Slashdot Mirror


New Alienware Media Center

Cyno01 writes "Alienware recently introduced a new product that seems to fill the gap between PVRs and PCs. The Navigator Media Center. It runs a new version of XP (Media Center Edition) and displays pictures, movies and plays DVDs. If I had the cash for it i would definitly ditch my 160Gb HD and Radeon AIW card."

73 of 222 comments (clear)

  1. Build it by D+iz+a+n+k+Meister · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't it be cheaper to just build one of those?

    Like, a lot cheaper

    --

    He painted a unicorn in outer space. I'm askin' ya, what's it breathin'?
    1. Re:Build it by l810c · · Score: 3, Informative
      Wouldn't it be cheaper to just build one of those?

      The Problem is you can't get XP Media Center(legally) without buying a new computer right now. I haven't seen XP MC in action, but I for one have been waiting for this convergence for quite a while.

      I've got an ATI AIW. It's cool and a really great use for an old PC and extra monitor, but the tools are just 'ok'.

      There are a couple of Linux programs out there, but last time I checked they were still in their infancy or had a more narrow focus.

    2. Re:Build it by FyRE666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wouldn't it be cheaper to just build one of those?

      Looking at the specs, I'd say probably so. But that's not the most important part: I've not check up on Microsoft's "Media centre" edition of XP but I'm betting it includes that marvelous mechanism whereby a broadcaster can prevent you from recording a program (and maybe even force recording for sponsor's programs).

      With a home-built solution you're free to use what you like... Makes you wonder who they're targeting this thing at really - since the tech-types will doubtless have the ability to build this from parts and the average J6P won't splash out $1700 to play DVDs and record programs. They seem to make a big deal of the 3D performance too, but I'd imagine playing Quake with a keyboard and mouse in the lounge is not the ideal gaming environment - and the picture will be crap on most TVs too...

      I do like their laptops though...

    3. Re:Build it by boaworm · · Score: 2
      Most likely, and have a look at this



      Black Navigator Case (200-Watt PS)

      Intel® Pentium® 4 Processor 2.53GHz 533MHz FSB w/ 512KB Cache

      Hi-Performance Heatsink/CPU Cooling Fan

      512MB DDR SDRAM PC-2700


      My first consern...why all this stuff if it will play my DVD/SVCD/VCD/DivX/Mp3 ?. Sounds like serious overkill to me.

      My second consern, somewhat related to the first, how much heat does this piece generate? If I for some reason really would benefint from having 2.5 Ghz and 512MB DDR to play my media files, would I also benefit from the sound I assume the box generates? It sure cant be that silent... and if it sounds like a "shuttle", i really _dont_ need one of these in my living room.

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    4. Re:Build it by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Best Buy near ME had a Sony machine with all this stuff (TV in/out, PVR software, remote control, firewire, USB 2, DVD burner.. pretty nice stuff) for 1500. Not sure if it was XP MC, but if it's not, then the next release of it will probably have it.

    5. Re:Build it by Qrlx · · Score: 2

      Actually, since I have a 8500 card and I was thinking of getting a HDTV (or just a good TV for like way less) and using the ATI DVI-to-component video adapter...

      Have you tried the catalyst 2.4 drivers? Do they fix the problem? How big is the improvement in quality going fron S-Video to component video? If the Component Video thing still doesn't work, that would suck. (Why don't they just put VGA in on TVs nowadays?)

      My plan is to make my 'puter be an "entertainment appliance" kinda like a fancy X-box (i.e. games) as well as email device and cd/dvd/mp3 player. Because basically, that's all I do with it anyway, and my living room is more comfortable than the "office" where the computer is now.

    6. Re:Build it by Rooterbaga · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was my plan too.

      Using this component to feed a widescreen TV.

      Yes, I tried all the drivers and went around and around with their tech support. They even had me try drivers for the 9500.

      Anyways long story short. I could find no one anywhere that was able to over come the overscan issues which renders the output almost useless. Try using Windows missing at least 5% around the perimeter. It's a real adventure

      While the output was decent enough to be legible for email etc. it was unusable due to the overscan.
      ATI has left us hanging simply saying to keep checking back for updated drivers.
      Definetely a product released that shoulldn't have been and my last ATI purchase (of course, I had said that 5 years ago because of their lousy drivers and support).

      --
      ~ this space brought to you by ~
    7. Re:Build it by Afrosheen · · Score: 2

      Yeah this thing is great! Since it's running XP you'll get full DCMA restrictions. I bet this whore won't play mp3's it didn't rip, movies it didn't record or missing region encoding, etc. More crap from microsoft.

    8. Re:Build it by Chasing+Amy · · Score: 2

      > Of course, I don't have a neon colored case but neither do I want/need one

      But if you *did* want one, you can buy the same case in the same funky colors. They're Chieftec/Antec cases (both brands made by same manufacturer), available for $65-$120 on NewEgg.com . Thermaltake and other companies love to take the same brand of case and modify it a little to sell as their own. I'm sure Alienware probabloy adds a few nice clear protective coats to the paintjob, but that's easy enough...

      Hell, anyone who can build his own PC could easily recreate a better Alienware-like PC for much less, right down to printing out his own Alienware logo to put under a clear case badge. I think that's why they finally added the decal up the side of their cases, to actually make it more difficult for DIYers to "fake" Alienware PCs.

      --

      Chasing Amy
      (We all chase Amy...)
      "The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws"-Tacitus
  2. Shuttle - ugh by X_Caffeine · · Score: 2

    Pity that they picked one of those ass-ugly Shuttle cases instead of a supersexy Soldam model.

    --
    // I will show you fear in a handful of jellybeans.
  3. Microsoft? by batboy78 · · Score: 2

    Is Microsoft making available Windows Media Center for the general public to build their own "Media Centers" or is this something that can only be purchased in these complete prebuilt systems?

    1. Re:Microsoft? by taernim · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe it is something only available on pre-made computers, although that may be changed in the future.

      It is a tweaked version of XP, mostly.
      But surely it will be released at some point.

      --
      "PC Load Letter? What the $@#% does that mean?!"
    2. Re:Microsoft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      It is a tweaked version of XP, mostly.

      They mostly come at night, mostly.

    3. Re:Microsoft? by h0tblack · · Score: 3, Informative

      AFAIK it's only available pre-installed on the special "Media Center PCs" at least that's what M$'s blurb says. There's more info on this OS (and some of the HP machines it was first announced to be used on) here [that's news.com.com ;)]. To be honest I can't see how anyone would really want to splash out on one of these considering the high cost and restrictions placed upon it's use (can you say DRM). I'd rather use some of the Multimedia-centric Linux distribs out there. Then again, I've seen stranger things happen... especially in the mass consumer market.

  4. Amazing! by Longinus · · Score: 3, Funny
    "...displays pictures, movies and plays DVDs."

    Shit, I wish my computer could do all that!

    I think I just might ditch Linux and my self-built box in exchange for an over-priced pre-fab system with WindowsXP so that I too can enjoy the thrill of displaying pictures, movies and DVDs.

    Will the innovation never cease at Redmond?

    1. Re:Amazing! by packeteer · · Score: 2

      This is not Microsoft at all. Its just another company (Alienware this time) building micro-atx computers. These are cool but unless you cant do it yourself there is no reason to buy an Alienware. WindowsXP comes on it becase thats all Alienware sells on their computers.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:Amazing! by strictnein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is not Microsoft at all. Its just another company (Alienware this time) building micro-atx computers. These are cool but unless you cant do it yourself there is no reason to buy an Alienware

      Incorrect. It is Alienware using an OEM only OS (XP Media Center), that Microsoft is heavily pushing, to build a "media center" box.

  5. .13 ghz = 300$ by Vengie · · Score: 2

    Wow.....i'm really shocked at the prices on these things. "PRO" is 3--$ more for a .13 ghz increase...i mean REALLY here.....*sigh*
    (alienware makes some nice stuff...but so overpriced!)

    --
    When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    1. Re:.13 ghz = 300$ by DietFluffy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Wow.....i'm really shocked at the prices on these things. "PRO" is 3--$ more for a .13 ghz increase...i mean REALLY here.....*sigh*

      The PRO version also comes with a Western Digital Special Edition 120GB Hard Drive and a Pioneer DVD-RW Drive. So, the $300 upgrade may be well worth it.

  6. This is new? by packeteer · · Score: 2

    This is jsut another micro-atx computer. Although alienware is sweet it was just a matter of time before they made one. As is standard with Alienware not many will buy it but everyone will want it.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  7. Geforce by batboy78 · · Score: 2

    Do they really need a Geforce 4 to output DVDs? Is Alienware/ Microsoft aiming these products at the mobile gamers that want more horsepower then a laptop can provide. I think my Celeron 500 with 120GB hard drive does just fine for playing DVDs and the occasional TV capture with my old ATI AIW 128 card.

    1. Re:Geforce by PerryMason · · Score: 2

      The GeForce4 series of cards were a big improvement over the GF2 and GF3 in TV output and DVD rendering. There is a definite visual improvement in watching DVDs on a GF4 vs GF3 and GF2. You also get 1024x768 TV output versus 800x600 in the pre GF4 cards.

      Cap it off with the fact that the GF4 Ti4200 are arguably the best bang for buck card on the market and you have a few reasons.

      --
      "I'm tired of all this 'Aren't humanity great' bullshit. We're a virus with shoes" - Bill Hicks
  8. Why can't these things ever be component width? by flsquirrel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    These types of devices will never make it into my home entertainment system until they at east fit in my AV cabinet with my other components. 17 inches people. It's not that hard.

    1. Re:Why can't these things ever be component width? by seanadams.com · · Score: 2

      Actually, full rack-width metal cases are considerably more expensive than injection molded plastic enclosures of 1/2 the size. The market wants cheaper right now, so that's what everybody is building.

      I predict that stereo components will converge on a smaller standard over the next decade or so. There's really no need for such bulky cases any more - they hail from the days of massive vacuum tube assemblies, tape mechanisms, and power supplies - all totally obsolete now, with the exception of high-power solid state amps, I guess. If you open up a DVD player, for example, it's just one PCB in the front and then a bunch of dead space inside... personally I'd rather have the compactness of a mini system with the modularity of a component system. It'd be much cheaper, and would look better too.

    2. Re:Why can't these things ever be component width? by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 2

      These types of devices will never make it into my home entertainment system until they at east fit in my AV cabinet with my other components.

      I don't care too much about the size but I do care about the bloody FANs (or harddrives for that matter).

      I'd much rather stuff a box like this in a closet and have a fanless, diskless box in my AV setup for playback over network.

    3. Re:Why can't these things ever be component width? by mblase · · Score: 2

      These types of devices will never make it into my home entertainment system until they at east fit in my AV cabinet with my other components. 17 inches people. It's not that hard.

      Maybe not *your* system; however there are plenty of folks out there buying Nintendo GameCubes despite the non-AV dimensions that your argument fails to hold up. Besides, with the heat that this PC must generate, I can guarantee you wouldn't want to stack your carousel CD player on top of this thing.

  9. Silence is golden by zeoslap · · Score: 5, Informative

    The key with a media PC is that it needs to be wireless and it also needs to be silent, the living room just isn't any place for a whirring, hissing PC.

  10. I already have one of these... by puppetman · · Score: 5, Informative

    and it doesn't run that crappy XP.

    Ok, I don't have the nifty remote, but I'm sure you can get one after market. Or get the All In Wonder 7500, like Tom did, and get a remote.

    There are instructions for this @ Toms Hardware.

    More flexibility on the configuration, etc, and you don't have to support any vendor (like Microsoft or Intel) that you don't want to.

  11. The free t-shirt is what sold me. by Blaede · · Score: 3, Funny

    I scanned the component list, and nothing impressed me. But then my eyes fell on the free carnival quality t-shirt that is bundled with it, and I was hooked.

  12. Xbox by Dexter77 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Xbox can do most of those features with little modifications and opensource applications:

    Control Live Television - can do with xbox
    Enjoy DVDs - can do with xbox
    Listen digital music - can do with xbox
    Burn music, photos and videos - not yet possible, but might be possible in future
    View your favorite photos - can do with xbox
    Edit digital videos - can do with xbox
    Incredible gaming performance - xbox games aren't that bad..

    Cost :
    Xbox+modifications = $400
    Navigator Mediacenter = $1699

    Which one would you choose?

  13. Windows XP Media Edition... by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 5, Informative
    Is not just Windows XP with a fancy interface. Other than many under the hood enhancements, Media Centre PCs have to have some kind of hardware MPEG2 recording solution. And that is why they are so expensive.

    So far, the Media Edition version of the OS is OEM only and it will stay like that for the foreseeable future. Having used it, I can say it is extremely functional and does what it says.

    So, no, you could not really build one like the Alienware PC that easily, and you most likely think you have a "media" pc. Microsoft bashing aside, if this is their v1 effort, I cannot wait to see what they will make of it in a couple of years.

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    1. Re:Windows XP Media Edition... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      So far, the Media Edition version of the OS is OEM only and it will stay like that for the foreseeable future. Having used it, I can say it is extremely functional and does what it says.

      So, I went to an eHome presentation about these things. Basically, v1 of the stuff will not do too much more than PVR/10' UI (that is, ui designed to be operated from 10' away). The media player is spiffed up, uses directX for the ui.

      The really cool stuff will start with v2 - that is: multiple tv tuners, a non-oem only license perhaps (the problem with the first time was the hardware support - they didn't want to try to do pvr on whatever hardware, so for now they only have a few supported cards/setups), and best of all, the smaller boxes that some people say that they want, connected to the pc via a network. That way your computer becomes a media server for the entire house, powering these smaller devices. I think there were also some discussions about integrating the Xbox2 into some of these plans, but I dunno, hey, I just attended a meeting.. :)

    2. Re:Windows XP Media Edition... by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 2

      This is not for everyone, in the same sense that a 42'' plasma TV is not for everyone. I enjoy my AIW as the next person, but I cannot, for example, capture DVD quality mpegs while gaming or burning a cd. The Media edition PC can.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    3. Re:Windows XP Media Edition... by Hast · · Score: 2

      There's a lot of cards which enable MPEG2 recording. The ATI ALL in wonder line has had it for a few generations IIRC. And I see no mention of any specific hardware in the Alienware box to do it. Just a regular GF4 card. (Which seems like an odd choice to me. I have a GF4 4200 card and the TV-Out is pretty bad compared to my old G400Max.)

      In conclusion, you can record MPEG2 just fine with other solutions. (Even the free MythTV.)

    4. Re:Windows XP Media Edition... by delus10n0 · · Score: 2

      No ATI All-In-Wonder card has ever offered hardware MPEG2 or MPEG1 encoding, just software.

      And the quality sucks. You just can't get decent realtime software MPEG1/MPEG2 on the PC. You're better off recording into something lossless (huffyUV) or something high bitrate (perhaps divx at 100% quality) and converting to MPEG2 later on using CCE or TMPGEnc.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  14. Looks nice but ... by xerofud · · Score: 5, Informative

    I want to not only be able to freely shift in time, but also be able to shift content in space between machines on my LAN. One has to wonder if this Windows XP box puts restrictions on moving content off the machine to other networked computers. TiVo certainly does, and because of the draconian lockdown these folks implemented in their series 2 version of this product (with all that cryptographic signing of the kernel nonsense, checksums for the filesystem and propietary boot firmware) I decided to return my Tivo (within the first 30 days) and brave the wild world of open source PVR products.

    Short story is that a few weeks later I successfully managed to get MythTV working (tonight in fact). Sure, it took me a while longer, but I learned a heck of a lot in the process, and it didn't cost me much more at all.

    Series 2 + lifetime subscription to programming guide:

    $550

    The non-refundable cost of shipping/return shipping:

    $30

    My new Pentium IV with Asus P4PE motheroboard (supports hyperthreading CPU, with onboard firewire, usb 2.0, serial ata, RAID, Gigabit LAN and intel8x0 5.1 surround sound -- all linux compatible) and ATI TV-Wonder (stereo version, not VE mono) for video-in and NVidia Ti4200 LeadTek for video-out (which sports Conexant Tv-out chip that is HDTV compatible unlike Philips Tv-out chip and also produces better picture quality with richer feature set)

    $700

    The satisfaction of doing it yourself ...

    Priceless

    So for all others out there like myself, remember there's www.mythtv.org

  15. More on XP Media Center by Russellkhan · · Score: 5, Informative

    ZDNet realeased an article titled Windows XP Media Center: Who needs it? Not me back when the first of the XP Media Center devices/PCs turned up: the HP Media Center PC.

    The title of the article sums it all up nicely in my book.

    Russ

    --
    Information doesn't want to be anthropomorphized anymore.
  16. Umm, can't we do this already? by lpret · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, I just looked at this box and laughed. It's the Shuttle SB51g with some stuff shoved in it, totaling (if my Pricewatching is correct) just over 800 dollars. Now, perhaps the new Media Center OS is cool -- but to the tune of 1000 more??? I can't find a reason to buy this because we at Slashdot (yes, a generalisation, deal with it) can build our own boxen. And we can run Mandrake 9.0 with KDE 3 and be very happy. *Sigh* Perhaps it's the alienware t-shirt?

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  17. So do I by The+Tyro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Already own one of these, but I did it my way.

    Used a 4u rackmount case and slid it right into my home entertainment center/stereo rack. Used an 8500 AIW card, soundblaster LIVE, integrated LAN, duron processor, and enough memory to make it work.

    Fleshed it out with a wireless keyboard/mouse, some front port adapters, and a front-mounted LCD that displays song title/etc.

    Plays audio streams, CDs, DVDs, MP3s, TV-out... runs them right into the receiver unit for the home stereo. Best of all, it looks like it belongs right in the stereo rack with all the other components.

    I honestly don't know where I'd put one of those Shuttle cubes, but it certainly wouldn't fit in a rack. The alienware/shuttle cube looks pretty hip, but where's the joy of tinkering? the satisfaction of building it yourself?

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:So do I by The+Tyro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      my bad... should have included more details.

      I'm using latest version of the ATI MMC software. I really haven't had many problems with ATI, except the occasional game bug. Their drivers are improving.

      The comp I mentioned is primarily a home entertainment appliance, though it's beefy enough to do lots of other things. For instance, aside from the lag in the wireless mouse/keyboard, it's a pretty fair Counterstrike machine (though I am definitely NOT 31337, more like cannon fodder). This box will also eventually drive a home theatre projector.

      Here's the hardware and prices:

      4U Rackmount case (100 bucks)
      Enermax PS (60 bucks)
      1.3gig duron (50 bucks)
      256M pc2700 ram (80 bucks)
      80gig Seagate drive (100 bucks)
      ECS motherboard (60 bucks)
      Soundblaster LIVE 5.1 (40 bucks)
      AIW 8500DV (200 bucks)
      DVD drive (40 bucks)
      USB 2.0 card (20 bucks)
      Koutech USB/Firewire 3.5" hub (50 bucks)
      CrystalFontz LCD (70 bucks)
      Wireless keyboard/mouse (100 bucks)

      Total, if you had to build it from scratch, just under 1000 bucks. I didn't pay that... some of this stuff I had laying around, or cannibalized from other boxen. You could certainly get away with much cheaper if you deleted some of the bells and whistles (less fancy video card, no LCD, etc). Also, in fairness to Alienware, my system is NOT portable... it's approx 30lbs.

      Honestly, I most enjoy the way it looks. Black, locking front door (keeps little hands away from important buttons) with a lexan window so the LCD is visible. Looks just like an amp, or some other home stereo component.

      My wife would say this is the first useful thing my computer tinkering has ever produced.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    2. Re:So do I by The+Tyro · · Score: 2
      The OS is win2k (yes, I realize it's not linux, but the video card features aren't all supported under linux).

      The LCD is made by Crystalfontz. It's driven from a serial port, and requires a power connector for backlight. Similar units are made by MatrixOrbital. The software to drive the LCD is a free download, and can monitor system parameters out the wazoo... temp, network stats, cpu load, memory management, winamp... you name it.

      Links:
      CrystalFontz Website
      Matrix Orbital

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    3. Re:So do I by puppetman · · Score: 2

      My wife loves the new computer as well. I stuck with the SiS on-board graphics. The Shuttle case I got doesn't have AGP, as it is the Athalon 1.8. The Intel version would have been $100 more, and I have AMD stock, so might as well get it. So the AIW 7500 is out. Maybe a seperate tv-tuner card at some point.

      Yah, ATI isn't market-dominant (they haven't been since the mid-90's, when the Mach 64 was the biz for gaming). Their drivers don't get the attention that nVidia's do. Wish ATI would pump more into their cards. They compete on the same level hardware-wise...

      I went cheap on the speakers, as we don't really have the setup in the room for a 4.1 or 5.1.

      How do you find the wireless keboard/mouse? I went with the Logitec wireless mouse/keyboard. The range only seems to be about 4 feet, and it's laggy. Read that electrical components can reduce range. The signal-receiver is sitting right on top of the tv, so that might be it...

      Mine is mostly for music and divx. No cable, no satellite. Just antenna, and a 2.5 megabit DSL line, so that makes sense. Bought my first DVD the other day - Extended Lord of the Rings - waiting till closer to the Two Towers before I play it... Be interesting to see how good it looks.

    4. Re:So do I by The+Tyro · · Score: 2

      I also went with the logitech elite combo, and have noticed some funny things about its range.

      It is VERY finicky with regards to how it is oriented. If I turn it 90 degrees to the receiver, it doesn't pick up at all (!). Mine is about fifteen feet away from the receiver, which sits on top of the entertainment center. It works, but not in every position.

      I really wish it had better range... but it's not a deal-breaker.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    5. Re:So do I by The+Tyro · · Score: 2

      you're welcome.

      --
      Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  18. Freevo by I_redwolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://freevo.sourceforge.net/

    Current Features
    * Watching TV, with TV Guide (using XMLTV).
    * Playing Movies (AVI, MPEG, etc) and DVDs.
    * Playing Music (MP3, Ogg).
    * Viewing Pictures.
    * Skins are configurable using XML files.
    * Movie and Music file info using XML files.
    * Preliminary Mame support.

    Price == the cost of hardware.

    Why exactly would I pay through the nose, ass and other body cavities for the alienware box?

    1. Re:Freevo by mhesseltine · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why exactly would I pay through the nose, ass and other body cavities for the alienware box?

      Because you'd like to record?

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    2. Re:Freevo by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 2
      Is it just me, or does the Freevo screenshots page show:
      (compare to the OS X page)
      --
      four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
  19. Wow... by Spytap · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wow, it's a...brick...cinderblock maybe?

    Oh, it has the Alienware name on it? We should pay more for that, right?

    You know, I owned a overpriced cube-like computer that played DVDs too, the PowerMac Cube...it looked better and didn't have that $hitty XP on it either.

    This is not a new concept people, MicroATX faactor motherboards are fairly common, and frankly, I could build the same machine for about half the price...Damn, for the extra 500 bucks it costs for them to market their name, I'll DRAW an alien head on the front of your's for you.

  20. Just build it yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have an old 500Mhz Celeron box, running Slackware, and Mythtv. I can watch DivX movies, look at my pictures, rip CDs, record TV, listen to mp3s and lots more.. and it didn't cost me a cent (a local business was throwing out their old boxen). Sure, the 500Mhz box is a little low for dvd, but most of my videos are video CD anyway (they are incredibly cheap here in asia).

  21. According to the website. by popeydotcom · · Score: 4, Funny

    (my emphasis) Navigator lets you watch DVDs from anywhere in the room, whether you're at your desk or on your living room couch.

    What? I can stand over here and watch it..? What about over here? I can't possibly watch it from over HERE can I?!

    1. Re:According to the website. by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Can you see it now?" "Yes." "Can you see it now?" "Yes." "Can you see it now?" "Yes." "Good..."

  22. replaytv by zephc · · Score: 2

    well, it doesnt play DVDs, but I can record DVDs to the replay's hdd, and then copy to our own computers (just MPG files)

    Ah, my NetFlix account is going to be handy!

    --
    "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
  23. Price: $1699.00 by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

    I don't think, at this price it's anything other than a desktop PC with a remote control. I have a PC (running Linux) that does pretty much the same except for PVR (that it will soon anyway), but I don't pretend that it's a new kind of device, it's a PC that happens to be used to watch movies and TV, and this is why it has (in my case) a projection screen instead of a regular monitor, but that's it.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  24. It displays pictures! by frovingslosh · · Score: 2
    It runs a new version of XP (Media Center Edition) and displays pictures, movies and plays DVDs.

    Wow! It displays pictures! Not only that, but it plays DVD's and movies! I bet it even makes sounds!

    Gee Wizz! It does all that, which of course I can do on my two year old system, and it runs a new version of Windows that gives Bil Gates the right to disable whatever software he wants (even though you may have paid good money for it). And not only was Cyno01 willing to say "If I had the cash for it i would definitly ditch my 160Gb HD and Radeon AIW card." but /. thought this remark was worthy of front page attention!

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  25. Re:I call this Windows Update Now! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

    Updated Price: $7900.00 Who wants the Navi? If only to call themselves Lain? buhahaha


    Navi is easy to upgrade, it had no DRM, and handheld version had self-hosted development environment.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  26. Linux equiv. by popeydotcom · · Score: 2

    freevo is a very nice Linux equivalent. I tried it for the first time last night, and it's just gorgeous.

    I'd like to put a 'multimedia' centre in the living room, maybe using a nice small micro atx board and case.

    Problem will be crowbaring a wireless ethernet card (I'd like it to be the wireless gateway too), and a tv out video card as well...

  27. Multimedia-centric Linux? by psxndc · · Score: 2
    Not a flame, but which distributions? I tried to get my Linux box to record TV to no avail (best I could do was video sans audio before ripping my hair out and giving up). I was using SuSE 7.2 or 7.3 and then switched to RedHat. I didn't realize there were distros directed at Multimedia. Can you tell me which ones? Thanks.

    psxndc

    --

    The emacs religion: to be saved, control excess.

    1. Re:Multimedia-centric Linux? by Hast · · Score: 2

      Well there's MythTV and FreeVo.

      The latter can't record as of yet AFAIK. While MythTV is more or less a complete TiVo replacement. (But apparently it's a bit of a bitch to get installed.) None of these are actual distros BTW. Both are just programs you run.

    2. Re:Multimedia-centric Linux? by h0tblack · · Score: 2
      There are solutions for recording tv straight to your Linux box, for a start have a look at the Video4Linux resources here and google and DistroWatch are always your friend ;)

      While the various larger distributions are geared towards multimedia functionality to different degrees, it obviously depends exactly what you want out of your box and how much you want to play with the guts (hardware and software). Many people would be happy with a DVD/VCD/mp3 player rather than a full-blown PVR, and I'm not sure how much freedom you'll get in this area with Media Center Pc's - I doubt this version of XP is designed around being able to rip, mix and burn ;) This is where some of the other Linux projects come in (some focussed on the embedded market only though). Maybe distribution in the classical sense was not the best of description for me to use, although projects like Flamethrower Linux are aiming for that - RedHat and Debian are working on multimedia based distributions, altho they are aimed more at the multimedia worker rather than player.

      Projects like Dave/Dina, homeDVR, OpenPVR, MythTV and FreeVo aim at homebrew boxes somewhat akin to the Media Center idea and there are a myriad of sources for building boxes that do as much if not more than the Media Center. Flexibility is always good IMHO, and if you can start with a box that may just do DVD, DivX, CD's, mp3's and ogg, but expand it into a classic gaming machine running MAME et al as well as serving up content to the rest of your flat/house/hovel then that is "a good thing". More info at ding, eboxy.

      Remember that Linux is used for commercial PVR's (and the Moxi Media Center) too and while there are companies that do these things commercially, that's normally a sign of open versions being around somewhere, especially if you like to get your hands dirty :) If you don't, then it won't be long before you new (or old) console will be able to fulfill many of these functions, again, they already can to a degree, if you don't mind hacking away a bit.

  28. translation by rakerman · · Score: 2

    XP (Media Center Edition) = XP (Now With Extra DRM!)

  29. I hate to point this out by theolein · · Score: 2

    but has Alienware considered the fact that all those copyprotected CD's won't play in the CD-drive? What about DVD's? Do they all work as well? does the XP-Media center edition give Bill the right to make a list of all your songs and movies? I don't think I want him to know that I have the full collection of the Morgan sex project and African sex safari.

  30. Why wouldn't I just buy a TiVO? by ewanrg · · Score: 2

    Taking a look at this system, I'm struck by how much they don't tell you. For example, where does the "Guide" get it's data? How much will I pay for that?

    Also, unless you go with the "Pro" version you still have the problem that when the HD is full, you then have to choose between deleting a program or not recording another. And the Pro version is as much more than the regular version as the DVD drive would cost you retail. Hmmm...

    Finally, you are looking at a solution where the upgradability is studiously not addressed. Can I add another HD and use it? Or will the DRM controls only recognize specifically configured disks?

    Basically I just don't see this as a solution.

  31. Re:A lot of people are missing the point! by Junta · · Score: 2

    I personally think building is the way to go, but for the general public, I think a Linux based solution would be ideal. Cheap for the company, and with freevo and an lirc configuration, you can play pretty much anything you want (quicktime,realmedia,avis, even those damn vivos) and have them treated pretty much as equals. Never really have seen XP media center edition, but I'd bet it is WMP-centric and as such can't play Quicktime, RealMedia, or Vivo (shudder). Probably also refuses to play DivX and friends without going through hoops. Even if QuickTime Player and RealPlayer can be downloaded, the remote control would be less than ideal way to interface with the players...

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  32. win mediacenter. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

    dude, IT HAS WINDOWS MEDIA CENTER EDITION!

    that is the only reason to buy it instead of buying your own ss-51g (or gbox or..).

    because you can't have it seperately...
    i'm seriously having doubts about (all)games working straight on it(sure, they _should_, it's just another xp, but that was the case with xp itself too). this, and the probable 'easy' configuration system limiting what you're able to do lesser it's value.. (especially as lanbox).

    720*480 from gf2gts looked ok. anyone know any tv-out tweak tools for radeons?

    also, outputting movies through mpeg2 decoder cards looks great, though outputting divx through hollywood+ (that costs ~20-30$ now) eats huge amounts of cpu(95% on 1140mhz duron-morgan, the program used is HHPlus, hungarian hollywood+, and seems to be dropped out of dev, i highly recommend using codec such as ffdshow, or some extra codec to scale the picture, hhplus doesnt know how to do it properly), this is, the_best_tv-out from pc that i have seen. though, several limitations, like, you need to have another display to start the thing.. i'm yet to test mplayers hollywood+ output(on linux, my linux machines are not powerful enough to decode divx), but i'm told it's ok. i'd imagine building a headless linux box that could be operated through zaurus or similar wouldnt be that hard, and it would kiiiiiiiick ass. i only have combined bedroom, movie room, and computer room so i haven't had too much intrest to anything except highquality output to my lowquality shitprojector.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    1. Re:win mediacenter. by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      to answer myself, to get 720*480&etc resos in radeons, use powerstrip to add custom resos.

      looks ok.

      (just bought the card on monday...)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  33. MOD PARENT UP by Cyno01 · · Score: 2
    the author speaks
    You sir, get a shiney gold star. I wrote the post rather hastily and left out a few of the features, if people would take the time to RTFA and not just immediately start griping about m$, maybe they'd realize that this thing is cool. The point is, my computer does all this too, but this would look sweet sitting on the shelf next to my tv, instead of runing all sortsa video cables through the walls.
    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  34. Ask Slashdot: Do it yourself TIVO? by cardshark2001 · · Score: 2

    I asked this question in the form of an article, but as with all articles I've submitted, the nameless editor rejected it without even giving a reason. So I've waited for it to become on topic for some time now.

    This box that the article links to costs a whopping $1700! For that price you could get a TIVO and lifetime subscription and have money left over to get your mom a TIVO with a lifetime subscription for Christmas (or for un-Christmas if you're a Jehovah's witness).

    Now, it seems to me you could build something with no DRM built into it for cheap. Does anyone who has experience with this want to tell me how to go about it? I really want to just build it into my existing computer, since I have my PC in the living room already.

    1). Is there a video capture card that's up to snuff?
    2). Assuming I buy a big-ass SCSI for TV to live in, could I record TV and do stuff (other than quake or NWN, I guess) at the same time? Or should I just not kid myself and build a new system? In this case, can I cheap out on the system, or do I need a high performance one like the one I've got already?
    3). Do the free internet services offer the same sort of stuff as TIVO. Anyone have experience with both?
    4). Should I just upgrade to digital cable and get the free DVR that comes with that now (here in Austin with Time Warner)

    Anyway, there are so many factors to consider I'd really like some feedback on this from those of you who have experience in the matter.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFA!
  35. Remote Control by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

    Anyone notice how the remote looks vaguely similar to the Philips TiVo remotes (at least the HDR112/212/etc series)? Peanut shape, numberpad at the bottom, logo button, etc?

  36. Stats are shite, error page slashdotted? by phorm · · Score: 2

    How about this:
    Cooling system: None on the media center PC? Oh come on, it at least has a fan and decent heatsink. If they're going to give us stats, then I want to see stats of a system built for the same price (and not by monkeys).

    Also, seems that their "page not found" error is slashdotted or something, it shows me the server JScript. Maybe they're running it on one of these navigators :-)

  37. Pretty pointless... by CommieLib · · Score: 3, Informative

    This device would serve one purpose and one only: PVR. No one willing to shell out 1700 bucks for a media computer is going to settle for non-progressive scan DVD, for the first thing.

    Secondly, mp3, photos, etc., are what my computer is for. I already have that capability.

    Games? If you have a big screen TV, I guess. I also second the post about the shape and size of this thing; why make it so radically different than every other AV component I have? The old desktop shape is more the proper shape than a cube.

    I still don't understand why I can't just shell out $350 for a device that does nothing but record TV. I want a digital VCR, that's all.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  38. Major issue overlooked by cmay666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have no idea why the poster would want to 'return my Radeon AIW card'. What the linked page doesn't mention, and what people need to consider, is the capacity for ANY PVR/PC card to have hardware mpeg decoding and encoding. I believe the ATI All in Wonder 9700 Pro has SOME hardware support, accounting for 10-20% performance "boost" (i.e. less resources used), but I don't believe there are any other cards on the market with this feature. Hauupauge is scheduled to roll one out in the future (the PVR-350 I think?). Also, another feature that the ATI card has that this doesn't is support for a second tuner, letting you watch one show while recording another, or pic-in-pic. And all the great software bundled with their AIW. So why exactly is the Media Center betteR?

    1. Re:Major issue overlooked by delus10n0 · · Score: 2

      Sorry, but you're wrong. No ATI All-In-Wonder card supports MPEG1 or MPEG2 hardware encoding. It's all software driven (licensed from Ligos) And it's filth.

      There are a few hardware MPEG2 encoder/decoder's out there that are PVR's. A few that come to mind are:

      * Sigma Designs REALMagic DVR -- My personal favorite, has had the best quality so far, both at low bitrates and high.

      * Hauppauge WinTV PVR -- It's decent quality for those on a budget. Encodes high-bitrate MPEG2 like a charm.

      A webpage detailing and reviewing a ton of MPEG1/MPEG2 encoders (both hardware and software) can be found here.

      --
      Not All Who Wander Are Lost
  39. It has to be posted by Stiletto · · Score: 2


    An old one but still relevant:

    http://www.theonion.com/onion3308/realtimetv.htm l