Slashdot Mirror


White LEDs for a Brighter World

deepfry writes "CBC radio today featured an interview with Dr. Dave Irvine-Halliday, an engineering professor at the University of Calgary, who's developed a home lighting system for the developing world using a combination of white LEDs, pedal generators and rechargable batteries. This type of "pico-power" can make a huge difference in the lives of villagers in rural areas where being connected to a power grid is not an option and probably never will be. Read about the Light Up the World project and make a donation."

346 comments

  1. White LEDs for a Brighter World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    White LEDs for a Brighter World

    More cleverly hidden racist comments from Slashdot.

    Can the editors of slashdot please disclose how many of your staff are minority? I emailed my resume and never got a response. I am also a black female... Coincidence? I think not.

  2. c64 by Wiggin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    so, is this a way for all those afganistan boys to power their c64's they surf the web with?

    --

    "I don't need a compass to tell me which way the wind shines." - Mr. Furious, Mystery Men
    1. Re:c64 by discstickers · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean serve with?

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    2. Re:c64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to mention watching DVD's on the C64, using the Afganistan Linux Distribution that comes on one floppy (includes trailers for popular American movies.)

    3. Re:c64 by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's too smart to post a link to a C64 web server on /. Much more powerful systems have faltered under the load.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  3. Great! by Decimal · · Score: 0, Troll

    I think people will see this as a real promising advance...

    ...Until patent laws get in the way. :(

    --

    Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    1. Re:Great! by Neil+Watson · · Score: 1
      Maybe the Pot growing industry here in Ontario (Canada) will inspire the use of LEDs. A UV LED would take alot less power.

      I know hydroponic shops around here are booming.

    2. Re:Great! by bwhaley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here is a link to some products with white LEDs. Hopefully they can find some better uses =p

      --
      "I either want less corruption, or more chance
      to participate in it." -- Ashleigh Brilliant
    3. Re:Great! by Deagol · · Score: 2
      I don't think this would work, and here's why.

      I have a chain of 3 lights in a long wooden case at home that my wife uses to sprout and start her garden plants. We used to use 100W incandescent bulbs. Worked fine.

      We went on an efficiency kick and replaced every bulb in our house with those 20W curly CF lights (sold at Costco @ $20 per 5). We did this with the sprouter. Didn't work so good.

      If I remember my solar energy figures, one gets a nominal 1000W per square meter of direct sunlight. I'm sure I could duplicate the luminosity (correct term?) with maybe 100-200W worth of florescents, but there will not be 1000W of radiant EM energy hitting that same area (how can you, if you put &lt 1000W in you can't very well get 1000W out!).

      I think LEDs would be even worse for plants, as they're pretty close to monochromatic light, and I think plants need a fuller spectrum anyway.

    4. Re:Great! by Old+Wolf · · Score: 1

      I've never seen monochromatic white light before..

    5. Re:Great! by Deagol · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I goofed. However, I've read that the spectrum of white LEDs still isn't very wide.

    6. Re:Great! by Verteiron · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      +1: ZING!

      --
      End of lesson. You may press the button.
    7. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I market-gardened in Fairbanks, Alaska for several years. There was no hope of getting sunlight to start basil and tomatoes in late February, so we grew our plants under cool white flourescent shoplights. We used four-bulb, four-foot-long, cheapie shoplights which we got from Sam's club ( a warehouse store). We draped foil over the sides of the shoplights and hung them so they just brushed the tops of the leaves. The plants grew well, and never got spindly, which suggests that they got plenty of light. We used the cool white flourescent bulbs which came with the fixtures because the cooperative extension service had studies which showed that they gave the most plant growth for the dollar.

    8. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderators: What was a troll about that?

  4. Big Blue (and I'm not talking about IBM) by xtheunknown · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Forget white LEDs, give me bright blue ones. The power on light for UV Networks web appliance is a bright blue LED. I think I will buy one just for the cool blue LED. I need these blue LEDs on all of my puters!

    --

    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    1. Re:Big Blue (and I'm not talking about IBM) by JZ_Tonka · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure that blue LED lighting "can make a huge difference in the lives of villagers in rural areas where being connected to a power grid is not an option and probably never will be."

    2. Re:Big Blue (and I'm not talking about IBM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      forget that, you can just go to radio shack and pick one up for around $3. Beware, though, if you try to replace existing LEDs with the blue ones - Blue LEDs have a forward voltage of between 3 and 5 volts, compared to like 1.5 volts for an average red LED.

    3. Re:Big Blue (and I'm not talking about IBM) by matrix29 · · Score: 2

      I'm not so sure that blue LED lighting "can make a huge difference in the lives of villagers in rural areas where being connected to a power grid is not an option and probably never will be."

      Uh, there is a windup flashlight that is powered by a spring and that runs a regular flashlight bulb. A quick GOOGLE for "windup flashlight" gives me a LED flashlight called the FREEPLAY. The other flashlights on that site cost $27 for a radio/flashlight +rechargeable battery +spring power. The solar-powered +rechargeable batteries bicycle light is $20.

      http://windupradio.com/

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
    4. Re:Big Blue (and I'm not talking about IBM) by JZ_Tonka · · Score: 1
      I wasn't talking about the practical, functional uses of LED lighting.

      I was talking about the parent's author's wanting blue LEDs to make his computer case look 133t.

    5. Re:Big Blue (and I'm not talking about IBM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DON'T fucking buy shit from radio shack, unless you want to get ripped off.

  5. Quality of Living??? by aardwolf64 · · Score: 1

    This rugged home lighting system will allow people in some of the poorest and least developed rural communities to light up their homes and raise their quality of living

    Remind me how exactly having to ride an exercise bike to generate electricity would raise my quality of living? I'm not in a place without power, but I seriously don't think I'd be buying this (probably expensive) device when a few lanterns would do just fine. (Although I MIGHT be tempted to get the whole hookup just so I could use my computer.)

    I wonder if the areas that don't have electricity have broadband??? DOH!

    1. Re:Quality of Living??? by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ride a bike for 10 minutes, get a couple of hours worth of light so you can read and learn.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Quality of Living??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this looks a lot brighter than a lantern. i'd rather read my tech books in front of this than a flame.

    3. Re:Quality of Living??? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      Remind me how exactly having to ride an exercise bike to generate electricity would raise my quality of living?

      As time goes by, the world predicted by the movie Soylent Green seems to get closer and closer to reality. IIRC, didn't Edward G. Robinson pedal a bicycle to generate power?

    4. Re:Quality of Living??? by rainwalker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Have you ever used any of the "traditional" light sources he is trying to eliminate in the article? And, have you ever visited any of the communities this is targeted towards? In the US, there is absolutely no reason to use this kind of system, but the rest of the world does not always have the same standards of living that the US does.

      I spent some time working in rural villages in the Dominican Republic, and I can guarantee that you have no idea what real poverty is until you have been to some such place. These people had no electricity (the nearest town with power was 40 miles away), no potable water or sewage, nor any other form of technology more advanced that several hundred years ago. Their lives are regulated by the day/night cycle; you get up at dawn, work hard, and go to bed at dusk because kerosene is too expensive, as are candles. I really hope you weren't suggesting using electric lanterns, as that would just have been silly. THAT is the target market for these kind of devices. He is talking about producing these for about $50/household, maybe less. This probabally won't be paid for by the people themselves, but more likely by first-world charity organizations, or subsidies from the parent government.

      Please, please read and comprehend the article before you reply.

    5. Re:Quality of Living??? by swankypimp · · Score: 0
      Ride a bike for 10 minutes, get a couple of hours worth of light so you can read and learn.

      Get on the treadmill or do thirty benchpress reps-- otherwise, it's no Ernest Hemingway for you! It's killing two birds with one stone, really, since most academics I know are 90 lb. weaklings or, ahem, supersized.

      --

      --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
    6. Re:Quality of Living??? by ackthpt · · Score: 1
      Remember, the key to the real industrial revolution was electric light. Combine extra hours of productivity with education and you're on your way to becoming an economic power (even a small one), for good and for bad.

      I wonder what quality of life they're really missing out on before making some blanket statement about replacing candles/oil lamps with LED's. Granted, they should suffer fewer fires without open flame.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    7. Re:Quality of Living??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading by lantern light is difficult and probably bad for the eyes, not to mention uneconomical for rural households without electricity.

    8. Re:Quality of Living??? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Remind me how exactly having to ride an exercise bike to generate electricity would raise my quality of living?

      Well, if you're really that lazy it'd have to improve your cardiovascular fitness level. Less huffing an puffing on the way to the Krispy Kreme counter (oh, you probably use the drive thru).

      Besides, this is gentle pedaling, nowhere near exercise bike levels of exertion.

      How about renewable energy that costs nothing (unless you count food you're probably going to be eating anyway to fuel your body). Dang! We're out of legs. Martha, be sure and get some more legs next time you're at Nepal-Mart.

      How about not sucking down smoke from oil lamps or kerosene from lanterns.

      (Although I MIGHT be tempted to get the whole hookup just so I could use my computer.)

      Wow! Your computer runs off of LED's??? Now there's an innovation worth talking about.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    9. Re:Quality of Living??? by zero2k · · Score: 1

      This would also be great for those of us who get frequent blackouts, like to dine outside where lighting isn't portable (eg night BBQs at the park) and camping trips.

    10. Re:Quality of Living??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lose some of those pounds you fat ass... go outside and run.

  6. The important issue is... by DMCA · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    ..do these LED lights interfere with 2.4 GHz 802.11 communication?

    I suppose if you can't get connected to a power grid, you probably are going to have a hard time getting wireless Internet serverce, making this a non-issue. But still, let's not be short-sighted!

    --


    --
    Repeal me, NOW!!!
    Thank you.

    1. Re:The important issue is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO!! they dont! NO NO NO NO!!!!
      For christ's sake and the love of god, no!!!

    2. Re:The important issue is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weak man, weak.

      That is probably the worst "joke" I have seen in a long time.

      What the hell does LED lighting have to do with sulphur-plasma lighting?

  7. Light up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Read about the Light Up the World project and make a donation."

    It ain't no joke, I'd like to buy the world a toke...

  8. This is great work by JoshMKiV · · Score: 1

    Some faith in humanity restored. Yes, not of vital importance, but what a cool project.

    1. Re:This is great work by wallsg · · Score: 1

      This is a better work...

      http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.04/approte c. html?pg=1

  9. Better off? by dirvish · · Score: 1, Troll

    Some people might be better off without lights or connection to a power grid. People should think twice before trying to invade rural areas with technology.

    1. Re:Better off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think we all be better off if you didn't have a connection to the power grid.

    2. Re:Better off? by dachshund · · Score: 1
      People should think twice before trying to invade rural areas with technology.

      I have a picture of hundreds of scientists storming an outhouse in rural Maine.

      Seriously, if people don't want this technology, they don't have to install it.

    3. Re:Better off? by CaffeineAddict2001 · · Score: 1

      What does thou mean?
      This would help greatly with the midnight barn raising, english.

    4. Re:Better off? by Ian+Bicking · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You should stop being so paternalistic and conservative. The attitude of your response shows you romanticize poverty, and mistake powerlessness for aestheticism.

    5. Re:Better off? by bahtama · · Score: 5, Informative
      Darksky.org is an organization dedicated to fighting light pollution.

      This was also featured on Talk of the Nation on NPR last week. It is worth a listen.

      --

      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
      Oh bother.

    6. Re:Better off? by RobinH · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Some people might be better off without lights or connection to a power grid.

      So I suppose it never occurred to anyone that this might be of use in hospitals or clinics?

      Does anyone realize how important low cost oil lamps were to families back during the industrial revolution. In those times, a worker would generally work all day until dark, and then after work, spend an hour or two of quality time with his/her family. How much quality would your time have if it was dark and you had no light source?

      We all need to step back from our CRTs/LCDs for a second and realize that many places haven't even reached where the western world was 100 years ago!

      --
      "I have never let my schooling interfere with my education." - Mark Twain
    7. Re:Better off? by FFFish · · Score: 1, Troll

      Fersure. Two points:

      a) Brighter cities equals higher crime. I don't have access to the stats, but the general gist is that most criminals aren't inclined to wander the streets if they're dark. IOW, yes, you want a yard light, but you don't want lit streets.

      b) Brighter cities equals greater disconnect with the world. If you ever have the opportunity to get a few hundred miles away from light pollution, you'll be humbled by the spectacular night sky. IMO, we'd have a better culture if people were more aware of how vast the universe is.

      Of course, the number of people that spend most of their non-work hours vegetating in front of a television may be the counterpoint to that argument. Stars or not, they'll never see 'em anyway...

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    8. Re:Better off? by dirvish · · Score: 1

      Some people do not want or have a need for the modern medicine that a hospital or clinic would provide.

    9. Re:Better off? by pokeyburro · · Score: 5, Funny

      Our village elders agree with you. I'd say more, but we're on a hunt for witches and evil spirits right now, and the others tend to get suspicious if I don't join in...

      --
      Lately democracy seems to be based on the skybox, the Happy Meal box, the X-box, and the idiot box.
    10. Re:Better off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You god damned communist! post your socialist crap elsewhere! this is slashdot, land of the libertarians!

    11. Re:Better off? by jafac · · Score: 2

      what most people don't realize when they look up at the night sky, is that even under ideal circumstances, with the naked eye, you're really only seeing a minute fraction of what's out there. There are only two galaxies visible to the naked eye, and one of them, we're in. (the milky way). The other one is only barely visible to the naked eye. Consider the billions upon billions of galaxies out there that are too far away to be seen by the naked eye.

      Looking at the sky with the naked eye in no way gives a true impression of how vast the universe is. It doesn't even scratch the surface.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    12. Re:Better off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seconded, by a non-nazi.

    13. Re:Better off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice troll kiddo.

      next time you're brushing your teeth, or washing out a wound with SOAP, you can thank modern medicine.

      And by the way, let me know when you find these people who have no need for medical care? Are they dead, or have you just decided they don't matter?

    14. Re:Better off? by dirvish · · Score: 1

      Wait a second! How did you power your computer to make this response? And how did you get a network connection? Something is fishy here...

    15. Re:Better off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about if you let the people in the rural areas decide for themselves, you parochial bastard?

    16. Re:Better off? by ryochiji · · Score: 1
      > Some people might be better off

      Okay, do you see the part where it says "some people". If you crack open your dictionaries, you will see that "some" is slightly different to "all".

      I don't know about you all, but I recall being in a rural area once (in ex East Germany it was), looked up at the sky, and realized how many stars there really were that we didn't see at all in the cities.
      Sure, for better or for worse, we've come to rely on electricity and artificial lighting. But at least some of us would like to still be able to go out and see real stars.

      But I dunno. Maybe some of you would rather see white LED's hanging in the sky than real gaseous formations that are thousands of light years away.

    17. Re:Better off? by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      "where the western world was 100 years ago" You are suggesting that we have made some sort of "progress" in the last 100 years. I am not trolling by saying this, as a cultural anthropologist I seriously question just what our "progress" means. We have less free time on our hands than most hunter-gatherers (and even chimpanzees!) do. Should we really be helping these people to be like us?

      --
      Jeremy
    18. Re:Better off? by kevinl · · Score: 1

      Please, keep those scientists away from my in-laws house. That's grief I don't need...

    19. Re:Better off? by 2names · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seconded by a non-nazi, non-AC.

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    20. Re:Better off? by rlbmagus · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to nag, but aestheticism means "the quality of being visually pleasing." I believe the word you are looking for is asceticism (sp?) like the Samanas of eastern Asia.

      On the other hand, if these people are powerless, they won't have any light to appreciate the aesthetic furniture in their living room. :-)

    21. Re:Better off? by reverse+flow+reactor · · Score: 1

      The point of these LEDs is to allow for light so that the people can learn to read and write in the evenings, when the sun has gone down. It takes them all day to scrape together the food and water supplies for the day in these places. The only time they have to learn is after sunset.

      Ask yourself this: Would these people be better off if they didn't learn HOW TO READ AND WRITE? I for one would rather they have this opportunity.

      -----

      --

      The significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them. -Einstein

    22. Re:Better off? by reverse+flow+reactor · · Score: 1

      This has nothing to do with light pollution. These places typically have NO ELECTRICITY OR OTHER INFRASTRUCTURE at all. No lights. They are completely dark at night.

      This does, however, have everything with being able to learn how to read and write in the evenings.

      -----

      --

      The significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them. -Einstein

    23. Re:Better off? by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      The nature of cultures 10 mellenia ago really have no bearing on this discussion. Your post isn't a troll; it's a red herring. Unless you would like to propose some viable method through which much of the third world can revert to Bushmen practices, bringing them up is largely irrlevant. We have to deal with the here and now. We have to deal with where people are NOW, not with some ideal that this planet won't even support.

      There's simply not enough planet for the 6 Billion of us to revert to roaming around in Chimp troops.

      The least you could do is relate the situation to the aboriginal conditions of the areas in question.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    24. Re:Better off? by ColaMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Some people do not want or have a need for the modern medicine that a hospital or clinic would provide.


      I think that the "some people" that you refer to are in the minority.

      I understand that 'some people' may not want modern medicine due to various reasons. Of course, 'some people' would prefer to die in agony from a burst appendix than get medical help. 'Some people' get a nice case of lockjaw from the tetanus infection they got from a cut. 'Some people' walk with a limp from that leg that they broke when they were six. 'Some people' just plain lose all their teeth by the time they are 35, presuming that they live that long.

      But I'm sure 'most people' would rather have a hospital or clinic nearby. And, when it comes down to it, most people are pretty flexible about issues such as their personal beliefs conflicting with urgent medical treatment.

      The fact of the matter is that it's our duty to provide opportunities for those who are less fortunate than us to improve themselves. That hosptial or clinic full of modern medicine has to be there on the off-chance that it might save a few lives and improve their quality of living. If pedal-powered LED lights gets it there, well I'm all for it.

      If you can get a population that is healthy , they can get on with improving their situation. If they're so busy fighting to keep alive, well improvement takes a back seat.

      This has turned into a bit of a rant. But having visited places where "upper class" living means having a toilet (which may be flushed with a bucket), it kinda stirs me up a bit.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    25. Re:Better off? by GreenPhreak · · Score: 1

      This organization focuses on preventing our skies from being polluted with too much light at nighttime. Light pollution is a problem for astronomers the world round, as it makes it difficult to observe the sky when nearby towns are pumping light into the local atmosphere.

      Organizations like this one focus on making outdoor lighting point downwards towards the Earth and shielding the bulbs from putting out light into the atmosphere. One might be surprised how much energy is wasted by outdoor lights without shields on them. All it takes is a reflective surface (read: shiny metal) just above a light bulb/tube to reflect the light down instead of skyward. It not only protects our skies from light pollution, but it makes more efficient use of the energy and light.

      In this case, the WLEDs are probably not being used outdoors, and even if they were they are a highly directional light source that would cause few light pollution problems due to their limited angular spread (you wouldn't be pointing these things straight up, you'd shine them on your book or whatever).

      Of course, if all of our cities had shielded outdoor lighting or LEDs instead, we wouldn't have the pretty nighttime maps of the Earth's surface that show where all the major cities are.


      --
      I drink to prepare for a fight; tonight I'm very prepared. -Soda Popinksi
    26. Re:Better off? by benedict · · Score: 2

      Would *you* like to live in primitive conditions?

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    27. Re:Better off? by benedict · · Score: 1

      "Aesthetics" refers to beauty, not specifically
      visual beauty, according to my dictionary.

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
    28. Re:Better off? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Organizations like this one focus on making outdoor lighting point downwards towards the Earth and shielding the bulbs from putting out light into the atmosphere.

      So these little LED lamps pointed directly at a work surface would probably help that problem over a lantern, oil lamp or fire used for light.

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    29. Re:Better off? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Some people might be better off without lights or connection to a power grid.

      Given the link in your .sig I'd guess you mean that people with ugly women would be better off without lights....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    30. Re:Better off? by carlos_benj · · Score: 1

      Looking at the sky with the naked eye in no way gives a true impression of how vast the universe is.

      You take your eyes outside naked??? Omigosh!

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    31. Re:Better off? by JebusIsLord · · Score: 1

      I am referring to the mostly-traditional cultures that we are bringing technologies such as television (and thereby creating a need for electricity) to. I would agree that if this technology is applied to already-disturbed and/or struggling societies already dependent on electricity it is a good thing, however i am wary of introducing it to cultures that have not yet demonstrated a desire to have such things at all.

      --
      Jeremy
    32. Re:Better off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked in western Africa for a couple years and one of the things that most impressed me about the people was the number of children who gathered in the lighted public areas every night to do their school work.

      At the equator it gets dark at ~6:00pm year round. Good lighting is vital.

    33. Re:Better off? by efatapo · · Score: 1

      And how much time do you spend with your family now....now that we're so much more advanced with these great lights? I would be willing to place money that people are just as happy if not more happy without lights than we are with them. How about fertilizers, pesticides, education, medicine? I think those would be far more useful to a person in places w/o electric grids. (plus LEDS look better glowing from my modded-computer case - jj)

    34. Re:Better off? by Drakonian · · Score: 1
      Some people might be better off without lights or connection to a power grid. People should think twice before trying to invade rural areas with technology.

      A power grid? In Nepal? Some people should think twice before posting.

      I've heard one of Dr. Irvine-Halliday's presentations, and I get the impression the reason he personally believes in the Light Up the World project is so that children in 3rd world countries can read/study in the evening at night, ie advance their education. Now maybe you'll argue that "some people" don't want to read/study, despite it being an overwhelmingly positive aspect.
      --
      Random is the New Order.
    35. Re:Better off? by lobsterGun · · Score: 1

      Mind is I quote a bit o' Kipling? White Man's Burden( this is more difficult than it sounds. The Lameness filter doesn't like poetry. It keeps telling me that My average line length it too short... of course it's too short its formatted text.)

      Take up the White Man's burden--
      Send forth the best ye breed--
      Go, bind your sons to exile
      To serve your captives' need;
      To wait, in heavy harness,
      On fluttered folk and wild--
      Your new-caught sullen peoples,
      Half devil and half child.

      Take up the White Man's burden--
      In patience to abide,
      To veil the threat of terror
      And check the show of pride;
      By open speech and simple,
      An hundred times made plain,
      To seek another's profit
      And work another's gain.

      Take up the White Man's burden--
      The savage wars of peace--
      Fill full the mouth of Famine,
      And bid the sickness cease;
      And when your goal is nearest
      (The end for others sought)
      Watch sloth and heathen folly
      Bring all your hope to nought.

      Take up the White Man's burden--
      No iron rule of kings,
      But toil of serf and sweeper--
      The tale of common things.
      The ports ye shall not enter,
      The roads ye shall not tread,
      Go, make them with your living
      And mark them with your dead.

      Take up the White Man's burden,
      And reap his old reward--
      The blame of those ye better
      The hate of those ye guard--
      The cry of hosts ye humour
      (Ah, slowly!) toward the light:--
      "Why brought ye us from bondage,
      Our loved Egyptian night?"

      Take up the White Man's burden--
      Ye dare not stoop to less--
      Nor call too loud on Freedom
      To cloak your weariness.
      By all ye will or whisper,
      By all ye leave or do,
      The silent sullen peoples
      Shall weigh your God and you.

      Take up the White Man's burden!
      Have done with childish days--
      The lightly-proffered laurel,
      The easy ungrudged praise:
      Comes now, to search your manhood
      Through all the thankless years,
      Cold, edged with dear-bought wisdom,
      The judgment of your peers.

    36. Re:Better off? by ahfoo · · Score: 2

      Bzzt!
      Nah, sorry man. That's a common misperception. Soap is much older than civilization. People used to think it was a Roman invention, but then evidence of it turned up in Egypt and now it's safe to assume it was probably one of man's favorites since before agriculture and probably not much more recent than fire and the concept of cooking. Think about it, a chunk of fat simply has to fall into the ashes of a fire to form a layer of soap. Combining fat and ashes makes soap and that's all there is to it. If you're the chief soap renderer for your tribe, it does help to heat the two ingredients in a clay jar --keep that in mind in case you ever fall into a time machine heading backwards. Never know.
      Seriously, soap is not some high-tech ultra modern invention. It's cool, sure but it's not a modern invention.
      Indeed, the bubbles that soap makes are very similar in structure and composition to the foam on the oceans and there is reason to believe that such omnipresent spherical lipid structures in conjunction with the action of the ocean's tides may be the true origins of the first cellular membranes. So, you could say that soap preceeds life altogether and may be the basis of life. So, there goes the idea that soap is a recent invention.
      This is off-topic though, so I'll AC it in.
      Your helpful tutor AhFoo

    37. Re:Better off? by Squalish · · Score: 1

      Seconded by a non-nazi non-AC non-multi-poster.

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
    38. Re:Better off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm.. this post's offtopic and informative, and that last line's kinda funny, so now I'm confused as to how to moderate it..

    39. Re:Better off? by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      There are only two galaxies visible to the naked eye, and one of them, we're in. (the milky way).

      The other one you refer to is obviously the Andromeda galaxy, or M31. However, M33 is visible to the naked eye under good conditions, and there are reports that M81 is also.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  10. make a donation by zoombat · · Score: 1
    Read about the Light Up the World project and make a donation.

    Ha! After slashdotting their web server, we probably REALLY owe them some donations.. their ISP bill is going to be sky-high this month...

  11. too expensive. by rschwa · · Score: 2, Troll

    uh, ok. $1 a piece for a .1 watt bulb. sounds great. Exactly how many would I have to gang to be able to read my newspaper?

    1. Re:too expensive. by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 3, Informative

      uh, ok. $1 a piece for a .1 watt bulb. sounds great. Exactly how many would I have to gang to be able to read my newspaper?

      Because, while that bulb only consumes 0.1 W, it gives off as much light as a much brighter incandescant bulb. I didn't see figures in the article, but one would figure that it's better than what you get with flourescent lights.

      I've replaced many of the lights in my apartment with compact flourescents. Typically, a CF bulb that outputs as many lumens as a 100 W incandescant bulb will only require 20 - 30 W. Reading a newspaper with a 20 W incandescant isn't practical, but the 20 W CF is more than bright enough.

      b&

      --
      All but God can prove this sentence true.
    2. Re:too expensive. by jmv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      uh, ok. $1 a piece for a .1 watt bulb. sounds great. Exactly how many would I have to gang to be able to read my newspaper?

      Maybe not that many... Remember that the efficiency of a normal light bulb is very very bad, since most of its energy is dissipated as heat. I wouldn't be suprised if a 100W bulb only produced 1W of visible light.

    3. Re:too expensive. by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      You should care about the lumens output of the bulb, not the energy consumption (i.e. W!=light output. A 15W flourescent puts out the same energy as a 60W incandescent, for example). I don't know the efficiency of the white LEDs, so I can't comment on the lumens output of it.

    4. Re:too expensive. by rschwa · · Score: 1
      uh, ok. $1 a piece for a .1 watt bulb. sounds great. Exactly how many would I have to gang to be able to read my newspaper?

      Maybe not that many... Remember that the efficiency of a normal light bulb is very very bad, since most of its energy is dissipated as heat. I wouldn't be suprised if a 100W bulb only produced 1W of visible light.

      I realize that, but even supposing your numbers are correct, we're talking 10 of those $2.50 (the $1 is in quantities of 100000!) LEDs to match 1 100W bulb. I guess the point is that it's cheaper to hook them up with these expensive alternatives than it is to run a power line out to bumfuck nepal, like it's cheaper to give 'em all satellite phones than to run phone cable, but still.
    5. Re:too expensive. by Mahrin+Skel · · Score: 1
      That's not much (if any) better than flourescents on power efficiency for light output, and if I'm reading that right it means $200-300 worth of WLED's could replace a $10 flourescent tube designed to fit standard sockets (which itself replaces a $1 incandescent). Now, it looks like it might work out in the long term (mean time between failures being 20 times as great for the WLED, and the multiple units involved giving a nice fail-soft capacity), but who wants to front $200 for a light bulb? I just spent 100 bucks on flourescent replacement bulbs in my kitchen and outdoor lamps, but 2 grand?

      I can see specialized usages where high-reliability in lamps that are difficult to replace are involved, same way they use colored LED's for a lot of traffic lights these days. Drop the price in half and I can even see some commercial property use. But it's got to come down by a factor of 5-10 before I'd even consider home use.

      --Dave Rickey

    6. Re:too expensive. by suwalski · · Score: 5, Informative

      What you do not realize, judging by your post, is that the average 20 mA white LED looks brighter than the average 40W 120V bulb. A single one makes an excellent flashlight. A few of them together make an awesome lightsource.

    7. Re:too expensive. by rainwalker · · Score: 1

      The article clearly states that one LED was more than sufficient to read by. Try reading the whole article....

    8. Re:too expensive. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wouldn't be suprised if a 100W bulb only produced 1W of visible light.

      It's usually around 3W. IIRC, flourescent runs around 25W.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    9. Re:too expensive. by Mahrin+Skel · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That's not so bad. I just bought flourescents to replace some of my incandescents for $10 apiece, and a big part of why wasn't the power savings, it was the reliability. 10 foot ceiling in the kitchen, and outdoor lamps blowing at least once a month, the flourescents went into the same sockets and have a MTBF of 5000 hours. These WLED's are supposed to be good for 20 times that, and would fail "soft" because of the multiple sources in one unit.

      $25 to never need to balance on top of that stepladder in the kitchen again? Sounds like a deal to me. I could even see $50. Be even nicer if these don't have the flicker issues of flourescents (which is why I won't use them for reading or near the computer). And it beats the hell out of the RF units, which would kill both my phone and my network.

      --Dave Rickey

    10. Re:too expensive. by Mahrin+Skel · · Score: 1
      I can read by the light of a single candle. Looking at the pages at the link to the company selling these units, it looks like the 36-108 LED models are what you'd want for replacing 60-100 watt bulbs, and then you're looking at $200-550, way too rich for my blood. There's some size issues, too, the 72-108 LED models would have trouble fitting into a lot of standard fixtures.

      For commercial use, they look good, reduced replacement costs and power drain would make back the investment in a couple of years (and they're supposed to be good for 10). For home use they need to be half the size and one tenth the price. Say, 5 years from now, after the commercial users have built enough of a market for economies of scale.

      --Dave Rickey

    11. Re:too expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Petzl Tikka headlamp uses 3 white LED's and runs for over 100 hours on 3 AAA cells. For the first 20 hours or so it's bright enough that you can use it to hike in the dark.

      http://www.petzl.com/petzl/publicFamille?id=LAMP &r ub=sport#TIKKA

      The product is expensive, but offers proof of the project's concept.

    12. Re:too expensive. by l810c · · Score: 1
      Exactly how many would I have to gang to be able to read my newspaper?

      Answer: 2

      I bought one of these nifty things at Wally World a couple of weeks ago. Great reading/camping light. It has 2 LED's in white plastic tubes that mimic flourescent.

    13. Re:too expensive. by jmv · · Score: 2

      I realize that, but even supposing your numbers are correct, we're talking 10 of those $2.50 (the $1 is in quantities of 100000!) LEDs to match 1 100W bulb.

      Yes... but who said it had to be equivalent to a 100W bulb? The sensitivity of the eye is (IIRC) roughly logarithmic so 10 times less light is still not that dark. I'd bet with a .1W LED you could see everything in one room (which means in the whole house for those people). It won't be very bright, but it'll work.

    14. Re:too expensive. by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      it gives off as much light as a much brighter incandescant bulb.

      Really? How does it do that?

    15. Re:too expensive. by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      the places these would be installed in do not have existing fixtures, since they are not connected to a power grid.

    16. Re:too expensive. by Onetime77 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      actually responding to sig.
      Can't remember...is that from the Dead Milk Men?
      "Stuart" or something.
      That monologe is a riot!
      Props!

    17. Re:too expensive. by Omnifarious · · Score: 2

      it gives off as much light as a much brighter incandescant bulb.

      Really? How does it do that?

      It uses quantum effects to generate the light. It'd take a long time, and a little more knowledge than I have to adequately explain how semiconductors create light. The short explanation, with terms left unexplained, is this:

      A solid-state semiconducting diode is one type of semiconductor (N-type) with an excess of free electrons (not a negative charge, precisely) and another type (P-type) with an excess of 'holes', or places where it's favorable for an extra electron to be. You could think N-type as a flat field of golf balls and P-type as a field of little cups.

      Now, the field is flat, so there's no reason for the golf balls to go anywhere. There's also a small wall between the golf balls and cups. Applying an electric charge to the system both tilts the field, and adds extra golf balls to the side farthest from the cups. When a golf ball lands in a cup, it moves into a state where it has less potential energy, particularily since it's also just gone over the little hill.

      Now, systems of atoms release energy through distributing vibration. So, a real golf ball and cup would heat up a little, and you get some sound (vibrating air). But, electrons absorb and release energy by absorbing and releasing photons, or 'particles' of light. So, when the electron (golf ball) falls into the hole (cup), a photon of a specific frequency (because it's a very precise amount of energy) is released.

      No energy is really lost in this whole process. A tiny bit of energy is lost to resistance as the electrons (and holes actually, but that made the analogy trickier) moved over the surface, and some of the photons will be absorbed before they leave the semiconductor, but it's largely very efficient.

      Now, that will make an LED of one, specific color, determined by the depth of the holes, and the little ridge (band gap) between the plane of electrons and plane of holes. In order to get white light, you have to have more colors. This is usually done by packing three LEDs together in the same package, along with some system of getting their light to mingle and be reflected in a particular direction. This system too absorbs some of the photons, but it's also pretty efficient.

      In contrast, incadescent bulbs work by exciting lots and lots of electrons in a filament into random states of excitation, and when they come back down, they release photons of all kinds of wavelengths, mostly in the deep infrared. Incadescent bulbs therefore waste tons of energy in heat.

      Flourescent bulbs are a bit better in the they excite electrons in a gas to a very high energy state using high voltages. These electrons then release mostly UV when they drop back down, but there's a phosphor coating on the inside of the bulb that absorbs UV and re-releases visible light photons. This is lots more efficient than an incandescent bulb, but a lot of energy is still lost.

    18. Re:too expensive. by sketchy_gomez · · Score: 1

      Uh, no.. Check your physics, bud. That .1 Watt figure is for the total power consumed by the LED from the power supply (Power=Volts*Amps) and includes both the light power emitted by the LED and the waste heat power produced. So, it does not give off even .1 Watt of light, and is therefore much dimmer than the incandescent bulb that you compare it too. This principle is known as "The Conservation of Energy."

      --

      Chaos is a name for any order that produces confusion in our minds. --George Santayana
    19. Re:too expensive. by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      It probably wastes less energy.

      Just contemplate incandescent versus flouresent. If you've ever tried to touch the former after it was just turned off, you probably got a nice little burn. Do the same with a flourescent and you don't have the same problem.

      THAT represents the energy that an incandescent bulb wastes relative to a flourescent.

      LEDs may just take this efficiency a step further by only producing what is useful for illumination rather than generating lots of heat or non-visble light.

      A bank of incandescent flood lights can generate as much (waste) heat as one might generate with an electric space heater.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    20. Re:too expensive. by cowmix · · Score: 2

      I just want to know why my two LED flashlight was 35 bucks!

    21. Re:too expensive. by kcbrown · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The measure of what it "looks" like should be how much light is reflected off an object at a given distance, not how bright the bulb itself looks. The latter is very misleading since the surface area of a typical LED is many times smaller than the surface area of a typical light bulb, so a LED can "look" much brighter compared with a 40W bulb even if the total light output is much less.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    22. Re:too expensive. by magarity · · Score: 1

      even supposing your numbers are correct, we're talking 10 of those $2.50

      Even a bulb with 10 LEDs costing $22.50 is worth the price. Remember that the things have an 11.5 year lifespan of continual use. If you run it at night, all night, it still won't need to be replaced for 23 years! How many traditional light bulbs will burn out and need replacing at what total cost in that much time?

    23. Re:too expensive. by OGmofo · · Score: 1


      Ummmmm....NOT

      That would imply that your typical fluorescent light bulb is almost 10 times brighter than a 100W incandescent bulb. That is patently incorrect to anyone who has ever looked at a fluorescent tube bulb and an incandescent bulb.

    24. Re:too expensive. by sirsex · · Score: 0

      A full moon produces about 1mW/m^2 of light, which is still a fair amount of visiblility. So you can light a football field for about 4W (~100m X 40m). A typical Li battery is 2.9Ah @ 1.5V, or 4.4Wh. Assuming 20% LED effiency(?), you can provide moonlight to rugby game for an hour w/ only 5 batteries!!

    25. Re:too expensive. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      That would imply that your typical fluorescent light bulb is almost 10 times brighter than a 100W incandescent bulb.

      This is true for a 100W flourescent and a 100W incandescent. However, flourescent bulbs are bigger, so the lumens aren't quite so concentrated, and most of them are less than 100W - closer to 40.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    26. Re:too expensive. by AndyGuy · · Score: 1

      3.

      I have a tikka headlamp that has 3 white leds lasts for about 100 hours on 1 AA (haven't actually used up the first battery). Used it for reading books when camping.

      Andy.

    27. Re:too expensive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't really have to write a disertation to answer a trick question. Things don't give off as much light as other things that are brighter then them. I think the original poster meant to say that they give off as much light as a higher wattage incandescant bulb.

  12. Please! Please! by aengblom · · Score: 0, Troll

    Please! Can we have more articles about improved light bulbs today. Light bulbs are rad!

    --


    So close and yet so far from the world's perfect ID number
  13. Why only the developing world? by TrumpetPower! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why limit something like this to the developing world? If the developed world used low-power, high-efficiency lighting, we'd dramatically reduce the consumption of energy and non-renewable resources. If these lights are cheap enough for the poorest on the planet to consider using them, there's no doubt that they'd save the industrialized nations amazing amounts of money, as well.

    Frankly, I suspect we'd do more for the developing world by adopting this sort of thing for ourselves--which is not to say, of course, that we shouldn't encourage them to skip our wasteful ways in favor of the right way to do things.

    b&

    --
    All but God can prove this sentence true.
    1. Re:Why only the developing world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The same reason we don't have 100MPG carbureators on our vehicles. The same reason most parts don't last longer than a few years. The same reason we don't have fusion power.

      It would destroy our economy.

      I once read a story where the Amish developed a blue paint that lasts 200+ years without fading, cracking, etc. The paint industry tried to buy it out and put it in a lockbox for noone to ever use. The reason is that if you had paint that could last 200+ years, the manufactures of paint would evaporate, no new business.

    2. Re:Why only the developing world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By all means, continue nursing your delusions. The grand cabal is uniting against you. LOL. Perhaps you are schizophrenic?

    3. Re:Why only the developing world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you ever hear an urban legend you didn't believe?


      Dumbass.

    4. Re:Why only the developing world? by Tycho · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem with white LED's is that they can be inconsistent in their color. If you will recall they are made by placing a small amount of white phosphorus on the light emitting element of a high powered blue LED. When the phosphorus is bombarded by blue photons it emits photons that make up the rest of the visible light spectrum. The issue with manufacturing white LED's is that it is difficult to make white LED's that are consistent in their color and brightness. Too little phosphorus and the LED's light can look a little blue. Too much phosphorus and the LED is dimmer than a good white LED. If the phosphorus is placed off center the light produced by the LED varies in color and brightness. Of course their are grades of LED's, but the higher quality LED's cost more. Some people in developed nations might find these quality variations unacceptable. Now don't get me wrong there are some places where I could stand the inconsistencies of white LED's, like in a garage, a hallway, or some other room where tasks are done that do not require the color to be consistent. I would find it annoying to have inconsistent light in some place where I would be reading though. For that matter while I cannot be sure as I do not use makeup, applying makeup might be difficult in light that has color and intensity variations.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
    5. Re:Why only the developing world? by MeNeXT · · Score: 2
      Yup they would be great as a porch light or outdoor lighting.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    6. Re:Why only the developing world? by Psiren · · Score: 3, Funny

      applying makeup might be difficult in light that has color and intensity variations

      Oh, I agree. Theres nothing worse than going out wearing blue lipstick when you meant it to be purple. Really makes you look like a prat... ;-)

    7. Re:Why only the developing world? by stu72 · · Score: 2

      You forget that the biggest reason people paint or repaint is because they're bored of the colour - the pain my last 200 years, but the fashion for any particular shade will not.

    8. Re:Why only the developing world? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Why limit something like this to the developing world?

      It's not limited to the developing world. As a (presumably) employed, citizen of a developed world country at a variety of online or retail shops.

      People in developing countries don't necessarily have that ability, as simple as it seems.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    9. Re:Why only the developing world? by thogard · · Score: 1

      There are 100mpg carbureators but they are on very small light weight cars (if you want to call the over grown scooters that).

      I don't think most of the middle ages grand master paintings were repainted every year without too much fading. It seems to me that the modern Amish would make paints very much the same way as Da Vinic did and look how long some of his stuff lasted.

    10. Re:Why only the developing world? by Trogre · · Score: 1

      You must also consider the amount of energy used in the production of these devices.

      I don't have any figures, but I wouldn't be too surprised if the amount of energy saved in a lifetime of using these leds is more than absorbed in their manufacturing.

      </cynicism>

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    11. Re:Why only the developing world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So unemployed people don't get lighting?

    12. Re:Why only the developing world? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh yeah, sure. The Mona Lisa lasted 500 years out in the sun, wind, and rain. Idiot.

    13. Re:Why only the developing world? by sciencewhiz · · Score: 1

      Considering how much the sun varies in color and brightness, I don't think these people have to worry about inconsitancies in white LEDs

  14. Bringing downt he price... by chill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One way to bring down the cost would be to sell them in the developed world. A finished product, that could screw into a standard light socket, but use 1/100th the power to provide the same light would sell well in the U.S.

    Especially with all the noise about power shortages and rolling blackouts.

    Selling them in the U.S. and the rest of the developed world would go a long way towards creating enough demand for serious mass production.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Bringing downt he price... by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Where do you get your information? Do you make it up? What makes you think that a white LED lamp that produces as much light as a fluorescent lamp would use 1/100th the power?

      White LEDs are only about twice as efficient as modern fluorescent bulbs, and less efficient then high pressure sodium lighting. They're also way more expensive to purchase than fluorescent bulbs.

    2. Re:Bringing downt he price... by oolon · · Score: 2

      And of course the big advantage of fluorescent tubes is that they can run of AC, which is already wired into the house, if every LED array required a transformer to fit in standard socket, the efficency of the system would drop fast.

      Personally I hate the light from flurorescent tubes, and will stick to my nice halogen lights.

      James

    3. Re:Bringing downt he price... by Mahrin+Skel · · Score: 1
      Flouresents don't run directly off 120VAC@60Hz, they use a unit called a "ballast" to step up the voltage. In the new ones, the balast is built into the base of the bulb and is solid state, in the older ones you needed an inductor-based ballast the size of a brick (which is where the characteristic hum of flourescents came from).

      --Dave Rickey

    4. Re:Bringing downt he price... by nolife · · Score: 2

      Compact fluorescent bulbs are a very good alternative. They come in many shapes and sizes, last roughly 7000-10000 hours and use about 75% less power then incandescent. I've seen 5 packs of bulbs at warehouse clubs for under $19.
      They are getting physically smaller and cheaper all the time.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
    5. Re:Bringing downt he price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can just put a number (33.3, round to 34 to be safe) of LEDs in series on 120V AC. They can handle 3.6 volts each, 3.6V * 33.3 is 120V. They'd have to be wired to take advantage of the full waveform to get the full possible light output, or else wire some forward and some backward.

    6. Re:Bringing downt he price... by chill · · Score: 2

      The number was a rough guess. Assume a 40w lamp uses, I dunno, 40w of electricity. Then assuming that the picture on the page was showing an actual lamp -- with an array of 10 LEDs, each consuming 0.1w of power, that works out to 1w of power.

      That right there is a 1/40 ratio. Factor in the *much* longer MTFB, the reduction in heat energy emitted, etc. and it is a damn good ratio.

      Yes, I would like to see a lumens output rating on the LEDs for a better comparison. I've seen reports of 120 lumens from a 5W white LED package. A standard 40w is 460 lumens.

      So, that is only a 1/2 ratio, which isn't good. However, factor in the much longer life and reduction in heating and it adds up.

      For a bit more info:
      http://www.eet.com/story/OEG20001212S0034
      http:// www.efi.org/articles/bulbs.html
      http://www.lumile ds.com/newsandevents/news_index.h tml?page=http://www.lumileds.com/newsandevents/rel eases/press04-14-02.htm

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    7. Re:Bringing downt he price... by AnotherBlackHat · · Score: 5, Informative

      Last year, the numbers were something like this;

      Lumens/Watt;
      85-95: 32 watt T8 fluorescent
      60-65: standard F40T12 cool white fluorescent
      48-60: compact fluorescents
      20: T3 tubular halogen
      15-19: white LED
      17: standard 100 watt incandescent
      6: incandescent night light bulb (7w)
      6: incandescent flashlight bulbs

      The very best white LEDs are still under 35 lumens/watt, or about 1/2 the efficency of a flourencent. They have been steadily improving however, and around 2004 should surpass them.

      But not today.

      -- this is not a .sig

    8. Re:Bringing downt he price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so if the input voltage wave crosses the y-axis two times in each period, the waveform for the absolute magnitude of the current through the leds will have a frequency of 30 hertz. Ouch!

      Why not build a rectifier?

    9. Re:Bringing downt he price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if this would work.

      Diodes do NOT obey Ohm's law (as I found
      out the hard way when I tried a similar
      experiment)

    10. Re:Bringing downt he price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oops, that should read "x-axis" not "y-axis"

    11. Re:Bringing downt he price... by ColaMan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're half right - Actually the ballast is also there to limit the current flowing through the tube.

      What (roughly) happens is:

      You turn the power on.
      The starter heats the two filaments, via the ballast, at either end of the tube for a few seconds, and then breaks that circuit. Since there was current flowing through the ballast , and the ballast is inductive (well, the old types)
      a high voltage kick is produced, which is placed across the tube, which fires it.
      That great.
      Except that the problem is that the voltage required to maintain the arc inside the tube is a lot less than the voltage to start the arc, so you need to regulate the current through the tube to stop it from blowing up. The ballast, being inductive, presents a nice resistance at the mains frequency of 50/60Hz, which limits the tube current under normal operating conditions.

      Anyways, that's how I remember it.

      Those new-fangled solid state ones might as well be magic - they have the same effect, but how is a different matter.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    12. Re:Bringing downt he price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they do.....the initial resistance is quite high, but once the threshold voltage has been passed (usually .7v for Si and .3v for Ge) and electrons begin to flow, the diode adds very little resistance to the circuit (you can figure it out using ohms law (voltage drop/current through the LED). This is why it's necessary to incorperate a current limiting resistor in LED applications.

    13. Re:Bringing downt he price... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally something that's cheaper in the UK, can get them for £1.50 each (~$2) here

    14. Re:Bringing downt he price... by gopher_hunt · · Score: 1

      Ask and you shall receive:
      White LED bulbs 120 vac
      LED's last 10 times longer than compact fluorescents and 133 times longer than a typical incandescent. And energy savings are incredible. It would cost $772.20 to use one hundred 25 watt incandescents for 13 hours a day for one year compared to only $30.80 using these light-equivalent LEDs - a savings of $741.40. They only produce 3.4 BTUs/hr. compared to 85 for incandescents - no more heat problems. And they fit in standard recepticles, lamps, recessed cans, track lights, any place you would use a normal bulb. The 17 LED version replaces a 25 watt incandescent and uses only 1.7 watts. 9 LEDs in a n A-19 bulb - the same style as a typical incandescent (2 3/8 diameter). They look the same, have the same base, and replace a 25 watt incandescent while using less than .9 watts.
      realgoods.com

    15. Re:Bringing downt he price... by glitch! · · Score: 2

      You're half right - Actually the ballast is also there to limit the current flowing through the tube.
      ...
      a high voltage kick is produced, which is placed across the tube, which fires it.

      Except that the problem is that the voltage required to maintain the arc inside the tube is a lot less than the voltage to start the arc, so you need to regulate the current through the tube to stop it from blowing up.


      That sounds about right. I remember doing my own experiments with fluorescent tubes. My own goal was to produce a circuit that had zero flicker and dimming control. These experiments were all with DC, of course. It is possible, but a real pain in the ass to control...

      If memory serves, a cold tube will start glowing somewhere over 200 volts, and have a nice medium-low glow around 300 volts or so. I think that the gas started ionizing pretty well before it hit 400 volts. The current seemed to be pretty much a linear function.

      Now a hot tube (filaments glowing) is a different matter. Once the gas started ionizing, the current goes WHAM! (96 point bold with a hundred exclamation points) and the voltage for full output is around 60 to 70 volts. I suppose that would be almost an amp at that point, a far cry from the tens or hundreds of milliams with the higher voltage cold cathode...

      --
      A dingo ate my sig...
  15. The REAL cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Yeah, too bad the article doesn't mention that it takes more power to make a white LED than you would save with fifty 100-watt lightbulbs.

    1. Re:The REAL cost? by Deagol · · Score: 1

      References please.

  16. My experience with White LED's by Bonker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About a year ago, I got a kitsch keychain from a vendor who was trying to sell software to my company. We didn't purchase the software, but I have held onto that keychain.

    Let me describe it. It's oval in shape, about 3cm long by about 2cm across and 1 cm thick. Inside the body of the keychain, which is clear vinyl, you can see the mechanism that makes it so neat, which is a small watch-type battery, a very small resistor, and one of the newer white LED's. The clear plastic vinyl is red, so when you squeze the thing, it's light is very slightly pink.

    Now, here's the thing that makes me keep this around. This little piece of what I would othewise call 'crap' is brighter than my 'keychain-size' Mag Light! I can easily read by or do computer maintenance with this toy. If I had five or six of them, I could reasonably light a room for however long the batteries lasted.

    White LED's are the wave of the future, IMHO. They're cheap in terms of production and electricity cost. I also understand that they're significantly easier on the environment than incandescent bulbs or flourescent tubes. Unless you overload it with current, which I understand is very difficult since many come with tiny regulators in the form of attached IC's, they don't burn out, making replacement costs plummet.

    Make my next lightbulb a white LED

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:My experience with White LED's by dachshund · · Score: 4, Interesting
      You can buy a similar product here. I'm not sure exactly sure if the white bulb is an LED, but it's bright as hell and it's lasted me a couple of years on a single watch battery (with no signs of fading.)

      They also make an IR version, for those of you with night vision goggles. And no, I don't work for the company, but I'm really impressed with their product.

    2. Re:My experience with White LED's by thesolo · · Score: 2

      You're describing a Photon Light. You can buy them at ThinkGeek!

      I love them. I keep 2 on my keychain at all times. You just never know when you might need one. The last CAT5 drop I was doing, the power went out (I was working in a thunderstorm). Thanks to my Photon Light, I was able to finish the drop with no problem at all. 2 White LEDs and I had more than enough light to keep working for over an hour straight.

    3. Re:My experience with White LED's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White LEDs are actually relatively frigging expensive. Well, compared to the normal low-luminosity red or green or amber LEDs. LEDs are still sweet anyway.

    4. Re:My experience with White LED's by Bonker · · Score: 2

      While the same size, the little light I have is probably much simpler than the one advertised at ThinkGeek. I'm guessing that it's total cost of production was around $3.00US

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    5. Re:My experience with White LED's by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2
      They're cheap in terms of production and electricity cost.

      Then why the hell are they so expensive? Check out the prices on available white LED replacements for incandescent bulbs, here for example although there are other vendors. The light equivalent of a 40W bulb will run you almost $200! I'm not even certain that's worth it even if it does last 100,000 hours.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    6. Re:My experience with White LED's by DogLover911 · · Score: 1
      The article said that the LEDs cost $1 each in quantities of 100,000. Well you can buy these white led keychains off Ebay from a variety of sellers-- AND THEY ARE GRRRRRREAT!

      Slightly more than $1 each for a white LED with batteries and a keychain. We got them imprinted with the company logo and give them away, and people love them.

      DogLover911!

    7. Re:My experience with White LED's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doing some searching for price on the photons, I found this: have2geek store Very cheep vs other places I've seen. Around $15 for the IIIs, and $16 with covers. Ultra Violet ones too.

    8. Re:My experience with White LED's by lupine · · Score: 2, Informative

      This place offers 17 led bulbs(comperable to a 25w bulb) for $39, but they wont sell to developed nations(usa).

      This place has 20 led bulbs for $60.

      here is a place that has dimmer(?) bulbs for 30-35 bucks.

      here are some really cool sunlight powered outdoor led lights for $80.

    9. Re:My experience with White LED's by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      thinkgeek also sells these.

    10. Re:My experience with White LED's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever try ordering direct from China before?

    11. Re:My experience with White LED's by joekool · · Score: 1

      Thinkgeek resells these, at a markup. Don't misunderstand me, I like thinkgeek (all the shirts I have worn this week came from them), but they can be a bit expensive for most things. I think they aim to be the next Sharper Image, or something. Don't be misleadingly lloyal too a company, even if they are cool.

      --

      Slackware: old school feel, new school gear.
    12. Re:My experience with White LED's by imroy · · Score: 1

      Down here in OZ, Jaycar Electronics is selling "Superbright LED keyring torches". I've got a red one, better for night vision, and it's bloody great. I remember seeing an IR one and even an UV one (apparently good for looking for counterfeight money or something...), but they don't appear in their web catalog. Neat little things. My only complaint is that it's a little hard to push the rubber button to turn it on, and that you have to push on the other side to turn it off. Just a little awkward and easy to get mixed up when going only by feel.

    13. Re:My experience with White LED's by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Cyberguys has a light like you describe for $9.95 - they call it the Inova Microlight.

  17. Finally by yasth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Light to starve by

    --
    I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    1. Re:Finally by sbsaylors · · Score: 1

      damn that should've got a bigger score :)

    2. Re:Finally by Drakonian · · Score: 1

      Finally light to study by, to get an education, to get a (somewhat skilled) job, to pay for food for your family.

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  18. white leds for a thinner world by reboot_imminent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i don't know about developing countries, but think about how much good it would do to get the overweight sedentary people here in the US off their asses and on a bike. Aside from energy savings, think of the savings from improving health

    1. Re:white leds for a thinner world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      enough is enough! how many more "get on a bike" posts does there need to be?!

  19. Light the World? by klocwerk · · Score: 1

    Jesus, have you seen the nighttime pictures from space?
    This planet is already a freakin christmas tree of lights. the only dark spot on the east coast is in the pine barrens of Jersey.

    I applaud the intent behind this, trying to bring the third world closer to a western standard of living, but please.

    Let's put OUT some lights.

    --

    "You worthless post!"
    -Shakespeare, 2 Gentlemen of Verona, 1. 1. 147
    1. Re:Light the World? by leshert · · Score: 2

      The light pollution you see in those images is from misused wide area lighting.

      I doubt that all the WLEDs ever created, used in task lighting the way this article mentions, would show up on one of those pictures.

      Read the article, and think about it...

    2. Re:Light the World? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Yes, lets put out some lights to make the few astronomer fucks in the world happy. It would only inconvienence the other 5.9999 BILLION humans on the planet.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    3. Re:Light the World? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please consider that these devices are HIGHLY DIRECTIONAL, and thus would REDUCE light pollution by placing the light directly on it's target, instead of EVERYWHERE.

    4. Re:Light the World? by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Well, as one of those astronomer fucks...

      It's not that you want lights on - they are a good thing. It's that the ground is where needs to be lit, but the lights we complain about are the ones that light the ground, but 60% of the light goes elsewhere - mostly up.

      Drive past a shopping center on a cloudy night and look how well lit the clouds are. Just what good is that doing?

      And even before I was an astronomer fuck I wanted night time to be dark, not this pale it has become.

  20. The banes of Opera by Havokmon · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    Did anyone else open the link in another window, put it in the background, and wait for that spinning world to stop?

    I thought the page was never going to finish loading..

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  21. Re:White LEDs by rmohr02 · · Score: 1

    These little lights of mine, I'm gonna let 'em shine, let 'em shine, let 'em ...D'oh!

  22. white LED != efficient by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes they are bright, but they make horrible area lighting. the most efficient lighting to date is still the compact flouresent and Cold Cathode flouresent lighting. It has the greates lumens per watt output compared to anything. White led's look bright, but are a concentrated beam, that same beam spread out to a 180Deg will be worthless. There used to be "tests" in home-power magazine that claimed white led's were superior.. but forgot to take into effect that the other lamps also lit up the room instead of a white spot on the bench aimed at the sensor.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:white LED != efficient by yasth · · Score: 1

      Yes they are bright, but they make horrible area lighting. the most efficient lighting ...
      The problem is your assumption for area lighting useful light != are lighting. Area lighting is actually relatively new as a complete replacement for other forms of lighting. If you notice older movies and photographs you will see lots of task lighting (i.e. table lamps, floor lamps, etc.) This is becasue they might well have had 20 watt bulbs, and lighting up a space with readable light with low wattage bulbs is difficult. Today you can just turn on the 500 watt halogen and read anywhere in the room.

      This all besides the point as one of the key features of LEDs are their ruggedness, and long life. CFL is nice but fragile, and will eventually burn out.

      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    2. Re:white LED != efficient by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Ok then take this for example...

      efficient lighting

      task lighting is a very new and rare to see concept. 99.997% of all homes still have a single bulb at the ceiling or on a lamp to light the room.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:white LED != efficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up yours to the a-hole that rated this as overrated... he's just pissed that lumpy is smarter than they are....

    4. Re:white LED != efficient by yasth · · Score: 1
      I call it task lighting, but it is of course not done with that term's modern intentions. A certain kind of taskish lighting existed, partly because:
      1. Fixtures and Bulbs were relatively more expensive
      2. Electricty cost more(in today's dollars)
      3. Bulbs produced less ilumination
      All this conspired to produce a more focused form of lighting.It was only later when cheap energy allowed the blanket of light style to take off did we move into most of today's even, ugly light. Since the only tasks light helps you do tend to require detail (excepting things that need lots of light like warehouses) they don't need more then task(ish)lighting.
      BTW nice link
      --
      I'd do something interesting, but my server can't handle a slashdotting.
    5. Re:white LED != efficient by PaulGibson · · Score: 1

      I'd say that Lumpy has pointed out what we in the manufacturing world like to call an "issue". All technologies have issues. When you solve them you then can sell the resulting product. Granted this is not a "new" idea, but there are definitely some good applications. Also, could you not mount the leds in a grid on the surface of a sphere, so that they shined in all directions, thereby lighting an area instead of a spot?

    6. Re:white LED != efficient by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      and therefore you eliminate the efficiency. a single item is efficient putting 500 together to reproduce what 1 inefficient item can do is not.

      500 white LED's produce less light than 1 Compact flouresent bulb does for the same 5 watts of power, thereby making them very inefficient... for now. the technology behind the white led can be expanded, and we may see a true semiconductor bulb soon.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  23. She sure isn't qualified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Her post did not have a single misspelling.

    1. Re:She sure isn't qualified by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's precisely why she's unqualified.

  24. brightness is as brightness does by tps12 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    It will be great to finally be rid of the antiquated incandescent bulb. LED has been a long time coming, and I'm sure all of us are excited about the promise of this sweet new tech.

    Not to mention, I need a nice Gandalf wallpaper (well, okay, maybe not "need"...). I want a close-up where he looks pretty stoned, like in most of the movie. I would prefer his pipe to be featured, if at all possible, and no writing (titles, copyright notices, etc). 1024 or larger, please. I know someone reading this has the perfect image for me!

    I'm of the opinion that the light bulb filament has been as like a Chain unto Humanity, even as fluorescent bulbery has been a Poison'd Gas which Chokes at Our Throats.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:brightness is as brightness does by swankypimp · · Score: 1

      What's with the advert in the middle of your post, eh? I feel like I'm reading UGO.

      --

      --All your stolen base are belong to Rickey Henderson
    2. Re:brightness is as brightness does by tps12 · · Score: 2
      Not to mention, I need a nice Gandalf wallpaper (well, okay, maybe not "need"...). I want a close-up where he looks pretty stoned, like in most of the movie. I would prefer his pipe to be featured, if at all possible, and no writing (titles, copyright notices, etc). 1024 or larger, please. I know someone reading this has the perfect image for me!

      I think it speaks for itself.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    3. Re:brightness is as brightness does by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will be great to finally be rid of the antiquated incandescent bulb. LED has been a long time coming, and I'm sure all of us are excited about the promise of this sweet new tech.

      Yes, I'm sure we are all excited. What is your point?

      Not to mention, I need a nice Gandalf wallpaper (well, okay, maybe not "need"...). I want a close-up where he looks pretty stoned, like in most of the movie. I would prefer his pipe to be featured, if at all possible, and no writing (titles, copyright notices, etc). 1024 or larger, please. I know someone reading this has the perfect image for me!

      Huh?

      I'm of the opinion that the light bulb filament has been as like a Chain unto Humanity, even as fluorescent bulbery has been a Poison'd Gas which Chokes at Our Throats.

      Good for you. Thanks for posting irrelevent garbage and unsupported personal opinions. We are all collectively stupider for having known ya.

    4. Re:brightness is as brightness does by jcsehak · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah, I'm sick of the yellow incandescant light. It'll be nice if we can get these bulbs installed everywhere.

      My cat's breath smells like cat food.

      The light bulb has been a chain onto Humanity, indeed. Much like the automobile, penicillin, the computer, and now that I think of it, fire.

      --

      c-hack.com |
  25. Geeks at Christmas time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geesh it reminds me of the thousand points of light

  26. Front page (with links) by datastew · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Welcome to the official web site of Light Up The World Foundation.

    The goal of LUTW is to be instrumental in providing White Light Emitting Diode home lighting, by both humanitarian and local entrepreneurial means, to one million people in the developing world by 2005 - thus enabling children to study in the evenings.

    This web site is intended to introduce you to a groundbreaking initiative instigated by Dr. Dave Irvine-Halliday, professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Calgary, Canada.The primary purpose of this project is to introduce to the developing world a safe, simple, healthy, reliable and affordable form of home lighting, using white light emitting diodes (WLED). This rugged home lighting system will allow people in some of the poorest and least developed rural communities to light up their homes and raise their quality of living. Please explore our web pages to find out more information about the WLED home lighting project and how we are making a difference by assisting Nepali villager's achieve a higher quality of living by their own efforts.

    Aug 24, 2002. Join us for the Light Up The World - Rocky Mountain Relay (2 person) at Canmore, Alberta. All race proceeds support LUTW. Click here for entry forms and info.

    LUTW Countries: 2000, 2001 and Projected for 2002.

    Light Up The World Project Photos: Everest, Nepal, India, Sri Lanka.

    Thank you to our generous supportors: Donations List.

    Donation Information.

    1. Re:Front page (with links) by datastew · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Oops. I guess I wasn't kidding when I said with links. Anyway, here is what I meant to submit.

      Welcome to the official web site of Light Up The World Foundation.

      The goal of LUTW is to be instrumental in providing White Light Emitting Diode home lighting, by both humanitarian and local entrepreneurial means, to one million people in the developing world by 2005 - thus enabling children to study in the evenings.

      This web site is intended to introduce you to a groundbreaking initiative instigated by Dr. Dave Irvine-Halliday, professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Calgary, Canada.The primary purpose of this project is to introduce to the developing world a safe, simple, healthy, reliable and affordable form of home lighting, using white light emitting diodes (WLED). This rugged home lighting system will allow people in some of the poorest and least developed rural communities to light up their homes and raise their quality of living. Please explore our web pages to find out more information about the WLED home lighting project and how we are making a difference by assisting Nepali villager's achieve a higher quality of living by their own efforts.

      Aug 24, 2002. Join us for the Light Up The World - Rocky Mountain Relay (2 person) at Canmore, Alberta. All race proceeds support LUTW. Click here for entry forms and info.

      LUTW Countries: 2000, 2001 and Projected for 2002.

      Light Up The World Project Photos: Everest, Nepal, India, Sri Lanka.

      Thank you to our generous supportors: Donations List.

      Donation Information.

  27. We should Kill all Niggers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seconded.

  28. not more light by Psychopax · · Score: 0

    i dont want more light, there's already too much light. it's not really possible to look at the stars without looking through some artificial light anymore :-//

  29. Re:White LEDs by rmohr02 · · Score: 1

    Oops, /. took out my <stops pedaling> that appeared before the ellipses.

  30. Neato Stuff by mikers · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I didn't take any courses from this prof, but some of my friends in school did.

    What he is doing is kindof neat... He wants to equip poor villages (in places like Nepal) with electric lighting that better utilizes the minimal generating capacity they have.

    I know you can get white LEDs as replacements for flashlights that will increase the battery life approximately 20x. For those Petzl headlamps a standard Duracell battery will give you about 6H of light with a standard bulb, but is rated at 100H with a superbright LED. And as far as I know the superbright gives you equivalent illumination - just at higher efficiency.

    When I was in Nepal a few years ago, most rural villages would have power (all from hydroelectric) but it was unpredictable and unreliable. Also the generators were small and there were limits on how many bulbs each place could have. Replacing regular bulbs with white leds would save power - and make battery backups realistic.

    Thats one way out of the dark.

    m

  31. No, it's not too expensive by north.coaster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a quote from the Web Site:

    I should point out that a single WLED provides sufficient light to easily read a book or to study with. My wife, who wholeheartedly assisted me in Nepal in 1999, has amassed ample field evidence to support this last statement. It is very significant to the developing world that these wee marvels of technology can effectively light an entire kitchen table area using less than one watt of electrical power and there are none of the attendant dreadful pollution and fire dangers associated with the use of kerosene lamps.

    Please read more of the web site before commenting. /Don

  32. I thought White LEDs were impossible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A long time ago, I read a book about basic electronics, which described how LEDs worked. It said that the frequency of the light(and thus the color) was determined by the distance of one element from the other, but that pulling them too far apart caused it to stop working, limiting LEDs to colors with frequencies lower than green.

    IIRC, white light is several frequencies, including blue, which should not be possible. What changed?

  33. Christmas Savings!!! by huckda · · Score: 1

    Well with these little buggars
    maybe we'll be able to save
    money at Christmas time when we
    all festively decorate our houses
    in all their glorious splendor!
    Worth some looking into anyway...

    --
    "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
  34. Which is the in shape uneducated one by bluGill · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can see it now: Some third world family of 12. Dad says to the 3rd kid "Okay, your the dumb one so the rest of us can learn. You get to spend the rest of your likfe riding the exercise bike while the rest of us learn to read."

    Don't feel bad for the "dumb kid" though, he will go on to win international biking compititions, while the rest of the family trys to compete in the rat race with millions of other people.

    1. Re:Which is the in shape uneducated one by doofusclam · · Score: 1

      Thats silly. I have a wind-up radio which is fantastic when camping (like going to music festivals, such as glastonbury (http://glastonbury-festivals.co.uk) .

      It's actually quite good fun too. People actually fight over spending 30 seconds winding the radio up. It's very social, you ought to try something different sometime!

      seany

  35. power generation and use in developing countries by happyclam · · Score: 2

    Many developing countries are in very sunny locations. Solar panels are really getting cheaper. For example, plastic solar cells that can be "painted" onto clothing are strong enough to power portable radios. I bet they'd be powerful enough to charge up that battery that runs the LEDs.

    A very interesting read about solar is From Space to Earth, which discusses the use of and need for solar power in developing countries.

    One thing that is clear is that power in rural areas is greatly needed for things like well pumps; powering reading lights is great, but it would be better used for true necessities. (though light becomes necessary when you need to fix that broken well pump...)

    --
    He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  36. MOD UP parent - LEDs innefficient by levl289 · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine works at an LED distributor, and they sell a grip of these things...They have to, their spread is a very small angle!

    While they're seemingly bright head-on, people pay a premium for getting them up to the same OVERALL output as incandescent, or florescent lights - while it might look cool, and seem futuristic, the price is prohibitively high.

    --

    Q: What do you think about American Culture?
    A: I think it's a good idea.
    (adapted from Gandhi)

    1. Re:MOD UP parent - LEDs innefficient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That quote is pretty lame, especially since you can't even get it right. Then 'adapting' it to be 'American'; looks to me like you couldn't come up with a decent comment, so you copied one and ended up saying nothing of value.

      I think American culture wins.

  37. Oh! And encourage exercise! by Arakonfap · · Score: 1

    That's be a good trade - lower electric bills, probably longer lasting bulbs, and exercise on top of it.

    Not only would it help solve energy-problemed areas, it would also improve the health.

  38. White LEDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody know if NetBSD has been ported to this yet?

  39. Hmm by Have+Blue · · Score: 2

    Who's seen Soylent Green? :P

  40. White LEDS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

  41. Keep pedaling, Gilligan!! My mid-term is tomorrow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they will have cardiovascular fitness.

  42. Great. Let's Really Annoy The Third World by istartedi · · Score: 2

    How many of you have ever seen a white LED light, much less read by one? I saw one in one of those Sharper Image type stores a while back. It was a flashlight that had a light that reminded me of a cross between flourescent and those annoying blue headlights.

    I realize they are efficient, but they are just not very pleasant. They might be useful as porchlights, but I wouldn't want to sit in a room with one and read for any length of time. Also, LEDs are probably not made in those countries. Simply giving them things is not going to encourage development (assuming that you think development is a good thing). I think we are better off educating the 3rd world then just giving them things. Educate them in math and language, and then they can solve their own problems, and in a way that will be suited to their culture, without contributing to the growing disatisfaction with the "imperialist" West. If you have to give them lights to educate them, give 'em good old incandescent/battery lamps. Kids won't be encouraged to learn under those annoying white lights.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  43. pedal powered? by AndyChrist · · Score: 1

    Think of all the good it could do in the US, land of the fatasses.

  44. Some info and links by ChenLing · · Score: 1

    Currently, LED lights are fairly directed (ie, they are not as good for filling a room).
    So they won't necessarily replace the light bulb yet.
    However, they are excellent replacements for flashlights, traffic lights, car lamps -- ie, any kind of directed light.

    They are brighter, more efficient, and last longer than regular incandescent or fluorescent bulbs.
    They do cost more though, but that might change with economies of scale.

    Some links:
    EETimes Article: White LEDs to overtake the light bulb, keynoter says
    TechWEB Article: LED: The End Of the Light Bulb As We Know It?

    --
    "You have the option of insanity. I do not. And that makes me crazy!" - Brian to Angela, My So-Called Life
  45. Pedal power is green - soylent green that is.... by jerryasher · · Score: 2

    Home pedal power via bicycle generators was written of in Harry Harrison's Make Room, Make Room (aka Soylent Green). Edward G. Robinson pedaled away throughout the movie" to generate the home power.

  46. Traffic Lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They have been using these LED's for traffic lights for some time now. I expect most people have seen them: they are brighter and easier to read from farther away. Not only that, but one of my civil engineering friends told me that the cost to keep them running (which is most of their overall cost) is cut by about 90% by using LED's instead of traditional lights. Not only that, but as has been mentioned before, they don't break unless you apply too much current. That's right... infinite lifetime expectancy. Never break. Ever.

    1. Re:Traffic Lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like traffic lights. I like traffic lights. I like traffic lights. But only when they're green.

    2. Re:Traffic Lights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's right... infinite lifetime expectancy. Never break. Ever.

      Uhhh.. No. That's one of the biggest myths of LEDs. They do break down. Not instantaneously, but over the years they lose their lighting ability. LEDs need to be replaced about every ten years or so, depending on how much current was pulled during their lifetime.

    3. Re:Traffic Lights by michael_cain · · Score: 1

      Lots of the new LED replacement bulbs for traffic lights have been going in here in Colorado. One unanticipated (I hope) side effect: when it snows and the wind is blowing hard, the sunscreens over the lights that face into the wind eventually accumulate enough snow to obscure the light. Fortunately, the LED bulbs are bright enough you can still tell which light is on. This doesn't seem to happen with the old incandescent lamps, I assume because they produce enough waste heat to melt the snow and keep it from building up.

  47. Great idea but.... by zandermander · · Score: 2, Insightful



    Having lived in a developing country for several years, I can appreciate this groups efforts and the technological advances made here but...

    Where I lived (a rural part of Thailand) very few if anyone would have used the generator. Why? Because they can rent car batteries from a business down the road for all their electrical needs (which are very few - a few flourescent lightbulbs and occasionally TV).

    In my case, the business was hooked up to the power grid for recharging batteries but I also saw even more remote places where they had a generator (gas? Diesel? Never checked) for the same purpose.

    Having participated in harvesting rice, I really doubt any farmer would want to hop on their pedal-powered generator at the end of a day of back-breaking field work to charge up their batteries for a night of bad soap operas.

    1. Re:Great idea but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not use those white LED's instead of those lightbulbs? It would make the battery last longer.

  48. Flashlight.... by idontneedanickname · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine has a flashlight with 4 o those white LED's and it can compete with my 3*D battery maglight! Since his purchae a couple years ago he hasn't had to change batteries yet. I dunno where he got it but it was very cool.
    --tzan

  49. Pedal faster damn it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My monitor's dimming again.

  50. Build your own.. by nolife · · Score: 2

    I've bought and used these LED's before. You can find them cheap here.
    I've built a few things with these and they are impressive. A solar cell, two AA rechargable batteries and one of these lights can be put to use just about anywhere.

    --
    Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  51. Kenya does it better by Astrorunner · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In Kenya, there are several private companies that are selling solar panels to do the same sort of thing, except without all that nasty stationary bike stuff. Just pop the solar cell on the roof of your hut and you're in business. Turns out its not that terribly expensive, even by African standards. Currently you have some options if you're in a rural area in Kenya, and by some, I mean two, that being, taking your car battery to a charging station, or making payments on a solar panel. Its not a tough choice.

  52. Still a ways to go by horati0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work in the lighting industry with conventional means of producing light (florescent, incandescent, etc) and have done some testing on LEDs. The most important thing to realize is that the light being produced is not a pure "white" light.

    Typically the manufacturer will use a blue LED and coat the outside of the lens with a yellow broadband phosphor, which when the blue light is filtered through it, appears white. True white is extremely difficult (and expensive) to produce; it's still years away and it has to do with the ability of the diodes to produce certain wavelengths of light.

    As far as efficiency, yes, LEDs are quite effecient at producing light at a given (low) wattage but they are still not as bright as conventional light sources. The rating of an LEDs efficiency is measured in lumens per watt; a bulb with a higher lumen per watt rating is more efficient than that of a lower one. At this point, red LEDs are the most efficient, which is why many applications that use LEDs (exit signs, car turn signals, etc) are red.

    Manufacurers claim a 100,000 hour life span of LEDs. What most of them fail to mention is that to acheive this, the power supply that the LEDs are attached to has to be set at a low current. Low current means decreased brightness. If the current is increased past the manufacurers recommended setting, you will get higher brightess but the lifespan will be cut short severely. Not to mention the fact that many LED applications where companies are touting 100,000 hour lifetimes (approximately 10 years) haven't been around that long to confirm or deny it.

    LEDs are not going away, however. It's not a question of if they go mainstream, it's when. And I have no problem with that, it's just that from what I have observed, the manufacurers are dispensing half-truths and outright lies about this stuff. People take it for gospel because big companies are developing the technology (GE and HP-funded Agilent come to mind) so they figure it must be true.

    Whatever. It's reall not going to make that much difference in the long run. Just want people to know there's more behind it.

    --
    The neutrality of this sig is disputed.
    1. Re:Still a ways to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, my uncle works (elec eng) at Agilent, and he's a nice guy... He wouldn't lie to people about this stuff! (Although, he works in wireless communications testing equipment, not LED development).

    2. Re:Still a ways to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      True white is extremely difficult (and expensive) to produce; it's still years away and it has to do with the ability of the diodes to produce certain wavelengths of light.


      Um, how do you think fluorescent lights do it? EYou sure don't get white light out of then by default; you have to use a phosphor.

      White LEDs will work exactly the same way; use a UV LED and shine it on a phosphor. Blammo! All we need is a decent UV LED, and we're getting close.
    3. Re:Still a ways to go by Fixer · · Score: 1
      I have a question. Not knowing an extreme amount of detail of the similarities between laser diodes and normal LED's, I'm not sure if this is a crazy notion or not, but here goes:

      They have 3600W laser diode arrays in a one cubic inch packaging (with integral coolant hoses!), and they achieve this by laying down diodes at 200 micrometer spacings.

      Why couldn't you accomplish the same trick with normal LED's?

      --
      "Avast! Prepare for the rodgering!" THWACK! "Arrr.. me nards.."
    4. Re:Still a ways to go by jaoswald · · Score: 2

      The other contributing factor for red LEDs replacing red lamps is that "red" incandescent lamps are white incandescent bulbs with red filters in front. The filtering substantially lowers the emitted light per unit input power, increasing the advantage of red LEDs.

  53. Swimming Pools by Apreche · · Score: 2

    they've had LED lighting systems for homes and swimming pools for years now. The pedal generators and rechargable batteries are a new idea. But LED lighting systems have been around. However they are quite expensive.

    You get a bed of white LEDs in your basement, and you use fiber optics to bring the ligh to different places in your home. Works really well for swimming pools, and is most often used there, because it doesn't bring electricity near the water.

    --
    The GeekNights podcast is going strong. Listen!
  54. a ha by tps12 · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    The ever-helpful slashdot moderators have informed me that you are trolling my thread. I knew there was a troll in here somewhere, and I'm glad they tracked you down.

    My cat's breath smells like cat food.

    News flash: cats eat cat food.

    Please go away, I do not want this thread to get a bad reputation as a place where trolls hang out.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:a ha by tps12 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I thought I told you to get out of here. Slashdot has no room for trolls.

      --

      Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  55. Absurd! by SPYvSPY · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a) Apparently you don't have access to common sense either. Criminals prefer dark alleys to well-lit streets. The "data" that you fail to cite is probably inconclusive, since there are a billion variables involved with comparing the crime trends in location A to the crime trends in location B.

    b) Where are you getting this stuff? If we didn't have well-lit urban culture, we'd still think that the Earth is a flat disc a few miles in diameter, with a large mechanical sphere surrounding it. That's not exactly what I'd consider an appreciation for the vastness of the Universe.

    c) People watching television probably learn more about the vastness of the Universe than you will staring at the night sky.

    Stop puking up luddite FUD, please. You're making a mess.

    1. Re:Absurd! by ShavenYak · · Score: 2

      Point a) I agree with.
      Point b) - We discovered that the world was round and orbited the sun before we had electric light.
      Point c) - Not if they're watching Survivor and Fear Factor. ;)

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  56. ride bicycle and watch TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i ride bicycle, generate electricity, charge battery and use it to view TV. i am allowed to watch TV as long as i can generate enough electricity to power it. thereby my watching tv, eating potato chips, drinking beer and excersizing balance out.

  57. not only white... by stagl · · Score: 1

    but red, yellow and green LEDs have been installed on almost every single stoplight here in sunny san diego. makes sense to me. much less maintenance, brighter, clearer, etc. the only problem is that i wear red sunglasses and they block all green LED light as if there were none at all. so a lot of lights look burnt out to me! :D

    --

    R.I.P.
  58. Re:LINUX LEDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You make the world a whiter, brighter place.

  59. How about this? by wizarddc · · Score: 2

    Found this on google, of course

    http://www.ccrane.com/120_volt_white_led_bulb.asp

    An led array that screws into regular fixtures. A little pricey at US$59.95, but it it never burns out, the your total cost would be 59.95/infinity, or is my math wrong? ;)

    --
    Th
  60. Dimmers? by 3ryon · · Score: 2

    My question about LED's is this: Can I use a dimmer? It seems like an LED would have to be either On or Off. Is that the case?

    If so, perhaps someone will invent a lightbulb where when only a small amount of current is applied that one or two LEDs come on. As more current is supplied more come on. Possible?

    1. Re:Dimmers? by guiding_knight · · Score: 1

      Current LED's will glow dimmer if less voltage is applied. A 5V LED will glow dimly when 2V is applied, etc. A variable resistor is all you'd need to make a dimmer switch.

      As for your multiple LED's idea, you'd need a voltage trigger in addition to a variable resistor so that when the voltage reaches a certain level, it turns on another LED.

      --
      LOTR: Elijah Wood is a munchkin asshat. Yes, asshat. LOL.
    2. Re:Dimmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever hooked an LED up to a couple AA batteries and a potentiometer in series? Turn the knob on the pot up and down... Observe the brightness.

      The brightness of an LED can be varied by changing the voltage or the current applied to it.

    3. Re:Dimmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My question about LED's is this: Can I use a dimmer?

      Of course they dim. Less current ==> less light. To see this, take an led flashlight, put in exhausted batteries, see a very dim light ... put in fresh batteries, see a brighter light.

    4. Re:Dimmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any time you use a resistor as a dimmer, the resistor consumes some power. The best options in a multiple LED cluster would be to independantly switch some of the LEDs. The other option would be turning the LEDs on and off rapidly with a monostable vibrator, like the Cheep CMOS version of the old 555 oscilator chip which can run on 3-15V and source or sink 200mA.

      Mike

    5. Re:Dimmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I meant to say an astable vibraor, not monostable. Whoops!

      Mike

    6. Re:Dimmers? by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      You need to control the current into the LED. This can be accomplished with a trimmer POT but that again wastes power. An adjustable switching power supply (in miniture of course) will efficiently control the current into the LED minimizing the power wasted while providing very good control over the dim function.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    7. Re:Dimmers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LED's (and incandescent lamps) respond very well to pulse width modulation (PWM) PWM is a very efficient method of controlling resistive loads by switching the full voltage with transistors instead resistors. It works on the principle of average power - the light is turned on for a percentage of a period, and turned off for the remainder. With intelligent PWM controllers, you can go all the way from off to full on without sensing the "blinking" that is actually ocurring.

  61. Toxics by MountainLogic · · Score: 1

    Great, we're shipping lead/acid batteries to countries that have no infrastructure to handle the cells when they die. Time to rethink the lifecycle impact of the product.

  62. MY home use! by Jonny+Balls · · Score: 1

    I would use these for my room, does anybody know where we can get them, hook it up!

    --
    --JonnyBlog
  63. On the other hand... by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 2

    It occurs to me that this extreme level of efficiency just begs to be hooked up to an array of solar cells, not an exercise cycle.

    Solar cells have been underutilised as a source of energy due to the low yield.

    This seems like a nice and symbiotic combination of different technologies... "Hey, the solar cells don't give me much electricity, but the white LEDs illuminating the office building don't need all that much anyhow. W00t!"

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    1. Re:On the other hand... by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who lives away from the power grid in Kenya. He uses a solar panel on the roof and lights the house with LEDs. He says it works good, but it definately does not light up the entire house.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
  64. Liights & Geeks by JohnHegarty · · Score: 2

    And for all the geeks who like lights.. or something : http://www.thinkgeek.com/stuff/gadgets/lights.shtm l

  65. Go buy some now. by km790816 · · Score: 2

    Go buy some now: theLEDLight.com

    My biggest problem with these bulbs is finding ones that have a nice, soft light. I don't want my bed room looking like an office. I spend enough time there as it is. Does anyone have experience with how 'pretty' the light from these is?

    1. Re:Go buy some now. by dolanh · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh well, no modding power for me this time :)

      I partially solve this issue with the compact flourescents in my house by choosing lampshades with a warm characteristic like Japanese paper lanterns.

      As most photographers follow, the "temperature" of the light is really what determines how "pretty" you consider it. Incandescent is way down the spectrum from flourescent. I don't really know where LED is, but I imagine it's closer to the latter than the former.

  66. Nothing innovative about this by mrroot · · Score: 3, Funny

    using a combination of white LEDs, pedal generators and rechargable batteries.

    Nothing innovative about this, the Professor was using pedal generators to power ALL KINDS OF THINGS while shipwrecked on Gilligan's Island back in the late 60s / early 70s.

    --
    I Heart Sorting Networks
  67. I saw the presentation a few months ago.. by reverse+flow+reactor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw this guy present this project a few months ago (as a presentation for Engineers Without Borders) and it is really important work.

    One of the biggest problems in third world countries is that taking care of food and water is an all day task. There is no time for learning to read and write during the daylight hours. These lights allow people the opportunity to learn to read and write after the sun has set.

    This is a very important task if we hope to help the people in remote areas. The target areas tend to be areas with no electricity, no running water, and very few fascilities at all.

    And I have seen the LEDs that he uses light light up a mid-to-large size lecture theatre to the point that I could read a paper in fornt of me, 5 rows away from the source!

    -----

    --

    The significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them. -Einstein

  68. Re:Oh! And encourage exercise! by MSBob · · Score: 2

    ...And would keep many Americans in (better) shape, which means fewer pounds commuting daily, which means less gas burned by American SUVs, which means less pollution! You're right, the benefits just keep on piling up.

    --
    Your pizza just the way you ought to have it.
  69. Buy them here, Re:Why only the developing world? by bourne · · Score: 3, Informative

    Frankly, I suspect we'd do more for the developing world by adopting this sort of thing for ourselves

    A quick Google search turns up The LED Light, and they have a collection of "bulbs" that fit into 120 Volt AC sockets (That would be them things in yer house, at least in the US)

    Very expensive though - "36 LED bulb...comparable to a 30 watt incandescent bulb" costs $190.

    Another site I've run into in the past is LEDTronics which looks more in line with the geek need for way too much information, and component-level purchasing. I can just see the mod case now...

  70. Currency conversion fees US-Canada? by Fencepost · · Score: 2
    If folks in the US want to send them a donation, what's the minimum practical amount given conversion fees?

    I know that for many European countries check cashing/currency conversion fees can easily be more than the actual value of a check, and while I'm sure it's much simpler (and cheaper) between the US and Canada I'm also sure that there will be some charges.

    So, what's a practical level?

    --
    fencepost
    just a little off
  71. Benchmark needed by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 2

    I for one would be interested in seeing a benchmark between this and the white LED's we're talking about here.

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  72. I want screw in replacements for std blubs in hard by ScrewTivo · · Score: 1

    to reach places like high up in my vaulted ceilings. Also one in my shower since I always cut my fingers on the inside mount. $20 ea would be fine with me for not having to change these bulbs ever again.

  73. Re:Great. Let's Really Annoy The Third World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yes, let's be carefull of their culture. Lets see, living in shit, starving, dieing young.

    I'm sure they will be oh so happy to learn math and science in the dark instead of having light to read by.

    Remember, it was the German culture to kill all the Jews ... (Of course, that seems to be European culture today) ... can't change that.

    I have to assume development is a good thing. Starving is the alternative.

    Ever notice the people ranting about how the simple (read imporvished) life is so wonderfull never seem to live it?

  74. Galena radio as power source by maitas · · Score: 1

    About 14 years ago I used a galena radio (diode, capacitor and inductance, no batteries) to light up a standar red LED... and it worked!! Although the ligth was very dimm it worked. I added a second galena radio in parallel (as a current source) and it improved the hole result.
    I haven't tried it on white LED, which requires more energy, but it might work... and this guy could get rid of the generator and the lead battery, and have free light without any human power source, as long as there are radio stations (or even pulsars! although you need to tune for high frequency) you can get it working!!!

    Free enery for all, Thanks TESLA!!!

    1. Re:Galena radio as power source by ScrewTivo · · Score: 1


      That's about as geek as you get. 14 yrs ago.....Kewl

    2. Re:Galena radio as power source by bryguy5 · · Score: 1

      Now that's an idea, the problem with solutions around lead batteries in the developing world is that they are heavy hard to transport and wear-out.

  75. Like LEDs? Go here . . . by slurry47 · · Score: 2

    http://ledmuseum.home.att.net/ledleft.htm Seriously cool site.

    --


    Dirt doesn't need luck.
  76. Another example of education overkill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A professor, 'Dr' no less, is required to hook up the world's oldest idea (crank powered radios, magnetos, etc..) to a LED????

    This is why Universities are so overrated. I really don't see what a professor at University is doing wasting his time with this penny ante nonsense. Where're the room temperature superconductors? Fusion? Will it take 25 years 'education' before you are qualified to work on something a bit more complex than a LED and a capacitor?

    Besides, like so many people point out, white LEDs are far from ideal, this just looks like a publicity stunt.

    You want light? Try a portable PC's backlight. Very efficient, bright white light from a thin panel.

  77. Re:Great. Let's Really Annoy The Third World by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1
    Simply giving them things is not going to encourage development (assuming that you think development is a good thing).
    There's no reason why we would have to give them away for free. You are right in that they should be encouraged to learn "to fish for themselves". They have to buy light sources anyways, so they may as well buy these at a cheaper price. Hopefully these LEDs can be sold at a cheaper price.

    A perfect example is Afganistan. As much as some people may not like them, they need the help of the west. Right now, many of them are growing marijuana. If they could get jobs in manufactoring and selling white LEDs, then maybe they would stop growing marijuana.

    Okay, I'm being a bit hopeful, but still you can see where I going with the idea.
  78. Interesting technology by j_kenpo · · Score: 1

    Im glad to see that the LED market is growing more and more out of the "blinking light on the front panel" industry. With brighter and brighter LEDs being developed, the use for them is growing. I was working with an associate of mine on some industrial lighting application using ultrabright white LED's configured in an array which were going to be used as a walkway light. These things were pretty bright an had pretty low power consumption, at least compared to other lights. The heating issue came up on the power supply designed for them, but off hand I dont remember how high we were running them. There was another projects were still working on using LED arrays that are pretty cool, but I wont get into those. Youd actually be suprised how bright these things can get, we had a LED array based flashlight we made for grins that blinded us, and it was about 3 times as bright as a Mag-Light. I think its fascinating where this stuff is going...

  79. LED light previously featured by Sarin · · Score: 2

    on slashdot a year ago orso,
    I remember there was a big light, that consisted of multiple leds (thought about 100-300) that you could program with your pc. It could change color to all the colors you wanted. I believe the casing was black and it costed about $600.
    I was searching for this item last week, because I wanted it for my new house, but I couldn't really find it, perhaps someone bookmarked it, or knows a simular light?

    Thanks in advance.

    1. Re:LED light previously featured by ArcticChicken · · Score: 1

      I know which lights you're talking about. I believe the Slashdot article actually included two relevant links.

      One of them was to the LED Museum. Follow that link, and on the left hand side under the "Other LEDs" category, click on "RGB LEDs".

      The variable-color spotlights you're thinking of are made out of those LEDs. But I don't recall the name of the company that creates the spotlights from those raw LEDs.

      Anyone?

  80. Re:Great. Let's Really Annoy The Third World by Jumperalex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    White LED's have come a LONG way. They now actually sell several different WLED's that have varying tempreture ratings to them. From soft white to the very blueish light you mention.

    As for the WLED's not being produced in that country ... so what. Eventually someone WILL build a plant there when they realize the tremendous demand that has been created. Then as people aren't running around collecting fire wood, or sitting around in the dark they can actually then BE educated by reading etc.

    "Kids won't be encourged to learn under those annoying white light" Um how do you know. Maybe it is only annoying to "us" because we are used to using innefficient incandescent bulbs. And you would rather us give them those rather than LED's? So instead of giving them one of our imperialist invenetions that is usable with their meager power production capacity you would rather us give them one that sucks every available bit of juice they have. Riiiiight that is good thinking.

    --
    If you can't be good, be good at it!
  81. Lite Brite? by psycht · · Score: 1

    This was tried back in the 70's. Didn't work too well, but it made a great Christmas gift!

  82. Bingo by SeanAhern · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You're right on.

    With as long as we've had "100 watt" and "60 watt" lightbulbs, people have gotten it into their heads that the wattage rating is a measure of the light output.

    I would have to work out the physics to see if it's possible, but I don't immediately see any barrier to a .1 watt bulb of some new technology giving the same light output as a 100 watt incandescent tungsten filament bulb.

    1. Re:Bingo by |<amikaze · · Score: 1

      Just like MHz. MHz doesn't necessarily say how fast your computer is, but people have it ingrained in their heads...

      WE SHOULD ELIMINATE NUMBERS!

    2. Re:Bingo by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      walmart now sells some brand of flourecent light bulbs. in little letters, it reads:

      "this flourecent lightbulb is as a standard incadecent lightbulb of equal or greater wattage of"

      (big letters) "200W"

      (little letters) "actual wattage - 35W. lower your cooling/electrical bills while producing more light!"

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    3. Re:Bingo by SurrealKnife · · Score: 1

      It's impossible for a .1W bulb to give out that much light, however, a 1-3W bulb could (different estimates put the actual visible light output at different levels).

      Assuming a 100W filament bulb gives off 2W of useful light, you'd need 20LED's to directly replace it. However: if you used a reading light (one hung over your head, about 50cm from the page, with a reflector to focus the light) then you would only want a fifth to a tenth of the power - so 2 or 4 LEDS would be fine.

      The final thing to consider is that and LED will last a lot longer than a filament bulb, so although it may cost $4 or so to build a 'bulb' for your reading lamp, you will probably replace it after *years* of continuous use - or decades of use only in the evenings, as opposed to a year or so of use for a filament bulb.

  83. Re:Great. Let's Really Annoy The Third World by Old+Wolf · · Score: 2

    If you had read the article, you would know that the main thrust of this initiative is to allow people in developing to study for more hours in the day -- precisely what is needed for the education you suggest.

    For spot lighting, a white LED is 100 times as efficient as an incandescent light. Have you ever used a mechanically-powered torch? Quite a bit of effort is required to produce a useful beam (which is even then hard to keep constant).

    I would suggest that LEDs are not "annoying" to children who may never have seen a lightbulb in their life, or not spent significant time under one.

    Children in developing countries are quite enthusiastic about the learning thing, unlike many Western societies where school is something dreaded, and they wouldn't dare touch an encyclopaedia (or even a book!) at home.

  84. Re:Great. Let's Really Annoy The Third World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup the 1000 watt grow leds are coming soon. A factory in Afghanistan make a lot of sense. Then the Afghanis's can produce even more of the finest hash in the world ... YAY !!!

    Smoke

  85. 2001 by pmz · · Score: 2

    Wouldn't it be really neat to have computer room floor tiles each with a tight grid of white LEDs under a clear plastic covering? Imagine a computer room with these floor tiles and a single IBM server standing in the middle...

  86. Blue High-Intensity LEDs Outperform White by SystemFork · · Score: 1

    I'm not knocking the benefits to humanity from an invention like this, but the inventor of High-Intensity LEDs said back in December that the Blue LED with an inexpensive phosphorent coating (thereby changing the blue light to white in the naked eye) is vastly superior to the White LEDs in efficiency and cost.

    Inventor of the high-intensity white, blue and green LEDs, Shuji Nakamura of UC Santa Barbara, in a keynote address last Dec 11th at the International Electron Devices Meeting, put forth the idea that blue LEDs are vastly superior in efficiency and cost to the common white LED. Blue and green high-intensity LEDs are based on indium gallium nitride, [providing] a higher output per watt than the common high-intensity white LED. Nakamura claims that it is a industry wide freeze on high-intensity blue LEDs that prevents the world from realizing their inherit benefits to mankind. Blue LEDs, he claims, are more efficient than incandescent lights by a factor of ten, and last more than a hundred times longer. Compare that to the white LEDs which in addition to costing more to produce, are less efficient than the blue lights by 20%, and last a mere 86% as long.

    Anyone owning a modded Nokia cellphone could have told you that white high-intensity LEDs are old news. They should have used the blue LEDs with the white phosphor coating. There's really no difference.

    - SystemFork

    --
    Slogan-free since April! We pass the savings on to you!
  87. Light Pollution is Ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever taken a look up at the stars on a night with no clouds and just wondered? Odds are no if you live in any major city. Street lamps and house lights are scattered back and only a few stars are visible. If you want confirmation that there are actually more stars, take a trip to Yosemite or some other less-lit area and hike about 25 miles into it.

    It is really nice.

    I know this is a smiggin of topic but I propose a national lights out day (now if only we wern't all greedy thieves ;>)

    1. Re:Light Pollution is Ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you're right about one thing, we all are greedy thieves, I know I'd have a new PS2+51 in TV on lights out night.

    2. Re:Light Pollution is Ugly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean lights out night? Lights out day would be kind of pointless!

  88. Light Pollution Map by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think there's satelight photos ( here's a small one) somewhere on nasa of light visible from space, there's a lot of it, especially on the coast cities.

    Oh yeah, and Yosemite is nice, but LOT of airplanes fly right over it, kind of annoying/distracting.

  89. You need more ultraviolet light by DogLover911 · · Score: 1
    For plants, don't you also need some ultraviolet light? The white flourescent lights filter out all the UV.

    There are such things as near-UV LEDs though! A recent Scientific American article wrote about how white LEDs are really near-UV LEDs with a phosphorous coating that flouresces white, so a UV LED should actually be cheaper...

  90. Generators at 1000 RPM? by gricholson75 · · Score: 1

    25 Small Permanent Magnet DC motors to be used as generators - at around 1000 rpm the generator should be capable of supplying 7.5 Volts and 1Amp to at least two batteries being charged in parallel: $50 each - total $1250
    Who can pedal at 1000 RPM?

    1. Re:Generators at 1000 RPM? by ColaMan · · Score: 2


      Ever heard of pulleys or gears?

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
  91. Thanks for the Credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Submitted a story with links etc a couple weeks ago about the Kinetic flashlight that you shake back and forth for thirty seconds and it gives you 1/2 hour of bright white LED light....

    But NOOOOOO, it didn't benifit humanity, Put pedals on it and it becomes the saviour of the night impaired masses....

    NO LINK FOR YOU!

    RB

    1. Re:Thanks for the Credit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Put pedals on it and it becomes the saviour of the night impaired masses...."

      Throw in a professor and a University, that's the difference. The cult of education has its tentacles everywhere, if it wasn't thought up by a Dr. Professor, PhD BS, it isn't good.

      Books only work inside the walls of a University.

  92. karma whore? by philovivero · · Score: 1

    If you want to read up on the LEDs, good tech specs can be found on Nichia Corporation's English homepage. They have a lot of good tech specs on their LEDs and flourescent paints and objects.

    It's a very good site.

    They have at least a couple of offices in the United States.

  93. Yet another slashdot topic ruined by lsd4all · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't post often but when I read the headline of this topic, I wanted to add my two cents. After reading the article and everyone's posts (most posts being irreverent or poop-joke related) I have finished another chapter on my book of human ignorance.

    As U.S. citizens, we live in a wasteful society of throw-away everything and unlimited (we think) natural resources. When you go home tonight, make a note of how many lights you have on in your house. If you live alone, this will be a good test to see how much energy you use, if you have family members, roommates, etc you can also monitor the total energy consumption in your house. OK, so you got five lights on and you are the only one home. Now add the energy used to power your fridge, microwave, water heater, stereo, dishwasher, TV, computer(s), aquarium, Nintendo, space heater, furnace, the list goes on. Are all these items 100% necessary? of course, this America and we demand convenience 24/7.

    I am no better than you, I waste energy and it bugs me to go outside and watch the power meter spinning like a twirling dervish when I got the guys over for band practice. But I am aware of what I use and I do my best to conserve energy. I live in the NW US and we have lots of hydro-electric power plants on the Columbia, I am not a save-the-salmon radical but I don't want to see all the changes we make on the environment in the name of power generation to go waste on every single light in my house. If there is a new technology to limit energy use, I am all for it. In fact I have a few solar panels and few devices (lights & a TV) that I can use with my "free" power. In our lifetime, home-based power plants (natural gas-hydrogen based fuel cells, PV, wind power, etc) will become popular and necessary in many highly populated areas. Third world countries need this technology now since its price is low and their living conditions are so medieval compared to ours that any change for them is better than nothing. Our turn is coming soon.

    My fifteen minutes are up. Here are some other links on energy-related websites/products.

    Home Power Magazine

    Jade Mountain Alternative Energy Devices

  94. White LED made from Blue? why not just add R+G ? by Ark42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My PC has plenty of red and green LEDs, so why both with this phosphorus addition to try to make it white? Doesn't blue+red+green = white?
    Just stick 50 of each together in interleaved and let them blend to white..
    What I dont really get either is why these lights for sale at theledlight.com cost so much? Is the cost for brightness or what? It seems that standard LEDs used in PC cases and other blinky status lights on almost anything electronical cost a lot less.

  95. The biggest problem? by DrCode · · Score: 2

    Seems like the biggest problem is that a bulb that provides light equivalent to a 30 watt incandescent is $190!! Thats a little steep when you can get compact flourescents for around $8.

  96. $173 per household by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After reading the information at the groups website, they state that it costs about $173 per household to have one of these damn LED lights. What kind of idiot came up with this? Isn't $173 like 3 years salary for a family in Nepal? My god! Don't they have candles over there? Much cheaper and they work just as well or better. And why just Nepal? For the $17000 they are raising, they should buy candles and ship them all over the world.

    1. Re:$173 per household by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What kind of idiot came up with this?"

      Hey hey, that's Dr. Idiot to you, that's like 10-15 years of 'education' at work, he has to repay those student loans somehow.

  97. Thinkgeek, feh! Buy direct from the company... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

    Thinkgeek is great, but why not buy directly from the family that makes these things: http://www.photonlight.com

    I've owned two Photon Lights for 2 years now... carry it with me every day. Probably use it once evevery two weeks, and man does it come in handy. Nice small profile, about as bulky as a typical housekey.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    1. Re:Thinkgeek, feh! Buy direct from the company... by joekool · · Score: 1

      I've got three, now--I had to replace two when I lost them, so I have red white and blue(just an odd coincidence, not patriotic-red is best for night vision, white is best for human eyes, and blue is brightest) Anyway, I have had the red one almost 4 years now, and have never replaced the battery. It has gotten a little dimmer, but is still very usable. Their site says that they can be left on for weeks at a time, on one battery, and be fine. replace the battery, and they are back to being fine again.
      These things are great.

      --

      Slackware: old school feel, new school gear.
    2. Re:Thinkgeek, feh! Buy direct from the company... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thinkgeek sells at $24.99
      Photonlight.com sells at $25.95
      (not including shipping though)

  98. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad Redmond, Washington has village elders. Perhaps a ritual sacrifice may drive away the Sherman Act demons: start with Gates and Ballmer!

  99. Already used widely by hikers by guanxi · · Score: 2

    I can't be the only one who has one, since everybody else I meet on the trail raves about them:

    The Petzl Tikka -- $40 'white' LED headlamp; the best innovation in outdoors equipment in decades:
    http://www.petzl.com/petzl/publicFamille ?id=LAMP&r ub=sport

  100. Using WLEDs for auto reading lamp - excellent! by Goldenhawk · · Score: 5, Informative

    After hunting around for a reasonably-priced reading spotlight to mount in the minivan for my kids to read after dark, I couldn't find anything that was (1) bright and clear at low wattage (2) priced under $100US (3) small enough to hide in the trimwork. Then putzing around Radio Shack one day, I saw the rack of white LEDs, and decided to give them a whirl.

    I bought 6 WLEDs for about $30, a couple 100-ohm resistors and 1K trimmer pots for current limiting and dimming, and went home. Half an hour and a few solder joints later, I had mounted the 6 LEDs shining thru holes in my overhead panel, pointed at my steering wheel area (hey, first I helped MYSELF, not the kids). I found that I could run three LEDs, with a voltage drop of about 3.5V each, in series with the fixed 100 ohm resistor and a trimmer pot. So two sets in parallel worked well. I couldn't wait until nighttime.

    After dark, out to the van I went. Switch on - WOW.

    First impression - the color was all wrong. Until I realized that I'm so used to yellow light that pure white was almost distracting. But the light was BRIGHT and very crisp. From about 18 inches from LEDs to reading material, with only 6 LEDs, I had more light than with the original dome light 20 inches away, and the color was perfect - I could enjoy reading material with photos, without straining to see the colors. The pool of light was about 15 inches across. The LEDs I used are rated at 30deg beam spread (to the point of half brightness) so that seemed about right for six lights pointed a bit apart from each other. Best of all, unlike a dome lamp, there was NO spillover light to the rest of the interior - with the light on I could still easily see out the front to drive. Don't try that for long with a glaring dome lamp.

    One other thing was worth noting - there were faint yellow/blue bands in the pool of light, noticable only when looking at a large mostly blank page. This is probably due to the blue LED/yellow phosphor combination used to make white light.

    The biggest problem was cost. At Radio Shack prices of $4.99 each, I couldn't affort enough LEDs to do the other five seating locations. But it was still far cheaper than a quality aircraft-style reading lamp, and just as bright. If I wanted more brightness, I can easily add more LEDs.

    Check out this link - http://www.theledlight.com - for some really cool ideas, parts, kits, assembled lamps, all based on LED technology. Really cool, and a LOT cheaper for the bare LEDs than Radio Shack. About $2.50 or less each.

    Soon I'm going to order some bulk WLEDs from them - and light up the rest of the vehicle interior.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

    1. Re:Using WLEDs for auto reading lamp - excellent! by nadaou · · Score: 1

      Try Digi-Key for better prices and a better selection.
      www.digikey.com

      [No, I don't even live in the same country as the company]

      --
      ~.~
      I'm a peripheral visionary.
    2. Re:Using WLEDs for auto reading lamp - excellent! by smyle · · Score: 1
      I had mounted the 6 LEDs shining thru holes in my overhead panel, pointed at my steering wheel area

      So do you usually read while you drive?

      --

      Sleep is just a poor substitute for caffeine, anyway. -Bob Lehmann

  101. Re:White LED made from Blue? why not just add R+G by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You can do that, but:
    1. Somebody's already done that before. R+G+B LEDs are an older technology. They are more complicated to produce than the traditional blue+phosphorous white LEDs and thus cost more.
    2. White LEDs produce a nice wide spectrum. R+G+B LEDs produce narrow peaks of output. This makes them inferior for illuminating objects and having said objects look right. If the object reflects a narrow band of bluish green light, a light source containing blue and green will result in a dark-looking object. Also, if you've ever worn glasses the prism effect of R+G+B is noticeable (and annoying).

  102. NO!!!!!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

    A variable resistor is all you'd need to make a dimmer switch.

    When a resistor drops the voltage, it does so by using turning current into heat. The entire purpose of using LEDs in this project is to make high-efficiency lighting to run off of batteries charged by people-powered generators. Using series resistance to reduce brightness is no better than putting a smoked lens in front of the LED array.

    1. Re:NO!!!!!!! by BlaisePascal · · Score: 2

      A resistor converts a voltage drop into current, and in a very prescribed, predictable amount.

      LED's work longest when the current through them is low, and they have a constant voltage drop across them. To change the brightness of an LED, you change the current going through it, but the voltage drop remains the same. So to get a dimmer, you need a constant voltage, variable current power supply. A battery and a resistor does that.

      Some math: Let's say you have an LED rated at 3.5V drop, 20mA max current, and a wattage of 0.07W (by my calculation. You have 3 Alkaline cells in series (1.5V/cell, 4.5V total) powering it. You must drop the voltage by 1V, and limit the current to 20mA total. That calls for a 50Ohm resistor, and a total power usage by the resistor of 20mW. Add a potentiometer in series (0-200Ohm), and you have a dimmer that takes your LED from using 90mw to using 18mW. Not exactly a power-hog.

    2. Re:NO!!!!!!! by fmaxwell · · Score: 2

      I'm assuming that your math is correct as you clearly know what you're talking about and I'll agree that the voltage drop and current limiting is necessary when your battery voltage does not match your LED's rated drop.

      But the more efficient approach is to choose your voltage carefully and to string LEDs in series to get the desired voltage. If you are going to convert the energy into something, light is a far better choice than heat.

      Alternatively, one could use 555 timer chips to create pulse-width-modulation to control the brightness. Also much more efficient than resistors.

  103. Pico Power? by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

    Pika power. Sounds like something out of Pokemon...

  104. Junis in Afghanistan by jokercito · · Score: 1

    Hello my name is Junis and I am posting this on my Commodore 64 powered by a little bicyle outside. My father is pedalling so I can post to slashdot... He says I will have to pedal when he gets on to search for por... hmmm... world news.

  105. It ins't LEDs that they need... by ManDude · · Score: 1

    deepfry, the "developing world" doesn't need LEDs; they need food, a place to live without a war every ten minutes, and to have the West stop robbing them whenever they get a chance. Shit if it was LEDs they needed... we could have stopped all of the poverty, hunger and premature death ages ago.

  106. Use as PDA backlight? by SparkGapTransmitter · · Score: 1

    It seems like a low energy light like this would be a natural for use as a PDA backlight (Anyone know if they are doing this already?)

    1. Re:Use as PDA backlight? by ScottBob · · Score: 3, Informative

      They're used quite extensively as backlights for industrial equipment, I know some of the newer Fluke multimeters use white LEDs to backlight the display for nighttime use. Also, Gameboy Advance has outboard white LEDs that you can plug in the link cable slot, and I'm pretty sure some geek case modder types have installed white LEDs in their GBA's.

  107. Woohoo! Found them! by ArcticChicken · · Score: 2

    This proved to be one of the more painful web searches I've done in a while!

    Here they are:
    Color Kinetics

    It looks like they've further developed their spotlight products since that original Slashdot article.

  108. High-Intensity LED by rapidweather · · Score: 1

    In Tuesday's (May 7, 2002) Wall Street Journal, page B1 there is a photograph of GE Global Research Senior VP Scott Donnelly holding a prototype for the high-intensity LED being developed at GE's research labs. It appears to be fairly bright, and about an inch square. He's also holding a replica of the original Edison light bulb, for comparison. neither one appears to be plugged into any sort of power, and naturally, the edison bulb is not lit. Not so for the LED, which appears in the photograph to be white hot. IMHO a bunch of these would provide a decent light. This is the first time I have seen a LED compared to the light bulb as a light source. No technical details, yet.

  109. Where do you get your numbers? by OhYeah! · · Score: 1

    And it would only cost $4200 to buy those 100 LED bulbs - meaning that it would take over 5 years to pay for them, going by your numbers. And who the hell uses 25w bulbs anyways, never mind 100 of them?

  110. For a really good quality LED keychain light.. by Belly · · Score: 2, Informative


    Check out http://www.arcflashlight.com

    The Arc AAA is a great little light that is very rugged, waterproof, runs off a single AAA battery with good longevity (using a step-up voltage regulator) and *very* bright. I have a couple of these - been carrying one on my keyring for about 6 months and its never failed me. White LEDs are great..

  111. we'll never see the stars now... by acomj · · Score: 2
    Great. More light polution. The developing world will get lights and the developed world will get brighter..

    What stars???

    usa at night

    There are already groups for keeping the night dark.

  112. Pico-Power! by sharkey · · Score: 2

    Ha!! Up yours, vi! Eat me, emacs! I've got PICO-POWER!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  113. Re:Oh! And encourage exercise! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
    ...And would keep many Americans in (better) shape, which means fewer pounds commuting daily, which means less gas burned by American SUVs, which means less pollution!

    The energy saved moving around fewer actual fat pounds is only a secondary effect. The main effect is this: If you don't have an enormous fat ass, you're less likely to feel that you need a 5774 pound vehicle to accomodate your girth.

  114. Sun and Wind by dissonant7 · · Score: 1

    Granted, I don't know a whole lot about the amount of electricity generated by the average consumer-grade solar panel, but it would seem that if our energy requirements were significantly lowered by using WLEDs for lighting, alternative energy sources like solar and wind would be far more practical.

  115. Re:FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I do not work in either field:

    "The most important thing to realize is that the light being produced is not a pure "white" light"

    While very true of all but the most expensive of the first and in some cases second generation LEDs. You can now buy white LEDs of varing degrees of whiteness (temperature). Ranging from yellowish (similiar to incandescent) to the traditional blueish. With the colder (blue) colours tending to be brighter.

    "As far as efficiency, yes, LEDs are quite effecient at producing light at a given (low) wattage but they are still not as bright as conventional light sources. The rating of an LEDs efficiency is measured in lumens per watt; a bulb with a higher lumen per watt rating is more efficient than that of a lower one. At this point, red LEDs are the most efficient, which is why many applications that use LEDs (exit signs, car turn signals, etc) are red."

    lumens always favours non-directional light sources. Strangely I have never seen a LED measured in lumens per watt. Rather they use candelas (spelling?), which is typically the measurement used to compare dissimiliar lighting methods. I have no data to suggest that one is better then the other so I will not comment. I was under the impression the lumens also counted more infra-red then candelas, but I don't remember.

    While it is true the red LEDs tend to be rated at higher candelas then say blue LEDs but the human eye is not very sensitive to red light, it is however more sensitive to green light. This is why a green LED will appear brighter then higher rated red LED. It is also why blueish white appears brighter the yellowish white. While we are on this point, the uses of the red LEDs that you mentioned all use red LEDs because they want a red colour not because they are the brightest. I've never seen red car turn indicators, unless you mean the dashboard lights, in which case all the ones that I've seen are green, red indicators danger, not the best thing for notification lights)

    "Manufacurers claim a 100,000 hour life span of LEDs. What most of them fail to mention is that to acheive this, the power supply that the LEDs are attached to has to be set at a low current. Low current means decreased brightness. If the current is increased past the manufacurers recommended setting, you will get higher brightess but the lifespan will be cut short severely. Not to mention the fact that many LED applications where companies are touting 100,000 hour lifetimes (approximately 10 years) haven't been around that long to confirm or deny it."

    Where do you start with this, um , how about, I bet none of your companies products have tested their BTBF rates this way either. I'll just point out that companies do not test products at normal conditions over the quoted MTBF rates. Rather the test the products above capacity or using accelerated ageing technics then calculate the estimated life time. And don't try and use the "but light bulbs have been around for years, but LEDs haven't" excuse. This is crap, each light bulb design is different, they have to test the MTBF for each new design. They use accelerated testing procedures and previous design knowledge to estimate the MTBF. Same with LEDs except they use experience with similiar semiconductor substances, that have certainly been around for 10+ years. You should be glad that they don't claim greater, as the lifetime of LEDs tend to be more dependant on the rate of the clear plastic decaying.

    "LEDs are not going away, however. It's not a question of if they go mainstream, it's when. And I have no problem with that, it's just that from what I have observed, the manufacurers are dispensing half-truths and outright lies about this stuff"

    At worst I would say they were exaggerating current products, and even then slightly. And possibly even talking about future uses or possibilities. Pretty much every company does that.

    "People take it for gospel because big companies are developing the technology (GE and HP-funded Agilent come to mind) so they figure it must be true."

    I thought most people shrugged off the claims of big companies. They get excited when they buy a LED based flashlight, etc then discover that it looks really bright for its size, it lasts longer on the same batteries. Takes more punishment, and doesn't get progressively dimmer as the batteries run down to the same extent as incandescents. Then they realise the possibilities, _then_ they get excited.

    Whatever. Just wanted people to know about misinformation spread by companies trying to protect their bottom line, rather then adapt.

  116. why batteries and not flywheels? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't a LED/Flywheel combo work better? That combo would seem to be longer lasting and better for the environment. It might cost more up front, but it would seem to allow this org. to not have re-supply burnt out rechargeable batteries to these homes in a few years...

    Of course, I'm not sure if they even have small, portable, semi-low cost flywheel devices available yet...but other than that, it's a good idea! :)

  117. brighest LED on earth by io333 · · Score: 1

    Here's a link to a review of "the brighest LED on earth." http://www.bit-tech.net/review/82/ I built a flashlight with a red/orange model, a 1 watt resistor, and 4 D-Cells. It is extremely painful to look at directly. (If you decide do something with one of these and don't have an EE, note: you need a resistor in line with it or you will fry the $15 LED. If you can't figure out a correct resistor value, find someone who knows how to do it.)

  118. Why are white LEDs so &^%$ expensive?? by cheros · · Score: 1

    I've built many lights with white LEDs (lots of light for a small form factor) but the thing that bugs me is that they cost an absolute fortune in comparison with red/green/yellow lights. Anyone any idea why?

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
  119. price is not law, esp. on newly developed tech. by nadaou · · Score: 1
    the average 20 mA white LED looks brighter than the average 40W 120V bulb.


    For those of you keeping score of the apples and the oranges at home:

    Power = Voltage * Current

    40W at 120v = 333mA.

    So if a 40W bulb puts roughly the same light as a 20mA LED (at 120v-AC - ddzzzzt! power limiting resistors are for wimps!), the LED is 16.6 times more efficent, or put another way, 40W worth of LEDs gives you the equivalent of a 666W bulb. Light up your friggin neighborhood, and still be able to touch the bulb for a few seconds without a bad burn!

    Unfortunately, the LED array would be evil and revert back to a red hue.

    Personally, I doubt a single LED puts out the same /total/ luminosity as a 40W bulb. Maybe over its small area of focus, but not over the whole room.

    [neglecting root mean squares and other stuff, but it's pretty good!]
    --
    ~.~
    I'm a peripheral visionary.
  120. Re:Buy them here, Re:Why only the developing world by geoswan · · Score: 2
    Very expensive though - "36 LED bulb...comparable to a 30 watt incandescent bulb" costs $190.

    They claim the light lasts for 100,000 hours. And an ordinary bulb lasts, what, 600 hours? Do you think the price is so high because they are supposed to be comparable in price to a regular bulb?

  121. Bicycle Charger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you put an alternator on a normal bicycle (I don't know too much about generators, but this should work the same on anything that rotates) You could charge a portable battery that could power your lights, or anything else. Transportation plus (almost) free power. I don't believe the extra effort to move the magnets would be significant. If it is, anyone know how much?

  122. I like the first picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The look on the kids' faces as they're being told that they can now look forward to working the swing shift every other week, now that there is enough light for 24x7 operations.

  123. experience as hiking/caving flashlight substitute by peter303 · · Score: 2

    On the positive side these lights burn 5-10 times longer on the same amount of batteries and the bulbs last forever. On the negative side, these systems are three times more expensive than their incandescent batteries, but pay for themselves in battery savings in couple weeks of constant use. Also in the minus column is the beam quality of the light- not as focused as incandescent. I'd be hesitant to use it as a night bike light source or in a snowstorm for that reason.
    Conclusion: an execellent backup source (you should have three light systems for climbing), but not quite ready to replace incandescent fully.

  124. Ugh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The light pollution in the US is horrid. Why would we want to ship that plague elsewhere?

    1. Re:Ugh by bhima · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between a 1000 watt street lamp and a 4 watt LED array.

      Read the article, you dolt!

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  125. light is important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    light means that people can do things when it's dark out. Light makes simple tasks possible which might not be in the dark. Light makes reading possible -- an LED lamp won't teach people to read, but without light to read by, literacy doesn't mean as much.

    But you're a troll anyhow, so eh, why go on? :)

  126. high end Nikon digicams, too. by timothy · · Score: 1

    The D1 series (at least the latest ones) have white LED backlights. I wish the CP990s did too, because I can sure tell the difference in battery life with monitor on vs. off ;)

    I figure in 3 years, it will be the industry norm, which is great. (Especially since then 18MP or more could be the norm, too! ;))

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  127. Decent overview of 2001-2002 LED technology by jolshefsky · · Score: 1

    I did a little digging triggered by a reply about the efficiency of various lights in lumens-per-watt. Not believing what I read, I dug a little on the web and found a decent exploration of the problem at Don Klipstein's website titled Why LEDs can be 10 times as efficient as incandescents in some applications but not in general home lighting! I got there after reading an article on custom boat cabin lighting with LEDs at Noemi Ybarra's site which includes an outline of the physics behind the units (i.e. 1 lumen is (4pi steradiansx1candella) only if the light source is uniformly spherical, which LED's are not, so the big "mcd" ratings don't correlate well to really big "lumen" ratings.)

    --
    --- Jason Olshefsky

    Karma: Poser (mostly affected by adding this line long after everyone else did)

  128. Re:FUD by stripes · · Score: 1
    I've never seen red car turn indicators

    In the USA red and amber are acceptable colors for turn signals. Red is the more popular color (even though I think amber is better suited since red is used for the break lights).

  129. Biological solution by kcelery · · Score: 1
    Photos show the houses were illuminated by 6 to 7 WLEDs. That is not much light. For the same effect, May be fire-fly will do the job.

    The link here says single firefly is 1/40 of a candle. A few hundred of these could help you for the evening.

    http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/insect s/ beetles/Fireflyprintout.shtml

  130. Is it sustenance? by ManDude · · Score: 1

    Coward, I'm not trolling. I just don't like the fact that people pan-off all of these ideas for helping the "developing world" with what amounts to trinkets. Sure a windup radio would help people listen to the radio where there is no access to electricity. Sure, fine, it works. LEDs, great. But this isn't going to solve the problems that not only have put these people into this situations but also keeps them there, like war, like poverty, like the West sucking them dry.

    Who the hell cares about LEDs when you don't know where your next meal is going to come from or in constant fear that the local warlord, backed by covertly funded arms, is going to drag your husband out and kill him for standing up to an oil company.

    It is too easy to say, "oh ya LEDs are great and are going to help these poor souls". What will help these poor souls is much harder and more involved. If you think otherwise I will have to resign you to being perverted. You could then troll the "Poor people with trinket" sites.