Slashdot Mirror


Long-Term Effects of Weightlessness

MartinBartinFargo writes "The Age has an article detailing the long-term effects of weightlessness on the human body. Stage 1 of the European Space Agency study involved 14 male volunteers spending 3 months carrying out all activities whilst lying on their backs, Stage 2 is currently underway. "

192 comments

  1. Hmmmm... by SubMissionary · · Score: 3, Funny

    So lying on your back conducting all activities makes one weightless? Guess I should tell her to get on top more often...

    --
    --Look behind you.
    1. Re:Hmmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come on.

      being that this is slashdot, i'm sure what he meant to say was:

      "Guess I should tell him to get on top more often...

    2. Re:Hmmmm... by Nailer · · Score: 2
      • Stage 1 of the European Space Agency study involved 14 male volunteers spending 3 months carrying out all activities whilst lying on their backs.
      • Stage 2 is currently underway.
      • Stage 3: Profit!
  2. Whee! by zulux · · Score: 5, Funny

    the European Space Agency study involved 14 male volunteers spending 3 months carrying out all activities whilst lying on their backs,

    Well, when the female volunteers start up, I'll be willing to help the poor things with whatever they need.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

    1. Re:Whee! by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      space geeks of the world untie!

      -Nano.

  3. Dieting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How can you eat food lying on your back? No wonder everybody is going to be weightless in the future :-/

    1. Re:Dieting by JohnnyBolla · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? Use a fork for the eating part and a straw for the drinking. Soup can be an issue, and damned if I don't always burning myself whilst trying to eat nachos, but other than that it's not a logistical issue.

      --
      Carpe Deez
    2. Re:Dieting by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      Food?!?
      Even worse is, how about trying to have a dump! ewww

  4. Stage 3 by meatspray · · Score: 1, Funny

    profit

    1. Re:Stage 3 by JiffySnatch · · Score: 1

      Only if they are collecting the underwear when the test subjects are through with them?

    2. Re:Stage 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Moderation Totals: Offtopic=2, Funny=2, Total=4. "

      guess i either failed to impress or they just didn't get it. :(

      oh well at least someone got a chuckle!

  5. Just a thought by brejc8 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    They could get some volunteers from the local brothel. They seem quite capable working while laying on their backs already.

    1. Re:Just a thought by GeckoX · · Score: 1

      Ohh, they don't like the truth at all do they?

      --
      No Comment.
  6. What will stage 1 prove? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can't they just look at hospital records of people who are forced to stay on their backs for 6 months or more? The muscles atrophy. I don't see how this equates to weightlessness, unless they compare weighted atrophy against weightless atrophy.

    1. Re:What will stage 1 prove? by AForwardMotion · · Score: 0

      Good point. Kings of the obvious rule the world.

    2. Re:What will stage 1 prove? by sporty · · Score: 2

      It will show the effects on the internal systems, such as lungs, heart and the likes. It will also show effects on things such as how the body holds together.

      Strapping them down makes it easier to conclude certain things by excluding one factor that can skew things with such a small sample-set. Their own movement around the ship. If they are perfectly still with a constant g, taking it away might have some effects.

      Imagine the chucklehead who exercises every-day, up in space, representing the human race in weightlessness. People can conclude the wrong things as he'll be what many humans might not be.. exercising chuckleheads.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    3. Re:What will stage 1 prove? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      They replicate weightlessness by having the subjects lie on slightly tilted beds, head down (6 degrees IIRC). This causes blood to flow away from the legs and to pool in the brain replicating the blood flow that happens to astronauts in real weightlessness (stronger muscles used to pumping against gravity's pull mean that more blood goes to the top half of the body)

      For this reason hospital records are of limited use.

    4. Re:What will stage 1 prove? by dbc001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looking at past records would probably not be a reliable source of information. In this case they are doing research that will affect the health of people who will be living under unusual conditions for two years, so it's important that the experiment is done under carefully controlled conditions. Also, you would have a hard time gathering data from looking at old hospital records because all of your subjects would have some kind of health problem, and that would probably screw up your results.

      dbc

    5. Re:What will stage 1 prove? by KenMoffat · · Score: 1

      Actually, the muscles are the least of it, they can be given exercises (well, for _some_ of the test groups they can). It's the bones that are the big problem. I spent about two months wholly on my back (after spinal cord injury), and lost a whole lot of bone. Now, you probably won't lose as much if you're not injured, but bones thrive on being weight bearing. Can you spell osteoporosis ? And don't even think about what all the extra caffeine while you're more or less permanently online is doing!

    6. Re:What will stage 1 prove? by sameb · · Score: 1

      >It will show the effects on the internal systems, such as lungs, heart and the likes. It will also show effects on things such as how the body holds together.

      No it won't. If they're lying down, then gravity is pushing on the internal systems from the front to the back.

      Weightlessness would mean there is no gravity (or acceleration) pushing in any direction.

      This will just prove what it would be like if gravity acted differently.

      Sam

    7. Re:What will stage 1 prove? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is bizarre, considering how long cosmonauts have stayed on Mir, and on ISS, the crew just returned from Freedom was up for 197 days. Real weightlessness, not bed rest.

      The point on human contact was interesting. We might have to send couples.

      Mars is three months away using either VASMIR or a nuclear thermal rocket. Less if you use a chemical booster to get out of Earth's gravity well.

      rotating the craft on a tether is also a possibility.

    8. Re:What will stage 1 prove? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't it be a reasonable simulation of 1g of velocity (correct term?) if they were facing in the direction that the simulated spacecraft was travelling?

  7. More than physical deterioration by Black+Aardvark+House · · Score: 1

    Few people realize the psychological impact of long space flights, especially the lack of human contact. I mean, even the INTERNET couldn't kill the boredom.

    --

    I am the evil aardvark!

  8. Lame article by Zelet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This article never really said anything. What worked? What didn't? Was there any data collected or did they do this for fun? Does anybody have a link to a scientific article that actually explains what they found out?

    --
    ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    1. Re:Lame article by Gwyndolyn · · Score: 1

      If you really want to know more about this kind of research, check out the Journal of Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine. (check university libraries for this publication). They have published similar studies, and also report other space/aviation related research. Since they are an actual journal instead of mass media, all their data and analysis is included. I havn't found a digital version, sorry.

      Gwyn

  9. Nature of experiment's sample by Conspir8or · · Score: 1

    >14 male volunteers spending 3 months carrying out all activities whilst lying on their backs

    Well, now we know where the staff of Ain't It Cool News was this spring.

  10. It might just be me.... by schizm · · Score: 1

    But this sounds very similar to how I telecommute...

    --
    "If you cannot get rid of the family skeleton, you may as well make it dance." -George Bernard Shaw
  11. Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would suspect that the Russians know a thing or two about this, as they tend to keep their kosmonauts in space much longer than anyone else dares to. However, I can imagine a couple of reasons why they wouldn't be inclined to share their information; long-term weightlessness seems not to be very healthy, and the fact that they have exposed their people to those may not be good for their image.

    ---
    Due to circumstances beyond your control, you are master of your fate
    and captain of your soul.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      Certainly the soviet union had many: http://www.funet.fi/pub/culture/russian/html_pages / osters1.html

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    2. Re:Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by gerddie · · Score: 2

      You did not read the article, did you?
      Yours was also my first thought, but in the article it is noted, that during the spache flight, the kosmonauts /astronauts did (and do) sports. The study focuses on people not moving at all. Maybe the third stage includes freezing the person ;)

    3. Re:Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      404 - not found; just like MrP- said

    4. Re:Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      may not be good for their image.


      Yeah, that soft, cuddly, thousand points of light Russian space program image...

    5. Re:Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      ``Check those URLs!'' they said, but I was as stupid as to assume that cut `n' paste works in X...
      http://www.funet.fi/pub/culture/russian/html _pages / osters1.html

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    6. Re:Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      OK now I'm sick of this shit. The last part is html_pages/posters1.html dammit!

      ---
      A debugged program is one for which you have not yet found the conditions
      that make it fail.
      -- Jerry Ogdin

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    7. Re:Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by balloonpup · · Score: 1

      Cut and paste is working fine, it's /. that's doing that to you. Yay lameness filter.

      --
      I sing the doggie electric!
    8. Re:Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by JohnsonWax · · Score: 2
      However, I can imagine a couple of reasons why they wouldn't be inclined to share their information; long-term weightlessness seems not to be very healthy, and the fact that they have exposed their people to those may not be good for their image.

      Well, I think after exposing a few hundred thousand former soviet citizens to near lethal doses of radiation, they probably aren't too worried about a few dozen kosmonauts getting worked up over this.

    9. Re:Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by bughunter · · Score: 1

      Well gee, if you'd learn a wee bit of HTML you wouldn't have to resort to profanity.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    10. Re:Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. I doubt if it would tell me anything, since I am fluent in HTML 3.2 and up as well as XHTML 1.0 Strict and 1.1 Basic. I just expect to be able to post plaintext when I select Plain Old Text from the select box below, that's all.

      ---
      One can search the brain with a microscope and not find the
      mind, and can search the stars with a telescope and not find God.
      -- J. Gustav White

      --
      Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    11. Re:Long Live the Unbreakable Soviet Union by jethro200 · · Score: 1
      ...and the fact that they have exposed their people to those may not be good for their image.

      yeah - that would ruin their sparkling reputation for being the most caring government on the planet.

  12. Three months in bed with an internet connection... by Vengie · · Score: 1

    To anyone who is/was/used to be a mudder, that means that at the end of the three months, you're hoarding every purple shard, excalibur, Hand of Glory, ball of wisdom, soul slasher, holy grail and every other piece of limited eq in the game, have 10 months of rent, have Calaron, Keogh, Shasta, Coastie and a slew of other wizzies/arches pissed at you and have been accused of scripting approximately 200 times. =)

    --
    When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
  13. Mental elasticity by rgoer · · Score: 1

    The volunteers needed a certain mental elasticity.

    You can say that again... I'm not altogether sure if I could muster the self-control needed to remain in one stationary position for three entire months. Remember tornado drills in school? I had the damnedest time keeping still, hunched over with my hands protecting my neck--and that was only for what, five or ten minutes? And these volunteers aren't even astronauts... so they don't even have "the right stuff" going for them! They're just postmen, builders, teachers and whatnot! What a bunch of crazy bastards.

    1. Re:Mental elasticity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You couldn't even master the use of the closing tag.

  14. Results of preliminary stages: by Little+Dave · · Score: 3, Funny


    Boffin: Lets run through those results...

    Egghead: Test 1 - Watching TV while lying on back. No adverse physical side-effects.

    Boffin: Test 2 - Drinking beer while lying on back. No adverse physical side-effects.

    Egghead: Test 3 - Disposing of body's waste gases while lying on back. No adverse physical side-effects.

    Boffin: We conclude that these human males are perfectly suited to weightlessness.

  15. I'll Volunteer.... by echucker · · Score: 1

    I've wanted to drop 50 pounds for months, and if they'd take me, I could get rid of them all!

    1. Re:I'll Volunteer.... by Black+Aardvark+House · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, this is the wrong way to lose weight, as most of the subjects' weight loss was muscle mass, and not fat.

      You can't burn any fat without exercise and enough protein.

      --

      I am the evil aardvark!

    2. Re:I'll Volunteer.... by bourne · · Score: 2

      I've wanted to drop 50 pounds for months, and if they'd take me, I could get rid of them all!

      Unfortunately, all you'd lose is muscle; your fat stores wouldn't be affected as long as you're adequately fed. So, you'd walk - or crawl - out of there with all the bad weight you currently have, and none of the muscle that is necessary to burn it off.

      That's one reason this experiment seems bogus. Without any body activity, how can you compare the experiment to space-based weightlessness? They'd be better off sticking these people in a swimming pool with perfectly balanced weights for 3 months.

    3. Re:I'll Volunteer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They'd be better off sticking these people in a swimming pool with perfectly balanced weights for 3 months.

      Do you have any idea how pruny they would get, not to mention the shrinkage?!?!

    4. Re:I'll Volunteer.... by echucker · · Score: 2

      It's a joke folks.... No scales, weightlessness... nevermind.

    5. Re:I'll Volunteer.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The average North American would probably gain a few pounds if they lie on the bed all day...

  16. The money by Violet+Null · · Score: 3, Informative

    $20,000 for three months? Wow. That sure beats those cheapskates at NASA; they only spent $100 / day, or ~$9,000 for the three months.

    1. Re:The money by Sapien__ · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I suspect that since the article was in an Australian newspaper, the amount is in Australian dollars.

      Currently, $20000 AU is approximately $11500 AU

    2. Re:The money by Sapien__ · · Score: 2

      err, $11500 US, of course :-)

    3. Re:The money by gvonk · · Score: 2



      Currently, $20000 AU is approximately $11500 AU

      Whoah, dude! That's worse than the Argentinian Peso!

      *badum-bum*

      --


      El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
  17. Re:minimal action principle by guybarr · · Score: 1


    a physical path between 2 points in phase space is the one satisfying the minimal action principle.

    --
    Working for necessity's mother.
  18. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  19. So why aren't space stations being planned by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    like in the 2001 movie and countless SciFi stories, as rotating wheels which make their own artificial gravity? Jogging around the endless loop / track would be great exercise.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:So why aren't space stations being planned by BlowCat · · Score: 3, Informative
      It would be hard to dock to the rotating station. The solar batteries would have to rotate all the time to point to the Sun. It would be hard to point scientific instruments to the Earth. Some experiments require microgravity.

      Rotating station may be a better place to live, but it would be a less interesting and useful place to work.

    2. Re:So why aren't space stations being planned by cnkeller · · Score: 1
      It would be hard to dock to the rotating station.

      Agreed. However, you could rotate only a portion of the station, such as living/exercise quarters. It's certainly feasible, why it's not being done is something I'm curious about as well. Probably because we don't have any plans right now for long term (years) occupation in a weightless environment.

      --

      there are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots

    3. Re:So why aren't space stations being planned by killmenow · · Score: 1

      Forgetting the improbability of how big it would have to be and how fast it would have to spin to approximate earth gravity, wouldn't your distance from the center effect the "gravity" pulling on you? I mean, if you're in the center of the thing, would the centrifucal force be as great? If not, there's your microgravity.

      Of course, things may be whizzing by you so fast you can't feasibly do anything...

    4. Re:So why aren't space stations being planned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because.... imagine docking at one of those things.

    5. Re:So why aren't space stations being planned by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Easy: have the portions of the station that need to stay upright/pointing at the sun/dockable stabilized and mounted on a race bearing so that the rotating part rotates around it, while it stays stationary.

    6. Re:So why aren't space stations being planned by bluGill · · Score: 2

      I agree it would have to be big, but I question the need for earth's gravity. While 1g (simulated with the phony cintripital force) might be ideal, I suspect there would be significant benifit from much lower forces. .1g would be a lot easier to obtain, and would make sure there are some stresses on the body.

    7. Re:So why aren't space stations being planned by mav[LAG] · · Score: 3, Funny

      It would be hard to dock to the rotating station.

      Bah - I could do this all the time in Elite. Screwed up a few times to begin with and destroyed my ship and crew but...OK I see your point.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    8. Re:So why aren't space stations being planned by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      one work radiation.
      no ozone or anything else to protect you.

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    9. Re:So why aren't space stations being planned by Thagg · · Score: 3, Informative

      The only reason to be in space is microgravity; so there'd be no point in rotating the whole space station. As far as rotating just the habitat portion of the station, it's difficult to imagine how you could do that -- what kind of seal you could make between the two compartments that would hold air perfectly but have very little friction. Perhaps more importantly, it's hard to see how you could rotate a part of the station at a few RPM and not transmit vibration back to the the other part, this vibration destroying the very microgravity that is the only reason for being there.

      For long duration space flights to somewhere, it makes perfect sense to rotate the ship; I can't imagine not doing that. But for a LEO space station I don't think it will happen, unless that space station is used for something other than microgravity research (tourism, maybe?)

      thad

      --
      I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    10. Re:So why aren't space stations being planned by Ashtangi · · Score: 1
      The other reason is to build (or assemble) an interstellar/interplanetary ship for lauch from LEO rather from Earth. This could greatly reduce the cost/risk of such an endeavor, as much cost is incurred in the first 100 miles of the trip (earth surface to orbiting the earth).

      Of course, this does make some assumptions about the source of fuel for the propulsion system. And if all of the materials come from the earth's surface you can't quite argue energy conservation, but let's assume a nuclear reactor propulsion system. The raw components could be lifted to the space hangar where assembly takes place. This would reduce the risks associated with a nuclear powered rocket.

      I'm sure given enough time and people we could find many other reasons to be in space . . .

  20. They earned $20,000 simply for staying in bed!!! by af_robot · · Score: 2, Funny

    222$ per day.
    It should be read as "spending 3 months carrying out all activities whilst lying on their bucks"

  21. heinlein's take on near-weightlessness... by rapid+prototype · · Score: 3, Interesting

    at least as described in "the moon is a harsh mistress" is that reduced weight environs, such as the moon, prolong life indefinitely. although my gut feeling is that prolonged weightlessness would be very bad for you -- atrophied muscles and the like -- perhaps the benefits of your organs not cramming into one another constantly, and your back not being hunched down, and the ease of pressure on the joints... maybe it's not too far fetched?

    -rp

    1. Re:heinlein's take on near-weightlessness... by Enocasiones · · Score: 1

      The moon is a harsh mistress was published in 1966. Heinlein had no idea what weightlessness could result in. Your guts are right.

      --
      Enoc
    2. Re:heinlein's take on near-weightlessness... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      Every animal on Earth, ourselves included, have been evolving for millions of years with only one real constant, gravity. The land has changed, the air has changed, but that 1g has been present for every ancestor we've had. Moving to a low or no g environment is something our bodies were never designed for. It's like using anything well outside of it's design specs, the bad possibilities are going to outweight the good possibilities by a big margain.

      -B

    3. Re:heinlein's take on near-weightlessness... by PD · · Score: 2

      OK, that does it then. We might as well take NASA's budget and just blow it on funny hats. Thanks for saving us the trouble of going to space.

    4. Re:heinlein's take on near-weightlessness... by rapid+prototype · · Score: 1

      but what about simple things, like the heart not having to pump so hard (against gravity)? other than disease (into which I'll lump things like Lou Gherig's Disease, Alzheimers, etc), "old age" basically means you are about to die of a vital organ failure, e.g., the heart, the brain (stroke) kidneys, lungs, liver, etc. perhaps the lessened gravitational force the heart has to deal with allows it to continue on much longer than at our 1g. perhaps not.

      and heinlein had about as much of an idea of what weightlessness could result in as i do (Well, he probably had more, he was smarter, but anyway...).

      -rp

    5. Re:heinlein's take on near-weightlessness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      prove it...

    6. Re:heinlein's take on near-weightlessness... by Enocasiones · · Score: 1
      I think you have an advantage over RAH when he wrote TMIAHM: we already know some of the effects of zero gravity, and they arent good, to say the least.

      The heart would actually be weaker, since it shouldnt have to pull against gravity and it would exercise less. Muscles atrophiate when they dont work, they dont get better. Just like the muscular mass loss discussed here.

      We have adapted over millions of years to the Earths conditions. One of these, gravity, remains fairly constant all over the globe, unlike air pressure, humidity or temperature. Our bodies are designed for 1g, thats their working point, and we probably function best at or around it. Oh, of course we can dream, but what we now know doesnt point at all towards increased longevity under low grav. You (and I) have a huge knowledge advantage over H, nothing to do with smartness.

      (psst, the strong ones in SciFi are the ones living under 2g, not the selenites!)

      --
      Enoc
  22. The price. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2

    $20,000 for three months? Wow. That sure beats those cheapskates at NASA; they only spent $100 / day, or ~$9,000 for the three months.

    This is indeed a generous amount. However, bear in mind that you'd also suffer fallout at work from taking a 3-month sabbatical, and you'll spend weeks regaining the ability to move or do anything strenuous for more than a few tens of minutes at a stretch.

    The good news is that this still beats having to sit around in true zero-g, which would do even nastier things to your body (in bed you still have to exert effort to lift things with your hands, to roll over, to breathe (to some extent), etc.).

    1. Re:The price. by Enocasiones · · Score: 1

      in bed you still have to exert effort to lift things with your hands Last time I checked, absence of gravity didnt mean absence of mass. In order to move a mass you need a force. Inertia is still there. But taking things up in zero-G can be tricky, though. Wheres up??

      --
      Enoc
    2. Re:The price. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, absence of gravity didnt mean absence of mass. In order to move a mass you need a force. Inertia is still there.

      True, but you can get away with applying much less force (and moving more slowly as a result).

      Also, you don't need to exert effort to keep your body in the same position (as you would to some extent for most positions on Earth).

  23. This doesn't seem like a well designed study by SuperCal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know that having the subjects lie on their backs is the best simulation of weightlessness over time, but it seems like a poor substitute. Their bodies are being stressed by gravity that would not be present in space. That difference could lead to either more of less 'health' over the long term. In low muscle exertion environments (I made that term up:), a little stress may increase bone degeneration or may be a catalyst for bone growth. I think the only way to get true results may be study people on the space station, which I believe is being done...

    --
    Business News and Resources: www.usasource.net
    1. Re:This doesn't seem like a well designed study by Enocasiones · · Score: 1
      Its not a bad study. You can only get a few people "out there", so this is the only way to have more than a handful for comparison.

      They also study the effect of zero-G on actual astronauts with results that can be beneficial for normal people.

      --
      Enoc
  24. Uh, that ain't weightlessness. by blair1q · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It ain't even microgravity.

    We've been sending astronauts into space for extended periods. I'm sure NASA and the Russians are studying them.

    Who funded this nonsense?

    1. Re:Uh, that ain't weightlessness. by Weh · · Score: 1

      You honestly think they didn't know about that?

  25. i think we have those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jogging around the endless loop / track would be great exercise.

    You mean like treadmills?

  26. doubting all space programs. by pmanheier · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    As a child I was really drawn into the space program, as many were. Growing up, however, added much skepticism to my view of organizations like NASA. The article mentions the oft-dreamed mission to Mars as a benefactor from this research. But really, what on earth is going to Mars gonna do for mankind?

    The money invested in such a pursuit could be used for an endless amount of other goods.

    I realize NASA has brought about many tech advances we might have not fallen upon otherwise, but then again, not all tech advances are good.

    Awfully general, I know, but a line of thought I see to be considered.

    1. Re:doubting all space programs. by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      I can almost hear my father in the mid to late 1960s saying "But really, what on earth is going to the Moon gonna do for mankind?"

      Does that put it in perspective for you?

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

    2. Re:doubting all space programs. by pmanheier · · Score: 0

      no.

    3. Re:doubting all space programs. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "I can almost hear my father in the mid to late 1960s saying "But really, what on earth is going to the Moon gonna do for mankind?"

      Heh, I think an episode of the Simpsons would answer your question:

      "The Moon belongs to America..."

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:doubting all space programs. by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      what did the moon do for humanity? not much i would imagine since we haven't been there in about 30 years.

    5. Re:doubting all space programs. by Capt.+DrunkenBum · · Score: 1

      Off the top of my head... How about ICs, and Velcro..

      --

      Not everyone deserves a 320i

  27. good opurtunity... by dmarien · · Score: 1

    But i'm sure some /.'s still couldn't get their karma to 50 in 3 months...

    "the men were each equipped with a mobile phone and an Internet-linked computer"

    --
    dmarien
  28. Now that we know what happens... by Liora · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't do it. I kind of like my limbs as they are: usable. I'm not sure how a sack of fluid for a calf can be walked upon, and I don't really want to know. This is going to make missions to Mars and other long-term space exploration really hard, this being more of an obstacle than any other facets.

    --
    Liora
    1. Re:Now that we know what happens... by praedor · · Score: 2

      The answer is technically complex but is there: artificial frickin' gravity. Nasa blows this off with every opportunity. Design a space station intended for long-term habitation and what the they do? Design a system gauranteed to destroy all muscle mass and assure lots of bone loss. One word...BRILLIANT!


      You want/expect people to spend any real length of time in space then you HAVE to design for artificial gravity, period. It wouldn't have to be much. You need just enough to allow exercise to continually put stresses on bone and tissue.


      This is basic stuff that Nasa ignores again and again. In any case, the Russians should have all the data you could possibly want about the detrimental effects of weightlessness. They still hold the long-term stay in space records, so by all means, duplicate their work again and again, ignore their data or think it will somehow turn out different when WE do it.


      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    2. Re:Now that we know what happens... by Liora · · Score: 1

      Just how does one produce artificial frickin' gravity?

      --
      Liora
    3. Re:Now that we know what happens... by praedor · · Score: 2

      Two ways: 1) a sheet of frickin' ultra-dense, ultra-heavy, neutronium for flooring, or 2) centripedal frickin' force. I'd say it is easier to do the centripedal frickin' force thing.


      At least one of the manned Mars rocket designs includes spinning two habitation pods at the ends of tethers for artificial frickin' gravity. As for the space station...donut shape ala _2001:A frickin' Space Odyssy_ is a nifty way. Big and ambitious. Building such a beast would take time so Nasa should be happy with such a project: they'd be exposing astronauts to zero-g for extended periods of time while it is built to the point it could be spun up. They'd be happy because they caused chronic wasting in their astronauts, and we'd end up with, ultimately, a space station with artificial frickin' gravity.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    4. Re:Now that we know what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You're not hostile toward NASA or anything, that's for sure :-P Thank you for the information.

    5. Re:Now that we know what happens... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the third alternative. Make the entire trip under acceleration except for a brief period halfway there where you reorient the craft to begin decelleration.

  29. Strange... by medcalf · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Did it not occur to them that there are platforms on which they could test the effects of prolonged weightlessness? Or that studies have been done, including similar lab studies. Oh, well.

    --
    -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    1. Re:Strange... by Animats · · Score: 2
      Sounds like the European Space Agency doesn't have enough to do.

      As of 1998, about 58 person-years in weightlessness have been accumulated. The record is 438 days, held by one of the Mir astronauts. Quite a bit is known; for example, bone loss in zero G is consistently about 1% per month. That's the worst effect; almost everything else is reversable.

      The general consensus is that six months in zero G is OK for healthy, flight-qualified people, but a year or more is pushing it.

    2. Re:Strange... by Jeremiah+Blatz · · Score: 1

      The purpose of this study was not to test the effects of weightlessness, but to test the relative efficacy of 2 methods of dealing with the effects. There were three groups: control, exercise, and drugs. I suspect that they really were just interested in the results of the drug group WRT the exercise group.

      Currently, the ISS crew spends 1 hr/person/day exercising, and even this doesn't prevent significant bone/muscle loss. If they could use drugs to ward off the worst effects of weightlessness, they could have astronauts be more productive and not exercise, or still exercise and have longer-duration flights. Both of these are good, and $20K + nursing staff + hospital space is peanuts compared to the cost of impinging on an ISS astronauts's time.

  30. 3 Months Lying on Their Backs? by eaeolian · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...well, now we know what happend to all the laid-off dotcom programmers.

    1. Re:3 Months Lying on Their Backs? by zeus_tfc · · Score: 1

      ...well, now we know what happend to all the laid-off dotcom programmers.

      They spent three months trying to get back on their feet...

      Buh-dum-bum

      Yeah, never mind.

      --
      "...At the end of the day"..."when everyone goes home, you're stuck with yourself." RIP Layne Staley
  31. Choosen Candidates. by lionchild · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Take note of how the article points out these candidates were put through rigorous tests before being selected. They wanted ones that had some specific characteristics for mental elastisty. Those are some pretty rough demands.

    Here, after only 3 months, the one individual interviewed (which we don't know which group he was in,) was in rough shape when it came time to get back on his feet. It sounds like we've got along way to go, to get someone whose capable of remaining in microgravity for 2 years, in order to get to Mars. That, or we're going to have to design a ship that employs some form of gravity simulator.

    It's good to see progress, but we're still a long way from being able to send men to Mars.

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
    1. Re:Choosen Candidates. by Ace905 · · Score: 1

      We've had the technology to 'simulate' gravity since the industrial revolution. Haven't you seen 2001 the movie?

      Man... the people that wanna pass for nerds.

      --

      Ace
    2. Re:Choosen Candidates. by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Here, after only 3 months, the one individual interviewed (which we don't know which group he was in,) was in rough shape when it came time to get back on his feet. It sounds like we've got along way to go, to get someone whose capable of remaining in microgravity for 2 years, in order to get to Mars. That, or we're going to have to design a ship that employs some form of gravity simulator.

      Psychology: Give me a laptop, a copy of CivIII or Alpha Centauri, and a DVD-ROM full of USENET postings to read and MP3z to listen to while I play. Upload some new warez to me halfway through the journey. That'll cover a good 8 hours a day.

      Gravity: Doesn't anyone remember the old Skylab footage of astronauts jogging around a cylindrical room -- sorta like a hamster wheel - except the wheel stayed fixed and the hamster ran around it ;-)

      Wouldn't that count as at least some simulated gravity (if you ran fast enough?) I can't see Coriolis forces being too disorienting - your legs may weigh more than your arms, and your head's still nearly weightless, but that's more of a tidal force, not a coriolis force.

      Jog around the track for an hour a day, maybe spend some time on an exercise bike (half an hour for the legs, half an hour for the arms). Strap legs to bed, do sit-ups - much easier without gravity, but it's still some exercise as you've still gotta move the upper half and slow it down again. Calisthenics.

      If I could get three months in space (not a hospital bed), I'd gladly spend a year in physiotherapy afterwards to rebuild my body to its previous functionality.

      Of course, if I could go to Mars, I wouldn't care if it was a one-way trip.

      It seems to me that going to Mars is like going to the New World in the 1400s. It's a long journey, in cramped conditions, with lousy food, and no medical help, and maybe a 20-30% chance that you'll die en route - on either half of the journey. Maybe we're looking for the wrong sorts of people. Instead of happy, well-adjusted folks with wives and kids to come home to, maybe we need people who are just a little bit nuts.

      So the first words beamed back from Mars won't be "One small step for a man...", more like "What happen? Somebody set up us the landing site! Your base is belong to us!" -- big deal. At least someone would make it there.

      One neophyte geologist on Mars could accomplish more in an hour than our most brilliant geologists have accomplished to date. For purposes of collecting samples and relaying data back to Earth, anyone could learn all they needed to know during the two-year trip. Think of it as a B.Sc. in Areology, offered as a two-year correspondence course, with the final exam to take place in situ :-)

    3. Re:Choosen Candidates. by Enocasiones · · Score: 1
      Excuse me, sir, but "simulating" gravity can be anything from impossible to trivial, depending on the meaning of "simulating".

      If you want to "create" actual gravity, its easy. Just get a big enough mass. Of course then you have to move it around, which can cost quite a bit of fuel. It would be somehow impractical to use the moon for example as a spaceship. Besides youd only get a sixth of Earths gravity and youd lose an important romantic icon. You could also use a micro-black hole, but thats stuff for Sci-Fi (see ...whatwasit, Greg Bear and his short stories about a math genius?)

      If you just want the acceleration exerted on a mass, which is what really matters (physics dont give a damn where accelerations come from, gravitys acceleration is indistiguishable from the one a motor provides), you can try the rotating spaceship thing, but if we havent managed to build a craft which can house more than a handful of people yet, that is probably a long way off. Moreover, if the ship isnt big enough youll have the problem of tidal forces: youd be subjected to different gravities at your head and at your feet. The human body doesnt like that.

      Oh, and theres the real, genuine, best-transport-means anti-g, which with our current knowledge of how things work can be relegated to pulp Sci-Fi. Or to bad Sci-Fi.

      --

      Trooled...

      --
      Enoc
  32. A Long Term Effect not listed by shmuc · · Score: 0

    No more Richard Simmons

    --

    Efren Belizario
    headspeak.com
  33. Not comparable by af_robot · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually there were everyday physical exercises onboard spacestation Mir for kosmonauts so it can't be compared to this experiment. And most of kosmonauts still in good physical condition.
    You can't compare result on Earth with experience on space station.
    And, Yes - Russians know much more about longtime space effects that all other nations combined.

  34. Who is funding this crap??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why in gods name wouldn't you just send someone up to the ISS instead and do the studies there in a TRUELY weightless (well, near weightless) environ... lying on your back has nothing to do with weightlessness.

  35. not yet by af_robot · · Score: 1

    You must build HUGE space station to make noticable artificial gravity.It is not possible with current cost to deliver goods on orbit.

    1. Re:not yet by Fuzion · · Score: 1
      Why does it need to be huge? The only requirement is that the space station is spinning, and that the centripetal force matches the force of gravity on earth.

      mg = mv^2/R
      v^2/R = g

      Therefore it should be possible to set the velocity according to the radius, so that it works out to 9.80 m/s^2.

      --
      "Knowledge makes us accountable." - Che Guevara
    2. Re:not yet by Ocean+Going+Squid · · Score: 1

      Yes that's true, however if the wheel is small like you suggest, A persons head would encounter different Gforces than their legs. This would be impossible to cope with. The wheel must be big enough to where the few feet between a persons legs and head wouldn't matter.
      Also, Its probably safer to spin the wheel at a slower speed so the torque doesn't throw the whole ship off. (Single engine ww2 fighter planes have this problem and had to compensate with trim)

    3. Re:not yet by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
      One could place a counter-rotational mass along the same axis, either an identical habitat section or just some dead-weight. This would prevent the transfer of rotational energy to the non-rotating sections.

      As for the gravitational difference, I imagine a 10% change from head to toe would be safe for humans, although experimental results would be required to determine the exact tolerances.

  36. Re:minimal action principle by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 1

    thank you Mr. Astro-Physicist.

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
  37. Longduration, Single Place Space Flight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    besides the physiological impact that a pure weightless environment will have on the human anatomy (and possibly the genetic structure) in the abscence of exercise and some artifical means of gravity, what else is there to consider.

    You have medical emergencies, such as sickness requiring surgery, that has to be accounted for.

    You have psychological effects associated with dislocation and isolation, both of which could lead to temporary or permanent insanity.

    You have latent sexual drive that has to be accounted for (lots of KYJelly for those of you more base than others).

    Enviromental stimuli must also surely play a role... nothing like staring at the same four walls, especially in a confined space, for 6 months to a year.

    What other factors can you think of???

  38. Civ III & Weightlessness test by taya0001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should study me i think i stayed in my chair for about 6 months after civ III came out. I think im ok. I am very fragele now and bleed whenever i brush up against stuff but at least i can take over the world with my grand army

    1. Re:Civ III & Weightlessness test by pjh3000 · · Score: 1

      Except that by the end of the 6 months, every time someone walked up to you, you'd want to trade with them. Or order them to remove their forces at once or prepare for war!

    2. Re:Civ III & Weightlessness test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew I had played too much Battlezone when I found myself driving at full speed up to the red lights and feeling like I should jump out the sunroof to snipe the driver of the car in front of me. Really.

  39. sounds like the focus should shift by sckeener · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nevertheless, organisers believe that, as well as helping astronauts, there should also be benefits for long-term hospital patients confined to their beds.

    Since there is still gravity in play, I'd say hospital patients are the real targets for this research....

    --
    "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    1. Re:sounds like the focus should shift by verloren · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What the researchers seem to have missed is that the "long-term hospital patients confined to their beds" are, erm, already doing this. This is like paying people to live in a warm climate to see how they cope with it - just go to Texas!

      Incidentally, I was confined to bed for a year, and what it got me was fat (I weighed the same at 7 years old as I did at 18!) better read (nothing else to do) and unable to walk properly for several weeks afterwards. Can I have my $20,000 please?

    2. Re:sounds like the focus should shift by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 0

      You were probably in the hospital for a reason. The goal of this study was to find the effects on a normal, healthy adult.

      --
      Have you been stalked by Seth today?
  40. Like shave their armpits by taya0001 · · Score: 1

    Wait european women dont do that anyways.... nevermind.

    1. Re:Like shave their armpits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets not start another stupid discussion over this... if Americans prefer to shave their armpits and mutilate their genitals, let them do it...

    2. Re:Like shave their armpits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if Americans want to do other crazy things like shower and use deodorant, so be it.

    3. Re:Like shave their armpits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine does. She shaves ... uh ... elsewhere too.

  41. Gravity Necessary for Resistance Exercise? by delphin42 · · Score: 2

    I understand that muscles can atrophy from lack of stress while in a weightless environment for prolonged periods, but surely there are creative enough engineers to design exercise equipment which doesn't require gravity to provide the resistance. Bowflex and similar machines use elastic bands to provide resistance. It seems like astronauts should be able to avoid muscular atrophy with a well designed fitness program.

    Am I missing something?

    --
    -- Adam
    1. Re:Gravity Necessary for Resistance Exercise? by Lobachevsky · · Score: 1

      A former astronaut came to give a lecture at my univ. Astronauts are supposed to conduct such excercises while in space; but they're lazy, and mission control down on earth can't help what goes on up past the statosphere. Realize that they're mostly scientists and not jocks; they often cheated by lowering the resistance on the machines or just spent less time on them -- by her testimony, they were far more eager to get back to their experiments, since they were allowed to conduct personal experiments while in space aside to the mission-assigned experiments.

    2. Re:Gravity Necessary for Resistance Exercise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can only exercise so much. even if they spent 5 hours a day on an exercise machine it's still not the same as having gravity pulling down on you 24 hours a day.

      Take the simple act of eating for example. to move your hand to your mouth you are still working against gravity, in essence getting exerceise that even for very physically inactive people keeps your muscles at some minimal level of functionality. Even sitting you are fighting gravity with your back & stomach muscles. It's not much, but under microgravity the strain is reduced to almost nothing.

  42. Trigger by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder if they had the death trigger program (See earlier article) set up just in case one of them choked something while trying to eat on their backs.

    One of them mentions in the article something about viewing it as a personal challenge. Yeah, every morning I wake up and say "I think I'll lie in bed for 3 months. Why? Because it's there."

    --
    With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
  43. Sending Men to Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well, I am not sure who is reading what, but my understanding is that the mission duration for travel between earth and mars at optimal launch time/window is only 6-7 months using current technology. The return is dependent on many things, but can be similar or up to 18 months.

    If the go ahead for nuclear propulsion, or alternatley some breakthrough in Ionic propulsion, is given, that trip time can be cut in half or more.

  44. I know by af_robot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    why they didn't take female volunteers.

    Just imagine women with PMS onboard spacestation.

  45. Not strange at all... by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

    Like slashdot, they post the same stories again and again...

    What do they care, it's your tax dollars!

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  46. Size matters... by J23SE · · Score: 2, Informative

    You would need a far larger space station for this type of rotation to feel natural for the station's inhabitants.

    For example... if we would do this to the Mir space station, the difference in "gravity" between the top of the station and the bottom of the station would be sixfold. Your body would be pulled in wierd ways.

    Read more about it on your favorite science site, or where I got it from, the movie physics page featured on slashdot a while ago.

    1. Re:Size matters... by fredrik70 · · Score: 1

      maybe not, can't find it, but someone else mentioned a good idea here on slashdot a few weeks ago. nOne could have 2 small sections connected with each other with a long cable and rotate around the cable with the middle of the cable serving as the centre of rotation. this would eliminate the risk of walking arouund with your head in 0G,while having 1G down by your feet, whith would happen in mir or the ISS if you started to rotate them.

      Thought it was a quite nifty idea..

      --
      if (!signature) { throw std::runtime_error("No sig!"); }
  47. Re:They earned $20,000 simply for staying in bed!! by Zelet · · Score: 1

    Yeah, considering they are on the "job" 24 hrs a day. That would be about $9.25 an hour. Then you have to figure the months of rehab that each of these twits will have to go through to be able to do any normal tasks.

    Oh yeah, don't forget taxes.

    --
    ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
  48. Simulating Gravity by lionchild · · Score: 1
    We've had the technology to 'simulate' gravity since the industrial revolution. Haven't you seen 2001 the movie?

    I've seen it. It's a fine movie for it's time. While we may have the tecnology to simulate gravity in space, why haven't we employed it yet? Shuttle missions don't seem to have the need for it, since their stays in microgravity are generally short. But have any of the space stations currently, or previously in service used some sort of gravity system?

    --
    Awk! Pieces of eight. Pieces of eight. Pieces of seven... ERROR: General Protection Fault. [Paroty Error.]
  49. Long term effects of waitlessness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I blame MTV and their fast paced videos. Or maybe it's the commercials that tried to imitate them?

    At any rate the effects are evident in traffic- folks inching into the intersection before the light turns red, then burning rubber to rush to the NEXT red light so they can be sitting there when it turns green, making YOU (the patient one) stop for a green light...

    Oh, WEIGHTLESSNESS, my mistake. Sorry.

  50. I wonder if you could telacommute to work? by antitribue · · Score: 1

    I am almost positive that I could program (and do most of my other jobs) from a lying down position. I wonder if they had any rules regarding what they could and could not do with the computers? Just a thought...

  51. Important Message Below... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please do not read this text.

  52. Stage 2... by kentyman · · Score: 0

    Stage 2: ?
    Stage 3: Profit!

    Lay all night, lay all day,
    Lay the atrophy way...
    We won't stop 'til we get atrophy,
    Bee doo beedle bop bo...

    --
    You know where you are? You're in the $PATH, baby. You're gonna get executed!
  53. The Matrix by cylcyl · · Score: 1

    This sounds less like prep for weightlessness than preparation for the fluid tanks in the Matrix.

    Wait till they start passing out the blue pills... Oh yeah, it's called Viagra ;)

  54. Sounds like the underpants gnomes by schroedinbug · · Score: 0

    Stage One: Have 14 male volunteers spending 3 months carrying out all activities while lying on their backs.
    Stage two:
    Stage Three: Profit!

  55. Why are they wasting time? by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Russians have the largest, most accurate database on such information.. The tests were done with real subjects in real microgravity, not some lame attempt with the slight possibility of simulating something.

    Come on, the Mir program is still full of wonderful data.. and couple that with the old data from Skylab and you have a pretty darn good basis for sending up 3 people for a 5 month stay. (with a control group of 3 here on the ground... hell let them lie around for 5 months..)

    it amazes me at how stupidity and quackery get's passed off as science and research nowdays..

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Why are they wasting time? by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It said in the article that they were applying counter measures to help the body adapt. They may have lots of data to see what happens in space (maybe enough to tell that lying on your back is a good substitute) but if the counter measures are new they probably don't have much data on them. Paying $20,000 a pop to get some untrained volunteers to stay in bed for three months is a heck of a lot cheaper than sticking them in a space station.

  56. This is no picnic -- I know by esler13 · · Score: 1

    During my junior year at college, I fell from the high-bar at gymnastics practice and split my L1 vertebra in half. As a result, I had to lay flat on my back for a period of about a month. I can attest to the frustration involved in such restriction. In my case, it was only a month, I had plenty of visitors, and I could eventually get up for a few minutes at a time with the help of a metal brace toward the end of the month. Of course I also lived in fear that a sneeze or sudden jerk could leave me paralyzed. I praise God that I healed well and returned to more or less normal. In any case, it was no picnic, and I would never choose to repeat the experience voluntarily.

  57. ESA needs a new name, perhaps? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    "Stage 1 of the European Space Agency study involved 14 male volunteers spending 3 months carrying out all activities whilst lying on their backs..."

    ... while us crazy loons in the US (Russia too, I hear) have the daft idea of conducting weightlessness studies in actual microgravity. Go figure!

    I'm waiting for the ESA to announce their intention to put people in space with a really tall ladder ala Eddie Izzard.

    1. Re:ESA needs a new name, perhaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also back a guy who wants to use model rocket engines to shoot them into space... now try not to laugh...

  58. About time by Joel+Ironstone · · Score: 1

    There have been so many studies about the effects of over-weightedness. I am glad someone has realized that weightlessness is just as bad.

  59. So what's phase 2? by colmore · · Score: 2

    Should future phases of this experiment require hanging out for a few months in the Space Station, then someone tell these guys to give me a call.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  60. Another instance of bad design... by Interrobang · · Score: 2

    Any study that "must" take all male volunteers because the results will be 'more stable' or something lacks good methodology. I'm sickeningly reminded of early experiments on treatments for breast cancer, overwhelmingly, almost unanimously conducted on men (who rarely get breast cancer, especially comparative to women) -- so that the (lazy) researchers wouldn't have to compensate for menstrual cycles. Throw them a pity party, 'cause they got their streamers up.

    Relatedly, I somehow (why, I don't know) expected better than the spate of sexist comments from further up in this discussion. (Note to sexist comment creeps: Mature men with grown-up attitudes towards women tend to get laid more often than twits. This is The Other Half speaking.)

    Disgustedly, Interrobang

    1. Re:Another instance of bad design... by garyrich · · Score: 2

      " Any study that "must" take all male volunteers because the results will be 'more stable' or something lacks good methodology"

      Normally I would be the first to agree with you. If they are planning an all male mars expidition then the single gender experiment may be valid. That said, the experiment looks like total crap science from the get go. It's actually a poorly designed study on the medium term effects of being bedridden - a subject with a lot of literature behind it already. Too bad Fenymen isn't around anymore to rip them a new oriface.

      --
      -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    2. Re:Another instance of bad design... by grahamm · · Score: 1

      Whereas if they had studied both men and women and found that women handled prolonged weightlessness better then men, would they change the plans and make the mars expedition all female?

  61. months on their backs? by mstorer3772 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like they only conclusion they'll be able to draw is that zero gee causes bed-sores and a stiff neck.

    Previous studies on women who spend too much time on their backs have determined that zero gee can cause pregnancy and may lead to hanging out with Italian men named Guido.

    --
    Fooz Meister
  62. Present WW II Rocket Technology near USELESS !!! by geekster_2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    according to this scientist !!!!!

    Space Propulsion Engine for Flying Saucer - New Physics

    Rumor in Silicon Valley -

    Inventor of 3D volume holographic optical storage
    shopping his concept for Space Propulsion Engine
    using Propellantless Mass to USA and other countries.

    for further look at biography background goto

    http://colossalstorage.net/colossal.htm

    He says he has researched all propulsion concepts at NASA, Lockheed,
    Europe, Asia, and Russian Space Agencies and
    knows their EARTH BASED WW II propellant mass and other
    propellantless technologies.

    He is working in top secret and he says no physicist or scientist
    he has ever studied or researched had this approach and knows his
    concept will work to give near light speed travel thru Galaxy with
    500K/Miles per Hour to start or 138 miles/sec. Nasa fastest time
    are 25,000 mile/hr or 3.9 miles/sec

    He says it is a mankind first concept !!

  63. Dangerous by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

    I spent several weeks lying on my back in a hospital bed and I wound up with a fractured skull, shattered pelvis, liver and stomach lacerations, brain damage and amnesia!

    --
    This space available.
    1. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? What the heck were you doing to yourself to get so fucked up???

    2. Re:Dangerous by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      crossing the street. Not carefully enough, as it turns out.

      --
      This space available.
  64. Re:Three months in bed with an internet connection by synshyne · · Score: 1

    To anyone who is/was/used to be a mudder, that means that at the end of the three months, you're hoarding every purple shard, excalibur, Hand of Glory, ball of wisdom, soul slasher, holy grail and every other piece of limited eq in the game, have 10 months of rent, have Calaron, Keogh, Shasta, Coastie and a slew of other wizzies/arches pissed at you and have been accused of scripting approximately 200 times. =)

    "you are hereby found guilty as charged of doing all of the above" and on a much lighter note, "so who wants to have another go round?"

    *synshyne raises her hand.."ohh ohh me pick me..."

    --
    -Alicia
  65. Re:Present WW II Rocket Technology near USELESS !! by mstorer3772 · · Score: 1

    He also says that he's completely honest and trustworthy. Just ask him. He'll tell you.
    So he's working in top secret, but just happens to spill his guts to you? Sad.

    Did you actually buy into all this, or are you just trolling?

    --
    Fooz Meister
  66. on that note i'd rather be a techie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm $9.25 hr + 24 hrs a day 7 days a week - taxes + months of talkin to some long necked goon that thinks your and idiot for volunteering in the first place = wasted 3 months of time for you (assuming you dont get to play on a computer the whole time) then again i could be a techie: have a computer + get a range of $12 and higher for pay (depending on skills, experience, etc.) - taxes (damn them taxes) - social skills (who needs them) + being the long necked arse that thinks everyone else is an idiot = the dream job for the ultimate hermit... what else is to be added to this? I know there's more to it than just that...

    1. Re:on that note i'd rather be a techie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $12 per hour?

  67. does that even... by caveat · · Score: 1

    ...deserve a reply? sounds like somebody's been watching a bit too mcuh Chain Reaction.
    (and the link doesn't even mention propulsion, just storage)

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  68. Re:I 0wn y4 :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    well, that's more just random offtopic crap. The most insidious trolls are those who post normal-looking comments intented to attract flames or otherwise upset people.

  69. Re:Three months in bed with an internet connection by Vengie · · Score: 2

    1) Where did you mud 2) Did you ever pkill me? ;)

    --
    When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
  70. Re:Three months in bed with an internet connection by synshyne · · Score: 1

    you were spared by the likes of me...probably cause i didnt mud *blushes* (dont kill me!)..so i wasnt guilty of "all" of the above...but hey with serious gamming time like that I'd have no objection to mudding til my eyes bulged out my skull and dried up......ye shall see me one day soon enough though...just soon as i get somethin better than this POS computer i've been stuck with for way too long...then I shall challenge you!! dont worry bout bein afraid I suck at gamming, but hey who likes a quitter, everyone likes to have someone around once in a while that is an easy target! hahaha

    --
    -Alicia
  71. Let's see... by Nindalf · · Score: 2

    No sunlight, so no UV aging the skin.

    No significant spinal compression, so no getting shorter or bent.

    Fleshy masses are not pulled downwards enough to strain and stretch the supporting tissue, so no sagging.

    I believe that people on the moon would at least look much younger for much longer than people do on the Earth. I'm sure moon gravity is much healthier than free-fall, too. You'd probably still need some sort of drug treatment to keep healthy bones and the right amount of blood, though. I sure wouldn't want to live 20 years on the moon, and then come back to Earth.

    1. Re:Let's see... by rapid+prototype · · Score: 2

      I sure wouldn't want to live 20 years on the moon, and then come back to Earth.

      in "the moon is a harsh mistress" it was also postulated that once on the moon for a significant time (without excercising in a centrifuge, of course) an irreversible physiological change would occur. now i don't buy that, but i think that your heart would definitely find pumping at 1g pretty difficult, and if you didn't excercise those legs, you'd be pretty much confined to a wheelchair while you were on earth. not irreversible, but pretty hard to reverse without dying :)

      -rp

    2. Re:Let's see... by Ashtangi · · Score: 1

      There's plenty you can do to uncompress the spine daily. Not many people are into it, but I've seen men in their 90s who move, bend, flex better than most humans at any age. The effects of gravity on aging are pretty much totally preventable.

  72. details by af_robot · · Score: 1

    Quote:
    "The problem is that if the radius of the spin is too slow, you can actually feel it in your middle ear when you turn your head! It's like a miniature version of the Coriolis effect which makes hurricanes on the Earth."
    http://www.badastronomy.com/mad/1999/spinstation.j tml

  73. Re:They earned $20,000 simply for staying in bed!! by Ashtangi · · Score: 1
    No doubt. This sounds like a really bad deal for the test subjects. These would have to be people who are at least fairly active and in some decent shape, or the impact of the study would almost certainly be lessened. You'd have to pay me a lot more before I put my body through something like that.

    Actually going to space? Well now, I'd do that for free.

  74. even worse..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just imagine women with PMS onboard spacestation./i> Just imagine women having to put up with guys like you at ANY time of the month.

  75. Re:Three months in bed with an internet connection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hone your pk skills here: Used to be one of the BEST pk muds around, might not be anymore. Also reachable at port 3333 on your telnet dial at the same domain. Have fun, die lots, blame it all on scripting.

  76. 90 Days and 90 Nights by manifested2 · · Score: 1

    I missed being able to go out for a drink, but also yearned for physical contact

    Poor dude...