Slashdot Mirror


The Dangers of Being A Microbiologist

Anonymous Coward writes "Globe and Mail is running a story for all the paranoid conspiracy theorists among us: "Eleven microbiologists mysteriously dead over the span of just five months.... Throw in a few Russian defectors, a few nervy U.S. biotech companies, a deranged assassin or two, a bit of Elvis, a couple of Satanists, a subtle hint of espionage, a big whack of imagination, and the plot is complete, if a bit reminiscent of James Bond.""

302 comments

  1. Ah ha! by AbraCadaver · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe this has something to do with that nifty Self-assembling "nano-building" virus from a couple stories ago :)

    "Wait, this isn't my drink! AARRGGHH!!"

    1. Re:Ah ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      This has happened before - and it is still not cool. Here's a link to some information on the death of five microbiologists from not-too-long-back. Here's a quote from the page:

      "Five eminent microbiologists, leaders in their particular field of scientific research, either dead or missing, and a bizarre connection between one of the dead scientists and the mystery surrounding the death by Anthrax inhalation of a sixty one year old female hospital worker in New York. Sounds far fetched? Read on."

      It's all very nuts!
      _
      [Free Awesome Cursors for Windows Users!]

  2. Elements of madness by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Throw in a few Russian defectors, a few nervy U.S. biotech companies, a deranged assassin or two, a bit of Elvis, a couple of Satanists, a subtle hint of espionage, a big whack of imagination..."

    You forgot CowboyNeal.

    1. Re:Elements of madness by omaha · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually they left out the "Lone Gunmen." They bit it or rather inhaled it too.

    2. Re:Elements of madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Le Pen, Fortuyn, Berlusconi, Dewinter.

      Soon, Europe will be as far-right as the USA!

    3. Re:Elements of madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only EU country the rest of the world cares about is Germany. Austria, France and the rest are of no value of all.

  3. Plot not yet complete by gregfortune · · Score: 5, Funny

    Until you add in the part where the Anonymous Coward who submitted the news item was hired by the same biotech company who paid an editor at Globe and Mail to publish a story to scare the living crap out of their microbiologists.

    Ahhhh, the simplicity of safe-guarding IP.

    1. Re:Plot not yet complete by inKubus · · Score: 2

      Yeah. It's been fairly obvious all along. I didn't need a silly newspaper story to tell me someone's killing microbilolgists.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    2. Re:Plot not yet complete by dattaway · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Consider the job of a microbiologist and you may see hazards of the profession. Consider where the money comes from and why over half the staff at any drug company is legal and security. Less than half the payroll goes to actual research. Medical research even less. There is a reason for this.

      My mom is a microbiologist and officially retired several years ago due to an "accident." What was interesting was the timing of the accident. I was interviewed at my house by one of the security staff who stated he was friends with Ewing Kauffman, the owner of MMD (he died recently and MMD is now defunct.) The guy with the nice golf shirt probed with many questions about my mom's consulting work. Shortly after that, contractors came into my mom's office to move some furniture. It would be a few hours after mom entered the office that she would be in the hospital. There are bad ways to die, but having the lungs burned with a chemical indicator to cough up green mucus is gruesome. Its not your average deathmatch in Quake III. She survived with 30% lung capacity. Someone at the company did not like her and we were forced to pay for the treatment until many years through the courts payed off.

      Pick your profession carefully. I'd recommend avoid working with companies that deal with intellectual property right minefields. Know where the mony comes from, especially when it deals with genetic coding of lifeforms. If you work with spooks, you better enjoy politics. I got to see intense rivalry between her peers. And it didn't seem fair. Just because it may be a white collar profession, people get hurt.

    3. Re:Plot not yet complete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      this guy has steel balls for mentioning this.

      he is right, btw, about the creepy amount of security surrounding drug companies and the amount of interest "defectors" generate. many of those employed by these firms for security purposes are independant consultants who have retired from government backgrounds

      and considering some of the wiggy things my genetic-research pals have mentioned, it is absolutely possible to know too much to be allowed to leave

      hundreds of billions in global revenue = a great deal of means to protect your interests

    4. Re:Plot not yet complete by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      Fairly obvious...perhaps because YOU'RE the one doing the killing! inKubus in the Ballroom with the Rope!

  4. Pagan != Satanist!!! by cardshark2001 · · Score: 3, Informative

    A "Pagan" is not a "Satanist". It makes me very angry when I hear those two terms interchanged.

    Perhaps some of those deaths seem suspicious, but please: a murder-suicide by an associate of the deceased? I really do not see how the "spooks" could cause something like that.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
    1. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by daeley · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I really do not see how the "spooks" could cause something like that.

      Yeah, but Pagan Spooks could. ;)

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by groman · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Amen brother! [doesn't beleive he just said that] Satanists are the biggest marketing stunt of the past centuries. Albeit the ones described by preasts never really existed. Only the classical LaVeyan kind who mean no harm.

    3. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone else shot both of them and made it look like a murder suicide ?

    4. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by neomagi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      what do you expect this comes from the same society that think that dairy is the prime way to get protein.

      hey if they said that a pagan is a satanist on tv, then it must be true.

    5. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Tom+Davies · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      cardshark wrote:
      Perhaps some of those deaths seem suspicious, but please: a murder-suicide by an associate of the deceased? I really do not see how the "spooks" could cause something like that.

      That's the one that proves it was the spooks!

      Only they have the advanced mind control techniques to do that!

      --
      I have discovered a wonderful .sig, but 120 characters is too small to contain it.
    6. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who is not Protestant is in league with the Devil. Therefore they are most certainly Satanists.

    7. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL! I hope you're joking, if not then you're a moron.

    8. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      If they ever met Satan, they'd probably cak their pants...

      Glad to see someone beat me to the punch and pointed out the bullshit pagan=satanist mistake.

      Pisses me off as well.

    9. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by slothq · · Score: 3, Funny

      get the story straight... these were no normal pagans, these were pagan's with samurai swords AND esp that can turn pizza delivery men into homa-suicidal lab assistants. therefore, obviously SATANISTS, i've already lined mine and my children's gasmasks with aluminum foil, i suggest you do the same... RECOGNIZE THE REAL ENEMY!

      --

      [o_o]
    10. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by SEE · · Score: 3, Funny

      NOOO!

      Aluminum foil doesn't work!

      The control waves are tuned to Periodic Table group 14 -- carbon for controlling humans, silicon and germanium for controling transistors. You accordingly need to protect yourself with one of the group 14 metals -- either genuine tin, or lead. Aluminum doesn't work!

    11. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no a pegan or the more popular neo-pegan are just freaks looking for a "spirritual" excuse to dance around naked and have mass orgy's.. (For some reason it is mostly homosexual women that become pegan or neo-pegan) or just to become even more freaks than they already are.

      And you notice that there are no really gorgeous women pegans.. they are all usually ugly-as-sin or mooooooo.

      so the rest of the world just use it as a simple indicator... "you're pegan? ok.... Time to run away...." It's a great way to be sure you aren't dating a freak.

      so Pegan = FREAK!!!! and that is the most accurate description I can give to the world..

      anyone who is honest and have witnessed these pegans in action and was secretely inside for a year will agree... they are wierdo-freaks.

    12. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Tunguska · · Score: 1

      Perhaps some of those deaths seem suspicious, but please: a murder-suicide by an associate of the deceased? I really do not see how the "spooks" could cause something like that.

      MK Ultra??

      Naahh, to quote Salon, if MK Ultra had been a successful project, we would have seen a bunch of deranged lone assassins from the start of the sixties and we didn't ;-)

      /Tunguska

      --
      Only dead fish swim downstream......
    13. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by inKubus · · Score: 2

      No shit. "Pagan" simply means "Not Christian". How often these terms get confused by the uneducated.

      You're all fools. It's wonderful, isn't it?

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    14. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ACs are worse...

      Hey...

    15. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waa waa!

      That which comes between humankind and God (Yahweh, of course) is the work of Satan. Paganism is Satanic.

      If they had a religion in which they actually believed, the name "Satan" would be meaningless to them (it only has meaning in Islamic-Christian traditions). Since they always cry like babies around the term "Satanic", we can clearly conclude that they're smarter than they look, don't actually believe their bullshit sun god brain fuck retardedness, and are actually Christians who never grew out of their rebellious teenage years. (Hey man, middle school sucks, but most of us cope with it and grow the fuck up.)

      Pisses me off too. Too things that don't go together - educated and pagan.

    16. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by mrjohnson · · Score: 1

      almost correct, gdict says:

      One who worships false gods; an idolater; a heathen; one who
      is neither a Christian, a Mohammedan, nor a Jew.

      Neither having the accent of Christians, nor the gait
      of Christian, pagan, nor man. --Shak.

    17. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Let me guess - she told you she was becoming a lesbian neo-pagen in order to dump you.

      And you believed it.

    18. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either way, someone who kills her own father is probably not a very nice person.

    19. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People could follow them without knowing them. They're not all that hard to figure out..

      Bill and Ted even got it right.. Be Excellent to each other.

      So Joe blow living under rock X has never heard of god y, but hasn't murdered, stole, or otherwise harmed Joe number 2. He's nice to him.. He even gives Joe #2 flour to bake some cookie when he needs it.. But has no clue about any organized religon. So he's not a catholic, doesn't know who christ is, and is all pretty clueless about the outside world, but he's not allied with satan.

      He's just Joe Blow.. Crazy man who likes to live under rocks.

    20. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by anon757 · · Score: 1

      Don't you watch movies? re the murder suicide: Tanya invites Matthew over. Of course The Bad Guys(TM) have their lines tapped. The asassin enters the house, shoots Tanya 7 times, waits for Matthew to come over, shoots him, and puts the gun in his hand. 1 murder/suicide made to order. Except when it's done in the movies, the bad guy usually fails.

      P.S. I've got to agree with your pagan/satanist. It's total ingnorance that someone would think they're interchangable.

    21. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1
      No shit. "Pagan" simply means "Not Christian". How often these terms get confused by the uneducated.


      Perhaps that is how dictionary.com defines the word. If you base your education on dictionary.com, perhaps I am "uneducated".


      Pagan can also have the connotation of nature worship. Wikkens describe themselves as Pagan, but that does not mean they get to define the term Pagan, either.


      Christianity already has a word for "Not Christian" - heretic. Pagan is not simply another word for heretic, even if that was the definition of the word over a thousand years ago, as one poster said earlier in the discussion.


      If you hear the word heretic, and the word Pagan, and think the same thing, you really are missing the true meaning of the word. Words are often not as simple as a dictionary definition, but carry subtle meanings and connotations depending on the audience.

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFA!
    22. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the fact that your the first person to "get" this doesn't speak well of the mental abilities of slashdot readers.

      i almost thought i was going to have to expliain it myself.

    23. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Iffy+Bonzoolie · · Score: 1

      Perhaps some of those deaths seem suspicious, but please: a murder-suicide by an associate of the deceased? I really do not see how the "spooks" could cause something like that.

      Haven't you ever seen a movie? These guys were late 30's, early 40's... chances are this guy Huang had a family. He was probably given a choice of who dies, his family or this lady. Of course he chooses his associate, but then cannot live with the guilt. Mystery solved!

      -If

      --
      Run a pencil-and-paper RPG campaign with your far-off friends: Gametable!
    24. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by plunix · · Score: 1
      Christianity already has a word for "Not Christian" - heretic. Pagan is not simply another word for heretic, even if that was the definition of the word over a thousand years ago, as one poster said earlier in the discussion.

      You're wrong there. "Heretic" is/was a word used by Roman Catholics, not Christians. "Pagan" is a more accurate word for "not Christian" although "not Christian or Jewish" would probably be more accurate. It's usually used of polytheistic religions though.
      heretic
      n 1: a person who holds religious beliefs in conflict with the dogma of the Roman Catholic Church [syn: {misbeliever}, {religious outcast}]

      The Roman Catholic Church killed many true Christians during the Inquisition for refusing to accept Roman Catholic doctrine/dogma.
      Don't confuse Christianity with Catholicism.
    25. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. Everyone knows that pagan really stands for People Against Goodness And Normalcy. Good work Joe Friday!

    26. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by cardshark2001 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Offtopic? I thought the article was the topic.

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFA!
    27. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't disagree with your statement, but please do look for the facts before commenting. Otherwise, you reveal stong personal bias.

    28. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1

      Thank you sire, can I have another? :P

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFA!
    29. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but where is the Sodomite?

    30. Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The accused "Pagans" say they are innocent. So who knows for sure if they did kill anyone.........

  5. Spoiler Warnings???? by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

    The assassin was *deranged*???! Not everybody lives on the East Coast, you guys. "License To Ill" isn't on out here for a while! A spoiler warning would be nice next time!

    (apologies to the Beastie Boys)

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  6. Text of article... by SHiFTY1000 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Hmmm... a co-incidence does not a conspiracy make...

    Scientists' deaths are under the microscope By ALANNA MITCHELL, SIMON COOPER AND CAROLYN ABRAHAM COMPILED BY ALANNA MITCHELL Saturday, May 4, 2002 - Print Edition, Page A1 It's a tale only the best conspiracy theorist could dream up. Eleven microbiologists mysteriously dead over the span of just five months. Some of them world leaders in developing weapons-grade biological plagues. Others the best in figuring out how to stop millions from dying because of biological weapons. Still others, experts in the theory of bioterrorism. Throw in a few Russian defectors, a few nervy U.S. biotech companies, a deranged assassin or two, a bit of Elvis, a couple of Satanists, a subtle hint of espionage, a big whack of imagination, and the plot is complete, if a bit reminiscent of James Bond. The first three died in the space of just over a week in November. Benito Que, 52, was an expert in infectious diseases and cellular biology at the Miami Medical School. Police originally suspected that he had been beaten on Nov. 12 in a carjacking in the medical school's parking lot. Strangely enough, though, his body showed no signs of a beating. Doctors then began to suspect a stroke. Just four days after Dr. Que fell unconscious came the mysterious disappearance of Don Wiley, 57, one of the foremost microbiologists in the United States. Dr. Wiley, of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute at Harvard University, was an expert on how the immune system responds to viral attacks such as the classic doomsday plagues of HIV, ebola and influenza. He had just bought tickets to take his son to Graceland the following day. Police found his rental car on a bridge outside Memphis, Tenn. His body was later found in the Mississippi River. Forensic experts said he may have had a dizzy spell and have fallen off the bridge. Just five days after that, the world-class microbiologist and high-profile Russian defector Valdimir Pasechnik, 64, fell dead. The pathologist who did the autopsy, and who also happened to be associated with Britain's spy agency, concluded he died of a stroke. Dr. Pasechnik, who defected to the United Kingdom in 1989, played a huge role in Russian biowarfare and helped to figure out how to modify cruise missiles to deliver the agents of mass biological destruction. The next two deaths came four days apart in December. Robert Schwartz, 57, was stabbed and slashed with what police believe was a sword in his farmhouse in Leesberg, Va. His daughter, who identifies herself as a pagan high priestess, and several of her fellow pagans have been charged. Dr. Schwartz was an expert in DNA sequencing and pathogenic micro-organisms, who worked at the Center for Innovative Technology in Herndon, Va. Four days later, Nguyen Van Set, 44, died at work in Geelong, Australia, in a laboratory accident. He entered an airlocked storage lab and died from exposure to nitrogen. Other scientists at the animal diseases facility of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization had just come to fame for discovering a virulent strain of mousepox, which could be modified to affect smallpox. Then in February, the Russian microbiologist Victor Korshunov, 56, an expert in intestinal bacteria of children around the world, was bashed over the head near his home in Moscow. Five days later the British microbiologist Ian Langford, 40, was found dead in his home near Norwich, England, naked from the waist down and wedged under a chair. He was an expert in environmental risks and disease. Two weeks later, two prominent microbiologists died in San Francisco. Tanya Holzmayer, 46, a Russian who moved to the U.S. in 1989, focused on the part of the human molecular structure that could be affected best by medicine. She was killed by fellow microbiologist Guyang (Matthew) Huang, 38, who shot her seven times when she opened the door to a pizza delivery. Then he shot himself. The final two deaths came one day after the other in March. David Wynn-Williams, 55, a respected astrobiologist with the British Antarctic Survey, who studied the habits of microbes that might survive in outer space, died in a freak road accident near his home in Cambridge, England. He was hit by a car while he was jogging. The following day, Steven Mostow, 63, known as Dr. Flu for his expertise in treating influenza, and a noted expert in bioterrorism, died when the airplane he was piloting crashed near Denver. So what does any of it mean? "Statistically, what are the chances?" wondered a prominent North American microbiologist reached last night at an international meeting of infectious-disease specialists in Chicago. Janet Shoemaker, director of public and scientific affairs of the American Society for Microbiology in Washington, D.C., pointed out yesterday that there are about 20,000 academic researchers in microbiology in the U.S. Still, not all of these are of the elevated calibre of those recently deceased. She had a chilling, final thought. When microbiologists die in a lab, there's a way of taking note of the deaths and adding them up. When they die in freakish accidents outside the lab, nobody keeps track. Suspicious deaths The sudden and suspicious deaths of 11 of the world's leading microbiologists. Who they were: 1. Nov. 12, 2001: Benito Que was said to have been beaten in a Miami parking lot and died later. 2. Nov. 16, 2001: Don C. Wiley went missing. Was found Dec. 20. Investigators said he got dizzy on a Memphis bridge and fell to his death in a river. 3. Nov. 21, 2001: Vladimir Pasechnik, former high-level Russian microbiologist who defected in 1989 to the U.K. apparently died from a stroke. 4. Dec. 10, 2001: Robert M. Schwartz was stabbed to death in Leesberg, Va. Three Satanists have been arrested. 5. Dec. 14, 2001: Nguyen Van Set died in an airlock filled with nitrogen in his lab in Geelong, Australia. 6. Feb. 9, 2002: Victor Korshunov had his head bashed in near his home in Moscow. 7. Feb. 14, 2002: Ian Langford was found partially naked and wedged under a chair in Norwich, England. 8. 9. Feb. 28, 2002: San Francisco resident Tanya Holzmayer was killed by a microbiologist colleague, Guyang Huang, who shot her as she took delivery of a pizza and then apparently shot himself. 10. March 24, 2002: David Wynn-Williams died in a road accident near his home in Cambridge, England. 11. March 25, 2002: Steven Mostow of the Colorado Health Sciences Centre, killed in a plane he was flying near Denver.

  7. Ahh! Now let's see how the Machine responds. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This story had been developing for about a year now, with no 'anti-conspiracy' angle yet presented by the sketpic community.

    Now, however, that it's a story on Slashdot, (along with several other Big Hot Button stories which have made Slashdot headlines over the past couple of days), we'll get to sift through all the Perfectly Logical Explanations.

    Let the Paranoia and Head-in-the-Sand-'Rationality' begin!


    -Fantastic Lad --The Truth is somewhere in between. . .

  8. Lunar Hoax by blugecko · · Score: 1

    I bet this is put out by the same people that believe we (the human species) never landed on the moon. That's not to say that this isn't bad, it is. This stuff is not far off, whether or not they were assassinated is not the question...

    --
    Lysergic Acid Diethylamide, not just chemistry, reality!
    1. Re:Lunar Hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We landed on the moon?! Whoh, talk about being out of it.

    2. Re:Lunar Hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, when the fuck did this happen. I'd better start reading my memos.

      --
      George W.

    3. Re:Lunar Hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest problem companies have with their
      satellites is keeping the cooling system running.
      We're talking mainly liquid nitrogen because
      the sats pick up MASSIVE amounts of radiation
      that translates to heat.

      Excuse me... but why do the astronauts complain
      of being too cold on their way to the moon?
      You and I BOTH know that the cooling system
      they were using wasn't OVER designed.
      Check the specs on the origional equipment
      that NASA used.... there's no way. *shrug*

  9. hysteria by j09824 · · Score: 2
    I know the work of a couple of those people pretty well. They were excellent specialists, but their work was not directly related to biological weapons.

    Imagine that there had been a missile attack scare in the US. This is roughly like looking through the ranks of recent deaths of computer scientists and implying that anybody who died who was working on Ada compilers, control systems software, robotics, or large-scale software engineering was somehow related to SDI work.

    Of course, an X-Files style conspiracy would be so much more interesting, I suppose.

    1. Re:hysteria by Iamthefallen · · Score: 1

      Uhm, I think a lot of people would be very happy if they managed to kidnap the guy who designed/built the locks on the doors to a top-secret installation.

      Doesn't have to be be directly related to be useful.

      --
      Wax-Museum Fire Results In Hundreds Of New Danny DeVito Statues
    2. Re:hysteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I know the work of a couple of those people pretty well. They were excellent specialists, but their work was not directly related to biological weapons.

      oh really, you do do you. well you should write to Mike Huppard at Cop V Cia and let him know. A brief stroll through all your other comments posted to slashdot does not indicate you know shit about microbiologists.

    3. Re:hysteria by sam_handelman · · Score: 3

      Really.

      The murder rate, US and britain together, is on the order of 5 in 100,000 per year (US it was 6.8 in '97, according to CNN.) I assume that it's about the same in Russia. The odds of seeing 7 (definitely murders) over the course of 9 months out of a group of about 30,000 people are small, but not preposterously small. Given the portion of my prominent colleagues who are, to be blunt, old men, I'm suprised only two of them died of strokes during that period.

      Also, if you keep subdividing the population into little pieces, eventually you're going to find a subsection (young black men of course, but besides that) who got killed disproportionately in any given period.

      If you keep taking different colors of bullets, and shoot each color fifty times, you will eventually find a color of bullet that is more accurate; if you insist on a higher "degree of significance," it just means you have to check more colors (blue isn't more accurate, but turquoise is!) before you "find one."

      This is not to say that I don't think that there's a conspiracy related to biological weapons, especially anthrax, in the United States. I believe that there is, and I believe that the fellow who fell off a bridge may very well have been bumped off. It is entirely a credible suggestion that the microbiologists who died under somewhat odd suggestions where targeted for assassination for some reason; such has happened in the past. Last year's death toll for molecular biologists *may* very well have been substantially enriched by CIA hitmen. Now, I don't think this is true, and you cannot conclude that it is true (or even likely) from the body count. The body count is not itself any cause for alarm.

      Just to be on the safe side, though, I'm installing a metal detector for federal employees who come by the lab. :)

      --
      The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    4. Re:hysteria by beat.bolli · · Score: 1

      His name is Mike Ruppert, and his site is here.

      --
      Karma: none (due to not believing in reincarnation)
  10. More conspiration theory: Fake NASA mission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $1 billion spent on a miniature model and a smoke generator. See for yourself. They even managed to compute the wrong period for a satellite "438 miles above the planet". Ok, where did the rest of the money go?

  11. you are a fucking moron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and i cannot wait until you fucking choke on your own stupidity. making a mockery of something that might actually be a conspiracy makes an idiot out of you. so in closing, i really hope your entire family (yourself included of course) dies of a mutated strain of tuberculosis. fucking asshole.

    1. Re:you are a fucking moron by xannik · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Maybe it would help if you posted under someone?

      --

      Go Illini!!!
  12. I know the truth by Linuxthess · · Score: 1
    It was those damn mice again!

    H2G2 was right again!

    --

    I sig, therefore I was.
  13. The Microsoft Conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    They died from using stupid M$ products. All microbiologists worth their weight in salt should know to use clusters of Linux machines!

    1. Re:The Microsoft Conspiracy! by maelstrom · · Score: 2

      They need to break out the beowulf clusters.

      --
      The more you know, the less you understand.
    2. Re:The Microsoft Conspiracy! by redhatbox · · Score: 2, Funny

      The fact that the parent comment is currently ranked "+1 Insightful" makes me want to spoonfeed myself 10 kilos of ebola. If this weren't Slashdot, I'd swear the end is near...

      #!/usr/bin/perl -w
      my @cryforhelp = ("The", "feds", "made", "me", "do", "it!");
      for ($i = 0; $i <= $#cryforhelp; $i++) {
      print "$cryforhelp[$i] ";
      }
    3. Re:The Microsoft Conspiracy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or the extended cry...
      #!/usr/bin/perl
      my @cryforhelp=qw/The feds made me do it!/;
      while ( true ) {
      foreach ( @cryforhelp ) {
      print;
      }
      }
  14. Don't forget the pizza! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why did he have to shoot her WHILE she was opening the door to get a pizza? Answer: the "pizza boy" was a robot (android). She opens the door, he busts in, and kills her with his "pizza" (which is a spinning weapon--deadly) and makes it look like she got shot. He shoots her body, just to make it realistic. The he shoots the other guy, and gets his fingerprints all over them. Walla! And he eats pizza while looking over his handiwork before taking off.

  15. Satanists != Pagans! by The+Evil+Beaver · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    The next two deaths came four days apart in December. Robert Schwartz, 57, was stabbed and slashed with what police believe was a sword in his farmhouse in Leesberg, Va. His daughter, who identifies herself as a pagan high priestess, and several of her fellow pagans have been charged.


    4. Dec. 10, 2001:

    Robert M. Schwartz was stabbed to death in Leesberg, Va. Three Satanists have been arrested.


    Obviously the writer of the article is some right-wing Christian fundamentalist idiot. Everyone knows (except for the religious crazies) that Satanists are not pagans.
    --
    Chris 'coldacid' Charabaruk Meldstar Entertainment
    1. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is an insult to Satanists everywhere.

    2. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

      Bleh.

      A Pagan is defined as;

      n.

      3. A non-Christian.


      adj.

      1. Not Christian, Muslim, or Jewish.

      3. Neo-Pagan.



      If the daughter was some deranged wacko who actually DID THINK she was talking to the evil one that indeed, she WOULD BE CONSIDERED A PAGAN.

      While there may not be a world wide conspiracy of devil worshipers running around, there are indeed a few nut bags now and then who may think they are doing something eeeviilll. In this case obviously her delusions went /way/ to far.

      When pagan was used it obviously was not referring to the cute and cuddly "hug all the woodland creatures" new age neo-pagans, who to their credit have turned out some rather decent works of art.

      (and that is all I am giving them. Well ok, and they also have a tendency to tie themselves to trees to help stop big corporations, which I have absolutely no problem with either. :) )

    3. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by Ledskof · · Score: 1

      where the hell did anyone say anything about talking to some evil one? It just says pagan. Pagan predates christianity. How could it have to do with the freaking christian "evil one".

      You are ignorant as hell for posting that crap. I hate hearing people assume BS and then spout off BS as a result. Get educated loser.

      --
      This is my sig. The post is over.
    4. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, it doesn't even say pagan. It just says she identified herself as one. I think if I ever get in trouble for anything I'm gonna identify myself as a windows user.

    5. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by Kintanon · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      Now you are talking out your ass with no regard for facts. The term Pagan was coined by christians to refer to the Druidic, pantheistic religions in Britain and Europe at the time. The term is almost exactly as old as established "Big Church" Christianity. The religions which it was applied to predated christianity by a long margin, but those religions have almost nothing to do with the current crop of "Pagan" religions. The current incarnation of "Paganism" is a hodgepodge of eastern philosophy, european mysticism, and native american totemic beliefs. It originated around the late 60s, early 70s and has begun to gain widespread popularity due to the increasing unpopularity of "Big Church" christianity. But no, the current incarnation of Paganism is not older than christianity. No, it doesn't have anything to do with satan.

      Kintanon
      Disclaimer: I am a christian, my wife is a pagan. I am not a "Big Church" christian.

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    6. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're a little mixed up.

      I've met a couple of avowed Satanists that consider themselves as Pagans.

      But to counter that, none of the pagans that I know worship Satan or believe in the existence of any being resembling it.

    7. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      No shit sherlock, I was merely saying that there is the POSSIBILITY that the reporter was using the OLD definition of the word, which is still perfectly valid.

      By definition, anybody who is not one of The Big Three is a pagan, and thus therefore a devil worshiper (even though worship of such a Deity would admit existence of the Christian belief system) is indeed a pagan, though a far different type of pagan then the tree hugging hippy derivatives that are around today.

      By the same regard, both Christians and Neo-Pagans fall into the category of religious people. If I mentioned people who are religious then I would be talking about BOTH GROUPS even though both are VERY different from one another.

      Yeesh.

      Read the f*'in dictionary some time.

    8. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Ugh, sorry, /.s shifty way of showing replies made it sound like you were yelling at me instead, hehe. Sorry about the vitriol spew.

    9. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 1

      Ha! Finally, someone who says "Mod me down" gets modded down!

      Victoly!!!

    10. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      heh.. "pagan" comes from the greek "paganos" - meaning "countryman."

      It refers (rather, used to) to the folk religions of the people, rather than the state-organized fun.

    11. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by inKubus · · Score: 1, Troll

      Don't be stupid. Your reply has nothing to do with the parent post.

      A PAGAN is someone who is not Christian.

      Yes, the christians made up this term.

      SOME pagans worship Satan.

      ALL pagans are not Satan worshippers.

      But it sounded like you were ripping on someone who said basically what I've just said, which is all factual, and which you agreed on in your post.

      That makes you a fucking retard, or a troll. Probably both. Fuck.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    12. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Current neopaganism goes back to at least the 18th century and the 'reconstruction' of 'druidism', then continues through the 19th century with theosophy and a general interest emerging in the west in eastern religion and continues on down to present. It doesn't originate "around the late 60s, early 70s".

      Christians can connect it, and, indeed anything outside Christianity, with the devil by employing the 'if yer not with us yer agin us' type thinking, with everyone 'agin us' on the side of the terrorists... er, I mean, Satanists.

    13. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pagan predates Christianity. Neo-pagan certainly does not. Their supposedly ancient traditions are less than a hundred years old. Good thing too. Actual ancient pagans were big on human (and other animal) sacrifice.

    14. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      No, you are just reading into it what you want to see. Pagans can't POSSIBLY worship Satan since none of them believe that Satan exists. If you worship satan you are something entirely different.
      Satan worship is a spinoff of Christianity, technically it's closer to a christian denomination than a Pagan religion.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    15. Re:Satanists != Pagans! by BluedemonX · · Score: 2

      According to hardcore Christians, it doesn't matter whether you think you believe in Satan or not, if you don't believe in Jesus by definition you're worshipping a false god, set up by Satan as a snare to the faithful.

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
  16. "Statistically, what are the chances?" by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 1

    "Statistically, what are the chances?" Well, the article answers this question pretty good, but I have something to add. This is like that study you may have heard of that linked ice cream sales in Florida with rape. Does that mean all ice cream vendors are rapists? Obviously, no, since I still like ice cream =). Especially Ben & Jerry's. But I'm getting Offtopic. So what if 11 top-level microbiologists died outside the lab? Don't forget, tons of people die EVERY SINGLE DAY and there are 6x10^9 people on the earth. A lot. Even more have EVER walked this earth. So if you look at the chances, they're relatively high.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:"Statistically, what are the chances?" by Linux_ho · · Score: 2

      So... if in a six-month period, Linus Torvalds, Alan Cox, Jeremy Allison, Bruce Perens, Larry Wall, Eric Allman, Brian Behlendorf, Randal Schwartz, and Guido van Rossum died under mysterious circumstances, you would find it only slightly more difficult to believe?

      I see your point -- there wasn't really any hard data presented. However, unless you have some hard data yourself, you're just muddying up the picture even more.

      By the way, the pizza boy was obviously an agent trained to convince the cops he was innocent. Either that, or her colleague was sick and tired of her ordering pizza instead of cooking for ONCE when it was her turn to cook and couldn't wait until the pizza boy had left before pulling the trigger in a mad rage. I don't know about you, but the pizza-boy-did-it story sounds more convincing to me.

      Oh and then there was the guy that died of nitrogen exposure! GOOD GOD! The Earth's atmosphere is 78% nitrogen! AAAAAAHHH! We're all gonna die!!!

      --
      include $sig;
      1;
    2. Re:"Statistically, what are the chances?" by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1
      Oh and then there was the guy that died of nitrogen exposure! GOOD GOD! The Earth's atmosphere is 78% nitrogen! AAAAAAHHH! We're all gonna die!!!

      OK. Seal up your room, fill it up with 100% nitrogen, and let me know how you get on after a few hours...

      *sigh* Next thing you know, people will be telling me we can breath water because it contains oxygen.

    3. Re:"Statistically, what are the chances?" by dragons_flight · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well let's play the game, what are the chances?

      Reading the article one will observe that most of the deaths involved people between age 45-64. The death rate for this group from the disaster center is 708 deaths per 100,000 people for all causes. Subtracting out the death rates given for medical conditions that almost certainly don't apply, that leaves us 200 deaths per 100,000.

      Now the article states that there are 20,000 microbiologists working in the US. Let us suppose that 1/2 of those are over 40. And perhaps 1/2 of those are "important" enough to attract attention. That's a pool of 5,000 people.

      Based on the rate of 200 / 100,000 we would expect 10 deaths annually, or about 4.2 over a five month period. Applying Poisson statistics, the probability of seeing 11 or more random events when 4.2 are expected is about 0.2%. In other words this really is a strange occurence, probably having some underlying cause and not just a statistical aberration.

      Of course, not knowing much about microbiology, I might be seriously underestimating (or overestimating) how important these scientists were. If they are in the top 5% of their profession, as opposed to the top half, then the coincidence would be even more startlingly unlikely.

    4. Re:"Statistically, what are the chances?" by sporkulum · · Score: 0

      Your example is a classic third variable problem (along the lines of correlating birth control use with #of home appliances, it has nothing to do with morbidity.

      --
      semper ubi sub ubi
    5. Re:"Statistically, what are the chances?" by inKubus · · Score: 2

      The pizza boy killed himself.

      And often these inert nigtrogen rooms are built to have close to 100% nitrogen, to prevent the decomposing of objects within them.

      The human lungs require and oxygen concentration of about 8% to function AT ALL. They are not that efficient; they are just efficient enough to deal with ~16-17% oxygen found in the atmosphere.

      Anythign much less, and you die. Period.

      Clever assasination. I'd like to thank the man, before I arrested him and put him on trial.

      Killing people (even scientists) is ILLEGAL.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    6. Re:"Statistically, what are the chances?" by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      It looks like Hollywood has got it wrong again. In every movie I've seen, a murder attempt like this would surely fail:

      Evil Villain: Haha! Now you're trapped in the airlock with no way to escape!

      Microbiologist: What do you want from me?

      Evil Villain: Silence! Do you hear that sound? That is the sound of nitrogen gas slowly filling the airlock. You will suffocate in a short while.

      Microbiologist: You bastard! You're never going to get away with this!

      Evil Villain: We'll see about that. Now; I'd love nothing more than to stay here and witness your demise, but I have an "appointment" with another prominent microbiologist, and I can't be late. Sadly, I must bid you farewell. I'm sorry to have leave your party so soon, I'm sure it will be a "gas"! BWAHAHA!! BWAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

      At this point, Hollywood would have you believe that the unsupervised microbiologist will narrowly escape from the airlock. Well, in the real world, it just didn't happen. It's no wonder that the kids growing up today watching movies and TV have no grip on reality.

    7. Re:"Statistically, what are the chances?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where the hell is he going to get data on the numbers, age distribution, and social status of all the microbiologists living in the US?

    8. Re:"Statistically, what are the chances?" by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1
      Killing people (even scientists) is ILLEGAL.

      Would ya look at that.... he's right!

      And it says here it's also illegal to put squirrels down your pants for the purposes of gambling...

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
    9. Re:"Statistically, what are the chances?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently, out of his ass -- which is precisely what that shit smell was when I read that fucking post.

    10. Re:"Statistically, what are the chances?" by AJWM · · Score: 2

      That's not "dying from exposure to nitrogen", that's dying from suffocation -- lack of oxygen.

      As the original poster pointed out, we're all exposed to lots of nitrogen every day, doesn't hurt us a bit.

      The original article specifically said He entered an airlocked storage lab and died from exposure to nitrogen.. That's just stupid writing on the author's part. The guy died from lack of oxygen, same as if he'd walked out the airlock of a space ship.

      (Early in the Shuttle days, a couple of technicians died the same way from entering the engine compartment after it had been purged with nitrogen.)

      (And actually, I guess some people have died from exposure to nitrogen -- but at about six atmospheres pressure, from nitrogen narcosis (deep diving SCUBA divers). And even then the immediate cause of death was more likely drowning caused by the narcosis.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    11. Re:"Statistically, what are the chances?" by ablair · · Score: 1

      This is all very well except we are dealing wiith a starting pool of substantially more than the 20,000 US microbiology researchers... deaths from the UK, Russia, and Australia are also included. Adding the pool of research microbiologists from these countries would more than double the starting number, and the 5,000 "important" ones as well. Using the same 200/10,000 death rate as in the US (probably higher in Russia and lower in the UK and Australia), we could therefore expect at least 8.4 deaths in a 5 month period using the same logic. This is not so far off from the 11 reported, and certainly nothing to write home about.

      Well, despite the sensationalism of this article, the Globe and Mail is still a top-rate newspaper.

  17. Dr. Wiley by DarkZero · · Score: 2

    As most visitors to Slashdot should already know, at least one of these scientists is most definitely NOT dead. One year from now, we will discover that it wasn't him that died, but instead his robotic clone. At this time, he will most likely die again, only to be replaced one year later by a different scientist that is actually being controlled by yet another robotic clone of Dr. Wiley.

    My apologies to the family of the victims, but I couldn't help but share my geekish laughter at the idea of "Dr. Wiley" (sic, sort of) mysteriously dying. My only hope is that the doctor, while he was still alive, got a good laugh out of his name and title, too.

    1. Re:Dr. Wiley by Broccolist · · Score: 1
      Ah yes, the Fundamental Theorem of Megaman: the villain is always Dr. Wiley.

      Yeah, I think I heard about this Dr. Wiley in connection with the antrax scare a few months ago, and I got a good laugh out of it then too.

  18. Sooner or later it had to happen... by tg_schlacht · · Score: 1

    First antiseptics... Then antibiotics... Now genetic resequencing... The bacteria, virii, and microbial life forms are mad as hell and aren't going to take it anymore. This is just their way of saying "Pick on someone your own size you digusting, smelly, featherless, bipedal bags of mostly water."

    1. Re:Sooner or later it had to happen... by Mercaptan · · Score: 1

      The microbes shall inherit the earth. If you thought cockroaches were durable, you got bacteria that live in the guts of cockroaches too.

      --
      -- "Sucks to your ass-mar"
    2. Re:Sooner or later it had to happen... by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that there are probably still microbes living on the stuff we left on the moon in the 60s...

      --Joe
  19. Didn't this happen to Programmers in the UK too? by MagikSlinger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I remember almost a decade ago, there was a rash of mysterious deaths in the UK of top programmers working on top secret military projects. That was also dismissed as a "statistical anomoly" and that working under such high pressures can cause suicidal tendencies.

    Yeah, like the one guy who took a lamp cord, bared the two ends, and taped them to his metal fillings in his molars and plugged it in.

    A lot of the deaths also occured in a brief span of time, and lots of strange and horrible ways to die.

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  20. measurement may affect results by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    well, the fact that everyone is now wondering about these deaths, and is on the lookout for more deaths, might affect the result in several ways

    1. microbiologists might start being more careful

    2. people might try to kill more microbiologists, since it's the popular thing

    3. contrarians (which many murderers are) might decide not to kill microbiologists, it being too passe

    4. other effect

    So, by all means, let us continue our scientific observations, but keeping in mind that the act of observing may influence the results, and may be dangerous to your health (if you are a microbiologist)

  21. My theory.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is that they got all finally got a conscience which was set to self destruct in 5 secs

  22. Don Wiley- Assassinated? by rchatterjee · · Score: 2

    I remember hearing news reports of his disappearance right in the middle of all the anthrax mailings. There were more than a few conspiracy theories around that. Though some of the deaths sound a bit like some KGB assassinations from the cold war days, they would use poisons like ricen to cause what appeared to be heat attacks and strokes, They some Bulgarian dissident like that in London.....

    1. Re:Don Wiley- Assassinated? by Tunguska · · Score: 1

      I was thinking along the same lines. The article fails to mention the 2 Israeli Microbiologists killed in the shootdown over the Black Sea in late 2001.

      The Priory of Sion is at work ;-)

      /Plantard

      --
      Only dead fish swim downstream......
  23. Now what do I do by KanSer · · Score: 1

    Do I count as a microbiologist if I mailed baby powder to congress? (That's a joke, don't take it seriously) I like the idea of a big time conspiracy. I haven't had a good real life conspiracy since Eric Crouch lasted until the 3rd round. (I'm a football nerd too)

    --
    • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
    1. Re:Now what do I do by KanSer · · Score: 1

      Come on now! Eric Crouch... conspiracy... St. Louis Rams... that's comic gold!

      --
      • MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward Wednesday April 20, @4:20
  24. Where's JonKatz when you need him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    HE would be able to piece this together!

  25. Re:fp fp fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why are there most trolls on friday night?

  26. someone forgot the big wack of imagination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so where is the consipracy theory? a bunch of people died, but the article doesn't provide any theory linking their deaths.
    the only redeeming element to this list of characters was the inclusion of a pagan high priestess. cool.
    that intro shammed me with its talk of plots.
    damn anonymous cowards!

    -anonymous coward

  27. What's that Asimov short story? by Nautilus · · Score: 1

    Isaac Asimov wrote an excellent short story about
    scientists who committed suicide for no good reason, comparing it to bacteria that try to escape their part of the petri dish or something.

    That's what I think about when I think about this.

  28. 'nervy'? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I've never heard this word before, what does it mean? Nervy as in nervous? Nervy as in 'having a lot of nerv', Nervy as in 'like the fictitious NERV organization in Neon Genesis Evangelon'

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:'nervy'? by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      I've never heard this word before, what does it mean? Nervy as in nervous? Nervy as in 'having a lot of nerv', Nervy as in 'like the fictitious NERV organization in Neon Genesis Evangelon'

      Just a click away, dictionary.com has the answer.

      (was this a "a nervy thing to say"?)

  29. Anthrax case unsolved: serious questions remain by Roger+Whittaker · · Score: 1

    While the fatal anthrax attacks of last year remain unsolved, the flippant tone of many of the comments on this seems inappropriate to me. It is clear that the anthrax attacks were not carried out by Islamic terrorists, and that the main suspect is still at large and is a US government employee.

    See for example this Guardian story.

    This in itself is chilling enough, along with the fact that the suspect is apparently being protected. This does not of course prove that these deaths are all part of some conspiracy: it does suggest, however that there are some very disturbing unanswered questions which could be related to this story.

    1. Re:Anthrax case unsolved: serious questions remain by AlefOne · · Score: 1

      It is clear that the anthrax attacks were not carried out by Islamic terrorists,

      No, this is not at all clear, unless you know something no one else does.

      and that the main suspect is still at large

      There is no main suspect.

      and is a US government employee.

      0 for three.

    2. Re:Anthrax case unsolved: serious questions remain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >It is clear that the anthrax attacks were not carried out by Islamic
      >terrorists, and that the main suspect is still at large and is a US
      >government employee.

      WRONG. It is not A government employee. That is nearly impossible. and the FBI search is almost a joke. It is a US Group of some type.

      1) the electro-static treament was an american process, probably known by 1 month for something that was supposidly top priority??

      Things reek and it is not the anthrax directly.

    3. Re:Anthrax case unsolved: serious questions remain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Un huh. Been watching CNN and taking it seriously, I presume?

      Just wait. In point of fact it takes about five minutes digging on the net to find the name of the most likely suspect. (Hint: he used to work at Ft. Detrick. Try the local Florida papers.) Try the recent report by the Federation of American Scientists for a bit of background, as well. I work in biotech and know people who know people, and believe me the whole story hasn't been a secret for a while now.

      The real reason the investigation is "stalled" is likely how bad it is going to look for the US Bioweapons programs when it all comes out. They are going to look incompetent, to say the least. There were (are? who knows?) some very serious lapses in security to do with access to dangerous materials.

      We'll see. I still think it will all come out eventually.

  30. Shoulda known. by Mercaptan · · Score: 1

    Momma warned me not to become a microbiologist, but I did anyways. She did her fellowship in infectious disease after all.

    Yeah, it probably is just a big coincidence, but the FBI *still* hasn't figured out who mailed out all that lovely anthrax last year. And that's a bit disturbing.

    --
    -- "Sucks to your ass-mar"
    1. Re:Shoulda known. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



      They still haven't caught the "Sons of the Gestapo" who derailed a train a while back, either.

      And it took them years to get the Unabomer: give the FBI some time.
      Investigatoins like this take a long time: think of the problems involved.
      1) The amount of identifiying info in the attacks was miniscule.
      2) There's a fairly large number of potential suspects.
      3) The attacks have not recurred, which limits the amount of data the FBI has to investigate.

      Don't expect this case to be resolved soon.

  31. Heh... by gblues · · Score: 2

    "Statistically, what are the chances?"

    The moon is covered with the results of astronomical odds.

    Nathan

    1. Re:Heh... by clone304 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently the microbioligist obituary column is hiring at statistically astronomical odds as well.

    2. Re:Heh... by inKubus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Divide the possibility of a moon hit by it's age.

      Then divide the possiblity of many promenent biologists dying mysteriously (and almost all unconventionally) by what...... 5 months?

      Scoff, but if you refuse to even slghtly question the cable news channels view of reality, you are much more unintelligent than you give yourself credit for.

      Unless you are omnipotent and can be everywhere at once, you must have trust in someone else's information (or view of reality). If you were a giant corporate news station, do yoou think you would have the money to fabricate something like this??

      Yes. And, although I'm sure a few deaths will occur to cover up the coverage of the one before it, no one will notice, and this will all be laughed at again as another "conspiracy".

      Wonderful, isn't it? :)

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    3. Re:Heh... by I+Want+GNU! · · Score: 2

      I agree that it is suspicious, but your argument is fallacious. You are trying to say that "if you disagree with me you are a stupid drone of the cable news station, so if you agree with me you are smarter." Come on. It was very suspicious and given how prominent they are I don't think they were coincidental, but the cable news channels aren't that far off. Slashdot is just a much a news network as other places, it just has fewer viewers and more technologically informed viewers.

      Please, next time you make an argument use valid logic instead of trying to insult my intelligence if I disagree with you. Same conclusion, different logic. Valid logic.

    4. Re:Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omniscient. not omnipotent.

    5. Re:Heh... by inKubus · · Score: 2

      Please, next time you make an argument use valid logic instead of trying to insult my intelligence if I disagree with you. Same conclusion, different logic. Valid logic.

      Heh, my post was tongue in cheek. Stop taking everything so seriously.

      ;)

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  32. "Exposure to Nitrogen"? by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 1

    The article said that "Nguyen Van Set... ...entered an airlocked storage lab and died from exposure to nitrogen."

    Um, isn't nitrogen one of the most inert and least dangerous gases there is, practically a noble gas? Isn't nitrogen used specifically when you DON'T want something bad to happen? Isn't the atmosphere like 70-80% nitrogen?

    Can someone explain?

    --

    Don't Bogart the fish sticks
    1. Re:"Exposure to Nitrogen"? by marimbaman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, nitrogen is very inert. You get asphyxiated when you breathe 100% nitrogen.

    2. Re:"Exposure to Nitrogen"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple. Cut off all your Oxygen & breathe only nitrogen ...then let us know how inert & noble it is.

    3. Re:"Exposure to Nitrogen"? by advid · · Score: 1

      Oh, it'd still be very inert and noble. You just wouldn't be around to appreciate it.

      --
      - "I'll probably get modded down for this."
    4. Re:"Exposure to Nitrogen"? by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 1

      Well duh you'll die if there is ONLY nitrogen in the air. But that's not how the article made it sound. It made it sound as if nitrogen was the cause of death. Lack of oxygen would be the cause. VERY different things. Nitrogen was just an innocent bystander.

      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
    5. Re:"Exposure to Nitrogen"? by Hank+Reardon · · Score: 2, Funny
      Could be, of course, that it was in it's liquid state when he entered the room.

      Chilling idea, actually...

      /me ducks quickly.

      --
      There's so little difference between politics and jihad lately...
    6. Re:"Exposure to Nitrogen"? by zaffir · · Score: 1

      So this is all a conspiracy to frame Nitrogen?

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    7. Re:"Exposure to Nitrogen"? by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Ever hear of "the bends" I'm sure that's the right spelling, happens when you deep sea dive and come up too quickly you get nitrogen bubbles in your your blood, very messy, very painful. And your guarenteed to die from it.

      The body can do nothing with nitrogen, and you basicly die from asphyxiation.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
  33. Disbelievers and their habits. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    I've had the clear impetus over the last two years during which I've been studying in depth all things New Age, Occult, Mystical, Magical and Fantastik, to observe trends in how people are conditioned to respond to any form of thought which falls outside the accepted norms.

    Really neat!

    With the advanced warning that Fantastic Lad's views on these matters come with a heavy bias, since I have become utterly convinced that prevailant forces beyond the understanding of conventional science are at work all over the place all the time, here are my observations. . .

    1. Most people who have embraced what I affectionately call, 'The Programming' automatically assume a position of denial and disbelief, regardless of their actual feelings. Even if they are fascinated by an alternative idea and might even be willing to accept it, the conditioned reaction seems to be one of ridicule and scorn designed to hurt the person sharing the information.

    This is really weird, because it even happens to me! After friends listen to me blathering on about Chem Trails, aliens, and Chi, sometimes they come to me and relate weird experiences they have had or esoteric theories they have read, and my automatic response is to doubt and scorn them! I actually have to work in order to listen without automatic negative judgement!


    2. People shed their programmed disbelief in weird levels. I've talked with astrologers and channelers who believe entirely in their 'craft' (I put 'craft' in quotes because, while these phenomena are without any question in my mind perfectly legitimate, they remain fields nonetheless filled with MOUNTAINS of crap, disinfo, charlatanism, etc.), while accepting these things fully, nonetheless automatically reject ALL aspects of things like free energy theory, UFO's, conspiracy theory, Chi, etc. --You can pick any combination of these subject headers for such an individual and distribute them randomly beneath "Believe" and "Disbelieve". --And I'm talking about TOTAL belief in one area with TOTAL denial in another. It should go without saying that this seems remarkably peculiar to me.


    3. The "Re-Boot" phenomenon. When you provide a powerful experience to a disbeliever, (such as knocking them on their asses by tapping their crown Chakra, pointing to a plane dispersing a chem-trail, Dream walking into their sleep and describing to them in detail their dream the next day, knocking over a chair or lighting a candle with focused Chi, etc.) -the average disbeliever will walk around stunned for a day or two, unable to process the experience, and then, if they are unable to find a rational sounding way of dismissing the new information will actually deny any memory of the event! --I've actually seen this happen several times. (I don't know if people actually don't remember or not, but when you press, people will actively avoid the subject in conversation with anger. I've never seen it reach the point of violence, but it seems to me quite possible.)


    4. Geeks and technically savvy individuals, who I believe are critical vectors in the determination of the current state of this reality paradigm, have by far the most powerfull 'blanking' programs and 'rationalization' programs installed, all sporting the most vehement emotional reactions when pressed. (It should be noted that 'rationalization' is very much in quotes. A look at something like the Skeptic's Dictionary shows a wide array of Mis-informed Straw-Man bashing, Half-baked logic, and Plain Old Ridicule used to fortify the 'Official Line'.) --All of which, of course, in my mind, suggests that special care has been taken in this sector by The Powers That Be.


    Anyway, I've found the whole process of making these observations utterly fascinating, and I know there are some out there who might also be interested. And of course, Caveat Lector should be employed at all times when reading my stuff. While I tend to know WAY more on most of these topics than a bevy of New Age morons, I'm still only on the lower parts of the knowledge mountain myself! For every bit of verification I find, I run across 25 lies and bits of fabricated sensationalist crap.


    -Fantastic Lad

    1. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by cardshark2001 · · Score: 1

      1. You seem a little too arrogant for your own good, even if your claims are true.
      2. If I see you light a candle with Chi power, I won't forget it!

      --
      WWJD? JWRTFA!
    2. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dream walking into their sleep and describing to them in detail their dream the next day"

      If anyone, anywhere, could do this to me, I'd be an instant believer. The only reason I don't believe in hoodoo is because every bit of hoodoo I've personally experienced has been completely and easily debunked.

    3. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Those who speak do not know....and those who know do not speak."

    4. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't it be ironic if those who spouted Yoda-isms were somehow actually wise?

    5. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by SEE · · Score: 2

      3. The "Re-Boot" phenomenon. When you provide a powerful experience to a disbeliever, (such as knocking them on their asses by tapping their crown Chakra, pointing to a plane dispersing a chem-trail, Dream walking into their sleep and describing to them in detail their dream the next day, knocking over a chair or lighting a candle with focused Chi, etc.)

      So videotape it next time.

    6. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You ever thought about demonstrating these powerful experiences to a larger audience/the scientific community? You could even claim a $1,000,000 prize!

      http://www.randi.org/research/challenge.html

    7. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by RKloti · · Score: 1
      I actually have to work in order to listen without automatic negative judgement!
      That is a good thing. It means you won't believe the kind of crap that one is forced to hear and read everyday. Horoscopes and such. It is much better to have an automatic defence reaction (scepticism) than to blindly and unquestioningly accept everything that is said and written. There are, IMO, far too many people out there that just believe in something becomes it gives them comfort. An analogy: Would you rather your immune system accept foreign matter until it could be proved to be dangerous, presuming it could be proved to be dangerous, in case you ever need an organ transplant, or would you rather have your immune system attack foreign matter be default, as it is intended to do? If you chose the first, I certainly hope you are living in hermetically sealed environment!

      The burden of proof should lie with he or she who is amking the extraordinary claim, not with the unbeliever who refuses to accept that claim without evidence. If you want me to believe that you or anyone else has psychokinetic or telepathic abilities, then not only do you have provide a convincing PUBLIC demonstration thereof (double blind and fully open to the scientific process) but you also have to allow for some physical measurement, so we know it isn't just a trick. I do not consider myself qualified to judge on such an experiment, so I will wait until you get a reputable source to confirm the veracity of such findings before I'd personally even consider believing. Point me out a scientific, REPUTABLE source which claims it has evidence of supernatural occurences and then I may take you seriously.

    8. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by ErikZ · · Score: 2


      1. Shock! Surprise! If someone comes off as a complete nutball, the odds are high that anything coming out of their mouth will be considered wrong. This isn't 'programming'. Surely you know an idiot at work. Once you realized he was an idiot, did you give all of his suggestions your full attention? Hell no.

      2. Yes, believing in one thing that most people don't believe in doesn't make you automatically believe in EVERYTHING you hear. The best example of this is religion.

      3. No kidding. You introduce a fundamental change in someone's worldview; they will walk around for a day or two thinking about it.

      4. Heh, the powers that be have nothing to do with it. It's called being a skeptic. It comes with being not sheeplike.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    9. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      So videotape it next time.

      Amen to that! It's funny how all of these phenomena are perceptible to human sense organs yet mysteriously defy technological recording. I once read a book (Faerie Tale by Raymon Feist) that made an interesting plot point: A paranormal investigator is walking around an upstate farm looking for clues and rapid-fire dictating into his handheld recorder. He stumbles on the Wild Hunt. Now, one of the myths is that those who see the Wild Hunt are doomed to forget it. (We'll leave out how there could be any myth about it, then...) This happens to poor investigator.


      But later, he plays back the tape, which -- being a machine -- could not be made to mystically "forget". When he hears himself describing the Hunt, he suddenly remembers the experience himself. Technology to the rescue!


      For a while, Feist's book shapes up to be an incredible tale posing human tech versus faerie magic in the ultimate showdown. Then for whatever reason Feist flinced and wrote what was -- to me -- a much lesser climax. But the idea has stuck with me: If "paranormal" is real (i.e., interacts with the physical world), then it is susceptible to scientific investigation.

    10. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      The fairy's made him forget the good ending, duh.

      It wasn't a bad book, though I do agree the ending was weak. The first few books of the Riftwar Saga were much better though.

    11. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by gilroy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Most people who have embraced what I affectionately call, 'The Programming' automatically assume a position of denial and disbelief, regardless of their actual feelings... my automatic response is to doubt and scorn them! I actually have to work in order to listen without automatic negative judgement!... Geeks and technically savvy individuals, who I believe are critical vectors in the determination of the current state of this reality paradigm, have by far the most powerfull 'blanking' programs and 'rationalization' programs installed


      Or, perhaps, it's just what Carl Sagan calls our "baloney detection kit". The essence of science -- and the reason it has lead to four hundred years of success, versus millenia of stagnation before -- is that it makes things rest on proof, not faith. What we can talk about, scientifically, may be a miniscule part of what's Out There. But what we say, can be said with confidence.



      Maybe geeks and techheads are more doubting because (a) they are more trained in scientific ways; (b) they are in fields that require judicious doubt and problem-solving skills to look for the simplest explanation; and (c) they are disproportionately likely to have gotten their fantasy fix by actually reading (honest) fantasy and sci fi, so the mystical worlds spouted by paranormal believers -- worlds which IMHO are much less transcendant than the fiction I read, let alone the actual Universe as revealed through science -- simply do not offer anything worthwhile.

    12. Re:Disbelievers and their habits. . . by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 2
      When you provide a powerful experience to a disbeliever, (such as knocking them on their asses by tapping their crown Chakra, pointing to a plane dispersing a chem-trail, Dream walking into their sleep and describing to them in detail their dream the next day, knocking over a chair or lighting a candle with focused Chi, etc.)

      If you can actually do any of this, why don't you go take that one million dollars that James Randi has put up saying there's no such thing? Have lots of cameras around and make sure you've got it all on tape if you don't trust him.
  34. army of the 12 monkeys by swirlyhead · · Score: 1

    Somebody had to bring it up. But if there really is a conspiracy
    the 'group of scientists decide to cull te human race and then get whacked by evil forces who want to immunize themselves before releasing the plague'
    is a pretty good one.

  35. Olympic games by humming · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now they only need a Olympic to spread this biological disease at.

    Tom Clancy, the Nostradamus of our time.

    //Humming

    --
    I'm too stupid to preview.
    1. Re:Olympic games by inKubus · · Score: 2

      Who is Tom Clancy anyway? Have you met him? And can we PROVE he wrote those books?

      The answer is no. Of course, in America, a trust of authors is ingrained into each one of us as children.

      The question is always WHY. But if you delve into the subject deeper, you may find more than you dreamed of.

      And also, remember, the powerful groups who do stuff like this also surf the web. You must delve DEEEEp.

      If you have the time, I strongly recommend it. If you don't, keep working, get that money. You're going to die one day.

      Remember, you are going to die one day.

      You too, will die someday.

      You are going to DIE. Not now, not by terrorism, but one day, everyone will die. You are not an exception. You WILL die. You will cease to be.

      Maybe you are just useless and living a standard, unexciting life. I'm non-standard. I like to have a little fun, blow my mind a bit.

      Just remember, you are going to die someday. Someday, it will all go black, and there will be no more YOU.

      So, don't be afraid to bend reality a bit. It's so boring sometimes, this Television news and government sanctioned information.

      Break the rules, find out what the more open-minded are thinking..

      humanunderground continues to process intelligence.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  36. Acceptable risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think that if you take a job that is anti-Scriptural you have to be willing to accept the risk of being killed by the moral community. Play with fire and get burned, etc.

    1. Re:Acceptable risk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But murder is amoral, so isn't the only danger from the amoral community?

    2. Re:Acceptable risk by DuckyExMachina · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Crack(TM). it's what's for dinner.

  37. Walken in San Jose by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
    Maybe a little off-topic, but since you mentioned Bond:

    I live in San Jose, and I've been laid off about three months. The other day I was watching View to a Kill, and I found myself genuinely hoping that Christopher Walken's character would succeed in blowing up the Silicon Valley.

    Christ, I need to find a job.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  38. Impressive List.....but not as near complete as by thumbtack · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. Re:Impressive List.....but not as near complete as by rand.srand() · · Score: 1

      Paul Olson on this list shows a rather odd claim that a bomb took down the airplane he was on. The NTSB report shows:

      "Analysis of the cockpit voice recorder, National Transportation Safety Board computer simulation, and human performance data (including operational factors) from the United Airlines flight 585 accident shows that they are consistent with a rudder reversal most likely caused by a jam of the main rudder power control unit servo valve secondary slide to the servo valve housing offset from its neutral position and overtravel of the primary slide."

      And also concludes:

      "USAir flight 427 did not experience an in-flight fire, bomb, explosion, or structural failure."

      If as an amateur investigator I can determine this in under 10 minutes, how am I supposed to rate the impartiality and investigative tenacity of this list if the one entry I decide to check turns out to be misrepresented? If the NTSB is part of the conspiracy why is it not mentioned?

      Next crackpot in the line please...

    2. Re:Impressive List.....but not as near complete as by StevenMaurer · · Score: 2

      Yet another piece of thouroughly debunked right wing bullshit, as you can see in this Snopes (Anti-)Urban Legend Article

      There's just got to be some way to bitch-slap people who mod trolls like this up. Single meta-mods just don't cut it.

    3. Re:Impressive List.....but not as near complete as by thumbtack · · Score: 1

      I think your sig says it all.... I don't believe any of the crap: Clinton Body Count, Bush Body Count, Micro-biologist body count. It was used to point out the absurdity or all of it, but then again it takes intelligence to figure that out, unless someone take the time to explain it to you.

  39. Viruses working for us . . . by Aurelfell · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the time Voyager had to form an aliance with the Borg. I mean, I'm all for using viruses as tools, and I appreciate the irony of using one of our species traditional enemy, (forgive the melodrama,) but what stops these viruses from mutating into something other than what there were meant for. I don't even mean something dangerous, nescessarily, just that viruses have a way of changing when you least expect it.

  40. SO WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The article simply ends without ever having answered the question of what are the chances! Where's the statistical test?

    A figure of 20,000 academic microbiologists in the U.S. is stated, but that's perhaps only a count of those who are members of ASM. The actual number of academic microbiologists is likely much more. Plus, "mysterious" deaths in the U.K. and Australia are also described. I don't see anything alarming on the whole. That's not to say some of the deaths aren't suspicious of foul play, but where's the basis for saying it's a conspiracy? The article is clearly inflammatory, in that it never really tests its hypothesis.

    Even more amazing is that such a flimsy article got recognized on /.
    Pathetic really.

  41. My conspiracy theory, since /. failed to provide 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posted anonymously, like that will help if they want to whack me too.

    The Bush administration was on shaky ground, and they are right wing nuts. They have some grievances with the arab world (which in itself isn't necessarily wrong, I do too). They decide they want to finish on Binladen, which Clinton failed to do.

    Motivation: Grudges, prestige of winning a war, etc. Possibly getting legislation passed.

    So, they have to be really careful. The CIA uncovers a really flaky Alquaeda plot to destroy some stuff. However, they're unable to succeed on their own. So the FBI looks the other way, certain airport security firms do the same thing, allowing something that could never have happened otherwise.

    Meanwhile, goverment black op spooks distribute some weapons grade anthrax to various offices in Florida and Washington. Partly to start hysteria to fuel war support, and partly to give some oomph to Big Brother laws.

    Also, microbiologists start dying mysteriously. Some were no doubt the kinds of experts who might have discovered the true origins of the anthrax, others were "celebrity" targets meant to add more panic to the hysteria that was building. Possibly, some were even witnesses to be disposed of. I won't even rule out that one or two might have been reluctant co-conspirators that were no longer useful.

    But something changed, and Bush reconsidered the all out war. Probably something we're not aware of. However, the kill orders for the scientists weren't easy to retract, nor was it even necessary to do so. Tha anthrax angle may have been ruled too risky, and it was curtailed. Or maybe it was time to prepare for a new plague? After all, who else could get ahold of smallpox? Certainly, if it had been some whacko mailing the anthrax, (sometimes there really is no conspiracy, after all) wouldn't their have been credible letters taking credit? We never saw such.

    And don't ever forget, full of loony shit though they are, who else might have printed such a conspiracy story, had they actually gotten ahold of it, other than a tabloid? I betcha that photographer had some really snazzy photos that are now sitting next to the Ark of the Covenant in the Indy Jones Federal warehouse.

    I don't claim that this is the whole puzzle, but I've got the edge pieces put together.

  42. weapon conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I live in Toronto, and I get the Globe and Mail in paper form, so I've had all day to think about the following question: who would want these microbiologists dead?

    IIRC, these scientists are the type of people that could develop biological weapons -- or develop the cure to biological weapons.

    I assume that the majority of the world is against biological weapons, and, possibly, some group of people, who think that they are "doing good", are systematically killing the people that are most likely to develop them.

    At the other end of the consipracy spectrum, terrorists with biological weapons would definitely not want cures found to their biological weapons, otherwise, their weapons cease to pose a powerful threat. Also, any country that develops biological weapons would be against other countries developing a cure or creating biological weapons, themselves.

    So, there's some food for thought. Maybe, this is all a very statistically unlikely coincidence, or, just maybe, someone is doing a very good job of systematically killing the worlds leading microbiologists. I've heard people today accusing Iraq of planning it.

    Peter

  43. The sober, scary truth by s390 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    is here

    The author is an academic and lawyer who had a hand in drafting US anti-biowarfare laws - he knows the history, the players, and the reasons related to US biowar activities, the Gulf War Syndrome, strangely convenient anthrax attacks on the US Congress, and well-founded suspicions about what's going on here. It's authoritative and frightening.

    1. Re:The sober, scary truth by dondelelcaro · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm not in a position to comment fully on Francis Boyle's commentary, but to attempt to deal correctly with biological warefare when you are unaware of the rudimentary biology necessary to generate said anti-biotics is definetly foolhardy. His talk should have been prefaced with the IANAMB (I am not microbiologist) instead of the ubiquitous IANAL.

      1. It's genetic engineering, not DNA genetic engineering
      2. You don't typically use "DNA gene splicing" to generate agents... the most powerfull agents are already there...
      3. The method to generate a vaccine is often dramatically different than the method to generate a new anti-biotic agent
      4. Pigs, sheep, and rabits are used normally in immunoligical research because their immune systems are relatively similar to humans (not because their circulatory system and respiratory system are similar)
      I'll stop there... while some of the points he raises are definetly worth going into, he should really consider becomming better informed of the technical details behind his assertions. It would also be userfull if he would site his sources in true academic style, rather than just asserting them to be so.
      --
      http://www.donarmstrong.com
    2. Re:The sober, scary truth by inKubus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The question is why. If this story is factual, one can rule out all coincidences. We are mostly scientists and know the rules of probability. So, these microbiologists are being killed by someone.

      The question is, WHO? The answer is usually "some powerful government" but in reality, how hard is it to make a series of deaths seem like suicides and strange coincidences?

      Any reasonably intelligent human who's read all the detective stories, watches discovery channel, and has the time to plan it all out could make something like this happen.

      So then, the question becomes "WHY?" To understand the WHY, you must understand the HOW.

      HOW are these individuals REALLY connected. Sure the story gives us some facts on what each researcher was working on, but there are no concrete links.

      And why no speculation in the story on the why and how? Then you must examine the what and the when:

      What: Biowarfare. A hot topic these days, and
      WHEN: 31 days after Sept. 11th, when we are in the midst of this anthrax attack.

      Many theories may arise from these minor statements:

      1. People killed were involved in the plot, and were killed to keep from talking.

      2. If this is the case, who was controlling the plot, and

      3. Is this linked to Sept 11th???

      Then you might ask:

      4. Most of these scientists were American, therefore perhaps the plot involved Americans..?

      then maybe

      5. The same people were behind ... Sept 11th? Or is it just opportunism?

      6. Yet, is such an agency who is capable of a Sept 11th also capable of this other plot:

      Yes.

      So you see, a few minor leaps of the imagination, and we are to the implcations of the matter.. it is not that hard these days to see what might really be happening, as much as we wish to not believe it.

      Believe or not, is it better to make 5 educated and strongly verified guesses, or trust a cable news channel (owned by the largest media corp in the world?)

      I ask you this.

      Bored? Delve in deeper:

      Human Underground Continues to Process Intelligence

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  44. The cast of characters.... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3, Funny

    Throw in a few Russian defectors, a few nervy U.S. biotech companies, a deranged assassin or two, a bit of Elvis, a couple of Satanists, a subtle hint of espionage...

    I give up. Is this MTV's latest The Real World cast? Where's the loveable, misunderstood homosexual?

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  45. Too bad the lone gunmen are dead by Rhinobird · · Score: 2

    Too bad the lone gunmen are dead. They'd have been able to get to the bottom of this....or maybe they already did...

    --
    If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
    1. Re:Too bad the lone gunmen are dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nikola

    2. Re:Too bad the lone gunmen are dead by Rhinobird · · Score: 2

      Thank you...boy is my face red.

      --
      If Mr. Edison had thought smarter he wouldn't sweat as much. --Nikola Tesla
  46. Okay, but... by advid · · Score: 1

    Check any research field over the last 5 months. In any field that's about the same size as microbiology, it wouldn't seem unreasonable for that many people to die.

    So they could probably have written this article about the mysterious deaths of cabbage farmers in the midwest, I suppose. It'd be about as relevant...

    --
    - "I'll probably get modded down for this."
  47. CONSPIRACY!!!!! by gnovos · · Score: 2

    Oh my god! The server has suddenly gone down! I can't read the page that slashdot has linked to! It must the the conspiracy at work....

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:CONSPIRACY!!!!! by LegendLength · · Score: 1

      Calm down now, everything is going to be ok. Just step into the car...that's it. We're going on a little trip to a place we like to call 'The Island'.

    2. Re:CONSPIRACY!!!!! by inKubus · · Score: 2

      You'd start to worry if it was your server, you friend who also saw the story, and 5 of his friends.

      Then if they started to get killed, what then? Would you start to worry?

      If you are doing something they (whoever "they" is) care about and you are fucking up their plans, they will neutralize you.

      What is it about killing people that makes people think this is all so unlikely?! MILLIONS died in world war two! What makes you think things are any different now.

      Except of course, the media. :)

      Cheers.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
  48. Dont put too much faith in that site... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not knocking the article you linked to, but http://www.etherzone.com/2002/lang051002.shtml is another story on the site. Just so you know what sorta crap they'll pass off as an article.

  49. It seems like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the quality of comment posts is declining. Are you doing anything about it?

    We have a moderation system.
    One of the unfortunate side-effects of the increasing popularity of
    Slashdot is that the number of trolls, flame-warriors and all-around lamers
    increases as well, and it only takes a relatively small number of them
    to make a lot of noise. Keeping this noise to a minimum is one of the primary
    goals of the moderation system (which is explained in detail elsewhere
    in this FAQ).
    Since this system is essentially an experiment in trying to solve the
    problems inherent in mass communication, one would expect its success to
    be variable, and indeed, this is the case. Some days it works great, and
    some days it doesn't.

  50. Hmmm intriguing ... by 1001+0000 · · Score: 1

    Microbiologists "mysteriously dead" after developing "weapons-grade biological plagues".

  51. they missed a few. by Kwantus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Woohoo! We Canucks'll crack Washington's BS yet!

    On Nov. 24 a Swissair flight from Berlin to Zurich crashed on its landing approach. Of the 33 persons on board, 24 were killed, including the head of the hematology department at Israel's Ichilov Hospital, as well as directors of the Tel Aviv Public Health Department and Hebrew University School of Medicine.

    on Oct. 4, a commercial jetliner traveling from Israel to Novosibirsk, Siberia was shot down over the Black Sea by an "errant" Ukrainian surface-to-air missile, killing all on board. The missile was over 100 miles off-course. Despite early news stories reporting it as a charter, the flight, Air Sibir 1812, was a regularly scheduled flight.the plane is believed by many in Israel to have had as many as five passengers who were microbiologists. Both Israel and Novosibirsk are homes for cutting-edge microbiological research. Novosibirsk is known as the scientific capital of Siberia, and home to over 50 research facilities and 13 full universities for a population of only 2.5 million people.

    http://fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/02_14_02_m ic robio.html

    Now, I'm not sure this is anything more sinister than Washington doesn't want a cure or cheap treatment for AIDS found... read between the lines of the 1974 NSSM200 report and match it up with the extensions of drug patents and other well-known actions contrary to Washington's hand-wringing about this epidemic.

    http://www.africa2000.com/SNDX/nssm200all.html

    http://amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0937307041

    1. Re:they missed a few. by RKloti · · Score: 2, Informative

      Excuse me? It was a Crossair flight, not a Swissair flight. Swissair no longer exists per se. Crossair was a regional airline, now it has taken up some (most) of Swissair's medium and long haul flights. That is, those that actually made money.

      The plane flew too low and ended up flying into a forest in Birchwil, which is a few kilometres from the end of runway 28, the shortest of ZRH's 3 runways (it is 2.5 km long, the others are 3.3 and 3.5 kilometres long). According to the CVR, it appears to have been an accident. At least partially responsible were noise regulations forcing airliners to land on a runway that was not IFR equipped during poor visibility, though the pilot should have been capable of performing this procedure safely.

      No, I do not work for an airline. Or for an airport. I happen to know this because Birchwil is about 2-3 km from where I live.

    2. Re:they missed a few. by Kwantus · · Score: 1

      pardon me :) (as long we're trading geography I live about 10 km from the crash that killed Swissair. How do you do :)

      It could well have been an accident, just like the ukrainian missile could have been an accident, and the shootdown of Flight 800 could have been an accident. That's probably why the G&M didn't deal with them - given the implication someone doesn't care about who's standing next to a ubiologist at the time. On the other hand there've been severl `convenient accidents' the last few years...

  52. Re:trollaxor.com by halo8 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    wow.. this actually is a very informative and well thought out post, off topic but its a good read

    my Question
    Q: is this going to be the next "big black post" like the "other" post of the recent blackout fame?

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
  53. Re:Didn't this happen to Programmers in the UK too by KieranElby · · Score: 3, Informative

    > I remember almost a decade ago, there was a rash of mysterious deaths in the UK of top programmers working on top secret military projects.

    To be precise, a total of 20 programers linked to Marconi Defense Systems or the Ministry of Defense died suspiciously between 1985-1987.

    The first mainstream magazine to break this story was the April 30th 1987 edition of Computer News (UK), but unfortunately the article does not seem to be available online.

    However, it gets a mention in the Risks Digest, as well as plenty of conspiracy sites such as this one.

  54. Re:Ahh! Now let's see how the Machine responds. . by SEE · · Score: 2

    Um, okay...

    First, if you're running a conspiracy to off microbiologists, why those eleven? There's no pattern as to nationality, research subject, etc.

    Second, unless you know how many microbiologists there are (20,000 academic in the U.S. is the only number given, which is clearly inadequate), how can you even show this is an unusual rate of "unusual" deaths? Only until you establish that there's a statistcally unusual number of deaths is there any grounds for any speculation at all.

  55. Where did the other sheep go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There were 103,632 other deaths in this timeframe - how do they fit into the conspiracy? I mean the grandma, the backalley bum, and the construction worker must have had something to do with it...

  56. Re:trollaxor.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, you retard, it's the same post. Before, it was an unforgivable troll... this time, it's some lame-ass copycat. At least, the first time around it was original, what's the excuse this time?

  57. Re:Didn't this happen to Programmers in the UK too by SEE · · Score: 2

    Now, you see, conspiracy theories about those deaths have what the one posted here does not: logic. They were all Britons involved in defense software, and the rate of deaths by apparent suicide was twice the national norm according to THE INDEPENDENT.

    It could still have been a statistical blip; things do occasionally happen to clump, and a doubled rate in a specific subsample isn't all that unusual. But a prima facie case for somebody bumping off British programmers exists.

  58. Don't worry I'm an athiest! by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2

    I think you're *all* religious fundamentalist nuts.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
    1. Re:Don't worry I'm an athiest! by clone304 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to include yourself among that group ;)

    2. Re:Don't worry I'm an athiest! by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      What about existentialist athiests?

      --
      It's been a long time.
  59. Not that unlikeley by DOsinga · · Score: 1

    Say, there are about 100 different communities like microbiology, linux adepts or literary critics, with each 100 experts. The chance of 1 expert dying in half a year is may be 2% (there usually somewhat aged). 10 experts dying in half a year from a community of 100 is then about 1 in 1000 (ie 0.02^10/(0.98^90) times a number of possible distributions), so something like this should happen about every 5 year within one of the hundred communities.

    1. Re:Not that unlikeley by RKloti · · Score: 1
      It's they're not there. There is relating to a place, they're is a shortening of they are.

      BTW, 2% average death rate per year sounds bogus, if you are talking about death rate average per year throughtout an entire lifetime. If the death rate were so high, only a little over a quarter of the population would reach retirement. Judging from the large and growing number of pensioners, I think the number is lower than that. Perhaps 1% per annum would be closer. If you are talking about, uh, older microbiologists, then 2% may not be unreasonable. But not all microbiologists are old.

    2. Re:Not that unlikeley by DOsinga · · Score: 1

      But not all microbiologists are old

      Not all microbiolists are old, but if there^H^Hy're famous, they're probably somewhat older, say average around 50. 2% death rate would give them a life expectancy of 85, which sounds about right.

  60. Offtopic, but needs to be said. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    So let me get this straight. You believe in astrology and channeling, while simultaneously and pre-emptively denying the validity of unnamed charlatans whenever and whereever you deem them undefendable.

    Let's examine these too beliefs. One belief is that practically any personality trait or significant event actually has something to do with the arrangement of stars and planets in the night sky. Or, in some cases, what they happened to be on the day you were born. Does this mean that it might be preferable for pregnant women to medically delay birth, for a more favorable astrological "sign" ? If they have a C-section, does it count. If an embryo is frozen for 3 years, and then implanted in a womb, does this affect things at all, or is it truly the birth date?

    What, you retards never actually tested any of this? Your 10,000 year old voodoo beliefs? What, are you afraid that if there were such tests, things might show it to be unsupportable superstition? And if you aren't afraid that is the case, what prevents you from doing this?

    See, this is what science is about. Figuring out what is going on. If atrology were in any way valid, not only would it strengthen your arguments that it is, but science would allow you to refine just what you know.

    Statistics, lies though they are, don't even come close to supporting anything that atrology ever claims. Made up bullshit by the trolls here on slashdot, is statistically indistinguishable from this garbage.

    Channeling? Hmm, dunno. I won't rule it out, but the truth is, this one would be much more defendable by you, on its own. It's certainly not repeatable though, let alone reliable. But this once, you get a "Get out of jail free card". I won't attack this one just yet.

    As for me being "programmed" to not believe stupid new age garbage, I thank you, I don't often recieve compliments on slashdot. For those of you that don't speak the fruity dialect of nutcasian, that translates to "having common sense".

    You see, it's not out of malice or distrust that the natural inclination is to not believe something until proven true. It's simply that there are any number (read: infinite) of possibilities, all contradicting. And it would be IMPOSSIBLE to give all the benefit of the doubt simultaneously. So therefor, you figure out the things you know for sure, while setting aside all the crazy stuff, until you get around to test this.

    Why? Because it's the only way to function as a human being, otherwise you'd starve to death worrying that if you ate at the wrong time, the gods would punish you (which they might, if all theories are equally plausible until tested, they might very well kill you for such a transgression, and by the time you find out, it's too late).

    And if you don't agree, all you have to do, is prove it to me with repeatable results. That's the cool thing about science, my belief doesn't matter if it's true.

  61. Here's another list of murdered scientists by millette · · Score: 2, Informative

    For some reason, the original isn't accessible anymore... perhaps it has something to do with the content. If anyone knows people at google, maybe now would be a good time to change jobs - who knows whom does lunatic murderers will go after now!
    dead scientists

  62. Pagans != Satanists! by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

    Dumbassed media, can't even get the terminology right...

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Pagans != Satanists! by inKubus · · Score: 2

      Media Logic:

      Some pagans worship Lucifer
      Therefore
      All pagans are Satanists.

      Most college students would recognize this as a "false" statement.

      75% of America has not, and will never go to college.

      Remember that.

      --
      Cool! Amazing Toys.
    2. Re:Pagans != Satanists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Pagan is a non-Christian. Not that neo-Pagans haven't gone & redefined it...

      Satanists don't actually believe in Satan (if they do, they tend to believe that they *are* Satan...) and I don't see how they can be classified as "Christian" ...

  63. Conspiracy theory vs. fear and trust by theolein · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reading stuff like this, although it is not placed in context (as others mention here), is startling. It does make me frightened in any case. A good starting point for the spread of biological and chemical weapons in the world, and perhaps more importantly who supports whom, is the federation of American Scientists website.

    I'm a South African and was shocked to read about the support given by almost all Western Governments to the Dr.Mengele of the Apartheid Government, Dr.Wouter Basson, a.k.a. Dr.Death, in that regime's attempts to create bio weapons which would only affect black people. (Although why they had this strange idea that blacks are some other species I don't know). In any case, although probably many people don't remember it, in the mid 80's an East German microbiologist claimed that the actual origions of the HIV virus(various newspaper archives) were in fact in a USArmy bioweapons lab in either Virginia or Maryland (Ft.Derrick? I don't remember the name). He was laughed off at the time. I also, in terms of normal common sense found it somewhat implausiable. But the problem is, who do you believe, and who do you trust?

    I was somewhat amazed at the many coincidents (reminiscent of a good episode of the X-Files) in the Anthrax attacks in the US last year. Why Florida? Why the isolated cases of lonely old women? Why liberal or popular politicians? How did the FBI get to the conclusion so rapidly that it was not linked to the 9/11 higjackers and that it was "probably of domestic origion"? Why has nothing ever come out of the investigation?

    I don't really like conspiracy theories, as they tend to cloud real events, but who do you believe? And what do you believe? Did anyone in any so-called country ever give their politicians an explicit right to muck around with stuff as dangerous as this?

    1. Re:Conspiracy theory vs. fear and trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because anthrax only happened in America and only during a short period of time. Should Bio warfare be a more common practice from islamic groups, then neighbouring european countries and Israel, who have for decades been under terrorist threats, would have already have had experience in it. Last time such thing was done was during the crusades were plagues bodies were thrown over fortifications, some 800 years ago. Europe has enjoyed since, the red brigades, the armenians, the GIA / Hizbolah and even local regional terrorist attacks (Corsicans, Basques, Ulster) most of them in the form of a bomb or assasinations.

      It just came out once, in only one country and is unlike the bombing problem. Thus it's an internal american problem. This is also the conclusion of the other western powers.

    2. Re:Conspiracy theory vs. fear and trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THere was a reason that East German was laughed at.

      Would you create a bioweapon that could take up to 10 years to kill someone, and which you can't vaccinate your population against?

      Plus, various KGB defectors have revealed that it was a KGB "active measure" designed to give the US a public black eye.
      Vitaly Mirtokhin talked abotu this at length in his book, as did Oleg Gordievsky.

    3. Re:Conspiracy theory vs. fear and trust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Although why they had this strange idea that blacks are some other species I don't know
      Perhaps from reading a book whose full title (rarely used) is "On The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life".

      Darwin was used by many whackos to justify slavery (the abolition movement was lead by Bible-believing Christians).
  64. _Twelve_Monkeys_? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds somehow of the movie _Twelve_Monkeys_
    Shit its started already.

  65. Re:Pay no attention to these Heathens! by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

    I'd imagine (or at
    least hope) that Philosophy would be eliminated entirely


    Oddly enough the military loves morals and ethics classes for their officers, as well as basic logic classes. If anything Philosophy would be highthened. ^_^

  66. ...and don't forget the newline! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Egads! That perl is daft! If you insist on using that array for your message, at least use the proper tools to reassemble it:

    #!/usr/bin/perl -w
    my @cryforhelp = ("The", "feds", "made", "me", "do", "it!");
    print join(' ', @cryforhelp), "\n";
  67. Do the math, people! by kris_lang · · Score: 1
    The problem is simple: given a population of 20k microbiologists and 11 deaths over 5 months, you have an obvious yearly death rate of 12/5*11/20k which is 0.00132 per person. Death rates are usually given in terms of deaths per population of 100000 subjects by the CDC and medical types. The death rate for this pool is 0.132% per year or 132 deaths per year.


    If you assumed a flat probability of death for each age for a large population, say only 1% per year for everybody from newborns to the elderly, you'd expect 1000 deaths per 100000 people. With an average life expectancy of 70 yrs (M) - 77 yrs (F) in health-economy-advantaged nations, you can expect a death rate of 1.4% as a decent guess. Higher death rates may apply. And if you realize that morbidity is higher for neonates and the elderly and lower for the teenaged to middle-aged, then the presence of a death rate of 132 per 100-thousand per year for 20-70-to-more years older is in fact NOTHING at all. It is not even a statistical anomaly. It is not anywhere close to being significant.



    I haven't bothered looking at the data for actual death rates and your MMV (morbidity may vary).
    But it is always smart to read numerical data in reports carefully and skeptically. The math does not support any conspiracy in this case. Of course, it does not rule it out. But that's what conspiracy theories are all about.

    1. Re:Do the math, people! by rufusdufus · · Score: 2

      see this post for more precise math.

      Also, you are assuming that there were only 11 deaths, which is probably not the case. What stands out about these deaths is that they have mysterious causes, or blantant criminal intent.

      Go do more investigation and you will find that there really may be something to this story.

  68. Paraphrasing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If you tolerate this, your children will be next"

  69. Re:Pay no attention to these Heathens! by Kwantus · · Score: 1

    (I don't know why i even bother with this obvious ignorant tripe, but...)

    >They have become ungrateful for the things that the greatest nation on earth has given them,

    Which includes:

    tens of millions of civilians killed; untold suffering and misery of a couple billion more; scores of interventions for `democracy' not one of which has resulted in democracy (and often demolished what there was)

    http://americanstateterrorism.com

    war crimes in Iraq (including but not limited to conspiring and lying to start both phases of the Gulf War)

    http://deoxy.org/wc/wc-index.htm

    war crimes in Yugoslavia

    http://www.iacenter.org/warcrime/wct2000.htm

    conspiring against their own people

    http://www.gwu.edu/%7Ensarchiv/news/20010430/doc 1. pdf

    I thank God there remain a few Americans (such as fmr Att'y Gen'l Ramsey Clarke) who face how Washington has soured what could have been a good thing.

    As for 9/11, the FBI has not been able to scrape together any evidence to support the theory of the Nineteen (it appears it's not even going to try to fake it, as it has been known to do - COINTELPRO)

    http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/speeches/speech04190 2. htm

    What evidence *is* available points to another conspiracy within Washington to start another imperial war (much as it is now known, from gov't documents, to have done in Pearl Harbour; with comparable loss of life in number and greater loss in per-capita terms http://www.independent.org/tii/news/020311Cirignan o.html ), and that Israel can prove that, and that's why the administration is bending itself in knots to do what Israel wants.

    The truly sinister, wretched cancer in the US is the indoctination, ignorance, and demonisation of informed, rational thought practiced by the US state-run education system.

  70. how about this one?. by Kwantus · · Score: 1

    I counted up 58 direct deaths and 304? 306? people who happened to be nearby

    http://www.devvy.com/deadmenlies.html

  71. Re:trollaxor.com by clone304 · · Score: 1

    Sucker.

  72. Antrax Connection? by dragons_flight · · Score: 2

    Your post makes me wonder about something. Perhaps someone on that list did have something to do with the anthrax attack. Four or five of those deaths could be potential suicides, and a stroke could be stress-related. Suppose it was a US researcher that made the anthrax, but that he was intending to make people wake up to the threat rather than kill anyone. It is certainly possible that such a person could suffer a severe fit of guilty conscience.

    Alternatively, someone might have found out what the person responsible for anthrax had done and killed him or her. I wouldn't even put it past the US government to do such a thing if they felt the guy would spill national security secrets or they would have to divulge too much classified info to pin the crime on him.

    On the other hand there might just be some anthrax crazed vigilante who is whacking high profile microbiologists.

    Some of the deaths are almost certainly just coincidental, and maybe they all are, but I do hope that the FBI is at least taking a serious look at whether there is some connection.

  73. Wow! Glad I got out of that profession... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    I thought the biggest threat to a microbiologist was doing something stupid like mouth pipetting, or cross contamination. Although the wild world of Microbiology in water filtration doesnt see the wild side... Hell it's actually damned boring.... Oh look the same microbes I found yesterday... and the day before.... and the day before that.. Oh wait that one is different.... Gram stain... Yup Gram Positive... and it's oh wait... same thing....

    The most exciting part of your day is handling the live sample bottles of E-coli.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Wow! Glad I got out of that profession... by Kris_J · · Score: 2
      The most exciting part of your day is handling the live sample bottles of E-coli.
      Is that the new Gaultier fragrance?

      Seriously, thanks to Infectious Awarables I'm sure there's someone at the last place I worked that thinks Ebola is a clothing designer that does men's ties.

  74. CSIRO microbiologist conspiracy theory by tawatana · · Score: 1

    I remember hearing on the radio a week or two ago about the findings of the inquiry into the death of Set Van Nguyen - the Australian microbiologist who died in an airlock filled with nitrogen.
    I did a search on Google and found a multitude of sites that go a bit further than this article and actually put forth a few theories. Some of these people sound like nutters but it's a bit interesting. Here are a couple of them.
    http://www.unsolvedmysteries.com/usm236911.html
    http://www.rense.com/general18/returb.htm

  75. Get out that home video camera by vandelais · · Score: 2

    make a short video about the 'facts' of the case
    and you too can own the distribution rights to this newsy event before someone else makes a movie about this with Pierce Brosnan or Wesley Snipes
    Fuck the MPAA!

    --
    Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
  76. Re:Didn't this happen to Programmers in the UK too by inKubus · · Score: 2

    Yeah, who would do that? It's almost like the "agents" of whatever "agency" that killed them was wanting to make it obvious these people were killed.

    Yet the police mysteriously overlook everything.

    The truth is, you can't trust anyone. Especially when money is involved. It's the one thing that can get you anything.

    Remember that.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
  77. Statistical breakdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Benito Que - murdered, beating
    Robert M. Schwartz - murder, stabbing
    Victor Korshunov - murder, beating
    Ian Langford - murder, "partially naked/wedged under chair"
    Tanya Holzmayer - murder, shot by Huang
    Guyang Huang - suicide, gunshot
    Don C. Wiley - ???, "fell off bridge"
    Vladimir Pasechnik - natural causes, stroke
    Nguyen Van Set - accident , laboratory
    David Wynn- accident, automobile
    Steven Mostow - accident, airplane

    7 deaths were murders, or seem very suspicious
    3 deaths were accidents
    1 death was due to natural causes

    http://www.disastercenter.com/cdc/111riske.html

    I suppose the next question would be is how large a sample group needs to be to make a significant comparison against the statistics of society as a whole?

    1. Re:Statistical breakdown by sporkulum · · Score: 0

      Roughly 30 according to the central limit theorem

      --
      semper ubi sub ubi
    2. Re:Statistical breakdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't matter. You're picking your group *after* the fact. In order for statistics to be relevant, you'd have to have singled out this group for observation before hand.

      Look at it this way - there are millions of possible grouping of people. So there is *guaranteed* to be groups that have oddly high death rates. You're picking a group with an oddly high death rate after the fact.

      It's just like claiming that person X winning lottery is a "miracle" because the odds of any one person winning it are so low.

      Scythe

  78. Re:Didn't this happen to Programmers in the UK too by Tunguska · · Score: 1

    German Schizo-junkie cracker Karl Koch was probably eliminated in relation to these events. He supposedly cracked WIMEX in the mid to late 80's gaining access via defense contractors insufficiently secured systems.

    /Dr. Tinfoil

    --
    Only dead fish swim downstream......
  79. Military ethics, etc by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    Oddly enough the military loves morals and ethics classes for their officers, as well as basic logic classes. If anything Philosophy would be highthened. ^_^

    Of course the morals and ethics they tend to get into tend to be justifications of their jobs. And as Sept 11 showed, it is sometimes difficult to have an intelligent conversation with a man bent on trying to kill or destroy you.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Military ethics, etc by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Haha true true but some sort of ethics class is needed to 'teach' people that killing others is a-ok. ^_^

      On the philosophy front though, it can also be said that all of the great generals where either philosophers themselves, are students of philosphy.

      As for music, one of the PROBLEMS and the reasons that music is so damn morally degraded these days is because the music listeners where never taught what REAL music is like. Teach those kids how to play at least one instrument from early on and I will assure you that you will have far less people buying pop music cds, they somehow lose their appeal when listeners can start to spot how f*cking repetitive and droning they are.

      Art is needed to teach people visualization abilities, mathematics does the engineer no good if the engineer cannot see in their mind whatever it is that they are modeling.

      There was actually a story on one of those 'investigative reporting' tv shows that is so popular (dateline, 20/20, whatever) that showed how the schools run by the military are actually better at teaching childern things, and that amongst other things the increased funding that they have (being Pentagon and all) was going towards some rather progressive changes (assloads of computers in all of the classrooms, and every shot of the school rooms themselves that the segment had showed tons of artsy fartsy stuff all over the place).

      Very few behavioral issues compared to regular public schools, and the dumb-shits concluded that (duuuh) parental involvement was even more important then anything else that had been done.

      Lesson to be learned, education succeeds damn nearly anyplace where you have parents who actually care

      Oh yah, and that the military would run schools pretty much the same way that they are run now, except with more funding and that they would be likely to not tolerate as much shit as schools do now. (around here teachers can no longer confiscate electronics from students due to parent suing the school district over it. . . . which means that students can be found going up and down the hallways all day long with huge boomboxs spewing out garbage.)

  80. analogous conspiracies? by __aamuga9686 · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else have a vague (or better, clear) recollection of a similar reporting of odd deaths, by automobile accident and suicide (alleged), in the UK in the 1980's. As I recall, vaguely, in Britain in the eighties, a slew of scientists working for GE UK were found, in a reasonably suspicious span of time, to have died in automobile accidents, suicides, or 'suicide by automobile accident,' etc. etc. I believe allegations were made they were working on some top secret or most secret electronics for Her Majesty, under the auspicies of GE UK. I do recall a couple of the suicide victim's surviving families were VERY dubious about these being suicides. If you recall this, or better yet, if you have any online SOURCE materials for this, please email me as well as posting them? Thank you.

    1. Re:analogous conspiracies? by __aamuga9686 · · Score: 1

      I am posting to my own comment, as my recall has improved, and I believe the older cases involved workers at Marconi in the UK. Thank you for the opportunity to clarify this data.

  81. No Katz please.. by distributed.karma · · Score: 1

    Where are Joseph Malik and Saul Goodman when you need them?

    --

    --
    If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

  82. maybe they knew something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... That pretty much sums it up ...

  83. Neat... by Jonathan · · Score: 2

    So, as I have a doctorate in microbiology, I now have a legitimate excuse for indulging in paranoid fantasies?

    But seriously, the conspiracy angle has a bit of flaw -- while the former Biopreparat (Soviet biological warware program) scientist Valdimir Pasechnik is dead, Kanatjan Alibekov (or Ken Alibek as he likes to call himself these days) who was nearly at the top of the Biopreparat hierarchy, is still very much alive -- wouldn't he be the obvious target of any conspiracy? Or, wait, he would be, but that would be too obvious. Anyway, gotta go, someone's knocking on my door (which is a bit odd, as none of my friends get up this early on weekends...)

  84. where is his killer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "David Wynn-Williams, 55, a respected astrobiologist with the British Antarctic Survey, who studied the habits of microbes that might survive in outer space, died in a freak road accident near his home in Cambridge, England."

    Who ran this guy over? I also didnt know you could die of exposure to nitrogen.

  85. No plane crashes on March 25 by Jmstuckman · · Score: 1

    According to the article, the doctor died in a plane crash on March 25.

    According to the NTSB ( http://www.ntsb.gov/NTSB/AccList.asp?month=3&year= 2002 ), no fatal accidents were on March 25. There was a fatal accident on March 24 near Denver, but the pilot was an Airline Transport Pilot flying a corporate aircraft from a company (not the biotech company.) ( http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/articl e/0,1299,DRMN_15_1048706,00.html )

    1. Re:No plane crashes on March 25 by codewritinfool · · Score: 1

      According to this site it was on Sunday, which was March 24th. The number of passengers and the originating location of the flight match up too.

  86. News links to some of the events, including plane by rufusdufus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here are links to news stories on six of the deaths.

    Dr Benito Que was beaten to death on Nov 12 by 4 unknown men Miami Herald. He was a cell biologist working on infection diseases at the University of Miami's School of medicine, and was killed as he left work.

    Dr Don Wiley drowned under mysterious circumstances on Nov 16.

    CNN.

    Only a week after Dr Que, Dr Wiley disappeared after a dinner party. Criminal intent has been noted by the Memphis police. Dr Wiley was the foremost infectious disease research at Harvard.

    Dr. Vladimir Pasechnik was found dead on November 23 Nytimes.

    Dr pasechnik was a soviet defector from the Russian biological warfare who was an expert in Anthrax.

    Dr. Robert M. Schwartz was stabbed to death on Dec 10. msnbc.

    Dr Schwartz was an expert in DNA sequencing, 'cultists' are blamed.

    Set Van Nguyen died in an airlock on Dec 14. Chemical incidents report center. He was in the field of animal diseases (anthrax) and died in an airlock filled with nitrogen. This is very odd since he should have been able to notice he was suffocating and open the door.

    Steven Mostow died in a mysterious plane crash on March 25.Colorado 9news
    One of the country's leading infectious disease and bioterrorism experts from the Colorado Health Sciences Center. Preliminary reports say the airplane engine failed. This is an extremely uncommon event, and does not necessarily lead to fatality. I am a pilot and can testify that the events of this death are highly suspicious.

  87. Re:No plane crashes on March 25-WRONG by rufusdufus · · Score: 2

    Absense of evidence is not evidence of absence!

    news report on plane crash

  88. Or the Bush Body Count by Cheap+Imitation · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.bk2k.com/bushbodycount/bodies.html Both lists are a hodgepodge of coincidences, incredible stretches, and faulty conclusions. Notice many of the names appear on both lists...

  89. FBI isn't allowed to tell you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the NSA...
    When the terrorism bill still wasn't getting
    the attention they desired... they blew
    up the world trade center.

    Nice how they can count on knee-jerk
    reactions. The public is so pathetically
    akin to sheep.

  90. Some Statistics by parabyte · · Score: 1
    According to http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/ the death rate in the U.S. is 8.7 deaths/1,000 population. Out of the cited 20.000 researchers, there should be 174 dead Bio-researchers within one year, or 72 dead in five months.

    Or the other way around, 11 dead in five months would correspond to a community of about 3000 experts, which seems to be a probable size.

    As you can see, it is all well within the normal death rate. Nothing strange here, just some math-handicapped newspeople making up a story out of nothing.

    p.

    --
    Without order, nothing can exist. Without chaos, nothing can be created.
  91. Hey why not plumbers...? by shawnce · · Score: 1

    Why don't they try the same "analysis" on some other vocations like plumbers, sanitary engineers, p0rn stars, etc.

    Lets see what other conspiracies exist.

  92. Zodiac by Snafoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think the deaths have to do with a corporation that has a twenty-year-old pile of PCB transformers rotting in the middle of the Boston harbour, and has surreptitiously genetically engineered a bacteria that converts PCBs to salt water.

    Either that, or I've been reading too much Neal Stephenson again.

    --
    - undoware.ca
  93. Nitrogen? by jonnythan · · Score: 2

    Four days later, Nguyen Van Set, 44, died at work in Geelong, Australia, in a laboratory accident. He entered an airlocked storage lab and died from exposure to nitrogen.


    What the hell sense does that make? As a scuba diver, I know that humans can (and do) regularly take large pressures of nitrogen... so what does that mean?
    1. Re:Nitrogen? by rufusdufus · · Score: 2

      Check this out chemsafety.gov.

      It says he died from asphyxiation in a 'deadly gas'. This makes no sense. Nitrogen is not deadly, and asphyxiation takes time; he should have been able to open the door once he noticed he couldnt breath..

    2. Re:Nitrogen? by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      You can breath easily, its normal pressure, and nitrogen is no less pleasant than N+O. That's why its deadly, you can't notice anything abnormal... you just feel short of breath, then pass out.

    3. Re:Nitrogen? by wholesomegrits · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Do you also know that, as a scuba diver, you need oxygen to live?

      --
      No sig is worth reading.
    4. Re:Nitrogen? by jonnythan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yes, but if he was breathing only nitrogen, he would have died of oxygen deprivation, not "exposure to nitrogen." Every dive, I'm "exposed to" up to 4 atmospheres of nitrogen ;)

  94. When I was in Grad School for Biology. by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 2, Funny

    We were always that microbiologists wash their hands before going to the bathroom.

    Stories like this make me glad I selected something microbe-free for a career.

    .

    --
    My father is a blogger.
  95. Quite frankly, I'm disgusted... by zulux · · Score: 3, Funny


    This new generaiton of Spooks and Operatives dropped the ball again - people are finding out. The just need to keep it simple - a drowing here, a maiming there - and nobody notices. Just like it should be. By now-a-days, these whipper snappers have to get clever - swords, nudity, pagens and these new-fangeled aero-planes. Lets get back to business, and just do our jobs, and leave the 'flair' for the Operatives in San Francisco.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  96. Pizza delivering hit-man? Hardly. by dws · · Score: 1, Interesting

    More on the pizza delivery hit can be found in the Mercury News article. This looks like a case of a brilliant scientist spiraling out of control after being fired. (They worked together. She was involved with his firing. He shoot her.) Such a thing is, sadly, not unknown in Silicon Valley.

  97. Sounds like Silk from Greg Bear's Vitals by Nova+Express · · Score: 3, Informative
    This sounds like the work of Silk, the sinister organization in Greg Bear's new novel Vitals which programs people's minds through bacteria. Naturally, they have to kill off a number of microbiologists who get too close to their secret, like the ones in the article. Especially the murder/suicide, which sounds like something Silk would do.

    Of course, just keep telling yourself it's only a novel... ;-)

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  98. "sober, scary"? More like "undocumnted paranoia" by Nova+Express · · Score: 0, Troll
    Lets see, not even an article, but a speech, without any footnotes, with several gross technical errors (see above post), published on a left-wing website. Gee, pardon me if I find this less than convincing.

    Man, there's not even as much documentation on this as there is on Arkansas Sudden Death Syndrome. And here's another site on the same subject.

    An as long as I'm posting, here's a nice statistical roundup of the Clinton Administration in gener.

    If you're going to spout absurd conspiracy theories, it's nice to have at least some documentation for some of your claims...

    --
    Lawrence Person (lawrencepersonh@gmailh.com (remove all "h"s to mail)

    http://www.lawrenceperson.com/

  99. It was meant as a comparison... by thumbtack · · Score: 1

    Jeez folks....it was meant as a comparison...I don't beleive any of the Clinton list, or the Bush list, or for that matter half of what they say on Connections....we could probably link global warming to MS or the decrease in the penguins at the South Pole to Linux users for that matter.

  100. Re:News links to some of the events, including pla by AJWM · · Score: 2

    Preliminary reports say the airplane engine failed. This is an extremely uncommon event, and does not necessarily lead to fatality.I am a pilot and can testify that the events of this death are highly suspicious.

    If you're a pilot, then you're probably also aware that light twins (which this was) are often referred to as "doctor killers", because they're typically owned/flown by doctor/pilots who only fly them occasionally, thus don't have the reflexes to deal with an emergency like this.

    Light twin on final (low and slow) losing an engine -- leading to asymmetric thrust and consequent yaw/roll moments? And in a snow flurry?

    Nothing surprising about crashing under those conditions.

    --
    -- Alastair
  101. Re:Didn't this happen to Programmers in the UK too by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
    What was particularly unusual about the GEC/Marconi people was that they were found with "Umbrella marks on their legs" which poses the interesting question How would you know those marks were made by umbrellas, unless you were the one weilding the umbrella? It was also "leaked" to the tabloid press that the KGB were fond of using poison tipped umbrellas to assasinate people, even though the only cloak and dagger agent to regularly use an umbrella was John Steed of the Avengers.

    Or for those of you with short attention spans, there was a lot of evidence/speculation that these cases were assasinations by MI5/6 with a less than credible attempt to implicate the KGB

    My guess is that they realised that no matter how skilled you are as a computer professional, and even if your work is essential to the nation's security, in the UK you are still treated like piss, and killed themselves using the only implement available to C programers -the poison tipped umbrella.

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  102. Re:No plane crashes on March 25 - correct by Jmstuckman · · Score: 1

    On the website that you just sent a link to, the crash was on March 24 -- not March 25. And, the NTSB investigates all plane crashes -- if it's not on their web site, it didn't happen or nobody ever found it. Somebody obviously would have found this plane crash -- otherwise, it wouldn't have been in the newspaper article. So, what are you implying in your post? There could not have been an "absense of evidence (sic)" in this crash, because somebody must have found it for it to be reported.

  103. Re:Ahh! Now let's see how the Machine responds. . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Truth is somewhere in between. . .



    The truth is rarely in between. But perhaps you're confusing the truth with the LCD. However, I do think that using an uppercase letter for the "Truth" is cute.

    Scythe

  104. exposure to nitrogen by global_diffusion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Damn. What a death. "He entered an airlocked storage lab and died from exposure to nitrogen." Those unreactive gases sure are dangerous.

    Surely those who write articles on such topics could do a little research. The author most likely saw that he died in a nitrogen environment and concluded that he died from the nitrogen. Silly writers. Nitrogen isn't a deadly gas! It comprises a huge portion of our atmosphere. It's the lack of oxygen that killed him. Next they're going to run a story about the deadly effect of H20 in our tapwater.

    1. Re:exposure to nitrogen by rthille · · Score: 1

      No, the press is trying to cover up the dangers of DHMO!

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  105. Anamolous Results And Statists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Those who calculate the "unlikihood" of a particular event "raw" miss a big point.

    Sure, the raw chance of an anomolous event of this sort might be low.

    But this would only be a decisive statistic IF you had reasonable hypothesis that predicted the event beforehand and you were scanning for these particular events.

    What's really happening is conspiracy theorists are scanning all death clusters and all event really looking for anomolous events.

    But in a universe of many, many statistics, anomolous are likely to occur, indeed also most certain. It could be planes exploding one week, dentists winning lotteries the next and so-forth. But strange things are certain to happen IN THE COURSE OF NORMAL EVENTS.

    So really what needs to be asked "is this an event that is SO, SO anomolous that it would be stand out above **normally unusual events**. And the answer seems like no. If this event has a %0.2 chance of happening, that makes it quite within the realm if conspiracists are scanning tens of thousands of possible.

  106. I've taken a microbiology course by The+Wooden+Badger · · Score: 1

    I had a lab with lots of fun stuff to play with. I recall organisms responsible for tetanus, gohnorrea (you try to spell that one from memory), and botulism. I think there is a good chance of death with 20,000 microbiologists. I don't know that much about statistics, but if you say 4.2 per 5 months is average, I wouldn't think that 5 per 5 is all that unusual. Of course I'd be able to say better if you had the standard deviation in your explanation.

    --
    Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
  107. The only two subjects I got 100% in... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...were probability (in high school and University) and atmospheric photochemistry. And people often find themselves in a poisonous fog in both cases.

    In brief, you are confusing statistical results after the fact with results before the fact. Lets use the "betting fallacy" on which Los Vegas continues to enrich itself: If I flip a coin twice, both times getting heads, the probability of that after two coin tosses is 1/2 x 1/2 or 1/4. But the chances of getting another head as a result remains 1/2, even though that outcome occurs only 1/2 x 1/2 x 1/2 or 1/8 of the time that I make three flips, because the outcome of the first two flips has already occurred.

    If the result only occurs 0.02% of the time, then it will almost always occur so long as I select 50,000 events (0.02% = 1/50,000). Here, the statistical cluster involved microbiologists. If it had involved firefighters, would we have thought arsonists were getting rid of the opposition?

    Statistically unlikely events occur all the time. Being able to pick and choose among them after the fact doesn't in themselves give them any significance.

    Let's act like true Slashdotters: "Gee, I had no idea that Micro$oft was getting into biotech!"

    1. Re:The only two subjects I got 100% in... by swillden · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the result only occurs 0.02% of the time, then it will almost always occur so long as I select 50,000 events (0.02% = 1/50,000).

      You may have done well in you probability course, but you should probably go back and take some more statistics. Particularly study the Poisson distribution and how it can be used to calculate the odds of an event with a given rate of incidence occurring a certain number of times within a given time period.

      The event with probability 0.2% was the occurence of 11 deaths in a period of time in which the expected average number was 4.2 (based on all those reasonable-sounding numbers the poster pulled out out of his hat). While it's true that in 50,000 trials the probability of an event with probability .002 occurring at least once is very, very close to 1, 50K trials would require watching a population of 20,000 microbiologists for 20,833 years, since each trial takes five months.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  108. bends by tid242 · · Score: 1
    one does not die from the bends, he/she dies because he/she blacks out and is underwater (ie. people don't breathe water). bends is the bane of 'freewater divers' (divers that like to hold their breaths), AFAIK it is not the bane of scuba divers and their oxigenated ilk.


    -tid242

    --

    With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

    1. Re:bends by Crisavec · · Score: 1

      uhmmm.....no. The Bends is very much the province of SCUBA divers. The depth compresses the nitrogen in your bloodstream and when you depressurize the nitrogen forms bubbles in your blood that collect in your joints. This generaly happens once you pass 33 feet, or the one atmosphere mark. Not a lot of freedivers can go that deep or stay down that deep that long. If you do some google searches there is a LOT of info out there that has been posted by divers and dive clubs about this.

    2. Re:bends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > bends is the bane of 'freewater divers' (divers that like to hold their breaths), AFAIK it is not the bane of scuba divers and their oxigenated ilk.

      Nope, just the reverse: freewater divers take amount X of nitrogen down with them, amount X gets compressed in the blood during the descent, and when they come back up, amount X is uncompressed during the ascent.

      SCUBA divers take compressed air down, they take in a lungful of surface-pressure air at depth, and when they come back up, the doubly-compressed nitrogen comes out of solution as bubbles, and the diver gets the bends.

  109. Mr. MovieFone says......... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't this movie come out on May 31?? That story is The Sum of All Fears right. j/k.

  110. Re:News links to some of the events, including pla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    died in an airlock filled with nitrogen. This is very odd since he should have been able to notice he was suffocating and open the door.


    IIRC, you don't feel the lack of oxygen in the bloodstream, rather you notice the buildup of carbon dioxide. Breathing pure nitrogen doesn't cause CO2 buildup, but it will kill you before you realize anything is amiss.

  111. More Info... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story has been on www.whatreallyhappened.com for months. They've been wondering why nobody's picked it up yet. Now I guess someone has.

    You don't have to believe all these conspiracy theories; I don't believe them all, but I admit that at least some of the info on that site looks possible, even probable. My friends look at this stuff and flatly refuse to even consider the possibility that their black-and-white worldview may be wrong, asking me "which side are you on, anyway?".

    It's not about sides; it's about right and wrong. It's about the truth.

    After that last comment, I think I should sign this Fox Mulder, but that's too lame, even for me.

    Signed,

    J. Doggett
    (just kidding)

    Michael M.
    (not kidding.)

  112. Re:News links to some of the events, including pla by SEE · · Score: 2

    This is very odd since he should have been able to notice he was suffocating and open the door.

    Actually, no, he shouldn't. In most people (though there are some medical conditions under which this is not true), the sensation of suffocation is not caused by lack of oxygen, but by buildup of carbon dioxide.

    Since breathing an inert gas allows the exchange of CO2 into the atmosphere, the only symptoms suffered are those of oxygen deprivation -- which impairs judgement and leads to giddiness like being drunk -- not a sensation of being suffocated. Due to the impaired judgement, people suffering from the symptoms generally don't recognize that they are suffering the symptoms, making inert-gas asphyxiation an especially easy way to die.

    (Note: specifically because there is no sensation of pain or suffocation, inert-gas asphyxiation has been proposed as a humane method of execution.)

  113. Re:News links to some of the events, including pla by namespan · · Score: 2

    (Note: specifically because there is no sensation of pain or suffocation, inert-gas asphyxiation has been proposed as a humane method of execution.)

    The mere idea of having execution become seen as humane frightens me. Someone once speculated that the problem with "stun weapons" is that because they did no (well, rare... well, pretty rare, anyway) lasting harm, police and authorities would use them with greater impunity. Hey, why not shock a demonstrator or two? No permanent damage, and it's humane!

    Of course, you probably didn't mean to imply that execution is humane, just that inert gas asphyxiation is a better way to go than a bullet or the chair, and that's gotta be true. Still... I think it's better not to attach the words. Execution may be necessary sometimes... but let's never fool ourselves about what it is.

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  114. OT: Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by proj_2501 · · Score: 1
    Actually the Inquisition was more concerned with bloodlust than anything else. Denounced? You're dead! Remember, the church back then was MUCH more intwined with European politics (Pope gives the crown to Charlemagne, etc. etc.), so preaching against Catholicism on these grounds is kind of like protesting against the Italian government because of stuff the Roman Empire pulled!.

    The time heresy was feared more was during the EARLY EARLY days of the Catholic Church, long before the Schism between Orthodoxy and Catholicism, before the Reformation, and before Henry VIII wanted a divorce. We're talking first millenium AD here.

    Perhaps you have read the Nicene Creed? Parts of it were written specifically to preach against things like Gnosticism, Arianism, etc. etc.

    1. Re:OT: Re:Pagan != Satanist!!! by plunix · · Score: 1
      Actually the Inquisition was more concerned with bloodlust than anything else. Denounced? You're dead!
      Bloodlust for those who disagreed with Catholicism, sure. They used the word "heresy" to accomplish this, though, calling anyone who disagreed with them a heretic.
      Remember, the church back then was MUCH more intwined with European politics (Pope gives the crown to Charlemagne, etc. etc.),
      Charlemagne was 8th-9th century A.D. The Inquisition was from around 1232-1820 A.D. You're a bit off with that example.
      so preaching against Catholicism on these grounds is kind of like protesting against the Italian government because of stuff the Roman Empire pulled!.
      Not really. The Roman empire ended in 496 A.D. (or so), and the modern Italian government is entirely separated from it. The Catholic Church has been around since around 321 A.D. That's a terrible analogy. Many of the doctrines and dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church were established during the time of the Inquisition by the same popes who ordered the slaughters of millions, for the purpose of increasing the political power of the RCC.
      Perhaps you have read the Nicene Creed [everything2.com]? Parts of it were written specifically to preach against things like Gnosticism, Arianism, etc. etc.
      Yes, but uniting the churches under a single political power (the "church catholic", or "universal church") was a much higher priority.
  115. Re:News links to some of the events, including pla by SEE · · Score: 1

    Er, yes. The idea being, if you're going to execute somebody anyway, asphyxiation with an inert gas isn't quite as brutal as electrocution, cyanide gas, lethal injection, a firing squad, hanging, or beheading, the methods usually employed in the world today.

    Similarly, when fighting a war, accept surrenders, treat POWs like fellow human beings, don't use poison gas, don't deliberately target civilians, etc. War is brutal enough as is.

  116. All I know... by Hard_Code · · Score: 2

    ...is that Evan Chan better be watching his back...

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  117. Re:News links to some of the events, including pla by namespan · · Score: 2

    The idea being, if you're going to execute somebody anyway, asphyxiation with an inert gas isn't quite as brutal as electrocution, cyanide gas, lethal injection, a firing squad, hanging, or beheading, the methods usually employed in the world today.

    "Less brutal." That seems accurate.

    OK, the raving semantic consequentialist in me is placated. : )

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  118. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people on here seem to think this story is a big Xfiles joke.
    Go read up on each death.
    Looking at it from a Forensic research point, there's something a little off on each death.

    F I S H Y F I S H Y

  119. Thanks a lot, jackass! by PCM2 · · Score: 2

    The Lone Gunmen are *dead*???!! Jeez, just spoil it for everybody!

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  120. ReFantastic Lad ROCKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool post, I totally concur with the points you made. Very Interesting.....

  121. Mystery British Death Toll at 10 dead programmers by DavidOster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is not the first time there there has been a suspicious cluster of violent deaths of scientists reported in the British press. Last time, it was programmers. See Comp.Risks, RISKS DIGEST 6.67 : and Who's killing Star Wars Scientists?
    For those interested in a book which follows a plot with a striking similarity to the Marconi incidents, try The Chain of Chance
    by Stanislaw Lem.It is a shame that noone will ever read this because I posted so late.

  122. Re:Ahh! Now let's see how the Machine responds. . by darkonc · · Score: 2
    why those eleven?

    Actually, I'd be inclined to say eight. There are 11 untimely deaths, but only 8 are truely mysterious.

    The guy who got offed by his daughters and her satanist friends is reasonably well explained, and "normal" in that -- If you're going to get offed, chances are it's going to be by family or 'friends'. You even have living, breathing conspirators who, if they were part of a larger comspiracy, would probably be happy to talk about it. The only thing really unusual about it is the satanist connection.

    Similarly, the Pizza delivery murder-suicide is similarly well explained and fits the family/friend statistical norm. In this case, however, everybody who was directly involved is dead. Unless someone can point to some evidence that the suicide was 'forced', I'm going to chaulk this one up to a love triangle, or something and mark it 'untimely but explained'.

    3 untimely death in a short time period is probably not that far off for a group of this size. As for the other 8 deaths, I'm betting that they take this group far outside the statistical norm.

    Any epidemiologists out there?

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  123. The correct link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's in here