Slashdot Mirror


Cheap KVM Over IP?

An anonymous reader asks: "I've been looking for a cost effective (ie, cheap) way to remotely administer several servers running a variety of OS's, and would like to have a solution that would allow for monitoring of the bios on startup, etc (ie, not VNC). The most appealing solution is KVM over IP, which really just means a souped up KVM switch with something like VNC running on it, unfortunately all of the solutions I've been able to find are more expensive than I can justify spending. I've played around a bit with making my own Poor man's KVM over IP; I did this by purchasing a cheap (sub $50) VGA-to-NTSC convertor, then feeding it into a video card with NTSC input (the ATI All-In-Wonder Radion), and then by logging into a machine running Windows Terminal Services I'm able to watch the reboot process. Of course, this doesn't address the mouse/keyboard issue, and the quality isn't all that great. What I'm hoping is that someone else might have a suggestion on how to do this, preferably using Linux and the least hardware necessary. Does anyone have any suggestions or insights on ways to do this?" There are pre-existing solutions, but it seems they are all kind of pricey. Can any of you suggest cheap solutions (at or below $500USD) that could handle a farm of 5-10 machines?

"Here are the three approaches I found:

ViewProxy: They make the most economical for administration of multiple machines (by one person). Their ProxyView device plugs into your KVM just like it was a monitor/mouse/keyboard, and then does all the packetizing magic. Price is about $6k from what I can tell.

eRIC: These are the same guys who make the Rolf (Reboot on Lan), which is pretty cool. They make a card called Eric which replaces your normal video card with their card, which has a built in ethernet connection and allows remote control. The cheapest solution at about $700 but only would allow control of the machine it's installed in.

Avocent: I think the first to introduce the whole KVM over IP solution, they have KVM's with this sort of functionality integrated. Some of their products allow multiple users to multiple machine, which is a neat feature but not needed for my applications. Their units run from $4k on up."

248 comments

  1. Maybe use GRACE? by jaxdahl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Use GRACE from the earlier article and tell her to manage the computers.. only problem is that she might budge in your CS games.
    heh
    fp

  2. Well by CrndrTaco+on · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I didn't want to post this because ssh works well for me but I gues if you use Windows you need something like this.

    --
    Pants are optional, but recomended for you.
    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can watch the bootup process, BIOS and all, via SSH?

      You might want to alteast read the question before you post.

    2. Re:Well by Sturm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm. You can see the BIOS on reboot using ssh? What are you doing, running ssh in ROM?

    3. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha CmdrTaco you assfucker!

      Why would you need to watch the bios part of the reboot? Linux 'dmesg' and the kernel logging facility is all you need to look at. If a machine you are responsible for needs to be babysat in the bios, then you are doing something very very wrong. Or using Windows.

    4. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re-read the earlier poster nickname. It wasn't CmdrTaco, it was C_r_n_drTaco. Nice visual hack.

    5. Re:Well by palesius · · Score: 1

      not to mention it wasn't even C r n d rTaco, it was "CrndrTaco on"

      --
      "We are what we pretend to be, so we must be careful about what we pretend to be." --Kurt Vonnegut
  3. Just get Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't crash all the time like Linux, so you don't have to worry about all that nonsense. :-P

  4. Bandwidth Issues? by Vodalian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What kinda bandwidth are we talking to transmit say a 1024x768x256 colors (to save bandwidth) screen at a decent frame rate? Hope you have Gigabit Ethernet to run this decently!

    1. Re:Bandwidth Issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What kinda bandwidth are we talking to transmit say a 1024x768x256 colors (to save bandwidth) screen at a decent frame rate? Hope you have Gigabit Ethernet to run this decently

      I use Terminal Services Client for Win2k @1024x768x256 without any bandwidth issues. It is even acceptable over a 28.8k dialup. (better on a lan, but acceptable on a dialup)

    2. Re:Bandwidth Issues? by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      I use Terminal Services Client for Win2k @1024x768x256 without any bandwidth issues. It is even acceptable over a 28.8k dialup. (better on a lan, but acceptable on a dialup)


      By comparison Netmeeting (and even TightVNC) can't manage that. . . .

      Of course, err, what is your definition of acceptible? To me 800x600x8bit Netmeeting over a 256kbit (cable modem, that is max upstream from either end) connection sucks.

    3. Re:Bandwidth Issues? by jpmkm · · Score: 2

      afaik with terminal services, the windows are actually drawn using on the client side, rather than transmitting actual images. Lot less bandwidth to send api calls than to send full res images.

    4. Re:Bandwidth Issues? by JM_the_Great · · Score: 1

      uncompressed, 1024x768x256 (8 bit) = ~6.3 MB/frame. Assuming our idea of "decent framerate" is persistance of vision (i.e. making all the motion seem constant, not a bunch of little jumps), we can start with around 15 fps. So, uncompressed, yes... you have a valid point of transferring ~94.4MB/sec.

      However, are you planning on sending the images uncompressed? That would be insane... the avreage screen is largely a bunch of boxes of a single color - perfect for compression.

      This doesn't even mention you really don't need to send a whole new frame when something moves, all you need to do is update that one part of the frame. I know VNC and M$ Terminal Services don't work for what we're looking for here, but they definately demonstrate bandwidth is -not- an issue.

      --

      --Justin Mitchell
      "2nd Place is a fancy word for losing" --Bender (Futurama)
    5. Re:Bandwidth Issues? by itzdandy · · Score: 1

      that is 6.3Mb, which equals 786K
      1024*768 = 786432 pixels, at 8bit color, 8 bits are used per pixel, theirfor 1Byte/pixel. 786,432bytes per image, uncompressed, but then compression is used and may reduce the image to 1/2-3/4, so on the high end about 600Kilobytes.

      not 600Kilobytes/frame, would in fact be 9.2MB/sec, but why would you update the whole screen?, of coarse the box would only update parts that had changed., realistically that resolution can be broadcast over a 56k connection because no more than 5% of the screen changes during most operations. even moving a window does not take too much bandwidth because the intelegent compression technology can "drift" parts of an image to a new position.

      also, keep in mind that the console is 640x400x4bit. = 128K per uncompressed image, and if it scales well. then a 56k should be more than adequate as @32K(average ~56k connection speed) it would take at most 4 seconds to do a full page refresh, and like i said before, only very small parts are refreshed on a regular basis. each character should be about 10pixelsx6pixels@4bit. so 8bytes for a single letter?

      rember that compression as well!

    6. Re:Bandwidth Issues? by spongman · · Score: 2

      yup, TS is much, much more intelligen than VNC. VNC sucks for anything more than 100M. The only thing wrong with the TS client is the rebinding of the common shortcuts (like ctrl-esc, etc...)

    7. Re:Bandwidth Issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You guys are confusing a video stream with updated screenshots. VNC works by only sending data thats needed. ie if a new window opens, it sends the data for that window only, and it only sends it once. So when your booting up, whatever changes on the screen is what is sent down the line. which *always* amounts to far less than 800x600x256 colours, or *whatever* res its running at.

      Look at how much bandwidth is chewed up by VNC when a screen is static. You will find that the answer is 'none'.

      I think any reasonable answer given to this ask slashdot will be one that involves a similar way of dealing with screen updates (ie. not having to send 800x600x256 every frame).

    8. Re:Bandwidth Issues? by mtythor · · Score: 1

      My god how much off context can you get. This is begining to sound like a bad Monty Python sketch.

      It could have been an African Sparrow....

    9. Re:Bandwidth Issues? by matguy · · Score: 1

      None is a strong term there, it takes at least a little bandwidth to tell eachother that nothing has changed, and that isn't nothing.

      --

      matguy(.com)
  5. How about using this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just get Grace to type and show you with a webcam? She can probably navigate to the various displays, press the KVM buttons, etc. YOu may have to do some hardware upgrades...

    1. Re:How about using this by Fehson · · Score: 0

      Grace has no hands. Perhaps you could hire an MCSE to push the buttons for her.

  6. RealWeasel by travisd · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.realweasel.com/intro.html

    1. Re:RealWeasel by jred · · Score: 2

      Even better is the model shown in their Haberdashery... That's the model *I* want :)

      --

      jred
      I'm not a mechanic but I play one in my garage...
    2. Re:RealWeasel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      they embedded the following easter egg in their FAQ:

      Q.

      Is "slashdot" a verb?

      A. Yes.

    3. Re:RealWeasel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      We use the weasel at work on 100+ linux servers and roboman ER for the windows boxes. Everything is connected through a console server that connects the serial ports to the lan. It works pretty well, excpet that the console server (baytech device) needs special cables to work.

    4. Re:RealWeasel by FocaJonathan · · Score: 1

      The problem with the real weasel at least the non PCI one that I bought was getting many computers to use it as the primary video card if there was built in VGA.

      Once the box is up you can switch it, but to watch the boot happen you better have a box with no onboard video or the MDA video will not get used.

      It is a neat product, bu we could not make it work in production.

  7. This is a market hole by Nijika · · Score: 2

    There's a giant need for this, cheaper. If someone can come up with a 1U KVM over IP box under $2000 USD they'd make a killing in the SME market.

    --
    Luck favors the prepared, darling.
    1. Re:This is a market hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what about the lantronix products? (www.lantronix.com) I have used them for console servers for Solaris boxes and they are great. Depending on what you are watching reboot this may fit the need...

      eric.

  8. simple solution for 5 machines: by edrugtrader · · Score: 1

    5 monitors, 5 keyboards, 5 mice

    price: $200.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:simple solution for 5 machines: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >5 monitors, 5 keyboards, 5 mice

      you are stupid

    2. Re:simple solution for 5 machines: by sporty · · Score: 2

      That requires a MUCH larger desk :P And what if it was on a rack?

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    3. Re:simple solution for 5 machines: by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know if wireless keyboards have a uid, or not? It would be nice to get cheap IR led off the motherboard and use a single wireless keyboard to admin in the NOC, hmmmz maybe I'll order some online they are dirt cheap and some even come with a serial or usb interface.

    4. Re:simple solution for 5 machines: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's cool. Login to all 30 machines at once!

  9. Rebooting? Whats that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yeah...now I remember...I "rebooted" last month. Never again. Am I the only one that thinks watching a boot process is a once-in-a-box's-lifetime experience?

    1. Re:Rebooting? Whats that? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh yeah...now I remember...I "rebooted" last month. Never again.

      Just out of curiousity, what is your IP address?

      - A.P.

      --
      "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    2. Re:Rebooting? Whats that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My LAN server's IP address is not publically routable. As such, it would be useless to Internet users...but if you're curious: fe80::221:7fff:fe10:55ea.

    3. Re:Rebooting? Whats that? by xtremex · · Score: 1

      Running BSD with IP v6? I still have to read up on IP 6....

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    4. Re:Rebooting? Whats that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yeah man, I can't speak for the other BSDs but FreeBSD sets up IPv6 in the default install automagically. You can even tunnel IPv6 through an IPv4 gateway using Freenet6. Pretty cool.

      Oh, and it is an honor to have the one-and-only Wakko Warner reply to my original post. An honor indeed.

    5. Re:Rebooting? Whats that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad your just an AC ass-muppet

      like me

  10. Serial Console (BIOS Redirection) by Precision · · Score: 5, Informative

    Many newer motherboards support BIOS redirection over the serial port. All of my systems (intel 440gx) supports this. It allows full remote BIOS configuration, etc. Used in conjuction with linux's serial console and sysrq over serial I find the solution works quite well.

    --
    - U
    1. Re:Serial Console (BIOS Redirection) by linzeal · · Score: 1

      The best person for any menial job is a blind person who just does that single task. If the bios already has a basic serial driver why not a specialized tcp/ip stack, vnc, and ethernet driver as well? Wasn't there a project to put linux in the bios along with a primitive firewall? Couldn't this be an optional module to this project?

    2. Re:Serial Console (BIOS Redirection) by kasperd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If the bios already has a basic serial driver

      All BIOSes has had that as long as I remember. (Which is more than 10 years.)

      why not a specialized tcp/ip stack, vnc, and ethernet driver as well?

      They are quite limited in the amount of code it has space for. Originally they could only keep at most 64KB. Today some are manufactured with more, but it can only be used during boot before loading the OS. When the OS gets loaded it switches to the small size, so all drivers must fit into 64KB to be available to the OS.

      This is also not an area in which much development is going on. In the days of DOS, the drivers in the BIOS was actually being used all the way. But today every OS has its own drivers, the BIOS is only being used during boot. So as soon as the computer can boot and get the OS into memory, nobody really cares about the BIOS any more. The BIOS API used by DOS and loaders has changed very little in the last years. This API does not include networking, and it probably never will. It has been many years since a new device got available through this API, most changes are just to deal with development in already supported units. Today BIOSes does support harddisks larger than 504MB. The last new device that has been added support for in the BIOS is the ATAPI CDROM, but this is really only suitable for boot, and it actually didn't change the API, it merely emulates a floppy.

      Wasn't there a project to put linux in the bios along with a primitive firewall?

      Yes.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    3. Re:Serial Console (BIOS Redirection) by deanpole · · Score: 1

      If you do build one, an Axis board would be a perfect. Boots from flash, has dual serial, has ethernet, and runs Linux!

  11. PC Weasel by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1, Redundant

    www.realweasel.com

    makes a card that allows for this... but i havent looked at their product in over a year now - so it might even have greater functionality than last time I looked...

    but it allowed for bios monitoring etc...

    and you can test one of their cards out from their site. (used to be over telnet)

    1. Re:PC Weasel by Scrybe · · Score: 2, Informative

      This looks like a cool product but would work IF and ONLY IF you only need a console. no mouse, no GUI, no XMMS :`( From the post I am guessing that he needs a mouse and a GUI (XMMS or Winamp optional).

      One comprimise might be to use the small slender rodent adapter to capture your post and then use a VNC server for daily operation but that sound almost as kludgey as what he is using now.

      Hopefully someone will come up with a smaller/cheaper process for IP KVM's and/or economies of scale will kick in and the price on these units will come down.

      One final thought that could be very dangerous, what is the possibility of hacking the BIOS on the motherboard to dump the post out the serial or ethernet ports, heck if there is enough free code space you might even be able to configure through the serial. (note IANAEE and IANACS)

      Good luck!

      --

      <This .sig left intentionally blank>

    2. Re:PC Weasel by laserjet · · Score: 3, Informative

      Why would you need anything more than a console? After the machine is booted up beyond the BIOS/etc, you can use the features of X or VNC to do whatever you want with a GUI. There is no need for it.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    3. Re:PC Weasel by adamjaskie · · Score: 1

      I have heard that many BIOS in servers have the ability to be configured over the serial port. Heck, I have an OLD mobo with a pseudo-windows GUI that uses a SERIAL MOUSE (optional) for configuration! Anyway, if your BIOS can be controlled over the serial port, you can control it from a serial terminal. Also, LILO can be controlled from a serial terminal, as can Linux and UNIX. I belive DOS also has this option (but it disables the local console.) Once you get logged in, you can run console apps, or GUI apps, set to display on a remote X server. You could even replace the serial terminal with an old Linux box running SSH with a bunch of multi-serial port cards in it. Then you simply run an ssh session to the serial-port server, connect a terminal emulator to one of the serial ports, configure the remote system's bios, tell it what kernel to boot, login, run some console apps, and bring up some GUI apps to your X display. I don't know how much multi serial port cards are, but you can get a very capable 486 system for well under $100. Of course, I don't know how this would work with Windows, or other operating systems, but it would work fine with Linux.

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    4. Re:PC Weasel by nehril · · Score: 2

      You applied the latest kernel security patch from your villa on the Mediterranean. It (the patch, that is) broke your Foozbit Gigabit ethernet, and now X/VNC/whatever is useless. You now have to cut your vacation short and say goodbye to the ladies on the nude beach, fly back and fix it yourself.

      I, on the other hand, did the same via a remote KVM over IP solution. When the patch hosed my system, I just logged back in via the kvm, booted into single user mode and backed out the patch.

      The ladies here, by the way, say hello. Though they don't really remember your name anymore. ;)

    5. Re:PC Weasel by laserjet · · Score: 2

      so you were applying kernel patches on a nude beach?

      I think it is you who is mistaken... :)

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
  12. try cyberguys by option8 · · Score: 3, Informative

    this link (which slashdot will probably munge: http://cyberguys.com/cgi-bin/sgin0101.exe?UID=2002 080514403159&GEN6=00&GEN9=5CG01&FNM=00&T1=104+1150 &UREQA=1&UREQB=2&UREQC=3&UREQD=4

    or else try product # 104 1150 on http://www.cyberguys.com

    it's a KVM "extender" that works over cat 5 for 500 feet. i don't know who makes it, but the cyberguys catalog had it. this plus a KVM switch on each end of your setup might be enable you to do what you want...

    1. Re:try cyberguys by cjpez · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      this link (which slashdot will probably munge:
      Yeah, blame Slashdot. <A HREF="http://getaclue.org">Learn how to make a link!</A>
    2. Re:try cyberguys by ahaning · · Score: 2, Informative

      Come on, you've been here long enough that you should by now know how to make a link. If you think people might be afraid of what it is, post the text for the foil-heads and a real link for convenience.

      CONSOLE EXTENDER CE-220

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    3. Re:try cyberguys by steelersfan · · Score: 1

      Here is a link for more info on that product:
      http://www.aten-usa.com/products/product select.php ?Category_ID=26

  13. What I used once... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Logitech USB camera connected to another box and this keyboard signal producing box. I dont remember what, but you could send a character to its input via serial and it would send that char into another computer's keyboard.

  14. The PC Weasel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the PC Weasel: PCWeasel. It replaces the video card and allows you to monitor the BIOS startup over a serial port. It won't help after the machine switches to a graphics mode, but at that point you could use VNC, SSH or other stuff. BIOS is the hard thing to monitor on a PC, and the PC Weasel does it. Plus it's somewhat cheap: $350 for the card.

  15. vga - serial cards by kevin+lyda · · Score: 2, Redundant
    --
    US Citizen living abroad? Register to vote!
    1. Re:vga - serial cards by bari · · Score: 1

      Is it just me, or does the card at bsdmall look exactly like the RealWeasel PCI, only $175 more expensive?

  16. Raritan by Kraegar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Raritan has some nice CAT5 based KVM solutions, that work terribly well in scaling between small and large environments. However I think the price may be a bit higher then you were hoping.

    1. Re:Raritan by NetJunkie · · Score: 3, Informative

      I just ordered this set up for work. Very nice, but yes, it's pricey. It uses CAT5 but not IP. We're switching to get rid of the clutter of those fat KVM cables that other boxes use.

      If you want connectivity over IP you can add the TeleReach option to the Paragon box (the one mentioned above).

  17. Cheap alternative by Zayin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Check out Raritan. They have a wide range of such products. Not sure about prices though.

    --
    "I'd rather have a full bottle in front of me than a full frontal lobotomy"
  18. are you serious? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1

    Umm...how about a serial console for the bios, then just redisplaying X for the gui...via just redisplaying it from unix to unix, or using vnc to see it in windows (or using an X client on windows, like Exceed). I mean...surely you can't be serious. Serial consoles have been around for like, eons. Even if you just use a digiboard so you can connect a bunch of com1's up to serial ports on a single system, that would work. on post, you don't typically have umm...you know...an ip. But through com1, you can do most everything.

    1. Re:are you serious? by froh · · Score: 1

      Who told you that you need an IP to transmit on an network?

    2. Re:are you serious? by dAzED1 · · Score: 1
      "Who told you that you need an IP to transmit on an network?"

      well obviously you don't per se, but there's nothing in the standard bios that allows network traffic of any sort as early as post.

      There IS something in the standard bios that allows you to remote manage the system through a serial console. And despite what dingleberry whomever thinks, doing admin through serial consoles has nothing to do with bailing wire or duct tape. Its been a viable means of doin it for a very long time. Its simple, and effective.

  19. RealWeasel by friscolr · · Score: 1, Redundant
    the RealWeasel will give you a serial console for i386 hardware. It might be out of your price range, though, at $250 for the ISA and $350 for the pci version.

    Dell and other companies come with their own similar solutions - add on boards that allow powering off the server. There are some nice links off of the realweasel site to other places with similar devices.

    Otherwise, buy Sun or any other hardware platform that comes with serial console standard.

  20. Hardware solution with caveats for you by wherley · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Check out the Compaq Remote Insight Lights Out edition board.
    • This full length PCI card has a network interface on it that which you access via a web browser.
    • It self generates an SSL certificate and gives you java access to live screen via java applet.
    • Works best with certain Compaq servers due to better cabling but may work with other servers.
    • Display updates not as snappy as VNC but bearable.
    • Lets you reply last boot sequence even if you weren't watching it live.
    • Lets you use a "virtual" floppy.
    • May have some issues when trying to co-exist with a local KVM switch.
    • Runs around $500 which is at the top end of your price list.
    1. Re:Hardware solution with caveats for you by andykuan · · Score: 1

      I have these deployed in all of our servers and I love it. Not only does it provide excellent remote control of Intel-based boxes, but it's all running over ethernet which means that a) there isn't a massive tangle of KVM cables to manage (imagine twelve 1U servers each with three fixed-length cables run to a single KVM switch -- no thank you!) and b) it runs on IP so I've got all of my infrastructure control/communication consolidated on one network. I've reinstalled Linux from scratch on servers from the comfort of my own home at 3AM.

    2. Re:Hardware solution with caveats for you by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2

      I've got several of these installed with customers. My comments:

      1) Despite any gripes below, it does what it says it will do flawlessly.
      2) Virtual floppy can only be used for booting and operating systems that access the floppy via INT 13 (basically DOS unless somebody out there has a *nix INT 13 hack - don't even think about Win NT/2K/XP).
      3) Requires one additional IP address, switch port per machine (and associated cabling, etc).
      4) As far as I know it only works with Compaq Proliant servers (but I'd love to hear from somebody with other experience).
      5) Graphical remote control sucks ass (sssslllooooowwww, even over a LAN), but it can get you to where you can use VNC / PCAnywhere / SSH / Windows Remote Console, etc.

      You also left out that it has the ability to power-off / power-on / cold-boot the server.

      Despite the above qualms, I spec them in all critical servers because they're the only way (short of true KVM over IP) to completely remotely troubleshoot a crashed server. By that I mean full access during the boot process, the ability to see a BSOD (or other OS equic) screen live, and the ability to control the OS boot through a text and / or graphical startup process. In fact, for a remote (colo, etc) Win2K server, I usually leave the Win2K CD in the drive, and a floppy disk with any special RAID / HDD drivers in the floppy drive. From there I can literally do a complete OS reinstall by remote control (of course, it would be nice if all of my server software ran on OSes that don't require occasional reinstalls, but that's another story).

      --

      Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
  21. PC Weasel -- open source product by devphil · · Score: 1, Redundant


    You want www.realweasel.com, and the PC Weasel 2000.

    It's open source, it's got a picture of a weasel with an axe standing next to headless (bleeding) Linux Tux and BSD Beastie, and it's from a company called Middle Digital Incorporated. You have to support that if you're a true geek.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:PC Weasel -- open source product by trajano · · Score: 1

      I think this product really hits its mark for the price. Might be a useful thing to have on a corporate server farm if I ever run one.

      --
      Archie - CIO-for-hire :-)
  22. Sneaker Net by drbaker · · Score: 5, Funny

    A pair of Nikes cost less than $500 (but only just). That's about as close as you're gonna get.

  23. Hey, why not? by delta407 · · Score: 3, Informative

    This probably isn't exactly what you were looking for, but I would consider and maybe request an eval of VMware GSX Server or maybe even ESX Server. Both let you monitor the virtual machine over IP -- in fact, there's even a web-based administration interface. And, of course, you can watch BSODs as they happen, hit the reset button using your toolbar, and go into the BIOS setup utility remotely.

    Neither is cheap (GSX is the cheaper of the two and runs $3500, $1600 academic) but if you can consolidate your boxes into one big box it might be worth it. After all, it's always good to centralize your points of failure, right?

    Big thumbs up for VMware.

  24. For God's sake...WHY? by realmolo · · Score: 0

    Why would you need to monitor the BIOS on startup? What's that going to do for you?

    1. Re:For God's sake...WHY? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      In a production environment, one sometimes needs to be able to do things to the machine in "BIOS" mode, like change partition/mirroring/raid settings on disk controller, or have machine boot from alternate device for upgrades, etc. Very convenient to be able to do such things remotely....I've installed Linux on former NT boxes using Compaq's remote management boards from 25 miles away

    2. Re:For God's sake...WHY? by stor · · Score: 1

      Machines sometimes fail before boot. Think memory errors, hard drives, controller failures...

      They happen. 8(

      Cheers
      Stor

      --
      "Yeah well there's a lot of stuff that should be, but isn't"
  25. Simple answer... by Tet · · Score: 3, Informative
    ...is don't use PC hardware. I have a farm of Suns at a remote hosting site. Because they're Real Computers(tm), they're designed with remote admin in mind. Which means you get a full serial console access, so you can mess around with the PROM (the equivalent of a BIOS), and I can even remotely power them on and off, all via a serial port. A few PC makers are starting to get the idea, but not a single one comes close to Sun (or other non PC hardware like Alphas or Power boxen). Dell and Compaq both offer remote access options, but they're a) expensive, b) require drivers, and hence are geared towards Windows, and c) typically take up the only available PCI slot on a 1U server. With a Netra T1, for example, it just works straight out of the box, no extra purchase needed, all you need to access it is an ANSI terminal emulator, and your precious PCI slot is still free for that extra SCSI card / quad ethernet / whatever.

    But given that non-PC hardware is probably not an option for you, then consider something like the RealWeasel, although I've heard mixed reports about it from those that have tried it. The online demo looks like it should at least be usable, though.

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
    1. Re:Simple answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Real Slow Computers(tm), right?

    2. Re:Simple answer... by norwoodites · · Score: 2

      Also Apple's Xserve also offers serial OF (BIOS) booting.

    3. Re:Simple answer... by Master+Bait · · Score: 1
      I agree. I also think that if the questioner told us why he thought it was necessary for him to watch his machine boot up, we would have come up with an answer that eliminated the need for him to stand around looking at the bootup screen in the first place.

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    4. Re:Simple answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      Ask Slashdot:

      Q: How do I make A do B?
      A: Don't use A. C does B better. Only losers use A.

      Moderation: +5 Informative
      Usefulness: 0

    5. Re:Simple answer... by beebware · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's got one of those annoying machines that we had at my old employers. Basically, every time it was rebooted it'll just hang saying "Press F2 to continue" halfway through the BIOS boot. This meant that while we could remotely reboot the box (via VNC) we still had to wander over to the server room at the other end of the building to press a single key for the box to come back up.

    6. Re:Simple answer... by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I realize this is a troll, but I really must reply. I'm impressed that you still hold close your illusions. It can only mean that you haven't been exposed to the greatness that is Sun. Just wait until your next Cluster Patch...

    7. Re:Simple answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Compaq Remote Insight Boards are $500, are non-OS specific and require no drivers. This isn't a solution to this guy's problem, but your research is inadequate or just plain wrong.

    8. Re:Simple answer... by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      OpenFirmware is an open standard. Apple uses it, although apparently has not implemented it fully (at least according to the Sun spec). I don't see why PCs couldn't use it. Maybe because it would require new firmware on any bootable PCI devices (IDE controllers, SCSI controllers, etc).

    9. Re:Simple answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The support guys where I work don't refer to them as Cluster Patches, but they are Cluster 'somethings', that's for sure...

    10. Re:Simple answer... by evilviper · · Score: 2

      I agree. Non-PC hardware is really the right way to go. However, Sun certainly isn't the only option.

      Compaq Alpha, HP PowerPC/PA-RISC, IBM RS/AS *, et al.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    11. Re:Simple answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sun systems; slow, expensive, unreliable(420r ecache data parity errors babe!, new sunblade 1k's
      high failure rate/doa!). a) commerical solutions to see bios post remotely + cheap fast pc's nowhere near as expensive as sun. b & c maybe for dell and compaq, but not for all(ibm, others) and with 1u systems with integrated video and most uses for 1u system are for being in a compute farm where slots remain empty anyway, big deal if one is used. Bottom line is that, though it's possible it will take more effort to get remote bios posting on the pc's, the initial cost savings and most importantly, the gain in using much faster machines aka faster time to market,
      WAY outway suns solutions. Suns last line of defense is software only running on sun systems but that's going fast at least for EDA tools. They'll only have the big iron stuff left, e10k.

    12. Re:Simple answer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...is don't use PC hardware

      Isn't that special!

      Because they're Real Computers(tm)

      You are more 37173 than me!

      (or other non PC hardware like Alphas or Power boxen).

      Nobody says, boxen, man. Give it up, uber hax0r.

      What you post has truths, but you don't need to be an asshole about it.

  26. why not serial console by jormurgandr · · Score: 1

    I know it wont work for windows boxes, but for the linux machines just compile-in support for console over standard serial, run the lines into a multiport serial card (~$50), and ssh into that box to access the servers.

    1. Re:why not serial console by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know it wont work for windows boxes, but for the linux machines just compile-in support for console over standard serial, run the lines into a multiport serial card (~$50), and ssh into that box to access the servers.

      Windows 2K or is it Windows XP, anyways one of the windows has introduced Serial based consoling. It is a new revolution as they continue one in their quest to invent Unix.

  27. bt878s with a gateway running ffserver by Deadplant · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How about putting cheapo tvout cards in all the servers, and connecting them all to a dedicated pc that has like 5 bt878 capture cards. (short svideo cables)
    That'll let you see the whole boot process including doing bios stuff.

    Then run ffserver (ffmpeg, or maybe ffpegrec which is part of nvrec) on this gateway machine to encode and serve up divx5 video streams.

    You can add security with freeswan and certificates if you like.

    This can all be done using linux fairly easily. The major drawback would be the limit on PCI slots for capture cards. There are cheap Viewcast cards that have 3 inputs you can switch between so you could get at least 15 channels.(just not all at the same time)
    You'd need a control channel aswell i guess.. maybe you could get a keyboard switch and write a little script to let you pipe your keyboard actions to whichever machine you want.

    1. Re:bt878s with a gateway running ffserver by Tassleman · · Score: 1

      That is probably the worst idea for this I could possibly imagine. I am now dumber for having read it.

    2. Re:bt878s with a gateway running ffserver by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1

      Or you could get a million little mirrors and lenses, then train a monkey to type based on how many electrical shocks you zap him with from your cozy remote location. Rube Goldberg rocks!

      Ok, I'm done, I'll try to be nicer now...

      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
  28. Would someone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..please reboot the clue server?

  29. Not any time soon... by PureFiction · · Score: 3, Interesting

    KVM over IP is going to be costly into the near future. This isn't exactly commodity hardware, so it may stay high for a looong time.

    You may want to consider an alternative approach (which is what I have been doing ever since the remote KVM sticker shock faded) which obviates the need for a remote KVM at all.

    For example:
    1. All systems boot from custom CD-R (good for security too) which then boots the remainder off a network drive or perhaps hdd.

    2. Remote power cycling (cheap, $100 for 8 ports you can controll over IP) is used to power cycle one or more machines to force a reboot.

    3. If you need to reimage the OS, simply replace the OS stored on the boot server, or have the CDROM boot image reimage remotely when given a specific trigger (this is the area wide open for all kinds of solutions. Luckily, all software based using linux and cheap CDR's, network filesytems, etc)

    This still has a number of drawbacks. If the machine doesnt come back, there is no remote KVM access to tell you what the bios is complaigning about (bad disk?).

    The bootup process is cumbersome. I.e. you need to always boot from CDR to be able to reimage a system later (dedicated hosting) and such.

    1. Re:Not any time soon... by swb · · Score: 2

      If I can buy an IP KVM and ditch a convoluted, impossible-to-maintain system like you propose, I'm saving myself thousands in future consulting fees when your house of cards system collapses.

    2. Re:Not any time soon... by PureFiction · · Score: 2

      House of cards?

      I am the first to admit this is a hack, but I have no idea what you think will suddenly implode in such a setup. It is one thing to be kludge / hack, and another to be unrecoverably faulty.

    3. Re:Not any time soon... by swb · · Score: 2

      Mainly because it's convoluted, nonstandard way of doing something. I'll give you that its clever and probably functional, but in terms of understandability and maintainability by others it loses a lot of points.

      I guess I'm just thinking of the number of "money saving", "clever" kludges/hacks I've had to detangle and re-assemble or integrate with other environments. It's goes from either more complex than usual (when the kludger is around to explain/understand it) to a total nightmare (no kludger, no docs, serious tear-apart required).

      Maybe I'm just not clever or I'm lazy, but I find KISS to be a sound principal...

  30. Kaveman - ~$3500 by Masao-Kun · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not cheap at $3500, but better than the non-video card solutions mentioned...

    Kaveman from Digital V6

    They also have models with integrated KVM's for more, but I didn't inquire about the price of those, and they don't put prices on their web page.

  31. Here is a per server solution that is cheap. by meyeaard · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another poster pointed me in this direction....

    1. Get a weasle card for each server you have.
    2. Get a Clysdale terminal server, or plug the serial into a Linux box and ssh to that system and use minicom....

    This may or may not work for windows. Windows won't let you use the weasle as primary video, but if you can add an AGP card to the system for windows and the weasle card for BIOS.... Make sure winblows gets the primary display setup for the AGP card....

    This is pure conjecture and you are responsible for any purchases and headaches caused by the preceeding!

    1. Re:Here is a per server solution that is cheap. by meyeaard · · Score: 1

      Oops forgot to post URL to weasle....

      http://www.realweasel.com/products.html

    2. Re:Here is a per server solution that is cheap. by M-G · · Score: 3, Funny

      . Get a Clysdale terminal server,

      Uh, don't you mean Cyclades? I think someone needs a beer... :)

    3. Re:Here is a per server solution that is cheap. by CoolVibe · · Score: 2
      2. Get a Clysdale terminal server, or plug the serial into a Linux box and ssh to that system and use minicom....

      I was with you up until the Clysdale/Livinsgton. The nullmodem-in-*nix box too... but minicom? Yech!

      Real serial terminal diehards go for either tip/cu or Kermit. Minicom has crappy terminal emulation (especially when dealing with Sun serial console, for example). cu/tip might not play nice with ssh, because the break sequence for cu/tip is the same as in ssh, but that just depends on implementation. Kermit just works everyhere, and anywhere. And it's free too! wow...

      Just a tip from a fellow admin with systems on serial console. Ditch that minicom abberation. Heck, even seyon is better.

      And, oh yeah, to still stay ontopic, newer intel 1u servers usually have that feature that the bios can be altered/monitored/whatever across the serial port too.

      Otherwise, if they're big mighty compaqs, give Compaq Insight a go. It saved me from getting up from bed when I was stuck in the hotel with a 56 Kbit modem connection and someting important decided to crash. I fixed it all remote from the SSL web-interface from my hotel bed. I was done in a short while, and I got to go back to sleep again. Very good. Compaq saved my lusers from a cranky and sleepdeprived sysadmin.

  32. What on earth are you talking about? by los+furtive · · Score: 3, Informative

    We use VNC here at work over 10/100 at those specs with no issue whatsoever. Hell, I use IBM's Desktop on Call over a 56k Connection without any fuss. Your issue is a non-issue.

    --

    I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    1. Re:What on earth are you talking about? by deanj · · Score: 1

      It becomes an issue if you have a lot of screen updates going on at once, and even more if they go beyond 256 colors to 24bit.

    2. Re:What on earth are you talking about? by Coventry · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Ok, if its a non-issue, why don't you get into the bios of your machines remotely via VNC and change some settings, or view a POST screen to see what error is comming up on bootup... oh wait, VNC Can't Do Those Things...

      --
      man is machine
    3. Re:What on earth are you talking about? by los+furtive · · Score: 3, Funny

      24bit colour resolution for accessing the BIOS? Cripes my computer must be out of date!

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    4. Re:What on earth are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a total idiot or just pretending to be one? The man was saying that displaying the screen over the network was not going to be a bandwidth problem. Nothing else. No statements of features that VNC has/doesn't have. Your post makes no sense whatsoever.

    5. Re:What on earth are you talking about? by los+furtive · · Score: 2

      He was using VNC and DoC as an example of other applications that can run at 1024x768x256 without being bandwith hogs He wasn't saying they could do the job, only that they didn't hog resources. Don't go taking things outta context.

      --

      I'm a writer, a poet, a genius, I know it. I don't buy software, I grow it.

    6. Re:What on earth are you talking about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok so your bargain basement VIA chipset board craps out and has a ram error. How are you going to fix that with a KVM proxy?

      You fucking fatasses need to get out of the office and go do something else besides eat hoagies and coke, while watching preteen porn and playing NerdWinter Nights.

  33. ia1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I use one of these: compaq ia-1 running linux (with VNC servers on the other machines). You can actually put whatever you want on it, but linux was fast and easy.

    Cost: box ($100 refurbushed from tiger direct), usb->ethernet ($40), and a little bit of time...

  34. I've seen it demoed by swb · · Score: 2

    WrightLine was selling Avocents for a while. They were expensive and required a server and client component in addition to the hardware, but were real slick -- total KVM over IP.

    They even had software tools to re-sample a big display (eg, 1600x1200) down to a more managable size (eg, 1024x768) without losing usability.

    They lost me due to (1) licensing costs for the management client based on per-machine, (2) it was real dodgy whether it was usable on a DSL-type broadband connection, (3) it was REAL expensive, even if you "waved" the extra client licensing costs (as the salesdude suggested I do).

    I hope this kind of tech becomes more common and cheaper to do; it looked like a hardware-based video capture engine and a client application to decompress the video.

  35. They sell them here... by TheKubrix · · Score: 3, Interesting
    1. Re:They sell them here... by Masao-Kun · · Score: 1

      CAT5 != IP

      It may use the same cable as a network, but your router is going to have fits if you plug it into it!

    2. Re:They sell them here... by CerebusUS · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've been amazed at how many recommendations I've seen here that suggest a cat5 solution. I thought this was slashdot... home of people who understood this stuff. :-)

    3. Re:They sell them here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of the old slashdot. This is the new slashdot, home of dorks who don't know their acronyms from their assholes.

    4. Re:They sell them here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It may use the same cable as a network, but your router is going to have fits if you plug it into it!

      WHY DO PEOPLE DO THIS ??!!??

      We had a KVM extender that used CAT5 to connect the remote box to the box in the server room.

      Nice feature: If you pay attention to what you are doing, you can use the cable that you already pulled to connect these things.

      Sucky feature: Sooner or later someone will connect the KVM connector box to the wrong port in the wall, and fry the box. (it probably won't do your router too much good either) (it didn't take us too long)

      This is exactly what murphy was talking about when he came up with that law of his.

      It doesn't seem fair, but any piece of equipment with a CAT5 cable on it that can't deal with being plugged into an IP router w/o blowing itself or the router should be destroyed immediatly.

    5. Re:They sell them here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're putting these in a data center and you have even a partial clue, you will have come up with some sort of coding standard for your cabling and shouldn't have to worry about this. That and a strict policy of not allowing clueless people in your computer room should signifigantly eliminate the chances of frying one of these.

    6. Re:They sell them here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It doesn't seem fair, but any piece of equipment with a CAT5 cable on it that can't deal with being plugged into an IP router w/o blowing itself or the router should be destroyed immediatly.

      It doesn't seem fair, but any person, who plugged a piece of equiment with CAT5 cable on it that can't deal with being plugged into an IP router w/o blowing itself or the router, should be destroyed immediately.

  36. Sorta OT by loraksus · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    But IF I don't get modded to hell, does anyone want to make a reccomendation on a cheap regular kvm switch?

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:Sorta OT by DJHeini · · Score: 1, Informative

      If you only have 2 PCs, I like my Linksys KVM - less than $60 at buy.com including cables, and I can have it buried behind my desk (double-tapping CTRL switches inputs). Only bummer is that it only has PS2 inputs, but I have no problem running my Logitech cordless kb and Intellimouse optical through USB>PS2 adapters. Linksys KVM Kit

    2. Re:Sorta OT by jandrese · · Score: 1

      double-tapping CTRL switches inputs

      I take it you don't play much Quake on that system.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    3. Re:Sorta OT by DJHeini · · Score: 1

      I don't play Quake, but I do play UT and other games, and it isn't a problem since I use the mouse to fire, instead of CTRL

  37. Terminal Servers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Use real computers without BIOS and the serial port to boot it.

    Real computers have a boot prom.

    See Sun, SGI, DEC, any of the classic workstation vendors. Hell, Apple's.

    Or realweasel or compaq's stuff. CMon, this isn't hard, it's basic computer science.

  38. VGA - RS232 card by nsayer · · Score: 1

    Somewhere on the net I heard about a PCI VGA card... that isn't one. It *emulates* a VGA card but actually has a serial port. http://www.bsdmall.com/console.html. It's not *quite* under your price point, but it's pretty close.

  39. Use an OS with a headless option, Unix Linux, OR.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Or hire a bunch of peons with digital cameras to
    watch the computer boot up and give you the play-by-play over the telephone and email the photos to you over a secure channel. Also, make sure that you get a Micro$erf ^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H peon which can type.

  40. u r teh WROGN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Links are created this way on goatdot: <A HREF="http://www.goatse.cx/">Click for the article!!</A>

    Oh shit I spelled "article" correctly. Change it to "articel". This is crapdot after all...

  41. some motherboards have serial by Rev.+DeFiLEZ · · Score: 1

    what i do at work is we have motherboards that allow serial connects to see the bios and controll it, so we use the kernel option for serial console in linux and get one machine with a lot of serial cards in it .. we ssh into that box and then run minicom and we have a profile for every server so its a simple as minicom servername , although we do use ssh when we can, the serial is just a fall back , as an add bonus, routers and other apliances with serial connect just fine

    most (all ) intel serverboards support serial (i know its not AMD but hey, i dont make all the choices) and if you have windows you can just call back to vnc when the logon screen comes up (you can do that right, i remeber someone saying that you cant run stuff while loggin it ... but i never needed to find out)

    -rev

    1. Re:some motherboards have serial by wtarreau · · Score: 1

      most (all ) intel serverboards support serial (i know its not AMD but hey, i dont make all the choices)
      Well, latest ASUS dual-AMD bios (rev 1006)
      support serial console. I wonder how did people
      who put these mobos in 1U servers before...

      Willy

  42. Cheap Terminal Server by jjv411 · · Score: 1

    On a related note, has anyone found an inexpensive terminal server that can be used for remote administration. I have looked and found only expensive ones. Maybe one really cheap Linux box could be turned into a terminal server for another. Anyone have any experience with this?

    1. Re:Cheap Terminal Server by travisd · · Score: 3, Informative

      Did this: Bought a Cyclades 8-port serial board and stuffed it into a P133. Load $FreeOS and $Term_Program and go at it. Keep in mind that consoled-devices that don't deal well with a serial BREAK may not like it if/when you reboot the console server box. There are usually hardware or software ways around this.

    2. Re:Cheap Terminal Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you consider to be expensive?

      A Cisco 2511 on eBay is =~ $500-600.

    3. Re:Cheap Terminal Server by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      First I want to say to everyone suggesting that you compile in serial support into the kernel, that YOU ARE NOT ADDRESSING THIS MAN'S NEEDS. Getting a serial console AFTER the OS is not what he wants. He wants to be able to control the BIOS remotely. This CAN'T be done with the Linux serial console (at least not currently). What we really need is a way to get at the BIOS settings in the CMOS without necessarily using the system's native BIOS. The question is... can this be done? A BIOS setup utility that runs as a kernel option? Ehh... just an idea.

      To actually satisfy this guy's requirements there are only a few possible approaches:

      1. A custom card that reads the basic VGA from the ISA or PCI bus and puts it on a frame buffer on the card which is routed over the net using IP.
      2. A box that connects to each of the machines to be managed and reads the VGA output, KB/Mouse IN/OUT (character mode only) into the parallel port of the "managment box" (a PC running Linux).
      3. Build BIOS control functionality into a boot manager like LILO or GRUB.

      Just my $.00000001 worth
      C.L.I.T. killah!

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    4. Re:Cheap Terminal Server by adamjaskie · · Score: 1
      1. Many BIOS in servers will do this. You can configure them to allow you to view POST and set BIOS settings from a serial console.
      2. LILO, and probably GRUB, can be controlled from the serial port. This allows you to select an OS and choose boot options.
      3. Linux and UNIX allow you to see boot messages on a serial console, and control the system from a serial console.
      4. DOS, IIRC, can also be controlled via a serial console (although it takes over the local display) However, I do not know if this is avaliable in more modern DOS or in NT based systems (I last used this on my XT several years ago [which I still have, but do not remember how to do this])
      --
      /usr/games/fortune
    5. Re:Cheap Terminal Server by yogensha · · Score: 1

      Roll over to ebay and search for a Portmaster 2e. I work for a small ISP that still uses one of these... we use the spare ports for console access. I saw a few on ebay for $100.

      --


      Abstainer: a weak person who yields to the temptation of denying himself a pleasure.
      --Ambrose Bierce
    6. Re:Cheap Terminal Server by funky+womble · · Score: 1

      4. Well, there's stty com1:, but it doesn't work with too many programs, and NT doesn't know about it (either in cmd or command). Other than that you can use one of the programs used on BBS that allow standard programs to run as doors (like Gateway) or something like PCAnywhere...

  43. Is this possible??? by BigMFC · · Score: 1

    Take n number of the KVM extenders over cat 5. Plug into ethernet switch (I don't mean the Cisco type of switch. The kind with a switch in front for selecting from n number of inputs. They make them for parallel ports too so you can easily switch between printers). Plug however many devices into switch. In the single output cable, attach other end of KVM cat5 extender and then run cable to terminal. It would be awesome if this worked, but it's possible that the switching device would mangle things up or reduce quality etc. Not quite KVM over IP but its really really cheap if you can get it to work Luck

    1. Re:Is this possible??? by geogeek6_7 · · Score: 1

      No, this would not work, because KVM extenders send actual signal information over the cat 5 they use-- not ethernet data recognizable by a switch. ~geogeek

    2. Re:Is this possible??? by BigMFC · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid i explained that badly. I meant a switchbox like this: http://www.mycableshop.com/sku/DSS%2045X.htm they're waayyy too ghetto to do mess with ethernet data. (around $40 CND). Using one of these is the equivalent of unplugging the ethernet cable in the back and plugging in a new cable.

  44. What about embeded VNC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I still dream about card which looks to PC like *GA, but has onboard hardware to run VNC (3D can sacrificed). Near optional VGA output and required ethernet socjet it should also have connector(s) for short cables going to mouse/keyboard or usb socets.
    Does anybody know good development kit to start this project?

  45. Remote console over IP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have the same problem here. We have a number of Linux and Windows servers running on Compaq and HP Intel servers. Trick is, they are in Denver, CO and I am in Dublin, OH.
    For the older systems, we use the DSView from Avocent. At $5k a pop, they are nice to have, but hard to buy.
    The newer Comapaq systems have the Remote Insight boards, which are pretty nice. The even newer ones have the Remote Insight built in, so it doesn't use up a PCI slot
    None of this helps you, though. I did once see a solution that ran PCAnywhere on a PC with custom hardware to plug into a KVM switch, it was about $4k.
    If you hardware developers are listening, please know that there would indeed be a huge market for a $2000 12 or 24-port KVM-over-IP solution, as more companies outsource support, co-loc their servers, of built remote POP's. I would love to see one.

  46. MegaRAC-G2 by unclei · · Score: 2, Informative

    Disclaimer: I work for AMI on the MegaRAC-G2

    That said, the MegaRAC-G2 sounds similar to what you want. It's not really a KVM switch (although you might see one from us in the future), but it is a great remote access card. It does very fast video redirection (10-15 fps) of the server's native display - which means it works on the console, in bios, in X, Windows, whatever. It redirects the client's keyboard/mouse activity, and even cdrom and floppy drives if you want.

    It does a lot of other cool stuff too, check out the website: http://www.ami.com/megarac/

    Oh yeah, and the card runs linux, and requires no drivers on the server. :)

    --
    Andrew
    1. Re:MegaRAC-G2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much is this, and where can I find one?

  47. Compaq Remote Insight by Kenja · · Score: 3, Informative

    I just picked up a few Compaq Remote Insight boards on ebay for about nine dollars each. Seems to be a good system as it allows remote power on and access even after a power outage thanks ot a battary backup.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Compaq Remote Insight by mfujie · · Score: 1

      Compaq RIBs are indeed very cool, as long as you're using Compaq Servers. Do any other manufacturers make similar hardware for their servers?

    2. Re:Compaq Remote Insight by persaud · · Score: 1
      There are many caveats, but you can use 90% of the functionality of the Compaq RIB Lights-Out Edition boards on a non-Compaq server, e.g. I have one running in an ECS K7S5A. You have to modify the standard power switch cable to connect to the ATX reset pins. Be careful with the reset pin wiring, I fried a RIB (little puff of blue smoke) before getting it right. The Compaq board just replaces your video card, so disable any onboard video.

      Caveats:
      • Virtual floppy didn't work for me, maybe more luck with other motherboards
      • RIB uses a lot of power, need the external power supply
      • Machine will hang if the Java console is active whenever the video mode changes. This means (a) during reboot, (b) change from BIOS screen to LILO, (c) change from LILO prompt to kernel messages.
      Other motherboards may exhibit different or no issues with video mode changes. Once you identify the timing of video mode changes on your machine, just make sure the console isn't active at the instant of a change. For selecting kernels at LILO prompt, enter your command, press Enter and immediately hit the back button on the browser. That will disconnect the console session fast enough to let the LILO video-mode change occur without hanging the machine.

      The video mode change after the LILO command prompt is the most inconvenient. Same problem exists with GRUB. Spent some time looking for the offending code in GRUB, but gave up after I figured out how to hit the back button fast enough. A LILO/GRUB hacker may be able to fix this in software.

      Sounds worse than it is. You pick up the timing after a few tries. Worst case, just hit poweroff button (wired to ATX mobo reset) in the browser and try again. Once it works, as others have pointed out, it's a lifesaver. Subject to timing workarounds, you can access bios settings, LILO prompt and console with remote ethernet KV (and probably M, but I didn't need it).

      If someone wants to risk a shiny RIB to repeat this with a non-Compaq mobo, I'll dig up my wiring diagram for the reset pins. Caveat hacker, etc.

      Rich
      --
      SF Bay Area Colocation
    3. Re:Compaq Remote Insight by tuiterwyk · · Score: 1

      Crystal PC group makes a product called Dark Site, information here. Won't let you access the BIOS, but will toggle power, etc, if motherboard supports it.
      Claim to have an OS agent for Linux, and lots of other operating systems, details here.
      Also will support the Serial Console interface.
      Think they sell for around $USD 500.

  48. Low Tech Solution by compjma · · Score: 1

    Try using a VersaPoint RF Wireless Keyboard, a 900 Mhz RF signal booster on each end, a local computer with a KVM attached, and a webcam. If you don't need quite that much range, just run long cables with signal amplifiers every 100ft or so.

  49. Talk about not READING the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this 'solution' completely ignores the poster's request - how to do this REMOTELY

    I've gotten used to seeing posts from people that didn't read an article being linked to, but this is getting absurd!

    1. Re:Talk about not READING the question by hatchet · · Score: 1

      Buy long enough cables, of course!

  50. WTI CMS-8 by rivvah · · Score: 1


    http://www.wti.com/cms8.htm

    It's a little pricier ($995), but if you couple this bad boy with a RealWeasel card in each box, you have an end-to-end solution to make a geek proud. ;)

    (it's also Sun ready, for your non-PC needs)

  51. Try this site: by pyite69 · · Score: 0, Redundant


    http://makeashorterlink.com/

  52. 'Ask Slashdot' has taught me something. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Namely this: There are two ways to do things: The right way, and the Slashdot way.

    The Right Way involves spending a little more money up front, but its benefits are manyfold: A proven solution, vendor support, reliability, stability, and various and sundry other good things.

    The Slashdot Way involves duct tape, bailing wire, and, sometimes, a 386 running RedHat. Its generally insignificant up-front savings are offset by the countless hours of configuration, tuning, tweaking, prodding, poking, and general lackluster performance of the contraption in question.

    You have chosen to go The Slashdot Route. I wish you luck as you set up your TV cards and serial ports. You will need as much luck as you can get, and an awful lot of patience.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:'Ask Slashdot' has taught me something. by FRAGaLOT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think a 386 box will work. I would think some sort of analog-to-video conversion will need to be done, along with video compression. Plus the box will have multiple servers hooked into it. So you'll need a box with a more robust CPU, or other special hardware... but that would drive costs up. But even a Ghz CPU is rather cheap. But it still will require special hardware made for all the KMV inputs if you're gonna build this on a PC.

      You could build special PCI cards that have all of these KMV connectors, and you can purchase as many cards as you need. Even use PCI riser cards to add more slots than the motherboard already has. Would be even nice if each card had the power to take the VGA video and convert to digital, and compress the image. Perhaps even make cards that can handle more than just one KMV input. Probably would have to make special 3-in-1 connector cables.

      Would be a gawd awful rats nest behind that unit!!!!

      Video compression should not be a MPEG format, since there's not much motion/animation going on with a desktop (unless you feel like playing quake 3), plus it would end up looking blurry with artifices >sp?. It would be nice if it were clear to read, at a normal frame rate so scrolling won't look screwy.

      It's possible we could ignore analog VGA video, and use pure digital input from a DV-out used for a flat screen. Then just compress the data on the fly as it's pumped over IP. Doubt many servers have newer video cards with Digital output... Unless you used some old matrox cards that used some funky DB-15 port for some sort of digital output.

      That's the only hurdle I can think of, the KMV connections into the box. Dealing with the VGA video would be another hurdle, but I don't think it would be that difficult to figure out. KB/Mouse input would be a no brainer.

      --
      -FRAGaLOT
    2. Re:'Ask Slashdot' has taught me something. by EllF · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What I think you're seeing is the difference between the "I don't want to think about it" mentality and the "Let's hack this!" mentality. The former is a fine one for the corporate world - you do something quickly, and it's Someone Else's Problem. You (generally) aren't paying out of your own pocket, and you're free to use the time saved to do other things.

      However, this doesn't make for "The Right Way". Hacking at something - figuring out how it works, seeing how you can do it better (or less expensively), and enjoying the process - is the source of solutions that Just Work.

      "[G]eneral lackluster performance of the contraption in question" is the result of not understanding something enough to do it well. Many off-the-shelf solutions suck - Windows 98, anyone? So do many home-brew setups. The problems doesn't come from the nature of a rig, it comes from the effort and intelligence of the creator.

      If you prefer to not think about things, and just have them work, fine - but don't disparage people who are interested in learning and improving with sweeping and inaccurate generalities about DYI projects. Most of your "proven solutions" only got to that point because enough people (or sometimes, one intelligent person) was willing to hack at something until they were satified.

      End of rant.

      --
      We who were living are now dying
      With a little patience
    3. Re:'Ask Slashdot' has taught me something. by glwtta · · Score: 2

      pah! "buy proven product. install proved product. use proven product." - am I the only one bored to tears just from thinking about this route? Slashdot route all the way! (of course we all know it would be Slackware, or maybe Gentoo, and not RedHat)

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:'Ask Slashdot' has taught me something. by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      Wow! A truly inspired troll from someone with a three digit user ID! Come with me to the dark side, Wakko.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    5. Re:'Ask Slashdot' has taught me something. by tanksimpson · · Score: 1

      Yeah I know, the guy is brillant - the funniest post I've read all day. And to top it all off, he's got the Slashdot Schoolmarms scolding him for "disparaging others" - HAHAHAHAH! Superb stealth troll, man!

    6. Re:'Ask Slashdot' has taught me something. by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Wakko *has* taken a turn of late (past year). Much less patience with this sort of crufty 'engineering'. I think he just wants to use his Signal11 alias again:)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:'Ask Slashdot' has taught me something. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The Slashdot Way involves duct tape, bailing wire

      Ah well, the little MacGyver in all of us..

    8. Re:'Ask Slashdot' has taught me something. by mosch · · Score: 2

      Trolls of low-UID? I don't think they exist!

    9. Re:'Ask Slashdot' has taught me something. by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I noticed that... most of his posts show a hell of a lot less patience. Must be burnout time at work ;)

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  53. Blackbox KVM Ethernet Extenders/Hubs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    BlackBox has a line of ethernet KVM extenders that can be used with other BlackBox KVM solutions.

    Blackbox Ethernet KVM Equipment

    Forgive the javascript errors, this was the only way to link to that exact page on the blackbox site.

  54. IP-to-serial adapters by kriston · · Score: 1

    We totally solved this by using IP-to-serial concentrators which makes every host's serial console reachable via telnet. The only limitation, of course, is not being able to see BIOS messages when using cheap PC hardware. Better PC hardware like Intel server boards lets you see the BIOS on the serial port. Naturally all the major Unix systems already do this. If you're using Windows, well, driving into work to fix your machine is the price you pay for the "convenience" of Windows.

    Kris

    --

    Kriston

  55. Dell DRAC cards can do this by Stonent1 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Dell sells these cards with some of their servers. They will allow you to do pretty much what you have said. I don't know if they require any special connections but you could look into it.

    "The Dell Remote Assistant Card is part of Dell's Open Manage program. DRAC offers "dead" server manageability via network or modem/remote access. This card allows you to access, diagnose and remotely manage your server regardless of its state."

  56. Colo server management by persaud · · Score: 1
    Rich
    --
    SF Bay Area Colocation
  57. Totally Wrong Dude by MyHair · · Score: 2, Funny

    The Slashdot Way involves duct tape, bailing wire, and, sometimes, a 386 running RedHat.

    Dude, you're way wrong. Pentium 166's are now the preferred GNU/Linux "rescued from the garbage heap" platforms for these applications. And you've got the sometimes in the wrong place. It always involves Linux, although not necessarily RedHat. Duct tape and bailing wire are in the sometimes used category.

    [Disclaimer: this is not a serious post, and I don't usually talk or type this way.)

    1. Re:Totally Wrong Dude by a2800276 · · Score: 3, Funny
      The Slashdot Way involves duct tape, bailing wire, and, sometimes, a 386 running RedHat.

      Dude, you're way wrong. Pentium 166's are now the preferred GNU/Linux "rescued from the garbage heap" platforms for these applications. And you've got the sometimes in the wrong place. It always involves Linux, although not necessarily RedHat. Duct tape and bailing wire are in the sometimes used category.

      Dude, you need to be seriously smacked on the side of the head with a clue-by-four (tm)! First off, no real haxors use RedHat boxen, cause they suxor. If you want to seriously use Li(g)nux you have to use Debian, cause thats what Linus and RMS use.

      Secondly, if you're running like 4 TV-Cards doing realtime video (mpeg4) encoding of 4 s-vga video signals, we're talking like 60GB/sec bandwidth raw IO (per channel)! I think you would probably need SCSI for that.

      Also, since the place I worked for did this with a bunch of old Sun's we had laying around, I think you would need more raw numbercrunching power than that P166 is going to provide. I swear to god, to get that type of throughput, you'll need at least a P250. You'll have difficulty overclocking your 166 to go a 250Mhz without using water-cooling.

      Which is what we ended up doing on that Sun, too, btw. Man you've not played Quake Arena, till you've played it on an E450 with 24 UltraSparc2's overclocked from 450 Mhz to 600 Mhz, at first we though we would have to use liquid helium to cool the fucker.

      [Disclaimer: this is not a serious post, and I don't usually talk or type this way.)
      You do, too! I've been watching your talking and typing recently. It is I who doesn't usually talk this way. :)
  58. webcam by lakeland · · Score: 1

    A simple (and cheap solution). Install a few quickcams and set them up on different webcam sites. Bandwidth requiremnts are within what DSL will give you.

    Input can be handled by a normal switch, remote controlled via ethernet.

  59. Damnit! by sheldon · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Just when my 3M stock was on the rebound you go and try to pull the plug on the whole duct tape and bailing wire industry!

    "If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy."

    - Red Green

  60. LinuxBios? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 0

    There is a linuxbios project (http://www.linuxbios.org) that probably could do serial redirection.

    The problem is that the number of motherboards they support is very narrow. But it's definitely something to look at later on.

    As a previous poster said, if you want to do remote admining you should probably get Sun boxes unless you're managing a linux farm or something then you could probably get newer motherboards that allow you to do bios through the serial line.

    But check out linuxbios I bet that could help right there without all that wierd hardware you're doing.

    sri

  61. Most of you are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KVM over CAT-5 is NOT the same as KVM over IP. Same goes for some of the serial solutions mentioned here. Also, a whole bunch of monitors, mice and keyboards won't help if the servers are remote to the user. I have LOTS of experience setting up KVM systems, including KVM over IP. A good solution would be to try and find an Apex/Cybex (now Avocent) Emerge or Emerge 2000 or I-Link card on eBay along with an 8-port Outlook switch. Of course, the Emerge or I-Link system would have to run Windows, but the remotely controlled systems could run anything. The Emerge 2000 was a rebranded Acer PII/400. It wasn't fast, but that's because back then, Apex (who made this particular product) insisted on doing full-screen refresh. They have since changed their minds with the DS product line. We used the Emerge for emergencies, and VNC and ssh for day-today work. And $500 for a new solution, cobbled together or not, is unrealistic. You have to consider cost per port (server). It's interesting that the Dell DRAC/Compaq RIB solution comes out to about the same price per port as a KVM over IP solution. IF you just want KVM over CAT5, you could go with minicom, avocent, raritan, or plenty others.

  62. Buy Compaq.... by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

    Buy Compaq (I mean HP!) servers and add the Remote Lights Out board. It works very well and their new servers have them built-in. You get BIOS level control with full remote access via a web browser.

    1. Re:Buy Compaq.... by glwtta · · Score: 2

      yes, the guy doesn't seem like he wants to spend $50, and you suggest buying new servers - very clever.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  63. ICA? by Unreal+One · · Score: 1

    Well couldn't you take it up to the software level and run some sort of MetaFrame, or Terminal Server style service on each of the boxes then use an ICA or Remote Desktop Client to login? The nice part is, just drop a VPN server in front of it, and you can connect from anywhere in the world. :oP

  64. Rose Electronics remote KVM by MoreBeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We have a semi-large farm of Windose Boxen at a lights-out colo (Frontend application servers to most of the UNIX boxen). We just picked up the Rose Electronics Ultralink for remote management. We need this so we can do remote diags, like troubleshoot hardware, view POST, etc. We have Cyclades for the *NIX boxen, and our HP Netservers have the serial 'management' console that other people are boasting about, but that just won't cut it in a real-world production environment. A Console is a Console and a serial port is a serial port.

    We're going to plug the Ultralink into our cascaded KVM tree and hope for the best. Initially looking at the unit, I have some gripes:

    * No distributed authentication. It's gotta be local accounts. Can't hit my LDAP, NIS, NT Domain, or RADIUS servers.

    * Client is a proprietary Win32 app. No JAVA, no browser. Cripes, not even ActiveX!

    * Only one user at a time... including console. You have to log into the console to gain access (crappy for CEs out to fix a problem), and if the CE stays logged in, guess what? You can't access it remotely! We had to plug it into our intelligent PDU so we could remotely hard boot it if that happened.

    * We have what must be version .99a ... we had to wait about 2 months to get it, and we must have been the first guinea pig to take shipment. I'm afraid to open it up to see if there is about 35 feet of spaghetti-wire patches.

    Aside from these (minor) flaws, I think we'll be OK. Anything is better than booking a last-minute 606 mile flight to reboot a Windows box that shows 'It is now safe to power off your computer' because PCNowhere admin chose the wrong logoff choice. [don't laugh] (Although, there is Buckhead...)

    1. Re:Rose Electronics remote KVM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A Console is a Console and a serial port is a serial port.

      On Sun hardware the serial port is better than the frame buffer based console as far as diagnostics are concerned. You can actually watch the POST results on the serial port, which you can't do with the frame buffer. The frame buffer doesn't get configured until after the POST!

  65. Am I missing the point?? by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How often do you really need "true console" access on a box that has no network connectivity?

    I've found that having the ability to remote power cycle (preferably through an interface -- but an ISP that can get someone to the box fast can do in a $ pinch) + some remote network admin tools (VNC, Terminal Services, Telnet/SSH, etc etc) goes a *long* way.

    Yes, once in a while the box crashes *so* hard that Terminal services/VNC (assuming a Windows platform) becomes useless -- time for a reboot! The only way that you can really screw yoursel is if you mess with the network settings and configure yourself off the network.

    Rather than spend $$$s for that possibility, why not just pick up the phone and call some hands-on support (or if it is your datacenter.. send in the geeks)...?? If you know you are going to be messing with "dangerous" settings, you should be prepared for these sorts of possibilities anyways..

    Just my $.02...

    --
    Evolution: love it or leave it
    1. Re:Am I missing the point?? by bastion_xx · · Score: 1

      How often do you really need "true console" access on a box that has no network connectivity?

      How about after the last OpenSSL patch? Take (1) RedHat server, add (1) RedHat Network remote install (i.e., push to the server), mix in pam-ldap and you get a broken SSH, even for users in the local passwd file.

      Just had to beg a coworker to login into *7* servers from our trusty analog KVM to 'service sshd restart'. Two other servers in a co-lo out in London were done from my desk via the IP KVM (Avocent). Oh, and another 2 fixed via VMware GSX server console.

      Morale of this story: just say no to RHN for updates that affect logins.

      Anyone know a good solution for getting PAM to work when the LDAP server isn't available?

    2. Re:Am I missing the point?? by steppin_razor_LA · · Score: 2

      I'd say that this fits in the category of "risky" activities I mentioned before :) :)

      Even so, it is often times possible to plan around those sorts of things -- for example -- temporarily re-enable telnet on the back network so you can make a connection if the SSH server fails.... or make sure you have serial access to the console..

      I know it isn't a "perfect fix" -- and maybe I've just been "lucky" -- but I've survived for years w/o a IP KVM, and I'm just not sure that the tech is worth the $s in many cases

      --
      Evolution: love it or leave it
  66. Let me rephrase the question. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cheap KVM Over IP?
    Posted by Cliff on Monday August 05, @05:43PM
    from the throwing-that-noisy-box-into-the-other-room! dept.
    An anonymous reader asks: "I've been looking for a cost effective (ie, cheap) way to remotely administer several servers running a variety of OS's, and would like to have a solution that would allow for monitoring of the bios on startup, etc (ie, not VNC). The most appealing solution is KVM over IP, which really just means a souped up KVM switch with something like VNC running on it, unfortunately all of the solutions I've been able to find are more expensive than I can justify spending. I've played around a bit with making my own Poor man's KVM over IP; I did this by purchasing a cheap (sub $50) VGA-to-NTSC convertor, then feeding it into a video card with NTSC input (the ATI All-In-Wonder Radion), and then by logging into a machine running Windows Terminal Services I'm able to watch the reboot process. Of course, this doesn't address the mouse/keyboard issue, and the quality isn't all that great. What I'm hoping is that someone else might have a suggestion on how to do this, preferably using Linux and the least hardware necessary. Does anyone have any suggestions or insights on ways to do this?" There are pre-existing solutions, but it seems they are all kind of pricey. Can any of you suggest cheap solutions (at or below $500USD) that could handle a farm of 5-10 machines?

    "Here are the three approaches I found:

    ViewProxy: They make the most economical for administration of multiple machines (by one person). Their ProxyView device plugs into your KVM just like it was a monitor/mouse/keyboard, and then does all the packetizing magic. Price is about $6k from what I can tell.

    eRIC: These are the same guys who make the Rolf (Reboot on Lan), which is pretty cool. They make a card called Eric which replaces your normal video card with their card, which has a built in ethernet connection and allows remote control. The cheapest solution at about $700 but only would allow control of the machine it's installed in.

    Avocent: I think the first to introduce the whole KVM over IP solution, they have KVM's with this sort of functionality integrated. Some of their products allow multiple users to multiple machine, which is a neat feature but not needed for my applications. Their units run from $4k on up."

  67. Combo by mmmmbeer · · Score: 2

    If you're satisfied with your current solution for monitoring the bios, why not just add VNC (or something similar)? Monitor the bios with your current setup during bootup, then switch to VNC once that's done.

  68. Pretty simple setup... not so $$$ by BenSite85 · · Score: 1

    Belkin

    Lots of great products for all budgets.

    I've started small and built on my setup over the years. Finally needed to move away from the humming mass of metal and electricity.

    OmniView(TM) SOHO Series 4-Port KVM and a OmniView(TM) CAT5 KVM Extender. Setup was able to switch between four computers well. Great picture and never had a problem with keyboard and mouse (PS/2 or USB) at distances past 200 meters. Windows, linux, BSD, whatever...

    Total setup was $498US.

    1. Re:Pretty simple setup... not so $$$ by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1

      You're not getting the question. He needs it to route through the internet to far-away places. Your suggestion won't work.

      --

      eTrade SUCKS
    2. Re:Pretty simple setup... not so $$$ by BenSite85 · · Score: 1

      Ahh sorry... my mistake. In that case using a OmniView(TM) ENTERPRISE Series Remote IP Console instead of the CAT5 Extender would work well. Haven't tried it myself and I'm not a sales rep ;) , but have had only great experiences with Belkin stuff. That'll still keep the budget under $5000, with cables to boot!

    3. Re:Pretty simple setup... not so $$$ by AngusSF · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sure it will.
      OmniView(TM) ENTERPRISE Series Remote IP Console
      Belkin Part Number: F1DE101N
      The Belkin Enterprise Series Remote IP Console (the Console) allows users to control, view, and administrate a server or multiple servers connected to a KVM switch remotely over a TCP/IP network. The Console enables the administrator to access the information stored on the servers, as well as to reset the hardware, access BIOS, and reset power. Unlike other KVM-over-IP solutions, the Console works with all PS/2-based servers and does not require additional software to support multiple operating systems. The Console uses the banking industry's 128-bit SSL encryption to prevent unauthorized personnel from accessing the server. Offering the easiest installation and setup in the industry, the Console monitors server activities and notifies administrators if and when problems arise. Its advanced capabilities far surpass current methods of remote server administration.
      The Belkin Advantage:
      • Remote control of a server or KVM switch over a TCP/IP network
      • VGA Video Emulation (even with power off)
      • Remote power on/off or server-reset capability
      • Standard web browser remote viewing
      • Support for VNC (Virtual Network Computing) remote display
      • 128-bit SSL encryption with three security levels and three security modes: Relaxed, Stealth, and Turtle
      • Support for up to 10 users
      Features:
      • Serial port monitoring and switching capability for serial devices
      • Flash-Upgradeability
      • PS/2 keyboard and mouse support
      • One local port for direct KVM access to your server
      • Automatic server monitoring and notification
      This is $3100 or so from Provantage; add a KVM at the server end and you're flying.

      See also http://www.kvmswitchoverip.com/ and http://www.kvm-switches-online.com/remote-access-s ervers.html for other solutions. I think these guys both have Raritans which haven't been mentioned yet.

      Nothing low-end, though, you'll have to roll your own with a PC Weasel ($250-$250/server) and a remote machine you can SSL to and then use as a serial terminal for the PC Weasels. You'd need a multi-port COM card for the SSL box as well, and you'll have to disable any onboard video to let the weasel control the servers.

      --
      "A gun is a tool, Marian. No better, no worse than any other tool. An axe, a shovel, or anything." Shane (1953)
  69. Comtrol by Sir+Spank-o-tron · · Score: 1

    Not the cheapest, but so what.

    We've had great experience with Comtrol RocketPorts.. (go find the url yerself!)

    one PCI slot is good for 32 serial ports.
    of course, that involves buying 2 1u rackmount dealy-bobs.

    then we use conserver (www.conserver.com i think).

    it rawks.

    At my old company, we used cyclades Z-boards with conserver. same shit, different channel. The nice feature about Cyclades was that you can daisy chain the zboards, so you can get like 128 serial ports from 1 pci slot.

    and of course, you need newer intel boards with the serial bios crap, or again... SUN.

    None of this helps you since you seem like you probably can't shell out $$$ for this stuff.

    I can't wait until I can get my linux console over USB. then it's all done. just daisy chain the machines together, and go.

    --
    -- Spankmeister General
  70. fa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KVM over IP: X11

    Secure KVM over IP: ssh -x

    Windows compatible hack: vnc

  71. A Vendor-specific solution, but works great by drew_ri · · Score: 1

    If you have the option of picking a particular piece of hardware, Compaq/HP has the Compaq remote insight board.

    This is a full computer on a PCI card, which has its own power feed with battery backup, 1 Ethernet IF, an optional 56K modem, and full hardware-level access to the input keyboard/mouse and video display.

    The card runs a propriatary OS, and includes telnet and SSL-based access supporting full console UI through a basic, Java-enabled browser.

    I don't know as if it will run in non-server class box3n, but I just picked up a Proliant 330 that at about $1k, is for all intents and purposes a really a basic x86 with server class chassis layout, etc.

  72. fa! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Backorifice. Works with trojans, but also good for remote administration of windows. Secure? Ha!

  73. I guess he reboots often... by RelliK · · Score: 2

    Seeing as he runs windows, this is probably a good guess.

    --
    ___
    If you think big enough, you'll never have to do it.
  74. Cybex by dromeo · · Score: 1

    Look into Cybex equipment. It is not IP, but does run over cat5 cable. Re-routes KVM for remote stations to central client. Some peices can be found cheap on the net.

    Dom

  75. Apex Emerge iLink (now Avocent) by Elentar · · Score: 1

    This was the best solution I found, a year ago. At the time it was $2500 - now, it seems to sell for around $1000 at some retailers.

    This is a PCI card that takes video input and sends keyboard and mouse out - perfect for connecting to the console of any KVM. We got a cheap 1U NT server, put this card in the single PCI slot it came with, and ran VNC on it. It worked beautifully.

    More info at Avocent's website, under "Emerge card".

    -Elentar

    --
    The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
    1. Re:Apex Emerge iLink (now Avocent) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of all the crap posted, this seems to be the only solution addressing the original question(other than the obvious, big ticket KVM over IP products).
      You say you have this baby and it works as advertised? I'm gonna have to get myself one just for the experiment.

    2. Re:Apex Emerge iLink (now Avocent) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I found basic pricing at:

      http://www.provantage.com/scripts/go.dll/-s/fp_5 48 21

  76. Cheapest solution possible. by joeblowme · · Score: 1

    I know this will work because I've done it. If you know assembly you could easily program a pic and wire it into your serial port or usb then wire the out to a ps2 port in the kvm switch. Total cost maybe $10 to $30. Depending on exactly how complicated you want it and what you already own.

    --

    If your not cheating your not trying. If your not trying your not winning and if your not winning why play?
  77. Yes... but when he's done he'll have a clue... by SwedishChef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    which is more than most of the "buy it off the shelf" people often have. The advantages to experimentation are many. While time savings is probably not one of them (at least in the short run) by the time the project is done, the experimenter has a better idea of how to go about getting things done than the buy-it-off-the-shelf guy.

    A few years down the road and most of us will want to hire the experimenter who has tried several different OSes, hacked out a wireless network out of a couple 2-meter transceivers, set up two 486 DX66 boxes as a dedicated VPN between his bedroom and his girlfriend's house, and wired up the girl's locker room with x10. Those are the guys who can think their way through a problem rather than hitting the catalogs looking for a million dollar solution.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
    1. Re:Yes... but when he's done he'll have a clue... by vegetablespork · · Score: 1
      wired up the girl's locker room with x10

      Hire me! I'll be out in just three more years with good behavior!

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    2. Re:Yes... but when he's done he'll have a clue... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      While I too would like to see the tinkerers and thinkers, I also need it documented and repeatable in a corp. environment.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:Yes... but when he's done he'll have a clue... by elanda · · Score: 1

      Send over a copy of the video. We'll see what can be done...

  78. Serial Port Mod by blueday4 · · Score: 1

    I was thinking about doing this a long time ago but given my soldering skills i haven't.. I had the same idea for the video interface but I wanted to construct a serial to ps/2 cable to control the mouse/kb .. i figured i would have to write a program to do this (actually capable of this part) but would then incorporate the video in with it. any thoughts?

  79. Great sense of humor for a business site by John+Jorsett · · Score: 3, Funny

    Love their attitude:
    "What sucks." "How we fixed it." "Why we're swell." "Asses saved."

  80. Re:You did not answer his question by Glasswire · · Score: 1

    Serial redirect (in BIOS a la Intel 440GX, PC Weasel and Sun (in a slightly more powerful way)) IS NOT WHAT HE ASKING FOR. KVM is a totally transpearent remote way to access any system operation including GUI graphics (which the Sun-o-phile seems not to have grasped).
    Serial redriection via terminal servers IS A SUBSET of what you can do with KVM.

  81. Re:TROLLAXOR SIGHTING: THE LATEST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was under the impression TROLLAXOR was dead! This is indeed good news that he is in fact alive.

  82. Re:Use an OS with a headless option, Unix Linux, O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i got your microserf right here

  83. 2C Computing may fit your needs... by zoid.com · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure of the price of these units but 2C Computing makes something close to what you are looking for. http://www.2ccomputing.com/ Just a note, 2C Computing Just announced that they are being acquired by Avocent.

  84. The Cost of your Time VS. Cost of a good KVM Switc by jellomizer · · Score: 2

    I am not sure if you are doing this for work or not. But you may want to keep in mind while looking at all these solutions even if the hardware cost under $50 to make a portible switch how much time will it take you. Lets assume you are making $25 an hour so if it takes 2 more hours to configure the hardware then that is an aditional $50. Of couse the cheaper the hardware solution the more time it will probably take to put it together. So if you spend a Week tring to get this to work you are probably wasing more money then it would have cost to bye a KVM switch.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  85. in case you use compa by HashDefine · · Score: 1

    we use the Remote Insight Board lights out edition - for remote management of proliant servers..I belive it retails for around 500 bucks. But each server needs its own card.

  86. RealWeasel and Other Issues by SEWilco · · Score: 4, Informative
    Yes, the RealWeasel provides a serial MGA/VGA text interface. It also translates serial input to keyboard code conversion. It solves most of the problems, just needs serial-to-TCP/IP to meet the IP requirement.

    • Serial Console (including reset and boot BIOS access)
      • RealWeasel (or similar if there is one) for console in each machine. Needed on machines whose BIOS or OS does not support a serial console.
      • Without RealWeasel, you could use a serial-to-keyboard adapter for remote ASCII console input. Console output becomes a separate problem. (I see a Keyat unit also allows several adapters on a single RS-485 interface, so a single RS-485 link could service several servers)
      • For Linux use, see the Remote Serial Console HOWTO..but no method to reset.
      • Terminal server, to convert all those serial ports to TCP/IP; IP support was specified. (Linux Serial Console HOWTO above has terminal server info also)
      • Mouse support: Another serial port, with servers configured for serial mice. On management workstation, install a serial mouse specifically for remote use.
      • Make a program for your management station which lets you select a remote console. The program pops up an appropriate terminal window (unless it already is running) and connects the serial mouse to remote's serial mouse input port.
    • Reset/power control.
      • RealWeasel offers reset control.
      • Reset could be wired to relays, which would require relays controlled through TCP/IP (could b done through terminal server serial or parallel ports).
      • Web cam and robot arm. Details left as an exercise for the reader.
    • Graphical console remote access
      • X11 Windows System: The usual X11 network access.
      • MS-Windows: Choose favorite remote console solution.
      • VNC: Question asker specified not to use it.
      • Remote Control Review: Review of several remote control packages.
    • As IP is being used, all this can be run through Ethernet or serial PPP links. Or USB, with serial ports for console/mouse and USB-Ethernet for X11 through USB network (Is there an Ethernet-to-USB_Host device, so a USB-through-Ethernet device driver could talk to a remote USB network?)
    • Encryption to protect console data: Have to encrypt the terminal server's link. X11 could run through an SSH tunnel.
    1. Re:RealWeasel and Other Issues by AngusSF · · Score: 1

      So why not set up a VNC box from which you use a serial port terminal to connect to the Realweasel on your final target machines?

      --
      "A gun is a tool, Marian. No better, no worse than any other tool. An axe, a shovel, or anything." Shane (1953)
    2. Re:RealWeasel and Other Issues by pgregg · · Score: 1

      " just needs serial-to-TCP/IP to meet the IP requirement "

      This is easy, probably also very cheap with the dotcom titsup...

      Old ISP Terminal Servers fit this bill very well, look for Annexes, Portmaster2 boxes - designed as a dialup server to which you connected ordinary modems. Portmaster 2 boxes have standard serial ports so you just need a 25-9pin straight through serial cable to plug the Realweasel into the PM. One PM can control up to 30 weasel cards.

      Once connected (and configured) you would just telnet to your PM, then "attach s1" to connect to the s1 serial port, and you have serial BIOS control.

      Paul.

  87. Re:You did not answer his question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you're also missing the point. Any solution that you do come up with is going to be a hack. You run the risk of it failing when you need it the most (this might be acceptable based on your requirements). Choose the right solution to solve your problems. If you need boxes with remote administration, then buy the big boys UNIX systems. I can't tell you how many times PC-Nowhere has failed. If you application requires Windows then find the best hack you can get.

  88. Not THAT cheap by RighteousIndignation · · Score: 1
    The lowest cost KVM over IP unit I've seen so far is about $2700 USD. That's not cheap, but if other solutions can't meet your needs, then this may be cheaper, and is certainly faster, than flying or driving there. (insert Total Cost of Ownership speech here).

    This topic already came up on Friday. See my poorly formatted response there.

    I've been checking the prices and availability of KVM over IP for about 4 or 5 months. The number of vendors and products has doubled and prices have dropped somewhat. I've got a deadline to purchase one by end of Q3, so I'll wait and watch the market a bit longer.

    Such devices are very practical, especially when combined with remote power cycling functionality. (Digital V6 makes an all-in-one unit).

  89. Mod this up by moogla · · Score: 2

    This is the best available solution I have heard so far.

    --
    Black holes are where the Matrix raised SIGFPE
  90. See my Linux Journal article on the subject by defile · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know it's not exactly what the poster asked for, but I was in the same boat about 6 months ago and you can at least step through my thought processes.

    Article linked here.

  91. Redhat's Redboot by protektor · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that you might be able to replace your PC's BIOS with a replacement BIOS from Red Hat. They have the Redboot BIOS that supports ethernet and serial interfaces at the BIOS level.

  92. 'Real' vs /. by guanno · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If it weren't for adventurous spirits who are willing innovate a home made solution, the computer industry would never have gotten as far as it has, or be going in such interesting and potentially rewarding directions.

    The 'Real' way actually amounts to mundane unimaginative and stagnant. At worst it amounts to millions of servers on an IP near you being adminstrated by lazy incompetant boobs, who don't know any better than to call a 'Real' technician (read /. fan) when the innevitable problems occur. And the rest of us suffer greatly for it. I wouldn't pay someone any more than minimum wage to do things the 'Real' way.

    BB -Guanno

  93. Cisco Access Server by un4given · · Score: 1

    A Cisco 2512 has an ethernet port and 16 serial ports, and they are available used for less than $400. To access a system, you telnet to port 200x, where x = the serial port you want to connect to. Here's one on eBay

    1. Re:Cisco Access Server by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      That's only useful if your servers have serial consoles from the time they switch on, which Suns do, but no PC I know of does.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

  94. Sneaker Net, are you fucking stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sure... I feel like walking 30 miles to a remote site to fix a minor problem. You fucking idiot!!!!! Get a clue!! This guy is asking the /. community for help/solution. You people recommend VNC, HELLO.... did ya read the article the guy posted!!! He wants to to be able to enter the BIOS or SCSI controllers to set/change/troubleshoot problems. IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!ID IOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIO TS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS!!IDIOTS !!IDIOTS!!

    1. Re:Sneaker Net, are you fucking stupid! by aes12 · · Score: 1

      Somebody needs a bran muffin.

  95. Remote Administrator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use remote administrator for all my servers around the country. It's the fastest IP remote administration utility out there. Can't catch things in the bios but can before the login and deal with things like file transfers/rebooting...

    www.radmin.com

    Just thought i'd give my $.02

  96. What about this? by obfuscated · · Score: 1

    Are there any apps that control two computers attached to two monitors but use only one keyboard and one mouse.

    IE, it's like a dual head monitor setup but over IP, when you reach an artifical boundary, you'd be controlling the other computer.

    I could see huge value in this.

    --

    -- dK ... Narf Poit!
  97. Re:You did not answer his question by Tet · · Score: 2
    KVM is a totally transpearent remote way to access any system operation including GUI graphics (which the Sun-o-phile seems not to have grasped). Serial redriection via terminal servers IS A SUBSET of what you can do with KVM.

    Nope. I can do everything with my Suns at a remote location that I could do if they were sitting on my desk. Tell me what you can do with a KVM that I can't already do now. If a KVM is a superset of what I have now, what am I missing? The serial console gives me complete access to the machine at a low level, and a network transparent window system (X11) gives me access to the GUI. What more do I need? What more would a KVM give me? As far as I can see, nothing. Note that these machines don't even have a video card, nor do they need one. PC hardware only comes with a video card because Windows is too braindead to be usable without one, which is one of the reasons why KVMs exist in the first place.

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  98. Avocent DS1800, give it a trial run first. by Erik_ · · Score: 1

    Before you buy an Avocent, request a trial box from a supplier to test it. I had the opportunity to test one early last year for a very large implementation, and found that the Avocent DS1800 was not stable enough to guarante remote management of a critical production environment. I experienced some lockups in the device, resulting in a trip down the computer room. When you need to keep your KVM's firmware up to date as well as your OS, that is not a good sign.

  99. The way of the hacker by Pholostan · · Score: 1

    I agree completely. (This is a bit OT but what the heck...)

    We hackers like to tinker and build things. We do it because we like it, no we _love_ it. It is a thing that all hackers have in common, all over the world. Some of us are programmers, some of us are engineers. It is all the same, get to the bottom of how it works and then build something better, something that suits the _hackers_ needs. Then marketing people sometimes take that and make it into a mainnstream product and sells it. We hackers don't care, we ahve already moved on to the next project. The passion to create and learn drives the hacker.

    The poet loves to write and the painter loves to paint.

    Hackers hack things.

    --

    Everybody knows that we are the evil boys, making noise with deadly toys.
  100. Avocent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just FYI, since we have recently bought an Avocent IP based KVM at work, it does *not* continuously eat up that amount of bandwidth. It digitizes the video and reconstructs it on the other end, and only transmits the information that has changed between frames. So a static screen (ie. you are not on that server) transmits basically nothing. On an active screen, where you are moving the mouse around and doing things, it can jump up to perhaps 2000-2500 packets/sec (at least, where we are running it at present... the max update speed... next lower choice is constant updates, which produces a *steady* 2k-2.5k packets/sec).

    due to it digitizing the screen, there are some 'artifacts' that pop up on the screen occasionally (dark pixels/dropouts), and the colors aren't totally accurate.. but it gets the job done on the servers. The nicest part of it is that I can manage the servers from my desk, rather than walking into the data center to a local console. And for a remote site, it would be invaluable.

    If you really need it, I'd say its worth the expense... yes, just under $5k for the box (around $8k total with the software and dongles and everything else). But, if you need it....

  101. Altiris Corperation by Kalidor · · Score: 1

    Altiris http:://www.altiris.com has a really nice client managment suite. I saw this at Comdex in Toronto a while back. It had kvm stuff and a whole lot more, Remote imaging, amazing desktop migration and user profile transplantation, and a bunch of other stuff. It made us all gawk. The said the cost was just under US$65 per desktop.

    I would really consider checking it out.

    --

    Code softly but carry a big magnet.

  102. Re:You did not answer his question by KILNA · · Score: 1

    Which technology does Sun equipment ship with to allow the remote dousing of equipment fires? There will always be a need for physical access to a machine at *some* time, even if it is to plug it in and power it on for the first time. This is a secondary observation, though.

    A KVM may not be the optimal solution for you, but the asker may have to run a mixed environment with some NT servers, neccessitating(sp?) system work after the bios but before full boot to a remote access enviroment (many errors can happen loading drivers before PCA/VNC/TS are available).
    --
    Error: PANTS NOT FOUND. Press <F1> to continue.
  103. best solution? Sun hardware and serial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A real serial terminal server and real Unix hardware is the solution. PC hardware is gay.

  104. compaq servers have had this for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get one of those cards that convert all the text mode into RS232 and RS232 into the keyboard info. (ISA cards, had them for years...) this will get you up to the graphical start, then you switch to vnc.

    Do it the old way. if you really dont need to babysit the boot process for every inch of the way then you dont need to spend $$$$ on that luxury.

    I'm guessing that you are looking for more than you really need.

  105. Minicom by cbodine · · Score: 0

    Checkout minicom.com they have a KVM system that uses cat5 cable to link all the systems, yes that right kiddies they will have to run one more cable to each machine but they are daisy chained together. The base
    price is 699 for the dongle version and 599 for the pci version and that will do 4 machines each machine after that is 159 for the dongle or 139 for the pci card version and it can be up to 360 feet away , I think that is how long the total cable length can be but I am not sure. Daisy chain up to 42 machines

    --
    Dr. Suess: 'Gandalf, Gandalf! Take the ring! I am too small to carry this thing!' 'I can not, will not hold the One.
  106. Re: Or buy DELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dell ships the DRAC (Dell Remote Assistand Card) which supports all you want over IP or Dial-Up

  107. The issue is the "when" of the hacker, not the way by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 2

    Sometimes a problem should be solved using efficiency and pre-created/existing tools. Sometimes the "let's hack this" mentality is appropriate.

    The true master knows when to use the correct approach. Calling either one a cop out or wasted effort isn't the way to go.

    In this case, I think you would want to go with a more "off the shelf" solution" and direct your hacking energies towards the machines that are actually being run. Instead of spending a week tweaking a home made KVM over IP solution you could purchase something and use that week to tweak the servers and maybe consolidate a box or two.

    Remember, at the end of the day you have to evaluate the priorities and direct your energies. Having a really cool home-brew KVM solution will not improve your overall system. Having a really well tweaked set of servers will.

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  108. What did it cost? by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We got a demo of an Avocent unit that did the same thing. It did have a centralized user database capability (unfortunately I think it was like Windows domain auth or something less flexible than RADIUS/LDAP/TACACS+).

    It worked well, but REALLY expensive for a 16 port version. Expensive to the tune of around $10k for the box, the auth server module, and 2-3 client licenses. I was most turned off by the fact that the server and client software were $old $eperately, since the software is useless without the hardware.

    I read a USENET post (circa 11/2001) that said the devices were buggy and the vendor was an asshole about other platform clients and future development/changes.

    I think digitized video and IP KVM connectivity is probably not a fluke and represents the "future" of KVM, but vendors will need to seriously get their shit together in terms of client access and pricing otherwise computer makers are just going to crush this product with their own built-in remote management. All our HP servers have built-in serial management that can do power on/off/reboot, environment management, and text/keyboard redirection; HP and Compaq both have boards that can do it natively over IP, the *only* thing missing is the ability to do transparent video redirection. When they do that, KVM will be obsoleted by a laptop running a redirection client.

  109. Cyclades Console Server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.cyclades.com/products/stdalone/ts1_2000 .php

  110. Raritan by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1

    www.raritan.com We use it for all our boxes in a room of about 60 boxes of a sun and nt mixture.
    Kevin

  111. FB2VNC Framebuffer to VNC server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Framebuffer to VNC server

    http://fb2vnc.sourceforge.net

  112. Good, but wrong. by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    However, this doesn't make for "The Right Way". Hacking at something - figuring out how it works, seeing how you can do it better (or less expensively), and enjoying the process - is the source of solutions that Just Work.

    No. Generally, in my experience, it's the source of solutions that Almost Work. Or solutions that Work Unless You Do This. Or solutions that Just Worked Last Week, What the Hell Did We Change That Broke It?

    "[G]eneral lackluster performance of the contraption in question" is the result of not understanding something enough to do it well. Many off-the-shelf solutions suck - Windows 98, anyone? So do many home-brew setups. The problems doesn't come from the nature of a rig, it comes from the effort and intelligence of the creator.

    No, the problem comes from the continual poor reinvention of the wheel on Ask Slashbots. In this situation, KVM-IP switches are the answer. Not a 486 with a bunch of TV cards in it. Not a rat's nest of cables. If this person worked for me and proposed this solution, I would have a hard time signing his checks from then on.

    - A.p.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  113. OK... No one bit... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    on my last post. So I've come back with research:

    Where I work, we use an old DEC product called Polycenter Console Manager. It's THE best thing since sliced bread and the morons that took over DEC gave it away to someone who didn't "get it".

    Basically, we have a server that runs Polycenter and monitors/logs the consoles on our alphas. Many times, I've wondered if there was anything like this for my servers at home. Well, after seeing this guy's post, I was forced to do a little research. Here is what I came up with:

    Conserver running on a Linux box set up to be a logserver (it sounds like it does what Polycenter does)
    http://www.conserver.com/

    To remotely control BIOS settings, install a small Linux distro and BIOSWriter on each workstation to be monitored along with a boot man ager:
    http://sourceforge.net/projects/bioswriter/

    GRUB or LILO with serial console enabled to choose the OS you boot into (One of those coices being LInux with BIOSWriter).

    VNC or X for UNIX boxen, VNC or Terminal Services for Windows boxen for after the OS is up.

    The way I see it, this should allow you almost complete control of the BIOS (via BIOSWriter), the ability to select the OS you boot into (via your boot manager's serial console) and monitoring of any activity from your Linux console messages on an x86 box, plus you have console logging to boot. NT can provide serial console if you enable it in the boot.ini. I don't know about Win2K or .Net server. I also don't know if NT serial console is always availabel or only available when the core dumps... errr... I mean when you get a blue screen. And of course X, VNC or Terminal Services give you the ability to manage via your OSes GUI.

    The only thing you can't do with this is watch the POST. From my perspective this is about the most cost-effective system with the exception of the time you spend setting it up.

    Any better?

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:OK... No one bit... by eno2001 · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.... found this one too. Sounds like what I said in my first post. I am a research GEENIUS!!

      http://sourceforge.net/projects/utcboot/

      Worship me.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  114. Call George by jma42 · · Score: 1

    Call George of Redwood KVM at 256-679-6178. He knows everything there is to know about KVMs. Plus he's a super nice guy. He went out of his way to find me a KVM and then refurbish it himself. And then he charged me very little for it.

    --
    OKsofar
  115. Remote USB by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    Well, I wondered about USB over IP. It does exist now. AnywhereUSB, by IONetworks.Com, lets a host with a USB over IP device driver talk to their USB server. So you could have USB keyboards, mice, or other devices in your cubicle which are connected to a system anyplace in the world. And if you have those USB devices connected to a switch, you can switch them to several systems.

    Unfortunately they only have a device driver for some versions of Microsoft Windows at the moment.