Slashdot Mirror


What Does The Internet Look Like?

scubacuda writes "What does the Internet have to do with the network of sexual partners? More than you think, according to this Economist article on Albert-Laslo Barabasi's attempt to 'present a general framework for improving the accuracy of Internet models' by treating the net 'as though it were a natural phenomenom.' Dr. Barabasi's findings that the Internet is 'scale free' has a lot of interesting implications: resistance to human failures, as well as vulnerability to malicious attacks. Dr. Barabasi's goal is to create models that are 'statistically indistinguishable from the real Internet. When and if that is achieved, the models should have predictive, as well as descriptive, power.' (BBC and News Factor had stories on his work earlier)"

124 comments

  1. Uh huh by Myriad · · Score: 4, Funny
    What does the Internet have to do with the network of sexual partners?...present a general framework for improving the accuracy of Internet models' by treating the net 'as though it were a natural phenomenom.'

    Uh huh.. I think we all know just what kind of 'Internet models' he's referring to! *wink wink* *nudge nudge*

    I wonder which site, err section of the net, was his favorite?

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
  2. bad research by Raiford · · Score: 5, Funny
    "That observation may have implications beyond the virtual world. Research has shown that the network of human sexual partners seems to be scale-free, too. In other words, some people have all the luck, while others have none."

    This person calls himself a scientist. It's not luck. He obviously overlooks the power of a good pick-up line

    --
    "player 4 hit player 1 with 0 stroms"
    1. Re:bad research by joyoflinux · · Score: 1

      Pickup line from 2025: "Hey baby, let's do it like the internet"

    2. Re:bad research by fymidos · · Score: 1

      Actually since internet is based on a client-server model, all the relevant experiments should be carried out in amsterdams' red light district, where the power of a "good pick-up line" would range from, let's say $50 "pounds" to, let's say again, $1000 ...

      --
      Washington bullets will simply be known as the "Bulle
    3. Re:bad research by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 3, Funny

      I've talked to a lot of girls about this, and 9 times out of 10 pick up lines work against you. Girls can smell a canned line like a fart in a car. Even if its not a huge cliche, girls know that you've used the same line on 5 girls in the same bar. That makes them not feel special. If a girl doesn't feel special, then it's no time for love, Dr. Jones. The best thing to do is sit down next to a girl who is just about done with her drink. Say hi, tell her your name, and spend the next minute making sure there isn't something obviously horribly wrong with her. Then order a drink for yourself (chug whatever you had and ditch it before walking over...the little extra liquid courage can't hurt) and order another of whatever she's drinking for her. If you feel the need to use a "line", make it original and make it funny. If all else fails, try "I love those shoes". She has to have cool shoes on and she's going to think you're gay for a minute, but girls love it when guys notice thier shoes, become most of them are just staring at their boobs. Once you start talking to her, ask open ended questions and LISTEN to what she says. And always be polite. Ok, that's all I've got. Use this advice at your own risk, my geeky brethren. Good luck.

      -B

    4. Re:bad research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and confidence, good looks, MONEY, etc. He's not a scientist. He's a slut from some gay hippie free sex commune.

      So what part of the above post is flamebait? I guess the truth hurts more than moderators would like.

    5. Re:bad research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the only problem is the "confidence" bit -- women would rather have men that they can manipulate and control. the rest of it is right on target, except maybe failing to mention "fast car" perhaps. but i suppose if you've got "money" you've got a neat set of wheels anyway.

    6. Re:bad research by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't buy drinks for girls. Never. Unless she frenches you or gives you a BJ first.

  3. Topology of the internet by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hopefully it's starting to look at lot more like this.

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    1. Re:Topology of the internet by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's not the internet, that's Pacman on LSD.

      Get it right dude.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
  4. network of sexual partners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geeks have a difficult enought time trying to get laid just once. Who has a network of them? Is this like a Beowulf cluster?

    1. Re:network of sexual partners? by equiraptor · · Score: 2, Funny

      1. Have great idea.
      2. Start company.
      3. ??????
      4. Profit!
      5. Network of sexual partners!!!!!!!

  5. Consider this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What does the Internet have to do with the network of sexual partners?

    If the internet had anything to do with the sexual partners of the slashdot crowd it wouldn't be much of a network, just a collection of standalone PCs.

    1. Re:Consider this: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're just envious of our massive hard drives.

    2. Re:Consider this: by Chicks_Hate_Me · · Score: 1

      At least I don't have to worry about getting a virus :p

    3. Re:Consider this: by Chicks_Hate_Me · · Score: 1

      ...unless some sticks a floppy into me...

  6. Better links ... by jetlag11235 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The linked article is very weak. His homepage is here:
    nd.edu/~alb/

    The specific article is here:

    nd.edu/~networks/PDF/NatureImmunol%202002.pdf

    Hopefully Notre Dame can handle the traffic.

    -- jetlag --

    1. Re:Better links ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (warning: karma whoring ahea ... .oh, wait. I'm an AC, nevermind)

      for those who prefer clicky links, and the use of www:
      www.nd.edu/~alb/
      www.nd.edu/~networks/PDF/NatureImmunol%202002.pdf

  7. Huh? by Flakeloaf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Amd what, exactly, is a phenomenom? If peogle can't be brothered to spell-check their posts, I cam't be botnered to read thek.

    --

    Am I the only one who heard Roxette to sing "I'm gonna get blitzed for some sex"?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called a typo, dumbo!

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "OMG!!11 i call someone fag, i am touh countrystrike gamer111!!11"

  8. Sexual Partners? On Slashdot? by Jouster · · Score: 5, Funny
    Wow, now it makes sense:

    1. Geeks use Internet, which is like sex.
    2. Geeks don't get sex, because they play on the Internet all day.


    3. And I thought it was because I was ugly....

      Jouster
  9. well, it looks like this: by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Funny

    [PC]
    |
    ["The Internet"]
    |
    |
    [porn]

    See? It's simple. Why the need to do this? The people that get it, get it. Those that don't, probably don't need to, and you sure don't want to try to explain it to them.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:well, it looks like this: by garcia · · Score: 2

      too complicated.

      Here it is simplified:

      [PC] -> [porn]

      It's a direct connection for most of us.

    2. Re:well, it looks like this: by jukal · · Score: 2
      > too complicated.
      > Here it is simplified:
      > [PC] -> [porn]

      Evolution tends simplify things until they cannot be simplified: { [porn] }

    3. Re:well, it looks like this: by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1
      [PC] -> [porn]

      Don't you mean [porn] -> [PC], or do you work on the production side?

      Also, I think that either way would be an indirect connection and that the rate of indirect connection would be inversely proportional to the rate of direct connection.

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health.
  10. hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your website sucks.

    the fact that you have to troll for hits is just pathetic.

    you don't see slashdotters on your site saying "visit slashdot.org!"

    you know why?

    because you suck balls.

    1. Re:hi by alphaparadigm · · Score: 1

      http://www.ablabla.org/modules.php?name=News&file= article&sid=121&mode=&order=0&thol d=0

      --
      -=The Dude=-
  11. Good cover by Valiss · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a slick way of talking about 'net pr0n. I mean, come on with all this new-age jargon of how the 'net is a natural thing, "Just like you and me, baby." =]

    --

    -Valiss
  12. THE NET IS LIKE A NETWORK OF SEXUAL PARTNERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why cmdrTaco is always over at Cowboyneel's house helping him add that "backdoor" to his "network".

  13. Mud? by joyoflinux · · Score: 1

    Well, according to this article, the internet is becoming all muddy..:(

  14. self-loop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot has a link to itself (when you click on their logo). What does that mean in terms of the network of sexual partners?

  15. Looks like... by ekephart · · Score: 1
    --
    sig
    1. Re:Looks like... by kingofnopants · · Score: 1

      yep, that looks pretty sexual alright.

      --
      Disco Stu was talkin' to you.
  16. 2 Books about networks by tyrani · · Score: 3, Informative

    First, "Where Wizards Stay up Late: The Origins of the Internet" gives you a great history lesson on the internet from pre ARPA to the present.
    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0387 08214X/qid=1033932106/sr=1-9/ref=sr_1_9/104-182014 6-7795912?v=glance

    Next, "Network models in population biology" talks about how networks form in nature.
    http://www.chapters.indigo.ca/item.asp?Catalog=Boo ks&Section=Books&Cat=&Lang=en&Item=978068483267&ms cssid=P4HKP76V6GCX8PR0DCK0FETJ22CQAAC9&WSID=1510D0 DFF8E2AF7C45148DDDD366042124C41706

    It's interesting to read the above articles keeping these books in mind because of the clear picture we can gain from nature.

    --
    rejected (19) accepted (0)
    Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
    1. Re:2 Books about networks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it your Visa card number I see in the Amazon URL? ;-)

      Usefull info stops at 038708214X (Amazon Standard Identification Number (ASIN)).

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/03 87 08214X is enough. And if you play with HTML (<a href="...">blabla<a>) , you get "Network models in population biology" by Edwin R. Lewis.

  17. So this means that . . . by IndependentVik · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the Internet is like a network of sexual partners, then a slashdotting must be like the most unmerciful gangbang ever.

    --
    I'd suggest you don't use Slashdot as your only news source, or you will suffer permanent brain damage.
  18. Re:Sexual Partners? On Slashdot? by SaturnTim · · Score: 1

    You think the internet is like sex?

    You really need to get out more.

    --T

    --
    http://www.theMediaBunker.com
  19. The secret is out by dknj · · Score: 1

    I guess he found the Sex Chart (http://www.attrition.org/hosted/sexchart/sexchart .9.30)

    -dk

    1. Re:The secret is out by ces · · Score: 2

      That does look a bit like a network map.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  20. Barabasi was interviewed on Radio 4 by wackybrit · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recorded a bit of it. Enjoy. It's about 200k mp3.

    http://www.boog.co.uk/media/barabasiinterview.mp3

    1. Re:Barabasi was interviewed on Radio 4 by Zerakith · · Score: 1

      MP3... keep your voice down.. they might be listening...

  21. Networks and models by pieterh · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This research is very interesting because it applies to much more than the Internet. Many natural systems have the same type of topology, i.e. self-similar scale-free organisation. There is a whole science of self-organising critical systems (try googling for ZIPF'S LAW).


    What interests me is how such models apply to human networks. The article mentions sexual relationships, and implies that effort in combating AIDS should be targetted at key individuals, not randomly throughout the population. This draws a parallel with the Internet, which is (the article says) resistant to random failure but vulnerable to targetted attacks.


    Consider the implications for other kinds of human networks if this theory is true. E.g. to fight crime, it does not pay to incarcerate minor felons. One has to take out the most important 'hubs', being the bosses.


    This may seem obvious, but I find it ironic that we are using knowledge taken from modeling one of our creations (the Internet) to understand ourselves.

    1. Re:Networks and models by ninthwave · · Score: 1

      My thought on this I can't quite articulate the best I can say is in The Hitch Hikers Guide to the Galaxy when the mice were researching humans. They learned about humans by the tests humans ran on them to learn more about themselves. Models have a psychology to them that explain about the individual or culture of the individual designing them. So the parallel between disease spreading in humans and the structure of the net. The question from this is; is the internet mimicking human social organisations because it is a human social organisation?

      There will always be parallels in the two. The model is focussing on threat based responses but what about growth and discovery or self control. In human social organisation the biggest combat of std's was change of behaviour, so in another human social organisation the internet the combat against computer viruses is change of behaviour.

      Sex education to stop stds
      Computer education to stop computer viruses

      Face it focusing on key routers will probably stop the current viral model but what will the next viral payload do or look like and how will it take this into account.

      --
      I was thinking of the immortal words of Socrates, who said: "I drank what?" - Chris Knight (Val Kilmer)- Real Genius
    2. Re:Networks and models by Saeger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      E.g. to fight crime, it does not pay to incarcerate minor felons. One has to take out the most important 'hubs', being the bosses.

      Sure, it makes sense to go after the higher-ups in a hierarchy, but there isn't much point in doing that when those hubs get replaced in notime flat.

      Take a drug kingpin down and there'll be more to take his place very soon after... just as there's millions of potential gnutella supernodes (superhubs) to replace the ones that dropoff (no, I'm not comparing drug dealers to p2p).

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    3. Re:Networks and models by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of the hub as the ISP instead. The ISP has the ultimate power to limit which packets traverse their routers. Best way to kill gnutella,and any network service in fact, is at the ISP megahub level. And thats how it will happen I think. Routers will have DRM in them wont let untrusted packets flow.

    4. Re:Networks and models by rodentia · · Score: 2

      . . . but I find it ironic that we are using knowledge taken from modeling one of our creations (the Internet) to understand ourselves.

      Ironic? Isn't rather the most natural thing in the world? A terrific and largely unexamined consequence of the technical revolutions of the last century is the distortion and exaggeration of the commonly accepted, but false, dichotomy between synthetic and natural systems. The concept is a legacy of Aristotelian categories and its undertow makes itself felt throughout Western philosophy.

      What are we if not natural?

      --
      illegitimii non ingravare
    5. Re:Networks and models by billd · · Score: 1
      ... just as there's millions of potential gnutella supernodes

      (no, I'm not comparing drug dealers to p2p).

      Well, yes you are. At least the topology

      --

      -----

      For great justice!

  22. scale-free, wtf? by jukal · · Score: 2
    Studies using random graphs had shown that changing the software on more and more machines had a cumulative effect. That is not true in a scale-free setting. There, most software changes make no difference to the rate at which a virus spreads (although they obviously protect the machines in question). However, treating a relatively small number of hubs in a scale-free system can stamp viruses out completely.

    What phenomena did this columnist exactly try to explain? I quess there must be some sense in this. But it does not ehmm.. really open to me. Does he want to stay that the spreading of viruses could be stopped by fixing the aortas (of the net)... or something else.

    1. Re:scale-free, wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's complete BS, as most viruses I've heard of (Code Red, Nimda, Ramen, Slapper) affect servers, not routers. I suppose you could stop a dumb portscan, but then you might get a KaZaA v2 style problem: smart worms working around the router blocks.

  23. What every man wants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wife's network of sexual partners: One level deep - me

    Man's network of sexual partners: 75,000 levels deep, all female (including partners of partners)

    Net porn makes this possible.

  24. Simple by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 3, Funny
    What does the Internet have to do with the network of sexual partners?

    Both are good ways to spread a virus.

    --
    Sigs are bad for your health.
    1. Re:Simple by DriceX · · Score: 1

      Just don't use the whore of mail clients and you'll be okay.

    2. Re:Simple by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1
      Score:1, Redundant

      Yeah, yeah, I RTFA after I posted that. But on the plus side, I got it right. I should have put a bit more BS around my reply and then I could be published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and get lots of pretty research money.

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health.
  25. Genius or gunk? by dazdaz · · Score: 1

    It's original, let's apply Freud to the Internet and what do you get?

    1. Re:Genius or gunk? by Snork+Asaurus · · Score: 1
      let's apply Freud to the Internet and what do you get?

      Lots of nice research money.

      --
      Sigs are bad for your health.
  26. I know it was meant as a joke, but... by Oswald · · Score: 1
    Research has shown that the network of human sexual partners seems to be scale-free, too. In other words, some people have all the luck, while others have none.

    ...is probably not too insightful. The really big numbers (in terms of sex partners) are put up by prostitutes, who may not feel lucky to be doing what they're doing.

  27. What does the Internet have to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...with the network of sexual partners?

    Well, it seems that for a lot of people, the Internet is their sexual partner... :-)

  28. The backbone of sex by Jhan · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, could anyone give me a few examples of the people who are the backbones of sex? I'd sure like to bone them right back, since they obviously handle a large percentage of all sex in the world.

    Even if they won't be boned by me, maybe they could carry my requests to distant parts of the world to someone who might?

    --

    I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    1. Re:The backbone of sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are many whores in Amsterdam. Why don't you schedule a holiday trip and catch a trendy disease.

    2. Re:The backbone of sex by Matthaeus · · Score: 3, Funny

      So, is it coincidence that one of the major routers on the 'net is named MAE WEST? Or did somebody come up with this a long time ago and leave the inside joke for others to get years later? Sounds like an Andy Kauffman job to me...

    3. Re:The backbone of sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MAE = Metropolitan Area Exchange
      MAE-East, MAE-Central, MAE-West

      That MAE-West is said the same as Mae West is an amusing coincidence, but I don't imagine it was an allusion to the actress.

    4. Re:The backbone of sex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Mae West joke on slashdot.

      YUO ARE ALL TEH FAGS.

    5. Re:The backbone of sex by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      Gives new meaning to the term "peering point."

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    6. Re:The backbone of sex by ces · · Score: 2

      I don't have any links, but I remember this coming up on nanog about 1996 or so. Somone who worked for MFS at the time the MAE were named claimed the names MAE-EAST and MAE-WEST were intentional puns.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
    7. Re:The backbone of sex by burns210 · · Score: 1
      So, could anyone give me a few examples of the people who are the backbones of sex?

      pimps?

  29. indeed by Trepidity · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Hey baby, you know research has shown that the network of human sexual partners seems to be scale-free."

    1. Re:indeed by cheese_wallet · · Score: 1

      "Hey baby, I want to wrap your legs around my head and wear you like a feed-bag"

    2. Re:indeed by schussat · · Score: 2
      You're suggesting that does does not really matter?


      -schussat

      --
      The hour of noon has passed. Let us go and get some Kentucky Fried Chicken.
  30. Salmon by BobbinsOriginal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It'd better not be bloody pink.

    --
    -- Bobbins
  31. Fallacy by tr0tsky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If he's serious, it's a pretty major logical blunder. Properties shared by two things (e.g., that the internet and some metaphor/model for the internet) do *NOT* imply the identity of those things, and certainly shouldn't be used as a justification for taking some particular action toward one thing or the other.

    This is the same logic employed by tyrants and dictators (and bad scientists).

    1. Re:Fallacy by joib · · Score: 2

      The concept of universality has been an important concept in statistical physics for at least a few decades now.

      And yes, scale-free networks are also a hot topic in statistical physics today. The point is, scale-free networks are characterized by common properties, just as universality classes are. So if you come to the conclusion that both the internet and human sexual networks are both scale-free, then e.g. attacks on certain types of nodes will have the same kind of effect.

      I see no fallacy here.

    2. Re:Fallacy by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Properties shared by two things (e.g., that the internet and some metaphor/model for the internet) do *NOT* imply the identity of those things,

      While you have to be aware, always, of the limits of your model, and while you must never lose sight of the fact that it is only a model(*), it's ridiculous to say that you can never derive prescriptive action from studying a model. It's done every day. Recent example: Our weather models sayd Hurrican Iggy is going to have a landfall at such-and-such a time and near this point. People living near the point get ready, by battening down or evacuating or whatever. Or are you saying you'd ignore the evacuation order because it's "only a model" of how the atmosphere reacts?
      (*) Insert obligatory "Monty Python and the Quest for the Holy Grail" line here.
  32. Even better links ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.nd.edu/~alb/

    www.nd.edu/~networks/PDF/NatureImmunol%202002.pd f

  33. Even better better links ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.nd.edu/~alb/

    http://www.nd.edu/~networks/PDF/NatureImmunol%20 20 02.pdf

  34. Re:Sexual Partners? On Slashdot? by Drunken+Coward · · Score: 1

    Maybe you're just going to the wrong web sites?

    Slashdot is definitely not like sex.

    --
    Have you been stalked by Seth today?
  35. Re:Sexual Partners? On Slashdot? by Jouster · · Score: 0
  36. Nobody has posted a link to the IRC Sex Chart? by httpamphibio.us · · Score: 1

    Weird... I thought somebody would have done it by now... I've had sex with two people on it, yet my name isn't there. That's ok by me. :)

    --
    sig.
    1. Re:Nobody has posted a link to the IRC Sex Chart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.attrition.org/hosted/sexchart/

      is that okay, or do you want a specific version directly linked?

    2. Re:Nobody has posted a link to the IRC Sex Chart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoops, sorry about that.

      www.attrition.org/hosted/sexchart/

      there.... is that okay now?

  37. What the internet does look like? by __past__ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, it's mostly white with green with black text, also some parts of it have a grey background. Around it is a black border which on top contains a light-blue ad from Microsoft Small Business Solutions. Oh, and if you've been nice, it contains that neat moderation boxes.

  38. Re:Sexual Partners? On Slashdot? by WhiteKnight07 · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if that's funny or if that's a troll. If I had mod points my head would explode.

    --


    We're going to make information free Mr. Anderson, whether you like it, or not.
  39. looks like a data sharing infrastructure to me. . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The internet looks like a good way
    to share data, but not a good way
    to send private data.

  40. www.fastseduction.com by xtal · · Score: 2

    Yes, it'll work for you, too. You'd be amazed what dressing well, maintaining some personal grooming, a big smile (think someone mailed you a new TiBook smile), and an enthusiastic "hi" will get you.

    Steve

    --
    ..don't panic
  41. Yeah, but what about... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2
    Until 1999, the standard way of modelling the Internet was to use randomly generated graphs, in which routers were represented by points and the links between them by lines. But it turns out that such random graphs are a poor approximation because they miss two important features. The first is that links in the net are "preferentially attached": a router that has many links to it is likely to attract still more links; one that does not, will not. The second is that the Internet has more clusters of connected points than random graphs do. These two properties give the Internet a topology that is scale-free--in other words, small bits of it, when suitably magnified, resemble the whole.

    You know that Net traffic doubles every three months, so you're confident that this will work, for all Half the world's poulation still hasn't made a phone call?
    --
    Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    1. Re:Yeah, but what about... by pangloss · · Score: 5, Informative
      Half the world's poulation still hasn't made a phone call
      The current issue of Wired refutes this statistic.
    2. Re:Yeah, but what about... by smittyoneeach · · Score: 2

      Both of those links were to bogus factoids. IP traffic doubling every tree months was part of MCI/WorldCom's Irrational ExEbbersance Program, by which we are all currently Bernied, don't you know?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    3. Re:Yeah, but what about... by pmenoud · · Score: 1

      The current issue of Wired refutes [wired.com] this statistic.

      It does refute it, it just turns around it, without a single direct computation. And not even accouting the replacement of landlines by mobile phones, or the office lines, used by the same persons who already have a phone at home.

      2,300% is huge, except when you start with nearly 0.

      And the "if we assume original guess of half was right in 1994 (a big if)" takes 1/2 as the starting point, although it might have been higher, like "3/5 of the world hasn't made a call"... Just that "half" is easier to say.
  42. The tipping point talks about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you've read The Tipping Point , you'll know this already. Malcom Gladwell talks about the spread of epidemics (including syphilis), and how making sure just a select group of carriers are not infected, the overall spread can be dramatically reduced.

    He also applies these ideas to the spread of new ideas and fashions - eg how a particular style of shoes become popular, just by making sure the primary trendsetters are wearing them.

    Its an excellent book!

  43. By process of elimination... by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "from the and-what-does-it-taste-like dept."

    It tastes like grape-aid.

  44. Re:Sexual Partners? On Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, I am not certain if it's funny or a troll.

    Jouster
    (posting anonymously to lessen the pain)

  45. What does the Internet look like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Does it look like a bitch?

    ~~~

  46. Vapour Warez by Quirk · · Score: 1

    The following speaks best to what it is: "When and if that is achieved, the models should have predictive, as well as descriptive, power."
    When and if are very big words in forecasting ;)

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  47. Re:Better links ...best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Notre Dame's Physics Dept. has a link to his book on this, as well as to a number of other papers on the subject of scale-free networks:
    http://www.nd.edu/~networks/index.html



    Chapter 1 of the book is up online (be ready to zoom):http://www.nd.edu/~networks/linked/newfile3. htm

  48. Waste of a story. by grub · · Score: 3, Funny


    I could summarize the net in one sentence:

    "You are in a maze of twisty tunnels, all alike"


    There, the internet.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  49. What about this by Adam9 · · Score: 2

    Peacock Maps makes some good maps such as this one. I first found out about it at ThinkGeek and later bought two for one at home and ine my dorm. Too bad they don't have a 2002 poster yet.

  50. scale-free? by commodoresloat · · Score: 3, Funny

    my sexual partner better be free of scales!

  51. Bathroom scales? by phorm · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Actually, sexual activity is a really good way to burn energy/calories/etc. People with a really cranked sex drive can get in shape from their bedroom activities.

    I suppose it's a trend. Sex=possible weight-loss,muscle gain=better looking partner=more sex

    So people with a lot of sexual output probably will be happily surprised when next stepping on the ol' bathroom scale.

    Next time you want to pick somebody up, just tell them:
    Do you know that strong sexual activity is a great way to get in shape? How about you and I do some workouts together - phorm

    1. Re:Bathroom scales? by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      (Conscious of the fact that we're getting more and more offtopic...)

      Most people don't have nearly enough sex to be able to burn any signifigant amount of calories from it. Vigorous sexual activity burns around 6 to 7 calories per minute, but most people aren't doing pelvic thrusts continuously for a half hour to an hour.

      And if you are, regularly... dude, don't you have a problem with chafing?

  52. All these Funny posts, and still missing one... by Cutriss · · Score: 3, Funny

    So...erm...how many of these hosts have their interfaces set to "Promiscuous"?

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
  53. Al Gore invented the Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Al Gore created the Internet (he said so himself, and who is he to lie?), you'd guess that the Internet should look like him: stiff, robotic, and given to facilitating campaign-finance related crimes.

  54. Look at this Internet model! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the site for all your trolling needs. Follow this link and free your mind! Hurry on over to:


    ablabla

    Oh, and CmdrTaco rapes his hand

  55. Obligatory link to the Internet Sex Chart by clohman · · Score: 1
  56. From the /. homepage, an answer by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    What does the internet look like?

    "High-Speed Data Transfer Over ... Mud"

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  57. Mona Lisa Overdrive by jeko · · Score: 1

    "And in that, Slick Henry, I'll see the shape."

    Suffering whiplash from seeing a Gibson story become a real-live Slashdot post.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  58. Wilt the Stilt by sporkboy · · Score: 1

    boasted of 10000 plus partners

  59. book on this subject by the author by sporkboy · · Score: 1

    Linked: the new science of networks is the full length version of this article, and presents some interesting if somewhat superficial coverage of scale-free networks in computers, nature, and society. I found it to be a worthwhile read.

    amazon product page

  60. We know what it sounds like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we have to believe the tv, the Internet sounds like a modem screeching...

    So it will probably look like a strangled pig.

  61. Some wikis are also 'scale free' by xof · · Score: 1

    Look at SeattleWireless' HowDoesThisWikiLookLike there are few pages with a lot of references to or from other pages, and many pages with few references. It seems to follow a 'power law' too(~ 'scale free').

    So, the 'inside' of the web seems to follow the same rules. It is particulary interresting with wikis because of the unplanned, distributed growth (like the Internet).

    As the belgian provider, where the pictures are, seems to be down. You can also see the pictures in ReseauCitoyen.be's TopologieDuWiki

    I thing it would be a good idea to have a discussion on /. on the Wiki phenomenon (sites everybody can contribute to, like WikiPedia.com ( more than 95,000 pages!).

    I know of only one book on the subject : "The Wiki Way: Collaboration and Sharing on the Internet" by Bo Leuf, Ward Cunningham (of c2.com, creator of the Wiki concept).

    If you search Google for 'RecentChanges' (a good marker for wikis (?)), you get a lot of them, more and more (A survey by country domain sept->oct 2002)

    There are some scientific papers at GaTech.edu

  62. Similar research on instant messaging networks by FlashBoltzmann · · Score: 1

    Similar research has been done on the structure of instant messaging networks. The possible applications to slowing virulent IM worms was also discussed.

    http://www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0206378

  63. read his book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    read the book Linked - very good - and you'll understand what the correlation between networks and sex exists

  64. Re:Sexual Partners? On Slashdot? by euxneks · · Score: 1

    It should be more like:
    Geeks use the internet a lot, which is like sex
    Therefore Geeks are SEX gods, and attractive to every woman

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  65. Big fluffy and pink by ScaryDeath · · Score: 0

    Well, I thought it was big, fluffy, and pink, with 18 legs and 4 eyes :) Who knows?

  66. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    When you are about to do an objective and scientific piece of investigation
    of a topic, it is well to gave the answer firmly in hand, so that you can
    proceed forthrightly, without being deflected or swayed, directly to the goal.
    -- Amrom Katz

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...