Slashdot Mirror
The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay
As someone who grew up reading comics during the Silver Age of Comics (approximately 1958 - 1970 or so), I was fortunate to own, read, and come to love the comics from the Golden Age (approximately 1939 - 1949 or so). Michael Chabon's novel spans the years from 1939 through the mid-fifties and comic books are the thematic motif he uses as a vehicle to explore that time and that jaw-dropping social innocence. Anyone who has even a passing interest in comic books and their origin will enjoy this book. In it, Chabon creates a convincing parallel universe that includes a historical facsimile of what the Golden Age of Comic books may have been like.
This is a book that explores the very big ideas of human transformation, Jewish mysticism, and the subtle variations on the concept of escape, all sugar-coated in rich layers of wishful but impossible remembrance.
The setting of the book is a mythical New York City. Chabon revisits The Empire State Building - home of Empire comics, the General Motors pavilion of the World's Fair (1939), and a Naval base in Antarctica.
Our first hero, Samuel Louis Klayman (Clay) may as well be the skinny boy we all remember from the body building ads that illustrated a bully kicking sand into the boy's face as the ad exclaimed, "Tired of being picked on?". Clay is described as, "seventeen when the adventures began: big-mouthed, perhaps not quite as quick on his feet as he liked to imagine, and tending to be, like many optimists, a little excitable. He was not in any conventional way, handsome.", "He slouched, and wore clothes badly; he always looked as though he had just been jumped for his lunch money.", and "...an omnivorous reader...". Clay is an inventory clerk at Empire Novelties Incorporated Company who occasionally gets, "to do an illustration" for an ad.
Josef Kavalier, on the other hand, is Clay's cousin who, in 1939, escapes from German occupied Prague via Asia, Japan, and finally San Francisco to Brooklyn, NY. Josef arrives believing that Sam is a commercial artist who can get him a job doing the same thing.
Joe is older than Sam. He is nearly nineteen and his hobby is stage magic and it is learned from Bernard Kornblum, "an 'eastern Jew, bone-thin, with a bushy red-beard". It is Kornblum who smuggles Josef Kavalier out of Prague along with the clay body of a giant-sized, androgynous Golem disguised as a cadaver. The Golem's casket is Joe's first significant escape. The character of Josef Kavalier will remind older readers of Jerzy Kozinski, author of The Painted Bird whose late night television appearances in the 1960's recounted his own talent for hiding from the authorities.
Once Sammy discovers Joe's ability to draw, he announces, "... I'll tell you what. I'm going to do better than just get you a job drawing the Gravmonica Friction-Powered Mouth Organ, all right? I'm going to get us into the big money." From here on forward, the young men team up to become Kavalier and Clay. The analogy to Golden Age comic's masters such as Simon and Kirby, Siegel and Shuster, and others is unmistakable and, in the hands of Chabon becomes a transcendent metafiction that is replete with real and manufactured historical acknowledgments that will have many readers rubbing their chins in admiration of the precision of Chabon's clever inventions.
Kavalier and Clay create a comic book character called The Escapist. Their comic quickly rivals the economic success of Superman and Captain Marvel. In the hands of Kavalier and Clay The Escapist becomes a vehicle through which Joe Kavalier expresses his hatred of Hitler and all things Nazi. Chabon uses The Escapist comic book as a vehicle to meticulously describe the historical development most comic book heroes explored from the early forties until the Congressional hearings that challenged the influence of comics on children and eventually, temporarily, censored the industry.
Concurrent to describing the evolution of The Escapist from comic book sensation to radio show and product merchandising windfall, Chabon traces Kavalier and Clay as their lives are woven by their venture.
The third, main character is Rosa Saks who is first a model for Joe Kavalier, then lover, and eventually a romance comic book creator. In a perfectly plausible subplot, she first engages Joe Kavalier to underwrite the cost of helping Jewish children escape from occupied territories on a ship called the Ark of Miriam in an effort to save his own brother Thomas.
Rosa also becomes the inspiration for The Luna Moth, a female superhero comic book that expanded the number of titles Kavalier and Clay created. "Luna Moth was a creature of the night, of the Other Worlds, of mystic regions where evil worked by means of spells and curses instead of bullets, torpedoes, or shells. Luna fought in the wonderworld against specters and demons, and defended all us unsuspecting dreamers against attack from the dark realms of sleep." Rosa falls in love with Joe as his art blossoms in The Luna Moth. A footnote informs us that, "Thirty years later" The Weird Worlds of the Luna Moth "quickly became a head-shop bestseller".
Sam Clay, on the other hand, discovers his homosexual preference. Through Sam Clay, Chabon explores the social mores of that time and masterfully examines the topic as a third rail subject pertaining to the comics industry.
Further adventures and life complications evolve these characters - too many to describe without spoiling the fun of reading. This is an entirely pleasant and entertaining book that is nothing more or less than a light, leisurely read assuming you have an interest in the general topic or historical period.
I will add that, like the comics of that time, there is nothing heavy about the reading despite the introduction and resolution of a remarkable pastiche of sublime themes and subplots. These are all handled with a genuine love and thorough understanding of the subject matter.
In an Author's Note, Chabon closes with this remark, "Finally, I want to acknowledge the deep debt I owe in this and everything else I've ever written to the work of the late Jack Kirby, the King of Comics." The book is a wonderful tribute.
Michael Chabon's website is: http://www.michaelchabon.com/ and well worth a visit.
You can purchase The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.
Just a correction ...
The book won the Pulitzer. The Nobel Proze is generally given for a body of lifetime work.
/
http://www.pulitzer.org/year/2001/fiction/works
When was the last time /. posted a review thatwas anything but glowingly positive? Everytime something goes up, it's either "Excellent" or "9/10"? Where are warnings: "Avoid this like the plague"? Reviews shouldn't just be "This was very very very good and everyone should read it"...
I hear Star Wars also one the Nobel Prize for most coolest movie!
Way to fact check, Frank.
Entertaining, and readable.
pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
Just so you know, the Pulitzer is awarded to an author for an individual work that author has done. The Nobel prize for literature is awarded to an author to recognize his achievements over a long career.
And not just because of the subject matter. Chabon is an amazing writer and I often found myself re-reading passages just because they were so beautifully written.
Don't read this book, it is absolutely awful and even makes Terry Pratchett's works look respectable! (I know.. unbelivable but it's true!)
I have a copy of Kavalier and Clay on my shelf, waiting to be read as soon as the semester is over. I read his Mysteries of Pittsburgh some time ago, though, and I must say that he is one of the most comelling novelists whose work I've had the pleasure to read. Mysteries was a book with a plot and characters so ordinary that it was all extrordinary. The characters were smart and compelling, and all so sympathetic that I was rooting for both ends of the very bizare love triangle that was the center of the book. There really are not enough good things that I can say either about Chabon or the book. I fully recommend that anyone interested in him pick up Mysteries of Pittsburgh too.
Wadam.
http://wadam.blogspot.com
Is there any way this article could be rewritten and then posted? Or, at least, you know, proofread? I honestly can't understand almost any of this. Half of this review is symantic unclarity, and the other half jumps from point to point without explaining what it means to the point where i can't understand any of it. I've read through this review twice, and I still don't know exactly what this book is supposed to be about.
Chabon revisits The Empire State Building - home of Empire comics, the General Motors pavilion of the World?s Fair (1939), and a Naval base in Antarctica.
Revisits when, where, why? Why are you telling us this? A Naval base in Antartica, in the Empire state Building? Help, there's an elephant in my pajamas!
Your book report gets a D plus from me.
I whole-heartedly recommend this book to anyone, especially if you have ever had an interest in comics. Chabon is a very talented author, and this is his best work (so far). I have heard rumors that he will be writing the screenplay for the next Spiderman movie as well... which would be a very, very good thing.
I'd say this probably isn't the timeliest of book reviews, however well-written it is (the review is very good, the book, outstanding). This book was first published in the fall of 2000, and fiction has a relatively short shelf life. Most of the people who would be interested in this book have probably already read it.
His other two "major" novels, The Mysteries of Pittsburgh and Wonder Boys were also first-rate. His current effort is for younger readers, it's called Summerland. It's on my "to read" list.
-- Josh Turiel
"2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
Subscribers now see stories posted on Slashdot from The Mysterious Past! These stories are recognizable by the familiar green title bar and the addition of a time stamp set several years after the publication the item being reviewed. Subscribers will be able to avoid the rush and read the links long after everyone else.
(Okay, I kid, I kid. K&K is a wonderful book and it's nice to see it getting some love on Slashdot, but the late timing of the review *does* strike me as a bit odd...)
I read it about 6 months ago, and even though I really don't read comics, it was an awesome book. I'd reccomend it to anyone who can remember being as infatuated with comics as I was a long time ago.
Then angain, I'd reccomned it to everyone!
It's an epic tale, with characters who engaged my interest far beyond my completion of the novel - I even named the computers on my network after them (I'm such a geek).
You don't need to be interested in comics to enjoy the story (I've recommended it to several people, including my wife, who have all enjoyed it). You've got youth, mystery, sex (of all sorts), death, middle age, innocence, corruption, politics, and more; there's something in it for just about anybody.
My only complaint is that it's so well written, you don't want to put it down, but the length of the book precludes reading it one sitting.
Must be a really slow day for submissions when Taco et al are reduced to posting their neice and nephew's homework.
But it is nice to see that the stilted literary touch and high quality editing runs in the family
The most memorable part of TAAOKK describes the "putrid sweet taste" in a main character's mouth after cleaning his own butt juice off a federal agent's dingy.
Seriously, this is in the book and it's still good.
I think this review delved to much on the plot of the book and not enough on the thoughts the reviewer had about the book. Or it was lost in the babble that I just read. Frankly I didn't understand half of it.
If you're thinking of buying a technical book, it's well worth your while to check out its ACCU review just in case it turns out to be a stinker.
Here's an example of a "not recommended" review.
here's a "highly recommended" review.
I don't expect that the ACCU will be reviewing works of fiction, but they do reviews on quite a wide variety of subjects and not just C and C++.
The ACCU has some great mailing lists too. If you program in C, C++, C# or Java, you really should join.
Request your free CD of my piano music.
Should go to none other than
the Puppet-In-Command
Cheers,
W00t
Get Your Iraq War On
Also, of good news for the Spiderman series, Chabon is writing the second movie. Also, I think part of that movie contract included a contract to adapt Kavalier & Clay into a movie.
This is really a fantastic book. The first 80 pages are a little hard to get through, but after that it's really great.
Book review for book that came out 2 years ago?
Huh?
during prime screwing off from work time?
I do believe this story has elicited the largest collective SlashYawn of all time...
No man is an island, but Gary is a city in Indiana.
I just finished this book. I was an avid comic collector in high school, even worked at a comic book store (one of very few women who were into that whole scene). The style of writing, the plot, the themes, all resonated with me because they were familiar - they were "comic-bookish". The book possesses a momentum of its own, it propels itself forward in the same fits and starts as a comic book, jumping along from frame to frame, with the odd pause for a 2 page ad spread. The story is just as detailed as Frank Miller's Batman was, while possessing the dynamic movement that you'd see by McFarlane's Spiderman. Great character development.
Highly recommended. Nice change from the angst-ridden navel-gazing pulp we see featured by Oprah. One of the best books I've read in the last few years.
"Content's a bitch."
I will add that, like the comics of that time, there is nothing heavy about the reading despite the introduction and resolution of a remarkable pastiche of sublime themes and subplots.
While I enjoyed the book immensely, I certainly would not call it an easy read. My advice on this one is to keep a good dictionary nearby while you read.
I like to think that I have a fairly large vocabulary, but reading this book humbled me.
I read the book soon after it came out (and it's been out for awhile), and I thought the first half of it was excellent. Chabon's style and tone reminded me of Kerouac's The Town and the City (one of my favorites). But...I thought the second half (beginning with the scenes in Antarctica IIRC) slowed down considerably, and I actually struggled to finish the book.
I've got a soft spot for Chabon, as he went to school in my hometown, and his first book is set in the 'burgh.
Whereof we cannot speak, thereof we must be silent. --Ludwig Wittgenstein
I read this book about 2 years ago, after it had already won the PULITZER prize.
It's not bad. Has it's moments. Pretty post-modern so if you like Pinchot or David Foster Wallace, you might like it.
There's got to be something more timely though. Try coming up with a book I haven't already read.
ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
Michael Chabon (Author) is writing the script for Spiderman 2. He is also adapting Kavalier and Clay for the screen.
Oh, and this book deserves any amount of praise heaped on it. The writing is amazing, and characters are dynamic and fully-developed. Literally, my only regret about this book (well, okay, you have to push yourself through the VERY beginning) is that it wasn't longer.
I am also puzzled by posting a review of a book that got oodles of press when it was first published back in 2000. I read this a couple years ago and was amazed by the use of language, the imagery, plot, etc. It brought me back to reading comics again. I just loaned this book to a friend at work and I'm curious to see how he will react to it. It would be interesting to see this novel redone as as a graphic novel. As a matter of further discussion, has anyone read any good graphic novels lately? I just picked up Moore's The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen, in anticipation of the upcoming film. Haven't read it yet, though.
In my opinion, looking back at previous winners of the Pulitzer for fiction, it's not a very prestigious award. It's more of a driver for the commercial side of publishing (sort of like a grammy is to the music industry). The Nobel prize, on the other hand, is a real mark of distinction.
Is this "News for Nerds" because it's about comic books? Are we going to start reviewing the appropriate Simpsons episodes?
A quick look at alt.binaries.e-books reveals that nerds are heavy into the technical references and Star Wars, with a bit of pr0n. This is closely followed by classic SF, bad fantasy, and Terry Pratchett. An interesting sidenote is that nerds seem to like to read books that come in endless series, Wheel of Time #24 and all that.
I've actually checked the newsgroups for Kavalier & Klay, and it's never been there, along with the vast majority of books on the indie bestseller lists. Or the regular bestseller list, if it's not Grisham/Crichton/King/etc. For a demographic that's so militantly anti-major label drek, we sure do READ a lot of it!
So I guess I'm asking why, this, now. Who cares all of a sudden?
This book is an incredible emotional adventure. I'm not a woman, but this book had me crying like one. One minute I'd be crying tears of joy and the next tears of sorrow. Chabon is a fantastic writer.
I'm reading the book now after having read and very much enjoyed The Wonder Boys.
I thought this was a much tougher read, and even though I'm into comics I'm having trouble getting into it. I don't blame the book for this, but maybe my schedule... Chabon has some great moments that will have you laughing outloud and at the same time really making your brain work for the laugh.
How nice to read a well written book review for once.
However, I'd like to highlight something I think was treated rather lightly. This book, though fiction, provides an amazing look at societal mores of the period. It crosses back and forth over so many cultures, classes, and cliques. It is colorful and thought provoking.
Also, if you do allow yourself to ponder the issues presented and not just focus on the fun easy read that it can be, be prepared for the very sad life of Kavalier. A young Jewish refuge of WWII forced to abandon his family in Europe. It is Chabon's masterfully touching portrayal of this man without falling into the easy (cheap) over dramatization of war victims (WWII victims in particular) that earned him the Pulitzer. It is an amazing study of a horrifying situation which so many people find themselves in as a result of war.
I read this book a few months ago. I actually picked it up at an airport bookstore almost two years ago, attracted to the faux-worn artwork and the faux comic book back cover, but didn't open it until recently. It wasn't what I expected. I thought it started a little slow, but I soon realized it has a very deliberate and well-timed pace. I was quickly drawn into the story and what I want to say here is that Chabon's sheer absolute knowledge of the times, the neighborhoods, the buildings, the people, the clothing, eastern Europe, languages -- and oh yeah, comic books, helps to create an entire world. The story is light, even when it gets a little deep. I felt as if I was entering another world and was repeatedly surprised at how complete it felt.
Check it out!
This was a decent book, and as some of the reviews listed on the first few pages of the book indicate, the themes of escapism and self-creation and art are well explored. However, the book suffers from a plot that doesn't ever surge forward; there were many times in the book, after finishing a section or a chapter, that I had no idea who or what I was even rooting for anymore. Yes, you love the characters and you want things to work out for them, but the storyline meanders forward without a conviction as to what it's driving towards.
That said, Chabon is an excellent writer. One of the best reasons to read this book is to better your vocabulary; the man uses about ten words per page that you've probably never seen before or at least don't know the precise definitions for. You'll laugh out loud at some of his descriptions.
Despite the length, it's a quick, fun read, worth it for the writing if not so much for the story itself.
it seems a little odd that a book about comic books gains greater mainstream acceptance than a comic book itself. and that is doubly odd considering the standard of writing in comics today.
but then accusing literary critics of prejudice is akin to accusing a bum of homelessness.
<B>note to self:</B> <I>post as html</I>
Towards the end of the event he told us an anecdote about losing a child to miscarriage, and how in the aftermath of that misfortune he was lying in bed with his youngest son, stroking his hair and painfully aware of how precious he was. His son, completely unaware of his father's tenderness just then, looked up at him and said: I smell STINKY. Stinky's up your nose!!
everyone knows that documents not published within the last 24 hours are not relevant to the world ..
It seems that the whole Slashdot crowd (or at least those that read the book) love it. Which is fine, but perhaps there are more people like myself who didn't find the book to be all that.
I read the book because it was being discussed on Plastic and I needed a book to read (I always need a book to read). Being a fairly big comic book geek helped as well.
That being said, I didn't find the book very good at all. Maybe it was because I was reading it in the middle of a David Foster Wallace binge (now there's an author), but the characters didn't seem interesting enough. Sure Joseph was cool, but he was too out there, too remote. Sammy's homosexuality also seemed forced. I have no objection to including a gay character, but it could have been handled better (like Apollo and The Midnighter's were in The Authority), it just seemed to cliched.
For a book that dealt with a lot of emotional issues and relationships I found the book to be flat.
But that could just be me.
Since your UID is smaller than mine, I can only conclude that you're trolling. -s20451 (410424)
Anyone have any ideas why Michael Chabon seems to put gay characters in all of his books? Mysteries of Pittsburgh, Wonder Boys, Kavalier & Clay all have major themes in homosexuality. Yet, the author himself is married with 4 kids so I assume he is of the hetero persuasion. Just wondering.
I also loved this book, but I have to disagree with those who found the beginning slow going. Maybe it's because it touches on me directly (my parents were Czechoslovak Jews who have pretty amazing stories of their own of surviving the same time and place), and maybe it's because I'm fascinated (as Norbert Weiner was) with Golem stories as precursors of robot stories, but I thought the first part was by far the best, and was waiting in vain for the book's reality to blur again into magical fantasy later in the book. The first part was oddly different from the rest, but I thought it was utterly wonderful. It also raises the question of whether the Golem stories are the mystical Judaism precursors of the Superman-type stories, too. If you find superhero comics worth thinking about, this is hardly beside the point.
mt
I just wasted several days on this piece of trash. The first 200 pages are really good. But the whole thing is like 500 pages long. The last 300 don't add much to what's already been said. Plot and character development become inconsistent, and boring. Chabon has a fresh style and deserves some praise, but Pulitzer Prize? His own day on /.?
Slashdot doesn't request books for review, it selectively chooses books that it wants to review.
A restaurant critic (here in the hyper-critical world of NY restaurants and foodies) was accused of only giving good reviews, and she said she gave bad reviews when places were very popular and expensive and people might need to be warned away (since they may only serve 100 dinners a night), but otherwise it was far more pleasant and a better policy to tell people where they should go.
I like this philosophy. If a book is very expensive or popularly reviewed as "good," a warning from a Slashdot reviewer might be a good thing.
Here: http://www.michaelchabon.com/radiocover.GIF and: http://www.michaelchabon.com/stamp.GIF ...from Michael Chabon's site.
He had to clarify that he wasn't gay, but he still read. His insights are great and gay characters are very realistic. (This is one of the better books that my gay book club has read. I liked Mysteries of Pittsburgh, too, but this more.)
Hahahahah. Yeah. I think the Nobel Prize for fiction went to those cold fusion guys...
Not saying that "I love this book, go buy it" is constructive criticism, but alas, yours was not either.
That and I happen to like the Discworld series, and happen to believe that the first volumes (granted, his later work is kinda ehhh...) are good.
blah
see here
isn't that close enough? does that mean I deserve one? cool!
I read this book almost 2 years ago now. I had actually forgotten about it. But now that I remember, I can recall a bit of how it really made me smile at points.
It's an excellent read, although it seemed a little light to me. Not exactly like reading a Tolstoy novel. It was much more simplistic in its language. But overall, I don't regret for a second the $20 I plunked down for the hardcover.
Go read it!
----------------- Oink. Moo. rarr! -----------------
won
It's good to know that Garcia Marquez won his prize for his strict journalistic integrity and realistic portrayal of life in Macondo in "One Hundred Years of Solitude".
Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...