Slashdot Mirror


Community Sets Up Their Own DSL

Thrazzle Throne writes "The folks in rural Ruby Ranch got tired of lame dial-up server. They fought the phone company for use of their un-used lines and installed their own Dsl service. Very cool read."

261 comments

  1. Old news by brsmith4 · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is a VERY old story. Nonetheless, it is still quite amazing that a small town banded together to set up their own dsl server, DSLAM, servers, routers and all. I only wish that my neighborhood had done that. Of course, I am too lazy to organize.

    1. Re:Old news by GreyPoopon · · Score: 1

      The story of their efforts is old, but based on the expected service date of 01-Jun-2002, it looks like they just actually went live. Their own website doesn't even appear to be updated with a "success" message yet.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    2. Re:Old news by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

      Our web page (http://www.rric.net/) says: "The Coop has launched service." It has said that for three weeks now.

  2. This is a repeat story by Ryvar · · Score: 0, Informative
    This has already been submitted, thanks.

    --Ryv

    1. Re:This is a repeat story by kesuki · · Score: 2

      Technically, this is one of many updates on this story. They're now finally providing DSL service to everyone, and thus they've 'succeded.'
      Also, they have nice graphs that show everytime the servers get slashdotted, which is nice.
      Wouldn't it be nice if everyone had graphs like this so we could get an idea of how much bandwith is really needed to avoid a slashdotting? They've got a T-1 for the DSLAM/webserver. Which is obviously not enough.

  3. Reminds me of by Strog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There was a small town out in the panhandle of Nebraska that decided they needed good internet to keep all the young people from moving away. They setup DSLAMs out in the country to within a couple miles of every house in the county. They didn't have to fight phone company but they did have to run a lot of fiber.

    1. Re:Reminds me of by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2

      they needed good internet to keep all the young people from moving away

      No good internet.

      Now I know the reason young'uns have been leaving home since the dawn of time.

    2. Re:Reminds me of by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's true... if my girl friend didn't pay the Cable modem bill I think I would leave

    3. Re:Reminds me of by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Now I know the reason young'uns have been leaving home since the dawn of time.
      And now I know how to get rid of the 21 year old still living in my house: Cut off my internet access.
      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    4. Re:Reminds me of by neuroticia · · Score: 1

      Hey, I moved in with my boyfriend the week after he got DSL. coincidence? I think not.

      Now I just have to find a guy with a fatter pipe.

      Size does count. ;)

      -Sara

    5. Re:Reminds me of by Darby · · Score: 1

      Hey, I moved in with my boyfriend the week after he got DSL. coincidence? I think not.

      You and my girlfriend should get together for tea some time. I think you have a lot in common ;-)

    6. Re:Reminds me of by Volta · · Score: 1

      Wanna come see my OC3?

    7. Re:Reminds me of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize you're trying to be ironic, but high speed internet access is just going to increase this syndrome of kids that don't move out of thier parent's homes. With video games, computers, hundreds of channels of TV, and now this 'broadband' internet thing, is there really any reason to leave? In the past if you wanted fun or adventure, you'd have to get out and see the world to do it. With games like This Sims, or Doom 3 you don't need to go through all that hassle to experience what it's like out there. from the comfort of your own home you can get all the hellspwan killing action anyone could want before breakfast. I mean really, you can't even get that experience if you go outside and sacrafice a few chickens in a pentagram and try to summon minons from hell to this side. With this internet thing, you can even try to out gun other people, the closest you can get to that IRL is paintball, and even then your weapon arrays are somewhat limited... CO2 propelled guns of various capacities and shot rates, and a few novelty paint grenades... where are the plasma beam weapons? or the circular saws? or the nailguns? Sure the resolution is better, but the map selection is limited to the popularity of the sport in your area. and to build your own maps you need the space and resources to build huge real life playing arenas. It could cost a lot to build a complex map with many ambush spots, not to mention people can't just instantly respawn..

  4. I bet by Budgreen · · Score: 0

    That satelite still would have been cheaper for them and no i'm not talking about starband/direcpc type home user setup, I mean the buisness setups which are much nore reliable.

    --
    The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
    1. Re:I bet by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      But would that have been cost-effective? If you read the article, it also states that as the hardware gets paid off, the cost of the service will go down. I just can't see them paying off a satellite...

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    2. Re:I bet by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

      This is a Frequently Asked Question, and thus several weeks ago we posted a page which answers it. http://www.rric.net/faq/nosatellite.htm . It is inconceivable that a business satellite connection could be cheaper than our present frame relay T1 connection. And so what if we had hooked up a satellite connection for the backbone link -- we would still have needed a way to get the connection to everybody's house.

  5. What's the big deal ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the big deal here ? I don't see what is so impressive about this. I am also surprised the phone company would give amateurs access to its facitlities. I hope they vetted these people first to ensure they were not terrorists!

  6. Sure is this a good idea? by icoloma · · Score: 0

    Right now they're slashdotted down :)

    1. Re:Sure is this a good idea? by Budgreen · · Score: 0

      This would make twice.. the poor town is grinding to a halt

      --
      The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
  7. And they're down for the count by Hatter · · Score: 5, Informative
    Slashdotted.

    Here's the google cache: linky linky

    1. Re:And they're down for the count by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Wow. A small group of dedicated individuals fights the Telcoms, wins, and gets their own homebrew DSP ISP up and running.

      Slashdot comes along, posts the story, and within seconds they're /.ed into oblivion.

      Now isn't that just the nicest way to start off your small CO-OP ISP--a deluge of traffic from marginally interested geeks who'll forget all about you in 48 hours.

      Editors et al, are you even considering the impact you have on these sites? You'll forgive me for being cynical, but the reasons you give for not caching smacks of "don't want to deal with it" rather than "genuinely concerned about the effect we have". (Wait six hours for breaking news? Heaven forfend...)

      Slashdot, you're like a bad concert. You come into town unannounced, make downtown completely inaccessible for a day, and leave the next morning without so much as packing out your mess. Take some responsability for the social impact of the Slashdot Effect. Pursue a solution. It is important.

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    2. Re:And they're down for the count by Joao · · Score: 2

      Actually, they're not /.ed. It looks like they just blocked all requests refered by slashdot in order to avoid getting /.ed. If you type their URL manually you can still get in.

    3. Re:And they're down for the count by CNERD · · Score: 1

      The google cache seems alittle out of date. The "What remains to be done" section is gone from the real page.

    4. Re:And they're down for the count by Hatter · · Score: 2
      not anymore...

      no one is safe, attempts to resist are futile!

    5. Re:And they're down for the count by sehryan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I definitely agree with your post. What I find ammusing is this little line from /. reply about why they don't cache...

      I could try asking permission, but do you want to wait 6 hours for a cool breaking story while we wait for permission to link someone?

      Let me see...wait 6 hours for a "breaking" story, or wait 6 hours (or more) while the server in question gets back on its feet, having to rely on nothing but the article summary on /. which we all know is usually completely blown out of proportion or just plain wrong. Yeah, you're right CmdrTaco, not caching links is better!

      --
      The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
    6. Re:And they're down for the count by Quixadhal · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, one could always setup a squid proxy farm and allow outside access to it, but disallow links that aren't already cached from an internal hit (soas to avoid pollution of the cache by zillions of pr0n hits).

      Permission to link huh? Yeah, like Google asks permission.... like the web proxy at your ISP asks permission.... yeah.

    7. Re:And they're down for the count by Hack+Shoeboy · · Score: 0

      Won't work. For the cache to hold the data from "internal hits," the /. editors would have to have actually read the pages before posting the story.

      --

      IN TEH FUCHAR, LITERSY WLIL EB OPSHANAL!!!!!111
    8. Re:And they're down for the count by Linuxb0y · · Score: 0

      Hey Geeks!

      Don't blame slashdot, you're fscking geeks clicking those links.

    9. Re:And they're down for the count by packeteer · · Score: 1

      actually most people who go to the slashdot homepage dont ever even go anywhere NEAR the comments... in fact a lot of /. readers arent even geeks they just want to see a goos list of tech stories...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    10. Re:And they're down for the count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google doesn't ask permission to link. Google also doesn't bring down websites or incur huge bandwidth fees due to millions of hits an hour.

    11. Re:And they're down for the count by foghorn19 · · Score: 1

      They've been wired for MONTHS now, dude. Just look at their traffic graphs etc.

  8. Why this is cool ... by pgrote · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This *is* cool because it's geeky, but what makes it even cooler is that the people behind the scenes walk you through what they did to make it happen.

    In their working against Qwest they had to settle a couple of issues. The include the forms and paperwork they used to make it happen and these can be used as a template.

    What pushes this over the cool mode into the must read are the accompanying technical documents. They have network diagrams, monitoring statuses and more. It's amazing.

    The best part of their site is a list of other communities have done the same thing.

    The site is dynamite and is full of information! One of the best articles I have seen on Slashdot in a long time.

    1. Re:Why this is cool ... by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      Come on, it's not 'monitoring statuses', it's 'monitoring stati'. Now please excuse me while I feed some cacti to my octopi.

  9. Any group... by fruey · · Score: 1

    ...that gets together and shows that they have a commercial or non-commercial project that is viable by the sheer weight of their numbers will win.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:Any group... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "commercial or non-commercial project" ?!

      Um...that would be everything then.

    2. Re:Any group... by fruey · · Score: 1

      Sorry. Good point.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    3. Re:Any group... by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

      Yes, but he did say "that is viable by the sheer weight of their numbers."

      That doesn't mean everything.

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    4. Re:Any group... by fruey · · Score: 1
      Well sometimes I get sick of stories which are of limited interest, because they themselves are redundant and have already appeared here before. Then I go say something, and get modded down as overrated when I wasn't modded up in the first place. I just don't dig it. I'm trying to say something about the story and encourage debate, but people in the end just want to attack me for some pedantic reason instead of replying in the spirit of the debate. Which is about the story and how redundant it is.

      I want to see proper news, or encourage proper debate, by posting as I do. I do not seek all this abuse I seem to keep getting for no particular reason. What is wrong with you people? (see whole thread)

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    5. Re:Any group... by ozzimark · · Score: 0

      Yes, the moderation system must be extensivly reworked, people when given power will always abuse it. I bet I'll be modded down too, but this is something that must be known.
      Modders- do something, you have the power

      --
      C makes it easy to shoot yourself in the foot; C++ makes it harder, but when you do, it blows away your whole leg
  10. Home page by buzzbomb · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Here's a link to the Ruby Ridge Internet Cooperative Association.

    Or in plain text: http://www.rric.net/

    It gives a lot of details on the setup and such...

  11. BAPA circuits by totallygeek · · Score: 2
    I read somewhere that people were ordering cheap burgler alarm circuits to run their own DSL on. Anyone have stories about doing this?

    1. Re:BAPA circuits by GMontag · · Score: 2

      You might be thinking of the Cringley column on "Roll Your Own DSL". Sorry I am not posting a proper link, but it can be found on pbs.org under Cringly's "old hat" link.

    2. Re:BAPA circuits by swb · · Score: 2

      Only works for sites at the same CO, as its basically a dry copper pair between sites, and AFAIK no dry pairs exist in urban areas between COs.

      IIRC the original slashdot story about this was some guy in some small town using DSL as a transport mode between sites; since the whole town was on one CO this wasn't a problem.

    3. Re:BAPA circuits by Grech · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is that you get burglar alarm circuits. They are they same as voice, but have different rules. If the ILEC finds out you're using them for DSL, they'll just load them, which is perfectly legal (after all, it enhaces the range for voice), but will squash your project flatter than a pancake.

      --
      It may not be just, but it is fair, and that is more important.
    4. Re:BAPA circuits by ralico · · Score: 1
      --

      SCO to Hell
    5. Re:BAPA circuits by AIXman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Phone companies such as Qwest usually try to de-tariff (make it so you can't purchase) the use of dry copper pairs in their infrastructure and run your own network on them.

      They would rather sell you value added ($$$) digital data services (56K, ISDN, T-1) and DSL (in high population density areas close to a central office) which are much more profitable for them.

      So if you try to buy such a circuit from your phone company, don't be suprised if they won't sell it to you. I know Qwest won't.

    6. Re:BAPA circuits by daddymac · · Score: 1
      So if you try to buy such a circuit from your phone company, don't be suprised if they won't sell it to you. I know Qwest won't.


      Sure they will, it might take some time before you get on the phone with the right person. When you call the first time, you'll get sales, ask to speak to repair, as they are more likely to understand what you're talking about, and they should send you to a sales person who can handle the request. in my case I had to wait a couple of days for a call back, but Qwest will give you a dry line.

      --
      If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
    7. Re:BAPA circuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in the process of ordering this right now. The actual name of line you want is called a Local Area Data conneciton. If you use the magic buzz-word LAD they will know what you're talking about. The line is ordered and will be in soon!

  12. Grass roots appeal by brad-x · · Score: 0

    Based on my current experience with a few ISP's, I hope the nature of this lends itself to more accessible technical abilities. I think too often communication goes from sales to support to the techs, and often even advanced users feel put upon because the chain of communication breaks down. Keep it for the people!

    --
    // -- http://www.BRAD-X.com/ -- //
  13. Redundancy by Provincialist · · Score: 0, Redundant
    That link was given in the 2.5-line summary, as well as in the original article, and was immediately slashdotted. Why on earth would you think that we needed to see it again?

    This is almost as redundant as the 10 posts complaining that this topic has already appeared. Of course, while I'm writing to call attention to this 3 other people probably are as well, so this message is also redundant. Sorry to waste your time!

    later,
    Jess

    --
    I am programmed for etiquette, not destruction!
  14. On another note by BurpingWeezer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ruby Ranch sets up the DSL, Slashdot effect takes it down...

    1. Re:On another note by MaxVlast · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, it's better than "guy installs commonly-used software on consumer device, turns it on, submits to slashdot." This is legitimately cool.

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
    2. Re:On another note by prockcore · · Score: 2

      "Ruby Ranch sets up the DSL, Slashdot effect takes it down..."

      At least it's not the FBI this time.

    3. Re:On another note by Steve+Hamlin · · Score: 1

      You are mis-thinking about a different location. Colorado internet vs. Idaho shootout

      Ruby
      Ranch
      Colorado

      NOT

      Ruby
      Ridge
      Idaho

  15. i would never set up my own DSL by tps12 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I leave that tech-y stuff to the professionals.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:i would never set up my own DSL by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 2
      From reading the Google cache of the article, it appears that the "professionals" at Qwest have been (& still are) jerking them around. I mean, seeing as how the community is willing to pay a *premium* for the DSL equipment & connection, why would it have been so difficult for the TELCO to set it up themselves?

      I hope more communities start doing this & similar services, that should send a message to the phone monopolies.

    2. Re:i would never set up my own DSL by allism · · Score: 1

      You must not live somewhere Qwest services or you would expect this behavior...they provide awful customer service and are all about saving a buck. When we moved into our apartment, we were assured by Qwest that DSL would be available by January. Still no DSL. They are in serious financial trouble, have recently had to post bonds to pay their taxes, one of their branches is filing bankruptcy, and Moody's and S&P have downgraded their stock to junk bond status. For them to do something that would actually MAKE them money is contrary to their business paradigm.

  16. What makes the site unusable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the fact that it is slashdotted already. :)

  17. Slashdot on the horizon by Hornsby · · Score: 5, Funny

    Better pen up the cattle boys, I can see a slashdot brewin' up on the horizon.

    I suddenly find myself wondering if this is the first barn slashdot has ever taken down...

    --
    A musician without the RIAA, is like a fish without a bicycle.
  18. Coloradoans, unite! by Chagatai · · Score: 5, Funny
    Being a Coloradoan who lives out in the farms, I can totally appreciate what my fellow statesmen did in the mountains. Without a doubt, Qwest is the worst phone company out here, even worse than its predecessor, US West. People out here call it Qworst as they have no continuity or set goals for DSL. Some of my friends in more urban areas complain about DSL being available four blocks north and south of their street, but nothing in their region. I cheer about this development and will try to implement one, pending I get a tornado-proof shed in my backyard.

    And for one last dig on Qwest, here's an often-heard Coloradoan joke: What's the difference between Qwest and Enron? About six more months.

    --
    --Chag
    1. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There actually is something people can do when they don't get DSL, but it's available so close, like a few block away: it's called 802.11b. I was unable to get DSL, but my neighbor who is right across the street was able to get it, so I setup two LinkSys wireless access points (WAP11) at USD$150 a piece, and they paid the upfront costs of the DSL modem and installation (which came out to about the same as the two APs) and we're splitting the monthly costs. Qwest could be making twice as much in this case, but they don't, and they have no plans to offer DSL service to my house anytime soon, so oh well. There are others in the neighborhood who can't get it, so I'm thinking of potentially offering the service to them, for a small monthly fee (maybe $20) because we'd probably have to increase the bandwidth for our service, otherwise I'd probably do it for free.

      The moral is that even if YOU can't get DSL, but if someone CLOSE to you can, that's good enough and with a little talking to your neighbors you can be online at high speeds too.

    2. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by ryanwright · · Score: 2

      I had to file multiple complaints with my state just to get Qwest to install a simple phone line in my new home. I gave them three months notice; they claimed it would take them 6 to 8 months. Even after 20 some homes were built in the neighborhood (with a total of 600 going in), they were still claiming 3 to 5 months for service for any of us.

      So, getting nowhere with the morons at Qwest, my neighbors and I filed more complaints. Lo and behold, a week later, a Qwest employee shows up and hooks up my phone service. Funny how that works.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    3. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Which came first, Qworst or US Worst?

      I had US Worst first (and called it that, as did most people I know), but I was wondering if people were using Qworst before the merger...

      I went from US Worst to Qworst... what could be worse? :P

      Their DSL is no better outside of Colorado -- in the Twin Cities, Qworst has a reputation for blocking and delaying competition and for saying certain areas are incompatible with DSL because they don't want to upgrade the phone system (supposedly even when a large provider offered to pay for it, but that may have to do with the debt of the company - avoiding a situation like Northpoint putting in system and going under 2 weeks later). The latest lawsuits involve Quest only allowed in certain competitors who had to sign a secret agreement...

      At least one of these issues (may pending appeal) cost them millions of dollars in court (blocking AT&T), and I know others are pending. What I love is that they now have the gall to ask to carry long distance in our area because they've been 'compliant' with letting competition in. Obviously my opinion is biased against them here, so they're lucky I don't get a vote.

    4. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by operagost · · Score: 1

      Probably also a violation of the TOS, but then they obviously don't have any service to offer you so their loss of revenue is exactly zero.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    5. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't get the internet access though Qwest, but instead I use a local company for my ISP, and they don't care if we share the bandwidth.

      As for Qwests 'loss of revenue', they actually gained revenue because my neighbor wasn't really sure if they would get DSL or not, but because I asked them to get it so we could share it, they signed up. So really Qwest gained in this situation, because they got one more customer that they wouldn't have otherwise.

    6. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a clue. The reason this occurs is because of wire types. I love it when people bash Qwest because they haven't spent the millions of dollars to invest in a community that will NEVER see the return on its investment. Please.. people do the math.

    7. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by Toshito · · Score: 1

      That's cool, except that most contracts for DSL or Cable connections forbid you to share or sell bandwith...

      --
      Try it! Library of Babel
    8. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by Mark+Bainter · · Score: 1
      As for Qwests 'loss of revenue', they actually gained revenue because my neighbor wasn't really sure if they would get DSL or not, but because I asked them to get it so we could share it, they signed up. So really Qwest gained in this situation, because they got one more customer that they wouldn't have otherwise.

      Unfortunately, companies like qwest/sbc/etc are way too braindead to consider these things. So it wouldn't matter one whit to them.

      --
      "No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare."
      --James Madison
    9. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by unitron · · Score: 2

      You realise, of course, that you just blew the chance to start your own phone company, and cable company, and ISP? You could have cited the lack of service and bribed enough local politicians to get an exclusive on right-of-way to those 600 housholds.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    10. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by Solokron · · Score: 1

      And when one of those people hack into the Pentagon you can have the CIA bang down your friends doors!

      --
      30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
    11. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by donovansmith · · Score: 1

      Good 'ol Qwest...they provide crappy voice lines and DSL lines that don't work. I'm just glad Earthlink and Covad were able to get me hooked up to a fat 1.5Mbps/384Kbps pipe for $49.99 a month. Qwest offers slower 640Kbps/256Kbps DSL with MSN as the ISP (yuck!) for the same cost each month. And it's a miracle if they can get it hooked up at all (last place I lived they couldn't). And then there's Qwest's wireless division, something I wouldn't touch with a ten-foot pole (heard the stories about the $100 a minute overage fees?). About the only thing I like about Qwest is QwestDex, and they're selling that division for some dumb reason; it's the most profitable part of the company.

      Who knows what company will come in and buy the assets of Qwest six months from now. Knowing our luck, probably MCI Worldcom...which is also about ready to kick the bucket.

      I can already hear Queen's "Another One Bites The Dust"...

    12. Re:Coloradoans, unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: What do you do if you can't use legally?
      A: Use it illegally.

  19. Link to another Ruby Ranch article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do-it-yourself DSL is no pipe dream
    http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2002/0408netb uz z.html

    1. Re:Link to another Ruby Ranch article by lscotte · · Score: 1

      Correct URL is http://www.nwfusion.com/columnists/2002/0408netbuz z.html

      --
      This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
    2. Re:Link to another Ruby Ranch article by lscotte · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Hey, how come that space keeps getting inserted in there? Odd...

      --
      This post is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.
  20. So there was no satellite service in their area? by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

    It's even better than DSL on DL speeds. Though maybe more expensive in total for all the houses. But to say they had no choice other than 28.8 is probably a bit of hyperbole...

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
  21. Home Built Fiber Network by bahtama · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I also remember reading about these folks who made their own neighborhood 100 Mbps fiber network. The screenshot of the FTP download speed is just plain silly. The creator of the page even mentions "and 25-40 Mbps is possible most of the time - that means it is their single hard disk limiting the speed!". :)

    --

    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
    Oh bother.

    1. Re:Home Built Fiber Network by unicron · · Score: 1

      And as you can see by this diagram, when attempting to talk to the outside world through our respective cable modems, we encounter a phenomenom known locally as "The bottle neck of no hope". And while getting 45Mbps locally is all fine and dandy, you must understand we were able to share everything we have with every one of our neighbors in roughly 15 minutes.

      I really hope those guys are gamers, otherwise that network is just massive overkill.

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Home Built Fiber Network by pacc · · Score: 2

      Their neighbors got a 1 MBps cable service instead...

      Seriously, even for DSL the phone company owns the copper here (often over 30 years old), and takes about the same fee for just keeping them connected as the network above. I guess they will still be satisfied in 30 years.

  22. Hrm... by anderiv · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny how this server doesn't seem to have held up as well as the iPAQ :-)

    1. Re:Hrm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      huh? the iPAQ story's been slashdotted too.....

    2. Re:Hrm... by someonehasmyname · · Score: 1

      yeah, but I think the iPaq lived longer.

      --
      Common sense is not so common.
    3. Re:Hrm... by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      That's because no one cared about the iPaq =)

  23. I'm glad to see the community has recovered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That standoff with the ATF (and its eerie similarity to the situation at Waco) hurt this community badly.

    1. Re:I'm glad to see the community has recovered by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

      thats ruby ridge, not ruby ranch. I have no idea if they are the same or not.

    2. Re:I'm glad to see the community has recovered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Ruby Ridge standoff occured on one very isolated homestead in Northern Idaho, I blieve this occured in Nebraska, but I don't know for sure since I got here after the slashdotting.

  24. Draw and Quarter Qwest, I say by pretoris · · Score: 1

    Old news or no, I'm still glad that someone stuck it to Qwest. I live in CO to and I don't know how well their service is in other states under their tyranny, but where I live 10 Miles outside of Colorado Springs you can't get anything from anyone outside of satellite. No isdn, no sat., no cable (*they* can barely deliver a clear picture) no nothing for any price. Qwest hasn't really expanded their DSL network much in about 3-4 years. I think I read somewhere that Qwest was considered the worst local telco in USA... =(

  25. yikes by UU7 · · Score: 1

    This'll be quite the barn burning ..

  26. Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by t0qer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've said this many times before, why are people in this kind of situation rolling out DSL? Why not just lay down new copper in the form of CAT5?

    It's dirt cheap. I've done it. Just look at these pics of my neighborhood area network. Currently 10 neighbors share the cost of an internet connection. We also share stuff we've grabbed from kazza, we have a intranet that announces the happenings and events on our street. Very cool stuff. Basically each house has a switch, and we daisy chain houses so we don't run into the 600' Ethernet limit.

    I can give a rat's ass about the AUP of my ISP because the question of packet ownership has to be asked. At what point do I own that packet? When I request a document from the web? When it hits my router? When it is on my copper?

    People can do this themselves, it's not hard. In a rural area you just replace the AC transformer brick on the switch with a battery/solar panel combo every 600', or you could something that has a bit more distance to it like token ring. Yeah maybe this all sounds silly, but we're doing it out here in silicon valley and it's been working for the last year.

    --toq

    1. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by r00tdenied · · Score: 1

      Yes, I agree. However, they do not live in an suburban area. The community is quite spread out and would make regular old CAT5 pointless because of the distance limitations. In rural areas other houses are most likely beyond 600' so even if daisy chained it would not work.

      r00tdenied
      --
      Platinum Networks Hosting www.platinum-networks.com
    2. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by afidel · · Score: 1

      600', I don't think so, 100B-T has a limit of 100m or about 300', with good equipment you might get 150m or about 450' but no way you can get 600' with copper.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You may want to invest in a bit of conduit. The insulation on that CAT 5 ain't gonna last forever. Also squirrels, mice, etc.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because they don't have an internet connection to share? Or maybe the 600' limit IS a problem (you can't rely on everyone keeping their side of the network running, so your solution doesn't work)

    5. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by Target+Drone · · Score: 5, Informative
      I've said this many times before, why are people in this kind of situation rolling out DSL? Why not just lay down new copper in the form of CAT5?
      Here's the answerfrom their FAQ.

      Why not simply bury your own cable? In our neighborhood, the ground is full of rocks. This means that many ways of burying cable, such as a vibrating plow blade or a Ditch Witch, are unworkable. Pretty much the only way to bury things is with a backhoe. Backhoe work is expensive. Our neighborhood has many miles of roads, and we would likely have to spend well over a hundred thousand dollars if we were to try to bury new cable in the neighborhood.

      Burying new copper under our roads is particularly frustrating to think about, given that the existing phone cables buried by Qwest were overbuilt by a factor of three or more. In other words, some two-thirds of the pairs in the cables are spares right now, spares that would never get used by Qwest for revenue service. Qwest ought to be delighted at the chance of collecting monthly revenue from us for some of these pairs.

    6. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by CNERD · · Score: 1

      I really dont think that CAT5 is ment for outdoor use without some sort of conduit (look at the pictures and you will see what im talking about).

      If any one of your lines snap you could easily short out a cable, disconnect the rest of the neighboorhood, and kill the 2 switches that the line ran inbetween.

    7. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by t0qer · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't know why i'm responding to you, you didn't even bother to use your REAL name. Oh well..

      First off, why do you have to be a player hater?
      Aside from that, you must be a BIG FUCKING MORON because cat5 doesnt carry shittons of voltage, it doesn't need grounding. What are you worried about lightning? Couple of points here for your unedumacted head.
      1. There are TONS of taller structures around the neighborhood for lightning to hit. There are rooftop TV antenna's, Power lines, and street lights to name a few.
      2. If lightning did manage to hit it, what's the worst that would happen? A blown switch? Big fucking deal, a $40 dollar netgear switch has to be replace.

      I can see why you posted as anonymous coward, you knew you didn't know WTF you were talking about when you made your post.

    8. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      100B-T has a limit of 100m or about 300', with good equipment you might get 150m or about 450' but no way you can get 600' with copper.

      the 100m limit on ethernet is due to the speed of light causing packets to cancel each other out. I don't see how "good equipment" will alter this, unless you're talking about improving the speed of light?

    9. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by catfood · · Score: 4, Informative
      I've said this many times before, why are people in this kind of situation rolling out DSL? Why not just lay down new copper in the form of CAT5?

      One word: right of way.

      Oh, that's three words.

      But the simple reason you don't just run CAT5 all over town is that the state won't allow it. You could theoretically get permission from the owner of every property the wire crosses, but even then you'd need an easement from the city or township for every crossing of a public street.

      This is one of the more important reasons why one has some recourse when the ILEC won't provide a needed service. They've been given unique privileges by the state, and in return have a well-recognized legal obligation to act in the public interest.

    10. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by dohcvtec · · Score: 1

      It's a good idea, one that I'd do if any of my neighbors were interested, but it would be nice to do it proper-like. Maybe junction boxes for cable ingress/egress, and consider burying the cable. IANAL, but it seems to me that one might be asking for trouble with city officials by conspicuously running cables between houses.

      --
      -- Never hit a man with glasses. Hit him with a baseball bat.
    11. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by t0qer · · Score: 4, Informative

      You could theoretically get permission from the owner of every property the wire crosses

      Yup, that's what we did...
      Sorta funny how it started out. I originally just shared with 1 neighbor, but then a guy on our street (who's also a pushy saleman) wanted to get on our network. Problem was he was 10 doors down from us. So he went door to door and asked all the neighbors in between if they wanted to participate.

    12. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by pyite · · Score: 1

      Besides being one of the WORST looking cat 5 installations I've ever seen (electrical tape wrapped all over what appear to be connections, the use of wire staples on cat 5 cable), there is a question of easement. You can't just run cable without asking permission. And even if you do get permission, it's probably going to be at great cost.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    13. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is due to Time Delay Reflectometry to be more exact, and it is a tolerance thing. Good copper and more acurate gain controll on the MAC will allow reception of the signal without degredation at longer lengths. I work with some guys that make a popular wireless access point, during testing we made a 150m cable and tested the AP talking to various pieces of equipment, of several dozen pieces of networking equipment and about as many nic's we only had problems with one low cost nic, all the other equipment (mostly cisco switches, 3com nics etc) was able to talk fine at 150m. This was over CAT-5E and CAT6 cable.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    14. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by t0qer · · Score: 2

      Besides being one of the WORST looking cat 5 installations I've ever seen (electrical tape wrapped all over what appear to be connections

      Actually, the electrical tape is where my dog chewed the wire in half. I was too cheap to run a new wire :P We have them secured using staples.

      Point of this exercise is that it CAN BE DONE. So what if it looks like shit? You should go outside right now, talk to your neighbor, and do it better if you can. Then take plenty of pics so I can see how to "Do it right"

    15. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      Maybe they wanted a professional solution that doesn't run the possibility of breaking any service agreements and doesn't devalue the homes. Man, if I was looking at a place to buy and I saw a simple hole in an exterior wall with a cat5 cable running into it (did you even bother to caulk the holes because it sure doesn't look like it). Heck, I could burn your house down just by setting your cat5 on fire. Plus was that just two patch cables spliced together in one of the pictures.

      There are those who wish to do it right (and yes, pay the price) and those who just want it to work, regardless of legality or asthetics.

      P.S. If you had read the article you'd understand why they didn't go this route.

    16. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by jea6 · · Score: 2

      Cat5 doesn't carry shittons of voltage until it gets struck by lighting. Then it melts or conducts shittons of voltage.

      Lighting usually but doesn't always strike the highest point.

      Back in the olden days pre-cordless phones, it was a good idea to get off the phone during a lightning storm because _if_ lighting hit (I should make that _IF_ cause it's admittedly a huge if), the same wires that bring in Aunt May's voice cross-country can also reunite you with your dead uncle.

      Also, what if the shitton spike goes past your netgear and into your neighbors unbacked up computer - frying the sucker - while he was in the middle of _important_ (neighbors are rarely important) work. What you've got there is a little liability issue.

      Finally, and don't be surprised cause you heard it here first: Sharing of your Internet connection is likely prosecutable in your jurisdiction in the same spirit that theft of cable is, regardless of who you get your upstream from. And no, it wont be a question of packet ownership. It'll be a simple signed contract that spells out what you can't but did do.

      Good luck.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    17. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by afidel · · Score: 1

      It needs grounded because ground loop effects happen if the switches are plugged into grounds with different potentials. This will reek havoc on your signal integrity. This can also lead to enough current passing across the ethernet to blow interfaces due to the AC transformer in one switch leaking electricity to the more favorable ground. As far as lightning, lightning only hitting the tallest object is an old wives tale, lightning will find the shortest path to ground regardless of how tall something is, some times due to one object being a better conductor it will go through a shorter object. Plus where does the lightning go once it hits ground, it disipates to a large area, say the tower that your line goes near gets hit, it is possible for the lightning to then travel through your copper, through your equipment and into your houses ground(s).

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    18. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Heck, I could burn your house down just by setting your cat5 on fire.

      You know how stupid that sounds? Heck I could burn YOUR house down by setting the fence on fire, not to mention there's more fuel in your fence than my CAT5.

    19. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your set up looks like shit and it is ungrounded.
      You have not disproven either point.
      Go back to school and learn something.

    20. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Yeah but don't most electronics (i.e. switches) have fusable links or self healing fuses built in?

    21. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Neither is that electrical tape.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    22. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just a trolling AC, your comments mean nothing. Here look I can post as AC too and save my karma!

    23. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by djp928 · · Score: 0

      Probably because they didn't want ugly blue cables stapled to their fence and nasty-ass holes punched in their exterior walls. Those pictures are insane, dude. For a couple of geeks wiring their houses together and not caring too much about anything else (property value, longevity of the connection) this is probably a fine solution. For an entire neighborhood with subscribers many miles apart, I think I'd go with the DSL solution.

      -- Dave

    24. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by jguthrie · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 100m limit is there in order to make it possible to do collision detection on half-duplex links. That's also why Ethernet has a minimum packet size. If you're running full-duplex links, you can run the cable much farther because there'll never be any collisions. I don't know what the limit is with CAT-5, but you're electrically limited if you're running full-duplex. I would expect several kilometers, at the very least.

    25. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by t0qer · · Score: 2

      Well, I gotta concede with dave, yeah it looks like shit, but that's just my connection. I'm a geek, not a construction worker. 4 of the other people on our NAN are construction workers, and theirs looks much neater than mine.(neighborhood area network? Is that the right term?)
      Having it stapled to the backyard fence isn't really that bad. It's small enough and high enough where it isn't really noticable. Heck I spend most of my time indoors anyways. Like I said, I am a geek.
      And finally, to address your third point of property values and such. I own this house, as do most of my neighbors own theirs. Over a 30 year period our property values will go up no matter what due to inflation. Thing is, i'm teaching all the little kids in the hood wassup with computers. They're taking an interest now. It so damn cool to see the light bulb go on in their heads. These kids will probably be better off in the future than their peers because of the exposure they are getting now.

      The biggest problem, I have always seen with technology is the luddite. The luddite is in all of us, its a measure of your comfort with technology. I think the more we teach young kids how to be comfortable with technology the more we will advance as a society.

      Click my hoempage, it's on my name. One of the last pictures in in my garage. Kids as young as 8 are scavenging my garage and scrapping together pc's. It's amazing. Older brothers are teaching younger brothers.

      Anyways dave, I went a bit off there, but it's cool. I'm doin it cause I know it's making a difference. I see kids getting inspired to do shit with it and well, it melts my heart.

      --toq

    26. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      The whole thing looks a little hinky.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    27. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by weierophinney · · Score: 1

      I think the point of the article is two-fold:

      1) They got broadband internet into a rural area (DSL)
      2) (1) was achieved by creating a co-op

      Contrary to the popular belief of some slashdot folks, broadband does not exist everywhere. From reading the page, it appears that they were unable to get broadband, wanted it, and found a solution (co-opting the Qwest lines and establishing their own CO for the DSL lines). They can't share a connection that doesn't exist, so they created a connection in the best way they could.

    28. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Looks like some of the CAT3 I inherited at my $ORK_PLACE. A couple of runs were too short, so the guy who did it spliced additional length onto the end by stripping it, twisting the wires together and encasing the splice in electrical tape. Brrr.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    29. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      If you wanted to burn my fence, you'd have to bring along plenty of fuel to get it to do anything. That and the fact that it's not physcially connected to my house. For the Cat5 on the other hand, the plastic will only need a lighter to get going. And since you have it sticking out your house like a fuse, once it hit the interior through that nice big hole in the wall, that house would be toast. The cat5 aint the fuel, it's the pathway, your drywall/insulation/dust/sawdust is the fuel. They make plenum cat5 for a reason (not for this use, but partially for it's better resistance to burning).

    30. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      When I ran cable in my workplace (three offices), I ran the cable out to the length I wanted, then added about 15 feet. Yeah, maybe some crosstalk (haven't seen any evidence, yet) but nobody will ever have to stretch a cable taut. Oh, also ran four runs for every one run needed. Yeah, a shitload more cable needed, but not much more money. And we've already used about half of the 'extra' drops.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    31. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by yakfacts · · Score: 2

      Sharing of an intenet connection is not illegal in most cases. It depends on the agreement with your ISP.

    32. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by yakfacts · · Score: 2

      Doing it the way you did it is cheap, doing it propely is quite a bit more expensive.

      Will your method work? Yes, sort-of, for a while. I have done it "properly" and all those little costs really add up.

      You have a limit of four repeaters (hubs, switches) TOTAL on a point-to-point ethernet connection, so you would need routers or bridges every 184m. I assume you are breaking that rule which, again, will work for a while.

      DSL is a very good solution for their community. Another would have been to run two pairs to each home and run a T1 connection. That's what I would have wanted. And I already have two spare CSU/DSUs....

    33. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by t0qer · · Score: 2

      Well, i'm sure you have a plastic garbage can or dry vegitation somewhere. Believe me if all I had was a lighter, I could set your fence on fire just by using my pocketknife to cut some kindling strips from your fence, I learned that in boy scouts! (Unless it's a cinderblock wall)

      And you are wrong about plenum CAT5. Plenum CAT5 isn't designed to be flame retardant, it's designed to not give off as many noxious chemicals when it's burned.

    34. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, and don't be surprised cause you heard it here first: Sharing of your Internet connection is likely prosecutable in your jurisdiction in the same spirit that theft of cable is, regardless of who you get your upstream from. And no, it wont be a question of packet ownership. It'll be a simple signed contract that spells out what you can't but did do.

      If I'm told that I cannot get DSL into my house because of lack of available appropriate lines to do so, how would it be theft when arguably there wasn't something to be stolen to begin with (person wasn't given the option to subscribe legally). In my mind I think the company would have a hard time prosecuting someone for sharing lines unless they were able to offer comparable DSL service to the other one who's "leaching". I would think a Court would let it slide and say to the company that this is an "incentive" for you (Joe Company) to get Project Pronto to be in effect "pronto" and be made available to these other customers in the spirit of free market competition from monopoly controlled services.

      I think in that case though that if the company were later to wire the neighborhood so that DSL were available to those that are wired into anothers' DSL setup, that they could send a notification to each of these people in the neighborhood that they would expect them to directly subscribe to DSL themselves now that "it's available." That would seem fair to me.

      And getting the companies to deploy DSL through this sort of motivation would perphaps help DSL market penetration grow that much faster than it otherwise would if people were penalized for sharing DSL connections in these circumstances.

    35. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you teaching them ebonics to go along with your "ghetto" LAN?

    36. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know - his LAN looks like a shanty-town on the outskirts of Mexico city.

    37. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by binaryDigit · · Score: 2

      And you are wrong about plenum CAT5. Plenum CAT5 isn't designed to be flame retardant, it's designed to not give off as many noxious chemicals when it's burned

      From the Technical Information Notice from the Telecommunications Industry Assocation site:

      Plenum cables have a significantly lower propensity for ignition, flame spread, heat release and smoke opacity than for LSZH cables. The fire performance of plenum cables was comparable to standard PVC cables in metallic trunking.

    38. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really need to be lloking into grounding issues for this - as someone pointed out. Running CAT5 between two seperatly earthed buildings is asking for problems.

    39. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by jea6 · · Score: 2

      My reply was to the guy who rolled CAT5 in his neighborhood, not to the association who got DSL for themselves.

      Listen, I'm not saying it is right or wrong. I'm saying that you can't necessarily dismiss your ISP contract because you believe you own the packets. You sign the contract and you abide by the terms of use.

      Again, this is not about what the article above refers to. This is about the growing "problem" of Internet connection sharing. If your ISP says they won't allow it, and you do so anyway, you will tend to be in breach of contract.

      No matter what some on Slashdot think, I shouldn't make copies of DVDs to give to my friends. If I decide to digitize my DVDs for viewing from my office, I should take reasonable precautions that my streams not be publicly accessible. I didn't spend the money making, say, Harry Potter. If I did spend the money to make it, and I decided to give it away, that would be my right.

      If I spend time and money to create something, and you want it, I can choose to ask for you to pay for it.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    40. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by unitron · · Score: 2
      "...your drywall/insulation/dust/sawdust is the fuel."

      The dust and the sawdust perhaps, and maybe the insulation, depending on what it's made of (the kraft paper facing on fiberglass might burn, but I doubt the glass will, although some insulating sheathing--used as much for wall rigidity as insulation--is burnable), but drywall/sheetrock is heavy in part because there's so much water tied up in it. It's used (in double thicknesses)between attached units as a firestop.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    41. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      (quote)
      how would it be theft when arguably there wasn't something to be stolen to begin with (person wasn't given the option to subscribe legally).
      (/quote)

      Youre argument just doesn't hold up. "I can't legally buy drugs, so I can't be prosecuted for stealing them." Nah, doesn't cut it.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    42. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So your the bastard thats hosting the goatse.cx images!!
      Damn you and your neighborhood LAN to hell! =)

    43. Re:Why didn't they just roll out CAT5? by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

      Why didn't we "just lay down new copper"? It's a Frequently Asked Question and the answer has been on our web site for several weeks at http://www.rric.net/faq/nobury.htm . Our homes are pretty far apart, not adjacent as in your neighborhood. This makes laying new copper a bigger issue than it was for you. The ethernet distance is 300 feet, not 600. Daisy-chaining works well only if everybody is home all the time, so that when a link goes out, you can get into that particular house to get it working again. Our people aren't home all the time. The wire you are using does not have UV coatings, so it will get brittle and crumble, by the way.

  27. Why not Wireless? by azaroth42 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    And why couldn't they do a wireless network? It didn't seem like the houses were too far apart that they couldn't have a directional antenna to beam from one place to the next. Sounds a lot cheaper than the trouble they had to go through.


    --Azaroth

    1. Re:Why not Wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The msnbc article neglects to mention it but this area is/was already covered by wireless for the last two years at least. I know this because I was one of the techies who installed the system. So a lot of the quotes in the article about 28.8 phone service are intentionaly misleading.

    2. Re:Why not Wireless? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe cost? Or maybe they didn't want a tornado to take out the Internet.

  28. Site contents by afidel · · Score: 5, Informative

    About the Coop

    The Coop offers DSL service to all homes in the Ruby Ranch neighborhood in Summit County, Colorado.

    The Coop was founded in 2001 because no one offered DSL or cable modem Internet access in our neighborhood, and because the voice telephone service to the neighborhood is of such poor quality that it is not possible to get modem connections faster than about 26K bits per second. The Coop is a Colorado nonprofit corporation and is federally tax-exempt under 501(c)(12).
    The Coop's History

    The Coop has launched service.

    By far the biggest challenge faced by the Coop, a challenge that dwarfed any of the Coop's technical and financial challenges, was gaining access to subloops from Qwest under the Telecommunications Act of 1996. (The subloops are needed to connect the DSLAM to the subscriber homes. The buried telephone cable in our neighborhood has some three times as many subloops as are actually needed for voice service, and the subloops we wish to rent are among the hundreds of spare subloops which otherwise would generate no revenue for Qwest.) The course of negotiations was such that the Coop found it necessary to file an informal complaint with the Federal Communications Commission and subsequently found it necessary to pursue arbitration before the Colorado Public Service Commission ("CoPUC"). In the arbitration, the CoPUC found that "all of [the Coop's] proposed equipment is compatible with the Qwest network," and that "Qwest is technically able to accommodate [the Coop's] proposal." The CoPUC found that the Coop is entitled to pay "wholesale" rates for the subloops rather than much higher retail rates. Finally, the CoPUC found that because the Coop will be providing only data services (not voice services) and because the Coop will be offering its services to everyone in its service area, the Coop does not need to be a CoPUC-licensed telephone company. (This is very good news, since being a licensed telephone company would impose prohibitive accounting and record-keeping burdens.) After the CoPUC's arbitration decision there were further negotiations with Qwest, and a signed Interconnect Agreement between the Coop and Qwest has been approved by the CoPUC.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  29. Colorado has a long history... by tenchiken · · Score: 4, Informative

    Of cheap internet access. A while ago parts of the community came together to form The colorado internet co-op. In fact, if you look at the network diagram of this group, they use nettrack, which also has a connection to the co-op.

    Some of the more prominant Unixers on the co-op board are Trent Hein, and Evi Nemeth (two of the authors of the USAH) was also involved. The CO-OP has played a nice part in keeping colorado up and wired.

  30. The cost of a slashdotting by datastew · · Score: 3, Funny
    From the faq What are you recurring costs?
    The Coop pays for its data traffic on the T1 data line. This cost could be anywhere from $75 per month to about $450 per month, depending on traffic levels. After some months in service we will have a better sense of what this cost is turning out to be.

    Does anyone know whether that "about $450 per month" is the maximum charge? I guess they are about to find out. Sometimes I feel sorry for the slashdotted victims.

  31. Thrazzle Throne?? by TheNecromancer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hmm, he must be a Qwest rep to post this story with a link to the cooperative's site. Easiest and fastest way to get back at those pesky consumers: Slashdot their new service!

    --
    Attention all planets of the Solar Federation! We have assumed control! - Neil Peart
  32. And they're down for the count [+5: Karma whore] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we're smart enough to find the google cache. Ok?

  33. Re:So there was no satellite service in their area by r00tdenied · · Score: 1

    Ummm not unless you like a lot of latency. DSL is more reliable than satellite also, and its pointless to use satellite access if you are building a COMMUNITY ORIENTATED network.

    r00tdenied
    --
    Platinum Networks Hosting www.platinum-networks.com
  34. Re:And they're down for the count [+5: Karma whore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wow, them is some sour fuckin' grapes.

  35. I hope that site isn't hosted on-location... by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    If it is, 12 poor DSL subscribers have likely lost their connection for a few hours... I wonder if they even know that they are victims of the Slashdot Effect?

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:I hope that site isn't hosted on-location... by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      Heh, they're probably thinking, "We just told the world that our network is up, and now it's down. Everyone's going to think we're fools! I guess I better go see what fell down in the barn."

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  36. Slow HDD you have by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    25-40 Mbps is 3 - 5 MBps my hdd transfers at between 35 and 40MB per second (in bursts), thats udma 100
    udma 30 is about 10MB per-second.

    That's assuming your not hitting memory buffers,

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  37. Re:So there was no satellite service in their area by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    Latency yes, but all of my cable stations (and all of my neighbors' cable stations) come over satellite.

    Satellite mixed with a few good lines would work nicely.

  38. A side note... by peterdaly · · Score: 2

    The department I work in is trying to put a bunch of "local level" government offices on the Internet. We need broadband speed connections from their offices to our data center. Getting some type of broadband installed in many of these places is absolutely horrible.

    In many of these places, there is just no way to send a 50MB file once a day in a cost effective manor. We just had Iowa telecom decide not to offer flat rate ISDN to us because it would be to expensive for them. This was when we called them a week after the promised install date to see why it wasn't installed! It took us MONTHS to get to this point. Would have been nice if they had a couple months ago (before quoting us a price and delivery time) told us they wouldn't do it. We have promised our customer a price and delivery date (which is now well passed.) Iowa Telecom (or whatever their name is) has now offered us a price for ISDN which is more than our promised total price to the customer.

    It is hard to believe phone companies can get away with this type of service, or lack thereof. We have now starting selling the service with a bring your own internet access spin. We have missed deadline after deadline due to the fact we cannot get tcp/ip access to these offices at reasonable prices, at the delivery time we are told. We are a "full service" provider, but there is no way we can deal with this crap. I'm sure we are not alone.

    -Pete

    1. Re:A side note... by bsartist · · Score: 1

      there is just no way to send a 50MB file once a day in a cost effective manor.

      Have you tried burning it to CD and FedExing it?

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
    2. Re:A side note... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, manors and large estates in general tend to be rather unwieldly. Zip disks are much more effecient for data storage.

  39. Re:first pr0n, nigs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fantastic! Thank you, sir!

  40. This is wonderful! by uncoveror · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A co-op for DSL! I love it. This reminds me of the Community Antenna Television co-ops that created cable TV. Too bad corporations turned that into a money grab scam. I used to get my electricity from a co-op before I moved, and service was cheaper and more reliable than from those crooks at Cinergy. If the co-op turned a profit, I got a profit sharing check at the end of the year. Someone has proven that neccesity is the mother of invention, not just the potential to get filthy rich. I wish all utilities were available from co-ops and not corporate robber barons who gouge me.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  41. Re:hi! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice UNICODE art, dude. Mad props and all.

  42. Two words: Lightning Protection by sphealey · · Score: 2
    Why not just lay down new copper in the form of CAT5? It's dirt cheap. I've done it. Just look at these pics [he.net] of my neighborhood area network
    Just be sure to think through the lightning protection aspect. Nothing like routing 10,000,000 volts right into your house. Gives a new meaning to high-powered router!

    sPh

  43. Nice! by kylus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I recalled this being mentioned on /. before. Glad to see that they were finally able to realize their goal! Now they can get the ultimate stress-test: a slashdotting :)

    --
    --Kylus
    Idiot-proof something, and Life will build a better Idiot.
  44. i guess the server is on DSL as well by krs-one · · Score: 2

    I guess the server is on their DSL line as well beacuse its been a Slashdotted.

    -Vic

  45. For more links & comments on this story... by 0x69 · · Score: 1

    You can find a bunch more links & comments on this story here. Oops.

    --
    It's easy to make up & spread cool- and credible-sounding stuff. Finding & checking hard facts is hard work.
  46. Bizarre Metaphor by snicker · · Score: 5, Funny
    Could someone explain to me what this quote means?
    If you throw a dart at a map of the United States, much of the nation can't access broadband even if they wanted to.
    I was following the story pretty well up until that point.
    *nick
    1. Re:Bizarre Metaphor by digitalsushi · · Score: 4, Funny
      Could someone explain to me what this quote means?

      If you throw a dart at a map of the United States, much of the nation can't access broadband even if they wanted to.

      I was following the story pretty well up until that point.


      If you're going to ask questions like that on Slashdot, until the farmer realized all the cows were already home!

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:Bizarre Metaphor by eclarkso · · Score: 1
      They should have said something like:
      "If you throw a dart at a map of the U.S. there's only a [small percentage here] chance you'll hit a location where broadband is available."

      It's a poorly-worded way of saying that broadband availability is limited to a pretty small geographic area (densely-populated urban areas).

    3. Re:Bizarre Metaphor by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Looks like the writer got distracted half way through the sentence. I think the point he was trying to make was that if you throw a dart at a map of the US, chances are whever it hits will have no available broadband choices outside of satellite. Basically: Broadband is restricted to metropolitan areas for the most part, and most of the US is still rural.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    4. Re:Bizarre Metaphor by red_dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Help, Yoda can:

      If at a map of the United States a dart you throw, access broadband even if they wanted to much of the nation can't.

      Better now?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Jesus asks: "What Would You Do?"
    5. Re:Bizarre Metaphor by charon_on_acheron · · Score: 1

      Depending on the distance, there is only a [small percentage here] chance I would even hit the map. The only darts-like game I'm good at is "pin the tail on the donkey", at least I can find the paper taped on the wall.

    6. Re:Bizarre Metaphor by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      You can't get broadband in about 30% of silicon valley. SBC (Pac Bell) basically just shitcanned "project pronto" which would have fixed this. Too costly.

    7. Re:Bizarre Metaphor by DirkDaring · · Score: 0

      I don't know why, but that made me laugh. A lot.

    8. Re:Bizarre Metaphor by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

      What I said was: "If you throw a dart at a map of the US, in general where it lands will be a place that has neither cable modem Internet access nor DSL." I was misquoted.

  47. Think people... by PDHoss · · Score: 1

    This is a cool story, yes, and an even cooler solution to an existing problem. But I think we (Slashdot) need to be a bit more responsible about thinking to sites like this. Can we possibly think that a rural network like this can sustain a Slashdotting?

    Linking to the MSNBC story should be plenty to get the point across. Why waste these folks network?

    PDHoss

    --
    ======================================
    Writers get in shape by pumping irony.
  48. Scooped by... yourself! by aridg · · Score: 2, Informative

    Gee, didn't I see this story somewhere before?

    (BTW, check out Carl Oppedahl's comments to that story...)

  49. Re:Two words: Lightning Protection by t0qer · · Score: 1

    We don't get a lot of lighting in silicon valley. Not to mention there are lots of things much higher than the cat5 that the lighting would rather hit first.

  50. one T1 and... by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    ... tens of millions of Slashdot geeks! If you squint, you can see the copper T1 glowing red hot!

    On a more serious note, I wonder if mod_gzip and a faster server would help out at least a little bit -- make slightly better use of the limited thrput the T1 provides.

  51. Re:So there was no satellite service in their area by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

    most vpn solutions don't work over satelite (2 ip's one for upload one for download) and alternative os's are often out. There are many reasons why splitting a couple T-1's via dsl drops is a good solution. Plus this way you have presumably more controll over your internet experience, eg need more bandwidth, call a motion and if people are willing to pay you get more. Code red got you down, block incoming request on the appropriate ports etc. Plus almost anything interactive sucks arse over satelite. Oh yeah and there is that monthly bandwidth cap and random slow as 56k speed caps etc.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  52. Re:about yer sig by fruey · · Score: 1
    Get a life. I have "No Score +1 Bonus" checked by default, but I can uncheck it. When I feel like it. :P

    What the hell is a fucktard anyway? Think of a decent insult at least.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  53. Hear that 486 webserver scream! by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    Maybe someone should videotape and mirror the meltdown of the webserver!

  54. I am Inspired by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 1
    My area in rural Ontario, Canada is on an ultra-long phone loop and we can get no better than 28.8. There's no cable (TV or internet so we have satellite) and no DSL. The satellite internet from Symcraptico stinks and still requires a modem for upstream.

    It is high time I find out what a T1 costs and calculate the numbers and see what the people on my street think.

  55. Re:Two words: Lightning Protection by weave · · Score: 2
    Whatever you do, don't ground it in more than one place. About 15 years ago, I saw a case with some thick ethernet run between two buildings underground that was grounded in each place. I'm no EE, but the way it was described to me was that the ground floated or something, and basically any difference between ground in the two buildings anywhere, even in their electrical equipment, would often cause ground to route to the other building via the ethernet and in the process run through a lot of equipment. A lot of transceivers, NIC cards, and some mobos were blown over those few months before it was fixed...

    Maybe someone with some real education in this area can explain it better. Still, point is, you're probably best off running fiber between buildings to be safe.

  56. Re:First Linux is Dying-- SO help! by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    BEGIN RANT

    Look Jon, rather than sitting there and counting down to the Delisting of LNUX from NASDAQ, why not do something about
    it. I mean, why not got out and buy some stock in VA?
    Now is the time to put your money where your mouth is and invest in this company. You can trade in LNUX stock right now for only $0.82.
    Unless you cannot even spend a buck to save the company. BTW That is lees than that Fat Ass Sally Struthers begs for to feed the children.
    Exactly! VA is down to only 205 employees, and planning to cut more jobs before the end of this quarter.Understand?

    So, what is it going to be? Are you going to support this company and invest. Shit, look at the ads on the OSDN network. 90% of them
    understandably promote other OSDN sites. We need to get those big pocket investors in here to buy adspace.
    Contact the VA National Sales Director Eric Kazanjian eric.kazanjian@osdn.com, Voice: 650-551-0175, Fax: 650-551-0195, Mr.
    Kazanjian can also be mailed at eric.kazanjian@osdn.com. Call and see what you can do, buy a banner stating YOU HELPED!
    So, in conclusion :o), Another 2 cheeseburgers at Burger King, or supporting a great company? You Cockeater.

    END RANT

    Mod me down as Off topic but I needed to clear that up!


    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
  57. Zippiness and fun! by dmccarty · · Score: 2, Funny
    [...] anyone who has used a fast connection knows it changes the online experience forever from one of frustration and drudge to zippiness and fun.

    Aha! I've been happy with my cable service. I just didn't know I could be that happy!

    --
    Have fun: Join D.N.A. (National Dyslexics Association)
  58. Broadband as a town utility! by mansa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I worked on a project as a consultant a number of years ago... a town decided to wire itself. It was city government sponsored, and they had their own T-1, and were wiring homes with ethernet. Since then it appears that they've really expanded! I wish I could live there. :)Check it out!

    http://web.rochelle.net/~city/

    I guess I'm a knucklehead, the html formatting doesn't seem to be working when I preview. Ah well, you get the link anyway.

  59. Economical effects of slashdotting by crawdaddy · · Score: 1

    I wonder how much the monthly charge is going to go up just to cover that poor barn getting Slashdotted.

    Elsewhere:
    Authorities are looking into web-related assissted suicides and their connection with the Slashdot community. One of the most recent and haunting Slashdot-assissted suicides involves a poor distraught I-Paq being abused to run a webserver. The I-Paq posted on slashdot under its owner's username and linked to itself. The large community of thousands of members began surfing to the handheld and within the hour, the poor thing was dead.

    In a related case, a webserver being kept in unfit conditions in a barn located in Colorado wrote in to Slashdot under a username suspected to have been stolen from one of its users. Once again, the chilling "Slashdot effect" has killed this webserver.

    Members of the Slashdot community claim innocence, claiming that they all have a right to connect to the webservers linked to on the Slashdot site, regardles of the end result. In the words of one Slashdot member, "If my viewing of content on a site contributes to the taking down of that site, so be it. Especially if the webserver has posted about itself in the hopes that it gets slashdotted! If the server wants to die, it would go against its rights to not allow it to. I'm just helping the cause."

    1. Re:Economical effects of slashdotting by Carlos+Laviola · · Score: 1

      The I-Paq posted on slashdot under its owner's username and linked to itself. The large community of thousands of members began surfing to the handheld and within the hour, the poor thing was dead.

      Is there any truth to this? Can you post a link?

  60. A barn, somewhere in Colorado... by Wraithlyn · · Score: 5, Funny

    Zeke: Durnit! All of a sudden, the DSL got reeeaal slow, then it stopped altogether!

    Ezekiel: Hmmm, my 28.8 connection seems to be connecting fine... let's just surf on over to Slashdot... OH MY DEAR GOD

    --
    "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
  61. Simple, really... cause and effect by Rayonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cause - You throw a dart at a map of the United States.

    Effect - Much of the nation can't access broadband if they wanted to.

    Solution - For the love of God, DON'T THROW THAT DART!

    1. Re:Simple, really... cause and effect by BlowCat · · Score: 5, Funny
      Cause - You throw a dart at a map of the United States.
      Effect - Much of the nation can't access broadband if they wanted to.
      Solution - For the love of God, DON'T THROW THAT DART!
      Wrong. The right solution - ban darts. And maps.
    2. Re:Simple, really... cause and effect by warpSpeed · · Score: 2

      ...and shoot the cartographers!

    3. Re:Simple, really... cause and effect by leighklotz · · Score: 2

      Here is a pretty map of the US. The dots are phone company offices (CO's), green ones with DSL equiment and red ones without DSL equipment.

      The dots are 1 pixel, and the map is 1000 pixels wide. The US is about 3000 miles wide; therefore the dots are about 3 miles, which is coincidentally the same as the region of service for DSL around the dot.

      • So in order to get DSL -- now or sometime in the future -- you have to actually live on one of the colored dots on the map.
      • If you live on a green dot, you can get DSL.
      • If you live on a red dot, you can't get DSL today, but could if they installed the equipment.
      • If you don't live on one of the dots, you cannot get DSL ever, unless the phone company builds a new building or puts in a repeater.

      Here is DSL Reports (scant) commentary on the image.

  62. Bureaucracy by m_evanchik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From their FAQ, it really sounds like the biggest obstacle was the lack of cooperation from Qwest.

    The Phone companies forget that they are public utilities. They are given certain privileges, not least of which is monopoly power, not so that they can turn a profit, but so that their service can do good for the community. The profit motive is just an incidental factor to encourage them to invest in providing that service.

    Hats off to Ruby Ranch for having the moxie to get the thing done. I wish I could get 1.5Mbit SDSL for $60/month.

    1. Re:Bureaucracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voice service is a utility. DSL is unregulated service offered at a premium to customers at Qwest's discretion. Qwest is not a monopoly, you can get anyone you want for voice service. The profit motive is the only reason they have DSL to begin with.

    2. Re:Bureaucracy by m_evanchik · · Score: 2

      Access to the lines that are required for DSL service are regulated, or else Ruby Ranch wouldn't have had the leverage to get Qwest to give them access to the lines.

      The great thing about a co-op like the Ruby Ranch ISP, is that it can operate independent of the profit motive. Qwest might be interested in profits, but its customers just want broadband access.

    3. Re:Bureaucracy by Ironpoint · · Score: 1

      Joe Nacchio, CEO, Qwest, is famous for supposedly saying something along the lines of:

      "We don't need customers, the customers need us."

      at a conference call.

      No one likes quest, not Wall street, not the SEC, not the customers. Their freakin dsl is twice as much as cable for the same bandwidth, and thats just for the loop and the dsl modem, with no isp. Really, shouldn't the ISP be who decides the bandwidth costs. Its ok, because you can't get qwest dsl hardly anywhere in Denver anyway.

  63. DSL service from a barn? by Pedrito · · Score: 2

    That's just funky, to think that the source of one's DSL service comes from a barn. But hey, if it works...

  64. Re:So there was no satellite service in their area by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    But to say they had no choice other than 28.8 is probably a bit of hyperbole...

    In most discussions of this sort the term "cost effective" or "acceptable" is implied, i.e. "they had no other cost effective (or acceptable) choice other than 28.8" is probably not hyperbole. Remember, satelites work for download, upload is still limited to what the phone line can carry, ie. 28.8kb, so satelite wasn't really a choice that would have addressed the problem of speed to their satisfaction (read their website for specifics of why when they systematically investigated the satelite option they rejected it).

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  65. Re:First Linux is Dying-- SO help! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha ha, you got trolled. Sucker. Feed them and they get bigger and stronger.

  66. Something similar, and older by jimmu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is Lariat.

    Its basically a co-op out in rural wyoming that provides internet access, support, and other stuff to members of the community. Pretty interesting, really. Check out their FAQ, or their Clone Us page which has information on how to create your own local community network.

    --

    ----
    One of us needs to stick ones' head in a bucket of ice water.
    - Hobbes
  67. M$--ware running the main site! by drwhite · · Score: 2, Funny

    NT/WINDOWS 98 is their main server o/s!
    check netcraft...

    1. Re:M$--ware running the main site! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up before I fuck start your head.

  68. And they impose restrictive TOS on their own users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They will not permit any of their user/members to run any kind of server at home. Not even a "vanity" domain which generates little or no traffic.

  69. Cost of slashdot effect by m0i · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you look at their bandwidth stats,
    who's gonna pay the bill?
    According to http://www.rric.net/faq/speeds.htm, the subscribers pay for usage; slashdot users should be billed to suck up that much bandwidth, eh!

    --
    have you been defaced today?
    1. Re:Cost of slashdot effect by LordYUK · · Score: 0

      slasdotted THAT one too!! Go us!

      --
      This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  70. old story??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is an old story??? They went into operation on June 1st 2002! Thats 5 days ago! Did it have to happen today to not be conisidered an old story?

  71. You utterly stupid moronic imbecile. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've said this many times before

    Yeah, and I've said this many times before:

    READ THE FUCKING ATTACHED LINK YOU STUPID MORON

    Oh, but it was slasdotted...

    READ THE FUCKING GOOGLE CACHE YOU STUPID MORON

    Oh, but I'm a dumb fuck still stuck on AOL and don't know what the hell I'm doing...

    READ...oh wait. Never mind. There's nothing you can do about that. You have my sympathies.

  72. I, Cringely article by pknut · · Score: 2, Informative

    There was an "I, Cringely" article about this last year. Nonetheless, it's still pretty damn cool.

  73. Its already been done by /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/04/09/124226 &mode=thread&tid=95

  74. Lets hope... by mixbsd · · Score: 1

    ... that none of the residents are chickenboner spamming trailer trash, or else their lil DSL link won't be worth the fight in the first place.

  75. Posted in April... by John+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Anybody remember the last time this story was posted? It's definitely cool, but it's easy to check if the story has been covered before...

  76. Re:So there was no satellite service in their area by MrResistor · · Score: 2

    to say they had no choice other than 28.8 is probably a bit of hyperbole...

    I very much doubt that. I've lived in a rural area most of my life. Even though I was only about 8 miles from the CO, and on a fairly new all copper loop(1), with 56k capabilities on both ends of my connection, I was lucky to get more than 19.6k and never got more than 28.8k. PacBell is the high end for line quality around here, too, being the major carrier. There are a few parts of the county that are served by GTE, and they are much worse.

    I'm guessing that you have never lived in a rural area. You wouldn't believe how bad phone service can be in areas where you can't open your window and spit on your neighbor. Universal Access is satisfied by only the most basic telephone capability on nasty, noisy lines, and the phone company only guarantees 4800 baud. My complaints about line quality were met with "you can get ISDN". I've since moved somewhere I can get DSL, but my mom still lives in the house I grew up in, and the situation hasn't changed a bit.

    No, saying that they were limited to 28.8k is probably not an exageration, and is in fact probably a quite generous depiction of the service they were actually getting. It's quite possible ISDN isn't available to them, or if it is it's unreasonably expensive for the bandwidth it provides. If they're in a mountainous area there could easily be line-of-site issues that would prevent them from using one of the satalite based services. Line-of-site is also a problem for radio and microwave (despite what folks would like you to believe about cell phones, they do have LoS issues).

    The MSNBC article says these questions are answered on the rric web site, but it seems to be barely limping along at this point.

    (1) The new copper loop was paid for by 5 families (including mine) when our self-installed farm lines started getting sketchy about 7 or 8 years ago. It cost us $10k per family for 2 miles of line extension, plus a 3 year service contract with PacBell. PacBell made it a loop a few years later of their own volition.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  77. Re:Two words: Lightning Protection by dattaway · · Score: 2

    The voltage difference between buildings over the same wires appear to be caused by the electrical load in one building being greater than the other at any time. The electrical resistance from the mains generates a voltage drop. Also, when dealing with the higher voltages, the current leakage due to capacitance and corona discharge add up greatly. It happens with 120 volts and becomes very pronounced with 480 volts. With 14400 volts from substations, this becomes a significant portion.

    Its best to use fiber optic cable over large distances, unless you like to isolate the circuits and treat the chassis as possible live conductors. The voltage differences across one building can reach several volts. Over different buildings, I'd hate to touch the wires if the worst happened. I have seen 277 volts (one phase of the 480) make it through the ground reference before. If its copper from another building, beware! Don't touch!

  78. Re:And they're down for the count [+5: Karma whore by Hack+Shoeboy · · Score: 0

    pls mod parent up

    --

    IN TEH FUCHAR, LITERSY WLIL EB OPSHANAL!!!!!111
  79. Hey, it's in Colorado by DarkHelmet · · Score: 3, Funny
    I wonder how the people in South Park are taking the slashdotting:

    Stan: Why's this damn thing taking so long?
    Kyle: Stupid slashdot crashed our DSL.
    Kenny: MFFMFMMMFMFMMMFMM
    Stan: Yeah, this movie of Cartman's mom's taking forever to download.
    Cartman: That's it! Screw you guys, I'm going home!

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  80. Way to go! by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 4, Funny

    As if slashdotting some poor guy's PDA earlier today wasn't enough, the hounds behind slashdot, the worlds #1 DOS trigger, had to go take out an entire community.

    Way to go guys!

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  81. Sounds familar by vrmlguy · · Score: 2

    See this article from April 9th.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  82. Good Idea. Wrong technology. by stere0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Rolling out a community network is a great idea and probably any network geek's dream. But DSL, oh my! Many wireless community networks have proved 802.11b is the perfect technology for this. These guys in Seattle are trying to cover the whole city and IMHO they're very likely to succeed.

    So you want to roll out a network in a small city ? UseNoCat Auth for authentication, connect everything to the net, and already you'll be able to read slashdot while sitting in the middle of the street.

    --
    Trollem mirabilem hanc subnotationis exigiutas non caperet
    1. Re:Good Idea. Wrong technology. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After the slashdotting's done, read the FAQ on their site; they already researched and rejected wireless (and cable, and ...). They didn't just pick DSL out of a hat, they did their homework.

  83. So? by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    They'll spend a lot of time keeping it patched, but if they're willing to, so what? It's probably NT 4, but that's not real surprising. Not everyone is a Unix/Linux admin. However, since it seems they have a good deal of cash, if they want ease of administration and security, the fast and easy road to a better server would be OSX.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  84. howdo you do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    --I'd love to do this myself out in the boonies, but no idea what you really need in the way of equipment and software, etc to get started. I can operate a computer, duh, but besides that, does anyone here have a link to some newbie detailed info on accomplishing a task like this? Or just some ad hoc info on a basic setup, what you need? Assume zero prior knowledge on getting an actual isp setup and going.

    Thanks in advance!

    1. Re:howdo you do this? by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Hey, I have the perfect link for you: http://www.rric.net/

      It even has network diagrams!

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  85. What a great article by ebmedia · · Score: 1

    The MSNBC story, and the Coop's website, were really great reads. Thank you, Slashdot :) I learned a lot about what really goes into a broadband connection, and I even went so far as to look up all of their equipment on ebay!

  86. FTTH by tomas.bjornerback · · Score: 1

    Old, but here it goes:

    100 Mbps FTTH in my home.

    --

    I have 1 Gbps Internet access@home

  87. a different mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://web.archive.org/web/20011031052416/http://w ww.rric.net/

    -- Ender, Duke_of_URL

  88. Would this work in Canada? by Brant · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if legislation exists in Canada that would give you access to the right pieces of the phone network? I'm working on building a co-housing community and this may be an option for us.

    Brant

  89. Why is Qwest like a shopvac? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IT blows and sucks at the same time. I am running a cisco 675 with a small lan to boot. We have currently 512 down and 128 up. For some reason I am lucky if I pull 6k off of anything. Currently we only have 6 people on the lan during summer session(college). Qwest keeps telling me I must have done something wrong, or that the router is broken. Which I replaced at a cost of $100 off ebay only to find out our old router is not broken, it still continues with slow dsl and periods of outage. We pay $60 some dollars for barely better than dial up, but to provide a fraternity house with access it's the only way. I am senior Comp. Sci. major and preparing to take the CCNA this summer so I don't think it is anything I did to the router. Plus I have followed the instructions to a T to set up the initial config. I have better things to do with my time like work on code for my Senior Project than to sit on the phone with qwest all day and have the technician tell me I am stupid and assume i f'ed it up. You go to hell qwest you go to hell and die

  90. Re:So there was no satellite service in their area by Jonny+290 · · Score: 1

    So, rather than get ISDN at $100 per month, you spent TEN THOUSAND DOLLARS for a phone loop?

    You do realize that the same 10 grand you spent would have paid for your ISDN for EIGHT YEARS, right?

    --
    Hey Taco! Looks like you're using the "infinite monkeys and typewriters" scheme to generate Ask Slashdots again...
  91. Re:Two words: Lightning Protection by unitron · · Score: 2
    "...there are lots of things much higher than the cat5 that the lighting would rather hit first."

    The other day I saw something on The Discovery Channel or something similar. After they went back through the tapes of the regional weather radar and the satellite pictures and all that, they discovered that the lightning that hit a guy on a bicycle in Vail, CO, out of a bright, clear sky came from 10 miles away, traveling sideways over a mountain before it got to him.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  92. Bandwidth at Ruby Ridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    [insert Randy Weaver or Janet Reno joke here]

    1. Re:Bandwidth at Ruby Ridge by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

      Uh, it's Ruby Ranch. Not Ridge.

  93. Re:So there was no satellite service in their area by MrResistor · · Score: 2

    You can't get ISDN on a farm line. You also can't get most of the other extra services, like call waiting and such. We had to spend the 10 grand for the phone loop before we could even have a chance at getting fleeced for ISDN.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  94. We did this too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few of us set up a network using SDSL modems. 2 Megabits over a 20 dollar a month leased line (analogue/voice). We used Pairgain SDSL modems to do it, which made us all appear on the same net. The machine in the next room was no faster than my friends 4km away.

    You have to be on the same exchange though, otherwisde your leased lines are not copper.

    I moved recently, and sadly disconnected. I have the two SDSL modems if anyone is interested (1000 dollars for the pair)

    Gary_howland@hotmail.com

  95. Re:And they impose restrictive TOS on their own us by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

    What a pity that you could not quote the paragraph that you were talking about. Here's what our web page (http://www.rric.net/faq/speeds.htm) really says: "We will not, however, permit servers, at least not at first. We need to accumulate some experience with actual traffic levels and with our charges billed to us by our upstream provider. Any server that were to generate appreciable traffic would need to be paid for at a higher rate than the rate paid by other subscribers who merely check email and visit web sites."

  96. Re:So there was no satellite service in their area by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

    Your question about why we didn't use satellite service is answered on our web site. See "Why don't you simply use a broadband satellite connection?" at http://www.rric.net/faq/nosatellite.htm .

  97. Re:Two words: Lightning Protection by Carl+Oppedahl · · Score: 1

    For our Coop we have lightning protection at each end of each loop. At the DSLAM end we are using 16-volt solid-state fused protectors (described on our web site in the FAQ section). At each home we have the protectors provided by Qwest -- gas-discharge devices that trigger at 150 volts or so. Plus the cable is buried at all points (other than pedestals and end points) so lightning is less of a risk than it would be for above-ground cable.

  98. Qwest is the worst by ErnieDV · · Score: 1

    These folks are fortunate that they had available loops to grab. I've been trying for months to get Qwest DSL. Qwest told me that my line wouldn't qualify because my second line was installed using a bridge tap and was interfering. I cancelled my 2nd line and asked for the bridge tap to be removed. Two weeks later I get a different story from Qwest that there are no unused pairs in my area so even though DSL is available just 2 blocks away, it will probably never be available in my area. No one ever mentioned whether anyone had removed the bridge tap as requested.

    I live in a city of 50,000 people in Northern Arizona. It's a crime that Qwest can treat it's customers this way and that DSL is not universally available in a city of this size. It isn't just that I can't get DSL, I cannot connect at anything higher than 28k. I don't have words to describe how bad this is.