Slashdot Mirror


Fan-Made Star Trek Episode Available for Download

Minnesota trekker writes "Two Minnesota fans of the original "Star Trek" series spent seven years, off and on, creating an all-new episode in the 1960s style using their own actors, sets and props. Behold, the U.S.S. Exeter (www.starshipexeter.com). The episode's look and feel is amazingly authentic. The story is inventive and the acting surprisingly good. The damn thing, dubbed "The Savage Empire," is actually watchable. The site gives lots of details on how the episode was created, and even more background is available on the Pioneer Press site."

228 of 627 comments (clear)

  1. Damnit Jim... by Life2Short · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm an ACTOR, not a STAGEHAND...

  2. Copyright infringement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    can't wait for the lawsuits to start :P

    1. Re:Copyright infringement by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      Actually, there may be come copyright issues

      On the music, which sounds pretty close to the original. I'll have to check it out again when the server is back up.

      On the set and ship design

      On the uniform design

      On certain creative elements of the Universe - while you can't copyright people from earth. But Klingons, etc. are another matter.

      Of course, if you changed all that, it would not be very recognizable as Star Trek. which I think would be the point of copyright.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  3. Great ! Now we need someone to do Firefly! by Snaller · · Score: 2

    I'll be in my bunk!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Great ! Now we need someone to do Firefly! by Snaller · · Score: 2

      You must be a moron who doesn't know how to use CSS if you think it causes readability problems.


      Actually you are the moron if you don't know that it causes readability problems.

      Visit www.cnn.com in Internet Explorer, try changing font size - what happens? The font size stay micro small, because of the stylesheets.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  4. Did they go... by craenor · · Score: 5, Funny

    To the William Shatner school of overacting?

    Cannot...seem...to...communicate...with...the aliens...must get...somekindof...resolution before Enterprise...is...destroyed!

    1. Re:Did they go... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Funny
      No respect for Starfleet captains.

      Just as the captain is heading to the bridge, someone jumps into the turbolift and shuts the door. (in the teaser) :P

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Did they go... by Jogar+the+Barbarian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Little known fact: Shatner started doing his trademark dramatic pauses in the early 60's as a Shakesperian actor, when he would forget his lines. The critics(?) loved it, so he incorporated it into his acting style.

      P.S. The ol' feller is 71.

      --
      3. Profit!
      2. ???
      1. On Soviet Slashdot, a Beowulf cluster of alien Natalie Portman overlords welcomes YOU!
  5. sounds like trouble by tps12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is pretty cool. I remember a similar community effort being discussed several years ago to bring the Timothy Zahn Star Wars sequels to the screen (or to tape, whatever). Never got off the ground, AFAIK.

    I am a little worried as to how this will be treated by Paramount. They are notoriously evil when it comes to "protecting" their copyrights, especially when it comes to Trek.

    Also, why the Exeter? Is there any reason given as to why the Federation would name a ship after an East Coast prep school with a history of buggery?

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
    1. Re:sounds like trouble by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 5, Informative

      Most likely, it was named after this Exeter. Here's an account of how the Japanese sunk her in WWII.

      Chris Mattern

    2. Re:sounds like trouble by edwardd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Exeter is also the name of a Brittish warship.

    3. Re:sounds like trouble by ChaosMt · · Score: 2

      I don't know if this was the inspiration, but Exeter is the lead uhh... villan who has a change of heart the end of the bad 50's sci-fi movie This Island Earth - which I only know because Mystery Science Theater 3000 focused their wit on this movie, when they made their Mystery Science Theater 3000, The Movie.

      Alas, after a run on the comedy channel and then on the sci-fi channel, production of new shows has been cancelled. They still show reruns Saturday mornings, in fact make sure and check out "Space Mutiny" playing on Jan. 11th. It the funniest one of this last season.

      Mst3k - Thank you for all the laughs and bad movies. May you rest in peace.

    4. Re:sounds like trouble by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Informative

      All the Constitution-class starships are from Earth (i.e., real) history.

      Others include the Farragut and Constellation, as well as others I mentioned above.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    5. Re:sounds like trouble by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "Also, why the Exeter? Is there any reason given as to why the Federation would name a ship after an East Coast prep school with a history of buggery?"

      On a hunch, I entered "HMS Exeter" into Google. It was a York-class heavy cruiser that saw action against the Graf Spee early in the war and was sunk in the Battle of Java Sea in 1942. It looks like it was one of the "not-a-battleship" classes that the RN was notorious for building in the 1920's and 1930's.

      IMO, a CC is closer to "NCC" than a CV-ish name like "Enterprise." What the heck does the N stand for, anyway?

    6. Re:sounds like trouble by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      NCC == "Naval Construction Contract"

      Concept Junkie (who could probably buy a car with his early 70's ST paraphenalia)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    7. Re:sounds like trouble by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm replying to my own post because nobody around here seems to know nautical acronyms/abbreviations.

      Let's start with the easy ones:

      HMS - His (at the time) Majesty's Ship
      RN - Royal (British) Navy

      Now on to the CC that everyone seems to have missed:

      CC - cruiser (like the HMS Exeter)

      Other examples include:

      DD - destroyer
      FF - frigate
      CV - carrier
      BB - battleship
      SS - submarine
      SSB - ballistic missile submarine
      SSN - nuclear sumarine
      SSBN - ballistic missile nuclear submarine
      CVN - nuclear carrier
      BBN - Wouldn't that be nice...

      Now since CC stands for cruiser and the Enterprise has been described as a cruiser, I assumed that the CC part of NCC stood for "cruiser" (silly me).

      CCN I would have understood. "Nuclear cruiser." NCC looks backwards.

      Now, so far, I've gotten an aeronatuical-ish explaination that just sounds stupid when you consider how the rest of the universe uses nautical terms (the rest of the show ain't exactly Air Force friendly).

      I've also gotten an equally silly explaination of "naval construction contract." NCC-1701 USS Enterprise to me looks like it should mean "some-sort-of-cruiser-variant, hull number 1701, a. k. a. 'USS Enterprise'" just as CVN-65 USS Enterprise means "nuclear aircraft carrier hull number 65, a. k. a. 'USS Enterprise.'"

      If Paramount and fanboys are going to hand-wave, at least try to make it sound more believable than that!

      Oh, wait, this is Star Trek... my bad.

    8. Re:sounds like trouble by Britano · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually all three letters in CVN stand for something...

      C = Carrier
      V = Fixed Wing Aircraft
      N = Nuclear

      So in real english it's a fixed wing-nuclear powered carrier.

      --
      Avoid The Rush, Hate OU Early!!!
    9. Re:sounds like trouble by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 2

      I had always hoped that the Zahn books would become movies after Lucas had retired or died. I'm sure that Lucas will never touch them while he's at the helm because then the plots wouldn't be a suprise to everyone. He should look at another trilogy of books, LOTR, to notice that a suprise plot is not needed for great movies.

      Any grassroots attempt at a SW film will certainly be met with a legal team that will make stormtroopers seem like nice, reasonable guys.

      -B

    10. Re:sounds like trouble by mpe · · Score: 2

      On a hunch, I entered "HMS Exeter" into Google. It was a York-class heavy cruiser that saw action against the Graf Spee early in the war and was sunk in the Battle of Java Sea in 1942. It looks like it was one of the "not-a-battleship" classes that the RN was notorious for building in the 1920's and 1930's.

      Odd that your search didn't bring up the current type 42 destroyer. Especially considering that its sister ship, HMS Nottingham has been in the news recently.

    11. Re:sounds like trouble by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      I thought CC was cruiser, command, CA being cruiser, armoured and CL cruiser, light. But that's the SFB geek in me talking.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    12. Re:sounds like trouble by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      "Space Mutiny" was in the 8th season actually.

      However, I'll one-up you. I actually rented the movie! The local video store has more MST'ed SF movies than SF movies I'd want to rent... bleh!

      Anyhow, it was interesting to see what they cut out... most exposition that made the film have slightly more sense, plus some apparent fleeting nudity in the for-lack-of-a-better-word sex scene with Chunkhead and Grandma.

      Truly a horrible movie, and a great MST3K episode.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    13. Re:sounds like trouble by Mulletproof · · Score: 2

      Farragut? You're kidding... Unless that's another historical reference, i do believe somebody has been reading some David Weber... or vise versa :p

      --
      You need a FREE iPod Nano
    14. Re:sounds like trouble by eyegor · · Score: 2

      An example:

      The USS San Francisco has a hull number of SSN-711

      The USS stands for United States Ship, the SSN means Nuclear-powered Attack Submarine, the 711 is the hull number.

      There's also SSG and SSGN (for conventionally powered and nuclear-powered guided missle submarines)

      --

      Don't anthropomorphize computers, they don't like it.
    15. Re:sounds like trouble by aallan · · Score: 2

      Also, why the Exeter? Is there any reason given as to why the Federation would name a ship after an East Coast prep school with a history of buggery?

      Possibly they named the vessel after the other, more historic, Exeter? Al.

      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
    16. Re:sounds like trouble by ThaReetLad · · Score: 2

      you missed DDG and CCGN for guided missile destroyers, and nuclear guided missile cruisers.

      I dont know any BBN's but there are CBGN's (Nuclear Guided Missile Battle Cruiser) in the Kirov class even if they are all rusting hulks these days.

      --
      You can't win Darth. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    17. Re:sounds like trouble by Zarquon · · Score: 2

      [Clears throat]Damn the torpedos! Full Speed Ahead!

      Ring any bells?

      http://www.encompass.net/~ctyson/civwar/farmain.ht m has a rather lengthy bio online..

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
  6. Oxymoron? by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Funny

    The episode's look and feel is amazingly authentic. The story is inventive and the acting surprisingly good.

    Wait a sec. No way it can be authentic to the original and be well acted.

    Much of the charm... of the original... Star Trek was... the wooden acting... not to mention the... inexplicable pauses... in William Shatner's... delivery.

    1. Re:Oxymoron? by SirSlud · · Score: 5, Funny

      The pauses wern't inexplicable .. every pause was his mind repeating in soothing tones, "I look like a goof. But the its worth the pay check. I look like a goof. Buts its worth .. "

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:Oxymoron? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      You're right. The acting ranged from "sort of almost decent. Almost." to "oh my God WHERE ARE JOEL AND THE BOTS IN THIS, MY HOUR OF NEED!!!". I'm still trying to figure out why the Andorians stole Chekhov's accent...

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    3. Re:Oxymoron? by ralphclark · · Score: 2

      Yeah yeah, yadda yadda. How many times have I heard this. But the acting in the original Star Trek was anything but wooden.

      It never ceases to amaze me how so many people can blithely keep on repeating stuff they've heard from somewhere without ever checking for themselves to see if it was true.

  7. My God Jim! by warpSpeed · · Score: 2, Funny
    These people have too much time on thier hands...

  8. 7 years in Minnesota by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    is 49 human years.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:7 years in Minnesota by slim-t · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ah, the old 7 dog years = 1 human year joke, except I think you've reversed it.

      I take it you're from Iowa.

    2. Re:7 years in Minnesota by miltimj · · Score: 2

      Move slow? At least we see the seasons pass... I can't imagine seeing green and brown 24/7/365... yuk. On a side note, it's January and my backyard (in MN) is all grass. :-(

      --
      "Truth is not decided by majority vote" consensus gentium -- Norman Geisler
    3. Re:7 years in Minnesota by dasunt · · Score: 2

      No, that's North Dakota.

      I'm still hoping that they'll invent trees here one day to block the wind.

      Seriously though, don't dis Minnesota. Twin Cities are one of the largest urban centers in the US. Plus, its the home of Mystery Science Theater 3000!

  9. Recipe for a flash fried server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ingredients:
    1 Website
    5 large Star Trek related Movie Files

    Instructions:
    Post 5 movie files on your website. Have someone post a link on slashdot.org. Watch your webserver cook at 300 degrees until the case is a nice golden brown.

    1. Re:Recipe for a flash fried server by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it's OK. It's at mac.com It's the first step in Apple's color-changing patent

      --
      That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
    2. Re:Recipe for a flash fried server by digerata · · Score: 3, Informative
      The site is slowing down, here is a mirror site until things get back to normal.

      --

      1;
    3. Re:Recipe for a flash fried server by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      The site is slowing down, here is a mirror site until things get back to normal.

      Looks like you've been /.'d...site came back with "connection refused." Meanwhile, the teaser's coming through from the original site @ 4.9 KB/s...good thing I'm downloading it and not trying to watch it while it's streaming, or the ... pauses ... in ... each ... sentence ...... would ...... be ...... really ......... really ......... long .........

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  10. 7 year production? by bytesmythe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They used their own actors, and it took them seven years? Can you see the people age visibly from one scene to the next? That can't be good for continuity. Suddenly the lead actor has gray hair and put on 20 pounds...

    Of course, that kind of thing still wouldn't drop it below the quality of most new shows that issue forth from the bowels of the major networks.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
    1. Re:7 year production? by I'm+a+racist. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Don't forget it's Star Trek, having continuity errors only adds to the authenticity...

      --


      Down with Saudi Arabia!!!
    2. Re:7 year production? by LordKronos · · Score: 5, Informative

      I imagine a large portion of the 7 years was prep work. Building sets, creating props, sewing outfits, writing scripts, etc. Then there is the post production editing and stuff. I didn't see the site mention anywhere how much time was actually spent filming, but I suspect it was only a small fraction of that (1 or maybe 2 years).

    3. Re:7 year production? by operagost · · Score: 3, Informative

      It says they started shooting on SVHS in 1996, but obviously they couldn't be using any of that footage because of the inferior quality compared to the digital cameras they used in the last year. Not to mention the degradation of the media over time.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  11. Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by netsharc · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Captain, I am detecting incoming connection from the Slashdot Quadrant. They have taken all available frequencies! Aarrgghh!!"

    (The console blows up)

    "Red alert, shields up!"

    This looks like a plot by Apple who wants to show off their OS X server (it's mac.com..)

    --
    What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    1. Re:Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by Bob+McCown · · Score: 2, Funny

      You forgot the flying sparks, and the camera tilting left-to-right and everyone throwing themselves out of their chairs....

    2. Re:Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by operagost · · Score: 2
      Truth is stranger than fiction:

      Server: Netscape- Enterprise /3.6 SP3

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Incoming http connections! Red Alert! by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 2, Funny

      We're losing packet containment! Warp Core Buffer-overrun breach imminent! :)

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
  12. Why EMBED? by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Can someone explain to me why webmasters feel the need to embed their movies within their own webpages? Why not just let us download it to our harddrives with a simple right-click? That way (a) people can watch it over and over without added strain on the server and (b) people can distribute the file through other means (p2p, etc.) again saving the webserver. I just don't understand why webmasters make it so difficult to download a movie directly to disk.

    GMD

    1. Re:Why EMBED? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 5, Informative

      Agreed.
      The url's for the mov files are:


      http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/teaser.mo v



      http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/actone.mo v



      http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/acttwo.mo v



      http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/actthree. mo v



      http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/tag.mov


      And btw mplayer can play these if you have compiled it right and have the proper codecs. Which also means that you can reencode them to something else.

    2. Re:Why EMBED? by TheRealFixer · · Score: 2

      Usually with this sort of thing it's because they're trying to stick with a "theme". The media is designed to fit in with the look of the site. It's usually the product of letting graphic artists have too much say over the site design. Or, in small sites like this, thinking you're a graphic artist yourself.

      The other reason is generally for copy protection. Sure, all you need to do is sift through the page source to locate the URL of the file... but average users aren't going to go through that much trouble, or aren't going to know how to do that. Of course, with these guys, I don't think they're very concerned about copyright, since fan films can be argued to violate all kinds of IP laws. You'd think they wouldn't be that uptight about someone spreading their movie around.

    3. Re:Why EMBED? by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      Scott to bridge: We're losing power Captain. Transfer speeds are at 13kB and falling.

    4. Re:Why EMBED? by bearklaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It looks like the pages are hosted at Apple's .Mac, and if you use the .Mac services to create a web site with movies, it automatically uses the EMBED tag. Maybe Apple figures people will buy QuickTime Pro just to get the "Save" link working from the player... -BearKlaw

    5. Re:Why EMBED? by statusbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The biggest reason why I hate embedded movies on a website is that I can not select 'Double Size' for the movie. Those movies are very tiny with my preferred resolution and I hate having to change my monitor resolution just to watch a movie in a web page.

      I end up sifting through the html and javascript and grabbing the raw url anyways.

      Oh well,

      --jeff++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    6. Re:Why EMBED? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 4, Funny

      And btw mplayer can play these if you have compiled it right and have the proper codecs.

      On the other hand, QuickTime Player plays these without having to be compiled, and it comes with all the proper codecs. ;-)

      --

      I write in my journal
    7. Re:Why EMBED? by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      I would about kill for a non-corporateware version of the quicktime and realvideo codecs that work on windows NT. In fact, if I can help in any way, lemme know.

    8. Re:Why EMBED? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

      Use Mozilla's "View Page Info" feature (Media tab). Gives you a "Save" option for any embedded media in a page.

      What? You're not using Mozilla? Too bad.

      Compliments to those providing mirrors, btw. A lot more helpful than posting more links and encouraging even more /.ing.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    9. Re:Why EMBED? by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      unless, of course, you're running Linux and then you also have to have...

      I think my point up there was that people who run Linux on their desktop computers are just looking for trouble, and shouldn't be surprised when they find it.

      --

      I write in my journal
    10. Re:Why EMBED? by Reziac · · Score: 2

      And I'd like to find something that's NOT Quicktime that will play 'em on Win98.. any suggestions??

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    11. Re:Why EMBED? by LMariachi · · Score: 2

      You don't need WINE for this. It's Sorenson v1, which is supported directly by mplayer. IIRC, at this point it's only Sorenson 3 that's still a sticking point.

  13. something tells me... by AssFace · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... that these fellas get laid ALL the time. seriously. chicks dig that shit.

    --

    There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
    1. Re:something tells me... by White+Shade · · Score: 2

      "...they both got married during the episode's long genesis and now intend to concentrate on raising their children (Josh has three kids; Jimm has a baby on the way)."

      draw your own conclusions :P

      --
      ìì!
    2. Re:something tells me... by YuppieScum · · Score: 2

      And yours... and, of course, mine...

      --
      This sig left unintentionally blank.
    3. Re:something tells me... by nege · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've got mod points, and I would mod you down as overrated (because you are) but then it would be obivious to the metamods that I am just a frustrated geek, who doesnt get any, who is tired of people reminding me that I dont get any.

      Oh well. Keep yer 5.

    4. Re:something tells me... by AssFace · · Score: 2, Funny

      nege, I'll always cherish those words. now hold me.

      If I had mod points, I'd wildly give them about all willy nilly, with total disregard to the law like I always do.

      Especially to that Anonymous Coward guy - he sure gets around. You have to admire his ability to be so prolific and have so many voices.

      --

      There are some odd things afoot now, in the Villa Straylight.
  14. Huh? Canopus plague? by Havokmon · · Score: 5, Funny
    The U.S.S. Exeter, freshly recrewed and commanded by Capt. John Garrovick, is on a mission to save a ship infected with the deadly Canopus Plague.

    Am I the only one who thought of a scene where the captain opens a hatch to the food reserves, and thousands of video cards drop down on him?

    --
    "I can't give you a brain, so I'll give you a diploma" - The Great Oz (blatently stolen sig)
  15. Much better than the latest movie... by dagg · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is much better than the latest Star Trek movie. And I bet it'll even be more profitable!

    --
    Sex - Find It
  16. Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by hndrcks · · Score: 5, Funny

    when does the black guy in the red shirt get killed by aliens?

    --
    Everyone will start to cheer when you put on your sailin' shoes.
    1. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by jargon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was wondering that myself when I watched it...and lo and behold - a red shirt gets incinerated shortly after getting into the underground fortress. Well done.

      --
      /dev/psychic: No medium found
    2. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by friscolr · · Score: 5, Funny
      starshipexeter.com -> cast/script -> starfleet -> crew -> Ensign Benjamin Halley

      Born in Waterloo, Iowa on April 2, 2245; Benjamin Halley is a non-descript red-shirt who, in the classic tradition, is vaporized early in the script. Like all such red-shirts, the 'X' at the end of his serial number indicates that he is surely doomed.
    3. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by GlassUser · · Score: 2

      This is amazing. Your link is great, but the funniest thing is watching it drop from 350 KB/sec to now under 50 KB/sec as more and more people find it. Ahh, the slashdot effect.

    4. Re:Slashdotted - so can somebody tell me... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      Good job, thanks!

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
  17. Impressive... by Schnapple · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...the mac.com server appears to be holding up quite well against our Slashdot attacks - I'm getting over 300K/s.

    My apologies if this does it in, but here are some direct links to the portions of the movies (i.e., not framed in HTML pages)

    Teaser
    Act One
    Act Two
    Act Three
    Tag/End Credits

    I think the episode would be better if the dialouge and video sound quality was as bad as the shots and sound effects of the original, but man - this is impressive ambition to say the least.

    1. Re:Impressive... by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 2

      I'm only getting 11K/sec when I normally get much more.

      It...can't..sustain an....attack from the...slashdot.

    2. Re:Impressive... by schlach · · Score: 2

      Lucky for you. Half an hour later, and I'm getting 17K/s. Would somebody who's downloaded the files already put it on a P2P network? I would, but at this rate it'll be another three hours before I have just Act 1-3.

      Here's two free mod-points. =)

      Seriously, Can people who have already d/led these please get them up on the P2P networks? How about renaming them starshipexeter_actone.mov, etc. ?

      Thanks

    3. Re:Impressive... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      the mac.com server appears to be holding up quite well against our Slashdot attacks - I'm getting over 300K/s.

      But I bet these guys will be getting a nasty e-mail from mac.com soon informing them that last week's bandwidth consumption of 100 terabytes was slightly over the fair use limit for a personal website!

  18. To boulderly go where no man has gone before. by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny
    Gimme Stone Trek anyday!

    Also hosted on Camp Chaos

    The adventures of the BCC-1701 Magnetize are in Flash.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  19. My only question is if they time travel by TrekCycling · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously. I've gotten used to the real Star Trek, where this is rampant, so I just can't watch Star Trek unless time travel is involved. Let me know if they go back in time to chase Klingons or get visited by Borg, and then I'm interested.

  20. Take that MPAA! by Telex4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I immediately thought was: cool, people can make fairly decent TV programmes on a tiny budget using the latest digital technologies. It's great seeing people who don't have the backing of the media mega-industry creating their own works. This is just one shred of evidence to add to the list to show that the Internet and open technology is about so much more than centralised shopping and news.

    Then I noticed how long it took them to do it :-)

    1. Re:Take that MPAA! by MrLint · · Score: 2

      Not to worry Im sure paramount is crafting the DMCA notice as we type. But honestly i thinkit because some guys in a garage came up with something better than rick berman could (see the last scene of of the finale of voyager if you wanna see wooden acting)

    2. Re:Take that MPAA! by Ig0r · · Score: 2

      Just because an act isn't prohibited by a particular law, doesn't mean you can't write threatening letters involving that act and that law.

      --
      Soma: because a gramme is better than a damn.
    3. Re:Take that MPAA! by Twirlip+of+the+Mists · · Score: 2

      Me? I want to know where they came up with the name "B'fusalek". :-)

      Isn't it obvious? It's an anagram of "sake flub." The writers were having a story meeting at a Japanese restaurant and... well, the rest is history.

      --

      I write in my journal
    4. Re:Take that MPAA! by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2

      Except that it wasn't "their own works." This is just the stage crew pantomiming the cast. I would have been a lot more impressed had these guys taken a property of their own, rather than one already done to death by both its owners as well as the silly "Fan-Fic" people, and created something worth slashdotting.

      Technology is easy (and getting easier and less expensive daily).

      Creativity is hard.

      On a positive note, the success and quality of work of independent film makers is making incredible leaps and bounds. The "latest digital technologies" are a part of that success, but focusing on that is like focusing on
      what word processor an author uses. oh, wait...

    5. Re:Take that MPAA! by MrLint · · Score: 2

      Im sorry i forgot to add for those impaired.

    6. Re:Take that MPAA! by silentbozo · · Score: 2

      It's true they were being creative, but they also were drawing upon a lot of existing material. There are many things that can be taken for granted once you know that this episode is based in the classic Star Trek universe. Also, there's a lot of interest in the episode that simply would not exist, if there wasn't a fan base for the classic Star Trek universe, and if the episode was not set in the classic Star Trek universe.

      It's sort of like building a cheaper, better, Apple clone. You're taking an existing item, and making it better, and because the original was a known quantity, you're benefiting from the attention that the original got.

      You can borrow elements of the original (Hollywood does this all the time), but when you copy substantial portions, you start to really lean on the previous body of work. Consider GalaxyQuest, which was meant as a parody of the original Star Trek series and associated community. They borrowed elements (the obsessed fans, the conventions, the now-stereotyped actors, cheesy plotlines in the original episodes) and wove them into an original story. They however, did not actually incorporate names, ships, or elements of the Star Trek universe.

      This fan-produced episode is impressive, but between the ship, the props, and the music/soundFX, they clearly want you to know there is a link between their material and the classical Star Trek universe. What would be impressive is if someone could get this much attention by producing an original pilot, distributed online (not a short, but an episode-length pilot.)

  21. I'm Watching it now... by 1stflight · · Score: 2

    And it IS quite good, see before the site's saturated and mirror if you can! Now this is the creative power of the Internet, good to see it! And to the people that made the show, good job!

  22. Re:What's the point? by Oculus+Habent · · Score: 2

    Like trite?

    That's the answer Mr. Spock!

    --
    That what was all this school was for... to teach us how to solve our own problems. -- janeowit
  23. Before I watch it, by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 4, Funny


    Will I have to wait another 7 years for the conclusion?

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
    1. Re:Before I watch it, by geekoid · · Score: 2

      would you rather wait 7 years for a good one, or get 7 crappy ones for the next 7 years?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  24. The future of movies by iamacat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This is unbelievably cool, not only for itself, but also as a proof of concept. With some experience and technology, perhaps regular groups of fans will one day shoot good movies in a couple of years. This should give MPAA a lot of food for thought - not only about copy protection but also about producing inferior movies like the Nemesis.

    Are there other projects like this on the web?

    1. Re:The future of movies by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2

      This should give MPAA a lot of food for thought - not only about copy protection but also about producing inferior movies like the Nemesis.

      I don't think the MPAA sits down and says lets make a really bad Star Trek movie. I think Rick Berman is the one who does that.

      The MPAA might have something to say about using franchises and trademarks of existing properties though.

      There is a good Star Wars based fan film over at http://www.crewoftwo.com Lucas is a fan of fan films. It will be interesting how Paramount will react to Exeter.

      --

      'Same speed C but faster'
    2. Re:The future of movies by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      I remember years ago seeing something about how a bunch of college students did a prequel to Logans Run - called Logan One I think. They built sets, made costumes, even made their own little monorail car. Don't remember where I saw that, but it was some 5-10 minute blurb somewhere.

      Also, there have been some halfway decent Dr. Who fanmovies made too.

      Look at ifilm, atomfilms, etc... If you dig around, you can find some cool amateur films - some a little more well done (George Lucas in Love comes to mind).

      Only problem is the massive amounts of storage/bandwidth required to host these things. Makes it kinda hard for you to easily just pop something of decent quality up there and still make it easy for people to see (ie...don't get bored after 25 minutes of trying to download it and move on)

  25. Nemesis by artemis67 · · Score: 2

    Just last night, I was thinking about the train wreck that is Star Trek: Nemesis, and thinking, "Ya know, somebody ought to write a different finale for the cast and crew of TNG that would truly do them justice."

    Nemesis was far too tame, and far too stale. If I want Wrath of Khan, I'll watch Wrath of Khan.

    How many times have we seen the Enterprise run right up to the brink of oblivion, only to save the day and turn everything back to normal in time for the next episode? I think I would have written something that resulted not only in the destruction of the Enterprise, but also the deaths of most (if not all) of the crew in a heroic, personal struggle.

    Maybe in a few years one of these fan groups will do TNG justice.

  26. Direct download the vids... by Randolpho · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
    1. Re:Direct download the vids... by schlach · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hate to cross-post, but...

      Can people who have already d/led these please get them up on the P2P networks? How about renaming them starshipexeter_actone.mov, etc. ?

      Thanks

    2. Re:Direct download the vids... by gadlaw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please do put these on Kazaa or Winmx. Going to the website after it's been slashdotted and already it took about a half hour to get a minute or so of the video. I'm looking at a 1.6 kb download happening. From the minute I watched already I love this thing. Quick please, before Paramount swoops down in their stolen Bird of Prey and lobs a couple of antimatter torpedos on these guys. -Sorry couldn't help that last bit. :-)

      --
      Enjoy your Karma, after all you earned it. Feel your Karma Joe, feel it burn.
  27. Of Paramount Importance... by Kaemaril · · Score: 5, Funny

    I predict that the Paramount Legal Away Team will soon be setting phasers on "heavy bitchslap"...

    1. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by swillden · · Score: 2

      Funny, but, AFAIK, they have no legal grounds for complaint.

      IANAL (nor do I play one in Star Trek fanfic), but I don't see any infringements here, except maybe the theme music.

      They wrote an original screenplay, and didn't use any video or sound clips owned by Paramount, so they didn't copy anything. They also didn't use any Paramount trademarks, that I noticed. Nowhere do they use the term "Star Trek" or any of the Star Trek character names. Unless Paramount has registered some of the generic terms like "Starfleet Command", "The Federation", "Andorians", etc., they should be fine there.

      They have copied the appearance and style of the ship, uniforms, sounds, etc., but AFAIK, "look and feel" lawsuits don't fare any better for TV episodes than they do for spreadsheet programs.

      The only thing I can see is that they may have violated the copyright of the author of the original music. I think they performed the music themselves, so they may be liable for mechanical reproduction royalties to whomever wrote the Star Trek theme.

      Anyone with a better understanding of IP law care to comment?

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    2. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by swillden · · Score: 2
      Did they mention Klingons? I couldn't see the whole show...

      Granted that threatening letters can be sent without grounds, some of the small things these guys did (like changing the starfleet emblem) make me think they've covered their bases, and possibly even checked it out with their own attorney, in which case a threatening letter isn't likely to bother them too much.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by swillden · · Score: 2

      OK, OK, I'm a NERD. So what? So you are YOU so THERE!

      I am outclassed, and bow before your superior nerdness.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    4. Re:Of Paramount Importance... by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      I suspect they're fried six ways from Sunday, to use the legal jargon. I was watching and counting rip-offs for amusement. Mind you, I think they did an excellent job recreating the original. Gene would be pleased. Truly difficult would be to count the novelties.

      Humorless greedbag Paramount, on the other hand... 6 years ago they threatened a few dozen fan sites to drop their image and .wav collections in order to increase traffic to their for-profit official Trek site. (I assume they backed off?)

      The rule is that derivative works are part of the original copyright. Some things like parodies are fiar use exceptions. Critically, the work need not mimic the original to nonetheless be derivative, rather it need only evoke the original in style or appearance or whatever. Here, the sight of the ship -- with music -- was more than enough. Even the door-slide effect sounds the same.

      One of the tests is "substitution" -- could the new work displace demand for the original in the marketplace, or reduce the market for derivatives (such as by saturation)? Here, sure; they've basically produced a low-budget sequel, not that the original was high-budget.

      Then there's trademark.... They could go to town here.

      Disclaimer: I think the work is really cool, but wish they had applied their talents to either getting permission or coming up with new material. In case the lawyers come, I suggest the producers begin making their own Klingon® weaponry.

  28. Trek history... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 5, Informative

    Long time Trek fans will recall that the Exeter was one of the original 12 Constitution-class starships. Others included Constitution (obviously), Enterprise (duh!), York, Potempkin, Hood... that's all I recall off-hand.

    The old AMC U.S.S. Enterprise I built with my Dad when I was a bout 8 or so had decals for all twelve ships with appropriate call numbers (NCC-1700, etc).

    I'm sure the classic, original Technical Reference Guide, with its silly "20th century equivalent" electronic components probably has a listing, but mine's in a box somehwhere.

    p.s. I live in a subdivision called "Exeter".

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    1. Re:Trek history... by pomakis · · Score: 5, Informative
      According to this site, this is the complete list of Constitution-class starships during the original Star Trek Series:

      • USS Constellation (NCC-1017)
      • USS Constitution (NCC-1700)
      • USS Defiant (NCC-1764)
      • USS Enterprise (NCC-1701)
      • USS Excalibur (NCC-1664)
      • USS Exeter (NCC-1672)
      • USS Farragut (NCC-1647)
      • USS Hood (NCC-1703)
      • USS Intrepid (NCC-1831)
      • USS Lexington (NCC-1709)
      • USS Potemkin (NCC-1657)
      • USS Republic (NCC-1371)
      • USS Yorktown (NCC-1717)

      The site also gives episode references for each of these ships. This is what it says about the Exeter:

      NCC-1672 Encyc., TOS "Court Martial"
      (identified by wall status display)
      Captain Ronald Tracey TOS "The Omega Glory"
      Abandoned in orbit around Omega I
      It's interesting that in this list the USS Exeter is given the NCC number 1672, but the guys who wrote "Starship Exeter" gave it the number 1706. This was either an oversight on their part, or it's supposed to be a different Exeter.

    2. Re:Trek history... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 5, Informative

      Depends on your source, I think. IIRC, the old Tech Ref Manual listed them as 1700-1711. I don't suppose the contract numbers are canon, even if (at least some of) the names are.

      The TRM goes on to list later generations including dozens more Constitution-class ships as well as several other versions from scouts and tugs to my fave, the "Dreadnought", with 3 warp nacelles.

      Those starship types don't show up in the later "Star Trek History of Space Flight" (or whatever it was called) book. I don't know how rigidly Paramount managed that sort of thing, so finding contradictory info might be easy.

      I don't want to get into the whole "what is canon and what isn't" thing, it's just a freakin' TV show. However, I do think the idea of making new episodes in the vein of TOS is really cool, especially if there's good continuity with established history (like "Federation", which was the best Star Trek book I ever read).

      I'm DL'ing the episode by modem, so I'll get to enjoy it tomorrow.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    3. Re:Trek history... by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      The Star Trek Star Fleet Technical Manual circa 1975 by Franz Joseph shows a similar list of Constitution class vessels, with the following changes.

      the Defiant is not listed.

      Excalibur is numbered NCC-1705,

      Exceter is NCC-1706,

      Farragut is NCC-1702 (lost in the line of duty),

      Hood is NCC-1707,

      Intrepid is NCC-1708 (lost in the line of duty; presumably replaced with the NCC-1831 you cite),

      the USS Kongo (NCC-1710) is added,

      Lexington is NCC-1703,

      Potempkin is NCC-1711,

      the USS Valiant (NCC-1709) has been added to the list, but is listed as lost in the line of duty; and

      Yorktown is NCC-1704.

      So there is some flexibilty to the canon, it would seem. Regardless, I've already spent much more time on this than I meant to. I really do have a life. Honest.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:Trek history... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Not literally, but in prior years the Home Owner's Association did a lot of that figuratively.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  29. Old-style klingons by SAN1701 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it just me, or the old fashioned klingons were far better vilains that the new ones? I mean, old klingons were cynical, smart, dissimulated, and very dangerous.

    But NG's (or motion-picture) style klingons are irracional, fanatic, even dumb, and it's by no way credible that this kind of civilization would ever manage to build any kind of science or engineering.

    Note that both know how to be brutal, but the first ones used brutality as a tool for their objectives, and, for the new ones, it's an almost biological characteristic.

    I remember that I've read, in a magazine, that the klingons of the 60's represented the enemies of the U.S. in that time (China, USSR), and, the klingons from 80 to date, represented the new ones (fanatics). It may be, but, as vilains, the previous generation of Klingons were way more fun.

    1. Re:Old-style klingons by B3ryllium · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think they explained this by having some sort of "north" and "south" Klingons. The North klingons were the old ones, the ones who were more intelligent, who created most of the technological inroads. The Southern klingons were gun-crazed rednecks who slaughtered the Northies and took over the empire. And that's why the Klingon empire is now doomed to fade into the background of the Trek universe. Right? :) Maybe I have it backwards.

    2. Re:Old-style klingons by steveha · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The new-style Klingons made their first appearance in the first theatre movie (Star Trek: The Motion Picture). Gene Roddenberry was asked why the Klingons looked different, and he explained that "they always looked that way".

      There is just no good way to explain why all Klingons in movies and TV from Next Generation on are bumpy, and all Klingons in the prequel TV show Enterprise are bumpy, and the 1000-years-previous holy guy Keh'less (or however you spell it) was bumpy, but all the Klingons ever met by Kirk looked like Fu Manchu.

      The word "retcon", short for "retroactive continuity", was coined for situations like this one.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    3. Re:Old-style klingons by PD · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is just no good way to explain why all Klingons in movies and TV from Next Generation on are bumpy, and all Klingons in the prequel TV show Enterprise are bumpy, and the 1000-years-previous holy guy Keh'less (or however you spell it) was bumpy, but all the Klingons ever met by Kirk looked like Fu Manchu.

      Actually, there's an excellent explanation: the budget for the old TV show was much smaller than the movie and subsequent TV show budgets.

      I don't know why people always overlook the obvious.

    4. Re:Old-style klingons by lunatik17 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Of course, this entire argument is kind of thrown for a loop after watching that DS9 episode, "Trials and Tribble-ations."

      Dax: That is a Klingon?!
      Worf: We do not talk about it!

      I realize that whole episode was tongue-in-cheek, but boy did that make the continuity problems even worse :)

      --

      Here's my DeCSS mirror, where's yours?

    5. Re:Old-style klingons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      DS9 blew away both the "north-south" and the "they always looked this way" explainations.

      Four Klingons (including Kang, Koloth, and Kor) that appeared in ST:TOS resurfaced on DS9 and embarked on a quest to fill a blood oath with Dax. So these Klingons had appeared in both forms

      As far as the "they always looked this way" theory goes, there was the DS9 episode "Trials and Tribble-ations" where the Defiant was thrown back in time and they found themselves in the middle of "The Trouble with Tribbles" episode. Several crewmembers of the Defiant were on the K7 space station and not only was the Klingon's different appearance noticed, O'Brian and Bashir didn't even realize they were Klingons. Wolf stated that reason for the change was not something that Klingons talked about with outsiders.

    6. Re:Old-style klingons by Psion · · Score: 2

      Oh, don't be so serious with "Trials and Tribble-ations"! It was conceived from the beginning as a tongue-in-cheek episode in the very tradition of the Original Series. The production crew just wanted to have fun, and that throw-away line was intended to simply poke fun at the fans who have debated this topic since 1979.

      Klingons always looked bumpy-headed. Even TOS Klingons. 1960's television cameras, however, lacked the resolution to properly capture the subtle detail. But when we finally saw them on the big screen, that's when we saw what they were really like. It's just like the subtle hull plating on the the motion picture Enterprise. Really.

    7. Re:Old-style klingons by sconeu · · Score: 2

      At the risk of sounding like a fanboy...

      The "Savage Curtain" version of Kahless came from Kirk's imagination. No nit.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    8. Re:Old-style klingons by steveha · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nonsense. It doesn't take much budget to make Klingons look bumpy. They could have done it in the 60's; they just hadn't thought of it yet.

      If Gene Roddenberry had decided that Klingons had big bumpy foreheads, the makeup guys would have made it so.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    9. Re:Old-style klingons by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      It seems to have worked out alright for the U.S.A.

      Ah, so the Klingons imported most of their smart people and ideas from other cultures? ;-)

    10. Re:Old-style klingons by JudgeFurious · · Score: 2, Insightful

      See, I think there's an answer to this entire question stuck in that DS9 episode right in plain sight.

      You got old (real old) Klingons like your thousand year old Keh-Less (sp? who knows?) and then your hundred year before TOS Klingon from the Enterprise series and they're bumpy looking. Then right in the middle of it you got the TOS Klingons with their smooth foreheads and human looking hair with very perfect teeth to match. The answer is obvious.

      The Klingons obviously went through a "fad" of sorts where they indulged in things like plastic surgery, hair implants of some sort, and dental work. Maybe they wanted to look more like the Terrans, Vulcans, and Romulans or something, who knows? Regardless we only saw a handful of Klingons relative to the entire species.

      Anyway the decadent and superficious Klingons who were running the show during Kirks time were obviously overthrown or simply fell out of favor and the Klingons returned to the "old ways".

      That or we just accept the fact that the budgets sucked and they're "the same" but that's the best we could manage in the 60's/

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  30. Now if I can only... by RumGunner · · Score: 3

    Beat the rest of the slashdotters in getting the movie from the homepage.mac.com site! Then I will rule the geek universe with my advanced knowledge of everything and anything that is Trek related! That will obviously make me have more sex appeal with the ladies, just like Cpt. Kirk!

  31. fanfic taken to a deeply disturbing extreme by The+Fun+Guy · · Score: 5, Funny

    When you say to your friends, "You know what would have been cool? If they had gone to a planet where...", and they agree, that's normal fan behavior.

    When you actually write up the idea you were thinking of in a 200 word concept and share it with your friends, who all like it, that's committed fan behavior.

    When you flesh out the concept to a 10 page script treatment, that's borderline wierd fan behavior. If your friends offer revisions to correct continuity errors, that's definitely wierd fan behavior.

    When you write out an entire script in three acts and actually perform it with your friends, that's borderline obsessive fan behavior. Defintiely obsessive if you film the process.

    When you perform it with homemade costumes, props, etc., and have special effects and a musical score to go with the footage, and then reformat the film as downloadable Quicktime videos for all the world to see, you are ready for film school.

    Either that, or the plastic pointy ears you wear to bed every night are cutting off the flow of blood to the brain.

    --
    The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man who cannot read them. - Mark Twain
  32. Missing one thing: by Mudhiker · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's just about everything you'd want from a Star Trek episode but the Captain getting it on with a green-skinned vixen down on the planet. Darnit, I wanna see some alien nookie.

    --
    "I want peace on earth and good will toward men." "We're the U.S. government. We don't do that sort of thing!!"
  33. Whether or not a library was linked... by DoNotTauntHappyFunBa · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... this looks like a derivative work to me.

    --
    Well, hey, I didn't spend all those years playing Dungeons and Dragons and not learn a little something about courage.
    1. Re:Whether or not a library was linked... by Sludge · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know you're a nerd when you analogize a star trek movie to the linking step of binary compilation.

    2. Re:Whether or not a library was linked... by iapetus · · Score: 2

      Is that a problem? They have made source code available, after all.

      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
  34. Can we have an interview with these folks? by Valar · · Score: 2, Funny

    So I can ask, so, how does it feel to not get laid for 7 years?

    1. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by metlin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Doesn't anyone EVER read the linked stories, or what? Duh!

      From the Pioneer Press site:

      But they both got married during the episode's long genesis and now intend to concentrate on raising their children (Josh has three kids; Jimm has a baby on the way).

      Looks like they pretty much did :-P

    2. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by yppiz · · Score: 2, Funny
      So I can ask, so, how does it feel to not get laid for 7 years?

      You've certainly asked the right group.

      --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    3. Re:Can we have an interview with these folks? by mgblst · · Score: 2

      Here to Josh and Jimm, I hope they have a very happy life together!

  35. The only way I'm going to watch this ... by HealYourChurchWebSit · · Score: 2


    The only way I'm going to watch some grainy, home-produce Star Trek episode if it includes one of those hot 'green skinned' chicks who's wearing a Jennifer Lopez style dress and has an obligatory interpretive dance scene.

    --
    --- have you healed your church website?
  36. Re:One Problem by dinivin · · Score: 2


    MPlayer works on x86 linux, as does using Quicktime through wine (or, if you'd rather, you can purchase the Crossover product from CodeWeavers).

    Dinivin

  37. The Difference by yndrd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can almost guarantee that this production, however amateur, is infinitely superior to any recent Paramount effort for one simple reason:

    The people who made it are passionate about the subject matter.

    The best years of Star Trek were when people with a love for the material were in charge of the shows/movies. I'll let the Slashdot crowd argue about when those were, but I think the current failure of Star Trek isn't one of story or budget or marketing: it is one of passion.

    Commercial Star Trek is a cheap hustle, fleecing idealistic and naive fans. It's always been that to some extent, but there was once some feeling behind it. Too bad Star Trek fans are now just a demographic to be exploited.

    1. Re:The Difference by Lightwarrior · · Score: 2

      I'm torn; part of me wants to tell you that it's naive to assume there was ever any passion behind Star Trek, and another part of me wants to tell you that Next Gen had that passion.

      Clearly, I'm biased ;)

      I didn't enjoy ToS. It might just be an age gap (I'm in my early 20s), and I probably saw Next Gen first. I enjoyed Nemesis, and feel the movie series should end on a good note.

      OTOH, I couldn't care less for DS9, VOY, or ENT.

      As for passion, it doesn't exactly equal success - and shows have to be successful. Firefly was my second favorite show of all time (might have made it to first after a season or two), and Joss Whedon n' crew were nothing if not passionate. Damn FOX for all eternity.

      ---

      --
      Mods: Disagreeing with me != my post Offtopic / Flamebait.
      World without hate or war, invaded. Tragic?
    2. Re:The Difference by yndrd · · Score: 2

      It's obviously a matter of opinion, but I think that several episodes (from both TOS and TNG) show an idealism beyond simple money-making--an idealism I don't see often in the franchise anymore.

      As for the difference between success and passion, I guess it all depends on the definition of success. I want to be entertained by something that has some meaning, and I consider any work that does that to be successful. Whether or not the slavering morons of the common television audience enjoy it really doesn't matter to me.

  38. Good for them by dswensen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure many of the comments here will amount to "these guys have too much time on their hands" or "haw-haw, these guys can't get laid," but I say good for them. Criticizing and tearing something down by making snarky comments on the Internet is the easiest and least impressive thing in the world.

    Actually doing something is hard. Especially something as eccentric as this. These guys had the passion and the perseverance to make something -- to start a project many people would consider too expensive and time-consuming to bother with, and they saw it through to completion. I have to respect that.

    More than once I've heard people say something like "wouldn't it be cool to build some cheap sets and make our own episode of (Star Trek, Star Wars, X-Files, My Mother the Car)", but these guys actually went ahead and did it. Which, despite whatever shortcomings the film project might have, is a hell of a lot more impressive than sitting around talking smack about it.

    I watched this a few days ago, actually, and it was fun to watch. The people who made it have a lot of love for their subject matter, and put a lot of work into the little details, which I appreciate. And that big pink dinosaur is a riot -- and as special effects go, still beats the heck out of that "lava monster" Spock mind-melded with in that classic Trek episode.

    So I say good for them, and I hope it doesn't take another seven years for the sequel.

    1. Re:Good for them by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Nice post. I just hope they don't end up on some lawyers' dart board....

      Forgive me for saying you were beginning to sound like one of those Apple ads. :) You know:

      Here's to the crazy ones.

      The misfits.

      The rebels.

      The troublemakers.

      The round pegs in the square holes.

      The ones who see things differently.

      They're not fond of rules.

      And they have no respect for the status quo.

      You can praise them, disagree with them, quote them,

      disbelieve them, glorify or vilify them.

      About the only thing you can't do is ignore them.

      Because they change things.

      They invent. They imagine. They heal.

      They explore. They create. They inspire.

      They push the human race forward.

      Maybe they have to be crazy.

      How else can you stare at an empty canvas and see a work of art?
      Or sit in silence and hear a song that's never been written?
      Or gaze at a red planet and see a laboratory on wheels?

      We make tools for these kinds of people.

      While some see them as the crazy ones,
      we see genius.

      Because the people who are crazy enough to think
      they can change the world, are the ones who do.

    2. Re:Good for them by praedor · · Score: 2

      What you say is true and for just actually getting it done they get kudos... But that doesn't mean that they can get laid. They can't.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
  39. OH NO! by mustangdavis · · Score: 2



    .... we're gonna get sued! ....


    This is what the creators will be saying as soon as they see a Paramount Studios IP address in their web logs :)


  40. Man...those guys are nerds by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 2

    Wow, I thought I was nerd...but after seeing that, I think I'm not to bad after all.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  41. how big... by zogger · · Score: 2

    ...how big are all the files combined? I am wondering if I even have space for all of them on my old coal burner here, I'd like to get all of them so I can watch it all at once, and thanks for your efforts!

  42. Re:Am I the only one?? by glwtta · · Score: 2
    that wasn't meant to be a "parody" that was meant to make fun of every ultra obsessives wet dream.

    Out of curiosity, what is your exact definition of "parody"?

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  43. Watchable? by istartedi · · Score: 2

    You mean the thing was watchable and should be watchable again as soon as this story is off the front page.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  44. Interesting observation by Raul654 · · Score: 2

    The damn thing, dubbed "The Savage Empire," is actually watchable.

    Not any more...

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  45. Actually... by MacAndrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Paramount is touchy about this stuff. I don't see any evidence the producers got permission -- in fact they claim copyright on the credits page. Permission is easier to get before than after. There are some trademark issues here, too, I think.

    One hopes of course that Paramount has a sense of humor and goes along. Technically all that fanfic stuff violates copyright and trademark, too. Paramount should formally give permission to prove it is policing its stuff. Maybe Exeter did get permission and hid it somewhere....

    It does look like they did a nice job (which is exactly what possibly gets them in trouble) but what bothers me is the sort of stranglehold on scifi creativity Star Treak has had by virtue of its success. Everyobody seemed to have transporters, "energy weapons", and annoying characters with apostrophes in their names (like ah'Choo or Phtt'tt). It took real creativity to break out of this mold, as in shows like Babylon 5 and Farscape, not that these are perfect (Trek sure wasn't).

    Maybe these folks should have gone where no nerd had gone before?

    1. Re:Actually... by RazzleFrog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They have every right to claim copyright on the movie. The movie and the script are original works and are therefore are immediately copyrighted when put into a concrete form.

      As for Paramount, they probably could make a big stink and intimidate the producers of the movie into some sort of settlement (since they of course have deeper pockets) but in truth this probably falls into the realm of fair use, much like the Star Trek parodies on SNL, etc.

      It is especially important to note that the name of the movie does not include Star Trek anywhere. It also does not use any names from the original shows and movies. In general there is not enough to really call this infringement.

    2. Re:Actually... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      theres been fanmade comedy films parodying star trek before, that go by the name of 'star wreck'.

      if they don't say that it's set in STAR TREK universe with STAR TREK characters doing STAR TREK STUFF and that it is a STAR TREK episode they should be in clean waters..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Actually... by RoundTop-VJAS · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ok... time for me to dredge up my business law class here...

      Here is the problem. A parody or criticism falls under fair use (such as a news article or an SNL sketch), as long as a) they can tell it is such, and b) it is one of those 2 things.

      If however the work is a derivative of the work (in this case Star Trek) then the viewer should expect that it is a proper work, as such it breaks copyright.

      These guys unfortunately don't have a leg to stand on, paramount could slap them with a cease and decist order quickly and take them to court for this easily... and win.

      Fair use is not "as long as it works or is good". Only critisism or parody (see Wierd Al's case with I forget what rapper). See UAW v. Michelin.

      It is also true that the script and movie are copyright to these guys, they are infringing on trademarks of Paramount.

      --
      RoundTop

    4. Re:Actually... by FrozenCat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually there is alot of original scfi stuff like Farscape, no that was cancelled by TV execs. Well there is FireFly, no that too was cancelled by TV execs (at least in Canada).

      Looks like its not the lack of creativity but the the TV execs lack of imagination and faith in original content being marketable.

    5. Re:Actually... by uncoveror · · Score: 2

      Fanfic is a lot of fun, and I think it should be allowed, unfortunately copyright law bans derivative works based upon an original work without permission, except for parody. Technically, fanfic is a derivative work, but most producers leave it alone. If you piss off your fans, soon you won't have any. If Paramount decided to be pricks, they could say that this is a parody.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    6. Re:Actually... by Nogami_Saeko · · Score: 2

      Uh oh... This just showed up on Tech TV...

      I have a bad feeling these guys are in for some nasty legal paperwork from Paramount in the very near future...

      N.

      --
      "Nothing strengthens authority so much as silence." - Charles de Gaulle
    7. Re:Actually... by Reziac · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is really just an extreme case of fanfiction, not much different from Star Wars shorts you can download from theforce.net (if you haven't seen "Troops" -- start there!!) Do you have any idea how VAST fanfic is? Here's a hint: in 1984, just the *index* of =known= Star Wars fanfic (probably about comparable to Star Trek fanfic in volume) was around 200 pages in 6 point type. The actual "one of each" SW fanfic collexion (sponsored by LucasArts) *fills* a double garage over in Santa Barbara.

      (BTW, do you know what subgenre of fanfic Shatner and Nimoy both collect? :)

      In general, studios leave fanfic alone, so long as it's nonprofit, and doesn't violate some arbitrary rule (like George's "there is no sex in the SW universe" -- which is why SW slashfic, tho very popular, is underground to this day). Selling fanzines to cover printing costs and postage is acceptable. As to copyright issues, that's long since been beaten to death (including by fanfic-writing lawyers, with varying degrees of cluelessness) but when it's come down to push and shove, essentially the studio can assert copyright on the fanfic as a derivative work. LucasArts has been involved in some court cases about that, but they soon learned that 1) they couldn't stop it anyway, and 2) nothing serves so well to keep fan fever alive, thus money coming into their coffers.

      As to how the studios do protect their material, they generally confine themselves to prohibiting distribution of actual images from film or TV, and being very hardassed about attempts to market novels to Real Publishers. Essentially, you need to already be on the studio's contract to do that. (Fanfic novels are ignored so long as no one ever attempts to sell them to a publisher.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    8. Re:Actually... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      That's my point. Fanfic, while ALL technically illegal, is best regarded as advertising where someone else bears the cost of producing and distributing the ad -- so rather than drive it underground (because you can't stop it), might as well USE it. Some of these "ads" are more "acceptable" than others, depending on the content owner's level of paranoia. Enforcement typically only happens when actual original material is used (hence chillingeffects.org) ... since by now most have noticed what Paramount understood real early on: nothing makes a franchise like a self-feeding fanbase.

      And contrary to what some of these fans think, the fan does not own the copyright, not even for the original plots or characters built within a copyrighted venue. Some of the most hilarious flame wars in the olden days had to do with this issue, even tho LucasArts already had a court precedent in their favour some years previous.

      And... oh, so you DO know what sort of fanfic Our Heroes collect... [beg] Nimoy's kid David (also a fine director) tells a funny story about that :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  46. The reason it took 7 years... by Timmeh · · Score: 2
    You've got to understand something about Minnesota, most people get snowed in the better half of the year. Actors can't act if they can't make it out their house. Between the above, and factoring in car stalls from the cold winters and the occasional polar bear attack, it's no wonder it took so long to finish...
    ok, ok... so I exaggerated... a little.. (it's actually been quite balmy in MN as of late, thank you global warming!)
  47. the new opening voice over by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

    Fanspace, the final frontier.
    These are the voyages of the committed fringe.
    Their continuing obsession:
    to film strange new fantasies,
    to seek out new geek prestige and maybe girlfriends,
    to boldly go where no fan has gone before!

    cue music

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  48. NCC: What does it stand for? Absolutely nothing.. by Mad+Man · · Score: 4, Informative
    IMO, a CC is closer to "NCC" than a CV-ish name like "Enterprise." What the heck does the N stand for, anyway?


    Although commonly believed to stand for "Naval Construction Contract", NCC doesn't stand for anything at all, according to the StarTrek.com FAQ at http://www.startrek.com/information/faq.asp?ID=136 5
    (there should not be a space in "1365")


    What does the starship registry prefix "NCC" mean?
    The Starfleet starship registry prefix "NCC" doesn't officially mean anything other than it is the standard prefix for starships in service. There have been other prefixes, notably "NX," denoting a prototype, or experimental vessel. The two most famous ships with this prefix would be the U.S.S. Excelsior NX-2000 and the U.S.S. Defiant NX-74205. Once the U.S.S. Excelsior was rendered operational, the prefix changed to the standard NCC.

    When Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry was asked this question, he replied that there was no significance to the letters and numbers comprising the registry of the U.S.S. Enterprise. At the time Star Trek first aired, airplanes commonly had "NC" on them, and adding the extra "C" updated the look. Original series art director (and avid pilot) Matt Jefferies has commented that he chose the "1701" combination of numbers because it was legible from a distance and the numbers wouldn't be confused. Other numbers, like 3, 2 and 5, were not used for this very reason. Also, the extra "C" in "NCC" was a nod to the Russian abbreviation for the old Soviet Union, "CCCP." According to Jefferies, "If we do anything in space, we (Americans and Russians) have to do it together."
  49. 4:3 vs. 16:9 by leomekenkamp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The one thing I absolutely *loved* about TOS (The Original Series) was that they had 16:9 displays everywhere. This was ofcourse years before anyone in the electric biz started talking about this format for television sets.
    Such a shame that feature is missing, and they have the boring old 4:3 display layout. Maybe NCC-1701 was more advanced than any of it's sister ships? It was Starfleets flagship ...

    --
    Wenn ist das Nunstueck git und Slotermeyer? Ja! Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput.
  50. Re: by Bastian · · Score: 2

    That joke is always redundant. Always.

  51. Re:spelling... by tomhudson · · Score: 2

    Interesting link. If you look at the exceptions, most of them come from words that were borrowed from french, where e before i is the norm..

  52. Re:Star Wars sends the wrong message, I am afraid. by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    No, I think these dolts keep a stable of halfwitted tirades around for a quick copy-and-paste. This one lacked the energy or presence of mind to edit "Star Wars" and "George Lucas" references.

    If I were going to write a right- or left-baiting comment, I could do a heck of a better job than this. Show some self-respect AC.

  53. Bravo!! by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Interesting


    I fully agree with you here. Those people who go around poo-pooing other people's projects as being a waste of time, etc. never have anything clever or interesting to show of their own. These star trek movie people went out there and did something. Which is a lot more than most people can say. If everyone listened to the naysayers, we'd still not have airplanes, rock-and-roll, or computers in our homes.

    As for the criticisms that these people aren't going to get laid, I can tell you that this is a huge misconception. This is the real deal from someone who has seen this situation play itself out... If you think it takes a rock band to get four guys laid, then you haven't filmed a movie before. No matter how silly of a movie you have made... if it is screened in public and people know about it, you will have a line of people (male and female) begging to be in your next movie. The difference being that a rock band may attract groupies, but the members of a band can only offer the groupies a brush with celebrity. A movie director can create celebrity. Do you know what some people will do to achieve celebrity status? That guy on Jackass ate a snowcone made from his own urine. Use your imagination.

    I've so far viewed the trailer. If you think that was easy or cheap to make, guess again. Props, costumes, and sets all add up real quick. These people spent a lot of money on this project. Perhaps the only area they are lacking on that keeps this thing from being mistakeable for one of the original episodes is the lighting. Lighting is what usually seperates amateur from professional looking movies. If you go back and look at the lighting on the old star trek shows, you'll see it's pretty dynamic. For simplicity's sake, these people used overhead lights like you see in soap operas. Dead easy to arrange, but gives shadows on eyes unless you have fill-lights.
    1. Re:Bravo!! by praedor · · Score: 2

      Whoa there Clarence! OK, perhaps it is a bit strong to say they can't get laid, but it DOES matter by whom (or what). They may get laid (for the first time in their lives) as a side effect of making this film, but the QUALITY of the layee...there's the rub.


      Getting to nail a creature that is actually more pitiful than you is not an accomplishment.

      --
      In Bushworld, they struggle to keep church and state separate in Iraq as they increasingly merge the two in America.
    2. Re:Bravo!! by protohiro1 · · Score: 2
      This is the real deal from someone who has seen this situation play itself out... If you think it takes a rock band to get four guys laid, then you haven't filmed a movie before. No matter how silly of a movie you have made... if it is screened in public and people know about it, you will have a line of people (male and female) begging to be in your next movie.


      People don't need to know about it, and it doesn't need to be screened publicly. When I was making student films (that sucked and were never seen) I routinely got over 150 headshots in response to casting calls. People are desperate and frightening. Auditions end up being a harrowing experience because you quickly realize that a significant percentage of the actors will do ANYTHING to get the part. In a silent student film. It is one of the (many) things that freaked me out about the film industry enough to scare me into another state.
      --
      Sig removed because it was obnoxious
  54. Wow. . . by stevarooski · · Score: 2

    "The damn thing, dubbed "The Savage Empire," is actually watchable."

    Boy, with rave reviews like that, I bet these guys are damn glad they spent seven years of their life doing this.

    --

    - - - - - - - -
    Don't worry, being eaten by a crocodile is just like going to sleep in a giant blender.
  55. Pirk! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 2

    Aha, Star Trek spoof! For some reason I expected you people to come up with this instead, because that's one helluva funny spoof on Star Trek :)

  56. P2P mirrors by Phaser777 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm now sharing all 5 files on the Gnutella and WinMX networks. In a minute I'll have them on Kazaa too. They're named starshipexeter_actone.mov, starshipexeter_acttwo.mov, etc. I'll leave them up until sometime tomorrow.

    And once you've downloaded them, make sure you share them too (if your DL and shared directories aren't the same)!

    1. Re:P2P mirrors by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
      I'm now sharing all 5 files on the Gnutella and WinMX networks. In a minute I'll have them on Kazaa too. They're named starshipexeter_actone.mov, starshipexeter_acttwo.mov, etc. I'll leave them up until sometime tomorrow.

      I'll have them up on Kazaa under the same names in a few minutes (they're reading from the CD-RW as I type this). Multiple download sources are always a Good Thing(TM).

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  57. .Mac outages responsible? by rufo · · Score: 2

    One thing to note is that Apple is having some .Mac outages today. One has to wonder if those outages are responsible for the slow speeds people are complaining about.

    Actually, now that I think about it, I wonder if it's actually the other way around - maybe Apple's .Mac outages are due to increased demand for this?

    --
    My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
  58. who has the less of a life, by geekoid · · Score: 2

    the fan that creates a fan movie, or the people who complain about people creating a fan movie?

    sitting around telling people to get a life, isn't a life, you know.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  59. Thanks by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    I knew if I just shut up, someone else would make the point for me. :)

    One analytical correction that I only realized recently -- a parody is a derivative work, just a kind that's OK. It's derivative because it uses similar characters or plot elements or whatever. The parody must address and comment on the original in some way; it would not be enough, for example, to parody space shows in general, it has to be Trek specifically if you're going to adopt their material.

    Also, you can't use any more material than necessary, and various other provisos spelled out in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose. The basic idea with parody is that you really have to carve out enough space in copyright for free speech to allow criticism and commentary, and maybe a little more. Even if your product clearly did not come from the copyright holder, you still can't get a leg up on their product.

    There are some similar rules for trademark. EFF.org and chillingeffects.org have some good materials on this difficult topic that I'm still trying to understand.

    I started laughing as soon as I saw their uniforms and ship -- I mean, really. Their problem here is not legal so much as creative.

    Here is a typical-sounding C&D sent for what looks like some college kid's fansite. You'd think this sort of this would be irrelevant, but, well...

  60. Sorry, guys, I mean no offense to anybody, but I had to quit watching when the blue dude said, "Commodore Jennings is on line one." ::shudder::

    --

    I write in my journal
  61. I had a great time working on this . . . by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    . . . but they cut me out, in an effort to be as authentic as possible.

    1. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by Fraize · · Score: 3, Funny

      That wasn't you in the background, laughing yet with no sound coming out?

      Perhaps they'll invite you to the premier of *this* one?

      --
      --Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    2. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by Kiwi · · Score: 2
      Well, the way I see it, it could have been done. Wes would be a time traveler, using his Traveler-given powers to travel back in time to the USS Exeter.

      Hmmm...speaking of which, I wonder if fandom will make the cut scenes with Wes' "wife" canon. If not, then exaplaining why Wes was at the wedding reception is much simpler (he travelled from whatever mythic space-time to be at his old friend's wedding reception).

      - Sam

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

    3. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Poor Wil.

      But did they invite you to the real premiere?

      Judging from the box office, Nemesis is perhaps a movie best not to be associated with. Maybe you can get a cameo on Enterprise as your great-grandfather or something? :)

      Seriously, Wil, your mistreatment looms as one of the biggest negatives I can think of relative to "the franchise." Amid all that Star Trek dreaminess, it's easy to forget show biz is a lot more like The Player than Risa. Gratuitous.

    4. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by rweir · · Score: 2

      Best. Joke. Ever.

    5. Re:I had a great time working on this . . . by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      Aww, snookums. Console yourself with the thought that when you did appear in Nemesis for those four milliseconds, my good lady wife exclaimed "Was that Wil Wheaton? He's hot!"

      Then again, she was blind drunk at the time. Although I think that I implied that when I said she was watching Nemesis.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  62. They got it backwards by Tony+Shepps · · Score: 2

    So you say they got original story, acting, and direction right, but borrowed the universe in which they were operating to apply all that?

    That's exactly the opposite of standard television, where the universe is almost always original but the stories are recycled, the acting is hack, and the direction is preditable and bland.

  63. Star wars fanfilm site: theforce.net by Spy4MS · · Score: 2

    Easy-to-click link
    Troops is my personal favorite--It's a very funny spoof of Cops with Stormtroopers and Jawas.

  64. Wil, you owe me... by Wee · · Score: 5, Funny
    ..one keyboard. A Keytronics KB101. The flatscreen monitor I can clean.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

    1. Re:Wil, you owe me... by CleverNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

      ..one keyboard. A Keytronics KB101. The flatscreen monitor I can clean.

      No problem. Just pick it up, and send the bill to Rick Berman, c/o Paramount Pictures.

    2. Re:Wil, you owe me... by Wee · · Score: 2
      No problem. Just pick it up, and send the bill to Rick Berman, c/o Paramount Pictures.

      No sir. Not by a longshot. Granted, the KB101 is old, comparatively rare, and a bit hard too come by in good shape. While while much beloved by me, it's still far too economical for the purposes of retribution -- in this case. Replacement I'd rightly ask for, justice requires a little more.

      Gimme a couple days and I'll find a nice, high-end keyboard that I was using what needs replacing. I'm thinking something in stainless steel, most likely NEMA-rated. It'll be our secret.

      -B

      --

      Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  65. Quick, Everybody! by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2

    Lean to the left!

  66. Redneck Klingons? by docbrown42 · · Score: 2

    Send in the Dueling Batliths!

    This has impired a new list:
    You might be a redneck Klingon if:
    1: any part of your cloaked warship is painted primer
    2: You have a shotgun rack on your bridge

    ...well, you get the point.

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  67. Not so fast! by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Funny

    She's dead, Jim.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  68. Use the mirror .... ;-) by fastlink · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hi /. crowd,

    I mirrored the movies so everybody can have a look. The mirror is at a site with a 1 Gigabit Uplink and powerfull ZEUS web servers, almost unsinkable ;-)

    Click here to download the stuff.

    Have fun!

    fastlink

  69. Can't beat Minnisota by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2

    ... for fun and refreshing home-made sci-fi. First MST3K, now this. Excellent work, guys!

    Keep circulating the tapes.
    GMFTatsujin

  70. startrek- mov links for download by emotioncafecom · · Score: 2, Informative
    "Can someone explain to me why webmasters feel the need to embed their movies within their own webpages? Why not just let us download it to our harddrives with a simple right-click? That way (a) people can watch it over and over without added strain on the server and (b) people can distribute the file through other means (p2p, etc.) again saving the webserver. I just don't understand why webmasters make it so difficult to download a movie directly to disk." well here are the links-- I am working on posting the movies on my web server now.../. proof!! lol http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/teaser.mov

    http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/actone.mov

    http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/acttwo.mov

    http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/actthree.mo v

    http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/tag.mov

  71. The Mighty Exeter by Rand+Race · · Score: 2
    Warships bearing the name Exeter have served with the Royal Navy since the mid 17th century. The first of her name was a Third rate of 70 guns that won battle honours at Beachy Head in 1690. She was broken up in 1698 following a magazine explosion in port.

    The second was a Fourth rate of 60 guns laid down in 1697 and rebuilt in 1740. She won honours off Newfoundland (1702), in the Mediterranean (1711), at Quiberon Bay (1711), and at the Siege of Pondicherry (1748). She was struck from the list in 1763.

    The third of the name was a Third rate of 64 guns laid down in the 1760s. She won four battle honours in one year (1782) at Sadras, Providien, Negapatam, and Trincomalee. She was burned two years later after being condemned as unseaworthy.

    The fourth Exeter, and the one most likely to be the namesake of the Trek one, was a York-Class heavy cruiser mounting six 8" and four 4" guns that was launched in 1929. She won her honours at River Platte (1939) and the Sunda Strait (1942). After being badly mauled by two Cruisers and a Destroyer (which she sank) at Sunda, she sailed for the Indian Ocean with USS Pope and HMS Encounter, but the three ships were boxed in by five cruisers and eight destroyers and were all sunk in the Java Sea.

    The fifth, and current, Exeter is a Type 42 Destroyer launched in 1978. She was awarded an honour at the Falkland Islands and also saw "action" in the Gulf War. She is still in active service.

    --
    Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
  72. Re:One Problem by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    And there you go. I am not going to wait a whole damn week for one program to compile properly.

    If it takes a week to compile a program, you need a new computer. Linux 0.99something only took an hour or two on my 386SX-25, back in the day...more recently, mplayer took maybe 10-15 minutes (I wasn't counting) to emerge on my Gentoo box @ home (Athlon XP 2400).

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  73. What I would do is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Make a whole file of the episode, send it to Paramount and ask them to fund "Star Trek: The lost episodes" and get Paramount on board for funds, these guys did it CHEAP, and produce more of the same based upon fan fiction Paramount has grabbed off the net. Imagine 100 shows more, produced at , say, 500,000 dollars apice , that could net a bunch of money for Paramount and add to the Trek Saga! This way everyone could profit with nary a beowulf cluster to be found! The actors would not get tons of money, but perhpas they would get recognition to further their careers. They would get paid and when they pinched the pennies correctly, winners all around! What say you?

  74. Plot Points by sconeu · · Score: 2

    Hey! They got the "Only ship in the quadrant", and "ship full of trainees" thing right too!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  75. To Boldly Go by Herkum01 · · Score: 2

    Where no man as loved before!

    For those looking for a Real Audio Link.

    I wish I could give credit to the originial editor of this sound clip but I could not find it. It is a great clip and if you have never heard it before you gotta try it now.

  76. Not all of us have Quicktime by Trogre · · Score: 2

    Does anyone have these in a format other than Quicktime?

    Something like DivX would be nice.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    1. Re:Not all of us have Quicktime by Trogre · · Score: 2

      Not all of us have DivX either.
      True, but DivX is an open format.
      Quicktime isn't.

      I suspect there are more media players that can handle DivX media than Quicktime media (off-hand, I can think of only two that support QT format: The hideously cumbersome "QuickTime Player" which is only available on two platforms, and mplayer (but only with various hacks applied))

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  77. P2P download by mlinksva · · Score: 4, Informative
  78. Canopus plague... by CommieLib · · Score: 2

    The prime mover of the plot, the "Canopus plague", seems to be a reference to TSR's venerable RPG Gamma World.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  79. It's available via the Gnutella network by sunspot42 · · Score: 2

    For those who can't get thru to the original site or the mirrors. Just search for "Starship Exeter".

  80. Original links are now down by zaren · · Score: 2

    The main htmlified pages are still there, but the big bandwidth sucking stuff seems to be disbaled. From http://homepage.mac.com/starshipexeter/teaser.mov:

    We're sorry, but we can't find the HomePage you've requested. It's possible that:

    The address was entered incorrectly. Check your spelling and try again.

    The .Mac member of this name has either created a page and removed it or has never published a HomePage.

    etc.

    So I hope those mirror sites can stand the load, because they're next on the hit parade! :)

    It's no surprise, though; Apple's quite vague in the allocation of bandwidth for their .Mac hosted stuff - I knew this was going to happen sooner or later, I just didn't expect so much sooner.

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
  81. Re:idiots by mstyne · · Score: 2

    yeah, pretty rad right? go democracy!

    --
    mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
  82. if anyone has this, put it on Kazaa by sstory · · Score: 2

    please

  83. Re:Toward an end to TOS-bashing by Gojira+Shipi-Taro · · Score: 2

    I'm of two minds on the lighting. I think the set lighting was outstanding, the colored gels in the andorian complex gave a very good approximation of that sort of set in the TOS period. I don't think principle lighting was that great, however. Most of the time the Captain (who bore a suspicious resemblance to Shane McMahon, of the WWE, only less fit) looked oddly pinkish compared to the rest of the cast. I can't really tell if that was lighting, or makeup, however. I was impressed by the simulated set for the bridge. If I hadn't seen the chromakey Green in the web sites shots of the command chair, I might not have realized it was composited in the background. I think a good deal of what you describe as blocky directing can be attributed to the limited cinematography options they had for the on-ship scenes, in particular. There are certain things that can be done with a full production rig and set that can't be done easily with mockups and compositing. For what they had to work with, they did a marvelous job of covering up the deficiencies. I doubt someone who was a more casual viewer (I once went to school to do broadcast/film production before I started in the software industry, so I've tried to discount the things that stood out to me only because of my training) would have noticed most of the problems.

    --
    "Oh my God. This is terrible. This is the end of my Presidency. I'm fucked."; ~ Donald J. Trump
  84. Really really bad by Arrgh · · Score: 2

    I'm not much of a fan of TOS, but this stuff is really quite awful, even by TOS standards. Sure, it's impressive enough that a bunch of amateurs can put together a project of this scope, but... Geez, did they even watch the footage before they cut it together?

    The Commodore's long-winded speech in the teaser is the lowlight (so far) of the awful acting; the pink monster isn't even funny, let alone believable...

    I suppose now's the time to plug my friend's independent superhero comedy short, Dial "A" for Alphaman, which is vastly more professionally acted, directed and shot. If you need some DV edited or a music video shot, call Mike!

  85. Sunk in the Sunda Strait by child_of_mercy · · Score: 2

    they SCUTTLED???

    If you want to read of a REAL fighting ship lost in the same location to the Japanese (at around the same time) I'd advise reading about HMAS Perth. There's a decent write up here.

    The fighting was so ferocious the Japanese mistook a 6" Light Cruiser (the Perth) for a Battleship.

    --
    'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  86. tradition by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 2

    There's something profoundly in keeping with the Star Trek tradition to see the admiral using a teleprompter.

  87. That didn't take long, did it? by ncc74656 · · Score: 2
    From their homepage:

    Well, well ... 10,000 hits an hour were just a little beyond what Mac.Com was willing to tolerate. The movies have been taken offline until an alternative host can be found.

    If they didn't know what a slashdotting was before, they sure as hell know now. :-)

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  88. Mirror mirror...? by cowtamer · · Score: 2


    Could someone who managed to get the downloads _please_ post these files over a P2P network or something like Freenet and post the locations/filenames?

    For all the P2P talk on /. you'd think someone would have jumped on it by now...
    </whine>

    1. Re:Mirror mirror...? by mustangdavis · · Score: 2

      If anyone downloaded these files, let me know and I will put them on my OC-12 connection ....

      As Jar Jar would say: "Mesa gotsa lotsa bandwidth"

      Email me at adavis@coldfirestudios.com if you'd like me to post them.

  89. You just made me cry by EvilAlien · · Score: 2
    ... I wish I had mod points today, 'cause you'd get some for bringing up a good sci-fi series in the context of over-rated Star Trek TV gruel.

    I won't give up on Firefly yet, despite Fox being a bunch of asschimps for cancelling the show (I guess it is a little too high-brow for Fox, in retrospect)... rather than some fan flicks, I'd rather see fans put effort into saving the series by getting it onto another network like UPN.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    1. Re:You just made me cry by Snaller · · Score: 2

      But more interesting that you

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  90. Score 5, Score 5, Score 5 & Score 1 (French ju by xigxag · · Score: 2

    It seems to me this subject has had a tremendous number of posts with scores of 4 and 5. Case in point, the parent and grandparent of this post are both scored as 5 even though they are repeats of other posts up-thread.

    Not that I'm complaining. But I'm wondering now if anybody has ever done a study of the /. topics that have the highest average scoring posts?

    I'm thinking this topic would certainly be in the top ten -- if for no other reason than that it is way too damned easy to hit a "5,Funny" by poking fun at what must be the nerdliest act of the past 25 years. I did know a guy in 1980 who was the president of the chess club in HS, a D&D dungeon master, had invented his own language a la Tolkien, and who wore thick black glasses held together with tape. And he never washed his hair. But yet I can't even imagine him parting with his collection of Tron cels to raise the cash to put together this project. Oliver Ardai, where are you?

    --
    There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
  91. Re:For those who were impressed by this... by mustangdavis · · Score: 2

    I went there ...

    All it said was "Panel Offline"

    Another /.'ed site????

  92. Am I the only one who thought of a scene... by serutan · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I think you probably are.

  93. Thanks ! by serutan · · Score: 2

    You are a demigod.

  94. Re:NCC: What does it stand for? Absolutely nothing by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 2

    Random question: Was that the same Jefferies for whom the (in)famous Jefferies tubes are named?

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  95. Has anyone noticed... by neurojab · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That this thing is actually quite bad? The dialogue is rushed, the acting horrible. I wanted to like it. Oh well.

    Here's what's got me wondering... They spent seven years tweaking every nuance of this. Why would someone do this? Why?

    They're actually trying to tell us something. We could spend our time consuming products we don't need... watching mindless drivel on TV, or we could "do something" by making a cheap knock-off of a cheap TV show from 30+ years ago. Millions of years from now, our society and culture will only be known through the continuing "Star Trek" parodies. For Auld Lang Syne!

  96. Don't forget the Reaction Marks: by Reziac · · Score: 2

    Bones! I! Have! Finally! Learned! Punctuation!

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  97. My Favorite Explanation by serutan · · Score: 2

    When the Klingons first ventured into space they immediately set about conquering every inhabited planet they encountered. Their overly ambitious expansion soon gave them an empire that was difficult for them to rule. As in the Roman Empire, the military forces on the frontier were highly autonomous, and what with the turmoil back home, many of the troops stationed faraway decided to settle down where they were, intermarry with locals and raise families.

    After several generations various hybrid Klingon races became common on the frontier, assuming positions of authority and building and crewing their own starships. The first Klingons the Federation encountered were mostly of this type.

    During the latter part of Kirk's career, the ruling clans undertook a vast campaign of racial cleansing, demoting or subjugating most of the hybrids. Those with distinguished service records (e.g. Kang) were allowed to take genetic therapy to remove "contaminants," which altered their appearance.

    This brief episode of racial impurity, particularly the fact that the hybrids were often superior to pure-blooded Klingons in many ways (better organizers, less psycho) is tremendously embarassing to most Klingons. Hence Worf's extremely tight-lipped reaction -- "We do not speak of it."

  98. Ok it was a bad joke but by nlinecomputers · · Score: 2

    ...a Troll mod? That was kind of harsh.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  99. Wow, you really are a Nerd... by Pii · · Score: 2
    Minnesota has it's own football team. They're called the Vikings.

    The Green Bay Packers (the *real* America's Team / F*** You, Dallas!) are from Wisconsin.

    --
    For those that would die defending it, Freedom
    has a sweet taste that the protected will never know.
  100. Re:From the Official (1975 edition) Technical Manu by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

    Here's the real question: Is the TRM considered canon? I know the U.S.S. Enterprise blueprints from the same era (which are extremely cool) are not.

    After that, we can settle the question of "Who is better, Kirk or Picard?"

    Then, "What is the one, true religion?"

    IDIC,

    Rick

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  101. MPEG-1 version now available... by ncc74656 · · Score: 2

    here. If you can't handle QuickTime for whatever reason or you just want to burn a VCD that you can pop into your DVD player, you want this file.

    --
    20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  102. Re:Score 5, Score 5, Score 5 & Score 1 (French by Randolpho · · Score: 2
    It seems to me this subject has had a tremendous number of posts with scores of 4 and 5. Case in point, the parent and grandparent of this post are both scored as 5 even though they are repeats of other posts up-thread.
    I swear to God, there weren't any posts like it when I started posting! I was just trying to be helpful.
    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
  103. Re:NCC: What does it stand for? Absolutely nothing by kilgore_47 · · Score: 2

    Random question: Was that the same Jefferies for whom the (in)famous Jefferies tubes are named?

    It is indeed. Google has more.

    --
    ___
    The way to see by faith is to shut the eye of reason. --Ben Franklin
  104. More on derivative fan works... recommended by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

    These Save Farscape people made an admirable effort to understand and describe the law on derivative works, specifically fan sites. Note that they point out ripoffs like "Ratscape" are also derivative works, odd as it seems.

    A nice plain-English effort, conscientious, and intelligently defensive of them. I can't vouch for every thing it says except for SAVE FARSCAPE damn it. :)

    One clear effect of the Web will be to really put fair use through its paces, and to determine new meanings within it.

    1. Re:More on derivative fan works... recommended by Reziac · · Score: 2

      [reads] Goes right along with my understanding of the issue, all right. To wit, derivative works belong to the venue owner, not the fanfic creator.

      There have been a few people, mainly SF *authors*, who have prohibited use of their venue for fan *art*, if not for fanfic. Of course it's still whack-a-mole, as even tho they can prevent public displays such as via web pages, they can't do a damn thing to stop people from creating derivative works and sharing them the old fashioned way, via [gasp] snailmail (or private email).

      There are a number of well-organised and highly-visible fanfic archives on the web, fanfiction.net for one. So far it seems that so long as they continue with no more than printed fanfic's traditionally-allowed infringement, no one gets upset about it. In fact, the only real hassles I've heard about have come from people who don't want the 'adult' material (not all of it slash) seen by minors.

      I've never seen Farscape. :(

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:More on derivative fan works... recommended by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Did you mean puritanical or draconian? :) Yeah, it makes sense to *reasonably* protect your copyrights... and to reasonably wink at 'em when there's nothing else you can do. I've had the thought that if [optimistic] anyone ever wanted to play in my universe [/optimistic] it'd be easier just to lay out the rules up front -- most fans are pretty good about it if they know what's allowed and the rules aren't too onerous.

      *blink* Rent?? wonder where would carry it that doesn't 1) need a subscription (I'm not a movie watcher, and a sub would be wasted; besides, the rural mail carrier is too blasted unreliable) or 2) make me immediately do the 40 mile r/t to return it to the nearest vid rental outfit (I only trek to town 2x-3x a month).

      And I'm a rum type myself :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:More on derivative fan works... recommended by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Tsk. Who's got the low userID number around here? Obviously you're trying to trademark something that has prior art. So lay off the unfair use, or better yet pay me a suitable inspiration fee ;)

      Trouble with Netflix -- I'd STILL have to make the jaunt to town, cuz the POBox is reliable and the rural box is not. Only progress there is the lack of deadline. Nah, I'll wait til it comes around on the cheapassed syndicated-only channel :)

      Only show I'm presently watching with dedication is Stargate, which only just became available on a channel I can get as of last summer. And we're a year behind at that.

      Oh, and gin is for sissies :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  105. MOD PARENT UP by njdj · · Score: 2

    Valid point - can't anyone convert these files?

  106. Re:From the Official (1975 edition) Technical Manu by Cyno01 · · Score: 2
    how many Enterprises has Picard lost!?
    Yeah, and how many expedable ensigns did kirk lose? "On this away mission Ill be taking, Spock, Bones, and Ensign Jimmy. Now this is a dangerous mission and all of us might not make it back..."
    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."