Slashdot Mirror


Lego Segway

Jeff Lalo writes "This Guy has built a Lego version of Dean Kamens Segway Human Transporter. This thing was constructed using only Legos, two cheap (~$40) custom sensors and some smart programing using the open source BrickOS for the Lego RCX. The LegWay, as the creator calls it, can balance itself on two wheels and follow a line. Pretty cool for few lego blocks!"

259 comments

  1. Ahh, the joys of Lego. by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, if they could only make a Lego Lobbyist for Open Source down in Washington. Seems like the Lego AI would be a whole lot smarter than any politician we have in there at present...

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
  2. Not as cool as... by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...that working gun that one guy made.

    Url, anyone? I sadly never bookmarked it (shame on me). It'll be good for me, good for your karma, good for everyone.

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
    1. Re:Not as cool as... by Defender2000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I don't know if you were thinking of this one, but this guy made an MP5 and a Beretta out of Legos. Awesome stuff.

      --
      ...I'll procrastinate tomorrow...
    2. Re:Not as cool as... by clifforch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Posting here to cancel the accidental offtopic mod.

      How lethal was the gun. Was it covered by any arms regs?

      Cliff

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA the hot grits profit you!
    3. Re:Not as cool as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dang, slashdotted off the map already! Awe nuts! :(

    4. Re:Not as cool as... by tunabomber · · Score: 5, Funny

      Judging by the indirect slashdotting, I'm also deducing that he built his web server out of legos. Apache for LegOS, anyone?

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    5. Re:Not as cool as... by diesel_jackass · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      how easy would it be to get one of those through customs/airports?

      Can you make the bullets out of legos too? Would lego plastic even show up on an xray?

    6. Re:Not as cool as... by President+Chimp+Toe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I think the british army are thinking about using these as a replacement for the SA-80

    7. Re:Not as cool as... by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      It's hosted on Geocities, and Slashdot is VERY stupid to post a link to a Geocities account, knowing full well they are limited to under 5MB per hour.

      Regards, Guspaz.

    8. Re:Not as cool as... by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

      Since no one is buying your "Geek Transport" which is really cool by the way, you should try to build some kind of segway out of that.

    9. Re:Not as cool as... by diesel_jackass · · Score: 2

      at $1500 it's only half the price of a segway too! (just how many segways can go 90mph (drag/cargo limited) ?) how could you go wrong? anyone up for a project?

    10. Re:Not as cool as... by schon · · Score: 2

      Url, anyone? I sadly never bookmarked it (shame on me).

      I did bookmark it, this is what I have:
      http://www.silverlight.org/Cray/lego/machinegun.as p

      Although the server isn't sending the correct MIME type...

    11. Re:Not as cool as... by lostchicken · · Score: 2

      Yeah, because Slashdot would never post a link to a site that might not be available for very long...

      --
      -twb
  3. Re:Yet... by MattCohn.com · · Score: 2, Informative

    Once again back on topic, I've heard about simmiler projects, the first one that comes to mind is the guy who made a copy machine out of legos here. (He now works for them.) Has anyone else seen any other insanly cool projects?

  4. Counter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Intermaresting. Counter was at 880. Lets see what it'll be in an hour.

    1. Re:Counter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3252

      one AM eastern standard time

  5. Boredom by mao+che+minh · · Score: 3, Funny

    Only intense boredom could drive one to undertake such an endeavor. Before I started using Linux, and before I got into IT, my system (Windows 95) went down with some VXD BSOD and would not boot. I was a web junkie (IRC, Ultima Online, pr0n), and without my poison, my fix, I develop a state of boredom that I have not reached sine. I found my nephew's enormous Lego collection and built myself a big PC, complete with monitor and keyboard, in the two days it took for my pal to get around to reinstalling Windows for me.

  6. First post?, and he's prepared for slashdotting by OzPixel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Looks like someone gave the guy pre-warning, his page only has links to some mirrors, e.g. Here or here or even here .

    1. Re:First post?, and he's prepared for slashdotting by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 1

      Its a good thing he didn't make this controllable via the web. I could just see the Legos melting now. A very cool toy though. Much props to him, He should think about subbmiting this in any Lego building event.

    2. Re:First post?, and he's prepared for slashdotting by intermodal · · Score: 2

      and meanwhile everyone clicks all three of those links and they all become simultaneously slashdotted! yay! i mean, awww....

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  7. Re:Because it will get /.ed [formatted] by SimplexO · · Score: 4, Informative

    Steve's Leg-Way
    This LEGO robot was built to stand on two wheels and balance, follow a black line, and/or spin in place.
    LegWay Program
    The program for LegWay was written in BrickOS (LegOS) and uses EOPDs to maintain a constant distance to the ground. As the distance decreases, LegWay moves forward. As the distance increases, LegWay moves backward.

    Every 50 ms, LegWay attempts to re-calculate the balance point by measuring the current distance and motor speed.
    To move forward (for line following) LegWay actually sets the motors to run backward, causing a tilt, which it automaticly corrects, by moving forward. When one sensor is over the line, it stops that motor, and LegWay balances using only the other motor, causing it to turn.

    To spin in place, both motors are shifted "off center" in opposite directions, the same amount, but they still correct for tilting.

    In the pictures, you may notice the second sensor is disconnected. The main LegWay program will follow a line if two sensors are attached (always moving forward) or attempt to stand still, if only one sensor is attached.

    If the motors are set at full power (either direction) for more than 1 second, LegWay assumes it has fallen over and the program ends.
    LegWay EOPD SENSORS
    LegWay uses two EOPDs (Electro-Optical Proximity Detector) from HiTechnic Sensors to balance and detect lines.

    The EOPDs are based on the IRPD (Infrared Proximity Detector) circuit, but use visible light to determine distance by checking the detector, sending a pulse of light, and checking the detector again to calculate the amount of light reflected. The value returned will change based on the distance to an object AND the color of the object. IRPDs can be used in place of the EOPDs, but they will not work as well for detecting/following lines ** I'm told these sensors will cost the same as the IRPD sensors, and will be available in a couple weeks (November 1)

    For this application, a small change in the value will usually indicate a change in the distance to the surface, while a large change will represent a change in the surface color (white to black) The EOPDs usually do not return a usable distance to a black surface, because the light is absorbed.
    LegWay VIDEOS
    Here are a couple videos, and some more pictures. The videos were taken with my LEGO Vision Command camera, so they're not really the best quality. I don't know my bandwidth limit, so if the videos don't work, try back later.

    Brickshelf Pictures
    LegWay Following a Line
    LegWay Spinning This video really doesn't show how fast it's going. The motors are at full speed (almost) and in this video, it doesn't change direction.
    Legway Building instructions
    LegWay Past
    I attempted to build LegWay using an accelerometer to detect tilt, but soon realized the acceleration due to gravity would not change as the robot tilts, because the robot is accelerating at 9.8 ft/sec?(physics was a long time ago). So the reading will be zero, until it smashes into the floor.

    Several people have said they tried (without success) to build something like this with standard LEGO light sensors, but I don't believe they have the resolution required. (not even close)
    LegWay Future
    My next project will be to make LegWay work with a remote control. I have a couple ideas, which include using a SpyBot remote to drive LegWay around, or use a regular LEGO remote to run some pre-programmed moves.

    Another idea is to make LegWay stand up (from a lying position) on it's own. It can't do that right now, because the center of mass is below the axle when it on it's side.
    Thanks for checking it out. Feel free to tell me what you think.
    Steve
    e-mail:hassenplug@mail.com

  8. Smart man... by MoThugz · · Score: 5, Informative

    I don't know how he got the impression that he's going to get some major slashdotting... but the list of mirrors is a good idea.

    Anyway... IF the Geocities mirror list get's slashdotted, here are the list of mirrors:

    http://perso.freelug.org/legway/LegWay.html
    http://legway.armorica.biz
    http://home1.gte.net/res1g289/StevesLegWay.htm

    1. Re:Smart man... by RevAaron · · Score: 2

      Why wouldn't he get a major slashdotting? After all, the link posted was to Geocities, where you get your bandwidth maxed out purty quick.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    2. Re:Smart man... by cymen · · Score: 1

      The original poster was pointing out that it was interesting that the page author _knew_ he was going to get slashdoted and thus was prepared with mirrors. Unlike most stories where the one existance of a page has to be mirrored by groovy /.'ites.

      I wonder if the story submitter tipped the page author off or something. Or maybe the submitter is really the page author hiding behind a hotmail account. Who cares...

    3. Re:Smart man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, the submitter is not the page author. I just hoped my page would be popular. Steve

    4. Re:Smart man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why doesn't slashdot ever give sites a warning that they're going to get slashdotted?

  9. wait by fredopalus · · Score: 0

    Did this guy set up mirrors because he knew he was going to get slashdotted?

    --
    Jonahweb.com has stuff.
    1. Re:wait by dotgod · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah...he knew that the server he made out of Legos would be no match for a good ol' slashdotting.

  10. F5 on His Page by Nintendork · · Score: 0, Troll

    Whoa! A Slashdotting counter!!!!

  11. And I can't get up!!! by djupedal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Another idea is to make LegWay stand up (from a lying position) on it's own. It can't do that right now, because the center of mass is below the axle when it on it's side."

    Until or unless it's articulated, this will always be true. Segway can't right itself from this position either...?

    1. Re:And I can't get up!!! by tzanger · · Score: 2

      Until or unless it's articulated, this will always be true. Segway can't right itself from this position either...?

      Can't you lock the axles so that when you engage the motors the rotors stop and the stator moves?

    2. Re:And I can't get up!!! by djupedal · · Score: 2

      This assumes both wheels have firm contact...not so when laying on it's side....front or back, maybe.

    3. Re:And I can't get up!!! by utahjazz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Another idea is to make LegWay stand up (from a lying position) on it's own. It can't do that right now, because the center of mass is below the axle when it on it's side."

      IANAPH, but I think it is possible.

      It might seem that because the center of mass is below the axles, that you could not lift the chassis by taking off in one direction, then reversing.

      But, if the wheels are big enough, the angular momentum built up could do it.

      You could even do it without lateral movement. Imagine this:

      Segway thingy is lying down:
      O--

      Segway thingy pops up a little kickstand:
      Q--

      Segway thingy starts whirring its wheels counter-clockwise:
      Q-- (imagine the whirring part)

      Segway thingy reverses it's engine, causing the -- part to react and rotate counter-clockwise.
      |
      |
      Q

      Drop the kickstand (quickly), and off you go..

      -These are not the sig your looking for...

      Se
      Imagine a little

    4. Re:And I can't get up!!! by Hater's+Leaving,+The · · Score: 1

      Can't the thing do wheelies? Sheesh, the kids round here pull wheelies on their crappy 35cc scooters. Build a better one with more torque.

      THL.

      --
      Keeping /. cynic density high since the fscking Kwhores/trolls arrived.
  12. Sad But True by nsample · · Score: 5, Funny



    I give him about 2 days before being slapped with a lawsuit for patent infringement. And then Lego towns all across the Midwest will pass laws preventing them from riding on sidewalks (at the behest of Ford, GM, and Daimler-Chrysler).

  13. $40?!?!?! by jchawk · · Score: 2, Troll

    $40 maybe for the needed senors, but the RCX brick (the big ass thing everything is connected to / and what controls it), is at least $120. You're actually better of just buying the whole Lego Mindstorms set and getting a whole bunch of other sensors, parts, etc. . . For $195 online.

    1. Re:$40?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're actually better of just buying the whole Lego Mindstorms set and getting a whole bunch of other sensors, parts, etc. . . For $195 online.

      eBay, baby. Much cheaper than the retail.

    2. Re:$40?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had to buy the sensors seperately, because the standard Mindstorms sensors don't have a high enough resolution.

    3. Re:$40?!?!?! by elmegil · · Score: 1

      You don't get the right kind of sensors with the standard kit. And nobody said you didn't have to pay for your Mindstorms kit....

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  14. Oops. by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 1

    Now Dean is going to scoot round and slap down this; the patent on Lego.

  15. wow by fredopalus · · Score: 0

    i guess geocities can't handle all this traffic

    --
    Jonahweb.com has stuff.
  16. A geocities link? by gvonk · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you serious? You put a link to a Geocities site on the front page of Slashdot during primetime?

    SLASHDOT.

    FRONT PAGE.

    Hahahahahahahahaha!
    Seriously. I bet no more than 150 people got to actually see that site.

    --


    El Karma: excelente(principalmente la suma de moderación hecha a los comentarios de los usuarios)
    1. Re:A geocities link? by djupedal · · Score: 2, Informative

      You lost that bet. It hit just under 1600 before it caved.

    2. Re:A geocities link? by SimplexO · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I saw it at 1624. :P

    3. Re:A geocities link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, that was 150 people refreshing the page going, "WOW! Genious! He has a Slashdot counter! I wonder if it works!" *refresh page again* I know I would! :-)

    4. Re:A geocities link? by dollargonzo · · Score: 2

      yeah, but he was a smart geocities linker :-)

      --
      BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    5. Re:A geocities link? by dirvish · · Score: 1

      I put up a joke web site on Geocities one time and it went down just from the traffic in my office. There were maybe 20 or 30 people viewing it but Geocitie's bandwidth restriction is so low that it was unavailable.

    6. Re:A geocities link? by Nohbdy001 · · Score: 1

      Watch the site get slashdoted in real time! If you refresh the page multiple times you can observe the counter increasing at about 5 hits/sec.

      Hmm, or a million other geeks are all observing the same phenomena.

    7. Re:A geocities link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not a million, just four other geeks :)

  17. Better in a few ways... by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    i can actually get one of these :\

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  18. It's too bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that the fact that it was built using MindStorm© parts means that it costs almost as much as a real SegWay. =[

  19. Just what we need by HackHackBoom · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lego Segway accidents on the freeways, Lego gridlock (sounds like a product?:P), Lego getaway cars...

    And I thought I was proud of my lego castle greyskull all those years ago!

    --


    "It's not stealing if you don't get caught!"

    1. Re:Just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And I thought I was proud of my lego castle greyskull all those years ago!

      You thought you were proud? Well, were you proud or weren't you?

    2. Re:Just what we need by evilviper · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just wait until you have a fender-bender, and you need help pulling the two apart...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  20. Cool! He used OS software by hbmartin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This guy used BrickOS (which is on sourceforge) to build it. Maybe when I get a few extra bucks I'll buy those Lego Mindstorms, they are quite expensive.

    --
    Karma: Bizzare (mostly affected by varying internal caffeine levels.)
  21. Re:Why do you need a web link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is no ordinary toy gun. This is also what I was talking about.

  22. This will of course get slashdotted. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Things like this aren't breaking news. No harm whatsoever would come from denying the slashdot community knowledge of a site like this for a week while permission to set up a mirror is requested from the site owner. Things that are breaking news are usually hosted on news servers which can withstand a slashdotting.

    One has to wonder why the editors don't start delaying stories like this for a week while they get permission to set up a mirror. Perhaps it's because they don't want to pay for the bandwidth for all of those images and movie files either.

    Slashdot: Taking the best internet sites offline since 1999 (or whenever it was).

  23. ouch... by Tregod · · Score: 1

    25 comments and already slashdoted to death...

  24. Mirror by i22y · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check it out here...he just went over his data transfer on Yahoo =P.

    --
    Mike
  25. I killed the page by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just opened the page and it worked. Then I refreshed it and it went to the bandwidth exceeded notice. The counter was at about 1500.

  26. Takes a licking.... by SmoothOperator · · Score: 2, Funny

    ....keeps on ticking.... oh wait, that's the Timex slogan, not Geocities...

    --

    Veni, vidi, vici.

  27. The Mother of All Slashdottings!! by jeffy124 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    From the link:
    Sorry, this site is temporarily unavailable!
    The web site you are trying to access has exceeded its allocated data transfer. Visit our help area for more information.

    Access to this site will be restored within an hour. Please try again later.

    --
    The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
  28. Impossible by Trusty+Penfold · · Score: 0, Insightful

    using only Legos, two cheap (~$40) custom sensors

    Two sensors? For an object to maneuver itself in 3D space it would need 3 sensors. 2 sensors is only sufficient to maneuver an object around in 2D space - this Lego toy will not be able to handle bumps or slopes.

    1. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, it only has one access of rotation, and rotation is all its concerned with. the sensors dont return an absolute value either, just a vague mease of the change from one reading to the next.

    2. Re:Impossible by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2

      Bullshit. It only operates in 2D it ain't going to fly.

    3. Re:Impossible by AbyssDragon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not so.. there are plenty of devices able to move themselves around in 3D space autonomously, with only two sensors.
      In fact, I think there are about six billion of 'em... and you're one of them.

    4. Re:Impossible by elmegil · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's ludicrous. A bump or a slope is just a distortion of the 2D surface that the wheels are riding along. It doesn't CLAIM to navigate 3D space anyway. (And the video of it following a line is pretty impressive).

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    5. Re:Impossible by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Two sensors? For an object to maneuver itself in 3D space it would need 3 sensors

      Counter-proof: You only have 2 eyes, yet you can.

    6. Re:Impossible by goofy183 · · Score: 1

      True, but he made no claims of the LegWay being able to manuever in 3-space. The demo videos are quite impressive. It have very good control of it's movement in two dimensions. I don't imagine it would be too terribly difficult for him to add a third sensor and the code to handle inclines. Some kind of sensor to check for level based off gravity should be sufficient to adjust for an incline/decline.

    7. Re:Impossible by buck_wild · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A hill is still two-dimensional. It's just an extension of the current plane. So the only limitation really...is gravity.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
    8. Re:Impossible by billd · · Score: 2, Funny
      and rotation is all its concerned with

      Might as well correct "it's" as well while you're at it.

      --

      -----

      For great justice!

    9. Re:Impossible by Igmuth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really? You actually think you can navigate with just your two eyes? Well come and vist me and I'll disable/remove your entire inner ear and then we'll see how well you navigate.
      Or for a less destructive method just try walking around with you eyes close and notice that you actually don't need them to move. They do help on collision advoidance but beyond that they are basically useless.

    10. Re:Impossible by NorthWoodsman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seeing how it is designed to operate in the XZ plane (much like most everything else, save for insects, birds, and CowboyNeal), I don't really see how it would need to maneuver itself in 3D space. Unless it has a Lego Jetpack...

      --
      1p}{ 1 sp34k |33+ +|-|e|\| p30p13 \/\/il| 8e i/\/\pr3553|)
    11. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It actually only needs one sensor. The second allows it to follow the line.

      Steve Hassenplug

    12. Re:Impossible by hatchet · · Score: 1

      Humans have 3 sensors. You should recheck human ear anathomy.

    13. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, but you still only have 2 (inner) ears, so still 2 sensors. he just named the wrong ones for balance :)

    14. Re:Impossible by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      The inner ear has three semicircular canals that each detect movement for each of the three different dimensions. This is required for you to be able to properly balance.

    15. Re:Impossible by CharlieO · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You actually think you can navigate with just your two eyes?

      Yes, and I can prove it.

      I sail with a friend who's inner ears were damaged by an ear infection in childhood, leaving him with no inate sense of balance. So his entire balance is now done visually.

      Does it slow him up? Well he's my dads age, is an ex British Olympic Fin Class sailor, and is now blue water cruising and is an Ocean Yachmaster / Instructor.

      I guess if you can cope with the heaving deck of a yacht, you can cope with anything.

      The advantage of course is that motion sickness is generally caused by a conflict of 'ear' balance and 'visual' balance (for want of better terms) so he doesn't get seasick. Thats the only way I actually found out, when I mentioned in conversation that he never got sick in rough seas, you'd never ever be able to tell otherwise.

      Actually the reason you get motion sickness, and those panaromic cinemas fool you into thinking you are on a roller coaster is because your eyes are very important to navigation and balance.

      Of course having the two systems (ear/visual) is a very good idea evolutionary, because one compensates for the weakness in the other.

      But knowing that a blind colleuge of mine doesn't fall over in a heap, and my sailing companion doesn't either, I think I can justify in saying humans can operate with only one system perfectly well

    16. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 eyes each capable of taking a two dimensional measurement. I doubt the sensors in the legway take measurements of two dimesnsions. Anyway your head moves so you can point the sensors in different directions

    17. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So no-one's ever been able to control anything using remote control with only visual feedback?

      And I assume noone's ever played Doom/Quake/any-FPS either.

    18. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only uses one sensor for balancing anyway. But it
      does have a problem if the topography changes on a resolution that's finer that the width of the axle. It correct for the surface under the sensor not under the wheels, which would cause it to fail if it rode over a lego brick for example.

    19. Re:Impossible by Suidae · · Score: 2

      My grandfather is in the same boat (sorry, couldn't resist), but he only has one eye (WWII injuries). He says that the pressure on the bottom of his feet is also important to his sense of balance.

    20. Re:Impossible by f97tosc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Two sensors? For an object to maneuver itself in 3D space it would need 3 sensors

      Before we draw too many conclusions we must ask what type of sensor we are dealing with. If it is a sophisticated radar, then perhaps one is sufficient. If it is a proximity sensor, that only gives you the distance of the closest object directly ahead, then numerous sensors are preferable. And, if it is something more like a camera with processing equipment then (as uncountable other posts have pointed out) 2 sensors will do, as can be seen on almost all animals on the planet.

      Tor

    21. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're forgetting a 'sensor' at each joint of the leg as well. Ever tried walking while your leg was completely numb from the thigh down? It's an interesting experience, because you can't tell whether your knee is locked or not, so if you aren't *extremely* careful, you'll put your foot down, lift your other foot, and fall on your ass.

    22. Re:Impossible by Gen.+Malaise · · Score: 1

      I built a Lego JetPack once... It only worked once before turning into a molten pile of plastic.

    23. Re:Impossible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Umm, most of us have 6 sensory devices in our heads that allow us to process light, sound, taste, and smell. We also have innumerable pressure sensors in our skin. Ever try walking with numb legs? Hard, eh?

    24. Re:Impossible by rnd() · · Score: 2

      this could to a large extent to handled in the software, especially with the addition of a third sensor to add more data.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

    25. Re:Impossible by buck_wild · · Score: 1

      Ok, gravity *and* traction. But I digress.

      --
      If all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
  29. now that's ambitious... by v8interceptor · · Score: 3, Funny

    posting a geocities url on slashdot. previewing the site would've sucked up half it's bandwidth alone...

    --
    --- Why are you wearing that stupid bunny suit? | Why are you wearing that stupid man suit?
  30. On Purpose by pyman · · Score: 1, Funny
    It's almost as if slashdot editors post links to small sites on purpose, knowing full well they will be slashdotted in seconds...

    Slashdotted with extreme prejudice.

    Hmmmm....

    --
    a ^= b; b ^= a; a ^= b;
  31. 8 inches tall? by Rader · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Was I the only one expecting to see a life-sized segway? I thought this guy was riding around in one!

    1. Re:8 inches tall? by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      yeah, a little disapointing, but legos aren't really sturdy enough to ride around on ::waits for re:penis jokes to your subject::

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:8 inches tall? by mtec · · Score: 1

      Yep, now the Weebles can get around.

      --
      Cake or Death? Cake Please!
    3. Re:8 inches tall? by dankjones · · Score: 1

      Theoretically, a taller one would be EASIER to balance onna counta that whole pendulum length frequency thing.

    4. Re:8 inches tall? by Myco · · Score: 2

      I dunno... did you see that lego harpsichord a few weeks back? That's a fair bit of tension -- of course, he did a harpsichord rather than a piano because there's no way legos could take *that* much abuse.

    5. Re:8 inches tall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was I the only one expecting to see a life-sized segway? (Score:5, Insightful)

      Only on slashdot that could be called "insightfull", everywhere else in the world the idea of a life size vehicle of any sort build from these tiny blocks would be called ludicrus, not on slashdot here where are used to only the highest standards of hacks. "So you say that your entire hovercraft is build with paperclips, except for the laser weapon? no fronpage for you!"

    6. Re:8 inches tall? by Rader · · Score: 2

      Yea, Score:5 Insightful is surprising. Maybe it really qualifies Score:5 "Me-Too"

  32. Geek Grammar by jdub! · · Score: 1, Informative

    The plural of 'lego' is in fact, 'lego'. Thank you.

    1. Re:Geek Grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lego is a name, not a common noun. So is the plural of Joe Joe?

    2. Re:Geek Grammar by spinlocked · · Score: 1

      You're quite right, but they won't learn, you know.

      The very next Lego related story will contain the word 'Legos' - just to annoy you and I. Then again, I stopped caring about Lego at about the age of 13, when I noticed that I fancied girls...

      --
      # init 5
      Connection closed.


      Oh... ...bugger.
    3. Re:Geek Grammar by Greebz · · Score: 1


      Indeed.

      But the world is full of idiots who refuse to learn.

    4. Re:Geek Grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The very next Lego related story will contain the word 'Legos' - just to annoy you and I.

      umm... that would be you and me, you broken grammar nazi you ;)

    5. Re:Geek Grammar by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      That's not possinble. The pedantically correct term is 'Lego Brick', therefore the only acceptable plural is 'Lego Bricks'.

    6. Re:Geek Grammar by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 1

      ummm... excuse me, but i play with *LEGOS*, but i dont play lego.
      bitch.
      -D

    7. Re:Geek Grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh. Since you think others refuse to learn, perhaps you would be willing to learn something yourself:

      Look up "descriptive" and "prescriptive" in your dictionary. Mull over it for a while. If you think only "Lego" is correct, you like telling others what to think. You are being prescriptive. Another word for that would be "anal."

      Lego is a legally protected marketing term.
      Legos is a word used by real people to describe a bunch of Lego-brand things, otherwise known as Lego bricks (strangely so, since often they do not resemble bricks at all).

      Lego, or Legos. Either one is correct. Get a life, and stay out of mine.

    8. Re:Geek Grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fuckin' tell'em man! it's LEGOS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Once and for all!

    9. Re:Geek Grammar by yelligsc · · Score: 1

      I understand it this way:

      Lego is a company.
      They make Blocks or Bricks.

      So the proper way to refer to a singular piece is
      "Lego Brick".

      Multiple pieces are "Lego Bricks".

      Scott.

    10. Re:Geek Grammar by Hassenplug · · Score: 1

      For the record, the web site NEVER uses the term Legos (but does use the term LegOS to refer to a programming language) I always say Lego Blocks/Bricks Steve

    11. Re:Geek Grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter what you think, no-one cares, but in any case you are wrong. You can't have "a lego", in the same way as you can't have "a rice". Do we say "rices"? No, and "legos" is wrong for the same reason. I'm not telling you what to think, I am just telling you that you are wrong. What you choose to do about it is completely up to you.

    12. Re:Geek Grammar by MooseGuy529 · · Score: 1

      Lego can be used to refer to a piece of one of the sets. A brick can be referred to as "a lego", and multiple ones are "legos." And no--if there are two people named Joe in a room, you can say there are "two Joes in the room."

      --

      Tired of free iPod sigs? Subscribe to my blacklist

    13. Re:Geek Grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can, however, have "a grain of rice."

      "A brick of Lego" just sounds dumb.

    14. Re:Geek Grammar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you say "A Lego brick."

  33. Oh sure, I find out NOW... by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    Cust. Service Dept.
    Amazon.com
    customerservice@amazon.com

    Dear Sir/Madam:

    I regret to inform you that I must cancel my current reservation for the Segway, currently listed at $7999.95 (US).

    I would like to place another order for the following items now:

    I trust that a credit to my account will be arranged.

    Thank you in advance for your prompt action in this matter.

    Sincerely,

    Saint Aardvark the Carpeted

    1. Re:Oh sure, I find out NOW... by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Funny

      they're always outa flux capacitors at radio shack, i call and they say they'll be getting some in in about two weeks, but they never come

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    2. Re:Oh sure, I find out NOW... by shrikel · · Score: 4, Informative
      Three MindStorms Lego Robot Kits [amazon.com], version 2.0, at $24.95 each

      ?!?!???!?!

      They're actually $200 each.

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    3. Re:Oh sure, I find out NOW... by blair1q · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're going to need an Oscillation Overthruster.

      My buddy John can get one for you.

    4. Re:Oh sure, I find out NOW... by D4M4DH477X0R · · Score: 1

      Yeah, i can never seem to find one either. Maybe they are hording them?

    5. Re:Oh sure, I find out NOW... by a_n_d_e_r_s · · Score: 5, Funny

      Am i the only one wondering how one can build a Segway for $50 when a copy of "How To Build a Segway Human Transporter for only Fifty Dollars" costs $69.95 ?

      --
      Just saying it like it are.
    6. Re:Oh sure, I find out NOW... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, they keep getting huge shipments of them here in 1955. Now if we could only figure out what they're for...

    7. Re:Oh sure, I find out NOW... by Kredal · · Score: 1

      Never buy fuses from Radio Shack, either. Every single one I've ever bought there has had a short in it. Talk about poor quality control!

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    8. Re:Oh sure, I find out NOW... by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      I was lucky enough to get an oldtime salesman who showed me how to wire two 605 MW caps in parallel.

    9. Re:Oh sure, I find out NOW... by jonnyelectron · · Score: 1

      This comment is so wonderfully obscure it would make Dennis Miller proud!

      --John Big Booty

      --
      It is not worth an intelligent man's time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do th
  34. Geocities links by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It would be a useful addition to Slashcode to autoreject any posts containing links to a user-configurable set of sites, and tell the user why his story was rejected.

    geocities *always* hits data limits.

    1. Re:Geocities links by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2
      It would be a useful addition to Slashcode to autoreject any posts containing links to a user-configurable set of sites, and tell the user why his story was rejected.

      It would also be useful if, after hitting "preview", the article's links were examined against previous articles. Therefore a warning message could be displayed telling them that there are previously published articles with similar URL's (with links to said articles as well).

      This may go some way to reducing the vast number of repeated submissions that we get.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  35. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  36. That's good work by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm impressed. I've worked on control of legged running, and a friend built a self-balancing unicycle in the 1980s. This new thing is the simplest self-balancer I've ever seen, and it does a good job. The video shows that it's quite stable.

  37. MP5 is a gun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh so *that's* why Fraunhofer called the successor of MP3 "mp3pro" and not MP4, MP5...

  38. 0ne ?access? of rotation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the word you're groping for and missed was axis .

  39. What about a Cluster of these! by OverlordQ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey, put alot of these together and it could haul a person!

    It'd be like a Beowulf Cluster!

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  40. Dude by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all saw the message thank you. You know, when it's a lego segway story people *do* actually click the link.

  41. IT is truly revolutionary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see entire Lego cities being built around IT! IT will help clean up the smog in third world Legos. On a scale of one to 10 -- one being mundane and 10 being revolutionary -- I would rank IT in the high Legos. IT is almost as big as Lego fusion would have been. IT will sweep over the world and change lives, cities, and ways of putting together plastic bricks!

  42. He's a wise man by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always have a mirror with me. People used to say I was vain, so I explained I just carry it in case I get slashdotted... now they say I'm insane.

    RMN
    ~~~

  43. segway vs. legway by dollargonzo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    obviously, both the lego and the original versions do pretty much the same thing. however, legway cannot guarantee that you do not fall. the segway, OTOH, pretty much does. it has to work with much higher precision sensors and much shorter update intervals. balancing on two wheels was never really difficult, it is basic robotics. making it practical and safe, however, is quite another story

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    1. Re:segway vs. legway by photon317 · · Score: 0, Flamebait


      BSD is for leftover hippies that never liked AT&T, Linux is for free-thinking modern unix fans.

      --
      11*43+456^2
    2. Re:segway vs. legway by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Funny, the only video I've seen of the segway involves a guy falling off it (it was linked to boingboing.net a while ago). You can cram it all you like with gyroscopes and the best software to predict what a person might be doing and how to correct it and still get crummy results. This is one of the many reasons the segway will be an industrial only toy. Its far cheaper to use a working inner-ear mixed with simple but effective technology like a bicycle or a scooter to fulfill urban transportation needs. I wouldn't be surprised to see if the learning curve to ride the segway properly is somewhere around learning to ride a bike properly.

      The segway is a great gee-whiz high-tech toy, but that doesn't necessarily make it practical for more than a couple different applications and it certainly isn't the fix-all DeKa would have the public believe.

    3. Re:segway vs. legway by cymen · · Score: 1

      Pepsi is for the new generation, Coke is for the classic folk.

      Arizona is for the old folks. Texas is for the fat cattle.

      When circled, crop planes, flight path delayed.

      Scrappled butter with spamified egg root is deadly.

      Sense is lost.

      On. /.

    4. Re:segway vs. legway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      BSD is for leftover hippies ...

      Well shit, better upgrade to it from Linux then

    5. Re:segway vs. legway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're also both going to have pretty much the same effect on how everybody gets around.

    6. Re:segway vs. legway by photon317 · · Score: 2


      Thanks again to the insightful moderators of Slashdot for making this killer moderation decision. My comment, rated as Flamebait and knocked down two points, is just the opposite of the parent post's sig line. If this is a one-time flamebait, then his every post is a flamebait with that sig - yet he doesn't get modded for it? Enquiring minds want to know :)

      --
      11*43+456^2
    7. Re:segway vs. legway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having ridden on one (segway, not legway), I will attest to the amazing ease of learning it has. I was up and going within the first minute, and it probably would've been about 10 seconds if I hadn't been so damn giddy about the whole thing. It kicks so much ass.

  44. Re:Because it will get /.ed by chainsaw_alligator · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's so smart. Split a vital post into two parts and get double the karma!

  45. Interesting OT: Segway is not IT by mypalmike · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From a NYT article:

    "Robert Metcalfe, the co-inventor of the Ethernet office networking standard, who is a friend of Mr. Kamen, told me via e- mail: 'Some months ago when speculation was running high, I said that Kamen's It was more important than the Internet, but not as important as cold fusion, had cold fusion worked out. The It I was talking about, which I did not disclose, was NOT Segway. That's all I can say.'"

    --
    There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    1. Re:Interesting OT: Segway is not IT by lux55 · · Score: 1

      Any guesses as to what it could be then?

    2. Re:Interesting OT: Segway is not IT by evilviper · · Score: 2

      The segway ISN'T more important than the internet? OMG! I can't believe it!

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Interesting OT: Segway is not IT by Suidae · · Score: 2

      Hmm, kind of makes one wonder about the name. Segway. Perhaps its a leader for something truely revolutionary?

    4. Re:Interesting OT: Segway is not IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The segway ISN'T more important than the internet? OMG! I can't believe it!


      Duh. You can't get pron on a Segway... can you??

    5. Re:Interesting OT: Segway is not IT by evilviper · · Score: 2
      You can't get pron on a Segway... can you??

      No, but you can get *TO* pr0n on a segway... What's more, it can even take you to INTERACTIVE pr0n.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Interesting OT: Segway is not IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at 12+ mph

  46. *chuckle* by Cyno01 · · Score: 1

    if only i had mod points, simply hilarious

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  47. arrrg by rupert2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    +10 points for lego segway -20 points for not shelling out $4-5 bucks a month for a halfway decent webhost

  48. Impressive but can you do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back when I was in 2nd year Uni, We had to do a similar thing. However we had to make it follow figure 8 line instead of just a track. The obvious problem here is how to make the robot cross the middle section of the figure 8. Most robots made in my year simply went bizerk when the got the cross over, started spinning, just left the track or stopped. This is an interesting problem I never found a solution to. Anyone got any idea's? Of course the materials available were only 2 optical sensors 2 motors and a bunch of lego. Anyone except this challange?

    1. Re:Impressive but can you do this? by vinsci · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Buffer the optical sensor readings, then use the buffer as a look ahead for detecting the crossing. Presumably a processor and some memory was also part of your robot materials list...

      --

      Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
    2. Re:Impressive but can you do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nice try but, the rules dont inlcude changing the track. You have a figure 8 track you can't change it. The assignment was to program the robot to follow the black line, without changing the track.

      The robot should be able to navigate its environment not have the envionment change to suit the robot.

      We did try placing the censors front to back as you suggested however what happens is the robot simply just goes round and round one half of the figure 8.

      Anyone else wanna have a stab at this one?

    3. Re:Impressive but can you do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Again nice try.


      We did try this approch as well. It is very difficult to use a buffer as the robot needs to react immeditaly to any line it incounters.


      You make the incorrect assumption that the robots censors will inclunter the cross over line at exactly the same time. Because a figure 8 is always curving, the robot will be at an angle to the cross over, thus only one of it censors will usually incounter the line first.

    4. Re:Impressive but can you do this? by vinsci · · Score: 2
      A buffer implies storing more than one sensor readings. It is obvious that you need to store enough readings to have the far end of the crossing in the buffer together with the near end.

      You can buy yourself time to react by moving the sensors forward. You need to do this anyway to compensate for the amount of distance/time represented in the buffer readings and the time needed for making decisions.

      --

      Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
    5. Re:Impressive but can you do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Believe me, we tried all of this. There are problems/situations that arrise that even placing the sensors further forward and buffering can't solve.

      For examaple.(This is hard without a diagram)

      your robot is approching the intersection in the middle of the figure 8. The first censor passes over the crossing but your robot does not respond because it is waiting say .5 seconds (this vary depending on speed) to see if the other censor crosses a line. If it does the robot continues on with no problem.


      However, What happens when the robot starts to go round a curve, the first censor crosses the line, the robot is waiting for the second line.... Nothing!!! so the robot turns. Everything is fine up until now. What happens now... the robots second censor is now triggered by the line it has turned into but it doens't do anything because it is check for a crossing. Because the line it is travelling around is curved and the robot doesnt turn the first censor encounters the same line as the second censor picked up a moment ago.... ahh but the robot thinks this is a crossing because we got two censor readings. So the robot continues off over the line and is lost forever.

    6. Re:Impressive but can you do this? by vinsci · · Score: 2
      When you're turning, take that into account when you cross lines. Track you position and turning by dead reckoning - i.e. integrate the distance that each wheel travels.

      Keep your sensors over the edge of the line rather than outside or inside, so that you can compensate sooner for a turn. When you're on track you'll have both sensors "gray". If one of your sensors goes "white" while the other goes "black" you need to turn. If one sensor goes "black" while the other stays "gray", or both go "black" you're approaching a crossover - keep on going on the same heading. You need to test out suitable treshold levels of course. You might even be able to do this without buffering, but it'll be a smoother ride with buffering as you can avoid overcompensating.

      Uh, is this you school assignment? In that case you must either immediately disregard any hints on how to solve this or give full credit. :-)

      --

      Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
    7. Re:Impressive but can you do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Your a fast thinker. I took me a couple of days to come up with the ideas you have in the space of a couple of hours.


      However, i also tried keeping the censors on the line instead of either side. This would work fine most of the time, but because the approch to the cross over is at an angle, the robot would often get confused becuase even the censors were both black and the robot moved forward it actually needed to be turning.


      That aside this was the solution i ended up using but the robot went stupid during the demo. I actually got quite a good mark beacuse everyone elses did a lot worse than mine.


      No ones was perfect though.

      No this isn't my assignment, it was two years ago, wish i new about slashdot then :o)

    8. Re:Impressive but can you do this? by vinsci · · Score: 2
      Was the robot zigzaging across the straight line before the crossing? I guess that would be one source of trouble, as it might be leaving the track on the other side just because it was zigging or zagging as it entered the crossing area. With a buffered bot, it ought to be possible to avoid zigzaging, stay on a relatively straight heading and thus avoid leaving the track while crossing.

      For turning, extend the dead reckoning code to also keep track of the rate of turning. Then you can also handle the situation where a crossing shows up in the middle of a turn, by continuing to turn at the same rate while crossing.

      Next, it needs a web interface, an OGG player, cam and a robotic arm to turn on the coffee machine, and... oh wait, that would be the ER1 from Evolution Robotics. I'm not sure if it can turn on the coffee machine, but it can deliver your pizza and hunt down people!

      --

      Trusted Computing FAQ | Free Dawit Isaak!
    9. Re:Impressive but can you do this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YEAH, ANONYMOUS COWARD, WHATEVER.... so, make it disregard any path greater than the width of the line it is following.

  49. To the /. editors by VFVTHUNTER · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could one of you lil' PERL monkies do us all a favor?

    In the article submissions form, put a little check box titled "Slashdot can mirror locally" or some other phraseology.

    Then provide the original link like you normally would, but on the last line where it says "Read More | XX of YY comments" add another link that says "Slashdot Article Mirror"

    1. Re:To the /. editors by ParisTG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except that it's not the submitter who is the one that can give the permission. It's the site's owner.

    2. Re:To the /. editors by lux55 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Could we instead check for the existence of a Google cached copy and link to that? Then there's no permission issue with the mirroring, at least with us because we're not doing the mirroring. :)

    3. Re:To the /. editors by gleam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      why not set up something like google's cache? they don't seem to need permission to archive previous copies of websites. Nor does anyone seem to be threatening to sue www.archive.org.

      Perhaps make the "cache" portion of the submission perl script check robots.txt, so site admins can forbid slashdot to archive an article..

      -gleam

      --
      this .sig is not a .sig.
    4. Re:To the /. editors by MikeBabcock · · Score: 2

      Or take the effort to actually find the Google cache entry for the page in question and point to that.

      Whenever archive.org picks it up, it will be at:
      http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://http://ww w.geo cities.com/stevehassenplug/LegWay.html for what its worth.

      And Google should eventually have info at:
      http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe =UTF- 8&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.geocities.com%2Fstevehassenpl ug&meta=

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  50. How is this offtopic? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    It relates directly to the link *in the article* to Geocities.

  51. Pretty picts and all but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you asked for a *working gun* and the page says "The trigger moves, but currently actuates no internal firing mechanism". Also the pictures are obviously fake (rendered).

  52. Meantime, from AARP... by Corporate+Drone · · Score: 5, Funny
    in other news, AARP met the creator of the Lego Segway as he was walking to work, carrying signs and protesting his creation.

    "Lego was meant for the rumpus room, not the sidewalk!", complained an unidentified senior.

    Another protested, "Hey! The sidewalks are already dangerous enough what with those dang newfangled bicycles! If you add Lego Segways, I could get killed!"

    Among the signs noted at the protest was one proclaiming, "Lego Segways at 11 MPH will injure me!"

    --
    mmm... yeah... You see, we're putting the cover sheets on all TPS reports now before they go out...
  53. no kickstand on segway by djupedal · · Score: 2

    A third leg, however minor, makes it a different device. Try again :)

    1. Re:no kickstand on segway by utahjazz · · Score: 2, Informative

      A third leg, however minor, makes it a different device. Try again :)

      You don't need the kickstand to make it work. You can either:

      a) Go in one direction, then reverse.

      or

      b) Design the device such that the wheels don't have clearance when it is horizontal. Looking at the pictures of the lego device, it appears to already be made this way.

      Nice reply. Try again :)

    2. Re:no kickstand on segway by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      a *third* leg? You mean a First leg dont you?

  54. someone has too much time on his hands by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this guy should walk across the street to meet his neighbors or something instead of wasting time on a fucking lego segway. Maybe he can power it with a potato fuel cell or something. Jeepers, that'd sure be neat-o!

  55. woooaa by dollargonzo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    don't give the credit to the creators for design here! the whole point was to show that the segway really isn't that complicated and a simplified version can be built by amateurs.

    --
    BSD is for people who love UNIX. Linux is for those who hate Microsoft.
    1. Re:woooaa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sigs are for people who don't have bumpers.

    2. Re:woooaa by p3d0 · · Score: 2

      I think you missed the point. He was saying that he has actually tried this kind of thing, and it's not easy. (Note that "simple" and "easy" are not the same thing. Sometimes it takes a lot of effort to make something simple enough to work.)

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    3. Re:woooaa by default+luser · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the problem is it's only good at one thing:

      Balancing while navigating flat terrain.

      Anything less than flat, and the distance sensor is going to be confused. It may overcorrect and send the thing tumbling. Really broken terrain, or areas with grass and plants, OR DENSE TRAFFIC would send this simple sensor crying home to momma.

      Ginger, on the other hand, uses a complex internal gyro system to determine which way is up, which means that no external interference is possible ( short of rigging gravity, and even then GINGER will always be right! ). The only way to make it tip over is to give it an external impulse that it's motors cannot respond to fast enough.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

  56. no, but if you sling a few bars by djupedal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Lower the water...don't raise the bridge.

    Wherever there is an intersection, replace the cross with a circle (diameter same or less than path-mark width), and program in a delay that allows the device to continue straight whenever it sees a circle, still looking for an unbroken path that will override the temporary step.

    Another method is to mount the sensors front to rear, scanning for the path itself (inside edge)...not left to right, looking for the outside edge of the path as the legway does.

  57. Cached? anyone? by McNeany · · Score: 1

    So whos got this cached and can fork over some bandwidth?

    -troll me out

    --
    I don't believe in sigs.
  58. Re:Not as cool as... a Playable Harpsichord! by johnpipe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's an artist who made a full-size playable Lego harpsichord (complete with an mp3 file).

  59. slow down by djupedal · · Score: 2

    You didn't pay attention Johnny. Please wait for the entire question before answering...legway's owner said that the problem is how to right it, if it falls on it's side....with the device on it's side, one wheel will be in the air.

    ===
    -| -
    ===

    Versus:
    |---|

    Read the article, then this thread, then take a breath and try again :)

    1. Re:slow down by utahjazz · · Score: 1

      Did read the article dude. The guy is trying to solve this problem:

      If the motors are set at full power (either direction) for more than 1 second, LegWay assumes it has fallen over and the program ends.

      Think about it. Then, think some more. Then don't reply.

    2. Re:slow down by GoRK · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All he needs to do is ensure that upon a sideways fall, it will roll to where a wheel has grip. Then, running the wheel at full power can flip it onto its back (or front) where it can right itself again using quick reflexes and a little angular momentum.

      The easy idea would be to place some sort of hemisphere on the outside rims of the wheels so that an unattached wheel would roll to its side. You'd also have to place some extension to the left and right at the top to prevent the unit from lying flat. As long as only one edge of the tire gripped the ground, rotating the tire at high speed in one direction or another should (messily) jerk/flip the unit in a position from which it can recover. (It should be less force than a fall at any rate)

      The final piece of the puzzle would be to add some type of sensor that allows you to discern your angular orientation with respect to the ground. One or more accelerometers would be sufficient for this.

      ~GoRK

    3. Re:slow down by aberson · · Score: 1
      I attempted to build LegWay using an accelerometer to detect tilt, but soon realized the acceleration due to gravity would not change as the robot tilts, because the robot is accelerating at 9.8 ft/sec?(physics was a long time ago). So the reading will be zero, until it smashes into the floor.


      Ok, so this is only true if the measuring axis of the accelerometer is always perpendicular to the earth, which won't be true if the thing is tilting over. Otherwise, the measured accelaration is going to be a cos/sin of 9.8 METERS/s^2 (which is what the parent post talks about) - you can use an accelerometer to measure tilt.

    4. Re:slow down by Hassenplug · · Score: 1

      I really don't think the accelerometer will work. I agree it can measure tilt on a stationary object, but if an object is falling... Well, I'd really like to see the math.

    5. Re:slow down by GoRK · · Score: 2

      I don't know where the reply came from, since it doesn't really apply to my post, but accelerometers will work for what I am talking about - allowing the robot to determine after a fall if it has landed on its front or back (two wheels in contact with the ground) or landed on its side where only one wheel can contact the ground.

    6. Re:slow down by Hassenplug · · Score: 1

      Yes, they will work for that. But several people have suggested an accelerometer could be used to detect tilt to keep the robot from falling over. I don't believe that is the case.

    7. Re:slow down by GoRK · · Score: 2

      Yes. I think for the size it could not do that. If an accelerometer were mounted at the top of a very long antenna or mast of some sort to sense the forward/backward tilting, then I believe it could, but I don't think that you're going to get enough data to extrapolate a tilt angle if you mount one on even the very top of the mindstorm brick.

      Now, a *very very* sensitive 2d accelerometer with a very very high sample rate might be able to do it, but that's probably a very ineffective method.

      ~GoRK

  60. Re: Counter-proof by Guido69 · · Score: 1

    Counter-proof: You only have 2 eyes, yet you can.

    Counter your counter-proof: They're different sensors.

    Each of your eyes can transmit 3D back to a "program" running on (author ducks for cover) a much more elegant platform than BrickOS. If you can figure out how to wire up a couple of eyeballs and a brain to the LegWay, you're right - probably only need two.

    NOTE: That is not, I repeat *NOT*, a challenge for all you MindStormers.

    --
    - If we aren't supposed to eat animals, then why are they made out of meat? - Steven Wright
  61. [OT] Playing AVIs in Linux by CanadaDave · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Anyone know what's the quickest way to be able to play AVIs? ie. what program should I download on apt-get

  62. Re:This story is actually rather good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Triumph will triumph!

  63. little tense, eh? by djupedal · · Score: 2

    "....can't do that right now, because the center of mass is below the axle when it on it's side."

    The full power routine is designed in as a safety. This routine is meant to prohibit falling over. That's all. The assumption is simplistic by nature. It can fall in two axis...fore/aft....and/or sideways. Recovering from either is a different thing to deal with and solve. He's trying to figure out how to recover from a sideways fall.

    1. Re:little tense, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's trying to figure out how to recover from a sideways fall.

      Oh yeah? How, then is the center [sic] of mass below tha axle, dumbnut?

    2. Re:little tense, eh? by p3d0 · · Score: 1
      It's strangely satisfying when some smug dork realizes he has been objectively, absolutely wrong. I look forward to it in your case because it will happen any moment now.

      Cheers.

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  64. Suggestion for Slashdot Admins by SetupWeasel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Given the ease at which GeoCities bandwidth limits are exceeded, maybe Slashdot could host a mirror to link to from here. This would be in case the person in question needs his site for the rest of the month.

    I really think this is starting to become a problem for people doing really cool stuff who don't have the money for a really good webserver. If slashdot thinks that a 20MB site is cool enough to post, surely Slashdot has that 20 MB of space on the its webserver to donate for a limited time. This would ensure that people like me can get to the site and people who do the cool shit aren't punished for doing cool shit.

    SetupWeasel

    1. Re:Suggestion for Slashdot Admins by microsost · · Score: 5, Informative

      20mb you say.. ok theres over half a million slashdot users. Now say just 1% of users visit the slashdot cache - 5000 users. Now say they download just 5% of that site - 1mb. That's 5gb of traffic from just 1% of /. users - 1% of registered users. Now say that happens on one site a day - 30x5gb=150gb/month.. That's one whole lot of bandwidth.. at a lot of $$. Now imagine of 5% of registered users looked at these sites.. 750gb.. 10% and you're up to 1.5tb

    2. Re:Suggestion for Slashdot Admins by Da+Fokka · · Score: 1

      The Slashdot FAQ has an item on this topic.

    3. Re:Suggestion for Slashdot Admins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about this:
      Slashdot run's a freenet node and automatically inserts posted links (to a certain depth) into the node.
      This would be a nice and also pratical use of freenet.
      Freenet handles all the distribution and there would be no /. effect any longer...

    4. Re:Suggestion for Slashdot Admins by SetupWeasel · · Score: 2

      what I am saying is if you can't do this, then don't link the site. I just think it is unfair to have your website shut down, because you can't afford to show everyone the stuff you're doing.

      SetupWeasel

    5. Re:Suggestion for Slashdot Admins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      p2p slashdot. a kazaa like client where users well you guessed it, download slashdot stories+images,vidoes,audios related to the story from other users.

      segmond

  65. Good idea by Catskul · · Score: 2

    ... Im suprized someone hasnt posted a page of a server case that they made. That would be pretty cool.

    --

    Im not here now... Im out KILLING pepperoni
  66. Yo, buddy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're insane!

  67. Re:Sugg. for Slashdot Admins(make /.ed obsolete) by vonsneerderhooten · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I took one look at the host domain and didnt try for that very reason. Theres no sense in me clickin on a geocities link thats on my slashdot homepage. The mere fact that a site hosted by geocities actually made it to the site is a little silly. C'Mon ppl, use a little common sense. Consider how much b/w you guys use per month. Lets say that only 5% of readers actually go to(or try) to go to the site. Now, I have no idea how much b/w u guys use or how much geocities allows, but im sure 5% of what you guys PAY for far exceeds what geocities gives away. My Point: make the term /.ed obsolete
    Just MHO.

    -D

  68. Bandwith by molywi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really think that Slashdot should mirror a page if there is no copyright information disclaimer on it. I am sure that most people who get /. ed would like that better then have their site brought down.
    Another idea is to have subscribers access to the story an hour before the nonpaying /.ers . This could raise the subscriptions.

  69. A webserver for LegOS already exists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    While you probably meant that as a joke, youe might want to take a look at the Slashdot article about TCP/IP for LegOS. The TCP/IP stack used already includes a simple scriptable web server...

  70. You lucky bastard... by citizenkeller · · Score: 1

    ... You actually did get to *see* the video?!
    Ah, the privileges of living in the right timezone... :@)

    --
    -- Serge K. Keller
  71. Re:Not as cool as... a Playable Harpsichord! by szelus · · Score: 1

    At least, his server stands up to Slashdot! :-)

  72. slashdot effect by Dexter's+Laboratory · · Score: 1

    I have to say that considering geocities stupid transfer limits, to slashdot a geocities page is like stealing candy from a child. Seriously, what were you thinking? Posting a link to a geocities page?

  73. Pretty soon, someone will sue him, I guess. by TripleA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's patent infringement, right there. Someone's gotta have patented the two-wheel-balance, right?

    1. Re:Pretty soon, someone will sue him, I guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, umm, I can patent having sex, and then people will have to pay me lots of money?....

  74. Darn by TheLink · · Score: 2

    Either a bug, or something slipped.

    Dunno why I moderated your post as off topic.

    Oh well, time to undo ALL moderation.

    --
  75. counter-counter proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    we have 2 eyes, touch, smell, hearing and taste...only two of them have no bearing on our navigation skills...So...for navigation...that's 3 _types_ of sensors and an uncountable _number_ of them (considering the nerves that relay touch to our brains individually).

  76. Re: Counter-proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Each of the eyes transmits a 3D image back to the brain does it? How does it do that then? Laser rangefinder perhaps ....

  77. Contradiction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm...

    The internet is more important than cold fusion.
    It is more important the internet.
    Cold fusion is more important than it.

    Or: Internet > Cold fusion > It > Internet
    Which means: Internet = Cold fusion = It = Internet

    So they're all equally important.

    1. Re:Contradiction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't see "Internet > cold fusion" anywhere in grandparent.

    2. Re:Contradiction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm...

      The internet is more important than cold fusion.
      It is more important the internet.
      Cold fusion is more important than it.

      Or: Internet > Cold fusion > It > Internet

      Which means: Internet = Cold fusion = It = Internet So they're all equally important.


      Nope, somebody failed math class.

      (Internet > Cold fusion > It > Internet) is an untrue statement, like 2>3.

      However, if it was (Internet >= Cold fusion >= It >= Internet) then we could conclude that, since Internet = Internet, then (Internet = Cold fusion = It = Internet). But, it's not.

    3. Re:Contradiction! by The+Wing+Lover · · Score: 2

      Oh, come on!

      Rock > Scissors > Paper > Rock

      Does this mean that Rock = Scissors = Paper = Rock?

      Put that in your pipe and smoke it. :-P

      --

      - In Capitalist America, law violates YOU!

  78. Site Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://perso.freelug.org/legway/LegWay.html

  79. Re:A geocities link? You might as well by Duds · · Score: 1

    Put it on a poster on the wall of your office. More of us would have got there before it all collapses like an anti-trust trial.

  80. Wrong by p3d0 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Ok, smart guy, then how could this be true?
    Another idea is to make LegWay stand up (from a lying position) on it's own. It can't do that right now, because the center of mass is below the axle when it on it's side.
    With your interpretation of "on it's [sic] side", the center of mass is not below the axle.
    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  81. Re:Yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your FP skills are impressive. May you claim many more. Your spelling still needs attention.

    R W S

  82. Weebles by yerricde · · Score: 1

    Yep, now the Weebles can get around.

    and they don't have to do this for long distances anymore

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  83. Scientology by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Nor does anyone seem to be threatening to sue www.archive.org

    You mean like this? It's not exactly a lawsuit, but it is a takedown order.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  84. Re:can you imagine by alphatool · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    fuck this shit. In 7 years I'll have global UWB connections, and so will everyonelse.

    I OWN THE FUCKING PATENT

    SUCK MY BALLS
    SUCK

    AGAIN> I OWN THE PATEMT(buyakabuaksha)

  85. Re:can you imagine by alphatool · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    me be owning the patnent.......

    SUCKSUCKSUCK

  86. Nah by chainsaw1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I believe you are only liable for patent infringement if you sell / distribute your replica. This is why Eli Whitney never made any money off of the cottin gin. It was so simple everyone went home and built their own, and there was notihing Eli could do about it. If they sold their home-made cottin gins or helped ohers with the process of making their own in some way, they may have been liable.

    IANAPL..

    --
    - Sig
  87. PUT MIRRORS IN ORIGINAL ARTICLE by halr9000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Admins....save ppl time and put the mirrors in the text of the original article.

  88. Overcomes my anti-lego prejudice by Hayzeus · · Score: 3, Interesting
    in a big way.

    I have to admit that is incredibly cool, especially given that he's done it with a couple of cheap optical rangers. I considered something like this with a small piezo gyro (made for model helicopter usage) -- but it hadn't occured to me that this might be workable with optical rangers. Some of the Sharp units only run around $12.00 apiece. I smell a new project coming on...

  89. How is this a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't insult trolls; we have out standards.

  90. Re:3rd post for you clay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Legway vs Sex with a mare, which will you choose:

    a) Legway

    OR...

    b) Sex with a mare

  91. IP Suit by boatboy · · Score: 0

    ...and in other news, inventor Dean Kamen has sued Denmarks LEGO Company under the DMCA. Dean charges the company's Mindstorms product is being used to illegaly produce copies of his patented Segway transportation device.

  92. Acceleration of Gravity by LordoftheFrings · · Score: 1
    because the robot is accelerating at 9.8 ft/sec?(physics was a long time ago).

    Just to clarify, the acceleration of gravity is 9.8 meters/second squared. Acceleration in the Metric system is measured in this unit becuase acceleration is velocity's (meters per second) change over time, therefore it is meters per second per second or meters per second squared.
    1. Re:Acceleration of Gravity by lostchicken · · Score: 2

      Also his assumption that the acceleration would be 9.8m/s^2 on the gyro is wrong. If the thing pivits, the center of mass would accelerate at 9.8 m/s^2, everywhere else would be different.

      --
      -twb
    2. Re:Acceleration of Gravity by Hassenplug · · Score: 1

      I knew there was some other stuff I left out. Thanks. But with the accelerometer within an inch of the center of mass, I doubt it could detect much difference.

  93. Might Be Nice if the site worked by necrolyte2 · · Score: 1

    Damn Geocities, the link said that the page had exceeded its data transfer. Bastards

    --
    Eat a Beaver, Save a Tree ---Meraok(a friend)
  94. transportation for all by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    I am looking for plans for a Lego Yugo

  95. Re:Not as cool as... a Playable Harpsichord! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the point? The harpsischord sounds like shit!

  96. InternetAlert Crap by buggered · · Score: 1

    What is the deal? I went to look at this story and got this BS garbage on my screen that my computer is broadcasting my internet address. And it's stuck in an infinite loop. Is this another reason to hate being stuck with a Windows machine or what?
    http://images.bonzi.com/fastclick/ia9g2.asp

  97. why??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do people even link to website from slashdot anymore??? do they just want to kill webservers?? You are all MySQL murderers....

    on a different topic

    microsoft.com - visit me

    (goo dthing they run bsd on their wbackend webservers :)

  98. Sorry, this site is temporarily unavailable! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The web site you are trying to access has exceeded its allocated data transfer. Visit our help area for more information.
    Access to this site will be restored within an hour. Please try again later.
    http://www.geocities.com/stevehassenplug/L egWay.ht ml

    Sorry, this site is temporarily unavailable!
    The web site you are trying to access has exceeded its allocated data transfer. Visit our help area for more information.
    Access to this site will be restored within an hour. Please try again later.
    http://www.geocities.com/stevehassenplug/L egWay.ht ml

  99. Is this a transporter for ANTS!??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It needs to be at least... 3 times bigger.!

  100. Re:Not as cool as... a Playable Harpsichord! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The same guy made a huge stegosaurus out of legos. Here's a pic of him standing next to it:
    http://www.henrylim.org/Stegosaurus1.html

  101. lego segway by legocarff · · Score: 1

    i do see a problem with his design though it cant go up any type on incline it will just tip over if it does.