Slashdot Mirror


Xbox Media Player Contest

mliu writes "Xbox Media Player, the GPL application that turns everyone's favorite hackable console (the Xbox) into a set-top-Divx/Xvid-playing- Shoutcast-radio-streaming- lean-mean-Mp3/Ogg-music-playing-all-while- sporting-a-pretty-user-interface-machine is holding a contest. They're in desperate need of help in terms of more developers and are holding a giveaway of 25 top of the line X2 Pro modchips for the 25 best patch submissions between now and March 31. If you don't know what Xbox Media Player is and/or feel the need to ask why bother hacking the Xbox, you have definitely gotta check it out. It turns the Xbox from Bill Gates' insidious plot to get into the living room into a set top box that can play practically everything even while sporting a sleek black look that won't stick out in your home theater system, and a user interface that your grandmother could use. And you can even run Linux on it in your spare time. It's no $100,000 but it's for a cause that is both more practical and useful if you ask me." The X-Box has proven itself an entertaining platform for hackers, and the XBMP is really excellent. When it has visualization plug-ins, I think it'll be a great way to put MP3s in your stereo.

187 comments

  1. XBox and media... by KefkaFloyd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The XBox would be a nice media player, yes, but wouldn't this sort of take sales away from MS Media Center machines?

    --

    Conglom-O: We Own You (TM).
    1. Re:XBox and media... by KefkaFloyd · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that is the point. Heh. Oops. *thwaps self*

      --

      Conglom-O: We Own You (TM).
    2. Re:XBox and media... by minionman · · Score: 1

      If it would take sales away, would that really matter? Thats just Microsofts problem, if you ask me - its like saying that people upgrading an old computer will take sales away from new computer sales. Im sure the media center units will be sporting greater hardware than is in the XBox.

    3. Re:XBox and media... by wumarkus420 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, because there is no TV tuner support for the X-Box. Especially considering the XP Media Center Ed. only supports a couple chipsets, somebody would have to come up with some type of USB solution, which of course would be ridiculous to use for PVR functions since the X-Box doesn't support USB 2.0.

    4. Re:XBox and media... by doofusclam · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are already mpeg2 USB solutions for win32 that could be used for the xbox with an adaptor, including those by hauppauge. You could also put one on the ethernet port though that would need different hardware. I'm personally waiting for hauppauge dec-2000t support, this usb box picks up mpeg2 from digital terrestrial transmissions in the UK and passes them thru USB. It's not impossible and people are already looking at it.

    5. Re:XBox and media... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get the Nova-T version instead, it already has LinuxTV support, including full multiplex capture so you can record the original 4/5 MPEG2 channels with in the transport stream.

      The Nebula board is also going to get Linux support pretty soon apparently.

    6. Re:XBox and media... by cscx · · Score: 1

      No, IIRC XP Media Center is more like a TiVO.

    7. Re:XBox and media... by Bishop · · Score: 1

      You brits are so lucky to have products like this. In North America we will be lucky to even get DVB, let along a product that lets you record the raw mpeg without hacking to bypass annoying anticonsumer controls.

    8. Re:XBox and media... by sean23007 · · Score: 1

      The people that would hack an Xbox are not the same kind of people that would be willing to buy Microsoft's media center pc. They would be much more inclined to just build their own machine to do it.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    9. Re:XBox and media... by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

      ummm...most people hook their X-boxes up to the TV, so they can probably get by without the tuner.

      --
      Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
    10. Re:XBox and media... by TheJesusCandle · · Score: 1

      I have been thinking (and I certainly am going to) about building a system out of PC/Linux/Pinnacle DC10 compresor card. But if I can get a working system for only 300 Euros That'l be cheaper..

      My question to anyone who actually has a XBox : Does it make a lot of noise ? A friend lent me his PS2 for a week and it was the loudest piece of hardware in the appartment .. I.e. (IMNSHO) unusable as a movie player.

    11. Re:XBox and media... by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      It's not a LOT of noise, but it's not silent (mostly when loading from the DVD). My friend's Xbox has something wrong with it and it actually will start to "chirp" occasionally, quite loudly in fact.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
  2. just a question by quick_dry_3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    given that you need a mod-chip in order to run your own code on an Xbox, wouldn't the Xbox hackers that are interested in the contest have chips already?

    1. Re:just a question by JBark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm sure they do, but since they have been hacking at the XBox for quite a while, they probably have one of the first gen modchips that don't support a lot of the newer features available on something like the X2.

    2. Re:just a question by doofusclam · · Score: 1

      Thats true you need a modchip to develop anyway but many people like myself have first generation mod chips that aren't particularly compatible with xbox live. If you need live then it's useful but otherwise i'd agree.

    3. Re:just a question by d7o3g4q · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So mod your second xbox. :) Actually, we're just happy to have someone donate something so that we can have a contest.

  3. why not? by doofusclam · · Score: 5, Informative

    Maybe but if it turns out the developers of XBMP are making a product that the public want, without all that DRM crap, then why shouldn't they take sales away from MS?

    I use XBMP daily and it absolutely rocks - the only thing missing is MPC audio support but divx/xvid/mp3/jpg playback is nearly flawless and everyone who sees it is amazed (I even have my home videos I took with my DVCAM on there converted to XVid and its so much nicer than whipping out a VHS videotape)

    seany

    1. Re:why not? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >the only thing missing is MPC audio support
      Nope, i would like .ROM support .c64 support .n64 support. It should be easy to also intergrate MAME in that player, so when i put a .ROM disk in there you can choose which game to play.

      Then X-BOX becomes my favorite game console after all ;)

    2. Re:why not? by doofusclam · · Score: 1

      You're right I forgot about them... though MAME is the mutts nuts. Joust is so much nicer and 'old school' in front of the tv rather than the PC.

  4. sorry by DeepZenPill · · Score: 1, Funny

    I would help but I just can't... stop... playing Halo.

  5. Visualizations Smisualizations by tunders · · Score: 5, Insightful
    When it has visualization plug-ins, I think it'll be a great way to put MP3s in your stereo.

    Is it just me who thinks that visualizations are completely unneccessary? When I am listening to music, I don't want some annoying repetitive picture flickering away in the background. They are an interesting toy, but add nothing to the experience.

    1. Re:Visualizations Smisualizations by martone66 · · Score: 1

      I think it the visualizations add a certain coolness factor if you're not just sitting down and listening to music. For example, you're at a party and the music is on in the background.

    2. Re:Visualizations Smisualizations by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Is it just me who thinks that visualizations are completely unneccessary?

      No, you're not the only one! I use XMMS, but it's minimized and controlled with the buttons on the multimedia keyboard, or LIRC remote controller. No need for fancy UIs for me!

      And why do every media player have skin support? I tried to find a working media player without any lame skins and failed...

      ...well, there was VideoLanClient but even that doesn't work perfectly...

    3. Re:Visualizations Smisualizations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heard of the commandline?

    4. Re:Visualizations Smisualizations by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      > I use XMMS, but it's minimized and controlled with the buttons on the multimedia keyboard, or LIRC remote controller. No need for fancy UIs for me!

      And why do we even need X to play music?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    5. Re:Visualizations Smisualizations by Vagary · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly, you're not doing enough drugs.

    6. Re:Visualizations Smisualizations by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      If your just listening to music while your doing other stuff, then no they don't add anything to the experience, and canned vises that come with media players are overused anyway. But I do VJing for gigs sometimes, and in that context, it does add to the experience - using a projector, someone with a camera moving around the place, visulisations, and plain video mixing really can add to the experience in that context.

    7. Re:Visualizations Smisualizations by knodi · · Score: 1

      Mostly, no, you don't need visualizations. Every once in a while, though, it's pretty handy.

      Last semester I had a party at my house where we all watched a Divx of "Big" output to my TV in the livingroom; afterwards, people were still hanging out, so I threw on a playlist and put winamp on "random vis, 30 sec change". EXCELLENT mood tool.

      I'd rather have a working MP3/divx/etc.. server in my living room now than one later that has visualizations. But sometimes they're handy....

      --
      Austin is more fun than Dallas.
    8. Re:Visualizations Smisualizations by UberLame · · Score: 1

      I don't know why one really has to have X11, except that other than mpg123, the options for console only seem limited. Even the program you link to, even though it is a console program, requires X11 be running.

      --
      I'm a loser baby, so why don't you kill me.
  6. PS2 by sakaruk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its a real shame that there isn't a team developing cool stuff like this for the Playstation 2 Linux.

    1. Re:PS2 by nekura · · Score: 1

      Actually, there was something like this developed for PS2, though it wasn't made using the Linux kit. It's called the PS2Reality Media Player, which you can find here (warning: Site is in Spanish). Right now it only handles DIVX, but further developments are being made upon it. Also, you need a modchip in order to boot it, unless you're into the whole swap trick scene. Peace.

      --

      "Programming is like sex - one mistake and you'll have to support it for the rest of your life."
    2. Re:PS2 by specialized_sworks · · Score: 1

      www.broadq.com

      Legal divx/mpeg/mp3/jpg player/viewer for the PS2. Requires a network adapter and a PC to stream the content off of. Easy. No modchip required.

      -Dubya

    3. Re:PS2 by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

      It's a shame that the PS2 has no hard drive. That's their problem, live with it.

  7. Re:So what? by doofusclam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because it now comes with a 20gb drive.

    Because it has a 10/100 ethernet port and FTP support.

    Because it comes with ALL xvid/divx variants unlike that new Kiss xvid/dvd player which doesn't support qpel and gmc from the latest divx builds.

    Because it lets you listen to shoutcast stations.

    Because it can stream from smb shares on a pc or linux server

    Should I go on?

  8. Sponsored in part by a generous donation from M$ by pr0f3550r · · Score: 4, Funny

    How ironic the the banner I get this morning on the slashdot site is for Microsoft SBS2000 preloaded on an HP. Which technically means the advertising for the XBox contest is funded by M$. Man, they do have their hands in everything.

  9. Re:good jorb by KefkaFloyd · · Score: 1

    Wow, such an agonizingly clear statement of my character. I bow down to you and your thoughtful commentary.

    --

    Conglom-O: We Own You (TM).
  10. And here we go again with the xbox by jeanjean83 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems as if mictosoft made a good move with the xbox. It seems to attract a great deal of the people that don't want to use windows. But for some reason a restricted computer by microsoft sounds good to the same people here. What's the catch here, could someone tell me?

    1. Re:And here we go again with the xbox by kubla2000 · · Score: 1

      It seems as if mictosoft made a good move with the xbox. It seems to attract a great deal of the people that don't want to use windows. But for some reason a restricted computer by microsoft sounds good to the same people here. What's the catch here, could someone tell me?

      Microsoft loses money on every unit sold (like Sony and Nintendo). They make money from selling you games (like Sony and Nintendo). When the XBox is hacked / moded to run Linux, you're not using it the way they intended (ie. you're not buying the games). What you end up with is a great piece of hardware, subsidised by Microsoft. Which is why we like it :)

    2. Re:And here we go again with the xbox by jeanjean83 · · Score: 1

      great piece of hardware. really? I am aware of the fact that they don't profit selling the xboxes, but they would make even less profit if people wouldn't buy them at all. Or would you use windows if you knew microsoft wasn't getting any money for it?

    3. Re:And here we go again with the xbox by CityZen · · Score: 1

      Unlike Sony and Nintendo, Microsoft _continues_ to lose money on hardware. Sony and Nintendo engineered (ie, cost-reduced) their hardware to eventually make money.

  11. What SHOULD Happen by NeoMoose · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Microsoft would be doing themselves a favor if they would release a downloadable dashboard update over live that adds support for VCD's and other Media functions. Official support always seems to work out better than community support.

    1. Re:What SHOULD Happen by kubla2000 · · Score: 1

      Always? Substantiate that.

      Linux seems to be doing alright. It's replacing commercial OS's... if you missed the news, IBM is replacing AIX (commercial) with Linux (community). That, alone, is a pretty solid counter-example to your statement.

      I'd like to hear why you think "official" support is so much better?

    2. Re:What SHOULD Happen by NeoMoose · · Score: 1

      Not really to state that it would be better, just that it generally comes out easier to use. Having something work out of the box is much easier than having to mod and then hack your Xbox into a media player.

  12. Linux? by Amsterdam+Vallon · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Personally, I'd rather stick to my guns and go ahead with a Linux jewkbox than to give in to the massive Microsoft histerea surrounding there X-BOX gaming system.

    Why would we line the pockets of MSs's corporate bottom dollar when we could simply utilize the foundation of Linux upon traditional X-86 hardware components like soundcards and high-speed motherboards??

    The answer is also the question, and the question in this case is LINUX.

    --

    Reply or e-mail; don't vaguely moderate. Ex-O'Reilly/MIT employee, now a full-time Google employee.
    1. Re:Linux? by doofusclam · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Does everything have to turn into a religious turf war where MS are concerned?

      Listen: XBMP is a damn fine project running on damn fine and CHEAP hardware. It's ideal for running Linux or Win32 ports 'cos its essentially standard x86 hardware and it's officially the coolest way to play *media* (very vague term that) in the living room. You may be an uber-geek but most of us don't want big fat beige PCs from WalMart next to our TVs.

      I don't care if MS lose or make money from my purchase - I just want to use the best tools for the job and XBMP on the XBox is this. In my house the Xbox remote control is used as much as the TV remote which says a lot about how useful non-geeks find it.

      So is there any chance of quitting this sort of crap? I don't care about kernels, beowulf clusters or Linus I just want to play my media and the Xbox does it magnificently. Credit where credits due eh?

      seany

    2. Re:Linux? by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 1

      ... a Linux jewkbox ...

      A jukebox that doesn't eat mayonnaise?

    3. Re:Linux? by man_ls · · Score: 0

      Hmm...

      The X-Box has a motherboard running a VIA chipset, Intel CPU, nVidia graphics processor; the only difference is the BIOS has a protection on it to prevent running unsigned code.

    4. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I remind you M$ actually LOSES money on every XBOX they sell. So buying an XBOX but no games is their worst nightmare...

    5. Re:Linux? by TheCrazyFinn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope, it's an NForce based chipset, but with a GeForce3.5 GPU and an Intel P3 based processor (It's not quite a celeron, not quite a P3). No Via guts to be found.

      BIOS is custom, and there's no legacy support in the chipset.

      --
      "You've got an invalid haircut" -Warren Zevon - Life'll Kill Ya
    6. Re:Linux? by doofusclam · · Score: 1

      My opinion is valid because it's relevent to this thread, as in XBMP.

      Yours on the other hand merely shows you're an idiot.

    7. Re:Linux? by akarnid · · Score: 1

      Doofus: truer words were never spoken. Great app, good hardware, that also just happens to have a Dolby Digital encoder chip on the motherboard :) It is the ONLY console to sport this. Plus a kick ass graphics chipset. Does anyone know If Cg from nVidia has been made compatible with (or is) the Xbox chipset? That would rock for visualizations if the code could be small enough.

    8. Re:Linux? by cornice · · Score: 1

      Why?

      Because MS looses big money on every XBOX they make. The console business is all about selling GAMES. It's like printers. Give the printer away and make money on the consumable items (mainly cartrages but paper too). Consider this. You buy an XBOX and you run Linux on it. You just caused MS to loose money on the console with no chance of making money on a game. It's no wonder MS wants to stop this kind of thing.

    9. Re:Linux? by Rydia · · Score: 1

      Yes, but not buying an xbox at all means they make even LESS profit off it. Just because they sell at a loss doesn't mean it's better than no sell at all.

    10. Re:Linux? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1
      How long have you been working for Microsoft, astroturf division? :D

      Oh yeah, let's get those numbers up. Office didn't destroy its whole competitive market until a lot of pirated copies were seen to be out there...

    11. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, I don't have a big beige machine in my living room - I do have a little 2.4gighz a/v receiver and a laptop with WLAN to control the 'media' being transmitted to it though (the transmitter being connected to a big beige machine elsewhere in my house)... now if only I could afford a little PDA to replace the laptop.. sigh...

    12. Re:Linux? by cornice · · Score: 1

      Not really. The equation is much more complex. Console manufacturers never make money on the hardware. This is by design. They simply want as many usites as possible to be available for their software titles. Given the current losses sustained by MS do you really think that they could possibly make money on more volume? I think their gross margin is negative at this point and every unit sold (actually made) puts them deeper in the red. More sales in a perfect MS world translates to more software sales in the long run but since these units are running Linux then these units contribute nothing to MS. Look at it this way MS is subisdising your entertainment center. How can this be bad?

    13. Re:Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OR you could do what I did: Get a Celeron 533 Compaq SFF box that was being sold at an auction for $50, reformat the drive with Linux, and paint the case with a glossy silver to fit in with all the silver cases in my entertainment center. Total cost was $50 for the computer, with $9.95+tax spent on the small can of paint. Easy enough, and it looks pretty decent.

      And although it has a built in i810 sound card (read crap), since I'm just playing mp3s anyways, I don't mind. The Line Out works, and that's all I need.

  13. don't give Microsoft the numbers by g4dget · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What Microsoft needs most is sales numbers for XBox: that's what they need to attract developers. If you give them that, they will take over this part of the computer market as well, and you can bet that they sooner or later figure out how to make their consoles secure. Then you can kiss GPL or open source projects on that platform goodbye. Or do you think Microsoft is just kidding with Palladium?

    If you want a low-cost system for playing music and videos, get yourself a Mini-ITX system; they start at around $200. For gaming, pay a little bit more and get yourself a real PC with a high-end graphics card.

    1. Re:don't give Microsoft the numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting



      M$ does not make any money on the Xbox hardware, they make it on the software. If you saw last weeks post they lost around 380 million on the Xbox.

      A few of us buying an Xbox and modding it will not make their Xbox (home entertainment) division profitable.

    2. Re:don't give Microsoft the numbers by twaltari · · Score: 1

      Microsoft doesnt manufacture hardware, but they're redefining the arhitecure of PC hardware. That is scary.

      I agree with previous poster that Mini-ITX-style low-end PCs are definetely the way to go with mp3/divx etc. boxes. They cost about the same as XBox and both Linux and WindowsXP run out of the box.

    3. Re:don't give Microsoft the numbers by blitzrage · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But THIS console, which does all I want it to do, ISN'T controlled by Microsoft. In the future, if I can't hack it, I won't buy it. Then the bottom end drops out and they are stuck. I think the hacking is what is putting the xbox in the living room. I like the look of the xbox way better in my living room, and it's basically a cheap computer I just bought, with the advantage of having games specifically made for it, and it's online. What more can I ask for, not much other than more network capable games that rock.

      If you are TALKING about THIS xbox, then MS has no control, and I don't feel bad about using it. I am an avid linux fan, but damn this thing is slick.

      --

      I have no signature
    4. Re:don't give Microsoft the numbers by MrEd · · Score: 1
      You're missing the point. I don't necessarily agree with the parent (parent) post but his point was not that buying an Xbox to mod it would make Microsoft money right now.


      The reason MS is (supposedly) taking a loss on the consoles is to get them out there and have numbers to show game developers, "See, you can reach X million eyeballs if you release for our console! We'll throw in a dev pack for free!". That was the original poster's point. Every Xbox you buy adds to the number used to sway developers, and if they start going for the X-box in waves you can bet MS will be raking it in hand over fist.


      My opinion: It's not likely that the number of geeks with modded Xboxes will really make a difference.

      --

      Wah!

    5. Re:don't give Microsoft the numbers by g4dget · · Score: 1
      In the future, if I can't hack it, I won't buy it

      In the future, if all the competitors have gone away, you won't have any alternatives.

    6. Re:don't give Microsoft the numbers by g4dget · · Score: 1
      M$ does not make any money on the Xbox hardware, they make it on the software. If you saw last weeks post they lost around 380 million on the Xbox.

      And why do you think they do that? Microsoft has enough cash to give an Xbox to every American home for free. But they need the actual marketshare and sales numbers in order to get developers to move over to their side.

      A few of us buying an Xbox and modding it will not make their Xbox (home entertainment) division profitable.

      No, but it will make the alternatives, including PC games, less profitable. And in the long run, that will make the Xbox division profitable and narrow our choices.

    7. Re:don't give Microsoft the numbers by Vaughn+Anderson · · Score: 1

      Maybe you can tell me this, everyone else on slashdot (including it seems mr taco) is so delusioned over the values of the xbox...

      1) Is it bad or good for microsoft to buy an Xbox? (yes or no, then why)

      2) If you hack it, does it make you buying an xbox a bad thing for Microsoft?

      3) If there are better systems out there to do what you want it to do (play dvd's, pvr, media coucil, etc...) then how can your motivation to buy an xbox be anything other than sheer hacking curiosity or to hurt microsoft? (is there a third reason?)

      4) If your only goal is hurt Microsoft, why do you think buying something from them (reguardless on how much they loose on it) will achieve your goal?

      5) If you are only trying to hurt a company, aren't you doing the same thing Microsoft does?

      6) If you really want an xbox that runs linux, isn't that simply pointless from a reality stand point? (as this is similar to converting a semi truck to run on electric power, it's cleaner, better in some regards, but doesn't do what it's made to do anymore...so looses it's inherent value)

      7) If your motivation is purly hacking oriented, are you sadistic or is there really a value in hacking this thing?

      8) If you do hack it, the only way you can get any value out of one is to buy it... (go back to question 1)

      -v

    8. Re:don't give Microsoft the numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >1) Is it bad or good for microsoft to buy an Xbox? >(yes or no, then why)

      Perhaps if Microsoft bought a significant amount of Xbox's themselves, the media-at-large released statistics regarding the dramatic increase in Xbox's purchase, and the knowledge that Microsoft was buying it's own products was kept secret, this would entice even more potential buyers. In this sense it might be "good," or advantageous for Microshaft profit-margin/media-attention, but disengenuous and probably even illegal; not anything new for Microsoft. However, they are large enough that they wouldnt have to pull stunts like this. ... But maybe you meant to ask if it was good/bad for the non-MS-employed consumer to by an Xbox?

      2) If you hack it, does it make you buying an xbox a bad thing for Microsoft?

      From an economic perspective, no.

      1. Because you already bought it, and they already got their money from the distributers (regardless
      of whether they turn a profit), and they are getting a positive reputation, eventually leading to profits and contracts from game developers, leading to more profits.

      2. Chances are, if you are buying it, you will probably run Xbox-games on it, regardless of whether or not you put linux on it at some point. This eventually amounts to profit for MS.

      From an ethical standpoint, I think it would be 'a bad thing' even to buy an MS Xbox in the first place, and if you did, it would be 'a bad thing' not to hack it. I'm not sure if I could say why, at this point. What do you think?

      3) If there are better systems out there to do what you want it to do (play dvd's, pvr, media coucil, etc...) then how can your motivation to buy an xbox be anything other than sheer hacking curiosity or to hurt microsoft? (is there a third reason?)

      Someone had stated previously, that it looked good. I think it is ugly as fuck and way to big for my home entertainment system. If I wanted to play DVDs, I'd use a DVD-player at least 1/3 the thickness of the Xbox. If I wanted a D/PVR or some other sort of digital-media server, I don't think I would want it to be visible for several reasons.

      Besides, don't you think the Nintendo GC has better games and is better looking?

      4) If your only goal is hurt Microsoft, why do you think buying something from them (reguardless on how much they loose on it) will achieve your goal?

      It seems to me that this is obviously a rationalization to justify a pseudo-geeks
      need for immediate gratification and propensity
      to be enticed by flashy gadgets, in spite of
      the surpressed guilt associated with betraying
      one's true nature of being free from the
      shackles of the man.

      Or, maybe people really dont have the goal to
      hurt (financially) MS, instead really enjoy hurting
      themselves (financially and intellectually)?

      If you really wanted to hurt Microsoft there are more radical things you could do than stop buying their products. And if you wanted to keep-it-legal and civil, so-to-speak, you could organize a broad-coalition of boycotts on Xbox and Xbox products. Do you want to hurt Microsoft?

      5) If you are only trying to hurt a company, aren't you doing the same thing Microsoft does?

      I'm confused now. What is Microsoft doing? I dont think they are trying to hurt any company as an end in itself, just perhaps as a means to bolster their own market-share. If 'you' are trying to hurt a company, because you are in the same business as them, then it might be the same.

      6) If you really want an xbox that runs linux, isn't that simply pointless from a reality stand point? (as this is similar to converting a semi truck to run on electric power, it's cleaner, better in some regards, but doesn't do what it's made to do anymore...so looses it's inherent value)

      Why can't an electric powered vehicle have as much horse-power as a semi deisel-powered vehicle, thereby serve the same purpose? I am sure it is possible, but perhaps not practical. From a geeks perspective, I think the fact that it is possible supercedes the fact that it may not be practical.
      Don't you? I don't believe there isnt any inherent functional value in an Xbox over some other console, say one that runs linux. The games available are not inherent in the console itself.
      If you are referring to value associated with solely the brand-name itself, perhaps there is unique inherent value.

      7) If your motivation is purly hacking oriented, are you sadistic or is there really a value in hacking this thing? ... you could hack-it, than rebuild a better, more efficient system and then if your idea of value is dollar-value, sell-it back to MS. Is this in violation of the DMCA?

      8) If you do hack it, the only way you can get any value out of one is to buy it... (go back to question 1)

      ? huh?

  14. furthering the MS cause.... by smd4985 · · Score: 1

    "Tt turns the Xbox from Bill Gates' insidious plot to get into the living room into a set top box that can play practically everything even while sporting a sleek black look that won't stick out in your home theater system, and a user interface that your grandmother could use."

    How does this turn Gates' plot into anything else? Seems to be furthering his cause - more Xboxes in the living room for him to make software profits off of. ;)

    --
    smd4985
    1. Re:furthering the MS cause.... by The+Zody · · Score: 1

      wait...did they say...sleek? have they seen the xbox?

    2. Re:furthering the MS cause.... by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 1
      Yeah, really... way to defeat his nefarious plot of getting in your living room by, um, putting him in your living room. WTF?

      It amazes me that any of you guys can still pretend that software profits are Gates' first priority. Do you think he created the Office phenomenon by insisting on cashing in on every copy in use? Just as a personal favor try not to be complete fools, OK? He'll pay you to help him have Microsoft-produced hardware everywhere you look. ESPECIALLY the living room. If I was him I'd be laughing my ass off at you 'use lots of Xboxen, it costs Gates money!' people. You gotta give it away to get people used to it, your revenue stream comes from the additional currents swept along by you IDIOTS rushing to make 'damaging' use of these things. You're his best helpers and don't even know it. Furrfu!

  15. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    You forgot that its also a damn fine games machine

  16. Re:So what? by shaklee · · Score: 3, Informative

    None of the xboxes come with a 20gb hard drive. When they see the LBA size on the hard drive start with a "20" they think that is the disk size, which it is not. The only hard drives shipping are 10gb.

  17. Re:So what? by FatalTourist · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why bother? The whole reason most people getting in to hacking and fiddling with computers. Because it's FUN.

    Getting there is the interesting part.

    --


    Escape Pod Films: Sketch Comedy and Web Series
  18. Re:So what? by wumarkus420 · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, I forgot that the average DVD player from Wal-Mart can stream divx over my PC's SMB shares on my network at home.

  19. GPL violation - mplayer by ddbsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    See here for a post in the dicussion. I haven't kept up with more (such as if they have fullfilled the terms of the gpl by releaseing source).

    1. Re:GPL violation - mplayer by groomed · · Score: 1

      This is ages ago. It's long been resolved. See the news on the MPlayer homepage (scroll down a bit to 2002.10.29).

  20. Re:So what? by doofusclam · · Score: 2, Informative

    The newer ones do, my friend chips a lot of xboxes and he opened one up on friday fresh from the shop with a 20gb drive. Though to be fair it's irrelevent because you can stream from a PC share anyway making the HD size a non issue.

  21. Visualization by d7o3g4q · · Score: 2, Informative

    When it has visualization plug-ins, I think it'll be a great way to put MP3s in your stereo.

    I'm working on a dll interface for the viz api. This is one feature that I'm very interested in finding some talented viz programmers, so if you're interested, please feel free to contact me on the xbmp forums.

    Thanks

  22. Dreamcast... by EverStoned · · Score: 4, Informative

    " turns everyone's favorite hackable console (the Xbox) "

    Hey! The Dreamcast Scene is just as hot right now, especially now that SDL has been ported!

    1. Re:Dreamcast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should point out that dreamcast needs NO MODCHIP, and costs around $50. I can play every NES game (I own, that is), watch VCDs, watch DIVX, listen to MP3s and use Linux.

      Viva Dreamcast

    2. Re:Dreamcast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dcemu sux ;)
      boob.co.uk and dcvision.com are much better, and dont support dc warez / fake emus.
      But the xbox scene is a joke plagued by xdk usage and modchip advertising/requirements.

    3. Re:Dreamcast... by EverStoned · · Score: 1

      I know the people who run boob and dcvision, and they're all very closly tied with dcemu.

    4. Re:Dreamcast... by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but if it can't play DIVX at 640-720 resolution, I don't want any part in it.

      320 or what-not just doesn't cut it.

    5. Re:Dreamcast... by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      I actually wrote a crappy Dreamcast game, constituting yet another use for the DC, along with all the other (much better) homebrew games out there. (Wow, way to plug that POS game, self!) Seriously, you can't effectively use Linux (no hard drive and it's slow, but there IS a Dreamcast keyboard), and CD-Rs wear out the Dreamcast's laser faster than the GD-ROMs "normal" games are on. FWIW, there are other homebrew emulators besides NES, including MAME, Genesis, and SNES.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
  23. Can you legally compile XBMP? by Glyndwr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last time I looked, I got the impression you could only compile XBMP using a warezed copy of the Xbox SDK. This was going to be the case until the OpenSDK project reached some maturity. This is why the XBMP website only supplies source and I have to scavenge binaries from Usenet or IRC.

    Assuming I was right in the first place, is this still the case? Be kind of a bummer if the only way to test your patch for this competition is via an illegally ripped MS SDK.

    --
    You win again, gravity!
    1. Re:Can you legally compile XBMP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some day you might be with OpenXDK - open source SDK for the xbox. For now, it is in the gray area morally speaking and does violate XDK licensing.

    2. Re:Can you legally compile XBMP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, the last time I looked, I couldn't even find a "Warezed" copy of the "xbox SDK" I tried using OpenXDK, but for some reason CXBE dosn't like XBMP

      I was wondering how you were supposed to compile this "BEAST"!!!!!!!!!!???????? Can you help me out here??

      Mabey you can drop me an e-mail, or give me a link to a "warez sdk"

      If you were really feeling generous, you can just attach the sdk, or the .xbe file for the latest XBMP??

      Big_Gunner@juno.com

  24. Why would my grandmother mod an Xbox? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >It turns the Xbox from Bill Gates' insidious plot to get into the living room into a set top box that can play practically everything even while sporting a sleek black look that won't stick out in your home theater system, and a user interface that your grandmother could use.

    How about just making a Linux box like that?

    Get one of those tiny MiniATX motherboards/cases, pick and choose other hardware and install Linux.

    Much more easier than modding an Xbox.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:Why would my grandmother mod an Xbox? by doofusclam · · Score: 1

      Yes but it has an excellent 3d video sub-system, with top tv-out quality (better than most PC TV outs), dolby digital *encoding* from all sources, a remote control for $20, it's quiet and it plays games.

      MiniITX is good though and at least you put some thought into your response rather than saying 'use a linux cluster instead it rocks' like some people round here. I just prefer something with a bit more video horsepower than the average £200 walmart beige-thing.

      seany

    2. Re:Why would my grandmother mod an Xbox? by Lowen+Na · · Score: 1

      I don't know, dude. Modding an Xbox is pretty fisking easy. MS might as well just put a header on the motherboard that was labeled "Mod Chip Here"

    3. Re:Why would my grandmother mod an Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously never installed an Xbox modchip before. It takes about 5 minutes. But yeah you're totally right, it would be much faster to build a Linux solution from scratch.

      Retard.

    4. Re:Why would my grandmother mod an Xbox? by stg · · Score: 1

      Yes, but most hardware companies don't sell their products at a loss like MS does on Xbox...

    5. Re:Why would my grandmother mod an Xbox? by rickmccl · · Score: 1

      How about making a WinXP box like that? Get one of those Shuttle SV25s, a VIA processor, ATI TV Wonder, and install WinXP. Much easier than installing video for Linux. Whoops; been there, done that!

  25. Re:So what? by doofusclam · · Score: 1

    Good point and it's also a good example of open source in action - xvid decoder fixes are usually implemented in a day or two by frodo, duo or runtime and they're using lots of open source projects like mplayer. So it would be nice if the platform zealots who spell Microsoft with a '$' would give credit to a project that lots of people find useful.

  26. Buy SONY and buy NINTENDO. by kyz · · Score: 0, Troll

    How it this article any more than a barely-disguised advert for X boxes?

    Let me make this perfectly clear - every X Box sold (no matter what you use it for) is used as propoganda to convince developers to write for it, which puts more developers under the thumb of MS, and makes money for MS so they can oppress and harass free software developers.

    If anything, you should be buying systems from MICROSOFT'S COMPETITORS. BUY A NINTENDO GAMECUBE, A SONY PLAYSTATION, A PALMOS-BASED HANDHELD and A SYMBIANOS-BASED PHONE.

    --
    Does my bum look big in this?
    1. Re:Buy SONY and buy NINTENDO. by doofusclam · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why? My Xbox is cheap and plays all my media, it also has more horsepower than the rest of those things put together.

      I tell you what, when your palmos based handheld can play DVDs, DIVX, XVID, MP3, DVCAM and any of a dozen other formats on my TV with quality as good as a top-end PC then come back to me?

      Or was your post nothing more than a barely-disguised advert for Linux without considering what other people want?

      By the way you can run Linux on it too.

      Slag off MS whenever it's relevent, which isn't here. If you have a better and cheaper way of viewing media and playing games on the living without a big-ugly ass beige PC humming away next to the TV then feel free to enlighten us.

    2. Re:Buy SONY and buy NINTENDO. by KilerCris · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      you.are.an.idiot

    3. Re:Buy SONY and buy NINTENDO. by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      Let me make this perfectly clear - every X Box sold (no matter what you use it for) is used as propoganda to convince developers to write for it, which puts more developers under the thumb of MS, and makes money for MS so they can oppress and harass free software developers.

      Repeat after me: "Microsoft is a for-profit company."

      Microsoft's goal in life is to make money. That is the goal of all companies. They sell the Xbox cheaply so they can take more market share away from the PS2 and the GameCube and eventually make more money in the long term. They aren't doing it specifically to harass OSS developers.

      Microsoft does not like Linux and OSS developers because they compete with microsoft. Typically, competing companies aren't on the best terms with each other, and they always try to take each other's market share away.

      Microsoft doesn't encourage the use of Linux for the same reason Ford doesn't encourage people to buy Chevies. Microsoft is not the spawn of Satan. They are just a company.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    4. Re:Buy SONY and buy NINTENDO. by polkapolecat · · Score: 1

      Firstly, the PS2 has plenty of horsepower to handle these formats. And as to what sounded like a defense of MS, one has to circumvent [read hack] the XBox [read void warranty] to even run the media player. They never would grant you something so convenient. BroadQ's software-only solution is clearly a better choice. You can keep your media in one place AND access it from multiple locations.

    5. Re:Buy SONY and buy NINTENDO. by Thatmushroom · · Score: 1

      Would this be the same Sony that is making profits off of it's gaming division and using some of that money to support the RIAA and copy-protection schemes?

      Or the same Nintendo that has been accused and convicted of price-fixing, something that has yet to happen to Microsoft (although they sorely deserve to have that charged against them)?

      Not all corporations are perfect. For my money, I'd rather buy a GameCube or an X-Box rather than a PS2. Microsoft is certainly evil, but when I think of Sony's actions to destroy fair use for the next 40-50 years, I would never purchase any Sony product. Ever.

      Your rant is crafted in a way that oozes FUD, even though it does have some valid points (and others not so valid). Presenting the facts and letting people decide which company is better is usually a better alternative than having an accepted list of companies for people to choose from.

      --
      You zap the moderators with a wand of humor! The moderators resist!
  27. broadq Qcast Tuner for PS2 by nuxx · · Score: 5, Informative

    Although slightly off topic, if you are interested in something like this for your PS2, check out the broadq QCast Tuner for PS2. It too plays MP3s, OGG Vorbis, DiVX/xvid, MPEG-1, etc. It doesn't require a mod chip, which is nice, but it does requre the ~$40 PS2 network adapter. The developers are also extremely active on the forum, making it simple to get help.

    And no, I'm not a broadq employee, I'm just a really satisfied customer.

    -Steve

    1. Re:broadq Qcast Tuner for PS2 by barureddy · · Score: 1

      Your forgeting that you need a networked computer with a shared hard drive to actually send the data to the ps2. Thus the xbox is a better solution.

    2. Re:broadq Qcast Tuner for PS2 by specialized_sworks · · Score: 1

      Unless you have found some way to get the files directly to the xbox without going through your computer, why is the PS2 not better? Just keep the files on your computer, and dont worry about transferring them over.

      You can stream from multiple computers if you want, and even stream over the internet if you put the PS2 outside your firewall.

      Biggest issue right now is playing higher resolution videos and lack of AC3 surround sound.

      Otherwise, very neat.

      -Dubya

  28. Not necessarily by aliens · · Score: 1

    It should compile on any x86 I would think. Since the Xbox is just a pentium 3. I guess it depends on what code you're working on for it.

    --
    -- taking over the world, we are.
    1. Re:Not necessarily by TheChadaChicken · · Score: 1

      Not trying to split hairs but, I thought the Xbox was running a Celeron processor.

    2. Re:Not necessarily by aao-brad · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's neither of the above. From what I remember reading, it's somewhere in between those two. I don't have the actual specs at hand, or I'd post them. I think they started with a P3 and stripped it down a bit.

      --
      "What kind of chip you got in there, a Dorito?" - Weird Al Yankovic
    3. Re:Not necessarily by TheChadaChicken · · Score: 1

      It's a custom chip? I guess this would mean that Intel is producing this chip just for the Xbox? I would imagine that this would effect the MS break even point for the console. You would thinnk a generic Intel or AMD cpu would get them the break even point faster. On the other hand, I have wondered since the Xbox launched how their cost could be lowered if when the latest processor drops in price, then older and lower production run chip would become more expensive and raise thoer costs as time goes on. Or would clock speed mess with games and male them incompatible accross consoles.

    4. Re:Not necessarily by CityZen · · Score: 1

      It's just like a P3, but it has half the amount of cache. So it probably is a P3 exactly, but the cache was probably modular to begin with, so they could just disable a defective half.

      What were the other differences between a P3 and the comparable Celeron? Could they just all have been produced on the same assembly line, with features disabled to make a P3 into a Celeron?

    5. Re:Not necessarily by CTho9305 · · Score: 1

      A p3 has full size L2, 8-way associative. a celery has half-size L2, 4-way associative. An xbox chip is half-size but still 8-way associative.

      n-way associative has something to do with letting you find something in the cache fast. more = better, but takes more chip area.

    6. Re:Not necessarily by CityZen · · Score: 1

      A direct-mapped cache essentially strips off the high-order address bits (removes the upper digits of the number, leaving just the lower digits). This works okay in some cases, but can result in a lot of collisions (ie, addresses that map to the same location in the cache).

      A collision just kicks out the old data and puts in the new. This can be a problem if you need that old data again real soon. Remember that main memory can be 100 times (or more) slower than the cache.

      Adding associativity avoids this problem. For 2-way associative, you can have 2 addresses map to the same place before you've got problems. For 4-way, up to 4 addresses can map to the same location before you've got problems, etc.

      Normally, each location in the cache keeps track of the upper address bits of the original location it's storing, plus the actual data. For a direct-mapped cache, you just need 1 set of hardware to compare the upper address bits against the appropriate location in the cache. For 2-way associative, there are up to 2 addresses (with the same lower address bits) that you need to compare (the upper address bits) against. So to do this fast (which is the whole point behind the cache), you need 2 sets of hardware to do the comparing at the same time. And similarly for 4-way and 8-way associative.

      Standard disclaimer: This is all per memory. I could be completely wrong.

    7. Re:Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you're right... I just didn't want to say it in more detail in case I was wrong, but what you said sounds right.

  29. Re:So what? by shaklee · · Score: 1

    No, they do not. It has been confirmed over and over, unless you want to take a picture to show it, then it is not true. All of the people that have claimed this have taken a picture and it sure enough was a 10gb hard drive. That is, unless you friend replaced the hard drive with a larger one.

  30. MS is planning their own Xbox media player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    1. Re:MS is planning their own Xbox media player by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 1

      D. R. M. baby! So I can enjoy lapping up those locked up only watch once files...and it reports details of the files back to MS? Tempting...

      --
      "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
  31. Mod Parent UP by Powercntrl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Last time I looked, I got the impression you could only compile XBMP using a warezed copy of the Xbox SDK.

    At the risk of sounding like an AOLer, I'll chime in with my "me too!".

    I agree the XBMP certainly looks neat, and an inexpensive box that can play DivX movies would kick mucho ass, but I don't have the paitence to hunt down a mod chip from a respectable seller, find the proper "warezed" BIOS image I need and then find the binaries so I can burn an XBMP CD.

    The mod chips I have seen are also priced a far cry from the original $8 bucks or so I paid for my PS1 modchip back in the day. All costs considered, I could ALMOST buy a PC with TV-out for just about the same price.

    Not that this project isn't cool... It's just not really that cost effective.

    --

    ---
    DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    1. Re:Mod Parent UP by Glyndwr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I replaced my Win2k (I hadn't discovered mplayer when I built it) based DVD/DivX/mp3 box with a Xbox.

      Reasons? The Xbox was a lot smaller, it had an IR remote (this was a big thing), it had good codec support out of the box (XBMP is based on mplayer so plays pretty much anything). It's noisy but not much more noisy. I recycled the PC to a family member and couldn't be happier with the result. The biggest plus is the hard drive I have chock-full with SNES, Genesis and MAME ROMs, all complete with a decent joypad to play them with.

      I reckon you can now put together a chipped Xbox with a suitably big hard disk for about £300 or so, and at that price, I think it's a very compelling device.

      --
      You win again, gravity!
  32. Re:So what? by doofusclam · · Score: 1

    Fair point i'll ask him but he's not the sort of person to get his LBAs mixed up with his GBs.

  33. Re:furthering the MS cause; buying software? by caveat · · Score: 1

    more Xboxes in the living room for him to make software profits off of.

    umm, but isnt' the point to buy the Xbox at a loss from M$, then install XBMP and load up the hard drive with media, avoiding buying any more software and giving M$ a profit? hell, the only Xbox game I'd waste my money on is Halo anyway..

    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
  34. Re:Sponsored in part by a generous donation from M by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

    NEWS FLASH: If you visit the page enough times, you can get any ad to come up.

    Seeing a Microsoft ad come up randomly means nothing. Oh, and using "M$" makes you ub3r l337. No, really, it does.

    *prepares asbestos shield*

  35. Re:The third place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I agree.

    Thank you, kind madame.

  36. error...does not compute by sstory · · Score: 2, Funny

    Was there some sort of malfunction on Slashdot which caused 1000 words to appear where there should have been a summary?

  37. How about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Getting the linux media players sorted out. mplayer may be able to support every codec out there, it its gui is teh sux0r.

  38. 1 complaint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My one minor complaint about XBMP doesn't really have to do with any serious bug in the code. It's really an excellent piece of software, and I'm really thankful that someone did take the time to put it together. However, and maybe I'm missing a setting here, I do wish I could get the menus to fit on my tv. It seems to be set for PAL displays, which isn't a problem in movies because it allows the setting of the playback field, but does mean information like the current song title is cut off in the menu. Again, terribly minor, and trivial (especially if you're in the UK), but aside from the normal developmental strides that will no doubt take place it's the only thing I would really like a "fix" for.

    1. Re:1 complaint by d7o3g4q · · Score: 1

      Um go into settings and calibrate. It lets u customize the displayable area on ur tv.

  39. Linux jewkbox? by asv108 · · Score: 1
    Personally, I'd rather stick to my guns and go ahead with a Linux jewkbox

    Hey just because Linux is cheap doesn't mean we should start using ethic stereotypes to describe it. ;)

  40. This REALLY bothers me ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Every freeking time on slashdot ...

    I think it'll be a great way to put MP3s in your stereo.

    Since when has this been a problem? Is the minijack to rca converter plugged into the line in of your stereo that shoddy of a setup? Does the numerous articles on putting a computer in your home entertainment center seem "too hard" or "not as cool" ??? As far as mp3's with a set top box, my DVD player, dreamcast, and laptop (which are all hooked up to the entertainment "glop" in my room) all have the ability to play mp3's I don't need another solution.

    I'm not bashing the article I'm all about hacking, but the constant fucking comments about "my home entertainment center needs something to play mp3's" has been solved!! I don't know of any reason why anyone would need another solution??

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:This REALLY bothers me ... by doofusclam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes but it's all in one box. Some of us don't want a lot of boxes in our living romm, especially big beige ones. Further, DVD players are notoriously picky about the mp3s they play and rarely support other codecs and features such as replaygain, VBR and id3 tags.

      Let me relate my situation: I have ~800 albums on my PC hard drive (all of my cds by the way). Theres a decent enough stereo system in my computer room but the home theatre setup in my living room is better. Any time me and my friends are listening to our Pink Floyd or Britney or whatever it's a pain having to leave the living room.

      With the tunes on the xbox its just so much nicer and convenient sat on my sofa with the remote control. Also, to watch a DVD I don't even need to find it as it's probably already been XVid encoded and stuck on the hard drive.

    2. Re:This REALLY bothers me ... by blitzrage · · Score: 1

      I agree. I run a jack from my soundcard on my computer to the RCA into my stereo. I have a DVD drive on my computer. I have a 21" monitor. I have a small bedroom where my monitor is bigger than my TV. The ONLY thing I haven't been able to get going is the XBox looking good on my computer monitor. I've tried plugging it into the TV Tuner card on my computer, but it looks like hell.

      Has anyone figured out how to do this clearly?

      I have both the coax and the RCA adapters, and I've tried both, and the picture just looks terrible.

      If I could get this going, I could be watching a DVD one of my 21" and playing XBox on the other 21" monitor. Good times.

      --

      I have no signature
  41. Wow. by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Somebody mod this up, and then go look at the thing nuxx is talking about. It's ingenious - and as near as I can tell, every bit as elegant as the Xbox solution, if not more so. If you really want your media on your TV, why even bother with the complexity of a separate 'computer'? This thing will stream anything to your PS2 from your existing computer.

    I dunno, maybe it's just me, but I like this solution a whole lot better, philosophically. It's cheap too.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
    1. Re:Wow. by Alex_Ionescu · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you've actually USED XBMP but it can do the exact same thing, stream media files over your network from any computer. It also doesn't need a separate broadband adapter as the XBOX has it built-in. Besides, I'm pretty sure it doesn't support that many formats or features (Post-processing, strechting, zooming, etc)

  42. Re:The third place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your mom agrees too and sends her regards. She also sais that the dildo is in the refrigerator if you're looking for it.

  43. Re:So what? by roka · · Score: 1

    > Because it can stream from smb shares on a pc or linux server

    If you think of XBMP while saying that, it isn't entirely true (yet). XBMP can only play from windows smb shares at the moment, but I'm sure linux shares will be supported very soon too.

    If you thought of Linux running on the xbox using mplayer, it is supported playing over NFS/SMB shares running on whatever OS.

    Truth is, as soon as I have my keyboard connected to the xbox, I won't use XBMP anymore, because I just love to use the original - and the terminal.

    BTW, I think it would be really cool, if there would be a X based dashboard, which starts instead of xdm or whatever after booting - and by pressing ALT+F1 you always can login and do things the console-way :)

    If we can release a userfriendly xbox-Linux distribution, booting without modchip, M$ has released a console wich will massivley distract users from their own OS. *grin*

  44. Slight problem? by op00to · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you're developing for the Xbox, isn't it pretty much assumed that you HAVE a modchip already? Why would they be giving out modchips to people that are guaranteed to have one? Why not just give out cases of beer or something that the coders really need?

    1. Re:Slight problem? by DJ+FirBee · · Score: 1

      Yeah, maybe give out women or something ...

    2. Re:Slight problem? by timlee · · Score: 1

      My current Gen 1 mod chip has 29 wires. 29 wires to tin and solder in every time I want to mod a new board. The x2 is definitly an improvement over that.

  45. Questions. by AftanGustur · · Score: 3, Informative


    I have been thinking (and I certainly am going to) about building a system out of PC/Linux/Pinnacle DC10 compresor card.
    But if I can get a working system for only 300 Euros That'l be cheaper..

    My question to anyone who actually has a XBox : Does it make a lot of noise ? A friend lent me his PS2 for a week and it was the loudest piece of hardware in the appartment .. I.e. (IMNSHO) unusable as a movie player.

    --
    echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
    1. Re:Questions. by darc · · Score: 1

      No, it is really rather silent. There is one fan in the entire box. You'll probably have to compare though, I haven't heard the PS2. The xbox is far quieter than my computer, and the sound of the dvd rom drive servo is probably louder than the fan.

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
    2. Re:Questions. by toopc · · Score: 1
      My question to anyone who actually has a XBox : Does it make a lot of noise ? A friend lent me his PS2 for a week and it was the loudest piece of hardware in the appartment .. I.e. (IMNSHO) unusable as a movie player.

      It's as loud as a PS2. Too loud for a DVD/CD player, unless you don't mind hearing fan noise during quiet parts. However, I figure most people using these are more worried about its low cost than its quality.

      It's all relative, but as A/V equipment goes its really little more than a toy. A good solution for a kids bedroom or something.

    3. Re:Questions. by radish · · Score: 1

      it's louder....much louder...

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:Questions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely louder than a PS2. If a PS2 is unacceptable, you'll hate the xbox.

    5. Re:Questions. by twfry · · Score: 1

      Too all of you people saying its louder than the PS2. Stop being misleading. Yes, it's a little louder than the PS2. BUT the PS2 doesn't make that much noise to begin with. My XBox is quieter than Tivo which is the dominate noise making box in the room. (An even that isn't too bad)

  46. Slave. by kyz · · Score: 1

    Slave.

    You're so easily bought.

    MS could easily withstand "selling" all their X Boxes at $0. They're not looking to turn a profit, like normal companies. All they care about is the "sales" numbers, so they can win over developers they can't otherwise buy.

    Why not wait for them to drop the price to $0 before you "buy" your X Box?

    --
    Does my bum look big in this?
    1. Re:Slave. by doofusclam · · Score: 1

      Because I want to listen to music and watch films, rather than lose my non geek friends by whinging on about evil Bill.

      If MS lose or make money - do I care? No. Do you? I assume so, but why should I use an inferior system to watch my films on just to stick one on Bill? I'm not an MS fan at all but people... please... can we give up the rhetoric for a bit?

    2. Re:Slave. by kyz · · Score: 1, Informative

      Do you actually do any free software development? Perhaps you're just a good little consumer and don't care about the power struggles "behind the scenes" as long as you get your bread and circuses.

      As it happens, if I wanted to play a DVD, I have the choice of my dedicated DVD player (which connects to a 5.1 decoder), my Playstation 2, or my Linux PC (which has my entire CD collection on it), all of which are connected to a decent amp. All three are better quality than an X Box.

      What I think is strange is why Bill think's it's OK to sell his X boxes for $100 less than they cost to make, but he won't pay $100 towards my own choice of hardware. I'm not interested in a X Box, but if MS would pay to take $100 off the price of a PS2, that'd be cool. I bought one anyway though, because the games are a lot better.

      --
      Does my bum look big in this?
    3. Re:Slave. by ecchi_0 · · Score: 1
      What I think is strange is why Bill think's it's OK to sell his X boxes for $100 less than they cost to make, but he won't pay $100 towards my own choice of hardware. I'm not interested in a X Box, but if MS would pay to take $100 off the price of a PS2, that'd be cool.
      What I think is strange is that you think he owes that to you. Bill Gates has lots of money, sure he COULD promote competitors - but why the hell would he? Bill Gates doesn't owe you anything, you don't owe anything to him... like you said, the PS2 has better games (opinion). Gates is struggling, Japan for the most part hates his Xbox. He's selling it at a loss to get market penetration that he can use later - its part of life. I don't want it to happen but i do not in any way feel like he is doing something wrong, simply... profitable. It IS ok to charge less than it costs to make (hell, you should be thanking him!) but its just flawed reasoning to expect him to pay for another console.
  47. Developers & Profit ? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    Sony has the PS2 Linux Kit, why doesn't Microsoft something comparable? Oh wait, it has to do with actually making money off the hardware! ;-)

    That's what I don't understand: If Microsoft had designed the XBox so that they could of made a slight profit just selling the hardware (instead of a massive loss), and allowed anyone to hack on it, they WOULD have a lot more developers - both Amateur and Professional. More developers = More software. Plain and simple.

    Interestingly enough, MS and nVidia just recently settled a dispute over pricing of parts!

    Cheers
    --
    #30794h SYSEVAL

  48. Re:SKO is a troll, c'mon mods! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ASF files are just butchered AVI files and can be easily converted. You fail it.

    ASF files are not butchered AVI's at all. However, libavi has been able to demux an ASF stream for well over three years or so now, so its not like ASFs are a big deal. MPlayer can also handle WMV and WMA files without any trouble. Windows Media? Wassat?

  49. I have a couple of questions... by wiresquire · · Score: 1
    They're in desperate need of help in terms of more developers ....
    Mmmm....perhaps the 'free market of developers' is telling them something?

    for the 25 best patch submissions...
    So they want help for patches, but not for the actual design, building of new features etc? What, no one wants to clean up the messy stuff?

    No offense intended, I just thought it was interesting that no one had commented on the community aspects of this story.

    --

    So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

  50. Re:So what? by xjerky · · Score: 1

    XBMP plays files over Linux Samba shares just fine. I do it myself.

    --
    A sentence you'll never see on an Internet discussion board: "You know what? You're right."
  51. Buying stuff from MS == MS gets money by llamaluvr · · Score: 1

    Umm, actually, NOT buying an Xbox and no games is their worst nightmare.

    --
    Insightful: 76, Off-Topic: 379, Flamebait: 24, Funny: 152, Interesting: 201, Underrated: 55, Troll: 9, Total: 896
  52. xBox killer media by linuxislandsucks · · Score: 1

    xBox kille media would be to run linux on xBox and then gt quicktime to run on it alos and really piss Bill Gates!

    --
    Don't Tread on OpenSource
  53. No *this* is the best way to play mp3s by voisine · · Score: 1

    This is the best way to play mp3s on
    your home stereo. It's called stereo link.
    Quality Hi-Fi equipment and costs less
    than most high end sound cards.


    http://www.stereo-link.com/

  54. No *this* is the best way to play mp3s by voisine · · Score: 1

    This is the best way to play mp3s on your
    home stereo. Quality Hi-Fi equipment and
    costs less than many high end sound cards.


    http://www.stereo-link.com/

  55. OT - for encryption people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets say i could factor that big number on the SF xbox linux project page. (I'm assuming it is a product of only two primes) How would you get the private key from the factors? and is the exact signing method known?

  56. Surely this is good for Microsoft? by wario78 · · Score: 0

    'It turns the Xbox from Bill Gates' insidious plot to get into the living room into a set top box that can play practically everything even while sporting a sleek black look that won't stick out in your home theater system, and a user interface that your grandmother could use.'

    I don't get this. XBMP obviously provides an excellent reason to buy an Xbox, and in doing so can only further "Bill Gates' insidious plot to get into the living room". Also, last time I checked the Xbox had the same "sleek black look" before and after running XBMP.

    Wario78

    1. Re:Surely this is good for Microsoft? by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I've ever heard the XBox described as 'sleek' before........

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  57. Re:So what? by roka · · Score: 1

    Which version are you using? A week ago, I didn't find anyone who got it working with Samba. For instance here.
    This solution isn't really a solution, because I need security=user in my LAN.

  58. Write a DivX player for PS2 by iamacat · · Score: 1
    You get a supported version of Linux, without mod chips and with keyboard, mouse and ethernet card. Use OpenGL for your visualizations and hardware MPEG2 support for your DVD player.

    Microsoft doesn't want any small or hobby developers for XBox, otherwise they would release a free development kit and a way to run the binaries on devices without MS signature. They do have free VC++ for CE.NET devices. I say we comply by not buying any XBoxes and games, instead of doing all the work for Bill Gates.

    And by the way, my PalmOS-based handheld does play MP3s and video clips. With a G4, PS2 and a CLIE I am proud to have a Microsoft-free (TM) home.

  59. nullsoft player for xbox by yathosho · · Score: 1

    the .plan of justin frankel reveals that some boys at nullsoft seem to port winamp to xbox or write an all new player for it.

  60. WTF is a RAR file? by eyegone · · Score: 1
    This looks like it might be just what I'm looking for. I've been ripping all of my CDs to Ogg Vorbis and FLAC files, and toting my laptop around to play them is getting old. (Before you ask, I'll get rid of the Ogg Vorbis files when I find a player that can handle streamed Ogg FLAC files.)

    Too bad the manuals are distributed in a format that requires a shareware program to decompress. Does anyone know of a free program that can handle these things?

    --
    "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    1. Re:WTF is a RAR file? by kyz · · Score: 1

      RAR will never be free, but you can decompress RAR files with the non-free open source unrar.

      --
      Does my bum look big in this?
    2. Re:WTF is a RAR file? by Golias · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Yea, what's up with that? Does anybody have a mirror where we can get an uncompressed verion of that manual (or at least something compressed by a sane choice of tools, like gzip or something.)

      rar is for usenet warez d00ds. Please don't use it for stuff like this.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  61. Synergy of console + opensource by Winnower · · Score: 1

    For all those people out there that say you should go get a system xyz and run abc on it, you are totally underestimating the primary advantage that homebrew console scenes have:

    Everybody is developing on the exact same system.

    This has tremendous implications in the development and testing of the software. You only have to develop for one platform, test for one platform, and support one platform. The software that anybody else out there writes for it will work for my box too. This is a tremendous advantage over getting some software that has some bugs/quirks with your slightly different "open" system.

    For instance, on my PC (standard Dell Box), I encounter a pretty nasty bug in Mame where it will kill my video card until I did a hard reset.

    I slapped the xbox version of Mame on my modded xbox and was running with no problems.

    You do have other limitations with using a proprietary console, but you must realize that the same "feature" that makes console games cheaper and more reliable than PC games can pay off for opensource developers as well.

  62. sleek??? by radish · · Score: 1

    while sporting a sleek black look that won't stick out in your home theater system

    *cough* *splutter*

    This is the same Xbox we're talking about here right? The fug ugly great plastic lump with green crap all over it? Oh please, if by some miracle you didn't see the thing you'd hear it's fans from the other side of the house!

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    1. Re:sleek??? by EvilSporkMan · · Score: 1

      Actually, a skinned Xbox looks pretty sweet. My personal choice is the chrome.

      --
      -insert a witty something-
  63. sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's hard to take anything Slashdot posts about Microsoft seriously.

  64. I DON'T COMMENT ON M$ ADVERTS!!! by noisyb · · Score: 0

    xbox.. xbox... xbox...

  65. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because it comes with Component video output.

    Because it comes with SPDIF out.

  66. GDAM you do boy.... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    checkout GDAM, you can mix mp3's in real-time etc....

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.