Gnome 2.0 RC2 Asks For Abuse
A nameless reader submits: "The GNOME Desktop 2.0 release candidate 2 has been released! Gnome 2.0 should be coming out soon! The release notes have some good information."
← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)
Pity they did't make the schedules release date...
Isn't Gnome abuse a felony in most states?
when the final version will be released? I'm looking forward to trying it.
Hmmm, emerge gnome....
Yeah, we love you spider !
For those of you who don't understand swedish too well: This release's code name, "Glad Midsommar", means "Happy midsummer". The swedes love a good mid summer party.
archive.progeny.com (US or Canada)
ftp.twoguys.org (US or Canada)
ftp3.sourceforge.net (US or Canada)
ftp.rpmfind.net (US or Canada)
ftp.sourceforge.net (US or Canada)
ftp.cse.buffalo.edu (US or Canada)
ftp.yggdrasil.com (US or Canada)
planetmirror.com (Australia)
ftp.sunet.se (Europe)
ftp.dataplus.se (Europe)
ftp.easynet.nl (Europe)
ftp.unina.it (Europe)
ftp.belnet.be (Europe)
ftp.codefactory.se (Europe)
ftp.tr.gnome.org (Europe)
fr.rpmfind.net (Europe)
ftp.acc.umu.se (Europe)
ftp.no.gnome.org (Europe)
ftp.dit.upm.es (Europe)
fr2.rpmfind.net (Europe)
linux.cem.itesm.mx (South America)
hey. if they are asking people to abuse gnome 2.0 rc2, why the hell are all the trolls modded down?
;-)
maybe i'm just being stupid, but trolling seems a very appropriate reply to such an ill-formulated headline
have a nice day!
As always, if you want to give the latest Gnome a whirl without messing up your existing system, try Garnome
It takes a while to build (about an hour on my 1.0 GHz PIII), but it doesn't touch your existing install - everything goes into ~/garnome.
I always been a gnome user, and i prefer gnome over KDE but i am dissapointed. I have been compiling gnome2 from CVS every 2-3 weeks.
Things I hope they can change in by release day.
Japanese Input is broken in gnome2 applications.
File Chooser is not improved.( I know this is planned for the 2.2 release)
I was expecting a lot more from gnome control center.
Default configurations are bad.
i've recieve the announcement view gnome announce mailing list. it contained with extra information:-
"Can we have a special TELSABUG category, and everything gets dropped
to fix them first?" - Telsa Gwynne
-- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
Does anybody else's gnome-panel (in gnome-2) automatically reorder their launchers in undesirable ways every time it gets launched? I see mine reorder them to almost but not exactly the order they were created in.
I've been playing with Gnome 2 for a while now, and I must admit it is starting to feel like a stable release.
There are a few things that I have mixed feelings about though. The default WM is switching to Metacity, which doesn't have the power and configurability of Sawfish, and that is symptomatic of the general reduction in configurability.
Someone, somewhere has decided that configurability === complexity, and that a bewildering array of choices is too many for a newbie. This appears to have been translated into a general 'dumbing down' of the interface.
I can no longer tell Sawfish to remember my window sizes. The Gnome Panel can no longer swallow applications, so all of those WM applets are now useless to me. I can't run the Afterstep clock applet!
I guess it is the applications job to remember what window size I last used, and to remember it without me telling the WM to do so, but they don't - not even Nautilus2 remembers it's window sizes - every time it opens a new window which is slightly less than 1/4 of my screen size.
Overall, this is probably a good thing. People should be writing their applications to remember UI things, and having the WM remember those probably makes them lazy, but I can see a bit of pain in my future with Gnome 2, until these issues are solved and Gnome 3 is released, perhaps.
At least Gnome 2 does seem somewhat snappier than Gnome 1.4, and the styling is better, especially with anti-aliasing available throughout.
After using ClearType on Windows XP, Gnome's antialiasing looks disappointing...
Sure thing, "Your mother was a hamster..."
Fuck you gnome! Who wan'ts fucking smelly feet on the fucking desktop! You suck! There isn't a place were you rule!
Windows has got their desktop right, its been more or less the same since about 1994 (When Windows Chicago came out)
Linux has no need for you! Its got the kick ass K Desktop Enviroment which is much better than your shit!
Mac OS X dosen't need you, its got an Aqua interface which nukes your smelly fucking feet off the fucking planet! Don't Forget KDE is avalible for it too!
Solaris is no good because they got CDE which owns j00 in its fucking sleep!
Who the fuck needs gnome! Its slow, bloated, a fat bastard file manager, DEPENDS on mozilla for its browsing components and has a butt ugly motif like interface which you fucking stole from the fucking GIMP! Your only freinds is shit hat and those fucking monkey brains over at Ximan!
KDE 0wn j00 and it is the choice of all the 'Desktop' linuxes, Mandrake, SuSE, Lycoris and So on.
Fuck off and die smelly feet and let the mighty K rule the penguins desktop!
P.S, in the garden i have two gnomes, one who is humping a turtle and another one who looks like bin laden
P.P.S, wash your fucking feet!
Desktop exploded Somebody please kill me now. I was running Gnome. Jesse haiku12.20.beamsplat@spamgourmet.com
I agree that dumbing down is bad, but I don't agree with your WM point. Why should every GUI program writer write the same support code? You might as well say that they have to make all their apps stateful by hand. It's much simpler to provide one provably correct code path in the WM, than potentially thousands in all the applications in a system.
For those apps which are "special," they could simply send a "NON_STATEFUL" token to the WM when dealing with that window.
--
Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
When this comment was written by Karora.
Moderators of the above comment (+1 style): YHBT. YHL. HTH. HAND.
--
Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
Why has nobody done this yet?
KDE is a WHOLE lot better than Gnome! Gnome is just a crappy copy quickly hacked together because of 'licences'. Now that QT is GPL Gnomes original purpose is gone and its obsolete!
Just scrap Gnome and join together to make one ultimate desktop! Just like when microsoft abandoned the 20 year old DOS Code for the NT Kernel with XP!
Im a KDE Supporter and I know GNOME sucks really badly and it should be destroyed! KDE looks a whole lot better than GNOME WILL ever be! Currently in Development is KDE new Keramik GUI. I downloaded a beta version from Suse linuKS and it is better than any other GUI ive seen in my life! Gnome limps on with crappy and obsolete PIXMAP guis and wonders why it sucks! KDE is the Future and gnome is dying! If you use gnome than your a loser!
But then theres always been flamewars between different Programs such as Emacs vs VIM, joe vs nano, linux vs BSD vs Windows, Aqua vs Luna, GTK vs QT vs TK vs Motif vs Athena vs Curses vs other toolkits and we will not stop having them until one defeats the other and reigns supreme! And KDE is winning!
Actually, I've seen the opposite effect. From what I've seen, people coming from Windows tend to prefer Gnome over KDE precisely because it's not like the Windows desktop they've left behind. It seems to be a combination of factors. One seems to be a desire to 'make a clean break'; they left Windows for a reason, and do not wish to be reminded of it. Another is likely to be the danger of confusion in using a desktop that's almost - but not quite - like the one they already know. Using a very different desktop there is no longer that danger.
Both Gnome and KDE are good, and Linux is far stronger for having two lively projects (and a lot of small or special-purpose projects as well) in this area.
/Janne
Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
Download it before its slashdotted!
I just can't believe the title. Gnome asks for abuse. Can you believe it? Blaming the victim, as usual. Fscking patriarchy....
Very nice reasoning, and quite original, too.
"Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
Where is the ChangeLog between RC1 and RC2 ? All the release notes say is that "some bugs were fixed", which isn't really interesting.
Seriously, I run straight WindowMaker even on newer hardware, sure on a fast machine I bring up a gnome panel occassionally to mess around with, but I honestly never really understood why people seem to think they have to have KDE or GNOME on a machine - particularly an older one of course. Install the libs, and whatever applications you have to have, and they'll run just fine without any panels or the like...
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
This guy copied the whole message from previous Slashdot message written by someone else!! Very lame!! He's just trying to get more karma by using others.
Why?
They couldn't fix menu editing so they simply dropped it completely. Now they say you have to wait until 2.0.1 for it. Why not delay 2.0? Can't they resist pressure of all the firms like Sun who wants to see it released before Solaris 9?
Where do the guys come from? They seem to have burned brains.
Oh, that and I have the privilege to be your first fan.
Is it an joke? I thinks it's not like an ad. The guy who wrote the comment seems to know nothing about computer.
I want to use a Desktop Environment...that can... s.i.i.i.i.n.n.n.g.g.g.g...
Is avalible at Freshflames!
Is here anyone who loves or agree with the new button order in dialogs?
It's winter here you insensitive clod.
Vennlig hilsen,
Ole
Seriously, with every good release of Gnome (and KDE as well) micro$oft has less and less arguments to keep its users. $700 for M$office? Go to hell - we'll install Open Office or Star Office. $300 for M$ OS with M$ IE? We'd rather install Linux + Gnome + Mozilla. $*K for Back Office (IIS + Exchange)? Even young Zope works fine for me.
That's the real abuse :)
Oh great, just what I need... A gnome with no pants on on my desktop :-b
Pedantry for the day.
Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
we dance around a big pole...
hmmm... wonder what that stands for..?!!
;)
Warning: This sig contains a small bug. ==> *
Yeah.. kde is for people who still use diapers..
And it's butt-ugly..
I haven't played with the gnome2 desktop until now, and to save (gobs) of time pulling/compiling, I just installed the Ximian Gnome2 developer snapshot.
However, I can't seem to find where the preference to enable anti-alias fonts is... I've tried selecting largish fonts, but all the rendering is clearly bitmapped.
Anyone else using the Ximian snapshot having this problem? Are they compiling w/ anti-aliasing off?
Do they have any substansial income yet from the project or will people quit working on it as soon as they leave school?
First of all, you must enable Xft support (the new font system for X). This is done by defining the GDK_USE_XFT environment variable before running a program. The best way to turn this on for the entire desktop is by defining it in the X startup script (probably ~/.gnomerc, ~/.Xclients or ~/.xinitrc):
After doing this, you may still not see antialiased fonts. For instance, on Red Hat systems, the default /etc/X11/XftConfig file has the following lines:
which turns off antialiasing for fonts with sizes between 8 and 14. By commenting out these lines, AA will be enabled for all fonts. If you have an LCD panel, add a line like the following to /etx/X11/XftConfig or ~/.xftconfig:
This will turn on ClearType style subpixel antialiasing.
I've been running Gnome2 since beta5 on gentoo and it's been rock solid. Becoming better and better for every revision. The only major concern I have is that gnome terminal still seems quite buggy - but there's allways Eterm, Xterm and hundreds of others so it's not a major showstopper.
Oh, wait; I'm sorry. You wanted the Abuse department. This is the argument department.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
Why would I want to subject myself to the abuse that is GNOME, when I already have the bliss that is KDE?
GNOME just plain sux.
if you are using Gnome 2.0, you're the one asking for abuse. *ugh*
Does anyone know if you can use WindowMaker (0.80) as your default WM with Gnome2?
And we're bigger whores about it, too!
I think it is.
Hasn't Ford's already won?
What about speed? I lost interest in Gnome because the version I tried was so insanely slow. Actually it probably wasn't so much Gnome itself that was slow, but Nautilus and Evolution. Anyhow, what is happening on the speed front? In principle, I like the idea that all this stuff is tightly integrated, and I like the Bonobo concept. It all sounds great, but for example, Evolution 1.0 takes 16 seconds to load, which is just way too long. (This is on a brand-spanking-new machine, too!)
I guess I'm just inclined to cynicism because I see how commercial software gets slower and slower with every release -- hope the reverse is happening with Gnome & co. For now, I'm sticking with KDE.
Find free books.
Wasn't the release supposed to be June 21? I thought they were saying all along that they'd be right on time....
http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/schedule/
I can't belive nobody here seem to remember
Abuse by DotCrack.com.
It was not that long ago....
When I read the title, my first though was that Gnome is putting the game back into their distribution.
Now that's some fucking bullshit. I waited for kde3 to be included in debian unstable for months and it's STILL not included. KDE3 is more featurefull, more mature, easy as hell to build and has a LOT of applications. Quite the opposite of gnome2 yet gnome2 is gonna be included first. BOGGLES the mind.
Liberty.
A hangover is caused by dehydration. To prevent a hangover, you should drink AT LEAST as much water as alcohol before you go to sleep. If you alternate alcohol and water drinks as you are partying, even better. Good luck!
cpeterso
I'm not sure if I was abusing Gnome2 by installing it but here's what I did and tell me if I did that wrong.
I installed redhat 7.3 cleanly. Then I installed all the updates as provided by the redhat tool that comes with it.
When I heard about the Gnome abuse request, I decided to download the RC2. Well, I downloaded the ximian redcarpet utility and told it to upgrade everything using the Gnome2 development channel.
At first everything seemed to go well except that my desktop settings weren't preserved. Now too many things are breaking to keep track of. The screen saver doesn't work either. I think I'll wait a bit longer... 'til like Gnome 2.1.
Does anybody else wish bad mojo on the guy who decided to give Pango yet another font configuration system? I mean I just got a hang of dealing with the standard X11, Xft, and ghostscript font configs, and now somebody introduces another one with Pango? Does the clue train just not make stops in GTK-land anymore?
A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
Hey, Solaris 9 has already been released. On the other hand, I would have loved to see Gnome 2 in Solaris 9. Anyone know of timeframe when sun would release gnome support in solaris 9
This Post was entirely made up of recycled electrons making up recycled signals to generate recycles ASCII to generate t