Slashdot Mirror


Apache Binaries Available for PS2 Linux

cant_get_a_good_nick writes: "From ApacheWeek, probably the best net resource for Apache, comes the announcement of a binary build of Apache 2.0.39 for PS2 Linux. You too can have a server farm for web serving, and GTA3. Be nice and don't kill this guy's downloads page."

183 comments

  1. What about xbox by rossz · · Score: 0, Troll

    We need it on the Xbox to make that microsoft junk useful.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
  2. Hmmmm... by nixchick · · Score: 0

    I hope it's the latest apache, otherwise your PS2 might get owned! ;)

    1. Re:Hmmmm... by damiam · · Score: 1

      It is. RTFA.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  3. Neet. by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of course, if you really just want low cost, Old PCs or laptops (to get low power consumption) would probably be a better bet. I use an old 200mhz P1 for my linux mail server, and it has more ram then the ps2 :P

    Now as far as coolness factor, OTOH...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Neet. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually read this as being for ps/2 linux, which
      is I guess is probably called MCA linux. Them's pretty cheap!

    2. Re:Neet. by jhoffoss · · Score: 2
      Now as far as coolness factor, OTOH...
      You could always take apart the PC and put it together in a pizza box or something for the coolness factor...
      --
      Linux: The world's best text-adventure game.
  4. Webserver by SpatchMonkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So what? You might as well get a decent webserver box than waste your PS2s superior graphics capabilities on just dishing out webpages.

    Another bizarre, ridiculous and completely useless application of the technology.

    1. Re:Webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But just think about the possibilities ... 3D gourad shaded hit counters!

    2. Re:Webserver by PacoTaco · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, this is Slashdot. If I got my ass to run Linux, they'd post that too. :)

    3. Re:Webserver by WasterDave · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Another bizarre, ridiculous and completely useless application of the technology.

      Which is exactly why it's so cool.

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    4. Re:Webserver by SpatchMonkey · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's only 'cool' because it's Linux and Apache.

      Anyone want to try Windows XP and IIS on a PS2? Didn't think so.

    5. Re:Webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone want to try Windows XP and IIS on a PS2? Didn't think so.

      Is that even remotely possible? Didn't think so.

    6. Re:Webserver by SquierStrat · · Score: 2

      Nobody cares to try it because everyone knows that it is technically impossible. Where's the fun in trying to do something you know you can't do??? :-) Sides, who wants to waste good technology on windows? ;-)

      --
      Derek Greene
    7. Re:Webserver by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Another bizarre, ridiculous and completely useless application of the technology."

      Only if you have no imagination. At work, there's a rack-mount web server that's basically an appliance that somebody bought for used for $300. They say it originally cost over $2,000. The nice thing about this type of appliance is that it has few parts to go bad on it. However, it does suffer from lack of features. (It's basically just an HTTP server, no PHP support etc...)

      Well, they got Apache running on a PS2. That means that PHP and all those other fun features of it will (presumably) work as well. I don't think it's too far away from burning a DVD, popping it in the PS2, turning it on, and boom you have a webserver running. The neat thing is that this $199 (new, and will always get cheaper) device should, in theory, stay up to date with Apache.

      PS2's will eventually go the way of the Dreamcast, and will reach ridiculously low ($50) prices. Personally, I'd rather set one of those things up once and reboot once in a while rather than having to maintain a machine with failing hard-drives and so on. If the thing breaks, buy it with one of those 1 year warranties for $20 and have them swap out with a new one. Heh. I bet you can't get a web appliance with that kinda guarantee! Setup is a breeze!

      I'm tempted to look into how to build a PC that boots off a flash card so I can remove all of the moving parts from it. That'd last forever, I bet. Actually, if anybody knows of a good place to find that info, fire a link to me. (I'll do a Google search later, but I'd much rather hear from somebody who's gone down that road.) In the mean time, I have finally found an interesting use for a PS2!

      Cheers.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Webserver by discstickers · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      you know, if i posted a link to a certain goat-releated site, i just might be ontopic.

      --
      I have a shitty sig!
    9. Re:Webserver by SpatchMonkey · · Score: 1

      I see what you're saying, but I really do think you overestimate the practical applications of such a device. Reading webpages from the DVD drive would be slow under moderate usage (because of large seek times) and read-only.

      Either that or you are limited to a very small website, of say only 16 Mb (the other 16M being used for Linux, Apache, etc.)

      And it is still a huge waste of such a device. You could build a webserver that does the same thing (read-only small website) for much less than the price of a PS2. Like the LART project, for example.

    10. Re:Webserver by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Thanks for posting the LART link, I'm looking at it now.

      I envisioned that the pages would be served up from a small 8-meg RAM disk.

      You bring up an excellent point about the limitations of the machine. I wasn't picturing a huge site in my mind, I was picturing something like a small 'brochure' kind of site. Don't they make a 40-gig hard-drive for the PS-2, though?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:Webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and even if you were successful, I think Microsoft would have something to say about it.

    12. Re:Webserver by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      You are an absolute genius.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    13. Re:Webserver by WasterDave · · Score: 2

      http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT2614444132. html

      http://www.soekris.com/

      Dave

      --
      I write a blog now, you should be afraid.
    14. Re:Webserver by Verizon+Guy · · Score: 1

      Actually, Windows NT 4.0 used to run on MIPS... I wonder if that IS possible?

      Anyone up to the challenge?

      --

      Aw, fuck it. Let's go bowling. - The Big Lebowski

    15. Re:Webserver by Nakago4 · · Score: 0

      but the problem with that is the PS2 won't read your burned dvds or cds for data unless you modchip it

    16. Re:Webserver by Afrosheen · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah the linux ps2 kit comes with a keyboard, mouse, vga-adapter cable, hard drive, toothpaste and sony branded comb. That way you can look as good as you feel.

    17. Re:Webserver by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Still begging for a new moderation option folks:

      -1 Stupid

      Posts like the parent are living proof of a dire need for this option. Everyone knows that the ps2 linux kit comes with a hard drive by now, and adding a larger one is probably a trivial task.

    18. Re:Webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The PS2's not good technology though.

      The design's bloody awful!

    19. Re:Webserver by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Umm, that was actually praise.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    20. Re:Webserver by LinuxIsDyingGuy · · Score: 0

      Nice sig.

    21. Re:Webserver by phunhippy · · Score: 2

      I have finally found an interesting use for a PS2!

      Hmmmm what about PS2 games? :)

    22. Re:Webserver by Second_Derivative · · Score: 1

      32 days!?

      You DO realize your sig is probably setting off uptime pissing wars all over Slashdot, right? ;) (59 days on my Lin 2.2 133MHz webserver btw. It has never been rebooted before, at least, not in its current incarnation)

    23. Re:Webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >So what? You might as well get a decent webserver box than waste your
      >PS2s superior graphics capabilities on just dishing out webpages.
      >Another bizarre, ridiculous and completely useless application of the
      >technology.
      >
      Pissed off that the PS2 is getting *REAL* applications while the Xbox "effort" is producing nothing but vapor?

    24. Re:Webserver by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      THey are $199? Man.
      The thieves here are still trying to charge about $900.

    25. Re:Webserver by Badassmofo · · Score: 1

      "The neat thing is that this $199 (new, and will always get cheaper) device should, in theory, stay up to date with Apache." ...

      "Personally, I'd rather set one of those things up once and reboot once in a while rather than having to maintain a machine with failing hard-drives and so on."

      Actually, to run this, you also need the PS2 Linux Kit (another $200), which comes with a hard drive and ethernet adapter. So in the end, you end up with a $400 machine with potentially failing hard drives, exactly what you were trying to avoid. Not to mention a slow processor and a severely limited amount of RAM. Very cool little setup to play with and learn from, though...

    26. Re:Webserver by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Doesn't modding your PS2 like this void the warranty, though?

    27. Re:Webserver by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Where are you? Australia?

      (Seriously interested, not being sarcastic)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    28. Re:Webserver by The_dev0 · · Score: 1

      No mate, according to the ad I saw last night during the Simpsons we are talking $399 for the PS2.

      --
      Never fight naked, unless you're in prison...
    29. Re:Webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a 300 MIP CPU it's not particularly fast though. It's not cost efficient.

    30. Re:Webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, IIRC flash cards have a maximum amount of times they can be written to. Something like 10 million writes/erases.

    31. Re:Webserver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not trying to burst anyone's bubble... but considering that i have linux on my PS2... linux does not boot off the DVD.

      The DVD includes the run time environment which boots the linux kernel off a memory card, which then mounts the hard drive as the root device.

      So no.... it isn't going to cost $200 (current price of the playstation) for each web server.

      You will have to buy a linux kit for each and every web server.. which is $200...

      And of course you need a dedicated memory card for the kernel also.

      Than you have to go through a 30 min install on each one...

      Don't get me wrong, I LOVE LOVE LOVE the linux kit on it but people are always talking about it and have no clue about how locked up tight Sony keeps certain internal workings of the PS2 hidden.

      The ONE AND ONLY reason anyone would need this Linux kit is so they can learn how to program the Emotion graphics engine for the purpose of employment or curosity.

  5. Woah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I can set up a webserver on my PS2 and visit it with my Dreamcast! Once they get the Xbox running linux, we'll be all set.

    1. Re:Woah by kyndig · · Score: 1

      Leave it to generation Y2K to bring networking to a whole new level.

      --
      My Thoughts, Kyndig
    2. Re:Woah by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Now I can set up a webserver on my PS2 and visit it with my Dreamcast! Once they get the Xbox running linux, we'll be all set."

      Three web-servers?

      Can't the Dreamcast handle the load of both your friends visiting it? Heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Woah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, silly. The Dreamcast is just for web browsing. The PS2 runs Apache, which would be connected to an IMAP/SMTP mail server running on the Xbox running linux (possibly with some sort of DNS cache, too.)

    4. Re:Woah by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Heh I figured it was something like that. I was goin for a +1 Funny. Wasn't that funny tho. Oh well... :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    5. Re:Woah by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

      Yes, but us DC users have been running apache for over a year. About time you visted us on your jonnie-come-lately console. Bah!

  6. Re:Can you even imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes I can imagine. It's called a "server farm".

  7. $W33t by dotgod · · Score: 2, Funny

    bUt wh3n wIll I b3 abl3 to s3rVe mY WaR3z fr0m mY l337 PaNa$0n|c 3D0?

    1. Re:$W33t by Enrico+Pulatzo · · Score: 1

      I think comments should automatically get a +1 funny if someone takes the time to type out decent leetspeak.

  8. Like that will ever happen by Rob.Mathers · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Be nice and don't kill this guys downloads page."
    That's like standing in front of the running of the bulls and asking for them to spare you -- it's just not going to happen! :P

    --

    My other sig is funny!
    1. Re:Like that will ever happen by geekd · · Score: 1

      Yeah. "Here's the link. be nice and don't click on it!"

      Now that's responsible journalism. :)

    2. Re:Like that will ever happen by hydrofi · · Score: 1

      Isn't it more like shouting to a herd of bulls "IF YOU NOTICE ME PLEASE DON'T RUN OVER ME!" so they sure will notice you and sure will get mad to you and sure will run over you? I believe most of the readers wouldn't even have checked out the page if there wasn't request not to slashdot the page..

  9. kill the server? by r00tarded · · Score: 1

    i hope this is finally the showdown between the slashdot effect and a bank of ps2's.

  10. Smile! by nixchick · · Score: 0

    It was just meant to be a joke hon. Chill out! ;)

    1. Re:Smile! by damiam · · Score: 2

      I agree with the AC. It wasn't funny.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  11. Why is this newsworthy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apache 2 has compiled cleanly on PS2 linux since its release.

  12. Re:1? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, "Neo" is an anagram for "one".
    Did you know that "Trinity" is an anagram for "try it in"?

  13. XBOX by Pi314592 · · Score: 1

    PS2 apache might be nice, but since you have to buy the special ps2 from sony for more money than a regular ps2 anyway, i would rather buy a computer.. until i can run linux on an XBOX anyways

    --
    [img]http://www.danasoft.com/sig/Digerati.jpg[/img ]
    1. Re:XBOX by DoctorGrim · · Score: 1

      I believe the Linux PS2's are 199$ also.

  14. I'm waiting for the xBox. by Guspaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The PS2 is great and all, but it's cost effectiveness for power is not matched by the XBox. The PlayStation 2 also costs a lot more than an XBox after you consider the cost of both the PS2 _and_ the overly restrictive Linux kit.

    Regards, Adam.

    1. Re:I'm waiting for the xBox. by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Wow you have a good point there. The cost effectiveness of the PS2 isn't matched by the XBox, a run-of-the-mill, cut-down pc which COMPLETELY LACKS THE ABILITY TO RUN LINUX OR APACHE at this time.

      If you hadn't noticed yet, the PS2 can run linux and Sony supports it. OTOH, the XBox can't run linux and MS will never support it, in reality, they've done all they can to prevent it thus far.

      Let's do some more comparisons if/when the XBox runs linux and there's a post about Apache running on linux/Xbox ok?

    2. Re:I'm waiting for the xBox. by Bogatyr · · Score: 2

      I believe Esther Dyson said once (going from memory so it may not be a direct quote, but a close paraphrase):
      "If you wait, there will always be a cheaper and faster computer later. But while you wait you have nothing." I see a PS2/Linux box acting as a webserver today. I don't see the XBox doing the same.

    3. Re:I'm waiting for the xBox. by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Actually, the X-box runs Linux - there's a /. article about it on the front page as we speak.

      Foot, meet mouth. You're gonna be spending a lot of time together.

    4. Re:I'm waiting for the xBox. by Zebbers · · Score: 1

      Actually, thats not a linux program. Just a generic proof of concept program from the xboxlinux team.

      Foot, meet mouth. You're gonna be spending a lot of time together.

  15. Being the one who sometimes submits kernel updates by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 3, Funny

    now I see it from the flamers' perspective... WOO-HOO. Oh looky looky, someone said the word "Linux". Let's post it on Slashdot! Whoah, someone actually downloaded a file, ran configure, and built a binary? Like everyone else in the world does? WOW! ... Ok. I'm not trying to be flamebait here, but ... it's that easy. ./configure --prefix=~/package/usr make make install tar czvf apache.tgz ~/package/* ... and presto-chango. You have a file called apache.tgz, which you unzip in / and you have apache. /me ducks from the mods, and hopes for well-done M2...

    --pi

  16. comon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    example from /.

    "A guy is running apache on a timex watch!! heres the link to his site"

    5 hits later, the site goes down.

    angry /.'er everwhere:

    a) "its /.'ed"
    b) "heres the google cache, gimme karma now!"

    comon ppl...

    1. Re:comon... by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      You forgot the other option:

      c) clever link to goatse.cx disguised as a google cache link along with the words "frist pots!!!"

  17. Rack Mount Kit? by peterdaly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, now its time for someone to come out with the Rack Mount Kit for the Linux edition of the PS2, complete with mounting for HD etc.

    How else is one supposed to make a decent server farm out of these? Has anyone done any serious benchmarking of Linux on this hardware? What's the price/performace for one of these doing (tiff to) pnm to png conversions? (I have the need for small cluster for that, have been looking into AMD's)

    I am only half joking.

    -Pete

    1. Re:Rack Mount Kit? by user+no.+590291 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Sadaam Hussein going to do that for his nuclear weapons program?

    2. Re:Rack Mount Kit? by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      Well, look at this too: Dreamcast vs. PS2

      Although it is harder to find the broadband adapter. But getting a DC for ~$50 brings the price to $150, plus no mod chip.

  18. I was considering getting a kit by nixchick · · Score: 1, Funny

    I thought about getting one of these kits for our PS2. But then I realised that while I'm messing around on the PC my boyfriend can play games which keeps him quiet. If I started hogging the playstation he wouldn't have anything to do ;)

    Maybe we should just buy another PS2 now that they've come down in price so much....no there's an idea!

    1. Re:I was considering getting a kit by ebbomega · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Interesting how incredibly sexually repressed some of these trolls are, considering they automatically think that anyone female is lying because... *gasp* "WOMMEN CAN"T UZE COMPUTARZ!!!!!!1"

      My apologies for feeding the trolls. But this one is just plain desperate. Dude. Turn off the screen, go out and find yourself a date before you masturbate yourself into oblivion. You're gonna go blind, dude.

      --
      Karma: Non-Heinous
    2. Re:I was considering getting a kit by valmont · · Score: 2


      i have no idea what you look like but ... marry me!

  19. All well and good by nakaduct · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does the distribution include mod_chip?

    1. Re:All well and good by bhsx · · Score: 1

      HAHAHA... that's the third time I read this and finally got it :) Where the hell are my mod points when i need them?

      --
      put the what in the where?
    2. Re:All well and good by jfunk · · Score: 2

      In mod_points, of course.

  20. Awesome! by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is just what I bought my PS2 for!!!!!

    Oh wait.

    No.

    It was to play "Gran Turismo".

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I think "Gran Turismo 3" is much better, call me a quality wh0r3 if you must!

  21. We'll Behave by great+throwdini · · Score: 1

    Be nice and don't kill this guy's downloads page.

    As deterrant as telling children they may get their own cookies from the jar, but to take only one.

  22. GTA3 and webserving? by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

    "You too can have a server farm for web serving, and GTA3."

    Well you don't really need a PS2 running Linux to do that. Just use a Windows 2000 box running Apache, then you can serve web pages while playing GTA 3.

    You can't do that on a PS2!!!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:GTA3 and webserving? by Evil+MarNuke · · Score: 1
      "I hate Linux because it made me type man mount."

      I like it because I can finger twatt.

      --
      The journey is better then the end.
    2. Re:GTA3 and webserving? by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      No chance... GTA3 is a HEAVY game and I'm pretty sure apache is not very light, and running them BOTH on a M$ Windoze box might be too much...

      --
      ^_^
    3. Re:GTA3 and webserving? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      It wouldn't be that bad unless the site got slashdotted. Most of GTA3's slowdown comes from drawing the graphics, not from calculating stuff. A faster video card would = smoother frame rate.

      Too bad the game's not as fancy as Quake when it comes to settings. It does NOT degrade gracefully.

      It wouldn't take much horsepower to get Apache to spit out a page within 90 seconds.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:GTA3 and webserving? by Coke+in+a+Can · · Score: 0

      Bah, am I the only one running GTA3 on a Celeron? That game runs like horsesh!t, but it's my video card. I can run at 640x480x16, or 1024x768x32, and I still get six frames per second (ooh, aah)!

    5. Re:GTA3 and webserving? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      I'm running a 1.2 gig Athlon at 640 by 480 by 16, it goes pretty slow too. When things are clear, it goes relatively smooth. Once it starts raining, I get like 5 fps. Seriously. I'm running a Geforce 4 MX.

      I'm sure it's my card.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:GTA3 and webserving? by Cubeman · · Score: 0

      I'm running 1.7 GHz P4 at 800x600 by 32, and it has absolutely no slowdown nor choppiness, and I have a GeForce 4 MX 420.

    7. Re:GTA3 and webserving? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Hmm maybe I'm wrong then.

      The game runs just fine until it starts raining, then the cops come after me with the helicopter.

      Unless P4s behave better with Nvidia drivers. I've heard of other cards with 'special optimizations for P4'. No idea if Geforce 4s are part of that or not, though.

      Or I'm just wrong. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:GTA3 and webserving? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe if you had a GeForce4 ;)

      Feature wise the GF4MX is more like an overclocked GeForce 2. My condolences, BTW.

    9. Re:GTA3 and webserving? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Hey, I don't feel bad. The card cost me only $150, and I have a fully accellerated dual monitor setup to boot.

      I was running a Matrox G550, and the 3d on it was HORRID. *Not dissatisfied* :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  23. That's Cool by tealover · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How much RAM does the PS2 have? I'm just wondering how truly effective it can be as a webserver.

    --
    -- You see, there would be these conclusions that you could jump to
    1. Re:That's Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      32MB...see here for the rest of the specs.

    2. Re:That's Cool by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      According to Sony, it can serve a quarter of a billion "hello world" pages to itself. Based on that number, it's the most powerful web server in the world.

      (Anybody who remembers Sony's 'The PS2 can handle 66 million invisible polys a second' marketing will find that amusing.)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  24. This is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now all I need are some PS2 game ISO's to serve and I'll be all set. Ahhhhh, the irony...

  25. Brilliant! by toupsie · · Score: 2
    Can you imagine web serving paradigm smashing possibilities of this?!?!!?

    Me either...

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  26. Mirrored here.. by matt-fu · · Score: 1

    The announcement, and the two files: binaries, readme.

  27. Ironic by stere0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "[Compiled Apache 2 binaries] are currently available from http://www.phi-web.co.uk/ps2-apache/"

    The site www.phi-web.co.uk is running Apache/1.3.22 (Unix) [...] on FreeBSD.

    --
    Trollem mirabilem hanc subnotationis exigiutas non caperet
  28. Be nice? by nochops · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Be nice?

    Why post a link if you don't want people to click on it? Why not include a list of users with the story, so we know who is allowed to click on the link and who is not? This way, we won't exceed our quota.

    That's rediculous, I know. But saying "be nice..." in this context just says to me "hehehe I know all about this thing called the Slashdot effect, but I don't really care. Just to make it a bit funnier, though, I'll tell everyone to 'be nice' in my most sarcastic tone."

    --
    "A terrorist is someone who has a bomb but doesn't have an air force." -William Blum
  29. bw by zmooc · · Score: 1

    blablabla beowulf cluster of those blablabla

    --
    0x or or snor perron?!
  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  31. Re:Being the one who sometimes submits kernel upda by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's that easy.

    Read his announcement, it was non-trivial.

    And we had the Lego mathematical models a few days ago, anyone can click Legos. He did it cause it was cool, and thought the community at large would like it. And it's on Slashdot cause using a game machine for doing real work is kinda cool to a geek.

  32. Re:Being the one who sometimes submits kernel upda by The+Pi-Guy · · Score: 2

    Yes, I realize that. Sure, it's kinda cool. Now if they had done something OTHER than just recompiling, like a little bit of porting to get it to run on... say... NewOS (ok, bad example. pick something with a network stack and try again.), that would be REALLY /.-worthy.

    --j

  33. Apache Binaries Available for FreeBSD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    News Flash: Apache binaries are available for FreeBSD.

  34. So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is stupid.

  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. GIVE ME A BREAK! by UrGeek · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone want to make your game console a web server? With all of that graphic processing power for a single display, why would you want to server web pages? Why? Whhy? God, oh, gawd WHY!!!

    1. Re:GIVE ME A BREAK! by Kwikymart · · Score: 1

      Why? Whhy? God, oh, gawd WHY!!!

      Because gaming companies usually take a hit on the hardware portion of the game console system and hope to get their profits on games instead. Consumers will be more likely to invest in a cheap hardware system not knowing the extreme markup of the games. If the systems are cheap enough, geeks can get a bunch of them and save on the hardware costs compared with buying conventional hardware.

      I havn't worked it out price / performance ratio-wise, but I think it is not totally out of the question. Regardless, it is a cool thing to do.

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    2. Re:GIVE ME A BREAK! by ebbomega · · Score: 2

      Why not?

      --
      Karma: Non-Heinous
    3. Re:GIVE ME A BREAK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but even when it's subsidised, you're completely disregarding the most expensive part of the system - it's 3D graphic processing.

      If you buy a fridge at half it's cost price, tip it on it's side and use it as a table, it doesn't mean it's a cheap table.

  37. Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    People keep touting stuff like this and how it'll revolutionize everything and provide low cost computers to everyone and herald an era of world peace.

    Right. Most console hardware blows chunks. There's no other word to describe it. You know what the important things in a console are? Sound and video.

    Every cool thing like this I've seen has something to do with turning a console into a server. Servers do not need sound and video. To put it geekily, if you proposed this as a Borg, they'd deactivate you for your lack of efficiency.

    I'm not even sure this is cool any more. They've been tossing Linux on consoles since the Dreamcast (at least).. And some guy had a webserver running off a C= 64 awhile back.

    I mean, I respect the efforts of those who brought us Apache on the PS2, but only from a technical standpoint. As far as cool, though, porting to consoles has become All Your Base - just not as funny.

    1. Re:Exactly! by inputsprocket · · Score: 0
      Most console hardware blows chunks. There's no other word to describe it.

      Try a thesaurus.

    2. Re:Exactly! by 00_NOP · · Score: 3

      Most console hardware blows chunks.

      This, if I may be so bold, is total garbage. Consoles may not have much hardware, but what they do have smashes all those crappy ia32 machines - armed with a hardware mindset that even Bill Gates was moved to call "brain dead" a decade and half ago (well, almost - 12, 15, who's counting?) - that we are all using into outer space.

      $50 buys you a Dreamcast - better graphics than a PCI graphics card for the same price.

    3. Re:Exactly! by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3

      Dreamcast ruled. They had better graphics than PS2 over a year before PS2 was released. These graphics included antialiasing and Z-buffering, both of which Sony still doesn't have. Plus, they had an innovative controller that both Microsoft and Nintendo have copied. Sega, with the Dreamcast, is also the first company to ship an internet-ready console to every customer. Each and every Dreamcast came with a modem (well, except for some non-Japan Asian model Dreamcasts that came without a modem).

      Only now, 2 years later, has Sony figured out how to graft on a VGA interface to its PS2. And that VGA interface requires rewriting software and will only work with Sync-On-Green monitors.

      Sega was so far ahead of its time, it's not even funny.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    4. Re:Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I guess that's why the Dreamcast is dead; it was *TOO* good.

      The DC was a piece of garbage (under)powered by some Hitachi CPU and a crappy Videologic 3D accelerator. The PS2 is clearly superior in all aspects. There is not a single PS2 indigenous title that could be reproduced on the DC, and it is a fact.

    5. Re:Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, they only make PCI graphics card for Macintoshes and original Pentiums, which were made several years before a Dreamcast came out.

  38. How hard is apache to compile? by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

    "the PS2 only has a 300mhz MIPS processor, and the compile time for Apache is quite hefty."

    I built Apache 2 on a Pentium 100 running OpenBSD (and ended up using the 1.3.x binaries that came with it anyway:) and it only took a couple of hours. How bad could it be on a machine that has not only 3 times the clock speed, but many more times the raw processing power?

    Now X11 or Mozilla (it's sad when a web browser takes nearly the same amount of time to build as a windowing system, but I digress) might be bad, but I can't see a huge chunk of time for Apache.

    1. Re:How hard is apache to compile? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony's marketing department notwithstanding, the PS2's CPU is very, very slow. Basically, its job is to manage game state and run physics simulations. The second MIPS, while also very slow, has a high performance SIMD unit attached, for doing transformations. Transformed (and possibly lit) triangles are then pushed off to the special purpose rasterizer, which is more or less fixed function.

      A 300Mhz MIPS just isn't that fast in 2002. Especially for $400. Especially if it only has 32 megs of RAM.

  39. Yeah, right!! by Not+The+Real+Me · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "Be nice and don't kill this guy's downloads page."

    I don't think 10 people downloading the PS2 build of Apache is going to kill anyone's download page.

    Correction -- I don't think 3 people downloading the PS2 build is going to cause any problems.

  40. Gta3 and web serving by ducker · · Score: 0

    "You too can have a server farm for web serving, and GTA3. Be nice and don't kill this guy's downloads page."

    Not at the same time u cant.. unless u run windows.

    Whats the point of having a games machine and a web server if u cant do it at the same time?

  41. All I want is a debian build. by vicviper · · Score: 1

    I'm trying to do one from source, but that's not easey/fun :/. BTW there's a debian project @ sourceforge for the PS2 Linux Kit....

  42. Ever so critical by tlh1005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of course this has uses on some levels. Will a bank of PS2's ever be the backbone of EBAY, NO. But it can be a useful hobby/ learning tool for someone who happens to already own a PS2 and not a computer.

    I can't figure out what "makes" a story here, I've seen readers praise less interesting re-invented wheels than this one. I could cure cancer and you guys would say "so", but let some guy setup Linux to auto-flush his toilet and he'd be a hero.

  43. You too can be a computer nerd! by ebbomega · · Score: 2

    All you have to do is pick out three things wrong with this parent!

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  44. misinformed. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    GTA3 and a webserver farm at the same time is not going to happen. You have to shutdown the linux to get to the game side of the PS2

  45. Re:Being the one who sometimes submits kernel upda by Cryptnotic · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It IS that easy. Here's his announcement. As far as I can tell, it's only non-trivial if you're brand new to Apache or compiling software in Linux. This guy admits to being "new to all of this".

    The greater benefit of downloading pre-compiled binaries for PS2/Linux is that compiling things on the PS2 takes a very long time. Compiling xmame for example, takes roughly 2-3 hours.


    Hi all.

    I've been a regular user of Apache now for about a year, 1.3 and more
    recently 2.0. Recently Sony released a kit to turn their PlayStation 2
    console into a fully featured Linux machine (hard drive, Ethernet etc etc).
    This kit has been gaining great popularity amongst the Linux community, and
    several users (such as myself) have already decided to use it as a webserver :)

    Anyway: to get to the point: the PS2 only has a 300mhz MIPS processor, and
    the compile time for Apache is quite hefty. Another discouraging factor for
    any would-be Apache on PS2 users is that compiling "anything" can be quite a
    daunting task for many people. For this reason, I've decided to provide
    compiled Apache 2 binaries for download.

    These are currently available from http://www.phi-web.co.uk/ps2-apache/ and
    I will endeavour to provide the binaries for each new release of Apache 2
    within a day or so of it "emerging". I just thought I'd let you guys know
    about this potential (admittedly small) market for Apache. With any luck, by
    making binaries for it more high-profile, more people will purchase the PS2
    kit, and hence get interested in Linux.

    I hope you don't mind me posting here, but it seemed like you guys should be
    the ones to know. Given that I'm quite new to all of this, I compiled it
    using the binbuild.sh script, but this has produced a fairly large (>11megs)
    archive: is this normal? Or is there an alternate method to provide a
    smaller archive?

    Thanks, and keep up the good work.

    Chris Taylor

    chris@phi-web.co.uk - The guy with the PS2 Webserver :)
    --
    My other first post is car post.
  46. In that case... by commodoresloat · · Score: 2
    Now for my latest invention.... hamburger earmuffs!!

    Oh, damn.... it's already been done.

  47. perhaps by martissimo · · Score: 2

    Of course this has uses on some levels. Will a bank of PS2's ever be the backbone of EBAY, NO. But it can be a useful hobby/ learning tool for someone who happens to already own a PS2 and not a computer.


    but for the cost of Sony's Linux kit and a PS2, you could certainly have much more computing power than a 300 MHZ processor if ya knew *anything* about computers...

    And if ya didnt know anything about computers, would ya be running Linux on a PS2?

    1. Re:perhaps by tlh1005 · · Score: 1

      Notice I said "someone who happens to already own a PS2 and not a computer". So, I'm not talking about going out and buying them together for $400. I'm saying that some kid who HAS a PS2 and NOT a computer could benefit from the addition of the kit and apps like Apache if they wanted to break into programming etc. and not spend the time and money on MS products.

      You're making the assumption that one has to be a Slashdot Linux nerd to want to get interested in running linux on a PS2. I think the PS2 getting Linux, Apache, and etc. can spark the interest of others who aren't like us. The kit isn't useful to me right now. It doesn't sound like it is to you either.... but none of this means that it doesn't serve a logical purpose for others.

    2. Re:perhaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And aren't you making the assumption that a kid that doesn't even have a computer (good luck learning about Linux, or downloading the associated files) is willing to go out and buy an add-on that costs as much as a PS2 in order to convert his exciting games machine into a boring terminal? **Maybe** Linux might excite him since at least he can use what comes with the kit to get started, but Apache??

      If he doesn't have a computer, then why would he have broadband? And if he doesn't have broadband or a PC, what's he going to get Apache to serve to?

  48. i look forward to sony's reaction when.... by Miska · · Score: 2, Funny

    they discover the first ps2 mp3/divX site

    .

    --
    -
    1. Re:i look forward to sony's reaction when.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Serving a DIVX copy of a movie made by Sony... ahhh the irony I love it!

  49. Irony by Kirby-meister · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's kind of funny - Sony, known for its extremely successful Playstation, wants the PS2 to be more like a PC. Microsoft, known just about only in computers, wants the Xbox to be seen only as a gaming console (and/or "entertainment hub").

    Sony distributes and supports Linux for its systems, while Microsoft is doing everything they can to stop (non-Microsoft-licensed, therefore not profiting MS directly) PC software from running on their gaming-console/entertainment-hub.

    "Hobbyists" port and program software for the PS2, while "hackers" port and program software for the Xbox. (actually I'm pretty sure hackers are doing/have done more to the PS2 right now)

    Sony's plan is probably to attack MS in the computer market, what with recent announcements of OS experience they've gained from the Linux project and the Vaio and the handheld Clie and the such. Microsoft's plan is to penetrate the entertainment market, a place where Sony, ironically (or coincidentally?), happens to have a strong foothold in (although I prefer Panasonic, myself, but my friend's Sony VVega is nothing to scoff at).

    And through this all, Nintendo sits, GameCube in hand, planning on how to continue in the console gaming market. With the recent retirement of Nintendo mastermind and uber-zombie President Hiroshi Yamauchi, and the recent announcements of the company focusing more on software than hardware, it's anybody's guess as to what is going on at Nintendo of Japan headquarters.

    (Don't even begin on the handheld gaming market - Nintendo owned that market for 10 years with a handheld that could only do spinach green and black sprites, and GBA will probably last at least another 5 on its own).

    1. Re:Irony by wuchang · · Score: 1

      To add...this goes back to the fact that Sony makes money on BOTH hardware and software sales of the PS2 while Microsoft loses money on the hardware and can only recoup it by making sure everyone buys game software for their systems. Console economics at... http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/05/20/142421 8&mode=thread&tid=127

    2. Re:Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are such a fucking overrated moron.

      The reason Sony sells the Linux kit is not so people can sit on a ps2 and browse the web, wtf?

      It is because it takes a programmer about 6 months to learn how to code well for the playstation graphics/sound/etc devices.

      So if they hire a programmer at just $100,000/year to make games, they will be wasting $50,000 in just training the guy for 6 months salary.

      If they make a linux kit, then programmer will be forced to already know how to code to the playstation before ever getting a job. Duh.

    3. Re:Irony by Kirby-meister · · Score: 1
      Yawn, console industry newb.

      1) Where did I ever mention Sony sold Linux kits for people to browse on the internet with? If you would read my post, I clearly state that Sony is gaining OS experience with this, something a company would need to attack Windows.

      2) Have you actually sat near a programmer, and timed him on how long it took him to get in good with the EE/GS? Or are you just pulling these figures out of your ass?

      3) My post was not even centralized on PS2 Linux to begin with; maybe you should read a post more carefully before calling someone else a "fucking overrated moron."

  50. Re:MEEEEEEEECCCCC!!! WRONG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/accuracy.html#whicho s

    Read last paragraph:

    "Additionally HP-UX, Linux, Solaris and recent releases of FreeBSD cycle back to zero after 497 days, exactly as if the machine had been rebooted at that precise point. Thus it is not possible to see a HP-UX, Linux or Solaris system with an uptime measurement above 497 days."

    No need for more comments, I guess ;)

  51. moving parts that don't break by valmont · · Score: 2

    depending on your budget, if you want reliable hardware with moving parts which do not break, you might wanna look at refurbed or new apple hardware.

    Back in early '96 i bought Apple's first "PCI Mac", the PowerPC 7500/100. The thing has been on 24/7 every single day for the last 6 years and has run a slew of operating systems, and i have crashed the thing many, many times while never corrupting a single hard drive.

    While in college, i used it as a TV, video capture platform, web surfing, web serving, web authoring, C programming tool.

    Then it was used for about 3 years as a dedicated web server on a T1 connection, serving filemaker-pro-db/lasso/webstar-driven sites for multiple clients until they'd migrate to their own boxes.

    And for the last two years it has been happily sitting on my kitchen table running LinuxPPC Q4 2000 24/7 serving some hobby sites of mine off of my DSL connection

    I've upgraded its processor to a 250mhz G3, added an Ultra2 LVD SCSI card, a 9gig 8.5ms 10,000 rpm IBM cheetah hard drive, boosted the ram to 200MB (could be up to 1gig in theory) and other nifty things.

    I've been opening the case and cleaning its guts about once every 2 years whenever i fellt the need to mess with it.

    in any case, it has been my experience that apple hardware just doesn't break, no matter how much i fuck with it. I still see 5 year-old apple laptops still running MacOS 8.5 and allowing you to surf the 'net. Sure the battery no-longer holds a charge, which is to be expected, but once the power supply is plugged-in, they still work.

    and i bet you could get an old 100mhz PPC 7500 CPU for around $300.

    1. Re:moving parts that don't break by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      That's really cool! Thanks man! :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:moving parts that don't break by valmont · · Score: 2
      no problem! heh :)

  52. Imagine a ... by valmont · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... whole clumsily-arranged, ill-balanced, awkwardly-vertical, babel-tower-defying, sky-scraping beowulf cluster of those!

  53. cross-compiling by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2

    i'm curious why he doesn't just cross compile the code from a bigger box?

    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
  54. Similar Win95 bug by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Additionally HP-UX, Linux, Solaris and recent releases of FreeBSD cycle back to zero after 497 days

    That's because they store uptime as centiseconds in a 32-bit integer. Windows 95 (before service packs) had a bug that limited uptime to 49.7 days because its count of milliseconds since startup would wrap, and it wasn't prepared to handle that situation.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  55. Sure it's a great Web server... by truffle · · Score: 1


    But can we get windows emulation with direct x support? :)

    --

    ---
    I support spreading santorum
  56. No they shouldn't... by dotgod · · Score: 1

    Then some troll could get modded up by typing "f|r$7 p0$7"

  57. Streaming media by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

    Seems to me these boxes would be ideal for a bit of streaming - load the DVD in and away you go. Anybody doing that?

  58. this is cool for web development by calarts_nutmeg · · Score: 1

    I actually run apache on my sharp zaurus, not to serve webpages, but to have a portable php/mysql web dev environment. It could be useful to have apache running on ps2 linux to just have a php dev environment, then when someone compiles binaries for mysql you could have a complete web dev environment.

    --
    Check my site out for ogg vorbis music produced with linux.
  59. Huh? by detritus. · · Score: 3, Informative

    Uh, Apache (older version) was already ported to the PS2 with the PS2 Linux 1.0 distribution. IMHO, I don't see what the big deal is, especially being that the source doesn't require any modification to compile on the PS2.

    As far as i'm concerned, i'd rather hear about developers porting over applications/libraries/new linux kernels which need modification to run on the PS2 architecture.

  60. Nope. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Costa Rica.

    I realized I was thinking of the Xbox.. .a Playstation is only about $500.

    If there's one thing that sucks to buy here it's electronics. Everyone just buys them from the states and sends them here.. way cheaper. It's rather silly.

    1. Re:Nope. by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Brazil's the same way. Everything there is really cheap (like food, etc) but anything that has some technology to it... bah forget it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  61. I second that emotion by RealisticWeb.com · · Score: 1

    I just have to second this emotion. My bother in laws servers are all PPC and I have been amazed at what they can do and take. He has three boxes, one is a 7500/100, the other is 8000 series of some sort, and the third is (I'm not making this up) an SE/30. In fact the SE/30 is up to 15 domains, and doesn't show any signs of stopping. I am completely shocked at how well it serves up web pages. It takes the thing like an hour and a half to boot, but it has NEVER crashed, and he has never had to do any repairs at all. He refuses to let anything but apple hardware into his house. This makes me really anxious to try the apple hardware that is actually MEANT to be a server. Mmmmm.... XServe...

    --
    Sigs are out of style, so I'm not going to use one...oh wait..
    1. Re:I second that emotion by valmont · · Score: 2
      yea those xserves sure look yummy. you should check out Steve Jobs keynote on those babies at his developers' conference, *very* interesting stuff, even if you manage to stay away from the reality distortion field.

      back in like '93 i remember visiting some french local cable channel broadcasting company who would constantly rotate local advertising "slides" thru their channel, which would be exclusively handled 24/7/365 by a couple of those early lower-end "AV" macs using Macromedia Director scheduled presentations. one box was like for development/staging/testing, the other one was the live box. the tech guy there told us apple wasn't too thrilled they'd put their hardware thru that kind of stress, but that the thing had been doing just fine for like a year and still not flinching.

      Shit man '93 was like still early versions of "System 7". heh. Back during the days of "windows 3.1", to put things in perspective.

  62. 32megs by Clansman · · Score: 1

    afaik thats a hard ceiling.

  63. smackdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah!!! Put that foot right into that bitch's ass. Dumb motherfucker can't be bothered to read the fucking article.

  64. Don't talk shit about C-64! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C-64s are still used by thousands (if not more) of people all over the world. There are several web servers on the internet running off of C-64s. There are graphical web browsers for C-64s. New software comes out all the time for C-64s.

    Granted, the people who use C-64s for these purposes may be a little but crazy. I just use mine for video games.

    If you'd like a smalltaste of the huge C-64 community, check out:
    http://www.c64.org/ and nntp://comp.sys.cbm

  65. Waah by roly · · Score: 0

    Someone killed this guys download page :(

    --
    "With Microsoft, you get Windows. With Linux, you get the full house" - unknown