Slashdot Mirror


Gnome 2.0 RC2 Asks For Abuse

A nameless reader submits: "The GNOME Desktop 2.0 release candidate 2 has been released! Gnome 2.0 should be coming out soon! The release notes have some good information."

214 comments

  1. Release dates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pity they did't make the schedules release date...

  2. Crime? by KnightNavro · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't Gnome abuse a felony in most states?

    1. Re:Crime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't Gnome abuse a felony in most states?

      If it were, then the authors of Red Hat's Gnome implementation would have been arrested by now,

    2. Re:Crime? by casings · · Score: 1

      If not it should be. ;D

    3. Re:Crime? by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

      Read in the paper today that falling asleep in a coutroom is.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    4. Re:Crime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are confusing gnome abuse with dwarf tossing ABC news story or paper in legal journal.. Gnome abuse doesn't seem to be considered a crime in most jurisdictions, although it has motivated the formation of a bleeding heart "liberation front" type organization. When it comes to gnomes, let you conscience be your guide.

    5. Re:Crime? by sharkey · · Score: 2

      Isn't Gnome abuse a felony in most states?

      Possibly, but it might just be Gnome tossing that you're thinking of.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  3. Does anyone know... by neo8750 · · Score: 1

    when the final version will be released? I'm looking forward to trying it.

    1. Re:Does anyone know... by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't have any inside information, but if you look here you can see that they've added an unscheduled release candidate and they had planned two weeks between the last release candidate and going gold.

      Assuming we don't get another release candidate (which I think is a good bet - I'm running the nightlies and they feel solid) that places 2.0 around July 7.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    2. Re:Does anyone know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As always, if you want to give the latest Gnome a whirl without messing up your existing system, try Garnome [gnome.org]
      It takes a while to build (about an hour on my 1.0 GHz PIII), but it doesn't touch your existing install - everything goes into ~/garnome.

    3. Re:Does anyone know... by high · · Score: 1

      Many of the configuration settings still exist but you have to use GConf to edit them now.

  4. gentoo Rulez! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    Hmmm, emerge gnome....

    Yeah, we love you spider ! ;-)

  5. RC code name by joeykiller · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those of you who don't understand swedish too well: This release's code name, "Glad Midsommar", means "Happy midsummer". The swedes love a good mid summer party.

    1. Re:RC code name by Per+Wigren · · Score: 2

      The swedes love a good mid summer party.

      Yupp, I'm still having a hangover.. :)

      --
      My other account has a 3-digit UID.
    2. Re:RC code name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..So do we Finnish people! And we consume more alcohol than you Swedish fellas as we celebrate the Midsummer Day ;)

    3. Re:RC code name by rasjani · · Score: 2

      Its not just Swedish, its all scandinavians like finns and norskes too. We, finns, are burning huge bonfires to celebrate midsummer and murder/drowning statictics go skyhigh because of the alcohol use.

      --
      yush
    4. Re:RC code name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Hep, Danes included.
      We should all party together.

    5. Re:RC code name by uncl_bob · · Score: 1

      You suck.

    6. Re:RC code name by MicroBerto · · Score: 2

      If there's one good thing that college has taught me, it's the fact that advil + lots of water not only is good treatment for hangover, but is also a good prevention too! Take it before you go to bed -- unless you pass out cold, then you must suffer!

      --
      Berto
    7. Re:RC code name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      We, finns, are burning huge bonfires to celebrate midsummer and murder/drowning statictics go skyhigh because of the alcohol use.

      Note to any smirking USAns: Finland has a murder rate of less than two per week in the whole country, so when he says "skyhigh" he means maybe they get three or four. In comparison, someone in the US was murdered while you were reading this topic.

    8. Re:RC code name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the US would only have two per a week too if our country were not full of niggers and wetbacks!

    9. Re:RC code name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and norskes too."

      heh .. whats are the norskes ;)

      .øs

    10. Re:RC code name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought you did - or maybe my porn has been lying to me!

    11. Re:RC code name by bokmann · · Score: 3, Informative

      OK, this is off-topic, but relevant to this particular comment.

      I know the perfect hangover cure. When I have a hangover, I can't sleep... so, oddly enough, after a heavy night of drinking, I'm up early, curled up in the fetal position on a couch cursing my own existance. (At least, when I used to drink a lot thats what I did... but that was 10 years ago).

      OK, here's the cure:
      1) 2 or more excederin (with both asprin and tylenol as pain releivers, it is always good at taking the edge off - and it has caffeine - a plus for this crowd)
      2) a multivitamin, like centrum.
      3) a b-complex vitamin suppliment(a lot of drug stores sell this as something like B-100). Alcohol flushes b complex vitamins from your system, which is one of the reasons you will feel like crap.
      4) Gatorade. Swallow all of those pills with a big jug of gatorade... it contains a lot of the electrolytes you need, but pissed out because your kidneys were dumping all the alcohol.
      5) a high-carbohydrate breakfast. Something like pancakes.

      finally, after doing all of that, melt yourself in a warm shower.

      Seriously... Do all this, and you will feel a LOT better.

    12. Re:RC code name by geekster · · Score: 1

      Oh great, we have fucking racist here too.

      "I applaud the wise anti-"multicultural" policies"
      "I'm white, thus I'm discriminated against"

      How does that go together?
      You applaud discrimination of black people and then you bitch about being discriminated because you're white?

      I always wondered how a racists mind work. Does it make sence to you or do you have a big internal conflict going on?

      Strange how you trolls always get your disgusting views into every thread.

    13. Re:RC code name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should work on your reading comprehension. If what he said seemed so ridiculous then perhaps you should have thought to re-read it to make sure you hadn't misunderstood. He wants to go to Finland because he feels he's being discriminated against in Sweden.

    14. Re:RC code name by robslimo · · Score: 1

      Go easy on that Tylenol. It can be mean to your liver, esp. when drinking.

      Here is an excerpt from this URL:

      However, when taken in excessive quantities or when combined with alcohol, acetaminophen may cause death due to liver failure. In fact, an overdose of acetaminophen is one of the most common causes of liver failure, as well as the most common cause of drug-induced liver disease in the United States.

      The best way to avoid a hangover? Don't drink too much.

    15. Re:RC code name by geekster · · Score: 1

      I know, but in his the first sentence he applauds discrimination (anti-multicultural).

    16. Re:RC code name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah you're right. I guess my own comprehension could use some work :-)

  6. abuse! by koekepeer · · Score: 5, Funny

    hey. if they are asking people to abuse gnome 2.0 rc2, why the hell are all the trolls modded down?

    maybe i'm just being stupid, but trolling seems a very appropriate reply to such an ill-formulated headline ;-)

    have a nice day!

    1. Re:abuse! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they meant Abuse, the kick-ass 2d side scroller. It already works under X-Windows who does it have to be ported to Gnome?

      For the few of you who haven't player:
      http://abuse2.com

  7. Garnome by Spock+the+Vulcan · · Score: 5, Informative

    As always, if you want to give the latest Gnome a whirl without messing up your existing system, try Garnome
    It takes a while to build (about an hour on my 1.0 GHz PIII), but it doesn't touch your existing install - everything goes into ~/garnome.

    1. Re:Garnome by AnoniemeLafaard · · Score: 1

      I'd love to, but the current version is still 0.11.0, which works with RC1, right? I guess we'll have to be a little more pateint for Jeff to release the garnome version that works with RC2.

    2. Re:Garnome by d2002xx · · Score: 1

      Only a hour!!! How fast compiling gnome is! I took whold day to compile KDE3 on my K6-2-400, and it only includes kdebase and kdelibs......

    3. Re:Garnome by MicroBerto · · Score: 2
      I tried Garnome 0.11.0 after the discussion of the last Gnome release, and I must say how awesome garnome is.

      However, Gnome 2.0 gave me mixed reactions. First off, the speed is unbelievable. Nautilus is actually a USABLE utility now (550mhz Athlon, 288ram), and everything runs SO much faster!

      On the other hand, I just didn't like the fact that I had to re-do all of my config, and wasn't in the mood to toy with it. So i'll keep testing a bit, but I'll be more excited when mandrake does all their pretty menus for me and I don't have to worry about it :)

      Another problem was the fact that I didn't know how to rebuild gaim applet and xmms-gnome for my garnome, and Evolution didn't work. Maybe I needed to re-specify my paths when compiling. I can't live without those 3 applets/programs.

      --
      Berto
    4. Re:Garnome by MicroBerto · · Score: 2
      One last complaint -- The panel prefs suck - My panel would not span the entire bottom of my screen! Is that fixable? I don't like that half-panel garbage.

      Thanks..

      --
      Berto
    5. Re:Garnome by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 2

      I tried RC1 and hated that the panel at the top was fixed! Since the dawn of time all my desktop environments have had the panel to the *left* of the screen, why is it that in Gnome 2.0 I have to have it stuck at the top ala Mac?

      Another *MAJOR* point that will prevent me from 'upgrading' to 2.0 is that there doesn't seem to be any way to have my favorite focus mode: sloppy with 200ms autoraise: there is 'focus follows mouse' but I wasn't able to get autoraise to work (and anyways having half the focus prefs under the gnome config, and half under the sawfish config is kind of lame).

      I also had several other problems with RC1 (preferences not saving, gconfd not being stopped when logging out (maybe related to the first)) but they might be related to my config.

      Personally these RC1 and RC2 felt more like an alpha than an RC, so if the above are fixed (moveable top panel, sloppy+autoraise) I will probably try gnome 2.2 (or whatever the name of the 'bugfix' release is).

      BTW, if there IS a way in RC1/RC2 to get the focus behaviour and to move the panel from the top to the left, I'm all ears!

      --
      -- the cake is a lie
    6. Re:Garnome by MicroBerto · · Score: 2

      That's not exactly the panel I was talking about. If you right click that menu there, you can add a REAL panel (the ones that you can move around and change the thickness and such). You can also remove the little one up top after that. I don't want Mao OS 9 either.

      --
      Berto
    7. Re:Garnome by bzzzt · · Score: 1

      It takes 3 hours on my P3/1ghz, so what did you overclock to get it to compile that fast? ;)

    8. Re:Garnome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C++ d00d! It doesn't just produce slow and shitty executables, it takes ages to do it!

    9. Re:Garnome by Spock+the+Vulcan · · Score: 2
      I wouldn't know - I am using a Compaq Presario 2700T laptop with a 1GHz Mobile P3 processor and 256 MB memory. I just did a complete recompile, with moderate web-browsing etc going on simultaneously, and the total build time, including download time was:
      real 84m41.180s
      user 49m45.300s
      sys 10m22.790s
      Maybe you have a slow network connection or something?
  8. Gnome2 problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I always been a gnome user, and i prefer gnome over KDE but i am dissapointed. I have been compiling gnome2 from CVS every 2-3 weeks.
    Things I hope they can change in by release day.
    Japanese Input is broken in gnome2 applications.
    File Chooser is not improved.( I know this is planned for the 2.2 release)
    I was expecting a lot more from gnome control center.
    Default configurations are bad.

    1. Re:Gnome2 problems by d2002xx · · Score: 0, Troll

      1. Why input japanese? English is the only global (and only useful) language even if you hate it.

      2. I think something like the address-bar in konqueror is much useful than file-chooser.

      3. The quickest method to do configuration is to modify the configuration file, isn't it? Are you newbie?

    2. Re:Gnome2 problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Some people use their computers for local work.
      2. Yay for you. Others do not.
      3. Maybe, but most computer users are.

    3. Re:Gnome2 problems by jfleck · · Score: 1

      > Japanese Input is broken in gnome2 applications.

      Have you filed a bug report on this? There was a mention of this on the GNOME lists recently, and others have had Japanese input working. The only way to track down an apparently isolated set of cases is to file a bug report and work with the developers.

    4. Re:Gnome2 problems by super-flex-o-matic · · Score: 0

      ha your funny

    5. Re:Gnome2 problems by fferreres · · Score: 2

      "3. The quickest method to do configuration is to modify the configuration file, isn't it? Are you newbie?"

      Woah, hold on a bit. That is nonsense. This is desktop enviroment. Doesn't matter if you can grow flowers from the command line, the GUI and specially the control center is really important (though i use the command line for a lot of thing, and specially when the GUI lacks. ex: file manager. I can't use Nautilus).

      --
      unfinished: (adj.)
  9. Missing info at Released note by sebol · · Score: 3, Funny

    i've recieve the announcement view gnome announce mailing list. it contained with extra information:-

    "Can we have a special TELSABUG category, and everything gets dropped
    to fix them first?" - Telsa Gwynne

    --
    -- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
    1. Re:Missing info at Released note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't she the chick that looks like she used to ride the short bus and is Alan Cox's wife?

  10. gnome-panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anybody else's gnome-panel (in gnome-2) automatically reorder their launchers in undesirable ways every time it gets launched? I see mine reorder them to almost but not exactly the order they were created in.

    1. Re:gnome-panel by MatrixLab · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have the same problem here... And I can't seem to find the transparency feature either... I loved that one, made the panel look really sexy, imho!

    2. Re:gnome-panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, well I do know the solution to that one...

      "Edit Current Profile -> Effects" has the background options.

  11. Looking forward with mixed feelings by Karora · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been playing with Gnome 2 for a while now, and I must admit it is starting to feel like a stable release.

    There are a few things that I have mixed feelings about though. The default WM is switching to Metacity, which doesn't have the power and configurability of Sawfish, and that is symptomatic of the general reduction in configurability.

    Someone, somewhere has decided that configurability === complexity, and that a bewildering array of choices is too many for a newbie. This appears to have been translated into a general 'dumbing down' of the interface.

    I can no longer tell Sawfish to remember my window sizes. The Gnome Panel can no longer swallow applications, so all of those WM applets are now useless to me. I can't run the Afterstep clock applet!

    I guess it is the applications job to remember what window size I last used, and to remember it without me telling the WM to do so, but they don't - not even Nautilus2 remembers it's window sizes - every time it opens a new window which is slightly less than 1/4 of my screen size.

    Overall, this is probably a good thing. People should be writing their applications to remember UI things, and having the WM remember those probably makes them lazy, but I can see a bit of pain in my future with Gnome 2, until these issues are solved and Gnome 3 is released, perhaps.

    At least Gnome 2 does seem somewhat snappier than Gnome 1.4, and the styling is better, especially with anti-aliasing available throughout.

    --

    ...heellpppp! I've been captured by little green penguins!
    1. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is starting to worry me. I have an old laptop that I use with gnome because it feels snappier than KDE. I don't think this machine would be able to handle KDE3. I've heard that gnome2.0 is quicker than gnome 1.4 on the same hardware.

      Is Sun just playing lip-service to gnome development or what? Isn't their default desktop supposed to be gnome at some point in the not too distant future. You would think that with Sun and Redhat's involvement in gnome that these issues would have been resolved before release.

      Oh well. If the time it's taking kde3 to reach sid is any indication, maybe some of these quirks will be sorted out before the debs are put on unstable.

    2. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think you have to wait for Gnome 3.0 for this stuff to be fixed. The improvements between 1.0 and 1.4.x were amazing and I would expect the same kind of thing here.

      Also, it'll take a while for most applications to be ported over to Gnome 2.0. In that respect I think a lot of users might be disappointed since most of what people think of as "Gnome" is really applications. The release of Gnome 2.0 means the new API and a few basic tools are ready, but the real benefits won't be apparent until Gnumeric, Evolution, and other big apps are ported over.

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    3. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by groman · · Score: 1

      What I'm interested in is if they fixed that *feature* that didn't allow you to change the shapes of widgets in Gtk.. like Qt lets you.

    4. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Karora · · Score: 3, Informative

      Gnome2 will hit Debian unstable fairly soon. In fact it is mostly in there already - there are just a few things in experimental really.

      I would say that in your case you probably will be better off with Gnome2, because it does seem snappier than 1.4.

      --

      ...heellpppp! I've been captured by little green penguins!
    5. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Ami+Ganguli · · Score: 2

      Are you saying that under Qt you can change a text box into an oval or something like that? Is this at the application development level or at the theme level?

      --
      It is tempting, if the only tool you have is a hammer, to treat everything as if it were a nail. - Abraham Maslow
    6. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by LionKimbro · · Score: 2
      The Gnome Panel can no longer swallow applications, so all of those WM applets are now useless to me. I can't run the Afterstep clock applet!
      Wait, does this mean that Wanda no longer fits in the panel?

      NOOOoooooooo!!!

    7. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An anlogue clock applet for the panel is missing too.

    8. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by GauteL · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Nautilus2 remembers window size now. It was just a bug, it has been fixed. RC2 includes the fix. I'm pretty sure RC1 did too, but anyhow..

      All the apps I use regularly, Galeon, Nautilus, gnome-terminal etc.. does remember window size.

      GNOME 2.0 has tried to decrease the amount of options. This is a Good Thing [tm], because it means that the options that are still there are useful, easy to find and intuitive.

      Metacity is NOT the default WM for GNOME 2.0, it is just an option. It will probably be the default WM some day, but it is still not completely ready for that.

      Swallowing other applets than GNOME-applets is hardly useful for anyone but a very few. It was a great source of bugs, and nobody really wanted to fix it. It was decided that unless someone really wanted it badly enough to fix it, then it would be dropped. Nobody wanted it badly enough.

      The strange thing is that the people that scream about lack of options, are mostly the same that scream about bloat. This is ironic because the huge amount of options it would take to satisfy everyone would lead to an extremely bloated interface both UI-wise, bugwise and probably also memory-wise.

      If someone wants an option or a feature this is the way to do it:
      - Open up a bug report in bugzilla, and argue carefully for your feature or option request.

      There are three issues that need to be addressed before they are accepted:
      1. Do they make sense? That is, are they sensible options or options that either fix something broken (in which case the brokeness should just be fixed instead).
      2. How useful is it, compared to the cost of increasing complexity both UI-wise and QA-wise?
      3. Does someone care enough to code it in?

      The swallowed applet was probably ok for point 1, a little on the edge for point 2, and definitely a miss for point 3. If someone does care enough to code, then state your interest on desktop-devel-list@gnome.org, and it might be in GNOME 2.2 or something like that.
    9. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by axxackall · · Score: 1
      The strange thing is that the people that scream about lack of options, are mostly the same that scream about bloat.

      It's not very strange. It just means that options should be organized/categorized/foldered better.

      It might be useful to combine the best experience from M$ Win2k Administrator's console and IBM AIX Smith.

      Also, it would be nice to have typical profiles. Hide some (or lot) of options in "non-super-user" profiles.

      I hope GNOME 2.1 options will be more smart organized than now. It may take knowledge management patterns but it will worth.

      --

      Less is more !
    10. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Zenithal · · Score: 1
      There are a few things that I have mixed feelings about though. The default WM is switching to Metacity, which doesn't have the power and configurability of Sawfish, and that is symptomatic of the general reduction in configurability.


      Regardless of the default, they're going to have to pry enlightenment from my cold, dead fingers.

      And that's all I have to say about that.
      --


      Aaron
      AaronCameron.net
    11. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Menthos · · Score: 1
      It's not very strange. It just means that options should be organized/categorized/foldered better.

      And this is what people are trying to do. However, it still doesn't make sense to keep every option ever invented in any operating system in, no matter how well organized they are. If hardly noone uses an option or if noone is prepared to maintain it, it's usually just unmaintained code that may have been broken for years and a source for bug reports. Preferences have a cost. Better organization and careful decisions on what to have and what to keep is what's needed, and that's what people are trying to do.

      --

      GNU/Linux. The Freshmaker.

    12. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      it still doesn't make sense to keep every option ever invented in any operating system in, no matter how well organized they are.

      That's why we need roles: categories could be permitted for roles. It's another question, will user assign a role to him/her self, or it will be don by the system admin.

      Once RBAC is not in linux-kernel VFS than GNOME can fix it on its own VFS level.

    13. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Alan · · Score: 2

      Swallowing other applets than GNOME-applets is hardly useful for anyone but a very few. It was a great source of bugs, and nobody really wanted to fix it. It was decided that unless someone really wanted it badly enough to fix it, then it would be dropped. Nobody wanted it badly enough.

      What about those who wanted it but can't code? Personally the one feature that I wanted it for was for gabber's swallowed applet. This works perfectly in kde3, even though gabber is a gnome app. As I use jabber for all my communication (icq, msn, etc) I really need a decent jabber client that will work in gnome2. If there is one out there, great, but the best I've seen are either PSI (swallowed into the kde dock, as it's a kde app) and gabber (swallowed into the gnome or kde dock, and a gnome app), and it seems that neither of them will work now :(

      </bitch>

    14. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Alan · · Score: 2

      Speaking of E, when the hell is there going to be a usable release of e17?? I know they're rewriting it all from scratch again, but it's been years now!

    15. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by StarHeart · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you. I have yet to see a window manager that even comes close to Enlightenment.

      Lack of remember settings in Sawfish is a major hit toward my willingness to use it. Metacity is dumbdowncity. All the window managers that only have Send window left or right royally suck. I want to Send to X not repeatedly Send to Left/Right/Up/Down.

      --
      Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
    16. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am rabbi with a gun...I will be victim of no one
      So you terrorists are warned, don't mess with me

      I will shoot you if I must...you'll be the one who's turned to dust
      On the streets of Brooklyn, you are gonna see

      So you can bet the whole farm...there won't be another Holocaust
      This time we'll stand up...too many people we've lost
      We're committed, we will defend ourselves
      We are strong...I'm set to lock and load...I am rabbi

      I am rabbi with a gun and...I am never gonna run and
      It is time you terrorists should be afraid

      We will hunt you day and night and...you're the ones who'll feel frightened
      In your stinking countries you will wish you stayed

      So you can bet the whole farm...there won't be another Holocaust
      This time we'll stand up...too many people we've lost
      We're committed, we will defend ourselves
      We are strong...I'm set to lock and load...I am rabbi

      I am rabbi with a gun and...I am set to get it done and
      For the scum among us we've a big surprise

      If attacks you will be trying...you're the ones who will be dying
      And around your bodies soon will come the flies

      So you can bet the whole farm...there won't be another Holocaust
      This time we'll stand up...too many people we've lost
      We're committed, we will defend ourselves
      We are strong...I'm set to lock and load

      And so, it's a promise not a dare
      Behave or please be aware
      Bullets will fly through the air

    17. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /apps/metacity/window_keybindings/move_to_workspac e_X

      That's the gconf path, there's even UI for it in Desktop preferences->Keyboard shortcuts. Also there's alt-space (for window menu) and then {1|2|...}

      So, I guess it's not dumbed down _enough_ since you've clearly demonstrated that it's quite possible to not be able to figure it out

    18. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by StarHeart · · Score: 1

      That may work in metacity, but other than that metacity is missing even more than Sawfish.

      --
      Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
    19. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by nihilogos · · Score: 2

      Speaking of E, when the hell is there going to be a usable release of e17?? I know they're rewriting it all from scratch again, but it's been years now!

      This question deserves its own story.

      --
      :wq
    20. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by The+Faywood+Assassin · · Score: 1

      > Regardless of the default, they're going to have
      > to pry enlightenment from my cold, dead fingers©

      Here, here! I'm using e0©16©5 and still going strong© Unfortunately I have no plans to move to e©017© I don't mean to insult their hard work, but as far as I understand, e0©17 is going to be a desktop shell, not simply a window manager© Enlightenment is basically making us choose between it and Gnome or KDE©

      Sorry guys, I choose Gnome ¥with select KDE apps as my default environment©

      While we're on the subject, GMC is still my file manager© Much faster, and it does so much more ¥better integration with GNOME than Nautilus©

      Beny

      --

      "I'm a humble person really,

      I'm actually much greater than I think I am"

    21. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by Prothonotar · · Score: 1

      There is a reason these doclets don't work... in fact, with sawfish 2, the reason seems to be that there is no good protocol currently for these doclets or other swallowed apps, so sawfish, which expressly does not have any code designed to support these non-standard protocols, and the panel which is trying to swallow the windows, both end up competing to grab the window first (or maybe last). If you enable and disable the gabber status icon, you'll see it appear in various states (unswallowed with window border, unswallowed with no window border, swallowed into the gnome status dock). Gnome 2 is supposed to be working towards supporting a new, Gnome-centric and window-manager agnostic system tray, based on the protocol being documented at www.freedesktop.org. Hopefully it will be ready when Gnome 2 ships.

      --
      "Every man is a mob, a chain gang of idiots." - Jonathan Nolan, Memento Mori
    22. Re:Looking forward with mixed feelings by esarjeant · · Score: 1

      The UI has definitely been "dumbed-down", there are very few options that can be configured. For neophite users this will make Gnome much more approachable, but more seasoned users will quickly grow frustrated by the limited configuration options.

      It's not stable yet, either. Inside of my first 15 minutes with it this version of Gnome has crashed 3 times. I'll need to use it more to understand what it was that might have made it become unresponsive.

      The default config is very Mac-like, but ironically this is after the Mac has already moved on to a new UI. Sun will probably be retisent to adopting anything that remotely resembles OpenWin, so this notalgic Mac look for Gnome 2 is likely to persist.

      Everything looks much more professional. Obviously the anti-aliased fonts are a win-win, and the Gnome Panel has been reworked significantly.

      I'm not at all happy with Nautilus. In contrast with Konqueror, there are too many basic file operations missing. For example, right-click on any file in Konqueror and you can pick anywhere on your computer to copy / move the file. In Nautilus, you're forced to use the sluggish copy/paste methodology. While certainly much more impressive, I think the Konqueror solution is faster in most cases.

      While I enjoy by bubble CPU monitor, I'm not sure this is going to be enough to keep me with Gnome. Version 2.0 isn't looking significantly better, so I may find myself back in KDE soon.

      --

      Eric Sarjeant
      eric[@]sarjeant.com

  12. Just anti-aliasing? by arvindv · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    After using ClearType on Windows XP, Gnome's antialiasing looks disappointing...

    1. Re:Just anti-aliasing? by loply · · Score: 1

      There are multiple anti-aliasing algorithms available for Gnome/XFree. Search on google for "Xft Hack" for a patch which results in a Microsoft style look.

      Also, if you want "ClearType" (technically known as sub-pixel antialiasing) you will have to do a bit of XftConfig`ing.

    2. Re:Just anti-aliasing? by JamesHenstridge · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you are using Xft for font rendering (that is, you set the GDK_USE_XFT environment variable to 1), you can turn on cleartype style rendering. If your LCD panel is in RGB order, you can put the following in your ~/.Xdefaults file:
      Xft.rgba: rgb

      Or equivalently, in your ~/.xftconfig file:
      match edit rgba=rgb;

    3. Re:Just anti-aliasing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, linux: ready for the desktop. Time to wait for Gnome 3.

  13. "Gnome 2.0 RC2 Asks For Abuse" by Second_Derivative · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sure thing, "Your mother was a hamster..."

    1. Re:"Gnome 2.0 RC2 Asks For Abuse" by JayAndSilentBob · · Score: 2, Funny

      and your father smelt of elderberries! I fart in your general direction!

      --


      Love,
      Jay and Silent Bob
    2. Re:"Gnome 2.0 RC2 Asks For Abuse" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I told him we already Got ONE!

    3. Re:"Gnome 2.0 RC2 Asks For Abuse" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't abuse, this is arguments. Abuse is two doors down the hall on the right.

    4. Re:"Gnome 2.0 RC2 Asks For Abuse" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I will taunt you a second time.......

  14. You wan't abuse eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Fuck you gnome! Who wan'ts fucking smelly feet on the fucking desktop! You suck! There isn't a place were you rule!

    Windows has got their desktop right, its been more or less the same since about 1994 (When Windows Chicago came out)

    Linux has no need for you! Its got the kick ass K Desktop Enviroment which is much better than your shit!

    Mac OS X dosen't need you, its got an Aqua interface which nukes your smelly fucking feet off the fucking planet! Don't Forget KDE is avalible for it too!

    Solaris is no good because they got CDE which owns j00 in its fucking sleep!

    Who the fuck needs gnome! Its slow, bloated, a fat bastard file manager, DEPENDS on mozilla for its browsing components and has a butt ugly motif like interface which you fucking stole from the fucking GIMP! Your only freinds is shit hat and those fucking monkey brains over at Ximan!

    KDE 0wn j00 and it is the choice of all the 'Desktop' linuxes, Mandrake, SuSE, Lycoris and So on.

    Fuck off and die smelly feet and let the mighty K rule the penguins desktop!

    P.S, in the garden i have two gnomes, one who is humping a turtle and another one who looks like bin laden

    P.P.S, wash your fucking feet!

  15. A Haiku for you! by HaikuSpank · · Score: 1

    Desktop exploded Somebody please kill me now. I was running Gnome. Jesse haiku12.20.beamsplat@spamgourmet.com

    1. Re:A Haiku for you! by HaikuSpank · · Score: 1

      Desktop exploded
      Somebody please kill me now.
      I was running Gnome.

      I should've hit 'Preview', shouldn't I? I'm such a n00b!

      Jesse
      haiku12.20.beamsplat@spamgourmet.com

    2. Re:A Haiku for you! by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Speaking of Haiku's, has anyone seen any posts from 575 lately?

      where did he go?

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  16. Agreement, but reserved. by Inoshiro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree that dumbing down is bad, but I don't agree with your WM point. Why should every GUI program writer write the same support code? You might as well say that they have to make all their apps stateful by hand. It's much simpler to provide one provably correct code path in the WM, than potentially thousands in all the applications in a system.

    For those apps which are "special," they could simply send a "NON_STATEFUL" token to the WM when dealing with that window.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  17. No, I think I liked it better the first time. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    When this comment was written by Karora.

    Moderators of the above comment (+1 style): YHBT. YHL. HTH. HAND.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:No, I think I liked it better the first time. by forged · · Score: 1
    2. Re:No, I think I liked it better the first time. by Carlos+Laviola · · Score: 1

      Can you tell me why I'm on your foes list? I don't even know you, dude.

    3. Re:No, I think I liked it better the first time. by forged · · Score: 1

      good point, I don't know you either. you're off the list.

  18. +1 funny dammit!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why has nobody done this yet?

  19. Re:What about KDE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KDE is a WHOLE lot better than Gnome! Gnome is just a crappy copy quickly hacked together because of 'licences'. Now that QT is GPL Gnomes original purpose is gone and its obsolete!

    Just scrap Gnome and join together to make one ultimate desktop! Just like when microsoft abandoned the 20 year old DOS Code for the NT Kernel with XP!

    Im a KDE Supporter and I know GNOME sucks really badly and it should be destroyed! KDE looks a whole lot better than GNOME WILL ever be! Currently in Development is KDE new Keramik GUI. I downloaded a beta version from Suse linuKS and it is better than any other GUI ive seen in my life! Gnome limps on with crappy and obsolete PIXMAP guis and wonders why it sucks! KDE is the Future and gnome is dying! If you use gnome than your a loser!

    But then theres always been flamewars between different Programs such as Emacs vs VIM, joe vs nano, linux vs BSD vs Windows, Aqua vs Luna, GTK vs QT vs TK vs Motif vs Athena vs Curses vs other toolkits and we will not stop having them until one defeats the other and reigns supreme! And KDE is winning!

  20. Re:What about KDE? by JanneM · · Score: 1, Troll

    Actually, I've seen the opposite effect. From what I've seen, people coming from Windows tend to prefer Gnome over KDE precisely because it's not like the Windows desktop they've left behind. It seems to be a combination of factors. One seems to be a desire to 'make a clean break'; they left Windows for a reason, and do not wish to be reminded of it. Another is likely to be the danger of confusion in using a desktop that's almost - but not quite - like the one they already know. Using a very different desktop there is no longer that danger.

    Both Gnome and KDE are good, and Linux is far stronger for having two lively projects (and a lot of small or special-purpose projects as well) in this area.

    /Janne

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  21. Quick hurry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:Quick hurry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to suggest you wait until next week when KDE 3.0.2 is released.

  22. Asking for it by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just can't believe the title. Gnome asks for abuse. Can you believe it? Blaming the victim, as usual. Fscking patriarchy....

  23. Re:What about KDE? by RPoet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Very nice reasoning, and quite original, too.

    --
    "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  24. Where's the ChangeLog ? by loom · · Score: 1


    Where is the ChangeLog between RC1 and RC2 ? All the release notes say is that "some bugs were fixed", which isn't really interesting.

    1. Re:Where's the ChangeLog ? by d2002xx · · Score: 1

      It's RC2, not a new version. I think any new featues should not be added, or it may need to release RC3, RC4, RC5, etc.

    2. Re:Where's the ChangeLog ? by JamesHenstridge · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can use bugzilla to find this information.

      As an example, here is a list of all bugs with the GNOME2 keyword that are in the RESOLVED, VERIFIED or CLOSED state that changed state between the RC1 and RC2 releases. It is not complete, and probably isn't fully accurate (some changes may have been fixed but no new tarball is available yet), but it gives you an idea of what has changed.

  25. Why use either? by Arker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seriously, I run straight WindowMaker even on newer hardware, sure on a fast machine I bring up a gnome panel occassionally to mess around with, but I honestly never really understood why people seem to think they have to have KDE or GNOME on a machine - particularly an older one of course. Install the libs, and whatever applications you have to have, and they'll run just fine without any panels or the like...

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    1. Re:Why use either? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blah blah blah, yes' you're so superior because you "don't understand why people ssem to think they have to have KDE or GNOME on a machine" . . . or are you just stupid?

    2. Re:Why use either? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's simple. They miss Windows. They're only running Linux (or whatever) because it's not Microsoft, and not for any genuine reason.

      The ones who are doing it to be 31337 may not even use a Linux distribution as the base, as that's too well known. These types resort to some BSD flavor just for the obscurity factor. Note to BSD zealots: shut up. I use BSD for various purposes and am not pissing on it. I'm pissing on THEM (and maybe you, if you're a zealot instead of a genuine admin).

      Now for the bad news: nothing any of us can do will change this behavior, or make them go away. All you can do is just keep using what works and smile contentedly at their thrashing to keep the latest eye candy running.

      Personally, I use Afterstep. The old one with the .steprc that the current AS people piss on. As long as the time never goes backwards, it works well enough. Give me a couple of essential window controls, a Pager, and a Wharf, and I'm set. File managers? Hah.

    3. Re:Why use either? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I think it's all digital-geek-penis-waving.

      I use KDE so mine's bigger.
      I use Gnome so mine's bigger.
      Fools that think you need a desktop, I use windowmaker so mine's bigger.
      Idiot, you need a GUI? I use the command line, mine's bigger.
      Luser! I use a self-compiled copy of CPM on a Commodre 128, mine's bigger.
      etc. etc.

      Use what works for you and don't post bullshit "I don't see why someone think's they need . . ." posts, it's all digital dick-waving.

  26. Parent is a copy!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This guy copied the whole message from previous Slashdot message written by someone else!! Very lame!! He's just trying to get more karma by using others.

  27. Re:shitfuckcunt! by d2002xx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why?

  28. No Launch-Feedback and Menu-Editor in Gnome 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They couldn't fix menu editing so they simply dropped it completely. Now they say you have to wait until 2.0.1 for it. Why not delay 2.0? Can't they resist pressure of all the firms like Sun who wants to see it released before Solaris 9?

    1. Re:No Launch-Feedback and Menu-Editor in Gnome 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also hadn't time anymore for complete control center integration into Nautilus, a new file dialog, a Nautilus Bonobo HTML part. So I tend to agree with you.

    2. Re:No Launch-Feedback and Menu-Editor in Gnome 2.0 by SpeedMan · · Score: 1

      Umm, Solaris OE 9 was released last month. SpeedMan

      --
      Regards, SpeedMan
    3. Re:No Launch-Feedback and Menu-Editor in Gnome 2.0 by Menthos · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd rather see a release now than delayed forever. Especially since 2.0 brings a good lot of improvements over previous releases.

      --

      GNU/Linux. The Freshmaker.

  29. Re:hi mom! by d2002xx · · Score: 1

    Where do the guys come from? They seem to have burned brains.

  30. Re:More Mirrors [Score +5 Informative] by forged · · Score: 0, Troll
    I recognize here the fine trolling style of people over at Trollaxor.

    Oh, that and I have the privilege to be your first fan.

  31. Joke? by d2002xx · · Score: 1

    Is it an joke? I thinks it's not like an ad. The guy who wrote the comment seems to know nothing about computer.

  32. To hell with Gnome. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to use a Desktop Environment...that can... s.i.i.i.i.n.n.n.g.g.g.g...

  33. More Flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Re:More Flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the date, Debian 3.0 includes KDE 2.2.2.

  34. New Button Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is here anyone who loves or agree with the new button order in dialogs?

    1. Re:New Button Order by Cheesy+Fool · · Score: 0

      Well, it wasn't hard to adjust but i'd like to know the reasons why this was done, because i don't see how it makes it anymore usual.

      --

      Hail to the king, baby!
    2. Re:New Button Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you are not confused that non-Gnome2 applications (like Gtk, Gnome1, KDE, other) present a different order? Never mistakenly clicked the wrong, dangerous option?

    3. Re:New Button Order by Cheesy+Fool · · Score: 0

      I still don't understand why they changed it but no i haven't clicked the wrong option/button.

      --

      Hail to the king, baby!
    4. Re:New Button Order by Nodatadj · · Score: 1

      User testing said that the bottom right corner of a dialog box was where peoples eyes were resting when they'd finished reading the text in the dialog. So it followed from there that the OK button should go there. It's been hashed out on various gnome.org mailing lists and it's pretty much the same conclusion that Apple came to with MacOS.

      And no, it's never caused me much confusion.

    5. Re:New Button Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the buttons should be the tree Microsoft buttons: [OK] [YES] [ACCEPT]

  35. Those of us currently stuck in Australia by sinistre · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's winter here you insensitive clod.

    Vennlig hilsen,
    Ole

  36. abuse micro$soft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Gnome 2.0 asks for abuse of micro$oft :)

    Seriously, with every good release of Gnome (and KDE as well) micro$oft has less and less arguments to keep its users. $700 for M$office? Go to hell - we'll install Open Office or Star Office. $300 for M$ OS with M$ IE? We'd rather install Linux + Gnome + Mozilla. $*K for Back Office (IIS + Exchange)? Even young Zope works fine for me.

    That's the real abuse :)

  37. Re:Gnome vs. KDE by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 1

    Oh great, just what I need... A gnome with no pants on on my desktop :-b

  38. Not a haiku. by tunah · · Score: 2
    The last line has six syllables. Remember, it's Guh-nome (probably short for GNU/Gnome :P)

    Pedantry for the day.

    --
    Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
    1. Re:Not a haiku. by big.ears · · Score: 2

      Actually, the reason it was not a haiku is because it is the truth. Help! My desktop exploded. I was running gnome. I don't have a panel and nautilus doesn't work. I got shoved into blackbox. Ugh.

      Serves me right for being bleeding edge and all.

    2. Re:Not a haiku. by laserjet · · Score: 2

      this made me think of the word, gnome. I know the correct was to say it is G/nome with two syllables, but I still don't. It just sounds stupid. I even tried to call it that for a month and felt like a retard. So, I just say gnome with a silent 'g' even though I know it's technically wrong.

      who's with me?!

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  39. fertility rite by thorgil · · Score: 1

    we dance around a big pole...

    hmmm... wonder what that stands for..?!!
    ;)

    --
    Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
  40. Re:Gnome vs. KDE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah.. kde is for people who still use diapers..
    And it's butt-ugly..

  41. How can I enable anti-aliasing? by sshambar · · Score: 1

    I haven't played with the gnome2 desktop until now, and to save (gobs) of time pulling/compiling, I just installed the Ximian Gnome2 developer snapshot.

    However, I can't seem to find where the preference to enable anti-alias fonts is... I've tried selecting largish fonts, but all the rendering is clearly bitmapped.

    Anyone else using the Ximian snapshot having this problem? Are they compiling w/ anti-aliasing off?

    1. Re:How can I enable anti-aliasing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you have to set an command line option

    2. Re:How can I enable anti-aliasing? by drunkahol · · Score: 1

      I too am having anti-aliasing problems with the Ximian Gnome2 developer snapshots.

      I've still had no definitive answer.

      Some have said to set an environment variable, but I don't know which file to put this in. It really should be a standard thing and have a GUI configuration program.

  42. Hey! by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 1
    I seem to recall writing that before. Where the hell do you get off stealing my posts?

    /me marks cybermint as a foe

    1. Re:Hey! by cybermint · · Score: 0

      Oh njo! I've been found out!

  43. Hmmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they have any substansial income yet from the project or will people quit working on it as soon as they leave school?

  44. How to enable anti-aliasing? by JamesHenstridge · · Score: 5, Informative

    First of all, you must enable Xft support (the new font system for X). This is done by defining the GDK_USE_XFT environment variable before running a program. The best way to turn this on for the entire desktop is by defining it in the X startup script (probably ~/.gnomerc, ~/.Xclients or ~/.xinitrc):

    #!/bin/bash
    export GDK_USE_XFT=1
    # set up $PATH and $LD_LIBRARY_PATH if needed
    exec gnome-session

    After doing this, you may still not see antialiased fonts. For instance, on Red Hat systems, the default /etc/X11/XftConfig file has the following lines:

    match
    any size < 14
    any size > 8
    edit antialias=false;

    which turns off antialiasing for fonts with sizes between 8 and 14. By commenting out these lines, AA will be enabled for all fonts. If you have an LCD panel, add a line like the following to /etx/X11/XftConfig or ~/.xftconfig:

    match edit rgba=rgb;

    This will turn on ClearType style subpixel antialiasing.

    1. Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the kind of shit that makes people say linux is hard.

      Can't they just put a button somewhere that you click and it automagically works?

      I mean ximian's whole point is trying to sell a usable open source desktop that anybody can use...

      Sorry but if that's the best they can do, or they think that is "usable by the masses" then ximian has some issues...

      (And yes i know how do to this and am comfortable with it so don't bother flaming me calling me a windows panzy or a gui fairy or some lame l33t d00d crap mmmkay?)

    2. Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? by maeglin · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of shit that makes people say linux is hard.

      Can't they just put a button somewhere that you click and it automagically works?

      I mean ximian's whole point is trying to sell a usable open source desktop that anybody can use...

      Sorry but if that's the best they can do, or they think that is "usable by the masses" then ximian has some issues...


      Font blurring has nothing to do with usability. Actually it makes stuff even harder to see. So, how does this make "using" Gnome hard? If you want to play with stuff prepare for some challenges.

      "I don't see how anyone can claim that windows is easy to use.. I mean, I can't even get it to do virtual desktops and I have to edit the friggin' registry to turn on focus-follows-mouse mode! Windows won't be "ready for the desktop" until there's a simple check box somewhere to turn these on.. how hard could it be? Gnome has had them for YEARS."

      Silly, isn't it.

    3. Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      IF it was only that easy. What about XFS? Do you still use the font server? Do we turn it off? How about enabling TTF fonts? Truetype? Does Xfree 4.2.0 (inital) have the truetype support? Does your distro support it? Do I have to recompile anything?

      Man might be nice to have an entire document, for whatever distro, with rpm levels on how to get AA setup. There is too much "turn this on" and it works mumbo-jumbo.

      Back to the real world...

    4. Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? by be-fan · · Score: 2

      It's really not that complicated. Most distros don't ship with XFS turned on anymore, since XF 4.x subsumes most of what it did. Freetype is installed by default in all XF 4.x systems, so that's in there. Basically, all you need is to make sure Xft is there, that you're using GTK+ 2.0 or Qt 2.0+ and hit the little checkbox in the control panel.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    5. Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If gnome's anti-aliasing makes it harder to read then their implementation sucks...

      Also it's l33t d00d attitudes like yourself that help make sure that linux doesn't get anywhere.

      In ten years when the linux desktop revolution never happened hey you can always post some lame anti-microsoft crap and talk about how everyone's mom should be thrilled to go fucking around in the x config files just to turn on anti-aliased fonts...

      Your attitude is silly, yes indeed, it is.

    6. Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Font blurring has nothing to do with usability. Actually it makes stuff even harder to see."

      Ya that's why when you try and show a suit a linux desktop the first thing they say is why do the fonts look like shit?

      If ximians anti-aliasing makes things harder to see then ximians anti-aliasing code sucks.

      No one says OS X hurts their eyes and no one says windows fonts look ugly. (well besides open source jihadis who have sworn their life to defend mullah stallman's holy war)

    7. Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? by JamesHenstridge · · Score: 1

      Xft can handle Type1, TTF and OpenType fonts (and in the version included in CVS XFree86, bitmap PCF fonts as well). Simply add a "dir" line to the XftConfig file for each font directory. No need to create fonts.dir files or anything -- Xft will discover the fonts in that directory itself. One of the nice things you can do is to add ~/fonts to the Xft font path in your local ~/.xftconfig file. Then you can drop fonts in that folder and they become usable to all your Xft using applications.

      You should probably still run XFS, so that older applications (such as gtk 1.2 based ones, and most Xt ones) that use core X font rendering still work. Note that the reason most distros are set up to use a font server rather than leaving the X server to render the fonts is that it adds a level of parallelism. If the X server was rendering fonts, it would block while doing so. With the font server rendering fonts, the X server is free to do other stuff while waiting for the fonts to be rendered, which can take a while for CJK fonts, for instance.

    8. Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "open source jihadis", "mullah stalman's holy war".

      Now that's fucking hilarious

    9. Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. I thought you might enjoy that.

    10. Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? by maeglin · · Score: 1

      If gnome's anti-aliasing makes it harder to read then their implementation sucks...

      No, font smoothing is a subjectively useful feature at best, for many it's a source of eye fatigue.

      Also it's l33t d00d attitudes like yourself that help make sure that linux doesn't get anywhere.

      How so? All I was arguing was that having to make an effort to enable a feature that you want but is not enabled by default is not endemic to only Open Source. You completely missed my examples of two features that I find indispensible (unlike font blurring) but is not available to Windows users without third party software or require a registry hack. Is Windows "Not Ready for the Desktop (tm)?"

      In ten years when the linux desktop revolution never happened hey you can always post some lame anti-microsoft crap and talk about how everyone's mom should be thrilled to go fucking around in the x config files just to turn on anti-aliased fonts...

      This is worse than mucking with the registry, how? Not that I think you'll actually read this time, but FYI there's a big-ass "Enable Font Antialiasing" checkbox in KDE. It'll be there in Gnome soon too. And every whiner like yourself can find something else to harp on about...

      Your attitude is silly, yes indeed, it is.

      Reading comprehension.. learn it, love it, use it.

    11. Re:How to enable anti-aliasing? by hejpig · · Score: 1

      Even if you have managed to switch on anti-aliasing, you may not see any difference. Many of the fonts used by programmes and the WM are non-aliased types. Many Adobe fonts do not display antialiased for example. You will have to go looking around for configuration options to change fonts. The URW and Xft fonts are good.

  45. Gnome2 since beta5 by daserver · · Score: 1

    I've been running Gnome2 since beta5 on gentoo and it's been rock solid. Becoming better and better for every revision. The only major concern I have is that gnome terminal still seems quite buggy - but there's allways Eterm, Xterm and hundreds of others so it's not a major showstopper.

  46. Gnome is Dead by hey! · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh, wait; I'm sorry. You wanted the Abuse department. This is the argument department.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Gnome is Dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's not a troll you twit. It's a spin, if not an exact quote, from Monty Python.

      This moderation is deceased! It is an ex-moderation.

  47. I'll pass on getting ABUSEd! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I want to subject myself to the abuse that is GNOME, when I already have the bliss that is KDE?

    GNOME just plain sux.

  48. Or is it... by tweakt · · Score: 4, Funny

    if you are using Gnome 2.0, you're the one asking for abuse. *ugh*

  49. WindowMaker compatibility? by greeneggsnspam · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if you can use WindowMaker (0.80) as your default WM with Gnome2?

  50. Re:gentoo Rulez more than Debian! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And we're bigger whores about it, too!

  51. Isn't running linux abuse enough? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

    I think it is.

  52. Re:What about KDE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hasn't Ford's already won?

  53. speed? by bcrowell · · Score: 2
    Well, I came to Linux from MacOS, so to me both KDE and Gnome seem too much like Windows :-)

    What about speed? I lost interest in Gnome because the version I tried was so insanely slow. Actually it probably wasn't so much Gnome itself that was slow, but Nautilus and Evolution. Anyhow, what is happening on the speed front? In principle, I like the idea that all this stuff is tightly integrated, and I like the Bonobo concept. It all sounds great, but for example, Evolution 1.0 takes 16 seconds to load, which is just way too long. (This is on a brand-spanking-new machine, too!)

    I guess I'm just inclined to cynicism because I see how commercial software gets slower and slower with every release -- hope the reverse is happening with Gnome & co. For now, I'm sticking with KDE.

    1. Re:speed? by Menthos · · Score: 1
      I guess I'm just inclined to cynicism because I see how commercial software gets slower and slower with every release -- hope the reverse is happening with Gnome & co.

      You won't get disappointed. A lot of people (me included) can testify that it is a lot faster.

      --

      GNU/Linux. The Freshmaker.

    2. Re:speed? by srn_test · · Score: 1

      > Well, I came to Linux from MacOS, so to me both KDE and Gnome seem too much like Windows :-)

      Indeed, most of the "useability" stuff that's been going on in Gnome is either:

      a) Changes to make it more like Windows, or
      b) Removal of useful features that could confuse first time users.

      It appears Gnome is increasignly aimed at people with limited short-term memory who have recently changed from Windows.

      Sad really, it could have been good.

    3. Re:speed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey well I've got an idea ... Why don't you contribute your views on UI design in a positive manner to the Project. See developer.gnome.org for information on joining in with the UI improvements. If we mostly make changes that you dislike this is an opportunity to get your views across :-)

    4. Re:speed? by srn_test · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I have. I've been pretty thouroughly shouted down, though. I no longer bother.

  54. late? by Nomad128 · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the release supposed to be June 21? I thought they were saying all along that they'd be right on time....

    http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/schedule/

    1. Re:late? by StarHeart · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was supposed to be June 21st. I heard last night in #gnome that it might be released on June 26th or something like that. But now that RC2 is out I bet it will be at least another two weeks.

      --
      Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
  55. Abuse by DotCrack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't belive nobody here seem to remember
    Abuse by DotCrack.com.

    It was not that long ago....

    When I read the title, my first though was that Gnome is putting the game back into their distribution.

  56. Debian... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 2

    Now that's some fucking bullshit. I waited for kde3 to be included in debian unstable for months and it's STILL not included. KDE3 is more featurefull, more mature, easy as hell to build and has a LOT of applications. Quite the opposite of gnome2 yet gnome2 is gonna be included first. BOGGLES the mind.

    --

    Liberty.

    1. Re:Debian... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      That's because of the debian developers that handles the KDE packages and the debian developers that handle the GNOME packages. It's not some kind of conspiration. The KDE-people have probably worked hard with trying to get KDE 2.2 packages good enough for Woody. The GNOME developers have made other priorities.

  57. Hangover Prevention by cpeterso · · Score: 2


    A hangover is caused by dehydration. To prevent a hangover, you should drink AT LEAST as much water as alcohol before you go to sleep. If you alternate alcohol and water drinks as you are partying, even better. Good luck!

  58. Report of Abuse by erroneus · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure if I was abusing Gnome2 by installing it but here's what I did and tell me if I did that wrong.

    I installed redhat 7.3 cleanly. Then I installed all the updates as provided by the redhat tool that comes with it.

    When I heard about the Gnome abuse request, I decided to download the RC2. Well, I downloaded the ximian redcarpet utility and told it to upgrade everything using the Gnome2 development channel.

    At first everything seemed to go well except that my desktop settings weren't preserved. Now too many things are breaking to keep track of. The screen saver doesn't work either. I think I'll wait a bit longer... 'til like Gnome 2.1.

    1. Re:Report of Abuse by laserjet · · Score: 2

      it's still in release candidate stage, dude. if you download it, you are testing it to see if it works.

      if everyone had your attitude, we sure would have some shitty software!

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  59. Major problem by be-fan · · Score: 2

    Does anybody else wish bad mojo on the guy who decided to give Pango yet another font configuration system? I mean I just got a hang of dealing with the standard X11, Xft, and ghostscript font configs, and now somebody introduces another one with Pango? Does the clue train just not make stops in GTK-land anymore?

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    1. Re:Major problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this "pango" font configuration file is for the freetype backend, if you are using XFT then pango is using the Xft file for the configuration stuff

  60. Solaris 9 already released by lliinnuuxxlover · · Score: 1

    Hey, Solaris 9 has already been released. On the other hand, I would have loved to see Gnome 2 in Solaris 9. Anyone know of timeframe when sun would release gnome support in solaris 9

    --
    This Post was entirely made up of recycled electrons making up recycled signals to generate recycles ASCII to generate t