Slashdot Mirror
Inspiring Adventures in SF Wireless Networking
JimDog writes "Here's a description I wrote of how I set up a
point-to-point 802.11b link over 3.5 miles for
Internet access at my house. The link runs at 3.5 Mbps, which I barely make a dent in, and I'd like to offer the rest of the bandwidth to anyone who's got line-of-sight to my location in San Francisco." The great thing about this story is both his terrific exposure to different parts of city and his willingness to share. It also makes it clear just how easy it is to set up a long distance link.
Just post your address. No Spam, I swear!
Free bandwidth just might save my company! Most interested indeed!
- Walt Walterson
Next time in town, I won't have to use a dialup!
I have been pwned because my
Is it just me or have we been getting a lot of 802.11b stories lately? Maybe it's just to replace the lack of MS stories today:)
I stole this Sig
The link runs at 3.5 Mbps, which I barely make a dent in
Now the whole of SF can experience the Slashdot effect, as 100,000 geeks point their 2.4Ghz transmitters at your aerial, creating enough radioactivity and EMG to render most of the male popular impotent.
mogorific carpentry experiments
I really wish someone would make a definitive database for WiFi locations based on either postings by users or the WiFi equipment owners themselves. I know that there are a few sites, but they, well suck. There needs to be a consentrated effort to do this. I'll gladly share my bandwidth if i know I can borrow someone elses later.
--sig fault--
thanks lmi.net, and sbcglobal.net; you know who you are.
With that kinda line of sight over San Fran and the entire population of Slashdot reading this... There will be a big dent soon
Hope your connection is firewalled from your home PC('s) or there will be a dent in those soon too
http://www.wifinder.com/ and this http://www.80211hotspots.com/
>> i think this type of sharing should be illegal cause terrorists can use this as a way to communicate without being sufficiently tracable --
>> only the doer of the "good deed" gets hanged.
But if we keep using 56k modems, the terrorists win!
Damn...Bin Laden's got us either way.
I mod down anyone who uses M$ in their posts. I like to live on the edge.
I'm waiting for high speed 802.11b access to be everywhere. We should blanket the country with 802.11b, and just provide internet connectivity similar to cell phones. In your "area" you get internet connectivity for $x, if you leave your area it costs some $y. It would kill DSL and Cable, but it would be great for travelers, people too far from CO, etc
is good for community group sites if you want to get more local than the global/national databases.
if you'd have read the article, you'd see they have security using ipsec thru routers on each end.
I really wish people wouldn't use generic acronyms in story titles. Especially when they use them for their less common meanings. "SF" on the internet generally means Science-Fiction, not San Francisco.
/. lately.
I've noticed a rash of these in article titles on
I'd imagine that the Howard area has something similar to this considering the kind of government grants they get to promote the Computer Science department at the historically black university.
Frankly, Howard's got the best CS program in the DC area.
The funding's a good idea, that's for sure. Minorities are severely under-represented in the programming field.
I have been pwned because my
Bruce Maggs did that way back in '94 or '95.
Maybe it's just me, but this employer seems to be extremely cooperative. I wonder how much convincing he had to do in order to get this project off the ground.
That is a seriously nice view. Any house with a view like that near downtown SF must cost some serious bank, even when splitting the cost with roomates. Doesn't it?
Don't moderate flamebait as Troll. Know the difference or you will be Meta-moderated.
I think this is great... out here in 'outback' Australia we're still trying to convince the budgies to comply with the Avarian packet methods.
I live on Potrero Hill, and can probably do line of sight to your house. I look at Twin Peaks out my living room window. Wanna try a linkup?
"You done taken a wrong turn."
-Bill McKinney, in Deliverance
I will be living in Boston next year, probably in Alston or thereabouts. Anyone interested in getting Boston 'unwired' with me? Set up a few points throughout the city? I think it would be a great project to get most of the area for 4 miles south of the Charles to be wirelessly accessable to some of us!
Tibbon
tibbon.com
Besides, I've seen XP run slower than other MS operating systems. IMHO, Win2K is the best of MS's offerings so far.
In reality, I use Linux and Mac OS X, both of which run much more stable, secure, and efficient than anything Microsoft has come out with.
Getting back on topic, I have an 802.11b card for my PowerBook. It's not an AirPort card, it's one of those Orinoco cards. Nobody makes OS X drivers for any of their cards except Apple. In order to get this card to work, I had to get open source drivers from http://wirelessdriver.sourceforge.net/ and it works quite well. Compared to the Orinoco drivers under OS 9.2.2, I don't see a difference. So, perhaps before your switch to WinXP there was something misconfigured, or perhaps bloatware or spyware or a virus taking up bandwidth and whatever it was got wiped out during the upgrade. Just a theory.
Hmmm, still not on topic. OK lets try this... This guy in SF is crazy, but in the good way. Maybe someday I'll set up a rediculously-long-distance WAN just for kicks. Hmmm I'm supposed to move within a few months, maybe then ;-}
how many ways was this post simply moronic?
shall we count the ways?
San Francisco Wireless Broadband
Or, how I came to have a 3.5 Mbps wireless link to my house
Firstly, appologies for the stark nature of this web site. I'm a network guy and HTML has never been my strong point. This whole page was written in vi.
I would consider myself a fairly early adopter of 802.11b. When my roommates and I moved up to San Francisco in March 2000, we bought an Apple Airport for $299, which was really the only affordable 802.11b access point at the time. We also got three 3Com AirConnect PCMCIA cards for our laptops and happily shared our PacBell DSL line wirelessly.
I was aware that 802.11b was useful for more than just wireless LAN access. I knew that people were constructing antennas out of Pringles cans and setting up point-to-point wireless links. I was interested in the idea of setting up some kind of distribution network for broadband Internet access, but I was skeptical that 802.11b would be reliable enough for semi-long-distance broadband links. After all, my idea of wireless Internet access was influenced by my first experience with the Internet, which was over 2 meter amateur packet radio at 1200 baud half duplex. I went to a BAWUG meeting to toss around the idea of getting together a group of people to start some kind of self-supporting wireless broadband Internet access in San Francisco. The idea was also discussed several times on the BAWUG mailing list, but always seemed to peter out.
There were several problems at the heart of the issue. San Franciso's topography makes it difficult to reach all of the interested parties from one location. The notable exception is Sutro Tower in the center of the city, but the price to locate equipment on the tower at a height high enough to reach everyone is probably cost-prohibitive. Additionally, the bandwidth for the project would have to be somehow transported to the tower, probably via T1 or multiple T1's -- also cost-prohibitive for a community-based effort. It occurred to me that transport costs could be greatly reduced or eliminated by placing the wireless site at a location where good bandwidth was already available, but no one was forthcoming with information about such a location, especially one with line-of-sight to much of anything. I gave up on the idea for the time being and decided to be content with my DSL.
In early 2002, both of my roommates lost their jobs. One decided to embark on an extended road trip around the country, and the other decided to lay low for a while and greatly reduce his living expenses. It became clear to me that my housing situation was going to be changing. I got together with some potential new roommates and we decided to take advantage of the depressed rental market and look at some places a little closer to the happening parts of town.
I work for a metropolitan area network provider whose primary business is building point-to-point Ethernet and SONET networks for enterprise customers. While I was looking for a new place to live, two things happened. First of all, my company established a Gigabit Ethernet link with a Tier 1 ISP so we could offer Internet access as a value-added service. Secondly, I realized that some of the houses we were looking at renting in Diamond Heights and Twin Peaks had line-of-sight to one of my company's points of presence (POP) near the intersection of 2nd St. and Bryant St. in downtown SF. Suddenly, having line-of-sight to that location became a requirement for any of the places we were looking at!
I was still skeptical that cheap, off-the-shelf 802.11b gear could provide a reliable link over the distance in question -- between 3 and 4 miles for most of the places we were looking at. As a test, I bought two Linksys WAP11's and built two antennas out of Safeway brand beef ravioli cans, which have the same dimensions as the Nalley's Beef Stew cans used in the tin can waveguide antenna. I placed one of the WAP11's on the roof of my place near 26th Ave. and Quintara St. in the Sunset District and aimed the ravioli can antenna down at Ocean Beach, about 1.2 miles away. I connected the other antenna to the Lucent PCMCIA card in my laptop and took it down to the beach. I had little confidence that this setup was going to work, but amazingly, as soon as I aimed the antenna back up at my house from the beach, I got a signal almost instantly and was chatting and surfing from the beach! It was surprisingly easy to keep the link up -- it seemed that the antenna aim didn't even need to be all that precise.
Encouraged by that success, I re-aimed the antenna on my roof to point at the top of San Bruno Mountain. For those familiar with the SF bay area, San Bruno Mountain is just north of SFO. It has a large antenna farm on top that looks kind of like the spaceship from "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" if you're headed north on 101 past the airport on a clear night. It's also a state park and is a great hike if you've never been. Microsoft MapPoint said the top of the mountain was about 4.7 miles from my house. My girlfriend and I embarked on a hike up the mountain with my laptop and antenna in hand. When we reached the top, my girlfriend aimed the antenna back at the house and I fired up the laptop. Sure enough, the link came right up and I fired off a few excited e-mails to friends letting them know of my success. It was a little more difficult to keep the link stable at this distance just by holding the antenna in your hand, but I was confident that I could get a reliable link working at 3-4 miles between the POP and one of the houses we were considering once the antennas were properly mounted and the aiming fine-tuned.
In March 2002, we signed a lease on a house on Twin Peaks above Market St. with a spectacular view of downtown SF, including line-of-sight to 2nd and Bryant where the POP is located. I got permission from my employer and the building owner to mount a small antenna mast on the roof of the POP. I used a length 1" electrical conduit as the mast and secured it to an existing pipe on the roof. To make the installation weather-proof, I removed the guts of the WAP11 from its case and placed them inside a waterproof enclosure from Home Depot which I mounted to the mast. To keep the ravioli can antennas from rusting, I spray-painted them with some white Rustoleum. This made them look not unlike the Winstar microwave antennas already mounted elsewhere on the roof. I constucted a homebrew power-over-Ethernet cable and ran this from the antenna mounting location, down the side of the building and into the window of our POP room. At my new place, I made a similar installation and mounted the mast to the railing of our deck.
I had some initial difficulties with the power-over-Ethernet setup for the access point at the POP side. The cable run was rather long, and the voltage drop over that length of cable was too much to allow the access point to operate. I ended up purchasing a 2 amp variable-voltage DC power supply at Fry's with a little dial allowing voltage increments of 1.5V. The power supply that comes with the WAP11 is rated for 5V, and after turning the new power supply up to 7.5V the access point powered up. After a bit of configuration and antenna aiming, I had myself a 3.5 mile wireless link! Some pictures of the set-up are here.
Once I'd done some initial usability tests for general Internet access at the house, I set up a ping monitor to test packet loss across the link. Amazingly, in the two weeks that had the monitor running, not a single packet was lost. I also used several of the publicly available "bandwidth meter" sites to test the link speed. All of the sites reported about 1 Mbps downstream and 300-400 Kbps upstream. The downstream was at least as good as DSL at my old house, and the upstream was quite a bit better. I was confused about the assymetrical speed of the link. The only explanation I could come up with was that there was more interference receiving packets at the POP side due to a higher density of 2.4 GHz devices.
After a couple of weeks, I decided I would get some commercially made 2.4 GHz antennas to see if I could improve the speed of the link. I decided on two 24 dBi parabolic grid antennas made by Pacific Wireless. These are quite a bit larger than the ravioli can antennas, but surprisingly lightweight and very reasonably priced at $75 each. Once these were installed and aimed, the link speed was significantly better -- about 3.5 Mbps each way. It's been running at this speed without downtime for nearly three months now. Security is handled via IPSec running between two routers -- one at each end of the link.
While having a 3.5 Mbps link at your house is pretty cool, it soon became apparent that we would never come close to utilizing it to its fullest. None of us are big into downloading music, movies, porn, etc. I began to think again about the possibility of a community-based group of people getting together to provide wireless broadband Internet access in San Francisco, and realized that I was now in a position to offer my resources to get that effort off the ground. My employer is receptive to the idea, as long as the additional bandwidth consumed does not expose the company to additional charges from our ISP. At current levels of utilization, I'm in the clear even if my wireless link runs at full 3.5 Mbps capacity 24/7. Additionally, even if the project does eventually consume more bandwidth, I am fully confident that the participating members will be able to support the cost since there are no transport costs involved.
At this point, there is no facility for public access to the network at my house -- only the point-to-point link. It would be wonderful for someone to donate or loan an additional access point, pigtail and omni or sector patch antenna so that we could get the first public access point off the ground. If you are in a position to provide said items, please contact me. I'd also like to hear from people who have similar good locations for wireless access sites. If you have line-of-sight to my house, it would be easy to get bandwidth from my house to your location for distribution to local users. Finally, I'd like to hear from end users who are interested in participating who might have line-of-sight to my house. Some pictures of my view are here so that you might be able to determine if you are a good candidate for line-of-sight.
Jim Meehan
jmeehan@vpizza.org
isnt that mod points are for in this negative modding day and age?
...to the beautiful lands down under? We'll be very happy to see you here!
sharing your inet connection is great right now, but what happens when cable companies start charging for bandwidth? will there be a loss of city or town-wide wireless networks?
Would anyone be interested in setting up a free wireless network in the North Side of Pittsburgh? I know that there is some wireless zone somewhere in downtown pittsburgh, but that's out of reach from where I am.
:-)
Let me know if anyone is in the area, maybe we could get something going.
You can message me here or email me at the above domain. Use my slashdot username @ domain.
The early days of radio sound pretty cool... imagine hearing about your neighbor "pulling music out of the air"! Or how about the first radio singers that "were paid to sing into a can [microphone]"?
I grew up with radio and television... but my friends and I would still string up tincan-and-string communication systems and eventually started moding walkietalkies.
These days the current generation of youngsters can transmit data at nearly half a megabyte per second with inexpensive electronics, a bit of coax, and a modified pringles can!
Kinda funny how it all goes back to a can...
802.11a is priced agressively and much faster.
For your own safety, and your employer's, you really need to install proper lightning arrestors on your outdoor antennas, or you could be in a world of hurt (and liability) if a fire starts in your house or your employer's building as a result of a strike.
(I also question the wisdom of allowing outsiders on your employer's network, since you never know what kind of illegal activities the random users might be up to. Your employer says everything's cool, though so he's probably assumed this risk.)
Just be careful.
-Isaac
I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
Where I live (West Texas) the town is flat. I live 3.3 miles from my office, but there are quite a few building between here and there. How line of sight is WiFi line of sight? Would I need to be able to see the building at the other end of the link?
Pair up in threes. - Yogi Berra
I know 802.11 was designed as a wireless drop in replacement /supplimant for traditional ethernet lan's. My question is, what happens if every house and business in America(world) throws up a WAP and a big dish on their roof forming one huge wan across the country. Can 802.11b scale this far (or big enough to handle a good size man - thats metropolitan area network for you non networking types) ? Is there enough bandwidth / frequency allocation in the 802.11 specs? What about packet collisions? Does the spread spectrum nature of 802.11 take care of this if the network was really huge?
Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
Could this be a good way to avoid a slashdotting? Straight text and it seems to have no problem serving it. Might be an idea for the future if you've no need for images and your posting a story.
Ham Operators can run big power in this band (hundreds of watts)..and the license is code free.
The waveguide is horizontally polarized, his grid antenna is vertically polarized. He should turn his grid 90 degrees, and reaim... Prolly start seeing a full 6mb (the real-world thoughput of wifi) over that link.
>It's not an AirPort card, it's one of those Orinoco cards.
Open the cards up. You would find that the Airport card is an Orinoco. Just as Airport is an Orinoco RG-1000.
I'm a high school student pocketing my money to set up a WiLAN this summer. My question is will a directional antenna similiar to the one used in this article (I was actually looking at the same model) penetrate a residential area. We have a fair amount trees, would this render the signal unusable? The first link would only be about 4 blocks away. Antennas 20-30ft up.
If your employer decides for whatever reason to discontinue the free connection, would it be possible to reconfigure it as an isolated LAN for the purposes of Q3A et al? I reckon that depends on latency and all that, and I haven't the inclination to look it up since I don't live in SF. (Though Wellington is in some respects similar...)
Anyone already knowledgeable care to comment?
and ever time there is an earthquake (every 10 min it seems) hes gonna have to reposition his janx. :)
adventure-today.com
By Tim Pozar - pozar@lns.com
for the Bay Area Wireless User Group
With the unlicensed use of 802.11b radio Ethernet devices in the Industrial, Scientific and Medical band that has been set aside for such use, there is confusion of what is allowed or limited by the Federal Communication Commissions Rules and Regulations. This paper is meant to help guide folks through the cryptic nature of these rules.
This paper does not cover other legal issues of using these devices such as FCC type-acceptance, Radio Frequency Radiation issues (ie. ANSI RFR levels) or Appropiate Use Policies (AUPs) of ISPs you may connect to.
The FCC is a regulation body whose purpose was defined in the Communications Act of 1934 as:
"For the purpose of regulating interstate and foreign commerce in communication by wire and radio so as to make available, so far as possible, to all the people of the United States a rapid, efficient, Nation-wide, and world-wide wire and radio communication service with adequate facilities at reasonable charges, for the purpose of the national defense, for the purpose of promoting safety of life and property through the use of wire and radio communications, and for the purpose of securing a more effective execution of this policy by centralizing authority heretofore granted by law to several agencies and by granting additional authority with respect to interstate and foreign commerce in wire and radio communication, there is created a commission to be known as the "Federal Communications Commission", which shall be constituted as hereinafter provided, and which shall execute and enforce the provisions of this chapter."
The FCC, with the Act of 1934, was empowered to regulate wire and wireless communications. Wired communications regulation was needed to monitor and regulate monopolies. Wireless regulation is needed as the spectrum is finite. The FCC is the "traffic cop" to ensure that communications is not interfered with.
Almost every bit of spectrum is regulated by the FCC with the exception of extreamly high or low frequency spectrum and bands managed by the Intergovernmental Radio Advisory Committee (IRAC) for the military and other goverment orginizations, by licensing operators of radio equipment. The part of the FCC's rules that cover the operation of equipment that does not need a license is (3) Except as shown in paragraphs (b)(3) (i), (ii) and (iii) of this section, if transmitting antennas of directional gain greater than 6 dBi are used the peak output power from the intentional radiator shall be reduced below the stated values in paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(2) of this section, as appropriate, by the amount in dB that the directional gain of the antenna exceeds 6 dBi.
Do we need to turn down the transmitter?
15.247(b)(3) makes the assumption that you are running a point to multi-point network much like an Apple Airport or Cisco/Aironet AP box with a number of computers connecting to the network. They may be randomly surrounding the access point so you are not using a directional antenna.
But what does the FCC mean when they limit the "intentional radiator" to one watt?
This is a critical sticking point in understanding what the FCC is talking about. There is some question of what an "intentional radiator" consists of and what and where exactly is 1 watt measured. Unfortunatly if you just look at these poorly written rules you will not understand what the FCC means here. One has to look a bit deeper to the "Report and Order" and Notice of Proposed Rulemaking" that generated this section of the rules.
Things get a little clearer when we read this sentence in paragraph 4 of the Report and Order...
-
"The current regulations limit spread spectrum systems to a maximum peak transmitter output power of one watt. When operating at that power level, the maximum directional gain of the associated antenna may not exceed 6 dBi, resulting in a maximum equivalent isotropically radiated power (EIRP) of four watts, i.e., 6 dBW."
With the old rules they are refering to the "intentional radiator" as a whole with a directional antenna can't exceed 6 dBw or 36 dBm and the antenna gain can't be more than 6 dBI. The transmitter can be up to one watt.In order to know if we are legal or if we need to turn down the transmitter we need to know the gain of your "intentional radiator". Let's say your access point actually puts out 1 watt of power and you want to put an omni-directiona antenna on it that has a gain of 5 dBi such as the ORiNOCO Range Extender Antenna".
We know the gain of the antenna, the transmitter but we also need to know the loss of the transmission line going to the antenna as this attenuats the transmitter output power going into the antenna. Looking up the attenuation of a common coax cable such as RG-8 on an coax attenuation table we find that at 2.4 GHz we have 16 dB of loss with 100 feet of cable. With a 10 foot cable your loss is about 1.6 dB. So your new "intentional radiator" will be radiating transmitter power output plus antenna gain minus coax loss or (30dBm + 5 dBi - 1.6 db) or 33.4 dBm or 2.2 watts EIRP.
Since this is a non-directional antenna you are limited to 1 watt EIRP or 30 dBm. The transmitter will need to be turned down 3.4 dB to 26.6 dBm or about 0.45 watts (450 mW) to get you back to 30 dBm or 1 watt EIRP.
If you think about this you may ask, "why add an omni-directional gain antenna it if I already was at 30 dBm?" You would be correct that it would be a waste of time. But if you had something like an Apple Airport that will only put out 15 dBm or 30 mW then you can add an omni-directional gain antenna and it will extend your "roaming" area. In fact you can add up to 15 dB of gain with an omni-directional antenna before you need to attenuate the output of the Wavelan card in the Airport.
Part 15.247(b)(3) actually gives you a free 6 dBi if you use a directional antenna your "intentional radiator". How do the do this? Only if the gain of the antenna is over 6 dBi will the Feds want you to roll back the EIRP of your "intentional radiator". You don't have to do it right at 1 watt EIRP. When would you do this? Say if you have an access point in the corner of a building and it needs to aim back into the work area. You don't want an omni-directional antenna as about 75% of the power would be going out the windows. Why not use a directional to keep the signal in the building and penetrate through the walls better? If we have antenna gain of about 12 dBi and in this case the antenna is a directional antenna. With the transmitter putting out 30 dBm and the coax has 1.6 dB of loss we have an "intentional radiator" that is putting out (30 dBm + 12 dBi - 1.6 dB) or 40.4 dBm or just over 10 watts EIRP. Since the antenna gain is 12 dBi and we have to reduce the power of this "intentional radiator" 1 db for every db we go over 6 dBi of the antenna we would have to roll the power back to 34.4 dBm or 2.2 watts EIRP (40.4 dBm - (12 dBi - 6 dBi)). Well, it is slightly better than 30 dBm or 1 watt EIRP.
There is another exception to this section of the FCC rules. Part 15.247(b)(3)(i) covers systems that are "fixed, point-to-point". That means this path only has two transmitters involved and they are bolted down by never moving their locations. Automobiles may not apply. An example would be if you have an access point and a user that is a couple blocks or even tens of miles away that you want to connect to.
This exception is more lenient as you only need to turn down the "intentional radiator" 1 dB for every 3 dB of signal over the 6 dBi of the antenna system. The FCC does this as it knows that these paths will not likely not be omni directional on each end and will have less of a chance to interfere with others as well as the need to span some long distances.
Lets look at an example using the same antenna, transmission line and transmitter as above. Without turning anything down we had an "intentional radiator" that was producing 40 dBm or 10 watts EIRP. Since the antenna gain is 12 dBi and we have to reduce the power of this "intentional radiator" 1 db for every 3 db we go over 6 dBi of antenna gain we would have to roll the power back to 38.4 dBm or 7 watts EIRP (40.4 - (12 dBi - 6 dBi) / 3).
Real world examples...
Recently I put up a short path between myself and a neighbor about 2 blocks away (.2 miles). I have an Apple Airport that uses the Lucent Wavelan Silver card that puts out 30 mW or about 15 dBm. The antennas have a gain of 24 dBi with a transmission line loss of about 6 db. This gives me an "intentional radiator" power of 48 dBi. Since the antenna gain is 18 dBi over the 6 dBi that the FCC gives you and since it is a fixed, point-to-point link I would have to limit my
[...]
Since the little Wavelan card only puts out 15 dBm, I am legal as far as part 15.247 goes.
Quicky Definitions...
dB, or one tenth of a Bel, is a unit of mesurment that looks at the ratio of one value to another. Gain or loss can be measured in dB. The dB scale is an exponential scale using the formula log(ratio)*10. This means that 3 dB is about twice the power, 10 dB is 10 times the power, 13 dB is about 20 times the power and 20 dB is 100 times the power.
dBm is deciBels referenced to a value of 1 miliWatt of power. Power over or under 1mW would be plus or minus dBm respectively.
If you have a transmitter that produces 1 watt of power that would be 1000 times more than 1 mW so that converts to 30 dBm.
dBW is deciBels referenced to a value of 1 Watt of power. Power over or under 1 Watt would be plus or minus dBW respectively.
Effective Isotropic Radiated Power defines the gain of an antenna over an "isotropic antenna" that would radiate equally in all directions.
An example would be a light bulb. A lightbulb is designed to radiate light equally well in all directions, except the direction that the base is in.
If you have an antenna that radiates better in one direction than another, it would likely have gain in this direction. The amount of gain would be shown as "dBi" or dB gain (or loss) over an "isotropic antenna".
To further our example above, if we have a light bulb and put it in front of a mirror, we would be taking the light radiation that would be heading in the direction of the mirror and reflecting it back in the same direction of the light not directed towards the mirror. Hence you would have twice the amount of light going in the direction of the refelction. As we are doubling the amount of light, we have a "gain" of 3dB or 3dBi.
I've been thinking about doing this with my neighbors house, which is only a few hundred yards away. I understand how to set up the sending side (the one with the WAP) but I'm not so sure how to recieve the signal on the recieving end. How do I hook up the recieving antenna to a wireless PCI card? As far as I can tell, there is no 'external antenna in' connector on these cards.
Any help would be appreciated.
Nanite
God is real unless declared integer.
[Dewayne] Hendricks [of the FCC] pointed out a simple case in which hams could shut down an extensive area. "Ham television is becoming more and more popular, the equipment's becoming cheaper; lots of hams like to broadcast," Hendricks said. "It's a pretty sexy application."
Hendricks said that the San Francisco Bay Area already has a number of ham TV repeaters. "A bunch of hams could deploy TV broadcasts" up to 1.5 kilowatts (kW). "We could effectively shut down 802.11 in the entire Bay Area, and it would be perfectly legal and there wouldn't be anything you could do about it." Part 15 devices like Wi-Fi radios are limited to less than 1 watt (W), and many devices use 30 to 100 milliwatts (mW). (When you start talking about radiated power output, these numbers are only starting points for calculations.)
Please keep in mind that the poster is an Amateur Radio Operator and is not restricted by the regulations you posted. I don't mean to imply that hams are not bound by FCC regulation, just that it so happens that Amateur Radio is the Primary Service in the frequency allocation you refer to. The regulations you post apply to the Secondary Service in this frequency range.
Would you get better speeds over the same distance using 802.11a? (and different antennas, of course)
Who makes 5GHz high gain antennas like the pacific wireless 24dBi parabolics?
I was going to ask the boss for a cable connection for our SF 'office' (really a Tenderloin apartment...) :)
now i've got a(nother) decent option! I love it!
Good luck doing it in Boston--the necessary line of sight conditions aren't good enough, especially in Alston. The only place it would work well would be near the Charles river, where there are a few hi-rise dorms (MIT's Teng Hall on the Cambridge side, or any of BU's big dorms on the Boston side). If you set something up in one of these dorms you would be able to serve a pretty wide area on the opposite side of the river.
Seeing as how the 2.4 Ghz range is very effectively blocked by things with a high concentration of water (2.4 Ghz is the resonance frequency of water, that's why your microwave uses it), and seeing as how most outdoor obstacles are going to be of the organic persuasion (trees, bushes, office buildings full of decorative plants), line of sight is actually a near-requirement for any long-distance 802.11b application.
San Francisco's population is roughly 800,000 if I remember correctly.
Oakland, San Jose, and other surrounding areas would be spared.
Wherever there's a will, there's a motorway.
With the priciness of getting space on a tower I started thinking about how practical it would be to use helium ballons as repeater antenas. Has anyone else looked into this? I know weather stations send up ballons twice a day but I wonder what kind of FAA regulations you would have to wory about to get something like this going.
For non-commercial use, your assertion would be correct, but isn't the poster connecting to his employer? Isn't he using the amateur airwaves for... oh what's the term... pecuniary interest?
Expect a response soon from the big ISPs. Wireless is currently in the phase that MP3 sharing was in its infancy, too small a blip to register much. But it will attract attention as more people do this. I wouldn't be surprised to see them even getting laws or FCC regulations that prevent wireless sharing.
Under part 15 you're only allowed 6db of gain - this guy is running two 24db grid style parabolic dishes.
So, he'll wind up nuking any birds that fly through that beam, then?
*zzzzt*
It looks like the placement of your antenna is perfectly in the way of several pipes. And those pipes I'd hazard to guess are Fire Department lines for emergency. If that's true, you've got a beautiful lawsuit just waiting to happen. And thousands of witnesses to say "yeah, they had wires and pipes and stuff cluttering up the roof there" from Slashdot.
:)
If they ARE NOT fire pipes, then you'll just tick off the building management (And I'm an alarmist). If they are, I'd have to think you're being irresponsible in your placement (and I'm not an alarmist).
I can appreciate the wireless link you did, it's cool. Good luck and hopefully nobody will blast on your channel nearby.
-- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
Legal? Not sure - depends on other factors as well which aren't necessarily in the article. Chances are, he's ok, but he's never made indication of what his calculations are. Also, the FCC has been beating on people (WISPs) more for using untested (uncertified by FCC) combinations of equipment - which is easier to prove in court than overradiated power.
f r15_98.html and try reading the regulations.
A skedQuestions#line83 for some more info on this, including a link to the above gpo site.
6dB? Where does it say that? And where relating to a point-to-point link? The ratings are ERP (effective Radiated Power) in which the dB rating of the antenna is a single factor.
Other things include the loss of the cable, the connectors, the power output by the device itself, etc. I suggest you get your butt over to http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_98/47c
Check http://www.austinwireless.net/index.cgi/Freqently
And I think the above pertains to point to multipoint links, which have different regulations than point-to-point links on wireless.
-- There is no sig line, only Zuul.
There is this company called Biongo brought to by the proud of owners of Earthlink formly known as Mindspring. Biongo has 3hotspots in the seattle area which is all located by the sea-tac airport. PRICKS.
*huh* Sig? WTF?
I saw this stuff at the NAB convention. Looked really good and not that expensive.. Here is the literature and prices you requested for the Trango Microwave Systems. www.trangosys.com Falcon Plus 5.8 Ghz - 1 mile system - $ 2250.00 Falcon Plus 5.8 Ghz - 4 mile system - $ 2749.00 Falcon Plus 5.8 Ghz - 7 mile system - $ 2849.00 Eagle Plus 2.4 Ghz - 1 mile system - $ 1168.00 Eagle Plus 2.4 Ghz - 4 mile system - $ 1408.00 Complete systems include: transmitter and receiver, transmit and receive antenna suitable for distance, all weather nema enclosures, hardware, antenna to radio cable, power supplies, manual. Resellar pricing is also available. Thanks Aaron Davis Diversified Marketing 509-585-9377 Phone 509-585-9455 FAX
I've heard of a five mile Non-Line-Of-Sight Network between a rich kid and all his friends. Has anyone heard of a cheap version of this?
5i9|\|3d, 5|\|ip3ri|\|di59ui53
Would it be possible to use a Laser based connection travelling at high speed across something line of sight like the Charles to connect 2 places that are more than 3 miles from each other, or just in case you wanted a higher speed connection? Use redundant (2 or 3) lasers aimed to get a constant connection?
Tibbon
tibbon.com
Your allowed more for bridging. Including power output, can output up to 2 watts for a bridge, but only 100 mw for AP units.
6dB? Where does it say that?
Right here
Keeping in mind that there's no real actual clear definition in the spread spectrum rules in Part 15. It does give a statement that monitor input may not exceed 6db.
I do have an amateur radio license so I'm not an RF idiot - and they do require you to calculate erp in the extra class exam (which I passed). Your right - feedline loss, antenna db, and transmitter power make a big difference in erp - especially feedline. For 2.4 ghz I'd never use anything less then something with an aluminum jacket.
Part 15 devices are not even on a secondary service level. They are on a non-level. They have no peering or priority over any other user.
Tim Pozar
This is a myth. The reason microwave ovens are on this frequency is it is the band that the FCC had for "junk" devices. In fact, the original "radar ranges" that operated on train actually operated at lower frequencies.
I believe that the stage wireless ethernet is in could be considered experimental, meaning the FCC allows a lot of leeway on use.