Slashdot Mirror


Buggy Bugging Backfires On German Police

Alethes writes "The BBC is reporting that German police have been caught bugging cellphones at the expense of criminal suspects who found a unknown and inaccessible voicemail number listed on their bills that was being used to record calls. Telecommunications authorities said that nearly 20,000 lines were currently being tapped."

101 of 270 comments (clear)

  1. hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    what's the German translation for "Do'h!"

    1. Re:hmmm... by whovian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ach Du D'oh!

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    2. Re:hmmm... by moonbender · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Nein!", according to The Simpsons (German).

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    3. Re:hmmm... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 3, Informative
      what's the German translation for "Do'h!"

      Scheiße - roughly pronounced "Schiess", but I believe "Do'h!" works.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    4. Re:hmmm... by Havokmon · · Score: 5, Funny
      what's the German translation for "Do'h!"

      Remember Wolfenstein?

      Halt!
      Kommentein!
      Aus Pass?
      Vonsaff!
      You panic and run into a wall:
      ###BERRP!###BERRP!###BERRP!###BERRP!###BERRP!

      Ok, so I KNOW the Vonsaff is wrong..

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    5. Re:hmmm... by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe it's roughly:

      Scheißetwaswirklichschlechtesgeschehenundesüberras chtemichgroß

      Used in a sentence:

      Mein Automobil ist defekt. Scheißetwaswirklichschlechtesgeschehenundesüberras chtemichgroß!!!

      (sorry about slashdot breaking the word in two. They obviously have no respect for the German language.)

    6. Re:hmmm... by unicron · · Score: 2

      I was pretty damn sure that nein meant no. When Mr. Burns married Marges mother, the groom side was Barney and an old guy in aWorld War 1 German officer uniform. Barney told him "down in front, and he replied 'NEIN!'".

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    7. Re:hmmm... by MacAndrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dontcha think Scheiße pretty much covers it?

      Ah German -- a word for everything. What was the one for "that feeling to get when your neighbor's house is on fire"? Ich vergesse.

    8. Re:hmmm... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      sheisse : literal meaning is 'shit'

      Exactally. "The crooks found out we are tapping their phones"..."Shit!" (or replace with "Do'h")

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    9. Re:hmmm... by moonbender · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're absolutely correct, which just happens to illustrate the fact that in contrast to common belief, The Simpsons is not always correct. It's just that there isn't really a better translation for the "D'oh!" ... "argh", perhabs.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    10. Re:hmmm... by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, my favorite is schützengrabenvernichtungspanzerkraftwagen.

      The English translation would be "tank".

    11. Re:hmmm... by Phil+Karn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Babelfish won't translate this unless you insert some spaces in the German. So I entered

      Scheiß etwas wirklich schlechtesgeschehenundesüberraschtemichgroß

      and got this English translation:

      Shit somewhat really bad-happen-and-surprise-me-largely

    12. Re:hmmm... by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Ach! Mein leben! :)

    13. Re:hmmm... by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Don't remember that one, possibly:

      Schutzstaffel!

      I'm not sure if the spelling's correct, and I think there's an umlaut over the U...

      That was the name of the secret police.

    14. Re:hmmm... by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Nein, nein -- wir sollen EIN Wort finden!

      Perhaps schadenfreude is close enough?

      Uh-oh, here comes the moderator who speaks German. Hide!

    15. Re:hmmm... by Bonker · · Score: 2

      I understood that a significant number of German speaking internet-users use 'ss' instead of the 'spassbe' (sp?) character so as not to confuse computers without an extended character set.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    16. Re:hmmm... by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Warum so viel Slashdotters Deutsch sprechen?

      Don't bother to correct grammar/spelling -- I know I haven't done this since high school. Didn't know I'd face situations like this.

    17. Re:hmmm... by quigonn · · Score: 2

      G'schissena, "schadenfreude" is already an English word, just like hinterland and rucksack (and several others, which I don't remember anymore).

      Anyway, it's really funny to see English-speaking people speaking or even writing German. :-) And then , you can overcharge them by speaking (or writing) one of the German dialects. Mine is the Upper Austrian dialect, so beware. ;-) (sometimes, not even Germans understand me!)

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    18. Re:hmmm... by macdaddy357 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who were the ones in charge of this bungled bugging? Col. Klink and Shultz?

      --
      How ya like dat?
    19. Re:hmmm... by tempfile · · Score: 2

      No, it's not deprecated. The spelling reform just made it a little less widespread.

    20. Re:hmmm... by Asprin · · Score: 2


      Remember Wolfenstein?
      ...


      Or, my personal favorite:

      GUTEN TAG! [BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM]

      It's hard to believe that actually scared me at one point in my life, but it did.

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    21. Re:hmmm... by Pius+II. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the german translation for "tank" would be "tank" (Nein!) or "Panzer", the exact translation for that long word would be "trench destruction armored force vehicle".
      In the Bundeswehr something like "Schützengrabenvernichtungspanzerkraftwagen" would probably become something like "SGVPKW".
      I can safely assure you that _noone_ ever uses such words in Germany. They are understandable, but they would be incredibly bad style. In fact, every normal german text could probably translated word-by-word (except for the word order) and would be accepted as a perfectly ordinary text by native english speakers; the same goes for english->german translations.

    22. Re:hmmm... by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      I suppose ... Schadenfreude? Basically the same feeling CmdrTaco would feel if kuro5hin's server facilities burned down.

      --
      +++ath0
    23. Re:hmmm... by psych031337 · · Score: 2
      In the Bundeswehr something like "Schützengrabenvernichtungspanzerkraftwagen" would probably become something like "SGVPKW".

      Oh, the english military gobblespeak is just as bad. You just don't have the lingual option of just merging the words to form new ones.

      Think of the "highly mobile multipurpose wheeled vehicle". HMMWV. Also called M998. Or just Humvee.
      --
      +++ath0
    24. Re:hmmm... by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      You mean that one -ß- i guess. You'd pronounce that "esszett" with a german tongue or "as-cet" with american language.

      --
      +++ath0
    25. Re:hmmm... by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sankt-Florians-Prinzip (Saint Florian principle): ""Heiliger Sankt Florian, verschon mein Haus, zünd and're an!" - "Holy Saint Florian, spare my house, put others on fire". As in "If it has to happen, let it happen somewhere else".

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    26. Re:hmmm... by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2

      True story (annotated for nonlocals):

      Back in the 20s, my grandfather, from Oberschlesien (Upper Silesia, now Poland), went to the University in Muenchen (Munich). After a week of listening to people speaking Bayrisch (Bavarian), he writes a letter home to his mother expressing shock at the number of foreigners in Muenchen -- in fact, he has yet to meet a German in the city, after an entire week!

      Of course, he *was* an absent-minded professor type, but still...

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    27. Re:hmmm... by unicron · · Score: 2

      Actualy, it does have meaning, it's Homer's brain not able to decide between "damnit" and "oh crap".

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    28. Re:hmmm... by Grab · · Score: 2

      You ever been to Britain? Accents R us!

      Grab.

  2. Oops! by natron+2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How in the hell do you manage to do this? I can understand if it was done by a hacker or novice phone tapper. These guys are supposed to be pros. I guess you could say that their cover is blown. Funny Germans.

    1. Re:Oops! by HedRat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funny Germans.

      Indeed. My wife is half German and half Mexican. It seemed like a good idea at the time. I never realized how quickly I'd get tired of sauerkraut tacos.

    2. Re:Oops! by _Spirit · · Score: 2

      From what I recall from an article about this, the technical details are handled by the phone company, they are required by law to have an infrastructure in place that can forward conversations to the police. The police just show them the paperwork and tell em which lines to tap. Sounds like the phone company involved is going to be in deep sh*t and the police isn't to blame.

      --

      beauty is only a light switch away

  3. The news here is by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that they got caught. German laws allow for this, Sloppy work on the part of either the telecom company or the police (or both). If its one thing American Inteligence ( homebound anyway) is good at is keeping the public unaware of these types of things. Is that a good thing? Thats an agrument for another post.

    1. Re:The news here is by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      german laws allow making people pay something they don't order? (ie, phonecompany would have to to be able to categorize what it's billing it's customers anyways, how are they going to explain, "you pay 4$ for 'special services'" "-i didn't order any!" "well but mr. klotz from berlin police did".)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  4. Headline by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This headline is almost good enough to be a contender in the Favorite Past Slashdot Headline.... poll!
    Buggy bugging, ha!

    --

    As with the sun's light
    My mom was magnificent
    Unquestionable
  5. Great by (H)olyGeekboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now they've given Ashcroft an idea to both monitor possible terrorists AND increase revenue for the US govertment...

    Record all of their conversations in voicemails, then charge them for the priviledge. Go Patriot Act! :)

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      There seem to be a few serious misconceptions in how this article is presented. The first is the idea that the police were "caught" wiretapping innapropriately... if you read the article it appears that the wiretaps were legal, the issue is that these suspects found out they were being tapped because this mystery number suddenly appeared on their bill.


      Misconception numero duo, that the German police were attempting to charge suspects for their being wiretapped. No, if you (once again) read the article it is clear that these suspects being charged on their bills WAS the screwup. Obviously the German Police did not want these potential baddies to get a mystery charge on their cell bills and tip them off to the fact that they were being bugged.


      Finally, it doesn't appear to be, at least completely, the German Police's fault. What happened is, they fiddled their mobbys (the article doesn't spell it all out but by all appearances with an appropriate warrant and the cooperation of the phone company) so that when they made a call it would hook up and record the convo into a voicemail box. The phone company upgraded the phone software and the upgrade was incompatible: the bug made the caller get charged for the hook-up to the voicemail box, and that charge tipped them off that something was fishy. Oops.

    2. Re:Great by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Better yet, bounce them to 900 numbers or obscure Carribean ones that charge you an arm and a leg before you figure out what's going on.

      After all, these are just terrorists, right?

      I had no idea a cellphone tap was this easy, or this easy to screw up.

  6. Free call? by philibob · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's listed on their bills... I just hope they weren't charged for it.

    1. Re:Free call? by McFly69 · · Score: 2

      No man. They charge me 6 Euro for it. I am fighting with Vodafight to refund those charge and the 900 number charges that just "appeared." Of coruse I am not going to admit I called them :)

      --



      NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  7. inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Inaccessable? Most voice-mail systems use a 5-digit password. Most of the paswords are simple, such as "1-2-3-4-5" (many detectives from the Montreal Urban Police, for example).

    Hacking most voicemail boxes is so simple because of the simple password.

    Not to mention war-dialing the number trying all possible passwords from a land line.

    1. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by Exedore · · Score: 2

      Well, yeah, I suppose they could figure out a way into the mailbox, but all they would hear are the conversations they've already had.

      "I said what?!? To who?!? Ohhh, I'm so mad... just wait 'till I get my hands on me!

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    2. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Not just their conversations, bot others as well.

      That's what happened up here. Guys were punching into the cops' voicemail, hearing them talk to their informants, making dates with their mistresses, giving their wives excuses for being late so they could keep their "date" with their mistress, etc.

      Very embarassing

    3. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Is there PGP for luggage?

      Yeah, it's called a booby trap.

  8. Coming to a town near you by WankersRevenge · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a something related to chew on . . . especially after last nights election results.

    "A little-known amendment in the Senate version of the bill makes it much easier for ISPs to disclose e-mail communications without being served with a warrant, which had been prohibited before the Patriot Act of 2001." - wired

    Check it here

  9. It is too bad that this did not happen in England. by Prince_Ali · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it had happened in England the subject could have been, "Buggy Bugging Backfires On British Bobbies."

  10. Schultz - "I see nothing...I know nothing" by bje2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    no wonder the germans were dumb enough to get caught doing this...i mean, c'mon, they never caught onto the old radio transister in the coffee pot routine...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  11. Installing new software by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Funny
    "The technical fault arose when we were installing new software," a spokesman for the mobile phone company O2 said.

    They should have read that SP3 EULA more carefully.

    "...GIVES US THE RIGHT TO BLOW ALL CURRENT AND FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS"

  12. I'm not sure what's worse.... by innosent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The software errors/stupidity that let the alleged criminals find out they were being tapped, or the fact that we don't have those errors here in the US. Not that I do anything wrong, but I'd still prefer not to be monitored by the government. This reminds me of a /. article a while back about the US taking bids for a central repository of personal information. It may sound like a great idea to the politicians, but after a while they're going to need money, and guess what?... Then everyone's personal information is up for sale. Telcos have been doing this for a while, even my university (UCF) does this, and I get a few dozen porn/marketing spams a day, just because they have my email address in their records. And you thought spam was a problem now....

    --
    --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
    1. Re:I'm not sure what's worse.... by Nicolai+Haehnle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is something I've been thinking about lately. May sound weird by some, but it should be possible to find out whether you've been bugged (pardon the pun) by the police. Obviously, they won't tell you as long as the investigations are still going, but it would be _very_ interesting to know afterwards.

      A good friend of my mother had been in regular contact with some RAF terrorists back in the '60s or '70s - AFAIK neither my mother nor said friend were actually involved in anything though. If I were in a situation like this I'd be curious to know how much the police has got in their archive about me.
      Anyway, I don't think many people on Slashdot know details about German law, so I guess I'll have to find out myself whether this is possible...

  13. Re:Damn Krauts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    This would have never happened back in the good old days of Hitler!

    Very funny. My grandfather died in Auschwitz.

    He got drunk and fell out of his guard tower.

  14. Amazing by RealTimeFreeAgent · · Score: 4, Funny

    Most of the paswords are simple, such as "1-2-3-4-5"

    That's the same combination I have on my luggage!

    --
    "You get what you pay for after all." --
    1. Re:Amazing by tomhudson · · Score: 2

      Aha! Another fan of Spaceballs!

  15. Quote... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 3, Funny

    Evil will always triumph, because good is dumb! - Dark Helmet

    --
    TODO: Something witty here...
  16. Related News from Finland by jukal · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Two senior security staff at Finnish telco Sonera have been remanded in custody, charged with breaching customer privacy by allegedly riffling through private telephone records in an attempt to identify an internal mole

    Read the rest here. Now, I consider this worse - you can expect policy to breach privacy - but you are not supposed to expect that from a major telco....or...actually...are you?

    1. Re:Related News from Finland by jukal · · Score: 2
      policy

      s/policy/police/

    2. Re:Related News from Finland by jukal · · Score: 2
      The NBI investigation was launched recently at Sonera's own request".

      Ofcourse, after the breach had been already made public by Helsingin Sanomat. Anyway, yes, I agree - it's better that this is discussed publicly - than kept secret. Oh, and to me it's the same which telco it was - the interesting part is that atleast now everyone knows any company can get caught for it. Also, hopefully this makes the BOFHs at all the gazillion ISPs consider their acts before lurking customer emails - it still the same issue even though the media is different.

  17. There is no limit to what we should do! by reverendG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The German police believe that over 20,000 people need to have active wiretaps on their phones?

    German authorities can only use wiretapping in serious cases such as murder, money laundering, kidnapping or treason.

    I think that when there are this many people who are being monitored, there's a problem. Just take a moment and think about the number of people it takes to monitor and administrate that level of surveillance!

    --

    Why should I argue rationally with someone being irrational? I'll just mock them instead.
    1. Re:There is no limit to what we should do! by tempfile · · Score: 2

      This seems to be a result of the "security package" legislation after September 11. They liberalized wiretapping, and even home searching, I believe. I should read that law some time. Before 11/9, the police needed a court warrant to do this in most cases, but now they can do a lot more by suspection. A bit sad in a country that has phone and mail secrecy in its constitution, but the public didn't care.

  18. Illegal? by wiredog · · Score: 2

    How so? Even in the US it would be legal if the police had the proper warrants.

    1. Re:Illegal? by Havokmon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How so? Even in the US it would be legal if the police had the proper warrants.

      Err No.

      A software glitch displayed information that was supposed to be private. I want to see posts on where the responsibility lies for 'software glitches'. Not "My privacy was invaded illegally". So far I can only see that there were 20k taps total, dozens in Germany. Home, Work, Cell. 3 per person. That gives you approx 6 thousand people total, say 'Telecommunications authorities".

      But that's not the issue, I don't care about the legality of the taps, I want to know what the company has to give up because of their 'glitch'.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  19. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by AftanGustur · · Score: 5, Informative
    If it had happened in England the subject could have been, "Buggy Bugging Backfires On British Bobbies."

    Unfortunately, no

    It is illegal for the UK media to report on incidents that involve national security.

    Yeah, yeah, laugh as you want, you can even claim that it's rediculeus to claim it has anything to do with national security, laugh while you still have the right..

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  20. Installation of New Software? by airrage · · Score: 2

    A couple of things seem rather odd to me, 1) Why do you need a voicemail to track callers (I do not profess to understand the underlying workings of cell-phone infrastructure). 2) They installed new software that cause the problem, but it really only showed up on the invoicing system? So did the install a new invoicing system? Sounds like they don't have their hacking all that together over there....but just my gut instinct. Maybe someone could shed some greater light on the subject...

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Installation of New Software? by allism · · Score: 2, Informative

      The voice mailbox was not to track callers, it was to record phone conversations on the phone lines. The billing for the voice mailbox was not supposed to show up at all, but after the software upgrade the owners of the phone lines started being charged for the voice mailboxes that were being used to record their phone conversations, even though they were not actually able to retrieve messages from the mailboxes.

  21. Re:It's worth it by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2, Informative

    -Remember: Mohammed Atta and his crew of butchers, who murdered 3000 Americans on 9/11/01, plotted the entire scheme in Germany-

    News to me - where did you get this piece of information, please?

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  22. If only... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    The charge had been listed as a phone sex number, there wouldn't have been a problem.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  23. Re:It's worth it by jpm165 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Terrorists are much like hackers and there will always be an exploit. I would rather die in an act of terrorism so that the civil liberties of my friends and family and countrymen were protected, rather than give them up for a little extra security. Any true American would agree. "Give me liberty or give me death." "

    I agree. I would rather have you die in an act of terrorism than to give up my civil liberties...

  24. Balderdash by MacAndrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The police ARE trying to listen in on private phone calls, in the hopes of finding something there. Would you say police seaching private homes was OK simply because they're only looking for criminals? Not if you believe in any form of privacy.

    "Al-Qaeda cells coordinating international terrorism is an everyday occurence in many German cities" -- you have direct knowledge of this? I haven't seen it reported anywhere. Maybe we suspect it is "an everyday occurrence" but suspicion without evidence is nothing, and acting on that to monitor 20,000 numbers would be harassment. Police doing "everything they can" would logically include what besides phone taps? Fighting terrorism is a worthy cause, but trashing everything we believe in to do it is not.

    Give blame where blame is due, but nothing is gained by mindlessly rounding up the usual suspects. Al Queda is evil, and so is an authoritarian police state.

  25. Worth Pointing Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This article from 1998 indicated that Germany has had suspected criminals under surveillance for quite some time. So this shouldn't come as much of a surprise. In fact, it was said that several nations in the EU had similar policies in that article. If that is true, then this isn't a good time to be a civil libertarian. Big Brother is watching quite a few of us.

    Now here's something to think about: These German police who conducted this were up so sloppy that the bugging information showed up on phone bills. So: how many governments are doing this the right way (i.e. without the public's knowledge?)

    1. Re:Worth Pointing Out by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      From Pulp Fiction:

      LANCE

      She ain't my fuckin' problem, you fucked her up, you deal with it -- are you talkin' to me on a cellular phone?
      VINCENT
      Sorry.
      LANCE
      I don't know you, who is this, don't come here, I'm hangin' up.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  26. Librarians should follow this lead by RevDobbs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps this can be employed by your local librarian as well:

    "Oh, that's a not a late fee, that's the 'records retrieval' charge... Gee, I'm sorry, that should have been billed to the FBI, let me take that off of your account. Now, do you still want me to fetch that Civil Engineering book on demolition explosives?"

  27. Billable wiretaps in New York by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Something like this happened in the US about a decade ago, in New York, and it's one of the reasons the FBI pushed CALEA through.

    The New York office of the FBI was wiretapping various Mafia types (with some success; they eventually broke the New York Mafia). The taps were done by New York Telephone, and were implemented by ordering a remote extension from the circuit to be tapped to an FBI office. This was a billable service, and it wasn't cheap; the total costs of all those circuits were a strain on the FBI budget.

    One month, the FBI didn't pay the bill for one of their "extensions". The billing software then started billing the other party on the line, the person being wiretapped. Big embarassment.

    This was part of the motivation behind CALEA. Not only did it hurt the investigation, but it embarassed the FBI. (The FBI is very thin-skinned. "Don't embarass the Bureau" started with Hoover and lives on.)

    All this is in one of the books about how the FBI took down the New York Mafia, but I don't have the cite.

    1. Re:Billable wiretaps in New York by quintessent · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see the software:

      if (!PaymentReceived(WiretappingAgency)) {
      SendBill(Customer);
      }

  28. Oldie but goodie by PolyDwarf · · Score: 2, Funny

    From Germans to everyone:

    All your calls are belong to us.

    1. Re:Oldie but goodie by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      That coming from Echelon country is preposterous.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  29. ironic by zenst · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its funny how in Germany they seem to want to charge the customer were in the UK all the mobile teco's got pissed off with requests for duplicate bill's from the police (which have all call's made and when) that they started charging them.

  30. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Buggy Bugging Backfires On British Bobbies."

    ...or "Buggy Bugging Backfires: British Bobbies Buggered"

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  31. Even better by Wind_Walker · · Score: 2

    "Buggy Bugging By British Bobbies Backfires"

  32. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK, one more...

    If this happened in Amish country, it could read, "Buggy buggy bugging backfires in bucolic backwoods blunder".

    I promise not to post for the rest of the day.

  33. Easy! by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    He's psychic! Or psycho? Well, socially challenged or "troll".

    Seriously, a significant amount of 9/11 planning took place in Germany (Hamburg?) ... and in England ... in that hotbed of insurrection, Florida ... and my neighbor's garage (oops, shouldn't've said that). Remember how they used public internet terminals in libraries to communicate godknowswhat? Communication is so easy now that location barely matters.

  34. How would the German police respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe the German police would say something like:

    "Das cellphones ist nicht usen fur trakken das badfolken. Das policen ist nicht snoopen das folken a la 3rd Reich. Relaxen und watchen das bills increasen. And Kwitchurbelliaken."

  35. More importantly... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Zey have vays ov making you pay forr it!

    RMN
    ~~~

  36. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by cmeans · · Score: 2
    Actually, it could have been, "Buggy Bugging Backfires on Bosh Bulls" and it would have stayed on-topic ;)

  37. A slight flaw in that argument by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2

    Even assuming the remaining 15% were all agents of the secret police, how could they keep up with everyone else? Each agent would have to tap, monitor and follow six people.

    RMN
    ~~~

  38. Thank God the Berlin Wall Came Down by serutan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And those awful communist Bad Guys are gone and the Good Guys won. Everything's all better now.

  39. But don't worry... by Puk · · Score: 5, Funny

    The US government/law enforcement/intelligence agencies would never use their powers to spy on people. Aren't you a PATRIOT?

    -Puk

  40. Re:Perhaps more importantly... by symbolic · · Score: 2


    If they were charged, will they get a refund?

  41. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by netsharc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, Bundespolizei means Federal Police, so it wouldn't make sense to put a state together with it.

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  42. Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In the film Brazil, after your arrest you have to pay for your own interrogations, your stay in prison and so forth; they send you a bill afterwards for the Governmental services you 'used'; or if you don't survive the interogation, they present the bill to your next of kin.

    Sounds to me like the Germans just sent the bill a bit early; they should have sent it after the investigation was complete.

    1984 came late it seems...

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    1. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      You left out a ;-) which makes me think you are worryingly serious.

      No, it will be unfair on the rest of us. They'll come out of prison with huge debts, and have to commit more crimes to avoid going back in for lack of payment. Insurance premiums would go up massively; and the thieves will get less money on the item once they have fenced it than the item is worth, so non criminals lose out all the more.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by rweir · · Score: 2
  43. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ummm how hypocritical is that?

    Why should they have rights?

    Everyone should have rights.

    Why should people who want to destroy us, and take away our livihood, and remove our liberties have any right?

    What the hell is wrong with you. You're like every other idiot in this country that thinks "Well G Dubbaya is taking away rights of certain people so that I can keep mine and live a happy life." It reminds me of something I read a while ago -

    In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and still I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.

    If you change communists to terrorists, jews to muslims, trade unionists to hackers, you basically have the situation of today.

  44. Re:Um.....That Sux by karlm · · Score: 2
    Why should they have rights? Why should people who want to destroy us, and take away our livihood, and remove our liberties have any right? I don't understand why anyone would want them to have rights. Let's support everything we can to stop them.

    Noce Troll, you got me. Good idea. If we take away thier right to a torture-free interrogation, we'll find that nearly 100% of the accused criminals confess to their crimes and we can execute them there in the interogation room.

    There are reasons you can't take away any of someone's rights until they're convicted by a jury.

    Oh, and it's a slippery slope. One day accused terrorists are held for just a month or two without being charged, a few years later they sodomize you until you confess to driving under the influence back in 1973, you dirty scum of a degenerate human you.

    --
    Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
  45. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by flossie · · Score: 2
    Is /. English?

    That depends on the legality of the revolution. After the fiasco in Florida a couple of years ago, the Queen is reported to be seriously considering revoking the declaration of independence.

    =o)

  46. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
    It is illegal for the UK media to report on incidents that involve national security.

    Such as just last month, when they gagged the press from reporting allegations that the UK govenment contracted Al Qaeda to assassinate Gaddafi.

    Not only did they gag reporting the story, they also demanded that the media can't even report (or protest) the fact that they have been gagged!

    Welcome to the free world. Leave your brains and integrity at the door please...

  47. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 2

    Ok whatever, live in a dream world where your liberties are protected by having them taken away by the government. I think based on the current president that most Americans are fucking retarded.

  48. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 2

    This idea of "protecting" and "defending" criminals who will then return the favour by doing all they can to destroy us is preposturous.

    Actually I was talking about protecting and defending your rights and the rights of other people. You don't seem to understand what's going on in this country, do you realize how many people were arested in NYC the weeks following 9/11 just because they looked suspicious and held for very long amounts of time (the law saying that they couldn't hold you for more than 48 hours or whatever amount of time was lifted.) They were given no right to an attorney, no lawyers, no phone call, no trial. If I were arrested I could have been sent to jail for 3 weeks, not been told what I did, then released and not able to fight back. Terrorists didn't take away our rights or liberties, the government did.

    I'll use my liberties in this democracy to strongly defend not only those people who would take away my liberties, but also to keep a government that will protect my liberties using every possible measure available.

    You will use your liberties to defend people who would take away the liberties and also a government that will protect your liberties by every possible measure available (by taking them away)? Wow so basically you're giving up your liberties and the liberties of all other citizens just so terrorists can't take away your liberties? Umm wait who has the power to give and take liberties... THE GOVERNMENT. So let's defend the government the only being capable of taking away liberties to stop terrorists from taking away our liberties (which they can't do anyway... I hope this eventually sinks through, only the GOVERNMENT can take away liberties and they've been doing that for over a year now.)

  49. Re:Um.....That Sux by bmetzler · · Score: 2
    If I were arrested I could have been sent to jail for 3 weeks, not been told what I did, then released and not able to fight back. Terrorists didn't take away our rights or liberties, the government did.

    Would you rather spend 3 weeks in jail cooperating with federal investigators, or worry about being blown up in the next building that Al-Quida is going to blow up? It's no contest for me, I'm taking the 3 weeks.

    -Brent
  50. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 2

    Co-operating with federal investigators? Do you think they did that in jail? No it was more like

    Police: get in jail
    You: Why?
    Police: We said, GET IN JAIL!
    You: I said WHY!
    Police: Looks like we've got a trouble maker
    *police throw you into jail*
    You: Don't I get one phone call? Can't I speak to an attorney?
    Police: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH BWAHAHAHAHAHA did you hear that george, he wants a phone call!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    3 weeks later
    Police: Well you can get out now
    You: What did I do? I'm going to sue the crap out of this police department!
    Police: HAHAHAHA SUE US!?!?! Good luck buddy but thanks to new laws we were legally allowed to detain you for nothing more than being suspicious.
    You: Well I'm going to get someone to believe me and we'll fight back.

    This is where people like you come in...
    You: Help! Help! I'm being repressed! Other People: Whatever, that's what you get for being a terrorist ok.
    You: A terrorist?!?! WHAT! I didn't do anything!!!
    Other People: Sure you didn't, look at you, you're from palestine, you had to do SOMETHING!

    Remind you of anything? Like the japanese during WW2 right after Pearl Harbor? Oh sure it's ok lock up all the Japanese, as long as they can't blow up any more of the armies bases we'll be fine, who cares if they'll be hated for the next few years and unable to get jobs after being arrested for absolutely no reason. Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.

  51. I'm an american german - I wanna laugh too. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    And Kwitchurbelliaken.

    I understood the joke in every fake german word, but what you mean with "And Kwitchurbelliaken." I really couldn't figure out.
    Could you get closer to real german spelling or give a translation of what's that suposed to mean?
    Thanks. :-)

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  52. Re:Um.....That Sux by rweir · · Score: 2

    I'll be fine. I'm not a Catholic or a Protestant. I'm a Jedi!

    I am not the terrorist you seek.
    *waves hand*