Slashdot Mirror


XBox Linux HOWTOs

killmenow writes "Following up this slashdot story from a few days ago, today The Register is reporting that the XBox Linux folks have released a HOWTO for getting SuSE 8.0 running. Cool...I may have to go buy an X-Box now." There's also a HOWTO for Debian if that's your style. All of these require an XBox with modified hardware... There's also a story about the XBox online gaming service that implies Microsoft will be scanning your machine to make sure you haven't modified it, but we can't link to it since silicon.com has some sort of stupid registration requirement. Anyone find the story elsewhere? Ah, News.com has a story about XBox Live.

309 comments

  1. You're going to buy an xbox because of this? by SoCalChris · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Cool...I may have to go buy an X-Box now

    You boviously have more money than brains if you want to go buy an X Box just because you can install Linux on it. If you want to install Linux on something, buy a PC. Xbox is for games.

    1. Re:You're going to buy an xbox because of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did the parent post get modded down? He has a good point.

    2. Re:You're going to buy an xbox because of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he hasn't the taste to reply nicely.

    3. Re:You're going to buy an xbox because of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, if anything, you can punish microsoft by buying an x-box since they lose so much money! especially if you aren't buying any games to go along with it.

    4. Re:You're going to buy an xbox because of this? by sabok · · Score: 1

      I agree that a normal p.c would be a better choice of hardware, but can you get a p.c with the same spec as the xbox for £200? I have a ps2 with a linux kit. It works as well as the highest spec p.c for most office tasks! the truth is most people don't need a 2Ghz+ p.c! Anyway the Xbox is the closest to a p.c any console has ever been!

  2. The HOWTO sounds useful... by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny

    but to do anything with this I would really need a WHYTO.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Its obvious!

      You spend $500 on an XBox, Controller and 3 games. Go ahead and toss the controller and games, cause they won't work.
      Now add another few hundred bucks in modified hardware.

      Install and enjoy your $700+ linux box!

      Sure, $700 on a PC woulda given you better hardware, but it wouldn't show you how 1337 you are (and how frivolous you are with money)!!

    2. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It -might- be useful, if X-Box sold for under $100, like the dreamcast.

    3. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      Umm $500 for an Xbox and three games? What three games might this be, for each of them to cost $100?

      And why get these games if you plan on tossing them out?

    4. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why ever do anything at all?

      Hmm, imagine you are a nerdy guy and want to write an operating system for fun. WHAT A JOKE, HAHHAHAHHAHA.......oops, it turned out good so now clowns can worship it.

      The above was to make a point. Linux is indeed a fine OS. But someone could have asked why then also. Why anything ever? Because we can...

    5. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It -might- be useful, if X-Box sold for under $100, like the dreamcast.

      What... mommy'll get you that 100 dollar Dreamcast but she can't afford $199 for an XBox? It's a wonder you can even go on at all with such a sorry life.

    6. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by ChaosDiscordSimple · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why?

      The first, and perhaps most important reason is "Because I can." We're geeks. Geeks modify things just to show that they can, to excersize their geek skills, to reveal in the technology.

      Second, for $200 I can get a machine with a stereo eqiupment form factor that will me a great mp3 and ogg vorbis player with visualization on my TV (great for parties), plays dvds, plays many classic games (courtesy of MAME, ScummVM, and others), browses the web (say, tvguide.com for listings), and if you're desperate can be used to ssh into work to fix something. For that, it's pretty good deal.

    7. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He may be talking about canadian dollars in which case, it's not unreasonable. I spent over $500 for my gamecube + controller + ram card + 1 game. The X-Box and PS2 were about $200 more expencive than that. Games here are $80 a pop for a new release.

    8. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      Ouch.

    9. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you a fucking moron?

      HAHAHAHAHAHAH...oops, it turned out you are.

    10. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      What's the CPU speed like? How long does it take to compile a kernel on an Xbox?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    11. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by NetMasta10bt · · Score: 2, Informative

      CPU: P3 733MHz with SSE
      Graphics Processor: 250Mhz nVIDIA X-Chip
      Total Memory: 64MB
      Memory Bandwidth: 6.4Gb/sec
      Polygon Performance: 125million/sec
      Audio: 3D Audio Processor
      Network: 10/100Mbps Ethernet
      Media: 2-5x DVD
      Hard disk: 10GB

    12. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by dsyu · · Score: 1

      For $400 (PS2 + PS2Linux Kit), I've already been doing the things you mention for months now. As an added bonus, I didn't have to void my PS2 warantee.

      Browsing the web on my TV at 640x480, however, leaves a little to be desired :-)

    13. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said "fucking" HAHAHAHAHHAHAH. You are *NOT* HAHHAHAHAHAH

    14. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

    15. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by juju2112 · · Score: 2

      but to do anything with this I would really need a WHYTO.

      I think a John F. Kennedy quote is an appropriate response here.
      "But why, some say, the moon? Why choose this as our goal? And they may well ask, why climb the highest mountain? Why, 35 years ago, fly the Atlantic? Why does Rice play Texas?

      We choose to go to the moon. We choose to go to the moon in this decade and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard, because that goal will serve to organize and measure the best of our energies and skills, because that challenge is one that we are willing to accept, one we are unwilling to postpone, and one which we intend to win, and the others, too"

    16. Re:The HOWTO sounds useful... by xingix · · Score: 1

      I live in Canada, and an XBox runs for around $350CA, which is about $230US. A GameCube will run you around $250CA.

      --

      Confucious says: Man who runs behind car gets exhausted.

      // jeku.com

  3. You go buy your X-Box just to run Linux by mrm677 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You'll eventually cave and will buy an X-box game. Its like a little kid dipping into the cookie jar even though its naughty.

    1. Re:You go buy your X-Box just to run Linux by rjbrooksjr · · Score: 1

      nah.. burn em

    2. Re:You go buy your X-Box just to run Linux by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I can't believe I'm going to buy an X-Box for a few games. I've always been a huge Sega fan, ever since I got the Master System (do a search for my /. nic sometime). Some how Microsoft got Sega to make Shenmue II/III X-Box exclusives in the US. I already got the import of part II, so I'll probally pass on that, but I need III. There is also the new Sega GT, and Panzer Orta. Hopefully Microsoft had to pay Sega for those exclusives, so they can take the loss on me buying the system, and then what they had to fork over to Sega for those games.

    3. Re:You go buy your X-Box just to run Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe you could forget about the stupid console-of-the-month and go out and do something fun. Get laid? Nah maybe that's asking too much of someone on /.

  4. wow by nocomment · · Score: 0, Troll

    be still my beating heart....is this actually by microsoft? is says x-box folks. and they even did debian, way to go guys!!! does this even run netbsd yet? ;-)

    --
    /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
    /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    1. Re:wow by batkiwi · · Score: 2

      "is this actually by microsoft" ????

      Did you go to the site? It's a hacker project, with the current version running only on MOD CHIPPED X-BOXES. With MS threatening to use xbox-live to scan for mod chips, I'd say the answer is pretty obvious.

  5. I've already done it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I have linux on my XBox.

    It was cool bringing a BASH prompt.

    But now I really wanna play some Halo, but I can't?
    It really sucks. I bought it for a gaming console, and now its just like a computer...

    1. Re:I've already done it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Wait till new games start checking for mod chips and such and watch your XBox become a worthless PC. :-)

    2. Re:I've already done it! by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Ooooh, you're one of those XBox BASHers I've been hearing about. :P
      Well, you can't play Halo now, but how about Zork?

  6. Why link to an article we can't read? by CerebusUS · · Score: 0, Redundant

    on a secure site? bizarre.

  7. Reward by 1WingedAngel · · Score: 3, Informative

    If I recall correctly wasn't some Anonymous Coward running a $250k award to the first group to get this done?

    1. Re:Reward by andrew_0812 · · Score: 0

      I think that the award was only for someone to get linux running on an un-modified x-box. These are still modified.

      I could be wrong, but I remember reading that somewhere.

    2. Re:Reward by 1WingedAngel · · Score: 1

      Actually the reward-offering site says:
      "The whole project is divided into two sub-projects, the first one consisting of four tasks.

      Project A: Porting Linux to a modified Xbox:"
      And that part is worth $100k.

    3. Re:Reward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more likely to be anonymous rich person... ;)
      $200K to be exact.

  8. sweet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I burned that damn .iso of theirs to CD, yet the system didn't boot. I couldn't find a straight answer anywhere to getting Linux up and running on my XBox.

  9. silicon.com requires password by Animats · · Score: 1, Redundant

    The site referenced asks for a password. Err...

  10. Password by grip · · Score: 1, Redundant

    If the link requires registration,the kind thing is to indicate that in the description.

    --
    Failure is not an option. It comes automatically enabled in every Microsoft product.
  11. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ive got to apt-get an Xbox to try this out!

    1. Re:Wow. by t0qer · · Score: 2

      It's immoral because we all know how MS does business.

      There used to be a company across the street from the one I worked at called netchameleon. They used to make PPP and TCP/IP stacks for dos, windows 3.1, and other operating systems. The majority of their business came from ISP bundles of their stack/PPP dialer.

      Then MS decided it would be cool to include PPP in 95. Sales dropped, people got laid off.

      Another good example is netscape.
      And another one is BEOS

      I'm sure there's a lot more companies to add to that list.

      The biggest bitch people have with M$ products isn't so much the fact that they push other companies out with these practices, it's the inferior quality of this shit they shlep out.

      Remember when
      OOB
      Used to make the 95 TCP/IP stack implode?

      So is that enough ranting to justify my comment on why it's morally wrong to develop xbox on linux? No strawmen here, just facts.

    2. Re:Wow. by duren686 · · Score: 2

      Then MS decided it would be cool to include PPP in 95. Sales dropped, people got laid off.

      My graphic design teacher had a similar example. As recently as 20 years ago, there were these things called "Typesetting shops" wherein you would pay megabucks to set type on a page. Somewhere around $60 CDN per page. Then along comes Apple and makes a computer that can do all that typesetting stuff in the comfort of your own home, and output it to a laser printer for relatively free.

      Guess what happened to the typesetting shops.

      That's what happens to people who make a business doing something that can easily be done better once someone has the idea to implement it.

      --
      Y2K Compliant since the late 1890s
  12. An interesting precident by secondsun · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MS has the right to block any one form its networks. However, if they pursue the X-box owner (most likely by lawsuit) this is a different story. While X-box live is their network, the X-box is the consumer's personal possession. With that said, the person who owns it has the right to do anything he wants to it, modding included.

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
    1. Re:An interesting precident by Winterblink · · Score: 1
      And that's fine. There's nothing to say you can't saw your X-Box in half after you're done buying it. However they sure as hell have the right to make sure the machine connecting to their online SERVICE meets a minimum standard. That being a functioning X-Box with no tampering.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not against modding or putting Linux on it or anything. More power to you if you want to do that. Just don't expect them to bend over backwards to accomodate you if you try to use their services. :)

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:An interesting precident by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Too bad that doesnt apply to the software. You can saw it in 1/2 as you do own the hardware, but you cant touch the softare as its a 'right to use' license you argreed too.. They own the software part.. not you. I think its stupid, but it IS the law currently..

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:An interesting precident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look who's talking. Trotting out the old troll ID again yourself, I see. So, I hear Vivendi's teetering on the edge of bankruptcy. How are things with you these days?

  13. Ok... by jsonmez · · Score: 1

    Suppose you get Linux running on your X-Box? Then what? You say "Wow, I have Linux running on my X-Box, I'm super cool." But... then what?

    1. Re:Ok... by Eyecannon · · Score: 1

      Just about to ask the same question... whoopdie-doo! Gimme $200,000.

    2. Re:Ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      1. Install Linux on XBox
      2. ???
      3. Profit!

    3. Re:Ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simple, you can prove your 1337-ness along with your ability to be frivilous with your money.

    4. Re:Ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get a cheap computer...

    5. Re:Ok... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All your base are belong to us!!!

    6. Re:Ok... by rjung2k · · Score: 1

      Replace "I'm super cool" with "I'm a total geek", and you'll have a response closer to reality...

  14. Replying to myself, cause I know!!! by jsonmez · · Score: 1

    Actually as soon as I hit submit, I realized the answer to my question. After you have linux running on your X-Box, you return it to the store and get your money back, then buy another X-Box and repeat. Make sure you put some Xgames on it and a KDE wallpaper with the XBox logo. You'll be puzzling the hell out of anyone who buys it and I can just see what happens when they call up toys R us and ask them if their XBox is supposed to have a little window with $ in it.

  15. I'll never understand ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the need that some people have to put linux on every game box created. It seems to me a useless and fruitless venture. Why not put the time into a project that has some possibilities.

    And dont say "xbox as a web server". Ive heard that said before - its a flemsy excuse and not very practical.

  16. Umm by Cheesy+Fool · · Score: 0

    You can get an XBox in the UK for £154.99 which is much cheaper than a PC.

    --

    Hail to the king, baby!
    1. Re:umm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no:
      Yes: M$ gets a bigger part of the market and
      No: as they have to subvent each box by 50-100$ (depends on the information source you read) to be comparable to the PS2

  17. Now that you did the X-box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you try something more tricky like

    A Dreamcast
    A TV-Set top box (thats not already linux based)
    A Gamecube
    A Mobile Phone
    A 16 bit or 8 bit system (This would be VERY trick

    1. Re:Now that you did the X-box by DavidLeblond · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uh, the dreamcast has already been done.

    2. Re:Now that you did the X-box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about an Atari 2600

  18. Mod Checking by falser · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Microsoft will be scanning your machine to make sure you haven't modified it.

    Bah! All you need to do is add another mod to hide the mod they look for. Remenicient of the ever popular radar-detector-detector.
    1. Re:Mod Checking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you mean "trace buster buster" from the movie "The Big Hit." (think the title is right...)

    2. Re:Mod Checking by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Remenicient of the ever popular radar-detector-detector.

      A radar detector detector is called a radar detector. Several years back I "almost" went to work for a law enforcement outfit in a jurisdiction where radar detectors were illegal. The patrol cars were equipped with radar detectors; when they went "chirp!" as another vehicle went past, it was time to hang a U-turn, flip on the lights and grab the ticket book because you had a live one on the hook!

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  19. Whatever "slashdot" by LordYUK · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linux on the X-Box? Suuuuure, next some high up at Microsoft will admit that windows isnt secure, or that someone landed on the "moon"...

    humor folks, enjoy it :P

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
  20. are you serious? by edrugtrader · · Score: 2
    Cool...I may have to go buy an X-Box now


    is this guy serious? if you just want to toy around with suse, BUY A PC. last i heard they were getting 1 frame a second on tux racer... for $300 you could buy a pretty decent PC that would run suse much better.
    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:are you serious? by geekd · · Score: 2

      for $300 you could buy a pretty decent PC that would run suse much better.

      Ah, but an XBox is only $199.

      And linux on an XBox will get better.

    2. Re:are you serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... but with that 101 bucks you saved, you'll need to go buy a keyboard, mouse, CDROM, and other miscellaneous junk that the XBox didn't come with.

    3. Re:are you serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... The XBox has a CDROM built in.

    4. Re:are you serious? by Lussarn · · Score: 1

      Who needs keyboard mouse and cdrom? It's Linux.

      No. What I want to know is if you can add a second network card. Anybody know the answer? USB maybe.

    5. Re:are you serious? by plover · · Score: 2
      A cheap Lindows box at Walmart is only $299. It has 128MB, 850 MHz Duron, 10GB, 52xCD-ROM, etc.

      Plus you don't have to do ANYTHING geeky to put Linux on it. It already comes that way.

      But it's shopping at Walmart... that's the part that's like having an AOL address.

      Disclaimer: I NEVER shop at Walmart unless I need a gun in a hurry...

      --
      John
    6. Re:are you serious? by geekd · · Score: 2

      Plus you don't have to do ANYTHING geeky to put Linux on it

      If you don't have to do anything geeky, then what's the point?

      Linux is too easy these days. You install it and it just works. Many of us pine for the days when it took WEEKS to get all your hardware working correctly under linux. We actually enjoy that stuff. There was a sense of accomplishment when the joystick finally worked or you could actually burn a CD from an IDE CD burner.

      I think that is part of the appeal of XBox Linux.

  21. That isn't a troll at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, it makes a very good point. Getting Linux to run on an X-Box is still little more than a parlor trick. It's still not a PC, and isn't a great substitution for one, at least at press time. This is just the Dreamcast hack on a better system.

    Besides, you're still giving your cash to Microsoft.

    1. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by metalpet · · Score: 1

      > Besides, you're still giving your cash to Microsoft.

      I keep reading MS is losing money on every single xbox they sell.
      If lots of people were to buy an xbox without buying a single game for it, MS would probably be a little bit unhappy about it.

    2. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by g00dn3ss · · Score: 1

      I keep reading MS is losing money on every single xbox they sell.

      Yeah, but as so many have already pointed out, they lose even more money on every xbox they don't sell.

      Also, what respectable geek isn't going to be just a little bit tempted to buy Halo if they have the system sitting around anyway.

      --
      ... rice, rice, gravy ...
    3. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by rjbrooksjr · · Score: 1

      >>Besides, you're still giving your cash to >>Microsoft. Nope, yer not.. M$ loses money (a lot of money) on each xbox purchase. And look at it this way - the xbox when opened, is nothing more than a PC. I've already upgraded the hard drive in mine for game storage.. but really for the $200 cost you could have a funny/cheap fileserver on your network, stick it to M$ by runing linux, and cause a financial loss to them. I like it =)

    4. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 1

      They lose more by NOT buying it in the first place.

    5. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Please explain.

      GM should give me 100$ because by not buying a $40,000 car of theirs, they're 'losing' (I think the term youre looking for is not realizing 40,000 dollars of revenue) more than just a tiny 100$? Is it preferable to them that I take 100$ from them instead of not buying a car since they 'lose' less that way?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    6. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bulk of the "loss" you read about is in R&D, the setup of the manufacturing lines, license, etc. Finance folks refer to these as sunk costs - they've already been spent and there's nothing that can be done about it.

      Now, if you spend $500 researching something, $500 marketing it, and $1000 building a production line, you have spent $2000 so far. These are sunk costs. Suppose that it costs you $100 to get the materials to build one on your line, and you are able to sell it for $150. Furthermore, you know that in the first year of operation, you will only be able to sell 20 units. Once you break the initial expenses over those 20 units, you have sunk costs of $100 per unit.

      That means it costs you $200 per unit to make something that sells for $150 per unit. So, you are losing money per each unit sold, right? You are losing $50. However, if you do sell a unit, there is the initial $50 you lose, followed by the extra $50 that you were recouping (sales price of $150 minus $100 in raw materials). Now, that also assumes you will be able to sell back the ram materials for the $100 you paid for it, which you probably won't...

      Ergo, they lose more money if you don't buy than if you do. This whole "they lose money if we buy things from them" idea is just a strawman advanced by open sores hippies that want to justify giving money to Redmond.

    7. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by Tom · · Score: 2

      I'm fairly sure they'd give you $100 if you go out and buy one of their $40,000 cars in return. :-)

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    8. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but as so many have already pointed out, they lose even more money on every xbox they don't sell.

      Yes, but that kind of loss is limited to their already-manufactured inventory. If buying Xboxen for Linux use becomes popular, there's the potential for the cumulative sum of losses per sale to exceed what they might have lost in unsold units.

      Are their no legaleze terms on the Xbox units that prevent this kind of creative misuse? With the lengths to which they went to secure the Xbox from tampering, and with previous industry experience with unexpected Linux-ized hardware, they would seem (IMHO) to be foolish to not have expected this to happen.

    9. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by rjbrooksjr · · Score: 1

      You can easily find many articles on this... I have in the past.. the reason the lose is they are selling it for less than it costs to make.

    10. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      I guess they're just not built for security. :o)

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    11. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by g00dn3ss · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that kind of loss is limited to their already-manufactured inventory. If buying Xboxen for Linux use becomes popular, there's the potential for the cumulative sum of losses per sale to exceed what they might have lost in unsold units.

      Yes, that's true. But for now, this setup isn't practical so that's not likely. And I think you're right that if it did catch on, MS would bring out the lawyers.

      Also, I think most slashdotters would much rather see the headline "XBox a Total Failure" than "XBox Sales Skyrocket - Reasons Unclear."

      --
      ... rice, rice, gravy ...
    12. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by edgezone · · Score: 1
      Also, I think most slashdotters would much rather see the headline "XBox a Total Failure" than "XBox Sales Skyrocket - Reasons Unclear."

      That might be the case, but seeing "XBox Sales Skyrocket -- Game sales decline" would be even better IMHO.

      --
      -- If you can't laugh at yourself, someone else will do it for you.
    13. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 1

      Let's say tha MS spends $400 to make an Xbox and sells it for $200.

      -400$ (what it cost)
      +200$ (What you give MS)
      = -200$ (What MS 'makes')

      -400$ (what it cost)
      +0$ (What you give MS)
      = -400$ (What MS 'makes')

    14. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Except if we assume they only produce as much as they sell, they'd be worse off if I bought one, and didn't buy any games or peripherals, as opposed to somebody else buying that specific unit and going out and spending their money on the money-making games for MS.

      My theory is that the Xbox will still be sold - the question is more like, did they sell it to somebody who is eventually going to turn it into a profit generating sale, or did they sell it to me so I can banish it to the closet? In that case, it seems me not buying one Xbox is going to hurt them less because it increases the chances that somebody is going to buy it for the games. :)

      I see what you're saying, but if they end up selling every last xbox, I'm not really hurting them worse by not buying one. But I can cause a hit on their ROI numbers by buying one and flushing it down the toilet because its one less sale that will turn into profit through the game licensing side. :)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    15. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by The+Turd+Report · · Score: 1

      And I see what you are saying. If they don't sell them all, my case works. But, if they do sell them all, your case works.

    16. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by bezza · · Score: 1
      That might be the case, but seeing "XBox Sales Skyrocket -- Game sales decline" would be even better IMHO.

      That would be the worst outcome...it would immediately blamed on piracy, which would prompt a call for "more anti-piracy laws and measures".

      --
      WARNING: This sig does not contain a joke
    17. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahh... but piracy of what, exactly? It would be interesting to see what kind of argument Microsoft would attempt to use were those events to pass.

      "They're using their XBoxes to do something that doesn't make us money! It's even more despicable than the MSN-CD-to-coaster exploit! There oughtta be a law!"

    18. Re:That isn't a troll at all. by xingix · · Score: 1

      How does one set up a Linux server on an XBox without buy any peripherals? Don't you need a keyboard??

      --

      Confucious says: Man who runs behind car gets exhausted.

      // jeku.com

  22. some sort of stupid registration req? by garcia · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    So when you link to NY Times articles that's different?

    1. Re:some sort of stupid registration req? by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Slashdot's policy is that the NYT is so useful and referenced by so many stories that it shall be the one exception to their rule.

  23. Well... by adamwright · · Score: 0

    "All of these require an XBox with modified hardware"

    So, that'll be an IBM-PC then.

  24. Why XBox? by alphageekette · · Score: 0

    Once again Microsoft is doing something that someone else already did and trying to make it sound innovative! The people at Sony have had a kit for putting Linux on the PS2 out since Feb! PS2 Linux Developers Sony's Kit

    --
    - If you think about it, doesn't someone who can only spell a word one way lack imagination?
    1. Re:Why XBox? by DavidLeblond · · Score: 1

      Microsoft didn't put Linux on the X-box.

      It requires a MODIFIED X-box.

      Try reading the article.

    2. Re:Why XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a moron.

  25. Did I miss something ... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's so good about Linux On an X-Box ?

    The people who are likely to put linux on a X-Box, allready have a PC anyway. So honestly now, what the heck is the point in this ?

    I really don't get it.

  26. here's the article!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    [Somehow, it worked for me before it started asking for a passwd. maybe they're blocking /. referrer tags?]

    Microsoft makes Xbox U-turn

    'You know we said we wouldn't be scanning your console to see what you've been up to... well...'

    By David Becker

    Microsoft has backtracked on an earlier pledge not to use its Xbox Live online gaming service to crack down on modified chips which enable the console to run copied game discs and unlicensed software.

    A 14-page user agreement and privacy notice included with the first Xbox Live kits sent to beta testers specifies that Microsoft reserves the right to revoke Xbox Live privileges for anyone with a chipped Xbox and to scan consoles on the network to enforce its rights.

    A handful of grey-market Xbox mod chips have gone on sale in the past few months. Once soldered onto the Xbox's main circuit board, the chips disable various copy protection measures, allowing the machines to run legally or illegally copied discs, imported games and unlicensed software. Numerous hacking projects have emerged to use the chips to adapt Xbox units for use as media players and Linux boxes.

    Although Microsoft has said it will take legal action against any modifications that infringe on its intellectual property, a representative for the software giant said last month that Xbox Live, the upcoming online service for the console, would not be used to detect modified consoles.

    Yet language in the initial Xbox Live user agreement appears to allow Microsoft to do exactly that. It states: "Xbox Live may only be accessed with an unmodified, except for Microsoft authorised repairs and upgrades, Xbox video game console. Any attempt to disassemble, decompile, create derivative works of, reverse engineer, modify, further sublicense, distribute or use for other purposes either the hardware or software of this system is strictly prohibited."

    The agreement further states: "Microsoft may retrieve information from the Xbox used to log on to Xbox Live as necessary to operate and protect the security of Xbox Live, and to enforce this Agreement."

    The privacy statement accompanying the agreement says information collected about specific consoles connected to Xbox Live will be used to update the console's software, protect the network's security and "protect and defend the rights or property of Microsoft."

    David Becker writes for News.com

  27. Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by dschuetz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Could someone please post the EULA for the Xbox. I'm 99% certain that it said, essentially, "you can't use the software that comes with the xbox for anything but your xbox." That is, you can't use their software on another computer (making Xbox-emulators pretty difficult). I don't think it said anything else.

    Furthermore, this restriction was only printed in a small box on one side of the product's shipping box -- nowhere did I see any EULAs on the unit itself, when I booted it up, or on any kind of sticker when I opened it up.

    I'm just curious if they've since made it more restrictive. I know I was VERY surprised not to find a typical Microsoft EULA attached to a big red sticker pasted over the power supply, or somesuch.

    That said, the "live network" could certainly deny access two whomever it wants -- be they people from another timezone, another country, or people using modded xboxes. But Microsoft shouldn't have any leg to stand on to prevent people from modding their boxes, except for the obvious one of avoiding copy protection on duplicated games (which wouldn't apply to 3rd party software, and *shouldn't* apply to backups). And Microsoft shouldn't go telling game companies that you've got a modded xbox and save folders on the hard driver for games X, Y, and Z (infering that they're illegally copied games).

    Of course, what's right and legal is irrelevant when they've got more laywer money than most geeks with modded xboxes....

    1. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by mapmaker · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Modding isn't prohibited, because it can't be prohibited.

      You don't *license* Xbox hardware from Microsoft, you *buy* it. When you buy something, you *own* it, and can do whatever the hell you want with/to it.
      So there is not and can not be a "license agreement".

      Now, Xbox Live is a different story. Xbox live is a service, not a piece of hardware. Microsoft can legally define the terms of that service, and one of the terms can be that only non-modded Xboxes are allowed to use it.

      To summarize: modding Xboxes is/can not be prohibited. Using modded Xboxes on Xbox Live can and probably will be prohibited.

    2. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by dschuetz · · Score: 2

      Modding isn't prohibited, because it can't be prohibited.

      I agree, but that hasn't stopped Microsoft from putting other theoretically or morally unenforcable terms into their software EULAs.

      And it hasn't stopped them from really pushing hard to close down modding-related sites.

      I was just curious if MS had even tried to prohibit modding, at the consumer-purchase-agreement level...

    3. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The good thing about Linux on the XBox is that it insulates mod chip makers from Microsoft's heavy-handed tactics.

      If Linux didn't exist on the XBox, Microsoft could (right or wrong) assume all mod chip makers were producing these things for the purpose of circumventing copy protection. Then Microsoft would let the legal dogs loose, shutting down most if not all of the mod chip makers.

      No mod chips = no modding your XBox at home, unless you have the expertise to make your own hardware hacks.

    4. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by mapmaker · · Score: 1

      Right, what I'm saying is not just that Microsoft's user agreement can't prohibit modding. It's that there is no user agreement. The only "agreement" between Microsoft and the buyer is that the buyer hands over some money and Microsoft hands over an Xbox.

      Once that transaction takes place, neither side has any say over what the other side does. The buyer is free to mod the Xbox, and Microsoft is free to hand the cash over to "pro-business" Republican politicians.

    5. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by mwjlewis · · Score: 1
      You don't *license* Xbox hardware from Microsoft, you *buy* it. When you buy something, you *own* it, and can do whatever the hell you want with/to it.

      Yes and NO. Improper opperation of a device/meterial can be ilegal, IF it is written. If you buy something does not mean that you have the right to use as you desire.

      A car- Yes, i bought my car, but if i remove my seatbelts, I am legally not allowed to drive it.

      Spray Paint cans- Sure, I buy them, but I can't use them to 1) deface property and 2) get high.

      What is my point, They DO have a leg to stand on, if their intentions are to have the XBOX NOT modded and that stated in some legal crap on the documentation/EULA/box etc. They also have the DMCA to use saying that the end user has circumvented the copy protection on it.

      --
      www.oobersworld.com - For those that ride.
    6. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by deanpole · · Score: 1

      It not just "copy protection" but also "anti-competitve control". I wish journalists would list both reasons if they must list one. Otherwise they make mod chips sound completely immoral.

    7. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Barring theoretical arguments about the DMCA..

      Every 'mod', save the complete linux kernel version, is basically replacing the original BIOS code with a hacked derivative thereof.

      So selling/buying a mod is an act of piracy in itself, since the BIOS is copyrighted just like any other software.

      It would seem if you used a chip with the 'written from scratch' linux bios, it'd be legal. If you use a conventional mod, and the XBE bootloader method of getting linux up, it's not.

      Kind of like its legal to start your own car with a screwdriver if you lost the keys. But if you stole the screwdriver, it's irrelevant.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    8. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by mapmaker · · Score: 1

      Your point about the DMCA is valid, but the rest of your post is not.

      It does not matter what is written on a product you buy. You can do whatever you want with it within the bounds of the law, regardless of what the manufacturer writes on the box.

      It is not illegal to drive a car without seatbelts because the manufacturer says not to. It's illegal because laws have been passed that make it illegal. Likewise with spraypaint. There are anti-drug laws and anti-graffiti laws which make using spraypaint in those ways illegal. Nothing that the manufacturer writes on the can makes it so.

      There is no EULA on an Xbox. An "End User License Agreement" defines the terms of a license. You don't license an Xbox, you buy it, and there's no such thing as a EUBA.

    9. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2
      i bought my car, but if i remove my seatbelts, I am legally not allowed to drive it.
      Not true. You don't have to have seatbelts in any car with a farm license plate (this also means it cannot drive on public roads). Also, if you live on a Reservation, the federal seat belt law doesn't apply to you or your car (provided you don't drive off the Reservation).
      --
      Yeah, right.
    10. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by nanoakron · · Score: 1

      Seems like the time is ripe for an 'XBoxnetD' to do to 'XBox Live' just like 'BnetD' did for 'Battle.net'...

      And I'm sure M$ will jump up the asses of whoever releases it, so watch out boys and girls - you're going to be playing with fire (but not with Halo or any other XBox games - without a linux-based emulator - so the whole exercise is a bit pointless really)

      -Nano.

    11. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by blonde+rser · · Score: 2

      When you buy something, you *own* it, and can do whatever the hell you want with/to it.

      hey you didn't rip the tag off your mattress did you?

    12. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      Or in NH with everybody in the car over 18. Once you're over 18 in NH you no longer need to wear a seatbelt (or a helmet on a motorcycle)

    13. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      Read the tag. It's illegal for the *retailer* to remove the tag, not for the individual who purchases it.

      And yes, I remove the tags when they're inconveniently located (such that they make the mattress/pillow uncomfortable) and don't worry about 'the law' comin' to get me.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    14. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      When I switched mine on it did pop up a eula - it also has one somewhere in the settings menu.

      Like most people however I didn't understand or read it all the way through.

    15. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 1

      No they do NOT. I bought it. I'm not using it to break a law (like deface property or get high). It is MY property and they have NO fucking business LOOKING at it.

      The Government has some lee-way in making sure things are not used illegally.

      The Manufacturer surrenders all right to the device once money is paid. Period.

      As to the DMCA issue they only have that to stand on if the device is actually being USED to circumvent copyright, not if it's "theoretically possible. Beyond that, see the original point. It's my property now, and none of thier goddamned business what I've done to it. If they want to know, they can just TRY to enter my residence and find out.

      Given Florida's law regarding shooting of trespassers though, I'd recommend against that...

      And no a judge is not going to give them a court order to inspect something thats not thier property, so put that thought out of your head.

      --
      "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
    16. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by handsomepete · · Score: 2

      Someone may have already said this but I haven't bothered reading through all the responses...

      Wouldn't it be sensible that if you purchase a used Xbox (i.e. from a funcoland/gameco/used game store) you don't even see the EULA, and therefore are not obligated to abide by it? I'd love to hear the legalese on that.

    17. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Actually, you may modify your car in any way you choose. However you may not be able to drive it on public roads after certain modifications. But you can still use it on private land. Think banger racing, most of those bangers wouldn`t pass legal requirements to be used on public roads. Similarly with an xbox, you may modify it all you wish.. but those modifications may mean that you can no longer connect to certain online services. Also, with spraypaint.. you may deface your own property if you so desire. And it`s not like people break into peoples houses and modchip their x-boxes against their will.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    18. Re:Where, exactly, is modding prohibited? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      (or a helmet on a motorcycle)

      Funny story: Twenty years back (or so) a new law was passed in Saskatchewan (Canada) that said that if you were driving or riding on a motorcycle you had to wear a helmet. A fellow in the town where I lived at the time was known as a bit of a non-conformist (to say the least) so he started riding his motorcycle around with a helmet strapped to his knee.

      It turned out that the law didn't say that the helmet had to be worn on your head. That got changed, of course.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  28. read between the lines. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Anonymous coward' = OSDN or VA Software.
    *IT'S OBVIOUS*... read between the lines.

  29. Linux for all by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 1

    First my X-Box starts trying to log into my tivo and delete the show it recorded on how microsoft smells.

    If I try and stop it, it'll log into my new furniture and have it trick me into building myself into a cage.

    If that doesn't work it'll have my microwave irratiate my house and my toaster burn all my toast (ok... so that one's not as scary).

    Can't wait till my video game playing AI decides to "destory the humanoids." Man I love technology (note the lack of sarcasm tags).

    --
    "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
    1. Re:Linux for all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can't wait till my video game playing AI decides to "destory the humanoids."
      Being destoried isn't all that bad. Just ask blank Reg. :)

      It isn't something I'd want happen to my house though.
  30. Well ACTUALLY... by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    The DMCA means that even if you crack the protection on the XBOX you own, you are in violation, no?

    1. Re:Well ACTUALLY... by 2Flower · · Score: 2

      That's true; the DMCA is the weapon here. It's also why finding mod chips for PS2s is night impossible, since Sony goes after anybody selling them like a shark that smells blood.

      Plus modding PS2's seems to be an imprecise science, but good luck finding ANY chip compared to the ubiqituous modchips available for the PS1.

      Even if they were only used to defeat the 'region encoding' on games and not be able to play CD-Rs, that's a circumvention device and they can nail you for it.

      It's really a shame; there are so many great Japanese games that I'm never going to get to play. I can't even import a Japanese PS2 easily, since Sony's clamping down on that, too.

    2. Re:Well ACTUALLY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      >but good luck finding ANY chip compared to the ubiqituous modchips available for the PS1.

      Let me help with that.

    3. Re:Well ACTUALLY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Import Jap games/ consoles?

      Just try these guys. They'll be glad to help you:
      http://www.amazon.co.jp

    4. Re:Well ACTUALLY... by jcenters · · Score: 1

      Just a question: Why do video game companies frown on Americans playing Japanese games? It makes no sense to me, since by buying the games, they're still getting money.

      Why would any sensible company wish to prevent consumers from buying their product?

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

  31. A complete waste of cash. by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 1

    Buying an XBox is a complete waste of cash. In case you haven't noticed, XBox sales are tanking compared to the PS2. And with Sony actively developing the PS3, who's going to want MS's offering? Hands down, the PS2 is the better system.

    With its reverse compatability, the PS2 already had a solid library of games when it was released. The XBox had zilch, just some games that were "exclusives" only because MS bought up their producers for that reason. Chances are that the PS3 will also be retro-happy. If there's ever an X2, knowing MS, it probably won't be retro-happy. How else would they suck our wallets dry?

    And now, people are porting Linux to it. That's no reason to rush out and buy an XBox. Sony embraced Linux and put out a PS2 Linux Kit. MS, while they haven't really bitched yet, will probably flip if someone gets Linux running on their console in any practical sense. They've been nearly 100% anti-Linux (as much as they are anti-competitive despite the DoJ rulings) and will probably go crying to the courts if it happens. And if they do that, you can bet the result will be having to all but say goodbye to your rights as a consumer/end user with regards to their failing console.

    I own neither a PS2 or an XBox. I'm waiting for the right moment to get one, and I assure you, it'll be a PS2. Reason? FF XI. The only thing I'd want to do with an XBox is put Linux on it to spite MS, and knowing me, I'd fuck that up somehow. At least with the PS2 I can go clean out my local Trading Post/Second Hand joint for all the games its got and know they'll work.

    But hey. I still wish the XBox Linux Project all the luck in the world. Anyone who's out to "stick it to the man" (whether that's their motive or not) is OK in my book.

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
    1. Re:A complete waste of cash. by inteller · · Score: 0

      yeah, well fortunately for microsoft they don't have to spend gillions on R&D for some proprietary POS chip....they just grab the latest PC and graphics hardware and it blows the custom chip shit out of the water. Microsoft may lose more money on a per unit basis to build the xbox, but Sony wasted more in R&D just to arrive at the PS2,3, 4, etc....

    2. Re:A complete waste of cash. by Winterblink · · Score: 1
      Buying an XBox is a complete waste of cash. In case you haven't noticed, XBox sales are tanking compared to the PS2. And with Sony actively developing the PS3, who's going to want MS's offering? Hands down, the PS2 is the better system.

      I love my PS2. But one thing, in case you didn't know, the PS*ONE*'s sales are outperforming the X-Box in Japan. In fact it's slaughtering them over there. Personally I think that's a riot, how a years-old platform can outsell the "latest and greatest", on the bases of the software alone.

      Personally, there's no reason for me to buy an XBox. The PS2 does me fine for console gaming, and my PC does me fine for PC gaming. I don't want the XBox because there's only like maybe one or two games that are even worth playing. Not enough to justify the expense, imho.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    3. Re:A complete waste of cash. by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft may lose more money on a per unit basis to build the xbox, but Sony wasted more in R&D just to arrive at the PS2,3, 4, etc....

      Yes, but Microsoft unfortunately doesn't have the first f**king clue about the electronics market. Sony does, in fact Sony are the biggest electronics manufacturer in the world. The reason that Sony don't just throw a bunch of off-the-shelf components into a box is because they understand their business better than Microsoft do.

      Give it a couple of years and I'll bet you'll see Microsoft giving up on the X-Box.

    4. Re:A complete waste of cash. by stratjakt · · Score: 2

      What's a waste of cash is all on your point of view.

      I may like linux for certain tasks, but that doesn't mean I'm an anti-MS zealot. That's just idiocy. It behooves me not to be so close-minded.

      Sony are not the "good guys". Nor are Nintendo, nor Sega. They're all running the same race towards the same finish line.

      I own all 3 current systems, because I love video games. All 3 have exclusive titles that I want to play. End of story.

      Sheesh.. Nerds spend 500 bucks on the latest whiz-bang video card, then talk about a 200 dollar console being 'a waste of cash'. I dont like PC gaming in general, so I'd rather spend the 500 to own all 3 current consoles (and I did). It's just a matter of taste.

      Btw, this comment is idiotic..
      >>"some games that were "exclusives" only because MS bought up their producers for that reason"

      Thats how the industry works, goofball. You act like its some evil conspiracy, sheesh.

      Nintendo bought exclusive rights to resident evil, Sony bought exclusive rights to GTA3, MS bought exclusive rights to DOA3 and Halo.

      Meh, I shouldn't be feeding trolls.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    5. Re:A complete waste of cash. by Osty · · Score: 5, Informative

      Buying an XBox is a complete waste of cash. In case you haven't noticed, XBox sales are tanking compared to the PS2.

      Funny, I've heard the opposite.


      And with Sony actively developing the PS3, who's going to want MS's offering?

      FUD. The PS3 is at least two years out from now, if not more. Sony is simply trying to do to Microsoft what they did to Sega (ie, when the Dreamcast started doing well, they began flooding the media with PS2 announcements, even though you wouldn't see the console for another year and some months).


      The XBox had zilch, just some games that were "exclusives" only because MS bought up their producers for that reason.

      And yet, the XBox library is growing quite well. The first run of games (Halo, Gotham, Amped, DOA3, etc) did quite well, with a number of them topping sales of 1 million. The next round was mostly filler (like all consoles, there is always a lot of filler -- even more so if the console is looking to increase its library size. the PSX has a bunch of filler crap, as does the PS2), with a few gems like Rallisport, Gunvalkyrie, and Crazy Taxi 3. There are a number of great games being released this month now, too. Sega GT 2002, Sega Soccer Slam (yes, a Gamecube port), the next rev of sports titles (NFL Fever 2003 in August, Madden 2003, NFL 2K3, etc), Dead to Rights, Quantum Redshift, and more. What's my point? A console can develop a great library even if it doesn't have the benefit of being backwards-compatible with something else. Hell, the SNES did quite well, even though it wasn't backwards-compatible with the NES. Same for the Genesis and SMS (though there was an adaptor there). And of course the PSX did quite well, even though it was Sony's first machine (after Square decided to get on board, of course).


      If there's ever an X2, knowing MS, it probably won't be retro-happy. How else would they suck our wallets dry?

      You just like making stuff up, right? Did you forget the 10+ years of backwards compatibility in Windows? The backwards compatibility in Office (new Office versions can read old Office files)? The simple truth is, Microsoft has proven that they value backwards compatibility in their other products, so why would you even think that they wouldn't with the XBox and theoretical XBox2?


      They've been nearly 100% anti-Linux (as much as they are anti-competitive despite the DoJ rulings) and will probably go crying to the courts if it happens.

      First off, there's absolutely nothing wrong with being "100% anti-Linux". It's simply not comparable to being "anti-competitive". (hell, for Microsoft to be anti-linux, that means they're acting competitively, so they can't be both anti-linux and anti-competitive, right? anti-competitive != anti-competition, since the goal of being competitive is to wipe our your competition.) Anyway, once again you've failed to apply past evidence to your argument -- namely, Microsoft generally uses the courts as a very last resort (unlike some other companies *cough*ORACLE*cough*, *cough*SUN*cough*, *cough*NETSCAPE*cough* who run to court if Microsoft bats an eyelash at them). In other words, I doubt you'll see Microsoft taking anybody to court over Linux on the XBox unless things start to get really bad.


      Anyone who's out to "stick it to the man" (whether that's their motive or not) is OK in my book.

      It simply amazes me that you can call Microsoft "the man" while at the same time praising Sony. Sony is just as "bad" as Microsoft, if not worse, but because their name isn't "Microsoft", I guess that doesn't really matter, does it?

    6. Re:A complete waste of cash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > It simply amazes me that you can call Microsoft "the man" while at the same time praising Sony. Sony is just as "bad" as Microsoft, if not worse, but because their name isn't "Microsoft", I guess that doesn't really matter, does it?

      Try this argument again after Sony's been convicted of being an illegal monopolist. Until then, YES, Microsoft is worse than Sony.

    7. Re:A complete waste of cash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey Genius.... you know sony has only been in the console biz since 95, not very long. the only reason we had the PSX is becasue the big N screwed them over on the original PS(snes cdrom addon). Sure ... sony knows it all, they have been there from the beggining, fighting for the gamers of the world.

      Im a *nix user, but fucking ABM'rs make me sick.

    8. Re:A complete waste of cash. by xjerky · · Score: 1

      And with Sony actively developing the PS3, who's going to want MS's offering?

      FUD. The PS3 is at least two years out from now, if not more. Sony is simply trying to do to Microsoft what they did to Sega (ie, when the Dreamcast started doing well, they began flooding the media with PS2 announcements, even though you wouldn't see the console for another year and some months).

      -----

      Well, it worked, didn't it? Where's the Dreamcast today?

      --
      A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
    9. Re:A complete waste of cash. by Osty · · Score: 1

      And with Sony actively developing the PS3, who's going to want MS's offering?

      With nVidia actively developing the GeForce 5, who's going to want ATI's offering? With Intel actively developing the IA64, who's going to want AMD's 64-bit offering? I think you've missed the point. You've got several options here (assumption -- you'll buy at least one console. second assumption -- I'm ignoring Nintendo, and focusing on Sony v. Microsoft):

      • Buy an XBox, ignore the PS3 FUD. Result? You get to play games on your XBox right now.
      • Don't buy an XBox, and wait for the PS3. Result? You have to wait two years before you can play games.
      • Don't buy an XBox, and buy a PS2/already have a PS2. Result? You can play PS2 games now.

      See what Sony's doing? They're not saying, "Go buy a PS2, because the PS2 still has fun games and can hold its own against the XBox." Instead, their line is, "Wow! PS3! Look at that! Why would you buy an XBox when you could have one of these? (fine print: the PS3 won't be available for another two years, and when it is available likely won't be anywhere near as powerful as we're claiming right now. But hey, at least you didn't buy an XBox, right?)" It's FUD, plain and simple.

      Ultimately, this boils down to the problem anybody who likes technology will have at some point -- Do I buy now, or do I wait for the next whiz-bang widget in 6 months/a year/I don't know when, but they said soon? And when that new whiz-bang widget is out, inevitably there will be something better just over the horizon. Do you finally buy, or keep waiting? How long do you wait?

    10. Re:A complete waste of cash. by donutello · · Score: 2

      Yes, but Microsoft unfortunately doesn't have the first f**king clue about the electronics market. Sony does, in fact Sony are the biggest electronics manufacturer in the world. The reason that Sony don't just throw a bunch of off-the-shelf components into a box is because they understand their business better than Microsoft do.

      Flashback to 1982:

      Yes, but Microsoft unfortunately doesn't have the first f**king clue about the computers market. IBM does, in fact IBM are the biggest computer manufacturers in the world. The reason that IBM don't just sell software is because they understand their business better than Microsoft do.

      Give it a couple of years and I'll bet you'll see Microsoft giving up on DOS.

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    11. Re:A complete waste of cash. by Odinson · · Score: 2
      FUD. The PS3 is at least two years out from now, if not more. Sony is simply trying to do to Microsoft what they did to Sega (ie, when the Dreamcast started doing well, they began flooding the media with PS2 announcements, even though you wouldn't see the console for another year and some months).

      It almost seems as if Sony was not ready for this. It would kill the Xbox if PS/3 came out right now. It makes you wonder why Sony didn't release the PS/2 enhanced or somthing. you know the blinkn lights edition with full compatibility and obscure XYZ GPU postprocessing.

    12. Re:A complete waste of cash. by Osty · · Score: 1

      Ugh. I quoted the wrong line from the poster. Oh well, I still make a valid argument.

    13. Re:A complete waste of cash. by zentu · · Score: 1
      Quote: Sony does, in fact Sony are the biggest electronics manufacturer in the world.

      Ummm, that is an incorect statement, Matsuia is. They own around 20 or so sub companies that are all in the electronic industry, but unfortunately I can only think of 1 Panasonic, the co-creators of the Game Cube.

    14. Re:A complete waste of cash. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Methinks you fell for a pretty blatant troll. We's eatsin' fish today.

  32. right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but we can't link to it since silicon.com has some sort of stupid registration requirement. Anyone find the story elsewhere?

    Doesn't seem to stop you from linking to the NYTimes, you flaming douchebags.

  33. xbox modification dection by snubber1 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Anyone who owns a xbox and puts in a mod-chip might as well forget about XBL for quite some time. There are about a million ways one could conceve of detecting mods.
    • MS downloads and tries to run unsigned code on your box (which reports back if run)
    • Look for the trademark files of all the alternate dashboards littered all over your drive. MS knows what the drive should look like.
    • Just scan your drive for unsigned code every night.

    I'm betting there will be a new generation of stealth mods and hd swap kits for those who want to make the box 'clean' to get on XBL. I don't really feel like playing cat-and-mouse every day to stay ahead of the game. Online play has historically been one of the most effective (not 100% mind you) means of copy protection.
    --
    I don't really mind double posts on //..
    1. Re:xbox modification dection by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      anti-stealth mods? huh?

      No need. Don't modify your hard drive, and put a switch on your current mod. *bingo* your console is back to its virgin state. It's quite easy to do.

      Or, like me, you can live quite happily without another lame-duck online service. XBL is another marketing gimmick to me..

      You dont want modchips on XBL anyways. Unless you like playing with cheaters. If they didn't block cheaters the linux set would be crying foul there.

      There's just no pleasing zealots.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:xbox modification dection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it doesn't matter... If you are running Linux off your Xbox (and only that) and you are not going to buy any Microslop games nor sign up for their service, then there are no ways they would know. ;)

    3. Re:xbox modification dection by snubber1 · · Score: 1

      9/10ths of the reason for a modchip is so you can load and run unsigned code on your xbox (at least for me). Not touching the hard drive means not doing a whole lot of things.

      --
      I don't really mind double posts on //..
    4. Re:xbox modification dection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Anyone who owns a xbox and puts in a mod-chip might as well forget about XBL for quite some time.
      Is there some licensing term that prevents someone from owning more than one XBox?
    5. Re:xbox modification dection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as the parent post effectively said though, a similar switch on an IDE y-cable could come in handy indeed..

    6. Re:xbox modification dection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So go buy a DVD-R drive or a second hard drive. It's not too difficult to switch hard drives when you want to play XBL. Just leave your retail drive untouched. It's even easier to just run your games from disc.

      #/> Pomp

  34. RTFS by natefaerber · · Score: 1

    Anyone find the story elsewhere?

    "In perhaps slightly related news, Cnet reports sightings of one of Microsoft's all-new draconian EULAs in the Xbox Live beta kit."

    --
    -- My HARDWARE, My CHOICE.
  35. latest conspiracy theory by jukal · · Score: 2
    ..a microsoft conspiracy theory per day keep you going, here we go:

    when Microsoft originally started shipping the xbox, they WISHED that that Linux would run on it as soon as possible. Why? They wanted a good excuse for entering the desktop/home PC market without being accused for using their monopoly power.

    Now, because Linux has already soon changed the xbox from a game console to a nearly fullblown home PC - Microsoft can do it with windows as well. Want more proof, here. They are practising for this take over in many fronts. And it's not only PCs, they also bought a mobile phone plant in china. Oh yes, they will be selling the whole package SW+HW very soon.

  36. WHY HELP MICROSOFT?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ye know, this whole Linux on X-BOX thing is helping microsoft in their marketing campaign (for free even).
    Let's port Linux to Playstation 3 (coming soon?!) ;-)

  37. xbox live story by sideone · · Score: 0

    I am running the story on the front page of ITBitch.com.

    its true, the xbox live service will be scanning your box periodicly to see if your running a mod or not. This kinda sucks, because if you are playing online, they will be using udp for the game connection, and at any time, they could send a 'spike' through to your xbox, which would piggyback on your real udp game connection. This would surely give the player a lagg pocket, and cause an interruption in the enjoyment of that game.

    I am thinking that the scanning may be done by a cluster somewhere, and it should be easy enough to look through some logs, find the range, and disallow that range through. There are also some of the newer chips, that supposibly turn off the mod, and therefore when you play online, you would not get noticed.

    --


    sideone
    ITBitch.com Your reason for leaving work!
    1. Re:xbox live story by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and when it detects no response to those "lag packets" being sent to your machine, yet you're still connected and playing, they can just disconnect you. Which is what would probably happen instead of them trying to DOS your linuX-Box.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
  38. You don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    These general purpose computers are trapped inside a console, but they're capable of so much more. They're like the people in The Matrix that are turned into batteries. The xbox-linux people are like the crew of the Nebuchadnezzar. They're trying to free the souls that are enslaved in each x-box.

    1. Re:You don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're on some bad fucking crack, dude.

  39. Why are we trying to do this at all? by t0qer · · Score: 5, Informative

    And don't give me the line about how every xbox sale is a loss to microsoft. A sale is a sale on a quarterly earnings report, which is all the stockholders care about anyways.

    For less than the price of an xbox you can get a really nice little motherboard Via technologies is putting out now for $130 or less.

    http://www.via.com.tw/en/Products/eden.jsp

    Now sure it doesn't have a 10 gig hard drive ($20 bucks?) or a dvd drive (+$40) or ram (128 +$20) or a case (+20) but so far for an Eden based system we're at $200, far less than the $270 you would expect to pay for a modded xbox.

    Since UltraHLE i've never bought a console system. Why? If I put that $200 into my system, in a couple of years someone will write an emulator that can play it.

    If you really want M$ to lose money, figure out a way around their copy protection, write an emulator, and watch how fast ISO images of the games start floating around IRC and p2p networks. Don't feed the beast by buying another xbox please!

    --toq

    1. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a quiet little box that can have component output + 5.1 digital audio to your receiver. The plastic molded case probably has less vibration than the typical sheet metal.

      I have yet to see a video card that do that and still have a overall system cost of $200.

    2. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It is a quiet little box that can have component output + 5.1 digital audio to your receiver. The plastic molded case probably has less vibration than the typical sheet metal.

      I have yet to see a video card that do that and still have a overall system cost of $200.
      Not many video cards handle sound... :-p
    3. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by ChaosDiscordSimple · · Score: 2
      And don't give me the line about how every xbox sale is a loss to microsoft. A sale is a sale on a quarterly earnings report, which is all the stockholders care about anyways.

      Wow, clearly Microsoft should start selling XBoxes for a dollar a piece (with the DVD support), their sales would go through the roof and their stockholders would be in heaven.

      Meanwhile, here on earth, shareholders tend to be interested in profits, which is the difference between revenue and expenses. An XBox costs more to make and ship than they profit from it. Revenue for XBoxes is less than expenses. Negative profit, or a loss.

      Not that all losses are a problem. Eating a loss to develop a powerful web browse and giving it away may be a great way to protect your very profitable operating system monopoly. Eating a loss because the vast majority of XBoxes will be profitable through game purchases isn't so bad either.

      Sure, you can build an similar system for a similar price. However, it's going to take my time to assemble and debug the hardware. For $200 I can build something that will match the technical specs, but will generally use lower quality components (bigger, noisier, flakier). What sort of case am I getting for $20? I don't see terribly good 3d acceleration on that motherboard you suggest.

      (I've seen the argument that an XBox that doesn't sell is a bigger loss to Microsoft. True, assuming that the XBox wasn't going to sell. The question is, would that XBox have sold? If Microsoft is still producing new XBoxes, the previous ones must be selling. Microsoft has enough of a marketing research to minimize the risk of ending up with a large backstock that they can't move.)

      Since UltraHLE i've never bought a console system. Why? If I put that $200 into my system, in a couple of years someone will write an emulator that can play it.

      If it works for you, great. Meanwhile, I want to play the games sooner than later, I want a system that is a breeze to set up, I want a system that has rock solid stability, I'm not interested in hanging around warez sites downloading various copies until I find one that works, and I want to support authors of high quality games by actually paying for them. To each his own.

    4. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by x+mani+x · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you really want M$ to lose money, figure out a way around their copy protection, write an emulator, and watch how fast ISO images of the games start floating around IRC and p2p networks. Don't feed the beast by buying another xbox please!

      Yeah! And who cares about all the game development houses who will be losing potential sales as a result of your elite 0-day warezing ...

      Or all of us who have to pay more for slower bandwidth because of selfish hogs flooding the pipes with illegal ISO's ...

      I'd rather "feed the beast" than stoop lower than them, stealing games under the guise of some techno-freedom fighter sabotaging the Goliath.

      All that said, it's not the actual criminals/pirates/etc that bother me. It's the hypocrites ... all the people who steal, vandalize, or generally fuck shit up for fun/profit, then justify it with half-assed anti-establishment ramblings. I've seen it in the punk rock scene, and I've seen it with geeks. It's all the same old bullshit and frankly I'm tired of it.

      -Mani

    5. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by t0qer · · Score: 1

      3d accelerator?

      Ok tack on the extra 70 bucks you saved on a mod chip and there you go.

      As far as debugging the hardware, well you gotta mod that xbox to run linux while the eden requires no modification at all. I think you would end up spending more time dicking with the xbox than you would with the eden.

    6. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      If you really want M$ to lose money, figure out a way around their copy protection, write an emulator, and watch how fast ISO images of the games start floating around IRC and p2p networks. Don't feed the beast by buying another xbox please!

      Psst.. they already are

    7. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by x+mani+x · · Score: 2

      Right now, unless your TV has a DVI or VGA input (99.9% don't), the only way to output high definition video to an HDTV is to buy a VGA->component transceiver which costs around $120. Then you have to configure your video card with a program like powerstrip to get the correct timings for the different HDTV resolutions.

      The XBox is capable of 480i,480p,720p and 1080i straight out of the box. No extra hardware, no ugly configuration. Plugs right into your component inputs with the $20 HD kit. With Linux on the machine and its DVD drive, the possibilities are pretty damn cool.

      -Mani

    8. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by t0qer · · Score: 1

      I'd rather "feed the beast" than stoop lower than them, stealing games under the guise of some techno-freedom fighter sabotaging the Goliath.

      Have you read the *nix on xbox docs yet?

      I'd rather support a company that doesn't require me to VOID my warrenty by installing some 3rd party chip just to get linux or pirated games to run. If you want to run linux FINE but it's pretty obvious M$ doesn't want it on their hardware. Try sending a modded xbox back to M$ and see what happens.

      Here is the condensed version on xbox on linux...

      1. Install mod chip
      2. turn on xbox
      3. when the title screen appears UNPLUG THE HARD DRIVE WITH THE POWER ON (that blew me away)
      4. Plug the drive into a PC
      5.
      6......

      One of these eden systems, you just put it together and load linux. No BS at all.

      I'm not saying you can't go out and buy an xbox for linux, i'm just saying if you're not welcomed in their sandbox, DONT PLAY THERE!

      As far as emulation=piracy, well that's another debate for another day, but I think playing 3 player rampart over the net is a blast. (Not to mention atari games arcade division is dead)

    9. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by t0qer · · Score: 2

      The eden mobo has TV out, built in sound, video, network and a 800mhz processor soldered on the board in a form factor smaller than the xbox mobo. With a stereo Y cable it plugs right into your stereo inputs.

      Did I mention the thing comes with 16-32 megs of IDE flash?

    10. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See the $200K reward project #2. There is a $100K reward for running Linux on an unmodified xbox.

    11. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Absolutely. Glad to see there are a few people here that get it.

      A bit more on the pricing: that XBox doesn't include a keyboard or the modchip you'll need to let it run Linux. And there's also the risk you'll take in frying the thing when you mod it.

      Meanwhile you can get a pretty good preassembled PC for $199. Walmart.com is showing an 800 MHz, 128MB RAM, 10GB disk, 10/100 ethernet with machine with Linux preinstalled (okay, Lindows, but hey), keyboard and wheel mouse for $199.86.

      Shop the mom'n'pop whitebox stores you can probably find something equivalent (quick check of local ads shows pretty decent kits in that price range, with the low-end on preassembled going for about twice that price with twice the CPU speed, twice the memory and four times the disk space.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    12. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by t0qer · · Score: 1

      Hey I just thought of something else...

      Over time the price of the xbox won't drop that much while the price of pc hardware drops dramatically.

      So 6 months down the road, you will be able to buy an even better computer for that $200 than you could an xbox.

    13. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that mean it's ever going to happen?

    14. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by kryptkpr · · Score: 1

      Emulators there are not..
      but ISO images, there definitely are...

      --
      DJ kRYPT's Free MP3s!
    15. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      And how many times do we have to have to say that copying IS NOT STEALING??? Intellectual property is an artifical construst - one that may in some contexts serve a useful purpose, but in terms of modern copyright/patent/trademark/trade secret law serves no useful purpose, unless subverting the democratic process by a few large corporations is what you consider a useful purpose.

      I don't know if you're paid by the megacorps to post what you did, or if you're just misguided,and I have no idea why your post was modded up, but it's all the same old bullshit and frankly I'm tired of it.

    16. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by cheese_wallet · · Score: 2

      You know, the sony tivos had locked drives too. Somebody wrote a utility to unlock the drive. I wonder if that same utility would work for the xbox hack.

      check out www.tivocommunity.com

    17. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Physical property is also an artificial construct.

      I 'own' this land because of this chunk of paper from the government that says I own it.

      And it's the same sort of sophistry to claim 'intellectual propery' is an artificial construct as it is you to show up and claim my property.

      Not that people like you will ever stop carrying on about it....

    18. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Working emulators, no. There is at least one emulator in development though (which looks very promising). It won't be too much longer before there is basic functionality.

      #/> Pomp

    19. Re:Why are we trying to do this at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That exact application probably won't work, but it would be essentially as simple as sniffing the IDE bus and then writing a program that does what the xbox does. All you need is a logic analyser.

  40. One Word: DivX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    With a modded Xbox running Linux I can use mplayer (possibly even Xine?) to watch all my DivX movies on my Wega flatscreen with simulated dolby surround.

  41. hardware != software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Software can be considered intellectual property, and in the warped system the U.S. uses, companies can use so-called "shrink wrap" licenses on customers. As common as these are, however, many feel they would not hold up in court due to first sale doctrine, and due to the fact that the customer did not sign a contract. UCITA states are the exception here.

    Hardware, on the other hand, is not intellectual property. A company may rent or lease this hardware to you, or they may sell it to you. Whichever one it is must be spelled out clearly at the time of the transaction. There's none of this grey-area crap that you see with software.

    So go ahead and mod the XBox all you want.

    The restriction from the DMCA comes in if you are modifying it to circumvent copy protection measures. But that has little to do with Microsoft. They are taking advantage of it by adding copy control measures, but it isn't part of some license that they wrote.

  42. Mods aren't always good for gamers . . . by SimplyCosmic · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "There's also a story about the XBox online gaming service that implies Microsoft will be scanning your machine to make sure you haven't modified it"


    Although some people will take the conspiritorial mindset that this was done solely to Microsoft's advantage and being anti-consumer, it was most likely done not to prevent silly things like Linux running on the box, but to prevent cheaters from modifying their boxes in such a way as to ruin the online experience for others.

    It wouldn't take all that many cheaters with modded boxes to tank any online network's value to the average casual gamer.

    Of course, there's the side benefit of punishing those who mod their boxes for copyright infringement purposes.
    1. Re:Mods aren't always good for gamers . . . by monthos · · Score: 0

      I agree, its main purpose is just to detect cheaters using a hardware hack, or people using those GameShark Utilities so cheat. i remember how the gameshark ruined gaming on Phantasy Star Online for the Dreamcast, so i cannot blame microsoft for trying to stop it.

    2. Re:Mods aren't always good for gamers . . . by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      A sale is a sale if it is for a game. It's common knowledge that MS is not making money on the boxes but on the earnings from the game sales.

      If you buy an xbox and then hack it up to be a linux box, you're obviously not going to buy any video games.

      So yes, if you have a slew of linux hackers buying up xboxes because they want to make a beowulf cluster of these, it will hurt profits [if they had any to begin with]

    3. Re:Mods aren't always good for gamers . . . by Basje · · Score: 2

      Uhm, yes and no. Yes, it hurts their bottom line in the short term. OTOH, they sell a lot more Xboxes. To the masses, it doesn't matter what happens to all those boxes. If it turns out that the xbox is selling much better than another console, Joe user will think that it has to be better. Microsoft on the other hand , will claim the losses on a slow market.

      So while you are right that it will hurt them a little, in the long run it will give them increased market share.

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
    4. Re:Mods aren't always good for gamers . . . by SimplyCosmic · · Score: 2

      That would be true if the only profit from the XBox came in the form of the games and any hardware accessories.

      However, the "XBox Live" which is doing the automagic checking for hardwarew/software modifications is Microsoft's online service for the system, one for which end-users pay $50 annually to play online against others.

      If modded boxes allow gameshark like cheats online, and there was no method of checking for such cheat mods, this would ruin enough of the online experience for end-users that the annual $50 Microsoft is counting on to run those now cheat-enabled servers isn't going to be so easy to raise.

    5. Re:Mods aren't always good for gamers . . . by WNight · · Score: 2

      I can. :)

      If they can't write something with a decent client-server architecture there'll always be cheating. If they scan for simple stuff it'll simply mean that only people with a "large" investment in it can cheat. I'd rather have a game like Ultima Online where everyone could cheat, so I knew not to trust it, than one where two people could cheat but they were taking money to produce items or level-up characters for everyone else.

      If a game developer choses to use a p2p game model where any peer can tell the others that something happened (and not - "my client moved left", but "my client picked up gold") obviously doesn't care enough about security to do it right.

      It's like MS blaming script kiddies for crashing servers. Sure, it's technically the fault of the person pressing the 'Nuke' button, but these attackers will always exist. In a world like this you need to develop secure products.

    6. Re:Mods aren't always good for gamers . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now you're talking about economic sabatogue. Actively working to screw up Microsoft's online gaming site.

      Hey, I know. Let's fuck up Red Hat and Mandrake.

      Everybody, let's put stickers advertising Cheapbytes on the Red Hat boxes at Best Buy and WalMart!

      Same sort of thing.

    7. Re:Mods aren't always good for gamers . . . by SimplyCosmic · · Score: 2

      Um ... No.

      A little reading through my previous posts will show that my point was that the checking for modifications in the hardware and software by the "XBox Live" online servers wasn't meant originally to simply catch DMCA violators, as some of the more paranoid in other threads have implied. It was designed to catch cheaters which would drive non-cheating, paying customers away from the online service.

      Most other massively-multiplayer online systems (Everquest, etc) have similiar checks, though it technically should be easier for Microsoft as not only should you have the same software as everyone else, but the same hardware as well.

      The ability to catch copyright infringement and Linux loading modifications is just a side benefit.

    8. Re:Mods aren't always good for gamers . . . by monthos · · Score: 0

      Okay, so you are then, blaming microsoft, for trying to avoid a problem? peopel will always try to cheat in onlien gaming, so why shouldnt microsoft try to stop it on many levels. there is more to the anti-cheating than just "lets see if his hardware is non-factory . Please bash microsoft for all the right reasons, but dont attack issues that they for once are getting right just becouse they are who they are.

    9. Re:Mods aren't always good for gamers . . . by WNight · · Score: 2

      How about bashing them because they can't write a fundamentally secure system and instead they layer on ineffectual protection that ends up stifling legitimate uses while avoiding the real issues.

      How about bashing them because they lie and say it's for our own good when really they couldn't be bothered to get it right.

      How about bashing them for trying to blame mod chips, which exist for perfectly valid reasons, for their problems instead of doing the work necessary to make a system that isn't vulnerable to the same lying-client attacks that we've known about since network games were first created and which have been discussed in literature since the 80s?

      There are plenty of perfectly valid reasons to bash MS. I'm not making anything up and I'm intentionally staying just on this issue and I can get three.

    10. Re:Mods aren't always good for gamers . . . by monthos · · Score: 0

      you people read a title and read it as (they are trying to stop mod chips) you dont realise that its only part of what they are trying to avoid. cheating is a very big problem on online gaming. they only real issue this will come up on is when you sign up for xbox LIVE. dont like the way it works, dont sign up. blame them for doing things wrong, fine, but now your blaming them for trying to actually DO something secure?!? what the fuck crack are you smoking, stick to ONE side please, do you want some of there products to be secure or not, or is it that you want it secure only if it benefits you?

  43. What is Michel Thinking? by Real+World+Stuff · · Score: 1
    'There's also a story about the XBox online gaming service that implies Microsoft will be scanning your machine to make sure you haven't modified it, but we can't link to it since silicon.com has some sort of stupid registration requirement. Anyone find the story elsewhere?'

    What is Michael thinking? Alienating another site is no way to drive revenue. Good God man, take a moment and think. Sure we all agree that registering for something and contributing are no way to run a site. With regards to the upcoming Subscription Plums here, your remark is quite contradictory. The ad revenue must be through the roof you ingrate. Please excuse my rant everyone, but I found that "stupid" statement especially offensive and crude. Perhaps I am wrong for holding the Editors to a higher standard, but it is my belief that they set the tempo and theme to this site by their choice of "news", moderation, and by editorial license. Before anyone says "if you don't like it leave", please note that I have subscribed with another account, I help fund this debacle. Fell free to contradict me.
    --
    If we don't fight for ourselves no one will.
  44. Is the cost even worth it? by RailGunner · · Score: 3, Interesting
    While I absolutely love the irony of running Linux on a MS box, I have to wonder if the hardware cost of the XBOX even worth getting one to run Linux?

    In a recent Fry's ad, I saw an ad for a AMD Duron 1Ghz processor and motherboard for $79, and the motherboard had on board sound / video. Add some RAM, a hard drive, etc, and you can build a more powerful machine for probably around $300, and you don't have to solder in anything or void your warranty.

    Anyone have a really compelling reason to run Linux on an XBOX? I'm sure there's at least one... maybe small machine footprint? XBOX is huge for a console compared to PS2 / Gamecube, but it's still small compared to even a midtower PC.

    And yes, I'll accept "Because it's fun" as an answer :)

    1. Re:Is the cost even worth it? by monthos · · Score: 0

      Its all about the 'i did it becouse i can' which after all is a great reason to. Its more for the people who already have modchips in place and want to run linux on teh xbox for some reason. or for the people interested in gaming system hardware who will bother to buy an xbox, solder in the modchip, and install linux, just becouse they know they will learn something along the way.

    2. Re:Is the cost even worth it? by barureddy · · Score: 1

      It would be in every way better except for the graphics capabilites. The xbox's gpu is an nvidia hybrid that is more powerful than the gefore 3, with extra stuff, but is weaker than the geforce 4.

  45. it's for cheating (the MS scanning) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article wording suggests that their possible xbox scanning in the Xbox Live license is to make sure people aren't hacking their system for cheating purposes. Auto-aiming mods for Halo Online, for example. Nothing like that exists yet. MS is putting alot of $ into their online program, so they darn well better make sure it doesn't become swarmed by people cheating.

    While making something like auto-aiming mods is rather unprecidented for a console game(it would probably hacking a backup disk), I can easily see someone using something like gameshark codes goofing things up in more limited ways.

  46. Cost effectiveness? by tshak · · Score: 2

    XBOX $199
    MOD $99-149
    Risk of ruining your XBox when soldering the mod chip: minimal but possible.

    Add the price of your favorite keyboard and mouse and it's more cost effective to just buy a cheap PC or a "Net PC" with Linux (ThinkNic's go for only $249 WITH a keyboard and mouse).

    For me, I'll keep my XBox of the games, and my cheap x86 box for Linux.

    --

    There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    1. Re:Cost effectiveness? by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      99-149 for a mod? Dooood.. Yer getting ripped off.

      Mods on lik-sang range from 49.99 to 59.99 for the reflashable openxbox.

      Or you can homebrew yer own for the price of a 1M flashrom (2-5 bucks)

      A usb keyboard is about 20 bucks. Xbox wont work with the fancy ones with built in hubs, so no reason to splurge here.

      There is a point to using a real PC if you want to run linux. But the really cool thing about linux on xbox is how you can legally code up a divx player, emulator, mp3 player, whatever.. The "homebrew" stuff floating around now is truly illegal.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Cost effectiveness? by warmcat · · Score: 2

      On my site there is a $4 modchip that most 12 year olds could fit.

      The xbox is also attractive at its price for DVD drive and a modern video chipset, plus excellent TV-out.

    3. Re:Cost effectiveness? by Dave2+Wickham · · Score: 1

      The irony of running Linux on an Xbox: Priceless

    4. Re:Cost effectiveness? by tshak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Looking at the instructions you mention the possibility of breaking the XBox multiple times. Doesn't seem worth it except for those who use a soldering iron with delicate hardware on a regular basis.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
  47. why ? by Tom · · Score: 2

    why, oh why is everyone so hyped about the xbox? aside from the fact that the M$ marketing department know perfectly well how to generate hype and sell crap, I mean?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  48. Not that I mind, really... by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Funny

    Two points, really. First, you could see this one coming miles away. Microsoft controls all the cards. They control the hardware you're getting, the software you're using and the network you're surfing. Given the fact that they created a closed box for a reason, it's no huge leap to imagine they'd use one or all of these paths to dissuade people from modding their box. And you won't see me minding too much either. One good thing that will make the X Box live a decent experience is conformity (yes, that evil, evil word). Knowing that the person who just fragged you has exactly the same hardware and connection. Sure, I might miss a multi region DVD mod or something, but not that much. Besides, I don't think anybody who mods for Linux is really worried about the games or X-Box Live. On that note, I can see MS being paranoid of Linux users trying to hack or otherwise use/abuse the Live network. I'd ban modded boxes too. A real, uncrippled OS is a dangerous tool in that environment. Too much temptation for you rabid, salivating Linux fan-boys. Finally, it's my opinion that Ps2 networking is probably going to blow because your going to have just as many surfing/playing problems as you did on your PC back in the Doom/Quake days... Y'know-- When that 56kb connection actually equalled out to 31.5kb if the planets were aligned and the wind was blowing south at 6kph? Maybe you'll get 42kb tommorow...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  49. Why get linux/bsd in a Dreamcast? by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

    Because they can.

    1. Re:Why get linux/bsd in a Dreamcast? by t0qer · · Score: 1

      So should I fuck that VD ridden hooker with track marks runnin up and down her arm "Because I can?"

      At some point anyone, not just programmers have to ask themselves, "Is this morally good for the world?" I digress that xbox linux isn't.

  50. If you're going to get an xbox by madenosine · · Score: 1

    Now might be the best time possible to get one. The initial release of the xbox might be the only one capable of running linux.

    Microsoft is doing things like finding more efficient/cheaper(/secure) components and is planning on combining the xbox with directv (not to mention the recent change in the security keys.)

    Wait, and you might have to get the original version on some overpriced ebay auction

  51. My Comment on XBox Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've only got one question: Why?

    And one comment: The HOWTO instructs one to unplug the ide cable from a running hard drive and plug the same running hard drive into another ide cable on another running computer. This is an excellent way to burn out the hard drve and/or the computer. Not very intelligent guys.

  52. Save some for the commercial by Mulletproof · · Score: 2, Funny

    Price of a New XBox: $300.oo
    Materials to mod the Xbox: $23.88
    The look on his face when he realizes he just screwed up the soldering job and ruined the entire board: Priceless.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
    1. Re:Save some for the commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last one can also read "Hearing the correct pronounciation of 'FFUAAUAUAUAAAKKKCKCKCKCCK!'" : Priceless.

  53. Sony's next move by pubjames · · Score: 2


    I think Microsoft's management were so used to winning in the software market they belived they can just do a similar thing in the electronics market and get the same results. I don't think they realised what they were taking on when they took on Sony.

    I believe Sony - as business strategists - are much more sophisticated than Microsoft, at least when it comes to electronics products. I predict a suprise from Sony with the PS3 - there isn't going to be one. What Sony will do is make it so that all their medium and high-end DVD players will have the capability to play games. Games is where the money is, after all, not the boxes. Watch Microsoft struggle trying to compete with that. It would be really difficult for them to persuade other DVD manufacturers to alter their boxes to play MS games. But Sony is the biggest manufacturer of DVD players. I'm afraid soon it will be game over for MS in the console wars.

    1. Re:Sony's next move by GabboFlabbo · · Score: 0

      I doubt it will be game over for mircrosoft's xbox with their end goal being a microsoft box in your living room. With $40 billion in the bank, they can keep trying again and again and again. Somewhat like IE and netscape where Microsoft kept putting tons of effort into IE to compete with netscape..., but of course, netscape is nowhere near a Sony and Sony will definetly not fall off the face of the earth. Also, keep in mind that all pc games are fairly easy to port over to the xbox (minus the requirement changes of memory and such).

      I believe Sony - as business strategists - are much more sophisticated than Microsoft, at least when it comes to electronics products...

      I'll agree with that.

    2. Re:Sony's next move by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

      At least somebody realizes that the one thing MS does and does well is play long term strategy. People tend to forget they are monopolistic empire for a reason and that reason generally isn't because they pump money into market sectors they believe they are going to outright fail in. I agree, Netscape has nothing on Sony. They are much tougher and have a loyal following in multiple industries. And unlike Netscape, all their eggs (and revenue) aren't in one basket. Sony can take hits for a few quarters and still have the stamina to keep trucking from other industry. Unlike Sega. And Nintendo. If I had to predict the next to fall (if), it'd be them. Remember the battle between Sega and Nintendo? Welcome to the 21st century; Sony versus MS. I still think MS needs roads in to Japan hardcore style to really take off, but there's not reason why it couldn't survive on domestic titles, provided gaming gains the popularity it has in Japan...

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
  54. hacking vs buying by Lxy · · Score: 2

    A quick check at Walmart.com reveals that Xboxen can be had for $199. An 800Mhz Microtel PC can also be had for $199.

    What do you want to do? Do you want a $200 PC? Buy the Microtel. Do you have an afternoon free to show off your 133t h4x0r 5k1115? Buy an Xbox and mod it.

    I bought the dreamcast ($50) for it's hackability. I think it's worth the $50, hands down. No hardware mods are essential. The possibilites are not endless, but quite attactive. I think these people who are hacking the Xbox are simply paving the way. When the Xbox can be found at the Pawn shop for $20, I'll buy at least one if I know it can run linux. Heck, I'll be watching the prices over the next 6 months. With the console war, the PS2 is the clear winner. How long until Sony drops the price? How long until Xbox drops price to follow suit? How long until Xbox gets cheap enough to be used as multifunction appliances?

    To the people who like to tear things apart and install linux, I wish you the best of luck. You are the geeks who make linux work the way it does.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
  55. The HOWTO needs a TODO section by Rolman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For all things that can be done with Linux installed in the console, I would like to be able to replace the Xbox drive with a higher capacity HDD and be able to partition it (one partition for a Linux filesystem, the other one for a regular 10GB Xbox filesystem).

    If not possible, then how about mounting a NFS filesystem from another computer in the network, leaving the internal HDD untouched? I would still need to mount a remote filesystem in order to access my nearly 50GB worth of A/V files, as they won't fit into the regular Xbox HDD.

    Lastly, a very important point here is that even though it is very useful to be able to convert the Xbox into a cheap and powerful $200 computer and use it as an A/V player in my huge TV, etc., I still want to use the machine in the way it was designed for, and that means running my legally owned games flawlessly.

    What I really need is a non-intrusive Linux installation, such as the one in the Dreamcast. I know it might never be possible to run unsigned code without modifying the hardware, but THAT would be too much to ask.

    --
    - Otaku no naka no otaku, otaking da!!!
  56. This is, of course, by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    just for those who happened to be given an X-box and were unable to return it, right? Or maybe you stole one and couldn't pawn it... riiight...

  57. Please Don't buy an Xbox Just for Linux by Nanite · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Cool...I may have to go buy an X-Box now.

    Do us all a favor and please don't. Microsoft may lose money if you buy one, but it loses more if you don't. A console's fate is decided on how many are sold, it has nothing to do with sales of games. So when geeks start making Xboxes fly off the shelf, just to install Linux, it still makes the Xbox look like a high selling success. If the Xbox is seen as a viable console with high hardware sales, Microsoft will have have the last laugh. Then we'll see Xbox 2, 3, and 4, a prospect no one around here wants to see. Let the Xbox sit on the shelf , and then MS may get the hint and get out of the console business when it sees that they aren't selling.

    Nanite
    Yeah, Small.

    --
    God is real unless declared integer.
    1. Re:Please Don't buy an Xbox Just for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, if the xbox fails, you may be able to pick one (or many) up at a serious discount at liquidation sales. Then you can have your own beowulf cluster of xboxes. WooHoo!

    2. Re:Please Don't buy an Xbox Just for Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then we'll see Xbox 2, 3, and 4, a prospect no one around here wants to see.

      Speak for yourself, Slashbot.

    3. Re:Please Don't buy an Xbox Just for Linux by egghat · · Score: 2

      i) IMHO in the current state of the LinuXBox project there may be 10.000 geeks on our planet who care and probably a 1.000 who will buy it for that reason. That won't change the course of the world.

      ii) MS loses money with every XBox. A good reason to buy one.

      iii) The game companies care much more about their sales than about MS sales. Even if gazillions of XBoxes are sold and noone buys games, no company will release new games in the future.

      IMHO: If you think it's fun, buy an XBox. You're not doing anything particulary good or bad to MS.

      But remember: As soon as you start buying games for the XBox you'll really start supporting the XBox and MS. But on the other side these games may be a hell lot of fun ... (and Sony with their DRM ideas isn't a company that deserves geek support either (even though their Linux on a PS2 is cool)).

      BYMMV.

      Bye egghat.

      --
      -- "As a human being I claim the right to be widely inconsistent", John Peel
    4. Re:Please Don't buy an Xbox Just for Linux by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      But on the other side these games may be a hell lot of fun ... (and Sony with their DRM ideas isn't a company that deserves geek support either (even though their Linux on a PS2 is cool)).

      Or, if it's just games you want, you could just get a Gamecube. No DRM. Easily modded to play imports. You're guaranteed to get good games (Metroid, anyone? Almost here!). You save $50. Right out of the box you get a controller that doesn't suck. And the Wavebird kicks ass.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    5. Re:Please Don't buy an Xbox Just for Linux by toliman · · Score: 1



      This theory also works for US Presidents.

      if you don't vote, they just won't get in ....

      idiots. the other universal constant.

  58. Wow. by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

    Strawmen left and right.

    What does morals have to do with anything? Why should that even enter into the question at all? Linux isn't moral or immoral it has nothing to do with that at all. You won't be judged by anyone on which operating system you chose to put on your xbox. You won't get rejected from the gates of heaven for modding your xbox.

    Besides, how does this affect you except on a superficial level?

  59. Re:One Word: DivX by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

    Can't you do that now if you buy a video card with a TV out? I don't get it. I agree it's neat to be able to use an xbox for more then it was intended, but come on.

  60. Hi by TobyWong · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Hellooooooooo fanboi!

    How's your ps2 gamers club subscription holding up?

    --
    - Toby
    1. Re:Hi by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Um, didn't I say I didn't own a PS2? Yet another case of reading only what you want to, I suppose...

      --
      Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
  61. XBox Boat Anchor HOW-TO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hey I just published a HOW-TO on mods to allow using your XBox for a boat anchor. Anybody interested?!!

  62. Now just for the opposite by Duckz · · Score: 1

    How do I get Xbox on my linux [box] ?

    --
    Todd

  63. The losses of buying an XBOX by ccollao · · Score: 1

    Ive heard a million times here that Microsoft looses money by selling XBOXes for Us$200, and if we dont buy any games we are just srewing them.

    THAT IS NOT TRUE!

    The console gaming arena is moved by the percentage of market sharing. If Microsoft can demonstrate that he has sold a respectable percentage of the market, they can force the gaming development companies to create more games for their console and to make the snowball bigger for them.

    So even if we buy the console and we dont buy any games -wich is not gonna happen, because if we have a game console at home you ended up using it anyway- Microsoft can get more market share and better games for its console anyway.

    CCV.

  64. One good thing about the scanning. by Openadvocate · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I normally hate every attempt to snoop my systems. But I can see one good thing about the X-Box chip scanning online.
    Now, I don't have a X-box or even played with it, so I don't know all that the chip mods can do. But let's assume that the gaming network catches on and there will be some very popular online games on the x-box. Couldn't one imagine that some would produce mod-chips that enabled the user to cheat the games in some way? Either by a function in the chip or by modified games.
    Cheating ruined my enjoyment with playing Counterstrike( that and the games was getting old), so I would like to play a game where I was sure that nobody cheated. With every major game coming out these days, there's a constant battle with cheats, so the checking of the system could be a way to ensure a fair game.

    Still I agree that it sucks and the fact that some servers insisted on scanning my files on my PC for cheats, before I could join a Counterstrike server, really made me say enough is enough. The X-box is not a pc, so maybe most people will not find it quite as bad. I don't know, I'm not going to buy a X-box anyway.

    --
    my sig
  65. Re:One Word: DivX by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall adding memory to my pocket calculator, so I really can't get down on these guys. It's all about fun, and a sense of accomplishment. It really doesn't have much to do with whether it's worth it or not on some abstract level.

    --
    Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
  66. I like my PS2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Considering I can use a Linksys 10/100 TX USB or just buy the PS2 Broadband Adapter itself, plus the free service except for providing your own way of connecting to the net.

  67. Re:One Word: DivX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, yes, I suppose I *could* buy a video card with composite or s-video out, but why park my office and desktop/server/workstation in my living room, next to my component cabinet/stereo/entertainment-center and whatnot?

    I want it to work, be cool, and not *look* like a pile of ass in the process. The Xbox fits nicely in my entertainment center, is well connected to my stereo receiver/dolby equipment and my flatscreen anyway. Now I can boot it into Linux, nfs-mount the DivX share, and fire up mplayer to watch a near-DVD quality DivX movie. That is worth the effort and minor $ in my opinion.

  68. I know why! by Quixadhal · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is to try and convince the SETI@Home people to produce binaries for the Dreamcast and PS2 linux enviornments, isn't it?

    If we hack the X-Box to run linux, won't that be an i386 platform console that can run seti@home? And then we can say, "See! People *DO* want to run seti@home on their game consoles. When can we get dreamcast and PS2 binaries to download?"

    1. Re:I know why! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should put out a seti@home binary to run on vibrating buttplugs. Since that's the whole seti@home demographic in a nutshell....

  69. I welcome scanning for mods by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There's also a story about the XBox online gaming service that implies Microsoft will be scanning your machine to make sure you haven't modified it

    I don't know about you, but I'm glad they'll be doing this. Considering the festering shithole that is Counterstrike, Day of Defeat, Team Fortress et al is for cheaters with aimbots, wallhacks, runfast, and other cheating mods I will be damned happy to know I'm playing against people who can't cheat. Especially given the consistency of the platform (ie - everyone has an xbox) I can't help but think that'll make the match-ups require skill and not hacks.

    Cheating has taken all the fun out of online gaming.

  70. MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by AJWM · · Score: 2

    I keep reading MS is losing money on every single xbox they sell

    Ancient history. This has been gone over before from time to time on /. when someone brings it up. It's no longer true -- but Microsoft would love to have you believe it. (Makes you think you're getting a good deal, for one.)

    Yeah, the first year, they had to write down R&D costs, pay start-up costs like for molds for the housing, circuit board design and low-volume prototypes, etc, etc. On a per-unit basis that first year, yeah, they probably took a hit. They wrote that off against taxes.

    All that stuff is now paid for. Incremental costs for case, circuit boards, etc is as low as you'd expect of anything else with that kind of production run. Hardware costs (chips, memory, drive, etc.) are lower now than a year ago. Et cetera, et cetera.

    Margins may be thin with the lowered price, but they're not negative.

    Besides which, every XBox they sell is one more they can point to when talking to game designers, trying to convince them to develop games for the XBox exclusively or at least before any other platform.

    --
    -- Alastair
    1. Re:MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Walmart can come out with a $200 PC and make money, I would expect that Microsoft could do the same.

      Check out the specs between the Xbox and the Walmart PC, they are pretty close...

      So yeah, I would expect that MS is making money on the Xbox.

    2. Re:MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

      I'd be curious to see any hard data on this. As far as I can tell (from a few contacts in the industry), MS still sells Xboxen at a loss, mainly because of the Hard Drive - remember, even though the cost of manufacturing the unit may have come down a little, MS did slash the list price of the console, from 300$ to 200$...Meanwhile, Sony is making a profit on each PS2 sold - and it's leading in software sales as well. Personally, I'm not too happy with this, as I still haven't forgiven Sony for killing off the Dreamcast :-) but it's hard to choose between two evil empires!

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    3. Re:MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Walmart sells a Microtel PC -- 800 MHz CPU, 128 MB 133MHz RAM, 10 GB hard drive, etc, etc -- for $199.86. You know they're not taking a loss on that. Take out the keyboard, speakers, heavy duty case, power supply, PCI slots, serial and parallel ports, and use that money to upgrade the CD to a DVD and put better video in, and you (especially if you're buying in the kind of volume and can make the kind of sweetheart deals that Microsoft can ("gee, it'd be a real shame if the next version of Windows didn't have a driver for this piece of hardware that you sell")) probably have a bit of profit margin left over.

      --
      -- Alastair
    4. Re:MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the GeForce3 alone would cost them at least $100 (assuming a really "sweet deal"). $100 won't cover the chipset/mobo, controllers, DVD drive, RAM, and HDD.

    5. Re:MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

      Don't forget, the Xbox has a NV25 chip, a DVD drive and an above-average (and custom-made) sound chipset. It also comes with a game controller and Tv adapter. The fact is, from what I've heard, MS still loses about 50 to 75 dollars on each unit. But perhaps you have hard data that contradicts this information (which, admittedly, is only hearsay, but from people in the industry, nonetheless).

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    6. Re:MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Chips are cheap, once the production line is ramped up. A DVD drive only costs a couple more dollars (at the manufacturing end) than a CD drive. A game controller and TV adapter wholesale for a buck or so apiece.

      Remember, you've got to look at manufacturer's production cost, not what they sell it to OEMs for, not what the OEMs wholesale it for, and not what the retailer sells it for. You can bet that with Microsoft's clout, that's the price they're looking at.

      Also remember that it's in Microsoft's interests for everyone (except maybe the shareholders who seriously look at such details, ie not many of them) to think that the box costs more to make than it does -- that way they think they're getting a better deal or snookering Microsoft.

      The industry is littered with the corpses of companies who thought they were snookering Microsoft.

      --
      -- Alastair
    7. Re:MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

      A game controller]...]wholesale for a buck or so apiece.

      Man, we're not talking about a Gravis Gamepad, here! Also, even with large production, the NV25 is still an expensive chip to produce. We're talking about a chip that's about as complex as a Pentium IV, here.

      In any case, the sources I refer to are not not competitors to MS, but customers who have no interest in MS losing money. It wouldn't make sense for MS to tell them that it's still losing money on the console. So until you come up with hard evidence, I'll have to go with the rumors (not that it's keeping me up awake at night!)

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    8. Re:MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Ever take one of those things apart and see just how simple the design really is from a manufacturing perspective?

      Anyway, you can believe what you want. If you want to believe rumors of what customers think the costs are, go right ahead.

      But for a realistic perspective, you might want to talk to some industrial or manufacturing engineers.

      --
      -- Alastair
    9. Re:MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

      I don't know what you mean by customers, but I'm talking about game developers and publishers who work with MS on Xbox titles. Now, I haven't heard anything from MS directly (and even if I did I wouldn't quote them - I don't want to put my employer or myself in any kind of legal trouble), but the grapevine is almost unanimous in saying that MS is still losing money on each Xbox title. I think it's a mistake to apply the same standards as for PCs to consoles, anyway - MS has gotten into specific, exclusive deals with a set number of manufacturers, it can't just go shopping for a better deal once every three months. So I'll go on believing rumors from people in the industry rather than estimates based on dubious analogies with what it would cost to make an equivalent machine in the PC world. Even though it can now run Linux, the Xbox is not just a generic PC built from the cheapest parts that can be scrounged...it's a game console, with specific hardware and costs. Sony makes money off of every PS2 they sell, and Nintendo probably breaks even, but as far as I know, and until someone comes up with some hard data, we'll have to believe analysts and insiders when they say that MS doesn't.

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
    10. Re:MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by AJWM · · Score: 2

      You were the one that brought up "customers" first. I guess you meant those game developers and publishers -- not traditionally an industry that knows squat about electronics hardware manufacturing.

      And sure it's a mistake to apply the same standards as for PCs to consoles -- traditionally, more specialized and limited function hardware is cheaper to manufacture in large quantities than PCs. The PC field changes too fast to set up lines for a multi-year production run, so startup costs have to be amortized over fewer units.

      As for "believe analysts and insiders when they say that MS doesn't [make money on every unit they sell]" -- show me an analyst report in this fiscal year (not last year when MSFT wrote off the startup costs) that actually says that, rather than saying weasel words like "rumor has it that..".

      I've done system engineering and electronics manufacturing. I've been following the consumer electronics and computer industries for a lot of years, my wife's an industrial engineer and some of our best friends are production engineers.

      I haven't seen Microsoft's specific numbers, but for what they're selling at the volume they're making them, with the purchasing clout they have, if they are losing money on each unit then they've got some pretty stupid people in their manufacturing and purchasing divisions. Not impossible, I suppose, but hardly the way to bet.

      --
      -- Alastair
    11. Re:MS *makes* money on every XBox they sell. by Archie+Steel · · Score: 2

      "Rumor has it..." is not using weasel words, it's telling it like it is. I've heard rumors, and they might not be true, but they do come from people working in the industry. Remember that MS has two things working against it: 1) it hasn't been selling as many Xbox as it thought - it's doing okay in the states, but European and Japanes sales are below expectations; 2) it has cut its selling price not because it could afford to due to its sales, but rather because it wanted to keep up with the PS2.

      But don't take my word for it: read this June 24 analysis on RedHerring. So, now it's your estimate, based on a faulty analogy with the PC world (which is cheaper, because the demand is much higher than for the Xbox - i.e. it's always more costly to produce a console that to assemble a PC; read up on it if you don't believe me) against insider rumors and professional analysis...Which is not to say that you can't be right...MS could be lying about their costs, I guess, though I don't see the point in that. After all, Sony's not shy to report that they're making money on every PS2 sold. And, as you say, they might have some people who made some stupid purchasing decisions.

      Peace.

      --

      Reminder: find a new sig
  71. Why should anyone want to run linux on a xbox? by jopet · · Score: 1

    Please can anybody tell me what the pupose of that exercise is? What can you actually do on a Xbox running linux? AFAIK there is no way to even hook up a decent monitor to the thing, and most of the hardware that is in there isnt that useful either. Why not just buy a second hand PC and get more linux power for the same money? I really dont understand it ...

    1. Re:Why should anyone want to run linux on a xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you can then run emulators on the xbox. I for one, would run a NEW emu on it to save space and play my NES games on one machine than two.

      Also people who build arcade cabinets could use it. Not only can you play arcade games on the cabinet you can play xbox, with one machine.

      There is a way to hook up a decent monitor to it. You haven't done your research....

  72. Question and Point... by Atryn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Question: Are the HOWTO's mentioned hosted on an XBOX running Linux and Apache? That'd be cool...

    Point: The DMCA only kicks in if you are circumventing encryption (i.e. to play illegally copied games). If I'm correct, this setup uses the mod chip to entirely bypass the existing OS. So you aren't even running the OS that has the decryption. It should only be illegal if you employ some Linux based software to then circumvent encryption on commerical software or games.

    I can't see how the DMCA could be used against someone just running Linux and freeware on the Xbox.

    --
    Come play Moral Decay!
    1. Re:Question and Point... by Winterblink · · Score: 1
      Question: Are the HOWTO's mentioned hosted on an XBOX running Linux and Apache? That'd be cool...

      Uh, why would this be cool?

      Point: The DMCA only kicks in if you are circumventing encryption (i.e. to play illegally copied games). If I'm correct, this setup uses the mod chip to entirely bypass the existing OS. So you aren't even running the OS that has the decryption. It should only be illegal if you employ some Linux based software to then circumvent encryption on commerical software or games.

      Admittedly my in depth knowledge of DMCA isn't that great, but doesn't it "kick in" if you try to circumvent any kind of copyright protection scheme? Encryption or otherwise? Someone please enlighten.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    2. Re:Question and Point... by Atryn · · Score: 1

      Uh, why would this be cool?

      Uh, just cause. ;)

      doesn't it "kick in" if you try to circumvent any kind of copyright protection

      You might be correct, but it is still irrelevant. You aren't circumventing any copyright or encryption by running standard linux and programs on your Xbox... Unless you are playing illegal MP3s, illegal DVDs, illegal games, etc.

      --
      Come play Moral Decay!
    3. Re:Question and Point... by Winterblink · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You might be correct, but it is still irrelevant. You aren't circumventing any copyright or encryption by running standard linux and programs on your Xbox... Unless you are playing illegal MP3s, illegal DVDs, illegal games, etc.

      Oh god, NOBODY who'd hack an XBox would dare do something like that, would they? :D At any rate, I'm consistently amazed at the amount of effort worldwide that's been put towards actually hacking this machine. I'm not yet convinced there's any real benefit to it other than just some people doing stuff as a hobby, but maybe someone might do something really cool.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    4. Re:Question and Point... by spectecjr · · Score: 1

      You might be correct, but it is still irrelevant. You aren't circumventing any copyright or encryption by running standard linux and programs on your Xbox... Unless you are playing illegal MP3s, illegal DVDs, illegal games, etc.

      Yes, you are. The boot-up sequence - which has to be circumvented to load Linux on the XBox - is encrypted.

      Simon

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    5. Re:Question and Point... by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      Noone seems to get it.

      All the mods replace the original XBOX bios with a hacked derivitave. A "clean" linux bios supposedly exists, but this makes your xbox into a linux box exclusively. Which isn't what most want to do in the real world. They dont want to give up "backing up" the software they rent from blockbuster.

      This in itself is piracy. You cant sell a hacked BIOS image any more than you can sell hacked copies of Windows XP.

      The DMCA is not an issue.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  73. Au contraire, Pooh bear! by Ride-My-Rocket · · Score: 2

    Actually, by buying an X-Box and running Linux on it, you're actively contributing to the downfall of Microsoft. Here's how:

    Microsoft relies on selling game licenses to make a profit off of their whole X-Box venture. And in order to remain competitive with Sony's PSX-2 pricing, they've had to heavily slash their unit costs. The net effect? They take a loss on each unit sold ($150, maybe more?), with the expecatation that if they sell enough games per unit, they'll be able to make that money back (and then some). By buying an X-Box, you're hitting MS where it hurts...... and no, companies don't have nuts.

    1. Re:Au contraire, Pooh bear! by xingix · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is, what's wrong with buying the system if it has some fun games? Sure, put Linux on it if you really find the need, but is it so awful to buy an XBox and play XBox games on it? Can't most M$ haters put the political shit behind them once in a while?

      --

      Confucious says: Man who runs behind car gets exhausted.

      // jeku.com

  74. Re:Au contraire, Pooh bear!ve by aonaran · · Score: 1

    But by pointing to the exta # X-boxen they sold they have the leverage they want to sell the development kits and licences etc to the 3rd party developers and they still make their money it's not until the NEXT Xbox when the developers say screw you, we didn't make nay money last time we're going with Sony. ....that's when MS finally loses money (if they were too dumb to notice that game sales were low and duck out of the market prior to Xbox2)

  75. Re: disputable assumptions by brokeninside · · Score: 1
    1. Gaming companies are too ignorant to look at figures such as number of games sold per console, number of games sold, profit per game.
    2. All people considering buying an X-box to run Linux also have an interest in playing X-box games.


  76. Re:One Word: DivX by Steveftoth · · Score: 1

    I added a turbo switch to my TI-85, fun stuff. I'm just saying that what he wants s/he can already get, and have it look and perform much better. Since s/he won't have to hack any hardware (only software) and won't have to reboot.

    Personally I can't stand rebooting my ps2 from normal to linux mode to do programming with it. I really want to get another one but I'm not going to spend the money yet.

  77. MS is a bad business partner by Steveftoth · · Score: 2

    but it's not immoral what they did, just ruthless business practice. Sucks that smaller companies are not as ruthless as MS, but that's the way it goes.

    Anyone who tries to compete with MS knows the rules, they haven't changed them since the DAY they were founded. If you know your MS history, they have acted in a consistant manner.

    It's the companies fault if they only made one product and never diversified what they made.
    BEOS was a great product, but it was not good enough to switch to. The drawbacks were more then the advantages.
    Netscape was an example of illegal but not immoral practices.

    Sorry that you love computers and hate MS, it's a fact of life, deal with it. It's like loving cars and hating roads.
    If you think that because some people got fired through MSes actions makes them 'immoral' then I would venture to state that through their actions, more people then ever have jobs in the IT industry. If they were the number one server OS then almost everyone would have a job because it would take that many people to keep that infastructure going!

    1. Re:MS is a bad business partner by t0qer · · Score: 1

      BEOS was a great product, but it was not good enough to switch to. The drawbacks were more then the advantages.

      You are forgetting that MS told it's OEM's "If you even *think* about selling Be we won't be selling you windows"

      That's not fair play at all.

      more people then ever have jobs in the IT industry.

      Hmm let's see, I was a M$ desktop monkey for 7 years, got laid off, went back to school, got my MSCE and I STILL CAN'T GET A JOB!!
      You're greatly overstating the job market in IT believe me. I live in san jose, there are NO JOBS at all.

      Even my wife with a BA in CS had a hard time finding a new job after getting laid off from nortel.

      The current trend is to maximize the value of your employee. I've been hearing countless horror stories from coders about how their companies laid off the entire IT staff and now relies on the coders to do the desktop support. This undermines their ability to produce quality code now because every 10 seconds someone is knocking on their cubicle, "Hey bob I just got a quick question!" Which is never JUST A QUICK QUESTION. It leads into a series of questions that build upon the previous questions, a line of questioning to which a criminal would not be subjected to in a police interrogation.

      So no and no, there is no future with learnin M$ products. Laid off and starving to make house payments I know first hand what being a M$ desktop monkey is all about...

      Companies that are looking for IT staff are more concerned with IT people that can do desktop, light DBA work, and reducing the TCO with open source. It's my current focus of study, hopefully i'll be employed within a few months.

      --toq

  78. No one is selling these yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a bit surprised...

    http://search.ebay.com/search/search.dll?MfcISAP IC ommand=GetResult&ht=1&from=R8&SortProperty=MetaEnd Sort&query=xbox+linux

    Returns zero results.

  79. Far cheaper than an Xbox by 00_NOP · · Score: 2

    If you want to buy a system to hack on then buy a Dreamcast. They're cheap (about $40) - and you can run Linux to your heart's content on the thing.

    Not only Linux, either - lots of homebrew games, NetBSD and even QNX

    There are even lots of good, and now very cheap, commercial games available for it.

    Sure, it's not as advanced as an Xbox or a PS/2, before someone makes that very obvious point. But that is not what we are about, is it? The fun for many of us is in subverting the manufacturer's intentions and doing something unorthodox with the hardware - well the DC's the best for that.

    1. Re:Far cheaper than an Xbox by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

      "Five times" is something of an over-estimate. Try three and you're getting there :-)

      But you can buy a coders cable for $25 and get by without the NIC.

    2. Re:Far cheaper than an Xbox by 00_NOP · · Score: 1

      I left one out NewOS has been ported too.

  80. What a waste, don't let Microsoft distract you! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much energy and effort has been expended to get linux to run in some marginal fashion on the Microsoft Xbox? Imagine if instead that effort had been used to improve linux. Which end result is better?

    1. Re:What a waste, don't let Microsoft distract you! by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 5, Funny

      " How much energy and effort has been expended to get linux to run in some marginal fashion on the Microsoft Xbox? Imagine if instead that effort had been used to improve linux. Which end result is better?"

      Well, you see, the situation where people tell you what to code (because it's useful) rather than you coding what you want to is called having a job.

      Coding what you want to is a hobby.

      If I want to spend an inordinate amount of time trying to get freeBSD running on a kitten then that's between me and the kitten (and possibly the RSPCA...).

      Who are you to tell me what to code ? I'll code what I damn well want to, motherfucker!

      graspee

    2. Re:What a waste, don't let Microsoft distract you! by ay2b · · Score: 1
      "How much energy and effort has been expended to get linux to run in some marginal fashion on the Microsoft Xbox? Imagine if instead that effort had been used to improve linux. Which end result is better?"

      How is getting Linux to run on yet another platform not improving Linux? Linus himself has stated that the goal of Linux is world domination. Getting Linux to run on a platform where it didn't use to run furthurs that goal. It seems to me like they are spending effort to improve Linux.

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
  81. Mod Chip ON/OFF switch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do any XBox mod chips come with a physical switch to activate them, which would leave the XBox in an electrically pristine state when OFF?

    1. Re:Mod Chip ON/OFF switch? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      2 bucks and a trip to radio shack and this is easily accomplished. (SPST or DPDT micro toggle, depending on the style of mod)

      Thing is, people want to mod so they can swap in a 100 gig hard drive (anything bigger xbox cant use) and copy everything they rent from blockbuster to it. Or swap in a PC DVD drive which will read CD-R(W)/DVD-R(W). (The xbox has trouble with cdr)

      Same thing with linux. It wastes up yer hard drive, putting it 'back the way it was' isn't so easy.

      Much harder to switch. Though, not impossible.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:Mod Chip ON/OFF switch? by handsomepete · · Score: 2, Informative
      http://www.lik-sang.com/catalog/product_info.php?c ategory=53&products_id=1998&

      (honestly not meaning to advertise a seller, but it's the only link I had handy)

      From the description:

      9 wires only

      Full BIOS update possible

      Works with all import games (US, JAP and PAL)

      Original BIOS remains unmodified

      Works with online games

      Import games works with standard AV cable in full color

      The only "ModChip" 100% safe for future upgrades

      Allows to use home-made software on the Xbox

      Parallel port built-in - upgrade BIOS anytime without soldering

      Play Import games

      Play Backup games

      There's discussion on the Xbox mod forums about all of this. Some people seem to think this is a good solution. For $60, I'd give it a shot.

  82. Re:Au contraire, Pooh bear!ve by tftp · · Score: 1

    I'd think, any sane game software company would look at the games sales figures first and only then on the number of X-boxes sold. Especially if everybody [in the business] knows that X-boxen are being modded for other uses.

  83. Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But he's been added to No More Trolls' foes list so you /bots will never know.

  84. Simple economics by IXI · · Score: 1

    >> Besides, you're still giving your cash to
    >> Microsoft. Nope, yer not.. M$ loses money (a lot of money) on each xbox purchase.

    Please stop this nonsense.

    In my first year studying mechanical engineering I have learned that, if you can't sell a product you already built for profit, it is more profitable to sell it below your own cost then not to sell it at all. So even if M$ loses on every Xbox they sell they still make more profit with every sold Xbox.

    Furthermore, as the development costs are already paid, an increase in sales numbers diminishes the loss on an individual Xbox.

    So once and for all: Buying an Xbox is supporting M$ regardless what you do with it

    --
    He saw some dirty arabs and fired. Too bad it was just some friendly kurds, BBC reporters and his fellow cowboys.
    1. Re:Simple economics by rjbrooksjr · · Score: 1

      But that success comes at a price. Each Xbox console sells for $299, and analysts estimate it costs the company anywhere from $20 to $150 more than that to get it on store shelves.

      taken from one of many articles on this, http://news.com.com/2100-1040-818798.html

      Now they sell for $199. If I buy an xbox and no games (which i have, but for other reasons than linux), they lose more than if I had not bought it.

    2. Re:Simple economics by IXI · · Score: 1

      No, they don't, they win about $299 if you buy one. They have already paid $320 to $450 before the Xbox goes over the counter. If they don't sell it, they must write that money off, if they sell it they gain $299. Go ask an economics teacher if you don't believe me.

      --
      He saw some dirty arabs and fired. Too bad it was just some friendly kurds, BBC reporters and his fellow cowboys.
  85. Re:One Word: DivX by homer_ca · · Score: 1

    A video card with TV-out and the about the same 3D performance (say Geforce4 440MX) costs about $100, and it doesn't do much sitting there by itself without a PC to put it in. Admittedly, if he just wanted TV-out and didn't care about 3D it may cost less than $50 (say Geforce2 MX200).

  86. umm by greymond · · Score: 1

    is it just me or would it seem somewhat dumb to buy a M$ product (whihc gives M$ money) for the purpose of installing Linux on it? I understand the people who run the linux xbox site that they want to be able to do that but other than proving you can do - whats the point - why not just stick to linuxfying your dreamcasts whihc is easier and cheeper (and we all know cheeper is better - otherwise we wouldnt be using linux in the first place)

  87. Re:One Word: DivX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think his wife will let him wedge the Dell Precision tower into the entertainment center in the living room of his $300k home.

    However, that might be an option for the tv stand in Steveftoth's swinging never-kissed-a-girl "bachelor" apartment.

    I know it's easy to forget that the entire readership of /. isn't made up solely of dormroom dwelling counterculture nerds like Steve. Some of us are real people, with families, and tastefully decorated homes.

  88. Positive Aspects by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

    There is a valid reason for doing this. Nothing ruins a good multiplayer game like cheaters. If an Xbox can be modded to allow one to cheat, it will be. Especially when you consider how hard it can be to distribute a patch with console games.

  89. Here's why! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Emulation. Running emulators is a great reason to have linux on the xbox.

  90. What do a 286 and Halo have in common? by SHEENmaster · · Score: 1

    They are both SLOW AS HELL.

    Yes, I am the guy who plays Unreal Tournament in low-grav mode with full mobility in both ground and air.

    Yes, I'm the guy whos Java games move at 30 pixels per frame.

    Yes, I'm the guy who pays for 500kb/s internet access.

    Yes, I'm the guy who uses X to play games on his older laptop while using his Server's processor and ram. X11R6 not OS-X X-box XP etc.

    For the record, my iBook running OS X had xfree installed before any X-box. And Unreal Tournament is a hell of a lot faster than Halo.

    I by no means support OS X over Linux as a server OS, but for a single-user laptop with commercial games it rocks. I am in the process of moving my software towards supporting it. It's executable format (standard binary inside of a directory) is a much faster version of the JAR idea. It shows innovation, and I'd be interested in working on the project.

    This concludes my monolouge. Hope you learn from it without concidering me just another moronic teen programmer (8 years of experience, half my life.)

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  91. Certificate problem by topham · · Score: 2

    Anybody consider the possibility that Microsoft may have butchered the signature crap on the xbox in the same manner as they did with CryptAPI?

    Any way to get a certificate and create another certificate with an issuer of Microsoft or something?

    just a stray thought from the void...

  92. Don't you mean by Inoshiro · · Score: 1

    "better than Microsoft does"?

    The sentence "Microsoft do understand business" makes as much sense as AYBABTU.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
  93. But let's not forget.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you try something more tricky like

    A Dreamcast
    A TV-Set top box (thats not already linux based)
    A Gamecube
    A Mobile Phone
    A 16 bit or 8 bit system (This would be VERY trick

    And let's not forget...

    Apple IIe, A Gameboy , the Atari 2600, a Commodore 64, my 5 year old walkman, my old Teddy Ruxpin, my blender and my toaster, THEN I'll be impressed!

  94. BOYCOTT Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It doesn't matter WHY you buy an X-Box.
    If you buy an X-Box, you are supporting
    an ABUSIVE MONOPOLY that has HARMED consumers.
    If YOU think that buying an X-Box and putting
    Linux on it is going to hurt the ABUSIVE monopoly,
    then YOU are naive. BOYCOTT Microsoft! Simply do
    not give that ABUSIVE MONOPOLY any $$$ at all.
    Just say NO to the ABUSIVE MONOPOLY. Don't buy
    their OS, their APPs, their MOUSE, ... NOTHING!
    If YOU can't get by without their products, BLOW!

  95. Re:One Word: DivX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have gone for the bachelor pad look, My TV is held up by the two Tower cases of my 1.3Ghz athlons :) with the video,dvd and DVB Sat system in between them.
    I realy should get a tv stand.

  96. I'd buy a DC if I could get a NIC card for it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For DC to be any fun to me, It'd have to connect
    to a network... that means a nic card. And the
    Sega Broadband Adapters cost way more then a DC
    does.

    Anyone have info on an OEM BBA for DC or instructions
    on how one might roll their own?

    -G

  97. With no network! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Sega's Broad Band Adapter (network card) is like 5
    times more expensive then the Dreamcast itself...

    It's not as much fun without a NIC.

  98. Cant Open the HOWTO URL !! by Gurukhan · · Score: 1

    Cant open the HOWTO URL as of Saturday 7th Sept. at 1:30 am Eastern, what about you guyz ?? Got the following error message ..
    Warning: Failed opening 'config/stdio.php' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/groups/x/xb/xbox-linux/htdocs/articles.php on line 2
    Warning: Cannot add header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home/groups/x/xb/xbox-linux/htdocs/articles.php:2 ) in /home/groups/x/xb/xbox-linux/htdocs/articles.php on line 3
    Error message trunccate .......

    --
    -- We are born naked, wet and hungry. Then things get worse.
  99. BSD on XBox? by pfish · · Score: 1

    I'd personally like to see FreeBSD or OpenBSD on the X-Box. Thats when I'll buy a used one and play around with it.

    1. Re:BSD on XBox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a funny thing about you *BSD users. Everytime something cool happens, you are whining that you want *BSD version of it. Funny thing is, it just never happens.

  100. Running ORACLE on it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! I can't believe this! I followed the HOWTO and got SUSE installed on my X-Box, but not only that. Now it runs ORACLE 8.1.7 and is my database server as well :) BTW, MPlayer really *ROCKS* on it! ..and all this for under $200. Did you know that Microsoft loses money every time you buy an x-box? They make their profit by selling games, not the xbox hardware itself.

  101. Artificial market control. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    because THEY want to control how and when stuff is released. They want to sell differently priced versions of things in different countries.

    The fact that some japanese game that will NEVER arrive in the US might be wanted by a few westerners is just a byproduct.