Slashdot Mirror


Gamespy Installer Spreads Nimda

NSG writes "Yahoo News is running this story about the Nimda virus infecting some Gamespy Arcade 1.09 installers. Approximately 3,100 infected files were served in a seven hour period. What responsibility does Gamespy have to the users who downloaded the infected file?"

171 comments

  1. Get it in you! by Pr0n+K1ng · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    First Post!

    If everyone would run Linux this wouldn't be a problem!

    --

    Oh well, back to dowloading pr0n...

    Pr0n K1ng

    1. Re:Get it in you! by joh3n · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hey, get back to fisting clowns ya freak!

      --
      -------- The thought plickens....
    2. Re:Get it in you! by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      You're right. If everybody ran Linux, there'd be no need for GameSpy. Brilliant!

    3. Re:Get it in you! by panic911 · · Score: 1

      thats not necessarily true

  2. This is an industry problem, not just gamespy. by User+956 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Viruses in gamespy software? The computer industry in general has demonstrated that the concept of ethics no longer applies when there is money at stake. Read the average EULA: you have to surrender fundamental rights, such as fair use. Worse than that, the developers generally absolve themselves of any responsibility or liability whatsoever -- they won't even guarantee that the software that you have just bought will do what they claim it does! What we're seeing is the culmination of an unfortunate trend. The creators of a piece of software for as long as they control it have a monopoly -- anyone committed to using their product is pretty much at their mercy. And that means money -- lots of money.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:This is an industry problem, not just gamespy. by crandall · · Score: 1

      I wonder though... since it's a one EXE file, would the file not infect your system before you are forced to accept the EULA? An interesting point. Still, how do you prove that a specific file infected your system? Difficult at best.

    2. Re:This is an industry problem, not just gamespy. by some2 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Even a clause that says they are not liable does not exclude them from liability.

      Here's an article on software liability clauses and theories on lawsuits regarding software liability. The key to success in a lawsuit is as follows:
      Negligence: The company has a duty to take reasonable measures to make the product safe (no personal injuries or property damage), or no more unsafe than a reasonable customer would expect (skis are unsafe, but skiers understand the risk and want to buy skis anyway.) Under the right circumstances, a company can non-negligently leave a product in a dangerous condition.
      The users of the software would assume that this software would be free from viruses. This company, by both not securing its networked systems from known viruses, and by not verifying that it's software was not virus-infected prior to release, acted negligently.

      Now the question is -- would the reward of attempting lengthy litigation over a relatively small loss be worthwhile? Unfortunately, it's not all too often as such. To my knowledge, as of yet, data loss due to negligence (not resulting in death, destruction of people or property, etc) has not provided for large damages. I'm sure as judges and congress members become more technically savvy, we will see more resonable laws and judgements relating to software liability. Until then, good luck.
    3. Re:This is an industry problem, not just gamespy. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "...they won't even guarantee that the software that you have just bought will do what they claim it does!" Let me ask you something: Would you guarantee (as in back up with money) that an app you wrote would run without crashing on Windows? Or would you rather license it so that when the Windows computer crashes, your bank account doesn't go with it? Think very carefully before you respond.

    4. Re:This is an industry problem, not just gamespy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand what he means. A real world analogy would be a guy selling you a brand new car, but not guaranteeing it will even run, but making sign a contract first that says its not his fault if the thing dies before you get off the lot.

    5. Re:This is an industry problem, not just gamespy. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      ..and you don't understand what I'm saying. It's like a guy selling you a brand new car, but not guaranteeing it will even run because the roads randomly develop sink-holes.

      You CANT guarantee a program if you can't guarantee the machine it's running on. As for this whole 'GameSpy' business: It's sad that they didnt' virus sniff the stuff on their site. That was stupid of them. However, to be fair, the real criminal here is the guy who wrote the Nimda virus in the first place. Microsoft made it easy for him to do it. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying GameSpy is absolved of all responsibility, I just don't think all the negativity should be focused directly on them.

    6. Re:This is an industry problem, not just gamespy. by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      No, it's not really the Nimda worm. It's a new game: Virus hide and seek. Fun! Fun!

      --
      How ya like dat?
  3. Hahah by blackula · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't use Gamespy, use The All Seeing Eye for all your online gaming needs. It is 100x better. Trust me.

    1. Re:Hahah by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      If they can goof like this, then it's probably only a matter of time before a few hundred thousand CD's are shipped with infected clients.

      Better hope that one of those 3000 odd downloads wasn't someone grabbing it to stick on their magazines coverdisk...

    2. Re:Hahah by shepd · · Score: 2, Informative

      >Better hope that one of those 3000 odd downloads wasn't someone grabbing it to stick on their magazines coverdisk...

      Speaking of magazines and viruses, I think you'll find it interesting that the first virus ever widely spread on Macs happened to be a veiled advertisement for a computer magazine itself, proving the truth is, in fact, stranger than fiction.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:Hahah by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      hehehe I can't remember which coverdisk it was (Amiga User International?) but back when the Saddam virus was wreaking havoc, one of the mags "kindly" gave away the virus on a coverdisk. The only program that could nuke it required two disk drives and I only had (and it wouldn't work from ram). Lost a third of my disk collection to that bastard.

    4. Re:Hahah by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1

      agreed.. i'm against all forms of SpyWare... GameSpy could be spyware, it's not like you could say they are hiding it with the title gameSPY.

    5. Re:Hahah by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      Nah. Use xqf :-)

  4. Who downloads it anyway? by crandall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I mean, seriously, who downloads this anyway? I make a habit of not trusting any software that has to scan your entire harddrive in order to 'find' games.

    If a game doesn't have an ingame browser, then I stick to direct connect, or single player. I shouldn't have to run external programs to play games online.

    Still, I think the bad press alone will be Gamespy's punishment on this one. I've seen this news crop up everywhere in the past day or two, and chances are, anyone who reads any kind of net news knows as well.

    1. Re:Who downloads it anyway? by yomahz · · Score: 5, Informative


      If a game doesn't have an ingame browser, then I stick to direct connect, or single player. I shouldn't have to run external programs to play games online.


      Most in game browsers are really half assed and lame as hell.


      I make a habit of not trusting any software that has to scan your entire harddrive in order to 'find' games.


      Well, if you don't have the source to a program, you don't have any idea what it's doing anyways. At least it's telling you. You can always cancel it you know...

      One thing I do have to say is that gamespy "Arcade" is really lame compared to Gamespy "3D"... Arcade just seems like a spam filled piece of crap..

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    2. Re:Who downloads it anyway? by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      It doesn't really have anything to do with what type of program it is....even single player games would be affected. it's simply an infectable executable that was run.

      > I shouldn't have to run external programs to play games online.

      So you won't run the wolfenstein demo? Or even the full install from the CD? If you would, then you could theoritically get a virus (no, not starting any rumors here). You do understand that you're limiting yourself to games that run solely from the browser and even then, there's no guarantee that you won't get malware.

    3. Re:Who downloads it anyway? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Most in game browsers are really half assed and lame as hell.
      Agreed, but compared to Gamespy Arcade (An UI that doesn't seem too nice, and ocassional crashiness) I'll pick them any day. =)

      And I don't need to pay extra to get the improved functionality...

    4. Re:Who downloads it anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is why you will always be a newbie.

    5. Re:Who downloads it anyway? by aDc_73 · · Score: 1

      I've used it a couple of times to play Halo across the internet and probably will keep using it when MS releases their subscription service (since it's free :-)

    6. Re:Who downloads it anyway? by DooBall · · Score: 1

      But with out GameSpy, you would have never been able to play and find some certain online games. =\

    7. Re:Who downloads it anyway? by VertigoAce · · Score: 1

      Read more carefully. He's saying that he shouldn't have to run a 3rd party's program to play a game (ie, he trusts the game's manufacturer to write a decent multiplayer environment, but not something like gamespy)

    8. Re:Who downloads it anyway? by Evro · · Score: 1

      I've been using Gamespy 3D for about 2 years and have never even been prompted to pay for it. The gamespy UI is about 1000 times better than anything in any game (Q3, CS, RTCW are the games I've played and GS3D is better than all of them). If you're trying to play a multiplayer game with other people (i.e. your clanmates) and trying to find a server, the in-game browser is nearly useless. Gamespy allows you to find a server (though the ping function in Gamespy has never given accurate results).

      --
      rooooar
    9. Re:Who downloads it anyway? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone said up above. Use the All-Seeing Eye. The GUI is simple and non-flashy compared to the horrible beast that is gamespy.

    10. Re:Who downloads it anyway? by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
      Most in game browsers are really half assed and lame as hell.
      The exception to this is the in-game browser in Half-Life, which has all the functionality of Arcade (most notably SmartSpy style query limiting) without any of the crap.

      Unless I'm mistaken, Quake 3 and offspring also have this.

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    11. Re:Who downloads it anyway? by Kosi · · Score: 1

      >> I shouldn't have to run external programs to play games online.

      >So you won't run the wolfenstein demo ? Or even the
      > full install from the CD?

      I think he meant that there should be no extra piece of software like GameSpy to play an game in the net. The game should bring everything it needs with when installing it on my machine.

  5. None, I'm guessing... by Shade,+The · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Legally anyway. I haven't looked at the EULA for Gamespy (haven't downloaded it, actually), but I'm betting some large odds it'll have some clause in it saying they're not responsible even if it destroys your computer, sets fire to your home, and heralds the End of the World.

    Whether this will stand up in court would be interesting to see, though. And the precedent it would set would be very wide ranging.

    1. Re:None, I'm guessing... by yomahz · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Legally anyway. I haven't looked at the EULA for Gamespy (haven't downloaded it, actually), but I'm betting some large odds it'll have some clause in it saying they're not responsible even if it destroys your computer, sets fire to your home, and heralds the End of the World.


      You mean like this one and this one, and this one, and every other EULA I've ever read?

      --
      "A mind is a terrible thing to taste."
    2. Re:None, I'm guessing... by Kizzle · · Score: 1

      Almost every program out there says in the EULA that they are not responsible for any damages.

    3. Re:None, I'm guessing... by Shade,+The · · Score: 2

      Yep! :)

      That's what I mean. All (or practically all) EULA's have that clause. Hence the large odds, which I'll clarify as being 1 million to 1 against it not having such a no-liability section.

    4. Re:None, I'm guessing... by Felinoid · · Score: 2

      The open source liccenses only permit you to use and redistrobute the code.

      So if in writing code for open source program you accadentally write a virus and infect yourself it's not going to reflect on the orginal author.

      As for non-commertal code.. with the lawsute madness in the 1980's of every jerk with a lawer suing every hobby sysop they could I'd think they'd sue the programmers of public domain programs that mistakenly carried viruses if the lawer didn't blow the whole idea off as silly.

      All non-commertal software has a default protection. Just as you can not sue the berror of a gift if the gift is defective.

      That part of the GPL that states the code comes with no warrenty etc is becouse not all GPLed code is noncommertal. ID software could be sued for defects in the GPLed Quake code if it weren't for that.

      Mostly thow that clause is redundent.
      "You may not sue me for your own suiside"
      Of course people do sue for the suiside of children due to games music what ever. Eventually somebody will sue becouse his kid was working on a GPLed program.

      Anywho.. It's redundent but probablly nessisary under the situation

      --
      I don't actually exist.
  6. Liability? Read their TOS. by User+956 · · Score: 4, Informative

    They're legally immune. From the GameSpy Website:

    To the fullest extent permitted by applicable laws, GameSpy and its employees, agents, suppliers, and contractors shall in no event be liable for any claims, charges, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, and expenses of whatever nature and howsoever arising, including without limitation any compensatory, incidental, direct, indirect, special, punitive, or consequential damages, loss of use, loss of data, loss caused by a computer or electronic virus, loss of income or profit, loss of or damage to property, claims of third parties, or other losses of any kind or character, even if GameSpy has been advised of the possibility of such damages or losses, arising out of or in connection with the use of this Web Site, software, or any Web Site with which it is linked. You assume total responsibility for establishing such procedures for data back up and virus checking as you consider necessary.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:Liability? Read their TOS. by I+Want+GNU! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not necessarily. Just because a company states that it isn't liable for anything doesn't mean it is. Several rights cannot be forfeited in contracts. If they could, companies could make people indentured servants instead of foreclosing on them. The EULA is designed to make a user think he or she has no rights, not to actually take them all away (although it does take away some rights).

    2. Re:Liability? Read their TOS. by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      People need to quite taking that kind of stuff literally. That statement from GameSpy is merely their fantasy of how they want things to be. It is not a legal document.

      If that document were legal, then the author of Nimda itself could make the same claim, and be off the hook.

      They trafficked in malware. It was probably accidental, not deliberate. But they still did it, and it they are partly responsible for what happens as a result, just as anyone else who spreads a virus is.

      There are some people who, systematically, do not ever spread viruses. And there are some who do spread them. There is a difference between the two groups, and it's not just luck or fate. It's responsibility vs negligence and recklessness. It's voluntary -- a person gets to choose which of those two groups he is in. And because of that, spreading viruses is not excusable.

      With all that said, I don't think it's practical to really punish them. But it is justifiable to do it.

      HYBTT?
      Hah! I think I see something!
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    3. Re:Liability? Read their TOS. by wzzrd · · Score: 0

      The Anglo-Saxon "Unlawful Act" should be enough ground to found a suit in against GameSpy. I really really doubt if they can be immune in this case.

      Usually, when I read about some mean USA law-suit with an enormous amount of $$$ involved, I like to think it's insane. But in this single case they would have really earnt it. Sue them.

      (Off topic: we Dutchmen have a somewhat broader idea of the "Unlawful Act". Pitty though that we can't sue for insane amounts of dough ;) )

    4. Re:Liability? Read their TOS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One could argue that the TOS/EULA covers the software itself, and not the virus.

    5. Re:Liability? Read their TOS. by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
      #include

      That's not even an EULA. It's just this little document they hope you'll read, which they call the "Terms of Service". Supposedly, by using the site, you agree to abide by the TOS, but since you've already used the site (you had to hit one of their pages to see the link to the TOS, and viewing the TOS also constitutes use of the site), their TOS isn't worth the pixels it's displayed on, since you can't agree to a contract before you've even read it! And that's assuming the TOS is valid at all, which is highly questionable.

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    6. Re:Liability? Read their TOS. by Vulture_ · · Score: 1

      So, I can post a little Terms of Service link on the bottom of my Web site that says that, by viewing this site, you acknowledge and agree that I may gun you down in broad daylight in the middle of Times Square for any reason? And expect to get away with it? I think not!

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

  7. Damn. by SpamJunkie · · Score: 1

    I finally bought a nice new PC for gaming instead of my trusty (yet older) mac, and am told I might have Nimda? I have Gamespy Arcade 1.09 installed! I feel like I've just been burned by unprotected sex.

    And like an STD I think Gamespy does have a responsibility to alert all their users to the potential infection.

    1. Re:Damn. by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "I feel like I've just been burned by unprotected sex."

      Here's a tip: Mineral oil doesn't evaporate as fast as hand-lotion. Hopefully now you won't burn yourself again. :D

  8. They copied Microsoft by I+Want+GNU! · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe GameSpy is doing this. It's sooo passé. Microsoft already did this. Next time GameSpy wants to get infected, it should be original and choose a different virus, maybe W32.Klez.E or even a McAfee homebrew bug, instead of just copying MS because it's an industry leader. Me, I prefer my KaZaA virus, because it has its own EULA.

    1. Re:They copied Microsoft by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Wants to get infected?

      Nice conspiracy theory you've got there, now you can provide some proof. Homebrew bug? I'd like to see some proof on that too. The McAfee virus was real, but the complaints about how the announcement was worded somehow turns into "manufactured virus" into the ears of the credulous anti-industry types.

      No one needs to keep creating viruses to sell product, there are simply way too many kiddies willing to do the dirty work themselves and for free. Next we'll be hearing how IIS web defacements are fake and run by the people at Apache to get people to switch to their server.

    2. Re:They copied Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      earth to zuki...earth to zuki...that was a joke

    3. Re:They copied Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is some funny shite..!!

  9. 3100 infected files downloaded. by scum-e-bag · · Score: 1

    According to this link at news.com Executive Mark Surfas said the virus infected one of their download servers for two hours on Tuesday and five hours Wednesday night, while they were performing routine service.

    Surfas said a total of 3,100 infected files were served, and the company is in the process of notifying everyone who got an infected file and pointing them to free antivirus tools that will disinfect their systems.


    Not cool...

    --
    Does it go on forever?
    1. Re:3100 infected files downloaded. by GutBomb · · Score: 2

      how the hell do you inform everyone? most people who sign up for gamespy give a bogus or a spam trap email that will never be checked. How the hell are they gonna notify all of them?

  10. What Responsibility Does GameSpy Have? by ematic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Answer: None

    Have you ever read that LONG agreement before you install software? It clearly states this phrase:

    NO WARRENTIES EXPRESSED or IMPLIED

    --

    idm owns me
    1. Re:What Responsibility Does GameSpy Have? by RebelTycoon · · Score: 1

      But isn't the virus installed before the agreement is displayed?

      Wouldn't they be liable then?

    2. Re:What Responsibility Does GameSpy Have? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1
      Good point, but they may have displayed some agreement before letting people download it (as many sites do now a days).

      But you're right, you can't agree to the setup licence without first having ran part of the program, by which time, you've already accepted it (ie: you've ran the program).

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    3. Re:What Responsibility Does GameSpy Have? by tempmpi · · Score: 2

      You can't accept something you couldn't have seen before you accepted it. If click-through agreements are legally binding, they must be displayed to be binding.

      --
      Jan
    4. Re:What Responsibility Does GameSpy Have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, if memory serves, some states limit just how much they can disclaim so in some states you may have additional legal rights. IANAL, however, so I don't know what states or what rights you might have. Perhaps a lawyer here could tell us? There's usually one or two hanging hereabouts...

    5. Re:What Responsibility Does GameSpy Have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it doesnt matter that they say no implied warranty. They cannot disclaim certain implied warranties... just because the company tries to limit it's liability by saying "we are not liable" doesnt necessarially mean a thing. For a disclaimer to be effective it must be prominantly displayed, and set off from the body of the agreement. Even so, if that is done, courts dont like disclaimers.

      However, here's the bigger question. what kind of damages are you going to get anyway? Supposing that you can sue, what would you recover? Contracts cases dont allow for punitive damages, so you might get restitituion for costs outlayed to fix the problem. But that's about it. It wouldnt be cost effective to sue, since any damages you would get would be outweighed by legal expenses.

  11. Not Worried by sevensharpnine · · Score: 1

    I really doubt this will be a serious problem. I'm sure Gamespy will offer a patch for a small monthly fee. Or better yet, maybe if you subscribe to their eXtreme 3d++ platinum gamers edition fileservers for a few bucks maybe they'll sell you someone elses virus scanner demo with no long-term value. Or even better yet, maybe if you purchase one of their programs you can connect to an online scanner paid for and maintained out of someone elses pocket.

    --
    "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." -Voltaire
  12. Big whoop. by JanusFury · · Score: 0, Troll

    Oh no, 3100 people got Nimda in a Gamespy Arcade installer. Oh no, a virus infected a webserver (who would have imagined something like THAT happening?). Oh no, the users have to download a free virus scanner like AVG to remove it. Oh no, it was their choice to download Gamespy Arcade in the first place.

    Oh no, this is absolutely nothing.

    --
    using namespace slashdot;
    troll::post();
    1. Re:Big whoop. by tulare · · Score: 2

      You obviously don't see the big picture. My guess would be that the majority of LameSpy downloaders are kids, either on the computer that daddy bought them, or on daddy's computer. Chances are that most of the 3000 people know just about squat about their computer beyond how to turn it on, frag like hell, and possibly how to turn it off.
      Enter Nimda. Replicating at a rate whose exponent is the average of the number of email contacts in the infected group, in this case about 3000 minus the number of machines had virus scanners which actually caught the bug - most likely the number of infected machines is about half the number of downloads. How many people on those email lists are not terribly computer literate as well?
      Not trying to blow a lot of fud on the table, but the reality is that these 1500 infected comps boils down to a real pain in the ass, simply because the, ahem, technicians at AdServerSpy can't properly manage their IIS box. I'm sorry, but enough is enough. Companies need to be held accountable when something this sloppy happens. I couldn't think of a better first pick than GameSpy... well, maybe ONE better pick...

      --
      political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    2. Re:Big whoop. by geekster · · Score: 1

      Oh no, the users have to download a free virus scanner like AVG to remove it.

      Unless you're from Europe of course.

    3. Re:Big whoop. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      That's 3100 people who wouldn't have had a problem were they using Linux instead of Windows.

      Just a thought.

    4. Re:Big whoop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or respectively, 3100 more reasons to write viruses for that platform.

      Don't be so blind sighted; fucking zealot.

  13. alternatives by Barbarian · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although many people believe they HAVE to use Gamespy Arcade to play their favorite game online, and some games bundle it on the CD and suggest you install it, most games also include their own in-game browsers and there are also alternatives available which don't try to force you into a chat room when ever you want to look for a game or shove banners in your face, although some (pingtool) are dead.

    1. Re:alternatives by crisco · · Score: 2

      Speaking of, Kali is still around and somewhat alive and for the time being, completely free(as in beer). Doesn't support everything but for what it does it works very well.

      --

      Bleh!

  14. Now I've seen it all by mcpkaaos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was one of the original Gamespy employees from a few years ago, and I never thought I'd see Gamespy as the subject of a /. story. It just goes to show, before long everything ends up on this site. ;)

    It doesn't surprise me in the least that this has occured, though I hate to bash on my old company (especially since when I left, I left with enough stock to really want the company to succeed, or liquidate and get it over with, hehe.) Truth be told, the company has always been run by a man who truly couldn't care less about customers, a development manager who can't understand why you don't call virtuals from a constructor, and a project lead who thinks UI coding is the end-all-be-all of computer science. Put them together and you end up with very little experience trying to manage a product that has long since outlived its usefulness.

    And before you flame me or whatever, I do know a little bit about which I speak... having written much of the original Arcade myself (though I'm not too proud of the outcome, having followed its progress since I left in '00.)

    All in all, you can continue to expect inferior product from an inferior company, shameful as it is. I often lament on how things might have changed were L-Fire and I given a little more freedom to get stuff done. C'est la vie.

    /me waits to get flamed by crt and Walla now

    --

    [McP]KAAOS

    --
    It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    1. Re:Now I've seen it all by kzadot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why cant you call virtuals from a constructor?

    2. Re:Now I've seen it all by pyrote · · Score: 1

      okay so, make a compatible open source one that doesn't suck...p2p gnutella esqe gamespy like.

      I'm no coder, but from the sounds of it you are...so do something about it.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    3. Re:Now I've seen it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and a project lead who thinks UI coding is the end-all-be-all of computer science.

      Wow, you really can't tell that from the output of Gamespy Arcade.. It's about as easy to use as playing a turd like a flute.

    4. Re:Now I've seen it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the company has always been run by a man who truly couldn't care less about customers

      Truly libelous material if ever I saw it.

      Release the lawyers!

    5. Re:Now I've seen it all by mcpkaaos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I did. The summer after leaving Gamespy (Summer '00) I designed and implemented a server browsing platform that used URLs rather than command lines to launch a game and connect to a remote host. Addtionally, for Windows users, it integrated completely within the Windows Shell, allowing servers to be browsed like files, games and game types browsed like folders, anywhere, anytime, in any explorer window. It also persists its UI and in-memory server lists to disk when you launch a game (releasing some of the memory that is much better spent on the game itself, not the server browsing software you don't care about at that moment.) I had originally wanted to do something similar for Arcade, but none of the coders (and I use the term loosely) at Gamespy seemed interested. Too bad, I thought it was a rather cool idea.

      It's actually a pretty slick system, though I didn't spend enough time on it then to iron out some of the wrinkles (I think a total of 80-90 hours was spent on it over the course of 6 weeks.) I would have spent more time on it, but a non-compete agreement I had signed (lasting 2 years from my resignation date) prohibited me from releasing the source (as I'm an open-source kinda guy) or releasing a freeware product (as I don't need gamers' hard-earned cash.. they need it to buy more games and video cards!) Now that the non-compete has expired (as of this past March 8), I might think about starting up a new project based on the old idea.

      If anyone would be interested in such a project, please email me (kaaos at clanmcp dot com). The project would be for no money, sorry to say, as I don't see the need for charging for a product that anyone could implement with enough time and desire (sorry Gamespy).

      --

      [McP]KAAOS

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    6. Re:Now I've seen it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth is an absolute defense to libel.

      Also, opinions are rarely libel, only things portrayed as fact. I doubt anyone would consider a slashdot post as anything but opinion.

    7. Re:Now I've seen it all by pyrote · · Score: 1

      kudos, I wish I could help, but alas, my focus is graphics.

      Nice to hear your actually thinking about a project like that

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    8. Re:Now I've seen it all by tuxedo-steve · · Score: 2, Funny
      ... a development manager who can't understand why you don't call virtuals from a constructor...
      Why cant you call virtuals from a constructor?

      You've given yourself away... let's see who's really behind this comment!

      (rips off mask)

      It's Old Mr Withers, Gamespy's development manager! Take him away, boys.
      --
      - SMJ - (It's not just a name: it's a bad aftertaste.)
    9. Re:Now I've seen it all by reaper20 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      /me waits to get flamed by crt and Walla now

      Let them flame, you did the right thing. Quakespy was awesome. Early Gamespy's were good. Hate to flame them but they deserve it.

      Then, through some sort of Realplayer-esque type move, it turned to crapware. Around the same time Planet* multiplied to 5 billion useless clones - now it's top flash banner, bottom ani gif, and 2 skyscraper flashes framing a 10x10 area of content. Gamespy Arcade, why? Meanwhile, Radiospy, which was actually cool, is "off the air". Get my GamespyID to download a patch "exclusively hosted" by Fileplanet? Go fuck yourselves.

      Gamespy now infects games all over the place, and it really sucks. NWN's ingame server is "powered by Gamespy", and let me tell you, it's a UI nightmare.

      I want the old Planetquake back - and before someone gives me the sob story on how hard it is to make it on the net/we got hosed by advertisers/bandwidth is expensive blah blah, Steve's been doing it without selling his soul, and building a kickass gaming community - and when he got in trouble, his users paid off a substantial amount of bills. Keep selling out users Gamespy, I won't miss you.

    10. Re:Now I've seen it all by hackerjoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why cant you call virtuals from a constructor?

      in C++ you can, but it's a bad idea because if someone overrides that function things may not work as expected:

      #include <iostream>
      struct A {A() {foo();} virtual void foo() {std::cout << "in A::foo" << std::endl;}};
      struct B: public A {virtual void foo() {std::cout << "in B::foo" << std::endl;}};

      executing the constructor B() produces the output "in A::foo", despite the fact that B overrides A's foo. this happens for the perfectly logical reason that since B hasn't been constructed yet, you can't call any of its methods, but it can be quite confusing. a parallel argument applies to destructors.

    11. Re:Now I've seen it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      communist bastard who blasts gamespy for *gasp* charging money for a product that people value enough to pay for.

    12. Re:Now I've seen it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want the old Planetquake back

      Part of the old Planetquake still lives and is doing quite well. Speed Demos Archive.

      Though we've also been subjected to gamespy's crappy new policies, where else could we get 1 GB of disk space for free?

    13. Re:Now I've seen it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1GB if diskspace is CHEAP these days. Under 2 frigg'n bucks. Can't you spring for that?!

    14. Re:Now I've seen it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though I, a lowly A.C., do not have the mad skillz to help, I would highly recommend placing your offer somewhere a few degrees more visible... I would _love_ to see somebody agree to work with you to create such a fanstastic-sounding program.

      Good luck!

    15. Re:Now I've seen it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no!@ slander u fag#!!# LOLOLLOL keke ^_^

    16. Re:Now I've seen it all by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      +1 Bloody Hilarious =)

    17. Re:Now I've seen it all by Kashif+Shaikh · · Score: 1

      Truth be told, the company has always been run by a man who truly couldn't care less about customers, a development manager who can't understand why you don't call virtuals from a constructor, and a project lead who thinks UI coding is the end-all-be-all of computer science.

      People who think UI coding is computer science should be lined up and killed. UI is like fat: it shrinks and grows. When was the last time UI was discussed in an OS class?

      Put them together and you end up with very little experience trying to manage a product that has long since outlived its usefulness.

      As a person who has been using GameSpy services every since Quake came out, I can say that what you say is true. I mean ever since "Gamespy Industries" came to existence, Gamespy has gone down into the gutter. With the dozens and dozens of planetfuck sites, ad-ridden Gamespy arcade, and now the line-up Fileplanet(subscription service)...Gamespy has moved from what once had humble origins to corporate fuck up.

      Take for instance Gamespy Arcade. It is a novel idea, in that you can play webbie games and other fav. games from one client /w integrated IE web browser. They took the online game service models(M$ zone, Sega Heat, etc) and placed it coveniently under one app. But the point that pisses me off in Gamespy Arcade is simply the fact of those fuck-filled almost-full-screen ads. They force you to watch and wait for the ads(before the 'X' is enabled).

      When I want to play a game like Quake3, I want to quickly browse the list, check available servers, and join. GSA prevents this, and makes everything time-consuming to the point that I'm not in the "mood" to play anymore.

      Another quibble about Gamespy Industries(yes I want to really bash those fuckers), is they were one of the first big gaming sites to implement(badly) Flash-based ads. I remember the day Xbox was launched...I went to www.gamespy.com only to be served with a FULL-SCREEN fucking ad about Xbox. This was followed by lots of Taco-bell ads that fly across the screen where I difficulty of closing them(small 'x').

      This is when Gamespy became to corporatish for me, and I realized they didn't give a hootnany about gamers.

    18. Re:Now I've seen it all by Genom · · Score: 2

      ...and he would have gotten away with it too...if it hadn't been for you meddling /.ers...

    19. Re:Now I've seen it all by beekr · · Score: 1

      Why would you devote time and effort to developing an OSS alternative to a "product that has long since outlived its usefulness"? Just curious.

    20. Re:Now I've seen it all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Executing arbitrary programs by clicking on URLs sounds kind of dangerous. Why develop such software? It already comes built into IE.

    21. Re:Now I've seen it all by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
      a development manager who can't understand why you don't call virtuals from a constructor
      Since when does one not call virtuals from a constructor? Unless your compiler really sucks and the generated code doesn't set up the vtables before passing control to the constructor (which, in case I forgot to mention it, means your compiler really sucks), it should be fine.
      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    22. Re:Now I've seen it all by Vulture_ · · Score: 1

      Actually, upon further observation, it would seem that even GCC has this behavior! Shame, shame. What can I say; I'm jaded from my Java experience, where all methods are virtual, and the vtables are set up well before the constructor gets invoked.

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    23. Re:Now I've seen it all by Vulture_ · · Score: 1

      That's not logical at all. Since the compiler already knows that you're instantiating B and not A, it already has enough information to set up the vtables appropriately. Why does it need to call the constructor first? IMNSHO, Java gets it right -- the vtables are set up well before the constructor gets called, so calling methods (which are always virtual, unless they are final) always yields the expected (and most useful) results.

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    24. Re:Now I've seen it all by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
      As you may already know, Unreal also uses URLs in the way you describe. It's pretty damn slick too. It also opens the possibility to a single server serving multiple games in (different threads of) the same process. Imagine:
      doom3://doom3.idsoftware.com/ctf/game1
      doom3://doom3.idsoftware.com/dm/slaughterhouse
      ...etc...

      By the way, if you use Java any, I suspect it would make implementation of such a program much easier, thanks to various facilities for manipulating URIs, the serialization system, easy-to-use network APIs, etc. Maybe make a companion "universal master server" program for it, too. Oh, and of course, this would be quite portable.

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    25. Re:Now I've seen it all by Vulture_ · · Score: 1

      Since when did I value GameSpy's products enough to pay for them? I've never paid the bastards a dime!

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

    26. Re:Now I've seen it all by Vulture_ · · Score: 1

      Launching the appropriate game (determined by URI scheme, I assume) and instructing it to attempt to connect to a game server is not executing arbitrary code. It's just like using a common server browser, only this time, you can (maybe) use a Web browser to browse what games are running on the machine, to have a hyperlink to a running game on a Web page that you can just click on to connect to, etc.

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

  15. Re:Liability? Read their TOS. Yes! by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

    A careful read of their TOS leads me to believe they had reason to expect this would happen. (Isn't that the implication you get from reading it?) If they knew or believed it would happen they may not be able to worm out of responsibility based on a disclaimer.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  16. They screwed up - so what? by Bjarne+Bula · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, so they screwed up. They're not the first, and it would surprise me if they were the last. At least we haven't had any major virus targetting online gamers. Yet. (I'm sure the anti-virus makers have some cooking in their skunkworks-labs, to unleash on us once the artifical panic from the JPEG virus blows over.)

    Part of the problem is of course the MS monoculture. Those of us wishing for a wider deployment of Linux (including me) may come to regret that wish, since it will inevitably lead to Linux virii. They will have a harder time of infecting the whole machine, but no doubt some clever cyber-{terrorist,vandal,take-your-pick} will come up with one that does exactly that, sooner or later.

    And as sure as flies home in on shit, MS will take that as an opportunity to tout Palladium and denounce Linux.

    Anyway, the big question is not really how to avoid having software distributions infected, but rather how to encapsulate software. On UNIX and Windows alike, any software you run, will run with the full privilegies of the user (at best) or root (at worst).

    It would seem to me that one interesting future development for Linux (or one of the BSDs, perhaps?) would be to find a non-intrusive way of encapsulating software packages, even at run-time. Let them define what they need access to, and then have an installer grant them rights only to those parts of the system.

    Most software really only needs write access to their own directory, plus perhaps /tmp. Why give them blanket access to everything? Software that manipulates random files could communicate via a system call/trusted library that would combine a file-browser and grant one-shot access outside of the applications "playground" for the specific file-name/directory chosen by the user.

    Oh well...

    1. Re:They screwed up - so what? by pyrote · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Doesn't matter, as a whole, we are moving to a 'computer' mono-culture. Every app is being ported to everything, hell, my palm runs gameboy, and has a simple dos prompt.
      with all of linux's efforts it's only a matter of time someone writes a virii designed to abuse all the windows compatibility software (read:wine), or codes a hybrid.

      eventually no one will care which OS we run, like now, in the handheld market, we don't care which Processor we run. we have ARM, MIPS, PowerPC, SH, and X86.

      It will come down to speed, and at thaat time, everything will talk to each other and virii won't care. it's the future.

      As for permissions, how many newbies will actually run a linux box on a sub user? hell, every XP box I see is run in admin mode. no newbie cares what a particular person or app needs access to... they want plug and play, which means no logging in or out to install crap.

      So there.

      -
      Hey I gave you a nickel, give me my 3 cents back!

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    2. Re:They screwed up - so what? by Dunkalis · · Score: 1

      In XP, permissions are a pain in the ass. Most older programs don't run properly. Compatiability Mode must be run as an admin. MS screwed up their User/Admin structure in XP. There are no groups like in Linux. Oh, I run my XP as admin, and my Linux as user. Its a neccessity to run XP as admin, until the coders catch up.

      --
      Slashdot is a waste of time. I enjoy wasting time.
    3. Re:They screwed up - so what? by pyrote · · Score: 1

      My point is, that XP can be used as a user level OS. (my wife uses mine at that level) but in either OS, odds are, to install you need admin.

      Yes, some programs don't run in user mode if you lock it down too tight, but same as Linux. what I am saying is, a nwbie or John Public doesn't have time or patients to figure out what permissions are required to get his copy of said app to run. Hell, I get pissed at Linux some times just because I have to log in and out so damn much to test a new install and not actually run it as root.

      I disagree that you absolutely have to run XP as admin, but it's sure alot easier. and anyone who has had that experience won't give it up for a little extra security. after all, the smart neighbor kid is just down the lane.

      This mind set is what is causing this epedemic to come. If everyone had an admin over their personal boxes, siting around all day locking crap down it would be easier, but it won't happen.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    4. Re:They screwed up - so what? by vittal · · Score: 2, Informative

      have a look at systrace, which is an attempt at providing a means of reviewing/restricting an application's access to system resources.
      http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/systrace/

      v

    5. Re:They screwed up - so what? by Dirtside · · Score: 2
      with all of linux's efforts it's only a matter of time someone writes a virii
      Wow, that's a first. I've seen the plural of virus written (incorrectly) as "virii", but I've never seen the SINGULAR of "virus" written as anything except "virus" until now. Kudos for expanding the English language! ;)

      All joking aside, "virii" is not any form of the word "virus". I'm not trying to be pedantic, I just can't stand it when otherwise intelligent people make mistakes like this.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    6. Re:They screwed up - so what? by pyrote · · Score: 1

      My point got across....my spelling isn't perfect.

      My apologies go out to all the english majors who find my last post offensive.

      Blame it on the Ritalin.

      Remove blade, perform seppuku.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
    7. Re:They screwed up - so what? by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
      Actually, this is done quite nicely by Java. And just think, it's had this feature for like 7 years now (ie, since day one)...

      Show me a piece of Java code that can get through the Java sandbox without exploiting a bug in a particular implementation (ie, by exploiting a loophole in the security model itself).

      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

  17. Re:Damn.(they Do) by pyrote · · Score: 1

    They Do...
    From TOS

    bla bla... loss caused by a computer or electronic virus, loss of income or ....bla bla blah

    --
    THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
  18. Gamespy by VirexEye · · Score: 1

    Does anyone else find it ironic that people are getting infected through a program called GameSPY?

    1. Re:Gamespy by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Does anyone else find it ironic that people are getting infected through a program called GameSPY?

      And even more so that people are suggesting a program called "The All-Seeing Eye" as the replacement?

      Of course, this isn't funny in itself. GameSpy is a double agent, and the all-seeing eye can't see everything because I keep my webcam unplugged when I run Windows. =/

  19. WARNING: GOATSE.CX LINK IN SIG by tulare · · Score: 1

    I'm going to post under my handle to tell you just what an asshole thing that is to do on your sig line. Some of us don't like to see that kind of shit. Thanks for nothing.

    --
    political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
    1. Re:WARNING: GOATSE.CX LINK IN SIG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. You do realize that guy is ROTFLHAO right now, don't you? 8^D

      HYBTT = Have You Been Trolled Today.

      And yes, I was too because I didn't believe you. However, I think it'd be mighty cooler if they guy didn't blink the picture as part of the magic eye and instead mapped the picture into the magic-eye somehow.

    2. Re:WARNING: GOATSE.CX LINK IN SIG by KnightNavro · · Score: 1

      Heh. You do realize that guy is ROTFLHAO right now, don't you? 8^D So that's the story behind that pic.

  20. Happened before... by josh+crawley · · Score: 2

    Well, aside from the recent MS nimda spreading, wasnt there a virus on the Mac that changed the "dog-ears" type of file around (I read it somewhere about viruses). Turns out that that virus was distributed on commercial disks and spread around the user base. I'd appreciate if somebody knew the name of it....

    Oh well. Stuff like this happens. In this kind of "software world" where everything's connected, I'm amazed this doesnt happen more often (commercial product virite distribution).

  21. Impact is probably relatively minimal by Ryu2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It does not absolve Gamespy of responsibility -- but fortunately the actual impact is now. Nimda only infects servers running IIS as a HTTP server, and I'm sure not many gamers are running IIS on their machines.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:Impact is probably relatively minimal by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it also tries to copy itself to any active network shares and opens your "Guest" account on Windows (should it have one) to administration level access, with no password, as well as random emails to people you know (or may not even know)

      For more information

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  22. Legislation by moankey · · Score: 1

    Well now that there is talk on Capitol Hill that Congress should pass a bill making upper manangement responsible in the wake of Enron, Andersen, MCI, and now Xerox. I think they should also throw something in there stating any software that is downloaded or packaged with the exchange of money then the company should be liable for any virus or spyware involved. Now if its given away for free and does not contain any fee for monthly service such as Open Source then they are absolved.

  23. that's not a virus by the normal definitions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac OS (before X) stores icons in a database. If you copied a file, you copied the icon over also. If you created an icon of the right type it would get substituted for the normal system icons.

    If someone copied a file from your HD they got that new replacement icon along with it. Thus the icons spread.

    But they weren't a traditional virus because there was no code of any kind associated with the icons. No code spreading thus no virus.

    1. Re:that's not a virus by the normal definitions by Mikey-San · · Score: 0

      The only similar "virus" I can recall clearly (CLEARLY) is more of a lame-ass trojan in the form of an AppleScript under Mac OS 7-9.

      Essentially, one could write a script that goes through and deletes everything it can before the user catches on, and paste on the icon of a SimpleText document. Name it "Installer log v2.0.3" and you're all set to screw an "unbright" user:

      on run
      tell application "Finder"
      screwUserSilly()
      end tell
      end run

      on screwUserSilly
      set screwed of user to true
      end screwUserSilly

      -/-
      Mikey-San
      "Moof!"

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
  24. Never Deal With This Problem Again... by toupsie · · Score: 0, Troll
    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  25. Re:Monotony Report 02/06/27 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very nice report, on by! But you should round those real numbers. Two digits after the decimal point should be sufficient.

  26. The plural of "virus" is "viruses" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not "viri", not "virora", and definitely NOT "virii". Please kill yourself, you fucking idiot.

    1. Re:The plural of "virus" is "viruses" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, any term that becomes commonplace can legitamately become a word. Virii has been common for years to refer specifically about infectious computer programs. Atleast since the early 1990s. There's no reason to believe that you wouldn't see this in the OED eventually. Language evolves. You, obviously, have not.

      So sit down, you stuck up prick.

    2. Re:The plural of "virus" is "viruses" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not commonplace. Do a google search.

  27. Gamespy still around? by pod · · Score: 1

    GameSpy used to actually useful (and usable) way back in the QuakeWorld days. It stopped being relevant to me sometime before it got renamed to GameSpy Arcade (or whatever it's called now), and it came with a bunch of useless crap. I never understood the 'scanning the hd' bit... I mean, it knows what games it supports, it knows their registry keys, the whole process should take less than a second, not several minutes. I just added games manually anyways.

    In any case, most games come with their own server browsers; launching a huge ad-riddled app just to connect to a server a pointless excercise.

    So what do people who used GS back in the 'good old days' and still use it have to say about it? Good? Bad?

    --
    "Hot lesbian witches! It's fucking genius!"
    1. Re:Gamespy still around? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah the good ol' days...where the l3373ST f00 would have quake running on their video card(s) (what do you mean Hardware accleration???) and teamfortress was the end-all-be-all....

      Gamespy was god and we were its subjects...

      Now it cant even sell itself for a fuckin dimebag...

  28. Making a mountain out of an ant hill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    GameSpy distributed an IIS/Outlook worm. So what?! GameSpy corrected it and we should move on. Instead we continue to discuss GameSpy. Why should GS and Nimda be a big priority?? If you want something to focus on this check this out...

    PayPal (among other companies) are promoting Providian National Bank for VISA Credit Card services. And, I feel it is reasonable to assume that PayPal customers that get the Providian VISA Card will be using the Providian online services available at https://www.providianservices.com/

    Well... lets break out our friend OpenSSL from the Linux command line:

    $ openssl
    OpenSSL> s_client -connect www.providianservices.com:443
    HEAD / HTTP/1.0

    HTTP/1.1 302 Moved Temporarily
    Server: Netscape-Enterprise/4.1
    Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2002 08:59:59 GMT
    Location: /NASApp/ola/base/Login
    Content-length: 0
    Content-type: text/html
    Connection: close

    Hey! What do we have here? A web server that is over 2 years old.
    Who is responsable for security patches? IPlanet was but they closed up shop in March 17, 2002.
    And...in May of 2002, even Netscape's own www.netscape.com stopped using Netscape-Enterprise as a web server!

    So... Providian Services Online (which is promoted by PayPal) is using an outdated web server to decrypt SSL packets related to credit card accounts and Slashdot users should be conserned about... GameSpy's temporily distribution of Nimda?!?!

    Thats truely messed up. I rather consern myself with the credit card company that is continuing to screw up online than a game company that already resolved it's screw up.

  29. EULA jargon by lysacor · · Score: 1

    Regardless of the legal ramifications and waivers there is still a responsibility of the server host to provide software that is free of damging components, say for instance someone sells you a car knowing that the car has major carbon monoxide emissions problem with seepage into the cabin, and has faulty brake lines that are just barely kept together... welcome to the Lemon Law, most judges will have the dealer buy back the car for the cost it was sold for, not the off-the-lot price, well if someone were to take gamespy to court under the auspices that they provided software which did the damages that it is well known for, yes there is really no legal remedy at hand to provide any kind of relief for the plaintiff, however it would prove that they are responsible for the files they serve from their webservers. Just food for thought

    1. Re:EULA jargon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what you're talking about is the implied warranty of fitness for purpose, or of merchantability. and with the car example, the judge just voids the contract, and returns the funds paid.

      here, were talking about files with viruses. assume the contract (EULA) is effective and binding. you might have a valid implied warranty claim against the company, but what would you gain? expenses would surpass any potential recovery. Now, if you could prove that gamespy knew of the viruses and did nothing about them, you might bypass your contract claim and sue under negligence theory - at least there damages are greater. The key here is though: does the company have a duty to not distribute files with viruses? it would seem like common sense but legally it's a tough call. there is absolutely zero legislation on the subject, and duty is not always an easy thing to attach to people. if you could make an argument that gamespy has a duty to protect their end users and by that i mean not distribute viruses, then you would have a case. however, straight up contract, it's tough.

  30. hello dear slashdot friends, i have a story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fade in...
    john carmack just got fingered.
    fade to black...

  31. LOL by sinserve · · Score: 1

    Click on the link in his sig, it is a small picture :-)

  32. WHEW!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For a moment there, I was afraid the headline said "Gamespy Installer Spreads Ninjas!"

  33. Xbox Meets Gamespy Meets Nimda by Scotch+Game · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My girlfriend's kids downloaded GameSpy yesterday, ironically, so they could hook the Xbox up to the router and look for other Halo devotees. And they succeeded.

    They also succeeded in hosing two W2K systems on our home network via the file share traversal vulnerability. One was my girlfriend's system, the only one with out-of-date virus protection and, of course, the only unprotected machine with truly irreplaceable files. Sigh.

    Well, I downloaded AVG and it's getting clean as I type this, but I thought it might be of interest to those who posted saying that only those machines running IIS can be infected. That ain't the truth. The two infected machines on this network were W2K systems, neither of them running IIS. They were just poorly monitored and vulnerable.

    It's /., actually, posting this story that made me realize the source of my pain. And for that I say thanks, because for those of you that said so-what-big-deal, well, it's true that this didn't really constitute a national emergency but, speaking now from experience, I can honestly say that NIMDA SUCKS.

    But here's the rundown: I've got nine machines networked here at home, four W2Ks, four Linux, and one Xbox. Well, two of the W2Ks met Nimda first hand, but two others didn't since all of the extant fileshares require logons. Email wasn't a factor, and on the one W2K system that IS running IIS and was potentially vulnerable to attack, well, I've got all the latest patches installed and everything on that machine is clean.

    The Linux boxes, of course, didn't even raise an eyebrow ...

    Peace.

    1. Re:Xbox Meets Gamespy Meets Nimda by Vulture_ · · Score: 1
      One was my girlfriend's system, the only one with out-of-date virus protection and, of course, the only unprotected machine with truly irreplaceable files.
      You, a Linux user, willfully keep irreplaceable data on a Windows box? Perhaps you should rethink that practice.
      The Linux boxes, of course, didn't even raise an eyebrow ...
      Maybe we could use this as a Linux success story to the unwashed masses?
      --

      The only way the typical /.er can pick up a chick is with a forklift. -- AC

  34. Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate Gamespy for buying some of the best websites out there and turning them to shit. I hate Gamespy for releasing an inferior product and doing some fancy corporate manuvering to make it ubiquitous. They have no quality control whatsoever, and this is just a shining example of their horrible product development process in action. Testing? What is that? Does that cost money?

  35. So what is GameSpy? by MrLinuxHead · · Score: 1

    So what is GameSpy? All I can see so far is a battle over EULA's. What does GameSPy do fer me?

    --
    I may be bad with names, but I'll never forget your IP address
    1. Re:So what is GameSpy? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      A great time saver for lazy game programming teams.

      Basically, it's a tool for helping people to find company for multi-user games. Back in the day, games didn't have in-game server lists and things like that (QuakeWorld and like are a good examples); The program lets you find servers to play on and launch the game to go directly to that server.

      Less relevant now that game companies implement this internally, but some game companies still think "what the heck, let's just implement 'connect to that IP' and let GameSpy or other such tools to do the rest"...

  36. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  37. Re:MSN and Redhat respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FUCK! My fucking EYES! God DAMN that fucking slashdot url shower! FUUUUUUUUCK YOOOOOOOOU, man!

  38. And this is why... by pne · · Score: 2

    And this is why you're supposed to use your email address as a password when doing anonymous FTP. The theory is that if you downloaded something that later turns out to have a virus or some other problem, the server owner can contact those who downloaded the faulty software.

    In practice, that probably doesn't happen all too often, but it's still a good idea IMO. Using "mozilla@" as a password doesn't really help the server owner when he needs to get an urgent message across related to a file you downloaded.

    --
    Esli epei etot cumprenan, shris soa Sfaha.
  39. SirCam!! by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny
    The obvious choice for Gamespy should have been the Sircam virus. You're playing Unreal II and all of a sudden this girl shows up.... just before she blows you away she says:
    Hi! How are you?

    I destroy you in order to have your advice.

    See you later. Thanks

  40. Liability? Err, sorry, it looks like we could be. by drbhoneydew · · Score: 1

    However, also from the Gamespy website:
    Some U.S. states and foreign countries provide rights in addition to those above, or do not allow excluding or limiting implied warranties, or liability for incidental or consequential damages. Therefore, the above limitations may not apply to you or there may be state provisions that supersede the above. Any clause declared invalid shall be deemed severable and not affect the validity or enforceability of the remainder. These terms are governed by the laws of the State of California and may only be amended in a writing signed by GameSpy Industries.

    In addition, there are also a number of legal challenges to EULA's and the like (although I'm not sure whether any have succeeded yet) - see here and here, for example

    I don't know whether any applicable laws apply in the States, but the UK has laws which effectively mean that even though you've put up a sign saying you can't have something (eg refunds in shops), it doesn't have any legal bearing over your statutory rights.

    Other laws apply which require companies to have signs in prominent positions - preventing vehicle clamping firms from stealth clamping. The legal stuff link on their home page is right at the bottom corner - you have to scroll right down (well past the files link) to even see it. OK, we'll let them off, so long as the files page has a prominent link. Erm, not quite - again right at the bottom, this time wrapped in a font size=-2 tag. Well done chaps.

    Not that the people who downloaded it didn't have any responsibility to run a virus scan of their download, of course. However, you do expect a "reputable" company that you get files from should prevent this from happening in the first place. It just adds a little touch of irony to the little check box found in the security warning popup which appears when you go here Always trust content from Gamespy Industries, Inc.

    For a look at how EULA's should be, check the SVLA at CEXX.org

  41. was it in the TOS? by cheesyfru · · Score: 2

    It's okay, though.. I'm sure the people who hacked the Nimda into the program also added a disclaimer into the Terms of Service for the software. After all, it's just another virus that gets installed when you install "free" software...

  42. Very simple solution by Wouter+Van+Hemel · · Score: 1

    ...Install something unix-like on their servers?


    HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request
    Server: Microsoft-IIS/5.0


    No, it's not a anti-micro$oft troll, well, maybe, yes, but it really would be the solution, wouldn't it? :)

  43. Ironic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of spy distributes viruses besides James Bond with his STD collection?

  44. GameSpy Revision History by keller999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Arcade 1.1b This version of Arcade, released on June 28, 2002, included the following changes: - Removed nasty NIMBA virus - Fired security admin

  45. Inside Gamespy by peekaboo82 · · Score: 0

    From what my friends tell me about gamespy (I know people who work there and I attend the company lan parties), it's run by a bunch of kids who love to play games, but they have no business or software development experience. There's also a bunch of weird stuff going on inside their engineering group.

    The project lead for Arcade is a spaghetti-coder who does nothing all day, but meets deadlines by hitting a meth pipe all weekend to hack out masses of buggy code that gets released to customers on monday. This is the guy that does the bloated Arcade user interface. He and his "wife" are closet homosexuals that use each other as beards. The married couple live with the wife's girlfriend who is a well-known female quake player.

    Their head of engineering is a sexually frustrated 24 year old virgin who spends 22 hours a day at work, half of it late at night surfing for porn. I hear there's a betting pool inside Gamespy for when this guy is gonna get laid. Coworkers are praying it'll be soon so he'll chill out and stop being so uptight. He dropped out of school and got hired at Gamespy, but he's never worked at a software company before! This guy hired the Arcade programming team.

    So with an engineering group like that, is it any wonder that they could be incompetent enough to release Arcade with a virus?

    It's too bad because the original Arcade (Gamespy 3D) and the planetquake.com website worked well. There's nothing wrong with Gamespy making money, but Mark Surfas could have at least hired some real programmers.

    ...PB82

    1. Re:Inside Gamespy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like they gotta lot of characters in there!

  46. Mod Parent Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a troll. I can't believe what idiot mods we have somedays. Why am I posting AC? Because some stupid mod that likes NIN decided that a direct quote attributed to the source was flamebait. Killed my Karma of 4.

  47. Re:MSN and Redhat respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All those links did was say "Connection refused while attempting to contact goatse.cx"

    Post a correct link, please.

  48. A good solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    do all your gaming in Linux, that's what I do. most games have pretty good in game browsers, plus there are other options such as Xqf that do all gamespy does, save for the viruses. plus, no registration required!

    P

  49. Responsibility? by sracer9 · · Score: 2

    What responsibility does Gamespy have to the users who downloaded the infected file?"

    About the same as Microsoft I would guess...

    (Remembering the recent slashdot story where .net CD's were shipped infected with a worm)

    --

    No thanks. I don't smoke anymore.
  50. This isn't the first time that this has happened by supremebob · · Score: 1

    This certainly isn't the first time that an online service has distributed viruses to it's users.

    Back in 1998, an online gaming service called mplayer.com (which, coincidently, is now owned by gamespy) distributed copies of the W95.CIH virus through it's automated software update system. The sad thing is that the company never admitted to it until it's users started complaining to gaming news sites about getting infected.

    Another more recent example is an outbreak of Nimda in Kazaa, which was being distributed through the 1.7.1 upgrade installers of their software.

    Anyway, these stories are just two more reasons why you should run updated Anti-Virus scanners 24/7 on your Windows boxes.

  51. Mod this guy WAY up. by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    Wow... He's right!!!

    Unless I'm missing something, he's got a really good point here.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  52. fix yer firewall!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 3 zones behind the OpenBSD firewall. One is for my kid. I firewalled his W2K boxen from my systems. Its sad when you have to do this... sad from a LOT of perspectives.

    He's a bright boy, but he doesn't understand why people would "write a virus". He's also been know to leave the car running on the street with the doors unlocked. One day his car will drive away and he will proclaim "I wonder why that happened".

    I can only say that Experiance is a good teacher and fools learn by no other method.

    1. Re:fix yer firewall!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your son is a 'tard

  53. This can be accomplished via a Partition Dataset by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    I've been suggesting the development of a "partition Dataset" concept for quite a while now. Basically this maps the directories and files into a single file. You can think of it as an application specific chroot, with the idea that the loopback is application specific.

    The time has come where we really need this and your post illustrates very clearly why we need to get this done ASAP. Linux is almsot ready for the desktop and the idiots out there are going to wreak havock with any security we might try to build into systems.

    The weakest link is the end user and we really need to design systems that are so tight that even they have trouble f*ing them up.

  54. Back in the day... by Psyko · · Score: 0

    This kind of thing has been happening for years without any recource from the companies that sent out the virus's. I remember a couple of years back when IBM was doing their big ebusiness security marketing campaign, the RS6000 configurator tool had a virus in it for like 4 builds in a row.

    The first time I came across it I put calls into IBMLink (that's where you download the app from), and the Rs6000 software support center and still nothing was done about it. 3 releases (about 5 months) later the virus was not included in the build anymore.

    --
    01:36AM up 426 days, 2:46, 1 user, load average: 0.14, 0.11, 0.05
  55. People are damn stupid by billybobthorton · · Score: 1

    I love Gamespy, they have supported the industry much more than any other company ive ever seen, and hey, if you get Nimda its your own damn fault, there is software called "antivirus software", it normally helps with this sort of thing. If you run windows and dont have AV software, your an f'ing idiot and deserve what you get. Hell, you can scan it for free online (housecall.antivirus.com, no this it not a plug i just use it for my customers who are too cheap to buy software). Get a life, if you have a computer chances are you have had a virus, nimda has an easy fix ..

  56. Better Alternative to GameSpy by Snover · · Score: 1

    Kali -- it does dynamic list updating, it is ad-free, and they're offering free registrations now. It's a far superior game browser.

    --

    [insert witty comment here]