Slashdot Mirror


Social Robot?

smashr writes "Researchers are currently putting the finishing touches on robots that will be attending the AAAI (American Association for Artificial Intelligence) conference this year as part of the AAAI robot challenge. In addition to robots wearing tuxedos and serving drinks, several robots designed to actually register themselves will be participating in the conference. One such robot is GRACE, being built by Carnegie Mellon University and the Naval Research Lab (among others). GRACE features a digital face and speech recognition to interact with people attending the conference. (She even runs Linux!) Her goal is to register for the conference, give a speech and answer questions. Stories at: Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, CNN.com, and USA Today."

188 comments

  1. *blush* by Zaphod+B · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gosh, I wonder what else lonely geeks will be developing robots for!

    --
    Zaphod B
    When duplication is outlawed, only outlaws will have /bin/cp
    1. Re:*blush* by muon1183 · · Score: 1

      Well, they did design it to be female, and they admitted the team is almost exclusively males, so you can't be too far off. However, if you looked at the picture, GRACE is anything but what you would want to be doing that kind of activity with. She looks more like an oil drum with a monitor stuck on top of it than any female I know. Unless oil drums have become suddenly attractive to us males, I don't think what you're suggesting is going to happen.

      --

      There's no sig like SIGSEG
    2. Re:*blush* by fobbman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Betcha next years /. "meatings" will be better attended by robots than this years organic model attendance.

    3. Re:*blush* by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

      http://www.sexuality.org/l/fetish/robofaq.html

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    4. Re:*blush* by Parsec · · Score: 1

      Looks like the movie list needs to be updated with A.I. and Austin Powers...

    5. Re:*blush* by craw · · Score: 1

      Actually, that oil drum looks more like an industrial strength vacuum cleaner (wet-vacs). You know, the kind that could..., ummm, I better stop here.

    6. Re:*blush* by RatBastard · · Score: 1

      I don't think www.fu-fme.com will be a joke for very much longer.

      --
      Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    7. Re:*blush* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should join forces with RealDoll.

  2. Ro-bot by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Robots with social skills? Dear God, they've surpassed 80% of the population of /.!

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Ro-bot by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 0

      Sounds like they are trying to build a protocol droid. They are supposed to look like C-3PO, not like a trash can with a monitor on top. And give her some arms already! Their trashcan design might be useful for an astrodroid, such as an R2 unit.

      --
      That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
    2. Re:Ro-bot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Robots with social skills? Dear God, they've surpassed 80% of the population of /.!

      Do the 80% include those who think that readers of a news web site are its population?

    3. Re:Ro-bot by Wirr · · Score: 2, Funny
      It depends.

      I mean she runs Linux. Can't you just imagine her telling everybody that she told you a thousand times that you shouldn't use Windows and that the RIAA is evil ?

  3. it's too perfect! by krog · · Score: 3, Interesting

    maybe one of these robots could give Bruce Perens' illegal speech! what a setup!!

    1. Re:it's too perfect! by gotih · · Score: 2

      sure! why couldn't a robot like this be setup with an anonymous upload that could allow a tech show participant (like bruce) to load presentations. ok, so sometimes it might get loaded with a 'sex-ed' program. ummm.... so either way it's educational.... riiiight.

      but really, who are 'they' going to prosecute?

      --

      fear is the mind killer
  4. Her goal? by Schik · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Is it really *her* goal, or is that the goal of the people behind creating her? Has anyone asked her what she might want to do?

    1. Re:Her goal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded up? Did you ask your car what it's goal was this morning? Don't be so dramatic.

    2. Re:Her goal? by Schik · · Score: 1

      No, I didn't ask it anything this morning, but then again, my car is not giving a speech and answering questions at the American Association for Artificial Intelligence conference .

    3. Re:Her goal? by iapetus · · Score: 3, Funny

      "What is your goal?"
      "Why does it make you feel that way that What is my goal?"

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  5. Someone.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should bring A.L.I.C.E. on a iPAQ/Palm with a wireless connection so it can join in the fun as well!

  6. Robots?! by Hacker'sEdict · · Score: 1

    Now my plan to take over the world can be completed! Excellent...

    1. Re:Robots?! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2

      I believe that's pronounced, "Eeegg-saaalaaad". No thanks nessesary. I like to help.

  7. One question. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is she available for dating? I have a Apple IIgs I've been trying to get hooked up. It's been rather depressed lately.

  8. Robots by invisi · · Score: 0

    Good thing she's running linux, I'd be afraid to see what kind of garbage she'd say if she was running Windows. MS would probably plant some conspicuous bug, that she would keep advertising and advocating Windows! What horror! And after someone mentions linux, the robot would probably crash with awe.

    1. Re:Robots by sbillard · · Score: 0

      It would be programmed to eliminate the competition just like Funzo.

    2. Re:Robots by invisi · · Score: 1

      Whoops.

  9. I can't resist... by jmu1 · · Score: 1

    Since this thing is running GNU/Linux... I suppose someone could
    1337@h4x0r>$finger GRACE

  10. I don't think so... by fatwreckfan · · Score: 2, Funny
    (She even runs Linux!)
    A girl that runs linux? Rriigghhtt ;)

    everyone I know that runs linux is male (unfortunately).
    1. Re:I don't think so... by Soporific · · Score: 1

      And as pale as the background of this webpage. :)

      ~S

    2. Re:I don't think so... by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Funny

      My wife runs Linux (on her computer, I mean).

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:I don't think so... by fatwreckfan · · Score: 1

      That's cool. I was just joking around anyway. I know there's some females that use it, but you have to admit that the linux community is mostly male. Just look at the names of the users on most linux-related forums.

    4. Re:I don't think so... by MSG · · Score: 2

      Sure, but some of us do what we can to do otherwise. My mom uses Linux on her computer, as does my girlfriend. As of this weekend, so will my /other/ girlfriend. I'm installing Yellow Dog Linux on her Mac G4 :)

    5. Re:I don't think so... by Silverlock · · Score: 1

      good try but you went too far. not only do i not believe in girls who run linux, i don't believe any linux geek has two girlfriends.. :P

    6. Re:I don't think so... by heartstab · · Score: 0

      I have two girlfriends.

      Wait. Scratch that.

      I have two girls that I'm banging on a regular basis, one of which _was_ my girlfriend until I decided I wasn't ready for monogamy.

      Hey. I'm 18, just going into college. This is normal.

  11. I misread the header as by WetCat · · Score: 1

    Robots that will attend the AAA
    (American Automobile Association)...
    If robots will really do that - they'll be really social robots!

    1. Re:I misread the header as by Lev13than · · Score: 2, Funny

      [quote]
      Robots that will attend the AAA [aaa.com] (American Automobile Association)... If robots will really do that - they'll be really social robots!
      [/quote]

      Of course, you'll know the robots have gotten too social when they start attending AA.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    2. Re:I misread the header as by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      It is AAA: that's where the robots pick up their batteries.

  12. In the end by Marvel+Man · · Score: 0

    It will just be like the last robot I read about. They will put this robot against other robots in a fighting arena and then break loose only to be found in the parking lot making a B-line for the nearest bar.

  13. hmmm... by arson1 · · Score: 2

    woudl I like to finger that.... aw, nevermind.

    --


    --
    Don't sweat the petty things, and don't pet the sweaty things.
    1. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, what?

  14. Oh Great.... by Reverend+Beaker · · Score: 1

    Now even ROBOTS will get more dates than I do! Sigh... where's my copy of Akira...

    --
    This is not the sig you're looking for
  15. Sorry, I have to say it.... by phigga · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Her goal is to register for the conference, give a speech and answer questions."

    Given the audience, I wonder how many questions will be answered with, "No, I won't meet you in your hotel room."

    1. Re:Sorry, I have to say it.... by Jacer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      do you wonder why you never get a date? you're too negative buddy! think of it this way, how many questions will be answered "yes, i will meet you in the hotel room."

      --
      --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    2. Re:Sorry, I have to say it.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      any geeks get laid on any conferences? I have given up even trying b/c
      - there are far fewer women
      - every single geek is trying to talk to her
      - and the women know they in high demand & don't budge that easily..

  16. A paradox by Tall+Rob+Mc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its an interesting paradox that the nerdiest of computer geeks are programming robots to interact socially...

    These people are the most qualified and least qualified at the same time!

    1. Re:A paradox by nebby · · Score: 2

      Well at least we know the robots will never have sex and be able to reproduce to take over the world.

      --
      --
    2. Re:A paradox by fobbman · · Score: 4, Funny

      People have been getting robots to do what is too unsafe for humans to do for a long time. Studying the insides of volcanos, defusing bombs, roaming the surface of Mars, and interacting with others in public all hold the same level of danger to geeks.

    3. Re:A paradox by rirugrat · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see how these "geeks" define "social interaction" for their robotic creations?

      1) Building/configuring a Linux box from scratch.
      2) Playing a Quake III deathmatch with other "bots".
      3) Ordering a super sized bacon doublecheeseburger combo meal at the Mickie Dees drive-thru.
      4) Posting on /.
      5) Arguing with the floor monkeys at Best Buy and Circuit City.
      6) Going to whitehouse.com to look for pr0n.

      Chris

  17. Sounds like a nightmare to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait a second. How is some group of geeks gonna ever know what social skills are? all this robot will end up being is a rusty hulk that lumbers around and yammers about Star trek episodes to anyone it corners.

    Hmmm... maybe the jock robot will slap it around some while the babe robot runs away screaming?

  18. Important step for Science. by tps12 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Someone built a robot that can wear a tuxedo and serve drinks? What's that, the Dean Martin test?

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:Important step for Science. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No - that would be "wear a tuxedo and DRINK drinks"...

    2. Re:Important step for Science. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or just "drink drinks."

  19. This is perfect by Hacker'sEdict · · Score: 1

    Now all those lonely computer geeks out there can finally get a date, even if she is just a robot. Oh wait I am one of those computer geeks... Doh! Minus the fact that she looks like something I hit with my car last night, she is still better looking then my last girlfriend which coincidentaly is CmdTaco's last girlfriend/sister.

    1. Re:This is perfect by Hacker'sEdict · · Score: 1

      Sorry man, I had to, it was just to tempting.

  20. ARTI-Mac by edrugtrader · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    i still think my pathetic attempt at AI when i was 15 is till the best ever made.

    ARTI-Mac is an artificial mack daddy. he runs big johnny's pub in my video game virtual pimp (written in QuickBasic 4.5)

    you go in the bar and "talk to the man behind the counter" then it opens up an Dr. Sbatso type session where you talk about guns, drugs and rap music. it was the inspiration for my online game which is still down due to TYAN!! if you don't believe me about the TYAN boards, just read this thread, they are blowing up left and right.

    lets hope GRACE was made with and ASUS!

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:ARTI-Mac by scott1853 · · Score: 2

      Now I get it, edrugtrader is a game. For the last month I thought your tagline was referring to an eBay type website you were running for potheads.

  21. Social Robot? by rbgaynor · · Score: 1

    When I saw the article title all I could think of was Bill Gates sipping soda at a cocktail party...

    --
    "Good things don't end with eum, they end with mania or teria." - H. Simpson
  22. It's not _real_ technology... by Autonomous+Crowhard · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Until it can do games and/or porn.

    (Did you ever notice that no one wnats to admit this. They always try for the educational uses for a while first)

    1. Re:It's not _real_ technology... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can do what you like with a 'social porn bot', just do it in the privacy of your home, thanks.

  23. AI by Uruk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While I'm sure this robot will be impressive in some respects, I really wish people would go ahead and segment the AI field out into two separate fields - "Cognitive Modeling" and "Cognitive Imitation". These types of robots which simulate high-level human behaviour that we realistically just don't understand how it works are essentially parlor tricks. They're entertaining, but do they really tell us more about how the brain works? I don't think so - they mostly push the envelope in the field of pattern recognition and imitation.

    In other words, when it comes to "AI", these things tend to be really heavy on the "A" and really light on the "I".

    Course that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.

    --
    -- Truth goes out the door when rumor comes innuendo. -- Groucho Marx
    1. Re:AI by Pemdas · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I disagree. AI may have this making-artificial-people mythos about it, but if you look at the direction of AI research in the past 20 years, that's not really what the field is about.

      There are exceptions; people are trying to make magical leaps over some percieved barrier, usually self-awareness. The cyc project works along those lines.

      By and large, though, AI research occurs in little steps, and most of those steps are like this one. There is a need for a good understanding of what works and what doesn't work for smaller tasks before we're going to solve the bigger problems. What you seem to call "Cognitive Imitation" I would often call "Trying to understand cognition".

      In other words, when it comes to "AI", these things tend to be really heavy on the "A" and really light on the "I".

      I'd like to hear of an approach that you think is light on the "A" and heavy on the "I".

    2. Re:AI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know much about this project, but I do know that CMU is home to one of the main cognitive modeling people in the world (John Anderson). ACT-R kicks ass.

    3. Re:AI by HiThere · · Score: 2

      I'd like to hear of an approach that you think is light on the "A" and heavy on the "I".

      Adding variable amounts human genes to other mammal's chromosomes.

      (Although, I will admit that it's not all that light on the "A", and the "I" of the experimenter would be decidedly questionable.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    4. Re:AI by bshanks · · Score: 1

      i haven't read it yet, but "Fluid Concepts & Creative Analogies : Computer Models of the Fundamental Mechanisms of Thought" by Douglas Hofstadter seems heavier on the I.

      but i do think basic pattern recognition theory is also heavy on the I. and i agree that "What you call 'Cognitive Imitation', I would often call 'Trying to understand cognition'."

      so here are some things heavy on the A:

      some forms of planning

      most kinds of statistical natural language processing

      some kinds of machine vision

      some uses of "uncertainty in AI" (i.e. many uses of Bayes' nets as a model for some domain, like medical diagnosis)

      Deep Blue/lookahead style game playing

    5. Re:AI by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      I disagree. AI may have this making-artificial-people mythos about it, but if you look at the direction of AI research in the past 20 years, that's not really what the field is about.

      There are exceptions; people are trying to make magical leaps over some percieved barrier, usually self-awareness. The cyc [cyc.com] project works along those lines.


      I also disagree with grandparent, but for other reasons. Cyc is an interesting expert system, but it hasn't made any magical leaps. Wallace's disparagements towards the project are plenty accurate.

      By and large, though, AI research occurs in little steps, and most of those steps are like this one. There is a need for a good understanding of what works and what doesn't work for smaller tasks before we're going to solve the bigger problems. What you seem to call "Cognitive Imitation" I would often call "Trying to understand cognition".

      Yeah. Exactly. Cyc is a little step too.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:AI by dorgy · · Score: 1

      From the look of this header file here http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~reids/challenge/interface s/mobInterface.h (look towards the buttom at the function names). I'd say this thing has the intelligence level the turtle.

    7. Re:AI by macosxaddict · · Score: 1

      No, that's just the low level mobility stuff. The AI is all done by higher level code that makes calls to Mobility.

    8. Re:AI by burgess · · Score: 1

      you mean the mobility code is in LOGO?

    9. Re:AI by macosxaddict · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of it is in C++. :-)

  24. Hacking reponsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a robot hacked a web site, say http://www.stopamerica.org as an example, who would be held responsible?

  25. Why a social robot? by drox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...they sent Vikia out into hallways to see if she could get passersby to stop and talk with her and if she could learn to predict the behavior of people.

    So it's a neat exercise. Is this really what we want robots to do? Recognizing human emotional states and predicting their responses from facial expressions and actions is one of the things humans do best. Why work at making a robot do it? It would seem to make more sense to design robots to do things that humans are BAD at, rather than having them try to do things we're GOOD at.

    1. Re:Why a social robot? by torinth · · Score: 2

      So it's a neat exercise. Is this really what we want robots to do? Recognizing human emotional states and predicting their responses from facial expressions and actions is one of the things humans do best. Why work at making a robot do it? It would seem to make more sense to design robots to do things that humans are BAD at, rather than having them try to do things we're GOOD at.

      Because people don't communicate to each other with a keyboard or mouse. If we want robots/computers/silicon-whatever to be able to perform tasks of any sort for non-experts, we need to be able to communicate with them more naturaly, and that means includes gestures and expressions.

      -Andrew

    2. Re:Why a social robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? Puhleaze. The reason you design robots to do things humans are good at are as follows:

      1) Once perfected, robots will be able to do these things faster than humans can do.
      2) Things such as emotion detection and facial recognition provide a "level playing field" of interaction between robots and humans. If robots become good at things we are good at, we can interact with them to the best of our ability (speech, facial expressions, etc.) and then they can do the "dirty work" that they are good at after understanding what we want.

      I'm always amazed that no matter what technology is portrayed on Slashdot, a site which is supposed to be techies, 9 times out of 10 one of the first posters is like "Why bother? This is so stupid! Especially b/c it's not open source! We should go back to punchcards!" etc. etc.

    3. Re:Why a social robot? by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 2
      So it's a neat exercise. Is this really what we want robots to do? Recognizing human emotional states and predicting their responses from facial expressions and actions is one of the things humans do best. Why work at making a robot do it? It would seem to make more sense to design robots to do things that humans are BAD at, rather than having them try to do things we're GOOD at.

      Hwah?

      Humans, *good* at social interaction?

      Sure, we're leading the pack species-wise, but I wouldn't go so far as to call humanity as a whole "good" at social graces.

      As proof, I submit any number of individuals employed in the "service" industry. Maybe one out of every ten has -good- social skills, and the primary role of a service person is to interact with the general public!

      I much prefer interacting with a cheerful, courteous automaton than with a surly, mumbling automaton, human or robotic...

      --

      Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    4. Re:Why a social robot? by solarrhino · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I happened to cross paths with someone who worked on Grace, and he mentioned that he taught it "how to ride an elevator".

      That's all he said, but I've been thinking about it ever since. Would I want to get in an elevator with a huge, industrial looking faceless machine? Okay, yes I would, but would my mom? No. What about a robot that has a face, but that stares grimly straight ahead? Or one that continually tries to make eye contact? Wouldn't those all seem creepy inside an elevator?

      The fact is, human behavior is highly context specific, and we feel uncomfortable and /or threatened when "people" around us behave improperly. Don't believe me? Try peeking over a bathroom stall sometime. That's why we need a socially aware robot.

      --
      "Lord, grant that I may always be right, for Thou knowest that I am hard to turn" -- A Scots-Irish prayer
    5. Re:Why a social robot? by AA0 · · Score: 1

      The real question is why not do it?
      You can not just work on one part of science at a time, you must progress the whole pack slowly. Because a robot that can interact with us isn't just about a robot maid, its about the future, and how computers will soon be able to know what we want when we say something. Computers will not be so anal, when you give a command, it might not take it literally as proper english suggests, but how we actually talk. I might sense our emotions and understand someone is mad and doesn't mean what they say. There are so many applications for the future.

      Think of the star trek doors, how do they know when to open? It isn't motion sensored primitive stuff, since they will walk right by it, or close to it and it won't open, but it is based on a AI that monitors your motion, and walking patterns, maybe your conversation too. I know its just a show with guys pulling the doors, but thats what it is meant to be anyways.

    6. Re:Why a social robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just want to thank you for the mental image of a man in an elevator trying to sidle away from a robot that continues to follow him about, staring him in the eyes... *grins* Definitely worth a good chuckle.

    7. Re:Why a social robot? by thrillbert · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Recognizing human emotional states and predicting their responses from facial expressions and actions is one of the things humans do best ...<snip>... rather than having them try to do things we're GOOD at.

      Bwuahahahahahahahahaa!!!!!

      Sorry.. but if we're so good at recognizing emotions and predicting responses from facial expressions, then why are there so many divorces? That alone is proof that we SUCK at recognizing each other's needs..

      On that note, maybe I'll start work on AICounselor_v1.0Beta.tar.gz now.. I'm sure GRACE would enjoy that module.

      ---
      With all things being equal.. well, no, that's boring..

    8. Re:Why a social robot? by The+World+Will+End · · Score: 1

      You could take that a step further, and say integrate an AI "friend" with your applications. It could say stuff like "Hey, It looks like you are trying to print a document, but you keep screwing up, let me help". You could even make the AI non-threatning looking, something like a little paper clip. Revolutionary!

      --
      Man, with his flaming pyre, has conquered the wayward breezes.
    9. Re:Why a social robot? by arielb · · Score: 0

      I guess you didn't see Terminator :)

      --
      ---
    10. Re:Why a social robot? by epgandalf · · Score: 1

      I know the person who taught Grace to ride the elevator. He did the project for an a class, which I was also in. At the end of the spring semester, there was a robot exibition where we all showed the public what we had been working on for the semester.
      The elevator robot was a big hit. There was no shortage of people interested in getting into an elevator with the robot. Admittedly, the exposition was in Newell-Simon hall, where the CMU robotics department is. The robot uses its laser range finder to keep from hitting people and nobody got hurt for the hour or so that it took the elevator.
      For AAAI, it will be using an altimiter to detect which floor it is on.

    11. Re:Why a social robot? by drox · · Score: 2
      Because people don't communicate to each other with a keyboard or mouse

      It's what I'm doing now.

      If we want robots/computers/silicon-whatever to be able to perform tasks of any sort for non-experts...

      I'm not saying that the short-term goal isn't a laudable one - or at least a stimulating intellectual exercise. I'm more concerned about the long term. Do we WANT robots performing tasks for non-experts? There are more than enough human non-experts around, and we keep making more. I guess it just seems more sensible to me to work on making robots that ARE experts. Particularly if they're made to be expert at things human have difficulty doing.

      ... we need to be able to communicate with them more naturaly, and that means includes gestures and expressions.

      Gestures and expressions are just another form of communication, and if you want to use them to communicate with your robot, be my guest. But gestures and expressions are extremely subtle (fractions of a centimeter in eyelid position can communicate volumes) and alarmingly variable, at least as humans use them. They also very subject to contextual cues. I expect that getting a robot to reliably recognize and interpret human gestures and expression will be far more difficult that getting it to recognize and interpret human speech. With speech we at least know most of the rules. We're still learning about nonverbal human communications ourselves.

    12. Re:Why a social robot? by drox · · Score: 2

      Rhetorical question, I'm sure, but I felt the urge to respond anyway.

      Sorry.. but if we're so good at recognizing emotions and predicting responses from facial expressions, then why are there so many divorces?

      If we're so bad at it, why are there so many marriages? People are at least good enough at it to convince themselves and others that they'd be compatible as lifelong partners. Try getting a robot to do that.

      That alone is proof that we SUCK at recognizing each other's needs..

      Not necessarily. Humans are pretty good at recognizing each others needs, by both speech and non-verbal cues. They may not always be so good at meeting those needs though.

    13. Re:Why a social robot? by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Correction, that should read:
      AICounselor_v1.0Beta.zoid.tar.gz

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    14. Re:Why a social robot? by andr0meda · · Score: 2

      ..ah you better rethink that statement because of the following: At Siggraph this year there was a neat paper about eye-movement simulation, and allthough the results weren't particularly impressive like in the rest of the papers at the (btw very great) conference, it showed one important message: context is everything! The speaker demonstrated that indeed, she had managed to make the eyes more or less move in a natural way, but despite her efforts, I think most of the people in that room would agree that it still looked bad. She kind of appologized for it and said that you realy ought to track the eye lids, the frowns, the cheaks and all that... to get a realy convincing AI eye simulation. On top of that, the eyes have specific behaviour that diverge wildly when the person is engaged in a social pattern, or when they are saying something. For instance: Studies have shown that one tends to look more to the left while thinking about social stuff, while looking the other way when thinking about some technical details. Things can of course be reversed, but these tendencies to stare into infitity in a particular direction exist. They come natural to us, but if you think about it it's rather odd.. Even males and females don't do the same things with their eyes.

      So, without wanntig to diss on your remark, because you are right in many ways: while we may seem to be doing rather average reading the face of someone, it is much more likely that it is due to the fact that we don't know the person that well, don't know how to give an appropriate response, instead of being unable to read their face, that causes all these human issues. Maybe one day we will be having stupid arguments with robots, who knows..

      Hozever, imho we're still a very long way from truely intelligent behavior, because a) you need lots of context and b) you need lots of noise. Both of them are impractical for current silicon. The best quantum computer can deal with just 8 bits.. not terribly impressive..

      cheers,

      --
      With great power comes great electricity bills.
  26. GRACE should go on tour by delphin42 · · Score: 2

    I would like to see a demonstration of this technology in person. Or if that isn't feasible, maybe they could demo it on Leno or something?

    --
    -- Adam
    1. Re:GRACE should go on tour by Knytefall · · Score: 1

      I attend Carnegie Mellon. Grace is often in the atrium entrance of one of the computer science buildings here. She tells jokes and asks questions. It's quite entertaining, and disturbing.

      Robots wander the halls around often. I'm oddly used to it.

  27. one would think by red_five_standing_by · · Score: 0

    That a bunch of guys wouldn't have modeled a robot after female drama students - and then expect it to socialize. I wonder what the sound of a robot whining/complaining/b!tching is.

  28. I recall something vaguely like this. by Dthoma · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has been done before. Back in 1999, five robots had to make their way around the American Assocation for Artifical Intelligence annual meeting in Orlando.

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

    1. Re:I recall something vaguely like this. by rtv · · Score: 1
      That's because it's part of a competition that runs at every AAAI conference

      The value of these competitions and robot demos at AAAI is somewhat controversial, as AAAI is not very keen on actually publishing papers about robots at that conference. The robots get lots of press attention, but the delegates won't hear many robot-related technical papers

      At the main international robotics conference the subject is treated a little more seriously.

  29. Robot by Rupert · · Score: 1

    Air-conditioned, psychoanalysed
    You're very nearly human you're so well disguised.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  30. Topic goes here by sheepab · · Score: 2

    Hmmm, unsocial geeks programming social robots. Now tell me if I am wrong but, dont you think if an unsocial geek and program a social robot, the geek himself has the capabilities of being social himself?

    1. Re:Topic goes here by sheepab · · Score: 2

      Grammar correction, sorry:
      Hmmm, unsocial geeks programming social robots. Now tell me if I am wrong but, dont you think if an unsocial geek can program a social robot, the geek himself has the capabilities of being social himself?

    2. Re:Topic goes here by Maniakes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now tell me if I am wrong but, dont you think if an unsocial geek can program a social robot, the geek himself has the capabilities of being social himself?

      Being able to program a computer to do something well doesn't mean you can do it yourself. I've written programs that play chess much better than I can.

      Another factor here is the "dancing bear" effect. A dancing bear isn't impressive because it dances well. It is impressive because it dances at all. Behaviour that is amazingly social for a robot may be pretty dismal for a human.

      --
      A legparnasom tele van angolnaval.
    3. Re:Topic goes here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that the idea behind the robot was to get a machine to do something that's too damned UNPLEASANT for a human to do, like peel potatoes, clean up shitty toilets, and be sociable.

    4. Re:Topic goes here by Bearpaw · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, unsocial geeks programming social robots. Now tell me if I am wrong but, dont you think if an unsocial geek and program a social robot, the geek himself has the capabilities of being social himself? Not without root access.

  31. The creator are sexists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    How can they imply a machine as female when it does not even reproduce? Not only that, they have no sexual organs, nor sex chromosome! Most ironic part is, all the photo has shown MEN constructing the machines!!! If they really want to respect the other gender, they should have put female engineers at work instead of making a poor excuse of 'female robot'.

    1. Re:The creator are sexists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Sorry, girls can't make robots. Just look here www.girlscantmakerobots.net

      Hell, it 's down. I guess girls can't make web pages either.

    2. Re:The creator are sexists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Bahahaha. You had me up to "female engineers". Yeah, honey, "engineer" me a beer out of the fridge. Thanks.

    3. Re:The creator are sexists by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      How can they imply a machine as female when it does not even reproduce?

      If a woman has cervical cancer and can no longer reproduce, is she no longer a female? Or if she loses her breasts to cancer, how about then?

      You are female if you act like a female.

      My dictionary lists this as one definition of female: "Characteristic of or appropriate to this sex; feminine."

      And why shouldn't males be able to develop a female robot? Guys stare at females all the time, they ought to know what they look like enough to make a female robot.

      By your logic, we should not have male gynecologists either.

      Yeah....

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    4. Re:The creator are sexists by stak · · Score: 2

      Isn't that a matter of gender versus sex? Do you assign gender to things in your life that can't reproduce?

    5. Re:The creator are sexists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why restrict it to female and male heterosexual robots? Being gay, myself, I demand that they implement homosexual robots who go around playing Petshop Boys and Cher on their internal speakers and complaining about attendees outfits (which said robots will refer to as 'ensembles')!

    6. Re:The creator are sexists by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Most languages other than English do that very thing.

    7. Re:The creator are sexists by sbillard · · Score: 0

      Guys (almost) always refer to objects as "she". All my cars have been "she"s. My computers at home are all "she"s. betty is a bitch and jenny is sweet. Marines have historically given their weapon a girls name. When reading books and articles about infant care, the baby is always refered to as "she". It isn't sexist. It is a compliment.

    8. Re:The creator are sexists by sielwolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Register had a good article on pronoun usage.

      In English the masculine is used in gender-neutral cases where the gender cannot be specified before hand ("The officer should have his standard equipment present").

      The feminine is used in cases of abstract personification ("The United States has her hands full") of a concept or an object (Freedom or automobiles).

      Much like a car, to give it "personality" would move it from the first case to the second. Thus when you give a generic machine a specific voice, it is (usually) female).

      But, as with all usage, it is up to the user. There is a strong push for gender neutral language in most things. The problem is that in cases that are purely up to personal taste, these rules apply.

      So you can't tell someone to not make their robot feminine. But you can tell someone to make their manual not masculine.

      And you seem to think their purpose was purely political (ie that there was a certain quota that needed to be maintained so they added a female robot to offset the male engineers). I really think it is much simplier than that.

      --
      What is music when you despise all sound?
    9. Re:The creator are sexists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That _may_ be complement if these guys don't treat them as property, which unfortunately it does when they assign genders to inanimate (or psuedo-animate) objects. But what about the people who have real genders on their own? It's unfortunate that people tends to want to own things their way, and since some of these gender assigning people can't do it to real women (and for that matter, some have little respect to them), they have to resort to imagining it to genderless machines instead of deal with their own social deficiency.

      When you think of it that way, the whole business of assigning gender really become less about complement to opposite sex, but more about desiring dominance over others which they can't do in real life to normal women. This may not necessarily leads to tragic results, but can be a dangerous trend.

    10. Re:The creator are sexists by macosxaddict · · Score: 1

      Vikia, the face, is female, since its developers felt that females tend to interact better socially. Since Vikia is female, and it was chosen for the robot, Grace cannot very well be either male or genderless, can it?

    11. Re:The creator are sexists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actualy they had several females working on it. Most of the non-student workers were female, and hired on skill, not based on their gender.

  32. Social Robots ?? #@ +1 ; Informative @# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who needs them with all of the illiterate, innumerate, and uncritical "graduates" of the
    U.S. educational system, some of whom help
    put the thief-in-chief into office?

    For more information about the thief-in-chief, please see:

    The White House

    Thank you and have a shagadelic weekend.

  33. Sirius? by Tar-Palantir · · Score: 1

    Does it have the Genuine People Personalities feature?
    Share and enjoy!

  34. Cool! I anticipate... by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 2

    Nothing will go wrong...
    go wrong
    go wrong

    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
  35. While I liked the "Cherry 2000" model, by burgburgburg · · Score: 1

    on my quest to find a replacement body, I eventually found true love with the tracker I hired to take me into "The Zone", E. (Edith) Johnson.

  36. Robots in tuxes by Scaba · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else laugh out loud when then pictured a robot wearing a tuxedo? That's about the funniest thing I heard all week.

    On a side note, with the robot conference and the Milky Way mapping thing, does anyone else get the feeling we're living in an Isaac Asimov book? (Go here and put author: asimov AND title: (robots OR foundation) in the Power Search box and buy and read all matching items if you don't get the reference)

    1. Re:Robots in tuxes by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny

      You should rent 'Ice Pirates'. Plenty in there.

    2. Re:Robots in tuxes by Christianfreak · · Score: 2

      I immediatly thought of 'Bender' I can't think of an episode off the top of my head where he wore one though...

      And yes, its a very funny image :)

    3. Re:Robots in tuxes by Scaba · · Score: 1

      'Bender' was my second thought (R. Daneel Olivaw is a larger figure in my personal mythology), especially the episode of Good Bender vs. Evil Bender, where it turned out Good Bender was the evil one all along.

  37. Knowing your limitations by solarrhino · · Score: 3, Interesting
    According to this solon article, they:

    "solicited drama students to teach GRACE how to act like a human so it will make people feel comfortable"

    You have to give the builders points for knowing their limitations.

    --
    "Lord, grant that I may always be right, for Thou knowest that I am hard to turn" -- A Scots-Irish prayer
    1. Re:Knowing your limitations by moronga · · Score: 3, Funny

      "solicited drama students to teach GRACE how to act like a human so it will make people feel comfortable"

      You have to give the builders points for knowing their limitations.


      I went to CMU and the drama students are the *last* people I'd go to if I wanted to teach a robot to act "human."

      :)

    2. Re:Knowing your limitations by terradyn · · Score: 1

      I second the last post. Just graduated and I definitely would not train her with our drama students.

    3. Re:Knowing your limitations by Anonu · · Score: 1
      I went to CMU and the drama students are the *last* people I'd go to if I wanted to teach a robot to act "human."

      I still go to CMU and agree whole heartedly with that fact.

      --
      SIGSIG -- signature too long (core dumped)
    4. Re:Knowing your limitations by solarrhino · · Score: 1
      Wow, must have touched a nerve!

      Actually, I was a CMU drama student - MFA program, playwriting - for a year back in 82-83. I was amazed at the time by the animosity between colleges at CMU. Since my BS was in Physics, I can testify that the hostility went both ways. Sounds like it hasn't changed much!

      (*sigh*) Too bad, really. They are just geeks in a different way. And they can act human, at least for a little while. Surely you guys are willing to give them that!

      --
      "Lord, grant that I may always be right, for Thou knowest that I am hard to turn" -- A Scots-Irish prayer
  38. She runs linux eh? by Jacer · · Score: 2, Funny

    touch, finger, uzip, configure(you know what i mean *wink*), mount, force, make, umount, sleep

    --
    --fetch daddy's blue fright wig, i must be handsome when i release my rage
    1. Re:She runs linux eh? by Random+Bystander · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      man bash

    2. Re:She runs linux eh? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      You forgot to fsck. Fsck. Fsck. Fsck! Fsck!! FSCK! FSCK!! FSCK!!!!! FSCK!! FSCK! Fsck!! Fsck! Fsck. Fsck. fsck.

      ahhh.

    3. Re:She runs linux eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It amazes me that /.ers frequently find their hormones raging at the sound of a geek girl, especially one running Linux. She might be butt-ugly for all you know.

  39. President Releases List of Nicknames +1; Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for U.S. and World Leaders (in the words of the
    President-Vice - "despicable" !) :

    To read the list, surf to:

    Nickname List of U.S. and World Leaders

    Enjoy !!

    1. Re:President Releases List of Nicknames +1; Funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To each their own, I suppose. Personally I think they could have done something much better (funnier, smarter, more pointed) with a name like whitehouse.org than a rather stupid poop-jokes and pussy-jokes site. That being said, I'm sure it's somebody's cup of tea.

  40. Forget talking robots. I want *mopping* robots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I cannot *wait* to have a robot that will mop my floor, possibly while weeping at its own fate.

  41. Trailer park trash comment. by t0qer · · Score: 2

    The REAL question all the guys wanna know down at the trailer park is can she REALLY suck the chrome off a trailer hitch.

    That is all

    --toq

  42. so long and thanks for all the fish ... by tandr · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who already sees this in reflecteted back to humans in say, 10-15 years? "In other news, Summer 2018 Natural Intelligence will have Dolphins Delegation with 10 minutes screech. There are some unconfirmed rumors that humans could be physically attending this conference too..."

  43. How Long... by John+Hasler · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...before the organization is renamed "The American Association of Artificial Intelligences"?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    1. Re:How Long... by wowbagger · · Score: 1

      No, they will name themselves the Artificial Intelligences of America Association, or AIAA. Then they will either begin suing all of us meat, or suing the [MP|RI]AA....

  44. Social Robot? by CommieLib · · Score: 1

    I thought this would be a story about Slashdot readers...

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  45. GRACE as a Battle Bot by CarlPatten · · Score: 2, Funny

    She'd get along great with Gaak, the robot that escaped from its masters and made it to the parking lot. I see a wonderful romance developing, or at least a great Thelma-and-Louise chase scene.

    On a related note, wouldn't a battle bot capable of social engineering the judges be a great thing? "I protest! My opponent is cheating!" "Never mind that broken wheel, t'is but a flesh wound!" Of course, she'd have be toughened up and given a weapon of some kind; sarcastic banter vs. a wedge is hardly a fair fight.

    1. Re:GRACE as a Battle Bot by Cyberop5 · · Score: 1

      wouldn't a battle bot capable of social engineering the judges be a great thing?

      That reminds me of a beer commercial where the bot opens a fridge full of ice-cold booze, the opposition manuevers their bot into position to grab the beer and bring it back, and suddenly the beer-bearing fridge pulls out a hammer from behind and whacks the other bot to smitherings.

      --
      Urgo: "I want to live. I want to experience the universe and I want to eat pie!"
      Jack: "Who doesn't??"
    2. Re:GRACE as a Battle Bot by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      And if it travelled by monopodial locomotion, would it be a GRACE HOPPER?

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  46. Now that's a task... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been trying to register myself for the AAAI for a while, but every time I check back, they don't have an "Anti-Social non-robot" option..

    And unfortunately, my 'member' can't click the mouse, let alone type...

    ---
    Posted anonymously to protect my karma.. Excellent!

  47. oh no! multiple A's by geekoid · · Score: 2

    AAAI

    Does this mean in 20 year we will be reading how the AAAI is sueing people for circumnavigating there robots copyprotection scheme?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:oh no! multiple A's by jratcliffe · · Score: 1

      "Does this mean in 20 year we will be reading how the AAAI is sueing people for circumnavigating there robots copyprotection scheme?"

      Isn't that what Magellan is for? :)

  48. I would disagree.... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 4, Insightful


    do they really tell us more about how the brain works? I don't think so - they mostly push the envelope in the field of pattern recognition and imitation.

    So pattern recognition and imitation are not considered a part of intelligence now?

    Wow. I better call my friends at every elementary school on the planet and tell them to radically change their teaching style.

  49. I guess the creators have to read up ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... on Asimov's "Feminine Intuition" (1969).

    "If I'd programmed her for sexual intonations,
    they would have asked her for a date already" :-)

    Toon Moene.

  50. Social Robot web/drink server is up! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    Well, I have finally gotten my Social Robot web/ drink server up! It is running in high positronic memory with about a 4k footprint. This server can do about 2-3 dps (drinks per second), and handle approx. 4 conversations at a time.

    I also have plans to do a Quake server that will actually come to your LAN party and kick your ass in person!

    Please check it out! http://www.socialrobotservesu.org It might be unavailable right now, I'm having a barbeque!

  51. where is Dr. Wallace? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've noticed that Dr. Wallace's name was suspiciously left out of the article.

    (probably because he's an idiot.)

  52. Does GRACE connect to internet? by currentdirectory · · Score: 1

    To make it more autonomous, grace should be able to connect internet (especially google). So, when user asks a question, all it has to do to ask the same question to google. There will be some reasonable answer in the search results.

    1. Re:Does GRACE connect to internet? by shadowduck · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, that is planned for the future. We currently have the ability to locate the AAAI badges that are given to all conference attendees and use OCR to extract the name of the person we're talking to (Swarthmore did that portion of the work). Next year, we'd like to try to schmooze with conference attendees about their current research by pulling down their current papers, c.v.'s, etc. off the web. In time, in time. :)

  53. "She has a nice personality..." by Picass0 · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    Wow. I mean, she may be nice, but put a bag over that head! In fact, put one over yours in case hers falls off!

  54. Separated at Birth? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
  55. pictures of grace by cisco_rob · · Score: 1

    Have a look at this!

    --
    "I do not fear computers. I fear lack of them." -Isaac Asimov
  56. I am building a space robot.. by anaesthesia · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Lowtax - I misprogrammed it. I tried to do good, but the robot jumped up and pushed grandma's head and she started spitting and her teeth flew out and the robot shot sparks and grandma fell down the stairs onto my uncle.

    It was the worst Christmas ever.

    Corn_Boy - oh no! sparks, did anything catch on fire

    Lowtax - Grandma did, but I got a Pusher robot to shove her outside into the snow."

    Credit where credit is due

  57. AICounselor by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

    On that note, maybe I'll start work on AICounselor_v1.0Beta.tar.gz now.. I'm sure GRACE would enjoy that module.

    Better yet, why don't you start work on AICounselor_Troi_v1.0Beta.tar.gz now! I'm sure WE would enjoy that module.

    GMD

  58. Oh great by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2

    several robots designed to actually register themselves will be participating in the conference

    Wonderful. First we have them registering themselves at conferences, the next thing you know they will register their own software installed on themselves.

    Does this mean in a few years I'll have to get my robot her own e-mail address for all the spam she gets?

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
  59. AI Advacnes by craw · · Score: 1

    I good indication of how far AI has advanced is the fact that GRACE is a brunette and not a blonde. In the next major advance, GRACE will don glasses and be renamed VELMA.

  60. Re:This post is sexist by CmdrSam · · Score: 1

    It's a sad, sad day on /. when this gets moderated up to 5...

    --Sam L-L

  61. What is this? by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 2

    GRACE runs Linux or she runs on Linux?

    --
    "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    1. Re:What is this? by macosxaddict · · Score: 1

      Grace is controlled by two computers mounted inside it, each of which runs Linux. Metrica's vision system also has a dedicated computer running Linux. Speech recognition is done by Viavoice, which (unfortunately) runs on a Windows laptop, also mounted on the robot.

  62. Re:This post is sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every day is a sad sad day on /. :(

  63. Re:This post is sexist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your right...it deserves much higher than 5..

  64. New Robot idea... by jzarzosa · · Score: 1

    ... when they release a robot modeled after Natalie Portman, I'll be more enthused. Especially the programmable aspect and 'open' source ;)

  65. I'm skeptical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    The AI establishment has, up till now, come up with very moronic robots that can deal only with environments so tightly constrained that the machines are virtually useless.

    For God's sake, I am not interested in a robot that can register itself at some conference. What I would like is a robot that can efficiently clean up the dust at home without wreaking havoc in the process. When the AI establishment pulls this one off they will, in my eyes, regain the credibility that they have lost after so many years of extravagant predictions.

  66. mod this shit up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but its ac :(

  67. What will this be like in 2050? by guttentag · · Score: 4, Funny
    Her goal is to register for the conference, give a speech and answer questions.
    I realize these are not easy tasks, but I have to wonder what challenging goals will be like in the future. Will we be reading an article on Slashdot.NET in 2050 that talks about a robot's goals at the conference including:
    • Driving itself to the conference in an inconspicuous, beat-up old 2040-model car?
    • Spilling its drink on an attractive woman's shirt and taking first-person-perspective photos of the cleanup efforts?
    • Fooling the attendees into believing it is a real person?
    • Fooling the other robots posing as attendees into believing it is a real person?
    • Fooling the attendees into believing they are real people?
    By those standards, registering oneself for the conference, giving a speech and answering questions seems easy.
  68. Wake me up.... by orthogonal · · Score: 1

    Wake me up robot lady writes her speech.

    Ahem. No, it's a cool idea, but it's a bit like the mechanical chess players of the 19th century: they played a good game, they moved the pieces by a clever clock-work mechanism, and some even had meachnaical faces able to form "expressions". But the ones that worked were all worked -- by little men inside their cramped interiors.

    Let's walk before we run, perhaps literally: we're not up to mechanizing consciousness or even a very reasonable facsimile. But could we pass the Turing tests -- indistiguisible behaviors -- for spiders or inchworms? Possibly and probably, for those two examples. Could we contruct a neuron-by-neuron facsimile of an Aplysia? With some hard work, you might expect to see it at sourceforge in 2006.

    So, what are you waiting for? Get to work on OpenAplysia Mark II! Or if you're busy with something else, atttack the other end of the problem, and donate your spare CPU cycles to folding@home.

    1. Re:Wake me up.... by orthogonal · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's http://folding.stanford.edu

      And now we know why I didn't go there or any other Ivy League school, don't we?

  69. Soccer Playing Robots Demonstrate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Columbia University had a competition demonstrating that robots can work in teams, learn, and have sportsmanship! ;) The direct link to the research results can be found here. Speach recognition, then soccer, next the WORLD!

    1. Re:Soccer Playing Robots Demonstrate by mtec · · Score: 1

      Great! Now they can teach Congress.

      --
      Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  70. Au contraire! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mon ami, geeks are way down low in self-esteem.

    Look, this is a social interaction:

    Geek: :-)

    Robotgirl: ;-D

    Geek: Wow! She smiled back! She loves me!

  71. Robotgirl, read this! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, not very original, but I wanted to do it in the dumbest way... ;-)

    Just kidding. It was great. 8-)

  72. Re:This post is sexist by linzeal · · Score: 1

    Yeah but if someone said, "Male cooks, yeah go to McDonald's" it would be primetime TV.

  73. One more thing... by mtec · · Score: 1

    ...the bot is supposed to do is trash the hotel room, steal the towels, make love to the ice machine and empty the minibar... (the same thing that French developers do at Apple's WWDC)

    --
    Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  74. On the eve of July 29th it became self aware... by Mattzilla · · Score: 1

    The system goes on-line July 28th, 2002. Human decisions are removed from strategic defense. Grace begins to learn at a geometric rate. It becomes self-aware at 2:14 a.m. Eastern time, July 29th. In a panic, they try to pull the plug...
    You know the rest...
    Quote plagiarized from Sciflicks

    --
    Everyman dies, not everyman really lives. -W.W
    1. Re:On the eve of July 29th it became self aware... by mtec · · Score: 1

      coulda been from Colossus: The Forbin Project (my favorite movie as a kid)

      --
      Cake or Death? Cake Please!
  75. Edmonton, Alberta? by dadragon · · Score: 1

    Why is the American robotics association meeting in Alberta? That simply strikes me as odd, unless it's a continental thing, and the Canadians comprimised on its name :)

    --
    God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    1. Re:Edmonton, Alberta? by macosxaddict · · Score: 1

      The United States is located on North America, just as Canada is. Of course it's continental. It's the AAAI, not the USAAI (United States Association for Artificial Intelligence, which, as far as I know, doesn't exist).

  76. Mrs. Sbaitso by ahaning · · Score: 1

    Attendee: Will you meet me later in my hotel room?
    GRACE: Let's not talk about me. Let's talk about you.
    A: So then answer is yes, then.
    G: Please be more specific.
    A: So, you will meet me later in my hotel room.
    G: Why do you want to meet me later in my hotel room?
    A: No, MY hotel room.
    G: What do you mean by MY hotel room?
    A: You'll be meeting ME later in MY hotel room. Not YOUR hotel room.
    G: I don't have a hotel room. Let's not talk about me. Let's talk about you.
    A: Gah!
    G: Please be more specific.

    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  77. Laser rangefinders? by iamroot · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Looking over photos of the convention center in Edmonton, one of Simmons' fears is the center's glass elevators.

    Grace uses floor-level laser range-finders to find her way around; the laser beams go straight through glass, rather than being reflected as they are with other obstacles."


    I can see the laser rangefinders at the bottom, but it also has a bunch of ultrasound transducers in the middle, and some other lens(laser scanner?) above those in front. The glass shouldn't be too much of a problem provided that the ultrasonics are working.

    Sonar does have some problems, but it works well enough on the robots I've seen/used/built. The ultrasound clicks they make can be annoying, but it works. At a university I toured once, they were demonstrating some robots, a heathkit one, and two custom ones which looked exactly like GRACE, execpt they had thermal, visible, and UV(I think) cameras, 24 ultrasonics, laser rangefinders, a 3D laser scanner on top, and no screen. The robots were roaming around, and greeting people. They didn't seem to have any problem avoiding obstacles, it was actually kind of funny when the heathkit said "Pardon me." to a supply cart:)

    1. Re:Laser rangefinders? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To which I wish the supply cart had replied: "Eat recycled food. It's good for the environment, and okay for you."

  78. Reportedly by Caliper+Remote · · Score: 1
    Reportedly it's first words were: "I suppose you'll want to see the aliens now. Do you want me to sit in a corner and rust, or just fall apart where I'm standing?"

    Followed closely by: "Pardon me for breathing, which I never do anyway so I don't know why I bother to say it, oh God, I'm so depressed."

    Later it claimed to be experiencing acute pain in the diodes down it's left side. Despite it's not having any diodes on that side, and not being programmed to feel pain. When confronted about this it said: "Making it up? Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."

  79. Read article? by SectoidRandom · · Score: 2

    Well I hate to be anal about a joke, but the CNN article actually mentioned that the researchers hired Drama Students to help teach the 'social skills'..

    That is interesting in itself. I guess these geeks see their weaknesses quite well?

  80. FUXORS 8====D FUXORS 8====D FUXORS 8====D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Important Stuff:
    Please try to keep posts on topic.
    Try to reply to other people comments instead of starting new threads.
    Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
    Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
    Problems regarding accounts or comment posting should be sent to CowboyNeal.

  81. Got skills? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Darn, it's the weekend. I'll have to wait until Monday to turn on the soap operas and see how smoothly social skills are demonstrated by those who have years of experience in the dramatic arts...

  82. Re:are you a rules girl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    26. Love only those who love you.

    I love ironic punchlines. Don't you?