Slashdot Mirror


It's Not a Police Box, It's a Tardis

xA40D writes "The BBC is reporting that they've won the battle with the Metropolitan Police over the trademark police box, more commonly known as a Tardis: 'arbitrator Shaun Sherlock remarked that even if the police had built up any reputation, it would have only been in the area of policing and law enforcement and would not have extended into the goods and services which the BBC had applied to use it for.'"

236 comments

  1. Of course, you know that's TARDIS by penginkun · · Score: 5, Informative

    All caps, right? Time And Relative Dimensions in Space, yeah? OK. As you were.

    1. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, right... TARDiS.

    2. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Burb · · Score: 1

      Time And Relative Dimension (singular) In Space. (Sad Who-loving saddo writes)

      --

    3. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      Acronyms that you can pronounce are, in British usage, spelled with an initial cap only (eg Nato). Ones you have to spell out when speaking remain as all caps (CPR). So it's "Tardis".

    4. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by spakka · · Score: 5, Funny

      And it's TARDISES not TARDII

    5. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Acronyms that you can pronounce?? Acronyms ARE INITIALISMS that you CAN pronounce as if they were real words. I f you can't say it like a word, it's NOT an acronym.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    6. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's TARDISES not TARDII

      And I've been saying Tard-en all these years!

    7. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
      Oxford English Dictionary:
      acronym A word formed from the initial letters or parts of other words; loosely an abbreviation composed of initial letters.

      initialism A group of initial letters used as an abbreviation, esp. one in which each letter is pronounced separately.

      So, "loosely", an initialism is an acronym. (Not that I'd ever heard of an initialism before today.) But if one makes the distinction, I don't think that an acronym is an initialism either. Better to say both are abbreviations.

      But anyway, "Tardis" is strictly an acronym, so it should be written thusly. Unfortunately, the BBC chooses otherwise.

    8. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, Tardii is actually the plural of Tard. Or is it Tards? I forget...

      I am sofa king
      What Todd did

      (read it out loud)

    9. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ugh... reTARD

    10. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by FurryFeet · · Score: 5, Funny

      But anyway, "Tardis" is strictly an acronym, so it should be written thusly. Unfortunately, the BBC chooses otherwise.

      You, of course, mean the Bbc, right?

    11. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by mary_will_grow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually its GNU/TARDIS

      --
      Why stick up for big business?
    12. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      oh?

      how about LASER?

      or is it Laser?

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    13. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 3, Funny

      "la-ser" -Dr. Evil

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    14. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

    15. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by kyletinsley · · Score: 1

      I am sofa king What Todd did

      That's "We Todd did", genius. Altough I guess if you are saying that as a true statement, it would justify you fucking it up...

    16. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by RealDhar · · Score: 1

      Nope, BBC is right. BBC is an initialism, since each letter is pronounced separately.

      -g.

      --
      Sucks to be a Windows user.
      -g.
    17. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 2

      What about RADAR, SONAR,COMSAT, M*A*S*H, DEFCON, POTUS, FLOTUS, RAM, ROM, USAF...

      Then there are those logical operations: AND, OR XOR, NOR, NAND, etc....

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    18. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always pronounced it BiBeC...

    19. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Semi-Psychic+Nathan · · Score: 1

      Okay, then. What does AND stand for?

      --
      I have nothing to allude to, and I am alluding to it.
    20. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's TARDISES not TARDII

      Actually, its neither. The plural of iris is irese, the plural of nemesis is nemesese, so the plural of TARDIS would become TARDESE

    21. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ISTR that it was Time and Relative Displacement in Space.

      Of course I'm not sure since it was so long ago when I last heard about it.

    22. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      There can be only one.

      Damn - wrong franchise ...

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    23. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 2

      'AND' is a logical conjunction when used in digital electronics, and computer science, where as 'and' is both a logical, and grammatical conjunction when used in colloquial English.

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    24. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Semi-Psychic+Nathan · · Score: 1

      Sorry. I misinterpreted what you said earlier as implying that AND was an acronym.

      --
      I have nothing to allude to, and I am alluding to it.
  2. Goods and Services? by acehole · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean the BBC are planning to use the policebox for timetravel tips?

    The timelords would not be happy about that.

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
  3. It's elementary my dear Watson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    By jove, I think Sherlock has got it

  4. No shit, Sherlock. by Trongy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next stop will be ionian columns.
    (The Master's tardis default appearance)

    1. Re:No shit, Sherlock. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, you're thinking of a grandfather clock.

  5. I wish... by gr0ngb0t · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... that my room was a tardis. not so much for interstellar travel and everything that the good doctor used to do (although that would be cool), but just so I can fit all my shit in there easily.

    dont know how much my cat would like K-9 though...

    1. Re:I wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I wish my fiance looked like Leela.

      OK, that was what I was supposed to say--I actually prefer Tegan(Janet Fielding) but I'm weird.

    2. Re:I wish... by spakka · · Score: 5, Funny
      I can fit all my shit in there easily

      You're thinking of the TURDIS

    3. Re:I wish... by fermion · · Score: 1

      Since when did the doctor find anything easily in the Tardis. It seems that every time we see him actually out of the control room, he gets lost.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    4. Re:I wish... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "You're thinking of the TURDIS"

      Hey, it beats the name "Honey Bucket".

    5. Re:I wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. Romana II (Lalla Ward) all the way.

    6. Re:I wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leela was my favorite before Romana II...Romana II was my favorite before Tegan.

      The stock answer is supposed to be Leela though. :)

    7. Re:I wish... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

      is your current room smaller than a tardis? i'd have a pretty hard time fitting all my stuff in one...

  6. Heh by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 5, Funny

    I peed in one of those Tardis boxes when I went to the UK, as I seriously thought it was a public urinal (I was very drunk) :D

    But anyways, it's not like the police were going to win against the BBC's high-priced lawyers -- and now that this lawsuit's over, the police (read: taxpayers) also have to pay the BBC's mega legal fees, too, even if the rest of it is just 850 pounds.

    If I were a UK taxpayer, I'd be quite angry at them for it.

    1. Re:Heh by Kwikymart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The one thing that bugs me about this is that why does a government organization that does not take part in any trade, own the trademark on something?

      Maybe if they developed profiling software or an efficient billyclub or something (even then, that is more of a patent area), but I really think the police should be the last people getting a trademark. If I lived in the UK, yes, I would be uber-pissed at such idiocy. I hate the attitude of cops in general. Damn cops!

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    2. Re:Heh by inputsprocket · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      ...please permit me to go off topic for 1 second...

      I hate the attitude of cops in general. Damn cops!

      I am in agreement - they should spend more in improving their image and attidute. While the attitude of UK bobbies is on the whole better than their US-counterparts, some are bloody down-right rude

      Get this - I got pulled over 2 weeks ago for running a red light in London (it was frikkin orange, but never mind). I was on my way from work to the hospital, where my 2.5 month-old son lay with a 40.3oC temperature, so I was in a bit of a hurry. I really was, and I was all panicky. Anyway, the cop was sympathetic and let me go on my way without issuing a ticket, and putting god-knows how many points on my license.
      Yesterday, I got a letter with a 600 GBP fine and an issue to go in front of a Police tribunal for failing to stop after being flagged down by a policeman for running a red light. WT friggin F??? The b'stard took my license number and issued a failing-to-stop-for-police notice. I'm frikkin fuming - So hah, Metropolitan police. Pay your frikkin huge court bill, because now I have to get a bloody solicitor to defend me in a my-word-against-your-word case, because I didn't ask for the policemans number after he was so 'kind' to let me go.

      Grrrrrr

    3. Re:Heh by rcb102 · · Score: 1

      The BBC does take part in trade - the TARDIS appears on T-shirts, posters etc all sold by the BBC.

      Even though the BBC is primarily funded by public money anything extra they can make on the side is useful to reduce the burden on the public purse.

    4. Re:Heh by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      The BBC does. As a publicly owned organisation they are entitled to. The police shouldn't. As a branch of the government service, they should get all their money through traditional channels.

    5. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree too, in fact I am against any civiliian security forces, martial law all day everyday would have more of an impact on crime.

    6. Re:Heh by snookums · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the police (read: taxpayers) also have to pay the BBC's mega legal fees

      Yes the police are funded by the taxpayer, but Joe Random Public also pays for the BBC (through taxes and TV licenses). That's right, two-fifths of British free-to-air television is public television.

      I think the BBC will do a better job of making money off the trademark than the police ever would, thus more money goes back into a public service. I put this one down as a good outcome for the British public.

      --
      Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
    7. Re:Heh by stygar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Regarding the Metropolitan Police's desire to have a trademark on something: they might've just been following the lead of the RCMP here in Canada. The mounties have trademarks on their traditional image (ie the red-coated, wide-brimmed hat wearing cop on a horse), ostensibly so that they have control over how the image is used, and on what products. The only really objectionable thing they've done with the trademark is sign a contract with Disney (shudder) to act as their agent for those licensing the image (IIRC, this contract has run out and not been renewed).

      Mind you, the RCMP is probably in a unique position on this - I doubt there are many other police forces with as distinctive an image, in any country.

    8. Re:Heh by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But anyways, it's not like the police were going to win against the BBC's high-priced lawyers -- and now that this lawsuit's over, the police (read: taxpayers) also have to pay the BBC's mega legal fees, too, even if the rest of it is just 850 pounds.

      You're right - one taxpayer-funded entity is suing another taxpayer-funded entity, over something that was developed with the taxpayer's money and therefore rightfully belongs in the public domain. They only people who are coming out of this ahead are the lawyers. What a coincidence that the present Prime Minister, his wife, and most of their friends, colleagues and supporters are all lawyers. Shakespeare had the right idea centuries ago.

    9. Re:Heh by fruey · · Score: 2
      But anyways, it's not like the police were going to win against the BBC's high-priced lawyers -- and now that this lawsuit's over, the police (read: taxpayers) also have to pay the BBC's mega legal fees, too, even if the rest of it is just 850 pounds.

      The BBC is public funded too. Brits pay a "television licence fee" to the tune of $150US per year, maybe even more now. So they don't necessarily have pots of cash either. Indeed, it is thanks to merchandising and program sales to foreign markets that the licence fee is so low. It seems ridiculous that the Police and another quasi-state owned institution should be battling legal battles. Cases like these just make lawyers rich from money in the public coffers, but there's nothing new about that.

      P.S. If you were really drunk when you peed in a Police Box, you were probably over 18. So you were born in 1940-1950? They haven't been in public for a long long time... there were still red phone boxes until about 10 years ago though.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    10. Re:Heh by fruey · · Score: 1
      I hear you, man. I was once lost in London coming up to the Euston Road. Well, I wasn't lost at all when the problem happened... there was a queue of traffic on the right lane, but I wanted to go straight and quite correctly put myself in the left lane. When I get to the end of the lane I see it's blocked that side, and a cop stops me as I try to just get back (politely I might add) into position. He waves me through, I think cool... I try to go straight but then I see (it's night) the POLICE LINE DO NOT CROSS so I stop and apologise, and put my RH indicator on to turn up a road I don't know and proceed to get lost.

      But what I object to is that the Policeman says to me "Use you f***king eyes you w**ker" as his first words to me. That is quite unacceptable as far as I am concerned.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    11. Re:Heh by jweatherley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are still some (non functional) police boxes in Glasgow. There's one at the end of Byres Road which was in a bit of a state the last time I saw it. You could certainly piss in there after visiting all the pubs in Byres Road on a Friday night as the door was kicked in.

      There is also a police box in the middle of Buchannan Street. It has a small window and if you look through it you see an infinite space full of fibre optic lights - maybe that one does work!

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    12. Re:Heh by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 0, Troll

      the fact that you can't navigate yourself around London is no-one's fault but your own.

      Get a fucking map.

      Life is generally fairly intolerant of idiots like you and there are already quite enough bewildered drivers on the road - do us all a favour and get a taxi next time.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    13. Re:Heh by phiwum · · Score: 1

      But anyways, it's not like the police were going to win against the BBC's high-priced lawyers.

      I agree. When it comes to the law, the police don't stand a chance.

      --
      Phiwum's law: anyone that names an obvious law after himself and then puts it in his own sig is just pathetic.
    14. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about then the cops hold a legitimate trademark on an image that can and does make money? I'm thinking of the RCMP here, which has been used in all sorts of Hollywood crap, Dudley Do-Right and all.

      It still pisses me off to no end that our government chose Disney, of all people, to be the official marketers of the Mounties' image. I'm quite surprised the Evil Mouse Empire didn't swindle the RCMP out of it, lock, stock and barrel, and henceforth have it known as "Disney's Musical Ride!

      I'm not a big fan of cops in general...IMHO what should be the proper public image of the friendly cop on the beat serving the public has been replaced by a machine gun toting stormtrooper, dressed in black fatigues, itching for aome "action". But the RCMP and the "Mounties" image is also a source of national pride, and something that, so far, hasn't been sacrificed on the altar of free trade or budget cuts.

      I wonder how this sort of thing might have played out in that same courtroom...

    15. Re:Heh by fruey · · Score: 1
      I'm sorry that from my story you read that I cannot drive; I knew that area of London well, lived there and drove there for a year, and can get from Brixton to Wood Green without a map no problems. However, this was a special case where the road I regularly took was closed and I was forced on a detour around a particularly complex one-way system, because the road I wanted was closed for about a mile. Now, I did find my way and without a map but I was technically "lost". That doesn't mean I couldn't get my bearings.

      However your agressive attitude somewhat mirrors exactly the problem I had with the Policeman's attitude: start swearing and shouting, instead of just being pleasantly scolding about it. I could not see (because of a bus) that the road ahead was blocked, and it was late, so logically the fact that the left lane was free did not suggest to me that I shouldn't go there.

      Come here to Morocco and let's watch you drive. Highest death toll per capita in the WORLD and I'm still alive after 4 years. Can't be that bewildered mate.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    16. Re:Heh by stevey · · Score: 1

      There's a few of them around in Edinburgh too - mostly they're boarded up or locked up so you can't even see inside them.

      A couple of years ago an enterprizing group got together and actually bought some of the boxes which were in central areas from the local council, and now they're being used as little coffee shops.

      There's just enough room inside one for a small student, a coffee machine and a selection of cakes and buns...

      These rebranded boxes have all been painted a purpley colour - I don't know if that was mandatory or not, I think it would have been nicer if they could have remained Police-box-blue.

    17. Re:Heh by billcopc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey we get the same kind of police fraud here in Canada. I once got pulled over for speeding, which in itself is okay except for the fact that the guy was out of his district (I traveled four close cities to/from work, and he was about a mile beyond the borders - bah). Anyways I fought the ticket in court and got shut out by the judge who had an obvious grudge against 21-year olds who earn more money than he does, so I pay the fine and go on with my life, slightly irate.

      3 months later I get arrested for driving without a license because they decided to charge late fees on my fine but never bothered informing me, so a sneaky (fraudulent?) 40$ late fee ended up costing 300$ (the fine for an invalid license) and another 600$ in hiked insurance premiums because of the big ugly mark on my record for having my license suspended.

      I have recently moved to the sneaky police's district, and I see them everyday, camping out the same traffic trap, arresting at least a hundred drivers at that intersection PER DAY for the same 130$ ticket and 2 points on the license, for changing lanes during rush hour in 2 kph traffic, something that has never killed anyone here, and certainly doesn't deserve the attention of FOUR cars and 6-7 police agents, leaving two cars to cover the remaining 1400 square kilometers of the region (an aggregate of small country towns, perhaps 25000 habitants).

      I swear every time I drive by that intersection, I get this urge to just ram them all into a sheet-metal sandwich. Police (and the rest of government) are supposed to be non-profit. We pay taxes for this shit, and we get raped in return. Police state, meet Anarchy village!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    18. Re:Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In England, that IS pleasantly scolding.

    19. Re:Heh by WINSTANLEY · · Score: 1

      The BBC is a public corporation and it sounds like the police sued the BBC (just guessing though), so who should be angry at whom for wasting taxpayer money?

      --
      It is by coff... er, will, alone I set my mind in motion...
    20. Re:Heh by fatboy · · Score: 1

      Get this - I got pulled over 2 weeks ago for running a red light in London (it was frikkin orange, but never mind). I was on my way from work to the hospital, where my 2.5 month-old son lay with a 40.3oC temperature, so I was in a bit of a hurry. I really was, and I was all panicky. Anyway, the cop was sympathetic and let me go on my way without issuing a ticket, and putting god-knows how many points on my license. Yesterday, I got a letter with a 600 GBP fine and an issue to go in front of a Police tribunal for failing to stop after being flagged down by a policeman for running a red light. WT friggin F??? The b'stard took my license number and issued a failing-to-stop-for-police notice. I'm frikkin fuming - So hah, Metropolitan police. Pay your frikkin huge court bill, because now I have to get a bloody solicitor to defend me in a my-word-against-your-word case, because I didn't ask for the policemans number after he was so 'kind' to let me go.

      But don't you feel safe with those cameras all over the place ;) Cameras never lie.

      --
      --fatboy
    21. Re:Heh by jumpingfred · · Score: 1

      You do know that the kill all the lawyers quote from Shakespeare was made by the villain of the play when they were going to over throw the government don't you? So basically the lawyers were the people standing in the way of repression and not the other way around.

    22. Re:Heh by The+Dark+P · · Score: 1

      sorry to poke holes in your post The BBC is funded by taxpayers (licence fee payers) money anyway. So the taxpayers money is going where taxpayers money was going anyway?

    23. Re:Heh by fruey · · Score: 1
      In England, that IS pleasantly scolding.

      LOL. Used to be that the English copper was a bastion of politeness. Alas, no more.

      I am English, I have been expatriated for 4 years... but I lived the first 23 years of my life over there...

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    24. Re:Heh by James+Youngman · · Score: 2
      The one thing that bugs me about this is that why does a government organization that does not take part in any trade, own the trademark on something?
      But the BBC does take part in trade. For a start, they market their TV propgrammes across the world (e.g. Teletubbies, as a famous example, but of course many more). They also sell products other than broadcast rights, too. See the BBC Shop.
    25. Re:Heh by PaschalNee · · Score: 1


      I doubt there are many other police forces with as distinctive an image, in any country.

      That's really a regional thing. The French Gendarme hats and the English Bobby's Hat are pretty recognisable in this part of the world.

  7. Sheesh... by darkov · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You'd think the coppers would have something better to do than having trade mark wrangles with the BBC over something they stopped using nearly 50 years ago. Sounds a bit opportunistic - were they trying to raise some cash for the police social club?

    1. Re:Sheesh... by foo12 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or win back the mark and allow its licensing to third parties, effectively capitalizing on the popularity won for the police box by the Dr. Who series.

      A similar suit was recently settled in favor of the London Underground. Perhaps those more familiar with international resolution of civil torts can comment.

    2. Re:Sheesh... by slipgun · · Score: 2

      You'd think the coppers would have something better to do than having trade mark wrangles with the BBC over something they stopped using nearly 50 years ago.

      You'd also think they'd have something better to do than pull people over for doing 80 down a clear motorway.

      were they trying to raise some cash for the police social club?

      Normally the speeding fines cover that.

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
    3. Re:Sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've got it good. I was driving down a litrerly empty highway (it was 4am). I passed a cop car doing 63 km/h (the speed limit is 60). They pulled me over. Then they told me my rego was expired. It had two months to go. They had a prisioner in the back of their car.

      A can say without fear of contradiction: Perth (Western Australian) cops are fuckwits.

    4. Re:Sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're complaining about being pulled over for speeding why? Whether you broke the limit but 3kph or 10 kph, you still broke the limit. Its a LIMIT, ie go no faster than this, not a TARGET, ie maintain a speed +- equal to this.

    5. Re:Sheesh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see, you *passed* a cop car, which was already going the speed limit, and you're surprised he pulled you?

      You may as well have taunted him to give you a ticket. At the very least it was highly insulting.

      And if the cop car was there, the highway was not totally empty, now was it?

    6. Re:Sheesh... by Yoje · · Score: 1

      You'd think the coppers would have something better to do than having trade mark wrangles with the BBC over something they stopped using nearly 50 years ago.
      Or the beeb would have something better to do than having trade mark wrangles with the Metropolitan Police over something they stopped using nearly 20 years ago.

      *sigh* Now if only the beeb could use these powers for good, and actually produce some NEW Doctor Who episodes. I miss Doctor Who, and those radio episodes and books just don't hold up to actually watching the Doctor in action on the television.

  8. Re:downhill by a_borowski · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The dot-com bonb happened and they all had to get real jobs.

  9. Re:downhill by gr0ngb0t · · Score: 1

    So Star Trek is geeky, but Dr Who isn't?

    Get thee to a video store, and hire a few volumes for the weekend.

    Personally I hate Star Trek and all the spin-offs, but Dr Who was hella cool...

  10. Erm... Huh? by pla · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF? Hey, I totally support police finding "alternative" methods of funding (as opposed to milking the taxpayers, or confiscating anything they lay their eyes on thanks to the WO(s)D, ala a witchfinder general), but really...

    With all that we have going on in the world, these folks have nothing better to do than bicker over who owns a damned box? Oh, sorry, the *IMAGE* of the box. My bad. That makes it so much more serious.

    1. Re:Erm... Huh? by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just a note - you've got to love a reference in this post to _Good Omens_. On a related note (so that this post isn't viewed as a troll or whatever), I think its important that what the courts basically said here is that if you're not using a trademark for a commercial use, its not really yours. In a meaningful way, they may have just made it possible for people to use any non-commercial trademark in a way that doesn't infringe on the original use.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    2. Re:Erm... Huh? by nounderscores · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cool! Now I can have my intrepid alien protagonist travel the galaxy in a space ship disguised as a box of Microsoft XP disks. The logic being that it can hide the space ship in computer stores and remain undetected because nobody ever picks it up to buy it.

    3. Re:Erm... Huh? by stygar · · Score: 1

      In a meaningful way, they may have just made it possible for people to use any non-commercial trademark in a way that doesn't infringe on the original use.

      Not really. IANAL, but since the decision was made by an arbitrator, not a court, I don't think its decisions can create a binding precedent. In any case, the decision won't have any effect outside the UK.

    4. Re:Erm... Huh? by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 1

      My mistake on the arbitrator as opposed to courts point, I misspoke.

      As to having effect outside of the UK, I think that its important that the UK would essentially be a haven for misappropriate of copyright/trademark if I'm properly interpreting the decision.

      Consider this: there are many highly known but not commercial trademark/copyrights, such as the design of the white house, the designs of public service uniforms, etc. I can now make a commercial product that features someone in realistic (i.e. identical to reality) uniforms of the nation's military, and advertise them as military, so long as I carefully dont claim them to actually be military itself. Then, I can profit off this, and actually claim that _I_ own the copyright/trademark as is the case for the TARDIS/telephone booth. (in the UK, that is)

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
  11. Re:downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't, I spent all my money on the dvd release of the Star Trek TNG series.

  12. Dr. Who could have stopped this.. by devross · · Score: 4, Funny

    If he were just a bit more clever, there never would have been a dispute. Nobody would have ever known there was a such thing as a "TARDIS" if the Doctor wasn't materializing and dematerializing all over London in broad daylight like that.

    --


    If these walls could talk they'd probly still ignore me. --MF DOOM
  13. Dr Who movies? Big charges. by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps this will allow a reincarnation of the earlier Dr. Who TV series in a new form, or perhaps even a new movie. I remember watching these when I was young, very cool stuff despite its age.

    But the Metropolitan Police lost its appeal and has been ordered to pay £850, plus legal costs.

    The case has been rumbling on since 1996, when the Patent Office originally accepted the Tardis as a BBC trade mark.


    Anyone besides me think that the £850 isn't going to amount to much in comparison to the legal charges. Having to pay legal charges for 7 years worth of case-wrangling is probably a big ouch on the police bankbook. The Metropolitan Police will probably have a shortage of donuts in the office for quite awhile.

    Any else anticipate an article that states Metropolitan Police are reducing the tolerance for speeding limit to 1% and then upping the cost of a tickets, they'll have to recover this money somehow. :-)

    1. Re:Dr Who movies? Big charges. by Atrahasis · · Score: 2, Informative
      Perhaps this will allow a reincarnation of the earlier Dr. Who TV series in a new form, or perhaps even a new movie. I remember watching these when I was young, very cool stuff despite its age
      I read somewhere recently that there will be a new series of Dr Who sometime next year - the Doctor has not yet been announced (probably not Paul McGann, so the Beeb wasted the entire 8th Doctor on a film).
    2. Re:Dr Who movies? Big charges. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Any else anticipate an article that states Metropolitan Police are reducing the tolerance for speeding limit to 1% and then upping the cost of a tickets, they'll have to recover this money somehow. :-)

      I expect the police can recoup the legal costs just by increasing tickets around the BBC's main office. That's the nice thing about modern legal systems - pretty much anyone can be prosecuted and fined for something.

    3. Re:Dr Who movies? Big charges. by G-funk · · Score: 2

      The Metropolitan Police will probably have a shortage of donuts in the office for quite awhile.

      If that's the worst that happens after such a cock-up of public money that this money-grabbing scheme was, I think they got off light.

      Any else anticipate an article that states Metropolitan Police are reducing the tolerance for speeding limit to 1% and then upping the cost of a tickets, they'll have to recover this money somehow. :-)

      Who'd notice? England's about the only place in the world worse than Victoria when it comes to revenue raising speed cameras.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    4. Re:Dr Who movies? Big charges. by Atrahasis · · Score: 1

      I may be missing something, but surely the onlt way a speed camera can raise revenue is if you (or someone else) speed past it.

    5. Re:Dr Who movies? Big charges. by krugdm · · Score: 5, Funny

      But the Metropolitan Police lost its appeal and has been ordered to pay £850, plus legal costs.

      Hmm. That should be just about enough cash for the BBC to pay for the special effects to film another episode...

    6. Re:Dr Who movies? Big charges. by Atrahasis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Done some digging around, and it would appear the series is scheduled for November 2003.

      Timomthy Spall (Auf Wiedersein Pet, All or Nothing) was rumoured to be cast as the 9th doctor, but that has been quashed by the BBC.

  14. Dammit! by ctar · · Score: 1, Funny

    Its too long to be my new sig...

  15. If the BBC had lost... by roalt · · Score: 5, Funny
    If the BBC lost this case, they could always send Dr. Who back in time to trademark the police box before the 1960-ties...

    Another question is... which Dr. Who?

    1. Re:If the BBC had lost... by spectecjr · · Score: 5, Funny

      If the BBC lost this case, they could always send Dr. Who back in time to trademark the police box before the 1960-ties...
      Another question is... which Dr. Who?


      [nerd mode]
      It's The Doctor, not Dr. Who. Dr. Who is the show; The Doctor is the main character.
      [/nerd mode]

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    2. Re:If the BBC had lost... by Quatermass · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You'd have to go quite far back in time as the Police box came into existence in the 1930s!

      Doctor Who started in 1963.

      :-)

      Strangely enough old Police box models designed for use on railway models are quite collectable to Dr. Who fans.

      I remember being told by a fan that the original hollow black iron models (about 3 inches high) are worth a good few quid whilst the blue ones are only good for a fiver.

      Amazing how anything Who related is worth money.

      I've still got my square CD of Dr. Who music (serial #2) that I bought donkey years ago at a charity auction. Its supppose to be worth a fair bit to music and Who collectors. :-)

      --
      Stuart http://stuarthalliday.com/
    3. Re:If the BBC had lost... by slave · · Score: 1

      [nerd mode]
      It's The Doctor, not Dr. Who. Dr. Who is the show; The Doctor is the main character.
      [/nerd mode]

      [redundant]
      It's Doctor Who, not Dr. Who. Doctor Who is the show; Dr. Who lives in Whoville with all the other Whos.
      [/redundant]

    4. Re:If the BBC had lost... by Phexro · · Score: 5, Funny

      [nerd mode]
      It's The Doctor, not Dr. Who. Dr. Who is the show; The Doctor is the main character.
      [/nerd mode]


      [uber who nerd mode]
      "Doctor Who" is the show, not "Dr. Who." Besides, you're both wrong. The credits listed The Doctor as "Dr. Who" until it's seventh season, when they listed it as "Doctor Who." The Doctor was never credited as "The Doctor," though it did flip-flip between "Dr. Who" and "Doctor Who" a few times.
      [/uber who nerd mode]

    5. Re:If the BBC had lost... by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 2, Insightful
      [Ultra uber nerd mode]
      But he's never referred to as 'Doctor Who' in the series itself, just 'The Doctor' [/ultra uber nerd mode]

      Well, except once. But then the Who nerds (what's the real term for them? Whoies? Whoites? Whovians?) got angry, so they never did it again.

    6. Re:If the BBC had lost... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      The credits listed The Doctor as "Dr. Who" until it's seventh season, when they listed it as "Doctor Who." The Doctor was never credited as "The Doctor," though it did flip-flip between "Dr. Who" and "Doctor Who" a few times.

      Wrong. The one story I own on tape (The Caves of Androzani, with Peter Davison) lists the character as "The Doctor", and IIRC so do all the shows from the early '80s onwards(?)

      I should not care about this, but I do...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:If the BBC had lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well ... in one of the earlist Dr. Who's with the first Doctor and 'Susan' ...

      (Susan's Teacher) "Yes, Dr. Foreman, ..."
      (The Doctor) "Whats that? Dr. Who?"

      heh heh....

    8. Re:If the BBC had lost... by scharkalvin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The car that Pertwee and Baker drove had "who"
      on the license plate. Later they just used "?"

    9. Re:If the BBC had lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was in "The War Machines." The computer called him "Doctor Who."

      And no, I don't have a life.

    10. Re:If the BBC had lost... by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      "they could always send Dr. Who back in time to trademark the police box before the 1960-ties... "

      I agree, 1960's ties are hideous. So thin! But what does that have to do with trademarks?

    11. Re:If the BBC had lost... by guuyuk · · Score: 1

      Well, there was another episode where the conversation went something like:

      Doctor: How do you do, I'm the Doctor.
      Character: Who?
      Doctor: Exactly!

      Along those lines, in another episode (the one where K-9 is introduced), the Doctor is coming on board a space station:

      Security Guard: I need your name and date of birth.
      Doctor: Well, I'm the Doctor.
      Security Guard: Date of Birth?
      Doctor: I don't know, sometime soon...

      Which I guess goes with the Timelord territory!

      --
      We're sorry, the phone number you have reached is imaginary. Please rotate your phone 90 degrees and try your call again
    12. Re:If the BBC had lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I remember watching it change.

      The rather sublime debut of new Doctor, Peter Davison, in the wake of the immensely popular Tom Baker, "Castrovalva" is actually a continuation of some storylines from "The Keeper of Traken" and "Logopolis," most notably the third part of a "Master trilogy" with Anthony Ainley. Some of the story was inspired by themes from artist M.C. Escher. This was the first time Doctor Who was not transmitted on a Saturday, but instead a twice-weekly, Monday and Tuesday schedule (later to be switched to other weekdays). It is also the first time that the main character receives the title "The Doctor" rather than "Doctor Who" (or "Dr. Who").

      see here

      The credits listed Tom Baker one way and Davison another. Despite the link I posted, I'm not entirely sure that Logopolis wan't like that, too.
  16. Etymology of Tardis by jukal · · Score: 4, Informative

    tar -c myself && dis locate work->home.

  17. ObSaloonBarJokes by Observer · · Score: 1

    "So that's why the police don't have the time to catch criminals any longer."

    "If you want to know the time, don't ask a policeman."

    (Yes, officer, I was just leaving anyway.)

  18. What's the point? by shplorb · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're both government departments - can't they be happy that it belongs to the government no matter what? Ahh the wonders of bureaucracy!

    Damn bitches! err... lawyers.

    1. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The BBC isn't a government department. It is a self-funding autonomous organization. The government has no contol over it other than appointing its governors.

    2. Re:What's the point? by istartedi · · Score: 4, Funny

      The point is that when the government sues itself, it begins a process that theoretical physio-economists have postulated will result in the following phases: 1. A massive increase in the consumption of money, in this case pounds. 2. Due to the increased consumption, the government expands. 3. After burning through a considerable ammount of money as determined by the famouse Shrodinger-Herzfeld equation, it begins to collapse in on itself. 4. The collapse accelerates, during which a number of curious phenomenon are predicted such as the emission of Higg-bosons, PI denominated Euros, and pfennig-marks. 5. Finally, the government collapses into a Police Box, err... Tardis, from which an infinite supply of pounds eminates which curiously enough neither overinflates the economy nor vaporizes the world into a burst of X-rays. Unfortunately, it causes everybody to lose their teeth at an early age but most of the scientists studying the matter don't see this as a great problem, and they are eager to continue their research.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:What's the point? by vidarh · · Score: 5, Informative
      They're NOT both government departments. The BBC is a Corporation under Royal Charter. It may seem like a subtle difference, but it means that the BBC for the most part is run like any other company with the exception that it's board is appointed by the Crown, and it's main form of revenue is the license fee.

      Particularly under the Royal Charter BBC has an agreement that guarantee them editorial independence, which means that if they use the Tardis in a way that the Metropolitan Police doesn't like they don't have any recourse through government channels - they can choose to try to negotitate with the BBC, or they can sue. Presumably it's a situation like that the Met doesn't like.

    4. Re:What's the point? by Burb · · Score: 1

      BBC does not belong to the UK government; it's a common misconception.

      --

    5. Re:What's the point? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The BBC is a Corporation under Royal Charter. It may seem like a subtle difference, but it means that the BBC for the most part is run like any other company with the exception that it's board is appointed by the Crown, and it's main form of revenue is the license fee.

      Then can you explain the practical differences, if any, between the license fee and a hypothecated poll tax on televisions?

      Calling it a corporation rather than a department is mere semantics. After all, license payers are not customers in any meaningful way, since you have to pay the fee irregardless of whether you watch the BBC 24 hrs a day, or not at all. Exactly the same as you pay NI whether or not you ever use a hospital.

    6. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Then can you explain the practical differences, if any, between the license fee and a hypothecated poll tax on televisions?

      You don't have to pay the TV license unless you actually own a TV.

    7. Re:What's the point? by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      "You don't have to pay the TV license unless you actually own a TV."

      I have 2 TVs and no licence. You are in fact only required to have a licence to receive TV programmes, whether through an aerial or cable/sat box.

      I use my TVs for watching videos, home movies, DVDs, divxs and playing console games. In fact it is even OK to constantly watch videos recorded off air without a licence as long as the person who recorded the show had a licence.

      graspee

    8. Re:What's the point? by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1


      Irrespective or regardless. Please choose.
      </vocabularyNitpick>

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
    9. Re:What's the point? by oldsk8r · · Score: 1

      Wrong, whilst in general the BBC will not mind, the licence is required on all equipment capable of receiving a television picture, regardless of the fact that you may not use it for that. You are also wrong about being able to watch videos that others have recorded. The law allows people to keep TV recordings for a limited time (very short time) for them to watch, not to pass them around.

    10. Re:What's the point? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      if your TVs are CAPABLE of receiving BBC broadcasts, then you must have a TV licence. Doesn't matter if you DO IT or not, I'm afraid.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    11. Re:What's the point? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      The point is that when the government sues itself

      The BBC is not a government organisation. Why do some people have so much trouble getting this? It is a publically owned corperation.

      The UK government has no control over the BBC. Any time that it tried to "suggest" they do something, they have had their fingers burnt.

      For example, the satirical current-affairs comedy "Have I got News For You" once received a request from up high to not mention a particular politition. They spent the next next show completely focusing on the guy. If they were govenment controlled, that would not have been possible.

    12. Re:What's the point? by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      Wrong, both of you. From tvlicencing.co.uk:

      "If you use or install television receiving equipment to receive or record television programme services you are required by law to have a valid TV Licence."

      and

      "Using television receiving equipment to receive
      or record broadcast television programmes

      without the correct licence is a criminal offence."

      also:

      "If your business installs or uses any equipment such as a TV set, PC with a broadcast card or any other TV receiving equipment which is capable of receiving broadcast television programmes (and is ever used for that purpose), you'll need a TV Licence."

      (my bold).

      Their site used to have an example of watching a videotape someone else had recorded and said the thing about it being OK even if you didn't have a licence if the person who recorded it had one.

      They seem to have cut loads of material from their site....

      I have talked to people from TV licencing about this a lot over the phone and I know I am right.

      graspee

    13. Re:What's the point? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2
      "If you use or install television receiving equipment to receive or record television programme services you are required by law to have a valid TV Licence."
      English is an ambigious langauge sometimes. The above can be parsed two different ways, both of which are equally valid:
      1. [ If you use or install ] [ television receiving equipment ] [ to recieve or record television programmes ] ...
      2. [ If you use or install ][ television receiving equipment to recieve or record television programme services ] ...
      The first way is the way you interpet it. The second states that equipment whose purpose is to recieve or record television requires a license, regardless of whether you are using that ability or not. I'm not calling you wrong - just pointing out how it is that people end up interpeting it the other way.
      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    14. Re:What's the point? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      You miss the point. The point is that you pay the same flat rate whether you use the TV to receive TV shows once a year, once a month, once a day, or once and hour. Thus there is no feedback mechanism by which the company has to respond to the needs of its customers beyond just making something they want to watch on rare occasions maybe, and in that regard the BBC isn't like a real company at all. A real TV production company would have revenue for a show vary depending on how popular the show is.

      And note how the BBC gets the money for a TV license for watching ANY TV show, not just ones broadcast by the BBC. Watch ITV, and BBC gets the money. Nice racket they've got going there.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    15. Re:What's the point? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      The BBC is not a government organisation. Why do some people have so much trouble getting this?

      Because it is funded mostly through television taxation. The difference between that and an actual government organization is irrelevant. It's a "private" company in the same way that the electric company is "private" or the sewage treatment company is "private", or the construction company that does nothing but road repair is "private". You cannot choose to patronize a competing company instead. (Can you get a TV, watch JUST ITV for example, and not pay the BBC any license fee? No. BBC gets the same fee either way, whether you watch them or some competitor. Not surprisingly, under that climate the competitors are very small in number.)
      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    16. Re:What's the point? by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, duh, but if you read the 2nd quote I gave it isn't ambiguous.

      graspee

    17. Re:What's the point? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      But it is still not a government organisation. It's not owned by the government. It can't be controlled by the government. I hardly see why it's "irrelevant", a government run station would be pro-government, the BBC is independant. Big difference.

      Again, I fail to see what the problem in understanding it. Just because it's funded by taxation does not make it government controlled.

      Personally, I think it's a great thing, folks from the US might not understand. TV without commercials. Think about it for a moment.

      Take a show everyone knows, e.g. one of the new Star Trek series. On US TV, you get the intro segment, the opening credits and then an ad-break. This would not be accepted in this country, because the BBC, having no adverts, sets a baseline for the other stations to compete with. If the commercial channels were to change to the US commercial-break format, there would be an outcry. IMO, this is a very good thing.

      Combined to that, the BBC produces some damn fine stuff. Documentaries that don't aim for the lowest common denomenator, you know the "WOW! AMAZING" type of documentary that tries to make it exciting and explosive to keep the public interested. Instead, the quality of the BBC shows shine through, they are informative and entertaining in a completely different way. Compare the likes of "Walking with Dinosaurs" to the other documentary producting channels, especially the US ones. I know what style I'd rather watch. The BBC is a thinking-mans channel. It's not full of crappy brain-dead shows, except for the obligatory prime-time shows.

      Each night there are at least 4 hours of educational shows on a wide range of subjects. These are aimed at school children, students or just anyone interested. They are set up to be recorded and played back, and play in the early hours of the morning. I'd like to see a commercial channel do anything like that...

      And yes, the BBC can critisise & patronise other companies. Some of it's shows are at the forefront of consumer affairs. Once, a car show, Top Gear produced a damning review of a crap car. The director of the car manufacturer was heard to ask that all advertising be cut from the BBC from them, in essence to "punish" them. But as the BBC doesn't have advertising, it gives it the ability to say what the hell it likes. Consumer affairs programs are always limited when the company they are talking about also pays the network for commercial time.

      Using the name "government television" makes it sound like "state TV", whether that is the intended meaning or not. State TV is pretty evil and anti-democratic. Take Italy for example, they have a state TV network. The current leader is a media demi-god and owns all the other channels. When you say government TV, that's what I think of. Not the BBC.

    18. Re:What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your 2nd parsing doesn't make sense. it would have to read
      [ television receiving equipment designed to recieve or record television programme services ]
      or similar.
      your original clause was ungrammatical. the text is unambiguous.

    19. Re:What's the point? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      Again, I fail to see what the problem in understanding it. Just because it's funded by taxation does not make it government controlled.


      A company is *always* driven by he who holds the purse-strings. When that's ultimately the consumer, it's a good thing. When it's not, you get the downside of capitalism - and that usually happens with monopolies - where the consumer has no choice in whether or not to patronize a particular company, so the company is no longer beholden to it's customers. The BBC is a government-mandated monopoly since you cannot use a TV in Britain without paying the BBC, regardless of which channels you choose to watch. If the government stays out of it and doesn't take an active role in control, it's merely because they choose to delegate - for the same reason Tony Blair isn't running the health care system, or patrolling the streets in a checkered hat directing traffic - it's delegated to others. The BBC just has a greater degree of delegation.

      Now, that being said, the BBC isn't so bad precisely because they are still in the long run beholden to the people, just in a roundabout way - they are beholden to the government that funds them, which in turn is beholden to the people that elect it. Your claim that the fact that the BBC is allowed to criticise the government means it's not a government institution would only make sense if you start from the premise that your government is totalitarian.
      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  19. K-9 or K-O by inputsprocket · · Score: 2

    What the hell did K-9 actually do anyway? Yes, he was the doc's trusty friend, but he just buzzed and wheeled around the TARDIS all day doing sod all.

    Shees, I mean the thing never even trundled his way off to the door wagging his antenna when the Doc returned home. Not much of an 'old faithful was he?

    Come to think of it, I think the Doc didn't really like him either - you never saw him stroking the box-o-bolts or say hello to it.

    Maybe he was supposed to have been a guard dog for the TARDIS, since there were'nt any locks on the front door, and that thing oftern found it way into pretty hostile territory. If so, he could have developed a more fierce attitutude. What would he have done if an intruder got in? Pee'd oil on him?

    1. Re:K-9 or K-O by g4dget · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not a Doctor Who expert, but I just saw the Key to Time series on DVD. In it, K9 does get the Doctor out of a lot of tight spots. Also, the Tardis is locked and can only be opened by the Doctor. And, the Doctor really seems to like K9 and does pet it quite a bit. And, yes, that tail does wag.

    2. Re:K-9 or K-O by Atrahasis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the the TARDIS has an infinite number of keyholes inside the one (apparent) keyhole on the outside. Only The Doctor knows which is the right one, and only he has a key.

    3. Re:K-9 or K-O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could be mistaken but I seem to recall seeing an episode(Tom Baker most likely) where someone gets the key and is able to get inside.

    4. Re:K-9 or K-O by Atrahasis · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall several people getting into the TARDIS at one time or another, but it was probably due to some implausible but well-explained happiness of circumstance that they were able to do so.

    5. Re:K-9 or K-O by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

      K9 was cool - he'd laser the badguy in the nuts.

    6. Re:K-9 or K-O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Come to think of it, I think the Doc didn't really like him either - you never saw him stroking the box-o-bolts or say hello to it.

      It's funny you should say this... I got an avi file of some bloopers. One of them:

      Doctor: How long K-9?

      K9: Insufficient Data.

      Doctor: Yeah, you never fucking know the answer when it's important.

    7. Re:K-9 or K-O by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes...as I recall, it was usually an assistant who would let the door close behind them rather than pulling it shut. A brief moment that would allow someone to sneak right in.

    8. Re:K-9 or K-O by Metostopholes · · Score: 1

      In "Attack of the Cybermen" (Colin Baker), the Cybermen didn't seem to have any trouble getting in while the Doctor was gone. In fact, they recognized the TARDIS even though it looked like a pipe organ instead of a police box...

      --
      "With rare exceptions people cannot use that picture to masturbate, therefore it is not the internet."
  20. Has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    'arbitrator Shaun Sherlock remarked that even if the police had built up any reputation, it would have only been in the area of policing and law enforcement and would not have extended into the goods and services which the BBC had applied to use it for.'

    In response to which the BBC commented, "No shit, Sherlock."

  21. Re:downhill by signalgod · · Score: 1

    You should be bitchslapped back to Skaro...

    --
    --------------------------------------------- SignalGod ---------------------------------------------
  22. Clearly... by Jedi+Paramedic · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the metropolitan police are running out of places to hide the bodies and simply need to figure out the "dimensionally transcendental" nature of the TARDIS in order to have more room.

    In light of this, I wonder why the people with the patent on the tire-pressure-checker have never gone after the BBC for infringing on their design for the sonic screwdriver!

    The real culprit here is the broken Chameleon Circuit. It was under warranty, but alas - the last time he was near an authorized OEM service station, the good Doctor had to leave Gallifrey in haste before someone tried to go and make him Lord President again...

    And remember - the REAL Matrix doesn't involve a kid whose only line is "there is no spoon."

    Dr. Who rocks. Only he could go back to the beginning of time and jettison 1/3 of the TARDIS (which is asserted in many previous episodes to be infinite) to escape from the gravitational pull that would become the Big Bang. Silly Zero Room.

    --

    That's my purse! I don't know you! -- Bobby Hill
    1. Re:Clearly... by a1englishman · · Score: 1
      Don't forget: In each instance, The Doctor stole the TARDIS. The lore of Doctor Who states that The Doctor fled Galifrey in a stolen Type-40 TARDIS, that was in for repairs, to escape the Time Lord society that allowed itself to stand by while other civilizations clobbered themselves to bits.

      Each of the other times The Doctor has returned to Galifrey, he has been reminded of his duty to stay as Lord President. At which point, he has snuck back into his faithful TARDIS and dematerialized.

      This also reminds me of so many ties Dr Who had with the Second World War. Everyone connected with the show denies it, but it's fairly obvious that the Daleks are Nazis. Especially after reading some of the Dr Who novels. Furthermore, I've just realized that Galifreyan society letting other civilizations get destroyed draws a parellel to the United States standing by while Europe became overrun by Hitler's Arian nation.

    2. Re:Clearly... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      Furthermore, I've just realized that Galifreyan society letting other civilizations get destroyed draws a parellel to the United States standing by while Europe became overrun by Hitler's Arian nation.


      Hardly. Time Lord politics was meant to be a good natured self-mocking parody of British government.
      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    3. Re:Clearly... by kyletinsley · · Score: 1

      The real culprit here is the broken Chameleon Circuit. It was under warranty, but alas - the last time he was near an authorized OEM service station, the good Doctor had to leave Gallifrey in haste before someone tried to go and make him Lord President again...

      He should trade the whole thing in for one of the newer Telephone Booth models... I hear they can be fixed with a couple wads of chewing gum...

  23. Are you referring to the BBC or the MET police? by msobkow · · Score: 2

    If the BBC, you can buy T-shirts, memorabilia, copies of shows, etc.

    If the police, I've never been in the UK, and from what's been posted it would seem I couldn't expect to see such a blue police box on the streets. Even though it might have been a trademark at some point, it lost that status because it's status as a trademark was not maintained and protected.

    Had they continually protected and maintained the blue police box as a unique feature or trademark, they might have had legal ground. For example, the RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) dress uniform is a very distinctive trademark and is appropriately protected. The protection isn't so much to make money for the RCMP as it is to protect the historical importance of that image and theoretically to ensure that it isn't abused for profit by a person or business that didn't build that reputation.

    As to "Damn cops", everyone has the right to their own prejudice. I've never had any problems with the police -- give respect and you get it back. Most of them are just regular people who spend an awful lot of time dealing with whackos, drunks, crazies, domestic arguments, and a lot of other situations where they have no assurance it's not going to blow up in their face. Give them attitude and they have to assume you're a problem and will react accordingly. Don't get me wrong -- there are a few gung-ho gung-ho jarheads and corrupt/prejudiced idiots with badges. They just aren't the norm.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  24. What's next? by cybercomm · · Score: 2

    A trade mark on Mr. Bean? :)

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
  25. Use of everyday item as trademark,. by N+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a meaningful way, they may have just made it possible for people to use any non-commercial trademark in a way that doesn't infringe on the original use.

    I don't think this is anything particularly new. The Beatles' Apple record company used to use a picture of a real apple on the labels, which I assume they considered to be a trademark.

    I don't think the farmer tried to sue them for it. ;-)

    1. Re:Use of everyday item as trademark,. by plumby · · Score: 2

      But you'd probably complain if a company decided to claim trademark on your face (which I'm assuming is not currently being used for commercial purposes) and keep the proceeds itself.

  26. Street furniture by frp001 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It's about time that I rushed out and claimed patents over bus stops, lamp posts and mail boxes, before public transportation, town hall or Post office do.
    Frankly, trade mark on street furniture!!!! This is really getting out of hand!!!

    --
    May I use your sig please?
  27. Re:haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the bbc wins the title "tardis". I think the police should still be able to use it though.

  28. TARDIS spotted in the wild by Monty+Worm · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "I bear in mind that for most of the period since the police call box was taken out of service, the only sight the public at large would have had of this item of street furniture has been in the TV programme Dr Who, provided by the BBC where it is a Tardis, a fictional time travelling machine with the external appearance of a police box," ruled Mr Sherlock.

    Eh? If it was taken out of service, how did I manage to get a photo taken of me next to one? For the excessively keen, this TARDIS is outside Earls Court Underground Station, in London, England.

    --
    ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
    1. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by sanqui · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's funny, I was in the area just recently, and I swear it's not there now...

      Unless...!

    2. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by Monty+Worm · · Score: 2

      Right! That does it, I'm going down there to look.

      --
      ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
    3. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by Craevenwulfe · · Score: 1

      It is out of service. It's locked up and non - functioning.

    4. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that's not there anymore. Or maybe it's just hidden behind all the scaffolding that's there now. I am generally pretty sleepy in the morning when i walk past Earls court.

      Ben

    5. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's there, I drive past it once a day. Of course I can't guarantee if that's all day. I'm going to be going past it in a couple of hours, I'll post back if it's still there...

    6. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 2

      They WERE taken out of service. The one you saw was put back after the only place people saw them for decades was as the TARDIS.

    7. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by mcpheat · · Score: 1

      There are at least two in Glasgow still on their original site but they haven't been used for years. There are several former police boxes (of a different design to the TARDIS) in Edinburgh in use by various companies.

    8. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK this is weird, I did drive by where it was in Earls Court about 3 hours ago and it's no longer there. I'll keep my eyes open for its reappearance.

    9. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bound to be dematerialization circuit. Always is. They ought to try reversing the polarity of the neutron flow. Usually works, except sometimes you end up sliding into a parallel dimension and that really cocks things up.

  29. What did a "police box" do ? by gibodean · · Score: 3, Informative

    It seems I'm the only person here to actually not know what the original purpose of the police box was.

    I mean, before 1960 when they were taken out of service, what were they used for ?

    Did they have a telephone inside which connected you to the police ?

    Or was it somewhere to hide when you were being chased by hooligans ?

    1. Re:What did a "police box" do ? by Foniks · · Score: 4, Informative

      They were used as a temporary holding cell for aprehended criminals and were made from anything from wood to cement. The front panel did house a phone that could be used by the public or the police to call for help/backup. In fact the original TARDIS was going to be an abandoned police box found in the country - but when the props guys rocked up it had been lifted, so they had to make a new one. Which lasted from 1963 till 1975ish when it fell apart on Tom Baker and Elizabeth Sladens head.

    2. Re:What did a "police box" do ? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 3, Informative
      They had a dual purpose:
      1. In a time when the telephone had been invented but had not become ubiquitous, and mobile radio units were extremely bulky, the telephone on the outside of the box was the beat cop's means of contacting the station. If he needed some help, or needed to report something, he could run to the nearest police box and use the phone there.
      2. The box could be opened and a suspect could be locked inside for a short while. Thus the officer could hold the person there, then make the phone call (using the phone on the box) to have more people come down from the station to escort the detainee back.
      This became obsolete when the constables started using automobiles in addition to walking cops. First, the automobile could carry a radio and the battery to power it, which made the police box telephone obsolete. Second, the automobile was used to transport the suspect back to the station directly, which made the second use of the police box obsolete.

      By the time of the show, they were already obsolete and only a few were left. Thus the first Doctor and his granddaughter (or was it niece? I can't remember), kept the TARDIS in a back alley piled with random junk (where an old unused Police Box would look normal.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  30. 850 Pounds? by NeuroManson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Awright, now they have the budget to bring back Dr. Who for another season! More tinfoil and oatmeal skinned aliens than ever before!

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  31. History of the British Police Box by fantomas · · Score: 5, Informative

    This looks like a good introduction to the history of the British Police Box...


    "The TARDIS style boxes were the most expensive and the cost for building a box in 1931 was 55pounds 16 shillings and 7pence, with another 3 pounds for number plate, coat hook, lino , stool, a fire extinguisher and bracket, as well as a brush and duster to keep the mini police station tidy!"


    Happy reading. Me, I'm 36 and grew up in England. Never saw a 'real' police box til I was a teenager. Vaguely knew that Dr. Who was travelling round in something that old-fashioned policemen used to use when my dad was a boy (or the Age of the Dinosaurs or similar) but never saw one until I was wandering round London as a teenager and found a few grubby disused and flyposted ones. Luckily these days councils have cottoned on to the fact that they are actually design classics, charming and tourists love them (as well as us who grew up as kids watching the Doctor take on tin foil and vacuum cleaner-part aliens), and they've been restoring a few rather than flattening them all.

  32. To purchase a Police Box by Foniks · · Score: 5, Informative

    Incidently, "This Planet Earth" used to make a full size replica TARDIS that you could purchase online. It came in a wood version and later a fibreglass version - but it has since been discontinued (only recently too). But you can still buy replica Daleks, Cybermen, K9's etc. Very high quality, i.e. as good if not better than the TV originals. In fact the Daleks have been used for Doctor Who promo gigs I believe. Check them out at http://www.thisplanetearth.co.uk It looks like they are thinking of releasing the 1996 movie version of the TARDIS soon..

    1. Re:To purchase a Police Box by daBuddha · · Score: 1

      did they manage to duplicate the dimensional warping so it was big inside, too?

      --
      DaBuddha
  33. If You want to buy one by TheEnglishPatient · · Score: 1

    Frome Reclamation http://www.fromerec.co.uk near Bath, England had one for sale last time I was there. Sorry don't know the price.

    Aslo sorry can't guarantee time travel bit still works - or phone bit for that matter. In fact it's just an old red phone box.

  34. Pedant mode on by Burb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Current usage in the BBC Dr Who Site and novels is all caps ...

    --

    1. Re:Pedant mode on by krugdm · · Score: 2

      And in the "quiz", the correct answer for "What does TARDIS stand for?", the D stood for Dimensions

  35. Not just in London... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    There's at least one in Glasgow, possibly two, and I think there's a couple in Edinburgh...

    1. Re:Not just in London... by mark.scott · · Score: 1

      Indeed there are - I know of at least two in Newington, Edinburgh, and I think there's a couple on the Royal Mile. For any tourists they might not be blue - the ones in Newington are brownish-red and house a person selling coffee and other beverages.

    2. Re:Not just in London... by stevey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah there are at least two restored ones in Edinburgh, and several others which have been refitted as refitted as small coffee shops

    3. Re:Not just in London... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      Is there one just up from The Bridges, perhaps on Nicholson Street?

  36. The BBC isn't publically owned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    At least, not in the sense you're implying. They're owned by the government, which is paid by the public's taxes, just like the police. The BBC does not have shareholders.

    However, the BBC has spun off a number of private companies to perform commercial work which falls outside the core BBC remit (and is therefore not allowed to be paid for with the license fee). BBC Enterprises handles things like merchandising and BBC Worldwide handles video/DVD releases, for example.

    1. Re:The BBC isn't publically owned. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Except that the BBC is not paid for by taxes.

      Nor is it really government owned. It's owned by the nation. The government can't tell it what to do.

  37. Daleks, too, while they're at it. by erik_fredricks · · Score: 1
    Seriously. Here in the states, we've got bomb-sniffing robots that trundle around on wheels. Why don't the UK police go for the total image and make a DALEK ("Dispose All Leaky Explosive Karma?") bomb-robot, spikes and all?

    At least then, I'd stop making fun of the British for Blur and EMF...

    --

    THE GOOD HUMOR MAN CAN ONLY BE PUSHED SO FAR
    Bart Simpson on chalkboard in episode 2F18

    1. Re:Daleks, too, while they're at it. by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, the Brits have had bomb disposal robots for years (for obvious reasons). Mind you, they sometimes end up like the Daleks did...

    2. Re:Daleks, too, while they're at it. by brucehappy · · Score: 1

      Because then they'd have to pay more royalties to Terry Nation's estate, since he, not the Beeb own the copyright on the Daleks and Davros (their creator). Terry Nation was the writer of most of the Dalek stories.

  38. Re:Patent office did it again by CelticLo · · Score: 1

    Esp as the police box wasn't originally made for the London Metropolitan Police Force, the first police boxes were installed in Edinburgh. Several are now listed buildings.

    Recently a few have become police intranet terminals for public information use, (using Microsofts Agent for IE).

    Around five others are now painted maroon and are privately owned coffee booths.

  39. Argh..... by Kr3m3Puff · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    begin presonal_gripe

    rant('This is probablly off-topic, but damn I submitted this exact article, with almost exactly the same text about 24 hours ago and I got rejected. On the other hand, we get things like the glass computer reported twice in less than 24 hours.');

    end personal_gripe;

    begin
    repeat
    personal_gripe;
    until statisfied;
    end.

    --
    D.O.U.O.S.V.A.V.V.M.
    1. Re:Argh..... by Repugnant_Shit · · Score: 1

      Error: personal_gripe not found

    2. Re:Argh..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, no wonder some programmers get a bad name. Got to wonder if Kr3m3Puff works for the great MS?

      begin presonal_gripe
      end personal_gripe;

      Never gonna work.....

      repeat
      personal_gripe;
      until statisfied

      I don't know about you, but I can't remember the last time I was 'statistied'. Is that a bit like being put into a field outside of space and time, so that you never age - a bit like the tardis really?????

    3. Re:Argh..... by NeonSpirit · · Score: 1
      Don't take it personaly. I have summited articles 2 or 3 times that have been rejected, but the topic has been put up by somebody else. My best guess is that I was too far down the queue and the version that got posted was reviewed first. Or it could be that somebody doesn't like me :-)

      I would like an option on the post to request a reason for rejection, if rejected, at post time. Just a few option, "bad Spelling", "Insufecient Detail", "Duplicate" etc. would suit me.

      --
      I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered.....my life is my own.
  40. The BBC is so cheep. by ayjay29 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is how the BBC got the TARDIS idea:

    Director: We'r doing a space time travel "Star Trek" type thing. We need a flash spaceship, with lots of flashing lights lights and things.

    Props man: This is the BBC, be realistic.

    Director: OK, well we need a cheap model spaceship with thin wires that we can blue-screen with and do some cheesy fly-by shots.

    Props man: This is the BBC, be realistic.

    Director: Well we need something, what have you got?

    Props man: I've got this old phone box from "Dixon of Dock Green", needs a lick of paint but...

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    1. Re:The BBC is so cheep. by a1englishman · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would've been great if Star Trek hadn't started in 1966, and Doctor Who in 1963. Hmmmm?

    2. Re:The BBC is so cheep. by Observer · · Score: 2
      Veering offtopic, but didn't Douglas Adams put in some time as a script editor (aka uncredited writer) on the series when Tom Baker incarnated the good doctor? ISTR some sort of Amazing Engine in one episode which had the usual perspex, silverpaint and blinkenlichten, and somewhere in the middle, the main control... the steering wheel from a Moris Minor[1]. Now that was being creative on a small budget.

      [1]A small British automobile, manufactured from soon after World War 2 until the very late 1950's or early 1960s. (Austin Powers would know them, and would surrender to Dr Evil rather than being seen dead in one.) Primitive, but reliable[2], some of the station-wagon versions with the wooden window-frames in the rear extension were still going strong into the late 1990's. They probably finally failed their annual safety tests because of damage from woodworm and deathwatch beetle rather than from rust.

      [2]The Morris Minor, not Austin Powers[3].

      [3]Austin was another British automobile manufacturer, it merged with Morris after WW2.

      [4]Apologies and credits to Terry Pratchett, independent inventor and populariser of the footnote-to-footnote joke.

    3. Re:The BBC is so cheep. by nvembar · · Score: 1

      Eddie Izzard fan, are we?

    4. Re:The BBC is so cheep. by grytpype · · Score: 2

      >Apologies and credits to Terry Pratchett, independent inventor and populariser of the footnote-to-footnote joke.

      Actually, I think Douglas Kenney did a footnote-to-footnote (and a footnote to that footnote's footnote) in National Lampoon in the mid-70s, probably before Pratchett.

      --

      - Have a picture

    5. Re:The BBC is so cheep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, Douglas did. Key to time episodes and later ones. Some of his were classic episodes.

    6. Re:The BBC is so cheep. by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 1

      "didn't Douglas Adams put in some time as a script editor"

      I read somwhere (DNA I think, the story of Douglas Adams by Neil Gaiman) that the story of "Life, The Universe and Everything" was originally written as a Dr Who script but never made it to production and was then rewritten as the book we know.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
  41. Re:downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dr. Who had better looking women ;-)

  42. What's his name ..... by Burb · · Score: 1
    Around about the early 80's he was credited as "The Doctor".

    But only ONCE was he referred to by the name "Doctor who" in dialog (The War Games). Oh, and the 2nd Doctor signs a note "Doctor von Wer" in one episode.

    (Remind where "Theta Sigma" comes into all this... I forget...

    Am I sad or what?

    --

    1. Re:What's his name ..... by JBCybernautics · · Score: 1

      Theta Sigma comes from last episode of the Key to Time series. It was The Doctor's fraternity nickname, if I understood the situation correctly. Either that or it was 'Feta Sigma' due to some strange fetish with greek cheese. In his third incarnation, he often asked to be called 'John Smith', though he never said it was his name. The seventh season was well before Peter Davidson's time. I wouldn't be at all surprised if he was creditted as Dr. Who or Doctor Who back then. It was an evolving series after all. They didn't really 'decide' Timelords regenerated until the fourth Doctor, for example. Just trying to redefine 'sad'. "That's traffic control."

    2. Re:What's his name ..... by Woko · · Score: 2

      I thought he mostly signed his name as "Dr. John Smith"?

      --
      ---
      Silence is consent.
  43. Re:downhill by Burb · · Score: 1
    Errrr.... sometimes

    Victoria, Zoe, Sarah Jane Smith, Romana II, Peri: yes. Jo Grant, Ace: The jury is still out Mel: NOOO!

    --

  44. Re:downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    gee, that's scary stuff

  45. 850 Pounds.... by Morologous · · Score: 2, Funny

    The BBC could practically make three Dr. Who episodes off that settlement amount!

    Let's see... rent a rock quarry for the day, drag out the old Dalek suits, Voila! Dr. Who episode!

    -jason <-- still loves Dr.Who

  46. yeah, right by GeekyMike · · Score: 1

    and my trashcan looks like a dalek EXTERMINATE. I hate when people just reach for straws in hopes of a successful lawsuit.

    --
    Beware the fury of a patient man
    - John Dryden
  47. I assume that you mean "Ionic." by emil · · Score: 2

    As in Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian columns.

    I wonder what the Master was doing in Greece? Hmm.

  48. Damn Chameleon Circuit!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If only the BBC had got the Chameleon circuit of the TARDIS working. They would have saved themselves all this trouble!

  49. Genuinely gone. by Monty+Worm · · Score: 2
    Okay, so doubting I went and looked.

    It's definitely gone. Dematerialised or whatever. That photo was taken in January...

    Mind you, that's absolutely a broken chameleon circuit. Who'd expect to see a call-box like that in London? Even a red phone-booth would be a rare sighting.....

    --
    ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
  50. If you want to know the time, ask a policeman. by whimdot · · Score: 1

    If you want to change the time.......

  51. OT- Dr. Who Sound Effects by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    The BBC bought 3-5 Mellotrons back in the day to use for sound effects for Dr. Who. Mellotrons are one of the first 'Samplers'; they used magnetic tape loop to store about 6-8 seconds of sound *for each key*. Each key had a rotating group of three of these tapes. You could change the sound my moving a knob, which would rotate the carriers and load new tapes. You can hear a Mellotron (sometimes known as a Chamberlain) on the Beatles 'Strawberry Fields Forever' song - its the flute sound playing in the beginning.

    OT as hell, but interesting nontheless.

  52. Let me get this straight... by mikosullivan · · Score: 2
    The BBC chooses the police box as the disguise for the Tardis for the exact specific reason that it is already common and well-known. Then they try to get trademark protection on it.

    That's a lot of nerve.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  53. Pardon me while I geek out by devphil · · Score: 2


    I am a Doctor Who expert (lots of misspent (sorta) hours of my youth, up until I discovered my first compiler), and the TARDIS can be unlocked by pretty much anyone with the key.

    In one of the sillier episodes, we learn (because the screenwriters had just invented this fact) that inserting the key into the lock turns off lots of protecting and stabilizing mechanisms, on the assumption that the door will be opened half a second later. So a companion (not the Doctor) puts the key in, starts to the open the door, but gets distracted and walks away leaving the key in the lock. So the TARDIS starts drifting around on its own.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Pardon me while I geek out by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Out of curiosity, do you know which ep that is or some keywords I could use to find that out?

      I think I missed that ep, and ya got me curious!

    2. Re:Pardon me while I geek out by whovian · · Score: 2

      I'd like to pick your brain on something.

      I thought I heard once, in an episode, that the TARDIS can detect the presence of the being attempting to gain access and can deny access. (hmmm, /etc/sysconfig/firewall/TARDIS.conf ... but I digress.) However there are also counter-examples, such as the Gallifreyan guards entering with a master trimonic key (Invasion of Time).

      Have you any thoughts on the matter?

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    3. Re:Pardon me while I geek out by devphil · · Score: 2


      Something in the Sarah Jane Smith / Harry Sullivan time. I don't recall the episode title, sorry, although I think it had the word "invasion" in it.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  54. Big Deal! by foistboinder · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Tardis has been Dr Who's preferred mode of travel for transporting him through time zones since 1963.

    So? I do that all the time in my car.

  55. There are some similarities... by ayjay29 · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I was a lad kids used to hide behind the sofa when Dr Who came on TV.

    Nowdays kids hide behind the sofa when the police come to the door.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  56. Re:Heh, some still around by gpvillamil · · Score: 1

    When I lived in London, they put up a brand new police box in Earls Court around 1997. Looks exactly like the Tardis, with a weird CCTV turret on top. And a vandal proof phone inside for calling the police.

  57. sane legal systems by martinflack · · Score: 2
    But the Metropolitan Police lost its appeal and has been ordered to pay £850, plus legal costs.

    I'm from the UK living in the US and for my American friends straining their eyes at their monitors, I have to point out that yes, there really is no missing M or six zeros after that number.

    We English figured out a long time ago that the fun is in wearing wigs while you make the judgment, not in ordering large amounts of money to be moved around.

    1. Re:sane legal systems by osu-neko · · Score: 1
      We just figured the exchange rate was high, as in, "Oh, so that's something like two million US dollars, right?"

      ;)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  58. Ahead of it's time... by baine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone noticed how ahead of it's time Dr. Who was?

    Examples :

    Stealth Technology : Chameleon Circuits (ok, so they never worked, but you can't fly a B-2 through a rain shower either).

    Non-lethal Weapons : Sonic Screwdriver

    Recent 'Anit-Gravity' research : The TARDIS' ability to move by manipulating time and space

    Sony's Aibo : K-9 (granted, K-9 could kick Aibo's ass)

    And is it just me or is Jeff Goldblum always seem like he's trying to channel Tom Baker?

    Anyone care for a jelly-baby?

    --
    Need a simple, easy to use data tier generator? http://www.gryphinsoftware.com/
  59. Go back in time and try again... by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 1

    Er... no, the Met stopped using the police boxes a long time ago (1960s), then the BBC started selling T-shirts with the TARDIS on them (1970s), the Met did nothing, but then when the BBC got the trademark on it on the grounds that they still used the image, and the Met had long ceased to do so (1990s), the Met tried to claim that they should have the trademark on it. By the time the BBC tried to get the trademark, the actual boxes were referred to regularly as 'TARDIS type'.

  60. BBC wasted the 8th Doctor by Chas · · Score: 1

    Not necessarily.

    They can take the tried and true path of a cop-out.

    Remember that there was pair Peter Cushing films that aren't, strictly, part of the canon.

    If they simply choose to ignore the McGann film, they still have a whole regeneration.

    Even though they DID use Sylvester McCoy there for the regeneration.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  61. This is just stupid... by orichter · · Score: 1

    The thing that really gets me is not who gets the trademark, but that fact that one branch of government (the police) had to use another branch of government (the courts) to try to force a third branch of government (the BBC) to give up a trademark which the first branch of government (the police) really had no need for. This is like me suing my wife over who gets to use the BRA I bought her. For gods sake don't they all answer to the same person eventually. Just ask that person what they should do. And a fine of 850 pounds???? So the government is going to fine one branch of government because of a lawsuit they brought against another branch of government. Who is going to pay the fine, the government??? What the hell is the point of that?

    On the up side, it's good to know that my own government isn't the only government which does stupid wasteful things with my tax dollars.

    1. Re:This is just stupid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the police are not a branch of the government.
      the courts are not a branch of the government.
      this much due to enlightenment philosophy.

      the BBC is not a branch of the government.
      that came later.

  62. "childish/313313 attitude" by kyletinsley · · Score: 1

    I am just worried that whoever is reviewing the stories is showing a childish/313313 attitude.

    You're worried that they are showing an "eleele" attitude? WTF is that??

    You're telling me that that tiny town in Hawaii has its own globally recognized attitude? Geez, I must be out of the loop...
  63. Maybe... by KlomDark · · Score: 2

    They should try suing Bill & Ted and George Carlin for the infringing time-travelling phone booth they used in their excellent adventure... They definitely stole the idea...

  64. Re:Boy, by iamacat · · Score: 1

    Well, most new technology only has shitty implementations at first. I don't think the first cell phones, notebooks (PC Portable?) etc were really practical. It's still a good idea and fun to play with :-)
    Anyway, the quality of stereo or the quality of my story still doesn't explain the disappearing mod points. A good editor will only react to a bad story by not publishing it.

  65. Re:downhill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but Dr Who was hella cool...

    lord help us all