      --

      In post-9/11 America, the CIA interrogates YOU!
    15. Re:The game by andfarm · · Score: 1

      Well, I can't recall any based on Amber. However, there *was* one loosely based on the Cthulhu mythos - _The_Lurking_Horror_. Very loosely, though.

      --

      TANSTAAFI: There Ain't No Such Thing As A Free iPod.

  29. Tripping the rift by xemacs · · Score: 1

    Doesn't that sound just like Red dwarf?

    Lister: "Hey dude, is our ship, like, attacked?"
    Kryten: "Engage lie mode. No sir."

    weeeeee \o/ !

    In France there we had this great tv show called 'Objectif nul' which was the trashy version of Red Dwarf. I'd be curious to see what you guys over the ocean will come up with :)

  30. How many Princes? by CaseStudy · · Score: 2

    Anyone know if they're doing the entire series, or just the first five?

    I think it would be a better series if they stuck to Corwin's story. It's more complete (was the tenth book supposed to be the last? If so, it's the worst ending to a series I've ever read), and it's easier to produce (sure, you've got the Trump effect and the shadow creatures and the Pattern, but all that Logrus/Ghostweel crap is gone). Besides, it's just a better story that way. Merlin's story has always seemed tacked on, and the second-generation characters are far less interesting.

    1. Re:How many Princes? by gila_monster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I, too, was a bit disappointed by the second Amber series, but let's cut Roger a little slack. If I recall correctly, it was supposed to be only three books. I think he ran against two problems that caused the work to suffer: 1) it was obvious that Merlin's story wasn't going to fit into three books, and 2) Zelazny knew he was dying and hadn't a lot of time to finish.

      Yeah, not as good as the first series, but not a bad read overall. (Of course, he's in my Top Three Authors of the 20th Century, so I'm biased.)

      Tripping the Rift...hooo, boy, that's going to be interesting.

      gm

      --
      Ad luna, Alicia! Ad luna!
  31. Tripping the Rift RULES!!! by sootman · · Score: 1

    ttr is *hysterical*, not to mention chock-full of violence and nudity. Go kill this poor guy's server and get yerself the ~35 MB mpg to see for yourself. Every bit as good as the original Spirit of Xmas.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  32. Amber books.. by jspectre · · Score: 1

    Does this mean someone might reprint the Amber books..? It's getting pretty hard to find them these days as well as some of his other early stuff. Bookstores list them as "out of print." :-(

    Pretty sad but a lot of my favorites from my younger years seem to have gone "out of print." Wish the publishers would release them to the public or something. :-) Would love reading Amber on my PDA while commuting.

    --

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  33. Mondays vs Thursdays by nuggz · · Score: 1

    Yes, you're right. Irrelevance was what I was thinking.
    Thursdays are my monday, just don't function good.
    The day after hump day is just rough on me

  34. any other channel i'd cry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But seeing the quality job that SciFi did with Dune, I'm actually hopeful. I wonder if they're gonna do the entire 10-book series, or just the first 5. And Forever War could be a geek-drool fest, with gigantic, relativistic speed battlecruisers and powered armor for the troops...it could be Starship Troopers could have been, expecially if they keep the authors message and don't insert the directors instead.

  35. Heinlein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So when is someone going to do a series, mini or otherwise on Heinlein's "Stranger in a Strange Land"?
    It is a far better book than most...or haven't you douchebags read any Heinlein?

    1. Re:Heinlein by Shack95 · · Score: 1


      Maybe I need to read a different Heinlein novel. Wasnt that the one were he kept going on about how much he liked waffles? I couldnt bring myself to read the last dozen or so pages...

    2. Re:Heinlein by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1
      I think YOU'RE thinking of "Job: A comedy of justice". Stranger is the book about a Martian named Smith. And waterbeds.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
  36. Galactica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The latest announcement has gotten fans of the original Battlestar Galactica more than worried since it's speculated that the new series is going to be more or less "Battlecreek 90210" ignoring basically everything from the original. This is despite the fact that a petition has over 14000 signatures in support for the original cast and themes. Recently a new one has been created with a more strict tone.

  37. Amber novels current availibility by Dr.+Smoe · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Amber Chronicles have been reprinted, as
    _The Great Book of Amber : The Complete Amber
    Chronicles_ [Eos (Trade); ISBN: 0380809060], which
    has all 10 books in it.

    Of course, I wish they'd done it as two separate
    books for the Corwin and Merlin series, since I
    think the former is *far* superior.

    1. Re:Amber novels current availibility by pkesel · · Score: 1

      I just bought the big book a couple weeks ago, and I'm now starting the second of the Merlin books. I have to concur. Corwin was much more fun to read.

      Overall i'm loving the series. I toyed with them earlier and never got much out of them, but this time I'm finding it much more fun.

      --
      - Sig this!
    2. Re:Amber novels current availibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are really good if you view them as entertainment -- technically, Amber is a one-trick-pony: Everything in the world of ideas emanates from a perfect form, and all those perfect forms exist in the world of Amber. I.E. all of the warrior-gods in every culture are essentially poor xeroxes of Corwin's brother Gerard. A very platonist idea. So as fantasy/SF, pretty average. The real meat of the story is in the richness of the characters, particularly Corwin. His brush with failure and frailty in prison gives him a very believable level of humanity that is not shared with the other characters in his books -- they all tend to be cold, ruthless bastards.

  38. Amber should work well by pogen · · Score: 2
    I have no doubt that they will completely ruin it like they have so many other of my favorites.

    Personally, I couldn't stand Zelazny's prose, so by the end of book 5, reading it had become a tedious chore. I never even cracked book 6. I might like the miniseries somewhat better... Lots of gratuitious action and dialogue, which will translate well to the screen. And the books are fairly short -- all ten combined are shorter than the Lord of the Rings trilogy -- so I don't see screen time as being too big an issue.

    Besides which, pulpy novels are easier to adapt. Amber is pure pulp sci-fantasy, so it will be much harder to screw up than something as weighty as Dune.

    With the exception of NPiA, I didn't even like the books. But I'm looking forward to the miniseries.

    1. Re:Amber should work well by dillon_rinker · · Score: 2

      Amber is pure pulp sci-fantasy

      No, it's not. It's pure pulp fantasy. It goes far beyond the realm of science.

      I liked the first two (NPiA and tSotU) but after that it went downhill. I've read all ten books about three times, though, because I still like them better than most other fantasy novels.

    2. Re:Amber should work well by Valdrax · · Score: 2

      Actually, Zelazny's introspective and bemusedly world-weary style of writing is part of the whole fun of reading the stories of Corwin and Merlin. That's a major factor which will be lost when the books are made into a TV series, because few TV series actually focus on a character's internal monolouge. It's those bits of musing that make Corwin's character so strong in the first 5 books. Without that, Corwin will just be a big guy with a sword and a great sense of paranoid cunning.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  39. Re:Battlesuits by Feersum+Endjinn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They could easily make the Forever War without battlesuits. The point of the war was that it was dehumanizing, utterly violent, depressing, futile and unnecessary. That could be conveyed without the battle suit, although they do need something better than the Starship Troopers movie.
    Also, the aliens need to be reflexively repulsive. Like a spider on your desk, they have to be something you would shoot on sight without thinking...

    The part I'm interested in seeing is the changes in earth's culture each time the time-displaced soldiers return home. Particularly: How are they going to handle the homosexuality aspects? That plays a large part in the book.

    Finally, it wasn't clear to me at the end of the book, did the humans and aliens merge into one race, or had the aliens actually won the war and taken over humanity? I'd like to see thier take on that.

  40. No Sex in Amber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    That might be a good thing. In the first five books, the sex was completely missing...

    You fail your reading comprehension. What on earth did you think it was referring to in Nine Princes between Corwin and Moire? Between Benedict and Lintra? (I may have butchered the spelling of her name, sorry, don't have my books handy) Between Corwin and Dara? And not between Corwin and Lorraine? I'm sorry, but if you missed the sex, you weren't reading closely at all.

    If you mean, there's no explicit descriptions of penises, vaginae, breasts, and suchlike? Fine, then there's "no sex" in Amber. It really torques me off when folks like you define "sex" in a book as the explicit, titilating depiction of sexual activity. There was plenty of sex in Amber--how can you not cover sex in a book about power rivalries in an immortal family who perceive the rest of the multiverse as mere pawns?

    No, there's sex in Amber, all right. It's just the subtle, literary kind, not the kind you can whack off to.

  41. TTP rated R or PG ? Only time will tell by cbodine · · Score: 0

    TTP is a ripoff of every scifi movie and show.

    It will be chesse but it will be CG chesse.

    I only hope that it will be just like the pilot on the page, if they put it on scifi then it will be edited for content nudity, language, and violence. It would have to be rated R for these reasons. But some dumb person in control of content will try to market it to kids, instead of the older crowds that the show was meant for.

    --
    Dr. Suess: 'Gandalf, Gandalf! Take the ring! I am too small to carry this thing!' 'I can not, will not hold the One.
  42. See the Dune series by ndogg · · Score: 1

    You obviously did not see what the Sci-Fi channel did with the Dune series. I was of the feeling that they did a rather good job on covering the first book in the Dune saga. It was a two hour mini-series with six episodes in all.

    The special effects were great, on par, if not better, than something that would have come out of traditional Hollywood movie series (and remember, this was six two-hour episodes.)

    Although the acting left a little to be desired, it wasn't horrible. Many people will disagree with me on this, but I preferred how House Harkonnen was portrayed as an arrogant aristocracy in this series than the filthy pigs in the original, 1980s version of the movie.

    While the series did not feel rushed, one could definitely tell that it catered to people who already read the book. There were a lot of important, implicit, character thinking stuff in the book that was missed in the movie and so to a person unfamiliar with the Dune series would have been completely lost and would have a hard time understanding the entirety of the plot.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:See the Dune series by mpe · · Score: 2

      Although the acting left a little to be desired, it wasn't horrible. Many people will disagree with me on this, but I preferred how House Harkonnen was portrayed as an arrogant aristocracy in this series than the filthy pigs in the original, 1980s version of the movie

      It was the movie that had the "happy ending". An inexplicable planetwide monsoon.

  43. 5 hour LOTR: FOTR? Not quite, but close... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    The initial DVD of LOTR: FOTR will be the normal 3 hour cut, but a subsequent one coming in November will have a FOUR hour cut, which should be pretty close to your wish. FYI.

  44. Amber is perfect for a mini-series, or movie even. by CurtisRWC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Chronicles of Amber were some of my favorite books growing up. Yeah, Merlin's chronicles weren't as good... There were good ideas, but they ended up getting drowned in a lot of not-so-good ideas that really changed the entire premise of the series. Still, Corwin's story was excellent. Why do I think the series would fit in a big (or small) screen format? First, the books are short. Really short. Teeny, in fact. I'm sure that the entire Amber series (Merlin's series included) doesn't even reach the length of some of the books in Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time series (I mean, Lord of Chaos was what, 1000 pages?). The problem with most movie adaptations is that the source material is much longer and richer than could ever be put in the standard 2 hour movie format or in a mini-series of reasonable length (reasonable to the networks, not to the viewers). Now, not only are the books short, a huge portion of those books are taken up by descriptions. Somebody up above mentioned Eric's "moist" beard and how Corwin hates getting hairs under his shirt. Stuff like that fills the books (unfortunately, it has been so long since I've read them that I couldn't think of my own examples, but oh well). You know how they say that a picture is worth a thousand words? With a good director, this would be more than true. What about the rest of the book? The stuff that isn't description? Stuff happens, and it happens rather quickly - to the reader at least, if not in the book itself. Take the plot of the first book (ummm... *SPOLIERS*... yeah...): Corwin wakes up, escapes from a mental hospital, goes to Flora's house, beats the crap out of some shadow creatures, goes on a drive to Amber and sees lots of strange stuff on the way (wasn't there a big guy eating cars or something?), gets attacked by Julian's men, runs down to Remba, gets laid, walks the pattern (and lots of flashback scenes), heads on over to the castle, gets in a fight, runs to Bleys, builds an army (this would take, what, one or two scenes?), attacks Amber, and so on. This is pretty much one action scene after another, and with Corwin's initial memory loss, it wouldn't be so awkward when another character gets to explain the Nifty Science Fiction/Fantasy Laws of Physics (tm) to him. Pacing could be made quick without any huge spans of time (like the armies getting built) seeming to vanish due to time working differently in Shadow. Of course, that somewhat changes when Corwin gets thrown in the slammer, but it still could be done very well in a TV or movie format. My only fear is that all the sword fights will be filled with Crouching Tiger meets The Matrix special effects.

  45. Audio? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone have the audio tapes of Zelazny reading the Amber novels? They came out from a company called Sunset Productions. I suspect he was somehow involved with the founding or running of this company because Sunset was based in New Mexico and the majority of their catalog was either his readings or stuff I know he was interested in, like Native spirituality. I have the first 5, his voice is hilarious; he sounds like Humphrey Bogart.

  46. Were the Second Chronicles bad? No. by SETIGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    And if you are a Chronicles fan, stay far away from the Second Chronicles -- they're horrible.

    I don't think the Second Chronicles were as bad as you think they were. IMHO, the worst of Zelazny's writings were better than the best writings of many more widely read authors.

    I'm reminded of an old review (written by Harlan Ellison, IIRC) of the movie 'Field of Dreams.' In it, Harlan claims that most literature (at least that written by men) is about a man's search for his father. The reasons for this are fairly obvious and I won't bore you with them. By extent, there are portions of such fiction that are autobiographical. It's certainly obvious that this theme is pretty prevalent in both Amber chronicles. Read a little deeper and you just might find that the Second Chronicles is worth your time.

    Of course the end of the Chronicles is disappointing. It was meant to be. I think Zelazny made a decision not to tie up all the loose ends. The end of a real story is never wrapped up entirely. Merlin, and Zelazny, get the same ending we all do. We turn and head back to Chaos.

    1. Re:Were the Second Chronicles bad? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course the end of the Chronicles is disappointing. It was meant to be. I think Zelazny made a decision not to tie up all the loose ends. The end of a real story is never wrapped up entirely.

      I'm not surprised you felt left hanging since the last two books of the second series never got written. AFAIK, only Zelazny estate and one or two lucky souls have even gotten to see the notes and partially written manuscripts (but only under an order of secrecy in case the family ever decides to get a ghostwriter to finish them).

    2. Re:Were the Second Chronicles bad? No. by digitalhermit · · Score: 2

      I don't think the Second Chronicles were as bad as you think they were. IMHO, the worst of Zelazny's writings were better than the best writings of many more widely read authors.

      I'd agree with this. There was a feeling that the last books were rushed, or possibly ghostwritten ( someone mentioned this may be the case). And I'm sure that the quality of the first books had raised my expectations for the second series. There were just so many little things that could have been developed better. In particular, the Logrus/Pattern matchup and its Faustian undertones seemed too obvious. When Ghostwheel was introduced I wondered if Zelazny had had a copy of Penrose's "Emperors New Mind" next to his typewriter (Wordstar?). In the end, Ghost seemed just another stereotypical AI, a HAL Jr. but with better weapons.

      I will give them another chance though.

  47. What No B5:Legends of the Rangers? @#*%!!! by Thag · · Score: 2

    I was really hoping B5:LotR would get picked up as a series.

    While the Legends of the Rangers tv-movie wasn't the greatest thing ever committed to screen, I thought that like pizza, not so great B5 is still pretty good, and MUCH better than anything Trek has put out lately.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  48. Don't forget Myst and Riverworld by Ifni · · Score: 1

    According to this official post from sci-fi on the demise of The Chronicle, they will be doing a movie based on Philip Jose Farmer's Riverworld.

    Also, some 20 hour miniseries from Steve Spielberg called "Taken". Also, according to this post, they will be doing a 4 hour Myst mini-series.

    The first 2 sound quite neat, but I'm not so sure about the Myst series...

    --

    Oh, was that my outside voice?

  49. more on Why It Will Suck by chiph · · Score: 1

    'Nine Princes' will suck, not because SciFi Channel's authors are a bunch of hacks who wouldn't recognize a good story if fell from the sky and whacked them on the head -- but because SciFi Channel doesn't have enough money to do it right.

    - Corwin's Mercedes SL? Uhhh, budget crunch - he's in a '92 Ford Taurus wagon. Sorry.

    - And, uhh, Nine Princes? More like 5, really. They had the other four signed to do it, but then they left for "Saved By The Bell: The Final Prom Dance".

    - Dworkin's animated cards? "Magic: The Gathering" cards that one of the crew stole from his little kid brother's room.

    - Walking The Pattern? They simply asked the LAPD to administer field sobriety tests to the cast.

    If SciFi were to put the appropiate amount of effort and money into this (like USA Networks did for Stephen King's 'The Stand'), then they'll have something worth spending 6 hours of my life on.

  50. A word about Zelazney by geekoid · · Score: 2

    I hear "Zelazney book made into movie", And I think "Damnation Alley"

    Horribe movie, after which Zelazney said he would never want any of his works to be a movie again.

    Of course, now that he's dead, his estate can throw all respect to the wind and cash in!
    Papas dead CHaCHing!
    sheesh.

    by the way, Damnation alley is a great sci-fi book.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  51. Re:Battlesuits by mpe · · Score: 2

    Finally, it wasn't clear to me at the end of the book, did the humans and aliens merge into one race, or had the aliens actually won the war and taken over humanity? I'd like to see thier take on that.

    Humans started creating clones and using them to crew their ships. The Taurans were clones without the concept of an individual.
    The other point was that it was the humans who started the war.

  52. Re: Janifer by merigold77 · · Score: 1
    Laurence Janifer, now there's a name I haven't even thought of in years. I have read a few of his books. The "Knave" series (Survivor, Knave in Hand, Knave and the Game) seems the most popular. I also think I have read "The Wonder War" and several of his short stories. Anyway reading your mention of him got me thinking about him after so many years so I pulled up a few links from Google:

    Janifer Bibliography

    What appears to be his homepage

    Of other science fiction writers he reminds me of maybe L. E. Modessit and Mack Reynolds the most. His writing isn't quite as political as that of either, but to me it has that same feel. Maybe Mike Resnick too?

    --
    Writing is the only socially acceptable form of schizophrenia. (E. L. Doctorow)
  53. "The Chronicles of Amber" and "The Forever War" by JustPassingBy · · Score: 1

    I have read both. And let's be honest. The books are always better that the movies. Would you really sit through an eight-hour movie so they can get all the details right? And I hate to say it but SEX sells. How else are you going to get the teenagers money. Plus Hollywood sometimes will make a good movie and follow the book. Harry Potter was a great book and I loved the movie. Lord of the Rings great movie and I then decided to read the book. The movie is making the book better, although it takes away from my imagination on how things look. And one last thing, at least they are trying to have quality television and not another Bay Watch. However, that had its Pluses.

  54. Re:Battlesuits by Galvatron · · Score: 2
    Or, they could just give the battlesuits big transparent faceplates. As you say, not a big deal really.

    How are they going to handle homosexuality? I'm more interested in how they're going to handle HETEROsexuality. They seemed to be having sex about every night, at least at first, and that's something you definately can't show on TV.

    Re: the end of the book. As the above reply said, the Taurans were all just clones of a single individual. As humans started using clones to fight the war, they somehow managed to establish a rapport with the Taurans (I think that part was a little fuzzy), and in communicating established that the Taurans had never attacked humanity, early human ships were simply very accident prone. Furthermore, had the war continued indefinately, humanity would eventually have won, because the Taurans were much less used to fighting.

    --
    "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
  55. Shortness of the Amber books by mjfgates · · Score: 1

    I have a compilation of all ten Amber books in trade format; I believe it has almost exactly 1100 pages. So, yep, short little books.

  56. Sci-Fi's Dune by Leeto2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've read Dune upwards of 10 times now. I've seen the 4 hr movie, the horrifically hacked 2.5 hr movie, and Sci-Fi's miniseries.

    If we could've had the costuming and actors of the movie with Sci-Fi's adaptation it would have been a helluva mini-series.

    I will never forgive the original movie for turning the "wierding way" into "wierding modules" quite possibly one of the stupidest ideas in an adaptation. That and the final battle scene..."This is Paul Atredies on a sand worm." "Here's the rear view of Paul Atredies on a sandworm" "Sand worms are REALLY BIG" "Here is yet another shot of Paul Atredies on top of a really big sand worm" "Did we show that sandworms are really big?" It was pathetic. They could've cut 30 min of worthless footage from the movie simply by paring down that scene.

    On the Sci-fi side, the Bene-Geserit costumes were laughable, and the guild navigators looked like ET gone horribly wrong. I also expected the foam sound-stage rocks to come tumbling down if one of the actors leaned on them. Costuming and sets aside, the actual way they adapted the book was pretty good. Giving Irulan a larger role was necessary to allow the audience a better understanding of who both she and Feyd were. You get a glimpse of just how slimy Feyd was.

    I've read the Amber series a couple of times, so I look forward to Sci-Fi's adaptation with a mixture of trepidation and anticipation. Watching Corwin on a Star Trek (the original) style set pathetically trying to pass as one of the more bizarre shadows of amber would be positively painful to watch.

    --



    "That's no moon"... Obi-Wan Kenobi
  57. Chronicles of Amber website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  58. Amber and Chaos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, all I want to see is how they do the patern, and what Ghostwheel and Logrus look like!

  59. Unfortuneate by nuggz · · Score: 2

    I think Moon is one of Heinleins better books.

    Although he has an obsession with the super intelligent quick witted character.

  60. Chronomaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chronomaster was a game that was one of Zelazny's last projects. It was an adventure game that got pretty good reviews, and had cool graphics.

  61. Re:Battlesuits by Surt · · Score: 2

    Having recently read the re-release of the book, the ending (spoiler):

    Humanity breeds to a perfect individual, and then decides that since that individual is perfect, they'll just make clones of that person so that humanity will be as efficient as possible.

    Once a sufficient portion of humanity is made up of clones, they begin to form a group mind.

    The human group mind contacts the tauran group mind (to me, implied telepathy) and they discover:

    a) the taurans have been all-clones and group mind for a long time.

    b) the taurans didn't start the war. Actually, some humans who wanted to profiteer off of producing war-time goods started the war.

    c) the taurans are more than willing to bend over backwards to achieve peace now that they can comprehend 'human' thought.

    Also, haldeman has brought out two pseudo sequels fairly recently, neither of which measures up to the first, but both of which do help to explain some of this stuff better.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  62. Re:What No B5:Legends of the Rangers? @#*%!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The abbreviation "B5:LotR" always makes me think of a Babylon V/Lord of the Rings crossover. Elves in Spaaaaaaaace!

  63. First five. by dark-nl · · Score: 1

    If they stick to the story of the first five books, there'll be a lot more room to get it right, and a more spectacular ending.

    I never liked the second chronicles anyway. I'm still not 100% convinced that they were actually written by Zelazny himself. He was playing around with the concept of authorship in his later years, I think it would have been just like him to want to see if someone else could write in his style, convincingly enough to pass as the second chronicles of Amber.

    1. Re:First five. by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess that I've been out of Sci-Fi and Fantasy for too long, because when COA was my favorite book (7th grade), there were only three. It's interesting that my two favorite books from middle school (the Forever War ROCKS!) are in the same post... I haven't even thought about either of them for 10 years or so. Now if only they would do the Unbeliever series...

  64. Many-trick pony by dark-nl · · Score: 1

    Actually what I like most about the Chronicles is the way its universe keeps expanding. Every time I thought I'd figured out how Corwin's world worked, he discovered something new that blew my mind. Of course, it doesn't work that well on a second read, but I still spend some evenings puzzling out details about how shadow-walking works :-)

  65. This is such cool news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I loved everything this article mentioned.

    I hope Roger is smiling, where/whenever he is right now. I met him once at a book signing. His reputation as a terribly kind, witty and urbane individual was well earned. Think I'll go light a candle for the repose of his soul.

    Jeez, wouldn't it be cool if Bruce Cambell was Corwin? Brian Blessed as Oberon? Too bad Billy Barty died, he'd have been a killer Dworkin.
    Who'd else would be a good Random besides Dennis Leary?

    Tripping the Rift, woohooo! Bring it on you purple bastard!

  66. You can buy it from Amazon.com by Wonko42 · · Score: 2

    You must not have been looking very hard. You can get all 10 Amber books in one large volume, The Great Book of Amber. I've seen this in Barnes and Noble as well, and a relative bought a copy for me for Christmas.

    1. Re:You can buy it from Amazon.com by arkanes · · Score: 2

      In all fairness, this only came back into print about a year ago. It took me regular prowling of used book stores all through high school to find my copies.

    2. Re:You can buy it from Amazon.com by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I gave up looking about 3-4 years after I started searching. Thanks for all the links, /.'ers

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  67. Forever War by surfcow · · Score: 1

    The Forever War is a great book, won the hugo and nebula that year. I suspect it'll make an awful mini-series. The politics at the heart of the book would prevent it from ever getting much air.

    Just as Heinlein's Starship Troopers was written throught the eyes of a WWII veteran, the Forever War is a pretty naked retelling of Haledman's his experiences in Viet Nam. His protaginist becomes increasingly jaded, cynical and disgusted with the government and the military, until he comes to see them as the enemy, not the aliens he is supposed to be fighting.

    And at the end of the book, we discover that the military actually started the war (and were not just responding to agression). A story was fabricated, and the war kept the military industrial complex in power and the population under control, while feeding millions of people into an unstoppable meat-grinder. This is not far off from what happened in Viet Nam . (and Germany and Japan and ...)

    Throw in lots of casual sex, drug use, actual homosexuality, etc, and you have a very unpalitable combination.

    Given the current policical climate of panic-induced patriotism, this show seems doomed to failure, unless they turn it into something more
    like Starship Troopers; glory in death, blood in your hands, flag-waving heroism and xenophobia.

    I wish them luck and hope they stay true to the nature and tone of the book.

    =brian

  68. A wealth of material out there by GSVNoFixedAbode · · Score: 1

    Nice to see that some of the best kept secrets of storytelling and entertainment - SF novels - are finally getting to a wider audience, even if they've been bastardised to hell.
    Now can someone please point the Sci-Fi Channel powers-that-be to The Moat in God's Eye, Niven's Known Space series, or Iain M. Banks Culture series. With current CGI, these are do-able!

    --
    "I am Heisenborg. You will probably be assimilated"
  69. They already filmed the combined shows in 1947: by Ann+O'Nymous-Coward · · Score: 1
  70. can video capture z's genius for a turn of phrase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The man was the best prosodist of 20th century s/f (I would say other than harlan ellison had his porcupine attitude not ceased to be charming). Think of the hellrides, or fred cassidy's reflections in 'doorways in the sand'. Or the rhapsodic nostalgia of the main character of 'this immortal', whose name I won't attempt to spell off the top of my head. As far as I'm concerned that's where he shines, and a picture is never going to compare, no matter how many words it's worth.

  71. Phage Press and Dirty Little Secrets by Valdrax · · Score: 2

    Phage Press is not defunct, or at least it wasn't two years ago when I met Eric Wujcik in person. Rumors had been going around about the death of his company for a couple of years thanks to one of the major catalog companies claiming that it was dead. The truth of the story is that this company had not paid Phage Press for a shipment of the Amber DRPG and its suppliment "Shadow Knight." Since Wujcik was holding off on another shipment until they paid for the first, this distributor told all the stores that were trying to order more that Phage Press was out of business and continued to refuse to pay Wujcik.

    Since Wujcik does not have enough money to fight them in court, this rumor persists to this day even though you can still get the game through other channels.

    I just wish I could remember which company it was...

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Phage Press and Dirty Little Secrets by sammy+baby · · Score: 2

      I was actually unfamiliar with the rumor: my assumption was based on the fallacious belief that if you can't find 'em on the web, they don't exist. I kinda wish he'd put a web site together, even a two page dealie, so that people know that he, like, still exists, and stuff.

      In the meantime, though, I apologize if I helped extend the myth.

  72. Eye of Cat by maxpublic · · Score: 2

    I think I'd rather see somethind done along the lines of "Eye of Cat". No large amounts of cash needed; only Cat requires computer animation (and perhaps some of the delusional scenes later in the book).

    Although I doubt 95% of the audience would actually get the ending without it being explained to them....

    Still, it's chock full of action, character development, and even does the Hollywood Politically Correct thing by putting Native Americans in a good light.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?