Slashdot Mirror


Pentium 4 2.8Ghz Review

Alex Behrens writes "Hardware-Unlimited, part of the 3D-Unlimited Network, has posted a review of the Pentium 4 2.8Ghz! The review includes all the latest benchmarks and information about the final Pentium 4 processor before we hit the 3Ghz mark. Check it out!"

186 comments

  1. A first by ObitMan · · Score: 0, Troll

    A repeat story in the same day!
    Huzzah the Editors!

    --
    Who run Barter Town?
    1. Re:A first by den_erpel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Last week the same about the US Rocket (forgot the name).

      Be careful in pointing it out though, or you might be issued a "flame bait"

      --
      :wq

      --
      Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
    2. Re:A first by macksav · · Score: 1, Funny

      numba one honiwah boom-boom you long time five bucks. love you loooong time. fucky sucky, numba one.

    3. Re:A first by ObitMan · · Score: 0

      there were subtle differences in those stories
      Atlas 5 Launches
      VS.
      Atlas V's Maiden Launch a Success

      Full coverage of events by our talented editors.
      Also notice the subtle nuances of using Roman numerals.

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
  2. Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does CmdrTaco even read the slashdot homepage before accepting stories?

    1. Re:Is this a joke? by N3WBI3 · · Score: 1
      Like the guys does not have enough to do providing the *FREE* forum than to listen you to bitch about a dup article that you could have freaking ignored..

      Damn, if it bothers you that much make your own damn site...

      --
    2. Re:Is this a joke? by ObitMan · · Score: 0

      If you wern't such a N3WBI3 you would know that the guys does not even read his own site.
      You would also know that bitching about duplicate articles is a time honored tradition here.
      If these things bother you so much make your own damn site.

      --
      Who run Barter Town?
    3. Re:Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      take it from me. I live in ann arbor and 9 months out of the year IT SUX!

      AC

    4. Re:Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time honored tradition? If they guy doesn't read his own site, what makes you think it'll do any good to complain? Or that the rest of us would even care? So why waste our fucking time trying to filter you out?

  3. Isn't this one too many p4 2.8 GHZ review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now i know that there are a lot of people out there who are just waiting to buy these new P4 chips, but having so many stories in such a short span on the main page is a bit too much ;)

  4. Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by philam3nt · · Score: 1, Troll

    SIX Hours Later!
    Now still on the Front Page, where Everyone Can See It!

    Double Posting Faster than Ever Before!!

    This iiiiiiiissssssssss ridiculous!

    Thank youuuuuuuu for watching!

    --

    If I had a sig, this is where it would be.
    1. Re:Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by The+Dobber · · Score: 1

      Just one of many benefits of the fastest P4.

    2. Re:Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. If Taco wants to look silly, it's his decision of course. But the sensible thing would be to post this review link to the older story rather than making his own version.

    3. Re:Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by thegrommit · · Score: 1

      What's even funnier is that none of the "editors" has noticed this 30 minutes later.

      P4 2.8Ghz - $500
      Editors that read their own front page - priceless

    4. Re:Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would even be MORE amusing if, in another six hours, timothy ALSO posts a pentium 2.8ghz story.

    5. Re:Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by MattCohn.com · · Score: 1

      No no no... it's not a double post! You can CLEARLY see by the titles that one is about the Pentium 4 2.8 Ghz, and the other one about the Pentium 4 2.8 GHz! Note the capital H. Brings up a question, which way is correct? I've always done Ghz, but have seen GHz also.

    6. Re:Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by PD · · Score: 1

      That's simple. One GHz = 8 Ghz. Just like the difference between MB(yte) and Mb(it). See?

    7. Re:Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GHz is correct. Units named after people are capitalised, hence Hz (hertz, the unit of frequency/periodicity named for Mr. Hertz); A (amps, unit of current named for Mr. Ampere); F (farads, capacitance, Mr. Faraday) and so on (W(atts), J(oules), C(oulombs) etc etc) as opposed to generic units (kg, s , m, ft. etc) . So billions of hertz is GHz, thousandths of an amp is mA, and so forth. Ghz is just wrong.

    8. Re:Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't it be GH(ertz) = Gh(ertz)?

      now... uGhz would be different!(and would confuse the hell out of people!)

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by PD · · Score: 1

      Twas a joke. And I prefer the term "millihertz" for confusing people. Some people don't catch it and think it's mega. Others think that milli is related to million and come out too small by a factor of 1000.

    10. Re:Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      Mine too was a joke. MicroGigahertz. Wacky. Strange. Try figuring out how many zeroes one uGhz vs. one hz would have and where. It hurts my brain.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    11. Re:Douuuuuuuuuble POSTINGS!! by Shanep · · Score: 2

      Note the capital H. Brings up a question, which way is correct? I've always done Ghz, but have seen GHz also.

      Since Hertz is a unit of measurement named after the German physicist who was the first to produce electromagnetic waves artificially, it should be capitalized.

      And I really hate with a passion, seeing m where M should be, considering m is 1,000,000,000 times smaller than M.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  5. WTF??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two posts on the same story in the same day! Ya for repeats!

  6. Can we say DUPLICATE? by techstar25 · · Score: 0, Troll

    How many reviews of this do we need in a 24 hour period?

    1. Re:Can we say DUPLICATE? by sebol · · Score: 1

      How many reviews of this do we need in a 24 hour period?

      2,800,000 times in a second
      (2.8 GHz)

      --
      -- Hasbullah bin Pit (sebol)
    2. Re:Can we say DUPLICATE? by AlgUSF · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually that would be 2,800,000,000 times/sec. You are still running at 2.8Mhz it seems... :-)

      --


      I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
    3. Re:Can we say DUPLICATE? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Can we say redundant? Read the other posts before chiming in. Yeah I know the story was posted only two minutes before you commented, that's still no excuse for not checking if 10 other people said the same thing before you.

  7. omg april fools! by chicoy · · Score: 1

    omg april fools! (that's all I can say).

    omg! april fools!

    --
    ~the keyboard is mightier than the pen.
  8. Taco, ever read your own site? by billbaggins · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This has to be a new record for redundant articles...

    --
    "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
    --Winston Churchill
    1. Re:Taco, ever read your own site? by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      actually, i think we had faster one day last summer. I forget the topic, but today we had three intervening articles between the two Pentium 4 articles. Last summer there was something separated by like two or so. And then something similar happened the following day.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:Taco, ever read your own site? by handsomepete · · Score: 1

      The part that annoys me is that the submitter of this story is also the guy who runs the site that it's on (or the network it's on - whatever). Redundancy and blatant site pimping.

      *sigh* I thought weekend /. just finished, now we have to go through it again?

  9. Gues that the by prisoner · · Score: 1, Troll

    editors weren't happy with the discussion in the previous thread(s).

    1. Re:Gues that the by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, they'll probably be much happier with the discussion in this one. :-)

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  10. Bug in 2.8Ghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Intel is reporting that there is a bug in the core design (Which is not necessarly bad they say), that would further delay the deloplyment of the chip. This is wierd, couldn't they have tested it out before rushing it out like this? If only they waited one day more....

    1. Re:Bug in 2.8Ghz by Astrorunner · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You know the drill..

      link, or STFU.

    2. Re:Bug in 2.8Ghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFM or site.

      You know the drill, see that location bar in your browser, type intel.com and hit return.

      Do you really need links to the obvious? Some ppl are utterly retarded.

    3. Re:Bug in 2.8Ghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not really a bug, more like a feature that shouldn't be turned on, that has been turned on, and since it's turned on, there is a possible chance that the chip might not work at full speed on certain mobos (I believe soya is the only one cited on Intel's site).

      I believe the feature in question is the advanced pipeline SSE requests over rewrites, this needs better cache representation on the mobos. The soya boards have really bad S.bridge and thus this becomes an issue.

      But overall the decrease in speed on a mobo like this would only be seen for integer calculatons and not FPA.

      Soya ppl say they can fix in their next bunch off the line, but for the ones already out there, you just need to avoid it, unless you dont mind a few 100 Hz slow down (Which you wouldn't notice much... anyway :)).

      Once again this is not a bug. Also, it's possible to turn off the feature in the OS, possibly Linux would have a fix by friday for soya ppl ;-)

    4. Re:Bug in 2.8Ghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Intel droid had already posted a patch on LKML two nights back, nice to see an OS that actually keeps up to the hardware.

      Also this affects soya only and once SSE/rewrite is turned off you'd be back to 2.8ghz again (i dont think ppl would notice the slow down, something to do with the CPU waiting for the mobo till some time out -- which is a fall safe I guess).

    5. Re:Bug in 2.8Ghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which part of the 'Bug' don't you understand? It's on OS news now. And already Linux has a patch to fix it (turn off something I think). But they said this is not an issue and production is going as the chip is with no changes.

    6. Re:Bug in 2.8Ghz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Intel spokesperson said it's not a bug over the voice cast. She said production would go as is, cause this is just a 'feature' (thehehe!!) that was mistakenly tuned on and could be turned off if required. Oh my!

    7. Re:Bug in 2.8Ghz by The+Dobber · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does that mean we'll have a third P4 2.8 article today?

  11. Intel must pay Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Commando Taco, how much does Intel and the movie industry pay you?

    What's the matter? AMD wouldn't "play ball"?

    You people crack me up.

    Mod away, it won't hurt me!

  12. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wise up Taco, nobody cares about this.

  13. 2.8GHz! Already? by brejc8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was only a few ours that I heard intel were releasing a errrmm.. 2.8GHz chip

    1. Re:2.8GHz! Already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you five-years-old, or just a spaz?

    2. Re:2.8GHz! Already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh...take a look at his other post in this discussion.

      My guess is both.

  14. New Submission Strategy by saider · · Score: 0, Troll

    When you submit your article, submit it several times. Chances are that one of the editors will not be aware of what is going on and post it. In essence, slashdot the submission page.

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    1. Re:New Submission Strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as in voting... submit early, submit often.

  15. Memory and system bus by axxackall · · Score: 1

    I'd better invest my money for having more RAM and faster system bus. Why would I need ~3Ghz for software development and information/document management?

    --

    Less is more !
    1. Re:Memory and system bus by taxman_10m · · Score: 3, Funny

      So the geeky chicks will come over your house to play with your computer?

    2. Re:Memory and system bus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So that the upcoming enhanced version of notepad will load in less than 10 minutes.

    3. Re:Memory and system bus by axxackall · · Score: 1
      So that the upcoming enhanced version of notepad will load in less than 10 minutes.

      With GNU attach client (X)Emacs loads up in a fraction of second :)

      Seriously, most of information/document tasks (including notepad related) work fine even on Pentium II it it has enough memory and good speed of data exchange between memory and disks. It makes more sense to have a workgroup server or a power workstation with Pentioum Celeron 500 MHZ and 2048 MB RAM rather than Pentium 4 3 Ghz and 128 MB RAM !

      --

      Less is more !
    4. Re:Memory and system bus by axxackall · · Score: 1
      Personally, I think that the most of PC users care more about information/document management rather than computer games. And also I think that Intel creates CPU for the most average computer users.

      Geeks should buy Mac - much better for geeks :)

      --

      Less is more !
    5. Re:Memory and system bus by TyZone · · Score: 1
      My geeky chick (less geeky than many, but she's getting better) might be typical in this: she isn't so much interested in CPU speeds, but she does like to play with my hard drive.

      Not that I mind, either -- I actually consider myself quite lucky!

      --
      TyZone
  16. newbs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    CLOSE THIS THREAD, NOW.

  17. Hmmm? by fredopalus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Now where have i seen this article before....?

    --
    Jonahweb.com has stuff.
  18. Patience by chill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reviews of hardware come from pretty much the same half-dozen review sites every time. How about this idea?

    When a review of a "new release" hits one site, wait 24 hours for all of them to release reviews then link it in one article?

    You could even time it, considering many of the sites do "previews" that say something along the lines of "the NDA will expire on XX/YY, until then..." Sort of gives you a clue when the full review is coming out.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    1. Re:Patience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just make a form for all the sites to fill out that automatically updates the forum with their links.

  19. Furthermore: by kafka93 · · Score: 1

    In other news, Hardware-Unlimited, part of the 3D-Unlimited Network, posted a review of the Pentium 4 2.8Ghz! The review includes all the latest benchmarks and information about the final Pentium 4 processor before we hit the 3Ghz mark. Check it out!

  20. before you ... by n3m6 · · Score: 1

    remember that slashdot editors need to get stoned once in a while too. just don't be too harsh on them.

    thanks for posting that second story. it was an inspiring event. we really need a second thread to discuss the challenges faced by the intel marketing department.

  21. Jumped the shark by shird · · Score: 5, Funny

    Slashdot jumped the shark when;

    (a) When they switched to a "pay for no ads" service
    (b) When they posted a dupe story within a six hour period
    (c) When they started displaying those huge ads
    (d) When they started showing MS ads in those banners

    --
    I.O.U One Sig.
    1. Re:Jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best part is that in the Slashcode administration applet, it lists all the stories in order. Now if you don't see "Intel 2.8 GHz" only __4__ lines down I think there is a problem with you not caring. Oh wait, they're just concerned about cashing that huge check every week from Andover, while telling every other OSS programmer to "work for free." They do nothing and get paid.

    2. Re:Jumped the shark by jdcook · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      You forgot (e) CowboyNeal

      --
      Q:How many libertarians does it take to stop a Panzer division? A:None. Obviously market forces will take care of it.
    3. Re:Jumped the shark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm seriously tired of this. How much effort does it take to see if anyone has already posted a story?

      I've finally decided I'm wasting my time reading slashdot. If they can't be arsed to check their articles at all, then I won't be arsed to bother reading the site anymore.

      Thank god I didn't buy a subscription.

  22. Redundancy by fizban · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can understand if Slashdot needs to flaunt its redundant, fail-proof system of posting, but jeez, we only need to see the redundant systems when the primary ones fail... Stop the double posting, already!

    The whole problem here is that Taco doesn't read his own site anymore. He just assumes that whatever he posts coudln't possibly have been put up already by anyone else. If you disagree with me, just look back at all the redundant posts in the past and you'll notice that the second poster is always the supreme leader himself...

    --

    +1 Insightful, -1 Troll. What can I say, I'm an Insightful Troll.

    1. Re:Redundancy by den_erpel · · Score: 1

      This means that complaining does not help, since he does not read the site, much less the comments...
      This means that complaining does not help, since he does not read the site, much less the comments...
      This means that complaining does not help, since he does not read the site, much less the comments...

      (I was hoping that redundent comments could be a remedy, but I guess it just results in spam :( )

      --
      Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, "Today I will be brilliant."
  23. Ghz != GHz by brejc8 · · Score: 2, Informative

    GHz is the correct.
    One of the got it right.

    1. Re:Ghz != GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One of the got it right".

      Seems like you can't get it right either.

      Here, I'll rewrite it for you:

      "One of them got it right".

      How's that buddy? Happy correcting...

    2. Re:Ghz != GHz by brejc8 · · Score: 2

      You cant beat these thinkpad keyboards.

    3. Re:Ghz != GHz by stevenbee · · Score: 1, Funny
      You cant beat these thinkpad keyboards.

      Sure ya can; I recommend a ballpeen hammer.

      --
      Don't read this!
    4. Re:Ghz != GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I know a guy who writes "mg" when he means "MB" (megabyte).

      I prescribe 500 mg sodium pentothal IA to such people.

    5. Re:Ghz != GHz by brejc8 · · Score: 2

      What is a hz?
      I was told it was something like a hezla

    6. Re:Ghz != GHz by simetra · · Score: 1

      Hey Asstard,

      You got it wrong. It should be:

      "One of them got it right."

      Note that the period belongs inside the quotes.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    7. Re:Ghz != GHz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Asstard,

      That's "Anonymous Asstard" to you.

    8. Re:Ghz != GHz by unDiWahn · · Score: 1

      I think that depends on whether you're British or American, actually. Talk amongst yourselves...

  24. Intel no longer loves MS? by n-baxley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It seems to me that processor speeds have relly shot up in the last 6 months. Before, there was always a nice tie between the advances in processor speed and the extra needs of Windows. This arrangment worked well for both parties in that everyone felt they had to have both to be right with the world. Has Intel (and AMD) now said to heck with MS we're going to put all the speed we can into our machines? Or, are we seeing a MHz race between Intel and AMD? With a viable competitor, Intel can no longer trickle out improvments at their own pace, they have to deal with someone else matching and exceeding their pace. What does this bode for the future of processors?

    1. Re:Intel no longer loves MS? by ostiguy · · Score: 2

      The cpu race is as competitive as it has even been - AMD makes great product, Intel has been forced to keep up. Intel has done a good job of really tweaking out the p4 to continually boost raw mhz, as well as little tweaks here and there. Currently intel is probably ahead because it appears they can push the p4 a lot further than amd can the athlon cores

      Windows hasn't dramatically required much more CPU - ram has been more critical. You can run both nt 4 and 2k (and I think xp) on as little as a pentium 133- but nt 4 will run decently with 64mb ram, whereas 128mb ram is a more comfortable minimum for win2k.

    2. Re:Intel no longer loves MS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah in the old days in six months the processor speed only went from 90 Mhz to 120 Mhz!

      Today it goes from 2.4 Ghz to 2.8 Ghz!

      Ok, you know it might seem like a lot more, but it's not. I think one of the struggles that Intel may be running into is that after the speeds got beyond about 500 Mhz, there stopped being a real need for the faster processors. It's the other parts of the system that play a larger part. My main system at home is a 1.2Ghz PIII, with 512 Megs RAM, GeForce4 and a 7200 RPM 80 Gig harddrive. No interest in upgrading yet, maybe next year.

  25. It's obvious why the story was posted again!!! by kvn299 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They forgot the exclamation !! points in the first one!!!!

  26. Have mercy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And pull the plug on this story.... Sorry to say it, but somebody fucked up-and how!

  27. "Did you ever get that feeling of Deja Vu?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Did you ever get that feeling of Deja Vu?"

    "Wait, didn't you just say that?"

    =P

  28. A New Pentium 4 Processor? by Mupp252 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mean Intel has a 2.8 GHz processor out? Sorry, I'm a little slow.

    1. Re:A New Pentium 4 Processor? by Feathers+McGraw · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you need to upgrade your CPU. I hear Intel has a 2.8 GHz processor out.

    2. Re:A New Pentium 4 Processor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, wait... what's all this about Intel? Something about a 2.8 GHz processor?!?

    3. Re:A New Pentium 4 Processor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know either; rumor has it that they're releasing a 2.8 GHz processor. I'll let you know when I find out more.

    4. Re:A New Pentium 4 Processor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's a processor?

    5. Re:A New Pentium 4 Processor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure you submit the story to Slashdot once you do!

    6. Re:A New Pentium 4 Processor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bees are on the what now?

    7. Re:A New Pentium 4 Processor? by Buck2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm looking for a 2.8 GHz processor and I would like to be the first to know.

      I'd really appreciate it.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
  29. In todays news, Intel buys Slashdot... by chicoy · · Score: 1

    Taco says, "Yeah, I thought the 'news for nerds' stuff is too old. I'm thinking 'Geeks Inside'.".

    --
    ~the keyboard is mightier than the pen.
  30. Double posting faster than ever by Cyclone66 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Clearly they used a Pentium 4 (jingle) to double post this quick!

    1. Re:Double posting faster than ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be a bug in the branch prediction section of the ALU :)

      Or maybe it was one of those pipeline execution errors.

  31. 2nd times a charm by sullrich · · Score: 1

    How many reviews of the same product does /. need in the same day? Just curious.

    These really should have been combined into one post.

  32. poor taco by lennygrafix · · Score: 0

    he just came up with a punching cool sounding department name... sad

    more-of-the-same-equals-happy?

    --
    ----------------------------------
    it aint all _that_ bad,.... right?
  33. Intel announces new processor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Today, Intel proudly announced their new dual Pentium 2.8GHz processors.

  34. More reviews by MagPulse · · Score: 5, Informative
    Even more than from my post in the last story...
    • [H]ard|OCP Intel Pentium 4 @ 2.80GHz : Intel is breaking out the big guns with their sights set directly on the competition. Will the 2.80GHz Northwood be enough for Intel to hold onto the performance crown?
    • Anandtech Intel's Pentium 4 2.80GHz - Moving to the Head of the Class
    • Tom's Hardware Speed Isn't Everything: P4/2800 Meets Athlon XP 2600+
    • Ace's Hardware Faster Still: The 2.8 GHz Pentium 4
    • FiringSquad Intel Pentium 4 2.8GHz Review
    • Hexus.net Intel Pentium 4 2.8GHz Review
    • SimHQ.com Intel "Northwood" 2.80GHz Pentium 4 Processor using .13 Technology
    • Tech Report Intel's Pentium 4 2.8GHz processor - Two billion eight-hundred thousand hertz
    • Hot Hardware The Pentium 4 2.8GHz Processor - Intel ups the anti once again
    • xbit labs Intel Pentium 4 2.8GHz against Athlon XP 2600+
    • VR Zone Intel Fastest Pentium 4 2.8Ghz Review
    • HardcoreWare A Thorn in AMD's Hide
    • Lost Circuits Pentium4 2.8 GHz - Another Hit And Run
    1. Re:More reviews by Jugalator · · Score: 2

      In other words - read one per day, and you'll have P4 2.8 GHz reviews for two weeks.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:More reviews by ParnBR · · Score: 1
      Tech Report: Intel's Pentium 4 2.8GHz processor - Two billion eight-hundred thousand hertz
      That's amusing. Tech Report reviewed a probably older version of the processor. 2.0008GHz doesn't sound nearly as good as 2.8GHz. ^^
      --
      My neighbor's .sig is better than mine.
    3. Re:More reviews by BryanL · · Score: 0

      Hey, you just ruined thirteen slashdot stories. That is a weeks worth of news. ;)

  35. No thanks by Hayzeus · · Score: 1

    My NEC V-25 is running just fine thanx. None of that heat-sunk glycol-cooled Pentium crap for me.

  36. News by roguerez · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Call this a news site? I miss the Pentium 4 2.8 GHz annoucement!

  37. Submit your reviews now! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Submit every one of the Pentium IV 2.8 GHz reviews as a new story! Let's set a new Slashdot record for repeated headlines in a four hour period!

    C'mon, I will not be satisfied until I see six news items posted about the same topic here on Slashdot!!

  38. Okay everyone... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Grab a link from the parent post, add a cutesy wrapper, and send it to "Submit Story"... let's see how many P4 stories we can get on the homepage today!!

  39. Two more reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here and Here

  40. read 42.8 GHz by earthpig · · Score: 2, Funny

    i miss read the heading. i thought they had come out with a fster chip.

    i need to get some sleep.

  41. tip for slashdot editors by bob@dB.org · · Score: 2, Funny

    check out slashdot.org before you post a story.

    --
    Acts@core.mailboks.com Acrux@core.mailboks.com Adam@core.mailboks.com Adar@core.mailboks.com Ada@core.mailboks.com
    1. Re:tip for slashdot editors by garcia · · Score: 2

      they just wanted to make sure we "heard it here first!"

    2. Re:tip for slashdot editors by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      they just wanted to make sure we "heard it here first!"

      And second...

  42. Error in the first paragraph by crumbz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Umm...the article makes a rather curious statement about Moore's Law.

    12 months ago - 2.0GHZ
    Now - 2.8GHz
    Fairly soon - 3.0 GHZ

    Where is Moore's Law? How does fairly soon translate to 4GH?

    1. Re:Error in the first paragraph by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Moore's law says nothing about frequency, only density of transistors.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Error in the first paragraph by chabotc · · Score: 2

      Ps, please note that the Moore's Law referes to the doubling of the transistor count for every said period; And _NOT_ the increase of the number of ticks per second (Hz).. This is a common mistake, but an important difference

      (look at it this way, if you doubled the number of transistors on a P4, you could theoreticly do twice the amount of actions per clock tick.. so it's theoreticly twice as fast without increasing the amount of Hz)

    3. Re:Error in the first paragraph by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Hasn't Moore's law been pretty accurate at predicting processor speeds, as well? In addition to hard drive densities, and other micro technologies.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  43. basic math by jrennie · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just started reading the review and noticed this paragraph:

    It's been nearly one year to the day since we first eyed the Pentium 4 running at 2.0Ghz, which debuted on August 27, 2001, and today we are testing the new Pentium 4 2.8Ghz. According to Moore's law, Intel is ahead of the schedule to double processing power every 18 months and if all goes according to plan we should be toying with a processor above to the 3Ghz mark before long.

    Sorry for my ignorance, but when did 3GHz become twice as fast as 2GHz? According to 2.0GHz and 2.8GHz point estimates, Intel should hit 4.0GHz about a year from now (2.8*(2.8/2.0)=3.92). A little slower than Moore's law predicts...

    Jason

    1. Re:basic math by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      isn't moore's law supposed to slow itself as time goes on? ie - at first speed doubled every 6 months, then that became 12. nowadays it's 18. Are we approaching every 24 months? Also, at some point Moore's law will be non-existant as physical limits will be reached (ie, the speed of light). At that point, Intel will have to focus on (gasp!) actual throughput instead of a GHz number.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:basic math by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      (doing my own research, imagine that!)

      moore's law indeed slows as time marches forward. when he originally came up with it in the mid-1960's, it was speed doubles every 12 months. Today, it's roughly 18. Maybe this getting to 3.0 GHz from 2.0 in 18 months is evidence of Moore's law stretching itself to something longer than 18 months.

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    3. Re:basic math by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2

      Moore's law only applies to the number of transistors, not the actual clock speed as a result of the number of transistors.

      And as we all know, processor clock speed does not mean a faster processor.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    4. Re:basic math by Peyna · · Score: 2

      or that moore's law only had to do with the number of processors, and isn't a law, just a statement about the state of the growth of things at the time. Moore's law is more of a self-fulfilling prophecy than anything.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:basic math by p3d0 · · Score: 1

      LOL! Nice sig.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    6. Re:basic math by tekrat · · Score: 1

      Actually, Intel should hit 4GHz in about 6 or 8 months, right on schedule with Moore's "law". The Processor Mhz "jmups" will get bigger and bigger.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  44. Its obvious why there was a double posting... by LordYUK · · Score: 1

    someone submitted this to two different departments, the "need-for-speed" department and the "more-mhz-equals-more-happy" department. After all, we all know that different areas of a company dont ever know what each other are doing, just look at Sony!!

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  45. grousing about duplicate stories by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    c'mon folks, this info is important...
    i mean, just look at the kind of info we get from page 5 of the linked review:

    The video card is still throttling the higher resolutions...
    blah blah blah...
    We are also nearing 300 frames per second at the lowest resolutions...
    blah blah blah, wait for it, because the paragraph ends...
    meaning that the Pentium 4 running at 2.8Ghz is really fast.

    i mean c'mon folks, could you make it through the day without this kind of insightful, probing journalism?

    i expect this kind of devastating information to be important to us on slashdot! ;-P

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  46. Jumped the shark - defined by tiltowait · · Score: 2

    To have "jumped the shark" pretty much means to have "gone to hell" - based on a Happy Days show where Fonzie waterski-jumped a shark. The show was pretty much game over from then on. More definition and I'll also bet the above poster reads Boondocks.

    1. Re:Jumped the shark - defined by Yunzil · · Score: 3, Informative

      To have "jumped the shark" pretty much means to have "gone to hell"

      Mmmm, not quite. The point at which something has jummped the shark is that precise moment where you know that the 'golden days' are over. You know that from that point, it's all downhill.

      There's a good web site about jumping the shark as applied to TV shows here.

  47. Not awake yet by robson · · Score: 2

    42.8 Ghz?!? Holy crap!

    Oh... wait... never mind.

  48. Re:Not awake yet... damn it. by robson · · Score: 2

    42.8 Ghz?!? Holy crap!

    Oh... wait... never mind.

    Great. Thanks to Taco, I unwittingly produced a redundant post: " Did any other late-night owls..."

    Don't believe the hype -- duplicate stories are NOT a victimless crime!

  49. Re:Michael is obviously in error [OT] by ObitMan · · Score: 0

    Stupid moderators, my post was not off topic, it was blatant flamebait.
    Please do better in the future.

    --
    Who run Barter Town?
  50. Does it cause double postings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so, we know Taco has one!

  51. Tragic news - Stephen King Dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Posted by CmdrTaco on 2002.08.26 16:19

    Writer Stephen King was discovred dead in his Florida hoem erlier today. Details are scarse at the moment. I'm confedent that he will be missed by everyone in teh Slashdot community, concidering his contrebutions to popular culture which cant be denied even if your not a fan of his work. Truly an American icon. ;)

    1. Re:Tragic news - Stephen King Dies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Who modded that "Troll"? CmdrTaco himself?

  52. Monday hangover??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "we first eyed the Pentium 4 running at 2.0Ghz, which debuted on August 27, 2001, and today we are testing the new Pentium 4 2.8Ghz. According to Moore's law, Intel is ahead of the schedule to double processing power every 18 months"... Let's see now... 1 plus 1 equals, duh... er, 3!

  53. This is embarassing by Katz_is_a_moron · · Score: 1

    Is is so hard for the editors to have a policy of checking with the other editors before posting an article? I fail to see the difficulty here.

  54. Warning, duplicate stories can be advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, Intel is probably paying /. to post this story twice. It's great ad having everyone talking about it.

  55. How did they get one??? by TibbonZero · · Score: 2

    Yea, how did they get one so fast, reviewed it, et al, when it just was released. Damn, and people say I sit hitting refresh on ./ too much.
    How about camping at the chip store or waiting for the UPS man all night just to get the chip and test it to see if it's really faster than the 2.6 ghz. OF course it's gonna be faster. When was the last time that you saw a nonoverclocked chip of slower speed beat the newer one?

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:How did they get one??? by dciman · · Score: 2

      How about the Pentium III compared to the pentium IV?? ;-)

  56. They broke 1 ghz??? by TibbonZero · · Score: 2

    Huh? I still have two Pentium 3 850mhz computers...
    What ? They broke 1 ghz?
    They have 2.0 ghz?
    Huh? A 2.8ghz?!?!?! Where have I been?

    You would think they way they do these benchmarks that you really need 200+ FPS in Quake 3 at 1600*1200@32 with everything to the max.
    I still have a 486 running Linux around here to use as a beast for some things.

    --
    Tibbon
    tibbon.com
    1. Re:They broke 1 ghz??? by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Seriously, where have you been for the last 25 years. How is it you didn't notice that the Hz in the latest Intel processors double about every 18 months? So what if you have two 850MHz chips.

    2. Re:They broke 1 ghz??? by TibbonZero · · Score: 2

      I was joking about how hard it was to keep up with the new chips that are coming out. I know that the processor power will be able to be fully used someday soon, but for now it's just marketing for the most part. I mean most people's 2.0ghz machines that they buy at Walmart run about the same speed as the 500mhz ones that they bought a few years ago, but now they put Weatherbug, Bonzi Buddy, IM, etc.. on it and slow it down so much. People think 'oh that's faster, I should buy that' When really all they have to do is optimize their system.

      Example: On dorm last year, I had my little mear P3 850 with a TNT2 Ultra 32mb. Yea, it sucks but I am a musician, not a gamer so I don't really care. Well, anyway, alot of people had 'new' computers that were supposed to be so fast and good. Well most of them came with 128mb memory. A few had 256, but they had to ask for it 'special'. In all seriousness, the amount of memory should double every 18 months as well, or at least ever 24 months. Anyway, Their computers ran like crap. They didn't have newer drivers, they didn't set up their systems right, they ran WinME, and they still thought that they got a good deal. When really they should have spent 1/3rd of what they did, gotten an older system, and kept it clean and optimized. I saw people get between 300-700 on 3dMark 2001. WTF is that? My system was beating most by 3-5x that! After I sat down with some of their systems and worked on them a bit I was able to improve them, but not totally.

      They were sold on chip speed, nothing else. They thought that the fastest chip would mean the fastest computer. All those crap OEM compenents, cheap video, cheap mobo, cheap memory. I would rather have an old system that's good, than a new one that sucks.

      Think for a second, what if, they stopped increasing the chip speed. Then what would happen? 2 things. Programmers would have to get efficiant with things that they are slack on (MSFT OSes), and computer sales would actually start looking at other stuff. No longer would they sell systems with 64mb or 128mb of memory. 512-1gb would be standard. Good system boards and cases would be defacto. Good powersupplies. Good cooling.
      Selling on processor is like selling a car based on HP only. Remember that there is Torque too, and HP/Weight ratio, as well as handling, stability, acceleration, top speed, gearing, etc... And some people want it to be comfortable to ride in and efficiant too!!
      Sorry if the joke wasn't apparent.

      --
      Tibbon
      tibbon.com
    3. Re:They broke 1 ghz??? by Elbereth · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I'm not so sure that consumer systems really need to be faster than 300 MHz, maybe 600 MHz at max. If you're a gamer, programmer, or power user, then, yeah, you'll want to have as much processing power as possible. For a long time, my dad was sadled with a 450 MHz Pentium II, which slowed down his compiles monstrously. After much complaining, the company finally bought him a new Pentium 4. Unfortunately, I think it was a low-end Pentium 4, but it's still lightyears better than his ancient Pentium II. I would have pushed for a dual Xeon, myself.

      I just recently bought a Tyan Tiger MPX and two 1.2 GHz Athlon MPs. I didn't want to spend the big bucks on 1.5 or 1.6 GHz Athlon MPs, since I'd probably see very little speed improvement over the incremental speed bumps -- not to mention saving myself over $100 on each processor.

  57. Other Upcoming Slashdot Articles... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    • Electric Armor
    • How Could TV Survive Without Commercials?
    • Interview with Battlebots Champion
    • John Gilmore and Maddog Hall discuss .ORG bids
    • HMV to Sell Digital Downloads
    • Voyagers Legacy in Pictures
    • Changing Face of Linux?
    • DOOM 3 will use P2P System?
    • The Square Kilometer Array
    • Dreamcast Broadband Adapters
    • Virtual Genetic Evolution
  58. Where are the Athlons? by SailorBob · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed that while you can pick up a 2.8Ghz Pentium on pricewatch, the Athlon 2400 and 2600 are nowhere to be seen? Anyone know where they are actually selling these things?

    --

    Woopty Doo Basil, what does it all mean?!

    1. Re:Where are the Athlons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what are you, some kind of a troll?

      we don't need your kind round here, boy.

    2. Re:Where are the Athlons? by jpmorgan · · Score: 3, Informative

      They aren't. AMD made a paper release: they claimed the chip had been released to try to one-up Intel, but they won't be ready to put it into production until sometime next month; this is the exact same trick Intel used to pull when it was P3 vs. Athlon (of course, the zealots who used to whine a bitch then are notably quiet now).

      Of course, most rational people ignore such 'releases' as marketting gimmicks whether they be prepetrated by Intel or AMD; the real release of the AthlonXP 2400+ and 2600+ won't be until next month. AMD's lost the speed game... until next quarter when it releases the hammers. Whoopdedo. I'm sure /. will celebraet.

    3. Re:Where are the Athlons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't say AMD has lost the speed game by that much. The Screensavers (www.thescreensavers.com) on TechTV tonight had the 2600+ beating the 2.8 P4 slightly in Lame MP3 encoding. So they are only about a month behind on speed, even if, as you say, the 2600 isn't really out yet. And AMD is still winning speed/cost by a long shot. In the real world, that's much more important than speed alone. I could buy two XP 2000+ for well less than the cost of a P4 2.8 GHz.

  59. WAIT, wait wait wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So let me get this traight... Intel DIDN'T release the 2.8ghz P4 and they're not planning to? Wow. You say they're going to stop making CPU's and focus on producing small toys of the blue man group? Wow.

    (Hey, if editors don't read stories why should I?)

  60. defined - saw that episode last week! by ard · · Score: 1

    wow!

    I just saw that episode the other day, they broadcast the show in sweden every morning 8-9 on Kanal 5...

    but I cant remember defining the expression of jumping the shark..

    You do mean the episode where Fonz gets challenged by a beachboy, the first contest is a tie, and to break the tie they jump over the shark, and the competitor bails out just before the ramp?

    1. Re:defined - saw that episode last week! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a Hollywood term. The situation and absurdity was captured in the act and later termed "jumping the shark."

  61. Who cares, twice even by wobedraggled · · Score: 1

    Intel is playing a horrible game, look we have a faster chip every 3 months. I work in an Intel house and could care less.

    AMD baby, more bang for the buck.

    --
    Ubuntu- Linux for human beings.
  62. No child left behind??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Taco, you stupid shit. Not only did you post a fucking duplicate story, you posted one with fuzzy math in it (2 * 2 = 3).

    Here's a few tips, you Bender worshiping romosexual: wash the hot grits off your crotch, get the seven inch dildo out of your ass, USE A FUCKING CALCULATOR, AND CHECK YOUR OWN FUCKING HOMEPAGE!!!

  63. Popup Hell by hbo · · Score: 1

    http://www.hardware-unlimited.com/ is not a place to go if you don't have popups disabled.

    So not only is this a duplicate topic, the site pointed to is guaranteed to annoy.

    --

    "Even if you are on the right track, you'll get run over if you just sit there" - Will Rogers

  64. so what? by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Wow next we will have 10Thz cpus, whoopy.

    What would be even cooler [punny] is if they made processors with the same MIPS but way less POWER requirements.

    IIRC I once saw a paper on mW per MIPS [citeseer]. That's the type of research intel and amd should be looking into.

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  65. Wow. 1972 technology at 2.8GHz. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just exactly what we need for faster pr0n. Here's an idea, quit posting reviews nobody gives a shit about, and certainly don't post them more than once.

  66. Warning: Slashdot karma shortage! by billbaggins · · Score: 5, Funny
    SLASHDOT (AP) -- In response to what is being described as a "severe shortage" in the global karma pool, CmdrTaco and other Slashdot administrators are taking the unprecedented step of deliberately posting duplicate, pointless, and just-plain-stupid stories, with a goal of encouraging slashdotizens to increase their output of "Redundant", "Flamebait", and "Troll" posts.

    "It's about all we can do right now," CmdrTaco said in an interview Monday morning. "We're hoping to get a new shipment of karma in within the next few days, but until then we're gonna have to just keep posting trollbait." Mr. Taco refused to comment on rumors that the low-quality postings were in any way related to the recent spate of coffee-machine breakdowns at slashdot.

    Stay tuned for further developments.

    --
    "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
    --Winston Churchill
  67. here, kitty kitty by bobtroy · · Score: 1

    It's kind of surprising to see how many pussies here have their lives turned upside down by a repeat post.

    1. Re:here, kitty kitty by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      It's kind of surprising to find as every duplicate post comes and goes, sometimes with spalling errors, how big of a pussy Taco is. You'd think he might give a flaming fuck about his site, instead of letting it become as stupid as he is.

  68. Taco's was really first by unsinged+int · · Score: 2

    Michael apparently had some success with this http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/08/2 4/1921239&mode=thread&tid=134

  69. No g0 Moto? by bluethundr · · Score: 1

    ...OKay, so I realize that Mhz aint the whole ball o' wax but it 5eems that the mhz gulf between the PPC and x86 is just getting way out of hand. Even with the supposed architectural efficiencies of the RISC, it seems that those benefits are being occluded by this widening gap in clockcycles.

    I have read in various places that Mot0 has suffered some tremendous "braindrain" in their design teams, which badly affected their ability to bust out fastr ch1ps....But I first heard this tale of woe like 2 years ago! Could it be that they have yet to recover from this unfortunate ph3nomenon?

    I'm beginning to wonder if Apple should just abandon the RISC platform altogether and let loose with the Intel version of OS X that they undoubtedly have (X being based on openstep).

    Also, I once read an article on ARS a couple years back about the whole RISC vs. CISC debate being largely erroneous. That some of the x86 registers (I think they were actually using an AMD for comparison) actually had reduced instruction sets and that some of the registers on the (then current) G3 had some complex instructions embedded into its architecture. It said that a more accurate term to describe CPU architecture for b0th x86 and PPC would be FISC standing for FAST Instruction Set...

    at any rate, I would like to see the PPC brought to the point where they could start putting out wafers of chips that clocked somewhere in the neighborhood of the x86 product line. Especially since at similar clockspeeds they would outperform their conterparts, but also because in the minds of the publix, Mhz is highly marketable. Most people equate Mhz with Mph...

    --
    Quod scripsi, scripsi.
  70. Then AMD comes back... by ripewithdecay · · Score: 0

    ...with the Athlon XP 2700+, with a 333MHz FSB.

    What's going to happen then?

  71. Speed by kiowa · · Score: 1

    One ought to think that Slashdot wouldn't be the place that was buying in for the GHz-hype of Intel. Wasn't it just a couple of weeks ago AMD set fourth to get a more sensible labeling of CPUs and what they can deliver.

    One ought to get the ability to moderate the articles, not just the comments.

    --
    =-kiOwA-> EOF
  72. Scalability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The P4 design is scalable to 10 GHz and should be rather easy to get it to 5 GHz. The PIII CuMine took 13 steppings and numberous revisions to tweak out more than 1.13 GHz.

    The P4 has a lot of changes to increase scalability. These include a very deep pipeline (20 steps) and wait states for signal drive (propagation time for current across the chip). This makes the P4 less powerful per clock cycle than the P3, but releases it from the design straight jacket. Intel took a lot of heat for the new design and the inherant trade-offs, but the choice is starting to pay off at 2.2 GHz and above.

    Mike

  73. Lead? by Beansack · · Score: 1

    "The benchmarks from Quake III: Arena follow the same pattern we have seen since the introduction of the Pentium 4: at the top of the leader board with a solid lead over the Athlon XP."

    Seem like a pretty pathetic lead for the price you pay.

    1. Re:Lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i prefer leaderhosen over leaderboard

  74. Dual P4s? by meehawl · · Score: 2

    For a system that I use for work - rather than games - I'm more interested in load balancing between multiple CPUs. I know I can get a dual Athlon system that will give me a smooth ride even during heacy operating load. Can I get a dual P4 system as easily?

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Dual P4s? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      I think you have to get the Xeon version of the P4. They are pretty pricy, even on the grey market, but are more avalible than their P3 predicessors were to system builders. Of course all the major manufacturers sell P4 Xeon systems, but one with a few bells and whistles will cost you at least $3,000 last time I checked. You could probably build one yourself for a little more than a Dual Athlon, but the SuperMicro boards from Broadcom are usually a little nicer than the ones from Tyan.
      If you decide to go with dual P4s don't try to get a bargin on remanufactured dell boards, they look cheap, but you need Dell's case, powersupply, and VRMs to make them work, as they have a special connector. The VRMs are cheap, but the case/powersupply are a single unit, and is pretty pricey.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  75. Electro-magnetic radiation by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

    With processors close to the 3GHz mark, I guess that the EM radiation levels should start getting some more attention. A usual "gray box" computer is well shielded should not cause much problems. But with all these case mods full of plexiglas, there is less of a Faraday cage to trap radiation in.

    Remember that the higher the frequency, higher the energy level, so more care should be exercised before you decide to put yourself under exposure for long hours every day.

    Also, the clock speeds are near the frequency of the microwave radiation on your oven, that thing about resonance of the H2O molecule that makes you feel all warm. Another bit to worry about.

    In the end that may prove be a non-issue, but I'm no expert on the field and usually prefer to exercise caution now and avoid chemotherapy later :-) That's one readon why I keep my case closed all the time (the other is cause it looks better with all the mess hidden).

    1. Re:Electro-magnetic radiation by Budgreen · · Score: 1

      well... when your p4 2.4ghz pc starts using a clock
      thats producing a few hundred watts of radiation you can start to worry.. but i highly doubt that your pc is going to put out anywhere near the power of a microwave :P

      --
      The greatest right given is the right to be wrong...
    2. Re:Electro-magnetic radiation by Koyaanisqatsi · · Score: 1

      Agreed. But on the other hand, I spend an average of 5 to 10 minutes every day near a running microwave. And anywhere from 7 to 12 hours in front a computer.

  76. Re:Jumped the shark - defined (better) by jcostantino · · Score: 1

    More precisely, when a show "jumps the shark" it means that the series is in a death spiral. Jumping the shark referrs to an exciting plot development that (hopefully) bails it out from bad ratings. Sorta like a "very special episode" but those happen while a show is popular. Wow! My first post :)

    --
    Reviews with a twist! http://www.sardonicbastard.com
  77. Intel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STILL sucks giant donkey balls!

  78. Sweet by whoop · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn, now I can't wait for the 2.85ghz cpu reviews! I only hope it's at least 1.75% better than these 2.8ghz ones.

  79. Unanticipated Side Effect by fhqwhgads · · Score: 2, Funny

    This just in...

    Sources are reporting that a recent attempt to slow the depletion of the karma pool at Slashdot have proven unsuccessful. Internal audits leaked to this station have revealed that, in fact, karma utilization has risen in the past hours.

    One person close to the Slashdot team has stated: "We thought that the moderators would realize that the posts would be perfect fodder for modding down. Unfortunately, we were wrong."

    In addition to many people modding comments highlighting the duplicate postings up, there have been unconfirmed reports of cross-posting of ideas getting modded up. If these reports are true, it is still to be seen whether this represents a duplication of ideas or an intentional abuse of the system.

  80. Didn't some guy... by infornogr · · Score: 0

    Didn't some guy already boot at somewhere around 3.6ghz by overclocking a p4 and using liquid nitro? Somehow this will make the breaking of the 3ghz barrier slightly less impressive.

  81. Redundant redundancy by fredopalus · · Score: 0

    Now we're all posting the same comments on redundancy.

    --
    Jonahweb.com has stuff.
  82. FreeBSD benchmarks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone have any FreeBSD benchmarks on Intel vs AMD like the reviews posted on Windows benchmarks? I don't run Windows or linux (both have set back the state of operating systems by 10 years), so FreeBSD would be much more relevant to me.

  83. How about reinstating M1 and M2 privs? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    Since it seems that Slashdot editors aren't perfect either, how about reinstating M1 and M2 privs to those of us who lost their privs in the Great Censored Thread fiasco?

  84. Note to the two posters above by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop talking out of your asses. Do you have links to these claims, or not?