Slashdot Mirror


Buggy Bugging Backfires On German Police

Alethes writes "The BBC is reporting that German police have been caught bugging cellphones at the expense of criminal suspects who found a unknown and inaccessible voicemail number listed on their bills that was being used to record calls. Telecommunications authorities said that nearly 20,000 lines were currently being tapped."

186 of 270 comments (clear)

  1. hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    what's the German translation for "Do'h!"

    1. Re:hmmm... by whovian · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ach Du D'oh!

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    2. Re:hmmm... by moonbender · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Nein!", according to The Simpsons (German).

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    3. Re:hmmm... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 3, Informative
      what's the German translation for "Do'h!"

      Scheiße - roughly pronounced "Schiess", but I believe "Do'h!" works.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    4. Re:hmmm... by Havokmon · · Score: 5, Funny
      what's the German translation for "Do'h!"

      Remember Wolfenstein?

      Halt!
      Kommentein!
      Aus Pass?
      Vonsaff!
      You panic and run into a wall:
      ###BERRP!###BERRP!###BERRP!###BERRP!###BERRP!

      Ok, so I KNOW the Vonsaff is wrong..

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    5. Re:hmmm... by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 5, Funny

      I believe it's roughly:

      Scheißetwaswirklichschlechtesgeschehenundesüberras chtemichgroß

      Used in a sentence:

      Mein Automobil ist defekt. Scheißetwaswirklichschlechtesgeschehenundesüberras chtemichgroß!!!

      (sorry about slashdot breaking the word in two. They obviously have no respect for the German language.)

    6. Re:hmmm... by unicron · · Score: 2

      I was pretty damn sure that nein meant no. When Mr. Burns married Marges mother, the groom side was Barney and an old guy in aWorld War 1 German officer uniform. Barney told him "down in front, and he replied 'NEIN!'".

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    7. Re:hmmm... by MacAndrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dontcha think Scheiße pretty much covers it?

      Ah German -- a word for everything. What was the one for "that feeling to get when your neighbor's house is on fire"? Ich vergesse.

    8. Re:hmmm... by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      sheisse : literal meaning is 'shit'

      Exactally. "The crooks found out we are tapping their phones"..."Shit!" (or replace with "Do'h")

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    9. Re:hmmm... by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      Dontcha think Scheiße pretty much covers it?

      Ah German -- a word for everything. What was the one for "that feeling to get when your neighbor's house is on fire"? Ich vergesse.

      Scheiße! Mein freunds casa ist vershekt!

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    10. Re:hmmm... by moonbender · · Score: 3, Informative

      You're absolutely correct, which just happens to illustrate the fact that in contrast to common belief, The Simpsons is not always correct. It's just that there isn't really a better translation for the "D'oh!" ... "argh", perhabs.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    11. Re:hmmm... by CrystalFalcon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually, my favorite is schützengrabenvernichtungspanzerkraftwagen.

      The English translation would be "tank".

    12. Re:hmmm... by Phil+Karn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Babelfish won't translate this unless you insert some spaces in the German. So I entered

      Scheiß etwas wirklich schlechtesgeschehenundesüberraschtemichgroß

      and got this English translation:

      Shit somewhat really bad-happen-and-surprise-me-largely

    13. Re:hmmm... by tzanger · · Score: 1

      Ok, so what was teh word that sounded like "Gunnerstchaffel!"?

    14. Re:hmmm... by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Ach! Mein leben! :)

    15. Re:hmmm... by Cruciform · · Score: 2

      Don't remember that one, possibly:

      Schutzstaffel!

      I'm not sure if the spelling's correct, and I think there's an umlaut over the U...

      That was the name of the secret police.

    16. Re:hmmm... by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Nein, nein -- wir sollen EIN Wort finden!

      Perhaps schadenfreude is close enough?

      Uh-oh, here comes the moderator who speaks German. Hide!

    17. Re:hmmm... by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      Ach! Mein leben! :)

      I looked that up, and all I found was "Acht, Mein Leiben".

      Which is "8, My Dear" :)

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    18. Re:hmmm... by whovian · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm not sure whether you get a good feeling or an ominous feeling, but if you are taking pleasure is his misfortune:

      Nachbarhausesverbrennungsschadenfreude
      (?)

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    19. Re:hmmm... by Bonker · · Score: 2

      I understood that a significant number of German speaking internet-users use 'ss' instead of the 'spassbe' (sp?) character so as not to confuse computers without an extended character set.

      --
      The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    20. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't know how you could tell - I was using an 8-bit sound card - it all pretty much sounded like:

      MMPHWAFFMPH!!

    21. Re:hmmm... by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Warum so viel Slashdotters Deutsch sprechen?

      Don't bother to correct grammar/spelling -- I know I haven't done this since high school. Didn't know I'd face situations like this.

    22. Re:hmmm... by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      Barney told him "down in front, and he replied 'NEIN!'".


      wouldn't be the currect usage then?

      Hey you in front of me, get down.
      No.

    23. Re:hmmm... by quigonn · · Score: 2

      G'schissena, "schadenfreude" is already an English word, just like hinterland and rucksack (and several others, which I don't remember anymore).

      Anyway, it's really funny to see English-speaking people speaking or even writing German. :-) And then , you can overcharge them by speaking (or writing) one of the German dialects. Mine is the Upper Austrian dialect, so beware. ;-) (sometimes, not even Germans understand me!)

      --
      A monkey is doing the real work for me.
    24. Re:hmmm... by Suppafly · · Score: 1

      I understood that a significant number of German speaking internet-users use 'ss' instead of the 'spassbe' (sp?) character so as not to confuse computers without an extended character set.

      No, they do it because the ess zet (scharfes s)
      is offically depricated and is only supposed to be used for those handful of words where ss doesn't convey the same meaning. That and german youth are fairly americanized using our words and customs a lot of times.

    25. Re:hmmm... by jakobk · · Score: 1

      ß is not deprecated.

    26. Re:hmmm... by macdaddy357 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Who were the ones in charge of this bungled bugging? Col. Klink and Shultz?

      --
      How ya like dat?
    27. Re:hmmm... by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      Upper Austrian ... oh Gawd that's one of the most arrogant, and among Germans at that! It amazes me that a country so small could have so many dialects. But it's good to have someone somewhere who makes Americans look modest. ;-)

      Yes, along with a thousand others we've absorbed schadenfreude -- a uniquely wonderful word -- although I doubt 95% of English-speakers could tell you what it meant. At least we had the good sense not to name a company "Fokker." People here were always uncomfortable with that one.

      Oh well, gotta go plan the destruction of the world -- you know, being American and all. And watch what you say on the cellphone, eh? :)

    28. Re:hmmm... by tempfile · · Score: 2

      No, it's not deprecated. The spelling reform just made it a little less widespread.

    29. Re:hmmm... by shepd · · Score: 1

      >At least we had the good sense not to name a company "Fokker."

      Sure, but what about this? At least you tried... :-)

      But this, I don't understand at all. Especially the one in Staines, UK (near the bottom).

      (Not to moderators who don't have much ball bearing experience: Work safe link. Seriously.)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    30. Re:hmmm... by Asprin · · Score: 2


      Remember Wolfenstein?
      ...


      Or, my personal favorite:

      GUTEN TAG! [BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM]

      It's hard to believe that actually scared me at one point in my life, but it did.

      --
      "Lawyers are for sucks."
      - Doug McKenzie
    31. Re:hmmm... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Actually it wasn't even 8 bit. The Apple II had a 1 bit speaker just like the PC speaker pre-Soundblaster. A few games like Wolfenstein used it to (barely) play voice samples.

    32. Re:hmmm... by Pius+II. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, the german translation for "tank" would be "tank" (Nein!) or "Panzer", the exact translation for that long word would be "trench destruction armored force vehicle".
      In the Bundeswehr something like "Schützengrabenvernichtungspanzerkraftwagen" would probably become something like "SGVPKW".
      I can safely assure you that _noone_ ever uses such words in Germany. They are understandable, but they would be incredibly bad style. In fact, every normal german text could probably translated word-by-word (except for the word order) and would be accepted as a perfectly ordinary text by native english speakers; the same goes for english->german translations.

    33. Re:hmmm... by Havokmon · · Score: 1
      Or, my personal favorite:
      GUTEN TAG! [BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM][BLAM]
      It's hard to believe that actually scared me at one point in my life, but it did.

      Hmmm I was actually referring to Castle Wolfenstein on the Apple ][. That sounds like a Wolf3D quote.

      But I know what you mean. My friend had a pirated copy, and 3 levels wouldn't generate properly. His Apple was in the living room, and after walking through empty floors, with only dead guards laying around, and playing it with no sounds for 15 minutes, an SS popped into a Room and Yelled "Vonsoff!".

      I jumped so high, I about gave HIS MOM a heart attack.
      (She was about 4 feet away from me watching TV).

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
    34. Re:hmmm... by PW2 · · Score: 1

      and if you wanted to record something, one way to do it was to type in a machine language program from a magazine and hook the audio source up to the joystick port - it did work though

    35. Re:hmmm... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Hey I remember that program from the magazine too! Was it from Nibble? Except it wasn't the joystick port, the one I remember used the cassette port.

    36. Re:hmmm... by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      I suppose ... Schadenfreude? Basically the same feeling CmdrTaco would feel if kuro5hin's server facilities burned down.

      --
      +++ath0
    37. Re:hmmm... by psych031337 · · Score: 2
      In the Bundeswehr something like "Schützengrabenvernichtungspanzerkraftwagen" would probably become something like "SGVPKW".

      Oh, the english military gobblespeak is just as bad. You just don't have the lingual option of just merging the words to form new ones.

      Think of the "highly mobile multipurpose wheeled vehicle". HMMWV. Also called M998. Or just Humvee.
      --
      +++ath0
    38. Re:hmmm... by psych031337 · · Score: 2

      You mean that one -ß- i guess. You'd pronounce that "esszett" with a german tongue or "as-cet" with american language.

      --
      +++ath0
    39. Re:hmmm... by Lars+T. · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sankt-Florians-Prinzip (Saint Florian principle): ""Heiliger Sankt Florian, verschon mein Haus, zünd and're an!" - "Holy Saint Florian, spare my house, put others on fire". As in "If it has to happen, let it happen somewhere else".

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    40. Re:hmmm... by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Why do they need to translate "D'oh" into anything? It's not like it means anything other than ""D'oh!"" in English, anyway.
      I mean, the first time I heard Homer say it, I got the meaning without having to consult a dictionary, despite never having heard the expression before, ever.

      Unnecessary translation = D'oh!

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    41. Re:hmmm... by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 2

      True story (annotated for nonlocals):

      Back in the 20s, my grandfather, from Oberschlesien (Upper Silesia, now Poland), went to the University in Muenchen (Munich). After a week of listening to people speaking Bayrisch (Bavarian), he writes a letter home to his mother expressing shock at the number of foreigners in Muenchen -- in fact, he has yet to meet a German in the city, after an entire week!

      Of course, he *was* an absent-minded professor type, but still...

      --
      Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
      www.fogbound.net
    42. Re:hmmm... by 1nfern0 · · Score: 1

      accually that was the movie. when the kids post a message on the message board for la resistance. yep

    43. Re:hmmm... by unicron · · Score: 2

      Actualy, it does have meaning, it's Homer's brain not able to decide between "damnit" and "oh crap".

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    44. Re:hmmm... by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

      umm.. there isn't an umlaut there.

      --
      Free as in mason.
    45. Re:hmmm... by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1

      and wouldn't a slashdotter be a "Schrägstrichpunkter" in german? *g*

      --
      Free as in mason.
    46. Re:hmmm... by hkl387 · · Score: 1

      I think it was

      Luftwaffe!

      ("Air Force", literal translation would be "Air Weapon")

      The Schutzstaffel (SS, not ßß, he) was something between a paramilitaristic elite police and and elite soldiers (Waffen-SS)

      The secret police was the GeStaPo (Geheime Staatspolizei, "secret state police")

      Phew!

      By the way, in no country more telephones are wiretapped by the state than in Germany.
      Germany is one of the very few countries in Europe that doesn't have yet passed an information freedom law.

    47. Re:hmmm... by G�tz · · Score: 1

      Wrong, they searched the web for clit:
      10 million hits, first one featuring Cartman's mom in a porn movie.

    48. Re:hmmm... by pit_bull · · Score: 1

      Fokker is a dutch company.

      You know, the country that had a minister-president called Kok?

      --
      _ Light travels faster than sound. That is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.... -
    49. Re:hmmm... by LeftOfCentre · · Score: 1

      Well, "d'oh" (especially the last part) sounds rather English / American, IMHO. Just importing the word straight off may not work very well.

    50. Re:hmmm... by Grab · · Score: 2

      You ever been to Britain? Accents R us!

      Grab.

    51. Re:hmmm... by rEWDBOi · · Score: 1

      My favorite "German" word is "Ausgeschnitzel". Which is not a German word, really.
      It appeared in one of the early Indy-Jones adventures on Amiga written on a torpedo on a German sub.
      We quickly adopted it into our own special style of German, meaning something like "broken" as in "Don't use that bathroom, it is ausgeschnitzel".
      FYI, I am German. But back then, our special language consisted of quotes from the German translations of Monty Python's Flying Circus episodes and Hape Kerkeling movies.
      We even developed our own martial-arts style called Hübnern. But don't get me started on that..

    52. Re:hmmm... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      farfenpuken!

    53. Re:hmmm... by PW2 · · Score: 1

      You're right about the cassette port... -- I miss those magazines

  2. Oops! by natron+2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How in the hell do you manage to do this? I can understand if it was done by a hacker or novice phone tapper. These guys are supposed to be pros. I guess you could say that their cover is blown. Funny Germans.

    1. Re:Oops! by AzrealAO · · Score: 1

      The USS Cole was hardly a supercarrier. It wasn't even a plain old Aircraft Carrier. It was just a standard, run of the mill Guided Missile Destroyer.

    2. Re:Oops! by HedRat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funny Germans.

      Indeed. My wife is half German and half Mexican. It seemed like a good idea at the time. I never realized how quickly I'd get tired of sauerkraut tacos.

    3. Re:Oops! by mosch · · Score: 1

      actually it still is a guided missile destroyer. It was recommissioned a little more than a year after it got attacked.

    4. Re:Oops! by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 1

      The Cole wasn't even armored (Since the US Navy doesn't have any armored ships in commission other than the Aircraft Carriers). The Cole is what the Navy refers to as Tin Cans for a reason, they have lots of firepower, but depend on their active defenses excessively (Phalanx and the SM-2ER missiles). Think of the outrage if they had actually sunk the attacking craft before it blew up.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    5. Re:Oops! by _Spirit · · Score: 2

      From what I recall from an article about this, the technical details are handled by the phone company, they are required by law to have an infrastructure in place that can forward conversations to the police. The police just show them the paperwork and tell em which lines to tap. Sounds like the phone company involved is going to be in deep sh*t and the police isn't to blame.

      --

      beauty is only a light switch away

    6. Re:Oops! by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      [sauerkraut tacos] Is that a euphamism for oral sex? (half german/half mexican)

      I believe that's a wetback blitz.

    7. Re:Oops! by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      --sauerkraut tacos--

      Tacos aren't actually Mexican although you can find them there. They are Texan.

  3. The news here is by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    that they got caught. German laws allow for this, Sloppy work on the part of either the telecom company or the police (or both). If its one thing American Inteligence ( homebound anyway) is good at is keeping the public unaware of these types of things. Is that a good thing? Thats an agrument for another post.

    1. Re:The news here is by chef_raekwon · · Score: 1

      makes one wonder if this was a telecom employee's (read:sysadmin) way of getting back at the police, for getting a ticket....

      quote "give me a ticket, eh? well, we'll just let everyone know your little secret mister cop"
      --this is when said person adds voicemail box to all tapped phoneline bills with simple perl script....

      --
      We're like rats, in some experiment! -- George Costanza
    2. Re:The news here is by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      german laws allow making people pay something they don't order? (ie, phonecompany would have to to be able to categorize what it's billing it's customers anyways, how are they going to explain, "you pay 4$ for 'special services'" "-i didn't order any!" "well but mr. klotz from berlin police did".)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:The news here is by Jump · · Score: 1

      A german private mobile phone company made the misstake (it's called O2). I guess somebody has big trouble now. One might think tapping phone lines is bad, but given the fact what criminals can do using mobiles I think it is ok.

    4. Re:The news here is by christoph_s · · Score: 1
      Sloppy work on the part of either the telecom company or the police (or both)
      it was an error of a new version of the accounting system of the telecom company. didn't check if the bbc-article pointet this out, but a lot of posts indicate that it didn't...
  4. Headline by EyesWideOpen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This headline is almost good enough to be a contender in the Favorite Past Slashdot Headline.... poll!
    Buggy bugging, ha!

    --

    As with the sun's light
    My mom was magnificent
    Unquestionable
  5. Great by (H)olyGeekboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now they've given Ashcroft an idea to both monitor possible terrorists AND increase revenue for the US govertment...

    Record all of their conversations in voicemails, then charge them for the priviledge. Go Patriot Act! :)

    1. Re:Great by rczyzewski · · Score: 1

      Where do you think the technology and idea probably came from?

    2. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      There seem to be a few serious misconceptions in how this article is presented. The first is the idea that the police were "caught" wiretapping innapropriately... if you read the article it appears that the wiretaps were legal, the issue is that these suspects found out they were being tapped because this mystery number suddenly appeared on their bill.


      Misconception numero duo, that the German police were attempting to charge suspects for their being wiretapped. No, if you (once again) read the article it is clear that these suspects being charged on their bills WAS the screwup. Obviously the German Police did not want these potential baddies to get a mystery charge on their cell bills and tip them off to the fact that they were being bugged.


      Finally, it doesn't appear to be, at least completely, the German Police's fault. What happened is, they fiddled their mobbys (the article doesn't spell it all out but by all appearances with an appropriate warrant and the cooperation of the phone company) so that when they made a call it would hook up and record the convo into a voicemail box. The phone company upgraded the phone software and the upgrade was incompatible: the bug made the caller get charged for the hook-up to the voicemail box, and that charge tipped them off that something was fishy. Oops.

    3. Re:Great by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Better yet, bounce them to 900 numbers or obscure Carribean ones that charge you an arm and a leg before you figure out what's going on.

      After all, these are just terrorists, right?

      I had no idea a cellphone tap was this easy, or this easy to screw up.

  6. Free call? by philibob · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's listed on their bills... I just hope they weren't charged for it.

    1. Re:Free call? by McFly69 · · Score: 2

      No man. They charge me 6 Euro for it. I am fighting with Vodafight to refund those charge and the 900 number charges that just "appeared." Of coruse I am not going to admit I called them :)

      --



      NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
  7. Re:Damn Krauts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    what exactly is a mud-person?

  8. inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Inaccessable? Most voice-mail systems use a 5-digit password. Most of the paswords are simple, such as "1-2-3-4-5" (many detectives from the Montreal Urban Police, for example).

    Hacking most voicemail boxes is so simple because of the simple password.

    Not to mention war-dialing the number trying all possible passwords from a land line.

    1. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by soup_laser · · Score: 1

      Oh No! Mine too! I think there is a DEA/FAA conspiracy. Must be part of the new Homeland Security dept's activities. Is there PGP for luggage?

    2. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by Exedore · · Score: 2

      Well, yeah, I suppose they could figure out a way into the mailbox, but all they would hear are the conversations they've already had.

      "I said what?!? To who?!? Ohhh, I'm so mad... just wait 'till I get my hands on me!

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    3. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Not just their conversations, bot others as well.

      That's what happened up here. Guys were punching into the cops' voicemail, hearing them talk to their informants, making dates with their mistresses, giving their wives excuses for being late so they could keep their "date" with their mistress, etc.

      Very embarassing

    4. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Is there PGP for luggage?

      Yeah, it's called a booby trap.

    5. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by Exedore · · Score: 1

      The article is kind of sketchy on details, but I just naturally assumed that there wouldn't be just one central voicemail to which all conversations are recorded... that would be rather tedious to sort out, wouldn't it? More likely, each tap had its own mailbox.

      But like I said before, the article is kind of skimpy on details. Anyone find another source somewhere?

      --

      I take drugs seriously.

    6. Re:inaccessable? Can you say war-dialing? by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      they could figure out a way into the mailbox, but all they would hear are the conversations they've already had.

      And delete them. "Press 3 to delete all pending messages." *bleep*

      So much for the evidence.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  9. Big Bro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not surprising. I saw a program that said before the wall came down East Germany had something like 80 - 85% of the population under surveillance.

  10. Coming to a town near you by WankersRevenge · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a something related to chew on . . . especially after last nights election results.

    "A little-known amendment in the Senate version of the bill makes it much easier for ISPs to disclose e-mail communications without being served with a warrant, which had been prohibited before the Patriot Act of 2001." - wired

    Check it here

    1. Re:Coming to a town near you by saskboy · · Score: 1

      AOL was also sued successfully by a Hong Kong company, for the to release the real name of a mouthy user who badmouthed the company's stock.
      Seems the States will soon being looking like Germany?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  11. It is too bad that this did not happen in England. by Prince_Ali · · Score: 4, Funny

    If it had happened in England the subject could have been, "Buggy Bugging Backfires On British Bobbies."

  12. Who are you worrying about? by Havokmon · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    "The technical fault arose when we were installing new software," a spokesman for the mobile phone company O2 said.

    How many people are concerned that German police MAY have been involved in illegal wiretapping?

    Now, ask yourself if your concerned with the quality of the software doing your billing at any number of companies..

    "Whoops, we didn't intend to share your personal data with 'Spammers-R-Us', it was a technical glitch during an upgrade. Sorry."

    Maybe if the German police can levy some damages on the phone company, we can feel better about other companies making sure that what they say is private, stays private.

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  13. Schultz - "I see nothing...I know nothing" by bje2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    no wonder the germans were dumb enough to get caught doing this...i mean, c'mon, they never caught onto the old radio transister in the coffee pot routine...

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  14. Installing new software by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Funny
    "The technical fault arose when we were installing new software," a spokesman for the mobile phone company O2 said.

    They should have read that SP3 EULA more carefully.

    "...GIVES US THE RIGHT TO BLOW ALL CURRENT AND FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS"

  15. I'm not sure what's worse.... by innosent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The software errors/stupidity that let the alleged criminals find out they were being tapped, or the fact that we don't have those errors here in the US. Not that I do anything wrong, but I'd still prefer not to be monitored by the government. This reminds me of a /. article a while back about the US taking bids for a central repository of personal information. It may sound like a great idea to the politicians, but after a while they're going to need money, and guess what?... Then everyone's personal information is up for sale. Telcos have been doing this for a while, even my university (UCF) does this, and I get a few dozen porn/marketing spams a day, just because they have my email address in their records. And you thought spam was a problem now....

    --
    --That's the point of being root, you can do anything you want, even if it's stupid.
    1. Re:I'm not sure what's worse.... by Nicolai+Haehnle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is something I've been thinking about lately. May sound weird by some, but it should be possible to find out whether you've been bugged (pardon the pun) by the police. Obviously, they won't tell you as long as the investigations are still going, but it would be _very_ interesting to know afterwards.

      A good friend of my mother had been in regular contact with some RAF terrorists back in the '60s or '70s - AFAIK neither my mother nor said friend were actually involved in anything though. If I were in a situation like this I'd be curious to know how much the police has got in their archive about me.
      Anyway, I don't think many people on Slashdot know details about German law, so I guess I'll have to find out myself whether this is possible...

    2. Re:I'm not sure what's worse.... by paule9984673 · · Score: 1
      In Germany, you have no right to know wether you have been bugged - not even (or rather: especially) when it was a mistake.

      Although the recordings have to be erased if they did not produce court relevant material, they are usually not, since only the police knows about them anyway.

      It is a German tradition to regard the citizens as tributaries. That's why we dont have any conspiracy theories - there's no need to conspire against someone who you regard as property.

  16. Re:Damn Krauts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    This would have never happened back in the good old days of Hitler!

    Very funny. My grandfather died in Auschwitz.

    He got drunk and fell out of his guard tower.

  17. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Eccles · · Score: 1

    If it had happened in England the subject could have been, "Buggy Bugging Backfires On British Bobbies."

    If it happened in Bavaria, we could say it backfired on Bavarian Bundespolizei..

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  18. Amazing by RealTimeFreeAgent · · Score: 4, Funny

    Most of the paswords are simple, such as "1-2-3-4-5"

    That's the same combination I have on my luggage!

    --
    "You get what you pay for after all." --
    1. Re:Amazing by tomhudson · · Score: 2

      Aha! Another fan of Spaceballs!

    2. Re:Amazing by banzai51 · · Score: 1

      Spaceballs!?!
      Oh, shit. There goes the neighborhood.

    3. Re:Amazing by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      I see your schwartz is as big as mine...Lets see how well you "handle" it.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    4. Re:Amazing by espo812 · · Score: 1

      That's the same combination I have on my luggage!

      What do you know, the number for the voice mail was 1-800-DRUIDIA

      --

      espo
  19. This was for mobile phones? by dubious9 · · Score: 1

    "The technical fault arose when we were installing new software," a spokesman for the mobile phone company O2 said.

    Don't you just have to sit and listen somewhere to tap mobile phones? You should be able to discretely listen to mobile phones(with the blessing of the teleco's) easily. The bug must have been somewhere in the overhead of logging thousands of calls.

    Since the bug is probably in the overhead and not the actual tap itself, the teleco would probably be the party at fault.

    --
    Why, o why must the sky fall when I've learned to fly?
    1. Re:This was for mobile phones? by mijok · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not quite. All countries in Europe use the GSM network - digital with encryption, packet switching etc. security features (search "GSM encryption" on google if you want more information). So it's much harder to tap into that than to any POTS. Thus it's the obvious that the police goes through the network operator.

      --
      Karma. Moderation. Is my .sig good now?
    2. Re:This was for mobile phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Besides, which is easier, following 20,000 different suspects around everywhere with portable recievers (assuming all the encryption and channer switching and stuff isn't a problem), or having all tapped phone calls automatically sent to the police station, similar to what they already do with tapped landlines?

    3. Re:This was for mobile phones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why receivers? Most mobile conversations are clearly audible at least 100 yards away.

  20. Quote... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 3, Funny

    Evil will always triumph, because good is dumb! - Dark Helmet

    --
    TODO: Something witty here...
    1. Re:Quote... by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      Ooh...my sig...
      Yay!

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  21. Related News from Finland by jukal · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Two senior security staff at Finnish telco Sonera have been remanded in custody, charged with breaching customer privacy by allegedly riffling through private telephone records in an attempt to identify an internal mole

    Read the rest here. Now, I consider this worse - you can expect policy to breach privacy - but you are not supposed to expect that from a major telco....or...actually...are you?

    1. Re:Related News from Finland by jukal · · Score: 2
      policy

      s/policy/police/

    2. Re:Related News from Finland by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      "Now, I consider this worse - you can expect policy to breach privacy - but you are not supposed to expect that from a major telco....or...actually...are you?"

      No, you aren't, but to be fair Sonera seems to have handled this incident pretty gracefully instead of covering up for the few employees that are suspected of the crime: "The NBI investigation was launched recently at Sonera's own request". I think this says more about the company than the breach itself.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    3. Re:Related News from Finland by jukal · · Score: 2
      The NBI investigation was launched recently at Sonera's own request".

      Ofcourse, after the breach had been already made public by Helsingin Sanomat. Anyway, yes, I agree - it's better that this is discussed publicly - than kept secret. Oh, and to me it's the same which telco it was - the interesting part is that atleast now everyone knows any company can get caught for it. Also, hopefully this makes the BOFHs at all the gazillion ISPs consider their acts before lurking customer emails - it still the same issue even though the media is different.

  22. There is no limit to what we should do! by reverendG · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The German police believe that over 20,000 people need to have active wiretaps on their phones?

    German authorities can only use wiretapping in serious cases such as murder, money laundering, kidnapping or treason.

    I think that when there are this many people who are being monitored, there's a problem. Just take a moment and think about the number of people it takes to monitor and administrate that level of surveillance!

    --

    Why should I argue rationally with someone being irrational? I'll just mock them instead.
    1. Re:There is no limit to what we should do! by tempfile · · Score: 2

      This seems to be a result of the "security package" legislation after September 11. They liberalized wiretapping, and even home searching, I believe. I should read that law some time. Before 11/9, the police needed a court warrant to do this in most cases, but now they can do a lot more by suspection. A bit sad in a country that has phone and mail secrecy in its constitution, but the public didn't care.

    2. Re:There is no limit to what we should do! by Jump · · Score: 1

      Let me see, ~80 million people, that's 80 000 000 / 20 000 = 4000 observers per criminal.

    3. Re:There is no limit to what we should do! by penfold69 · · Score: 1

      So, anyone thinking of relocating to Germany then? The country with 20k 'serious' criminals that need wiretapping.. I'm just on my way to buy an airline ticket........ OUT!

      --
      Beer Coat: The invisible but warm coat worn when walking home after a booze cruise at 3 in the morning.
  23. Jeez... by TerryAtWork · · Score: 1

    The Gestapo'd be embarrassed by these lightweights....

    I bet Hogan is behind it all!

    I can hear it now ... 'HoooGAAAAAANN!'

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  24. Illegal? by wiredog · · Score: 2

    How so? Even in the US it would be legal if the police had the proper warrants.

    1. Re:Illegal? by Havokmon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How so? Even in the US it would be legal if the police had the proper warrants.

      Err No.

      A software glitch displayed information that was supposed to be private. I want to see posts on where the responsibility lies for 'software glitches'. Not "My privacy was invaded illegally". So far I can only see that there were 20k taps total, dozens in Germany. Home, Work, Cell. 3 per person. That gives you approx 6 thousand people total, say 'Telecommunications authorities".

      But that's not the issue, I don't care about the legality of the taps, I want to know what the company has to give up because of their 'glitch'.

      --
      "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  25. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by AftanGustur · · Score: 5, Informative
    If it had happened in England the subject could have been, "Buggy Bugging Backfires On British Bobbies."

    Unfortunately, no

    It is illegal for the UK media to report on incidents that involve national security.

    Yeah, yeah, laugh as you want, you can even claim that it's rediculeus to claim it has anything to do with national security, laugh while you still have the right..

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
  26. Installation of New Software? by airrage · · Score: 2

    A couple of things seem rather odd to me, 1) Why do you need a voicemail to track callers (I do not profess to understand the underlying workings of cell-phone infrastructure). 2) They installed new software that cause the problem, but it really only showed up on the invoicing system? So did the install a new invoicing system? Sounds like they don't have their hacking all that together over there....but just my gut instinct. Maybe someone could shed some greater light on the subject...

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Installation of New Software? by allism · · Score: 2, Informative

      The voice mailbox was not to track callers, it was to record phone conversations on the phone lines. The billing for the voice mailbox was not supposed to show up at all, but after the software upgrade the owners of the phone lines started being charged for the voice mailboxes that were being used to record their phone conversations, even though they were not actually able to retrieve messages from the mailboxes.

  27. Re:It's worth it by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2, Informative

    -Remember: Mohammed Atta and his crew of butchers, who murdered 3000 Americans on 9/11/01, plotted the entire scheme in Germany-

    News to me - where did you get this piece of information, please?

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  28. If only... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    The charge had been listed as a phone sex number, there wouldn't have been a problem.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  29. Re:It's worth it by jpm165 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Terrorists are much like hackers and there will always be an exploit. I would rather die in an act of terrorism so that the civil liberties of my friends and family and countrymen were protected, rather than give them up for a little extra security. Any true American would agree. "Give me liberty or give me death." "

    I agree. I would rather have you die in an act of terrorism than to give up my civil liberties...

  30. WTF?? by Ted_Green · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    "Remember: Mohammed Atta and his crew of butchers, who murdered 3000 Americans on 9/11/01, plotted the entire scheme in Germany."

    Where the hell are you getting this? One of Mohammed Atta's possible places of residnece was Hamburg, Germany. But so was florida. In fact, Florida was one for Waleed Alshehri, Wail Alshehri and Abdulaziz Alomari. Who *all* happened to be on AA #11 Boeing 767.

  31. Balderdash by MacAndrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The police ARE trying to listen in on private phone calls, in the hopes of finding something there. Would you say police seaching private homes was OK simply because they're only looking for criminals? Not if you believe in any form of privacy.

    "Al-Qaeda cells coordinating international terrorism is an everyday occurence in many German cities" -- you have direct knowledge of this? I haven't seen it reported anywhere. Maybe we suspect it is "an everyday occurrence" but suspicion without evidence is nothing, and acting on that to monitor 20,000 numbers would be harassment. Police doing "everything they can" would logically include what besides phone taps? Fighting terrorism is a worthy cause, but trashing everything we believe in to do it is not.

    Give blame where blame is due, but nothing is gained by mindlessly rounding up the usual suspects. Al Queda is evil, and so is an authoritarian police state.

  32. The suspects! by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    The problem was they were billing the "suspects" not the criminals in jail with phat bank accounts!

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  33. Worth Pointing Out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    This article from 1998 indicated that Germany has had suspected criminals under surveillance for quite some time. So this shouldn't come as much of a surprise. In fact, it was said that several nations in the EU had similar policies in that article. If that is true, then this isn't a good time to be a civil libertarian. Big Brother is watching quite a few of us.

    Now here's something to think about: These German police who conducted this were up so sloppy that the bugging information showed up on phone bills. So: how many governments are doing this the right way (i.e. without the public's knowledge?)

    1. Re:Worth Pointing Out by Lars+T. · · Score: 2
      From Pulp Fiction:

      LANCE

      She ain't my fuckin' problem, you fucked her up, you deal with it -- are you talkin' to me on a cellular phone?
      VINCENT
      Sorry.
      LANCE
      I don't know you, who is this, don't come here, I'm hangin' up.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  34. Librarians should follow this lead by RevDobbs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps this can be employed by your local librarian as well:

    "Oh, that's a not a late fee, that's the 'records retrieval' charge... Gee, I'm sorry, that should have been billed to the FBI, let me take that off of your account. Now, do you still want me to fetch that Civil Engineering book on demolition explosives?"

  35. Billable wiretaps in New York by Animats · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Something like this happened in the US about a decade ago, in New York, and it's one of the reasons the FBI pushed CALEA through.

    The New York office of the FBI was wiretapping various Mafia types (with some success; they eventually broke the New York Mafia). The taps were done by New York Telephone, and were implemented by ordering a remote extension from the circuit to be tapped to an FBI office. This was a billable service, and it wasn't cheap; the total costs of all those circuits were a strain on the FBI budget.

    One month, the FBI didn't pay the bill for one of their "extensions". The billing software then started billing the other party on the line, the person being wiretapped. Big embarassment.

    This was part of the motivation behind CALEA. Not only did it hurt the investigation, but it embarassed the FBI. (The FBI is very thin-skinned. "Don't embarass the Bureau" started with Hoover and lives on.)

    All this is in one of the books about how the FBI took down the New York Mafia, but I don't have the cite.

    1. Re:Billable wiretaps in New York by jeffy124 · · Score: 1

      I recommend the book "Goodfella Tapes" by George Anastasia. I just finished reading it (for a crime class), complete with a guest speaking from the author. It's basically the story about the Philadelphia/South Jersey Mob War that occured about 1993-1995, based largely around FBI wiretaps, bugs, and other black-bag material. It's claimed to be the largest FBI wiretapping operation ever, and it almost got nixed by the overseeing judge after the first 4 weeks because nothing was happening (until two days before the 4 weeks were up).

      My favorite part was a guy who's office they had bugged. He pretty much said "I'm gettin' so paranoid I even had a guy come sweep the place."

      --
      The One Rule Of Chess You'll Ever Need: Don't play someone who carries a kit in their bookbag.
    2. Re:Billable wiretaps in New York by quintessent · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see the software:

      if (!PaymentReceived(WiretappingAgency)) {
      SendBill(Customer);
      }

  36. Oldie but goodie by PolyDwarf · · Score: 2, Funny

    From Germans to everyone:

    All your calls are belong to us.

    1. Re:Oldie but goodie by JivanMukti · · Score: 1

      No, more like...

      All our bills are belong to you.
    2. Re:Oldie but goodie by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      That coming from Echelon country is preposterous.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  37. ironic by zenst · · Score: 3, Funny

    Its funny how in Germany they seem to want to charge the customer were in the UK all the mobile teco's got pissed off with requests for duplicate bill's from the police (which have all call's made and when) that they started charging them.

  38. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Buggy Bugging Backfires On British Bobbies."

    ...or "Buggy Bugging Backfires: British Bobbies Buggered"

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  39. Even better by Wind_Walker · · Score: 2

    "Buggy Bugging By British Bobbies Backfires"

  40. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Wireless+Joe · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK, one more...

    If this happened in Amish country, it could read, "Buggy buggy bugging backfires in bucolic backwoods blunder".

    I promise not to post for the rest of the day.

  41. Easy! by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    He's psychic! Or psycho? Well, socially challenged or "troll".

    Seriously, a significant amount of 9/11 planning took place in Germany (Hamburg?) ... and in England ... in that hotbed of insurrection, Florida ... and my neighbor's garage (oops, shouldn't've said that). Remember how they used public internet terminals in libraries to communicate godknowswhat? Communication is so easy now that location barely matters.

  42. fuck off you dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sure let the f-ing govt take away all our liberties, under the "I have nothing to hide" moniker. Well, you DO have something to hide, YOUR PRIVACY. They can sieze property w/o cause, tap your phone, spy on you, hell even get your library habits WITHOUT CAUSE. I'm sorry to say, but idiots like you who want security over freedom don't seem to understand that without freedom, who cares about security?

    Now that the dumbass republicans control both houses, i'm sure we'll lose more of our rights, multinational corporations will gain a bigger foothold in world domination, and you will be arrested for "looking" at a cop wrong.

    DONT SAY I DIDNT TELL YOU
    (see that small camera in your bathroom?)

    1. Re:fuck off you dumbass by Raven1 · · Score: 1

      Are you really that ignorant?

    2. Re:fuck off you dumbass by ethanms · · Score: 1

      Better question... is the person who mod'd his post "insightful" that ignorant.

  43. How would the German police respond? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe the German police would say something like:

    "Das cellphones ist nicht usen fur trakken das badfolken. Das policen ist nicht snoopen das folken a la 3rd Reich. Relaxen und watchen das bills increasen. And Kwitchurbelliaken."

  44. More importantly... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2, Funny

    Zey have vays ov making you pay forr it!

    RMN
    ~~~

  45. Re:Damn Krauts. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Anyone who isn't white.

  46. Those crazy germans! by ChuckMaster · · Score: 1

    This is the same country that outlawed red blood in video games. Well, if the those violent video games and nazi symbols aren't getting through, how is there crime to even wiretap? *couch* sorry, choked on my own sarcasm.

  47. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by saskboy · · Score: 1

    Is /. English? If not then it wouldn't be illegal, but thanks for the tip anyhow.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  48. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by cmeans · · Score: 2
    Actually, it could have been, "Buggy Bugging Backfires on Bosh Bulls" and it would have stayed on-topic ;)

  49. Uhmm, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    you mean Destroyee, don't you?

  50. A slight flaw in that argument by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 2

    Even assuming the remaining 15% were all agents of the secret police, how could they keep up with everyone else? Each agent would have to tap, monitor and follow six people.

    RMN
    ~~~

  51. Thank God the Berlin Wall Came Down by serutan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And those awful communist Bad Guys are gone and the Good Guys won. Everything's all better now.

  52. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Everybody · · Score: 1

    Or even better:
    Buggy Bugging by British Bobbies Backfires ?

  53. You forgot the obvious... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

    Start the sentence with "Bugger!"

    RMN
    ~~~

    1. Re:You forgot the obvious... by Malcolm+MacArthur · · Score: 1
      Minimalist:

      Buggers Buggered Up

      :-)

    2. Re:You forgot the obvious... by Rui+del-Negro · · Score: 1

      You mean their ass was on the line and they cocked it up? :-p

      RMN
      ~~~

  54. But don't worry... by Puk · · Score: 5, Funny

    The US government/law enforcement/intelligence agencies would never use their powers to spy on people. Aren't you a PATRIOT?

    -Puk

  55. Re:Perhaps more importantly... by symbolic · · Score: 2


    If they were charged, will they get a refund?

  56. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by netsharc · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, Bundespolizei means Federal Police, so it wouldn't make sense to put a state together with it.

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
  57. Re:Damn Krauts. by Trespass · · Score: 1

    I think it's someone who makes pottery.

  58. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by JoshWurzel · · Score: 1

    Try saying that ten times fast!

  59. Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In the film Brazil, after your arrest you have to pay for your own interrogations, your stay in prison and so forth; they send you a bill afterwards for the Governmental services you 'used'; or if you don't survive the interogation, they present the bill to your next of kin.

    Sounds to me like the Germans just sent the bill a bit early; they should have sent it after the investigation was complete.

    1984 came late it seems...

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    1. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by WetCat · · Score: 1

      Don't you think it'll be fair? Taxes can be lowered if prisoners will pay for their prison services?

    2. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      You left out a ;-) which makes me think you are worryingly serious.

      No, it will be unfair on the rest of us. They'll come out of prison with huge debts, and have to commit more crimes to avoid going back in for lack of payment. Insurance premiums would go up massively; and the thieves will get less money on the item once they have fenced it than the item is worth, so non criminals lose out all the more.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    3. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by WetCat · · Score: 1

      What if they'll have mandatory bancruptcy
      ( amnesty on their debt WITHOUT putting into credit history)
      when they leave out their prison ?
      But while they are in prison their are billed for prison maintenance.

    4. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by rweir · · Score: 2
    5. Re:Sounds like the film 'Brazil' by NTDaley · · Score: 1

      They billed it to his charge account beforehand.
      What was presented to Mrs. Buttle afterwards was the refund check, because Information Retrieval were supposed to be working on Tuttle, not Buttle.

      --
      bits and peace
      Nicholas Daley
  60. Dangerous by locarecords.com · · Score: 1
    I think that the fact they got caught shows that they are still naive when it comes to using the technology. But as they work out ways and means to control the technology we will less hear about it, and more scarily experience it unknown to us....

    --
    ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
  61. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 1

    Or: Blatant Buggy Bugging Botched, Backfires: British Bobbies Buggered, Baffled. Boffins Blamed.

  62. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by beebware · · Score: 1

    No, Slashdot isn't, but the British Broadcasting Corporation (aka The BBC) who's coverage of this story Slashdot has linked to is.

  63. Alliteration Competition Entry by Shackleford · · Score: 1
    How's this for a headline:

    "Big Brother's Biggest Blunder: Bad buggy bugs beget big bill-related bungle. Backlash begins."

  64. Re:Um.....That Sux by bmetzler · · Score: 1, Troll
    Um.......i guess we have no rights online or on the phone, at least they don't.

    Why should they have rights? Why should people who want to destroy us, and take away our livihood, and remove our liberties have any right? I don't understand why anyone would want them to have rights. Let's support everything we can to stop them.

    -Brent
  65. Schadenfreude? by Hershmire · · Score: 1

    Nur wenn man seine Nachbarn hasst.
    Und wer nicht?

    --
    if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  66. They WERE charged for it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Yes, indeed -- they were even charged for it.

  67. Re:Um.....That Sux - Sure Does by RgnadKzin · · Score: 1

    Why should they have rights? Why should people who want to destroy us, and take away our livihood, and remove our liberties have any right? I don't understand why anyone would want them to have rights. Let's support everything we can to stop them.

    Am I to presume that you can decide precisely whose rights are to be ignored, just by looking at them? In order for you to discern who should be tapped and who should not be tapped, you must first understand that probable cause is required in order to obtain a warrant.

    So does that make the choice:
    - tap us all or
    - tap us at random or
    - tap us because we're different,
    instead of
    - tap us upon the basis of a sworn affidavit showing probable cause?

    When you can tell the difference between friend and foe on sight, let us all know. It will make this war far easier.

    But that should not deter us from violating a "few" people's rights under the rule of necessity to impose peace and order under law martial rule, should it?

    Until it is your rights that have been violated.

    Or do you presume to sacrifice your essential liberty in exchange for some unattainable temporary safety?

    In that case, you deserve neither liberty nor safety, and that is what you will get.

    Feel free to mod me way, way down.

    --
    Liberty is not a concept... Liberty is a way of life!!!
  68. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ummm how hypocritical is that?

    Why should they have rights?

    Everyone should have rights.

    Why should people who want to destroy us, and take away our livihood, and remove our liberties have any right?

    What the hell is wrong with you. You're like every other idiot in this country that thinks "Well G Dubbaya is taking away rights of certain people so that I can keep mine and live a happy life." It reminds me of something I read a while ago -

    In Germany they came first for the Communists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist. Then they came for the Jews, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist. Then they came for the Catholics, and still I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant. Then they came for me, and by that time no one was left to speak up.

    If you change communists to terrorists, jews to muslims, trade unionists to hackers, you basically have the situation of today.

  69. Re:Um.....That Sux by karlm · · Score: 2
    Why should they have rights? Why should people who want to destroy us, and take away our livihood, and remove our liberties have any right? I don't understand why anyone would want them to have rights. Let's support everything we can to stop them.

    Noce Troll, you got me. Good idea. If we take away thier right to a torture-free interrogation, we'll find that nearly 100% of the accused criminals confess to their crimes and we can execute them there in the interogation room.

    There are reasons you can't take away any of someone's rights until they're convicted by a jury.

    Oh, and it's a slippery slope. One day accused terrorists are held for just a month or two without being charged, a few years later they sodomize you until you confess to driving under the influence back in 1973, you dirty scum of a degenerate human you.

    --
    Copyright Violation:"theft, piracy"::Anti-Trust Violation:"thermonuclear price terrorism"<-Overly dramatic language.
  70. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by flossie · · Score: 2
    Is /. English?

    That depends on the legality of the revolution. After the fiasco in Florida a couple of years ago, the Queen is reported to be seriously considering revoking the declaration of independence.

    =o)

  71. Re:Um.....That Sux by bmetzler · · Score: 1
    If you change communists to terrorists, jews to muslims, trade unionists to hackers, you basically have the situation of today.

    This idea of "protecting" and "defending" criminals who will then return the favour by doing all they can to destroy us is preposturous. That seems to be like saying that you should stop the government from finding and punishing the person who burglered your neighbors house. After all, if the government is willing to go after those who steal property, they'll surely go after those who own property next. In the meantime, Mr. I've-Protected-You-To-Protect-Me comes around to burgler your house.

    No thanks, I'll have none of that scenerio. I'll use my liberties in this democracy to strongly defend not only those people who would take away my liberties, but also to keep a government that will protect my liberties using every possible measure available. And I think that based on the elections results yesterday that most Americans agree with me.

    We live in a good situation here. I can't wait for these 2 strong years of further strengthing ourselves against those who are bent at our destruction.

    -Brent
  72. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
    It is illegal for the UK media to report on incidents that involve national security.

    Such as just last month, when they gagged the press from reporting allegations that the UK govenment contracted Al Qaeda to assassinate Gaddafi.

    Not only did they gag reporting the story, they also demanded that the media can't even report (or protest) the fact that they have been gagged!

    Welcome to the free world. Leave your brains and integrity at the door please...

  73. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 2

    Ok whatever, live in a dream world where your liberties are protected by having them taken away by the government. I think based on the current president that most Americans are fucking retarded.

  74. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 2

    This idea of "protecting" and "defending" criminals who will then return the favour by doing all they can to destroy us is preposturous.

    Actually I was talking about protecting and defending your rights and the rights of other people. You don't seem to understand what's going on in this country, do you realize how many people were arested in NYC the weeks following 9/11 just because they looked suspicious and held for very long amounts of time (the law saying that they couldn't hold you for more than 48 hours or whatever amount of time was lifted.) They were given no right to an attorney, no lawyers, no phone call, no trial. If I were arrested I could have been sent to jail for 3 weeks, not been told what I did, then released and not able to fight back. Terrorists didn't take away our rights or liberties, the government did.

    I'll use my liberties in this democracy to strongly defend not only those people who would take away my liberties, but also to keep a government that will protect my liberties using every possible measure available.

    You will use your liberties to defend people who would take away the liberties and also a government that will protect your liberties by every possible measure available (by taking them away)? Wow so basically you're giving up your liberties and the liberties of all other citizens just so terrorists can't take away your liberties? Umm wait who has the power to give and take liberties... THE GOVERNMENT. So let's defend the government the only being capable of taking away liberties to stop terrorists from taking away our liberties (which they can't do anyway... I hope this eventually sinks through, only the GOVERNMENT can take away liberties and they've been doing that for over a year now.)

  75. Re:Um.....That Sux by bmetzler · · Score: 2
    If I were arrested I could have been sent to jail for 3 weeks, not been told what I did, then released and not able to fight back. Terrorists didn't take away our rights or liberties, the government did.

    Would you rather spend 3 weeks in jail cooperating with federal investigators, or worry about being blown up in the next building that Al-Quida is going to blow up? It's no contest for me, I'm taking the 3 weeks.

    -Brent
  76. Re:Um.....That Sux by Zakabog · · Score: 2

    Co-operating with federal investigators? Do you think they did that in jail? No it was more like

    Police: get in jail
    You: Why?
    Police: We said, GET IN JAIL!
    You: I said WHY!
    Police: Looks like we've got a trouble maker
    *police throw you into jail*
    You: Don't I get one phone call? Can't I speak to an attorney?
    Police: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAH BWAHAHAHAHAHA did you hear that george, he wants a phone call!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
    3 weeks later
    Police: Well you can get out now
    You: What did I do? I'm going to sue the crap out of this police department!
    Police: HAHAHAHA SUE US!?!?! Good luck buddy but thanks to new laws we were legally allowed to detain you for nothing more than being suspicious.
    You: Well I'm going to get someone to believe me and we'll fight back.

    This is where people like you come in...
    You: Help! Help! I'm being repressed! Other People: Whatever, that's what you get for being a terrorist ok.
    You: A terrorist?!?! WHAT! I didn't do anything!!!
    Other People: Sure you didn't, look at you, you're from palestine, you had to do SOMETHING!

    Remind you of anything? Like the japanese during WW2 right after Pearl Harbor? Oh sure it's ok lock up all the Japanese, as long as they can't blow up any more of the armies bases we'll be fine, who cares if they'll be hated for the next few years and unable to get jobs after being arrested for absolutely no reason. Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it.

  77. I'm an american german - I wanna laugh too. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    And Kwitchurbelliaken.

    I understood the joke in every fake german word, but what you mean with "And Kwitchurbelliaken." I really couldn't figure out.
    Could you get closer to real german spelling or give a translation of what's that suposed to mean?
    Thanks. :-)

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  78. Re:It is too bad that this did not happen in Engla by Eccles · · Score: 1

    Well, Bundespolizei means Federal Police, so it wouldn't make sense to put a state together with it.

    I don't speak German, I just got Bundes from Bundespost and Bundesliga. But how about "Buggy bugging backfires on battalion of burly blond Bundespolizei battling baddies based in Bavaria"?

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  79. Re:Um.....That Sux by rweir · · Score: 2

    I'll be fine. I'm not a Catholic or a Protestant. I'm a Jedi!

    I am not the terrorist you seek.
    *waves hand*