Slashdot Mirror
My Short Life As An Unintentional Porn Spammer
Freerange writes "Mike Masnick wrote up his experience getting slammed by a somewhat new kind of spam attack that doesn't get much hype (yet?). A spammer spoofed his personal email address as the 'reply-to' for a batch of spam, with interesting results for Mike: "I can
now answer the questions 'who replies to spam?' and (should anyone ever
wonder) 'what are the hundreds of variations on bounced messages?'" From Politech."
Spammers have been spoofing legit addresses for a while. I know a lot of times they'll simply use webmaster@somelegitdomain.com and basically cause that person a bunch of grief and headaches. Most users are too clueless to realize it's really not coming from that address.
A proprietary mail protocol by a major power (MS?) to eliminate IP address/e-mail address spoofing.
I experienced this five years ago and a group of sysadmins helped me track the guy back to his ISP and we turned the info over to the FBI as identity theft. We were told that my experience did not meet the threshold for them to investigate further ($5000 in damages). Worse, the ISP didn't have a code of conduct prohibiting this type of thing...
Sucks when it happens, but isn't new.
Probably the same idiot in Minnesota:(
"... but you can love completely without complete understanding." - Norman Maclean, "A River Runs Through It"
its not going to be military computers that come alive and kill us all, its going to be the spam filters! I mean, its going to take some serious adaptive AI to filter out spam at this rate...
and the conformforting thought:
when spamfilters come alive... their prime directive will be "eliminate anything that is worthless"
-You're wasting your time. Alfador only likes me.
The place I work (Productive Data Corporation) gets tons of bounced spams and replies to spams every day. Our domain is productive.com so any email to whatever (at) productive.com comes back to the admin email accounts. As you can probably guess there's quite a few spammers that use productive.com as reply-to. We have to constantly update our spam blockers to weed out all the real emails from the spam =/
Why not just put some bogus made-up address there?
Are the spammers just trying to cause as much chaos and unpleasantness for as many peoples as is humanly possible?
an article about it
--sex
Very popular slashdot journal for adul
...with all the spam replies and such he got, he now decides to take it a step further and slashdot his server!
Way to go!
Everybody has a purpose in life, maybe mine is to lurk in slashdot.
I'm in the Northwest US. The spam sent with my name came from Bermuda, according to the headers. I got complaints and a reply that seemed to be a death threat. The death threat came from Russia. Email to its return address came back as undeliverable. Talking to my ISP, they said that there is really not much that can be done about this unless I wanted to change my email address. I do business there, so I can't.
Really, the only way to combat this kind of identiy fraud is with PGP. It would be ideal if every mail-program out there supported PGP.
-- bartman
Obviously, legislation isn't catching up and as evidenced by the junk fax law is useless when it does. Technical minds built the Internet, and I have little doubt that a solution could be found once we quit looking for the quick fix.
Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
-- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.
the site seemed to be going pretty slow for me.. so Ill put the info here if it gets slashdotted
My Short Life As An Unintentional Spammer
by Mike Masnick
Ever wonder what sorts of emails end up in a spammer's email database? Want to know who actually responds to spam and what they say? Want to know the myriads of formats (and languages) a bounced email message can take? I can now tell you all of this. Without my knowledge, I recently became an accidental porn spammer.
When I got home one evening a few weeks ago, I noticed that I had more than the expected amount of email waiting for me. A quick glance through the inbox showed about fifty "bounced" emails - saying that email addresses of people I had emailed did not exist. The problem with this, of course, was that I hadn't actually emailed anyone.
It did not take long to figure out what happened. While some bounces simply told me that the recipient didn't exist, others included the original text of the email I had supposedly sent. It claimed to be from someone named "Chris" or "Ali" and was a reply to an alleged message from an online dating site. Chris and Ali apologized for taking so long to reply, and nervously suggested that the recipient find out more information about them by going to a website. Clearly, this was porn spam. Out of principal I won't visit the websites that were in the spam messages.
The problem was, I hadn't sent these messages at all. I'm not Chris or Ali. I don't use dating sites. I don't have a porn website. I don't send spam.
One of the popular "tricks" among spammers nowadays is to set the "reply-to" address as the same as the recipient's email address. That cuts out on the problems of bounce mails, and also has a psychological effect on recipients who are curious what email they've sent themselves. Most spam filters have figured out ways to still capture these spam messages (though, I'm now hearing stories of legitimate emails that people send to themselves being classified as spam). I've received plenty of these types of spam, and most are filtered away, never to be bothered with.
It seems that this particular spammer took things one step further, and made the "reply-to" address for all of his spam message set to my personal email address. If anyone looked at the headers, it was clear that I had nothing to do with the email whatsoever. However, most mail servers aren't so smart.
With any spam list, there's a certain percentage of "bad" or outdated email addresses. Generally speaking, a server that receives an email for someone they don't have an account for will "bounce" the message. Those bounces go to the person who sent the message - normally found in the "reply-to" line. Since my email address was in the reply-to line, all those bounces started coming my way, regrettably informing me that my pornographic spam emails had not found their intended recipient.
After dealing with the rapidly growing desire to reach through the internet and strangle whatever lower-than-life scum did this to my email address, I resigned myself to looking at this from an anthropological perspective. Suddenly, I was in a position to offer information on things that few others would (hopefully) ever willingly have access to.
Should anyone want it for research purposes, I now have a fairly large collection of bounce messages. It appears there is no standard format for a bounce message (which, by the way, makes them painfully difficult to filter). They have infinitely different subject lines. They say different things in the body of the message, sometimes nicely, sometimes rudely. They show up in different languages with different explanations. Some admit that the account has been closed due to too much spam. Others simply don't exist any more (if they ever did at all). Some bounces quote the original message; some don't. Some include full headers; some don't. Who knew there was such variety in how mail servers bounce their email?
Beyond the bounce messages were all sorts of auto-responders. It seems that some of the email addresses in the spammer's database were emails people used to send responses to those who "request more info". Suddenly I was receiving huge files of information that I really had no use for whatsoever. I also found out about a number of people who were on vacation that week, or who had recently switched jobs. One even had an auto-responder saying "this is closed...I am tired of the internet... all internet access for me is closing". Some of the addresses were to subscribe to various mailing lists. Many bounced back confirmation emails, asking to prove that I really wanted to subscribe, while others just subscribed me automatically (which will now force me to manually unsubscribe).
While most of the "information" was fairly useless, I suddenly had the opportunity to peek into the lives of people I had no association with whatsoever - connected only by spammer. I felt like reaching out and commiserating with those who were sick of the spam and wondered if I should congratulate those with new jobs. However, there was no time for that, I had more erroneous spam fallout to deal with.
Next, came the responses. I, like many people, often wonder what sorts of people actually respond to spam emails. For years, it has been beaten into my head that you never, under any circumstance, respond to a spam email. It just shows that you're a live human being, making your email address more valuable. I'm still shocked when I come across people who haven't heard this. However, they are out there, and they come in all different shapes and sizes. I have their emails to prove it.
There are the confused, but polite people. One woman wrote me a nice message saying that a "horrible" mistake had been made, and that she had not replied to my online dating ad. She did warn me, however, that there are "plenty of strange people out there" and that I should be careful. How nice. Another woman couldn't remember what she had said in her reply to my non-existent online dating profile and wanted to be reminded. A few others just asked who I was.
Then there are the unsubscribers, who are under the unfortunate delusion that asking spammers to take them off their list will help. They send simple messages saying simply "unsubscribe" or "unsubscribe, please", as if that will ever get to the actual spammer, or that they would actually pay any attention to it.
Lastly, are the angry, but clueless. I feel their pain, but they need to find a better outlet. I received emails telling me things I never knew (and find unlikely) about my lineage and suggesting I go places I have no interest in going, using all sorts of language you wouldn't use in polite company. I also received a threatening letter saying that I would be hearing from some company's corporate lawyer.
None of these people stopped to think that it was odd that my email address includes, pretty clearly, my name - which is neither Chris nor Ali. With the number of spam messages that go out every day, I wonder if these people reply to them all. I guess, for some people with anger management problems, this is a kind of outlet. All day, every day, respond angrily to spam messages, and maybe it will have a calming effect on your life.
What's scary is that, for the most, part, I only saw the bounced messages. They continued for approximately 36 hours, and then stopped abruptly. In the end, about 500 email messages bounced back to me, so I can only guess at how many thousands of poor, unsuspecting email boxes are currently dealing with spam sent with my email address as the reply-to. I apologize to all of you, even if I had nothing to do with it. I don't want to date you, and please, feel no compulsion to look at the web page in the email.
Most people agree that spam is evil. It's a waste of time and a general nuisance. I can argue against spam from a variety of levels. It's bad for the internet. It's bad for users. It's bad for business. It's just bad. Luckily, there's a rapidly growing industry of companies (and simply concerned individuals) creating software solutions to help stop the spam menace. While there are debates over how well any of these systems work, it is possible to at least reduce your spam intake. Personally, I use a spam filter that is pretty effective in reducing my spam load to a mostly manageable level.
However, with something like this, there simply is no effective preventative measure in place. The spammers spoof the reply-to, making it whatever they want - so it never even touches my mail server at all. My inbox gets bombarded because there's no simple way to filter out the bounced messages since they are all so different. It's difficult to track down a spammer normally - and more so when the spam isn't even sent to you. Despite the fact that my address was the reply-to, it seems the spammer never sent me the message directly. I found a bounce message that showed the full headers and tracked it back. The email came from a mail server in the Philippines, and pointed to a website hosted in China, owned by a company in London. Tracking down the actual spammer would likely be close to impossible. Assuming they could be found, suing them would be nearly impossible as well, not to mention costly.
One potential solution to this would be to require every outgoing email to have a verified identifier of some sort, so that any email can automatically be traced back to the original sender. This (as does every solution) brings up other problems. There are benefits to anonymous email, and we wouldn't want to take that away (though, perhaps you could limit the number of emails that could be sent anonymously to prevent bulkmailers from abusing the system).
In the end, though, this sort of stunt has killed off the tiniest amount of support I had for spammers. These spammers stand behind their First Amendment rights to speak their minds (which is an argument that can be shot full of holes in a second). In this case, though, the spammer made no use of any First Amendment rights. What they did was just mean and nasty and a complete waste of my time.
Selling software wont make you money, selling a service will.
- Penis emlargements;
- Viagra;
- Boob jobs;
- Sex;
- Porn;
- Rebuilt credit;
- Credit cards;
- Cheap mortgages;
- Cheap health insurance;
- Cheap dental insurance;
- An easy way to make millions from home with little effort!;
- University Diplomas;
- Free anything; and, of course
- Spam lists.
Spammers try to sell (gullible) people what they might buy, never what they won't. I've yet to see a spammer selling flights to Mars - although I do predict it will be a growth area for spammers in 20 years time."Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
I gave Testimony to the Missouri House of Reps on Jan. 29th.
It's easy to get things in motion, everyone is too lazy to try though.
The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
Curiously, I almost never get anyone writing to me complaining about the spam. That used to happen, but I think most folks have figured out not to reply. I also don't seem to have been blacklisted anywhere (faughnan.com); the blacklist maintainers are apparently smart enough not to be fooled by spoofed fields.
Why did they pick me? I think they like to take addresses that are present in the registrar databases. Or maybe they picked me because I complained about spam and write about ways to stop it (not that hard really, we just need to authenticate the sending service rather than the harder task of authenticating the sender).
In any event, sadly this is old news. Good to know it's starting to make its way into the public consciousness though.
John Faughnan
jfaughnan@spamcop.net
Has the rapid growth of the Internet of the last few years caused it to reach the status of an immovable object?
IPv6, which includes security, ummm, mechanisms that could be utilized to curtail spoofing, some forms of DDOS and net abuses in general, but rolling it out seems too be gracial.
New RFC's could be authored that extend, modify or replace those upon which our present mail server's are based, but would... could anyone get them pushed through? Or is the Internet infrastructure so massive that any major advances in concept run smack into the issue of interoperability?
it's now illegal to provide any false information while using oral communication. specifically related to, but not limited to, false information regarding the name of the communicator.
spam spam spam. if spam should be illegal, so should any form of unsolicited communication. that includes conversing to persons without their permission at the local pub.
i'm personally in favor of a more liberated
government system, but if we want our legislatures to make rules, let's make it a level playing field , not just fix the annoying problem we have of spam (that is created because of a technical deficiency in the overall system of itself).
Holy crap the email she got! Emails came from people all over the world. An incredibly rare number of them included clothing and were simply introductions. Most of them included an attached nude picture of (I assume) themself (either that or there is a cast of nude pictures of incredibly ugly people floating around somewhere). Some of them demonstrated their sexual experiences with animals. But every single one of them seriously pursuing some sort of sexual relationship with someone that
This whole experience turned my wife off of the internet for a long time.
I was able to track down the original post to alt.bestiality.whatever it was, and tracked it to a posting through deja news. (This was about 5 years ago). But ironically, there was nothing in that post that included "go to this website" or anything like that. The only contact information in it was my wife's email address. At the time, I assumed that the person who did this wanted us to change email addresses so he/she could have the one that we had (which was simply my wife's first name@iname.com).
After tracking it down I sent deja the information and asked them to pursue it. And I changed my wife's email address. We have our own domain now. BUT I still, occasionally login to the iname.com account and empty it. I want that account to stay active forever so that whoever tried this doesn't win.
What would you do if this happened to you? What are the defenses for this kind of thing? The email that came in wasn't spam. It was real email from real people who had real mailboxes. How do you prevent this kind of thing? So most of the antispam techniques that I know of wouldn't have worked. Additionally, we occasionally get emails w/attachments from friends who want to show us pictures of their kids. So blocking all attachments won't work. What should be done?
Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
This domain was used by a spammer, they sued and won. http://www.mids.org/mn/803/spamset.html
Michael Loves Me!
...if it's a legit company who has someone who has a person actually reading the replies.
This is a letter I sent off to a company who offered me ways to enlarge my breasts. Being male and having no desire for hooters I felt obliged to reply.
----------
Do you people simply not bother to see to whom this message is going to? Do you not bother to do market research to see if I'm even going to be able to use the product? I am a man. I have a penis and not breasts. I am a guy, a bloke packing a "willie", a "johnson", "meat and two veg", a "one-eyed trouser snake", a "little fellow", a thingie, the "outy" parts to match up with the "inny" bits of the people to whom you should be sending this spam to and not me and my "Collection of dangly bits".
To put it simply people..."A DICK"
I have no interest in your product for the enlargement of breasts and request that you remove me from your list.
Thank You,
[name removed]
BTW: I'm also happy with the size of my naughty bits and request that you not send me information on that product should you offer that as well.
----------
To which I actually got this as a response:
----------
ROFL
Sir we are deeply sorry that you have recieved this advertisment and we are taking you off our contact list. We thank you for your polite and amusing letter.
Again sorry for the inconvience
----------
That was in August and to this day I have not seen any messages offering to give me "Huge...tracts of Land" since that date.
Sometimes it pays to answer a spam
Phoenix
-- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
This happened to my wife recently - She was suprised (to say the least) to be getting hundreds of bounces back from a spam.
If it had been porn I would have looked into the possiblity of filing a defamation of character lawsuit. It was in your case and if it was written in the first person singular ( "come see me nekkid...") and had *you* as the reply-to I'd imagine you'd have an excellent chance of winning such a case - it would certainly be worth talking to a lawyer about.
A spammer forges the wrong domain into a batch of spam, and the victim strikes back.
Someone needs to register a domain name and make anything@foo.bar automatically forward to UCE@FTC.GOV . That way, when we sign up for sites and such that filter out users who use UCE@FTC.GOV as their email, there will still be a way to prevent junk mail. Also, sites that list randomly generated fake emails to slow down spambots could be made more effective.
Karma: Excellent (fuck, even in the future moderation doesn't work!)
That would vastly reduce the amount of USEFUL EMAIL as well. You would not believe what a large fraction of the Internet is configured to fail that kind of test -- or else you would not seriously contemplate that solution. Sometimes there are good reasons to configure a mail server that way.
DNS is not a terribly useful authentication mechanism for this kind of thing. Much more useful is origin-authenticated SMTP: the originator (either user or mail server) calculates a signed hash of the message, and attaches that when sending it. The receiver can verify that the signature is valid for the person (or mail server) that claimed to originate the message.
Obviously things lose in the transition period before every sender does that. You also get a huge fight over which algorithms to use, how to distribute and verify the public keys, and so forth. Welcome to Internet politics.
Sometimes spammers do this just by putting whatever domain in. Other times this is done deliberately as a means of attacking someone.
The term Joe-Job got it's name originally from Joes.com when a spammer decided to get revenge in this fashion. Information can be found here:
Spam Attack!
I can say from having had this done to me, it absolutely sucks. It creates a huge mess that takes weeks to clean up, plus the joy of dealing with people who decide to attack you for something you didn't/would never do. If I were to ever get my hands on those responsible....
Unfortunately, the problem with tracking down those responsible for this dispicable act is the same one with tracking spammers down in general. It is time consuming, costly and may not yield a desireable result.
If you want to see more on this, just Google Search for "Joe-Job"
It is good to bust/report spammers, but when you do, look at the spam and the site being spamvertized. You might have received a joe-job email and by reporting them, you're playing into the spammer's hands.
If you ever get joe-jobbed, I would say one defense on the web is to change your page to one similar to the "Spam Attack" page I reference above.
A: I'm going to slashdot my web server!
Have there ever been any cases of an e-mail equivalent of "road rage", where someone (or a group) has actually went out and either physically harmed a spammer or killed him?
BEFORE
SEND
Seriously, if your mail server has that, turn it on. It means no one can relay mail through your server, unless their IP has made a successful mail-check. Some mail servers let you "authenticate" by checking to see that the reply-to address is valid on the local server, that, as you can see, does nothing and can be spoofed easily. Pop-before-send is quite a bit stronger and doesnt really require the clients to do anything. No, its not perfect, Im not saying it is, but it will help 99% of the time.
I'm Rick James with mod points biatch!
I tried to find where they were coming from, some of the bounces were more informative than others... The originating IP ended up being someone(intentionally or unintentionally) running an SMTP proxy server... And the IP was out in the middle of nowhere... (Came back to a B-class set of addresses... Not much help in tracking down a network admin...)
Some of the bounces had the actual message... Which were linking people to a site which in turn asked them to buy something (saying that their order page was secure when it wasn't)... I tracked down who had registered the domain (the admin and billing contacts...) addresses ended up being in China (domain was cnmailads.com)... Sent email, no response... I set up procmail to redirect the hundreds of bounces to them, plus I had some simple spam filters, and redirected all of my spam to them as well...
The order page contained a form that had an email address for where the orders were really going... I made my own personal copy of the form, and began sending megs of data through... Entering bogus info to corrupt any real entries (who would order this crap over the Net from a website in China??? Who knows...) Email address was a yahoo account, which it didn't take long for me to fill it up... All added the yahoo address to my procmail redirector as well...
I went to a couple of spammy sites (cooldeals.com or something like that)... Signed them up to receive all sorts of valuable emails... Signed them up for some mailing lists too... Easy to sign up, and pain to get off of...
It had been going on for about a week before I started this, and stopped after about 2 days... Checked back to the link that was sent and the site was gone... Probably moving on to the next sucker email address and site...
Platform independent bug tracking software
I had this happen to me. It was "www securedrugs net" I thought for a while of using some recent attack as revenge, such as the anonymous UDP Gamespy DOS attack, to take down the perp's website for a few weeks. However, I don't really have the time or experience for this sort of thing. If anyone else feels like it, Go right ahead! Now that this has happened, my inbox has seen a doubling of spam. From a Yahoo account, it is not so easy to filter this stuff. Soon I may very well have to pay for Yahoo mail, to get better filtering. Perhaps some of these recipients have signed me up for more? J
I mirrored it. Read away.
Even Outlook Express sets any From: you want
There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
If an email bounces, the bounce is supposed to go back to the sender, not to the Reply-to: address. (I believe this is in RFC 2821) It's amazing how many commercial mail servers out there use Reply-to: to send postmaster notifications.
Spammers have been resorting to guessing email addys now. This isnt new but I've just started seeing more and more of this shit lately:
Feb 12 13:39:27 warthog sendmail[21909]: h1CIdQK21909: <dclark@mydomain.com>... User unknown
Feb 12 13:39:27 warthog sendmail[21909]: h1CIdQK21909: <paladin@mydomain.com>... User unknown
Feb 12 13:39:27 warthog sendmail[21909]: h1CIdQK21909: <mbrown@mydomain.com>... User unknown
Feb 12 13:39:27 warthog sendmail[21909]: h1CIdQK21909: <viper@mydomain.com>... User unknown
Feb 12 13:39:27 warthog sendmail[21909]: h1CIdQK21909: <kelley@mydomain.com>... User unknown
Feb 12 13:39:27 warthog sendmail[21909]: h1CIdQK21909: <rbrown@mydomain.com>... User unknown
Feb 12 13:39:28 warthog sendmail[21909]: h1CIdQK21909: from=<joe@nowhere.com>, size=0, class=0, nrcpts=0, proto=SMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=[200.162.240.168]
I tried to post all 65 attempts in this batch but the damn lameness filter said:
"Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted"
Nonetheless you get the picture.
It seems to me that as long as we have no authentication method for sending e-mail and verifying where it is coming from we will continue to have problems with SPAM. Most mail servers will believe whatever you tell them; this has got to stop. The Reply-To and From fields need to be set on the mail server. Users should also log in to send mail from their smtp server and you should be able to use the same smtp server from anywhere instead of just within its domain. There are other details involved in verifying the smtp server when receiving mail to prevent people from using their own sendmail in an inapropriate manner. This can be solved techinically; especially if there was one global e-mail database but we all know how much everyone wants a global database of anything; let alone e-mail to ID.
I've given up on most of it. The best way to figure out where junk is coming from is to just view the contents as ASCII, which The Bat does very nicely. (Show kludges shows headers) Most of the time there's a phone number or website and doing a whois on many will reveal the villain.
There are urls which are use just the IP address and those which look like HTTP://434328432849, the number being an IP address, not in the form 127.0.0.1, but the sum of 1+0*2^8+0*2^16+127*2^24, a neat way of masking sites.
Other news... I was just checkin a website I've had for 4+ years and never checked the mailbox that came with it. It filled up Mar 23, 2002 and has 1,669 pieces of mail, mostly spam. Looks like I'll be cleaning it out on Saturday. It would be an interesting project to archive it all and see how many violate California's anti-spam law and see if I can Make $$$$ At Home!
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
I have had to deal with this same problem off and on.
Someone who does not like the idea of my operation of a website critical
of our company forges e-mails with my E-mail Address.
Instead of porn or spam this person includes Virus files.
Same said person also sends me 2 or 3 Klez infected e-mails everyday.
http://www.Slaveway.com
only break $5000 worth of his bones. then you won't be worth investigating either.
Given that you just entered the domain name not once, but twice, and your post is likely to be seen my thousands, spidered, and google-cached, I take it that you don't like your mail admin very much, do you?
"They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
Service Pack 1 of Office XP (which contains Outlook 2002) adds a feature for disabling HTML mail which is described in Microsoft KB Article # 307594 . Users of previous versions of Outlook can use the macros provided here
Press CTRL-ALT-DEL now for an IQ test.
You're going to have trouble with any mail that passes through non-routable hosts inside a firewall. All my mail will have something like "Received: ... by gateway.localdomain (10.0.0.1)".
It will be even worse for mail that travels though something other than SMTP for a bit.
I was the target of a joe-job since last April. A spammer advertising a Human Growth Hormone website based in China was sending out tens of thousands of spams over a long period, with my long-held email addy in the From: address.
The vast majority of the mails you get back are administrative emails saying that "the user does not exist." There is also a small amount that you get that are ill-informed, ignorant, and often very inflamed responses from people who respond.
At the peak of the attack, I got over 14,000 emails in a single day. It almost caused me to have to give up my email address, which I had held for almost seven years at the time. I didn't want to give it up so easily.
My solution was to install and use the Tagged Message Delivery Agent (http://www.tmda.net), which is a whitelisting service. It has my admiration for rejecting 100% of the unwanted emails for two reasons. First administrative accounts don't reply to their whitelisting requests, and second, ignorant angry users don't bother to reply to get whitelisted anyways.
As for the question of why someone would do this, I have thought of three reasons:
- To make their spam look more legitimate.
- Just to cause general havoc
- Because I have, in the past, not hesitated to complain to service providers about spam. This was probably retribution.
I did attempt to bring some form of legal action into the fray. I talked informally to Scott Frewing, a US attorney (one of the prime players in the Skylarov case), about the attack. He referred me to the FBI's online fraud folks, but couldn't really give me much encouragement on the chance of the success, since the spammer's website was located in the China Telecom domain, although the company it claimed to represent was in New Jersey. In fact, he told me I would probably be better off pursuing the case strictly on the basis of fraud and possible identity theft (the use of my email address) rather than as a spam case.
I stopped pursuing it after talking to Frewing.
In any event, I have won the battle in the sense that I will never see the unwanted mails. But I have lost the war in the sense that I can't really make the F*CKER stop doing it, and it does consume resources on my linux box.
-- Mojo Tooth : exploring our world as only an idiot can.
My sweetie got Joe-Jobbed a couple of weeks ago. 20K bounces over the course of the day. Thankfully, the payload of the spam was only two lines of text, containing a URL to a (non-existent) pr0n site. So the bounce messages were comparatively short. A cursory look at the headers in the bounces suggested that the attacker -- 'spammer' is too genteel a term for this -- was using a constellation of open relays to spread the stuff.
She came into my office, saying, "Make it stop!" Sadly, there turns out to be little one can do to stop it. The emails were coming from thousands of different legitimate sites, all serving a legitimate bounce to an illegitimate spam. It was very distressing for her. Fortunately, the attack stopped, and things settled down after about 24 hours.
I wrote up the experience on Kuro5hin. Feel free to have a look.
Schwab
Editor, A1-AAA AmeriCaptions
I had the UK national radio station Classic FM hijack my domain and use it to send a Valentines day spam message (this was last year). Again, the only way I found out was when all the spam came bouncing back to me. I wrote to the MD of the station, and did get a personal reply, apologising and claiming their web developer had made a "mistake". I asked for compensation and didn't get it though. I also got plenty of out of office auto replies, plenty with name, addresses and telephone numbers. The biggest number of bouncing emails came from Hotmail, Yahoo and Lycos. The thing I found most upsetting was the possibility of having my email blocked by companies or people that got this spam or having my net connection closed because of spam reports.
Two stories, one related to /.
/. last weekend about the Simpsons cast on Bravo. To my utter shock, it was accepted and posted. I stupidly put my very private email (the one that didn't ever get spam) in the Email field. I know, I know...
.zip.pir attachments, and a few with blatant Trojans. Luckily, I'm OSX so they had no effect, but I was amazed how quickly the email hoovering app grabbed that email addy. They seemed more malicious than sales oriented.
I submitted an article to
Less than two hours later, I started getting weird email, complete with
I haven't received any today at that address but I'm still kicking myself. Moral: spammers hoover slashdot, so don't post your email here, ever.
Story two: For almost five years I had the email bruce@altavista.net. In November, I got mail from Mail.com stating that the Altavista.net domain was being closed down and they were replacing my long-used address to something like bruce@way-cool-dude.com. Um, no thanks I said, I use this account for business and that doesn't work for me.
Ok, they said, how about we reactivate bruce@mail.com and you can have that? "Hmm, neat addy, easy to remember," so I agreed. They activated it on a Monday night.
Tuesday morning I woke up to more than 400 mails. Maybe 20% were typical Hotmail "make your penis so big you need a hose reel" spams but a full 80% were Joe jobs: spammers who had used that address as a reply-to. I knew I was going to shut it down but I watched it for three days just to see.
Total Joe job spams, almost four thousand (in three days) before I had them cut the damn thing off. Said fuck it, and bought a domain for business mail, and ended that adventure.
Someone oughta make a law.....
"The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
You mean like this?
RFC 2487: SMTP Service Extension for Secure SMTP over TLS.
SMTP [RFC-821] servers and clients normally communicate in the clear over the Internet.... Further, there is often a desire for two SMTP agents to be able to authenticate each others' identities. For example, a secure SMTP server might only allow communications from other SMTP agents it knows, or it might act differently for messages received from an agent it knows than from one it doesn't know.
THIS THING CAN TURN ON A DIME, MACROSSZERO STYLE ALSO FUCK BETA, ~NYORON
in the last 4 days my yahoo account (which i've had for years and don't want to have to change) has used its' 6mb quota up 17 times because of all of the undeliverables i'm getting back from this spam I didn't send. I volunteer for a Forensics K9 Search group and I get emergency call-outs sent to this address, so my mailbox filling up and bouncing messages is a very very very bad thing. (side note: this week NASA contacted us saying that if they needed to call in groups from outside CA and TX we were next on the list to be brought in!) This morning was the last straw..i got over 1000 bounces again and I decided to take a closer look at the SPAMMERs site. It turns out they have a crappy verisign shopping cart that does not, in fact, verify credit card numbers beforehand. So i submitted the form about 1000 times before i got sick of it. If you'd like to have a laugh, or to help me get revenge, then click the link below to see a screenshot of their website with the info i filled in the form, as well as the URL to the SPAMMER's page...
This is NOT the spammer's page, just a link to a screenshot of their page with the URL included
"Leave no authority existing which does not answer to the people" --Thomas Jefferson
My girlfriend started getting a ton of bounced emails and not being a techie type person, asked me what the hell was going on...turns out the same thing happened to her as happened to the writer of that article: A spammer was mass mailing, in this case, penis enlargement pills, and setting her address as the reply-to.
Instead of writing a witty retort on a website though, I took care of it the way everyone else should from now on: (READ THIS) I looked up the registration info on the website that was being advertised in the spam....luckily it was a US registrant.
I then immediately called the technical contact listed for that company. After a few tries, I managed to get him to answer the phone. I told him politely but firmly that whomever he had hired to advertise his website/product was using questionably legal and certainly unethical tactics to do so and was making a lot more enemies than customers. He seemed genuinely upset that this was going on and gladly gave up the name, address, email address, and telephone number of the spam-mercenary he had hired. I called the spammer and left a voice mail telling him I hope he didn't really enjoy his email address or phone number a whole lot and proceeded to sign up for any and every mass marketing, porn, magazine subscription, and telemarketing form I could find.
Sometimes the operator of the website is the one doing the spamming, and if this were the case I would have chewed him a new one when I talked to him. Either way, you'll get a pretty good idea of where the spam is coming from if you just call the webmaster for the advertised site. I've been saying for years that this is how they need to enforce spam legislation....bring charges against the website operator rather than trying to track down the spammer. No customers to spam for, the spammers will dry up and blow away. Legally, it makes sense...if you hire someone to kill a person for you, you're legally culpable...so hiring someone to spam for you should get you into trouble as well. Make the first offense a "warning" in case they hired a marketing company and didn't know they were spammers. A slap on the wrist and warnings of heavy fines for future infractions will most certainly make them choose more wisely when picking a marketing company.
This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.