Slashdot Mirror


Embedded Linux In Onkyo's Home Music Server

IrateSurf writes "ExtremeTech has a story about a new use of embedded Linux from Onkyo, which runs a home music server. Their NAS-2.3 has a CD-player as well as an 80GB hard drive for storing music and streaming it to other players on the an Ethernet network. Also check out the web site for the NAS-2.3." If only they would make it record radio, too ...

76 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. they must be rich by Stanley+Feinbaum · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They must be rich if they can afford to have 80gigs worth of legal copies of their music...

    if each album takes 80megs about.. then the hd can hold 1000 albums... 1000 albums at 20$ an album is 20,000$ !

    Who can afford to spend that much on music?

    --

    Stanley Feinbaum, professional journalist and master debater! God bless the USA!

    1. Re:they must be rich by StArSkY · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have about 450 Original CD's, and my two flat mates (combined) would have over 1000. so do they make a version with 150Gb+????

      --
      lounge around on the blue couch
    2. Re:they must be rich by infolib · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They must be rich if they can afford to have 80gigs worth of legal copies of their music...

      Actually I just checked hard drive prices:
      Cheapest available 40GB drive: $93.30
      Cheapest available 40GB drive: $120.51
      (Note that these prices are converted from DKK)

      Since this is a $400 product, I wouldn't halve the storage space just to save 30 bucks.

      Stanley Feinbaum, professional journalist and master debater!

      You've come to the wrong place...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
    3. Re:they must be rich by GregGardner · · Score: 2

      An album would be around 80MB as a 128kbps MP3. If you follow the NAS-2.3 link, you will find that it also plays uncompressed PCM format music. That's going to be more like 500-600MB per album. So if you redo your math:

      80 gigs @ 600MB/album = 133 albums * $20 = $2666.

      I would say that a lot of people I know own over 100 albums easily. Not to mention people with roomates combining their collection, etc.

    4. Re:they must be rich by Dalroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I know a guy from college who worked at a *LIBRARY*. He was about 22 years old and had well over a thousand CDs.

      I have well over 500 cds myself. I *WOULD* have more if they didn't cost so much. Back in the day when they used to cost $10 I made a trip to the store every week to purchase CDs.

      Now a days, I make almost 8 times what I used to make. Maybe I'm getting cheaper in my old age (probably true), maybe new music sucks (it does but there is still a lot of stuff I like), but I can't justify $20+ for a CD I don't even know if I'll like. Were that not the case, I know I would have more. Most of my friends are the same. Between us we've got 1000's of CDs lying around our homes and apartments.

      It's not impossible, in fact, in my experience it's quite likely.

    5. Re:they must be rich by sammy.lost-angel.com · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Classical music CDs are often very cheap. $5 if you go for bargins. Some of these are even double albums, and almost always filled. Don't forgot people that work in the music industry, who get several free cds in the mail daily.

    6. Re:they must be rich by rednox · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In Canada, it is legal for you to make a copy of someone else's music CDs for your own personal use.

      Recording artists and performers are compensated for this by massive levies collected on all blank recording media sold in Canada.

      This would be a handy device to take advantage of this law. It might take a few years to borrow and copy 1000 CDs from your friends, though.

    7. Re:they must be rich by ediron2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Spread the cost out, man... ask 'Who can afford a few grand a year?!'

      Young people. 15 to 25, no mortgage or significant debt, a job, and lots of exposure via friends to help thin out the good music from the bad before buying...

      I bought music from when I was 15 to about 28 yrs old, and didn't buy much compared to most of my music-fanatic friends. Since then, I've tapered off to a few cd's a year, plus a few more as gifts. I've got well over 100 tapes, 150 in vinyl, 250 cd's, and one 8-track (Abbey Road, don't ask why). And I repeat, I wasn't SERIOUSLY into music like several friends I had...

      So, 1000 seems quite plausible. What's more, a lot of those I got via cheap sources: rummage & yard sales, used bins, friends, etc. Nowadays, I pick up a cd when I hear a good concert or live band in a bar. Since the night's bar tab has usually cost me a lot more than the $10-15 for the CD, I consider it a tip to a good band and a chance to reminisce later.

      Round down to 15k (that's being charitable compared to your $20 per album), give me 1/5 the needed collection, and spread it over the last 30 years, and it seems laughably cheap... $100 a YEAR on average. Rich?! Shee-it, I spent more last weekend on sushi! Throw in the wife's similarly-sized music collection, not force me to waste a wall in my li'l house (not to mention portability like ipods and archos units have) and give me access to stuff that's only available on out-of-print vinyl and I'd probably start collecting old, good music like a fiend.

    8. Re:they must be rich by gmhowell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I see several others have corrected you, let me add a bit more. I'll be 30 in about two weeks. My father's first CD player cost around $500. 1983 or 1984, I believe. At that time, I started buying CD's, and have bought only 3 tapes since. That's just CD's. Most were purchased for around $12 each. I have around 400 CD's. And I don't use some shitty 128k mp3, I use VBR with the r3mix settings. That's why I recently replaced my 60 gig drive.

      This also ignores a music collection of my father's on vinyl that begins somewhere in the dark ages, when Buddy Holly was the new thing. Much (most?) of his collection is unobtainable on CD. That will quickly add up when I get around to ripping the vinyl.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    9. Re:they must be rich by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

      I trust that the 80GB is $120.51?

      You've really opened yourself up there with the "professional journalist" comment.. :-)

    10. Re:they must be rich by Tyrell+Hawthorne · · Score: 2, Informative

      As many have noted, it's not that unusual to have over 1000 albums. And what's more, it's not *that* unusual to spend that kind of money on a music system.

      Here's something that resembles the Onkyo in the article, which in itself costs $20 000:
      Linn Knekt

      (Of course it's on-topic, it runs Linux!

    11. Re:they must be rich by Excarnate · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hi Oblio!

      They must be rich...

      There are 3 problems with your post. Working backwards:

      Your cost per album estimate came out of your ass and it stinks. $20 per album is way off. Even when I buy new CDs they cost $13 at most (per disc). I buy lots of used discs at typically $8 or less. A rough estimate of an average for my collection is $7 per disc. Replacement cost, now that's something different.

      Your estimates on how much music an 80 GB drive can hold don't list your assumptions and thus are useless for use in arguing or making a point. Using a (low) figure of 1 MB = 1 minute, and my collection's average of 52 minutes per disc (and 14 tracks per disc) I get about 1538 albums. I (and it seems many others) record at a higher bit rate, if you use 160/VBS it holds about 1326 of my average albums. Taking the higher bitrate and my averages, that's about $9900 worth of CDs this thing will hold. That's close to your $20,000 for goyim ;-)

      The final place you fall down is in your time estimates. You assume that everyone is a loser teen who has to fill the hard drive and fill it today. I'm old enough to have been buying CDs since 1985. And I've got a beautiful wife who has been buying her own CDs for our (instead of "my") collection. And I wouldn't fill the drive with what we have today, but guess what? Shock shock horror horror, we are still adding to our collection and we wouldn't be interested in something without expansion room. With our collection we've spent an average of a bit over $400 per year of which I've spent about 3/4 of that. (And yes, Napster led us to many new bands where we ended up buying the band's CD.)

      Oh yes, Onkyo might not care if you don't buy this product. They sell many products aimed at different segments of the market. There are people whose CD collection makes mine look puny. Just because a coat doesn't fit you doesn't mean it shouldn't be for sale. The same for this product. But you have a point, too. I fail to see it, but I'm sure you have one.

      Hey, here is an idea for record companies: Give away all music but at a low bit-rate. People can find what they like and what they think sucks a golf ball through 50 feet of garden hose. And the quality will be low enough that they'll want to buy, on CD, what they like.

      --
      .signature: No such file or directory
  2. Why not wireless? by Metalhead01 · · Score: 5, Interesting
    There are a lot of these little guys popping up on the market, yet all of them use a physical connection. Is there some inherent technical problem with using an 802.11b device to stream the music?

    --
    The only reason I keep my Windows partition is so I can mount it like the bitch that it is.
    1. Re:Why not wireless? by pummer · · Score: 3, Informative

      you should be able to use one of these for wireless. It's an adapter that plugs into ethernet ports and turns them into wireless.

    2. Re:Why not wireless? by NetJunkie · · Score: 2

      Ethernet is cheap. Want wireless? Buy a wireless bridge for $100. I do that with my Rio Receiver and XBox.

    3. Re:Why not wireless? by Drakin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Price, simple as that. They're trying to keep the price as low as possible, and adding wireless supporty would likely as $50 to $100 to the price, for functionality not everyone would use.

      The consumer base (not more geek minded users) hasn't really started to adopt wireless in a major way, while they're getting into devices like this.

    4. Re:Why not wireless? by Stanley+Feinbaum · · Score: 2

      yeah, you aren't allowed broadcasting music over the airwaves without a licence.

      --

      Stanley Feinbaum, professional journalist and master debater! God bless the USA!

    5. Re:Why not wireless? by Moofie · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, what non-geek would be buying a hard-drive based music player?

      On the third hand, if you're REALLY a geek, you know how to pull Cat5. : ) Wireless is fine for laptops, but I don't understand why I'd want to use it for stationary boxen.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Why not wireless? by jedrek · · Score: 2

      My friends in NYC are renting a big apt. When they started figuring out how much it would cost to cable their apt, it came out to like 2x as much as setting up a wireless network. 95% of what they do is internet sharing so the economics panned out great.

    7. Re:Why not wireless? by Zathrus · · Score: 2

      There is no technical problem, just a logistics one. It's trivial to convert wired to wireless, but not the other way around. It would also add significantly to the cost, when most of these systems are trying to stay low priced.

      Personally, if someone came out with a wireless model that would kill it dead for me. I have no wireless in my house, other than cordless phones (and none in the 2.4GHz range), but I do have ethernet jacks all over the place.

  3. Archos Radio Recorders by Foxxz · · Score: 5, Informative

    "If only they would make it record radio, too ..."

    See archos for devices that record raido directly into mp3. They have a hard drive and a smart media device that does that i beleive. Plus they keep the last 30 seconds of audio in memory in case the song you want has already started you can still get the begining.

    -Foxxz

  4. does it matter what OS it's running? by rtphokie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    mod this flamebait if you must but I gotta ask, what does it really matter what OS it's running?

    It could run TRS-DOS for all I care as long as it gets the job done efficiently.

    1. Re:does it matter what OS it's running? by Black_Logic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      :flame on:

      Well, it matters because this is not
      a press release site for mp3 players.
      The fact that it's using a a version
      of embedded linux is a interesting
      facet of the story to someone who is
      interested in the way things work.

      Also slashdot readers have a bias for
      linux related things. (It's one of
      the reasons i'm here)

      Why are so many of the readers here
      so constantly pissed off about the
      pro open source/linux/anti-windows
      slant here?

      --
      Ansi's and stupid tricks!
    2. Re:does it matter what OS it's running? by Maudib · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If this were simply a piece of speciality hardware or a component from a pc-centric/mp3-enthusiast company, then it would be fairly trivial. But this is from onkyo. Onkyo is a manufacturer of fairly high-end consumer stereo equipment, with zero background in pcs. Its the equivalent of Bose or pioneer using linux on their recievers. Or sony or nintendo using linux on their consoles. Its an application of linux in a major piece of consumer electronics. Hence, its fairly major.

      Sure Dimaond and Rio have similair products, but they got their start in computer based audio. This is the transition of linux to the mark at large. Id say thats news.

    3. Re:does it matter what OS it's running? by Anonymous+Hack · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Because this is a linux-centric/Free Software/Open Source Website. That's why we care.

      No, no it's not and what bothers me is people who think it is. Certainly, it's a part of OSDN, but it's not a Linux members-only club. From the FAQ:

      Slashdot is many things to many people. Some people think it's a Linux site. To others, it's a geek hangout. I've always worked very hard to make sure that Slashdot matches up with my interests and the interests of my authors.

      In other words, it's whatever the hell CmdrTaco, the editors and the story submitters feel like it should be on the day. I don't agree with the initial poster who was like "big wow", but i don't agree with you either. Yeah often a lot of the "LINUX RUNS ON TOASTER X" stories don't thrill me in the slightest, i ain't bitching, but remember we're out there.

      I code in Linux every day for work, but when i go home i use Windows. I buy my CDs and loathe MP3s and pirated music. I watch wrestling. Most anime bores me. I'm not the only one. Big deal, you know? We're all people who read Slashdot, and whatever it is it's gotta be something cool because we keep coming back. (Since late 99 for me.)

      --
      I got a sig so you would remember me.
    4. Re:does it matter what OS it's running? by Erik+Hollensbe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What about sharp (the zaurus, makers of various consumer electronics), or the empeg (who didn't make anything prior)? Or TiVO?

      Sony DOES use linux on their consoles. In fact, you can get a kit that lets you do development on PS2 hardware.

      And, Diamond got their name making video cards. Only later did they start making everything that fits in a PCI slot (this was shortly after they bought Supra).

      I just find it hard to believe, that embedded linux has been out for how many years, and we're still cheering about it being licensed?

      Lineo (or whoever owns them now) did the world a great service and may have made some money at it, and now linux is everywhere.

      But what's next, are we going to hear about the embedded linux that's in the next high tech microwave?

      At this point, it's really not the fact that /. posted this -- I'm not surprised at all. It's just that there has to be a point where you guys realize that it's already BEEN accepted in this market.

      If you guys masturbate too much, it's just not going to feel good anymore.

    5. Re:does it matter what OS it's running? by bahwi · · Score: 2

      Take a look at the site. Linux/Open-Source/BSD certainly seem to be the theme of this site. Just because CmdrTaco == Theme of Site doesn't mean CmdrTaco's Interests != Linux, Open Source, BSD.

      You're going on technicalities here, when that certainly doesn't seem to apply at all. I use BSD, not linux. I detest Windows, and I enjoy Anime when it's good(once every few years). Wrestling I don't care about. We are all people, and that's that. There are people on here who bitch because someone posts something that doesn't interest that specific person.

      But good use of the FAQ. Next time I'll just post a link and I'll be good. =)

      I'm just sick and tired of people against linux or against open source coming here and getting upset that those stories are here. Or worse, modded up, like we haven't been having those arguments for some time now. Or people who bitch because they can't mod. I read most comments looking for something funny, and keeping my threshold at 3 is generally quite good. But it seems that sometimes posts like the first one get through, the same old tired argument. And sometimes I just feel like myself posting and going along with that same old argument. People need to understand they don't have to be here. If it's auto loading in their browser they need to change their start page, no one hacked it to do that.

      I'm just bitching hoping that these people will quit. For the honeymoon for google story(still on the front page) I have 70 of 334 comments. If I up my threshold another notch I'll have even less, and there are many people who post something interesting, but there are people who post something offtopic that gets modded up as "Interesting" or "Insightful" when it's really not. Checking now, that post is at 5. Maybe soon I'll have to disable comments altogether just to get past the crap, and post comments myself blindly when I want to contribute.

    6. Re:does it matter what OS it's running? by nathanh · · Score: 2

      It does matter because it proves that Linux is useful in its own right, rather than being nothing more than a fanciful toy for geeks.

      When a major company treats Linux seriously it's a big boost for the open-source and free software communities, and a big slap in the face for the fools claiming that Linux is "useless" or "without value".

    7. Re:does it matter what OS it's running? by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

      Because if it is running Linux there is hope of reflashing the bugger and getting a useful piece of gear. I.E. no dependence on a Windows file server (which the current software depends on) and getting OGG support.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    8. Re:does it matter what OS it's running? by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

      Ok, replying to my own post a minute later is lame. But I had this gadget confused with a different Onkyo receiver I was looking at a day or so ago. This one has its own HDD unlike the Net Receiver I was pondering earlier.

      --
      Democrat delenda est
    9. Re:does it matter what OS it's running? by lgraba · · Score: 2

      It matters because it provides ammunition to use with people that will insist on only using Windows and parrot the latest MS FUD, while completely resisting even LOOKING at Linux. The next time they say something to the effect that Linux is useless, can't compete with MS products, etc., you just point to a couple of electronic boxes in their home entertainment center and say, "Oh yeah, well your TiVo is using Linux, your MusicServer is using Linux, ..."

  5. Other sources by pompomtom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Legal mp3's don't have to come off a $20 CD.

    Check acidplanet.com mp3.com mp3.com.au spinwarp.com etc etc etc

    --

    Buckets,

    pompomtom

    "There's an exception to every rule. Except for some rules"
  6. Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Onkyo (www.onkyousa.com) is one of the better-known Japanese manufacturers of home theater gear. Recently, the company has begun building audio and home theater equipment with built-in Ethernet ports, rather than some proprietary connectivity scheme. PC Magazine wrote about one of Onkyo's product, the NC500 Net-Tune Receiver. However, the Net-Tune receiver is perhaps the least interesting of the products, offering the now-familiar paradigm -- the digital receiver that can route music from your PC to your home audio system. The NC500 does have a stereo amplifier, but is otherwise similar to products from Turtle Beach, Sonic Blue and others. However, Onkyo is bringing Ethernet capability to a full-fledged, Dolby Digital/DTS 7.1 receiver in it's TX-NR900, THX-Select certified home theater receiver. The TX-NR900 offers 110 watts RMS into 7 channels, supports all the major surround sound standards and can act as a Net-Tune client, allowing you to pipe the digital music from your PC directly to your home theater rack. In addition to the usual array of input and output ports is a standard, 10 megabit Ethernet port.

    That's pretty cool, but that's not all. Onkyo also sells a line of high-end gear targeted towards custom installations under its Integra brand. Onkyo offers products similar to the NC500 and TX-NR900, but with additional capabilities. What's most interesting, though, is the Integra NAS-2.3 Net-Tune Server.

    At first blush, the NAS-2.3 seems like a CD player, but it also has an embedded 80GB hard drive. So now it appears to be like any number of digital music players on the scene. But the NAS-2.3 also has a 10/100 Ethernet port, and is capable of acting as a music server to a network of Net-Tune devices. Running on the Integra product is an embedded Linux operating system, which acts as the server software.

    The NAS-2.3 can support up to 12 simultaneous streams to Net-Tune receivers or other clients. You can have different tracks playing in multiple rooms, move music to a PC, display a playlist on most types of displays (the NAS-2.3 has VGA, S-Video and composite video outputs) and can even connect up to CDDB to download track information on various CDs.

    One other interesting aspect of the NAS-2.3 is the availability of an empty drive sled inside the box, allowing users or installers to add additional hard drive space. You can't use a standard, PC-formatted hard drive, according to Eric Harper, Integra's Custom Installation and Product Manager. The formatting is somewhat different, but a knowledgeable user or installer should be able to add another drive to the server.

    So if you don't want the headache of building your own music server from a PC, then the NAS-2.3 can integrate into your home Ethernet network, co-existing quite well with your PC systems. It's an intriguing idea that embraces the PC network, rather than trying to remain isolated.

    NNY News with a twist of lime.

  7. I'd like more TIVO like functionality by SuperCal · · Score: 3, Redundant

    I'd like one to work more like a radio Tivo. Say I always listen to Neal Boortz and Sean Hanity, then maybe the machine will sugest old Rush. Or if I always listen to the new rock station, maybe save the new rock show (or what ever the call radio segments) on a different station. Of cource without any real listings of radio shows, like a radio TV Guide, all that may be asking to much...

    --
    Business News and Resources: www.usasource.net
    1. Re:I'd like more TIVO like functionality by Drakonian · · Score: 2
      Good idea! Maybe we should have an Ask Slashdot on it.

      Sorry, I couldn't resist - I mean it was in the summary!

      --
      Random is the New Order.
  8. Re:why by EvanED · · Score: 2

    There's the display to, they want to make it look nice among the other stereo devices, and finally take a look at the back panel. They use virtually all the space.

  9. Ogg by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It mentions that files must be in mp3 or pcm format. Now alot of my music is actually in ogg. First, if it's embeded linux, will there be a means by which we can install other codecs? (say ssh or such.) Second, will there be a supplied means to upgrade the hard drive? (I know you might not need 80gigs for your legal collection but my illegal collections already over that. by far.)

    --
    I do security
    1. Re:Ogg by technos · · Score: 2

      Probably meant shn. Shorten, a lossless music compression scheme.

      --
      .sig: Now legally binding!
  10. Re:why by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    why do they have to make these so big??

    1. space for all the connections in the back

    2. power amp cooling. Driving serious power to multiple large speakers takes power. That heat needs to be dissipated.

    3. It looks better

  11. RIAA Sez: by nfotxn · · Score: 2, Funny
    If only they would make it record radio, too ...

    But recording off the radio could mean the end of the music industry as we know it!!

    --

    _nfotxn

  12. PCM Digital Out Though? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I love the ease of CD's on an HD, but as a semi-audiophile I want something that does uncompressed audio.
    The last unit from Integra (Made into an Onkyo brand) also offered digital out but only for MP3s. If you played PCM the digital out turned off! Anyone know if this unit does the same thing?
    AFAIK iMerge UK is the only company that has given RIAA the finger and offers PCM digital out, oh, and their players are much cooler but also more expensive.

  13. Recording Radio.... by Penguin2212 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would question the market viability of a device designed to copy songs from the radio. When you copy a CD that you bought and paid for, you are buying the material on the CD. You are purchasing a copy. When you hear a song on the radio, you are hearing performance of the song. An artist/record company makes money for every copy and performance made. If you buy a CD and copy it (assuming that you don't share it or anything) just to listen to it on a device such as this, you aren't taking any more than what you paid for. But if you copy from the radio, you are. In fact this was the basis for the case against radio stations streaming broadcasts over the internet, because temporary copies of songs were made on the user's hard drive therefore making it a copy. Most of you have probablly heard of that case. Most radio stations have ceased to do so because of this, and are fighting it as well. I'm not trying to defend the RIAA in any way. However, a device that would facilitate copying of music from the radio would definitely come under serious fire from the RIAA, IMHO.

    1. Re:Recording Radio.... by /dev/trash · · Score: 2

      The AHRA gives the US population the right to record such music.

  14. Input Sources by Dark+Warrior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe I missed it, but I didn't see ethernet as one of the input sources. I have that 1400 legal MP3s ripped from my CDs--I'm not sure I want to go thru that again.

    1. Re:Input Sources by lowdown722 · · Score: 2, Informative

      From the product site: "An Ethernet port lets you connect to a PC to transfer MP3 files and store and sort them as well." That seems to suggest that you can transfer mp3s from PC to the NAS, but it's not explicitly stated. The input sources listed on the product's features site only include Analog In, Optical, and Coaxial. Maybe somebody who works for the company is reading this and could clear it up?

  15. Running gerbilware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry for the subject line, but that's what I think whenever I see one of these embedded Linux stories--"For all I care it's powered by gerbils running in exercise wheels." Am I happy to see Linux get a little positive press? Sure, but let's not read more into this than it deserves. The rest of the world won't know this thing has "Linux Inside", nor will they care. The Linux crowd should be focused on the real battleground, the desktop, and derailing MS's monopoly.

    1. Re:Running gerbilware by nolife · · Score: 2

      For all I care it's powered by gerbils running in exercise wheels.

      It is called Linux advocacy. The more you hear about positive uses of a product, the more common that product becomes which brings on more positive uses. I would guess that over 95% of the non computer geek comunity would care less or even know anything about what gerbilware their computer was currently running had it not been for a strong MS advocacy and PR campaign to push the Windows name.

      The Linux crowd should be focused on the real battleground, the desktop, and derailing MS's monopoly.

      The embedded market has its own battleground which is just as real as what you want to battle for. Linux is many products to many people. The combination of all of them makes Linux what it is and where it will be later. I know that sounds like something you'd hear in a glorified PR but its true.

      Multiple people are working on multiple things in Linux to fill a desired need. People are not being "pulled" away from the desktop to work on an odd side job.

      --
      Bad boys rape our young girls but Violet gives willingly.
  16. Yoko Ono? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does anyone care what Yoko Ono does?

    Oh, ONKYO. Sorry...

  17. No inherent technical problem... by toupsie · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Is there some inherent technical problem with using an 802.11b device to stream the music?

    No. In fact, there is a product on the market that can stream music in three different wireless paths, 802.11b, 802.11g and bluetooth, along with gigabit ethernet. The system uses an open source operating system, you can address it via http, ssh, X11 or you can roll your own access system, its portable, has a fold-out LCD screen and is so thin, it can fit under a typical AV receiver. You can read more about it here.

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    1. Re:No inherent technical problem... by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      umm, and it sounds like shit.

      its not going to sound like your Onkyo reciever will - furhter, its got a HD && fans for lotsa crappy humming noise to f-up your $4000 B&W speakers (or whatever) listening experience.

      If there was a way to put a PC in the entertainment center -- and Have it *SOUND* like a good pc of audio kit, we would all do it -- trouble is, a $150 sound card dont cut it.

    2. Re:No inherent technical problem... by toupsie · · Score: 2

      What about USB digital audio? No crappy humming noise like the line-out. I use it all the time for amazing sound.

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  18. Re:why by carpe_noctem · · Score: 2

    erm, mebbe because most stereo equipment is manufactured at 19" and they want to make it an actual audio appliance?

    --
    "Quoting famous computer scientists out of context is the root of all evil (or at least most of it) in programming." - K
  19. Redundant hard drives? by zerofoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Of all the "music server" products i've seen on the market, i've yet to see one that has redundant hard drives. Maybe these things haven't been on the market long enough, but eventually the hard drives in these devices will fail, and when they do, there are going to be some very pissed off consumers out there.

    Until recently, audio gear manufacturers never had to worry about the storage media. When you bought the music, you bought a hard copy of that media (cd, record, tape...etc). I understand that these devices still require you to purchase the "hard copy" of the music, but do you want to re-rip 500 CDs just because your hard drive went clunk-clunk?

    -ted

    1. Re:Redundant hard drives? by zerofoo · · Score: 2

      is the availability of an empty drive sled inside the box, allowing users or installers to add additional hard drive space.

      No redundancy there...just extra space.

      But the NAS-2.3 also has a 10/100 Ethernet port, and is capable of acting as a music server to a network of Net-Tune devices.

      Don't know about this...will this feature allow me to access the raw files via the network? If so, then I can do a network backup...if not, then i'm still stuck with no RAID 1 and no way to back up my music

      -ted

  20. What I'm waiting for... by sammy.lost-angel.com · · Score: 2

    A rendezvous enabled wireless device that ties into my music collection (yes, iTunes). The reality of the situation is, if Apple doesn't release it, we won't see it for at least a year. Well, depending on how the HomePod is made, maybe it could incorporate rendezvous...

    Anyone have any home brew devices in the works? Maybe now's the time to start :)

    1. Re:What I'm waiting for... by seanadams.com · · Score: 3, Informative

      A rendezvous enabled wireless device that ties into my music collection (yes, iTunes).

      Slim Devices probably has what you're looking for. It doesn't use Rendezvous (yet) but does have all the things that Rendezvous has been promising (auto-discovery of server, integration with iTunes). A lot of companies are hawking auto-disocvery like it's some revoultionary technology... ummmmm it's a couple tiny UDP packets in each direction. That's it. We were doing this long before anyone had heard of Rendezvous.

      But Rendezvous is evoving into more than that... we recently showed the product at Macworld in San Francisco, and received a very enthusiastic response from the iTunes developers at Apple. They're opening up more of their system to us, so expect to see even better integration with MacOS iApps in our next software updates for the SLIMP3.

      BTW, the HomePod is about where we were two years ago. Seriously, they're good guys, and geeks like us, but don't expect them to ship anything for a few more months.

  21. Re:why by sholden · · Score: 2

    And the client product, which does have an amplifier (although at only 15W a channel, and only two channels), is significantly smaller. Less than half the size...

    Of course half the size in the wrong dimension if you want to stack it with your other audio components...

  22. Re:why by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

    except the Onkyo doesn't have an amplifier

    From the extremetech review:
    "The TX-NR900 offers 110 watts RMS into 7 channels"

    Sounds like an amp to me.

  23. I agree by lpret · · Score: 2

    This is nothing more than a simple "I agree" . I think that many times we get carried away with trying to "protect" rights we've never had, like taping the radio, which may have been tolerated in the past, we're now realizing is quite illegal, as you pointed out quite well in distinguishing it as a performance. I think a more rational approach such as yours is needed to make sure that we do get our digital media however we want.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
    1. Re:I agree by /dev/trash · · Score: 2

      What???? Ever hear of the AHRA?

  24. There is a reason they choose Linux . . by MrLinuxHead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Onkyo is smart for using Linux. Nearly all the Pacific Rim (Sony, Pioneer, Panasonic, ect.) manufacturers are testing it or are ready to deploy because they don't need to pay out royalties per unit, can share innovations with each other, and can share data with each other's units over 100Mb Ethernet or 802.11x or whatever. The most important thing to remember is they don't need to spend huge amounts on R&D. Linux will become the Linga Franca of consumer electronics, unless Microsoft buys one of the big players and twists everyone's arm to go along. Maybe not even then, as the long term gains are too big. And most Japanese electronics manufacturers are thinking very long term.

    And yes these babies are BIG! And HEAVY! At 110 RMS per CH. Thats 660 Watts out, all discrete. No output IC's. Not to mentions pre amp and video switching. Schwweett.

    Inputs:

    Audio and AV Inputs - 3/6

    HDTV-Ready Component Video Input/Output - 2/1

    Front-Panel Video Input (with S-Video) - Yes

    S-Video Compatible Jacks Input/Output - 6/3

    Digital Inputs:

    5 Optical (1 Front Panel), 3 Coaxial

    Digital Output - 2 Optical Amp In

    RS-232 Control Port

    IR In/Out - 1/1

    --
    I may be bad with names, but I'll never forget your IP address
    1. Re:There is a reason they choose Linux . . by MrLinuxHead · · Score: 2

      I mean 770 watts. (110 x 7) I sometimes see the rear channels as one. This is real 7.1

      --
      I may be bad with names, but I'll never forget your IP address
    2. Re:There is a reason they choose Linux . . by abimelech · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your specs seem to refer to the TX-NR900 reciever. This does not run Linux, it merely plays music from a network connection. I don't think Linux is required for such basic functionality.

      http://www.imerge.co.uk/products/improductsimage s/ downloadphotos0901/S2000/S2000row34.jpg

      The Integra NAS-2.3 Net-Tune Server is the Linux based product. It's actually a rebranded Imerge product, from the UK. You can control the server via a TV, Monitor, PC, Palm, IR Pronto etc... Check out the LCD, it's just a bog standard LCD display used by many case modders - not a custom built VFD display as found on most hifi components.

  25. Please market this in the UK too! by Morgaine · · Score: 2

    Integra + Onkyo, please market this in the UK!

    At last a networked digital audio recording and storage device that actually looks like a proper piece of hifi gear for the rack in the lounge.

    While there are several units along these lines on the market now, they haven't really respected the basic ergonomic and stylistic standards for hifi separates in the modern home until now. This product seems to be the closest so far --- I want one, purchaseable here with a UK warranty! :-)

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
  26. Onkyo NET-Tune supported formats & data rates by martijnd · · Score: 2, Informative
    Animated (Flash) diagram demonstrating their home music network (Net-Tune) system :

    http://www.net-tune.net

    From the Onkyo FAQ:

    While WAV, WMA, MP3 are supported formats, there are many variations of these. Please check that the bitrates used are compatible and if certain files will not play back, check the following: * The file must not be saved in a system folder, such as C:\Windows or C:\WINNT. * WMA file contains Digital Rights Management (DRM) which prevents reproduction on other devices. * The WAV file is not in RIFFWAVE format or is corrupt. Format Bitrate Sampling Frequency WAV(PCM) ---- 32k/44.1k/48kHz MP3 All 32k/44.1k/48kHz WMA 32/36/40/44/48/64/80/96/128/160/192bps 32k/44.1k/48kHz

    Further, it uses DHCP to get an IP address. And needs ports 60096,60097. But that is of course all useless information until I actually find one of these machines.

  27. Integra *is* a UK product. by abimelech · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Integra is really a rebadged Imerge product, who are based in Cambridge. It is known as the SoundServer S2000 - http://www.imerge.co.uk/products/improductshtml/ip main.html

    Of course, there may be some functional difference, but otherwise they look identical. Costs £1599 - AS this is Slashdot, I bet most people would just build their own audio server PC and slap in a nice sound card (M-Audio Delta 410 audio card offers slightly better specification) and with some interesting software, you could have a relatively cheap multi-room audio server which supports say, OGG Vorbis, APE, SHN, etc.

  28. Re:Can it... by orthogonal · · Score: 2

    I don't understand. You want to rip cds on a portable CD/mp3 player? Do you have a hard drive on your CD/mp3 player? I don't think I've ever seen one of those. Please provide a url.

    Well, I've got an Archos Recorder. I'm not sure if by "CD/mp3" player you mean "a CD player that plays MP3s", or if you mean "CD or MP3 player". If the latter, the Archos Recorder is a hard-drive based MP3 player (18 GB). It also records to MP3 format at up to 160kps.

    By connecting a CD player's audio out to the Recorder audio in, I could in theory rip directly onto the Archos. I've never done this, and probably won't, as I'd have to manually enter song names, which is tedious, and as I like to rip CDs at a somewhat higher (~ 192kbps) quality. On the othr hand, the Recorder also contains a built-in microphone, so it can be useful for voice recording.

  29. It doesn't matter to me in the least by NineNine · · Score: 2

    It doesn't matter to me in the least. Onkyo makes some of the shittiest components I've ever used. I had a CD changer fail within 3 years, an amp fail within 5 years, and the sound quality coming out of even their "high end" models sucks ass. Onkyo could be running a full graphical interface of OSX, and I still wouldn't buy another one of their products. They make Sony look good by comparison.

  30. Re:Onkyo and Sansui in the 80's by NineNine · · Score: 2

    Onkyo, high end? Maybe not now, because they're always the el-cheapo brand that the drones at Circuit City are always pushing. The few Onkyo components I've owned have all been bottom of the barrel when it comes to quality.

  31. Re:Rendezvous/zeroconf support? by mccalli · · Score: 2
    It would be nice to see one of these new zeroconf enabled TiVo reading its music off one of these.

    Agreed. Additionally, I would like to see Tivo come out with its own device - a Tivo with a CD drive that could rip tracks itself and present them via the normal Tivo menu.

    In addition, a 'Treat as audio'-type option could inform Tivo that certain TV recordings should be treated as audio tracks, not TV broadcasts. That covers the case where digital cable supplies a lot of radio stations.

    I like Tivo's interface, and would be interested to see them move out slightly beyond their current TV-only remit.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  32. Re:they must be rich - or canadian. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    I know a guy from college who worked at a *LIBRARY*. He was about 22 years old and had well over a thousand CDs.


    if your Canadian, you can LEGALLY copy Audio CDs. Your CDR blanks have a tax that goes DIRECTLY to some RIAA-whore group -- in exchange, you can copy any CD you please for yourself...

    so, go on down to the library with your burner and have at it.

  33. Re:why by Zapman · · Score: 2

    Outside of the integrated amp weighing a ton, there's another reason. If you listen to the 'audiophiles' out there, one of the things that they rave about is 'build quality'. 99% of the time, what they mean by that is 'weight'. "Feels cheeply made" is a complaint about a lot of 'low-fi' and 'mid-fi' gear (low and mid-fi gear is defined as equipment one or more steps down (usually in price) from the gear you currently own (or the gear you're currently lusting for)).

    There do exist good, quality, peices of equipment that produce music wonderfully. Trust your ears over your other senses (unless you're looking at video gear. At which point your eyes should only see 2 things: the picture and the price. People can be conned into wasting a lot of green on video gear.)

    --
    Zapman
  34. Also cool ... by Greedo · · Score: 2

    What the article doesn't mention, but you can find by digging around for screenshots, is that the back panel has not only ethernet outputs, but a VGA, USB and modem connections.

    Dunno how useful the modem would be, but it sounds like you could probably hook-up a USB keyboard and monitor, and get a shell on this device.

    --
    Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
  35. other-other sources by EvilStein · · Score: 2

    * Buy used CDs from Rasputin's Records, just make sure they're fairly new and in good shape.
    * Go to The Wherehouse
    * Take advantage of old policy and manager that your brother sells pot to and exchange used CDs that suck for new CDs that you want. ....profit! Well, have lots of CDs, anyway. That's how I made my CD collection. Now, everything has been ripped to mp3 and the original CDs are in a box in storage. I got tired of having them get scratched/stolen/lost.

    The Wherehouse also had a policy of accepting any coupon from other stores. One summer we found a big pile of "3 free movie rental" coupons.

    I don't think that I left the house all freekin summer, and boy, did we see a lot of crappy movies.

  36. An Audiotron and your computer make more sense by GlobalEcho · · Score: 2

    These countless manufacturers making home audio MP3 devices with integrated hard drives are missing the point: you want a single point of storage in your house for MP3's, or you are going to have chaos.

    Networks are not just for web-browsing. They're also for sharing files, like those MP3's. And if you're going to have them somewhere, you might as well have them on your PC where:
    (1) You can rip with that expensive Athlon or PPC processor using LAME
    (2) There exist myriad MP3 control tools like id3tool and mp3gain
    (3) Your portable MP3 player hooks up
    (4) You may be downloading files from mp3.com or other places
    (5) [Important] You have a chance of keeping the hard drive and fan whines away from your audio equipment

    Thus, you want the home audio component you buy to simply get its music off the network. Audiotron and SLiMP3 do just that, which makes them the only reasonable such devices.

    Between them, I prefer the Audiotron because it has digital output, which means I can use the expensive DAC in my receiver rather than the cheap one in the unit. The SLiMP3 is impressively flexible, though!

  37. The good question is by Nawak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will I have access to source/documentation to customize this linux?
    If not, I think this kind of item would be frustrating as I am likely to end up with a dream of doing something totally different with this embedded computer...

    You know, some networked remote control for it for instance... arg... must... stop... thinking!

    --
    A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).