Slashdot Mirror


Mandrake Linux... Not Dead Yet?

bloodeu writes "Mandrake Linux has been beaten down by linux experts alike, but this new release of Mandrake may hold many promising Linux users what they have been waiting for, like NTFS resizing(which is a first), Automatic Network config(zeroconf), Supermount, and many more. You can download the Mandrake 9.1 RC1 Here"

89 of 494 comments (clear)

  1. I'm not dead yet! by bryanp · · Score: 5, Funny

    The obligatory Monty Python reference. I'll go sit quietly now.

    --
    "An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." Col. Jeff Cooper
    1. Re:I'm not dead yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "promising Linux users what they have been waiting for, like NTFS resizing(which is a first), Automatic Network config(zeroconf), Supermount,"

      How much does it really matter that they have all this? They don't make any money, thats their problem!

    2. Re:I'm not dead yet! by packeteer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ok first of all it does matter a lot that they have these improvments and its NOT true that they aren't making money. They do have sources of income which for certain areas actually create a profit. The overall Mandrakesoft situation is different. Mostly because of their failed investments such as their Mandrake Online Learning plan. Once they go through bankruptcy and rescructure their spending they will be able to turn a real profit.

      I dont understand why people are saying they are going away. The only place i hear about "Mandrake Linux is dying!" would be slashdot. I am surpirsed i dont see trolls more often screaming that since there are some good FUD opportunities here. If you read almost anywhere else about Mandrake all you see is people talking about the upcoming version which looks very good so far.

      To address your first point last i will say that most definetly what they release matters. Even without an increase in income they can probably turn a profit so by releasing a better product they can get even more profit. You know... that's what business's do. If Mandrake can put in many more firsts for linux yet continues to improve their ease of use and auto-configuration, which they did in this release, then more people will join the mandrake club.

      Also as a side note the Mandrake club is a great idea and i think if you download this and you like it you should join. Some people say that setting up a business on a subscription based model will scare off investors and you should buy the CD's instead. That is oh so very wrong. If MandrakeSoft can pull it's self out of debt and show everyone that their business model works i think we could potentially have many more sucessful open source companies make it.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  2. Lets hope they release it soon by Twister002 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So we can all go download it and not pay them a cent.

    uhhhhmmmmmm

    --
    "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
    1. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by Salsaman · · Score: 4, Insightful
      So we can all go download it and not pay them a cent.

      Yes of course. That's what the GPL is all about :-)

      But if you do that, please consider giving them a donation (e.g., by joining the Mandrake Club) so that they might be around for the next release.

    2. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by whereiswaldo · · Score: 4, Insightful


      I'd be more impressed if I could get in the Mandrake club by purchasing a boxed product from a retail outlet.
      Right now that's not possible (to my knowledge). Why should I pay twice?

    3. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by Hatter · · Score: 4, Informative

      The point is they only get a fraction of the money you spend at a retail store. It's divided up between the retail chain, the company which pressed the cds, Mandrake, and more than likely a middleman.

    4. Re:Lets hope they release it soon by swv3752 · · Score: 5, Informative

      All new purchases from the Mandrake store and new release box sets will come with a one month complimentary subscription the MandrakeClub.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
  3. NTFS by NickisGod.com · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Um, okay. Maybe I've been out of the loop when it comes to Linux/NTFS compatibility. I thought we were still kinda' afraid to write to NTFS partitions. Now we can resize them.

    Can someone please elaborate?

    1. Re:NTFS by y2dt · · Score: 5, Informative

      Mandrake is using ntfsresize which is part of the Linux-NTFS project.

      This is the project that contributed the NTFS driver to the Linux kernel

    2. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Remember, kids: Nothing makes a better first impression than corrupting a user's existing NTFS partition during installation.

    3. Re:NTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Resizing NTFS isn't as difficult as writing to it. The resizer only has to alter a few pieces of metadata. This is relatively safe.

      Note that the resizer cannot defrag, yet, so it can only shrink NTFS partitions by the amount of free space you have.

      Mandrake are using a 2.4 kernel patched with the new NTFS driver. This driver has limited *safe* write support. It can overwrite existing files (using write or mmap). This is enough to read-write loopback mount an NTFS file as a filesystem and use it as your root filesystem.

      FlatCap (Rich)
      ntfs at flatcap dot org

      Linux NTFS Project

    4. Re:NTFS by Selanit · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Another thing worth pointing out about NTFS is that Mandrake is not the first Linux distribution with NTFS resizing support. Xandros had it when they announced their first official release a few months ago. I suspect that they used the same code as Mandrake, though I don't know. Xandros's PR pages claim that they were the first with that capability.

      I have no idea who to believe, and frankly I don't care who got their first; I'm just glad it's implemented. Now, if we could just get decent NTFS write support, we'd be in much better shape. Being able to read/write your Windows partition from Linux makes dual-booting much more tolerable. On at least one occasion, being able to write a FAT32 partition from Linux has saved my butt. (Windows was refusing to boot because some vital configuration files had gotten corrupted; I couldn't boot from floppy 'cause my disk drive was dead, but I was able to replace them from Linux -- disaster averted!)

      Not being able to do similar things with NTFS partitions is a significant drawback which may be discouraging some people from trying Linux out on their shiny new 2K/XP machine. I hope it gets worked out in the not-too-distant future.

    5. Re:NTFS by DickBreath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have no idea who to believe, and frankly I don't care who got their first

      FYI... off topic...

      In about 1982, PC World magazine says, on the front cover, that MS-DOS 2.0 is the first operating system with a hierarchical file system.

      The first in a long list of Microsoft innovations.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  4. Mandrake rocks. by Big+Mark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, so it's the really simple distro for thickies and n00bs. It's also by far and away the easiest Linux distro to set up and use that I've tried (and I'm from the days of Yggdrasil, me) so it's my distro of choice - it has (or is easily made to have) all the power of "proper" distros but isn't as condescending as Lycoris and friends.

    Mandrake should be kept alive, it would be a loss to the Linux world if it were to die.

    -Mark

    1. Re:Mandrake rocks. by Hatter · · Score: 5, Informative

      I find it funny that so many people overlook urpmi. It's apt-get for rpms. It can retrieve packages from cdrom, or the internet and handles dependencies automatically.

    2. Re:Mandrake rocks. by JSCarr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just installed urpmi for the first time last night, after ten minutes of snarling at the RedHat 8.0 package manager (which, frankly, needs a LOT of work). Apt-get for rpms is brilliant, in my noobish opinion.

      It's not funny though that it's overlooked - it's sad that it's not publicized more heavily. I wish I'd have known about it sooner. It would have saved me lots of frustration over the last six months.

    3. Re:Mandrake rocks. by peter_gzowski · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, apt-rpm and urpmi do the same thing, only apt-rpm does it better :). To me, apt-rpm and synaptic are godsends to the upkeep of my box (Mandrake 9.0). I didn't invest too much time in figuring out urpmi. It's configured to handle security updates quite well, but I didn't want to fiddle with it to go grab KDE 3.1. I know, someone's going to reply saying it's easy, just do blah, blah, but I grabbed the apt package, and the synaptic package from texstar rpms and I was up and running after one rpm -Uv command.

      Great job, Mandrake! I've used Slackware (for quite a while) and Redhat, and I think Mandrake is the shit.

      --
      "Now gluttony and exploitation serves eight!" - TV's Frank
    4. Re:Mandrake rocks. by dolson · · Score: 3, Funny

      it's easy, just do blah, blah

  5. Their trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Trying to out live apple

  6. What's wrong with Mandrake? by swtaarrs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I tried it (9.0) for a few weeks and the only thing I didn't like was that wine wasn't installed/configured like in RedHat (7.3). Is this another case of some linux people hating a distro because it's too easy to use?

    1. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by Pike65 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is this another case of some linux people hating a distro because it's too easy to use?

      Too right!

      If everyone learns how to use Linux then I lose my smug feeling of superiority.

      Seriously, does this seem like hypocrisy run rife? Everyone says they want the world to use Linux, but when someone produces a distro that is easy enough for Win users to use as a stepping stone to *cough* 'greater things', everyone mocks it for being too dumbed down.

      I wish some people would keep their attitudes in line with their principles . . .

      --
      "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
    2. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by 7-Vodka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      that's the thing about mandrake. It was never too dumbed down at all. I had to use mandrake as a rescue system last week and i was really overjoyed by how quick and easy it was to install a base system and from the cli, urpmi all the rescue packages I needed and use them.

      --

      Liberty.

    3. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by Otter · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I used Mandrake throughout the 8.x series. A PowerPC person for years, I needed a PC running Linux and Windows at home and tried Mandrake. I was very impressed with its installation (far, far easier than Windows for someone unfamiliar with Windows) and other features like easy configuration and font importing.

      Why I've abandoned it:

      • The software updating blows. I use apt-get to update the Yellow Dog Linux on my laptop and it is vastly better. The ease of Debian, without having to be one of those irritating Debian users.
      • The user-friendliness got in my way when anything went wrong. Try adding a new window manager that Mandrake doesn't offer, or a secondary (CVS, for example) version of an existing one. Now fight the system until kdm learns about it. Or, when audio-CD or floppy mounting doesn't work, try making sense of the spaghetti in /etc/fstab.

      Still, having hosed that same PC trying to install Gentoo, and under orders from my wife to get some form of Linux running TODAY so she can run some software (she just doesn't get what using Linux is about ;-) ), I suspect I may be going back to that. Either that, or I'll be soon seeing some of you in #gentoo...

    4. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by teslatug · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's my experience...

      I bought their 7.2 version at Best Buy. I thought it was pretty easy to install and use. Then I started having problems with packages. It would get to the point where I would install, uninstall a package, or even refresh the list of installed packages, and the rpm database would get corrupted. Being a newb, I didn't know how to recover from this other than a reinstall (the menus were screwed up, the installed packages went missing, etc.). I installed the updates and even got their updated CD in the mail (after badgering them for a couple of weeks -- which I shouldn't have had to do since they promissed it to registered users -- they sent me a used copy with visible wear). Even after all the updates, I still got a corrupted rpm database. After this third time, I gave up on Mandrake for good. Even though I haven't touched Mandrake for a few years, I still get occasional spam from them. Serves me right for registering.

      Maybe they have gotten better, maybe it's just my experience, but these are my reasons for not using Mandrake.

    5. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by sc00p18 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone says they want the world to use Linux, but when someone produces a distro that is easy enough for Win users to use as a stepping stone to *cough* 'greater things', everyone mocks it for being too dumbed down.

      I don't think most people in the community are really after that "smug feeling of superiority." Sure, there are elitist assholes. But I think the majority of the so-called elitist comments come as a result of frustration with those who want a free ride all the time. You see, what we REALLY want is for people to be self-sufficient, and able to figure things out for themselves. If everyone operated like this, then there would be very little time wasted explaining the documented solutions to common problems, which would free everyone up to concentrate on the real problems, in order to make progress.

    6. Re:What's wrong with Mandrake? by gregmac · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You see, what we REALLY want is for people to be self-sufficient, and able to figure things out for themselves.

      But the thing is, 98% of people use computers because they are a tool to get a job done. They don't CARE to become self-sufficient, they want it to work. Like it or not, it's a reality of the computing world.

      If your car broke, and you took it to a mechanic, and he refused to do any service on it - even though he knew exactly what was wrong - until you read the engineering spec manuals for all the parts he had to replace, how happy would you be?

      --
      Speak before you think
  7. Mandrake, OS, dead at 6 by stud9920 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Operating system distro Mandrake was found dead in it's Paris siege this morning. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss it - even if you didn't enjoy their work, there's no denying their contributions to the free software movement. Truly a French icon.

    1. Re:Mandrake, OS, dead at 6 by iomud · · Score: 4, Funny

      You've got it all wrong, mandrake didn't die it surrendered to the axis of evil. So long Mandrake we barely gnu ye.

  8. attention, release candidate 1 ... by nicsterrr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's worth pointing out to anyone thinking of installing this as their main OS that this is an initial release candidate and is nowhere near prime time.. be warned unless you want to find and report bugs.

    1. Re:attention, release candidate 1 ... by Thing+1 · · Score: 3, Informative
      be warned unless you want to find and report bugs.

      And if you do want to report bugs, they have BugZilla set up to make it really easy.

      Sometimes it's difficult to determine which package things go in when reporting, but the developers have been very nice and helpful in moving my bugs around to the proper places. And as another comment mentioned, the turn-around time is quick.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  9. As a distro... by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mandrake is great. They've really built something that's useful in its own right, and provides many useful things back into the community. Maybe it's not for you, but it's a great place to start for a lot of people. A nice introduction.

    The problem is, Mandrake as a business is like a comedy of errors. All sorts of crazy problems, some of which were outside their control, and some that could (and should) have been avoided in the first place. 20/20 hindsight is nice, so I can't carp too much, but if they could get their shit together for just one release (no distribution problems; keep the paying club members happy, and get them a box before it's been on shelves for 3 months), I think things could turn around in a hurry.

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  10. Good for Mandrake by Gyorg_Lavode · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I'm looking forward to Mandrake 9.1. I had alot of gripes about Mandrake 9.0, not least of which is the separated package management, but I've gotten acustom to using kpackage so that doesn't bother me any more. Hopefully 9.1 will include many of the bug fixes for the other problems I had.

    Now all the new stuff I"m looking forward to, zeroconf network, kde 3.1, gnome 2.2, XFree86 4.3, 4.21 kernel and a cornacopia of other programs, are in mandrake 9.1. While in the end I intend to move over to debian completely, IMO mandrake is the best of the others for me. I can't wait for 9.1 to become available.

    --
    I do security
    1. Re:Good for Mandrake by Hatter · · Score: 2, Funny

      4.21 kernel

      Wow, I had no idea Mandrake was so advanced!

    2. Re:Good for Mandrake by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      4.21 kernel

      Wow, I had no idea Mandrake was so advanced!


      Lisdexia is a terrible disease.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:Good for Mandrake by 1nv4d3r · · Score: 4, Funny

      Be careful, 4.21, being an odd-numbered release, is primarily for developers and advanced users.

      Ballsy move by Mandrake, since they're known as a beginner's distro.

      I'm waiting for 4.22 before I use it in production.

  11. My experiance by hswerdfe · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've Been Using
    9.1 Beta 2 for about a month and I have to say ...
    it rocks

    it is much beter than Mandrake 8.0....

    it is by far the easiest distro I have ever used
    and with the exception of Knoppix the easiest to install...:)

    I personaly hope they survive....

    all of the needed aps are there I only have few complaints....

    1. I had to specially select Vi for install and emacs auto installed...(Flame away)..

    2. Gnome meeting was not installed...by default

    3. I am having trouble changing some of the default loggin, and boot manager stuff....

    other than that....I give the 9.1 Beta 2 an A+ ....
    give it to any newbee they will be happy

    --
    --meh--
  12. I thought.... by A_Non_Moose · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mandrake was a French distro....so it will never die.

    Surrender, yes, but die? Never (pronounced: Nev'air!)

    {SEG}

    --
    Have you read the moderator guidelines? Well, have you, PUNK? (and I want a Karma: Gnarly option)
  13. WTF? by zulux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Mandrake Linux has been beaten down by linux experts alike

    Ok. I'm a Linux, more specifically a Unix "expert" and I can see nothing wrong with Mandrake:

    A easy to install, easy to use, full featured Linux desktop? How horrible! Oh the humanity! When will it stop!

    It's not like Mandrake Linux pissed in my Wheeties this morning.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  14. Even if you don't *use* Mandrake ... by timothy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even if you don't use Mandrake, you've probably benefited from the work they've put into "making the Linux desktop user friendly."

    (That's a category I'm in right now: I don't currently have any systems running Mandrake, but for about three years running -- until about a month ago -- I did.)

    - Mandrake concentrates on ease of install. Not that everyone's intuition is actually the same, goes the past-the-nipple argument, but Hey, Mandrake 6 did a lot better job with *my* intuition (and hardware) than did any of the contemporaries I can remember putting on.

    - Automount. Yes, it's come and gone strangely (back now?), but Automount is a very good thing. Try explaining to a Mac user the procedure of mounting a CD drive, or a simple %$#@ USB memory key thing.

    - Mandrake (afaik) was the first and so far only Linux distro to be sold as a standalone product in Walmart, and I bought several versions there (as the king of Swamp Castle says "... just to show 'em!"). Software specifics aside, this is another good reason to be grateful to Mandrake, whether you use their distro or not. Lindows was *not* the first Walmart-associated Linux :) [And I could be wrong -- perhaps they also had Red Hat, dunno.]

    Mandrake started to fade off my systems when I discovered how nice Red Hat 8 is, and then when I used Knoppix to convert some machines to Debian. (And since I need to reduce the number of machines floating around here, there are fewer computers with which I care to purely experiment.) However, I plan to try the 9.1 release candidate to see where it falls.

    Cheers,

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:Even if you don't *use* Mandrake ... by entrigant · · Score: 2, Funny

      - Mandrake (afaik) was the first and so far only Linux distro to be sold as a standalone product in Walmart, and I bought several versions there (as the king of Swamp Castle says "... just to show 'em!"). Software specifics aside, this is another good reason to be grateful to Mandrake, whether you use their distro or not. Lindows was *not* the first Walmart-associated Linux :) [And I could be wrong -- perhaps they also had Red Hat, dunno.]


      More power to you for defending Mandrake 'n all... but wtf. Wal-mart is Hell-On-Earth(tm). It's the kind of place you'd be sent there for an eternity as punishment for your sins. It's a clubhouse for the fat, ugly, and painfully stupid. If you escape the parking lot without being hit by someone you should be on your knees thanking whichever god you worship. Hell just the name alone screams redneck central :(. I would rather have hot pokers shoved up my ass than ever have to go to that place.

      Yay for Mandrake 'n all... but Wal-mart is NOTHING to brag about.

    2. Re:Even if you don't *use* Mandrake ... by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 4, Interesting

      - Mandrake (afaik) was the first and so far only Linux distro to be sold as a standalone product in Walmart, and I bought several versions there (as the king of Swamp Castle says "... just to show 'em!"). Software specifics aside, this is another good reason to be grateful to Mandrake, whether you use their distro or not. Lindows was *not* the first Walmart-associated Linux :) [And I could be wrong -- perhaps they also had Red Hat, dunno.]

      While my example is not Wal-Mart, but, FYI, I used to be able to buy Red Hat and Mandrake from Best Buy. As a matter of fact, I have still have the "Linux-Mandrake 7.2 Professional Suite" box set I bought from Best Buy. I believe that I have seen SUSE available at Best Buy as well. Now, mind you, the choices available at Best Buy have dwindled I think, but I know at least Red Hat is still available. (Right next to all the M$ stuff). Best Buy actually tried to keep a decent selection at one time... I remember BeOS (yes you read that right) on the shelf next to Red Hat, when BeOS was still kicking.

  15. Re:the french connection by Alex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mandrake is the ONLY good thing ever to come from France.

    Cheese, wine, food, women with hairy armpits ????

    (ok maybe not the last one) but the first 3 deserve some recognition

    Alex

  16. Easiest to install by Yonder+Way · · Score: 2, Informative

    The distro has been dead for years, but I have yet to see a distro that is as easy to install as Corel Linux. IIRC, it prompted me maybe twice to make decisions about things, and had sensible defaults for the average user. If they had more fully exploited DHCP/DNS I think they could have gotten rid of one of those prompts (asking for a hostname).

    Corel was, for all intents and purposes, a Debian for the average joe. I have yet to see any other distros approach the friendliness of it.

    1. Re:Easiest to install by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Informative
      I have yet to see a distro that is as easy to install as Corel Linux.

      Maybe this is cheating, but could I suggest Knoppix? It really _is_ 'Debian for the average Joe', probably more so than Corel, since it requires no installation at all.

      (On a slightly related note - can anyone recommend a tiny Linux distribution that runs off floppies? I am hoping to run an X server, icewm, PPP and ssh.)

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    2. Re:Easiest to install by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Twenty megabytes for X seems excessive. XF86_VGA16 is about two megs big, libX11.so.6.1 is 800Kbyte. A lightweight window manager would presumably be another 100Kbyte or so. After piping through bzip2 the X server and libX11 come to about 1100Kbyte. Allowing for the window manager and some extra stuff I've forgotten (pixmaps, two or three bitmap fonts in small sizes) it should fit on a floppy formatted to 1920 kilobytes. You would need another floppy for Linux itself of course, and enough RAM to decompress and run from ramdisk.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    3. Re:Easiest to install by Ed+Avis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slackware used to install off floppies, but by the time of recent releases only the 'a' (base system) and 'n1' (basic networking) disk sets can still do it.

      Debian's base system can be installed from floppies, but I don't know if there is a convenient way to install further packages from there.

      But since trying Knoppix I've become obsessed with the idea of having nothing important on the local disk. Since I do most of my work over ssh anyway, this is certainly possible. The question is can it be done in a machine with no CD player?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  17. ive been around longer and dont agree by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I predate ANY distro, back when the kernel wouldn't even properly compile..

    And I've still found Caldera's to be the easiest for the newbie to install, if it supports your hardware..

    Though, with the incarnation of 'unitedlinux' and their recent SCO attitudes, I've stopped recommending them to clients as they cant be trusted..

    ( Disclaimer, I moved to FBSD for 'server land' a while ago, due to the progressively fragmenting Linux desktop community.. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:ive been around longer and dont agree by Shadowlion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Disclaimer, I moved to FBSD for 'server land' a while ago, due to the progressively fragmenting Linux desktop community..

      Wait a sec. You changed what you used as a server based on the fragmenting desktop? I don't get that. Why change servers if the desktop situation is wierd?

    2. Re:ive been around longer and dont agree by PurpleBob · · Score: 2

      That's like saying "This is the best, most solid car there is, as long as you don't kick the tires". Because once Caldera (I refer to 2.2 here; I sure as hell wasn't going to pay for their bugfix 2.3 release) was installed, if you wanted to reconfigure something, you were pretty screwed.

      It shipped with an incompatible version of RPM, and had no development libraries, so upgrading something (like its glitchy version of X) involved compiling it from scratch, including its huge tree of dependencies. Changing other settings was done through the "Caldera Open Administration System", a linuxconf workalike except for the fact that it didn't work. It would often exit quietly without successfully changing any settings.

      When talking about the "ease of installation" of a distro, it's not just the original installation that matters. It should be easy to keep installing packages, and to upgrade the system without buying a new boxed release.

      It's amazing I kept using Linux after Caldera. They were a crappy distro even before they were a crappy business.

      --
      Win dain a lotica, en vai tu ri silota
  18. Re:the french connection by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mandrake is the ONLY good thing ever to come from France.
    I assume from this statement that you don't drink wine, and don't eat at all.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  19. Mandrake, it's easy, SO? by perotbot · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So it's easy, when is the linux community going to drop this attitude of "Linux is supposed to be hard".

    In the last three weeks I've tried RedHat 8.0(too slow on a 366mhz machine), Yopper, Knoppix (lots of stuff) and Mandrake 9.0. Of them all, I'm using mandrake. Why? because everything worked, first time, everytime. So I went out and bought a copy. Voting with my wallet, the easiest thing to do. I hope they make it out of Chapter 11 or whatever the french equivalent is. They're providing the gateway to make it easier to switch, without the cost overhead that Lindows requires.

    --
    ~corporate tool, but employed~
    1. Re:Mandrake, it's easy, SO? by mojo17 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I hope they make it out of Chapter 11 or whatever the french equivalent is.

      You mean to say Le Chapitre Onze. :-) Oh la la.

  20. End to Freeloading by Idou · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since some posts appear to be made in ignorance of this fact, Mandrake apparently is no longer going to be the best distro to freeload off of.

    Only members will be able to download the new version, or order cheap cd sets when it is first released. Depending on what kind of member you are (I am a Silver member) will determine what kind of bandwidth priority you get. I think the free download version for 9.1 will only be available after the package version is in stores for a while. Maybe the free download to the public will not even be available until the first RC of the next distro is out.

    Complain all you want, but you brought this upon yourself. I became a member and was willing to let my membership fees go, in part, to allowing freeloaders download at the same time as everyone else. However, there were too many of you and too few of me, so now if you don't want to pay but want the newest version you will have to just use an RC (sounds fair to me).

    Anyway, Mandrake not being dead is not news to me or any other members. It is just news to the people who don't care enough to get involved. Why such people would even care about weither Mandrake is dead or not eludes me.

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  21. NTFS Resizing Done Before: Xandros OS by csisux · · Score: 3, Informative

    Xandros already supports resizing NTFS partitions.

  22. Does it include... by rampant+mac · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...but this new release of Mandrake may hold many promising Linux users...

    Distributions keep getting larger and larger, but now they come with promising Linux users? Wow! What will they think of next?

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  23. I didn't see it mentioned on /. so by bogie · · Score: 2, Informative

    I thought would point out that Redat 8.1 Beta 3 is also out.

    You can see the anouncement here

    https://listman.redhat.com/pipermail/phoebe-list /2 003-February/002969.html

    Its got Gnome 2.2, KDE 3.1, kernel 2.4.20, OpenOffice 1.02, CUPS as default, etc

    So far I've found some bugs and the occasional app crash, but its shaping up to be real nice. Speed is better than 8.0, mostly due to the new kernel I suspect. (RH 8.0 sped up a lot for me by going to 2.4.20) Its great to see Redhat finally actually trying to put out a good desktop and the effort is really paying off. One last thing I've mentioned before, I pitty the distro that doesn't ship with as good a font setup as Redhat uses. They'll get put to the wall for it and rightly so. Its high time that not a single distro ships with shitty fonts anymore.

    Anyway its worth a look if you have the bandwidth.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  24. Dead, yes dead, completely dead. by gukin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just like Loki software is dead, no more games, the entire "linux game industry" collapsed when loki went away. All those great developers disappeared off the face of the earth never to think about a penguin again. Dan Vogel (the Really Smart Guy who ported UT to OpenGl) just disappeared, oh yeah except he ported UT2003 to OpenGL and got a Linux installer on the retail media. Loki is all gone, they've gone to the great icculus.org in the sky.

    Yes Mandrake is dead, the IT (Ironed Tee shirts) pissed off all the money and Mandrake is dead. Oh, there's still that 10-12 guys who put together the release candidates, and the betas. The guys who are busting their humps as we speak to put together the hippest easiest bestest distro ever to be released. Yes it's dead, RedHat 8.0 just cleaned it out. Nobody needs Little Mandrake anymore, nobody ever cared about DRI working immediately after installation, and EVERYONE is listening to ogg media instead of MP3's. Sure Mandrake is dead, nobody even cared that Redhat 8.0's kernel didn't work right with WineX.

    Dead dead dead, nobody needs an easy to use, easy to install, distro which can be installed on a computer with XP pre-installed without having to destroy the XP partition.

    Everyone is pure, everyone runs Pure Linux, nobody needs games, nobody dual-boots, nobody is a noob, nobody needs to RTFM.

    I renewed my Mandrake membership last week, did you?

  25. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by hogger · · Score: 5, Informative

    The biggest difference between Mandrake and Red Hat is urpmi. urpmi is the packaging system that Mandrake employees, and just about every desirable program is available (after a little setup) with a simple:

    urpmi (packagename)

    First though, it's very handy to setup urpmi so that it never requests the installation CDs, but rather gets the packages via the internet. Here's what I do immediately after installing Mandrake:

    1. Remove the three CD-based package sources:
    urpmi.removemedia "Installation CD 1 (x86) (cdrom1)"
    urpmi.removemedia "Installation CD 2 (x86) (cdrom2)"
    urpmi.removemedia "International CD (x86) (cdrom3)"

    2. replace them with an FTP source:
    urpmi.addmedia base-ftp ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandra ke/9.0/i586/Mandrake/RPMS with ../base/hdlist.cz
    (That's a single command. It may appear wrapped.)

    3. add the contrib source:
    urpmi.addmedia contrib ftp://mirrors.secsup.org/pub/linux/mandrake/Mandra ke/9.0/contrib/RPMS with synthesis.hdlist2.cz
    (That's a single command. It may appear wrapped.)

    4. add the plf software source:
    urpmi.addmedia plf ftp://plf.chem.yorku.ca/pub/plf/9.0 with hdlist.cz
    (That's a single command. It may appear wrapped.)

    After those four steps (don't forget to su to root before you run them) you'll be able to easily install just about any program that you run across . It brings the installation ease that Debian users enjoy (via apt) to linux newbies in Mandrake. Redhat has nothing that can touch urpmi. The term "RPM Hell" exists for a reason -- RedHat.

  26. Re:Apache 2? by JM · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apache 1.3 is still present, but it's in the Contribs (separate download or extra CD in PowerPack).

    What's more, you can install *both* versions, and with a simple command (advxrun1.3 or advxrun2.0), change from one to the other.

    PHP 4.3.1 has been tested a lot, and we fixed most major bugs. I use it on production on several servers, and I find it more stable than the 4.2 series.

  27. Mandrake Get's It. by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope MandrakeSoft stays alive, simply because they seem to be the only major distro that "get's it" in the Linux community. They have consistently been pushing to make Linux easier to install and use, without browbeating newcomers into a "it must be bad if it's easy" mentality. I applaud them for it.

  28. Re:the french connection by pi+radians · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Mandrake is the ONLY good thing ever to come from France.

    Considering how big of an American tourist trap this is, I'm sure there are a number of Americans who'll say that there is a few more things they cherish that came from France.

    Where's the US Army to rescue this group of dying frenchmen?

    I find it odd that Americans are all so willing to insult France for being defeated by one of the most powerful armies in modern time, but are now all upset when they don't want to aid an attack on a small, middle-eastern country who has shown no signs of a direct threat.

    --

    sin(6cos(r)+5A)
  29. Want to support Mandrake? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Don't just post to slashdot. Go out, with wallet in hand, and BUY a boxed Mandrake distribution. Hell, buy two and get one for a friend. I've bought three mandrake distros in the last few years and will probably buy 9.1 when it comes out too.

    Just because it is available for free doesn't mean there isn't some merit in paying for it sometimes. I won't go up on some soap box about how "every download is a dagger in free software's heart" because that would be absurd. Free downloads are what spur the rapid discovery, reporting and repair of bugs as well as bring noobs into the fold. 95% of the noobs I've brought over have been swayed with the logic "Hey, no risk to try it other than the download time..."

    But at the same time, if you get good use out of Mandrake, (or any distribution) the best support you can give them is to vote with your dollars. Spend some money on Mandrake services or products. Buy a t-shirt... I bet your girlfriend would look smashing in a "Mandrake Club" t-shirt... (Is that the geek equivalent of having her wear your football jersey?)
    *money = &mouth; /* Put your money where your mouth is. */
    --
    Who did what now?
  30. Wrong! by JM · · Score: 5, Informative

    The parent post is complete B.S.

    Yes, the Club Members will have a more complete list of mirrors, possibly including Club-Only mirrors.

    But as far as I know (and I am a Mandrake employee, so I should know), Mandrake Linux 9.1 will be available for everyone on public mirrors.

    Don't forget that it's 100% open-source, most of the stuff is GPL, so it has to be distributable by everyone.

    That said, I strongly suggest our users become members of the Club, it's the best way to support our work.

  31. Re:the french connection by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ah, how quickly we forget where the Statue of Liberty comes from, which way it faces, and *why?*

    Oddly enough the American armies who "saved" France did. That's one of the reasons they were there in the first place, to honor a debt that was defaulted in fact and unrepayable in philosophy.

    I live in upstate NY, just a couple blocks from the occasional local residence of a young French gentleman whom both Pershing and Patton are reputed to have payed homage to when first setting foot on French Soil.

    LaFayette, we are here, and some of us haven't forgotten.

    And don't forget the old saying, 60 million Frenchman can't be wrong. Hell, maybe when they became "Cheese eating surrender monkeys" it's simply because they knew something we didn't.

    Go figure.

    As for Mandrake. Good distro in its way. If the company deserves to live it just might pull it off. If it doesn't well, millions of Frenchman have died while singing La Marseillaise rather than surrender.

    Did you know that proper protocol for handling a French flag is that once it's raised it is never taken down again until reduced to rags? Think about it.

    KFG

  32. Re:zeroconfig? by ramdam · · Score: 4, Informative
    From the site of the ZeroConf technology :
    "
    • Allocate addresses without a DHCP server.
    • Translate between names and IP addresses without a DNS server.
    • Find services, like printers, without a directory server.
    • Allocate IP Multicast addresses without a MADCAP server.
    "
    Apple already uses this technology under the name RendezVous in Mac OS X.

    As a Mac OSX user I can say that this techno does exactly what is supposed to (since RendezVous is deeply embedded in the system and some third party software, and Rendevous-enable products are available, it's a true real world benefits, not just a lab's experiment)

    It's easy to understand the point when more OS, network devices, Consumer Devices (Philips is already doing prototypes), and P2P softwares (the mac version of Limewire is RendezVous enabled) will adopt the technology.

  33. Mandrake not the first by jensend · · Score: 3, Informative

    Xandros Deluxe also resizes NTFS with PQDisk, proprietary software by PowerDesk (the makers of Partition Manager).

    Mandrake's market niche is getting squeezed at both ends, by Redhat working to make their system more user-friendly as well as by up-and-coming distros like Xandros working to make a simpler Linux experience. If RedHat decides to work more at their dependency/updating system (outdoing urpmi and apt rpm) for 9.0, Mandrake's niche will disappear.

  34. Knoppix owes a lot to Mandrake by bhsx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The beauty of Knoppix is obviously its automagic hardware configuration. Well, you know what that is? It's HardDrake, Mandrake's hardware recognition tool. That's the magic of Mandrake, and the common sense of Klaud Knopper, to tack it onto Debian.

    --
    put the what in the where?
  35. Re:"Release candidate" abuse by Penguin+Follower · · Score: 2, Informative
    This 91.RC1 defiently is not a proper release candidate. It isn't even frozen yet! I'm really getting sick of using RC tags in linux world, and Mandrake had been the prime offender until KDE released seven candidates...

    Not frozen yet? Better go read again...

    Quoting from the webpage:

    RC1 - Feb, 19th 2003 Release notes:
    • The list of packages is frozen
    • New Mandrake theme "Galaxy" is available
    • "Supermount" is back
  36. Re:Mandrake vs. RedHat by SiChemist · · Score: 5, Informative



    Without touching off a flame war, I will have to disagree with:

    Redhat has nothing that can touch urpmi.

    There is a version of apt for RedHat-- Here's how to install and use it in RH 8:

    Download and install these:

    http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/psyche/apt/ apt-0.5.4cnc9-fr1.i386.rpm
    http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/freshrpms/psyche/apt/ apt-devel-0.5.4cnc9-fr1.i386.rpm

    Make sure you're online, then, as root (or sudo)issue the following commands:

    apt-get update

    (You will see apt download package listings)

    apt-get -f install

    (This is to fix dependencies that will prevent apt from working.)

    Your output should look something like this:

    Reading Package Lists... Done
    Collecting File Provides... Done
    Building Dependency Tree... Done
    0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 removed and 0 not upgraded.

    If your output is different, make sure that you know what you are doing before you let apt make changes to your system.

    Now, do:

    apt-get install synaptic

    and run synaptic as root or sudo root. You now have a gui tool to resolve dependencies and install packages.

    This was shamelessly stolen from an excellent article by Robert C. Dowdy on OSNews:

    http://www.osnews.com/printer.php?news_id=1890

  37. Re:the french connection by pmather · · Score: 2, Funny
    Colin Powell had a class for slow learners at the UN ... fast forward a couple of months, tune in CNN, and see what sort of threats were uncovered by advancing American Armed Forces as they look for weapons of mass destruction. Today's keyword: "Tip of the Iceberg".

    It's true. Powell's sattellite photos proved the Iraqis had a forklift AND two trucks. If they get a bulldozer they'll have Bob the Builder.

  38. Was just to clarify by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Was just clarifying that im not as much into the linux community, so that my statement was based on older info.. that things could have changed somewhat..

    Due to the fragmentation in the linux community i changed to FBSD for servers, yes. Cant have a community like that when it comes to the back room.

    I have stayed on linux for desktop, but at this rate that may change too..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  39. More or less out-the-box by buchanmilne · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here (195kB PNG) is a screenshot of Mandrake 9.1rc1 running Gnome with the Galaxy theme. I hae done almost no changes to Gnome (I don't usually use it), so this is pretty much how it looks currently out-the-box after changing to the Galaxy theme (which I assume will be enabled by default on rc2). The window decorations for KDE went in only a few days ago, wait till I update some stuff from cooker for a KDE screenshot.

    My USB flash disk was detected automatically, just had to right-click on the desktop and check "removable" (in KDE an icon appears which you can just double-click). ACPI works (though I am not sure how much functionality my Thinkpad 600X supports). Note the ACPI is not enabled by default (acpi=off is in the default append for the bootloader) due to problems with desktops. Zeroconf works (ie over a crossover to a windows box I get a "auto-configuration"-compatible IP address and can resolve my own hostname via "dns"), but the gui tools need a bit more work (config only works during install currently), but my NIC does not support ifplugd, so I do not get automatic interface management.

    I did make some changes to the fonts in Mozilla, which may have affected how Galeon displays.

    We just hope that freetype-2.1.4 will be out in time to make it, since the maintainer will not agree to shipping CVS versions (which Redhat seems happy with, even with glibc to the point of breaking things like winbind - for those of you who think Mandrake is not stable).

  40. Re:Galaxy Gnome Theme? by mac586 · · Score: 2, Informative
  41. and if you do... by 7-Vodka · · Score: 2, Informative

    wish to try it and report bugs, you won't regret it. In my experience they tend to have the fastest turn around I've ever seen fixing bugs. All of mine were fixed within 24hrs of reporting.

    --

    Liberty.

  42. Can't wait by MicroBerto · · Score: 3, Funny
    I can't wait for 9.1 - The installation will really clean up my system. After each release, I start installing rebuilding development cooker rpms, and by this time, my system is in such a state of terror that I haven't been able to compile a program for like 4 months :)

    But with a new release, I'll get everything on the same page... and then repeat the process until 9.2!

    --
    Berto
  43. Mandrake needs to merger with Apple by kireK · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then we'll cut the number of dead and dieing compnay storeies in half for the next 5-10 years.

  44. Huh? by bonch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me get this straight...you consider a "free ride" like the ability to go from Windows to Linux frustrating? You want people to be "self-sufficient" and "figure things out for themselves?" In other words, you want them to take time out of their days learning to use their system in order to be productive, when they could be using that valuable time to actually BE productive?

    If everyone operated like this, then there would be very little time wasted explaining the documented solutions to common problems, which would free everyone up to concentrate on the real problems, in order to make progress.

    Instead of this ass-backwards view, how about developers get around to FIXING those common problems, so they don't need to be explained? Expecting people to make tinkering with their OS a hobby in order to use it--lest they get a "free ride"--is ridiculous to me. It reaks of the "smug feeling of superiority" you say isn't so prevalent. Linux being difficult to set up isn't a fault of the users. I am so tired of people who imply such. Some out there need to spend some time away from their command prompt and Emacs sessions and interact with the rest of the world and see how they use computers. Otherwise, Linux will forever remain just a nice file and web server.

    Sorry for the frustrated tone...I just want Linux to succeed, and I see so many attitudes holding it back.

  45. Re:the french connection by HomerJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    Colin Powell had a class for slow learners at the UN ... fast forward a couple of months, tune in CNN, and see what sort of threats were uncovered by advancing American Armed Forces as they look for weapons of mass destruction. Today's keyword: "Tip of the Iceberg".

    It's true. Powell's sattellite photos proved the Iraqis had a forklift AND two trucks. If they get a bulldozer they'll have Bob the Builder.

    Yes, but they can combine and form Devastator.

  46. I like Mandrake a lot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    What I've really liked about Mandrake is that it comes with like... EVERYTHING on the damned cds. I hear about some obscure package, and I check and sure enough, drakconf shows it's on the cd and I can choose to install it. I have a modem dialup and I'm not very interested in downloading tens of megs over the internet. If I had a faster link I'd probably be more interested in thinks like the PLF and Texstar's additions for Mandrake.

    I tried out Redhat 8.0, and while I see the difference in focus between Redhat and Mandrake, I'm amazed at how LITTLE redhat came with. Nothing that can violate the MPEG licenses (no mp3, no xine, no mplayer, no video, no shit), nothing that can be construed as "fun" (this is BUSINESS LINUX).

    What I'm really looking forward to is Mandrake with Xft2 font setup. That's what attracted me to RH8 in the first place was the nice anti-aliasing. In the end I went back to Mandrake 9, and compiled and installed the Xft2 stuff myself, then compiled kde3.1 from source (what a colossal pain!). The problem is replacing the non-xft2 libs with their xft2 counterparts borks up the kde3.0 installation from Mandrake. Plus now the Gnome-Pango setup is all borked and makes compiling Gnome stuff hard. I haven't gotten up the ambition to download and compile gnome 2.2 for myself.

    I like linux, I do software development, but maybe I'm getting old I don't get much thrill anymore out of building the entire system myself from scratch. I like to put in the cd, run the installer, and have something nice and usable.

  47. Happiness.. by _marshall · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is knowing you downloaded The 3 ISOs before it was posted on slashdot.

  48. Been using it since it was released... by ebbomega · · Score: 2, Informative

    The RC1 was actually released last Wednesday, and that would be the day I installed it and got it running.

    Fucking beautiful, except Wine keeps crapping out on me (expected considering it's still in bux-fix mode). Seriously, one of the reviews I read about Mandrake 9.0 was that they had evolved to a lot more of an "expensive" or "professional" look. While I'm sitting here hoping that the installer for RC1 is only a temporary thing and that they go back to the format they had for 8.2 and 9.0, I have to say that they actually outdid themselves for this release. Gnome 2.2 is slick, With a really _really_ nice new font set... New GnomeICU (one of the main programs I use) is a lot nicer than previous versions, etc. etc.

    The only main problem I have is with the installer, which I'm guessing is because they're not quite done with it yet... It seems to be missing a whole thwack of packages that are on the CDs (Apache and Wine to name a couple) but all in all this distro is very very slick.

    So I've pretty much decided now that I'm a bona-fide Mandrake user....

    As soon as I garner up enough money I'm going to be sending in for a 9.1 boxed set... I'd honestly hate to see them go under, because as I see it they're offering me a really quality product.

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
  49. Ok, a BAD experience with Mandrake 9.1... by badasscat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I admit I'm a noob, but I haven't had very good luck with 9.1 so far. I desperately want to run a Linux desktop and I'd heard Mandrake was the easiest (which it still may be for all I know - just because it's hard for me doesn't mean the others aren't harder). But so far, here are the problems I've had starting with 9.0 and now actually getting worse in 9.1:

    1. Network doesn't work. This is new in 9.1 RC1. It worked in the betas and in 9.0, but doesn't in RC1. I have heard various workarounds but being a noob haven't really tried getting my hands dirty yet. It detects my card but does not connect to the net, and will not even connect to my router (so it's not just an internet thing).

    2. Font import doesn't work. This has never worked for me, in any Mandrake release. I have pared my Windows fonts down to the minimum and it still hangs at various points during the import - hangs to the point where I need to restart the system in order to kill the process.

    3. Mounting of pretty much anything other than the Linux partition on my hard drive takes about 10 minutes, as does doing any operation at all once mounted. This includes simply listening to a CD, or browsing my pictures on my Windows partition. Again, just trying to listen to a CD last night necessitated a reboot.

    Any one of these is almost enough to get me to give up on Linux as a whole for now. Windows, for now, is much more useful as a desktop, however "easy" Mandrake is to use. I've spent almost 100% of my time with Mandrake so far just trying to get it set up, and I still can't get some pretty important things to work at all. I hope Mandrake and other distros continue to improve to the point where a newbie like me can actually use them, but I don't think we're at that point yet.

  50. Not dead yet.. by Zapdos · · Score: 2, Funny

    But after having to pay for that bandwidth spike caused by slashdot.

  51. Not exactly 55 years by Freezing+Polaris · · Score: 2, Informative
    It would be more like 188 years, actually...

    The famous sentence "La garde meurt mais ne se rend pas" (the guard dies but does not surrender) is attributed to general Cambronne, in Waterloo, as he was already wounded, and the English troops commanded him to surrender with the imperial guard, which he leaded. Hugo would write later that the real winner of Waterloo was Cambronne, for his heroic behaviour in front of adversity.

    More accurate evidences seem to suggest that the sentence actually was from general Michel, who found death during this battle. Cambronne's answer was shorter, although no less heroic, in the form of the famous "word of Cambronne": Merde ! (Shit !).

    Supposed dead during the battle, Cambronne was captured by the english military, then freed and sentenced to martial court by the new french monarchy for having served under Bonaparte, before being freed again to serve the Bourbons.

    So perharps it makes the citation more appropriate for poor Mandrake, willing to fight until its last breath without admitting defeat, the way real stubborn french people do.

    Reminds me of another famous citation, from Cyrano de Bergerac, a fictional character of Edmod Rostand:

    Que dites-vous ? C'est inutile ? Je le sais, mais on se bat pas dans l'espoir du succès.

    (Lame translation: What do you say ? it's useless ? I know that, but one does not fight hoping for success).

    --

    All generalizations are false, including this one...

  52. Re:ACPI? by Thalias · · Score: 2, Funny

    What you mean actually get of your lazy @$$ do something. Way to much work.

  53. Re:USB Mice by rusty0101 · · Score: 2, Informative

    While my experience is not perfect with it, Beta3 and RC1 recognized my Wacom Graphire2 tablet, including the wheel mouse component. The imperfection of it relates to the fact that positioning is treated as a combination of relative and absolute. As you place the pen or mouse on the tablet, it is positioned absolutely. Once you start moving it, it is relative, and apparently not mapped nicely to the movement of the mouse pointer on the screen.

    The installer did recognize a usb mouse, including the wheel, but would not recognize a USB Keyboard, even though I did try teling the bios to tell whatever OS was running on top that the USB Keyboard was a PS2 keyboard. The Installer apparently recognized that it was not a PS2 (or older) keyboard, and didn't know what to do with it. After the install, the keyboard does work in the running OS. I can live with a PS2 keyboard during the install for now, but I would prefer that the USB keyboard work during the install.

    Those are just my experiences. Others may be different.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
  54. Why I like Mandrake but would never support them by yoink! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mandrake huh? I remember when I walked into a friend's apartment and asked what that strange looking Windowing System was. KDE was the response; KDE included with the Mandrake Distribution of Linux. I believe it was version 5 at the time.

    So intrigued I was that, upon my return home, I downloaded and installed Mandrake right away. I was hooked. Having never used Linux before, I immediately downloaded Debian as well and started reading about this strange little kernel called Linux. So whilst I read all I could about Debian, I used Mandrake, learning far more in the using than in the reading. I in fact never got Debian to work they way I wanted and continued to use only Mandrake.

    My self-owned small business signed on with Mandrake to become Quebec's only distributor of the Power Pack series (at the time.) It was here that I ran into trouble. I was caught between my love of the distribution, and the hatred of their distribution system. I was forced to pre-buy large quantities of boxed Power Packs. I never got rid of a version set without having to buy more of the new version set. When all was said and done, and I was ready to give up the ghost, I had leftover power packs of 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 7.0, 7.1 and 7.2. Altogether I had spent over $1000K on Linux Mandrake Power Packs. I never made a cent, and in fact lost plenty. There was no response from any Mandrake offices; complaints and questions remained unanwered. Additionally, it took them several years to get my name of their list of resellers.

    So here I find myself, years later, introduced to Linux and the OpenSource community by then-little Linux Mandrake. I still have a Mandrake-based Linux install running at my home. The distro has been modified heavily and possibly retains little resemblance to any known Mandrake products but that's how it started. I have now used many OSes that would not have made their way into my life without Mandrake. I recently discovered the joys of the BSD OSes, all thanks to Mandrake.

    As much as I would like to say that I will be forever indebted to Linux Mandrake, the fact is that MandrakeSoft is really endebted to people who took a real hit early on simply because they loved the distribution so much. Although they have continued to put out a very useful distribution one has to wonder how other projects (with a much smaller bankroll) have survived and prospered.

    Nonetheless, I will still recommend Mandrake to anyone who asks, and proudly exclaim it still remains part of my home network. My previous finacial and promotional support met with no rewards and even less satisfaction. They seem unable to run a economically viable ship and as has been the case with many other companies producing good products, tough luck. I do hope they survive, and I hope people have had a better experience with the business side of things than I have. Their product opens up a world of possibilites for those who want an easy-to-use and inexpensive alternative to the costly but widely accepted operating systems for the x86 platform. I wish them luck in their future endeavours.

  55. Re:Mandrake Debs? by deno · · Score: 2, Informative

    Paying for something you don't use is really not something I woudl ask you to do - even if it ends up feeding me. .-)

    Not paying for something one does use (which is what many people do these days) is on the other hand a very stupid thing. One day you wake up, and the "free lunch" is gone... ;-)