Slashdot Mirror


Sony Ericsson P800 Reviewed

Ch_Omega writes "For all those who have been waiting, there is now an in-depth and detailed review of one of the most anticipated connected handhelds of 2003, the Sony Ericsson P800, over at Infosync. Does it live up to the hype? According to the story, the answer is yes." I've been lusting after the t68i for awhile, but maybe I'll wait for this one. It just looks so cool!

220 comments

  1. It's the screen by metamatic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was planning on getting a P800 until I discovered that the screen is smaller than a Palm.

    I figured if I was going to put up with a device with a screen the size of a postage stamp, I'd go with a t68i, which will at least fit easily in my pocket, and have a separate handheld computer linked via Bluetooth.

    I'm still looking for the computer part of the setup; the new Sony CLIE is looking promising.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:It's the screen by Troed · · Score: 1
      ... the screen is also so much _better_ that the small physical formfactor isn't a problem.


      Having the handheld computer and phone in one device really, really, makes up for a lot.

    2. Re:It's the screen by SecGreen · · Score: 4, Informative

      The screen is a bit larger than a postage stamp... It's resolution (when open) is 208x320 pixels, just a little lower than most PocketPCs (320x240) and much higher than the old-generation PalmOS PDAs (160x160).

      When compared with a PalmOS pda, the screen is smaller (about 60% the area), but it's still 2.5 times the area of the screen on the t68i.

      Devices like these have to make compromises.

      --
      Dupe posts are /.'s tacit protest on the rights of users to time-shift content...
    3. Re:It's the screen by MrMickS · · Score: 2, Funny
      I figured if I was going to put up with a device with a screen the size of a postage stamp, I'd go with a t68i, which will at least fit easily in my pocket, and have a separate handheld computer linked via Bluetooth.

      I already do this. I've looked at PDA phones for a while but I've never really been taken with them. I've used various Palm devices to make SSH connection to servers using phones over the past few years. I used to use IR but with bluetooth this is even simpler.

      The only neat PDA/phone is still the Nokia 9210i. I mean Doom and you can use a serial cable to connect to switches/servers, what more could a geek want?

      --
      You may think me a tired, old, cynic. I'd have to disagree about the tired bit.
    4. Re:It's the screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.neonode.com

      the size, funktionality, the geekfaktor...

    5. Re:It's the screen by SerpentMage · · Score: 1

      I just got my T68i with bluetooth. And my wife already has had the T68i for a while now. (We live in Europe). The T68i rocks. Tonight when I got my t68i the salesman showed me the T800. Nice, but too big. I have gotten used to putting my phone in my pocket instead of the "geeky" belt protector. And with bluetooth enabled Pocket PC, what more do you want. Bluetooth really is a godsend, with the devices.

      --

      "You can't make a race horse of a pig"
      "No," said Samuel, "but you can make very fast pig"
  2. hey by odyrithm · · Score: 2, Funny

    it looks just like my ice box! kewl.

    --
    moo
    1. Re:hey by odyrithm · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I give up with /., you fucking mods (not all) have about as much intelligence as a gold fish with no head.

      --
      moo
    2. Re:hey by odyrithm · · Score: 2, Funny

      cheers to the mods that have a sense of humour. need more like you.

      --
      moo
    3. Re:hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M2ed the Insightful as fair. Had me ROFL.

  3. I have one by Troed · · Score: 4, Informative
    ... and it's wonderful.


    It's a bit bigger than my last two cellphones, but it packs a lot of functionality. I've always had a handheld computer since I work in the embedded/telecom/handheld-industry, but I've never carried it with me. With the P800 I finally do - it's the perfect replacement for the cellphone/palm-combination.


    Oh, and Symbian OS is the meanest, cleanest, leanest wonderful little operating system to run - and code for. Really.

    1. Re:I have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Oh, and Symbian OS is the meanest,
      > cleanest, leanest wonderful little
      > operating system to run - and code
      > for. Really.

      You *are* kidding right?

      --greg.

    2. Re:I have one by Troed · · Score: 1

      Symbian-greg? Anyway .. I actually do consider Symbian OS to be that good. Sure - I haven't developed on _all_ systems, but quite a few .. and I'd take Symbian OS any day if I could choose.

    3. Re:I have one by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Symbian is appalling! It's desparately in love with itself and its own idioms, and re-implements everything. "typedef void TAny;", for god's sake, not to mention the tortuous try/throw/catch replacement and cryptic error cleanup. The documentation is truly dreadful: everything returns "KErrNone or another of the system wide error codes", but no hints as to what error codes or under what circumstances, you have to use an undocumented feature to translate error returns to comprehensible values, getting network support in the emulator is a lottery, the develop forums are full of questions but no answers, you have to jump through hoops to fake global variables...

      Put it this way. If you never intend to develop for any other platform, then Symbian is worth investing in. If you only plan to live for one human lifetime, then get a P800 (they're superb) but don't waste your life trying to develop for it.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    4. Re:I have one by Troed · · Score: 1
      If you, like me, knew that Symbian implemented its own try/catch _before_ it even existed in C++, then you might understand why.


      (Several of the constructs in Symbian (Epoc) predated their equivalents in C++)


      Since I've developed on Symbian since 1998 I have no problems with what you describe, but that might be to me being a Symbian employee for a few years also ;) (Nowadays I'm consulting .. )

  4. T68i is a step down.. by ltning · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to my own experience with the T68i, the build quality and usability of that phone is significantly worse than that of the T68. Sure, you can bring them to the same level firmware-wise, but the T68 is just more sturdy than the 'i' model. I had one T68 and two T68i's, and the T68 works nicely still (it's the oldest and has had the roughest treatment), while the i's have both broken down, and been repaired four times altogether.
    But I don't like any of them; they are just too damn slow. I mean come on - 2-3 seconds wait to open the address book? And what about typing SMS'es, by the time you wrote half the message you have to wait for the phone to catch up with you..

    I really hope this new one is faster, sturdier and more usable. Then I'll perhaps check it out.

    --
    Love over Gold.
    1. Re:T68i is a step down.. by Slashdot+Fool · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have to say that that han't been my experience of the t68i at all. Mine seems pretty snappy to use, and opens a book of 120 or so numbers in 1 seconds. The predictive text is much the best that I've used - vastly better than motorola phones', for example.

      It also has a large memory for numbers and text messages, and about twice the battery life of other phones I've owned (and of my friend's phones). And that's with bluetooth on purely for the natty blue LED.

      I'd have to agree that it's not the most strongly constructed, but that's what you get for lightness, I suppose. I'd add that I've dropped it several times onto hard surfaces, and no harm has come to it.

      If I had to critique it, I'd say that it could stand to be heavier (provided the size didn't change) in exchange for an even longer battery life, and the keys aren't all that great.

      Overall, though, it's the best phone I've owned by some way, and something like 50% of the people I know have bought them since the first ones started appearing amongst my aquaintances.

      And yes, I do know someone who had a more-or-less DOA, but then I know someone who had two from Nokia, so I'm not drawing any QC conclusions.

      Steff

    2. Re:T68i is a step down.. by pigeon · · Score: 1

      I don't know, my t68i feels slow.. when I push the buttons (tap tap tap.. wait.. ah!) it reacts too slow, especially compared with a nokia 8310. The user interface is also a bit of a dissapointment compared with nokia's. But the feature's are cool.. to be able to use your t68i as a bluetooth remotecontrol for your computer for example.. and it syncs well via bluetooth with my mac. I wonder: does the p-800 sync with OS X or linux?

    3. Re:T68i is a step down.. by Brummund · · Score: 1
      MultiSync is almost working with my t68i. A bit of a struggle to compile the bluez-modules/utilities, but I can now ping my phone via Bluetooth. :-)

      MultiSync can sync your Evolution mail, contacts etc. (But not bbdb, but I guess there must be some lisp/Gnus/bbdb hacker out there working on it now)

      I agree that the t68i feels slow. The t9 menus are annoying, and using the joystick seems slower than using the numeric keys to access menus. I can write SMS messages at least twice as fast using T9 on my 7110.

    4. Re:T68i is a step down.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh No...! Not 2 seconds...my god

    5. Re:T68i is a step down.. by Priyadi · · Score: 1

      Address book is slow? Try upgrading the firmware. It solved all the speed issues for me here.

    6. Re:T68i is a step down.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can use numeric keys to access menus on the T68i also...think of the icon based menu as your keypad (i.e. the 9 icons correspond to the 9 number keys) - pressing 1 will get you into the address book section, 2 will get you into the messages menu, 3 will get you the calls menu, etc...it works pretty well. from there, most menu options have numeric equivalents also. once you get used to them you can click the joystick followed by long strings of numbers to get right to where you want to be (click-212 for your sms inbox, for example), just like nokias.

    7. Re:T68i is a step down.. by ltning · · Score: 1

      Is there any way I can do the upgrade myself? And where can I find out what the latest firmware is?

      --
      Love over Gold.
    8. Re:T68i is a step down.. by Priyadi · · Score: 1

      You can't upgrade yourself. Take your phone to nearest SonyEricsson service center.

  5. Yeesh! by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "there is also a plastic stylus which looks quite silly and flimsy at first glance, but thanks to its flat, curved shape works surprisingly well. And just like Sony Ericsson, we suspect it to be easy to lose track of - which is probably why there are three spare ones included in the box."

    That doesn't exactly inspire confidence in the design team!

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Yeesh! by matthew.thompson · · Score: 1

      Why not? They have the insight to realise that people will put their stylus down and loose it and so include spares as standard.

      To keep the weight down the stylus is plastic and a little easier to forget about than the relatively hefty Palm Tungsten T stylus which is a more memorable item.

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    2. Re:Yeesh! by skirch · · Score: 1
      That doesn't exactly inspire confidence in the design team!

      Actually, I think it does. There's really not much a designer can do about a stylus apart from tethering it to the PDA, but I think most would agree that a tether would suck. It's the only necessarily separate object, and bound to be lost. Seems like a smart thing to do, including multiples of an easily lost object...

    3. Re:Yeesh! by neden · · Score: 0

      Actually, I think it does. There's really not much a designer can do about a stylus apart from tethering it to the PDA, but I think most would agree that a tether would suck. It's the only necessarily separate object, and bound to be lost. Seems like a smart thing to do, including multiples of an easily lost object...


      One design suggestion: how about some form of electronic tether? Perhaps something like one of akin to an RFID tag in the stylus. The 'mother-device' (PDA, phone, what-have-you) could check for proximity at an certain interval (every few seconds?) and start to complain (beep, warning message) if the stylus gets out of range. Of course, there would need to be ways to 'un-tether' and 're-tether' the stylus (changing to a new one, lending yours to someone else, etc.) through the SW. I don't know if this is feasible yet (size, cost, etc), but it's just an idea.

    4. Re:Yeesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about it, that would be the most obnoxious feature ever.

    5. Re:Yeesh! by neden · · Score: 0

      Think about it, that would be the most obnoxious feature ever.

      How so? About the only time my stylus is more than a few feet away from my Palm is when I have left it somewhere and walked away or lent it to someone else and they walked away with it. Even in the second case, I would only loan it to someone who would use it for a few minutes and give it back (ie they shouldn't get up and walk away with it).

      Anyone who frequently has their stylus separated from their PDA/cell/etc can just disable the warning by always leaving the stylus set to 'un-tethered' through a software setting.

      I expect such a feature to be fully customizable through the software - in addition to being able to disable it, I would want to control what type of warnings (visual, audible (including volume)), how long it has to be out of range before the warning occurs, etc.

  6. T68i by cdrudge · · Score: 3, Informative

    Taco - If you've been lusting over the T68i, you are going to be sadly disappointed. The reception sucks unless you are withing about 6 inches of a tower. The only plus it has is bluetooth. Do yourself a favor. Get the Samsung S105 if you can't wait.

    1. Re:T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the mod who gave you an overrated probably thinks, that's not necessarily true for everyone. I won't say more, because I don't want to tempt fate :-)

    2. Re:T68i by krorvik · · Score: 1

      This is not my experience with this phone. Then again, I live in Oslo, with very good signal conditions.

    3. Re:T68i by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      I did exagerate some, but not much. I bet that 75% of people who have the phone are unhappy with the phones signal strength. I purchased a T68 (the T68i is just cosmetically different for the most part) and the signal was horrorible. Dropped calls, choppy reception...and that was within line of sight of a tower about 300 yards away. Inside buildings or farther away was even worse. Check out Amazon's reviews, howardforum.com, or any other place that has reviews of the phone and you'll see that this isn't just my opinion. This was last October that I experienced this. Maybe they found it was a firmware thing (not likely) or something else wrong since then, but I doubt it.

    4. Re:T68i by catch23 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you use AT&T with your T68i. I don't get your reception problems with T-Mobile....

    5. Re:T68i by Zerikai · · Score: 1

      I've heard lots of people say this, yet my t68i reception is just about perfect.

      But this phone is sluggish, stay away from it if that bothers you. The nokia 6310 was so much faster... Oh, and the site where the review was posted is slashdotted...

    6. Re:T68i by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      Actually it was T-mobile in NE Indiana.

    7. Re:T68i by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      See here for all the problems that people have had. I probably should have said that your reception may suck. Everyone hasn't had problems, but many people have possibly do to the internal antenna.

      Whatever the reason is, I think that there are many better phones out there. The screen has an inferior resolution to most color phones out there right now, doesn't have polyphonic or better ringtones (if that interests you), or java applets/midlets. If you want to go spend 199 for the T68 or 299 for the T68i, go for it. I'm just telling you my experience. I thought that the $200 I paid for my S105 was a better deal.

    8. Re:T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously know nothing about GSM. Just because your 300ft from a tower, doesn't necessarily mean that's the tower you're talking to.

      I also have a T68i and am more than happy with its performance. The specification is also great, far ahead of any comparative Nokia, which is a shame as I used to love my old Nokia phones.

    9. Re:T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Puh-lease. I'm not sure if you're deliberately trolling or just being naive.

      Firstly, if there was such a widespread problem, the retailers would know, and if it was as bad as you suggest, there'd probably be a recall.

      Not all reviews mention problems, in fact fairly few that I visited do.

      I have a T68i, it's fine (in fact, far better reception than my previous Nokia 3210). As seems to be the case with all the other people I know that have it. Yours may be faulty but stating that you guess 75% of people that have the phone have problems is simply ridiculous.

      I bet that 83% of people take you to be a troll, and realise that you're talking bollocks.

    10. Re:T68i by l1gunman · · Score: 1

      My T68i cost me -.01 dollars due to the Circuit City/ATT rebates offered. It's hard to beat that price! SO far I'm not complaining about reception, though I have managed to find at least one "dead spot" in my house with aluminum siding (aluminium for those of you on the other side of the pond! ;-)

      For all the features, the size, the battery life, etc., I think it is a great phone. Excuse me, gotta run and trade my Palm 515 w/ Bluetooth adapter for a Palm "T"... I thinnk that'll be a kick-ass combination.

    11. Re:T68i by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      For those of us who don't like to get a new phone number every 12 months, it's 199/299. Maybe a little cheaper, those are T-Mo's prices before any type of loyalty discounts if they apply.

    12. Re:T68i by l1gunman · · Score: 1

      Of course, you're right about that. I gave my old Verizon StarTac to the wife as an excuse for getting GSM w/ Bluetooth. (What can I say, she went for it!)

    13. Re:T68i by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      That is correct. It doesn't necessarily mean that. But there is a very good chance that would be the tower that you would get since it probably would have the strongest signal. Also, if you are on a fringe area, it may be the only tower for some distance, so if you are getting a signal, then that would be the tower you'd hook up with. The particular area that I had the most problem with was exactly that type of problem. My Moto Timeport, Nokia 3390, and Samsung S105 never had any problems, but my T68 did.

      I was expressing my opinion. I said in another post that this is what I experienced. Maybe your's was different. I do know that I am not the only one that was disappointed by the poor reception.

    14. Re:T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      if you're rating the reception quality of a phone, you NEED to also mention which service provider you use, and what areas you use the phone in.

      otherwise, your comments are useless.

    15. Re:T68i by Stuart+Gibson · · Score: 1

      Of course, the T68(i) is also over a year old, yet is still one of the most lusted after phones on the market. Even as a die hard Nokia fan I couldn't resist getting one and will seriously consider the P800 next month as my yearly upgrade. 11 months ago it cost me GB£100 as an upgrade and can now be got as a freebie in the UK with a new contract. Reception hasn't been a problem either (the only thing to upset it is multi-story carparks), but I am led to believe the UK has a much better mobile infrastructure than the US.

      Goblin

      --
      It's all fun and games until a 200' robot dinosaur shows up and trashes Neo-Tokyo... Again
    16. Re:T68i by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      T-Mobile. The other GSM providers (AT&T & Cingular) do not have a presence in my area yet so I can safely say it was a T-Mobile tower. It was in New Haven, Indiana. Not exacly New York City, but decent coverage. I don't have problems with several other phones I've own so I attributed it to the phone.

  7. Top right corner by quitcherbitchen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Pre-Reserve Now!

    To make sure you're one of the first to reserve one?

  8. Howard Stern Is My Cousin by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've used this and it was okay - I don't really have any need for making constant phone calls so the dual purpose of the device isn't really of interest to me. What is troubling and why I wouldn't buy this is that the only memory expansion you can use is the Sony Memory Stick - a proprietary memory device. What this says to me is that Sony wants to control the price of any future add-ons for the phone and that, in all likelihood, they're going to consistently steal my money! In some instances, you're forced to deal with proprietary formats due to lack of other choices, but in this case, I'm sure I'll be able to find a PDA/phone that uses SD or MMC.

    --
    I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    1. Re:Howard Stern Is My Cousin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Sony! My Aibo has the same problem... memory stick only!

      How dare they promote and / or use their own technology?!? I really wanna stick a CF card in the Aibo's ass, too.

    2. Re:Howard Stern Is My Cousin by Kingpin · · Score: 1


      Well.. Do you imagine that you'd have kept this device forever? Just like that last PC you bought? :)

      --
      Unable to read configuration file '/bigassraid/htdig//conf/14229.conf'
      Geocrawler error message.
    3. Re:Howard Stern Is My Cousin by citizenv · · Score: 1

      It always bugs me when uninformed people blast Memory Stick (the normal sized one) as proprietary. Its just as propeirtary as SD cards are, if not less. Multiple manufacturers produce memory sticks (Lexar, Sandisk, etc.), and more than one company employs them in their products (Samsung, Acer, etc.). Most new photo printers and multi-format flash card readers support Memory Stick. Capacity is catching up to and exceeding SD, and other features (price, reliability, etc.) reall stand out in favor of the MS, in my opinion.

      However, the new Memory Stick Duo found on the P800 (the "smaller version" talked about here) is a horrible proprietary format with approximately equal size to (but not compatible with) SD cards, with lower MB sizes, higher prices, and only works in a standard MS slot with an adapter (which most likely be sold as an extra). I'd much rather get any Clie with bluetooth (even the TG-50 with the useless thumbboard... http://www.palminfocenter.com/view_story.asp?ID=49 31) than get an SD or MS-Duo device of any kind.

    4. Re:Howard Stern Is My Cousin by cheezus_es_lard · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is the lack of devices that are moving towards open frameworks. We're currently looking at devices attempting to perform multiple functions; instead of using proprietary memory and so on, why not use the existing modular solutions we have now?

      I don't see why a SmartMedia or CompactFlash card couldn't be used to store address books, mp3s (to be used as ringtones, no less!) camera snapshots, and any of your other pda-style functions. Include bluetooth, infra-red, and a usb port. (possible addition of a usb->serial device for terminal emulation?) Design it so that via usb, bluetooth or infra-red, it can act as a data connection for the laptop (passing IP packets to the GPRS handler or some such!?) At the same time, publish the internal specs (interface specs for the packet engine, cellphone subsystems, and display), and base it on embedded Linux.

      Design side, the SideKick seems to be moving in the right direction, except for the flimsiness. A full keyboard is important to most geeks, as is hand-holdiness AND comfort while using like a phone.

      Anyone have any other design suggestions? Maybe someone will actually LISTEN?!

    5. Re:Howard Stern Is My Cousin by Mac+Degger · · Score: 1

      That's why Lexmark also makes those 'proprietary' memory sticks...

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    6. Re:Howard Stern Is My Cousin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Capacity is catching up to and exceeding SD, and other features (price, reliability, etc.) reall stand out in favor of the MS, in my opinion.


      Well, your opinion doesn't agree with the facts. According to this site, Memory Sticks only go up to 128MB. SD memory goes up to 512MB for $245. To it's credit, MS is priced exactly the same as SD memory ($55). Not favoring MS at all, really.
      I don't have any experience or could find anyone else's about reliability, so I won't pretend to know anything about that. But saying that MS is better than SD and greatly improving every day is just complete BS. The only innovation Sony has made with basic MS in the last few years is 128MB cards, which isn't that impressive compared to SD's 512MB cards.

    7. Re:Howard Stern Is My Cousin by Keith+Russell · · Score: 1

      Standard Slashdot Clue-Slap #7: Sony Memory Stick

      Once again, we have a case of somebody railing against Sony's Memory Stick format because it's "proprietary". Well, I gots news for ya. They're all proprietary. The only difference between Memory Stick and Compact Flash, SmartMedia, and MMC/SD is how many big multinationals split the licensing fees. Sony keeps all the MStick yen for itself, while the others have consortiums to spread the money around. (Although, IIRC, Matsushita gets the lion's share of MMC/SD money.)

      At least you didn't attack MagicGate, then endorse the equally DRM-encumbered Secure Digital, like some others around here.

      --
      This sig intentionally left blank.
  9. Killer App ?? by Bob+Abooey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks good but is it the killer app that the industry is looking for to drive sales for new devices?

    With the economy still in the crapper it's gonna take a real killer "gotta have" device to make people shell out some dough right now

    --

    All the best,
    --Bob

    1. Re:Killer App ?? by jlanng · · Score: 1

      Picture messaging is the next mobile killer app. It is already huge in Japan. You (didn't) hear it here first!

    2. Re:Killer App ?? by Bob+Abooey · · Score: 1

      You may be right but you need the bandwith to be there and it's got to be cheap enough for the average USian teen to be able to afford it.

      The cell phones became killer in the US when you could get one for next to nothing with 300 "FREE" minutes for $29 clams per month.

      --

      All the best,
      --Bob

    3. Re:Killer App ?? by mgs1000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Picture Messaging is huge in Japan

      That doesn't mean it will be big anywhere else.

      Plain 'ole SMS has been huge in Europe for years, but people in the U.S. rarely use it.

    4. Re:Killer App ?? by mgs1000 · · Score: 1

      T-mobile already offers MMS. They call it "t-zones" or something. I think it starts at $3 or so a month.

  10. Wow by zaren · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was originally going to be posting about how that's an insane price to pay for a cellphone, but after reading the review...

    damn, that thing looks cool, not just in appearance, but feature-wise as well.

    It still seems to be something of a steep price to pay for an integrated cellphone / pda (after not having a cell phone since getting rid of my TracFone last year, any price seems too steep for me), but it's still very interesting, and I wouldn't complain if one found it's way into my pocket.

    --
    Come to the University of Mars! Classes starting soon!
  11. LInux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can I connect it with my Linux box?

    1. Re:LInux? by ites · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course you can - all you need to do is get a GPRS connection on your phone, and enable your Linux web server via a WASP (wireless application service provider), then exchange your data over MMS. It's so simple that dozens, even hundred of people will do this by 2004!
      Or, you could just use a serial cable.

      --
      Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    2. Re:LInux? by monkey_tennis · · Score: 1

      Yes, but there doesn't appear to be any dektop sync softwarem available yet, so it won't do anything useful unless you're very clever with WINE and the software's willing to play ball.

    3. Re:LInux? by catch23 · · Score: 1

      There are lots of people using it with Linux already. Just check out the Sony Ericsson forum on Esato. All of Ericsson's mobile phone products that talk the bluetooth protocol work pretty well with Linux. I've got mine to talk to the BlueZ Linux drivers on the first try... I can upload ringer tones, pictures, or sync my address book/calendar without much trouble.

    4. Re:LInux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? All you have to do is make sure apache serves the right MIME type for .wml files (text/vnd.wap.wml) and make some WML pages.

    5. Re:LInux? by pointwood · · Score: 1

      What Linux addressbook/calendar/etc. applications are you sync'ing with?

    6. Re:LInux? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Can I connect it with my Linux box?"

      Of course you can! Start programming...

    7. Re:LInux? by dezoe · · Score: 1

      I use a PuTTy (http://dreo.org/p800/putty/index.html) with my P800. Works well over USB, GPRS and Bluetooth.

  12. GSM coverage not great in US by asmithmd1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check to see if you have GSM service It is pretty spotty in the US right now

    1. Re:GSM coverage not great in US by Kalrn · · Score: 1

      Au contraire...

      T-Mobile and ATT offer GSM service across the US. ATT has good metropolitan area coverage but T-Mobile has the largest coverage area (over well-travelled routes such as the I5 corridor).

      I'm using T-Mobile and my service has been excellent.

    2. Re:GSM coverage not great in US by onthefenceman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Track your cell phone in real time?? I hope your not the cheating kind...although most slashdotters probably have enough trouble getting one girlfriend.

      --
      Have you seen my stapler?
    3. Re:GSM coverage not great in US by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

      Agreed it looks bad on a map, given that it doesn't cover anything but a small % of the area. However you have to understand that there are large areas of the USA where there's no population and areas with not even roads running to them.

      The coverage you see although it only covers a small percentage of the country, does cover most of the population and anywhere you're ever likely to go.

    4. Re:GSM coverage not great in US by matthew.thompson · · Score: 1

      Err - All 4 GSM networks in the UK offer close to 99% population coverage of the UK. Most European countries are in a similar state.

      Admittedly the USA is a bit bigger than most European countries but if you're slightly off the beaten track in the US you may have to use a different network and not be able to get the P800.

      Just the facts as I seem 'em.

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    5. Re:GSM coverage not great in US by mihalis · · Score: 1

      Agreed it looks bad on a map, given that it doesn't cover anything but a small % of the area. However you have to understand that there are large areas of the USA where there's no population and areas with not even roads running to them.

      The coverage you see although it only covers a small percentage of the country, does cover most of the population and anywhere you're ever likely to go.

      i find this just a little over optimistic. I own a house less than 10 miles from an interstate, and there is no GSM service at the house whatsoever. The house is within a town boundary ("incorporated land") and we are eligible for DSL. I can drive for miles around and still get no phone signal. When I head towards the nearest big city I come into range about 10-15 miles east of my house. Friends not on GSM get coverage at our kitchen table.

    6. Re:GSM coverage not great in US by SETY · · Score: 1
      Canada has GPRS GSM for 93% of the population. If your in the middle of the wilderness of course you will not get cell phone coverage. The UK doesn't have wilderness. In a country bigger than all of Europe with less than 10% of the EU population, 93% is pretty damn good.


      Now if you take a look at the coverage maps below you will see the whole of the USA covered by Cingular (GSM provider w/ proper plan), except for places like rural Nevada, etc. Rural Nevada looks like mars. The only things using cell phones out there are the cacti.

      sources:
      http://www.pcsws.com/coverage.html
      ht tp://www.shoprogers.com/store/wireless/coverage/ overview.asp

    7. Re:GSM coverage not great in US by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

      Well of course there are still places that aren't covered. I was just trying to counter the typical European response to the US coverage map being so poorly covered. It's a simple fact that most people from Europe don't quite get how empty the US really is. :-)

    8. Re:GSM coverage not great in US by mihalis · · Score: 1

      very true, however the area I describe is 3 hours drive from New York City, not somewhere remote. No doubt Voicestream is only a few more transmitters away from serving us. I'm looking forward to not paying the local phone company a fortune just to pick up my email!

    9. Re:GSM coverage not great in US by scottj · · Score: 1

      3 hours drive from NYC is remote to me. Unless you're in a large city in the US, you're remote. Period. Well, that's how the still-developing GSM carriers see it anyhow.

      BTW, I recently looked at the GSM coverage map for the new GSM network that AT&T Wireless is building and noticed that they don't offer any service in the state of NY whatsoever. Strange but true.

      --
      .-.--
  13. I'd like to run a web server on one of these by dphoenix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That would be like a nerd's dream. Run a web server on your PDA..

    Oh wait.

    You CAN!

    1. Re:I'd like to run a web server on one of these by hype7 · · Score: 1
      Run a web server on your PDA..


      I think the InfoSync guys beat you to it, for all their site is responding now...

      -- james
    2. Re:I'd like to run a web server on one of these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big deal, I can run a web server on my 6 year old Newton MP 2100.

  14. Opera on the p800 by Bj�rn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to The Register you will be able to download Opera for the P800 on Monday. Sounds cool, but I wonder about how the web will look on such a small screen?

    --
    Never express yourself more clearly than you are able to think. --Niels Bohr
    1. Re:Opera on the p800 by cacheMan · · Score: 2, Informative

      Refer to earlier thread about scrolling Opera Software Brings Its Browser to Mobile Phones

    2. Re:Opera on the p800 by monkey_tennis · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's pretty easy to find out - just hit select 'small screen rendering' in a desktop version of Opera to try it out. Also check out http://www.opera.com/products/smartphone/smallscre en/ for more info - it works surprisingly well!

    3. Re:Opera on the p800 by weicco · · Score: 1

      What I've seen pages that are correctly (that follows standards) written looks real nice on P800. Pages that doesn't give a crab about standards... well, they look little less nice.

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    4. Re:Opera on the p800 by Tha_Zanthrax · · Score: 1

      it does function great!
      putting it in the desktop version is a nice gimmick, but it doesn't seem to work well with frames. oh wait, make that not at all!

    5. Re:Opera on the p800 by monkey_tennis · · Score: 1

      Actually for a more in-depth review check out http://www.esato.com/reviews/opera.php

    6. Re:Opera on the p800 by ihavenovoice · · Score: 1

      More importantly: Will it run Opera Bork edition? Bork bork bork!

    7. Re:Opera on the p800 by catch23 · · Score: 1

      Well considering it has more pixel res than those dinky palm pilots... and palms have web browsers too. It can't be much worse.

  15. Different OS - Re:T68i is a step down.. by monkey_tennis · · Score: 4, Informative

    Remeber the P800 is a completely different architecture and OS to the T68m/i

  16. Re:I'm getting sick. by nant · · Score: 0

    That - or you're just a no-fun person. :\ Each to his own, so try not to judge people...

  17. Missing features by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yet another phone that includes both a camera and bluetooth but fails to extend the features to the next logical step. The step? A webcam.

    To make the connection would involve only a small amount of code so why not? While they are at it, an FM radio is a nice (but largely ignored) touch. Also something that I have yet to see in a phone is universal remote control features for your television and stereo systems etc.

    All in all the 3 very useful features (IMO) would probably cost less than $30 to include in a $650 phone.

    -------
    Interior design making Australia look flashy.

    1. Re:Missing features by WPIDalamar · · Score: 1

      yeah ... but then the next 3 $30 cool features to add in the phone, and then the next 3, and so on and so on.

      Somewhere the line needs to be drawn.

    2. Re:Missing features by asmithmd1 · · Score: 1

      If you are talking about burning bandwidth with a web cam...for no additional hardware you could stream any radio station in the world over the internet connection with a Java midlet.

    3. Re:Missing features by cloudturtle · · Score: 1

      Yeah a universal remote would be cool, but then there is the inevetable:
      "Please hold, I have to change the channel"

      Or even worse "Please hold, I have to switch to the Cartoon Network to watch the Care Bears" cause you know everyone is watching the Care Bears, they just don't want to admit it..

    4. Re:Missing features by Mattygfunk1 · · Score: 1
      By radio I didn't mean streaming from your computer, but a fully functional digitally tuned FM radio. I'm not sure why you would want to have radio only coming from phone only when it is within the very small range of the computer.

      I spose it would be more convenient to have headphones coming from your mobile rather than the PC, but then again why not just use the speakers?

      ------
      Home interior decorating without furniture

    5. Re:Missing features by bob_dinosaur · · Score: 1

      The Nokia 8310 has an inbuilt FM radio. The forthcoming 3650 will record video and supports GPRS, so you could use it as a webcam.

    6. Re:Missing features by catch23 · · Score: 1

      Why couldn't you make that feature? It already has GPRS, a camera, and a decent OS that someone has even made a networkable doom game for it. How difficult would it be to make some webcam software?

    7. Re:Missing features by tengwar · · Score: 1

      Not too sure about a webcam if you actually mean to use it as a server rather than a record and forward device. Some (most?) operators use private addressing for GPRS - also at the moment GPRS is expensive by the megabyte, and I don't know of any network that implements QoS yet. It will be more practical with UMTS (or 3G in general) with SIP, Mobile IPv6, and E.164.arpa.

  18. P800 with Opera by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's so cool that Opera is about to realease a P-800 version of their webbrowser...

    http://www.opera.com/pressreleases/en/2003/02/11 /

  19. Within Ericsson... by little1973 · · Score: 0

    ...there was a contest about what kind of application should be written for this phone. I think the prize was $500 and a P800. However, the development kit for this phone is $1500 (if I am not mistaken).

    One of my colleagues (an UPX developer), suggested to use UPX to compess the applications. According to him, the executable header looks quite similar to the format used by Windows. Unfortunately, because of lack of support he was unable to complete his idea.

    --
    Government cannot make man richer, but it can make him poorer. - Ludwig von Mises
    1. Re:Within Ericsson... by Troed · · Score: 3, Informative
      Metrowerks Symbian OS developer studio, Personal edition, costs $400.


      The SDK in itself, with which you can compile for the P800, costs nothing - just download it from SonyEricsson.

    2. Re:Within Ericsson... by little1973 · · Score: 0

      If you do not have a P800 and want to emulate your software you will need CodeWarrior. It costs $1500.

      --
      Government cannot make man richer, but it can make him poorer. - Ludwig von Mises
    3. Re:Within Ericsson... by Troed · · Score: 4, Informative
      No, it costs $400 - as I wrote.

      /me - Symbian consultant

      >

    4. Re:Within Ericsson... by HeUnique · · Score: 1

      I don't remember the URL, but the-registered mentioned few months ago that there's a Linux SDK for the P800 - for free!

      --
      Hetz (Heunique)
  20. Wow by e2d2 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quote from the description:
    Just in case the camera isn't entertainment enough, the P800 comes fully equipped with games, a video clip viewer and enough customizable features to keep you happy for weeks

    Wow, I can be entertained for weeks! And for only $650 US. What a bargain.

  21. It just looks so cool!! by ites · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yeah, why not just carry a plastic replica if you want something that looks cool. Too small for a PDA, too large for a phone.
    I've been using a wireless bluetooth headset for the last month or two, and this is a much better indicator of the future of mobile phones.
    Split the headset from the phone, and you get something more practical: a larger box that can do more and that you do not have to lift to your ear like a small well-designed brick.
    And... which you can actually write on with your stylus while you are making a call.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:It just looks so cool!! by Troed · · Score: 1

      ... so why don't you do that - with the P800? It includes a stereo headset, wired though - but with built in bluetooth you can do exactly what you described.

  22. T39 :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Sony/Ericsson are offering pretty good mobile phones.
    But, sadly, my t29w need to be replaced and I need to geet a new one.
    I loved the t29 for it's size. That's what I need....a phone that can fit in my poker and I forget about it.
    The T39 is already out of the market and not easy to find.
    An ericsson employee told me the T39 was a brain cooker....still, I want it.
    The T68i is simply too expensive and the T800 is too big.

    I want : small, fast, simple, long battery and cheap. + bluetooth.

    Any other good alternative?

  23. P800 and T68i by thefinite · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know exactly where Taco is coming from, but I got the T68i anyway, because it was only $25 after rebate from Amazon. Now, you can get it for free(after rebates).

    I don't know where the other complaints about the phone here are coming from. Mine gets great reception, doesn't take 2 seconds to pull up the address book (it is slow, but not 2 seconds slow), and the way it syncs with my PowerBook over Bluetooth and iSync is a dream come true. I see other people carrying Palms and Handsprings and feel sorry for them having to carry bricks around in their pocket. Anyway, enough advertising. Just trying to balance out the reviews I've seen posted so far....

    --
    Boom Shanka
    1. Re:P800 and T68i by catch23 · · Score: 1

      You know, the reason they may be carrying palms/pocketpcs around with them is so that they can get an internet connection with them via bluetooth. I was able to get mine working perfectly with the BlueZ tools and pppd... I could dial into GPRS and use internet just about anywhere the phone has reception. Makes it nice... I can keep the phone in my pocket, and the pocketpc in my hand and surf the web without expensive services!

  24. MS Pocket PC Phone Edition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is also trying to catch by releasing the Pocket PC Phone Edition:
    http://www.microsoft.com/mobile/pocketpc /learnmore /phoneedition/default.asp

    After using the Qtek 1010 for a couple of weeks my impression is that they stressed out this product on the market. The UI and functionality of the phone and GPRS part is just crap compared to a traditional mobile phone. Though its cool with IRC and ICQ on my phone using GPRS (pay per kb), but its too unstable and buggy to be used as your primary phone.

  25. Expensive for a phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that kind of money for a phone/gadget seems reasonable to you, your priorities are seriously out of whack.

    Oh, and by not buying crap like that, I'll be retiring far, far before you do.

  26. Bork bork on the p800 by jrumney · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't wait to read MSN in Swedish chef on my P800!

  27. Sony Ericsson fan page by kiley · · Score: 3, Informative

    This page has a bunch of Sony Ericsson forums and review links. Pretty good info about this.

  28. Yet another overpriced executive salesman toy by longduckdong · · Score: 1

    Can't these geniuses come out with something that isn't geared towards traveling sales people with top level salaries/commissions?

    --

    -- Knuckle Blood : Official Lube of Team Rusty Nuts.
    1. Re:Yet another overpriced executive salesman toy by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Relax. As more and more devices come out the prices of the existing ones will go down.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    2. Re:Yet another overpriced executive salesman toy by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Here's a giggle. I work in an office that develops for all the best toys; iPAQ's, Palms, 7650's, P800's, tablet PC's, all that jazz. We make decent developer salaries and are all geeks and proud of it.

      And yet almost none of us own any of these devices. They're just too expensive for what they do. The only piece of development kit that I even bother to take home is my iPAQ, and that for one thing and one thing only: so my wife can play solitaire on it.

      I too am at a loss to explain who is actually buying these top dollar toys.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  29. Not true by ciryon · · Score: 2, Informative
    I worked until recently at a company with close contacts with Sony Ericsson. We had many of the phones long time before they hit the market. The T68i uses much better plastics and is more steady than its predecessor. The T68 model doesn't feel very robust if you squeeze the phone. Still you can upgrade the T68 to get exactly the same software as the new model.

    To get back on subject the P800 is a really cool phone, a bit large perhaps but the best smartphone I've tried so far. The camera has really good quality and the phone has fast enough CPU to give smooth frames per secons - not at all like other cameras in phones if you've tried them.

    If only the P800 could sync with iSync I'd get one today.

    Ciryon

  30. You know, most of us had one a while ago... by UnrefinedLayman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Oh... I thought you said "TI 86"...

  31. T68i / T68 by Cpt+Kirk · · Score: 1

    I'm using a T68m (Classic ?) which over here in the UK actually has the updated T68i (buggy organiser) software on it.

    So I actually have a T68i ... for the price of a T68m. The shop wanted £149 upgrade for the T68i and they didn't have any it stock, so the T68m was £49 and they did have it in stock.

    Apparently the only difference between the T68i and the T68m is the colour of the bit of plastic around the keys. (Didn't want bloody gold anyway :-)

    Anyhow, its a pretty good phone, no reception problems here.. bluetooth works well (linux cnx too), IrDA works. The only thing I want now is the polyphonic ringtones... But i have a few of those in the office (Nokia 7210, Siemens S55, Nokia 7650) for testing, T68 screen is better.

    Cpt Kirk

    --
    --- Did I say that ?
    1. Re:T68i / T68 by monkey_tennis · · Score: 1

      Aside from the physical shell where the T68i has different colour, better backlight and a better lit keypad, there's no difference, so any SE service center will do a software upgrade on a T68m (to make it a T68i for free (most major Carphonewarehouses in the UK). Just beware that a few of the T68i firmware relaeases introduce new bugs - I've swapped my phone and stuck with the older firmware for this reason (better the bugs you know...)

    2. Re:T68i / T68 by Cpt+Kirk · · Score: 1

      The only real dumb ass thing I've found was I had a message on my phone... changed sims (office testing) then changed back and the message claimed it was from a different person from the phonebook :-)

      Swapping them again fixed it though ...

      Cpt Kirk

      --
      --- Did I say that ?
  32. Re:GSM coverage - Better coverage site by perly-king-69 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The official gsm site and maps is at: http://www.gsmworld.com/roaming/gsminfo/index.shtm l

    --

    --
    This sig is inoffensive.

  33. Re:T68i is a step down.. ... T68i is not slow... by catch23 · · Score: 1

    I agree that the T68 takes 2-3 seconds just to open the address book. However, this is not the case on the T68i model. The 'i' model is considerably faster for all the menu operations, typing, and just about everything else. I don't know whether they improved the software or the hardware, but I like it much more than the old T68.

  34. Sony-Ericson Phones by vohlish_n · · Score: 0, Troll

    I have owned a T68i for 5 months, and I must say it is the worst purchase I have ever made. I cannot believe Sony is ruining their brand name with such an awful product. The reception is terrible, the UI is awful, the speed at which it responds to anything is horrendous. Unfortunately due to my contract I have to wait another 7 months before I can get a replacement.

    The reviews for the T68i are obviously done by people who do not actually use phones. Superficially it is very light, has fairly good battery life and a good feature set. Trying to make a call from it is awful. For some reason the sequence to lock the phones keypad is different from the sequence to unlock it. In fact, the sequence to lock it regularly deletes numbers from my phone book, because it is the same sequence (clear and then yes). Even when locked the phone can be turned off by accident.

    The only thing I have ever seen with a worse UI, is the communicam I mistakenly bought to test a friends website (http://www.phlog.net). This camera is unusable. Its no good for anything. I tried wedging a door open with it and it wasn't even any good for that. Sometimes things are so bad they're funny... unfortunately this phone even surpasses that level of "badness".

    I know various people with this phone and they all hate it. They all have the same problems.

    I can only think that any other phone in there product line is going to be just as bad, as they have zero idea on how to program an interface. The 68i was supposed to be an improvement over the T68. It wasn't.

    I really could go on for a long time, but there's probably better things you could all be doing that reading my post.

    Just make sure you don't buy a T68i, and please talk to a serious phone user who already has the P800 before purchasing it.

    1. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      Odd - my fiancee has a T68i, and loves it...

      Different strokes, I suppose...

    2. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by vohlish_n · · Score: 1

      How much does she use it? I know about 4 or 5 people with this phone, and they all detest it. One wants to start a hate website devoted to it. Doesn't she find it too slow? Once you've ended a call you have to wait another 10 seconds to make another call - when I'm putting test calls into a system this cuts my productivity down seriously. The last number recall is so slow its a lot faster to type the number myself - unless of course I have just made another call in which case the number buffer only holds one keypress.

      If I used it only occassionally it wouldn't be too bad I guess, but due to my job I have to use phones constantly. And due to my girlfriend I have to make frequent use of its appalling T9 implementation.

      *sigh*

      This phone is ruining my life... I want my old Nokia back.

    3. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by binaryDigit · · Score: 1

      This phone is ruining my life... I want my old Nokia back.

      Question, couldn't you purchase another phone and activate it? I know that they'll charge you, but if you have another phone (I know less likely since the i is a gsm) and it really is making your life so bad, this may be an expensive, but more pleasing option. After all, it's the service that you have to keep for a year, not the phone, right?

    4. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by winkydink · · Score: 1
      1) I travel to a different continent every 2 weeks (Europe->US->Asia-US->repeat...)
      2) I work for a company that designs cellular phones for brand-name mfgs
      3) My company doesn't mfg the t68i
      4) I change phones about every 6 months and have for about 10 years

      I love my t68i. Absolutely love it.

      Well, at least for a couple more months. :)

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    5. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by vohlish_n · · Score: 1

      Yes I probably could, and am considering doing this when the Nokia 3650 is released next month. Unfortunately purchasing it without a contract is something like £300 (approx $460) and I can't justify that right now. My phone was bought for me by the company I work for, so I'm hoping they won't notice the expense on my credit card statement!

      They probably will though.

    6. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Have you tried getting the software upgraded? There were some comments like yours when the T68i was new, but I haven't heard anyone complain lately. The software upgrade usually takes about 30 seconds to do at your favourite service center.

    7. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by vohlish_n · · Score: 1

      I've never met anyone that actually liked the interface. Do you actually find it fast enough? Have you not had the experience, which several friends have, where mysteriously it loses your entire addresss book, and you have to retrieve them from the SIM, only for them to reappear again a few months later?

      If we all bought them from the same store at the same time I could understand maybe it was a bad batch, but these phones were all purchased at differently locations, different stores, months apart.

    8. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by jpc · · Score: 1

      And if someone calls you and their number is not in the address book there is *no way* to put it in other than writing it on a bit of paper and reentering it.

      its shite

    9. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by vohlish_n · · Score: 1

      Thats if they can get through to you. Its possible to have full signal and not receive calls. This may seem to point to a network issue, but I do believe the T68i has issues receiving calls. Turning it off and on makes it work again.
      Sometimes when I receive an SMS, the phone hangs for about 2 minutes - if its near a speaker you can hear the normal text message sounds being repeated constantly, and then I receive the message that failed 10 to 20 times over the next 48 hours, each time hanging by phone for several minutes.
      Also when I send messages, they will refuse to send even though I can make and receive calls. Again, doing a "Windows" on it resets it to working again.

    10. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      She uses it quite a lot, and I've never heard her complain about it at all. Perhaps she has a newer firmware version or something? She's had it for about six months.

      It's odd. It's almost like we're talking about different phones here.

      If you want a different phone so badly, Carphone Warehouse are selling some repackaged Nokia 8210s for £110 no-contract at the moment. I'm sure you'd be able to sell your T68i for more than that...

    11. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by muggy2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just to add my fuel to the fire...

      Thankfully I managed to offload that T86 POS off to the girlfriend and I'm using the wonderful Nokia 7650 now. I just couldn't take the T68 any more.

      Basically all the same complaints as above - not receiving calls even though you have full signal, losing the address book for 4 months (where did it go? Why did it suddenly reappear?) The endless repeating text messages. It is an absolutely attrocious phone. If you take your mobile seriously, don't even think about getting one. Nasty, nasty thing. And I can't even count the number of times I deleted the 1st entry in my phonebook.

      Rant over

      Anyway, if you have a phone with camera, visit Phlog - Mobile Photo Blogging Phlog.net

    12. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by CMan20 · · Score: 1

      On the T68 (probably T68i also) you can add a number from the caller id. Get to the part where you add a new number (either through add contact or update contact) and either hit the menu button which will bring up the list of all unsaved numbers, or hit the cursor to the left which will bring up a menu where you can select from Phone Book, SIM entries, or Unsaved numbers.

    13. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by dtr20 · · Score: 1

      This is not true on my T68i. In the missed calls window, hit the Menu button and click on "Add Number".

      I believe you have picked up an issue with early firmwares.

    14. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by dtr20 · · Score: 1

      Ok the UI is a bit sluggish, but 10 seconds between calls? On my T68i I can dial within one second after a call has ended. And redialling can happen in one second by hitting the green key twice.

      I'll agree that the T9 system has some major flaws - for example:
      * typing in a phone number or a time of day - you either revert to multi-tap or press menu-3 to enter it as a new word in the dictionary!
      * caps-lock is rather random

    15. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      And if someone calls you and their number is not in the address book there is *no way* to put it in other than writing it on a bit of paper and reentering it.

      Get a Mac. Get a Bluetooth widget. Pair phone to Mac, launch iSync, update AddressBook entry, hit 'Sync', cello!

      And you can set the T68 (mine's the m) to add new fone#s any time they're received, or from the 'calls' menu by using the 'notepaper' button over the '1'.

      I agree on the interface lag and range though, which is why I'm hoping the N-GAGE gets to the states at some point soon!

    16. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by Glonoinha · · Score: 1

      Vishnu, enough bashing or we are going to know you are a paid plant. You work for Nokia or something?

      I have had my T68i for about half a year now. Yes, there is a half second lag between when I hit the joystick and the contact list comes up. No it isn't speed of light, and yes it is fast enough.

      No I haven't had my contact list mysteriously eaten, only to show up again months later.

      I am reading this thread hoping to learn why I have this phone, hoping for some insight on how to make my laptops (Win2kPro, XPPro) access the Internet via Bluetooth iff I buy a USB Bluetooth adapter - if such a connection uses 'minutes' and allows me to call a dialup connection or uses 'kilobytes' and is simply (magically) connected via the phone to give me a DHCP TCP/IP connection via the GSM network, what all is involved in setting it up, if anybody has ever done this and found out the hard way that it is wicked expensive (2Megs = $60 if it is considered 'data')

      Want to know what I like about the phone?
      Small, light, battery lasts forever, screen is good enough for me to put my girlfriend's picture on it, crystal clear sound (send and receive), the included earplug is high quality (always use one when driving), a few of the games don't suck but it could use a Snake / Light Cycles game or better yet the games from the A-500,

      Want to know what I don't like about the phone?
      Doesn't have a 1/8th" jack for aftermarket headsets, doesn't default to putting dashes where dashes go in phone number (8005551212 instead of 800-555-1212), makes calls at random in the holster if you don't lock the keypad (yes, I am bumping it on stuff), I am envious of the games available on the A-500, it (the T68i) is GSM ONLY meaning no analog or digital (or PCS) roaming to save me if GSM isn't available, works great in Austin but doesn't work in some cities I visit, prohibitive cost of web use (.03 / kb doesn't sound like much until you figure it = $30 per MegaByte), card games suck and 4 of the 8 games on it are card games, the buttons take a little getting used to, I sure wish it would do that 'Real Time Phone Locator' that someone else has in his sig (if you are reading this, pretty cool trick...)

      There ya go, the definitive list of the good, the bad, and the ugly.

      Do I like the interface? It is a phone. Push the buttons, talk in the bottom and listen at the top. Don't like that - dig up Alex G. Bell and discuss it with him.

      Do I actually find it fast enough? Well I am capable of calling folks, and talking to them so hell yea I guess it is fast enough.

      Do the games suck? Yea - but if I want to play games I have four desktops and two laptops that play pretty nice games.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    17. Re:Sony-Ericson Phones by vohlish_n · · Score: 1

      Maybe I just use my phone +too+ much. But its how I keep in contact with my friends round the country. I'm just busy chatting about it on another forum.

      Because its a company phone I can't really change it, and although its appalling I don't think I could go back to a black and white interface with no blue-tooth etc. Maybe if I work hard my boss will listen and get me a 3650!

  35. Hmmm.... Guess I'll have to wait to see the review by wjp3 · · Score: 1

    Warning: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/tmp/mysql.sock' (111) in /usr/local/apache/sites/infosync.no/htdocs/news/20 02/n/3067.html on line 3

    Warning: MySQL Connection Failed: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/tmp/mysql.sock' (111) in /usr/local/apache/sites/infosync.no/htdocs/news/20 02/n/3067.html on line 3
    Unable to connect!

  36. Re:T68i is a step down.. ... T68i is not slow... by catch23 · · Score: 1

    I'll also add that I don't have a small address book either. Mine contains 150 something addresses. I transferred all of them from my palm. It's pretty much "instant" when I browse the addresses...

  37. Looks good but by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    Does it run Java? That's the question

    1. Re:Looks good but by pointwood · · Score: 1

      Yes it do.

      Specifications

    2. Re:Looks good but by Phoukka · · Score: 1

      In short, yes it does.

    3. Re:Looks good but by dezoe · · Score: 1

      Yes, pJava and MIDP 1.0 (got one - love it!)

  38. If you don't need color, get a Danger Hiptop by digithead · · Score: 2, Informative
    I've been evaluating devices like this for work (yeah, I know how did I get that lucky!). Per other comments around the T68i, it's build quality is lousy and BT and battery life are it's only big pluses (oh yeah and it's free from Amazon right now with contract). It is a nice companion for the Palm Tungsten T, though since the Palm can leverage data services through the T68i over BT, dial the phone, etc. Hopefully Sony-Ericsson will make the 800 a bit sturdier.


    So far, I've been most impressed with the Danger Hiptop. It's not color but has a real crisp greyscale display. It's Java based and a SDK should be available soon. True desktop syncing with your PIM should be here shortly too, but the export to the T-Mobile website isn't too bad. It's been available for as little as $50 with rebates recently. It has it's own mail and can check other POP accounts (and IMAP in a limited/unsupported fashion), you can browse regular websites, it does AIM and overall can be considered a consumer version of the Blackberry.


    Another device to consider if you're a CDMA fan (Sprint & Verizon) is the Kyocera QCP-7135. I don't have an eval unit yet as Verizon hasn't certified it yet, but it looks to be one of the best Palm/phone combos.


    It'll be nice to finally see a P800 after all this hype, but there are other good options now.

    --
    Once you lick the lollipop of mediocrity, you'll suck forever!
  39. Handwriting Recognition by cybergibbons · · Score: 1

    I know someone who works at Symbian, and he gets all the phones to test before they are released. In November I think, he had a P800 with him, and I had a play... and I thought generally, it was a very nice piece of kit.

    The thing that I think I was most impressed with was the handwriting recognition. I have really bad writing, and I've never liked any of the funny "Graffiti" methods or anything. All this had was some different strokes for "i" and punctuation really. But it works, quickly and reliably on my writing. That is very cool...

    ALso, if you do lose the stylus, at a pinch, your finger works. And you can ditch the flip keyboard and leave it off, since all it does is press the touch screen. I thought it was a good idea doing this.

    Still, I would never get one. I'm happy with my Trium 110, which does all I want it to, has two games which are better than other phones (useful for boredom on tube), and the battery lasts ages. It's taken a good hammering now as well, and works fine.

  40. other reviews by sloppystanley · · Score: 1

    mobiledia also has a good review of the P800, among other phones at: http://www.mobiledia.com/reviews/sonyericsson/p800 /page1.html after reading both of these, i am seriously considering getting this phone. saving money itching to replace my current POS.

    1. Re:other reviews by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.mobiledia.com/reviews/sonyericsson/p800 /page11.html

      Great, an $800 phone that has average reception.

  41. Umm.. no.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With ANY new tech gizmo article, there's stuff like "I'm going out to buy it", "I already have it" or "I've been lusting over this". It's never "I hate this shit, I'll never buy it". Maybe the bad ones never make it to the front page then. I don't know.

  42. Re:Opera on the p800 (screenshots) by catch23 · · Score: 3, Informative
  43. Handspring Treo 300 Slams Them All by skidoo2 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Handspring's Palm phone, the Treo 300, is far and away the best convergent device on the market right now. At least for my purposes :-)!

    It's got a killer color screen, an excellent keyboard that works really well, it runs every Palm 3.5 app I've tried on it, and it fits comfortably in my pocket.

    SMS, e-mail, browsing the real web, excellent calendar and contact management. The only things it lacks are:

    Expansion slot.

    Bluetooth.

    Better sound support (for music playback).

    But if you really need a wireless productivity tool in your pocket, this is the only option. Palm Pilot, Blackberry, and cell phone, all in one.

    And no, I don't work for Handspring :-)!

    1. Re:Handspring Treo 300 Slams Them All by rbuysse · · Score: 1

      After looking into this a bit more, I can't see why anyone would opt for the Sidekick. Color screen plus the ability to install apps?

      Just as long as T-Mobile offers a data plan and there's an ssh client available, this is going to become the admin's new best friend.

      --
      An infinite number of monkeys at an infinite number of typewriters still wouldn't repost stories on /.
    2. Re:Handspring Treo 300 Slams Them All by skidoo2 · · Score: 1

      And I forgot to mention maybe the most important fact of all: Sprint gives you unlimited access to their (relatively) high-speed Vision network for a flat 10 bucks a month. Beat that (in the US)!

  44. Friggin' Laserbeams by Atomizer · · Score: 1

    Alright, is this just the coolest phone accessory? A phone with a friggin' laserbeam?

    OK, yeah, maybe not...

  45. Get on with it already. by johnlcallaway · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All I really want is a goddamn phone. I like my Palm just the way it is. And my camera.

    Did you ever notice that most cell phone commercials now don't even talk about the PHONE!!!! All I really need from my cell phone I got in the cheapest one out there. Then I bought a serial cable so I can upload/download phone numbers a couple of times a month. Sure, USB or Bluetooth would be nice, but data really doesn't change that much.

    What is with all this "Let's put everything into one device" anyway. How many of you geeks buy all-in-one entertainment systems? Or TVs w/VCRs and DVDs in them?

    Answer ... none of you, because then when the next-big-thing comes along, you couldn't change just that one piece. When surround sound came out, I bought a new receiver, and then slowly added more speakers. I just bought a new DTS receiver, and guess what ... my speakers, DVD player, VCR, CD player, and TV all work just fine with it. I looked at some of the all-in-one units and they stunk. They were all missing features that I could only get my buying the individual components.

    OK .. I'll admit the cheap TV/DVD over the hot tub is kinda cool, but you only use it a couple of times a week and can live without all the neat features. You wouldn't watch The Matrix on it, would you??

    So .. phone company...sell me a phone to make phone calls. I'll take care of finding the best for the rest.

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    1. Re:Get on with it already. by matthew.thompson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hmmnnn. Do I want to carry a phone, a palm, a laptop. OR do I want to carry a PhoneDA and a Laptop.

      My working life is spent with my laptop open on my desk, on my lap, on the train, in hotels etc - as such it is great. I connect into servers and configure stuff and fix problems - through my mobile or through a fixed phone line. But one thing it's crap for is storing my lists for shopping, phone numbers for quick reference and being used in cramped conditions - and I'm in those most mornings on the train to work.

      I've already ditched the lead from the laptop to the phone using Bluetooth and that's a big enabler - if you've ever tried plugging cables in or lining up IRDA devices whilst on your lap or holding both with one hand while you use a stylus in the other you'll know what I mean - but this isn't enough.

      I would dearly like a single device which keeps my in touch in the most basic ways - voice, SMS and email - and stores all the notes with a relatively big screen and easy text entry. A standard phone doesn't cut it but a PhoneDA does. I've looked at the Treo but it's a little clumsier than the P800 looks.

      As for replacing it when the next big thing comes about, I do that with a single PDA or phone anyway - it's no more expensive (£299 for the P800 - £298 for a Palm Tungsten T, phones are usually free for me)

      --
      Matt Thompson - Actuality - Insert product here.
    2. Re:Get on with it already. by macpeep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The way you're bitching, you'd think that phone companies no longer make "normal" phones. That's simply not true. In fact Nokia just recently announced a phone (http://www.nokia.com/nokia/0,,4582,00.html) that is much MORE simple than any of the recent low end models of theirs. In fact, most phones of most manufacturers are very low end and doesn't have much more than basic features in them.

      Having said that, I think it's a little sad to see you being so locked on a word; "phone". Think of it as "device" instead. In addition to the low end models mentioned above, these companies also make some devices which not only have phone functionality but also other stuff. For example, they have a large screen to make using email and the web easier. They have a camera, so you can send picture messages with MMS to friends ("Look, we're here in Thailand. Doesn't it look nice? Too bad you couldn't join us!" or "The bar is crowded and we're having fun!! You should come here! Here's what it looks like right now!").

      Oh, and of course you don't HAVE to buy these devices. If you're happy with your old phone, just keep it.

    3. Re:Get on with it already. by kevinadi · · Score: 1

      It is sometimes very inconvenient because some of us do need more than one phone due to business use. You wouldn't want anyone caling on your private number, so you give everyone your business mobile number. That way, when your business cell phone rings at 2 am you can safely ignore it, while if your private phone rings at 2 am you know something is amiss. At least that's how most people do it in my country.

      Add to those two cells a PDA, and you'll get one hell of a mess to carry around with you all the time. With THREE devices to carry, you'll bound to misplace one of them eventually.

      Personally I love this kind of phones, the ones that combines a cell and a PDA. This will bring my total count of device luggage to two. If only the P800 can manage two SIM cards then I'll be more than happy to get that. Paired with the bluetooth headset, it's perfect.

      So far there's a hack floating around that lets your small nokia 8210 (I think it's called 8290 is the US, not sure) to manage two SIM cards. It's quite a popular hack here.

      This P800 could actually be useful, while some of Nokia's new phones are just plain ridiculous and looks more like a knee-jerk reaction to the P800 or Treo to fight for market share.

      After all, I quit buying Nokia after some bad experiences with their marketing tactics that more and more looks like Microsoft with their selling a new untested handsets that crashes often, and gradually improving the ROM every month or so. This is a PHONE we're talking about, for God's sake. I don't want to lose all my contact numbers and have to pay for the software upgrade everytime Nokia screws up. Since T68 was released, Nokia was all downhill.

    4. Re:Get on with it already. by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of being 'told' by the phone companies and society in general that I need more than a freakin phone. Somehow, if I only have a phone, I'm missing something. 'Oh, look how cool he is. He has a phone with a camera and gaming system and text messaging and email and web browser.'

      I'm sorry, but I don't need to be so connected that I'm willing to put up with poor quality. I have yet to see any real WAP application I need, phones don't really make good gaming systems, and the cameras suck. Big Time.

      And text messaging just sucks. I don't see the point of spending time trying to use a phone keypad to send a text message when YOU CAN JUST CALL THEM!!!! It's cute the first few times, but come one. Call me and tell me how good the band is, then put the phone in the air and let me listen. Use some of those 500 minutes a month, or those free evening and weekend minutes. My friends send my text messages, and then I call them and we talk about something in far greater detail and make a good decision. And laugh, and joke, and enjoy the human interaction, even if it is over a phone.

      Don't get me wrong, I love my Palm Vx. I've got a ton of information at my fingertips. And I love taking my laptop into a hotel and plugging into a broadband connection. And our computer systems sends me text messages if something is causing a problem so I can decide if I need to do something about it and use my cell to telnet in and fix it.

      It just seems that the push is to see how much they can cram into a device, whether or not it fits or is a real value is a moot point. My Palm is great for contacts, passwords, and shopping lists, but it makes a lousy email reader. It also made for a lousy gaming system. Why would I want to play anything other than solitare on a small screen when I can go home and have a 1280x1024 color system with full joystick/mouse/keyboard control. And I just can't see holding it up to my face to make a call with. It's too freakin big. But if you make the screen any smaller it would be next to worthless.

      Hey ... to each their own. I've had my Palm Vx for about 4 years now, and have no desire to buy a newer one. When it breaks, I'll go research and buy a good value. But I'm not throwing away a perfectly good Palm and cheap-ass phone just because Nokia has 'the next big thing'.

      Oh .. I forgot. This is America. We need to fill up those landfills and spend our money regardless if whether or not we really need to.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    5. Re:Get on with it already. by skidoo2 · · Score: 1

      The Treo is clumsy?! Dude, do you wear a Speedo or something? The thing has a very practicaly keyboard, AND it fits in your pocket! And it's very durable. I've dropped mine at least a half a dozen times, and I abuse the hell out of the flip.

  46. P800: The Bad and The Good. by juuri · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've only had my P800 for a week. It is the Swedish release model with the most currunt stable rom. Overall I find the phone to be everything expected and a bit more.

    First the bad:

    * It is heavier than many of the current cellphones out and has larger dimensions. While it still fits in a pocket it feels like you are carrying a phone from '99.
    * Because you can install any number of random apps from the world the stability can be suspect thanks to installing some garbage (there is a signing feature but I have yet to see any signed apps).
    * The flip keypad actually just presses the screen. There are reports in the wild of people slapping the buttons hard and ruining their LCD screens.
    * The preferences are in silly locations, go ahead try finding where you change the tone for message alerts.
    * Doesn't seem to be a bluetooth networking protocol stack built in despite what some people have claimed.
    * The vibration isn't impressive for a phone of this size. My pager can outshake it any day of the week.
    * Reception is much better than the t68i but still seems prone to signal fade (then again maybe this is just something that happens extremely often with GPRS in tall cities).
    * All of the buttons are very small.
    * There doesn't seem to be a built in way to disable or reprogram the hard buttons on the right side of the unit (camera, internet).
    * You can use the jog dial to select and go into things but there isn't a hard button to back out, you must use the LCD.
    * Navigation of the phone without looking at it is nearly impossible.
    * Limited size and proprietary nature of Sony memory expansion.
    * Requires Outlook/Notes for address book sync.
    * Expensive dev kit for creating native Symbian apps. ... whoa that was longer than I expected and now the Good:

    * Oh Jesus, it is damn sexy.
    * Very powerful, one of the included games is a rather bland race car game that you can play networked. What is impressive about it is that it is all shaded polygons similiar to what one would see on the 1st gen of Atari Jaguar games. Nothing too special really but when it is in the palm of your hand, awesome.
    * The camera is much better than any one inclued in any cellphone so far. The max resolution is 640x480, there is no flash, but the camera seems to take pretty decent pictures. Comparable to any of the $75-$100 digital cams one can currently purchase.
    * You can use practically anything for a ringtone. In some strange conspiracy it seems to only not support using .mod files to announce calls or alerts.
    * Syncing (if you have msoft products) works well. Just hook up the phone and go. Combine with an external sync program like trusync and syncing through outlook to your favourite web service is a breeze.
    * Practically every midlet I have tried on it works.
    * Ports of games like DOOM and the emulator MAME if you are into that sort of thing. While they work I've found MAME to be more of a showoff than usable to play games. The stylus just doesn't lend itself to old arcade games.
    * The screen is bright and the clarity kicks ass.
    * Phone comes with 12meg Internal and one 16Meg stick, that holds a lot of stuff if you aren't trying to fill it full of mp3s.
    * Included headset (headphone/microphone) have suprisingly good sound.
    * Handwriting recognition is fast, accurate and easy to get used to.
    * Support for POP/IMAP. This is probably my favourite feature of the phone, there is something just damn cool about having the phone pulling your email for you every hour or so and replying wherever you are.
    * SMS becomes insanely more easy when you can just write out your responses.
    * Played with a beta of the Opera browser which comes out on Monday. It is a *real* browser in your hand.
    * Bluetooth file transfers with laptops seem to work well as does moving files from phone to phone. I can not get bluetooth syncing to work.
    * Did I mention it was sexy?
    * Speakerphone quality is amazing (and very loud).
    * In fact the phone is *very* loud. You can play an MP3 loud enough for an entire room to hear.
    * Easy to assign pictures to any contact info.
    * Quickdial screen features icons of pictures for your friends/family. Nothing like just touching someone's face to call them.
    * IRDA works.
    * Flight mode.
    * Better than expected battery life for such a complex device.
    * Great sound quality in calls.
    * ...!

    Okay I am tired. Suffice to say even with the downsides this is by *far* the best integrated solution to come along.

    --
    --- I do not moderate.
  47. Wrong direction by WeeBull · · Score: 1
    I agree with ites - I think the recent "evolution" for mobile phones (and PDAs)has been in the wrong direction - more features per unit. I'd prefer to carry (slightly) more units doing fewer things better.

    You're a phone? Good. Be a phone. Provide access to the (telephone) network (voice and data; WAP, GPRS, 3G, WiFi, etc.). Speak Bluetooth.

    You're a PDA? Good. Be a PDA. Provide me with a calendar, appointments, contacts, etc. Speak Bluetooth. Speak to the phone, when I want to call one of my contacts, write SMS messages, or browse the web (WAP, GPRS, 3G, WiFi, what do you care, that's the PHONE's decision!)

    You're a hands-free/headset? Good. Be a headset. (Be stereo, please!) Be very lightweight, use in-ear microphones. Speak Bluetooth. Speak Bluetooth to the PDA who'll be streaming you MP3s. Speak Bluetooth to the phone who'll interrupt the MP3s when I get an incoming call - or when I make an outgoing one.

    Go further - think big. PA (Tannoy) systems should speak Bluetooth. My PDA knows which train I'm taking home - if the PA system is about to make an announcement regarding my train, mute my MP3s. If I'm on the phone, record the announcement and play it back when I hang up. (TiVo in your pocket, woo!)

    We've only scratched the surface - Bluetooth is the enabler - but we should be thinking WAY beoynd "Oh yeah, Bluetooth headsets, that's neat." I for one DEMAND that whole "personal network" of gadgets I've been promised for so long!

  48. It supports the AU audio format? by pomakis · · Score: 1
    According to the web page:

    Audio formats supported by the P800 include MP3, WAV, AMR, and AU.

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't AU the ancient Sun audio format? I find it odd that they advertise support for that, but don't mention Ogg support at all.

    1. Re:It supports the AU audio format? by ry4an · · Score: 1

      Java's from Sun and .au it was the first audio format Java supported. I suspect it was a freebie feature.

  49. Security lies in multiple devices by panurge · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I really don't like the idea of entrusting my digital everything to one small box that has "steal me" written on it in big letters, (especially when you cannot use all the functions simultaneously). After a period of deep initial suspicion I've been doing some evaluation on Bluetooth recently and it seems to me like the connectivity idea in that is much more sound. Bluetooth headset, phone with sensible keys and a small, greyscale display giving excellent battery life, PDA with a decent screen and processor (it doesn't have the same standby power needs as a phone because it isn't always listening).
    And, as for cameras, even with the small image sensors of digital cameras you need quite a large zoom lens for good pictures. To me it makes sense for someone to produce a good quality camera for which you can use your PDA as the monitor screen, something better than the optically poor add-ons we have seen so far.

    It seems sensible to optimise the gadget for its function and enable the gadgets to talk.

    If they also had a common battery charger and interchangeable battery, I guess that would be functionality heaven. Your PDA would be able to use expensive mobile phone connectivity only when necessary, otherwise using the local wireless network: I can't see a phone manufacturer wanting to allow that any time soon. So, although this thing looks like a v. cool gadget, I remain unconvinced.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Security lies in multiple devices by fain0v · · Score: 1

      You are completely right. In this day and age, Security lies in having more objects to throw at your assailant.

  50. a friend has one by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    and it's painfull watching him use it.

    He's left handed, so I don't know if that's the main cause of the problems.

    1: there's no way to setup the UI for left handed people e.g. scroll bar on the left so you don't cover everything up with your hand.

    2: It takes him ages to input text, with lots of errors

    on the good side, the developer kit he got looks quite good, and the interface isn't that bad (apart from 1 and 2).

    I'm going to stick to a keypad for now, my handwritings so bad even I can't read it.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:a friend has one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      scratches head, thinks again....
      Why arn't the menu's at the bottom of hand held devices, you can't see what your doing when you hand covers the screen as you reach for a top menu bar....

      Bug report to Gnome and KDE UI guidelines comming tomorow!.

  51. Not the phone I want... by splatbang · · Score: 1

    I have a Palm Tungsten T with Bluetooth. There are several small Bluetooth-based headsets (or, if I'm in a less tech-minded mood, plugin headphones into the T|T and use the builtin mic).

    The phone I want is stripped down to very little... A small black box that has Bluetooth and perhaps a numeric keypad for quick dialing if the Palm is not at hand (where it should always be). I don't really want to know I'm carrying it.

    Or even an SD card that I shove into the Palm T|T. Then the "phone" doesn't need to provide its own power or Bluetooth; it leeches from and funnels through the Palm.

    Gimme gimme gimme...

  52. The attraction of convergence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    What is with all this "Let's put everything into one device" anyway. How many of you geeks buy all-in-one entertainment systems? Or TVs w/VCRs and DVDs in them?
    Do you put any of those in your pocket?
  53. Old news by megagurka · · Score: 1

    The P800 is already old. Why post an article about an old phone? This one will be WAY cooler:

    Neonode N1.

  54. Nice link by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

    Hey, nice link, brainiac.

  55. Too many features by Chaltek · · Score: 1

    We need the phone manufacturers to stop seducing us geeks with all the sexy little features (camera, games, MMS) and focus on making phones that do what phones should - make calls, quickly and reliably. Maybe then the service providers could work on their quality of service, rather than wasting all their techs on fancy new features we don't need.

    BTW, I have a T68i and I'll never buy another Sony Ericsson until they fix the stupid interface lag.

  56. I allready have one of those by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AND IT'S GREAT! There is no need for anything else, throw those other phones away and do same to any other PDA-device.

    It is the ultimate machine for everyone!

    Just get one and You will be pleased.

  57. Bluetooth Phones by orpheus2000 · · Score: 1

    I'm about to get a 12" Powerbook (please, no flames, just bear with me) and it BT enabled. I'm also going to probably get a Tungsten T for my wife. I'm in the US and I'm currently using a Nokia 3300 on the Cingular vanilla network. What is the *cheapest* option to get a bluetooth enabled phone working on either the Cingular vanilla US network, or another network? I'd like to use this phone as a wireless modem for my laptop/palm, I don't care about color, camera, etc. on the phone.

    I ask this because it's seems that current BT phones are prohibitavely expensive due to all the extra features. Is this just a pipe dream?

    TIA

    1. Re:Bluetooth Phones by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      I ask this because it's seems that current BT phones are prohibitavely expensive due to all the extra features.

      ???

      There are places in NYC giving them away for free with a service contract... Too late for me tho :/

      (and I sync my T68m via iSync, and it works ok, though I have yet to figure out how to get gprs to work :p)

    2. Re:Bluetooth Phones by Scyber · · Score: 1

      I believe amazon has the t68 either for free or very cheap after rebate. But this is only with a new t-mobile service activation.

    3. Re:Bluetooth Phones by ianfinity · · Score: 1

      I found myself in the same quandry with cingular. Signed up in July, bought a cheap phone, knowing that I would switch to a bluetooth enabled one when they came out. Then found out that I would be charged an arm and a leg as a current subscriber, while they were basically giving them away to new subscribers.

      The solutions for me was to buy an unlocked Ericsson T39m. I paid about $225, but you can now get them for under $200, both online and in the right nyc shop if you pay cash (wink, wink, nudge, nudge). Just switch in your sim card and away you go. note: I did have something odd happen two weeks after I did this, where my account was locked as if I had reported my phone stolen. Cust. Serv. said they did not know how this happened and reactivated it, were chagrined that I was using an "unsupported phone" and I agreed that it was at my own risk. Have had no problems since. Note also that unlocked phones can use disposable sim cards overseas at much cheaper prices than locked phones from a US carrier, which will force you to call from anywhere at their roaming rates.

      Pros: Battery life is amazing- 5 days w/ bluetooth off, 2 days with it on. Phone is light, slim, sturdy and has a flip, which i value for both protection in pocket and better voice pickup on calls. Syncs with my TiBook without issue. Controlling settings on the phone is easy, but address book is difficult, but the UI has the same issues on the newer, more expensive phones.

      Cons (depending on your needs): grayscale screen, no camera built in (attachment available, i think), non-standard wired headset jack (cheap converters available), address book, calendar & to do UI is wacky (but usable overtime)

      Overall, I am happy with this solution. The phone has worked consistently better than any other I have had, except possibly a motorola flip on sprintpcs. My palm gathers dust in a drawer, while all my info is available on and backed up from the phone - in fact setup of all info on the phone took less than 10 minutes. I think this would be your best bet.

  58. Avoiding being locked in by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
    This is an expensive phone.

    If I were to purchase one for use with one network provider, what information do I need to get in hand to ensure that they don't lock it to their service? It's my understanding that many of the newer units work on multiple networks, so long as you retain one of the codes used when they configure the phone.

    At this price, I'd want to ensure that the phone's sale was contingent on my getting that code. I don't think many cellular resellers would hold back on that if it makes the difference of their getting a commission or not.

    1. Re:Avoiding being locked in by dtr20 · · Score: 1

      In the UK you can get an average GSM phone unlocked with a small bit of hardware available for about $50. There are lots of places which offer the service to unlock phones for you for a lot less than that.

      Unlocking is often as simple as sending a couple of ASCII characters in on the serial port on the bottom on the handset. At worst, you need a special connector to connect to pins under the battery. There are no PIN codes etc that I know of that are required.

      Some operators, like Orange, sometimes modify the firmware slightly adding some operator specific features, but this generally doesn't cause problems upon unlocking. For example I have a phone now running on another network, but it still has an Orange splash screen!

  59. Re:T68i [disagree] by rapett0 · · Score: 1

    Where you located? I had Sprint PCS for 5 years and when I moved to So Cal, I had *no* reception in my apartment, but the GSM phones seemed to work, so I went with TMobile and life is good again. Oddly enough, AT&T works the best at my apartment, then my T68i/Tmobile, then Cingular, even though its all same protocol, and I thought Cingular and Tmobile piggy back on each others towers (AT&T might be in on that too, not for sure though).

    It gets less reception then my Sprint phone at work, but never dropped a call yet.

    So point is, its probably just a problem in your location, the sad fact is the reception varies per provider in the same areas, so if your used to something else thats better and you switch and the new one sucks, well, return it, almost all providers have 14 day full refund return policies.

  60. Wait for the Sharp GX10 by marcmac · · Score: 2, Informative

    I just spent a week in Europe playing (well, working, really) with the t68i, P800, SPV and GX10, and I like the GX10 best, hands down.

    The screen on the T68 series sucks, badly. The joystick moves when I want to click, and clicks when I want to move.

    The SPV (Orange only, AFAIK) runs some form of windows, and it sucked... It *crashed* constantly, and the menu layout and function navigation was terrible. F'rinstance, from reading an SMS, it took no fewer than for navigation steps to change from one folder (eg. inbox) to another.

    The GX-10 has a great screen, intuitive navigation interface, easy camera functionality, great form factor, great controls, and was the easiest to configure and use. My only carp is that it's not great on memory - it refused to download MMS messages that the t68 had no problem with (but that may be due to greater color depth - 68k colors vs. 4096)

  61. Re:P800: The Bad and The Good. by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    * Requires Outlook/Notes for address book sync

    Whaa?

    You mean it doesn't support syncml, ala iSync and the T68 series?

    That'd be mighty stupid if they didn't.. Is there even a bluetooth/syncml plugin for any of the main linux PIMs?

  62. Re:Opera on the p800 (screenshots) by torpor · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or do these groups currently making web clients, still slogging at it in spite of the apparent revenue conundrum, seem to have serious balls of steel?

    "Small-screen rendering"? For some reason, that just seems brilliant in every possible way.

    Man, I suddenly have a lot more respect for these guys and what they're going up against. Opera, Gecko, Microsoft, etc. What are there now, probably *15* different 'browser' projects? Whoa!

    And when I see shit like this on a P800, it re-affirms that respect. There's still a *lot* of sway left in this browser market it appears!

    It does have to be said that there seems to be *some* sort of mis-direction occurring in the browser arena, though.

    These cool features, and the kind of spirited thinking behind it, seems to me to be seriously lagging. Why am I so surprised? Because I'm down on the whole browser thing.

    I feel like we've gone off into chase-the-pretty-media land in rendering terms, instead of addressing the issues which make the 'manage-our-collective-knowledge' a daily grind.

    (Who do we thank for that this week, Apple or Microsoft?)

    Browsers, feature-wise, are still incredibly crap to use frequently.

    +Google happens because of -Bookmarks.

    For heavens sake, we've still got a 'menu' for our bookmarks as standard in most browsers - oh, wait, we can put them in 'folders', thanks for that metaphor ...

    That no single web vendor has bothered to fix this massive oversight, or that I am too browser-bound to give a shit to find out if other browsers -have- solved this problem, just seems to indicate that, in fact, The Browser War is not over.

    Cool!

    (I remember when 'http' was something you only saw on a gopher server.)

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  63. Typo: by torpor · · Score: 1

    Damn:

    "... single web browser vendor has bothered to fix ..."

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  64. Not spotty -- Just Ignored by Mr.+No+Skills · · Score: 1

    My first cell phone was a digital PCS phone in good 'ole Washington DC. Sprint Spectrum was the first commercial PCS based services in USA, using GSM equipment. I believe they got a jump on other PCS based services because the technology was well proven in Europe at that point. Within 2 years I could use it anywhere I traveled on business. Generally good reception everywhere I went.

    About two years after that Sprint "upgraded" me to CDMA based equipment as part of the Sprint PCS service. I was told that CDMA was superior to GSM and that everyone was going this way except Europe. Sprint actually sold the GSM network to Voice Stream (or something that eventually became Voice Stream) where I assume it still exists.

    And I was moved to the overcrowded CDMA network that was built on leased network towers and equipment, not the owned equipment of Sprint Spectrum. My experience was many more dropped calls between cells, poorer customer service, and "signal lost" messages on my phone.

    If coverage is "spotty", it probably represents a reduction of the GSM networks as opposed to a "not build yet" of the networks.

    --
    Sleep is for the Weak
  65. Killer app enough? by Ch_Omega · · Score: 1

    According to another Infosync article, someone has allready ported Doom to the P800. I would love to provide a link, but Infosync appears slashdotted. :) Wait until the dust settles, and search for P800 Doom on infosync, and I'm pretty sure you'll find it.

    1. Re:Killer app enough? by freitasm · · Score: 1

      Doom on P800: http://www.geekzone.co.nz/content.asp?contentid=16 0

  66. The thing is... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    In the UK, and in most other European countries, in order to get their licenses from the local equivelents of the FCC, it was mandatory for the cellular carriers to offer coverage for the entire country.

    And YES that DOES include the non-urban areas!

    Our own FCC just doesn't have the balls to stand up to, and regulate, US telecomms corperations. So from a European (And others, Japan for instance.) point of view, the US's real (Sorry, AMPS and other obsolete garbage don't count, G2 and G3 GSM are where it's at.) cellular network IS tiny, and pretty damn ass-backwards.

    The standard-issue America-bashing does grate on ME a bit too. But really... our cellular system really *IS* backwards compared to Europe. And it's positively neolithic compared to Japan's.

    cya,
    john

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  67. I hate that the base unit only supports cartridges by dubiousmike · · Score: 1

    Oh... I thought you said "TI 994A"

  68. Memory Stick Duo? by lesterchakyn · · Score: 1

    I have been searching over the net for the past three months trying to find what the "Memory Stick Duo" format is.
    I know it's a Memory stick, and it's smaller than the "common" memory stick, but.. the question is: Are they compatible?

    I mean, can I just slide my (expensive for me) 128Mb Memory Stick inside the MSDuo slot (and getting it out a bit, like inserting Gameboy carts inside a Gameboy Advande), and will it work???

    I just want to share my "stock" MS I use for my Clie and my Cybershot with the phone.

    Does anyone know something about this matter?

    1. Re:Memory Stick Duo? by Logopop · · Score: 2, Informative

      The duo is slimmer, shorter and narrower. It is electrically compatible. I can take the duo out of my P800, put it into the adapter that came with the phone, and stuff the adapter into my regular-sized memory stick USB reader to transfer stuff from the PC to the memory. Great for brining MP3's with me on the go.
      Still can't seem to be able to purchase Duo's on the street, though...

  69. t68 series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes this is a decently cool phone, but I have been quite disappointed with it's reception as well as it's bugginess. Seems to turn off quite often. Not something to lust after imo. I'd wait for the p800 if I was you.

  70. Had once since dec 12th by Xenious · · Score: 1

    True there are some issues with it and T-Mobile US's network but as they release it in the US I imagine they will clear up. I was previously using a Treo 270. The only thing I really miss is the ease and speed of the keyboard entry on the Treo. The handwriting recognition on the P800 is good, but I can "thumb-type" much faster. That and missing a few apps like vindigo. The applications should start appearing now though...finally an ICQ clone client came out and with the publishing of the Opera browser (it is actually out now on Sony Ericsson's download site for the P800) it is getting there. The speaker phone is much much better than on the Treo and it nicely plays MP3, WAV, MIDI, etc on the P800 (as well as for ringtones!).

    The GPRS speed (when used as a modem for a laptop via bluetooth) is pretty close to a PC card GPRS modem. Not quite there, but close. I got 36kb/s with the P800 as a modem, but could get 39kb/s with my Sierra AirCard (and they use compression as well on the aircard).

    The size is larger than most phones (a bit smaller than an old Nokia 6190 and a bit wider), but the phone itself has an excellent "feel" to it and fits well. It has a good phone weight if that is a description. Feels confortable like a regular land line phone, but is still light and portable.

    The price is high for a SIM free version ($650 preorder from SE US), but I would imagine subsidized versions will come out soon from T-Mobile and AT&T.

    Overall it is a much nicer phone than the treo and has better integration, but the treo is a bit nicer PDA (due to a huge application base and keyboard). If you have the cash definately pick one up, if you just want a mobile phone that makes calls and no more then this isn't the phone for you.
    -xen

    --
    -Xen
  71. The Screen by Lord+of+the+Wazz · · Score: 1

    Haven't heard any mention about how the screen will survive the inevitable rough and tumble of your average night out. I currently have a Siemens SL45i which has a scratch resistant coating on the screen which helps against the odd drop. Nights out are expensive enough as it is without having to buy yourself a new one of these the next morning as well.

  72. Re:Difference between T68m and T68i by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is more differences between the "m" and the "i".

    1) The "i" has got more user memory
    2) The T9 and menus is faster on "i" compared to an upgraded "m".

    + the other things mentioned

  73. a few things about P800 by Priyadi · · Score: 1

    I recently sold my old T68i and bought this P800. I think it is the best PDA+phone combo available now. The others are too big, clumsy and will make people around stare at you with funny look. OK, maybe the new Kyocera is OK too, but it is not GSM.

    Now the sad parts. There are a few things that I miss a lot from the old phone:
    - decent battery life. the old t68i can run for more than 2 days with a single charge with both irda and bluetooth always on! this thing can't survive half a day with those on. (but maybe this is because I only have it for 2 days, the battery is not at full potential yet, according to the manual. I hope so)
    - SMS delivery status report. P800 doesn't have this yet :(

  74. Re:T68i [disagree] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its quite possible that TMO and Cingular colocate on a tower.. they are really into cooperating these days.. but seriously doubt taht ATT and Cingular will have anythign to do with each other, they are bitter rivals... just 2 cents from someone in the biz.

  75. pop3s/imaps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone knows if it supports secure pop3/imap? I couldn't find anything about those and I don't feel confortable with them passwords flying around :) I saw the browser can do ssl/tls but there was no mention of secure mail.

    Thanks in advance.

  76. Re:P800: The Bad and The Good. by mercx · · Score: 1

    > * You can use the jog dial to select and go into things but there isn't a hard button to back out, you must use the LCD.

    We have a P800 for development here at the office.
    The jog dial goes in *five* directions 8|...

    You can back out of any menu by pushing the jog dial backwards (to the back of the case). It's not readily apparent, but really handy once you figure it out...

    As an aside, pushing the jog dial forward can pop up context sensitive menus... pretty cool, i only hope the jog dial is sturdy enough for prolonged usage considering the number of directions it goes in.

  77. 4096 color screen - EWWW by Future+Shock · · Score: 1

    So this thing exists as a mobile media center, ready for us to pop up the jpgs of our kids on the the screen rather than pull a wallet photo out. I admit it makes sense, and I do it all the time on my Pocket PC, but not on a 4096 color screen! What was Sony thinking? This reminds of all of the Handspring and Palm handhelds that had limited color screens that were condidered insufficient - and that was 2-3 years ago. Today people's standard of comparison is an Ipaq color screen, transflective, well lit, with 65k colors. To produce an expensive competitor with "media" pretensions but a much more limited screen doesn't make sense to me at all

  78. Re:Opera on the p800 (screenshots) by jpiterak · · Score: 1
    Wow!... Talk about fresh off the presses...

    Either the article grabs a fresh Slashdot page periodically, or they JUST put it up.

    Guess somethimes there is fresh info on Slashdot ;-P

  79. P800/iSync by mcwetboy · · Score: 1

    The article says that the P800 uses SyncML, so I can't see any reason why iSync wouldn't support it at some point.

  80. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    ***** Special AI Seminar (abstract)

    It has been widely recognized that AI programs require expert knowledge
    in order to perform well in complex domains. But knowledge alone is not
    sufficient for some applications; wisdom is needed as well. Accordingly,
    we have developed a new approach to artificial intelligence which we call
    "wisdom engineering". As a test of our ideas, we have written IMMANUEL, a
    wisdom based system for the task domain of western philosophical thought.
    IMMANUEL was supplied initially with 200 wisdom units which contained wisdom
    about such elementary concepts as mind, matter, being, nothingness, and so
    forth. IMMANUEL was then allowed to run freely, guided by the heuristic
    rules contained in its heterarchically organized meta wisdom base. IMMANUEL
    succeeded in rediscovering most of the important philosophical ideas developed
    in western culture over the course of the last 25 centuries, including those
    underlying Plato's theory of government, Kant's metaphysics, Nietzsche's theory
    of value, and Husserl's phenomenology. In this seminar, we will describe
    IMMANUEL's achievements and internal architecture. We will also briefly
    discuss our recent efforts to apply wisdom engineering to oil exploration.

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...