Slashdot Mirror


Produce Organs...From Printer

Gavinsblog writes "New Scientist reports that researchers have modified desktop printers and filled them with suspensions of cells instead of ink. Apparently the work is a first step towards printing complex tissues or even entire organs. Amazing technology. " Well, I guess this could give a whole new meaning to "watermarking".

213 comments

  1. Hmmmm.... by nano2nd · · Score: 4, Funny

    So how long till I can print out a nice fillet steak?..........

    1. Re:Hmmmm.... by BlueGecko · · Score: 1

      Actually, that would pose a fascinating problem: if you could print out a steak, would it be a vegetarian dish? After all, no animal would have been harmed. I have also wondered what the implications would be with regard to those religions that require meat be killed a certain way (Islam, Judaism, many others also). Would a "printed" thigh count as animal from that perspective? Could it ever be acceptable then, even if you were printing a duplicate of clearly kosher beef?

      I don't think we're there yet, by any means, but I certainly look forward to when the technology has progressed enough that such a discussion becomes relevant.

    2. Re:Hmmmm.... by websaber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Judaic scholars have been discussing that a lot longer than you might think, and the consensus that I know of is that it would be considered kosher. If my memory serves me correctly 2000 years ago (good memory huh...) the Talmud was already asking the kosher status of an animal that was born by caesarian section which would have the same status as a printed piece of meat as it would be considered made by man. However the only real answer will come when they actually print one.

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    3. Re:Hmmmm.... by brnsurgon1 · · Score: 1

      Eazy bake oven....... For hannibal

    4. Re:Hmmmm.... by morleron · · Score: 1

      I can just see it now. The latest product from your local Internet porn distributor...print your own porn star will take on a whole new meaning.

      Just my $.02,
      Ron

      --
      Impeach Barack Obama for violating the Constitutional requirement to be a "natural born" citizen to hold the office of P
    5. Re:Hmmmm.... by BlueGecko · · Score: 1

      Hoping you'll notice I replied 'cause you sure ain't gonna read a week-old discussion, but: I fail to see how the Talmudic discussion on animals born by caesarian section would apply here, on any level. As long as the animal has a cloven hoof and chews cud, it is a clean animal. We have two problems besides that, however: first, because the meat was never alive, does it count as carion? The only parallel I can think of for comparison would be a stillbirth, which is definitely NOT kosher (or wouldn't be in my house unless a rabbi argued really persuasively otherwise). Furthermore, even if we agree that it is not carion, we still have to deal with the method of killing: since the meat is not kosher unless a shochet cuts the throat cleanly and the blood is drained, but here we have no full animal to kill to get the meat, then even if we can agree that the meat was alive at once point, is it still not kosher? This issue is far more complicated than simply citing the Talmudic discussion on cessarian sections and I am not at all convinced that this meat could ever be kosher unless (and this is I suppose possible) we could manage to classify it as a manmade vegetable (which opens up another whole slew of problems). I think it would require a very lengthy discussion in a bet din to establish that.

      Comments, corrections, etc. more than welcome. :)

    6. Re:Hmmmm.... by websaber · · Score: 1

      I must reiterate my lack of knowledge on the subject but I vaguely remember hearing that if an animal is not considered a animal until it is naturally born so a still born cow would be un-kosher where as a caesarian pig would be kosher if not for other problems. If you were still interested I could find out the exact answer.

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
  2. Cloning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So does this mean that cloning for organs becomes obsolete?

  3. print organs? NO! print organisms! by grimani · · Score: 4, Funny

    i'd print myself a girl.

  4. And in other news by gowen · · Score: 3, Funny

    Scientists today reported methods on how to store small quantities of ink in feathers (that they have named "quills") in order for writing. They claim this is the first step to mass producing multi-colour documents and distributing them over the internet.

    i.e. a nice first step, but -- to be frank -- an unfeasible distance from their lofty goals.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    1. Re:And in other news by Negatyfus · · Score: 5, Funny

      4-Winged Dinosaur Fossil Printed

      In an astounding accomplishment this week, scientists from China have printed the fossilized remains of a 4-winged dinosaur on a standard desktop printer. This achievement could go a long way in providing more evidence that, in fact, Creation was done on an old 24-pin matrix printer, which could explain away the various inconsistencies in the end result we see today.

      "There may have been driver problems in the first test-prints of Creation, bugs in the software that make the printer work, that God may have overlooked," says evolutionary theorist Dr. Winston Guystone. "Of course this is met with a lot of opposition, prominently from the religious quarters, who strongly believe God is omnipotent."

      Rev. Dr. Edward Martins of the Baptist Church of Redemption, responds, "It is absolutely ludicrous to think that the universe was printed from some divine desktop printer. And even so, where does the paper come from?" Lately the Protestant and Catholic church have been in an uproar when it came out that the Holy Bible was, in fact, based on an ancient Roman website that was run from a recently discovered modified Commodore 64 server with a custom network device.

    2. Re:And in other news by whimdot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I see the bbc are reporting that biometrics are gaining ground for user authorisation. Who will be first to print a retinal pattern?

    3. Re:And in other news by Eccles · · Score: 1

      "There may have been driver problems in the first test-prints of Creation, bugs in the software that make the printer work, that God may have overlooked,"

      In related news, Richard Stallman has blamed the problems with the printer driver on it not being free software, and declared the start of the GNU/earth project.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  5. re: watermarking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fingerprinting?

  6. The ink by mini_me · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here [eurakalert.org] is an article about the gel they use to print the tissue.

    1. Re:The ink by mini_me · · Score: 3, Informative

      Opps, messed up the link.

    2. Re:The ink by Negatyfus · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You got the ink, but messed up the link...

  7. imagine the spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "refill toner cartridges! Print yourself a new 12 inch organ, guaranteed!"

    1. Re:imagine the spam by wiggys · · Score: 0
      Queue the old classic:

      "I've got 12 inches... but I don't use it as a rule!"

      --

      Sorry, but my karma just ran over your dogma.

    2. Re:imagine the spam by Starman9x · · Score: 0

      Hopefully the spammer will succumb to a mental melt-down trying to figure out how to make "50% off" sound good...

  8. a new paradox is born by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    and ye, a new paradoxical quandry is born:

    which came first, the printer repairman or the printer?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:a new paradox is born by Puk · · Score: 1

      You're in trouble if you need to print your printer repairman (but even so, HP tech support will tell you to do so, cause it's on their checklist).

      What this really reminds me of is the days where I needed to decompress something all I could find to unzip.zip.

      -Puk

  9. YES!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    So, I should have my Natalie Portman pictures on stand by then??

  10. New form of terrorism by horcy · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Now we dont get antrax filled envelopes, but they'll print some sort of organic killer stamp on the envelope that will come off the moment you touch it and will make the kill... omg... am i dreaming again ;/

    --
    Check my site: http://pixel.pagina.nl
  11. Weird Science? by cranos · · Score: 1

    Does this mean we'll be able to get generic cartridges? Or will we be able to select different cartridges for what we want?

    Mind you this does mean they can combine the "Get Larger Genitalia" and "Cheap Ink" spam mails now.

    1. Re:Weird Science? by matrix29 · · Score: 1

      Does this mean we'll be able to get generic cartridges? Or will we be able to select different cartridges for what we want?

      Mind you this does mean they can combine the "Get Larger Genitalia" and "Cheap Ink" spam mails now.


      Ummmmmm... to risk a pun, scientists already have beaten the spammers to this market.
      Tissue engineers grow penis in the lab
      19:00 11 September 2002

      (Yes - the story title is funny. You have permission to snicker.)

      Breast boost
      19:00 23 May 01

      Silicone breast implants could soon be unnecessary, claim researchers in Australia. They say their work will make it possible for women to grow their own.


      I think that covers pretty much the two biggest obsessions of the male market.

      On the upside (some signs of sanity returning to the American public).
      Judge Throws Out McDonald's Obesity Suit
      Wed Jan 22, 4:28 PM ET


      NEW YORK - Saying the law is not intended to protect people from their own excesses, a federal judge threw out a class-action lawsuit Wednesday that blamed McDonald's food for obesity, diabetes and other health problems in children.

      U.S. District Judge Robert Sweet said the plaintiffs failed to show that the fast-food chain's products "involve a danger that is not within the common knowledge of consumers."

      The lawsuit was filed against McDonald's last summer and sought unspecified damages.

      "If a person knows or should know that eating copious orders of supersized McDonald's products is unhealthy and may result in weight gain ... it is not the place of the law to protect them from their own excesses," the judge said. "Nobody is forced to eat at McDonald's."

      Plaintiffs' attorney Samuel Hirsch filed other, similar lawsuits last year. In one, a 270-pound city maintenance worker alleged that eating McDonald's, Wendy's, Burger King and KFC had caused him health problems. Those suits had been dropped or put on hold while Sweet considered the lawsuit against McDonald's.

      The lawsuits became a lightning rod for pundits and editorial writers who jeered that they were the latest example of a litigious society in which people abdicate personal responsibility.

      "Common sense has prevailed," McDonald's spokesman Walt Riker said. "We said from the beginning that this was a frivolous lawsuit. Today's ruling confirms that fact."
      [ end of clipping ]

      Or as Lewis Black stated on The Daily Show: "You're telling me that you didn't know that FAT fried in FAT is FATTENING?!?

      --
      "Face it, a nation that maintains a 72% approval rating on George W. Bush is a nation with a very loose grip on reality.
  12. And you thought... by Docta · · Score: 4, Funny

    You thought that printer cartridges were expensive beforehand! Imagine what they'll be like with black, 3 colours and a "cell" cartridge.

    1. Re:And you thought... by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      Canon OrganPrintXP!! Gives (Primordial) Soup-er results every time!

      (Canon, OrganPrintXP, and Primordial Soup-er are registered trade marks of Canon, Inc.)

      Kind of brings new meaning to the expression "I could piss on the page and it would look better."

    2. Re:And you thought... by plasm4 · · Score: 0

      and imagine the outcry over refillable cell cartridges.

  13. Wow, The Onion was right by icantblvitsnotbutter · · Score: 5, Funny
    You just know technology's getting scary when The Onion is accurate (oddly, this same link was used recently in another Slashdot post).

    Mexican Scientists Perfect Copying

    It may also be possible, some medical practitioners believe, to use copies to save lives on the operating table. A copy could be made of a kidney dialysis patient's good kidney, and then the copy could be inserted into the patient's body cavity, replacing the bad kidney.


  14. Yay, more new technolgy! by InadequateCamel · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Print out a girl for yourself?

    If this technology goes anything like every other technology we make, you might as well buy a RealDoll; it will probably be smarter.

  15. Eeeeeeuuuuu! by Inflatable+Hippo · · Score: 3, Funny

    > Apparently the work is a first step towards printing complex tissues or even entire organs.

    Imagine clearing out the jams in your flesh jet...

    1. Re:Eeeeeeuuuuu! by laughing_badger · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suspect that most Slashdotters have plenty of experience at manually clearing their flesh jet...

      --
      Help children born unable to swallow - www.tofs.org.uk
  16. hmm... by Kalewa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Combine this with that electronic device printing and we could whip up an army of Epson cyborgs in no time!

  17. Skin grafts.... by oliverthered · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I didn't think most tissue would be 'printable' it's to complex. so don't expect a new set of lungs any time soon.

    The process may be usefull for skin cultures or other simple single cell types. I beleive there are already other quite efficient techniques out there though.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Skin grafts.... by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I didn't think most tissue would be 'printable' it's to complex. so don't expect a new set of lungs any time soon.

      I'm not sure this argument holds. Any 2400-dpi printer that's actually 2400-dpi can place dots accurately enough to place cells, so placement's not an issue for a specialty printer. You can keep data requirements sane by algorithmically generating the tissue structure map as you print. We already both seem to be assuming that you can store enough types of cell; the limit to the number of inks you can store is a cost/engineering problem, not a strong limit.

      In summary, I don't think complexity is a serious roadblock.

      The main limits I see are more fundamental. Cells are flexible enough not to deposit easily into well-controlled 3D structures even if you do have a way to form connective tissue on contact (which we don't), and you're going to have an interesting time printing open spaces like blood vessels (water doesn't like staying in one place at *all*). I'm undoubtedly overlooking many other important problems in addition to these.

      Still, it's a neat concept.

  18. Problems... by vjmurphy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ahggg! Paper Jam! Literally!

    Sorry, Mrs. Smith, we were attempting to give Timmy a new spleen, but he apparently slipped in a few pages from his Winnie-the-Pooh coloring book...

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  19. Mac users rejoice! by ScottForbes · · Score: 2, Funny
    Scientists expect this technology to bring the dogcow back from the brink of extinction.

    Moof!

    1. Re:Mac users rejoice! by Lebannen · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but is he going to be printed the right way up, or on his side?

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying "nice doggie" whilst looking for a rock
  20. It's been done.... by jointm1k · · Score: 1

    ... it was called weird sience.
    --

    --
    You know it makes sense, a little reminder from jointm1k.
  21. DMCA already called into action... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a land-mark case Lexmark are invoking the DMCA against the pregnant women.

    "We produce organs, so apparently do pregnant women, clearly they have reverse engineered our technology in breach of the DMCA. As normally with copyright violations this is biggest in China, India and other countries with large populations"

    Pregnant Women have filed a class-action countersuit claiming prior art, but are not expect to win as they didn't give any cash to elected officials.

    Senator Joe Bung(R) said "I know my mother doesn't agree with this case but the fact is she broke the DMCA when she had me, I'd much of prefered to have been printed out and it would have been easier for ma, women must realise that this is a natural thing and we must let the market decide."

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:DMCA already called into action... by fr2asbury · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought something very similar when I read this, but I was thinking Lexmark was going to sue the scientists for using modified cartridges in the printers.

      Jonathan

    2. Re:DMCA already called into action... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You laugh now. But wait till the US Government becomes a bonified fascist regime with a socialist foundation in place for the common man/woman. Yes, the worst of both worlds will collide.

      Welcome to the next level...pethetic ordinary human.

    3. Re:DMCA already called into action... by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1

      Oh crap, does that mean my peins is a circumvention device?

  22. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by Silicone · · Score: 2, Funny

    humanity weeps...

  23. good news for geeks by roalt · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just what we need, another technology that prevents a geek from having a girlfriend:

    They now will not only print pictures of nice girls, they now also start stuffing them...

  24. Newspapers and that by tenjah · · Score: 0, Funny

    Four winged dinosaurs, printed livers...

    I know that these stories are relevant, but Slashdot this morning is looking ominously like the copy of metro (free subway "news"paper) that I was reading on the tube today.

    Just don't let the next story be about Britney Spears and that lame Limp Bizkit singer splitting up, or getting together, or whatever it is they are up to.

  25. Produce Orgasms...From Printer by plasm4 · · Score: 0

    now that would be a cool invention. or you could use them to produce steaks. Star Trek geeks rejoice.

  26. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by TheEnglishPatient · · Score: 1

    Funny maybe but informative, I don't think so.
    N

  27. 5th element by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Isn't this how they made Lulu?

    1. Re:5th element by datadictator · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mean lilo ...and no.
      Lilo was grown from genes using cell duplication.

      Does bring up an interesting movie idea...drumroll please

      Lexmark Park
      Atack of the copied copywrite laywers.

    2. Re:5th element by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was "Leeloo Minai Lekarariba-Laminai-Tchai Ekbat De Sebat" :)

    3. Re:5th element by datadictator · · Score: 1

      I've been outgeeked...oh the horror the horror.

      Aaaah.
      But you got it spelled wrong anyways, correctly written the name would use only the letters/pictograms/binary symbols from the Ancient Language, The divine language spoken throughout the universe since before time was time.

    4. Re:5th element by RobertNotBob · · Score: 0
      TMTOYH.

      Too Much Time On Your Hands.

      --
      ___ I don't respond to Anonymous Cowards, and I Never Mod them UP.
  28. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The worst is, I misread and thought for a second you wanted to print orgasms....

  29. Woohoo! by m0RpHeus · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that in the near future, I can print not just images, but clones of pornstars for my own *user*? ;)

    --
    Take-off every .sig! For Great Justice!
  30. but whos gonna fly it kid by plasm4 · · Score: 0

    I'm not such a bad pilot myself

  31. Damn weird science! by IsmoVuorinen · · Score: 0

    This is just one of those weird
    inventions that will be locked away
    to the Pentagons storages..
    Too soon for this kind of technology..

    --
    When you pull the pin out from Mr. Granade he's no longer your friend.
  32. Great News!!! by PasteEater · · Score: 1

    Now I can put away the sewing machine I was using to stitch myself up a new liver *hiccup*.

    --
    There are two kinds of people in the world: those with loaded guns, and those who dig.
  33. or perhaps by plasm4 · · Score: 0

    the new paradox is not born, but printed

  34. Deal of the Week! by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Our compatible celljet and flesh-toner cartridges are designed specifically for your printer allowing you to produce organs equivalent to those produced by the manufacturer's cartridges at a fraction of their cost.

    Don't forget... Free Shipping on all orders! That includes our discounted value packs!

    HMOs, Hospitals, Medical Schools and Government Agencies - Talk to an Account Representative now! Please call our Sales Department to receive a special pricing quote: Tel: 1-800-555-0006

    Click here if you do not wish to receive further 'Deal of the Week' promotions.

  35. Sweeney Todds Cartridge Refills by Inflatable+Hippo · · Score: 0, Funny

    Refills don't have to cost an arm and a leg!

    Well, not your arms and legs personally...

  36. From the Print Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's funny that at the top of the article it reads "Exclusive from New Scientist Print Edition"

  37. I just copyrighted the .rpn file for a heart. by Memetic · · Score: 2

    So if you want a new one that'll be $250k for a single user licence.

    Licence agreement:

    No licence transplants allowed.

    Separate work and recreational licence required.

    This design is not tested for mission critical applications, any usage in mission critiacal applications is at the licencee's own risk.

  38. Eewwww by klaasvakie · · Score: 1

    Was I the only one that read: Produce orgasms...From Printer?

    dirty me

    --
    # ssh -l neo the_matrix; killall -9 agent_smith
  39. The REAL Story by t0rnt0pieces · · Score: 0

    The REAL story is linked under the "Related Stories" header. Could ink-jet technology also one day make possible the long-awaited penis transplant? Imagine the spamming possibilities!

    --
    Karma: Excellent (In Soviet Russia, karma pimps YOU)
  40. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by ketamine-bp · · Score: 1

    Let me troll for a while.

    wait the goatse guy to come, and probably we should print them the giver . :-)

  41. Insightful message... by heytal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is it that all the responses to this story are Funny and there are no Insightful or Interesting responses ?

    Does this show the /. mentality ?

    1. Re:Insightful message... by datadictator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does this show the /. mentality ? Yip.

      On a serious note, this is still too novel for anybody to think about it insightfully (at least in the way /.'ers define the term). I mean sci-fi gave us years of phylosophy on cloning to think about before we had to deal with the concept for real.

      I sure aint never read about the human printer in a sci-fi story. Truth is also we know that it's early days yet. They would need something with a much greater capacity for layered printing before this is more than a science novelty.

      Frankly the concept just lends itself very well to humour so we joke. Insightfull and Interesting posts require you to have shown insight into the ramifications of the tech first - and frankly there just wasn't time.
      How many insightful comments on September 11 did you hear before September 12 (allthough of course not a lot of people joked about that one, but nobody was being insightful either)...come to think of it, the only insightfull response to 9/11 I have read so far was on the EFF website.

      More's the pity that everything I have seen on a .gov website would (if it was a slashdot comment) have deserved to be modded either redundant or troll.

      But I digress, point is I think it's just there has been no time for insight into this tech yet. But it takes 2 secconds to remember 'wierd science' - which was a comedy. Nobody ever seriously thought this could happen, so nobody ever seriously thought about it at all.

    2. Re:Insightful message... by eples · · Score: 2, Informative

      I can sympathize with that sentiment - you can auto-mod down "funny" posts in your preferences. I have mine set to knock two points off.. That way I have to read all the way to +3 to get the "funny" comments.

      Nice feature :)

      --
      I'm a 2000 man.
    3. Re:Insightful message... by germinatoras · · Score: 1

      We need a good laugh to cheer us up after reading how Microsoft won this or that, the DMCA yadda yadda, warmongering w/ Iraq, etc.

      I really like the "+[2-5], Funny" ies, since they really help lighten the mood of an otherwise somewhat pessimistic crowd.

    4. Re:Insightful message... by Tripman · · Score: 1

      No, what really shows the slashdot mentality is those people who have claimed this is old news because they had seen it in The Fifth Element and Weird Science.

    5. Re:Insightful message... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I always read trolls and flaimbate at +1, funny at -1
      sometimes a troll is just a post that goes agaist the beliefs of someone with mod points.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    6. Re:Insightful message... by jandrese · · Score: 1

      That's fine, but I'd better not be hearing you complain about how Slashdot has gone downhill since Taco added the customizeable moderation options.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:Insightful message... by LePrince · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points, I'd mod this +1 Ironic, seeing your score. ;-)

    8. Re:Insightful message... by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1
      Why is it that all the responses to this story are Funny and there are no Insightful or Interesting responses ?

      Does this show the /. mentality ?

      I don't think it says anything about the /. mentality.

      Summary of article

      Some researchers who are in desparate need of grant money were playing with a "Play-doh barbershop kit", and thought to themselves "Hey, if we prentend to do this for real, we might get money!"

      So they spent gobs of "doh", and built something that almost looks like a prototype to something that may be feasible to build thousands of years from now. Optimistically, if Moore's law holds, we may have the equipment to make this work sometime within the next thousand years.

      One guy in the article grossly understated how important an invention like this was, by saying "We could be as famous as Gutenberg!" Something tells me that in the year 3117, when they finally get this to work, the guy who will be credited with the breakthrough will still be living, unlike these fools.

      As someone else pointed out, it almost reads like an onion story.

      Anyone who takes this story seriously should be modded down as -1 gullible. 90% of the people reading these comments clicked on the story because they wanted some good laughs.

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
  42. beyond the jokes by lingqi · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I print an organ that is disproportional (no I am not thinking about penises) to what normally comes out?

    like, say, would I be able to print a sphere of kidney cells?
    how about a longer stretch of arm-muscles?
    attached to a printed, longer leg-bone?
    can I print a new layer of skin, or new hair folicles? (can you imagine rogain all up on this stuff?)
    how about a third leg?
    in fact, how about a beak?
    a gill so I can swim underwater? (i mean, as long as the blood circulates through it)

    the possibilities are endless, marvellous, and scary.

    --

    My life in the land of the rising sun.

    1. Re:beyond the jokes by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, print those things, but how do you think you're going to connect them to your body?

      --
      ^_^
    2. Re:beyond the jokes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wouldn't like to know what's the first thing I've thought to answer your question...

    3. Re:beyond the jokes by KinkyClown · · Score: 1

      What about new skin for people that are badly burned? This is probably one of the first steps that can be done and that has a high demand.

    4. Re:beyond the jokes by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Can I print an organ that is disproportional (no I am not thinking about penises)....like, say... sphere of kidney cells...a third leg?...a gill so I can swim underwater?

      Now I know why you excluded a penis: you are not going to get a chance to use it after adding all those.

    5. Re:beyond the jokes by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Offtopic, but can anyone remember a really cool story about beaks. They took a duck egg and an animal with teeth. They took the teeth-growing-catalyst-thingies (as you can probably tell I'm not a doctor) and injected them into the egg. Then when the duck grew up, it had teeth, and the teeth were in the style of some 3rd animal. This was to prove that ducks evolved from the 3rd animal (I forget what it was) and the dna for teeth was still there, it was just that option was turned off.

    6. Re:beyond the jokes by Cybrr · · Score: 1

      Sounds like this.

      --
      Why did GEAR crush RDP?
  43. Nothing new.... by StandOnZanzibar · · Score: 1

    ...the standard photocopier is no stranger to human flesh at most Christmas parties.

  44. organs as in `member' vs. organs as in `pipe' by flaez · · Score: 1

    ah, organs ist it, as in wetware?
    ...and I already thought somebody made a fugue for laser-printers as a follow-up project to the symphony for dot matrix printers `

  45. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 2, Funny

    She'd be paper thin, she'd be so flat the wall would be jealous, litterally.

  46. new! canon starter kit 2010 by jedjohnson · · Score: 1

    The canon corporation wishes to announce the immediate availability of the latest version of the 'starter kit 03'. We now encompass all faculties of life and offer a uncompromising value for money. After several years of research we are pleased to make available the total customisation kit for all unborn modifications needs responsible citizens require. Choose the physical characteristics beyond our rivals products. The unexpected is no longer a worry that mounts woe upon the expectant pregnant women. The pain and anguish and complexities of child birth are finally confirmed to be consigned to history. From the great day in 2009 when Cannon Corporation announced the first public showing of a newborn child, and the following scramble of IT companies to compete with a plethora of starter kits, our children are 100% guaranteed to not suffer from any genetic defects known to exist with previous technology. The subsequent embodiment of new laws and procedures has now ensured that our corporation and HP are the sole new born providers, for the world. Canon features -------------- physical preferences potential talent obiedience statis deanimation (for times when you need peace, to yourself) zodiac correlation

  47. Re:Setting up a small network by peterpi · · Score: 1

    Why don't you love me? I only have 2 freaks. I'm really not such a bad guy.

  48. New Terrorist tactic.. by farrellj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Mail a Macro-exploit to Outlook users that causes anthrax to print out on your printer...

    I don't know if this is funny or scary...

    ttyl
    Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    1. Re:New Terrorist tactic.. by Sri+Lumpa · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Sure, I would be very impressed when a non-modified bona fide printer manages to create a living, working Anthrax based on shades of black, cyan, yellow and magenta ink.

      --
      "The obvious mathematical breakthrough would be development of an easy way to factor large prime numbers." Bill Gates,
    2. Re:New Terrorist tactic.. by ShadowDrake · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe you could get just as terrifying effects much more easily.

      Four large stripes, one in each colour, and at the bottom, a simple line of black text. "This page consumed $3.62 worth of ink!"

      --
      It's just like a fascist dictatorship, without the punctual rail service!
  49. I can see the spam now by blowdart · · Score: 1

    We already get inkjet cartridge spam and penis enlargement spam. Someone will combine the two ...

    ENLARGE YOUR PENIS
    With our PENIS CARTRIDGE REFILL

    sob.

  50. HP state.... by hplasm · · Score: 1

    ..that they will invoke the DMCA on anyone refilling their cartriges and using them to print copies of organs.

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  51. Only organs so far by Isle · · Score: 3, Funny

    So far they can only print organs, so no girl printing..

    But you can print yourself girl organs!

    hmm....

    1. Re:Only organs so far by groke · · Score: 1

      Maybe once they print organs, they'll start working on printing orgasms?

      Skip the whole "girl" step. Much more efficient.

  52. or... by AsnFkr · · Score: 0

    Well, I guess this could give a whole new meaning to "watermarking"

    Or "paperjam"....yuck.

  53. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by buzban · · Score: 1

    i'd print myself a girl.

    and here i read the title as "print orgasms"...

    i guess i was just a little further along in the thought process...

  54. They can also make "organs" by sm.arson · · Score: 1

    I'm suprised I haven't seen more penis jokes in response to this story, because in the same article they have a link to this story: Tissue engineers grow penis in the lab.

    My psychology prof. just gave a lecture about how basic research is fundamentally important, but you've got to wonder why all these research dollars are being spent in the field of penis enlargeonomy...

    --
    for great justice, this sig has been moved
    1. Re:They can also make "organs" by technomom · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall a Dave Barry column which pointed out that if you rearrange the letters in "Spiro Agnew", you get "Grow a Penis".

      I have no idea why I just posted that.

  55. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by Cheap+Imitation · · Score: 0

    Sounds to me like you're trying to print orgasms instead of organisms....

  56. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by giel · · Score: 4, Funny

    $ prn < hottie.3ds
    error: Printer on fire!

    --
    giel.y contains 2 shift/reduce conflicts
  57. Speculation on the side by Badgerman · · Score: 1

    First of all, this is great news. It mixes stuff that is just cool with actual hope of useful results. Bravo to these people on their work.

    However, why is it EVERY advance these days is compared to Gutenberg? Not to degrade the man's work, but comparing this to Gutenberg seems rather odd. I'd think there must be other breakthroughs to compare this too.

    Still, I can't complain. They may have found a way to save untold lives. Let them make what comparisons they will.

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
  58. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ^^ teh funneh!!!

  59. Differentiation by sam_handelman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Jamming the cells into the proper position works with cartilege - you can sculpt an "ear" out of cartilege and surgically implant it in someone's body, if there ear was cut off.

    However, more complex tissues require cell differentiation on a microscopic level.

    For example, your inner ear - the part of your ear that you use to hear - cannot be simply sculpted.

    Individual cells must diversify so as to play the proper role in the function of the organ; the nerve cells attached to the little hairs all have to be wired up properly and in the correct direction. This is true of all the organs you might wish to make. Actually, I'm not certain about the liver - all hepatocytes (liver cells) are pretty much the same, IIRC.

    There are cells in the kidney which exist to move salt out of the blood and into the urine (several different types of cells are involved, actually). They are epithelial cells. However, you cannot assemble a kidney out of epithelial cells; it won't work! The epithelial cells need to know - that is to say, they need to recieve chemical signals which indicate:
    a) That this epithelial cell is supposed to play a given role in salt transport (most cells don't make the proteins used in this process.)
    b) Which SIDE of the epithelial cell the blood is going to be traveling past and which SIDE of the cell the pre-urine is going to be on. In the living organism the blood may carry this signal (the nature of the signal is probably unknown) but you couldn't duplicate that with a printer.

    Stuffing epithelial cells (or even epithelial stem cells) into the overall shape of a kidney does not produce the chemical signals that trigger these differentiation events (when a "generic" epithelial cell - a variety of stem cell - becomes a kidney epithelial cell, it is called "differentiation".) In addition to various ions (Salt,) the kidney has dedicated mechanisms for dealing with dozens of other classes of chemicals.

    It is POSSIBLE that such a simulated organ might spontaneously arrange itself into a functioning kidney when blood was pumped through the correct portions.

    You might be able to help it along with chemical signals from a real kidney, somehow, or synthetic signals you add yourself.

    However, personally, I doubt that either of these strategies is going to work.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:Differentiation by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      IANABiologist, but from what I've read, most of these signals come about from emergence...al that's needed is a concentration of cells. It kind of works like this: the outermost cells only have liver cells contacting x% of their cell wall, thus signalling that cell to be a certain cell and to release certain chemical signals. Cells more to the center recieve the message that they are surrounded by liver cells, and more signaling chemicals are coming from the left and top than tothe right and bottom, thus giving it a position in the cell mass, upon which it differentiates accordingly.

      This might be way too simple an explanation, but I do know it is at least part of the explantion, which is observed from differentiation in the zygote. It's not spontanious, it's a response which comes out of a complex behaviour emerging from a simple ruleset.

      But as the article stated, it's a first step, nowhere near close to actually making organs.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    2. Re:Differentiation by dread+minerva · · Score: 1
      What if 3D modelling software was involved? First, complete a diagram of what you wanted and then have it cut into strips (horizontal might be easier) to show how the organ (or whatnot) should be pieced together. One could print out sheets of the necessary cells and layer them appropriately. Aren't there machines and softwarethat print or produce 3D models directly from the computer for making patents, etc.?

      This is more feasible in making, say, skin, which has easily defined cell layers, than constructing a kidney, wherein you'd have to print out sheets with multiple types of cells, etc.(besides other obvious problems)

      I agree with the above that more immediate practical uses might include skin grafts for burn victims, healing agents for skin conditions, putting a cell printout over a surgical scar, replacing/healing scar tissue, or grafting organisms onto each other (studying symbiosis, perhaps?).

    3. Re:Differentiation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really really liked your interesting answer. Maybe there is a way forward here though - pretend we could always get you a new liver.

      Then all we have to do is look for medicines that do a really good job on fixing other organs (heart, kidney, lungs, etc) but where their only side effect is that they really hurt your liver.

      That's okay! We just replace the liver at the end of the treatment. :)

  60. RE: OUch... by fshalor · · Score: 1

    This could be one REALLY SICK way of delivering some nasty germs via the post... Just one more reason to Lysol/Chlorox/UV-treat your mail. Has anyone been keeping count?

    --
    -=fshalor ::this post not spellchecked. move along::
  61. Haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I guess this could give a whole new meaning to "watermarking".

    Haha, Slashdot janitors are so funny! I can't stop laughing with their jokes! Hahaha

  62. No. by jonr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    No
    lalala, stupid lameness filter.
    Once upon a time in the ether...

  63. But the question is... by Compact+Dick · · Score: 0


    can I play it?

  64. Fax by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    I'd hate to have receive a transplant faxed from the organ bank. (Faxes never seem to come out well...)

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  65. Blood? by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    Thinking of banks...Blood should be a relatively easy substance to print. (All cells are individual, and they're suspended in a liquid, instead of being stuck together.)

    Anyone know what the advantages are for receiving whole blood?

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:Blood? by greenhide · · Score: 1

      Hmmm...

      IANAPWRTFA, but just the story description alone seems to suggest that you need to have the source cells before printing the organ tissue.

      As a result, to create blood, you would already need blood cells.

      So it doesn't seem to me that this would be an effective technique for synthesizing blood.

      Now, if all you're suggesting is using this cell printer as a way of evenly distributing blood cells over a larger surface then, yeah, this probably would do the trick...but why?

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
  66. Teleporting by KinkyClown · · Score: 1

    Next we build us a scanner (a large knife that slices us up and examines every cell) then we can scan ouself into the computer... email yourself to your favorite holiday country and print yourself out! Shall I fax you a sandwitch? :)

  67. CellScript by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any ideas on what would go into a PostScript-like language for printing cells? (and other biologicals?) It would definately have a niche.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  68. Better keep the print drivers up to date. by decaheximal · · Score: 1

    Egads man, when a printer used to spit out garbage, it used to be no big deal. NOW it could very well be the next Bubonic plague!

  69. oh I'm sorry by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

    but your kidney licenses just expired. Would you like to purchase a renewall for a nominal fee?

  70. Lots of cell types = organ by panurge · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Of course even apparently simple organs need lots of cell types - the liver needs blood vessels as well as the various types of liver cells, and even skin consists of multiple layers with different properties.And making anything which needs structural properties could be a problem - cells that need to intertwine, like muscle and bone. Not really a case for even a hexachrome cartridge.

    But the concept is really interesting for doing things like creating little insulin producing nodes for diabetics.

    Or perhaps little skin-graft packages with a cell mix that would attach to the substrate and then align themselves. Or perhaps producing really effective animal-testing substitutes.

    A few years back I spent a little time on a manufacturing think-tank. The one thing everybody agreed was needed was a device that produced objects at their final net shape with no intermediate finishing stages. An inkjet printer basically does that already in two dimensions, and it's additive. It's surely potentially much nearer-term for all sorts of things than (say) exotic silicon micro-machining, and much more process-granular.

    I wonder if - no, where - someone is trying to develop an inkjet printer that produces sintered metal shapes?

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Lots of cell types = organ by WillWare · · Score: 1
      I wonder if - no, where - someone is trying to develop an inkjet printer that produces sintered metal shapes?

      Apparently, lots of places.

      --
      WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
    2. Re:Lots of cell types = organ by spearchucker · · Score: 1

      There's an entire industry that's built up around this type of thing. It's called RP (Rapid Prototyping) See: http://www.3dsystems.com/ http://www.wohlersassociates.com/ http://home.att.net/~castleisland/ The medical stuff will blow your socks off.

  71. Problems with printing by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    I think they're going to have to figure out what to do about the length of time it takes for them to print an organ(ism). Your average organ may start drying out before it's done being printed.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  72. Let me tickle your funny bone by whimdot · · Score: 1

    Just fax it over....

  73. Funding by RedWolves2 · · Score: 1

    Where do they get the funding to create something like this? I can't get funding to purchase the software I need to program a simple web application let alone create something out of the box like this.

    1. Re:Funding by FroMan · · Score: 1

      Well, you see, it costs and arm and a leg...

      (sorry)

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  74. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by rjamestaylor · · Score: 0
    Very funny!

    I think most normal people thought of printing out pr0n pics. Only helpless hacks *cough* Hemos *cough* would think about "watermarking" to say nothing of condering it as funny . . .

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  75. Pacts with the Devil by sacremon · · Score: 1

    Even without the ability to print cell structures, the technology now makes signing documents in blood much easier!

    --
    If you can't beat them, embrace and extend them.
  76. Real computer viruses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can now spring forth from your printer.

    Another reason to stop using MS LookOut... ;-)

  77. Why does it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why does it give a new meaning to Water Marking?

    I see no relevance in this statement at all

  78. Some limitations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This can only rearrange cells you have grown outside. No plagues, or genemod organisms can be made from it, you can only print out what cells you stock it with. So in most cases, only vivisectomy is allowed, e.g. the assembly of some of your own cells into a functional organ. To print out another organism, you must get a new batch of cells from a similar organism, or twist and differentiate your own cells into what you're looking for. Since you're probably going to use your own cells as a stock, printing out a girlfriend would be a blatantly homosexual act, as that construct would still have your own DNA, and thus be you. (homo=same, of course)

    1. Re:Some limitations. by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
      Homosexual?

      Maybe. I read a SF story when I was a teen about a group of engineers what were all cloned from the same cell. Seems they sent work teams like this to do jobs because they worked well together. They were called a "tenclone". Some were male; some female (easy enough to modify that one chromosome).

      The tenclone had one name and regarded hirself as a single entity; one member who got separated from the tenclone had a hard time dealing with life. The tenclone slept together like a big pile of puppies, and sometimes screwed each other (themself?), too. The author seemed to have a hard time labeling this sort of sex--fucking? masturbation? incest?

      It's interesting to note that the author was comfortable talking about masturbation, incest, group marriage, and cloning. But he needed to produce differently sexed clones for some reason. Clearly they were not needed for reproductive purposes!

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  79. Yeah, but you know what'll happen... by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    ...halfway through printing you'll run out of spleen.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  80. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by ausoleil · · Score: 0

    >I'd print myself a girl.

    Someone has been watching bad 80's movies again.

    Look up "Wierd Science" on IMDB...the move where two teenagers printed up Kelly Lebrock using an old PC. :-)

  81. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    Aren't women sorta like organism printers?

  82. Star Trek.... by Ogrez · · Score: 1

    Dammit Jim! Im a doctor, not a printer repair tech...

    --


    Fire in the hands of the village idiot is no tool, but a weapon of mass destruction
  83. This is already being done with plastics by twfry · · Score: 1
    Here are some companies out there which do something like this with plastic. The idea is to build, by printing, 2D images of plastic on top of each other to build a 3D object.


    The very cool thing is that you can build movable solid objects within other solid objects. We got a (not very useful) but neat adjustable wrench. The screw part of it which is used to open and close the wrench (sorry I don't know tool terms) was actually built inside of the other pieces. When looking at it you realize that if you started with individual pieces, you could never have gotten the screw part inside.

  84. Permanent storage? by minton · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you could use stenography (not shorthand) to hide your medical history inside an organ? Or maybe a map to where you've buried your savings in your backyard. "The blueprints for the new Mach V engine are encoded in your new kidney, Speed" - Pops

    1. Re:Permanent storage? by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
      Did you mean steganography?

      Also, why don't I find anything when I search for "stereolithography" on this page.

      C'mon people!

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  85. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  86. Duct tape... by HaloZero · · Score: 0

    ...of course. How else? :D

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
  87. If it's anything like my Lexmark 1100 ... by krumms · · Score: 1

    ... my brain would print in technicolour and be abnormally spotted.

  88. Looks like I need a new 'Liver' cartridge by mikerich · · Score: 1
    This is great news for the desktop hamster printing industry, but those replacement ink cartridges are going to cost!

    Best wishes,
    Mike.

  89. 5th element?? by mcdade · · Score: 1

    Hello, this is straight out of the movie "Fifth Element", where they had that crazy genetic printer unit and constructed Milla with it, the perfect being.

    I don't blame them, if I had one of those printers I would be making myself a Milla as well, maybe two, always good to have a backup.

    -b

  90. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And like jackasses, they didn't produce a stupid lobotomized version, or better, a version with no arms and legs, just 10 twats and 10 tight asses...

    Pick a hole and start fucking till your hearts content...

  91. Print 1 foreskin please by macmurph · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can print me a foreskin. Ive always wondered what one of those felt like.

  92. This is your brain... by JoeCommodore · · Score: 2, Funny
    This is your Brain on Paper...

    Oh man there are sooo many good jokes here!

    Hey! Don't touch my monkey, he isn't dry yet!

    --
    "Enjoy what you're doing! If it becomes drudgery, you're doing it wrong!" - Jim Butterfield
    1. Re:This is your brain... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Oh man there are sooo many good jokes here! "

      yet, you didn't manage to find one. ;)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  93. Stem cells by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

    Stem cells would let you create whatever cell type you need.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
    1. Re:Stem cells by greenhide · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess...but the stem cells would have to come from somewhere.

      I guess I was wondering why you would try to "print" blood.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    2. Re:Stem cells by mmol_6453 · · Score: 1

      Depending on how quickly you need to print the organ, stem cells might actually be your ink. (A nice ink they would be, self-replicating and all.)

      As a potential use, you may want to produce blood with 100x the number of platelets, or maybe with tuned antibodies (such antibodies may be designed as a temporary treatment, such as attacking cancerous cells, for when continued treatment is dangerous.).

      I see "printing" special fluids (or body fluids) as conceptually similar to printing a monolithic object like a muscle, or a heart.

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
  94. DeskTop Engineering? by Funky+M · · Score: 1

    Hmm.. that reminds me of the "DeskTop Engineering" in the novel Frozen Heart (which I can't seem to find a link for right now). Straight from design to finished product with all testing done on computers, and one machine which could combine any material in any form. I think something like that could be very profitable.

    -VbG

  95. I can see the Ads now.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On all the Porn sites....
    Program to print yourself up a 12" schlong. Just $9.95

    And I can see some doofus walking into the doctor's office. "I just printed this off using PartMaster 2000. Would you please attach this to me... and these to my wife?"

  96. Good thing we have editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, I guess this could give a whole new meaning to "watermarking".

    I guess this gives a whole new meaning to worthless editor comments and lame attempts at jokes.

  97. Star Trek explained... by CommieLib · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the things that always cracked my suspension of disbelief wide open was the medical technology on Star Trek. Specifically, whenever the doctor (choose your favorite) would pass a light over someone's arm and the wound would close.

    It seems to me that this could be the reality, give or take 100 years, to that dramatic device. Start with a good gash in someone's arm, something bad enough to require stitches and would leave a scar with our current technology. Doctor takes a hand held "flesh printer", that "prints" either a rejection neutral flesh cover to the wound (more Star Trek tech) or a genetically specific cover (maybe presampled and supplied in the device, or even more fancy dynamically sampled and generated).

    So muscle injuries require more involved work, but a shallow tissue wound can be fixed more or less on the fly.

    Real doctors: start your engines. What's stupid about this idea? It is of course more complicated than simply laying the skin over top; blood vessels and nerves would have to be reconnected, depending on the damage. I would appreciate a thoughtful critique.

    --
    If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    1. Re:Star Trek explained... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "One of the things that always cracked my suspension of disbelief wide open was the medical technology on Star Trek"

      If the transporter didn't crack you suspension of disblief, then nothing should.

      If you can transport them, you can rearange them, and thus fix people. The moment the transporter was feasable, doctors should have been out of business.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Star Trek explained... by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in fact, I think they addressed that in a DS9 episode, IIRC.

      On the other hand, if the transport involves something funky like quantum entanglement, you could transport, but not alter the object (see: quantum encryption). That doesn't explain replicators, though, which do exactly that.

      I used to scoff at the transporter, but recent stuff ("transporting" a photon) has made me a little less quick to scoff.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
  98. Don't tell the raelians... by xv4n · · Score: 1

    ...they would start claiming they've printed the first human being.

  99. Billy Jean by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    If you think Micheal Jackson looks odd now, wait until he gets ahold of one of these. He'll probably want a Beowulf cluster of them.

  100. teleportation! by mikeee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now all we need is one of those deli meat-slicers and a good scanner and we can email ourselves around!

  101. Also new meaning by teknofile · · Score: 1

    to the "enlarge to page" options... Not that I would recommand putting (certain??) body ograns through the roller mechanisms :P

    --
    http://www.teknofile.org/
  102. teeheehee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    these would be great for haloween.

    -troy

  103. Combine this with the 'Gadget printer' by chickanmonkey · · Score: 1

    http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns999 93238 I wonder what would happen to society when these two devices mature and perhaps merge. Of course I refer to the replicators of star trek fame. One thing that struck me is that this work was being done on modified ink-jet printers. So it seems vary likely that we will be able to use the information from these studies to modify our own ink jet printers into our own replicators. If you think hack your Xbox is cool, wait till you see the articles on how to hack your Epson. The common man will have the manufacturing capacity of both 3 billion years of evolution and the last 200 years of the industrial revolution. Naturally there will be businesses who will try to capitalize on these types of manufacturing. And there will be patent problems what we will have to deal with. Taking a que from the internet, where to gain a patent all one has to do is add an 'e' to a preexisting idea (ie, eauctions, ebussness). So I use the letter 'r' for replicator and add write a perl script to add 'r' to the beginning of a massive word list. Now I own the ideas for the rauctions, rebussness, resex (witch I will need a lot of to continue, nevermind). One the replictor becomes reality it will be heavily regulated or for the free use of individuals. Because these devices will be easy to make, heavy regulation by businesses and or governments can only keep these devices from a large portion of society at first. There will still be groups of hacker biologists who will be able to create these machines using their own skills. And so long as the internet remains there will be a repository of products that can be printed out. I don't know about you, but if I didn't have to worry about food and shelter I would not be working where I do. These replicators will provide all the material wealth that we can download off the internet. We will no longer be coerced into working for our material wealth. We'd grow it from easy to acquire substances such as "Hamster Ovaries", as the article mentions. Without the need to spend all our time working for someone else, we'll be able to educate others to do the same as we do. Given the choice of working for a company or government for food, or sitting on their ass all day, the public will be completely enticed to join our cause. With the public on our side one of two things will happen. They will vote to eliminate restrictions on replicators or will be killed by cyborg terror-minators with Texas accents. (Don't mess with Texas) Thank you

    1. Re:Combine this with the 'Gadget printer' by chickanmonkey · · Score: 1

      (Sorry about the formating)

      http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns9 99 93238

      I wonder what would happen to society when these two devices mature and perhaps merge. Of course I refer to the replicators of star trek fame.

      One thing that struck me is that this work was being done on modified ink-jet printers. So it seems vary likely that we will be able to use the information from these studies to modify our own ink jet printers into our own replicators. If you think hack your Xbox is cool, wait till you see the articles on how to hack your Epson. The common man will have the manufacturing capacity of both 3 billion years of evolution and the last 200 years of the industrial revolution.

      Naturally there will be businesses who will try to capitalize on these types of manufacturing. And there will be patent problems what we will have to deal with. Taking a que from the internet, where to gain a patent all one has to do is add an 'e' to a preexisting idea (ie, eauctions, ebussness). So I use the letter 'r' for replicator and add write a perl script to add 'r' to the beginning of a massive word list. Now I own the ideas for the rauctions, rebussness, resex (witch I will need a lot of to continue, nevermind).

      One the replictor becomes reality it will be heavily regulated or for the free use of individuals. Because these devices will be easy to make, heavy regulation by businesses and or governments can only keep these devices from a large portion of society at first. There will still be groups of hacker biologists who will be able to create these machines using their own skills. And so long as the internet remains there will be a repository of products that can be printed out.

      I don't know about you, but if I didn't have to worry about food and shelter I would not be working where I do. These replicators will provide all the material wealth that we can download off the internet. We will no longer be coerced into working for our material wealth. We'd grow it from easy to acquire substances such as "Hamster Ovaries", as the article mentions. Without the need to spend all our time working for someone else, we'll be able to educate others to do the same as we do. Given the choice of working for a company or government for food, or sitting on their ass all day, the public will be completely enticed to join our cause. With the public on our side one of two things will happen. They will vote to eliminate restrictions on replicators or will be killed by cyborg terror-minators with Texas accents. (Don't mess with Texas)

      Thank you

  104. Spray on skin.... Cybernetics here we go. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    Well, I was thinking about Skin grafts (it's not to hard to grow a sheet of skin).
    But then I had an idea, you could print the cells straight onto the area you wanted extra skin, and they would then grow in place.

    Still can't think of anything else it would be useful for in humans, maybe making layers of different cells for bio-electric and circuits (cybernetic implants and all that).

    Bones you can already do to some extent, by mashing some bone up, forming it into the correct shape and putting it back in.

    Organs are a no go so far as growing goes, and I should imagine fibrous tissues (nerves, muscle etc..) couldn't be grown in this way and be useful, except maybe hair?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Spray on skin.... Cybernetics here we go. by HiThere · · Score: 1

      Actually, growing a sheet of skin is relatively easy. It's already being done, though I don't know with what success.

      Livers, kidneys, etc. are much more difficult. But a printer might solve the problem. You would probably need more than four colors of "ink" however, and it would be necessary to modify it to work in 3-D.

      I'm not really sure that printers work finely enough, but I'm certainly not sure that they don't. One of the problems is getting the blood vessels working. If you can solve that, then the rest is probably relatively easy. So one of the inks will need to be oxygenated gelatin, and one will need to be a "tougher" gelatin (so that the first time you try to circulate the blood, you don't tear the blood vessels apart before the cells connect together. Print it out at a cold temperature, and warm it no faster than you can circulate oxyegenated fluid. (Possibly that synthetic flurocarbon rather than blood to start with. I understand that it's got less surface tension, and doesn't need capillaries to circulate.)

      N.B.: IANAMD.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    2. Re:Spray on skin.... Cybernetics here we go. by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Ok, when they do bone replacements for things like the hard pallet in the roof of you mouth,
      They grind up the bone (in a coffee grinder or whatever) and add some (can't remember) that is absorbed by your body after a few weeks.

      They then press the mixture into the shape they[you] want, stitch it inplace etc...

      Anyhow, as the bone reforms the blood supply comes back quite well with capillaries where the (can't remember) used to be.

      Blood vessels on the size of kidneys may be a bit hard, as could the nephrons, and you'd still have to get ion gradients, proton pumps and all that good enough for the organ will work in the first place.

      Anything lymphy will be a nightmare, just finding a usefull medium that they will bind to to keep them alive in the first place will take a while.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  105. They'll cost an arm and a leg I'm sure... by V_drive · · Score: 1

    ...but thankfully you can just print replacements.

    --
    char *mySig;
  106. snappy one liners now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sure these are just snappy one liners now, but who knows about 5 years from now:
    1. WordPerfect: Upgrade to FacePerfect.
    2. Microsoft: Who do want to look like today?
    3. Sort of gives a whole new meaning to the idea of a toner cartridge!
    4. Number of Copies?
    5. Fingerprint prints???
    6. .. I won't even touch font size equivalencies
  107. I can see it now... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Yeah, I remember John. Poor guy. Died on the operating table when they had a paper jam."

    Chris Mattern

  108. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  109. Printing a new liver by billstewart · · Score: 1

    and some fava beans and chianti....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Printing a new liver by capnjack41 · · Score: 1

      With the new HP LiverJet 4100N nyuk nyuk nyuk

  110. There's been recent work on this by billstewart · · Score: 1
    Not with printers, of course, but some people have been working on vat-grown meat muscle tissue, with at least one goal being for long spaceflights where grazing space for cows is limited. Unfortunately for ethics-motivated vegetarians, the nutrients they've been most successful with have been meat-based (fish broth or something), so it's not all that helpful. For the religions that have specific requirements for methods of killing animals, it's probably ok, because there's no animal-killing involved, though some of the pickier variants on kosher are likely to find some reason to object.

    For health-motivated vegetarians, or for people who don't eat meat because it's gross, well, it's still meat.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:There's been recent work on this by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      I hate to be vague, but hopefully someone will find some links to back this up..

      I remember reading that the problem with just growing a steak (and probably printing one) would be that it wouldn't have the texture of steak. The problem is that you need to exercise and stretch it, and you need the blood vessels, the mussle, the oxygenated blood, and everything else to make it taste and feel like a steak.

      I really hate to do analogies, but personally I see it like imagine cooking a steak. It (more or less) contains exactly the same thing before and afterwards, but it has changed dramatically.
      It's the same sorta thing. You can't just dump a load of cow-meat-cells together and get a steak.

    2. Re:There's been recent work on this by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I disagree here. I can see it as being quite possible to print out the proper texture of a decent steak. All you would have to do is put a good steak under the microscope and analyze the patterns of where the cells are, and how they're shaped. From there, you merely have to map different types and cuts of meats and save them on computer to get different flavors.

      Just like an inkjet printer uses different ink tanks - some have up to 8 now for different colors - the hypothetical steakjet printer could have different lengths and textures of cells, and the cook merely tells the printer which pattern of cells to print out. Say one set of cells for filet mignon and another for a nice porterhouse

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    3. Re:There's been recent work on this by AnotherBrian · · Score: 1
      grazing space for cows is limited.
      Not to mention the fact that is is just far to easy to cow tip in space.
  111. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oops... I drank too much last night. I guess I'll just print out Liver 2.0 and have my local med tech install it.

  112. McDonalds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    McDonalds has known about this for years. It's how they make their burgers.

  113. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    "i'd print myself a girl."

    "A woman complete in every way."

    "Why don't you do it now?"

    "I don't know how! I wouldn't even know how to make the nose!"


    --
    "Derp de derp."
  114. Thermo Reversible gel? by Cruciform · · Score: 1

    I hadn't heard of that either.

    Interesting applications... here, and here.

  115. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms!-Fill'er up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Aren't women sorta like organism printers?"

    Yup! Just got through filling the "ink" reservoir on one, beautiful "ports" too. And the paper "feed" is a joy to behold. In about nine months, baring any "jamming" or "leaking",there will be a lot of little "fonts" to admire, as long as "backspace" isn't being used.

  116. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by datadictator · · Score: 1

    Funny indeed.
    But what sort of geek are you using 3ds files ?

    Real geeks print text based hotties

  117. Old Hat by Mr.Happy3050 · · Score: 1

    Wait, are you saying this is new technology? I thought the RIAA have been using this for years to churn out new "boy-bands" every 6 months.

    --
    "All great truths begin as blasphemies." -George Bernard Shaw
  118. Uhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brings a new meaning to Cyber sex

  119. Re: print organs? NO! print organisms! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'd print myself a girl.

    Can you fax her to me?

  120. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by SubCypher · · Score: 1

    Uhmmmmm... I think it wasn't possible at all but if that would be the case, why think of a printer not other specialized machine. Printer creating organisms is great but does it serve the purpose? =)

  121. Amazing!!!! by SubCypher · · Score: 1

    Wow! That was a very great idea, another proof of human intelligence! If you come to create a successful one, could you please give me a bit of it? hehe ;-)

  122. Orgasms? by bluetooth_god · · Score: 1

    I have to read more closely. I thought it said something about printing orgasms. sadly that wasn't the subject matter of the article.

  123. Heh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "PC Load Bladder, what the fuck does that mean?"

  124. Printing reactants w/ inkjet is an old trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See this

  125. The ankle bone's connected to the.. by evil_pb · · Score: 1
    shin bone, the shin bone's connected to the knee bone, the ankle bone's connected to the #^%^YTRHHBgfrt766574$TYHTY4v56......

    "WINDOWS HAS EXPERIENCED A GENERAL PROTECTION FAULT AT LOCATION 0x545455:546543FEE:FU, YOUR GENETIC CLONE HAS BEEN HALTED. PLEASE RESET."

  126. Help! by Tudil+Di'Masharen · · Score: 1

    LOL! That would be interesting if someone forgot to replace the ink cartridge back to the one with the ink. You go to print out your homework and it prints cells instead.

    Teacher: Where's your homework?
    Student: Uh.. It evolved and revolted against me!

    Crazy stuff... My teacher enjoyed it! =)

  127. WRONG DEPT ! by arska · · Score: 1

    This Story belongs clearly to the "lasers-would-be-even-cooler"-dept. !

  128. University of Minnesota ChemE Researches This by Salis · · Score: 1

    I'm a graduate student in the University of Minnesota Chemical Engineering department and I've seen some of this work demonstrated and explained in a few presentations. There is a joint project between Dr. "Skip" Scriven and Dr. M. Flickinger that seeks to imprint cells within a fluid that may be printed onto paper or other materials using standard inkjet technology.

    Although I don't work on the project, the goal is to maintain the viability of the cells as they are mixed with the fluid and layered onto the paper. The paper may not be completely covered in cells (called confluency), but will have enough cells adhered to the paper so that numerous applications are possible:

    Biosensors: Make the cells physically respond to outside environmental stimuli, which may include pathogens, proteins, minerals, etc. Put the paper (or other material) on something that you wish to perform as a biosensor. Think super fast and cheap blood testing or a really quick and effective way to test the air for anthrax. A LOT of possibilities here.

    Reactive Materials: Have the cells absorb and metabolize certain harmful chemicals or excrete other useful chemicals. The paper (or other material) is easier to handle, distribute, and install than a solution of cells. Cells imprinted onto the paper would also be in a 'dormant' state, having a lower metabolism, utilizing less nutrients, and having a longer life-span than cells in solution. The cells would be exposed to a much larger surface area, making them more effective in uptaking chemicals from the environment.

    While I don't work on this project, I am working on a project that seeks to design the gene 'circuitry' that controls the metabolism of the cell and the function it performs. The biosensor part, the specific reactive function part. I'm purposely not going into details. :)

    Salis

    --
    Favorite /. tagline: "On the eighth day, God created FORTRAN." And it was good.
  129. Re:print organs? NO! print organisms! by knowledgepeacewi · · Score: 1

    humanity weeps...
    ....from happiness