Slashdot Mirror


No-Cost StarOffice Licensing for Institutions

eugene ts wong writes: "A while ago Sun announced that it was giving unlimited donation of StarOffice to China's Ministry of Education. Well, it turns out that they announced that they are giving unlimited no-cost licenses for all education and research institutions." Many college students now get drastic discounts on Microsoft Office - but this covers a much broader range, from kindergarten up.

201 comments

  1. Why? by fogof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would anyone use StarOffice, M$Office? When openOffice is there?

    --
    --=.=-- www.cyber2000.qc.ca
    1. Re:Why? by topher1kenobe · · Score: 2, Informative

      StarOffice is OpenOffice with a bunch of added loot. Not everyone needs it, but hey, if it's free, why not get the fonts and clipart etc.?

      --

      yadda

    2. Re:Why? by garett_spencley · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot of people won't touch software that's "free" (as in no commercial backing).

      Mainly execs and people who are not technically "inclined". They think that if it doesn't have a company backing it it's not worth anything.

      People like this wouldn't dream of touching open office (let alone know that it exists) but knowing that Star Office costs money means it must be worth something.

      --
      Garett

    3. Re:Why? by Misch · · Score: 2

      Because:
      "In addition, Sun is also providing academic institutions with specially-priced support options."

      Well, that would explain why Sun is doing it at the least.

      I don't know... I don't have a great answer. I guess they're going to have to compare the apple and the orange and pick the taster fruit.

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    4. Re:Why? by moonbender · · Score: 5, Informative
      StarOffice has some features that were left out of OpenOffice because they rely on proprietary code.
      This is the part of the official FAQ pertaining to this:
      Q. What are the differences between StarOffice 6.0 software and the OpenOffice.org 1.0?

      A. StarOffice 6.0 softwre is a commercial product aimed at organizations and consumers while OpenOffice.org 1.0 is aimed at users of free software, independent developers and the open source community. StarOffice includes licensed-in, third-party technology such as:

      Spellchecker and thesaurus
      Database component (Software AG Adabas D).
      Select fonts including Windows metrically equivalent fonts and Asian language fonts
      Select filters, including WordPerfect filters and Asian word processor filters
      Integration of additional templates and extensive clipart gallery

      In addition to product differences, StarOffice offers:

      Updates/upgrades on CD
      Sun installation and user documentation
      24x7 Web based support for enterprises and consumers
      Help desk support
      Warranties and indemnification guarantee Training
      Professional services for migration and deployment

      For more information on components and services available for the OpenOffice.org product, visit http://www.openoffice.org site.
      The main difference is probably the thesaurus and the database. OpenOffice has its own free spellchecker, don't know if it's as good or better than the proprietary one.
      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    5. Re:Why? by killmenow · · Score: 1

      Because many people believe the adage: "You get what you pay for.."

      Which unfortunately means a lot of people believe that if something is free, it must be worthless.

    6. Re:Why? by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      I've been using OpenOffice exclusively at home for about 4 months, and I'd be using it at work if I weren't stuck with this damned 2GB HDD and an Admin who's a VB programmer. OpenOffices spell checker has been great so far. In fact, I consider it to be much better, and more complete, than MS Office 2000's spell checker.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    7. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are insane. the OO spellchecker is the biggest pile of dogshit in the world. about every other time I open it in 1.0 the whole application implodes. I have learned to have to save before ever running the checker. it also misses obvious misspellings sometimes, as I have found on a few papers turned in using it. its total crap as far as I am concerned

    8. Re:Why? by zangdesign · · Score: 2

      Is this the same that people bitch about Microsoft doing with Explorer? This is a much more substantial product than Explorer.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    9. Re:Why? by dhogaza · · Score: 2

      No, it's not. If you don't understand why after a lengthy process including an appeal to a conservative US Circuit Court of Appeals, nothing I can say here will help you.

    10. Re:Why? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      "you get what you pay for..."

      this is most certainly true. you're not going to find many books/courses on the free office packages. they're also not going to quite integrate in with the OS as well as one that's produced by the os vendor ;).

      same goes for your free OS. sure, there's lots of books on them, but the reading and comprehension level required is a little more than for an OS (M$) you pay for. also, a lot of people purchase a pc package, and it makes a LOT of sense to have the OS pre-installed. nobody likes to fumble with driver hell that can occur even in the fully polished M$ suite of OS's.

      there's always hidden costs associated with the luxary of going the easy way out as well. you get an office suite that you're now fairly locked into if you go the M$ route because the file formats are not open. you also get a package that is not certain to even be fixable. it's possible, though not probable, that M$ goes belly up and there isn't an OfficeXP+1 released. for years WP was THE word processing package and where is it now on the required skills list?

    11. Re:Why? by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      Were these "obvious misspellings" on the order of their/there/they're? In that case it would fall under grammar, not spelling. You can hardly blame a spell checker for not catching a mistake like that. Or, perhaps you have accidentaly added these misspellings to the dictionary, or have dictionaries for other languages installed also? Spell checkers work by comparing every word against their internal dictionary, so if the misspellings weren't caught, then it means those misspellings are in your dictionary as real words for some reason. Perhaps a friend decided to help you out by adding them for you?

      I haven't installed 1.0 yet, but I haven't had the crashing problem you discribe. OO has only crashed on me once, ironically when I was trying to save.

      The main reason I find the OO spellchecker better than the MS one is that it is more complete. Whenever I sit down at an install of MS Office that I haven't touched before I find myself having to add an absurd number of words to the dictionary (and yes, I know that they are real words and that they are spelled correctly). Don't even get me started on MS' grammar checker. Talk about lowest common denominator! I'm sure it's great for people struggling through English 1A, but it's a serious impediment to anyone more familiar with the language than that.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    12. Re:Why? by fogof · · Score: 1

      " have to compare the apple and the orange"

      But the thing is, they are both apples. One is a red apple and the other is green.

      --
      --=.=-- www.cyber2000.qc.ca
    13. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because staroffice _can_ be installed but openoffice cannot,
      i see only blank install window :-(

      and when i see problem during installation process, i wonder what i can get later

    14. Re:Why? by darien · · Score: 2

      Well, possibly he doesn't understand because he simply hasn't been following that process so assiduously as some of us.

      In brief, the difference is that whether you decide to use StarOffice or MS Office, the process is exactly the same: get software, install software, use software.

      Internet Explorer, by contrast, is built into Windows, and can't (officially) be removed. This is a strong disincentive to use another browser: you have to download one, when you already have IE; and even while you're using your other browser, IE will still be using resources.

      So while StarOffice is competing purely on its merits, IE has a huge head-start over its competitors - which is only possible because it's made by the same people as make the OS. Hence, questionable legality.

  2. Great News!!! by eyegor · · Score: 0

    This is awesome! They're smart by undercutting Micro$soft and building a whole generation of users that won't be used from suckling on the Micro$oft teat.

    I'll bet Bill Gates has nightmares about this stuff!!!

    --

    Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    1. Re:Great News!!! by sjnokker · · Score: 0

      I'll bet Bill Gates has nightmares about this stuff!!!

      You must be joking.

      Really.

  3. Institutions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do /. users get free licenses then? Most of them belong in institutions...

    1. Re:Institutions? by questionlp · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if mental institutions are eligible right now :) /end humor

    2. Re:Institutions? by pogle · · Score: 2

      They tell me I'm special at my institution. I even believe it after those nice pills they give me...but no M$ software, unless the psychedelic swirls are a new screensaver....ooh...colors...

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
  4. Microsoft offered the same deal... by j-turkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many college students now get drastic discounts on Microsoft Office

    Microsoft offered the same deal that Sun did when I was a college student -- no wait, I stole it.
    ;)


    -Turkey

    --

    -Turkey

    1. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by nirvdrum · · Score: 1

      My school has some sort of agreement with MS, where we get Office XP, Win2k Pro, Office XP Pro, VS 6.0, and VS.Net (amongst other MS software) for free. It's great.

      --
      If there was a "-1 Not Funny", that'd be my most used mod.
    2. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by pythas · · Score: 2

      By free, the translation is "you pay for it in your tuition"

    3. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by nirvdrum · · Score: 1

      See my other post about the tuition thing. But I guess I'll cross-post the semantics. Basically, my school jacks up about $2K a year. There was no visible variation from this trend from the time before we had the licenses until after we started getting them. So, if it's in the tuition, it's miniscule. But I suppose that's irrelevant because it's MS.

      --
      If there was a "-1 Not Funny", that'd be my most used mod.
    4. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by captain_craptacular · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, you may get it for "free" but whats really going on is your school pays M$ 4.5 assloads of cash for a site liscense. My school does that, everything was all good for the first couple years. Then the beast started contesting the liscenses of products on staff/faculty personal computers even when used solely for University related work. It went downhill from there.

      --
      They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security
    5. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Probably the Microsoft Campus Agreement.

      I don't remember the details, but we have it and it costs about $8 per student per term.

    6. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by jd142 · · Score: 2

      My school has this too. The University increased the student computer fee by 15 dollars a semester specifically to pay for the licensing. That's around 150 dollars for a 5 year degree (the average here). Now consider that most of those people have computers that came with a copy of office. Now consider that the academic cost of office is around 180, the deal starts to really suck. Now consider that Word alone is more than enough for the non-tech majors and should never need to be upgraded.

      When you take all of that into account, the deal really starts to suck.

      For the non-engineers/cs people, a copy of openoffice distributed by the University ITS department is plenty.

    7. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Who knows what sort of deal Microsoft gave (gives) your school. It is also possible that the University simply absorbed the cost. Your school might have been able to add a wing to the library but purchase MS Office instead. Either way switching to StarOffice would probably save your school a tremendous amount of cash on a yearly basis. You can bet that the "powers that be" will at least look into a switch.

    8. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by sketchkid · · Score: 2, Funny

      damn you for making me picture "4.5 assloads of cash"!! :)

      --


      ------
      [insert funny .sig here]
    9. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by nirvdrum · · Score: 1

      I doubt it. The school provides Office XP et al. because it's what the students want. Last time I tried StarOffice, it was horrendous, so I doubt I'll be planning any sort of migration soon. I leave politics out my software decision. And put bluntly, MS products tend to work for most people. Yeah, maybe they don't support feature X, but they tend to offer a lot more useful features then a lot of the OSS rivals. But it really doesn't matter. Closed minds think alike, and I'll get modded down anyway.

      --
      If there was a "-1 Not Funny", that'd be my most used mod.
    10. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by scruffy_minds · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's free just like the first one a crack dealer gives out

      --
      "It's a puzzle, Miss Scully..."
    11. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      Yes, previous versions of StarOffice were less than perfect (as is the new version). However, the biggest problem is that StarOffice used to have very serious problems reading MS Office files. The new versions do a much better job of handling MS Office files, and in a school setting, where the administrators can easily mandate formats such compatibility isn't such a big deal anyhow.

      The point is that StarOffice is getting closer and closer to the "good enough" stage, and the price just can't be beat. Institutions are going to at least take a look at it. Especially institutions that already have Linux or Solaris based computer labs (and there are more of those than you might think).

    12. Re:Microsoft offered the same deal... by nirvdrum · · Score: 1

      I still disagree. I attend a pretty decent tech school, and we have our fair share of Linux labs (all running SuSe AFAIK), but these are reserved mostly for the systems courses, so there's never a need to do word processing or spreadsheets or what not on them.

      I would speculate that if the school stopped the licensing agreement with MS, the people who use Office now would just find someone with an MSDN or some other pirated copy. Mandating a format is crap. I don't think it would be right for the school to require that files be submitted in some format that would require a student to install a particular variant of office suite software (where is your Free then? -- likewise, I don't condone files needing to be submitted in some .doc or .xls format)

      The fact of the matter is, you guys can speculate all you want about how this release will mark the demise of MS Office in the academic setting, but I'll bet you'll find out otherwise. Beyond the file format, people in general just like the look and feel of Office, and if there's no reason other than some political agenda to learn a new software suite, why would most people bother making the switch?

      --
      If there was a "-1 Not Funny", that'd be my most used mod.
  5. College students don't really get a discount by pogle · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is great news!

    Here in Maryland, the state universities pay a massive license fee that covers every student attending, so they can pay for the cost of media only ($5, real expensive cdrs). But that money comes from your tuition anyways, so the savings are all only perceived...better off using StarOffice, and dropping that license, and saving some of that tuition money for better purposes (I want the old studen center made into a lasertag arena personally, but other improvements could apply too).

    --
    http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    1. Re:College students don't really get a discount by macrom · · Score: 1

      But that money comes from your tuition anyways, so the savings are all only perceived

      The savings aren't perceived...they're real for a student. The more Mom and Dad can pay for, the more money that's left over for chicks and beer! And the more to spend CDRs to store all of that other free software you get from the school's network...

    2. Re:College students don't really get a discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We actually get a discount. Through something called the WISC program we get Office for about 30 dollars and REAL Cd's. Also, Visual Studio and WinXP Pro are 25 bucks a pop. Bye Bye open sauce!

    3. Re:College students don't really get a discount by swb · · Score: 2

      But that money comes from your tuition anyways

      Nonsense. No state institution that I'm aware of runs off of tuition. They almost all run off of massive taxpayer subsidies (state, federal). Tuition barely makes the vig at those places.

      If you're in college and you feel oppressed by your university because they're holding back on what they "owe" you for your tuition, you're pretty sadly mistaken.

    4. Re:College students don't really get a discount by ranger8x · · Score: 0

      at Penn State we get the whole ms office 2000 or xp suite for free. all students can. free OS's too: win2k, xp, even OSX.

    5. Re:College students don't really get a discount by pogle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Nonsense. No state institution that I'm aware of runs off of tuition. They almost all run off of massive taxpayer subsidies (state, federal). Tuition barely makes the vig at those places."

      Gee, where does that 10 grand a year go to then?

      "If you're in college and you feel oppressed by your university because they're holding back on what they "owe" you for your tuition, you're pretty sadly mistaken."

      I think you're sadly mistaken on the point of this post: I work for the technology department of the school, and was recently involved in try to decide if it was worth the continuing license costs when less than 15% of the students use the option for cheap M$ software. That money could be put to better use, simply because its not cost effective. And whether the money comes directly from tuition, or from the taxes I get stiffed on every year (in reality, both), it could still be put to more beneficial use than offering an option that a majority of the student body doesn't know about or care to take advantage of.

      When we can use M$ in the computer labs for the one+ paper(s) we need to type in a year, why buy it? And the other half of us got Office as part of a computer package from Dell or some company, and don't care if Office XP has newer stuff than their Office2k.

      So regardless, my original point stands.

      --
      http://thechubbyferret.net - Ferret pictures and informative links.
    6. Re:College students don't really get a discount by Dr.+Blue · · Score: 1

      You probably have the same deal we have, which involves students/faculty/staff just paying media costs. However, if you look at the fine print (at least in our deal) you'll see that the license is only good as long as you're at the school. If you graduate (or if an employee leaves) you're supposed to uninstall the software (maybe this will be the BSA's new cause!). I think it's even part of our "exit interview" for employees that are leaving to remind people to uninstall their institution-licensed software.

    7. Re:College students don't really get a discount by swb · · Score: 2

      The U of Mn has 50k students, and a 1.2 billion dollar budget. $10k * 50k is *less than half* the budget and it doesn't include a lot of research-grant funding that most of the technology departments use for purchasing high-tech equipment and seriously supplementing researchers salaries. And I'm pretty sure the 1.2 billion doesn't include any bonding dollars used for capital improvement.

      Of course spending money better is always smarter, regardless of where the money comes from. I won't argue that.

  6. Go Sun GO! by G00F · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Its nice seeing Sun take the ball and run, even though some of their thigns arn't making sense. (like the new cost of Solaris) I do like how Sun creates cross platform/os/network things. I just hope they keep them open once all the MS monopolies are broken and they have the lead.

    This is a really good stratigy to moving(breaking MS "other" monopoly) into business. Open source/free program that can do most things Staroffice can, staroffice being a more polished product with more features being charged a low amount, but giving free to all places that where people would be inclined to bring it into a place where it could make money.

    I haven't used the new star office yet, but I do know that the old one had major flaws with office files.(saving) Also, it has some anoying features I have to fight with, and can't find the options to. But other than that, its a very nice product.

    --
    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    1. Re:Go Sun GO! by Captain+Pooh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Walt Mossengburg of the Wall Street Journal(I don't know if I spelled his last name right) said that StarOffice is not consumer friendly and that Sun doesn't know how to talk to consumers because they mostly do Enterprise stuff. But I think he missed some points, like If I just wanted to write a report I could use StarOffice instead of paying for MS Office which is really expensive and have things I don't need. My point is StarOffice is an alternative if you want to do simple tasks as word processing and such without all the other business features which is geared to executives.

  7. Great News for the NW Schools! by questionlp · · Score: 3, Informative

    I think this is great news, primarily for those schools in the NW who were targetted with audits by Microsoft as they are moving towards Linux. Not only do they have a more stable/secure environment to work in but also a very nice office suite... for gratis.

    So far, I'm quite impressed with OpenOffice.org 1.0 on my Windows machine, though some of the files that I need to open won't since it doesn't work with Macros or data pulls from a SQL Server or an Access file.

    1. Re:Great News for the NW Schools! by feloneous+cat · · Score: 1

      Yah, we started having internal audits and I basically said "screw it" and started using OpenOffice 1.0.

      Now, granted, MS .doc files don't get decoded correctly 100% of the time, but if they bought me the proper tools I wouldn't have to get stuff that is for free [grin].

      Now if we can just get of out the Windows rut...

      --
      IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
    2. Re:Great News for the NW Schools! by questionlp · · Score: 1

      I've ran into some problems with decoding Word 2000 files myself, but I was able to extract the data that I needed, made the changes and saved it into XHTML (I was converting and updating some of the procedures to a web-friendly format).

      Getting rid of the dependencies on Windows is always a tough one, mostly since many (most?) educational software is released for Windows (and Mac). I wonder if some of the software would run under Wine or the Crossover plugin... (I don't follow the Windows emulation stuff very often since I primarily run Unix, be it BSD, Solaris or Linux, on servers that don't really run desktop apps.)

    3. Re:Great News for the NW Schools! by aero6dof · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but Microsoft is pushing a license that charges a fee for every machine that could run MS software - instead of charging for any that actually do run MS software. Under that scheme, StarOffice might not make any difference in the licensing costs until the institution is willing to swear off MS site licensing entirely.

    4. Re:Great News for the NW Schools! by questionlp · · Score: 1

      It may not be a financial advantage in the sense of avoiding the Microsoft tax, but think of the cost of keeping Windows and Office up-to-date on those machines (applying patches, service packs) as well as dealing with anti-virus software in case somebody opened up an infected Excel XP spreadsheet or a Word document with infected macros.

      It's an option for those who are sick of Windows/Office and want some alternative and a bit of relief about not worrying if opening a message in Outlook or a nasty bug ridden web page destroying the machine, if not others machines or the servers (a la Nimda).

  8. Re:We would qualify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wow. The Microsoft hired trolls got here quick, didn't they?

  9. packaging by EricBoyd · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know that at Queens University, the students don't buy individual packages of software anyway, at least not the engineers. We buy a $200 package of everything we'll need for our 4 years there - MS Office, good telnet client, Maple, matlab, etc. etc. So I don't know that this will make that much difference - it's not like the engineers have a choice...

    Websurfing done right! StumbleUpon

    --
    augment your senses: http://sensebridge.net/
    1. Re:packaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows that Queens engineering students are just a bunch of pompous idiots anyways...

  10. So as a student by 2000+Britneys · · Score: 1

    will I be able to download or buy (for nominal fee) a copy of Star Office on my own or do I have to ask my school, faculty etc to get it for me? I think this is a great news

    1. Re:So as a student by leastsquares · · Score: 2

      As I understand it (and I may be wrong) the agreement only relates to the institution's computers. You would need to pay the full price ($79.95 US) for your own computer. That probably doesn't matter because it is unlikely you'll need any features not in the free Open Office.

    2. Re:So as a student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think leastsquares is right, according to Sun's edu pages. There's an email contact on that page you can use to request a discounted copy.

  11. hmmm... by jeffy124 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many college students now get drastic discounts on Microsoft Office

    Not quite. Typically the school purchases licenses from MS and then discounts them to students or, in the case of my school, just plain gives them a license (or 2 in the case of Office XP). Guess where the money to but those licenses comes from? Yup - tuition.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    1. Re:hmmm... by nirvdrum · · Score: 1

      Tuition at my school didn't change (save for the $2K it goes up every year) between the time we didn't offer the free licenses and the time we did. It may still be hidden in the tuition somewhere, but it's pretty miniscule if so.

      --
      If there was a "-1 Not Funny", that'd be my most used mod.
    2. Re:hmmm... by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      You're lucky, my school actually made a profit on selling me software. Their student OEM version almost always costed more than the OEM full version I could hunt down on Price Watch

    3. Re:hmmm... by madenosine · · Score: 1

      at our school, it costs each student $38 per student per year

  12. Re:We would qualify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, you sure have marketter speak down. Did you do this all by yourself or copy an ad out of a magazine?

  13. Pay for M$ office by Raul654 · · Score: 1

    Why pay for the cow when you get the milk for free?

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
    1. Re:Pay for M$ office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean here "Why pay for Microsoft when you can get money for free" or "Why pay for MS Office when you can get documents for free"?

    2. Re:Pay for M$ office by Raul654 · · Score: 1

      Why pay for Microsoft Office, or any other Microsoft product, when you can get them for free from practically anywhere?

      --


      To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
      --E.C. Stanton
  14. Re:such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that StarOffice running on GNU Hurd? In the Hurd thread you said you moved everything to GNU Hurd in your organisation remember?

  15. Education Distro? by scaramush · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Okay, given this, and the recent spate of MS educational license nut cracking, it seems like there's a real need for a special linux distro designed for educational centers.

    Having run a college lab, I know the major barrier to adoption was ease of use -- you don't want your lab CAs having to spend hours explaining a shell to drama majors (or professors, for that matter). But what about a very simple desktop (similar to Apple's old easyfinder (I can't remember what it was called) specially prepared for educational students?

    I mean, throw together a dist that's user friendly, that has Star Office, some pre-canned ghost like functions (for labs) and a grading app for teachers, and I think educational instiutions big and small would be falling all over themselves to adopt it.

    --
    "...you can steal my woman, but you ain't done nuthin' smart."
    1. Re:Education Distro? by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      That sounds like a brilliant idea. I'm sure its been done to some extent, but I'm sure a pre-packaged distro with the neccessary visible user base would really help *nix fight *doze in the schools.

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:Education Distro? by Misch · · Score: 2

      Try k12linux.org. There is a shite load of projects to bring Linux into the schools there.

      --

      --You will rephrase your request for me to go to hell. Goto statements are not acceptable programming constructs
    3. Re:Education Distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You shuld contact University of Helsinki they have linux distro designed for education CS Linux 2

      Contact Information
      http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/contact/ind ex.html

    4. Re:Education Distro? by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      "Try k12linux.org [k12linux.org]. There is a shite load of projects to bring Linux into the schools there. "

      Sorry, but k12linux.org, the web site itself, is not simple by any stretch of the imagination.
      If your average English teacher looked at this, she would be scared out of her wits.

    5. Re:Education Distro? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So go edit the source and respectfully submit it to the authors, rather than whining about it. These are folks doing fantastic things, free and _for_ free. Chip in or shut up.

    6. Re:Education Distro? by stephanruby · · Score: 1
      "So go edit the source and respectfully submit it to the authors, rather than whining about it. These are folks doing fantastic things, free and _for_ free. Chip in or shut up. "

      Please don't take my post as a criticism of k12linux. I was responding to the previous poster's comments. I said what I said only because I felt the previous poster was missing Scaramush's main point about simplicity and ease-of-use.

      I am not part of k12linux, but I have written open source code, I did teach middle-school kids computer-skills, and I have edited other people's wiki-enabled web pages. See seedwiki.com for proof.

      What about you? When was the last time you simplified someone else's web page instead of just adding to it? And when was the last time you deleted useless software features instead of just adding more of your own? Telling someone to simplify and refactor their work is not easy. I'm sure not going to tell them. I don't know these people. I was just responding to a comment made in the context of Scaramush's suggestion. That's all.

      Stephan

  16. Excellent, but one issue still for Sun to address: by afflatus_com · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Firstly, this is excellent news.

    However, one thing that Sun must still address is how to increase their adoption in the corporate sector.

    The reason why colleges are requested to stock Microsoft Office is that is what the businesses use to whom they are applying for jobs.

    My last university, McMaster University used to stock nothing but Corel office (cheaper, helped to support a local business), but in about 1997, they bowed to student pressure to replace it with MS Office since the commerce/science/arts/etc students wanted to have the "strong proficiency with advanced Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Access" on their resumes to compete for their jobmarkets.

    --

    -----
    Cast a Cold Eye
    On Life, on Death
    Horseman, pass by
    --W.B. Yeats' gravestone
  17. Low cost support too... by southpolesammy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As the website states, "$85/campus for support". That's truly amazing, and especially so when you realize that they're going to get a ton of calls about some of the translation from M$ formatted docs to SO formatted docs. I'm sure that it doesn't seem so bad when you're looking at supporting small colleges, but what about the Ohio State's, Michigan State's with around 50,000 students per campus? Also, what about state systems like UC and SUNY? What constitutes a cam pus? Is SUNY-Albany covered if SUNY-Buffalo gets support?

    The only caveat here is getting campuses to support two office suites, since you know that the overwhelming majority aren't going to just pick up and move over to SO and leave M$Office behind in one fell swoop. Initially, those who decide to adopt SO will have to transition users into using SO instead of M$Office, and that means more support costs for the campus IT personnel.

    Of course, get a few students who want instant resume material (read: participated in a major campus-wide application migration project), and it might not be an issue.

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  18. Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I really hope they see the light and make it Open Source. There are numerous quality developers in the Open Source community who could contribute with their knowledge, experience, and professionalism.

    It is such a shame that they are ignoring such a great opportunity.

    1. Re:Open Source by WiKKeSH · · Score: 1

      *sigh*
      the core is open sourced.
      but im guessing that if you really cared about this, that you would already know that.

    2. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I do, kind Sir, I do. I have been carrying the torch of the Open Source community in forums such as these for a very long time. I would like to see the generous developers from the Open Source community get the recognition that they deserve for creating such reliable and innovative software.

      It is only when we ourselves recognize the value that we provide, that the public and corporations will notice and appreciate our work.

  19. Try it, you'll like it. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 4, Informative


    If you haven't tried Star Office or Open Office, try Open Office. It's free. It's excellent. Of the free word processors, it seems to be the best.

    I've had a lot of problems with Microsoft Word being quirky. Sometimes Microsoft Word will move a footer to the top of the following page, for example. I don't have a huge amount of experience with Open Office, version 1.0 was released on May 1, I think, but it doesn't seem quirky.

    1. Re:Try it, you'll like it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OO is not perfect for footnotes as well. But the real troubles you get when you exchange files between both offices. It may be so bad because OO is free and it might be fixed in Star Office - can anyone explain?

  20. So I can RTFM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the same reason I buy SuSE Linux instead of downloading an ISO -- for a printed manual.

    1. Re:So I can RTFM! by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 0

      And it's actually a rather well-written manual, unlike some cough-cough other larger company's UN-help files.

  21. Good job by unformed · · Score: 2

    That is one of the best news I've heard from Corporate America in a while.

    Feel free to rip off businesses; they've got the money anyway.

    But the schools should get free software, or at least heavily discounted, software.

    After all, Let's think about the children!.

  22. Cheap MS products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want cheap ms products(OS's, OFFICE, Visual Studio, ect...) Go to your local university, find a college bar and offer some broke student 50 bucks to log into the website and order the software for you. You can pick up visual studio, office xp, and windows xp for 30 dollars a piece. Add in the 50 bucks you gave the kid and you have the whole set for 140 dollars.

    If you don't think many students would be interested, I think you have forgotten how broke students are and how much cheap beer 50 bucks will buy.

    1. Re:Cheap MS products by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      why to go to the trouble of *paying* for a license that doesn't apply to you!? you're being more ripped off than people who pay the full cost at a consumer-ville store. you mayaswell just get it on a CD-R for free for-gods-sake

  23. Ok, not RedStar Office by rjamestaylor · · Score: 1

    Instead of RedStar Office, as I suggested previously, how about AllStar Office?

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  24. Great news for geeks with kids by cecil36 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now that any educational system can get StarOffice for free, we don't have to worry about our kids vandalizing computers when they see Clippy appear on the desktop.

  25. OO.org spell checker by MoNsTeR · · Score: 2

    It's terrible. I used the SO6 beta for a while, and switched to OpenOffice 1.0 when it came out, and ye gods the checker is awful. It's better than it was in the older betas, but it's nowhere near the quality of the one in commercial SO releases.

    1. Re:OO.org spell checker by fizbin · · Score: 2

      Could you point me to something where the OO.org spellchecker does a significantly worse job than a commercial spellchecker?

      As far as I know, OO.org's spellchecker is based on ispell, which was supposed to be comparable in quality to commercial versions.

    2. Re:OO.org spell checker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I've been using ispell in emacs for quite a while now, and I like it. It seems to be slightly better at guessing intelligently than Word's spell checker. I have to use Word at work, and the whole program is so atrocious that its spell checker seems relatively tolerable.

      I'm thinking about switching to OO at work, and seeing if anyone notices.

  26. Shrewd Marketing? by wbav · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a student I'm all for this; I like star office (well right now I have open office) better than the M$ stuff.

    But sun isn't doing this out the kindness of their hearts. The idea is if student use their product from k-college then when they get into business they will buy full versions for companies. Apple tried something similar, but it never quite took hold. Also, becuase StarOffice is able to save as M$ formats, but M$ cannot read StarOffice format (atleast last I checked), well it seems to say that M$ does not have to worry about Sun, yet, but Sun has to worry about M$.

    If sun is successful; we'll be seeing businesses switch to StarOffice, just as soon as the kids grow up. Does this mean that Sun thinks StarOffice will still be around in 20 years? Sure seems like it.

    --

    =================
    Unix is very user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are.
    1. Re:Shrewd Marketing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will Sun still be around in 20 years? Sure doesn't seem like it.

    2. Re:Shrewd Marketing? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2

      The reason that Apple computers never took hold in the business community was that they were always a lot more expensive than PCs. StarOffice, on the other hand, has the advantage of being considerably less expensive than MS Office.

    3. Re:Shrewd Marketing? by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      But sun isn't doing this out the kindness of their hearts
      Kindness has nothing to do with it.
      If I send you a document and you can't read it and you can't reply to it, I have a "failure to communicate" problem with my office software. The situation also applies to "big bad corporation" in its relations with customers and suppliers. My willingness and ability to spend x$ on office software does not translate to your willingness or ability to spend x$ on the exact same software, nor should it. Star Office and Open Office are not the same product. Even if all binaries and files are identical, they are different products. I can't call up Sun and complain about Open Office and expect to accomplish anything.

  27. So, let me get this straight... by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 4, Funny



    ..StarOffice WAS free... but now its no longer free, so now it's free instead.

    I'm telling you, Sun's "Insanity First!" initiative is REAL! When you people start believing me? I was right about Katz being a mad-libs Perl script, wasnt I? :)

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:So, let me get this straight... by happyclam · · Score: 4, Interesting
      ..StarOffice WAS free... but now its no longer free, so now it's free instead.

      I'm telling you, Sun's "Insanity First!" initiative is REAL!

      Actually, it's terrific. Here's why: The major barrier to adoption of free software in institutions is fear: fear of using something unsupported, fear of having to maintain it themselves, fear that it won't work, fear that it's got back doors in it... we've all heard that "no one ever got fired for buying IBM."

      So Sun has this great product that they can't give away for free because it comes from free software roots. So what do they do? Start charging for it. This legitimizes the product in the minds of the PHBs, small as those minds are. Then they say they'll give it away for free if you qualify in some way. So the PHBs all scurry around to see whether they qualify, and when they figure out they do, they jump at this terrific discount from a well-known, strong company.

      Having served time in the marketing end of software, I know that "Insanity First" is often the only way actually to succeed.

      --
      He looked at me and said, "Kid, we don't like your kind, and we're gonna send your fingerprints off to Washington."
  28. Re:such a good idea? by primus_sucks · · Score: 1

    The US government should fund all of China with MS software. Just think of how easy it would be to spy on them with all the security holes!

  29. Re:Excellent, but one issue still for Sun to addre by thrillbert · · Score: 2

    Sun must still address is how to increase their adoption in the corporate sector

    Remember Apple? They gave away free Mac's to schools. After the students graduated, a good portion of them found that since they were already used to using Mac's, it was easier for them to buy a Mac than it was to get a PC.

    Sun is thinking the same way.

    They're going to give it away to schools, the same schools where the future admins/managers/workers are coming from. If the admin/manager/worker has already worked with StarOffice and is comfortable with it, they will be more apt to push for that solution rather than paying $x+xxx for the M$ solution.

    It's almost like drugs.. at first, you give it away for free. Eventually, they'll get hooked on it and come pay you for more! ;)

    ---
    I think, therefore I think I am.

  30. Well, this free licensing... by Beyond+Redemption · · Score: 3, Interesting

    would really work if they *gasp* made a version compatible with the system that HALF of all public schools use. It shouldn't be that hard to port the linux version over to OS X. Microsoft is just laughing at Sun for forgetting about HALF of the computers in schools.

    1. Re:Well, this free licensing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      half of the computers in schools do not run OSX.

    2. Re:Well, this free licensing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      isn't that what he just said?

  31. Re:such a good idea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    StarOffice is the BEST technology the west has to offer to the world!!! WOW! I'll have to run out and get a copy now that I know it's the best technology!


    China has many completely legal sources of office productivity software and this new deal makes not one iota of difference to the level of access the Chinese have to western technology.


    Word processors and spreadsheets aren't actually at the pinacle of the technology heap. The technologies that the Chinese are actively developing are mainly related to communications, balistic missles, and other technologies actually requiring complicated hardware.

  32. How separate are StarOffice and OpenOffice? by timeOday · · Score: 1

    Can any of the further development that goes into StarOffice be put into OpenOffice?

    1. Re:How separate are StarOffice and OpenOffice? by SteelX · · Score: 2

      Actually, it's the other way round. Sun takes the source code of OpenOffice.org, adds extra stuff (database, etc), packages it nicely, and you get StarOffice. Ok that's not totally detailed, but you get the idea.

  33. As All Civilized People Know, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (Christians, Jews, and Muslims), the source for
    all StarOffice originates from Sun.

    Smoking some very potent all-American
    marijuana,

    Woot_spork

  34. Re:We would qualify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mission-critical grant proposals

    Best line I've seen on /. in a long time.

  35. Ngh... by aetherspoon · · Score: 1

    ... so, in other words, Microsoft gives an actual student discount (go right ahead and ask them - they will give you a discount), but Sun only gives it to institutions? What crap is that?!

    --
    --- Ãther SPOON!
    1. Re:Ngh... by leastsquares · · Score: 2

      I don't know how much the dicounted Microsoft Office costs now, but IIRC in the UK 4 years ago it cost 149 pounds ~= $200 USD. Now, that would position _undiscounted_ Star Office at 1/3 of the cost of the _discounted_ MS Office. So not "Ngh..."

      (If someone knows the real cost of the Student edition of MS Office, I'd be happy to hear it.)

    2. Re:Ngh... by esper_child · · Score: 1

      depends where you go, some schools have the ability to let you install it on your home computer for as long as you go to that school (it tells you to delete it afterwords but i doubt that happens, there also is no CD-Key on these either). They usually have Office, Visual Studio, Windows (was NT4 and 98 last time i checked one out, i think it is 2k and xp now, but i am not sure). I think i remember seeing the whole office suite in the book store for 150-200 area, but I haven't looked at MSOffice since i picked up StarOffice a year or so ago.

  36. Wow, that's worth a lot of money. by Cecil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm surprised they're not trying to spin things like this the way most other software donations work. "We just donated one hundred billion dollars *coughOfSoftwarecough* to all the little kiddies."

    Or maybe it's just because "We just donated infinity dollars..." would make it sound like the silliness it actually is.

  37. Re:We would qualify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Dude, It's our job, mmmkay?

  38. MS discounts by MrResistor · · Score: 2

    When I was a full time student I regularly checked on what discounts were available to me on various software packages. In general I found them to be not enough to be relevant. They didn't make them affordable to the average student, just less than you would pay through any other legitimate source.

    Now that I've discovered GIMP and OpenOffice, though, it's largely irrelevant. They do everything I would use the various Adobe or MS packages for, and the price is right.

    This is still good news, though. I would love to see StarOffice take over in schools. That would make things much easier for me as an OpenOffice user.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  39. Kindergarden up? by Havokmon · · Score: 2
    Well then, my Son (5) and Daughter (8) will be getting their copies ASAP. -wink-

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  40. My Mother-In-Law doesn't "Grok" StarOffice by Geek+In+Training · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is funny, since my mom-in-law was just in town last weekend and we talked at length about StarOffice. She is the director of a large educational outreach program in a large midwestern US state, designed to get poorer school disricts online with current technologies.

    I love my mother-in-law, she is awesome. She has an advanced degree and an uncanny ability to understand where things are going and why they are important in the grand scheme of things. The devil is in the details though... she can't understand StarOffice very well at all, from a UI point of view.

    All of her project schools are going to get StarOffice, and all of her staff is undergoing training. The problem is that they have been using MSOffice for so long, they dcan't be "untrained" easily at all. She says the third graders pick up StarOffice - piece of cake... but for the people in charge... teachers, administrators, etc, StarOffice is counter-intuitive.

    So the question begs... even if it is free, and can do everything they need, will it work?

    Just my thoughts on the matter.

    --
    SlashSigTheorem: Humorous, Political, Critical, Constructive- If you have a .sig, someone WILL complai
    1. Re:My Mother-In-Law doesn't "Grok" StarOffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe she has an old copy of Star Office??? The new versions work almost exactly like M$Word/WordPerfect. I haven't seen anybody having a problem with it. No training required - just dive in and use it...

    2. Re:My Mother-In-Law doesn't "Grok" StarOffice by slimme · · Score: 1
      Well, I work for a company that does MS office training (e-learning). While I'm not in the department, I can can edit your remarks a little:

      The devil is in the details though... she can't understand Office XP very well at all, from a UI point of view.

      All of her project schools are going to get Office XP, and all of her staff is undergoing training. The problem is that they have been using Office 95 for so long, they dcan't be "untrained" easily at all. She says the third graders pick up Office XP - piece of cake... but for the people in charge... teachers, administrators, etc, Office XP is counter-intuitive.

      You wouldn't imagine this to be true, but the devil is in the details.
    3. Re:My Mother-In-Law doesn't "Grok" StarOffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I love my mother-in-law, she is awesome. She has an advanced degree and an uncanny ability to understand where things are going and why they are important in the grand scheme of things. The devil is in the details though... she can't understand StarOffice very well at all, from a UI point of view.

      I don't say this to pick on your mother-in-law, but to make an important point clear: she doesn't understand MSOffice either.

      All of her project schools are going to get StarOffice, and all of her staff is undergoing training. The problem is that they have been using MSOffice for so long, they dcan't be "untrained" easily at all. She says the third graders pick up StarOffice - piece of cake... but for the people in charge... teachers, administrators, etc, StarOffice is counter-intuitive.

      All of these people you are describing don't understand what they are doing; they've been trained to push buttons the way a pigeon can be trained. They've never thought about what they were doing. StarOffice is not counter-intuitive, it is simply (slightly) different. The difference is slight enough that someone who understands MSOffice will have no difficulty making the adjustment. The ones who have been functioning at the level of a trained animal will struggle. Some of the ``trained animals'' are very bright and well-educated, and some are not, but none of them have tried to learn the theory behind the buttons.

      The simplist approach might be to give a two or three half-day course in ``which buttons to push'', with lots of question-time. Have the users bring documents which they consider dificult to create, and step them through re-creating them in StarOffice. Run half the office through in the mornings, half in the afternoons, so that the place isn't shut down. This might sound expensive, but you probably have crufty old procedures in place, not because they're good, but because no one knows that they're bad. Letting someone who understands the process see some of this stuff, and improve the process, might well save a lot of worker time. Perhaps enough to pay for the training effort in the first year. Of course, you'd get the same effect from equivalent training for MSOffice, except that you couldn't ever get the crufty old secretaries to listen: they already know all they want to. The switch will give you a rare chance to shake up established practices.

      Snip the parts that your ma-in-law might take offense at, and pass the rest along to her.

    4. Re:My Mother-In-Law doesn't "Grok" StarOffice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Alternatives to Micro$haft are not "counter-intuitive", DAMNIT!!!!!

      Does anyone on this planet who hasn't tried to up their earning power by sucking Billy G's cock^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H, er, getting an MCSE really think that M$ products are really "intuitive"?

  41. Office unfortunately rules the corporate world by Interrobang · · Score: 2

    ...but this may be a place to start undermining that sad home truth. I wish more software companies (like Corel, hint, hint?) would do this.

    As a WordPerfect freak (no flames, please, I'm a wordsmith and it's a crafter's tool) who works for a Corel VAR (among other things), I still sit in front of MS-Office all day. Why? Even though my current project is an ideal FrameMaker (or your designated alternate here) job, the guy on the other end wants Word files.

    Similarly, when I don't have a job, it's convenient to be able to send resumes from home in Word for the clueless recruiters who can't (or won't) open anything else, since I don't imagine we're ever going to see complete M$/everything else document interoperability anytime before the Tuesday after Doomsday.

  42. Charging for Solaris... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they have to get Solaris to be a major player in the wars against Windows, then they have to charge for it. It's not like they need the cash; it's simpler than that.

    The fact is that people don't steal free shit. So if Sun charges for the product, then when you steal it, you feel better about yourself because you didn't give them any money. Let Gates make any of his stuff free and no one will want it, cuz 90% of the fun of having MS stuff is because you stole it. :)

    1. Re:Charging for Solaris... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The Coward is correct.

      I downloaded StarOffice6 from edonkey a few days ago, then got rid of OpenOffice which I had been using without any trouble for a few weeks.

      I did this because StarOffice will be used by more people, so it will get more support and will make more money, so I'll get a better product for FREE until my company pays for it later when they ditch MSOffice. Also, StarOffice doesn't hog my diskspace/CPU as much.

  43. K-12 DO Get Discounts by moosesocks · · Score: 2

    Microsoft offers a similar deal to K-12 students and faculty (for use OUTSIDE of the school, according to EULA. Microsoft doesn't typically release those prices to the public)

    K-12 Students and faculty can get Office XP Full for $149 (a 70% discount).

    Of course, Sun offers no indication of offering the products to students for use at home (for school related work, of course!)

    One can only wonder HOW microsoft can legally enforce their EULA on the K-12 Office, as it only permits it to be used by students (not parents) for work relating to school.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    1. Re:K-12 DO Get Discounts by nedrichards · · Score: 1

      AFAIK (from the retail version) each copy of StarOffice 6 can be installed on 5 machines per user. That should cover home nicely.

      --
      http://www.nedrichards.com
  44. So what. by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 0, Insightful
    StarOffice is already very cheap. I have it and have tried both (Star and Open).

    They are still not sufficient to be comparable with M$ Office.

    What the Linux community NEEDS to get in its (collective)head is that the desktop will STILL be RULED by M$ until XXXOffice (Open/Star/etc) has a Word package that COMPLETELY pulls in ALL M$ Word docs AND something that TRULY functions as M$ Outlook and can pull in PST files. Until this happens M$ will continue to RULE the desktop.

    I do not like M$ any more than others BUT I have to use Outlook to function in ALL of the large corps I consult to. The inbox, calendar, and contacts are a formidable opponent. M$ Exchange means that a large multinational corp can have every office around the world connected with the same global address book and the ability to make scheduled meetings with EVERYONE in that company. IF "alternate Outlook" existed that connected to M$ Exchange and worked completely (schedule, contacts, email), I would be ALL over that in a heartbeat, AND I would sell it to ANYONE who would listen.

    BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY... WITHOUT something that can "BORG in" (assimilate) M$ DOCs, Outlook, and XLS there is NO CHANCE Linux will topple M$. The package does not even have to have "all" the capabilities as long as it can pull in the file (doc, pst, xls) not crash and have the file look "almost" exactly like it did in M$ Office and we have a chance for a REAL revolution on the desktop.

    People seem to forget that the WAY to WIN is to ASSIMILATE. M$ proved that SO MANY times over. How did I get sucked into Outlook the first time before my Corporate experience? Fire up Outlook and it says "Hey I see you have a Netscape email account... Want me to pull that info into Outlook for you?" Sure I said just to see how effective it was and to my supprise is got everything without one error. So I used it for a couple of days... It out does ANY email system out there. The ONLY MAJOR caveat is the F*%king security problems and we ALL know about those. BUT, it is FAR more effective at email/scheduler/contacts controller than anything else.

    MY $0.02

    1. Re:So what. by gwydi0n · · Score: 1

      They are still not sufficient to be comparable with M$ Office.

      No, but they're really, really close.

      What the Linux community NEEDS to get in its (collective)head is that the desktop will STILL be RULED by M$ until XXXOffice (Open/Star/etc) has a Word package that COMPLETELY pulls in ALL M$ Word docs AND something that TRULY functions as M$ Outlook and can pull in PST files. Until this happens M$ will continue to RULE the desktop.

      Again, we're almost there with the functionality of Star/Open Office and Evolution. I'd say that we're at about an 80% compatibility level with MS products, for two reasons: simple file r/w, and Evolution only functions as a full Outlook-compatible client with a proprietary add-in package (Connector).

      BUT MOST IMPORTANTLY... WITHOUT something that can "BORG in" (assimilate) M$ DOCs, Outlook, and XLS there is NO CHANCE Linux will topple M$. The package does not even have to have "all" the capabilities as long as it can pull in the file (doc, pst, xls) not crash and have the file look "almost" exactly like it did in M$ Office and we have a chance for a REAL revolution on the desktop.

      Two points here - Lycoris (I know, I know), wine, and again, 80% with the others. Consider the possibility of getting certain departments or portions of these institutions switched over to free software; departments that don't need full compatibility or feature lists.

      People seem to forget that the WAY to WIN is to ASSIMILATE. M$ proved that SO MANY times over. How did I get sucked into Outlook the first time before my Corporate experience? Fire up Outlook and it says "Hey I see you have a Netscape email account... Want me to pull that info into Outlook for you?" Sure I said just to see how effective it was and to my supprise is got everything without one error. So I used it for a couple of days... It out does ANY email system out there. The ONLY MAJOR caveat is the F*%king security problems and we ALL know about those. BUT, it is FAR more effective at email/scheduler/contacts controller than anything else.

      I've heard that Evolution is pretty good at importing mail as well, and it includes the calendar/scheduler/contacts functionality, minus the security issues. Netscape mail has always done a good job for me, as far as imports go.

      MY $0.02

      Here's your change, and think positive! :)

    2. Re:So what. by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 1
      Thank you. I was not trying to come across as negative. I just have had a ROUGH week, personally.


      I agree we are "getting" close. I just do not like seeing(reading) "we got it!!! we got it!!!" when in fact they don't. On top of this so many people that I have talked with (in the linux community) just don't "get it" that until we (linux users) can assimilate M$ data "perfectly" (99%) we cannot topple them. To many large companies have TOO much invested in the way they do biz. If there was an alternative that not only assimilated but installed and connected/integrated with Exchange without flaw it would be a no brainer as an IT person to just buy the "new" sytems with linux and ???Office installed. This would "slowly" phase out M$.

      Believe me when I say that _when_ linux gets to that point I will be one of the loudest and devoted clerics. ;)


      Seriously though, I do not like M$ and I DETEST their open arrogance (we know what is best for you), but I have to admit I like Office.


      Thanks for the change and the attitude check.

    3. Re:So what. by Art+Tatum · · Score: 2
      Just to help your mood a little bit, I agree with you completely. Microsoft is on top for several reasons. Some of them are insignificant to this discussion. But the one you raise is very important: Microsoft understands what their consumer base (corporations) want. And what do they want? Why, to use computers for basic but important office tasks! That, combined with the momentum of the computer software industry, is what keeps them on top.

      It's nice to craft your software for artists or the education market or even for the server market (and companies like Apple and Sun have done an OK job at these things). But what really keeps Microsoft flying high is that they cater to the biggest (but definitely NOT the sexiest) market: office workers and secretaries. If you want to beat them, you MUST play on that field.

    4. Re:So what. by gwydi0n · · Score: 1

      You're welcome, I hear and understand :)

      I'm not sure if I clarified it enough in my first post, but I do agree with you, wholeheartedly. I think there are two important things to keep in mind here: first, we (as the "clerics") have to push to get those departments that can work (and work well) with free software, to do it. Second, I'm not sure how feasible this is, but I think the trick with getting 99% is the PR that has to go along with it. We have to make sure that the relevant parties know without a doubt that there is an alternative which could lower the TCO by nearly half, maintain compatability, and is able to be launched with minimal effort. If we are successful at this, then the only remaining factor that will influence the overall acceptance of free software and their low-cost alternatives is the time that managers take to react and implement. If they are fast enough, we can immediately clamp down on that new market share, and assimilate/expand from there.

      Craig

  45. For-profit schools by Bouncings · · Score: 2

    This LOOKS like this applies not only to traditional universities, but the for-profit Devrys of the world. Interesting, compared to the standard "non-commercial" stuff.

    --
    -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
  46. Re:Excellent, but one issue still for Sun to addre by Schnapple · · Score: 1
    After the students graduated, a good portion of them found that since they were already used to using Mac's, it was easier for them to buy a Mac than it was to get a PC.
    That may have worked at first, but by and large once you get off into the real world you discover that while Apple was aiming at the kids, Microsoft was aiming at the adults, and when the kids became adults, they had to change because the adults weren't going to. This is why Apple is a bit player these days and were it not for the aesthetics of their new machines and the $150 million cash infusion Microsoft gave them they wouldn't be around anymore.
  47. Re:Education Distro exists already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is commonly known as Mandrake Linux.

    Any idiot, even me, can get Mandrake to work...

  48. You forgot, this one, brickhead: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Micro$lop. Hope this helps. Do Slashdotters
    share their marijuana?

    Thanks in advance.

  49. The key is to get students to use it.... by purpledinoz · · Score: 1

    Once the students get familiar with StarOffice, or any other free Office application, they can enter the workplace and use StarOffice rather than MS Office. As long as the documents are portable between the two, then there's no reason why people won't switch over to StarOffice.

  50. I'm an Institution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I represent the Forward Thinking Open-Source Systems Engineering Review Synagogue. That's right - the F-TOSSERS. We believe that good drugs and bad sex ... no, wait. We believe that Star-Office should be given free to all who worship at the gates of Open-Source.

    Oh, yeah - and smoking pot is part of our religious beliefs (that's the Synagogue part).

  51. Re:Excellent, but one issue still for Sun to addre by hij · · Score: 2
    ...the commerce/science/arts/etc students wanted to have the "strong proficiency with advanced Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Access" on their resumes...
    Wow, that is a really sad comment on the state of computing in North America. The ability to use a gui based software package is considered a "skill." Thank goodness we can steal people from other parts of the world where they can learn that programming the damn machines can be fun.
    --
    Believe nothing -- Buddha
  52. Does this mean... by gillbates · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That Sun will be accused of anticompetitive behavior because they are giving away Star Office the same way Microsoft gave away Internet Explorer?

    But on a lighter note, this can only be good, folks. Hopefully, over the course of time, this will devalue the Microsoft Office suite to the point where Microsoft will either have to give it away for free, or will no longer able to charge such exorbitant licensing fees (a $79 version of Office wouldn't be bad...) Consumers, regardless of which office suite they choose, will benefit.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  53. This is Not Why I Wen to College! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    afflatus said "The reason why colleges are requested to stock Microsoft Office is that is what the businesses use to whom they are applying for jobs."

    The only people I know who need strong MS Office skills are my Secretaries. I have never been asked in a job interview if I would use Word or Excel. I suppose it is assumed that as a Professional with a Masters Degree that I can figure out how to communicate. If colleges are concerned with teaching Office skills, then we are in very a sorry state.

  54. Re:This is Not Why I Wen(t) to College! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, my Secretaries always proofread for me because I am obviously prone to typos :)

    Damn 2 minute waiting period.

  55. Sun needs to extend this... by gwydi0n · · Score: 1

    As stated here I think Sun should consider adding something along these lines:

    An additional benefit of the agreement allows each Purdue faculty and staff member and each Purdue student to install and use the selected Microsoft products on one computer that he or she owns, for University-related work.

    For additional effect. Ah, well, it's a step in the right direction. I should also add, that SO has been on all of our lab computers for several years. Now we just need to get rid of / replace the rest of that junk :)

  56. Blue Linux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Already there.

    Very cool, simple, and slim distro. Specifically targeted at school computers.

    Blue Linux

  57. OpenOffice for OS X already available (almost) by xcomputer_man · · Score: 3, Informative

    Work on an OS X version of OpenOffice/StarOffice has been underway for a good while now. In fact if you bothered to visit the OpenOffice.org web site you'd see that there is already a Developer's Build of OpenOffice.org 1.0 available for download.

    You're right, free StarOffice for OS X would be a most excellent idea for educational institutions.

    1. Re:OpenOffice for OS X already available (almost) by Thunderbear · · Score: 1

      The OS X port has been slowed by the incomplete port of gcc 2.95 by Apple. Apparently the gcc 3.0 port is better, so that they could at least compile the thing. Now the porters need to catch up on almost a year of development, and make an Aqua frontend.

      I personally would be very happy with an X11 frontend, but that somehow does not quite feel the same under OS X.

      --

      --
      Thorbjørn Ravn Andersen "...and...Tubular Bells!"
  58. Can colleges make money by selling CDs with SO? by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 2

    I think that it would be great if colleges sold CDs with Star Office to make it easier for students who don't want to download the software. The students can pay for the disk and the time that it took to copy the cd. Is $5 asking too much?

    1. Re:Can colleges make money by selling CDs with SO? by nedrichards · · Score: 1

      It's certainly legal for colleges to sell CD's of OpenOffice.org, SO I think is a little different since it's being provided for cost of media (I assume a massive pile of CDs). They couold probably pass that cost along through if they wanted to.

      --
      http://www.nedrichards.com
  59. Suggested way for encouraging students to use SO. by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 2

    I hope that proffessors would encourage students to use Star Office by allowing them to hand in essays in Star Office format. Perhaps, the students can hand in the essays on disk or as an email attachment?

  60. can you say apple! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is exactly what apple did by targetting schools.

  61. Just like Quark by autechre · · Score: 2


    Quark Express is the standard in layout and design software. It's also a horrible piece of crap, but we won't get into that.

    A single-user license for Quark 5 costs (IIRC) $900. However, universities can buy an 8 license package for $800, with the ability to add licenses later for $99 each. Thus, everyone learns Quark in school, and it stays entrenched in businesses because it's easy to find people who know it (trust me, I really didn't want to buy Quark again, but I just did, because I basically have to). Plus, that's what most printing places accept, because it's the most popular...and so that's what they teach in schools so that their students can graduate and get jobs. Begin again.

    --
    WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
  62. Not Just for Schools... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember - "education and research institutions" doesn't just mean schools. For instance, I work at a hospital. We have residents and student nurses here (mmmm....).... ; We therefore qualify for educational status on all software!

    ~m

  63. giving it away! that's ANTI-COMPETITIVE! by dlt074 · · Score: 1

    isn't this ONE of the reasons M$ got into trouble in the first place?

    as long as sombody is charging for a comprable product, you can't give it away. it's NOT FAIR!

    as much as i hate M$ i hate people who look to the government to "save" them. the more government does FOR you... the more government can DO to you.

    if the government decides to go after Sun for it's anti competitive practices... i'm gonna laugh.

    1. Re:giving it away! that's ANTI-COMPETITIVE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sun isn't giving it away. Look carefully. You still have to pay for "media and shipping."


      Now here's the hoot. The "Packaged Product" sells for $76 and includes the CD-ROM and printed manuals. The "Download" product sells for $76 and includes no CD-ROM and no printed manuals; i.e. NO MEDIA at all and shipped on the network.


      So, tell me, isn't is amazing that the prices with and without any media and shipping are exactly the same? And just how does Sun keep a straight face while claiming that the prices are the same with and without media when the cost is supposed to be for the media?


      And it gets even stupider. Guess how much an "enterprise" has to pay for the "media and shipping". FIFTEEN DOLLARS. ($25 for five copies of the CD, $50 for five copies of the manuals.)


      Yeah, Sun sure is giving the schools a break.

    2. Re:giving it away! that's ANTI-COMPETITIVE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > giving it away! that's ANTI-COMPETITIVE!
      > isn't this ONE of the reasons M$ got into trouble in the first place?

      How many times must it be said:

      The Rules Are Different For Companies Having Monopolies Than For Companies That Don't.

  64. I'll tell ya why! Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dunno, maybe I made the decision to buy StarOffice when I opened a .ppt in OpenOffice and got a black screen, whereas this doesn't happen in StarOffice or MSOffice (of course, I've had problems with Word simply crashing as I typed --but that also holds true for KDE's Kate).

    Free doesn't mean better, it just means you have no reason or right to bitch when a freebie doesn't work.

    This message brought to you by the good people at Folgers Crystal Meth Labs

  65. Re:Excellent, but one issue still for Sun to addre by lelitsch · · Score: 1

    I hire about 10 people a year and "strong proficiency with advanced Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Access" is one thing that drives me up the wall. We are an ISV, so the ability to use a standard computer GUI program should be a self evident requirement. Especially when this usually means that the applicants are able to type a letter in Word, open an Excel spreadsheet and can fill out a query form in Access. A couple of other favorite skills on the resumes that I get:

    -Internet Explorer
    -HTML (7 tags)
    -Windows (sometimes broken out into 95/.../XP)
    -Email (ye gods!!!)

    I am waiting for the one that lists "able to dial a phone number" as a skill.
    But this is not only North America, but pretty much every country. And it also bites another way, I actually stopped listing my computer skills in my resume, because recruiters seem to put me into an "overqualified" box all the time.

  66. Re:Excellent, but one issue still for Sun to addre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    they bowed to student pressure to replace it with MS Office since the commerce/science/arts/etc students wanted to have the "strong proficiency with advanced Word/Excel/PowerPoint/Access" on their resumes to compete for their jobmarkets.

    McMaster Trade School, was it?
    Slogan ``Evanescent Knowledge For a Changing World'', I suppose.

    It must be nice to know that the knowledge that you've imparted to your graduating class will be obsolete by the time they get fired from their first job. You'll get to charge them tuition all over again, if they're fool enough to fall for your pitch a second time.
    What sort of jobs were those people going after? I guess I must be behind the times; I always thought that one hired university graduates for jobs that required flexibility, analytical/critical thought and the ability to learn. I thought that jobs which require skill with particular equipment were found mostly among the skilled trades, printers and plumbers and electronics technicians and the like; people whom you don't expect to be quite so flexible and quick.

    When I picked out a major, I chose something which would let me concentrate on studying knowledge which hadn't changed since it was first discovered (electrical engineering, communications emphasis). My curriculum was math, physics, and some courses on how to apply them to electronics. Very little of what I learned is out of date now. I don't bother to put qed and roff (Honeywell mainframe text editor and formatter) on my resume anymore, but my course work is as current twenty years later as it ever was.

  67. It could be done, except.... by kcb93x · · Score: 1

    As soon as an open-sourced piece of software is written that IS fully compatible, as you envision, Microsoft will just change the formatting of the files, or will have it check to see what program it's interfacing with. Remember MS-DOS and Win 3.1? If Win didn't detect MS-DOS, then it wouldn't work. wouldn't be hard here, either. That's why StarOffice/OpenOffice.org does NOT have perfect MS Word/Excel/Powerpoint/Etc file filters...Microsoft keeps the file format private, so for the files to be opened as good as they do (I've used both...works great under StarOffice 6.0 beta/OpenOffice.org 1.0). If you can get Microsoft to willingly open up their file formats, do it. Same with Outlook/Exchange. Until Microsoft does, we will never see a piece of software that perfectly integrates with Outlook OR Exchange.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:It could be done, except.... by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 0
      Microsoft...will have it [the OS? Word?] check to see what program it's interfacing with

      Huh? If {Star|Open}Office reads in a MS Word document from, say, a floppy disk, how could Word possibly interfere with that? Would Word constantly be running in the background, checking all of its documents, everywhere making sure no other application converts its precious document files into another format? I think not.

  68. One suggestion is just to re-do your footnotes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    One suggestion, when coming from Word is just to re-do your footnotes. How is OO not good for footnotes?

    The problem in Word was that the footnotes would move around, so it was necessary to fix the quirkiness before I could finish the document. I had to make a PDF file to make sure that everything would stay stable.

  69. StarOffice by The_Final_Word · · Score: 1

    Nice ploy by Sun to steal the corporate market in the long term, get the future leaders of big business hooked on your juarez while they are in college and reap the rewards when they are people doing the purchasing in a few years time.

    Not that M$ ever did that by offering free OS and Software to folks in "educational" establishments, oh wait....

    --
    The Final Word
  70. Hey, could be worse, sketchkid... by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 0

    ...they could be liquid assets.

  71. Uninstalling student software by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 0
    I can see it now...

    (Pomp & Circumstance playing in background)
    Dean: "Congratulations! Here's your diplo..."
    Software Police: "Freeze! Does that wearable computer contain school-provided software?
    Student: "Uhhh...nnnn..no."
    Software Police: "You're lying. Men? Cuff 'em! Follow me to the whole-body degausser."
    Dean: "Err, if you remember anything after the degaussing, come back for your diploma. Next student, please?"
    Student: (using heads-up sunglasses and laser-eye cursor) mail -s "urgent: M$ help needed" council@eff.org ...

  72. Yeah, but the SO file format is open by Guru2Newbie · · Score: 0
    and XML-based, not some proprietary M$ format, so it shouldn't be hard to migrate if something better comes along. besides, have you seen how many old file formats SO will import? (XYWrite, IBM DisplayWrite, etc.?)

    At least you won't run into M$/Clippy/Jar-Jar saying "Oh-suh, meehsa thinks youse document format is-a no-go."

  73. according to the FUD... by BigBir3d · · Score: 2

    ..." Companies considering a switch to StarOffice or a competing product won't find the move cheap. Gartner estimates that the average cost per user would be about $1,200, which works out to about $800 for labor and $400 for productivity. In contrast, companies upgrading to Office every two years would spend about $550 per user, or $700 every four years. That means many businesses would take eight years to recover their initial investment."

    That is from here.

    How is a person doing a network install costing their company $800 per machine? What kind of hourly rate is that?

    1. Re:according to the FUD... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erhm,
      most companies upgrade more than every 4 years, I mean
      3.1
      95
      98
      2000

      You do the math.

      T.

  74. And homeschoolers? by gimgol · · Score: 1

    As the father of 3 home schooled children do they qualify as an "institution"?

    --

    We'd like to know a little bit about you for our files
  75. Re:Excellent, but one issue still for Sun to addre by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2

    ... one thing that Sun must still address is how to increase their adoption in the corporate sector.

    Sun says that's why they're charging for Star Office in the first place (rather than just open-sourcing it). They want to achieve penetration in businesses that are used to paying through the nose for tools such as Microsoft Office and think free software means amateur crudware.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  76. Guessing and Google by eean · · Score: 1

    I find the spell checker to not be good at giving guesses - it sounds like your major qualifier of what makes a good spell checker is whether or not it has words you know are spelled right. I find Office to give better guesses at words I don't know how to spell just right.

    If they would include an interface to Google API, which has a spell chechker, that would be great. When you right-click a word there could be a "Google Suggestion" selection. As it is, I often open up Google as a last resort to find how to spell a word as it has a better spell checker then Office (though it dictionary is really big, including other languages and odd acroymns so it sometimes makes things difficult when you enter a word that is misspelled but Google doesn't think so. There should be a "pretend this word is misspelled" option.)

    1. Re:Guessing and Google by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      If I'm not sure how to spell a word I usually look it up at Merriam-Webster. If I don't know how to spell it, I'm generally not exactly sure of the definition/connotation, and so it's probably a good idea to make sure that's really the word I'm looking for. It's also pretty good at making suggestions, and if I'm not sure that's really what I want, there's also a theraurus.

      I've always been a bit of a spelling nazi, so for me a spell checker is just a tool to catch typos. I find it really irritating when it keeps questioning me simply because I have a large vocabulary. It doesn't seem like it should be that difficult, especially for a company like MS, to give their office suite a real dictionary. Maybe they sell one as a seperate add-on to bleed more money from their customers? I don't know.

      The spell checker is just an annoyance, though. It's the grammar checker that really irks me.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  77. Re:Excellent, but one issue still for Sun to addre by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

    i gotta mostly agree with you on this, but i'm not so sure that 150M$ goes very far with keeping a software/hardware company afloat such as apple. hell a dot bomb with 60 employees (and actual revenue) couldn't sustain for 18 months on that cash (been there done that).

    even before going out to play w/ the adults we realized that apple wasn't going to be the thing to do. the colleges might have had some apple labs for use, but business, comp sci, and accounting students were using the ibm pc's for everthing. i don't know what happened to the marketing droids, but that's gotta explain why they're always have a floor of their own.

  78. Jargon Dictionaries by eean · · Score: 1

    Various jargon (like biological terms) dictionaries are sold though I don't know if by Microsoft.