Slashdot Mirror


Automakers to Make Diagnostic Codes Available

Rubbersoul writes "As reported on /. a few months ago independent auto repair shops are a bit tense about not having access to car computer diagnostic codes. Well it seems that now the auto makers will share these codes after all. According to an article at CNN the codes will be available to all professional mechanics as well as amateurs working out of their garage at home. Good to see the auto makers came around on this one, even if it did take Congress to help a bit."

185 comments

  1. Mod Chips by OptimizedPrime · · Score: 1

    will this make it easier to make the mod chips for engines: ie the extra horsepower or higher rpm computer mods that are available for a lot of vehicles

    1. Re:Mod Chips by Knacklappen · · Score: 1

      will this make it easier to make the mod chips for engines: ie the extra horsepower or higher rpm computer mods that are available for a lot of vehicles
      No, since those who are competent already know. I am am afraid of those who are just now thinking of joining the business... Already too much black sheeps out there. Hell, I think the whole car chipmod community consists of black sheeps with a few whites outlaws among them...

      --


      Excellence: Moderate (mostly affected by comments on your karma)
    2. Re:Mod Chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh thank god. For a minute there I thought you were going to ask if this would make it easier to make mod chips in order to get Linux to boot on a car's computer. Anyone try it yet? Imagine a Beowulf cluster of GTPs.

    3. Re:Mod Chips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your car does not have an onboard PC? geesh. i thought everyone mounted a mini-pc in their car nowadays.

    4. Re:Mod Chips by narkotix · · Score: 0

      all it means is that your local mechanic or an individual who fixes cars will be able to tell what fault may be occuring on a vehicle with an onboard computer. Also alot of vehicles actually have embedded LED's to tell the mechanic what the fault may be as in the case of Jeeps where the fault code appears on the odometer, and for holden commodores (an australian gm company) where it appears as a flash of lights(depending what model) which allows for easy diagnosis for problems

      --
      We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
  2. Not all that significant.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Japanese makers have been doing this for a long time. I've diagnosted my Impreza since I've owned it. The American automakers, as usual, have had their money shoved up their asses too far to care.

    1. Re:Not all that significant.. by John+Miles · · Score: 2

      That's not really fair to say. The service manuals for the fifth-generation Corvette give you practically everything but the ECU's source code. I don't know about GM's other vehicles but would guess that's a company-wide practice.

      The truth is, most manufacturers were already on board with this policy.

      --
      Dahlmann tightly grips the knife, which he may have no idea how to use, and steps out into the plain.
    2. Re:Not all that significant.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While there is a lot in my 2002 Corvette manuals, a lot is still missing.

      For example, only GM's Diag product (you can't buy one) can cycle the ABS pump for brake bleeding. There are many others.

    3. Re:Not all that significant.. by Banner · · Score: 1

      Oh? Toyota doesn't do this, and they will sue you if you try and make your own machine to read the codes.

      On the other hand GM released their codes and some guy wrote a nifty program (WinADLD) that allows you to hook right up to the computer for the cost of a home made cable (about a buck).

    4. Re:Not all that significant.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is similar program & cable for 2001 Ford Explorer?

    5. Re:Not all that significant.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why bother? It's just going to have tread separation and roll over, killing you and everyone inside, shortly after you do this.

    6. Re:Not all that significant.. by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      Interesting program. Got a linkie?

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
  3. Well thats good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This way the mechanics don't have excuses for not getting things done correctly now lol.

    1. Re:Well thats good by Regul8or · · Score: 1

      Yeah, we still have excuses. Trouble codes can only tell you in what curcuit the problem lies. It can't tell you what condition exists to cause the problem or where in the circuit the problem is. You still have to get in there and run tests to determine the cause of the problem.

  4. Hack your car by MxTxL · · Score: 0, Troll

    All your custom engines are belong to us...

    Really, is it THAT good of an idea to let people hack their car's computers? Sure, i go with the whole idea that if someone wants to blow himself up, then have at it... but in a car, that's potentially putting other people at risk... and that ain't cool.

    1. Re:Hack your car by rich22 · · Score: 2

      The diagnostic codes are designed to help mechanics troubleshoot problems on automobiles. With the level of sophistication used in modern cars, it is hard to diagnose the cause of the most common of problems by conventional means. For instance, let's say your car is using way too much gas. Perhaps your Air Temperature Sensor is on the fritz, and is telling the ECM that it is 20 below zero. The computer will compensate by richening the air/fuel mixture, and the results will include fouled out spark plugs, black exhaust smoke, etc. 25 years ago, that meant "the carbeurator is floodin'". Now it means a sensor needs changing. The ECM codes help you figure out which one.

    2. Re:Hack your car by MxTxL · · Score: 2

      Yes, and that's fine for people doing trouble shooting and tune-ups... but it also allows street racers and other performance minded folks to pump up their air-fuel mixtures and screw up emission controls. With the wrong settings, it's also conceivable if someone doesn't know what they are doing to cause engine fires with all the associated hollywood-type explosions.

    3. Re:Hack your car by Regul8or · · Score: 1

      Reading and clearing diagnostic trouble codes doesn't allow you to reprogram an engine's powertrain control module. You need a factory tool to accomplish that. Those go for several thousand and I highly recommend you know how to use one before you start uploading PROM images to your PCM.

    4. Re:Hack your car by Regul8or · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it does not allow them to do this with access to trouble code information. Tweaking modern day computers has already been accomplished with modifications to the engine's running paramaters through external chips and repogramming of PCMs. People's engines don't just catch fire because you chipped it and it now make 10 more horsepower. Engine fires occur, for example, when your cooling systems fails because you neglected it. Or, better yet, an unprotected electrical circuit such as the one I know morins like to put into their bumping sound system.

    5. Re:Hack your car by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

      That's clearly a troll - but either way it should be pointed out that the engine control computer doesn't really do much of anything that would put anyone at "risk". The steering and brakes are, at their core, not reliant on the computer to function. That's because other things (like dead batteries and running out of gas) could also disable the computer. No one's gonna "blow anything up" by tweaking the car computer - unless they're doing something else as well...

    6. Re:Hack your car by ez76 · · Score: 2

      Increasingly, higher-end vehicles are coming on the market with steering, brakes, throttle, etc. that are completely controlled by electronic sensors and other "drive-by-wire" technologies.

      Hopefully said systems have a Lithium battery back-up that's more reliable than my PalmPilot's.

    7. Re:Hack your car by JesseL · · Score: 2

      Have you got any examples of production vehicles that have drive-by-wire controls for anything other than the throttle and transmission? The article that you pointed to only mentioned throttle control in current vehicles.

      --
      "Prefiero morir de pie que vivir siempre arrodillado!"
    8. Re:Hack your car by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1

      There are no drive by wire vehicles currently in production. You will see drive by wire in top end vehicles like Caddilacs and Corvettes in the near future.

      --
      ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
    9. Re:Hack your car by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      The 2002 Infinty Q45 is drive by wire. I think Mercedes and BMW have had drive by wire for some time in their higher end models. The new 350Z, and Infinity g35 are also both drive by wire. I don't know but would guess that Caddilac Lincoln and Lexus have drive by wire vehicles as well.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    10. Re:Hack your car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2003 Mercedes 500 SL

      http://www.whnet.com/4x4/sbc.html

      Although it appears to still have hydraulic backup circuits.

    11. Re:Hack your car by Vinum · · Score: 1

      Isn't the Nissan altima drive-by-wire? or was it the Maxima.. I haven't paid much attention to Nissan since they stoped making the 240sx :(

    12. Re:Hack your car by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1

      There is no car ont he market which offers "drive by wire." Some cars may offer a few "drive by wire" features such as linkage free accelerator pedals and linkage free transmissions, but this does not make a "drive by wire" automobile. A drive by wire car would require a linkage free steering system of which non has been introduced on a production vehicle due to safety concerns.

      --
      ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
    13. Re:Hack your car by Regul8or · · Score: 1

      Those concerns are perfectly warranted. You ever notice how when something goes wrong with your car it's usually an electrical problem? I'm not yet convinced that a drive-by-wire steering system is safe. Sounds to me like it'll end up being a die-by-wire system.

  5. Not good... by chainrust · · Score: 0, Troll

    Now I have to buy cars only with CarFax on them, because I don't trust that 'mod-chips' won't be placed on cars to roll back the mileage a little. Yet another step in the degredation of the automobile industry...can't wait for jet packs!

    1. Re:Not good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on, get a clue. This has nothing to do with modchips. It's called "making error codes available." Sorta like letting me know that 404 = Not Found, or 401 = Forbidden. P.S. "degradation"

    2. Re:Not good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just LOVE chainrust's site ! Especially the "fash" section , where I learned to cut the bottom off of an old shirt to use as a hair enhancement! Oh, and the "dance party" photos !

      Of course, don't forget to read chainrust's emails ! Here you will discover how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have a pizza party? A fash party? Go to the mall with all of your friends? Have a sleepover and call boys on the phone?

      In short, if you haven't checked out chainrust's site , you don't know what you're missing!

  6. Oh boy, open source cars!!! by Spazntwich · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Who's going to be the first person to install Linux on their ECU?

    1. Re:Oh boy, open source cars!!! by cscx · · Score: 0, Troll

      The modern term is 'PCM,' or Powertrain Control Module -- they're being integrated in most cars now. :D

      More importantly, what relevance does this article have on slashdot? How many people here are auto mechanics!? Oh wait, michael posted this, now it makes sense.

    2. Re:Oh boy, open source cars!!! by GMontag · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the article The fault or diagnostic codes, which appear on a handheld computer that the mechanic attaches to the vehicle to designate the source of trouble...

      This is describing the OBD-II (onboard diagnostics) codes. OBD-II is required on all new vehicles sold in the US since 1996. The protocol is open, but manufacturers would add additional information that they did not disclose to outsiders. Throttle position, fuel flow, intake temp, etc were all easy to decode but other codes were proprietary.

      And, yes, I am one of the people interested in this :-) Planning on hooking up a decoder to an old Grid PalmPad and using one of the programs on SourceForge to continuously display the data and log it to the network I am adding to my '96 Jeep Cherokee.

    3. Re:Oh boy, open source cars!!! by Regul8or · · Score: 1

      I'm an auto mechanic, been so for 6 years. About 25% of the mechanics I know are addicted to the internet. And yes, some do read slashdot regularly from previous exposure to interesting articles.

    4. Re:Oh boy, open source cars!!! by BabyDave · · Score: 1
      "The engine's overheating! Has the radiator sprung a leak?"

      "Worse - my car's been Slashdotted"

    5. Re:Oh boy, open source cars!!! by cscx · · Score: 2

      OBD-II is required on all new vehicles sold in the US since 1996. The protocol is open, but manufacturers would add additional information that they did not disclose to outsiders.

      Sounds like what Microsoft did to Kerberos...

    6. Re:Oh boy, open source cars!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, not at all.

      My 'Z06 Corvette ECU has hundreds of values available for features like traction control, active handling, throttle by wire, etc.

      Things like:

      yaw rate in degrees/sec
      long/lat accel
      brake temp
      desired torque output
      actual torque output
      engine misfire
      trans temp
      engine load

      And then many more to diag those systems. The car is a geeks dream.

      This will open up more of the values that previously were only availabe with GM's scan product (restricted to GM techs and very $$$). You already need hardware to translate the PWM signal to RS-232 or whatever. I use EASE PC as my scanner.

    7. Re:Oh boy, open source cars!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait, michael posted this, now it makes sense.

      and we all know what ass-wipe modded you down.

  7. We already had access to the diagnostic codes..... by jcrb · · Score: 1

    at least if you had a car on which you could use this tool

    --
    -jon
  8. A big Deal by Tadghe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a pretty big deal since it's pretty tough to figure out what's going on on computer controlled engines otherwise.

    This is a bigger deal because it means that people publishing the codes will no longer face the prospect of being sued for posting it and means that, in this case at least, the auto makers (with pressure from congress) decided that public good out weighed copyright law.

    --
    Bugs Bunny was right.
    1. Re:A big Deal by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2

      [It] means that, in this case at least, the auto makers (with pressure from congress) decided that public good out weighed copyright law.

      It's more likely that they believed that, had they not done this, congress would have found a way to open it forcibly in the interest of free trade or something.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:A big Deal by dnoyeb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually the auto makers have always had much incentive to release the codes. But their relationship with the dealerships has kept them from doing that. The dealerships of course make LOTS of money from diagnostics, not the manufacturers.

      But the dealerships start to be at opposition with the manufacturers when warranty claims are made. Perhaps they got too much opposition and sowered the OEMs a bit too much!?

    3. Re:A big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that the real holdup was twofold: Dealerships wanting that lock (and now the car companies can just say that Congress forced their hand), and now they are going to get their asses sued off every time some asshole screws himself with an automotive mod chip.

      Speaking of which, what happens to repairability when the dealership has no idea what's going on in the computer because it's not OEM?

      Something else to think about: I wonder if the American auto companies will worry less about putting out an underpowered car (in the name of fuel efficiency), knowing that folks that really want the power can mod their way up to it?

    4. Re:A big Deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The SAE recommended practice for Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTC's) has been around much longer than OBD-II. Ditto with SAE J1939 which describes the link to access the codes.

      Where this helps is when manufacturers have used proprietry codes ie ones of the format P1XXX (the 1 denotes a proprietry code). From what I've noticed, auto manufacturers stick to the DTC recommended practices as much as they can, until they have a fault that doesn't quite fit.

      Not sure if this is the case, but I thought that the documentation submitted by the car manufacturer to the EPA/CARB for approval is meant to be publicly availably, meaning that any proprietry DTCs and their detection strategies ought to be accessible by the public. This only helps for emissions-related faults though.

      It's worth noting that fault codes don't give anything away about anti-theft functionality etc. For that you need access to PIDs which are manufacturer-specific (aside from the ones required to meet local OBD laws). There was no mention of access to anything other than DTCs in the story.

  9. Cheaper? by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 2

    Under the agreement signed by the Automotive Service Association, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers and the Association of International Automobile Manufacturers, the automakers agree to make the service information available on the Internet by Aug. 31 at a "reasonable price."

    Which means that private mechanics will charge more to analyze the codes since they have to pay a "reasonable price" which negates:

    Some automakers felt more comfortable giving the information to their dealerships, which must keep the data confidential under franchise contracts. That often meant higher costs to consumers, since dealer labor rates tend to run $10 to $20 per hour higher than independent shops, according to AAA.

    Unless, of course, someone creates something like carwarez.com

    1. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think access to these codes will cost the repair shops 10 to 20 dollars per hour for an entire month?? I think not. Most likely, it'll cost the average repair shop less than $100 a month. This cost will be primarily negligable for the consumer, especially when the mechanic will be able to more quickly and accurately diagnose problems. In fact, the consumer should see a DECREASE in their bill because of this new access.

    2. Re:Cheaper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, someone creates something like carwarez.com

      You can bet that the internet enthusiast groups (RX-7s, Z cars, DSMs, Whorevettes, F-bodies, etc) will share this sort of stuff among themselves. Hell...we're already doing PDFs of entire shop manuals and such...and somebody had to scan 1000 pages front and back for that to happen....this looks like it will already be in a digital format, ready to pirate...err...share that is.

  10. we fear change by k3v0 · · Score: 1

    i wonder if big brother bill will classify this new open source system as a threat and team with the big 3..

    1. Re:we fear change by audiophilia · · Score: 1
      i wonder if big brother bill will classify this new open source system as a threat and team with the big 3..

      well of course. He has plans for the microsoft car

  11. Block Exemption Changes in Europe by goul · · Score: 2, Informative
    I would expect to see this sort of information more readily available throughout Europe too. At the end of September 2002 the existing Block Exemption expires in Europe.

    This means a number of major changes in the industry including the right for independent motor dealers to buy directly from manufacturers (as franchise dealers do now), and for them to have the right to the information required to service these vehicles at a fair price.

    Some more info on this is available here.

  12. Cool by papasui · · Score: 2

    Now when my wife makes me go fix the car I'll actually know whats not working, instead of randomly hitting parts with a wrench until a part breaks.

    1. Re:Cool by AcdFlashBk · · Score: 1

      Now when my wife makes me go fix the car I'll actually know whats not working, instead of randomly hitting parts with a wrench until a part breaks.

      Depends on the error message...

      "'PC Load Letter'? What the fuck does that mean?!" -Office Space

  13. Its about time by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    So sick and tired of companies hiding things of things i OWN.

    And i really dont want to hear about 'use license'.. its mine. i paid for it.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Its about time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get real. You don't 'own' the software that runs your VCR, you don't 'own' the software that runs your cell phone, and you don't 'own' the software that runs your car. You own the chip. Period. Oh, and you own the right to reverse-engineer that code, so go to it and have fun.

    2. Re:Its about time by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      The point i was trying to make is i really dont care about the licenses or these 'laws' since i dont agree with them at all.

      If i fork out $ for a 'box'. its mine and all that it takes to make it work.

      If i lease a box, or a service ( like cable tv ).. then different story.. But im talking purchasing it in my rant.

      Once it enters my home i refuse to allow anyone else to dictate what i do with it.

      If YOU want to follow letter of law, no i dont have a 'right' to reverse engineer.. rememeber DMCA?

      However i wont ..

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  14. Re:Trivia For Nerds, Stuff That Doesnt Matter by Tadghe · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    May I ask what the hell this has to do with the Automakers making Diagnostic codes avaliable?

    --
    Bugs Bunny was right.
  15. This is a Good Thing (TM) by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There has been a recent trend in mom'n'pop (well just pop usually) mechanic stores fading away because of big companies sucking up all the businness. Ever seen those commercials that compare Joe Blow mechanic to a big time Jiffy Lube or NTB buff? Notice how the mechanic is portrayed as a greasy hungover hobo, and the friendly neighborhood WalMart-of-cars mechanic is clean cut, muscular, educated, and reviewing what appears to be a concise list of repairs with the client. I'm not against corporations coming to town on a political level, but it stinks to drive out in the country and seeing mom'n'pop stores taken over. And with all of the computer chips and advanced parts requiring really expensive tools to fix, it's nice to see something to go against that trend and empower the small guys again ;)

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    1. Re:This is a Good Thing (TM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree this is very good.

      BUT, I don't think the techs in your corner garage are going to cobble together their own Pulse Width Modulation to RS-232 converter.

      Nor will they write a windows XP or Palm app to communicate with the OBD-II system and request specific values, store them to disk, plot them, etc.

      That tech only costs about $200. Closer to $450 if you want a more universal version with support for an unlimited number of vehicles.

      MAINLY, this disclosure will bring more functionality to already available comercial products (EASE PC, AutoTap, etc). GM, for example, reserves certain functionality to their Diag tool (only available to GM techs and very, very $$$). Things like ABS brake bleeding, etc.

      So this is good, but don't expect most joe mechanics to become joe hackers.

      It costs a lot of money to make good repair and suport docs available. Some of those costs go into the price of the car, some into the tools, some to the repair shops that profit from the repairs.

    2. Re:This is a Good Thing (TM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...ur absolutely right--I'm not happy that a revolution is coming and Joe Shmoe is back in business...I'm happy to see one small step backwards, though there's likely at least 3 forwards for each :(

    3. Re:This is a Good Thing (TM) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What most people don't know is that those big chains of shops that only do fluid and filter changes have had NO education on the science of Auto Repair. The shop I work for does at least one repair a week caused by one of those 'corporate' shops, and all we work on are Hondas and Acuras. There's no telling how many other makes these jokers mess up. All three of our techs, including the owner, are college graduates, with degrees in automotive technology. Two are multiple times ASE Certified Master Technicians. Find ANY chain shop that can say that. I feel stupid next to these guys, because all I do is maintain the network and database systems.

  16. music by DBordello · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Now i can make my engine rev to the beat of my music. No need to pump the breaks!

  17. I'm not sure I follow... by FakePlasticDubya · · Score: 3, Informative

    What is new about this? The OBD and OBD II standards have been around for a long time... you can go out and buy a tool that will interface with your car and show you the codes... You can even get a cable that lets you hookup a laptop the sensor port.

    The OBD-II Homepage
    OBD-II Codes

    --

    "We shall show mercy, but we shall not ask for it" -- Winston Churchill
    1. Re:I'm not sure I follow... by Regul8or · · Score: 2, Informative

      SAE defind trouble codes are only defined to mean something within a certain range. There are manufacturer specific trouble codes that they can make mean whatever they want. Those are the codes that we don't know the definition of.

    2. Re:I'm not sure I follow... by denzo · · Score: 2

      OBD-I and OBD-II are the Federally mandated codes that auto manufacturer must make available to any standard reader; this is mostly for emissions-related fault codes, and doesn't cover other components of the car that may not have a direct effect on emissions. The point is that an owner may have some mechanical or electrical problem with their car, which might not be diagnosable by an independent shop due to proprietary codes, and the car would then need to be taken to a dealer to make the diagnosis and repair.

  18. This is not source Code. by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Informative

    These are Diag Codes not Source Code. These will not give you information to put Linux on your car. They give information like Code 2453 Means Sencor 4 is malfunctioning. So opening the code help the machanics not the hacker. They are not saying how the Onboad computer is working just giving you the information on what is wrong. It is like a help book for windows error messages. With know all the window error message numbers it helps you possible fix the problem with the Os but not nessarly hack the OS.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:This is not source Code. by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

      Actually its just like windows error messages. When my fuel pump is failing on my 95 Blazer with the bass ackwards OBDI...It always reports o2 sensor errors but never lean fuel or anything else that would suggest fuel pump.

      As in windows the codes require a bit of "interpretation." ala the Book of Daniel...

    2. Re:This is not source Code. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad you can't speak. no idea what you were trying to say with that last sentence.

  19. Guess What? by Enonu · · Score: 1, Troll

    Now those same 31337 doods who put a 12-inch high spoiler (unpainted for the first 3 months, since they have to save up their McDonald's salary) on a Honda Civic are going to start hooking up neon lights and a speaker system to their diagnostic code system.

    1. Re:Guess What? by GigsVT · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      FYI- Neon lights on cars are illegal in many states.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Guess What? by toast0 · · Score: 2

      FYI- a car mod being illegal doesn't stop it from happening.

    3. Re:Guess What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha! I've seen cops look at clear lenses and just let it go. I know. I was behind the cop when he/she turned off and I pulled behind the civic with the clear lenses (also a blocked off rear window, but I don't know if that's illegal in my state).

      So is bass so loud it shakes windows and doors in most areas. Talk to a neighbor that lives at the corner of a busy intersection and ask them what they think. Then again, folks like to blow their horns for fun nowadays (K Street and Dupont Circle, DC anyone?)

      I have no problems with people modding their cars. But when they squeal away, speed, blow their bass, and put a wide diameter muffler in front of their rear axle, all illegal in many areas, folks around them, including the cops, get acclimated to it all.

  20. NO by dnoyeb · · Score: 2

    Diagnostic codes are read only. They will not be releasing any modification codes I am willing to bet.

  21. I cracked my car by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was mercedes D - series. It's really not that hard. All you need to do is to connect a laptop to it. It's an ordinary computer - just like any other after all. If you have cracked games or done some brute force password cracking, you can crack your car.

  22. "Code" wars. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Urged by Congress?

    The deal comes after Congress held a hearing on the issue this summer and threatened to force automakers to share the codes with car owners and independent mechanics."

    The more important question is why did it take action from congress?

    "This deal will protect the viability of independent service station and repair shops and ensure that consumers will continue to have a choice of automotive service providers," said Sen. Paul Wellstone, D-Minn., who introduced a bill in the Senate aimed at prying open access to the codes."

    "Automakers were concerned the legislation would require them to turn over the calibration codes that could be used by the aftermarket parts industry to copy their vehicle parts, in addition to the fault codes. Territo said the manufacturers were not trying to give dealers an unfair advantage."

    The aftermarket industry already has the tools for copying parts and codes. So if you weren't intending to give an unfair advantage to your guys. What were you intending?

    "I think everyone realizes that a lot of the automotive repairs are done by the aftermarket industry," he said. "It's in our interest to make sure our customers can get their vehicles repaired easily.""

    Apparently you weren't, otherwise it wouldn' have taken a nudge from congress. The aftermarket and independent mechanic is almost as old as the automobile industry. So one can't work from an "I didn't know" standpoint.

  23. ... This isn't new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most manufacturers have had these codes available for a very long time.. late 80's even.

    What the hell is new about this? This isn't newsworthy. slashdot has gone to such shit.

    1. Re:... This isn't new by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      RTFA, the codes have been avalible to dealerships, this means your local chain (quaker, jiffy lube) or your local mechanic still didn't have acess to them, so you'd either have to go the the dealership and pay their higher prices, or go to your local mechanic and pay more because it would take longer to figure out what was wrong, btw, IMO going to a dealership is throwing your money away ussually, free estimate, they told me it would cost $115 (parts and labor) to replace a seatbelt and a window roller handle thingy, i went to a junkyard, payed the guy about $20 and took the half an hour to replace them myself

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:... This isn't new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, only the first dealership was supposed to be ital'd ~Cyno01

  24. Next to Useless by dnoyeb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As someone who works in the industry on the engineering side I am very familiar with their "codes."

    The codes will be USELESS to a mechanic. A mechanic needs a "TOOL." A mechanic is not a programmer or engineer. He will still pay $300 for the tool to read the codes. he will still pay $100 per 'module' for each car's codes he wants to read.

    He can do that now. So the hope is that more tools will be developed and that will bring the cost of the tools down.

    Don't confuse this with any ability to modify anything. These will be read only idiot codes like "o2 is out of range" or "Low Voltage."

    It still takes a good mechanic to find the problem and often, VERY DAMN OFTEN, the codes are simply misleading the mechanic when his nose and ears have already given him the answer.

    1. Re:Next to Useless by fisgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Agreed: the biggest advantage will be a general price reduction, hopefully.

      While the codes are generally useless to a good mechanic, the ability to reset them on many models is the tough part. Among others, BMW was notorious for this. I haven't worked on one for a while, but the "service reset tool" was DOD expensive, and a total scam.

    2. Re:Next to Useless by Vinum · · Score: 1

      Ya... on my Nissan 240sx to reset error codes I either had to disconnect the battery for 15 minutes... get to where the computer is and push a button... or do the easy part and turn the ignition from the on-position to the acc position 37 times in a row real fast.

      My friends thought it was silly to see me put my key in and move it back and forth really quick when I installed a new O2 sensor once.. heh. Ohh well.

    3. Re:Next to Useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree. Even though I'm a computer hacker, many of my relatives are heavily into automotive mechanics and they come to me with all their automotive computer problems.

      While scan tools are great, most only show you the English meaning of the OBD-II "standard" codes, which only cover basic component failures. (Misfire on cylinder X, rich fuel mixture at rear O2, etc.)

      In order to see the manufacturer-specific codes, you need a scan tool "blessed" by the manufacturer.

      Case in point - I took my '96 GM car to my cousin's garage and plugged in his $500 scan tool. It showed all the sensor values (which looked ok) and displayed "no trouble codes found". Meanwhile, the CHECK ENGINE LIGHT was flashing, which means that the computer was logging trouble codes!

      Next day, I took it into the local GM dealership (where my brother is chummy with the mechanics). We plugged it into their $3000 "Tech 2" scan tool, and it displayed a manufacturer-specific WARNING code that indicated that my car was never operating in the optimal range of tunings for one component. It was enough to make my car have lackluster performance, but not enough to look like a problem when looking at the sensor values (or using your eyes and ears - no missing, no excess fuel in the exhaust).

      A quick upgrade of the default tunings in the computer was enough to make my car sound like it was running brand new.

      The moral? If my cousin's scan tool had said "operating outside of optimal range for component XXX", then he could have inspected the component (and replaced it if neccessary), or dispatched me to the local dealer with specific instructions to upgrade the tunings for component XXX. Otherwise, I would have been at the mercy of any mechanic who wanted to fix my car by trial and error replacement of any parts they felt neccessary.

    4. Re:Next to Useless by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Dude, BMW's are a total scam. Any
      twit can drop a fat V8 into a 10-year-old body with fresh paint. On that note, has anyone else ever noticed that the body of a BMW tends to rust and fall apart REAL EARLY compared to the common man's automobile ? It seems that every Bimmer I see is either brand new off the lot, or lacking the crest and sagging to the left. But they still try to race me and change lanes at 110mph in the downtown area. Fags!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    5. Re:Next to Useless by ONOIML8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      As someone who works in the industry on the fleet mechanic side I have to disagree.

      The OBD-II codes have been around and they are helpful for the most part. What has been needed are the non-standard manufacturer specific codes.

      I wish I could purchase a good scan tool that would work on the major brands for $300. With software, leads, and adapters for domestic only I think our Mastertech package was over $2,800. That's domestic only, no imports, and it is never current. I'm just now getting updated for 2002 model year vehicles.

      You are correct that it still takes a good mechanic to find the problem. A good mechanic stays current with his training. Todays mechanic is not a programmer, but he is a technician.

      Using the scan tool to read diagnostic codes won't tell the mechanic exactly where the problem is. He has to know the systems well enough to understand what the on board computer is telling him. The ability to read the real time data stream is important too, maybe even more important than knowing waht the diagnostic codes mean.

      It is important to understand how the on board computer arrived at the diagnostic code. You have to know what test is run, how it is run, and what the conditions for the test are. If you don't have that information then you are correct, the codes will be misleading.

      --
      . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  25. You people have no idea what you are talking about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats what I said. Someone says something about "diagnostic codes" and the next thing you know every idiot on slashdot that has ever looked under the hood of a car has something to say about "damn kids mod chipping their cars".
    IT IS NOT THE SAME THING AS CHIPPING A CAR.
    A diagnostic code is what your engine's computer gives out when the "check your engine" light is on.

    Get it? Good....

  26. There is a Tool Call AutoTAP and OBDII scanners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Diagnostic trouble Code so called DTC are avil online for long time. check out http://www.autotap.com for detail on their software and OBDII codes. Autotap is not just for Trouble Codes, you can use it to monitor 1000's of parameters in Real time!! from how much air/fuel your car consuming, how far you have your throttle down, what gear are you in, what's your temptures etc etc.

    I have all the Codes for my Grand Prix GTP.

    Yes A lot of people mod their cars, reprogramming the PCM or ECU can give you more HP and remove speed limiter etc.

    I'm one of those guy who tweak on the cars, i'll be setting DTC's left and right, i just use autotap and look up the code and do the necessary correction to fix the problem.

    Sometime friend who have Service Engine Soon light on their late model car I tap in and check out the code (Which cost $75 at the shop) so we'll get idea on the problem with the car before we take it to the shop.

    There are palm size code readers and scan tools also.

    Look for multiline, serial gauges that coming out in a few month that let you monitor various parameters of your OBD II car and they're reprogrammable too with serial interface. :)

  27. GNU Automake by huhmz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am i the only one who though for about .8 seconds that the article was about GNU Automake?

    I best cut down on the wine I think...

    1. Re:GNU Automake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are.
      You are also a moron.

    2. Re:GNU Automake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do people think it's cool to comment that they are drinking alcohol, have had too much caffine or have not had enough sleep? Do you honestly think people care or actually think you're kewl? In reality you're really a moron with no life.

    3. Re:GNU Automake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I thought that too. For longer.

    4. Re:GNU Automake by base3 · · Score: 1
      Maybe he wasn't talking about the drinking kind; he was talking about WINE.

      Incidentally, why do people think it's cool to comment that others are morons with no life? Do you honestly think people care or actually don't realize that by posting that, you yourself admit that in reality, you're really a moron with no life?

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
    5. Re:GNU Automake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but he/she's not nearly as cool as those people who spell the word 'cool' as 'kewl'!

    6. Re:GNU Automake by Zog · · Score: 1

      I best cut down on the wine I think...

      But what would getting rid of windows apps help with?

      Ohhh, wait a second....

  28. OBD is an interface standard by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Informative

    On Board Diagnostics is a tool. You can read the codes with the tool.

    What the codes mean is the point.

    1. Re:OBD is an interface standard by fred911 · · Score: 2, Informative

      MOD PARENT UP!!

      Seems the feds figured that if they "required" every vehcile manufacture to use the OBD-II physical interface, they would all be standard.

      Sad thing is most manufactures pin out on the interface is different.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:OBD is an interface standard by pll178 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, if you buy the OBDII reader and a factory service manual you have enough information to understand what the code is and how to fix it. You can buy factory service manuals from www.helminc.com. These two resources are indespensible for a DIY mechanic.

  29. Read the article.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    That has nothing to do with this. You know the Check Engine light that people never have checked out? Thats the car's internal diagnostic system giving you a heads up that something's fscked up.

    Believe it or not, that actually has a good bearing on if something is wrong with your car. People who fix their cars at home (or the car tuner) actually likes to look up what caused that Orange Light of Death, but from most car companies (most being the American ones) the code it displays is kept secret from small garages or individuals.

    This allows the do-it-yourselfer or the entrepreneur garage to repair their vehicle with the aid of the vehicle. Score one for the little guys.

    1. Re:Read the article.. by Blkdeath · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That has nothing to do with this. You know the Check Engine light that people never have checked out? Thats the car's internal diagnostic system giving you a heads up that something's fscked up.
      One of my parents' cars had a constantly lit check-engine light. You know what it meant? The check engine light was broken. Cost to fix? Over $500 (they had to tear apart the entire dash, then there's parts, wires, sensor(s), re-assembly of dash, inspector to ensure they don't tinker with the mileage, etc..)

      There's a reason they're called "idiot lights", you know. :)

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    2. Re:Read the article.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually about 10 billion pissant things will turn on the check engine light. All thanks to federal law.

    3. Re:Read the article.. by Vinum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Reminds me of the Simpsons...

      Marge: Homer! The check engine light is on!

      Homer: Ohhh no! The tape I put over it fell off. ....

      Or something to that effect. Either way, it is highly probably your mechanic charged your $500 and did some fancy work and just disconnected the check engine light. It happens all the freaking time.

    4. Re:Read the article.. by narkotix · · Score: 0

      i knew a girl who's was relived when her "check engine" light finally went out thinking that the problem fixed itself....the bulb actually blew out and she had a blown head gasket LOL

      --
      We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
  30. Will it have hidden commands like the R2D2 robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Sound the horn twice, and select third gear = "Bring me my light saber"

    Select first, third, then fifth gear, then turn on the radio = "Call Princess Leia on my cell phone"

    Doubtless you can make up others :-)

  31. Corps are shafting us again by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Funny
    This situation is like if you had a car and they kept the specs closed so that you couldn't figure out how to...

    ... wait -- no need for a car analogy on this topic.

    Never mind.

  32. Just keep on driving by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 1, Troll

    As an owner of "beater" cars, I can honestly tell you that those codes do not matter one bit, and are only there to get you ripped off by auto mechanics.

    My beat-up Chevy Celebrity has had that yellow "Service Engine Soon" light on for years, and it runs just fine.

    The whole thing is nothing but government waste, as there's a lot more pressing issues at hand than forcing companies to publish every single detail of their trade secrets.

    1. Re:Just keep on driving by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      Ugh, a celebrity. I don't think I could ever say mine used to "run fine". That car was total trash. Only after I got rid of it did I see the consumer reports that ranked cars on how many repairs they required on average, the Celebrity was #1 by far.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    2. Re:Just keep on driving by wadetemp · · Score: 2

      I had a Subaru with a chronic check engine light problem. Two mechanics (one operating out of the Subaru dealer and one non-dealer) told me that (on Subarus anyway) that quite often the vague "service engine" light indicates a failure in emissions control or some other non-critical part, and unless the failure is causing a loss of performance or your car to just plain not work, that quite often it's not worth worrying about. (And even with my failed emissions control systems I still passed all emissions testing with flying colors... so I think quite often the non-critical part that's failed is the light itself...)

    3. Re:Just keep on driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The check engine light on many cars can be put into diag mode and it will pulse out codes that indicate problems with sensors, fuel injectors, etc. You can even trigger engine diagnostics that check injector balance, etc.

      This is all extremely useful, even for the novice shade tree mechanic. Even many cars in the 80's had significant diagnostic capabilities.

      The light may indicate a non-problem, or a very serious problem that, if ignored, could lead to the destruction of the engine.

      So you are lazy and know nothing about the subject - thanks for sharing.

    4. Re:Just keep on driving by tiohero · · Score: 1
      This is very bad advice. Hopefully you don't work at a nuclear power plant.

      The "check engine" light is there to tell you that a sensor is malfunctioning/out of spec. Something IS wrong with your car and it will probably cost you more $$$ in the end. Just because a car "runs" doesn't mean that there are no problems. Often the sensor codes are triggered during specific events such as heavy acceleration/hot/cold engine that won't show up while idling so emmissions and other basic testing likely won't indicate any problems. Under some circumstances, the engine may even be operating under "open loop" which means that it is ignoring most sensor data and instead using factory established default values in order to keep running.

      Considerable fault-tolerant design goes into the computer control of modern engines. For safety reasons, they will continue running as best they can despite significant problems. (except over-heat conditions which could cause fire)

      By driving with an engine out of spec, you may quickly wear out your expensive catalytic converter... or worse. A car will most often pass state emmisions tests just so long as the catalytic converter is not used up. The garage could get true diagnostic readings at the O2 sensor, not at the tail pipe.

      The code may also indicate a transmission fault that may be eating away fuel economy and cause transmission overheating such as if the "torque-converter clutch" isn't locking properly.

      BTW, on most american cars, there is a "trick" to get the car to read back the fault code without an expensive scanner. These days, many parts stores such as "Advance Auto" will also read-out the codes for free.

      The government's role here is to reduce pollution and improve highway/vehicle safety. By giving more people access to the diagnostic information(most of which has been "hacked" already), it means that on average, cars will operate better since fewer problems will be ignored.

    5. Re:Just keep on driving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my car was running without the computer for a few minutes. hahaha. (the battery died, but the engine kept running. i could tell the computer was no longer in charge of the throttling and my gas pedal was.)

    6. Re:Just keep on driving by WizardX · · Score: 1

      You obviously have no clue what you are talking about. When a car is running, you can remove the battery and it will continue to do so. The ECM will continue to be powered.

    7. Re:Just keep on driving by Ogre332 · · Score: 1

      as an owner of "beater" cars you may not care. but i think most would agree that if some component on there brand new car failed (even if the only noticable difference is that the ses light is on), they would rather have that light come on so they can get the vehicle fixed while it's still under warranty. after the vehicle is out of warranty, people can do whatever they like.

      --
      Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip. - Homer Simpson
  33. Automake? by alanwj · · Score: 1
    Automakers to Make Diagnostic Codes Available


    I wonder if the autoconfers will have anything to say about this.

    Alan
    1. Re:Automake? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hardeeharhar

  34. Re:We already had access to the diagnostic codes.. by billstr78 · · Score: 2

    Me Too! Once I bought the $60 factory published repair manual, the codes and an easy method of having the car cough them out was right there in the book. The book paid for itself after having to replace two timing belts, a water pump, rotor and oil pump. D@mn 200,000+ mile cars.

  35. Is this news? by Matey-O · · Score: 2

    I wasn't aware that manufaturers WEREN'T releasing those codes. While BMW uses a funky doodad to reset the oil usage timer, both my Corvette and PT cruiser can ofer up trouble codes via the dash display AND all of those codes are documented on the net.

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a 2002 Corvette. It will only provide *TROUBLE* codes on the dash for the actual *faults* that it sees or has recorded. You cannot request any of the hundreds of specific values available. Nor can you record those values while you are driving.

      It takes hardware and software to interact with the PWM OBD-II interface. And many of the codes are not disclosed or available in any product other than GM's Diag tool. And no, you can't buy one.

      So this is good.

    2. Re:Is this news? by autechre · · Score: 3, Interesting


      Yes, it is news. No, auto makers such as BMW and Volkswagen were not releasing the diagnostic codes. This made it impossible for non-dealer repair shops to diagnose a variety of problems on newer model cars.

      My father is the supervisor of the auto shop at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, and he was very concerned about this, as they certainly don't want to have to outsource any repairs on their fleet. These days, much of the work in diagnosing car problems involves hooking up a computer to the car and asking the car's computer, "OK, what's not normal?". It's not quite that simple; you still have to know what you're doing in order to figure out what's wrong (not like a dialog box pops up and says, "Mass air flow sensor bad. Replace? Y/N).

      Anyway, I spoke to my father today to make sure he had seen this article, and he said that basically the auto makers have said, "We promise to release the specs if you don't pass a law saying we have to do so." He doesn't really trust them, but is hopeful, and will wait and see.

      --
      WMBC freeform/independent online radio.
    3. Re:Is this news? by macheath · · Score: 1

      The codes your are describing are not the same codes as they are going to release. The dashboard codes give a general indication of what's wrong. The codes you get via computer hookup can be much more detailed. Also (when having the correct access codes) some manufacturers can update the parameters and sometimes even the software within the onboard electronics. At least one manufacturer (Peugeot/Citroen from France) can even do this via the internet: an engineer in the development department can check and update the software remotely if your car is in the workshop. Check this out: http://www.computeruser.com/news/02/01/30/news18.h tml
      MB

  36. Re:Not good... (jetpacks) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    www.solotrek.com

    no, i'm not a salesman, just think this shit is WAY WAY WAY overdue.

  37. Great news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like we can finally overclock our automobiles. Thanks guys!

  38. Reprogramming the existing computer... by banzai51 · · Score: 1


    Automakers were concerned the legislation would require them to turn over the calibration codes...
    The calibration codes would have been very usefull to the car hacker community. Too bad we can't make 'em give up the goods.

    1. Re:Reprogramming the existing computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just what I want. Sharing the road with folks driving cars that have untested software. There's a reason new models take forever to get out the door. It's called testing. It generally keeps folks safe.

    2. Re:Reprogramming the existing computer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case you havn't noticed there are huge communites of "Automobile Hackers" who have had this information for years. To find them you must go to their secret meeting places. These places are named with confusing nomikers such as "Drag strips" or "Road courses" or "Dirt Tracks". Thay even have secret magazines with names like "Hot Rod", "Sports Car" or "Off Road". Many of their hacked vehicles are illegal to use on the Highways and Streets of Amreica. But then I would not take my hand built SCCA Spec Racer Ford on the streets with some of the idiots they let drive on public strets!

  39. Why is this on slashdot? qjkx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought we only care about vehicles propulsed by antimatter. Why should we care about such dated technology?

  40. This is old news... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

    "Enter "GLYCERINE" as a code, then press L1 for a nitro boost."

  41. new mini-ITX car project? by phorm · · Score: 2

    I think this could definately pave the way for some cool mini-ITX projects (see previous slashdot article). I'm not sure how exactly these diagnostics run though, or what information they provide.
    I think in some systems you can get (and maybe set) your fuel-to-air ratio, which controls how rich your car is burning gas and to some extent power. Turbochargers are based on providing extra air flow allowing for more gas to also be mixed in.
    Even if you can't stat your car on the fly, it would be quite cool to have the onboard PC able to do something other than play Mp3's.

    I'd like to wire one into the speedometer and gas gauge, then have it calculate milage based on speed and the current fuel/air ratio.

    Checksum error. Now terminating system: brakes - phorm

    1. Re:new mini-ITX car project? by bergeron76 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We're actually working on something like this already. We'll see if we can't integrate this into the dashpc project. We're working with the guys at freediag and hopefully they'll be able to help us integrate the ODBII codes into the dashpc codebase.

      We'll probably end up recording all the codes into a public mysql db that can be queried or integrated into the core code.

      This would allow the UI to display the EXACT problem ("Your 3rd spark plug from the left is firing oddly - please check") instead of just "check engine". Very good news indeed.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    2. Re:new mini-ITX car project? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I think every car should report it's mileage using this method. Or at least an average mileage. Geesh. It seems only the luxury cars do this right now.

    3. Re:new mini-ITX car project? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Sounds awesome. I'd be quite interested in this project myself, please post it to slashdot when working :-)

      I suppose the user will need to connect the mini-itx to the appropriate terminals, then simply enter his car make/model/year and it the rest will be done by freediag? I could help with an apache-webpage based interface, if you need assistance?

      phormix at phormix dot com

  42. Diagnostic code list: by MrEd · · Score: 3, Funny
    Hey, I got a sneak copy of the universal error code manual... check it out:


    CODE 0000-FFFF:


    YOUR CAR IS BROKEN. BUY A NEW ONE.

    --

    Wah!

  43. New product idea by interociter · · Score: 3, Interesting
    OK, here's an idea. Since the diagnostic codes are available, how about an on-board computer that monitors and logs engine data: avg MPH, mileage, temperature, daily usage, etc. The data could be downloaded to a laptop via a USB port, analyzed, and archived.

    Imagine: you're doing the monthly check, and discover that your mileage has suddenly dropped 10%. Even before something goes wrong, you could take it to a garage and give them strong diagnostic data.

    When the time comes to sell the car, you can provide a day-to-day profile of the car's history: every oil change, fillup, and repair automatically logged. Real examples of winter vs summer and city vs. highway performance.

    Seems to me that the technology is already available, and some of the functions are already in place. All that really needs to be done is for someone to hack together an interface. Any takers?

    --
    Interociter
    -=What do I want? I'm an American. I want more.
    1. Re:New product idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine knowing the actual mileage of a car in a real world scenario before buying it too! WOW! cool! (everyone knows the reported mileage of cars when they're first sold is inflated through the roof.)

    2. Re:New product idea by Ogre332 · · Score: 1

      actually obdII already does essentially this. the father of a teenage girl brought the 96 saturn that he bought her back to us screaming and threatening to sue. she had told him the car would randomly cut out while she was driving down the road. what she didn't tell him is that she was doing 110 miles an hour every time it happened (the pcm shuts the engine down at 110 miles). all we had to do was hook the car up to the techII service stall and pull the information out.

      --
      Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip. - Homer Simpson
    3. Re:New product idea by ctr2sprt · · Score: 1
      My '88 BMW has this feature, except you can't download it to anything. It monitors average speed and mileage. It also tells the time, date, range (how far you can go based on how much gas you have left and the current average MPG), and temperature You can also program it as a timer and with a maximum speed, so a chime sounds if you go above that speed. I believe all BMWs have had the OBC since at least 1985. I don't see any reason you couldn't hack up a serial interface or something. I think Siemens actually makes the unit.

      Somewhat more on-topic, there are devices that let you read and program the engine management chips for cars with electronic fuel injections. The most common use is to dump out the engine data as part of making high-performance custom chips, but you could probably also hook in a fast laptop (over a really fast interface) and control it from inside the car. Actually, I think I read about someone doing that, but I can't remember where any more.

  44. Parent is spreading FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It must suck to be you. Posting inaccurate, ranting lies does not give you credibility. Office XP Pro does not cost $900! Microsoft's suggested price for the full edition of Pro is actually $579. The price is well worth it too: Word, Excel, PowerPoint, the #1 email program Outlook, and the best database manager in the industry, Access.

    I just bought Office XP Pro yesterday at my college for the low price of $199. It's the academic edition for sure, but I can upgrade it and I have all the programs that are in the more expensive retail edition. Plus, it comes with Visio and FrontPage trial CDs. Office XP is becoming more standards-compliant; many of the formats are beginning to include XML concepts. In any case, OpenOffice already is able to read and write all the Office formats, so what are you complaining about?

    1. Re:Parent is spreading FUD by cybermace5 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Loser.

      I bought Office XP at my school for $15. Educational license that turned into a permanent license when I graduated.

      $15, and it was worth every penny.

      --
      ...
    2. Re:Parent is spreading FUD by Mr.+Firewall · · Score: 1

      Only some colleges have the Campus Agreement with M$ that allows them to sell copies of M$ software to students for $15. The one where I used to work was looking at this, but hadn't decided yet to do it when I left.

      Congratulations for picking one of them as your alma mater.

      Of course, that doesn't automatically make the other person a loser. It's possible that maybe -- just maybe -- the administration of his school chose not to become a Micro$oft whore....

      --
      In times of universal deceit, telling the truth gets you modded -1 Troll
  45. In-dash access by mikewas · · Score: 2
    Our old Toronado had a touch screen in the dash. It took a 3-finger exercise to enter diagnostics mode, the GM version of ctrl-alt-del, but then you:
    1. had access to the engine diagnostics codes
    2. could override/modify some things (e.g. shut down one injector, select Canadian shift regime)
    3. had a summary screen that showed engine & transmission status
    4. let you access the body computer (e.g. heat, A/C).
    I had hoped that was the coming thing, but they charged too much for the touch screen. The dealership was forthcoming with info on the codes, or you could buy the service manual at a reasonable price.

    Too bad. A great car, still looked good, my wife loved it, I could work on it, but we couldn't get parts to keep it on the road any more.

    --

    "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." --Napoleon Bonaparte
  46. Not So! by EXTomar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Go to ebay and buy a scan tool. You see the engine light on your car go on. Even if you have the tool and plug it into your car's computer it only spits out an error number and a little extra information. What does it mean? No one knows....except for the car makers who want to charge you money for the manual.

    This is the same stuff Free Software Philosophy seeks to fight: closed systems that take rights away from the user. You bought the car....why can't you figure out what is wrong with it on your own if you choose to do so? Why do automakers want to keep your property a secret from you?

    1. Re:Not So! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mainly because most people are too stupid to figure out what's going on, so they fuck with the car until it's broke more, then take it to the dealership who bills it back to GM as warranty because that shouldn't be broken. They'd rather keep you in the dark because a little knowledge is a LOT of trouble in the age of 50,000+ mile warranties.

  47. I much don't care... by defile · · Score: 2

    I mean, my car is a lease. If there's any trouble whatsoever it goes back to the dealer for servicing. In fact, it's in their best interest not to fuck the car up since they have to cover repairs under warranty, and they have to buy the car back at the end of the lease. So long independent mechanic, I barely knew thee.

    Although I'd probably be mad if I tinkered with cars in the same way I tinkered with computers and didn't have the open source equivalent.

    1. Re:I much don't care... by GMontag · · Score: 2

      n fact, it's in their best interest not to fuck the car up since they have to cover repairs under warranty, and they have to buy the car back at the end of the lease.

      Huh? If they mess the car up and it lowers the value YOU are on the hook for that amount. They had a set buyback value and mileage in your lease, if it is worth less and/or has more mileage, YOU pay for that, not them.

  48. Appologies to Agent Smith... by fo0bar · · Score: 1
    I must fix my car, I must get free. In this computer is the key. My key.

    Once my car is fixed, there's no need for me to be here. Do you understand? I need the codes. I have to get inside my car's diagnostic mode. You have to tell me how...

    ...or you're going to die!

  49. my empeg already does that.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and it plays mp3s. and it runs linux.

    nyah.

  50. this is very good by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

    This is very good news indeed, even i haven't owned a single own car and i do not repair cars as a hobby nor as my job i have been couple times pissed off because automakers hide some info, not particularly with the diagnose codes but anyway for that i have been missing some information which has been needed, like schematics of wirings etc...
    also i know a lot of people which has been same problems, actually one of my friend had his car just staying on the parking lot unrepaired because he couldn't get the schematics to fix the problem, he had his car sitting there over 6months until he gave up and took it to professional hands, he had it waiting there like 2months so that everything else had been repaired before he gaveup...

  51. I can't believe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is +4 informative. Are /. readers that fuckin dumb when it comes to cars? Wanting to put Linux on everything makes it look like a disease...

  52. Durability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While we're on the subject of automobiles, here is a question. Why can't automobile makers make vehicles that last? We all know they can. I'm tired of little plastic POSs falling or breaking in my car. You go to the dealership, "I need this part for my car" and they say, "That'll be $250" even though you know the part is worth $10 lol. It would be nice to have 1 car in my lifetime that didn't come with cheap parts. I mean I know things like tires get worn out yes, I can replace those myself.

  53. Stealing airbags? by BillX · · Score: 1
    Something tells me that knowing "Code 41 == No Airbag" isn't going to help a shyster mechanic steal airbags.


    Is my FUD-finder broken or am I missing something here?

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  54. Happening in Europe; EU standard EOBD by damieng · · Score: 2

    This is also happening here in Europe now that the EU have provided a standard called EOBD for all newly-developed cars which is actually the OBD-2 system which has been available for some time.

    This months issue of Elektor Electronics has full details on the interface, with next months issue presenting a do-it-yourself EOBD diagnosis adapter. They also do an OBD-2 to RS232 adapter for those geeks wanting to play using their laptop in true "The Fast 'n The Furious" style.

    --
    [)amien
  55. VAG-COM by Professor_Quail · · Score: 1

    For Audi and VW owners, theres been a 'tool' and software (that runs on windows, but can use WINE under linux) called VAG-COM that is supposed to just plug into the diagnostic port and give you real time data from the ECU, I considered buying it...VAG-COM page

  56. Great, inexpensive OBD-2 interface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.obd-2.com

    Alex Peper's software and hardware is AWESOME.

    $122 for a module to connect yoru computer to one of the three types of OBD-2 protocol (ISO, VPW, PWM). A little more if you want two of the three, and a little more if you want all three built into one interface.

    Software updates are frequent and free. Worked perfectly out of the box, he's just making improvements.

    Download the software for free at www.obd-2.com, check it out with the sample datasets he provides, and then consider buying a module. Student discounts, and an additional discount if you solder it together yourself.

    Jim

  57. tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1.) The diagnostic link is a serial link, 9600bps on older cars and 19.2kbps & up on newer vehicles, i.e. it should be possible to hack up an interface from a generic serial port.

    2.) some of the code results will be useless without the transformation formulae & module addresses

    3.) some code won't be all that useful w/o access to the relevant technical service bulletins.

    4.) this is in no way a cure all. I doubt that it will help very much other than with faulty module identification, and faulty sensors, esp w/o the TSBs.

    5.) this isn't going to help you hack the modules very much. ...and to the OBD/OBDII poster, don't forget ISO-9141 and related...

  58. Re:We already had access to the diagnostic codes.. by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1
    you could use this tool

    Diagnostic Software for European Automobiles

    Windows-based Diagnostic Software for VW / Audi / Seat / Skoda


    I highly doubt that you're going to enlighten much of the /. audience with your link.

    I drive a Subaru Outback, in America, and I only use Linux...
    --
    I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
    I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
  59. jeep diag codes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's one for Jeeps w/a digital dash:
    lock doors (IIRC)
    rotate ignition through 3 times (do NOT start the engine)
    poof diag code(s) flash through the digital odometer

    IIRC on digital vehicles without a digital odometer it will flash the check engine light

    of course this and what the codes are, are generally available from any half-decent Jeep site...

    I'd also be willing to bet that any vehicle with a digital dash does something similar or exactly the same.

    Pinouts: most manufactueres also have their own little proprietary vehicle network protocol & physical layer...
    GM/Chrysler essentially became OBDII IIRC ...and Ford has SCP & ACP(Visteon now protocol?)

    most antilock brake modules generally use ISO-9141, esp. European made modules. IIRC ISO-9141 is pretty common in Europe/Japan. (Except Mazda. They were/are(?) using Ford ECU/PCMs for a while... so was the V12 Aston Martin...DB7(?) ... actually dual V6 controllers...)

  60. Hell with the car, bought a motorcycle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the sort of thing that made me switch to a motorcycle, after I couldn't get the ABS on my Camaro fixed properly.

    I went to one shop, they didn't have the equipment.

    I went to another shop, they didn't want to touch ABS due to liability fears.

    I went to a dealer, and they said "well we don't understand what the computer's telling us, but for $1000 we'll dig into it!!"

    Fuck that. So in the rain about 2 weeks ago the rear brakes locked up and sent me into a guardrail. I just bought a Suzuki SV650 with the insurance check. There's nothing on that which I can't fix myself.

  61. Codes for motorcycles? by harryhomeowner · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this includes motorcycles. As a specific example, BMW uses their own interface to access diagnostic information for their motorcycles. The data is encrypted, and is not readable by anythin other than their Moditec computer, which you can by form them for something like $5000.00. I have one of these bikes, and it is frustrating to know that I cannot properly diagnose my bike's woes without going to a dealer.

  62. Olds Achieva by PW2 · · Score: 1

    I have a '92 Olds Achieva which has the 'Check Engine light' flicker on/off/etc due to a warped computer board (common problem)

    I've been getting by without it though;

    (yes, I had the common cracked head gasket issue)

  63. Don't just keep driving... also, flip a switch. by tlambert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't just keep driving... also, flip a switch.

    The Chevy Sprint and Geo Metro and other Chevy cars of that vintage had a blinking "check engine" light, which would go on automatically as soon as you hit 30,000 miles, and each 30,000 miles, after that.

    This was a result of a single-pole, double throw switch in the odometer. There was also a single-pole double-throw switch inside the fuse area (below and two the left of the steering wheel). In other words, a standard two location three-way switch assembly.

    The "corrective" action for the blinky light was to bring the car into the dealer, pay them a lot of money for "scheduled maintenance", and whatever engine parts they happened to have an excess of in inventory in their parts department that month.

    And for them to toggle the position of the switch in the fuse holder, to turn off the blinky light until you'd gone another 30,000 miles.

    Hooray for blinky lights that get people to spend money at the dealer!

    -- Terry

  64. Re:Will it have hidden commands like the R2D2 robo by ColaMan · · Score: 2

    Don't laugh about it - one of GMH's vehicles (with an automatic transimission), if you do a sequence like "Ign on - select 1st - Ign off - select Drive - Ign on" it will default to a particular transmission mode that you can't get by pressing any of the knobs or buttons in the car.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  65. Watch out! "check engine" light can fail emissions by odin1122 · · Score: 1
    I had a friend who got screwed over by the State of Arizona who has decided to base their emissions testing for 96 or newer vehicles entirely on the car's computer.

    His "check engine" light had been on for quite a while. He had taken it to a mechanic to see what the problem was when it first came on. The mechanic said that code was for evaporative and the reason was that the gas cap wasn't on tight enough. Well, he cranked the gas cap tight from then on, but the light came right back on.

    He didn't give it anymore thought since he was tired of paying the mechanic $100 to "scan the codes". That is, until it came time for emissions inspection. My advice now, don't go to the emissions place if your "check engine" light is on, there is NO WAY you will pass, that's exactly what the tech's there told him. Anyway, disconnecting the battery for an hour or so clears the codes (at least for this car), so after he did that, he took the car back; rejected again, "sensor's aren't ready".

    To make a long story short(er), a few trips to the mechanic and emissions place later, he's passed and has a new evaporative "switch" (parts $17, labor $40). This, of course, is after several $100 "diagnostic" fees.

    So, watch out, some states have decided that they'd rather not test which cars are actually polluting beyond the regs, they'd rather screw over people whose cars are in spec.

    ====
    TopoFusion GPS Mapping software featuring trail networks.

  66. Not quite what you think.... by boshi · · Score: 1

    A few things to know.... These codes being released will not allow you to be able to program your car, you're not gonna have a GNUHonda, it's just gonna allow you to see what the problems are. It also does not mean that youre gonna be able to just go to a webpage and download a program and just be able to work on your car in your garage. what it does mean is still great though. take the Porsche Boxter for example, normally when one comes into the shop you need the Porsche diagnostic tool to be able to reset the computer, which costs $14,000 and only works on a specific model. The availability of these codes means that other companies will be making these tools, so instead of paying Porsche $14,000 you would pay Snap-On around $1,000-3.000.

    --
    Blog
  67. Re:We already had access to the diagnostic codes.. by swschrad · · Score: 2, Informative

    uhhh, what you get with a commercial tool is almost always the international standard codes, occasionally manufacturer-specific drivetrain codes. with very few ($2000 and up range) exceptions do you get the "chassis codes" for traction enhancement controls, transmission/engine crosstalk codes, and so on.

    you still are not going to get them free, but they will be availiable in updates some day before we all die to professional test readers.

    presumably this will also include the equivalent to the "mode 4" international code for the wacko ones. "mode 4" is also known as "reset," turns out the $$$ light on the dash.

    wanna check out scanners, including build-your-own, try

    http://www.batauto.com/technical/scaninfo.shtml

    and for code lists for specific cars, try

    http://www.batauto.com/technical/

    and click what you want. as usual, you get what you pay for, no deposit no return, use at your own risk, etc. etc.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  68. NOT NECESSARILY Re:Next to Useless by swschrad · · Score: 1

    you also need the diagnostic trees for the particular auto system(s) that you are trying to fix. you see issues, you pull codes, you work down the diagnostic tree from the factory manual, alldata, whatever... try a couple other tests as prompted by the tree... and > THEN as if by magic, you get down to one or two parts, adjustments, or lame excuses to lay on the customer that solve the particular issue.

    if you can't hear, if you can't see, if you are colorblind and chasing wiring, you have some handicaps in the way of fixing a car. same for not having the diag codes from the modules.

    none of this has anything to do with reverse-engineering the real-time process code in any of the modules, or using the airbag controller as a circumvention device so you can play DVDs over the heads-up display. it is the equivalent of self-diagnosing system outputs like S.M.A.R.T on hard disks.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  69. You folks just aren�t getting this by judoMan · · Score: 2, Informative
    There is an awful lot of ignorance in this thread. Check what the domestic and import manufacturers' actually agreed to (from http://www.asashop.org/legis/agreement.htm):
    Automobile manufacturers hereby commit to make available, by August 31, 2003, emission and non-emission-related service information, training information, and diagnostic tools in the same manner and to the same extent as specified by California Air Resources Board (CARB) regulations for emission-related systems and components. This means that 1) the same service and training information related to vehicle repair will be made available to independent repair shops either via the Internet, or in the same manner and extent as it is made available to franchised dealerships and 2) the same diagnostic tools related to vehicle repair that are made available to the franchised dealers will be made available to the independent repair shops. These will be made available at a reasonable price consistent with the guidelines provided in CARB regulations. The service and training information and manufacturer tools will be available to independent repair shops without the need for them to return to a franchised dealership (to the extent allowed by law).

    Do you understand? This is huge. Huge, huge. This is indeed the "opening" of the closed information source. It's as if MS agreed to open *all* proprietary informational resources (private KBs, training, diag tools, etc.) that were previously used only by their premier tech support reps.

    Now will most mechanics avail themselves of this? Heck no. Most don't know or care how to truly troubleshoot; there are easier ways to flag hours that don't involve trying to convince a skeptical customer that you're not ripping them off.

    But to those who love troubleshooting, this is manna from heaven. Take codes for example. An earlier poster said they were useless. If all you had was the description of the code, that's a correct statement.

    However, if you also knew the exact criteria the PCM needed to see before throwing a code (this knowledge will be one of the takeaways from this act), you could then use your understanding of the proprietary system (a second takeaway) to straightforwardly troubleshoot and fix it.

    Make sense? This is a hallmark day for savvy techs (or rather, August 31, 2003 will be <grin>).

    Cheers,
    -jm

  70. Re:Will it have hidden commands like the R2D2 robo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent!

    What do you have to do to make it fly, then? :-)

  71. Old news no? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2
    On Dodge Neons, turn the ignition key on/off on/off on/off (don't engage the starter), and it will flash a diagnotic code on that idiot "Check Engine" LED. Most Chilton-type books list the codes for each car.

    That Check Engine light was the most annoying thing! When was it lighted, I'd never know if it was signaling 30 seconds to warp-core breach or just a glitched oxygen sensor aft of the catalytic converter. The damned "owner's manual" was pretty vague about it, like "Check Engine: Check Engine". Garages can plug into a port, get it in text, then make "expensive engine repair" noises.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  72. Re:We already had access to the diagnostic codes.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, this is an OBDII compliant product, it can be modified, and with other software work with any OBDII vehicle aka damn near anything, including your subaru outback :)

  73. but do they thell you... by danalien · · Score: 1

    ... where you could go and download those codes? *hum*

    --
    I don't claim I know more than I know, and if you know you know more than I know, then by all means, let me know.
  74. Scan TOOL by robofunk · · Score: 1

    http://www.obd2.com/ Check 'em out...

  75. How to put out engine fire by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Just thought I'd drop this line, because most people *don't* know how to put out an engine fire.

    That includes firemen.

    I sold my car a while back, and then about a year later, heard that it had burned. The new owner had taken a church group to a ski resort, and then noticed the engine was burning. He put water on it, and it didn't help. So he called the fire department. They used up all their portable fire extinguishers... no good. It just kept relighting, because the engine was so hot. Eventually the car burned to a crisp.

    My *brother*, on the other hand, did successfully put out an engine fire once. It was a car pulled over at the side of the road, and he packed mud on the engine. The mud smothered the flames, and kept the oxygen away until the engine had cooled.

    Anyhow, chipping or due to an oil leak (the most common cause *I* know of), there is a way to put those things out.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  76. Not so fast by dgenr8 · · Score: 1

    I sure hope the backers of the Motor Vehicle Right to Repair Act are not giving up the drive to get that legislation passed just because of a few crumbs thrown by the automakers.

    As several in this thread have pointed out, the diagnostic codes are already available. What made this proposed legislation a leap forward is that it mandated in very general terms that the automakers had to empower independent repair shops to fix cars as well as their own dealerships, by whatever means necessary.

    Frightened with the prospect of losing their share of the lucrative service business, they are trying to nip this populist movement in the bud.

  77. But they'll still end up going to the dealer by shlybluz · · Score: 1

    How many independents and shade-tree mechanics are really going to understand what those diagnostic codes mean? It really doesn't matter if the codes are released; they'll still end up coming to the dealers for many reasons, most because having the codes didn't help them fix the problem. Certain parts are still only available through the dealers - air bags, ECMs, BCMs, etc.

    Frankly, I see this as a double edged sword for dealers. On the one hand they'll lose business to the independents, but on the other hand if the indpendents screw up the owners will end up coming back to the dealers. And they still have to come to dealers for certain parts; which is fine by me because it means more money in my pocket every month. (yes, I work for a dealer, but we're not too concerned about the code release).

  78. Whats the difference? by hpavc · · Score: 1

    how does this differ from the pccable used in DashPC. Where he takes a B. Roadman's ODBII serial interface and gathers information about his car?

    Or does this suppliment with other amazing codes? Such as access to the odometer in some fashion (i think the only code i am missing on my car) that my dash displays but i cannot.

    --
    members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
  79. OBD-II (Interface Specification) by wodelltech · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about USB. Currently, there is a common protocol (OBD-II) for interfacing to the on-board computer; however there are at least 4 different phyical interfaces (Europe + Japan use ISO; GM, Ford, Chrysler each have their own). All cars built in the mid-90's or later have an OBD-II interface; look in your glove box, under your stearing column, some other accessable location.

    --
    Your monitor is staring at you.
  80. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    "I am convinced that the manufacturers of carpet odor removing powder
    have included encapsulated time released cat urine in their products.
    This technology must be what prevented its distribution during my mom's
    reign. My carpet smells like piss, and I don't have a cat. Better go
    buy some more."
    -- timw@zeb.USWest.COM

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...