Slashdot Mirror


How Yoda Became an Action Star

fexter writes: "This article at Entertainment Weekly talks about Yoda's transformation from a puppet to a completely-CG character, and talks about the animators' horror at Lucas' transformation of Yoda: 'When Coleman and crew first saw them, they were appalled. They thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store.'"

216 of 663 comments (clear)

  1. Fight Scene by fidget42 · · Score: 4, Funny

    A friend of mine said that the fight scene reminded him (sound wise) of a battle involving Miss Piggy. Unfortunately, now I picture her in the fight instead of Yoda.

    --
    The dogcow says "Moof!"
    1. Re:Fight Scene by Sc00ter · · Score: 5, Informative
      Considering the person that does the voice of Miss Piggy is also the person that does the voice of Yoda (Frank Oz) it's no suprise.

    2. Re:Fight Scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But Miss Piggy would have knocked him out faster

    3. Re:Fight Scene by Grell · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Nah the reaction is more like these.

      One

      and this

      Two


      That's the feeling I left with at least. Makes you realize how the destruction
      of the Jedi Council must have left him old and alone.
      (Dagobah Yoda) vs. His top of his form Council Leader persona.

      --
      ...when it gets down to fundamentals, do what you have to do and shed no tears. Dr. Matson in Tunnel in the Sky
    4. Re:Fight Scene by Triv · · Score: 2

      Well, according to imdb Frank Oz didn't do Yoda's voice in this one, he was on the set only as a consultant.

      Triv

    5. Re:Fight Scene by Gid1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      According to imdb, he did do the voice. He was only required on set as a consultant to fill in the voice of Yoda he did (before or after) in the recording studio for the benefit of the real life actors.

      The imdb trivia entry is misleading... the full cast list clarifies it.

    6. Re:Fight Scene by colmore · · Score: 3, Informative

      unless he's in a nielson family, that won't matter.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  2. Credibility lost by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the first paragraph:

    We're talking, of course, about the most crowd-pleasing scene in a movie so far this year, wherein the little green Jedi Master summons the Force to bounce and whoop and haiiii-yah!

    No... The most crowd pleasing scene in a movie so far this year was Kirsten Dunst giving mouth to mouth resuscitation to Spiderman in the rain with her nipples hard from the cold.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Credibility lost by Mike+the+Mac+Geek · · Score: 5, Funny

      May you live long, good sir, for putting that particular image back into my head. I had nearly forgotten the perkiness of that moment. Never again.

      --
      -------------------------------------------------- ---- The man, the myth, the something or other.
    2. Re:Credibility lost by Snaller · · Score: 2

      Why is it some kids get so carried away by such a thing? Unless you are the cause; who cares!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    3. Re:Credibility lost by gvonk · · Score: 2

      Unless you are the cause; who cares!

      Us heterosexual males who get to watch, that's who.

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    4. Re:Credibility lost by Nighttime · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The most crowd pleasing scene in a movie so far this year was Kirsten Dunst giving mouth to mouth resuscitation to Spiderman in the rain with her nipples hard from the cold.

      You didn't notice that Natalie Portman had a twin nipple-on in the cockpit scene on Tatoonie. Who'd have thought it was that cold in the desert? :)

      (No, I wasn't deliberately looking out for it, but it was one of those things that once you'd noticed it, you couldn't stop noticing it.)

      --
      I've got a fever and the only prescription is more COBOL.
    5. Re:Credibility lost by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ahh yes... they must have had some good air conditioning in that spaceship.

      That and the fireplace scene were my favorites. The only thing the fireplace scene was missing was some "porn groove" music.

      (off-topic: I still don't understand how a queen is elected, but a senator is appointed. It just seems like a stupid thing that Lucas made up so that Natalie Portman's character wouldn't need $100,000 costumes).

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    6. Re:Credibility lost by Fjord · · Score: 2

      My take on the queen election is that there are people of a liniage that can be elected Queen. These would be princesses and Leia would be one because she is decended from Amedala. So you have these princesses, but rather than using a "first child always rules" system, the princess is elected as the ruler for a short term.

      As far as a senator being appointed, that's not that alien to Canadians.

      --
      -no broken link
    7. Re:Credibility lost by Snaller · · Score: 2

      >>Unless you are the cause; who cares!

      >Us heterosexual males who get to watch, that's who.

      No trollboy that's not true (unless you meant US for United States, perhaps its an American phenomenon to get turned on by a girl with a body like a twelve year old boy as long as she has erect nipples) - but I suppose virgin males get overly excited by things they hope are yet to come.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    8. Re:Credibility lost by Snaller · · Score: 2

      >>Why is it some kids get so carried away by such a thing? Unless you are the cause; who cares!

      >Uh, why do you go to movies at all? Unless you are the main character, why do you care?

      Ah, good point. A million people go for a million different reasons, one can only wonder about some of them.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    9. Re:Credibility lost by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2

      Taking your joke seriously for a while- it can get damn cold in the desert. Deserts just don't have much rain. They're not nessicarily hot. I've camped out in the desert and had to get back into the car because the temperature dropped below freezing.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    10. Re:Credibility lost by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Leia is a Princess of Alderaan, not of Naboo. She was adopted into whatever royal family thing they have there (there's an implication that Princess is an honorary title, with no real power attached)

    11. Re:Credibility lost by Nightpaw · · Score: 2

      Dude, it's Geocities. You can slashdot it with 10 minutes and a reload button.

    12. Re:Credibility lost by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2

      It can happen at night like it did to me.

      But it can also happen in the day.
      The only factor in determining whether an area is desert is the amount of rainfall. Not nessicarily the warmth of the place.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  3. Well, Yoda just used the force... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    but he forgot to take a few minutes to warm up as stretching cold muscles can cause injury.

  4. Appalled? by MightyPhil · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Why, I thought this was one of the best scenes in the movie. All my life, I wanted to see Yoda as a real Jedi, rather than just a frail wise old master. This fight was what I have been waiting for from Star Wars for a long time.

    Finally, you understand that Yoda, although frail physically, has the ability to channel the Force in ways that no other Jedi can, at least as far as we have seen.

    I don't think that the fight was in any way a detriment to the character, it actually just enhances his mystique. Besides, the irony of him finishing up bouncing off the walls, only to pick up his cane and hobble around again was priceless.

    1. Re:Appalled? by Buran · · Score: 2

      Indeed. One man's trash is another man's treasure, as they say. I'd have to say that scene is tied for favorites (in Episode 2) with the juxtaposition of C-3PO and a battle droid; details left out in case readers haven't seen the film, but those who have know what I'm referring to.

    2. Re:Appalled? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, I am of similiar mindset to you in someways and not in others.

      Finally, you understand that Yoda, although frail physically, has the ability to channel the Force in ways that no other Jedi can, at least as far as we have seen.

      I've always thought that the Jedi are a pretty clear reference to martial arts and that The Force is similar to the chinese concept of "chi". Chi is meant to be some kind of biological energy force that flows through the body of an individual (in fact, acupuncture is designed to reroute the chi through meridians in the body -- if you believe in that sort of thing). Chinese martial artists believe their superior fighting ability comes from being able to channel their chi into an opponent and use the opponent's chi against them. In a book by B.K. Frantzis entitled "The Power of Internal Martial Arts," he describes studying under several chinese kung fu masters. One of them was so old and frail that he walked into the dojo with a cane, after warming up was able to toss strong men around effortlessly, and then had to leave again with the assistance of a cane. So the idea that The Force can help one overcome their age-induced physical limitations isn't exactly new.

      I don't think that the fight was in any way a detriment to the character, it actually just enhances his mystique.

      I don't think that people object to Yoda fighting, it was the way in which he fought. Movies have somehow perpetuated the idiotic notion that martial arts is about jumps and flips. I think it would have been far, far, more impressive if Yoda moved around a lot less and demonstrated his skill with the speed, accuracy and ability to rapidly change his sabre strokes. He expended a lot of useless energy bouncing around. Remember, when you're doing a flip, you're basically defenseless and not doing any real attack. You would think that a wise old Jedi like Yoda would be able to use some pretty efficient moves on Dooku.

      Just my two cents,

      GMD
    3. Re:Appalled? by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Why, I thought this was one of the best scenes in the movie.

      And if you read more than the first couple of paragraphs, you would have seen that Coleman and the animators eventually agreed with you.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    4. Re:Appalled? by FFFish · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it would have been far, far, more impressive if Yoda moved around a lot less and demonstrated his skill with the speed, accuracy and ability to rapidly change his sabre strokes.

      Damn straight. Imagine him fighting with an economy of motion and energy. Defeating enemies by using their movement against them; parrying their attack by using their attack against them; using the subtlest shift in weight to completely alter a situation to his advantage.

      It'd have been a thing of beauty.

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    5. Re:Appalled? by Arandir · · Score: 2

      Finally, you understand that Yoda, although frail physically, has the ability to channel the Force in ways that no other Jedi can

      But that's not what Yoda did. He and Dooku figured out that neither could defeat the other through mastery of the force, so they agreed to settle the dispute through mundane methods. Did you even see the movie?

      It wasn't the force. If it was, here is what would have happened: Dooku would have swung fast and furiously with the light saber, and Yoda would have parried every blow with his mind and a minute wave of his fingers. He would have thrown off those attacks just as if they were the earlier stones and lightning bolts. If that were the way the scene would have been done, it would have been awesome! It would have put fear on the face of Dooku.

      --
      A Government Is a Body of People, Usually Notably Ungoverned
    6. Re:Appalled? by Bishop · · Score: 2

      Agreed.

      I had chills as Joda drew his sabre. In that instant I was thinking, "Excellent. Now we will see *The* Master Jedi in action." Unfortunately my ephoria was quickly dashed aside.

      I was hopeing to see a grand master swordman. Where every parry, and stroke were perfect. Instead we get to see a buzzing bee zip around the screen.

    7. Re:Appalled? by FFFish · · Score: 2

      Basically, yup. :-)

      --

      --
      Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    8. Re:Appalled? by crimoid · · Score: 2

      If every stroke was perfect would it not be a pretty short fight? Not exactly fun to watch, eh?

    9. Re:Appalled? by Bishop · · Score: 2

      ok ok, "perfect" wasn't the best word to use. I toyed with the idea of useing "amazingly great" but it didn't seem to fit. :-)

    10. Re:Appalled? by wljones · · Score: 2

      Film viewers seem to forget that Count Dooku took part in this fight. His escape was straight from the Fu Manchu character that was also played by Christopher Lee. The count provides a devastating distraction to occupy the hero, Yoda, while he slips away to do more evil. Doctor Loveless in Wild Wild West used similar methods to keep his part from ending in one episode. Writers hate to lose a good villain too early.

    11. Re:Appalled? by afidel · · Score: 2

      Actually a fight between two masters, even old ones can include many, many minutes of perfect attacks countered by perfect parries. After seeing two 5 don's in kendo fight at the national competition here in Cleveland I can say that it is in fact a beutiful thing to watch, and if the swords had been glowing and the lights dim it would have been mind blowing =)

      p.s.
      The sword fighting in the origional trilogy was a combination of fencing and kendo, since my brothers sensee (sp?) teaches both he can emulate the style pretty well.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:Appalled? by Slynkie · · Score: 2

      I believe what MightyPhil was referring to was Yoda using the Force on himself, not against Dooku. In otherwords, there was no way the physically frail little one could move like he did without applying the Force, in some way, to his own movements. It's quite obvious that under normal circumstances, he barely has the ability to walk at any decent speed, let alone perform acrobatics.

    13. Re:Appalled? by raistlinne · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I've always thought that the Jedi are a pretty clear reference to martial arts and that The Force is similar to the chinese concept of "chi".

      Well, sort of. The Chinese concept of chi is a fairly internal one, whereas the idea of the force is very external. Chi powers have more to do with manipulating energy in one's body, and force powers have more to do with manipulating energy outside of one's body (not that the force isn't inside of people as well, but it's by virtue of being all-pervasive).

      I don't think that people object to Yoda fighting, it was the way in which he fought. Movies have somehow perpetuated the idiotic notion that martial arts is about jumps and flips.

      Well, this isn't so idiotic. There are chinese styles that are very, very jumping-heavy. From what I understand, there are some northern styles where a fighting person spends more time in the air then on the ground. (This is supposed to be derived from fighting on ice, where the air is actually a more stable place than the ground is.)

      That being said, I heard a story (from someone who witnessed it) about a 60-something year old black dragon gung fu practicioner who drank gin from the bottle, smoked cigars about 1" in diameter, had a pot belly the side of some people's bodies, and waddled around. Some students insulted him (laughed at how fat he was, I believe) and by way of demonstration, after informing them of what he was going to do, he jumped upso that his waste was around the height of their shoulders or heads, kicked one in the shoulder and before he hit the ground had spun around and kicked the other one in the side of the leg. The students both hit the ground at approximately the same time.

      So maybe there's more to the idea of a master jumping around at really high speeds than you realize. :-)

      He expended a lot of useless energy bouncing around. Remember, when you're doing a flip, you're basically defenseless and not doing any real attack.

      Well, I thought that (1) it wasn't his energy - it was the force, so that there was an unlimited supply of it and (2) he was moving around to attack from different positions. After all, it's not like he jumped up and waited to land again before attacking. His saber was spinning around saw-tooth fashion while he was jumping, and I recall Dooku having to block it more than once while yoda's feet were not on the ground.

      You would think that a wise old Jedi like Yoda would be able to use some pretty efficient moves on Dooku.

      Given that Yoda probably couldn't even reach Dooku's chest with his light saber, how did you want him to fight? By constantly attacking Dooku's ankles? Do remember that in traditional sword fighting a longer reach count's for quite a lot - and Dooku's arms were something like twice as long as Yoda's, if not more. Yoda would have been severely outmatched just by that, had he stayed relatively motionless on the ground. By jumping around, Yoda was able to attack Dooku near his head.

      That being said, he didn't seem to be doing much in the way of deflecting Dooku's saber and attacking a more vulnerable spot, which happens a lot in real fencing. That was a bit dissapointing. That and yoda not winning. It's not like Dooku wasn't expendible.

      --
      They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
    14. Re:Appalled? by raistlinne · · Score: 2

      Please note that what you're describing is very hard to do against a skilled opponent, let alone a skilled opponent who is literally bigger than twice your size? Bear in mind that it's hard to take advantage of small mistakes in someone's attack when their body isn't actually within your reach, partially because your head is as high as their waste and partially because their arms are as long as your entire body. Don't you recall how Yoda's unignited light saber was about half as big as he was?

      The sort of technique that you're talking about works well if you're roughly physically comparable to your opponent. When your opponent is much, much, much larger than you are, different techniques have to be used. Often the compensation that the small use is to be a lot faster than their opponent.

      Remember: reach counts for quite a lot in martial arts. More over, all things being equal, big people have an advantage over small ones - they're stronger and have a longer reach. Is it any wonder that yoda used the same sort of technique in fighting larger people that small people have traditionally used: being faster?

      --
      They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
    15. Re:Appalled? by raistlinne · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Where every parry, and stroke were perfect.

      Well, did you ever see yoda get hit? His opponent had no opportunity to hit him. What other quality is there to the perfect parry, or the perfect stroke?

      Why should yoda have fought like someone twice his size with none of his force powers? It doesn't make sense.

      As the old saying goes: "If you're a master of the invisible kick, it really doesn't matter what your opponent knows." Similarly: "It is better to be great at one type of punch than good at ten." Yoda could move faster than essentially any other living creature. Since yoda's speed came from an unexhaustable source of power, why waste time with skillful moves on the gamble that your opponent isn't better at his attack than you are at your specific parry, when you can constantly bombard him with attacks that give him no chance to counterattack?

      Something that a judo sensei told me: once your a blackbelt, you'll have some move that you do really well -- better than prettymuch everyone else. When you're a high degree blackbelt, you'll have for or five such moves. When you're practicing, you practice all of your moves. When you're in a competition (or fighting), you use the ones that you're expert at. yoda was an expert in the force. Why would he ignore that in favor of his skill in fencing?

      --
      They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
    16. Re:Appalled? by p3d0 · · Score: 2
      I don't think that people object to Yoda fighting, it was the way in which he fought. Movies have somehow perpetuated the idiotic notion that martial arts is about jumps and flips.
      I look at it a different way. The characters in episodes 4-6 sometimes seem impractically fantastic. But just as Episode I explained why R2-D2 is built the way he is (for wheeling around spaceship hulls, not rolling across the desert), similarly this one explained how a 2-foot-tall man could have an advantage nobody else has: end-over-end turns within the space of half a lightsabre.

      You give the viewing public (including me) too much credit if you think we'd notice "speed, accuracy and ability to rapidly change his sabre strokes".

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    17. Re:Appalled? by gorilla · · Score: 2
      Do remember that in traditional sword fighting a longer reach count's for quite a lot

      Which begs the question, why are light sabres so short? Conventional swords are limited by the mass of the blade, if it's too long, it's going to be too heavy to swing properly. A light sabre is massless, so it should be possible to make one much longer, and give a much more dangerous weapon.

    18. Re:Appalled? by Odinson · · Score: 2
      "Remember: reach counts for quite a lot in martial arts. More over, all things being equal, big people have an advantage over small ones - they're stronger and have a longer reach."

      If you have seen the recent Tyson vs Louis fight you know what he was talking about. Tyson couldn't even reach the guy without exposing himself. Louis won by knock out.

    19. Re:Appalled? by cheese_wallet · · Score: 2

      "I think it would have been far, far, more impressive if Yoda moved around a lot less and demonstrated his skill with the speed, accuracy and ability to rapidly change his sabre strokes. He expended a lot of useless energy bouncing around"

      I think he did all of that. And he did it while flying around. He was 2 feet tall! And his light saber wasn't much more, certainly not nearly as along as Dooku's. I don't know why they made his saber short... just to keep it in perspective I guess.

      And, I believe, lightsaber blades don't have mass, so a longer saber isn't really a disadvantage.

    20. Re:Appalled? by Sorklin · · Score: 2
      But just as Episode I explained why R2-D2 is built the way he is...

      Yeah, Lucas is extremely consistent in these movies. For example, Episode II explains why R2 can fly.

      Wait a minute....

    21. Re:Appalled? by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2

      I did fencing in college (I was better at rapier than saber).
      I'm 5'6" and let me tell you, being small can be an advantage, but only if you move around a lot. It's hard to hit a small fast moving target. Moving in close to someone with a long reach can turn that reach into a temporary disadvantage. Using someone's 'weight' against them dosen't matter quite so much in sword fighting. A light touch can still do damage. This isn't Judo. Anyone who is a master with a sword is going to launch a series of light attacks. If you wind up for a full swing like you would with a baseball bat, you're going to get a sword in your gut and no master class swordsman would do it.

      Yoda's strategy (close fast and quick and small) makes a lot of sense given the circumstances.

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
    22. Re:Appalled? by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 2

      So you'd rather see a fight scene with Mr. Miagi from "The Karate Kid" than Trinity from "The Matrix"?

      Wax on. Wax off.

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    23. Re:Appalled? by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 2

      Uggghhhh, Dooku's line right here was easily the worst line in the movie. Even worse than the 3PO dialogue. I have this feeling that while the movie was being edited, someone decided that we really needed that horribly forced line of dialogue to explain why they pull out the light sabres.

      I can hardly wait for "Episode 2.1: Attack of The Editors" so we can be rid of a couple of the scenes.

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    24. Re:Appalled? by streetlawyer · · Score: 2

      Give over. Aikido is notoriously a useless martial art for actual combat against anyone who is not one of your students, in a gym or dojo, who you have just told to run toward you with their right wrist stuck out.

    25. Re:Appalled? by streetlawyer · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, Ali beat Liston, and Tyson beat a lot of big guys when he still had his lateral movement. A big man's jab is hard to beat, but big men who jab often do so with their feet planted, making them vulnerable to a smaller guy who circles.

    26. Re:Appalled? by raistlinne · · Score: 2

      Well, a 10' lightsaber blade would still be very combersome, especially inside of rooms where you (1) don't want to kill everyone and (2) don't want to destroy everything. Also, just by the lever principle your strength in pushing the blade decreases along its length, so fighting with the end of it if it were 10' long would probably be ineffective (it is indicated that you need strength to push through things, even if the saber is good at it).

      Also, jedi need to be fast with their saber and a 10' saber would be much slower not because of increased mass but just because of increased distance that it would have to travel.

      --
      They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
    27. Re:Appalled? by arkanes · · Score: 2
      Exactly - I'm also a fencer (better with saber than rapier, so I guess we're even :P) and this fight is EXACTLY what lightsaber duels should be like. I always hated the fights in the original movies - we're talking about infinitly sharp weapons, so just like it fencing, power isn't an issue. It's all about your speed and agility, and, like the fight between Dooku and Obi-wan/Anakin, it'd be a very fast sequence of blows decided by one strike. Non-serious lightsaber wounds would be practically non-existent.

      Also, from a movie-makers perspective, fights like this are alot more exciting to watch (for the masses) than slow, deliberate Judo throws or whatever.

    28. Re:Appalled? by MikeTheYak · · Score: 2
      Uggghhhh, Dooku's line right here was easily the worst line in the movie.


      Add to that the pain of seeing it delivered by an actor of Christopher Lee's caliber.

    29. Re:Appalled? by arkanes · · Score: 2
      I'd have to contradict most of your post - first case, staff fighting techinques won't work at all with a lightsaber. You can't touch it anywhere except the hilt, so you can't do pretty much any of the moves that makes staves versatile. Darth Maul's lightsaber is cool and all, but it's really a defensive weapon - he's got no reach to speak of.

      About being able to attack faster with a staff... just not true. Sure, you've got 2 ends, but the angles you can attack from are limited, and it's not neccesarily faster. Since you have to either a) face full body or b) bring your whole body forward to attack with the other end of a staff, a good fencer will have no trouble riposting before you can get the other end around.

      I'm not sure where you get this nonsense about a sword fighter having to move his entire body to parry. If your technique is good, you won't need to move any part of your body except your wrist and lower arm, and even then just a few inches. 300 years of sword-fighting technique has come up with a few things, after all...

      2 weapons - there's a reason it never became a popular technique. It's bloody damn hard to effectivly use 2 full length weapons, and parrying with one to attack with the other, while a good technique, is far from some sort of instant-win. IF you can bind your opponents blade, you can usually get a hit in, but since you can't bind with a lightsaber (stupid Ep 4-6 battles notwithstanding), a better technique is the circular one Anakin used. And even that would only work for someone with preternatural reflexes and instincts, because turning your back on someone with an instant-death weapon is a wise action.

      As for the two-handed technique... well, if you're only gonna use one weapon, you may as well put both hands on it. You've got better control, and you can always take one hand off if you need to. Otherwise your off hand is just sitting there being useless, and there's no point in that.

      It'd be foolish to move inside in a lightsaber duel. Closing is dangerous, because it's a commited action, and you have to remember that you can't afford to take ANY hits. Better is to maintain distance, and make stop cuts to the wrist. Keep moving, and try to circle your opponent when they attack. He attacks from the right, parry, capture, move right, and attack at his arm. Between 2 skilled opponents, you'd likely have a very rapid exchange of parries and ripostes, decided by one blow - exactly as in Ep 2.

    30. Re:Appalled? by arkanes · · Score: 2

      The impression I got was that Dooku, due to the power of the dark side, was an even match for Yoda in a pure force battle. Also, Yoda, being a Jedi and not a Sith, doesn't use the force directly for attack - he only deflects and redirects his opponents attacks. Dooku attacks Yoda, sees that Yoda is strong enough to deflect anything he can throw at him, and decides to use the lightsaber. As for pandering... well, duh.

    31. Re:Appalled? by jafac · · Score: 2

      Reach is fine and dandy, but speed and power win out. In the REAL world, very few matches are going to occur where one person outclasses another in speed and power enough to make a difference. In a fantasy world, where you've got the Force Mastery and all dat, it could easily make a difference.

      That said, I'd like to add;
      a WISE fighter uses his opponent's strength against him. Isn't Yoda a WISE character?

      The lack of wisdom in the jumping and flipping has been talked about.

      How could Yoda have used his lack of reach to his advantage?
      Yoda can reach targets on Dooku's body, that Dooku can't easily defend, by virtue of height. And as funny as it may sound, attacking Dooku's shins and ankles would have been excellent strategy, and I really wish that the fight choreographers had thought of that - instead of feeding us the same mad jumping screaming and flipping that the martial arts "industry" has been feeding us since Bruce Lee and before.

      Once Yoda had a good hit on an ankle, Dooku would be crippled, and a much easier target.

      Here's another example of why AOTC's portrayal was just plain WRONG.
      Remember ESB, when Luke and Vader squared off? For much of the fight, Vader was calm, didn't do a lot of gymnastics, and even fought one-handed - compared to Luke's balls out two handed sweating grunting fighting. Luke was obviously totally outclassed, and Vader fought with. . . dignity. Superiority. He was schooling Luke. That was how Yoda vs. Dooku should have been treated. In fact, had I scripted it, I would have had Dooku lose a foot, and he could still have narrowly escaped with the same trick (though I would have made the tumbling object MUCH larger, because Yoda should not have had any problems moving that silly little beam).

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    32. Re:Appalled? by jafac · · Score: 2

      And what do you think is useful? Monkey style? I hate to tell you this but Aikido people were the ones kicking most of the ass in Ulitmate Fighting. Gracy was an Aikido guy.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    33. Re:Appalled? by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      You know, given we have seen yoda move an Xwing with the force, wouldn't it have been more dignified and masterful for him to use the force to fight and/or control his light saber?

      Yoda probably couldn't even reach Dooku's chest with his light saber, but who said yoda needed to hold onto his light saber to control it?

    34. Re:Appalled? by raistlinne · · Score: 2

      Well, I thought about this as well and the problem with it, as far as I can tell, is that Dooku would probably make it very hard for yoda to accurately weild his saber by force power, as Dooku would doubtless use his force power on the saber as well, and dooku is quite powerful.

      I doubt that yoda could effectively use his blade remotely with a powerful sith fighting him for control of it. This is why, I suspect, that jedi/sith battles don't primarily consist of one of them pulling the other one's saber out of his hand and then making a quick end of the now saberless opponent. If both pull, the net effect is probably 0 or close to it.

      Of course, this probably was not thought of, but battles between jedi and sith would be pretty boring otherwise.

      --
      They laughed at Einstein. They laughed at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the Clown. -- C. Sagan
  5. Still should have been better by CarlDenny · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm still annoyed at the Yoda fight scene, and I think the animators were right.

    Yes, having Yoda kick ass was cool.
    But he didn't have to do it by spinning around at 3600RPM.

    Yoda is supposed to be relaxed and smug. He should have overwhelmed Dooku with -skill- instead of just being four times faster, with no moment of inertia. That scene would have been twice as good if the big Y had stayed upright, and parried and feinted like a madman. No need for backflips.

    1. Re:Still should have been better by Deagol · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I have to agree. I would have liked to see a parallel to the first Luke/Vader fight in ESB. The first few minutes are Luke going at it, while Vader kinda shrugs him off with his 'saber -- with one hand, no less. This really made an impact as to how much of a badass Vader truly was.

      And don't get me started on how Yoda should have simply force-shoved Kenobi and Skywalker out of the way of that pillar, rather than stop the pillar itself. Soooo lame.

      Speaking of Vader, am I the only one who was really let down by the 30-second battle between Anakin and Dooku? I mean, this kid is destined to be the Jedi, yet this scene lacked any real tension. Even the last Darth Maul fight in E-1 was better!

    2. Re:Still should have been better by Xerithane · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Uhm, don't you think that being 4x faster than your opponent is skill?

      I'd rather fight someone who is fighting "upright, and parr[ying] and feint[ing] like a madman" than a cracked out superball spinning around like a guided battle-axe. Just the opinion of an old tournament fighter, though. What Yoda did, takes more skill. Period. You can spin around all you want, and a lot of amatuer fighters do it. The trick is to be able to do it well and make it hard to defend. If done well, and fast, it throws your opponent off to defend and if they fail to defend, you get more power. Assuming you aren't doing focused strikes.. which is a whole different story.

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    3. Re:Still should have been better by iuyterw · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...the semi-overhead perspective makes it look shorter... Yeah, that's what I keep telling my girlfriend. :)

    4. Re:Still should have been better by g4dget · · Score: 2
      What kind of skill do you think allows a 2 foot figher get within striking range of a 6 foot opponent? Jumping and spinning, of course.

      And how do you suppose a 50 pound fighter is supposed to block a strike from a 200 pound fighter? If he just stands there and tries to block, he'll fly across the room like a golf ball.

      Jumping may or may not be dignified, but it's what small opponents have to do against large opponents. Jumping constitutes skill.

    5. Re:Still should have been better by CaseyB · · Score: 2
      What kind of skill do you think allows a 2 foot figher get within striking range of a 6 foot opponent? Jumping and spinning, of course.

      No, jumping is pretty useless. You're much better off moving in on your feet, where you have more control, more speed, and are much less predictable. Spinning is of course useless and dangerous.

      And how do you suppose a 50 pound fighter is supposed to block a strike from a 200 pound fighter? If he just stands there and tries to block, he'll fly across the room like a golf ball.

      Yoda also blocks and fights him strength to strength when they lock sabers. Your argument doesn't hold there.

      Jumping may or may not be dignified, but it's what small opponents have to do against large opponents. Jumping constitutes skill.

      Utterly false. Jumping is a pretty lousy tactic under most any circumstance. Small opponents just have to do anything they can to close the distance.

    6. Re:Still should have been better by afidel · · Score: 2

      And how do you suppose a 50 pound fighter is supposed to block a strike from a 200 pound fighter? If he just stands there and tries to block, he'll fly across the room like a golf ball.

      My brothers sensee's sensee who was an old many of about 75-80 weighed aproximately 95 lbs wet, his sensee was a big American about 6' 220lbs, 40 years old, all muscle, guess who got the shit kicked out of him when they fought. Yep, the younger bigger stronger guy. That old man knew just how to move and when to move. He would wait for you to do something stupid and crack you over the head so hard that even though it was a bamboo sword and you had a helmet on your head would ring for about 20 minutes =) Oh yeah and the old man was also an aid to the Japanese olympic judo team.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    7. Re:Still should have been better by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      Speaking of Vader, am I the only one who was really let down by the 30-second battle between Anakin and Dooku? I mean, this kid is destined to be the Jedi, yet this scene lacked any real tension.
      Think about it. The kid's bitching about how he should be all powerful. Then, he enters into a lightsabre battle with a longwinded older gentleman, and gets his ass, not to mention his arm, handed to him. Boy, he just might be a bit more tempted to try out some of that darkside power now.
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    8. Re:Still should have been better by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      Read your Kenshin! Shorter swords in close range allow one to block much more quickly than longer ones can strike. And once you get in close enough (inside their defense), the opponent with the longer sword is toast.

    9. Re:Still should have been better by ProfBooty · · Score: 2

      thats actually what i was expecting would happen, i think its more credible

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    10. Re:Still should have been better by G00F · · Score: 2

      "Of course, that begs the question of why Yoda seemed to be straining to lift it."

      Its called inconsistency, I think that's a Lucas trademark ;), actualy quite a bit of the "movie makers" have it. Where book writers keep things very consist with themselves.

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    11. Re:Still should have been better by hey! · · Score: 2

      The first few minutes are Luke going at it, while Vader kinda shrugs him off with his 'saber -- with one hand, no less

      Sure, but Vader was simply trying to show Luke who's boss. Yoda is trying to turn his opponent into Dooku-sushi.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    12. Re:Still should have been better by hey! · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of the extremely difficult Chinese martial of Bagauzhang, that combines evasive footwork with devestating short range power. Bagua experts are so slippery, they sometimes end up behind their opponents. I've heard it described as what you get when you cross a weedwhacker with a lock-pick gun.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    13. Re:Still should have been better by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      ---yes that is true, but the problem is closing the gap. the guy with the longer sword/reach etc can hit you before you can hit them asuming equal speed between the two of you.---

      In this case, the opponents with the longer sword would have to be faster, not of equal speed, to compensate. Larger, heavier swords take more time to swing, and more time to recover from a swing.

  6. jeez, they have like 2 paragraphs per page by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it me, or were there an awful lot of pages (and ads) in that article?


    Fight Club

    How Yoda became

    click to continue...(page 2/1345)

    an action star

    click to continue...(page 3/1345)

    With a little help

    click to continue...(page 4/1345)

    from director George Lucas

    click to continue...(page 5/1345)
  7. You've got the right vision... by allism · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The animators were right...he does look like a bouncing Sooperball, it is undignified, and I (and others I asked) found it more comical than amazing.

    1. Re:You've got the right vision... by rblancarte · · Score: 2

      I thought that what he did (bouncing around) was kind of cool. But I thought his HEE-YAA, was really annoying, and very overboard. Oh well, I have been the first to defend Lucas doing his thing, and this is just another example, BUT this is one thing I did not like.

      RonB

      --
      It is human nature to take shortcuts in thinking.
  8. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by 3th3rn3t · · Score: 3, Insightful

    " They thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store. "

    Yes, i have to agree with that, Lucas is a complete moron. Always was and always will be.
    He completely disregarded all the background the fans had created for the various characters in the movie ( for example Boba Fetts story ) and managed to ruin things once again.

    Not to mention the whole film was PACKED with CG. I mean, ok, sure, CG are nice and helpfull, but for god's sake, do use some real actors and scenert at some point. Every signle thing in the movie was CG'ed. I dont know, it just didnt feel like the StarWars people loved and respected anymore.

    As for the duel scene, it was a complete disaster IMHO. Many people in the theatre laughed and laughed after it, when Yoda grabbed his stick to help him walk. Sure, Yoda uses the force blah blah blah, but dont make the duel act as a comic relief.
    We await for Episode III - Lucas Epic Disaster.

  9. Dignity? by Dirtside · · Score: 5, Interesting
    They thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store.
    Yeah, I guess it would have been more dignified for Yoda to stand there and let Dooku hack him to pieces with a lightsaber. :) Come on, wise sayings and Charlie Chan grammar do not a powerful Jedi make. There has to be a reason Yoda is so respected -- and it's because he's a badass, not because he can spout aphorisms. (He's certainly not very wise, considering how badly the Jedi get blindsided by the Dark Side.)
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Dignity? by nomadic · · Score: 2

      I don't know, while I could appreciate the CGI, I was kind of disappointed that Yoda stooped to fighting. The cool thing about Yoda was always that he was THE Jedi master, even though he seemed frail and unimposing. I thought the whole point of putting him in the series to begin with was to emphasize that the Force wasn't about fighting power, but more about a sort of zen mystic state.

      It's like in Lord of the Rings (book, not the movie). Tolkien effectively conveyed that Gandalf was incredibly powerful, without making him shoot fireballs or blow up dragons.

    2. Re:Dignity? by qubit64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I disagree about how wise you think Yoda is. Consider the scene at the end "victory you say? ..." I think it is more about arrogance than wisdom. I suppose they are to a degree mutually exclusive, but I guess the Jedi simply have not had to deal with such a problem in a long time. (How long was it? 1000 generations or something) They've put themselves on quite the pedestal so they don't think that a Sith lord could possibly slip by them when in fact he did... They've forgotten (to a degree) the ways of the sith and how powerful they really are. Also, I think they respect Yoda for his wisdom in that he is very wise in matters that would effect the affairs of the jedi up to episode 1, and not so much with this new threat. Even with this new threat however Yoda seems to know more about it than the others... (again look at the victory comment) Come to think of it, it seems like a dark side ability is to be able to cloud the vision of even other jedi (light or dark). Evidence for this is the obvious stuff from episodes 1 and 2, but also in ROTJ, in which Vader feels the presence of luke when Sidious does not, and near the end when Sidious doesn't notice Vader is about to pick him up and throw him to his death. All this being said I don't disagree that they also respect him for his mastery of the sabre. I think it's a combination of the two however...

      --
      "Save me jebus!" - Homer Simpson (btw, I'm probably talkin out of me arse)
    3. Re:Dignity? by Dirtside · · Score: 2

      That's insensitive clod to you, buddy!

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    4. Re:Dignity? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2

      Heh. Guess who only saw the film, never read the books...

      Heh.. You can't say for certain whether or not Gandalf "died" in his fight for the Balrog.. it's never really explained how he came back... at least not in my recollection.. it's been a long time since I read the books.

    5. Re:Dignity? by jafac · · Score: 2

      EP II = 1000 years.
      EP IV = 1000 generations.
      GL = carelessly inconsistent.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    6. Re:Dignity? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      I thought it was that the Republic had existed for 1000 generations, or about 25,000 years, and, in ATOC, hadn't fought a war in 1000 years.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  10. It should look familiar by DeadBugs · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know it looked just like the scene from Karate Kid where Mr. Miyagi opens a can of whoop-ass on those punks. If you use photoshop to color Mr Miyagi green you will see a near perfect match.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  11. The fight we're really after by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yoda vs. Miss Piggy.

    I'd just love to see Miss Piggy move to her fighting posture, Yoda draw his lightsaber, and Frank Oz get throatache.

    1. Re:The fight we're really after by big_cat79 · · Score: 2

      "I'd just love to see Miss Piggy move to her fighting posture, Yoda draw his lightsaber,..."

      Right after this, immediately cut to Yoda eating a ham sandwhich or pork chops or a BLT. Don't show the fight, just the after effects.

      --

      BigCat79

      "The dead have risen and are voting Republican!" --Bart Simpson
  12. I don't like any of the fights by taxman_10m · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In TPM and ATC the jedi fight like samuri. Back with the original trilogy the jedi seemed to me to fight like duelers (mukateers or something), and even then their movements were slower, as if each jedi put a lot of thought into each single move. Watch the new ones, it's a bunch of flashing light and people jumping up and down. The Yoda thing is just the epitome of that. I saw ATM via a download, so maybe someone could clear this up. Did Yoda give Dookie that "bring it on" hand gesture that Neo did in the Matrix? Looked like it to me. It was sad.

    1. Re:I don't like any of the fights by nathanh · · Score: 2
      Did Yoda give Dookie that "bring it on" hand gesture that Neo did in the Matrix? Looked like it to me. It was sad.

      What's really sad is that you haven't watched enough Bruce Lee movies.

    2. Re:I don't like any of the fights by taxman_10m · · Score: 5, Funny
      Why don't you go spend the EIGHT dollars to see the movie in all its wonder...

      Because I saw the last movie in all its wonder.

    3. Re:I don't like any of the fights by nagora · · Score: 2

      Why don't you go spend the EIGHT dollars to see the movie in all its wonder...

      Because I saw the last movie in all its wonder.

      So why did you bother downloading the film? Methinks being a cheap-ass thief has more to do with it than being uninterested in seeing the film.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  13. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by dfn5 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Rumor has it that the crowd laughed during a pre-screening or some kind of audience test where Lucas was present. Apparently he got upset because it was supposed to be a serious scene. If this is true the man has lost all touch with reality.

    -Star Wars: Not the choice of a new generation.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
  14. Denny's TV commercial by cpeterso · · Score: 3, Funny



    Have you seen the new Denny's TV commercial? She and Kermit are ordering breakfast at Denny's. They order a Grand Slam breakfast and go ape-shit because they are overjoyed to be eating pancakes, sausage, and bacon. Man, there is some sick shit on TV these days...

    1. Re:Denny's TV commercial by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Funny
      Q: Why does miss piggy douche with honey & vinegar?

      A: Because kermit likes sweet & sour pork!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  15. The best scene in the film I have... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    When 875-or-so years old you reach, look as good you will not, eh?

    Of course, the bits that really make that scene come immediately before and after the fight, not during, but half the posters on this thread have spoiled the joke for anyone who hasn't seen it yet anyway... :-(

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  16. Filthy by thelen · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Filthy Critic's take:

    "Kirsten Dunst is a very good actress, and each of her tits under a wet shirt is worth a quarter the price of admission. I mean, this is the kind of stuff that makes a man sitting alone in a theater instinctively squeeze the Hamm's he smuggled in."

  17. Re:Lucas, Lucas... by G-funk · · Score: 2

    I love slashdot:

    "Lucas is a complete moron. Always was and always will be..... We await for Episode III [but it'll suck]"

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  18. Sadly Undignified by blink3478 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The animators were right all along, and I had a small piece of my childhood die watching Yoda leap around like a gymnist on crack. Yoda was my favorite character growing up, and that fight scene made no sense. I remember a video I saw of the guy who invented Aikido in the 1900s - I forget his name now. He was a wizened old man in the video, probably pushing ninety years old, his diciples had long-since taken over teaching their own varieties of aikido, and he still showed up in his dojo to train his students and give little demonstrations. What he lacked in mobility and strength he made up for in grace and economy of movement, and I watched as he would toss aside the students with little hand movements or slow sweeping gestures. The students could attack in piles, and still they would be tossed aside like leaves. It was really magical to watch such an old man possessed of such power. Anyway - that's how Yoda should have fought. He should have been slow, graceful and easily dispatched his enemies using only the force. He had no business using a lightsaber, and had no reason to spring about like a ping pong ball. Lastly, the reason Yoda and Boba Fett were awesome characters in the original trilogy was because they were mysterious - unknown pasts, unknown barely hinted-at abilities under the surface. Lucas destroyed their mystique by making them full fleshed-out characters in AOTC.

    1. Re: Sadly Undignified by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Insightful


      > Anyway - that's how Yoda should have fought. He should have been slow, graceful and easily dispatched his enemies using only the force.

      Yeah, but how many action figures would he sell that way?

      > Lastly, the reason Yoda and Boba Fett were awesome characters in the original trilogy was because they were mysterious - unknown pasts, unknown barely hinted-at abilities under the surface. Lucas destroyed their mystique by making them full fleshed-out characters in AOTC.

      Kind of like his inspiring "explanation" of The Force in E1, eh?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:Sadly Undignified by gosand · · Score: 2
      Morehei Ueshiba, and I belive it was originated around 1942. You did give a 100 year range, I thought I would narrow it down for you.

      I haven't even seen the movie yet, but I have heard about the "awesome" yoda scene. Then the new trailers came out, and I have seen a little of it. I really hope there are some good light saber scenes when I do get around to seeing it, because that is about the only reason I have left to watch it. I may just wait for it to come out on DVD and rent it. Damn, Episode I really did a number on me.

      --

      My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  19. Maybe it was only me.... by xinit · · Score: 2

    Despite the fact that I kept picturing kermit doing the fighting with all that bouncing around, I was simply glad that there were no frozen-time effects. Last thing we need is more homage paid to The Matrix with bullet time...

    --
    --- http://foo.ca
    1. Re:Maybe it was only me.... by jafac · · Score: 2

      argh - didn't see Muppet Treasure Island where Kermit fights LJS (Tim Curry) in the same manner - flipping jumping, only two cutlasses. . .

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  20. Bring back scale models! by phallen · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This Start Wars CG stuff is crap. Did you see some of those graphics? Taking a bite of CG fruit from 3 inches way? Gimme a break.

    I say bring back scale models! Watch the old movies. See how the X-Wings look real? That's because they are! How about that AT-AT or "Chicken-Walker"? They looked great, too. They're just small, but hell, WE can't tell.

    Yoda as a CG didn't look as real (shaddows and debth looked off), the vehicles, cities, characters, monsters, animals... everything CG looked horrible, except maybe for the light-sabers and lasers.

    Wait, I take it back: R2-D2 and C3P0 looked good... oh yeah, they were real! My bad.

    I would love it if Lucus, for Epesode III, tossed the CG and brought back the models, rubber masks, and puppets.

    --
    If Slashdot is where the spelling-challenged go when they die, I'm in heaven.
    1. Re:Bring back scale models! by CaseyB · · Score: 2

      Pretty bad examples, as in both of those cases the look of the CG element was quite different from the rest of the movie. Almost to the point of distraction for me.

    2. Re:Bring back scale models! by galaga79 · · Score: 2

      This Start Wars CG stuff is crap. Did you see some of those graphics? Taking a bite of CG fruit from 3 inches way? Gimme a break.

      I say bring back scale models! Watch the old movies. See how the X-Wings look real? That's because they are! How about that AT-AT or "Chicken-Walker"? They looked great, too. They're just small, but hell, WE can't tell.


      While scale models may look great in the space fights of the original trilogy than can look crap when composited with real actors. If you don't believe me then cast your mind back to the unscary model from Terminator 1 or ED-209 from Robocop. Granted the CG was overdone in Episode 2 but by the same token there is some stuff you can't do effectively with models, with the droid army battle springing to mind. Though I am surprised that every single clone trooper in the movie was CG.

    3. Re:Bring back scale models! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      His lightsaber shouldn't've had to blur once; he should've just been able to stand there and defend against attacks like a kendo master. Dooku attacks, and Yoda blocks, barely moving his saber to knock the blow aside before returning to a waiting position.
      Like Kenobi in A New Hope. "Fighting for center"
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    4. Re:Bring back scale models! by plover · · Score: 2
      They did use models. With a venegance.

      Did you watch the credits? (My family and I were alone in the theater watching them.) There were probably more model makers than programmers on the project. I was amazed, I had thought that they had switched entirely to CGI. But, according to IMDB they listed 48 model makers in the credits.

      I've read that AotC actually used more models than any movie ever before.

      But yeah, no CGI character I've ever seen has ever come close to the Taun-taun that Han Solo went riding in Ep 5. That was excellent puppetry.

      --
      John
    5. Re:Bring back scale models! by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Wait, I take it back: R2-D2 and C3P0 looked good... oh yeah, they were real! My bad.

      Um... yeah.

      Remember the scene where Anakin and Padme showed up at the moisture farm, and 3P0 greeted 'em? 3P0 was composited in. That shot was originally filmed with a puppet 3P0 without skins, TPM-style. When GL decided to cut the scene where 3P0 got skins, he made ILM go back and composite a new skinned 3P0 into those scenes.

      Never fucking noticed, did ya?

      People bitch and bitch about how bad this shot looked, or that one. They don't seem to realize that there were over 2,000 effects shots in that movie. For every shot you noticed, there were 200 that you didn't. Some little stuff-- my friend who shall remain nameless painted sparks and fire on the falling column during the Yoda/Dooku duel-- and some big stuff-- Palpatine's office was an entirely CG set. Even the desk.

      Basically I'm saying this: quit your whining. You have no idea what you're talking about.

    6. Re:Bring back scale models! by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2
      Yoda being diplomatic to Queen Amidala when she shows up for the first time. I don't know what, exactly, the line he said was, but it was lame, and didn't deserve screen time. What they should've done, instead, was have him hit on her. ... Yeah, you heard me, hit on her. This is the same Yoda who stole Luke's flashlight, and couldn't help but tease him repeatedly when he first met him, after all..

      Think about how different the circumstances were in the two scenes you are comparing. In Ep. II, Yoda is a top member of the Jedi council. In Ep. V, all the Jedi have been killed and the few that weren't had to hide in the corners of the galaxy. No other sentient creatures around. How much of a chance does he get to enjoy himself or laugh? So when Luke comes he wants him to stay around and whatnot. Makes perfect sense. It doesn't make much sense, however, if he acted that way as a top member of the Jedi council. How the hell did he get there? By being really good at the force? What about Qui-Gon? Didn't his behavior keep him from getting a place on the council?
      the scene with Yoda and the little kids was insanely embarrassing. It had one purpose, and one purpose only; to relate to the audience that Obiwan got permission from Yoda to visit the cloner's planet.

      To me, it had other purposes, like showing early Jedi training. We know that at some point in the teen years a Jedi is taken as a Padawan learner. What about before then? How does Jedi instruction work? It shows how Yoda taught Jedi in classes. Maybe this wasn't the most crucial moment on which the entire plot hinged. It was showing a character, and fleshing out the universe, and frankly, putting in touches like that is what makes a movie like Episode II, with an epic universe and tons of back stories, really enjoyable.
      Yoda's fight scene sucked. This is definitely not the same Yoda that we see later on in eps. 5&6. Sure, he hops around in the later movies, but seriously... athletic prowess is not Yoda's strong suit.

      Yoda never even fights at all in Episodes V and VI so we don't know how he fights until now. In any case, do you think Yoda's athletic prowess made him able to jump like that, or was it perhaps... the Force? The fact that he hobbles away on his cane directly after the fight was to make it very clear that Yoda's abilities come from the Force, and not because of his race or athleticism or anything like that.
      he should've just been able to stand there and defend against attacks like a kendo master.

      But he's not a kendo master, or an Aikido master, or a fencing master, etc. He's a Jedi master. All bets are off.
      Yoda's "average" expression, and the rest of the jedi council's' too, never changed once through the entire movie.

      What about the Jedi teachings about how your emotions betray you and whatnot. This was a crucial time and they needed to not let their emotions get in the way. Contrast that with Anakin's super-emotional behavior, and we can see how he started the path to the dark side. Later, when Yoda lives on Dagobah, he's a changed Yoda. He is a bit jaded about some things. He didn't even want to train Luke and bring about another Jedi.

      However, the fruit scene? Stupid! It had a purpose-- to show that Anakin used the Force for frivolous things. But this could have been done so much better by using real pieces of fruit instead of CG ones. Why couldn't they have used the magic of cutting to a closeup of Padme when she actually takes a bite, so that she didn't have to bite CG fruit? Who knows. Plus, the point with the fruit was already shown when he made that ball levitate while Padme was packing.

      Oh well.

      mark
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    7. Re:Bring back scale models! by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2
      To me, it had other purposes, like showing early Jedi training. We know that at some point in the teen years a Jedi is taken as a Padawan learner. What about before then? How does Jedi instruction work? It shows how Yoda taught Jedi in classes. Maybe this wasn't the most crucial moment on which the entire plot hinged. It was showing a character, and fleshing out the universe, and frankly, putting in touches like that is what makes a movie like Episode II, with an epic universe and tons of back stories, really enjoyable.
      Actually, what I thought was "I wonder just how complete Vader's eventual purge of the Jedi order is...does he wind up slaughtering all of the three and four year olds that they apparently induct?
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    8. Re:Bring back scale models! by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2

      I bet they just won't mention them. Hmmm, on second thought, maybe they'll follow Episode II's tactic.

      Preview of Episode III:

      "I killed them... every last one of them! And not just the male Jedi... but the women... and the children too! They're animals and I slaughtered them like animals!"

      mark

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  21. The Jedi are an order of knights... by mir@ge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and knights are combatants. It only makes sense for their most respected member to be able dish it out when necessary.

    That said, Yoda is more in touch with the light side of the force than all of them. When he is a peace it flows through him and he can do wonders. I personally thought that he should just have "relaxed" and start tossing Doku around like a rag doll when he wipped out the light saber. It is peace that has always been Yoda's ally not violence. I think the Yoda we see in AOTC is more rash and youthful himself. He is arrogant and still has a lesson to learn.

  22. Hand gesture by LowneWulf · · Score: 2

    The 'move' that Neo did was was THE SIGNATURE MOVE OF BRUCE LEE!
    Come on, while Keanu did kick some AI butt in that movie, credit must be given where credit is due.

    The only question now being who would win in a fight? Neo? Bruce Lee? Or Yoda?

    Neo can bend reality, Yoda's got the force, and Bruce Lee just takes the hits and keeps coming.

    1. Re:Hand gesture by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      as wong fei hung?

      same character

  23. Where's the hero's journey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    fexter (original story submitter) here...

    It's only fair to note that the article concludes that it was cool for Yoda to do this, after all:

    But, boy, were they wrong: The scene has played like gangbusters, and Yoda is by far the most popular character in the new film (as a recent EW.com poll confirms). He even became the star of the ads, which dropped romantic-lead costars Natalie Portman and Hayden Christensen for him.

    But I think this points out the bigger flaw with the movie: that a mentor character becomes, with ease, more popular than the supposed heroes.

    I think the writing and direction were the root cause of this.

    This article:

    http://nationalpost.com/search/story.html?f=/sto ri es/20020525/299070.html

    was really spot on. All about the missing rogue character.

    Lucas talks all about Joseph Campbell's mythology structure, which focuses on the hero's journey. But somehow, in the last two movies, Lucas has managed to avoid giving us any heroes we could enjoy watching.

    Sure, he has given us a couple characters who we at least like, but that doesn't mean they're heroes who we root for all the way along, and who we grow *with*. The most recent two movies are more of a series of events than heroes' journeys.

    fexter, ashintaro.com

    1. Re:Where's the hero's journey? by Bishop · · Score: 2

      Lucas has managed to avoid giving us any heroes we could enjoy watching.

      Worst still, the only character worth watching is the evil protagonist, Papaltine.

    2. Re:Where's the hero's journey? by prockcore · · Score: 2

      "The most recent two movies are more of a series of events than heroes' journeys."

      Well that's because they involve the development of an anti-hero. But really that's no excuse... the fact is that the anti-hero is just annoying and whiny.

      Compare and contrast with Lex Luthor in Smallville. Much more depth.. and he's got charisma, something required to be a hero or an anti-hero.. something that the last two Star Wars movies have lacked.

      The last two Star Wars movies are to the first 3 movies as Star Trek TNG is to the original. The former have emotion and a roguish quality.. the latter are plasticy, devoid of emotion, it's like watching robots.

  24. i hope this isnt redundant but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    why was Yoda straining to lift the column thing in ep. 2, when in the eyes of the force (as it were) everything is the same. Someone as 'powerful' as Yoda shouldn't have had to strain at all. and why didn't he maneuver it to crush Dooku's escape thing?

    1. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by bigdavex · · Score: 2
      No, it doesn't. The problem is explaining the relative difference between moving small objects and large objects.

      In the Empire Strikes Back, there's a conversation something like this:


      Luke: Master, moving stones around is one thing, but this, this is something entirely different.

      Yoda: No, no different. Size matters not. Judge me by my size do you?
      [Luke shakes his head.]
      Yoda: And well you should not, because my ally is the force.
      [Yoda lifts the X-wing out of the swamp.]

      (That's not quite right, but it's embarrassingly close.)

      In episode II, we see Yoda move his saber effortlessly and then move the bolder with great strain. So Yoda is really full of crap in this respect.
      --
      -Dave
    2. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think he was straining because Dooku was at that point trying to slam it down. Once Dooku turns and leaves, Yoda just heaves it aside. The problem I have is that none of them use the Force to DO anything. Like in the first movie, at the beginning. Oooh, droids with shields. PICK THEM UP AND POINT THEM AT ONE ANOTHER!

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Cheap, over-analytical attempt at an explanation: At the beginning, when he's holding up the ceiling, he's straining because Dooku is actively pushing down - the strain isn't from the weight, it's because he's fighting with Dooku. The big pillar that gets knocked over, he's straining because a) he's weary from the duel and b) because it takes focus to move things with the force, and he didn't have time to properly center himself. he's able to easily pick up his staff because.. umm... because... yeah.

    4. Re:i hope this isnt redundant but... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      Remember that, even in Empire, Yoda almost keels over after hoisting the X-Wing. I think that what he's saying is more that you can channel as much Force power as you think you can, but it's still going to be a strain.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  25. OT: Fist of Legend by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

    That is one fucking awesome movie! That fight scene you describe in only one of several awesome scenes. What makes that particular scene particularly cool is that neither Jet Li or the old Japanese master really want to fight but feel obligated to do so because of the political strife between China and Japan that is a constant undertone in the film. And while the two hold mutual respect for each other, they are perfectly willing to kill the other if need be. But once they start to fight, they both realize their commonality is much more important than their differences, which are really externally-imposed.

    Cool movie! Go rent it if you wanna see some kick-ass martial arts!

    GMD

  26. an expedient solution by gripdamage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I see the Yoda scene as an expedient solution to problem. I knew Yoda was going to "throw-down" in AOTC, and I wondered how they'd do it. No matter what I pictured in my head it didn't look right, and the animators had to do it on the screen. The solution Lucas came up with seems to be: make him move so fast you can't look at him while he's fighting. Part of me wants to call it it a cop out, but personally I think it works.

    It also sort of bothers me when adults complain about Jar-Jar and now CG Yoda. We all saw the original trilogy for the first time when we were younger than we are now. I don't know about you, but I accepted the Ewoks then, and in subsequent viewings I've accepted them (for better or worse) as part of Star Wars package. Attempting impartiality, I don't think they are any better than Jar Jar or CG Yoda.

    George Lucas himself, confronted by the fact that the Death Star explosion (and other explosions in a vacuum) shouldn't make a boom said something like: "A lot of people have a lot of money invested in this movie, and when something blows up they expect there to be a boom, so I give them a boom."

    Science fiction can be heavy on the science or heavy on the fiction. I think it's clear which side of that fence George Lucas has chosen: you can either go to the show, suspend your disbelief, and be entertained. Or you stay home. But I don't think anyone should expect the prequel movies to become to them now, what the original trilogy was to them starting nearly 25 years ago.

    1. Re:an expedient solution by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2

      It also sort of bothers me when adults complain about Jar-Jar and now CG Yoda. We all saw the original trilogy for the first time when we were younger than we are now. I don't know about you, but I accepted the Ewoks then, and in subsequent viewings I've accepted them (for better or worse) as part of Star Wars package. Attempting impartiality, I don't think they are any better than Jar Jar or CG Yoda.

      Heh, I've been trying to make that point for some time, thank you for bringing it to a good illustration.

      One thing I've noticed last month watching Disney classics is that Jar-Jar seems to be remarkably similar to Goofy, with the sloppy neck, floppy ears, long flat snout and overall clumsy idiot personality.

    2. Re:an expedient solution by babbage · · Score: 2
      Interestingly, I listened to a good long interview with Stan Lee on the radio last weekend, and he made a similar point about when he was getting started with comic books. His characters, as all Marvel fans probably know, were different from older super heroes in that, in spite of the special powers, they were basically ordinary people with basically ordinary problems. They just happened to be saving the world from super villians in between doing their homework, paying their bills, and taking care of their elderly relatives.

      Apparently, when Stan first wrote the Fantastic Four, he took this even a step further by having them look & dress like normal people. None of this spandex crap -- if Stan's heroes are going to act like regular folks, then they should dress the part too.

      The fan reaction was awful. "Stan, we love the story, the characters are great, but why don't they have uniforms? if you don't fix that we're not gonna buy another issue..."

      And so, being a practical man, he "fixed" the problem. For decades now, he has continued to put his soap opera stories -- "soap opera" being his term from the radio interview, not mine -- in their spandex jumpsuits, even if it looks silly. He's never been able to explain why, but any attempt to buck the convention has always been a dismal failure. Go figure.

      Like Stan Lee, George Lucas also has to pay the bills. Granted, I don't think he's about to default on his mortgage or anything, but like you say, it's all about giving the audience what they want to see. Is it a distraction from how the story "should" be told? Possibly, but this is a highly commercial artform, and the minute it stops playing to the audience the show draws to a close.

      Speaking of tinkering with the audience's expectations, I can't wait until the next James Bond movie :-) :-) :-)

  27. Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clones by Carnage4Life · · Score: 4, Funny

    Below is a repreint of a top ten (plus one) list entitled Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clones that circulated around work that was originally compiled by Dan Charlson.

    1. There are no police, or more importantly, traffic cops or highway patrol officers, on Coruscant. Endangering pedestrians and other vehicles is just "no big deal."

    2. Six-year old Jedi trainees are so capable with their light sabres that you can group them very tightly together -- even wearing "blast shield helmets" -- and have them swing away at training beacons without any concerns for safety.

    3. Saruman can wield a mean light sabre -- although thankfully, he hasn't forgotten how to use telekinesis (but why didn't he do some more body-slamming?!? Wait -whaddyou mean this is Star Wars...?)

    4. Just because you put a homing device on your opponent's getaway vehicle does NOT mean you shouldn't also follow him or her into a really dangerous asteroid belt instead of just waiting for him or her to come out the other side (you have a tracking device, remember!) -- of course, on the other hand, flying through asteroid belts at high speed is required in the Star Wars universe. [Thanks to JLyle for this one.]

    5. The GSO -- Galactic Standards Organization (the future counterpart to the ISO and W3.org) -- has been so successful that not only have ALL major industrial manufacturers adopted the same data access, networking, and transfer protocols throughout the Republic, but so have secret, guerilla arms factories -- and besides, those same factories wouldn't use security software or electronic countermeasures to defend themselves against network intrusions anyway.

    6. Even though the Republic has scads of enormous, elongated wedge-shaped Star Destroyers, you should never put them into high orbit around a planet and use them to prevent enemy starships from taking off, let alone using them offensively as long-range artillery weapons against enemy ground forces. Pitting land force against land force is pretty much the best way to go -- you can always make or get more robot or clone soldiers...

    7. C3PO is so well-designed that there are power cells in every major constituent of his body -- including his head. [Thanks to JacobJ for this one.]

    8. You don't need to wear a helmet or even goggles while you drive hovercraft, land speeders, or other flying vehicles in a desert environment such as Tatooine.

    9. Little Boba Fett is so accustomed to seeing his dad's face only behind his cool helmet that it just wouldn't occur to him to lift the visor or remove the helmet to look at his poor dead dad's decapitated visage (try saying that three times fast!).

    10. One's reputation, manner, and conduct just can't be guessed by observation alone -- you need to have a name which transparently broadcasts to all but the stupidest that you're not a nice person: Darth Sidious, Lord Tyranno, Count Dooku (?!?) -- not to mention Darth Maul, etc....

    11. Who's the biggest, baddest dude of the whole Galaxy? He's short, he's green, he has thinning hair, and nope -- he doesn't _really_ need that walking stick after all...

  28. Personally. by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 2

    I liked the scene, but I always envisioned Yoda fighting by just standing still and using the force to manipulate his lightsaber without actually touching it.

    Maybe that's not practical in the realm of swordfighting, but I think it'd be a lot cooler.

  29. Re:OT: Fist of Legend by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

    There's no flying in it, if that's what you mean. It's pretty impressive stuff. The only thing that's really fake about it is how much abuse the fighters take. Some of those shots are definitely death blows.

  30. Smart of them to preserve Yoda's "puppetness" by Artifice_Eternity · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This was the most interesting part of the article for me:

    At first, anxious to demonstrate CG's full photorealistic power, the animators took Yoda far beyond his crude former self, having his mouth form full phonemes and moving his body around faster. They also ironed out all the wrinkles: No more jiggly ears or shaky arms or broadly pantomimed walks. But these initial results ''looked creepy,'' says Coleman. ''It looked like a little green man. It wasn't Yoda.''

    So they ''dirtied up'' the animation, aping all of Yoda's limitations. When original puppeteer (and voicer) Frank Oz saw the footage, he freaked. ''He said, 'You're even matching my mistakes! Those ear wiggles -- you've got to get those out!''' But Coleman, and especially Lucas, vetoed Oz's request, arguing that the evident puppet-ness of Yoda is in fact what audiences remember best about him, and they still expect it.


    They were right. I was impressed by the fact that Yoda still moved like he used to, and didn't suddenly have overarticulated lips. I also noticed his ears trembling occasionally as his head moved. This was essential to selling us on the CGI.

    I much prefer the more organic look of puppetry and stop-motion to some of the poorly done CGI in the last couple SW movies (and the "Special Edition" of the 1st trilogy). Two examples: In Star Wars: SE there was a lot of crap that was supposed to "enhance" Mos Eisley, including a Stormtrooper (I think) falling off of a beast he was riding. It looked stupid and fake. In ATC, there was the Sound of Music scene where CGI Anakin fell off of his giant snail, or whatever the hell that thing was. Also incredibly fake. Clue to Lucas: put REAL people on horses, or even on big stuffed models of the creatures you're portraying (like the Taun-Tauns in Empire), and film them falling off. Looks much better.

    1. Re:Smart of them to preserve Yoda's "puppetness" by clontzman · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Clue to Lucas: put REAL people on horses, or even on big stuffed models of the creatures you're portraying (like the Taun-Tauns in Empire), and film them falling off. Looks much better.

      I dunno... some of those stop-motion tauntaun shots are some of the worst effects in all of Star Wars. Not sure I'd use those sequences as a model to emulate in any way.

    2. Re:Smart of them to preserve Yoda's "puppetness" by colmore · · Score: 2

      My biggest problem with CGI, and the general Lucas school of direction, is not the realism of the animation. (though in 20 years, people are going to look back on the new Star Wars and every other action movie from the past 8 years as being more or less Who Framed Rojer Rabbit, real people acting next to cartoons)

      Wath Dooku in the Yoda fight scene. It's painfully obvious that he's standing in a green room, with someone yelling at him "Ok, turn, ok swing your stick ok, good, but look angrier"

      Human actors can't act to a bluescreen. So no matter how silly puppet Yoda looked, he made Empire a better movie, because Mark Hamill could actually *act* in the Yoda scenes.

      Of course George Lucas doesn't care about this. He'd rather make one big video game cut sequence than actually have a story worth telling.

      The thing that really pisses me off about all this is, if someone handed me $600 Million and told me to produce a new Star Wars trillogy, I promise you I could do a better job.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    3. Re:Smart of them to preserve Yoda's "puppetness" by colmore · · Score: 2

      perhaps i should say interact, and after the original he wasn't *that* bad, or at least, not as bad as the current Skywalkers.

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  31. Glad I'm not the only one... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    Personally, I think that Ep 1 rivaled Empire as the best Star Wars at the time. I think that Ep 2 blows them all away. This nonsense about the original trilogy being better is absurd.

    Jar Jar is NO MORE annoying than C-3PO, except that as a kid I thought that 3PO was funny, and Jar Jar was more annoying to a 20 year old.

    The acting in the original trilogy is AWFUL. Hands down, the acting is better.

    The dialogue STILL sucks.

    However, ALL 5 movies are fun flicks. In all 5 movies, scenes on Tatooine (probably mispelled these days) dragged, though Ep2 sucked less in that regard.

    They are fun. Luke/Anakin are whiny, Anakin being less whiny than ANH Luke.

    These Space Operas are fun.

    It isn't Sci-fi, because it isn't from the future... It's from a long, long time ago!

    Alex

    1. Re:Glad I'm not the only one... by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      Two words: Han Solo. The new films have no Han Solo character: no dashing, witty antihero/hero. He's what made the original trilogy so fun, despite all its flaws. The new films are just... dry. Ep 1 didn't even have a real main character to identify with.

    2. Re:Glad I'm not the only one... by Rupert · · Score: 2

      So true.

      My wife and I recently rewatched the original trilogy. My thoughts were along the same lines as yours. Hers were more along the lines of "Oh my god, he was so handsome!"

      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
    3. Re:Glad I'm not the only one... by junkgrep · · Score: 2

      Not in Ep 1. He came into the story too late in the game, and was totaly underwhelming as a character. In Ep 2, maybe an attempt: but as you note: a no go. The other unique characteristic of Han was that he was just a regular joe hero: he was the perfect foil for the stilted jedi froofery of the few jedi hanging around. Now, when we have hundreds of ultra-serious jedi, we have no such cynical foil.

  32. Suspension of disbelief by inkswamp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm starting to wonder if our culture isn't collectively losing its ability to suspend their disbelief. Of course, a diminutive warrior like Yoda suddenly flying through the air is going to be funny on the surface. But if you were lost in the film like I was, really submerged into the world on-screen, not self-consciously fearful of what people might think if you let yourself go and connect with it, then that moment was one of the most startling moments in all the SW films.

    One nice touch I noticed is that Yoda grabs his cane afterward and we are left to ponder the fact that this guy just moved like lightning in his fight, but has difficultly with the act of walking. It strikes you that he was exerting the Force on himself to move himself through the air and engage in battle. It makes a definitive statement about his ability.

    I didn't have trouble with this. I feel sorry for those who couldn't enter that world and experience it full-force. Pity.

    --Rick

    --
    --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    1. Re:Suspension of disbelief by junkgrep · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe, like many martial arts masters, Yoda likes to play up his supposed frailty to catch others off guard.

    2. Re:Suspension of disbelief by Monkelectric · · Score: 2
      What do you mean dude? I *suspended my disbelief* that the movie wouldn't *suck* and went and saw it anyways:)

      Also, it's well known in sci-fi that the characters/people/plot needs to follow the *rules* of the world, ie. must maintain self consistancy. The suspension of disbelief is that the rules of the world exist, not that the characters can break the rules of the world.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    3. Re:Suspension of disbelief by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      I don't think its really about SoD. This action sequence was a big gamble, everyone seemed to agree on that. Then the audience bought it. If it wasn't for the pacing of the action sequences, the tension, and already seeing Yoda as a commanding military figure I doubt it would have worked as well, if at all. Lucas took a gamble and things worked out. He did the same with Jar-Jar and midiochlorines and those didn't pan out too well.

    4. Re:Suspension of disbelief by buckeyeguy · · Score: 2

      I think it's selective here... some people have an image of Yoda as not being able to do the things he did in this movie (much like they'd be surprised when a real-life older person doesn something unusually active)... meanwhile, I had a harder time accepting the early scene in Coruscant where Obi-Wan and Anakin are chasing the chick through the skies between the skyscrapers... really had a hard time buying that one. Yoda in a lightsaber battle? No problem.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    5. Re:Suspension of disbelief by jafac · · Score: 2

      the cane?
      naw, that's like my senile old grandmother who pretends she's deaf so she doesn't have to engage in conversations with people she doesn't like, and so that people feel sorry for her. Conniving old bat.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  33. "Yoda should be reserved..." by deft · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "the crew... thought it was unseemly and undignified for Yoda to bounce through the fight like a Superball loose in a toy store. ''They thought, My God, this is never going to work."

    I admit I thought the same the first time i saw Pat Morita playing ol' Miyagi, but he turned out all right too.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
  34. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by dimator · · Score: 2

    4. Just because you put a homing device on your opponent's getaway vehicle does NOT mean you shouldn't also follow him or her into a really dangerous asteroid belt

    Speaking of this scene, probably the coolest sound effect I have ever heard was when Jango Fett shot those seismic charges at Obi-Wan. Does anyone else remember the noise they made? SOOOO cool. Much better than the normal explosion sound we've all heard so much.

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  35. Re:riminded me of a kvack salesmans show by Maserati · · Score: 2
    Nah, reminded me in a scene from one of the Zatoichi movies. Zatoichi accidentally offends a munch of boisterous students at a dojo. Thet take him inside to beat him up, he stumbles towards the center, finding the rack of practice swords by touch and cane. The scene cuts to his buddy waiting outside. WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK WHACK. Reaction shot of his buddy wincing in sympathy. Zatoichi walks back outside completely unruffled. Budyy looks surprised.


    Zatoichi was way cool.


    Of course, the Japanese have been doing cool-guys-with-swords for as long as they've had a cinema (call it 50+ years for argument's sake). SOme black and white samurai movie has done pretty much every cool sword trick already. Not much left for Lucas to do but to steal from the masters.

    --
    Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  36. Kung Fu Jedi by Rommel · · Score: 2

    Can't be so! The Star Wars story takes place "Long, long ago."

    Perhaps the Kung Fu masters are the descendants of Jedi?

  37. If you'd noticed by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Its alot harder to move Jedi/Sith around with the force than it is mundane objects.


    And saying that size doesnt matter is relative: the amount of effort yoda had to put into stopping the attack is commesurate with the amount of energy that dooku put into it, perhaps compounded with the possible death of the jedi beneath it- he was being careful: and perhaps precient:


    He may have wanted to let tyrannous get away, knowing that the master was his true quarry, and that dooku was not the master...

  38. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Dredd13 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What impressed ME about those was that it actually looked/sounded like someone had put some thought and ACCURACY into it. It's silent, UNTIL the explosion (and the vibrating "stuff" it's bringing with it) gets to the camera.

    Might be the first "scientically accurate" sound fx in the entire Star Wars universe. ;-)

  39. Suppose I have to comment on this one... by Yoda2 · · Score: 2

    The Yoda scenes were entertaining, but could in no way shape or form make up for the horrific acting by Anakin or the awful dialog.

  40. Love scenes were terrible. by uberred · · Score: 2, Funny

    During the big one, by the fireplace...yeah, that one... When Anakin says his famous (very stupid) line "If you're suffering as much as I am, tell me...", someone in the theatre (all right, I admit, it was me) shouted, "We are! Cut the scene!"

    Moral: ANAKIN CAN'T ACT!!

    --
    Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so. --Ford Prefect
    1. Re:Love scenes were terrible. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

      I was too busy wondering why Padme, having caught all of the subtle*cough* hints Anakin was throwing, and knowing she'd have to let him down, chose to wear the Heaving Bosom(tm) dress.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  41. So, Episode II would have been better if... by dswensen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... instead of drawing lightsabers, Yoda (who would be a puppet, because believing a CG image is Yoda is so much harder than believing a wad of latex with Frank Oz's hand up its ass is Yoda) should have fought Dooku by using the Force to summon a clunky ethereal knight (done in cheap front projection of course; matte lines just look more -real-, and matching color palettes are for sissies), who then fight in jerky slow-motion.

    During this battle, there is much groaning, pantomiming, and grimacing (except for Yoda, who has only two expressions: "furrow brows" and "lower ears." That's okay though, because PUPPETS GOOD.) Then, at the end, when there is a big flash of light (all done with squibs), Dooku says "You never could beat me, Egg Shen."

    Yeah, that totally would have been worth my five bucks.

    (Oh, and bring back Mr. Perfect, Irvin "Empire Strikes Back, Robocop II, SeaQuest DSV" Kershner to direct, because that man can do no wrong. Just watch that Amazing Stories episode "Hell Toupee.")

    Please, take off the rose-colored glasses. The special effects technology of Star Wars has always, always, always been a work in progress. Watch the difference in space battles, and the lightsaber battles, between Episodes IV-VI. They make a quantum leap in sophistication, complexity, and speed.

    That's because FX technology was, and is, always developing. This expectation that CG is somehow infallibe, and all its imagery should somehow be perfect and consistent, is rubbish. There's probably a very good reason there wasn't a CGI Yoda in Episode I -- and he will probably look much better in Episode III -- just like everything else.

    Star Wars has always been about pushing the technological envelope as far as it will go. Sometimes it works. Sometimes they drop the ball. This has not changed since 1977. Look at any of the movies and you will find places where the special effects are truly great, and places where they stink on ice. Why all of a sudden this warrants another "George Lucas sucks" troll of a story is beyond me.

    1. Re:So, Episode II would have been better if... by Patrick · · Score: 2
      That's because FX technology was, and is, always developing. This expectation that CG is somehow infallibe, and all its imagery should somehow be perfect and consistent, is rubbish.

      The CG has progressed to the point where it's no longer the weak link in Lucas's filmmaking chain. The writing, directing, and acting -- those are the weak links. The CG, he mostly gets right. (Mostly, I say, because a few scenes looked a lot like undergraduate ray-tracing term projects.)

      There's probably a very good reason there wasn't a CGI Yoda in Episode I

      There was a CG Yoda in Episode I. When he walks, in the Jedi council, that's CG. There's a distinct lack of puppeteer in that scene.

      Why all of a sudden this warrants another "George Lucas sucks" troll of a story is beyond me.

      Did you actually read the article? The rough flow (if you slog through all five pages of it) is: Animators make CG Yoda, Lucas tells them to make CG Yoda fight, animators whine, audiences love the scene, animators admit they were wrong. The point of the article is that that fight was a good scene. It's not clear that the submitter made it to the final page of the article, either.

      --Patrick

    2. Re:So, Episode II would have been better if... by gilroy · · Score: 2
      You're completely missing the point, I think, of people's negative reactions. It's not that Yoda was CG and not a puppet. It was that Yoda was a spinning superball bouncing around in a manifestly wasteful way. If they had done it with a puppet, it would have still been dumb. If they had used the CG to render more conventional scenes, it would have been better.


      The issue here is: Lucas was seduced by what he could animate, and didn't pay attention to what he should animate. The scene was well-executed but poorly-written and debases the character.


      Now, the scenes immediately before -- with Yoda as the Patton of the Star Wars Universe -- were great. They made much better use of the subtleties available through CGI, and they didn't tear down the character.

  42. Star wars fans now == trekkies by Wylfing · · Score: 5, Insightful
    All you who cry "TPM and AoTC were betrayals" and whine endlessly about how much it suxored and fucking nitpick about whether the physics of Yoda's swordfight were accurate or whether it takes more skill to leap than to parry -- you are all like the worst kind of trekkies now. In other words, you are ruining for the rest of us a perfectly good pulp space opera that is escapist fiction which is not supposed to be realistic .

    I am reminded of a Saturday Night Live sketch starring William Shatner, in which he is pelted with inane questions from feverish trekkies about "What was the combination to the lock in Episode 17?" Shatner tries to explain that it was just a prop, and there wasn't really a lock and therefore no combination at all, and the trekkies just stare without comprehension.

    You are those fuckwits now. And yes, that means you too, you butt-munch, who are even now preparing a reply that goes something like "But Ep1 and Ep2 really were betrayals." Yes, you are the fuckwits.

    --
    Our intelligent designer has never created an animal that we couldn't improve by strapping a bomb to it.
    1. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by bryanbrunton · · Score: 2



      Who gives a shit about Star Wars. There are important elements in movie making that distinguish good movies from bad movies. Things like writing, dialog, acting. AoTC fails in all of these categories.

      You are simply one of those fuckwit denialist who is simply counter-reacting to the huge wave of disgust with the bad movie making of George Lucas.

    2. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by shaldannon · · Score: 2

      That's your opinion. There are plenty of people who go to movies (especially, Star Wars movies) for the entertainment value. I'm not looking for a philosophical treatise on the universe. I'm looking for decent action, grand vistas, and cute gags. Part of the charm from Ep. 4-6 was the gags, the inconsistency, etc. Maybe you prefer something that looks like it is a photo clip from an actual event...but that doesn't necessarily make movies that don't look that way bad.

      The beauty of the Star Wars universe is (and always has been) about the little guy making it big against the oppressive regime...Luke helping take down the Empire...Anakin making it from slavery to a position of importance in the galactic republic.

      Besides all that, if you want to complain about bad writing, that's your prerogative, but you'd better make sure *your* writing isn't bad...and I think you failed in that regard.

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
    3. Re:Star wars fans now == trekkies by bryanbrunton · · Score: 2



      Where did I say I didn't like Ep. 4 - 6. Those movies for the most part did have good writing, acting and dialog. Ep. 1 and 2 did not.

      Overall my writing is good. I save the really bad stuff for Slashdot when I'm typing as fast as I can and don't give a shit how it comes out unlike anal retentive assholes such as yourself.

  43. Yoda was never dignified by themanfromutopia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't be the only one who remembers Yoda beating R2D2 with a stick and stealing Luke's candybar. I can think of many reasons that the recent Star Wars movies are no good, but this one doesn't fly.

  44. Re:OT: Fist of Legend by ProfBooty · · Score: 2

    there is some wire work in it(ibelieve jet li runs and flips off a wall at one point).

    it is no doubt one of the best martial arts movies out there. unfortunatly disney's release of it is cut(the ending is slightly different, in the original ending, jet li trains a group of martial artists to fight the japanese, also a smoking scene at the brothel is cut) and dubbed in english(instead of japanese and either cantonese or mandarin, the funny part is that the dialogue was changed in the parts of the movie where english was spoken(like the court scene). this is too bad because what the judge says in english is funny. its also still 25 bucks at best buy.

    you can find the hk dvd online, but it is dubbed in the wrong chinese(can't remember if it is cantonese or mandarin), it is definatly worth watching and i'm surprised it didnt make it to the screens instead of black mask.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  45. That WAS reserved... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Dooku was just barely keeping Yoda at bay, and Yoda wasn't even winded - Yoda was just playing with Dooku at that point. To me, the scene was really well done and I thought somewhat the same as the scene you mention.

    As for just force shoving them aside - how do you know it wouldn't have taken the floor out with it if it were just left to fall? Frankly, I'd trust Yoda's judement in this matter if I were you! :-)

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  46. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Chazmati · · Score: 2

    Aww, I totally missed that. I was sure the head was going to fall out of the helmet as Boba picked it up.

  47. Not any more difficult... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    I think that can be resolved by saying that larger objects are not more difficult to move, but that they might take a bit longer to overcome.

    Also, Yoda did say the difference in size was all in his mind. Perhaps even Yoda faces some barriers in that respect and can not totally get the size of an object out of his mind, even though he knows logically it would not be any different to move.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  48. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Malcontent · · Score: 2

    You forgot the most important one.

    12) When you have the technology to make anything no matter how small or large float, hover and manuever perfectly you will still make devices with wheels, legs, rollers and all kinds of other cumbersome locomotion methods.

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  49. The way it should have been by Animats · · Score: 2
    Yoda pulls out a blaster and shoots the guy. No preliminaries, no talk, one shot.

    "Oh, hell, just shoot him with the gun" - Steven Speilberg, during the filming of Raiders of the Lost Ark, when Harrison Ford had an injury from the previous day's filming.

  50. Three Words: Li Mu Bai by Genady · · Score: 2

    Three words: Li Mu Bai. Things would have been better if Yoda had had the dignity of Mu Bai for this fight scene.

    Wouldn't that just be a bad ass crossover, Li Mu Bai against Doku. Then I could stomach the flying because it would be graceful, not like Sonic.

    Shoulda had Woo Ping choerograph the fight. Maybe we can hope King George will get him to consult for the next one.

    --


    What if it is just turtles all the way down?
  51. Re:Well ... by junkgrep · · Score: 2

    ---but you cannot use the force to harm someone....that is the way of the dark side---

    What bollocks. Force for a good cause is perfectly justified. Allowing Dooku to run off contributes to millions upon millions of deaths. Striking out against evil does not make you evil, no matter what Lucas' crazy mysticism demands. As David B said, good people have good friends to help you deal with the things you might have to do in the name of justice, and yet still stay a good person.

  52. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by smoondog · · Score: 2

    You forgot that it is not okay for Anakin to go back to save his woman because it isn't an important goal, but it is okay for yoda to let dooku go to save anakin from a falling metal pillar.

    -Sean

  53. Re:David Carradine by Skyshadow · · Score: 2

    David Carradine benefited from slow and stupid opponents. Bruce Lee would have -- should have -- killed him in seconds.

    Slow Yoda would have sucked. Yoda as bunny-on-crystal-meta had the people in the theatre cheering, which is what counts.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  54. Re:Where the hell do you live? by dswensen · · Score: 2


    Tuesday afternoon matinees at our local theater cost five bucks. I like Star Wars, but I've yet to pay for an evening showing (which is more like eight bucks).

  55. The fight was cool.... by snol · · Score: 2, Funny

    the part that was retarded was how he struggled to move the pillar when Dooku collapsed it over Obi-wan and Anakin - move the PEOPLE, dumbass, not the humongous pillar thing.

  56. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by DennyK · · Score: 2

    1. There are no police, or more importantly, traffic cops or highway patrol officers, on Coruscant. Endangering pedestrians and other vehicles is just "no big deal."

    Maybe there are...but you know there's never a cop around when you need one... ;)

    2. Six-year old Jedi trainees are so capable with their light sabres that you can group them very tightly together -- even wearing "blast shield helmets" -- and have them swing away at training beacons without any concerns for safety.

    They could have been "practice" lightsabers...capable of deflecting a target drone's light blaster bolts, but not of removing the appendages of the trainee next to you. ;)

    3. Saruman can wield a mean light sabre -- although thankfully, he hasn't forgotten how to use telekinesis (but why didn't he do some more body-slamming?!? Wait -whaddyou mean this is Star Wars...?)

    Heh...glad I wasn't the only one having deja vu during that point in the movie... ;)

    4. Just because you put a homing device on your opponent's getaway vehicle does NOT mean you shouldn't also follow him or her into a really dangerous asteroid belt instead of just waiting for him or her to come out the other side (you have a tracking device, remember!) -- of course, on the other hand, flying through asteroid belts at high speed is required in the Star Wars universe.

    Maybe it's a short-range tracking device? Maybe great Jedi Master Obi-Wan's a little hot under the collar at being thrashed by a low-life bounty hunter and his clone-kid, and isn't thinking straight? ;)

    5. The GSO -- Galactic Standards Organization (the future counterpart to the ISO and W3.org) -- has been so successful that not only have ALL major industrial manufacturers adopted the same data access, networking, and transfer protocols throughout the Republic, but so have secret, guerilla arms factories -- and besides, those same factories wouldn't use security software or electronic countermeasures to defend themselves against network intrusions anyway.

    Artoo's just a rolling, beeping Black Box. He can crack any system in seconds. Maybe there's a Powerbook under that blue dome? ;-D

    6. Even though the Republic has scads of enormous, elongated wedge-shaped Star Destroyers, you should never put them into high orbit around a planet and use them to prevent enemy starships from taking off, let alone using them offensively as long-range artillery weapons against enemy ground forces. Pitting land force against land force is pretty much the best way to go -- you can always make or get more robot or clone soldiers...

    Those big ships aren't Star Destroyers, though they are probably early ancestors. They seem to be designed more for troop transport and deployment than planetary bombardment. For all we know, they could be lightly-armed transports...we never see them in battle. Remember, the clone army, developed in secret over a decade or so, was Palaptine's ace in the hole. I don't think he had the time or the resources to construct a fleet of powerful warships in the short time he was in power, and it's reasonable to assume that a Republic without a standing army probably didn't have much in the way of a battle fleet either. Palaptine's primary goal at that time would have been to move his army to the battle zone. Once the war gets rolling, he will have plenty of time (and public support) for constructing fleets of massive battle cruisers.

    7. C3PO is so well-designed that there are power cells in every major constituent of his body -- including his head.

    Well, it wouldn't be suprising that he would have at least a redundant power supply in his head (which obviously contains his cognitive functions). It would make him more modular (as we've seen ;) ), and allow his memory to be kept functional and accessible in the event of damage to his torso or primary power unit. We've never seen his arms or legs move on their own when they fall off, so it would seem that his head and his torso each have a power supply.

    8. You don't need to wear a helmet or even goggles while you drive hovercraft, land speeders, or other flying vehicles in a desert environment such as Tatooine.

    Luke's landspeeder in ANH had a windscreen. Granted, it was pretty small, but it would have helped. It's also possible that the repulsorlifts in vehicles may have the side effect of repelling sand, dirt, and other particles. Even if they didn't, a light deflector screen could be employed...it wouldn't take much to deflect incoming particles away from the driver. And Anakin has the Force, of course... ;)

    9. Little Boba Fett is so accustomed to seeing his dad's face only behind his cool helmet that it just wouldn't occur to him to lift the visor or remove the helmet to look at his poor dead dad's decapitated visage (try saying that three times fast!).

    Barring the argument of whether dear old Dad's head was still in his helmet or not (I wasn't paying that much attention, to be honest...), assuming his head WAS still in there, just how is little Boba going to remove the helmet? Reach up his Daddy's neck, grab a handy vertebra, and yank? Ewww...

    10. One's reputation, manner, and conduct just can't be guessed by observation alone -- you need to have a name which transparently broadcasts to all but the stupidest that you're not a nice person: Darth Sidious, Lord Tyranno, Count Dooku (?!?) -- not to mention Darth Maul, etc....

    Well, for the Sith, perhaps they choose their own names. Obviously, until they gained control of most of the galaxy, they didn't parade them around much. I doubt Darth Sidious introduced himself as such at cocktail parties... ;) As for the others...Dooku isn't really a sinister-sounding name (silly, yes, sinister, no... ;) ). And maybe I missed something, but who the heck is Lord Tyranno? Don't remember hearing that name before...

    11. Who's the biggest, baddest dude of the whole Galaxy? He's short, he's green, he has thinning hair, and nope -- he doesn't _really_ need that walking stick after all...

    Hoo yeah... ;) Although I just can't picture Yoda with a full head of hair. Maybe he never did have one. Heck, maybe he never had any hair at all when he was a young...um...green short dude. Ya know how old men get hair growing out of their ears? ;)

    DennyK

  57. Re:Wisdom? by Imperial+Tacohead · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In that case, you have no dark Jedi, but you still have guys running around with weapons with destructive power enough to destroy entire planets. It seems to me that the balance of power is radically in favor of the light-side Jedi. Force powers have only a marginal impact on one's ability to seize power, or destroy order. Drone armies and Death Stars are really a lot more useful than the ability to choke someone with your mind when you're trying to keep a galactic empire under your heel. On the other hand, true Jedis have an enormous impact, because without them to pull off miraculous stuff like hitting that exhaust port, the forces of evil would clobber the forces of good, because good is dumb.

  58. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by dimator · · Score: 2

    Come on man, its a movie. Shit like that can be forgiven.

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  59. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The truth is that Lucas needed her to have a different job in Episode II so that she could fly around from planet to planet and people could try to kill her and Anakin would be forced to protect her and the two of them could have their cheezy dysfunctional romance.

    Lucas made a big deal in Episode II about Amidala being the "former Queen" of Naboo. He rubbed our noses in the fact that she "served her term and then the new queen appointed her to be a senator". No mention of this weird system of government was ever made in Episode I.

    Lucas had however received quite a bit of criticism about the morality of the Star Wars universe after Episode I came out. Episode I made things look like the universe was one in which the only way to be great was to be born great. Young girls were born into monarchy and being given authority based on their royal birth alone (not just "Queen Amidala" but also "Princess Leia"). The Jedi were all genetically superior (high midiclorian counts). The Force was only strong for Luke Skywalker because he was the son of Darth Vader, not because he was our lonely hero. And the annoying kid Anakin was born by some kind of Immaculate Conception. Lucas altered things in Episode II deliberately to change those perceptions.

    This is all despite the fact that the word "queen" in the English language by definition means a woman who marries a king or a woman who is the daughter of the previous king and inherits the throne.

    --
    My other first post is car post.
  60. If Yoda was so smart... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 2
    Why did he use all this energy to stop the pillar from falling (while letting Dooku escape) when all he had to do is push Obi and Ani out of danger. Don't tell me that Yoda can't do that within miliseconds. Also, since he can move large objects like spacecraft, why didn't he "force" Dooku's ship out of the docking bay, leaving the count stranded?



    I can think of two reasons: 1) Lucas didn't want him to, or 2) Yoda is really pretty stupid.

  61. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Sheridan · · Score: 2
    Speaking of this scene, probably the coolest sound effect I have ever heard was when Jango Fett shot those seismic charges at Obi-Wan. Does anyone else remember the noise they made? SOOOO cool. Much better than the normal explosion sound we've all heard so much.

    Hmm... It sounded a bit too much like a power chord on an electric guitar to me. I kept expecting Ozzy Osbourne to start singing at any moment ;)

  62. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Sheridan · · Score: 2
    5. The GSO -- Galactic Standards Organization (the future counterpart to the ISO and W3.org) -- has been so successful that not only have ALL major industrial manufacturers adopted the same data access, networking, and transfer protocols throughout the Republic, but so have secret, guerilla arms factories -- and besides, those same factories wouldn't use security software or electronic countermeasures to defend themselves against network intrusions anyway.

    And they have a standardised head/neck connector for robots, so ubiquitous that everyone from mass producers of military hardware to home hobbyist slave kids on Tatooine use it.

  63. Did They Miss The Point? by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    Yoda is the greatest of all Jedi Masters. Not only the most skilled with The Force, but also the best with a light sabre. This is even mentioned in the original trilogy repeatedly with instances of Yoda stating, "judge me by my size, do you?" Then, he proceeds to lift an entire X-Wing fighter, full of water, out of a murky swamp.

    In otherwords, we've known from the beginning that Yoda has been hiding himself, taking advantage of a key mistake made by his opponents: that they would underestimate him. (Note also that he knows those of the Dark Side do this all the time, and thus comments to it.)

    When George Lucas decided to have Yoda fight, I think most of us were thrilled, not appauled. Finally, we got to see the greatest of all Jedi do battle. And it was good. Even if you don't think Yoda should have a sabre, at least consider that watching Yoda do a bunch of psionics would be very boring at least. For me, it realized a very well-known plot element.

    --
    Why bother.
  64. Realistic fight scenes in films... by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 2

    I think you're right, most people wouldn't appreciate a realistic fight scene in a film.

    OTOH, if you're really fighting with weapons, there's an almost-truism that if you can get inside the reach of the other guy's weapon, his weapon is a handicap. If reality you seek, then Yoda a mini-lightsabre should wield. Inside Dooku's range he should fight to demonstrate his skill.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
  65. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by Dredd13 · · Score: 2

    In a vacuum, there is no sound, since there is nothing to vibrate. Not until something that is vibrating (the stuff) gets to you would you be able to hear anything.

  66. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by KaptajnKold · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Lucas had however received quite a bit of criticism about the morality of the Star Wars universe after Episode I came out. Episode I made things look like the universe was one in which the only way to be great was to be born great. Young girls were born into monarchy and being given authority based on their royal birth alone (not just "Queen Amidala" but also "Princess Leia"). The Jedi were all genetically superior (high midiclorian counts). The Force was only strong for Luke Skywalker because he was the son of Darth Vader, not because he was our lonely hero. And the annoying kid Anakin was born by some kind of Immaculate Conception. Lucas altered things in Episode II deliberately to change those perceptions.

    That's the kind of thing that makes me want to scream! It all happened "a long time ago"---It's supposed to be a fairy tale! And why is it moraly wrong to have a universe in which it is necessary to be born great to be great? I'll tell you why: Because it contradicts the American Dream. And that's the reason that I want to scream out loud. I am NOT american, and to anyone like me it feels like an assault of the mind to be made to believe that americans have seen the light and everyone else has not! (I will now go and eat som fruit to raise my bloodsugar).

    /Adam Lett

  67. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by eam · · Score: 3, Funny

    Also, along the lines of the senator being appointed, that isn't that unusual considering that there was an unexpected vacancy.

    Senator Palpatine became Chancelor & was unable to finish his term as Senator for Naboo. The elected government of Naboo would have to appoint a replacement senator until elections could be held. Imagine now that the (democratically elected) queen's term ended before a new senator was appointed & the new queen appointed the old queen to finish out the senator's term.

    [aside: I think I should have used "former queen"...I think "old queen" usually means something else]

    Even if you assume that the term was less than the 10 years that passed between the Chancelor's election & AoTC, we could just accept that after finishing out the term she was appointed to she was elected to several more terms.

  68. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by BluFinger · · Score: 2, Informative

    There were actually several references to her being elected in Ep I. They never mentioned a term length, so I think a lot of people assumed it was a life-term because of the whole Queen title.

    --
    Lib.BENCH the only site you'll ever need!
  69. To all who are rationalizing the Yoda fight by Nagash · · Score: 2

    Now you are asking to be pooped on (17 MG file).

    Woz

  70. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by gilroy · · Score: 2

    Um, neither are Galaxy-spanning Empires woven together with FTL starships and communicators...

  71. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by DEBEDb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That said, it is pure hogwash to think that a planet would elect a 14 year old to rule them.


    If people cannot even suspend their disbelief
    for a FICTIONAL STORY, and allow for the fact
    that people a LONG TIME AGO in a FAR-AWAY galaxy
    could have different belief systems, one wonders
    if tolerance of cultural differences is at
    all possible in our world.

    --

    Considered harmful.
  72. Bin Laden Appointed Taliban Commander in Chief by bryanbrunton · · Score: 2


    12. A Republic with thousands of star systems that has endured from thousands of years will have no standing army or plan to defend the seat of government when attacked by a quickly assembled army of droids.

  73. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2

    Spoken like a true anonymous coward.

    --

    If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  74. Deleted scene by Chelloveck · · Score: 2

    Y: Pinned I have you, Count Dooku. Why then smiling you are?

    D: Because I know something you do not know, Master Yoda. You see, I am not left-handed!

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  75. Re:now that was apalling by Jbrecken · · Score: 2

    Well, 3PO still had his original personality, and he was built by a little kid.

    So why wouldn't an eight-year old give his robot a taste for puns?

  76. Re:Well ... by MsGeek · · Score: 2
    If jedi could levitate the Emporer could have saved himself in the last scene of RotJ. Or Luke could have kept from falling off the platform in tESB.

    Plausible explanations:
    1.) Emperor Palpatine drained his energy levels badly while he was zapping the kishkes out of Luke. This allowed Vader/Anakin to take Palpatine by surprise and throw down. (literally)
    2.) Luke's training was far from complete in TESB. Remember how concerned Yoda was? Remember how both Yoda and the shade of Obi-Wan speculated at the end of TESB that Luke was bound for the Dark Side like his father before him? If he had been trained to the point he was in ROTJ he would have had more of a chance. Also, remember that Luke was suffering from shock...you get your hand lopped off, force or no force you are prolly in shock after the event.

    It doesn't offend me at all that Yoda is able to fight like an Anime/HK martial arts character because of his intense connection to The Force. It offended me far more when Lucas stooped to a biological explanation of The Force in TPM. I had always envisioned The Force as completely numinous...100% supernatural. Sort of like the true, ineffable Dao of Lao Tze. All that talk about blood midichlorian count was a big bring-down. I didn't like Jar-Jar but I could live with his existance more than the midichlorians and a biological explanation of the Force.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  77. Hamlet reprisal by mblase · · Score: 4, Funny
    9. Little Boba Fett is so accustomed to seeing his dad's face only behind his cool helmet that it just wouldn't occur to him to lift the visor or remove the helmet to look at his poor dead dad's decapitated visage (try saying that three times fast!).

    The deleted scene actually continued as follows:
    Alas, poor Jango! I knew him, C-3PO: a hunter
    of infinite skill, of most excellent gadgets: he hath
    flown me in Slave-I a thousand times; and now, how
    abhorred in my imagination it is! my stomach turns at
    it. Here hung those lips that kissed good-night I know
    not how oft. Where be your grapples now? your
    blasters? your blades? your flying rocket pack,
    that was wont to set the grass nearby on fire? Not one
    now, to kill the cruel Jedi? quite heart-fallen?
    Now get you to my father's spaceship, and once there, let
    me paint his armor red, and bounty hunter
    become; make them laugh at that.
  78. Re:Well ... by arkanes · · Score: 2

    The impression that I always got was that you can't actually levitate yourself with the force - you can "push" with it, so you can jump high, and control a fall, and if you're seriously badass like Yoda you can maybe hover for a second, but actually flying, like Luke or the Emperor would have needed to do is beyond them.

  79. Ueshiba's undignified demonstrations by streetlawyer · · Score: 4, Informative
    Like hell. Unfortunately, a lot of aikidoka have been suckered by that roll of film into studying a useless martial art.

    What he lacked in mobility and strength he made up for in grace and economy of movement, and I watched as he would toss aside the students with little hand movements or slow sweeping gestures.



    Not quite. What he lacked in mobility and strength, he made up for in being the venerated founder of a school in Japan, where it would be considered appalling behaviour to cast any aspersions on the Venerated One's declining powers.



    The students could attack in piles, and still they would be tossed aside like leaves.



    More like "the students ran at him in piles and then leapt aside like leaves as he waved a hand at them". Half sub-consciously, the students cooperated in being thrown. The idea that Ueshiba could have done anything remotely similar on a resisting body flies in the face of any non-mystical biomechanics.



    It was really magical to watch such an old man possessed of such power.



    Alternatively, it was really disgusting to watch an old man posessed of such vanity.

    Ueshiba was a genuine fighter as a young man, but during that period, he practiced jujitsu/tai-jutsu. It was only after he founded his own school in 1942 of a state-sponsored, Shinto-flavoured dumbed down taijutsu that he started becoming a cult and staging demonstrations for gullible Westerners.

    1. Re:Ueshiba's undignified demonstrations by streetlawyer · · Score: 2
      It sounds like you've never felt an Aikido throw or joint lock

      Right. Because I've never attacked anyone by sticking my right arm out and running toward them. Because I don't think that a good way to initiate hostilities is to stand in front of someone and grab hold of their right wrist. These locks are potentially useful for keeping control of an already subdued opponent, but absolutely impossible to apply on anyone who is in a position to resist.

      Trust me, some of them are very effective

      For bullying students in staged demonstrations, yes. For actual combat application, no. Ten years of mixed-martial arts competition ought to have cleared this up once and for all; nobody has ever won an UFC bout or similar with an aikido joint lock, except in so far as aikido shares a couple of techniques with practial styles, from its jujitsu heritage. Aikido is jujitsu for people who don't like fighting.

      The idea in these types of throws is to lead the person to a position where they are very vunerable and offbalence and then make sure that they make an effort to fall safely. Often, this means that they need to jump a bit, but like I said, if they didn't then they'd end up a whole lot worse

      Yeah right. Have you seen the film under discussion? A student takes a good long run-up, sticks his arm out, reaches the Venerable Founder, then flips. Over and over again. It's laughable.

      If you ever train with an aikido class, try slapping uke round the jaw with your free hand the moment he applies his funky wristlock. I guarantee that 1) he releases the lock (if he doesn't go down like a sack of shit) and 2) you will be thrown out and never allowed back because "we don't want people who are just here to fight".

    2. Re:Ueshiba's undignified demonstrations by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a martial artist, I think there is more than a little truth in this; if anything what is inaccurate is to say that the students do this half-consciously. Nobody wants to see a venerated old teacher hurt. You don't gain face by slamming a small elderly man to the mat, because it doesn't prove anything except that you have execrable manners.

      On the other hand, if you are participating in a demonstration, you can only challenge such a teacher if you are willing to get seriously hurt. If a renowned teacher is publicly demonstrating a joint lock on you, and you have a counter, you had better be damned sure its going to work because it's generally accepted that the teacher is justified by responding to such a challenge by breaking your wrist. Rank hath its privileges. So, if you are getting joint locked, you go to the mat the fastest way you can, and if that is jumping headfirst into a somersault, that's what you do. The alternative is to get hurt (which is bad) or to hurt the venerable teacher (which is worse).

      The public gets a little deceived, I guess, but they really aren't ready to understand the art. In reality, most flashy demonstrations are much less impressive than they appear. When real skill is shown, it is either to fast, too subtle or to strange to be comprehensible.

      There are also cases where teachers have essentially hypnotized students. Demonstrations of Kong Jing -- which is supposed to be a lot like The Force -- fall into this category. The Aikido examples aren't like this; they're just the students doing what they are supposed to be doing in the course of a demonstration.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  80. Re:Duh by streetlawyer · · Score: 2
    If someone attacks you and they get close &"enough", and you know your shit, then you can push them around a bit to make them fall.

    "Shit" is about right. Even if you can work aikido on a resisting subject, rather than a cooperating, uke, their next move is to grab hold of your legs and pull you down to the ground with them. At which point you're fucked because aikido doesn't have any groundwork.

    It's a lot of fun to leap around pretending to be thrown and all that, but as a martial art, aikido is about on the level of tai chi.

  81. Re:OT: Fist of Legend by Kintanon · · Score: 2

    The wall jump in that movie is wireless. I can perform it on any random brick wall.

    Kintanon

    --
    Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
  82. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by DennyK · · Score: 2

    Aah...yes, I think you're right. Well, in that case, like the other Sith, he probably chose his own sinister moniker, or had it chosen for him. ;)

    DennyK

  83. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by DennyK · · Score: 2

    The Jedi are "keepers of the peace", not traffic cops. They would be more like a cross between the FBI and a diplomatic corps. I doubt they would be concerned with minor things like traffic violations. ;)

    DennyK

  84. Re:Why? by shaldannon · · Score: 2
    I don't think it's quite that simple.
    1. Yoda was obviously trying to help Luke grow. Part of that was physical and mental conditioning. Luke would be running through the forest with Yoda giving him Force lessons.
    2. A good Jedi doesn't let anger/hate/etc. affect him. Hence, you can't just 'piss Yoda off.'
    3. Jedi will act to protect others. Dooku was setting up to wipe out Obi-Wan and Anakin. Yoda was simply coming to the rescue. You'll notice from the dialog that Yoda retains his composure throughout the entire sequence. Contrast this with Luke facing the Emperor and Darth Vader. Luke in that situation is quite obviously struggling with his hate and anger.
    The fight scene, instead of making you feel dirty, should make you proud of Yoda as an exemplary Jedi Master.
    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  85. His name is Tyrannus by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    And he's the same person as Dooku.

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  86. It worked in Mummy returns by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    Notice as Anubis Army overruns the city...the head Anubis Warrior has his foot on a severed head....I forget the rating on that movie, but it's PG-something.

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  87. Amen, brotha! by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    Out of all the whiny brats who hate Star Wars because it doesn't live up to their outrageous expectations, I finally find someone with exactly the same perspective I have. I just wish more people enjoyed the movies for what they are rather than griping about what they aren't.

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  88. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by roman_mir · · Score: 2

    'Short range tracking device' that trucks through hyperspace in 'short range' as well? Mother!

  89. Mohammad Ali by mactari · · Score: 2

    Ever seen Ali, Parkinson's making it nearly impossible for him to walk or talk, start throwing punches? It's incredible -- it's like the disease can't get to that gift Ali has that nobody's come close to matching.

    Though it's hard to read this into a CG Yoda, that's sort of what I was thinking about when I saw him limp off.

    --

    It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
  90. Other words he could have used by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2

    Fucknob. Handjob. Cockgobbler. Ass Badger. Ass Clown. Fuckstick. Skinmunch. Buttslobber. Ass Weasel. Chickenjob. Cockbagger. JeanCream.

    Feel free to add on.

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  91. right on by ProfBooty · · Score: 2

    for some reason lucas wants to interject humor into the story (maybe in tribute to the kurosawa movies he used as inspiration), but it felt rather forced in those sceens.

    I remember being a little kid and being annoyed at c3po and r2d2's role as the comic releif in the story,their joking antics really didn't add anything to the story itself, but their characters were usefull to the story.

    3po's role in that part of the film wasn't necesscary for any other reason than to attempt to make people laugh(the only laughing i heard in the movie was when yoda turned into a bluring mess), r2d2 on the otherhand was useful.

    lucas is aiming for a younger audience(or at least what feels like a younger audience than the original versions of the original films) so he has to make parts of the movie relate to little kids wether we as adults like it or not(and i don't).

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  92. Re:Top 10 Things I learned from Attack of the Clon by jafac · · Score: 2

    I thought that the face plate was going to explode, and underneath you'd see Luke's face.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  93. don't feed the trolls by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    For some reason I thought you were trying to express valid opinions rather than just trolling. Sadly, I was mistaken. I'd sit here and argue with you about whether I was being anal retentive, Episodes 4-6, acting, writing and dialogue, etc., but as a troll you probably wouldn't have the capacity to make a reasoned, thoughtful, cogent, and (shocker) cleanly written response...

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  94. Re:Duh... Why didn't Yoda really use the force? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2

    Also, Yoda was trying to drive home a very personal point to his former student; that no matter what Dooku's game was, and no matter how much Dark Side force he put into it, Yoda could whup him. Hell, I almost think Yoda made a point of not slaying him, so he could run away and think about how much he got his ass kicked.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  95. I object to being called a "butt-munch"... by mekkab · · Score: 2

    Good sir, I read your comment and took a long, hard analytical look at myself. And in no way could I be classified as a "butt-munch". However the rest of your comment rings of truth to my ears like a golden church bell on a beautiful Sunday morn.

    and what was the combination to that lock in episode 17?

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  96. Re:Ueshiba's - It's an ART by streetlawyer · · Score: 2
    I'll never forget what my Hapkido teacher told us, "This is NOT a self defense course. If you want to practice self defense, buy a pair a good running shoes and practice screaming HELP while running at top speed down the street."

    Christ almighty, you've nearly collected the whole set of useless martial arts; all you need now is tai chi and perhaps a little bit of boxercise. A Hapkido teacher would be right in saying that, although one might ask him why he wasted so much of his time doing it then, since Hapkido has few health benefits and looks like shit.

    With the commencement of the twentieth century where machine guns can kills thousands and bombs can kill millions, all schools of martial arts have had to introspect on their internal value and where their future may lie.

    With the continuing popularity of nightclubs, bars and dance halls, it is ridiculous to suggest that hand-to-hand combat without weapons is not still highly relevant to the lives of a lot of people. Anything calling itself a "martial" art which leaves people no more able to fight than if they'd spent the time playing darts ought to be prepared to be laughed at.

  97. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by danox · · Score: 2

    This is not really the point. The point is that a good story shouldn't require you to throw away everything you know about what things actually mean, just so that George lucas can still a 14 year old girl in his movies to get all the little geek school kiddies going wild. Its so transparent that he is just making up shit to try and fit in the actors that he wants to use and the merchandising that he wants to sell. that is the problem.

    --
    "Me and my girl named bimbo . . . limbo . . . spam" - Captain Beefheart.
  98. Re:I believe its called democratic republic... by darkonc · · Score: 2
    That said, it is pure hogwash to think that a planet would elect a 14 year old to rule them.

    It's also hogwash to think that a country would elect a former coke addict to rule them.

    Shit happens. Grow mushrooms

    --
    Sometimes boldness is in fashion. Sometimes only the brave will be bold.
  99. Re:Ueshiba's - It's an ART by streetlawyer · · Score: 2
    oh yeh, the "martial applications" of tai chi. Which are so deadly that they can never be demonstrated. Give over. I am prepared to concede the possibility that there might once have been a martial art which had the name "tai chi". But the connection between that and the art taught under that name today are as tenuous as ... well, the "Lineages" of most traditional chinese martial arts instructors taking them back to the Shaolin Temple or Yang Lu-Chan. They're fairy stories. You can pretend to yourself that any human movement might be a concealed attack if you've got an active enough imagination (I've seen an instructor claim with a straight face that the opening movement of the form is actually a deadly strike with the backs of the wrists). But the fact remains that tai chi practitioners don't spar and don't train for combat, and those few people who do claim to practice "combat tai chi" invariably cross-train with a system that works (usually a form of jujitsu)

    Why should a sports or artforms be disqualified as 'martial arts' just because they are impractical in this age? Archery and Greco-Roman wrestling are important contests within the Olympics. I don't see any spectators laughing

    You are surely kidding if you think people don't laugh at Greco-Roman wrestlers. It's an absolutely risible sport. And it is a sport, not a "martial art" in the ordinary language meaning of the phrase. Archery is certainly not impractical, as Ted Nugent will tell you.

    If you are only interested in kiling and maiming

    Hang on, you're the one defending tai chi with all those "dim mak killer touches", eye gouges and strikes to the throat! I'm interested in being able to defend myself in a manner consistent with the law of the land and common humanity. Which is to say, to be able to trade a punch for a punch, or to be able to grapple someone to submission. Heck, I'd be happy to learn wrist locks and aikido nage if they worked on resisting opponents, which they don't.

  100. Re:Ueshiba's - It's an ART by streetlawyer · · Score: 2
    Oh get real. You've been sold a bill of goods by a bad martial arts teacher.



    First of all, Tai-chi is based on the philosophy of Taosim

    Wrong. This is more fairy stories. The only documented histories of tai chi chu'an place its beginnings squarely in the Chen village in Henan province. The modern inhabitants of Chen village are not Taoists, and there is no evidence that they ever were. Fanciful lineages taking tai chi back to Taoist sages or to Wudang Mountain have no verifiable basis.

    Some of them purport to teach these "dim mak killer touches", but that is NOT in the TaiChi curriculum.

    Really? Or is it not on the curriculum of your particular school, because you have a fraud for a teacher who is making it up as he goes along. The links between tai chi and traditional chinese medicine are well known.


    As for sparring and combat, I can testify that I've seen taichi practitioner sparring. They can be as fast a furious as any other styles.The difference lies in how the forces are applied and directed: not something obvious to the casual observer

    Like hell. People have been laughing at traditional chinese martial arts types for the last twenty years for claiming to have loads of "hidden force" powers that nobody can detect, but the message isn't apparently getting through.

    As for jujitsu, there doesn't seem to be any techniques there that is not already covered in the various "qiam na xao" (Capture & Grasping Hand) techniques. Nothing special here.

    Except that ju jitsu players train to apply these techiques to resisting opponents. Big difference.