Slashdot Mirror


Battlestar Galactica to Return

Chris Curtin writes "Looks like SciFi channel is redoing the classic series! I don't know about a female Starbuck but it might be interesting." I can't picture a Galactica without Lorne Green. So long as they don't bring back that stupid robot dog, it might be okay.

481 comments

  1. Dirk? by bfootdav · · Score: 1

    No Dirk Benedict?

    1. Re:Dirk? by mrjb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Neh, he reportedly couldn't make it... to busy fighting the bad guys with Hannibal, Murdock and B.A.

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    2. Re:Dirk? by lhand · · Score: 1

      They've fixed it. The new-and-improved Starbuck!
      Check out the picture here

    3. Re:Dirk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sci Fi cancelled Farscape's fifth season allegedly because it "cost too much to make" and because Sci Fi Channel wanted to "get away from doing shows about space ships".

      So now they make an expensive new show about a space ship, a remake of a lousy 70's show about a space ship.

      Dirk who?

  2. And I can't imagine one without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Lorne Green. Who is Loren Green?

    1. Re:And I can't imagine one without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lorne Greene. Who is this Green family of actors?

    2. Re:And I can't imagine one without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They're all related to Red Green.

    3. Re:And I can't imagine one without by nursedave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Isn't he that incredibly cruel guy from the dog food commercials? You know:"This is Max. He's 12 years old. That's 84 years old in people years. (throws stick)Here, Max, run boy!"

      Man, if he did that to my gramps, I'd kick his ass.

      --

      The Democratic Party: We've been pussies since 1968!

    4. Re:And I can't imagine one without by Artifex · · Score: 1
      Lorne Green. Who is Loren Green?


      You mean Lorne Greene, right?

      There was a Red Green episode about this that aired a couple of weeks back, involving Red's scheme to turn Possum Lodge into a tourist attraction based on finding an old oar with the name "Loren" written on it.

      That's how I remembered the "e," actually. Amazing what you can learn on public television.
      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    5. Re:And I can't imagine one without by jmccay · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lorne Greene played Commander Adama on Battlestar Galactica, but most people remember him for his role on Bonanza.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    6. Re:And I can't imagine one without by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      What can you say? They frakked it up! haha hehe huhu. I crack me up. OK, you can mod me to oblivion now...
      You know you used to run around getting hit for saying "frak" just like I did.

    7. Re:And I can't imagine one without by Ed+Avis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In terms of viewers/listeners, his biggest role was probably as the Voice of Canada during WW2, but most SF fans will be too young (or too non-Canadian) to remember that.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    8. Re:And I can't imagine one without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Correction:

      Most old people remember him from bonanza.

    9. Re:And I can't imagine one without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'm only 30 and I remember him in that series, and the cable tv network that play retro shows has played it once in a while.

    10. Re:And I can't imagine one without by unitron · · Score: 1

      If I were that idiot Tucker Carlson I'd probably make some snide remark about the impossibility of being too non-Canadian, but, fortunately for me, I'm not, so I won't.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    11. Re:And I can't imagine one without by bokmann · · Score: 1

      Does anyone here watch Angel? If you watch Angel and don't know Lorna Grene, you've missed a great inside joke...

      The green 'demon-like' character who can see people's future when they sing... the first few seasons, we didn't know his name, just referred to as 'the Host'. Then, we find out his first name was 'Lorne'. When asked why he didn't go by it, he said, "Hello... I'm green... Lorne Green? LORNE GREENE?"

      Such a great homage.

      -db

    12. Re:And I can't imagine one without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a Lauren Green on Fox News.

    13. Re:And I can't imagine one without by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's the one. The show was basically a 70's era fossil, but ole' Lorne managed to stick out like a sore thumb anyway. He was a believable character in Bonanza. He blended in with Hoss and Lil' Joe (both dead as well), but he looked awfully uncomfortabe in that tight velvet tunic with the goofy looking jewelry. Besides, would buy dogfood from a 50ish man dressed that way?

    14. Re:And I can't imagine one without by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Not the Voice of Canada...he was known as the Voice of Doom!

    15. Re:And I can't imagine one without by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      In fact, because he was The Voice of Doom during WWII, he had to find other work once the war was over -- Nobody wanted to be reminded!

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  3. Yay! by PitViper401 · · Score: 1

    Yay! Pointless nostalgia!

    1. Re:Yay! by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, where bad shows suddenly become good simply because you saw it as a child.

    2. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have an opinion! Yay! Yay!

    3. Re:Yay! by Jonathan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah, it was actually pretty good -- at least until they rearched Earth and the kids had superpowers or something equally stupid. And the Viper toys that actually shot little plastic pieces were way better than the Star Wars toys.

    4. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dragnet!!!

    5. Re:Yay! by Peterus7 · · Score: 1

      Cheesy sound effects and bad acting remind us of a time where we didn't have the worries we carry now. That's the main reason old school nostalgia is so good.

    6. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a local TV station (CityTV, Toronto)advertised the reruns (paraphrased here):

      Who would have thought the future would look so much like the 70's?

      And I thought the next version of Windows was going to be scary...

    7. Re:Yay! by Talinom · · Score: 1

      No, it was good when I was a child. Now, looking back, the show should've been named Battlestar Galaxative.

      --
      "Giving money and power to governments is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys." - P.J. O'Rourke
    8. Re:Yay! by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      I remember the MAD parody having the title "Cattlecar Galaxative".

    9. Re:Yay! by Sir+Nimrod · · Score: 1

      Except a couple of young kids choked on the little plastic pieces, so the toy maker altered them so they wouldn't go anywhere. They'd just go "poot!" and stick out about a quarter of an inch.

      I think my brother had the nifty idea to take apart my Deep Space Probe (I think that was the name, but I never saw such a ship in the series). We found that if you filed off some little nubbins, they'd operate the same as the earlier toys.

      Were that to happen today, could we be charged with "circumventing a protection device" under the DMCA?

      --
      The United States of America: We mean well.
    10. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it had anything at all to do with copyright, yes. So no.

    11. Re:Yay! by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      > Nah, it was actually pretty good -- at least
      > until they rearched Earth and the kids had
      > superpowers or something equally stupid.

      The rationale for Galactica 1980, the second series you're referring to (which all BG fans have unspokenly agreed to forget permanently) was that gravity on Kobold (the original home planet in the nebula), and therefore on the twelve chosen planets for colonies and on the battlestars was tremendously higher. They didn't have superpowers, they were just used to 7-8g. They weren't flying. They were jumping.

      And now you see why we know to forget it. Move along. Reached Earth? Never happened.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    12. Re:Yay! by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      My brother and I did that too: disassembled our Cylon and Viper ships and filed off the pieces that kept them from firing. I suppose that was a very, very early kind of hacking.

  4. Galactica without "Loren Green" is easy to imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Since there has never been one with anyone by that name.

    The one with Lorne Greene was enjoyable though.

  5. special effects by spineboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    As long as they use their one special effect (launching the fighters out of the tube) at least 30 times an episode, I'll be happy.

    No, really.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:special effects by simetra · · Score: 1

      One of my strongest memories of Battlestar Gallactica is that they used the same special effects clips all the time. In particular, there's one shooting sequence from the good-guy's shooter perspective, where he shoots about a dozen times in an arcing pattern, finally hitting and blowing up the bad guy. They used that one all the time. Ahhh, memories.

      --

      "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    2. Re:special effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DOn't hold your breath. Mr. Moore was a Star Trek write and there is no sound in space.

    3. Re:special effects by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not only was that effect used over and over BG, but also in a really awful Z-grade BG-ripoff movie called "Space Mutiny" riffed ever-so-eloquently by Mystery Science Theater 3000.

      Sick individual that I am, I actually rented "Space Mutiny" to watch it in its unmitigated awfulness. Picture a space opera filmed almost entirely in an abandoned factory of some sort, and a couple of drop-ceiling offices with surplus late-80's office computer equipment, with costumes consisting almost entirely of lycra.

      However, it does feature Cissy Cameron in all her middle-aged-waitressy glory dressed like Denise Austin in "Thin Thighs in 30 Days" the musical, by Andrew Lloyd Webber.

      Punt Speedchunk!
      Big McLarge Huge!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:special effects by theclinic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Buck Rogers used the same effect for launching their fighters. The laser blasts were also the same.. I guess that's what you get when Glen Larson is the producer..

    5. Re:special effects by Chris+Y+Taylor · · Score: 1

      I lost a "bad movie night" competition when one of my friends entered Space Mutiny as his selection. After watching it, we were forced to admit that it was not only the worst movie of the night, it was the worst movie any of us had ever seen.

    6. Re:special effects by NetFu · · Score: 1

      What's funny is that, according to IMDB.com, all the battle scenes are simply footage from the Battlestar Galactica series -- man, that's a B-grade movie when they have to use footage directly from a TV series!

      Also, here are a few "memorable quotes" from IMDB.com for this movie (I can't believe this movie was meant to be anything more than a spoof of Battlestar Galactica considering these quotes and the fact that they used BG footage):

      ----------
      Lea Jansen: Can a woman buy a man a drink in this galaxy?

      ----------
      Pirates: Surrender, or be blown to astro-dust!

      ----------
      Kalgan: I'm being undermined by my own disciples!

      ----------
      Kalgan: It's not unlike ancient dental equipment on Earth - not that you'd know anything about that!

      ----------
      Kalgan: Take that, you space bitch!

      ----------
      Kalgan: You're much more attractive with your mouth shut!

    7. Re:special effects by dorsey · · Score: 1

      Then I take it none of you have ever seen Ganjasaurus Rex. It's about a Gozilla-ish dinosaur that's addicted to prehistoric weed. Draw your own conclusions.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    8. Re:special effects by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      Obviously, no one brought a Coleman Francis film. The man who looks like Curly Howard's evil twin brother makes horrible dreary movies that compare unfavorably to fever dreams. Compared to those, "Space Mutiny" is a light-hearted romp (with railing kills).

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    9. Re:special effects by edbarrett · · Score: 1
      Glen Larson is the producer..

      Gary Larsone!1!! Man!11!!! CowZ!!11!!!1!

    10. Re:special effects by mako · · Score: 1

      Another MST3K favorite is Manos . This movie is supremely bad. I think the guy that made it eventually killed himself as well. That's what I heard anyway.

    11. Re:special effects by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I can't believe this movie was meant to be anything more than a spoof of Battlestar Galactica considering these quotes and the fact that they used BG footage.

      Not to mention the fact that Captain Santa Claus had more than a passing resemblance to Commander Adama. At least, it appeared that they were trying to have him have more than a passing resemblance to Commander Adama.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    12. Re:special effects by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that. Battlestar Galactica was, at the time, the most expensive series to produce per-episode on the air, due largely to its huge special effects budget. In fact, the production costs got to be so bad that when the show's budget was slashed, they took to re-using the same dogfighting sequences over and over again, frequently in the same episode, as Simetra notes in another post.

      If memory serves, a good portion of the filming of the show (not to mention the special effects) were done by Industrial Light and Magic. This created more than a little tension later when George Lucas initiated a lawsuit against the producers of the show for being too similar to Star Wars! ("Hey guys, great job on the effects for the "Ice Planet Zero" episode. Loved that death-ray. By the way, any chance you could stop suing us?) By the time the courts ruled in favor of BG, the budget for the show was razed, and production had stopped anyway.

    13. Re:special effects by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This created more than a little tension later when George Lucas initiated a lawsuit against the producers of the show for being too similar to Star Wars

      Space operas existed before Star Wars (Buck Rogers, Flash Gorden, Lost In Space, Trek, etc.), and Star Wars barrowed a lot of its hardware looks from 2001 Odessy.

      They hardly were in a position to claim originality. Although the Cylon heads in BG looked a little too Vaterish IMO.

    14. Re:special effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course there's sound in space. The only place on TV there was no sound in space was Firefly, and that's cancelled. And that's probably why it's cancelled too. Fancy getting something like that wrong.

    15. Re:special effects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Cylon heads weren't Vader-ish, they were pseudo-Egyptian, same as the helmets in the Vipers. Search down this thread for "Mormon".

    16. Re:special effects by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The Cylon heads weren't Vader-ish, they were pseudo-Egyptian, same as the helmets in the Vipers.

      A triangular mouth? Show me some Egyption art with a triangular mouth.

    17. Re:special effects by sammy+baby · · Score: 1

      Oh, the lawsuit was completely ridiculous. However, there was a perception that BG was capitalizing on the success of Star Wars and a re-awakening of interest in the space opera genre, so Lucas must've thought there was money to be sued for somewhere.

  6. I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hope they have a robot dog. A well done robot dog. Earlier versions of the robot dog, or of robots in general have soured the idea for most science fiction stories. Don't watch the classics! Down with robot dogsploitation!

    1. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fuck the dog, more Jar-jar!

    2. Re:I for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Fuck the dog, Jar-jar! Screw the pooch!

  7. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    And they are redoing it rather than letting it die the sad lonely death it rightfully deserved. That should give you an idea of the magnitude of creative talent that will be directed at this project.

  8. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, now that everyone has hated the past two Star Wars movies, the bar should be much lower.

  9. Build better dog by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

    Come on. They build a HUGE battle ship in space with modern systems and sensors all around, but they can't make a dog as good as SONY Corporation.

    What they need is dog who is half-robot, half-real-dog in order to create a ethically themed program for us 21st century viewers. (Don't tell me I am some kind of cheap-assed 1970's viewer.)

    --
    I suggest you read Slashdot
    1. Re:Build better dog by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      What they need is a cameo appearance by Ein The Data Dog.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    2. Re:Build better dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to be the only one here who enjoyed Battlestar Galactica.

      I don't get it: it was a good show, they had interesting storylines, the technology was mostly believable, the effects were pretty hot. What's wrong with it?

      Compared to Aibo, Muffit is a bit more advanced, but not so much that it becomes silly.

      The diary dictation device Adama uses is also pretty believable, reacting more or less as I would expect such a device to do (watch it closely, and you'll see that it picks up some words quite easily while others it needs to listen to context first).

      The vipers were absolutely cool.

      I liked the religious aspects of the show. It made the characters seem so much more human.

      Like any SF show it suffers from the lightspeed syndrome, but just watching them float through empty space for eternity wouldn't be very interesting would it?

      So, bring back Galactica, but please do preserve the spirit of the original. And bring it to Dutch television already! We are still waiting for Enterprise damnit!

    3. Re:Build better dog by Hao+Wu · · Score: 1

      That dog is puney compared to a half-robot-dog, half-real-dog dog. Why did you make such a comparison? I can see if you utilized CGI or an advanced rendering station to create a dog like that, but a cartoon dog!!! You are a crazy person. Nobody in their right mind would put that in to a show (certainly not a show for a sophisticated TV audience).

      --
      I suggest you read Slashdot
    4. Re:Build better dog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn it you fools! The six million dollar dog would kill 'em all!

  10. Female Starbuck? by __aapbgd5977 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's like re-doing Barberella with Ben Affleck in the title role.

    I mean, Starbuck was the womanizer - the fighter pilot stereotype. I can see writing female pilots to play off the stereotype, or rewriting some of the tremendously shallow female characters of the show (Athena, Cassiopaea), but Starbuck?

    Worse/Better Analogy: It's like remaking the A-Team with J-Lo as Face. (March 1 is "Let's Pick on Dirk Benedict Day")

    ---

    1. Re:Female Starbuck? by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 5, Funny

      I mean, Starbuck was the womanizer - the fighter pilot stereotype.

      So why can't a woman do this? I think America is ready for a kick-ass lesbian who drags her scores back to the cave for some hot stuff.

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    2. Re:Female Starbuck? by skaffen42 · · Score: 1

      I mean, Starbuck was the womanizer - the fighter pilot stereotype.

      Hey, this is the 21st century. Nothing has to change. What is wrong with a lesbian fighter pilot?

      Hell, considering that their target demographic is geek guy, that would do more for the ratings than anything else they could come up with.

      --
      People couldn't type. We realized: Death would eventually take care of this.
    3. Re:Female Starbuck? by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Then why did Cleopatra 2525 fail, where Baywatch succeeded?

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    4. Re:Female Starbuck? by jmccay · · Score: 1

      They have enough problems with people hating the current rewrite of the cript, and you want to add another character twist?

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    5. Re:Female Starbuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Starbuck and Boomer are both women. Boomer is supposed have some big surprise. Mr Moore is a bad, unemployed, star trek writer.

    6. Re:Female Starbuck? by radish · · Score: 1

      Errr...because Cleopatra 2525 was the worst TV ever made? (yes, even Baywatch had better storylines and more beliveable acting!)

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    7. Re:Female Starbuck? by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I never thought I'd see this post on slashdot.

      I'm very happy I am seeing it now though. It gives me back the hope I once had for the world and this site. That is, of course, as long as you are looking for something more than just something to fill a stupid male fantasy about what a lesbian is. I don't know you from anyone else so I can't tell, but I will just guess that you are as you appear, and thus again, say, thank you for making this post.

    8. Re:Female Starbuck? by staggerlee · · Score: 1

      Awfully cruel, considering it's his birthday =)

      (and mine too!)

      --
      "I woo women with my sensuous and godlike trombone playing."
    9. Re:Female Starbuck? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      You missed out, the 2nd season, when they went to hour-long shows, rocked. It was developing a decent on-going storyline and good character development as cleopatra slowly became competent - and had tons of potential over all.

      Not to mention that the hot black chick is seriously talented (sorry terrible with names) - she went on to co-star on Firefly, just did an episode of "The Agency" and married Laurence Fishburne (not that that reflects on her acting ability, but he's a smart guy so it stands to reason he'd marry a smart girl).

      The other two girls have done ok, the muscular blonde starred on that x-men knock-off where she got to look very feline and sexy (never mind that show had the same plot each episode, not her fault). The stripper has had a couple of "guest star" roles on various shows since then as well - ironic since as cleopatra, the show was named for her character.

      As for baywatch, I never noticed any storylines or acting, I was just let myself be hypnotized by the boobs swinging back and forth, back and forth, back and forth...

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    10. Re:Female Starbuck? by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 1

      Trust me. I am dead serious. I am a heterosexual white male who is bored to pieces by watching other people fuck, whether it be $mm|$mf|$ff. So it is not about the hot sex part of it. I think it would be a better story line than the tired ass "Ugh. Me kill and fuck and be bad ass" thing with typical SF story lines. Why not a female Starbuck? Personally, I know no lesbians that even try to fit the Jenna Jameson mold. Tend to take care of their cats and teach sociology and work for Habitat for Humanity and the like. Evil sodomites! ;-)

      Still I can see the Network notes now: "Um. Since it is a woman, should it be Stardoe?" D'oh.

      Preemptive strike against flames: I played college football and scored with all the chicks you geeks never had a chance with (until now) and I don't consider even the most highbrow of SF literature/cinema/whatever as able to touch the Epic of Gilgamesh, Nibelunglied, etc. or a good history book of things that actually happened (to the degree we can really know).

      --
      Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    11. Re:Female Starbuck? by t0ny · · Score: 1
      Wow, mentioning B. Fleck and J. Lo in the same post... does that mean something?

      Anyway, Im just hoping Halle Berry didnt talk them into giving her the part. Worst... Actress... Ever... Could anyone have done a worse job of playing a fricken comic book character?

      --

      Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

    12. Re:Female Starbuck? by KoshClassic · · Score: 1

      I mean, Starbuck was the womanizer

      I thought Starbuck was the coffee?

      --
      Understanding is a three edged sword. - Ambassador Kosh Naranek, Babylon 5
    13. Re:Female Starbuck? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      Does that mean she's gonna wear a skimpy leather armour? Can't get far without - no, wait...

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    14. Re:Female Starbuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A female starbuck? Ahhh... the infamous "switch the gender of the lead role and no-one will notice that you are a creatively bankrupt tosser who is just telling the same stories from the original AGAIN" ploy. See also: Terminator 3.

    15. Re:Female Starbuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is indeed hard to picture Starbuck at 58. Rather disturbing in fact. Steam purge!

    16. Re:Female Starbuck? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      > > I mean, Starbuck was the womanizer - the
      > > fighter pilot stereotype.
      >
      > So why can't a woman do this? I think America
      > is ready for a kick-ass lesbian who drags her
      > scores back to the cave for some hot stuff.

      So I think all of Slashdot is now wondering "why don't you work for Sci-Fi?" ... or Skinemax, or *something*...

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    17. Re:Female Starbuck? by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought her Storm wasn't too bad. Not great, but not bad, either. Part of the reason was the lack of dialogue, and they wrote her character as too much of a pushover. When she had that one finale with Toad, she was cool.

    18. Re:Female Starbuck? by serutan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree. In a more general sense, what is it with people who produce remakes, that they feel the need to mess with the original concept in strange ways? Example: I grew up watching the original Mission Impossible series, and there is No Freakin Way that Jim Phelps was a double agent. Sorry. Can't happen. Might as well recast Einstein as a Nazi sympathizer.

      If they want to introduce a female hotshot pilot as a new principal character in Battlestar Galactica, no problem. But Starbuck is an existing character with a history, and He's A GUY. Oh well, let's make him an alien, or a Cylon whose programming went awry. Wait! How about a remake of the original Star Trek, and have Spock be a Klingon? Yeah!! The fans'll spend money on anything. Sadly, that's true.

  11. It's a Dagit by voice+of+unreason · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, that annoying thing was a dagit

    1. Re:It's a Dagit by bobl · · Score: 1

      Which reminds me of the funniest line never used in Battlestar Galaxative (of which I must have seen at least two episodes):

      The lead scientist has taken valuable time away from such unimportant duties as working on defenses against the Cylons to build a "dagit" for a kid who lost his puppy. He introduces it and...

      KID: Is this a dagit I see before me?

  12. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by Jedi+Paramedic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It wasn't crap... I think they need to improve a little on some of their interpretations, though...

    My biggest criticism of BSG has been (as with many sci-fi programs) that they speak English but come up with their own units of measurement (centons, etc.). Kudos to them for trying to make it interesting by creating everything unique to the series, but sometimes it was just hokey. :)

    I have to admit, though - seeing the Cylon in costume on an episode of (and, I believe, the opening credits to) the A-Team, having a brief exchange with Dirk Benedict, was priceless.

    I think that if a scifi writer is going to allow some "inaccuracies" in (like the English language) they need to be consistent and talk about minutes and seconds and parsecs and lightyears, too... Just my opinion.

    --

    That's my purse! I don't know you! -- Bobby Hill
  13. Yea, but now by GMontag · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't picture a Galactica without Loren Green.

    Well now we have Lauren Green, I can stand to watch her all day!

    Also, I hope the wardrobe departments continue the Science Fiction media tradition, tighter clothes and less of them on the chicks please. Stop underestimating slutty so much and PLEASE higher heels!

    1. Re:Yea, but now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, whatever, I prefer Laura Greene myself.

    2. Re:Yea, but now by hachete · · Score: 1

      beagly, beagly

      sure, Admiral Asimov

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
  14. Convergence by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2, Funny

    Boogie Nights vs Battlestar Galactica

    Dirk Diggler Benedict

    Action ... Dirk!

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Convergence by k_stamour · · Score: 5, Funny

      " I don't know about a female Starbuck" What about *the* female *of* Starbucks.... in a soon issue of Playboy... I am waiting for the women of Waffle house.... -long long dig outa Troll level....

      --
      Julius Caesar - Act I, Scene i: "What mean'st thou by that? Mend me, thou saucy fellow!"
  15. Will the Cylons finally learn how to shoot? by b-baggins · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess the fact that the Cylons couldn't hit a planet at 500 feet was the only things that kept the humans alive.

    --
    You can tell a great deal about the character of a man by observing those who hate him.
    1. Re:Will the Cylons finally learn how to shoot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what do you expect, they only had one eye that bounced around like a ping-pong ball!

    2. Re:Will the Cylons finally learn how to shoot? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      Sure, the cylons will learn to shoot... just as soon as a crack commando unit sent to prison for a crime they didn't commit are the lead characters in a series in which no-one dies, in spite of numerous gun-fights in every episode. ;-)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    3. Re:Will the Cylons finally learn how to shoot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you expect? Those Cylon Centurions only have one eye--no depth perception.

    4. Re:Will the Cylons finally learn how to shoot? by uptownguy · · Score: 1

      What do you expect? Those Cylon Centurions only have one eye--no depth perception

      On the contrary... I can't believe I am such a geek for writing this but... obviously the side to side motion of the red eye would imply a very high degree of depth perception. For depth perception you need visual input from two different sources. Rather than two inputs, aka mammals, they had a continuum of inputs along that bright red track.

      Duh.

      --


      I would have to say that explosives are the most abused technology in all of history.
    5. Re:Will the Cylons finally learn how to shoot? by xA40D · · Score: 1

      no-one dies

      IIRC, there was one death in the A-Team. An African Game Warden shot by poachers.

      --
      Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
    6. Re:Will the Cylons finally learn how to shoot? by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      It's true, there were exceptions (plural, IIRC) to the rule, particularly in the later series. But usually, they couldn't shoot for toffee...

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    7. Re:Will the Cylons finally learn how to shoot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Physically impossible for them unfortunate buggers that they are. Nature (or the manufacturing plant) gave them a sinle eye that bobbed back and forward.. imagine try to hit those wily humans with your vision slewing left to right all the time..

    8. Re:Will the Cylons finally learn how to shoot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have the processing power to handle it (note that two eyes placed at the extreme points are probably still superior though, especially for a target covering more arc degrees/time than your eye does).

      Unfortunately, the Cylons had 6502s.

    9. Re:Will the Cylons finally learn how to shoot? by NaDrew · · Score: 1

      I always figured the A-Team were aiming to keep the bad guys' heads down. Why add (voluntary manslaughter|2nd degree|1st degree) to your list of outstanding warrants?

      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
    10. Re:Will the Cylons finally learn how to shoot? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Well, what do you expect, they only had one eye that bounced around like a ping-pong ball!

      Hey, I wonder if that helps them play ping-pong?

      They later embedded Cylon visual hardware into that talking car show with the Baywatch guy, whatshisname.

  16. ATTENTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Revamping old characters will get you no where but flocks of viewers still living in the past. Deflect from the old, create the new.

    1. Re:ATTENTION by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Firefly?
      Recycle the old, we know it works!

  17. robot dogs by Anvil+the+Ninja · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope Sony doesn't pay for Aibo product placement.

  18. Great Show.... by Kong99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kick ass space ships, evil robots, cool guys, and Hot Chicks! What more good a 12yo boy ask for!! :)

    1. Re:Great Show.... by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I doubt you'll like this version. A lot of that's supposed to be gone.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    2. Re:Great Show.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I doubt he's still 12.

    3. Re:Great Show.... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      What more good a 12yo boy ask for!! :)

      I hated it whe I was 12...

      Fucking Irwin Allen got so much right (Lost in Space, Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, Time Tunnel), with good casts, state-of-the-art effects (for the time), but blew it on the lamest, dumbest, most insulting scripts and concepts that even in primary school i couldn't suspend my incredulity long enough to enjoy them.

      Having read TFA, I see "Battlestar Galactica is written by Ronald D. Moore (Roswell, Mission: Impossible II, Star Trek: First Contact) with David Eick (American Gothic, Hercules: The Legendary Journeys) and Moore serving as executive producers.". Well, looks like more of the same. The writer has done derivative crap, the producer some good stuff, so it'll look good but embarrass anyone who actually reads SF rather than consuming TV sci-fi.

    4. Re:Great Show.... by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      look good but embarrass anyone who actually reads SF rather than consuming TV sci-fi.

      So it's just as good as the original Battlestar Galactica then.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  19. Scott Bakula by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

    Would replace Dirk Benedict as Starbuck, of course.

    1. Re:Scott Bakula by Stavr0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Scott

      Dirk

      Separated at birth?

    2. Re:Scott Bakula by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      Separated at birth?

      Nope. Clone. Wonder what the Raelians are up to with all of this cloning yet?

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    3. Re:Scott Bakula by Jenova · · Score: 1

      Oh boy!

    4. Re:Scott Bakula by idontgno · · Score: 1
      Would replace Dirk Benedict as Starbuck, of course.

      Nope, sorry, he already has a bad sciffy series. If it weren't for that, though, you would be right.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    5. Re:Scott Bakula by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

      I know I'm going to regret asking this, but what is it you don't like about Star Trek: Enterprise? I've caught a few episodes since they started airing it over here and it seems ok to me.

      --
      Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
    6. Re:Scott Bakula by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm... no,

      he actually has two... did you forget (or block it from your memory) Quantum Leap ?

      Whats to stop him doing a third? Bad things come in threes......

    7. Re:Scott Bakula by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      > Re: Scott Bakula
      >
      > Would replace Dirk Benedict as Starbuck, of
      > course.

      I choose to believe that the original poster knows Starbuck is being recast as a woman. That makes this far funnier.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  20. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by Fjornir · · Score: 1
    they speak English but come up with their own units of measurement (centons, etc.).

    How fast is a 'warp' in Star Trek again?

    Back on topic though, I'd be happy to watch a well done remake of BSG, so I have my hopes.

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  21. Production Companies Running out of Ideas by youngerpants · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fact that a production companys creativity has dried up so much that they have to remake a mediocre sci-fi program (and spend all the money on special effects no doubt) is very sad.

    I would imagine that every year there will be thousands media graduates and new creative writers coming onto the market who would love to have a pop at a large scale production like this.

    Either; the big companies are so scared at taking a risk that they just tart-up the same old crap, or all these new brains on the market are not up to the job (unlikley)

    when something slightly new and fresh comes along in this niche marketplace (e.g. Farscape) the public lap it up (until it gets cancelled)

    These people need to remember how to take risks

    1. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You missed one. The average person would rather watch a formulated, farmiliar plot over and over, rather than have to think about something new. Same script, different setting, jumble the characters around, and boom! Instant hit. That's why there's been a vulcan on every star trek so far (Data==Vulcan), save DS9, and they had to bring in characters from TNG to offset this.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    2. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Nah, people like new stuff. The problem is most television producers are dumb as a bag of doorknobs, so they can't understand this. Look at the most successful shows; with few exceptions they're different than the regular crop of brain-numbing digital opium.

    3. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're implying they're emulating something orginal to begin with. BSG was as lame and derivative a Star Wars rip-off as it was possible to make within a limited budget. The quality of writing showed just how few randomly typing mokeys that budget allowed. I realize now I'll go through life permanenlty scarred by hearing that little chrome robot say "I'm freezing my ball-bearings off".

    4. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Law and order, La Law, CSI, CSI Miami, Law and Order SVU?
      Or do you mean ER, Third Watch, Crossing Jordan, etc?
      Maybe you meant Baywatch, Baywatch Nights, V.I.P?
      You couldn't mean Star Trek, Star Trek TNG, Star Trek DS9, Star Trek Voyager, or Star Trek Enterprise?

      Whereas 30 something had a cult following, Quantum Leap did okay, Farscape failed without trying to differentiate itself too much, John Doe is surviving, Six Feet Under is fighting, yadda, yadda, yadda.

      Even the Sopranos is pretty much recycled, and now it's spawning its share of crap.

      The general television viewers are nothing more than sheeple, too dumb to think on their own, and use the opinions of the masses to avoid indiviual thought, and the Neilson ratings to verify their intelligence. You can quote me on that. McLuhan would have.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    5. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      I liked Battlestar Galactica, mainly because the technology/tactics were internally consistent. I got into the whole universe a bit too much, though, because several weeks after I got a warrior jacket, I was explaining to my fourth grade teacher that "frack" was not a curse word. Unfortunately, you can't go very far as a story when you are running away to some distant destination all the time (...cough cough Voyager), and the show just got worse and worse until it basically fell apart quite horribly by the time they reached Earth. I watched "The return of Starbuck" during the last marathon and almost gagged. It's hard to find science fiction that sucks more than that.

      I never could get into farscape. It's one thing to have flawed characters, quite another to have a bickering band of characters so self-absorbed and just generally pissy that you can't sympathize with any one of them for more than a scene.

    6. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by kEnder242 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Firefly.

      It had potential but got screwed because the pilot ep never got aired untill it was canceled.

      --
      my associative arrays can kick your hash - TCL
    7. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

      It was on fox what would you expect. Worse networks to be on is Fox and UPN as they drop show in less then 1 Season. Best is WB I have yet see a show no matter how bad last less then 2 Seasons.

    8. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I never could get into farscape. It's one thing to have flawed characters, quite another to have a bickering band of characters so self-absorbed and just generally pissy that you can't sympathize with any one of them for more than a scene.

      Sounds a lot like Red Dwarf, which was great. (Never had the opportunity to see Farscape.)

    9. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sci Fi cancelled Farscape allegedly because it was "too expensive" and because they "wanted to get away from doing shows about space ships".

      Now they are doing a new show about a space ship, which presumably will not be cheap. And a retread, tired old story from a lousy 1970's series, as well.

      I will never forgive Sci Fi for cancelling Farscape, after they had promised a fifth season. Never. May their execs burn in hell forever (figuratively speaking).

    10. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Firefly also screwed over because it's timeslot coincided with some major sports thing in the US?

      I'm pretty pissed at how Fox screwed it up. It had interesting characters who worked really well together, decent dialog, some resemblence of a story arc, a cool style, and I was really looking forward to seeing how it developed. All lost because of Fox's incompetence and impatience; they didn't even air the last three episodes!

      <wanders off to find a Fox executive to use as a punchbag>

    11. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Law and Order was unique because it kept all the boring personal stuff out. CSI was unique because it showed real science. Not sure exactly what the Sopranos recycled. You forgot Seinfeld.

    12. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by Angry+White+Guy · · Score: 1

      Sopranos recycled the 1980's godfather era, and more to the point, Goodfellas. I will concede on Seinfeld. As for law and order, they also left out all of that tricky evidence stuff. The show has some really thin evidence, mostly circumstantial, that would appear laughable in a real court.

      --
      You think that I'm crazy, you should see this guy!
    13. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Well we weren't talking about realism, we were talking about originality. The great thing about Law and Order was they didn't turn into a weepy drama like NYPD Blue, where every character looks like they're about to burst into tears.

    14. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 1

      Well, that totally works with comedy. Especially when you have a pair running around like Lister and Rimmer. Their characters were specifically designed to piss each other off. hehe. I think Farscape tries to come off as gritty, but the effect is that you can't get personally involved with any of the characters.

    15. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh well, I thought Farscape was just a bland ripoff of Blakes's 7. Now that was some bickering!

    16. Re:Production Companies Running out of Ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, Dead Last? Among others?

      All the networks are populated with exactly the same kind of fearful little clones. Your loyalty is misplaced.

  22. That would be Lorne Green . . . by SmokeSerpent · · Score: 0, Redundant

    . . . and when you can build a better robot dog while living in a spacefaring refugee camp, I'd like to take a look at it.

    But seriously, do you all inject these ridiculously awful and often disrespectful spelling errors as a part of some nefarious plan, or can you possibly be that stupid?

    --
    All kings is mostly rapscallions. -Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
  23. New mormon connections as well? by dlleigh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The real question is, will the new version have all of the thinly disguised mormon doctrine like the original did?

    See http://www.proaxis.com/~sherlockfam/art5.html or http://home.earthlink.net/~billotto/Mormon_N_BSG.h tml or http://www.lib.msu.edu/lorenze1/bg.htm
    or anywhere else you can google up from "battlestar galactica" and "mormon".

    1. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Dan+East · · Score: 0

      Very interesting. I can certainly see the parallels. The bizarre mormon religion would explain some of the off the wall overtones seen in the show.

      Compared to its predecessors (Star Trek and Star Wars), BSG mixes in a lot more mythological, spiritual mumbo-jumbo. Even compared to the latest Star Wars episodes, which tries to explain exactly what the Force is and some of the history of the Jedi, BSG was many times more complex and, well, unbelievable. They should have just stuck with Cylons and the "just trying to get home" theme. There were some episodes that seemed to just come completely out of the blue ("uh, why are my clothes all white?"). I guess the writers took on the same fictitious embellishment Joseph Smith dosed in liberally when he wrote his own "bible".

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    2. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Interesting. I thought the show just suffered from biblical analogies taken a bit too far. Still maybe that's what Mormonism is. Hmm,

      Mormonism: religion -> science fiction
      Scientology: science fiction -> religion

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    3. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Glen Larson belongs to the same -- I forget what the Mormons call their local church units -- as a friend who is big into SF, and they've talked about it, so I heard about it that way. In fact, Larson got in trouble with the church elders for "revealing secrets" in BG that gentiles (what Mormons call non-Mormons) aren't supposed to know.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    4. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      There is a line of thought which says that The Book of Mormon was originally written as a fantasy novel. And indeed, it is structurally identical to The Worm Ouroboros. In that era of publishing, it was not acceptable for your characters to be *directly* shown as having fantastic adventures. But it WAS acceptable to have a mysterious person or being arrive in the middle of the night and tell a narrator (the author) about those adventures, and have the narrator relay the tale to the Dear Readers.

      In the Book of Mormon, the angel Moroni fulfills this "mysterious being" slot, with Joseph Smith being the "narrator" (author).

      [Tho in The Worm Ouroboros, after a couple chapters the author forgets to use the "narrator" convention, so the rest of the book is written in the "direct" mode of modern fiction.]

      [disclaimer: I'm not a Mormon, and in Montana was on their local blacklist, because when those nice young missionary boys came to the door, I'd drag out my annotated Book of Mormon and ARGUE with them, using their own source materials. Yep, there were advantages to growing up with a Mormon landlord after all!!]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like:

      Biblical fiction from the 1800s (think Ben-Hur) meets old-school Freemasonry and an attempt to get around Victorian morality = Mormonism

      '40s pulp Sci-fi meets totally misunderstood readings of Aleister Crowley and the colossal ego of "Ron" = Scientology

    6. Re:New mormon connections as well? by On+Lawn · · Score: 1

      Mormonism: religion -> science fiction

      Yep, between Orson Scott Card and the producer of Battlestar Galactica and a host of others Mormons are capable of writing science fiction.

      You might appreciate this interview with OSC on Religion, Science Fiction, and Fantasy. It hits the nail on the head.

      ------------------
      OnRoad: Hit the Road.

    7. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2, Funny


      > Mormonism: religion -> science fiction
      > Scientology: science fiction -> religion

      Thanks, dude. Now they have to kill all of us.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    8. Re:New mormon connections as well? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      There were some episodes that seemed to just come completely out of the blue ("uh, why are my clothes all white?").

      I thought that episode (or two, it was actually a two-parter) was one of the better ones. Call it cliche, but it had a deeper message than "just trying to get home." After all, how long can you "just be trying to get home" before it gets boring? A nice spiritual twist was refreshing and also suggested that as advanced as their (BSG) technology supposedly was, there were still things they couldn't understand.

      Of course, I'm sure it rubbed the atheists the wrong way. But the atheists are a delicate bunch--witness their typical reaction to my sig. :)

    9. Re:New mormon connections as well? by leandrod · · Score: 1

      On a related note, what about Orson Scott Card and the Ender books?

      He has some really, truly good ideas, but sometimes is just sick -- as in the Protestant planet where the Calvinists are cruel legalists, but the Lutherans are nice, simple people, and Romanists are deeply wise; presumably because Calvinistic idea of grace goes against the grain of Mormon Pelagianism (salvation by works), while Lutheranism in its modern, liberal form, and specially Romanism are more congenial to the Mormon mind.

      Worse, he has a speech published in the web defending the Book of Mormon, shamelessly lifted from CS Lewis and his literary argument for the authenticity of Scripture. Just that Orson fails to take in account most of the literary arguments against the Book of Mormon. Moreover, reading the CS Lewis original one sees the argument actually implicates a big contrast between the Bible and the Book of Mormon.

      Sorry, too tired, and looking for a job; no time to look for references.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    10. Re:New mormon connections as well? by GrayArea · · Score: 1

      That reminds me: a few years ago Salon did an interview with him that was, let's say, less than favorable. I don't know how much of it was (is?) baloney, but there were a bunch of pissed-off readers because of that interview.

      --
      "The deluded are always filled with absolutes. The rest of us have to live with ambiguity." - Aristoi, Walter Jon Willia
    11. Re:New mormon connections as well? by slaker · · Score: 1

      Regarding your .sig:

      Would you feel the same way about saying those words if you were declaring your nation to be one nation under Allah or Zoroaster or Cthulhu?

      Or if your money said "In Rael we trust"?

      Maybe you can understand why the 9th circuit court did the right thing if you look at it that way.

      --
      -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
    12. Re:New mormon connections as well? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      -- I forget what the Mormons call their local church units --

      They are called "wards".

      I would guess that some members of the church might have been offended by the marriage ceremony that was performed on the show. It bore some resemblance to a temple marriage, but I would guess that this is a case of over-zealous members getting offended rather and church authorities telling him to knock it off.

    13. Re:New mormon connections as well? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      Calling that an interview is a bit of a stretch. That was an assasination attempt and a first rate example of journalistic bias.

    14. Re:New mormon connections as well? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      Na proxima vez, quero referencias, ta'? Especially, which Card book are you talking about? Also, to say that Mormons believe that you are saved by works is a gross simplification of the issue, though perhaps a useful statement when contrasting them with other Christians on the most shallow level.

      If you are interested in an academic examination of the Book of Mormon, I recommend By the Hand of Mormon by Terryl L. Givens published by Oxford University Press. It goes into the pro and con arguements concerning the Book of Mormon in a number of fields, including literary criticism.

    15. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Revealing secrets, indeed. What a bunch of malarky.

      It's true that there's stuff associated with the LDS temple ceremony that Mormons find very sacred and vow not to reveal. It's also true that NONE OF THIS is even REMOTELY in Battlestar Galactica. All the dorky Larson revisions of LDS doctrine are perfectly kosher.

      The truth of the matter is that Mormons have been persecuted for so long that they have an immediate impulse to not want to hang out to dry the more tender parts of their doctrine and society. Jews have a very similar response, and for very similar reasons. It's a cultural thing, and Larson (and Orson Scott Card) regularly violated it. Net result is church members aghast and embarassed, and everyone else not knowing, or if they did know, not caring.

      It'd be nice to see people who are actually MORMONS posting stuff on this thread: the amount of ignorant crap that's been posted here is nothing less than amazing.

    16. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is a line of thought which says that The Book of Mormon was originally written as a fantasy novel. And indeed, it is structurally identical to The Worm Ouroboros.
      If this little piece of nonsense is intended to suggest that the Book of Mormon was based on The Worm Ouroboros, it should be noted that the author of Ouroborus (E. R. Eddison) was born in 1882, and the Book of Mormon predates this by well over sixty years.
      disclaimer: I'm not a Mormon/blockquote This much is clear.
    17. Re:New mormon connections as well? by On+Lawn · · Score: 1

      In the Book of Mormon, the angel Moroni fulfills this "mysterious being" slot, with Joseph Smith being the "narrator" (author).

      You'd be suprised to find out that Joseph Smith is not in the Book of Mormon. There are a few narrators in the Book of Mormon, but the main one is simply named Mormon.

      I'd drag out my annotated Book of Mormon and ARGUE

      Good for you. You don't seem very informed though. Calling Moroni an "angelic visitor" in the Book of Mormon is about as ignorant a statement as they come.

    18. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, it's pretty much understood to be one nation under Cthulhu by now.

      (Only two or three more groups to destroy and we control the world!)

    19. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very cool interview. I consider Mormonism an interesting curiosity, in particular because being so modern allows one to see how other religions have been generated over the years (the same applies to Islam, actually, or the Sikh religion). And in its original, Joseph Smith form it was even kind of noble. There were a lot of similar efforts to redress inherited dogma during that era, like homeopathic medicine.

      Didn't know Tracy Hickman was Mormon either. Guess that explains the Desert of Desolation AD&D modules I enjoyed when I was a kid. ;)

    20. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Calling it journalistic is a bit of a stretch. ;) It was a first-rate example of someone with serious baggage being trolled.

    21. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      In fact, Larson got in trouble with the church elders for "revealing secrets" in BG

      Wow, you mean that the BSG personnel had official long underwear too, emblazoned with various cryptic symbols?

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    22. Re:New mormon connections as well? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > which Card book are you talking about?

      Not a book, a speech that made it to the web. Google for you. If you mean the carichatural depictions of Protestants, it is the Ender one in a Brazilian planet -- Orson was a missionary in Brazil.

      As I said, looking for a job, will leave homework for you.

      Now there are much more than just this OUP books around. One very interesting booklet by http://pfo.org./ is one century old and shows where Joseph Smith picked his themes. Nothing that one Muhammed had not done 1300 years before.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    23. Re:New mormon connections as well? by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


      So is Sandy Petersen:

      Member: Gaming Hall of Fame. (Only one person makes it per year, you are voted in by peers and fans). Co-creator Doom, Doom 2, Quake,Call of Cthulhu, Civilization (the computer game), and Age of Empires.

      http://www.ensemblestudios.com/ourteam/petersen. sh tml

      Somewhere is an interesting interview about his involvement in Doom as a Latter Day Saint, but I can't find it right now.

    24. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Wards, that's it. Not sure what the elders got upset about, as nothing specific ever leaked out about that. Anyway, I personally didn't see the harm in it -- it's not like he was parodying anything!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    25. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      The real question is, will the new version have all of the thinly disguised mormon doctrine like the original did?

      No, because Cylons keep falling off their bicycles :-)

    26. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Oh look, I caught a Mormon. [g]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    27. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Card is the man. I'll bet steam was coming out of her ears by the end of that interview.

    28. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Oh dear -- and here I thought those were uniforms!!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    29. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point was that it's structured the same way as other fantasy novels of the era.

    30. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, with the possible exception of Call of Cthulhu, those were all crap. Might explain some of the pseudo-satanic mumbo-jumbo in Doom, though.

    31. Re:New mormon connections as well? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      I read Card's "Ships of Earth" series. In it, the reader learns that humans on an alien world are the descendants of earthlings who moved there to escape some unspecified worldwide disaster. The world they moved to was meant to be temporary home until enough generations had passed to make earth livable again, and then they would return. The series follows the main characters' journey to find the means to get back home to earth, by chasing historical clues.

      That would have been a good story. But Card decided to add elements that made it unenjoyable to read for anyone who isn't a big fan of fundamentalism. (No, not just religion, but fundamentalism.) The colonists who set up this world in the first place decided to set up an overmind satellite around the world, and genetically alter themselves so that their own minds were receptive to this overmind satellite, and the minds of their descendants would be as well. The overmind's job was to keep people from ever thinking of inventions that could be used for warlike purpose, and thus the technology of the world was quite stagnant because many things were forbidden, such as the wheel. That wouldn't have been so bad, except that Card portrayed this as a GOOD thing, as if the reader was supposed to think that's a great idea.

      In the end of the series, when the colonists get back to earth to repopulate it, they find a presence in their minds that is even bigger than the overmind satellite was, that they call the oversoul, that they decide to subjugate themselves to. It's obvious that Card meant for the reader to think of this as the real god, and the satellite from the colony before as a human-made god substitute.

      That wouldn't have been so bad, except that a main character of the series is portrayed as the hubris-addled unbeliever who won't let the oversoul's thoughts into his head, and as a consequence does criminal things that others aren't capable of thinking of, and how everything is so much nicer when he finally gives in in the end and realizes the error of his ways.

      I found the books' moral message so offensive and opposite from actual ethics that it ruined the enjoyment of the series.

      It turned me off from reading any other Card novels after that. Everyone tells me that the Ender books are great, but I no longer trust Card to be capable of producing a story I'd enjoy, after reading his anti-thinker, anti-individualist propaganda in the Ships of Earth series. The interview linked to in this article doesn't serve to change my opinion of him.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    32. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suppose that the message in the Book of Mormon
      is far more important than the messinger. The
      book may well stand on its own. Certainly Joseph
      lacked the background or literary skills to put
      it together. As for the translation stone, his
      folks were shyster well drillers who used 'Indian
      Stones' to gull the suckers into paying for well
      jobs, and when one of Joe's fathers construction
      crew threw a white quartz stone out of a pit for
      young Joseph to catch and be fascinated by, the
      rest was history. Joseph may or may not have really found the gold plates, but whether or not
      Sidney Rigdon or a man named Spaulding gave the
      book to him or not may be immaterial as well. It
      only adds to the mystery of the origin of the book.

    33. Re:New mormon connections as well? by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      But the atheists are a delicate bunch--witness their typical reaction to my sig. :)

      I rest my case!! Man, you guys make it easy. :)

    34. Re:New mormon connections as well? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      I am pretty sure that Apollo gets married in a ceremony that looks suspiciously like a sealing ceremony. I don't find it offensive, but I can see how some overly sensitive people might freak out.

    35. Re:New mormon connections as well? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      Now there are much more than just this OUP books around.

      I am not saying that there aren't. However most come from biased sources such as pfo.org or the LDS Church. This one does a pretty good job of examining both sides of the issues.

      Orson was a missionary in Brazil

      Me too.

      Anyhow, I have read the entire Ender series and found it to be pretty interesting, though I thought that it slowed down towards the end. None of the depictions struck me as caricatures, but it has been a while.

    36. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Hitokage_Nishino · · Score: 1

      No, you are saved by works in Mormonism. Yes, I know that we are all automatically get the Telestial Kingdom just by the atonement, but to actually be SAVED, as in Celestial "Everybody should be here" Kingdom, you gotta run the Mormon Hamster Wheel for the rest of your life. Works. Time. Money.

      BTW, the Book of Mormon is full of some of the most absurd anachronisms that I don't see HOW you could have an honest academic examination without the majority of the text being against. Glass. Horses. Sheep. Headless men struggling for breath while propping themselves up. Metallurgy. Raising two great nations from 20 people in 19 years. Building Solomon's Temple with not even 1% of the manpower. Crossing the ocean by divine wind yet taking 344 days(do the math). Ignorance of Mosaic Law(e.g. pigs being good). Hebrews recording history in Egyptian. Leaders giving farewells in French. Blatant contradictions with its own creed(Jac 2:24, D&C 132:38-39). Blatant plagarism from the King James bible(Matthew 7, 3 Nephi 14), also including chapters of Isiah written after the characters leave Jerusalem.

      I mean... seriously.

    37. Re:New mormon connections as well? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > biased sources such as pfo.org

      Have you read, or do you assume one is biased because he has an opinion to offer?

      > found it to be pretty interesting

      Me too.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    38. Re:New mormon connections as well? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      Have you read, or do you assume one is biased because he has an opinion to offer?

      I have read quite a bit of it. According to my reading it is a one sided presentation of the arguments, though not as hate-filled as many I have read. In my book it still qualifies as biased. I again suggest the Givens book if you want to see both sides presented and given an airing. If you don't want to see how any of the arguments raised by one side are addressed by the other then there are plenty of options to choose from. It is pretty rare that you can find a source that dares to examine both sides seriously. Do you?

    39. Re:New mormon connections as well? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      This really isn't the forum for this, but oh well. Again, this "saved by works" thing is a common misperception even for those who are LDS. Without the atonement of our Savior, none of us would get anywhere regardless of what your "works" were. This seems pretty obvious when you think about it.

      Of course if you think of living a christian life as running a hamster wheel, then you probably think of this as people simply going through the motions, which of course would be empty and useless. If this is the case then I can see why you think the way you do.

    40. Re:New mormon connections as well? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      Since there are now 7 Ender books if you count the Bean ones, I have a hard time saying that you should read them all. I do think that Ender's Game by itself is worth a quick read even if you have already decided that you are going to hate Card for the rest of you life. Its examination of growing up as someone who is both talented and an outcast is very interesting and I would guess that most of the /. crowd can really identify with it.

      Also, I read him as being very pro-thinker. In fact, the Ships of Earth series was a giant thought exercise that many people objected to. Of course that series is a bit strange since it has two distinct aspects to it. One is a sci-fi novel and the other is an examination of issues raised by the Book of Mormon through retelling some parts of it in a different setting. Being LDS I thought it was fascinating though I didn't agree with all of it. Of course some of the moral issues are tweaked by having the initial "god" turn out to be a computer and never resolving what the other one was other than some mention of magma flows.

    41. Re:New mormon connections as well? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > pretty rare that you can find a source that dares to examine both sides seriously

      What if one side never deserved being taken seriously?

      Yes, I read the book of Mormon, and some other LDS materials. But I have to confess I find them too ridiculous, no better than Mohammad and his Koran. Actually a little bit more ridiculous than the Koran, because we are near enough the author in time, culture and space to know what he really was, and where he did get his ideas.

      All in all I find it so tiresome now that the only thing that could raise me to the effort would be trying to get someone from entering into, or to escape from, this cult.

      Now the Bible... so refreshing it cannot be read too often ever...

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    42. Re:New mormon connections as well? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      What if one side never deserved being taken seriously?

      Well I guess we know where you stand now. :) Out of curiosity, what prompter you to read the whole Book of Mormon if you found it so rediculous?

    43. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Civilization was crap?

    44. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Knarf0 · · Score: 1

      FYI - According to the Book of Mormon, you are not saved by works alone: Check here: http://scriptures.lds.org/2_ne/25/23#23

    45. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Hitokage_Nishino · · Score: 1

      No, I mean attending all the pointless meetings(mandatory), doing Home Teaching(semi-mandatory), Callings(mandatory), Splits(optional), etc, etc as hamster-wheel activites.

      Simply living a good, christian life is not enough in Mormonism... that's Terrestial "You should have done better" Kingdom stuff. I'm sure you know this.

      However, I will accept the notion that people are saved simply by the atonement, if you consider "saved" as merely not going to burn in fire and brimstone for all eternity. Yet being "saved" doesn't really mean much really in that sense, and doesn't match what others consider "saved".

    46. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Hitokage_Nishino · · Score: 1

      Since when did the Mormons care what the Book of Mormon says about doctrine? It also says God and Jesus are one, polygamy is an abomination, faith+babptism+repentance is all that's needed(no endowment), no works can be preformed after death, and also condemns secret oaths(ie. temple oaths).

      Check the Doctrine & Covenants if you want doctrinal scripture.

    47. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Knarf0 · · Score: 1

      >It also says God and Jesus are one

      Yes, one in purpose, not in body.

      > polygamy is an abomination

      Unless God specifically commands it (ie: to raise up a righteous generation. See http://scriptures.lds.org/jacob/2/30#30)

      > faith+babptism+repentance is all that's needed(no endowment)

      Semantics; how does one define 'repentance'? Following the path as shown by Christ? Obeying all the commandments? There were temples at the time the passage I think you are referring to was recorded. Would they not be included in the process of repentance?

      > no works can be preformed after death

      If you're referring to temple work, then I don't see how this is a contradiction, since the work done in the temples is done by the living on behalf of the dead (who can't do their own work).

      > condemns secret oaths(ie. temple oaths)

      The Book of Mormon condemns the (evil) secret combinations (Gadianton Robbers) who used secret signs, and oaths. Just because the temple ceremony is held sacred and is not discussed outside of the temple, does not equate it with the secret oaths of those evil groups in the Book of Mormon.

    48. Re:New mormon connections as well? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1
      However, I will accept the notion that people are saved simply by the atonement, if you consider "saved" as merely not going to burn in fire and brimstone for all eternity. Yet being "saved" doesn't really mean much really in that sense, and doesn't match what others consider "saved".

      That is not at all what I meant. I meant that without the atonement nobody will enter the Celestial Kingdom. That said there are things one must do to get there. I think that all the activities you mentioned are debatable on some level, but without striving to emmulate Christ (which defines "good works" imo) you won't get there.

    49. Re:New mormon connections as well? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > what prompter you to read the whole Book of Mormon if you found it so rediculous?

      Well, I have to confess to having skipped some parts in the latter half of it...

      Anyway, the initial parts sound interesting if read as fiction. Later the moralising, indoctrination and stretching, as well as the pretence to veracity and authority, become tiresome. Also I was strandled in a hotel in Ciudad Guatemala with little else to do; and thought I would read it even if I had already read enough about it. That was when I found that, besides being false, it is also ridiculous, and that is a feeling later Orson Scott Card writing also gives me.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    50. Re:New mormon connections as well? by John+Harrison · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Leandro,

      Thanks for the reply. I have enjoyed our little conversation here. While we will obviously have to agree to disagree it is nice to discuss this with someone without accusations from each side that the other is going to hell. Of course, you might still think that, but at least you don't let it get in the way of the discussion. Good luck in your job search.

      um abraco,
      John

    51. Re:New mormon connections as well? by leandrod · · Score: 1
      > without accusations from each side that the other is going to hell. Of course, you might still think that

      I do not believe doctrinal correctness saves. I do believe over-reliance on doctrine can endanger one, as well as too bad doctrine. But what saves is the Grace of God, in Jesus the Christ, thru faith.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    52. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Hitokage_Nishino · · Score: 1

      Yes, one in purpose, not in body.

      You just proved my point on this. BoM says little about "purpose".

      2 Nephi 6:9 - Nevertheless, the Lord has shown unto me that they should return again. And he also has shown unto me that the Lord God, the Holy One of Israel, should manifest himself unto them in the flesh; and after he should manifest himself they should scourge him and crucify him, according to the words of the angel who spake it unto me.

      2 Nephi 9:4-5 - 4 ... wherefore I know that ye know that our flesh must waste away and die; nevertheless, in our bodies we shall see God. 5 Yea, I know that ye know that in the body he shall show himself unto those at Jerusalem, from whence we came; for it is expedient that it should be among them; for it behooveth the great Creator that he suffereth himself to become subject unto man in the flesh, and die for all men, that all men might become subject unto him.

      2 Nephi 9:20-21 - 20 O how great the holiness of our God! For he knoweth call things, and there is not anything save he knows it. 21 And he cometh into the world that he may save all men if they will hearken unto his voice; for behold, he suffereth the pains of all men, yea, the pains of every living creature, both men, women, and children, who belong to the family of Adam.

      2 Nephi 10:3, 7 - 3 Wherefore, as I said unto you, it must needs be expedient that Christ--for in the last night the angel spake unto me that this should be his name--should come among the Jews, among those who are the more wicked part of the world; and they shall crucify him--for thus it behooveth our God, and there is none other nation on earth that would crucify their God...7 But behold, thus saith the Lord God: When the day cometh that they shall believe in me, that I am Christ, then have I covenanted with their fathers that they shall be restored in the flesh, upon the earth, unto the lands of their inheritance.

      2 Nephi 11:7 - For if there be no Christ there be no God; and if there be no God we are not, for there could have been no creation. But there is a God, and he is Christ, and he cometh in the fulness of his own time.

      2 Nephi 26:12 - And as I spake concerning the convincing of the Jews, that Jesus is the very Christ, it must needs be that the Gentiles be convinced also that Jesus is the Christ, the Eternal God;

      2 Nephi 26:23-24 - 23 For behold, my beloved brethren, I say unto you that the Lord God worketh not in darkness. 24 He doeth not anything save it be for the benefit of the world; for he loveth the world, even that he layeth down his own life that he may draw call men unto him. Wherefore, he commandeth none that they shall not partake of his salvation.

      Mosiah 3:5 - For behold, the time cometh, and is not far distant, that with power, the Lord Omnipotent who reigneth, who was, and is from all eternity to all eternity, shall come down from heaven among the children of men, and shall dwell in a tabernacle of clay, and shall go forth amongst men, working mighty miracles, such as healing the sick, raising the dead, causing the lame to walk, the blind to receive their sight, and the deaf to hear, and curing all manner of diseases.

      Mosiah 5:15 - Therefore, I would that ye should be steadfast and immovable, always abounding in good works, that Christ, the Lord God Omnipotent, may seal you his, that you may be brought to heaven, that ye may have everlasting salvation and eternal life, through the wisdom, and power, and justice, and mercy of him who created all things, in heaven and in earth, who is God above all. Amen.

      Mosiah 13:34 - Have they not said that God himself should come down among the children of men, and take upon him the form of man, and go forth in mighty power upon the face of the earth?

      Mosiah 15:1-4

      1 AND now Abinadi said unto them: I would that ye should understand that God himself shall come down among the children of men, and shall redeem his people.
      2 And because he dwelleth in flesh he shall be called the Son of God, and having subjected the flesh to the will of the Father, being the Father and the Son--
      3 The Father, because he was conceived by the power of God; and the Son, because of the flesh; thus becoming the Father and Son--
      4 And they are one God, yea, the very Eternal Father of heaven and of earth.

      Mosiah 16:15 - Teach them that redemption cometh through Christ the Lord, who is the very Eternal Father. Amen.

      Alma 11:38-40

      38 Now Zeezrom saith again unto him: Is the Son of God the very Eternal Father?
      39 And Amulek said unto him: Yea, he is the very Eternal Father of heaven and of earth, and all things which in them are; he is the beginning and the end, the first and the last;
      40 And he shall come into the world to redeem his people; and he shall take upon him the transgressions of those who believe on his name; and these are they that shall have eternal life, and salvation cometh to none else.

      3 Nephi 1:14 - Behold, I come unto my own, to fulfil all things which I have made known unto the children of men from the foundation of the world, and to do the will, both of the Father and of the Son--of the Father because of me, and of the Son because of my flesh. And behold, the time is at hand, and this night shall the sign be given.

      3 Nephi 11:14 - 14 And it came to pass that the Lord spake unto them saying: 15 Arise and come forth unto me, that ye may thrust your hands into my side, and also that ye may feel the prints of the nails in my hands and in my feet, that ye may know that I am the God of Israel, and the God of the whole earth, and have been slain for the sins of the world.

      3 Nephi 11:27 - And after this manner shall ye baptize in my name; for behold, verily I say unto you, that the Father, and the Son, and the Holy Ghost are one; and I am in the Father, and the Father in me, and the Father and I are one.

      Ether 3:14 - Behold, I am he who was prepared from the foundation of the world to redeem my people. Behold, I am Jesus Christ. I am the father and the Son. In me shall all mankind have life, and that eternally, even they who shall believe on my name; and they shall become my sons and my daughters.

      Unless God specifically commands it

      Some things don't match. The God giving Jacob 2 delighted in the chastity of women, and considered the acts of David and Solomon an abomination. Yet the God giving D&C seems to have changed his mind. David and Solomon did nothing wrong at all! Not to mention any man is entitled to 10 virgins! I also must say that nowhere does either God command Joseph to take women as young as 14 or those already worthily married to other men... but I suppose that's all infered from the second God. Yes, Jacob 2 has an escape clause, but everything else was broken with mormon polygamy as we know it.

      Semantics; how does one define 'repentance'? Following the path as shown by Christ? Obeying all the commandments? There were temples at the time the passage I think you are referring to was recorded. Would they not be included in the process of repentance?

      All normal acts of devotion are acceptable under "repentance", but telling me that secret handshakes and code names that will be required to enter into heaven(don't BS and say these don't exist, they do) are also included in repentance is a REAL hard sell.

      If you're referring to temple work, then I don't see how this is a contradiction, since the work done in the temples is done by the living on behalf of the dead (who can't do their own work).

      I was more referring to the belief that people can progress even after the resurrection, just not to the highest degree of the Celestial Kingdom.

      The Book of Mormon condemns the (evil) secret combinations (Gadianton Robbers) who used secret signs, and oaths. Just because the temple ceremony is held sacred and is not discussed outside of the temple, does not equate it with the secret oaths of those evil groups in the Book of Mormon.

      Um, yeah, and I suppose the oaths against the United States Government in the early temple ceremony and the bloody oaths in the pre1990 ceremony were NOTHING like the Gadianton Robbers. Oh, and get a f---ing dictionary. Temple ceremonies are SECRET, as in kept private or concealed. "Sacred" just means holy or inviolable. Jesus Christ is the most sacred thing in mormonism, yet that's what they are trying their damnest to present to the public.

    53. Re:New mormon connections as well? by Knarf0 · · Score: 1

      > You just proved my point on this. BoM says little about "purpose".

      The best answer I can give you with respect to those passages is in an address given by Elder Robert E. Wells

      It talks about the Divine Sonship of Jesus Christ, and how He is Jehova, the God of the Old Testament/House of Israel. He is also the Divine Son of our Heavenly Father (Elohim).

      > Unless God specifically commands it

      > Some things don't match. The God giving Jacob 2 delighted in the chastity of women, and considered the acts of David and Solomon an abomination. Yet the God giving D&C seems to have changed his mind. David and Solomon did nothing wrong at all!


      To clarify, The Book of Mormon and The D&C are consistent with respect to David: He lost his exaltation because took a wife (Uriah's) without the Lord's consent. This was an abomination. (See D&C 132:39)

      I agree that the scriptures are unclear on Soloman, but I fail to find any explicit reference to Soloman in the D&C (or anywhere else) saying he was completely righteous. Maybe Jacob had access to more information than has survived to our time.

      > Not to mention any man is entitled to 10 virgins!

      I'd say that's a pretty loose interpretation. Look at D&C 132: 62 -- I don't see where you are getting the sense of entitlement. To me, it just states that if God sanctions a plural marriage, even 10 wives does not constitute a sin, so long as the people involved are obeying the commandments and entered into the marriages following the way God has ordained.

      > I also must say that nowhere does either God command Joseph to take women as young as 14 or those already worthily married to other men...

      I can't really comment on this, since I am not aware of any case where Joseph Smith married a woman of 14 years, or a woman already worthily married.

      However, I will say that it doesn't sound completely unreasonable. If Joseph really was a prophet of God, and he was receiving revalations, it's not a stretch for me to believe God directed him to do this. It's not unusual for revalations given to a prophet to be kept from the public. (See Alma 12:9-10, 3Ne. 26: 16) even less surprising, considering the circumstances Joseph and the Church were in at that time -- heavy persecution from mobs.

      > All normal acts of devotion are acceptable under "repentance", but telling me that secret handshakes and code names that will be required to enter into heaven(don't BS and say these don't exist, they do) are also included in repentance is a REAL hard sell.

      "Normal acts of devotion" -- I think we're still largely in a semantic debate on this one. I'm afraid I am unwilling to discuss aspects of the Temple ceremonies, but I can say that I'm quite comfortable with the acts of devotion I perform there.

      The Bible tells about rites of worship among the Israelites and Jews (animal sacrifice) that raise my eyebrows more than anything I've seen in the LDS church. My personal opinion is that there are things in the Gospel that will seem strange at first, but upon closer examination, become a lot easier to understand and appreciate.

      As the Lord told Isaiah: " For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways, saith the LORD.

      For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts." (Isa. 55:8-9)

      > I was more referring to the belief that people can progress even after the resurrection, just not to the highest degree of the Celestial Kingdom.

      Sorry, I'm still unclear on your point here. Are you saying that modern LDS teachings contradict the Book of Mormon in the sense that one can not progress in the spirit world? Or after resurrection?

      > oaths against the United States Government in the early temple ceremony

      Sorry... quote a source for me on that one. I defy you to present any credible evidence. D&C 134 clearly directs members to respect and obey laws and government. For example, D&C 134:5 -

      "We believe that all men are bound to sustain and uphold the respective governments in which they reside, while protected in their inherent and inalienable rights by the laws of such governments; and that sedition and rebellion are unbecoming every citizen thus protected, and should be punished accordingly; and that all governments have a right to enact such laws as in their own judgments are best calculated to secure the public interest; at the same time, however, holding sacred the freedom of conscience."

      Again, Article of Faith #12: "We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, and magistrates, in obeying, honoring, and sustaining the law."

      Not to mention documented acts of patriotism displayed by the early members. For example, the Mormon Batalion

      > and the bloody oaths in the pre1990 ceremony were NOTHING like the Gadianton Robbers.

      Again, I won't discuss Temple ceremonies. I would point you to Isaiah 5:20

      > Oh, and get a f---ing dictionary. Temple ceremonies are SECRET, as in kept private or concealed. "Sacred" just means holy or inviolable.

      Secret. Sacred. When I read in the Book of Mormon that Secret Combinations like the Gadianton Robbers proved to be the downfall of an entire nation, I can draw a pretty clear distinction between them and the sacred teachings of the Temple that help me to be a better person, and a better citezen. (if not a better speller)

      Sure it's fair to call the temple ordinances secret. But to compare the motives for secrecy with the corrupt secret cartels of the early Americas is not accurate. Information is power, as is the denial of information. The secret combinations of the Book of Mormon used their secret oaths and signs to deny information and their identities from the authorities, and to further their evil designs against the government

      As far as I can see, the only reason God asks members of His church to refrain from disclosing temple ordinances is to test us, and to teach us faith. I don't see how my honoring a promise of silence advances my temporal prosperity, or undermines the freedom of our nation in any way.

      > Jesus Christ is the most sacred thing in mormonism, yet that's what they are trying their damnest to present to the public.

      Ok, so you're taking issue with my semantics. I think the word 'secret' carries a fairly negative connotation, so by using the word 'sacred', I'm attempting to convey a similar meaning, with an opposite connotation.

      Do you not believe that God, occasionally, commands us to not share certain things with others?

  24. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by gmuslera · · Score: 1
    If the plot was so bad will not be a lot better in this remake (it should be based in the same, after all). Anyway, I was very young when see it first time, and not was very critic in this time, so for me it not was so bad.

    But standards are mostly good today, at least for costumes and special effects, the other day I finally saw the first version of Dune, and compared with the miniserie it looked... well, old, and different from the book in other aspects

  25. re-airing by yoni003 · · Score: 1

    I was wondering why Sci-Fi channel started re-airing the series..trying to segway into their re-make. I used to watch it as a kid and was so blown away, now I'm embarrassed to see it (ok, it was entertaining)..I remember how excited I was when I could get my Commodore 64 to make the Cylon voice.

    1. Re:re-airing by adzoox · · Score: 3, Informative
      Forget a Commodore - on the series they used 36" blade fans and swirled a 2ft plastic pipe to make the "eye" swoosh sound - I'm guessing on the second one - that's how they did the "cylon eye" on KIT on Knight Rider.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    2. Re:re-airing by Mosasaurus_Maximus · · Score: 1

      I remember how excited I was when I could get my Commodore 64 to make the Cylon voice.

      "By your command"... heheheheh

      Yeah, they were pretty damn cool for 1978.

  26. TV is dead by sh0rtie · · Score: 1


    They have run out new ideas for TV programs already, in less than 100years, now all we have to look forward to are more re-runs of the same old (paid for) shows all because TV companies won't take risks on new material.

    There are millions of talented writers,authors,actors,musicians etc etc all hungry for the chance at getting their work out to the public and yet TV firms still keep re-using the same old stock formulas/actors until we become sick of them

    Oh how far we have travelled in 100years of TV/Cinema when even kids are sick to death of old reruns

    Is there no ambition or willingness left in the television/film business to create new and inspiring shows/stories that people will replay in generations to come as examples of pioneering work ?

    if todays television is anything to go by i guess not

    1. Re:TV is dead by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Is there no ambition or willingness left in the television/film business to create new and inspiring shows/stories that people will replay in generations to come as examples of pioneering work ?

      No.

      Move to a city and see some theater. That is where the original stories are.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    2. Re:TV is dead by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      It's Corporate Media all over, though, isn't it.
      The Music Industry puts out Karaoke Pop, new manufactured groups re-sing old songs.
      The Movie Industry remakes anything it can get a hold of, sometimes it's a sequel, sometimes it's an old tv show/cartoon, sometimes it's a foreign film, or just an old movie.
      TV does it too.

      The people who make these decisions are, you should remember, frequently arseholes. Creativity, to them is formulating a way to write off the lunch they just had as a business expense.
      Corporate power and artistic integrity..... oil and water, dude; oil and water.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    3. Re:TV is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theatre? are you serious? Shows that run for 12 years at a stretch running the same material?

      No thanks.

  27. Ruruns? by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    Does this mean the Sci-Fi channel will start playing reruns of the original BSG again?

    There were some things I enjoyed about the series, but sometimes it was a little too off the wall. Hopefully the new series won't have to reuse the same space battle scenes in every single episode.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Ruruns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They actually just finished showing the whole series the past couple of weeks: remastered video, apparently.

      The stupid thing is that they did it from 11-3 every day. Your fanbase tends to work those hours. ;)

  28. Am I the Only Person... by UsonianAutomatic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who hears the Comic Book Store Guy in my head as I read all of these Lorne Greene corrections?

    Worst. Remake. Ever.

    1. Re:Am I the Only Person... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The trouble is the ratio of normals to comic book guys on any post relating to 1970s SciFi remakes.

    2. Re:Am I the Only Person... by Twister002 · · Score: 1

      Worst correction ever

      --
      "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
    3. Re:Am I the Only Person... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      "That's a hundred and five to you and me."

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  29. If you don't like the robot dog... by C0LDFusion · · Score: 1

    ...you may like seeing them replace the dog with Ein from Cowboy Bebop! :)

    Plucky little corgi w/ l33t h4x0r sk1llz.

    --
    Only in slashdot are posts of solidarity modded at -1 Redundant, while posts of antagonism are modded as -1 Flamebait.
  30. Apollo Returns by StillDocked · · Score: 1

    My question is Richard Hatch going to have anyhting to do with this? As hokey as the original show was, Herr Hatch's meglomanical impulses were held in check, but now, as friends who have interacted with him have told me, his ego has no bounds when it comes to "his" show.

    1. Re:Apollo Returns by arturogatti · · Score: 1

      No, Hatch isn't involved in this. In fact he regularly posts articles on his website (example) urging fans to petition the powers-that-be in an effort get his own treatment of the original story produced. By the way, Hatch isn't the creator of BSG, but he has co-written several novels based on the original show and, up until the point when this Sci-Fi project was announced, had been battling with BSG creator Glen Larson, attempting to win the rights to produce a new Galactica film or TV series. (BTW, Larson apparently doesn't control the rights either; those seem to be owned by Universal.)

    2. Re:Apollo Returns by KoshClassic · · Score: 1

      If I'm not mistaken this does not involve Richard Hatch. Considering the effort he's put in over the years to a Galactica (and his own career) revival, I'd bet he's quite pissed.

      --
      Understanding is a three edged sword. - Ambassador Kosh Naranek, Babylon 5
    3. Re:Apollo Returns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in Richard Hatch's show, he runs around taking his clothes off, plays slap-ass with Commander Adama, and whines about the decor of the pilot's lounge?

      Oh, this isn't the Richard Hatch from Survivor? Oh..sorry...

  31. How sad by frenchgates · · Score: 1

    The poor quality of BSG is totally obvious to all but the most nostalgic who enjoyed it only because of their age. It is like "Goonies" in this regard. The characters were cardboard and plots formulaic and derivative. I was eleven, the perfect age for this series, when it premiered and even then its crappiness was apparent. I'll never forget how they re-used the same Dykstra-created footage from the pilot over and over again. "Let's fly down to the ice planet!" followed by yet another insert of the ships flying down to the DESERT planet from the pilot. Remaking this is ludicrous and demonstrates the total lack of imagination of the Sci Fi channel.

    --
    Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
  32. YES! by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 1

    Bring the ragtag fugitive fleet back! Just keep the psy stuff out of it. Make it SciFi not Fantasy.

    Me and my bro had all of the toys. We had the Vipers that actually shot the missile. YEAH! Of course with in a day we had lost them!

    --

    Gorkman

  33. Loren Green? Is she hot? by Control-Z · · Score: 0, Redundant


    Which one was Loren Green?

    And is there even any point to criticizing spelling on the Internet any more?

  34. By the lords of Kobol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We will get a whole new generation of crap-ola.

  35. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 1

    warp speed is a little different. when they define warp speed in ST, it's done in relation to a real established measure (light years). also, warp speed as a term in sci-fi probably predates star trek (too lazy to bother to try to find out).

  36. Could be fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never seen the series, but I'd really liked the first two movies.
    And be it just for the Galactica simply being the best designed starship out there. It beats not only the Enterprise/Voyager (not that difficult, granted) but also the mighty star destroyers.
    Well, not that I would treat Galactica for (true) Star Wars if I had to, but given the horror Lucas createt with his latest two excrements, I guess a remade Galactica will not be able to undercut this. So yes, one could look forward to this.

    P.S.: What a about a remake of "Buck Rogers" with Pamela Anderson as Buckine Rogers" ? widiwidiwidi

  37. Another SciFi show I will boycott.... by uberdood · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let's review:

    1. Cancel Farscape because of money.
    2. Run non-SF crap like Crossing over and Dream
    Team (and soon Scare Tactics).
    2. Spend tons of money on Spielberg to do Taken.
    3. Spend tons of money on a show that was NEVER
    any good (Battlestar Galactica).

    I'll be boycotting BSG like I did Taken.
    Anyone remember when MTV played music videos? Same thing is happening with SciFi. At some point seing actual science fiction will be a rare oddity on SciFi.

    --
    "Population 1,656"
    1. Re:Another SciFi show I will boycott.... by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      Anyone remember when MTV played music videos? Same thing is happening with SciFi. At some point seing actual science fiction will be a rare oddity on SciFi.

      Anyone remember when MTV, Inc. made a TON of money and began to branch out with their flagship brand into stuff besides music videos but also started multiple other cable channels to actually show music videos? At some point, seeing actual science fiction will be a rare oddity on SciFi, but hopefully by attracting more viewers and more advertisers with 'phony' scifi, they will be able to subsidize the production of REAL scifi to be published on other channels...hopefully.

    2. Re:Another SciFi show I will boycott.... by Cappy+Red · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the SciFi channel seems to have an extremely efficient crap detector right now... except they seem to have forgotten that they're supposed to avoid the crap.

      Two of the shows I've seen ads for that are coming up on the channel(Tremors and Scare Tactics) both look like crap as well. Is it a boycott if you just don't want to watch?


      *honk*

      --
      This is my sig. It's prescription, I swear. I need it for reading things... on the other side of things
    3. Re:Another SciFi show I will boycott.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Remember, one of the Sci Fi execs used excuses for cancelling Farscape such as
      "it costs too much money to make" and "we're trying to get away from doing shows about space ships".

      Now they do a remake of Battlestar Gallactica, a show about a space ship, which I'll warrant will not be cheap; and if it is, will be unwatchable. Will probably be unwatchable anyway, but you have to admire the sheer gall and mealy-mouthed hypocrisy in their shabby treatment of Farscape.

    4. Re:Another SciFi show I will boycott.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm....you kidding or something?

      Your portrayal of what occurred at MTV is rather accurate. However, to say this does or might occur with the SciFi network is like a farmer hoping his crops will grow without rain.

      MTV branched out beyond music videos and continued to because the ratings supported it. They made money attracting younger viewers and selling time via ad sales to companies, who happen to then and still focus on this growing and lucrative demographic.

      When people started complaining of the lack of videos, and VH1 was being the channel to go to, MTV started other cable channels, several now, and they continue to make money.

      MTV is a well-run business.

      SciFi, on the other hand, has yet to have a new show since the cancellation of Farscape that was a real success. And when I made a show, I mean a show, not a one hit wonder or "we're going to show this a weekend and that's it". Dream Team (has it been cancelled? eh, what do I care) had ratings in the .6s. On the premiere show runs.

      Frankly, SciFi screwed up. People boycott it. Maybe you find such spite silly; in this case, I think it's deserved (they signed a contract, promoted it, and then utterly bailed using legalese and then badmouthed the audience after an extended period of silence).

      They lost a signature show. Their Dune series might return some favor and I expect it to, but it won't be a 22 episode per year multiyear deal.

      Their reality TV series suck.

      And their SciFi Pictures aka movies are half-baked.

      They did this before--they used to show anime on Saturday mornings. They pulled that, due to ratings. Meanwhile, people apparantly still email them to this day for its return. They say it's no lucractive enough. I say, I don't even watch you on Saturday morning, because you of little of interest on. OTOH, Cartoon Network seems to be doing reasonably well with their anime selections.

      They just don't seem to have a brain over there. Or maybe I dislike them because their decisions just piss me off. But the simple reality is, I don't watch their channel any longer. Don't care to. And several folks I've spoken to, who aren't science fiction folks, who watched SciFi, don't bother with the channel either.

    5. Re:Another SciFi show I will boycott.... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      At some point, seeing actual science fiction will be a rare oddity on SciFi, but hopefully by attracting more viewers and more advertisers with 'phony' scifi, they will be able to subsidize the production of REAL scifi to be published on other channels...hopefully.

      Problem with that scenario is that you have to be committed to your genre to entertain the idea. The reality is that the current "leadership" at Sci Fi doesn't see the difference between SF and Element Press sort of stuff.

  38. If the Cylons look too much like the Borg... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...how long will it take Rick "Sluggo" Berman and Brannon "Bustah" Braga to invoke the DMCA? On the other hand, if the Cylons are too cheesy, maybe the BBC will sue for Dalek infringement.

    Evil Cylons, death-destruction-n-mayem, and, of course, scantily clad hot chicks, would make this a winner. However, I'm betting we get the full Berman/Braga politically-correct painty-waist white wash.

    1. Re:If the Cylons look too much like the Borg... by jmccay · · Score: 1

      Actually the Cylons look like humans and Baltar isn't the evil scourage of humanity. He's just seduced by a cylon spy.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  39. Re:USE IMDB! USE IMDB! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well, you didn't spend a few seconds checking that nobody else had made exactly the same comment.

  40. Why not just buy Firefly? by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Godddamn it! This is going to be such crap! This year we cancelled what was looking to be the best sci-fi show ever. Unless we are totally stupid, which we apparently are, our first priority should be figuring out a place that will pick up that show.

    1. Re:Why not just buy Firefly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My thoughts exactly.

    2. Re:Why not just buy Firefly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but Firefly was on Fox, not Sci Fi. The real tragedy for this story is the cancellation of the fifth season of Farscape.

      Sci Fi said the reason for the cancellation was that Farscape cost too much to make, and that they were trying to get away from shows about space ships.

      So...they spend their money instead on a show about a space ship; and a crappy remake of a crappy 70's show about a space ship, to boot.

      Firefly's cancellation was Fox's decision, not Sci Fi's; it was bad, but at least we had only invested a mere half season into the show, and there were no cliffhangers. Farscape was cancelled at the end of season four, when the writers were expecting to be able to resolve everything in season five. This will be aggrevating in the extreme.

    3. Re:Why not just buy Firefly? by JonMartin · · Score: 1

      Time for my Fox rant.

      I sent Fox a letter asking them to not cancel Firefly. I used the mailing address provided on their website (it explicitly says "Send programming questions and comments here:..."). A couple of weeks later the letter shows up in my mailbox with a big Fox sticker on it "explaining" that they could not deliver it.

      It took me a second to process. The first word out of my mouth was "MOTHERFUCKERS."

      USPS delivered the letter. Fox decided that instead of opening it they would return it. Motherfuckers.

      --
      Serve Gonk.
  41. No Maren Jensen - not the same! by stevew · · Score: 1

    For me it won't be the same because Maren Jensen won't be there as Athena - it wasn't a major role in the series - but I went to high school with her so the series had a different slant for me ;-)

    --
    Have you compiled your kernel today??
    1. Re:No Maren Jensen - not the same! by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1
      I agree that Ms. Jensen was certainly a reason to watch the original. I always hoped they'd give her more of a role to play.

      You're a lucky guy to have known her in HS.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  42. Here's a tip... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's the gay robots of Star Wars vs. the kick-ass robots of Battlestar Galactica!"

  43. Where have you people been? by jmccay · · Score: 5, Informative

    This news is at least a year old! This is the 25th Year Anniversary of the original series. This is just a mini-series. This is going to suck! Nobody likes what they have done. There are SEVERAL petitions to stop this from airing! The fans and Richard Hatch (Appolo from the series) have been trying to get a continuation of the original series. Richard Hatch has written 4 books continuing the saga. This site is a great place to get the information on the new mini series.
    Where to start. There is no more 12 colonies on 12 planets. There is 12 colonies on 1 planet. The cylons weren't created a reptilian race. The cylons were created by the humans to fight each other. All the characters are pale shadows of themselves. Anything that made them look and act like a hero is gone. Starbuck & Boomer are both now woman. Mr. Moore turned this once great show into a social propaganda engine. Don't expect this to be anything like the original because he is basing this on the the original Battlestar Galactica movie which was the first few episodes of the show and does have a lot of the character development.

    --
    At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    1. Re:Where have you people been? by crawling_chaos · · Score: 4, Funny
      Whoa buddy... Try breathing into a paper bag, you're about to hyperventilate. I have a recommendation for you. There's a switch on the television marked "Power" try setting it to the "off" position during the airing of the mini-series.

      Here we are about to go to war and people have their undies in a knot over a television show. Maybe George Bush is representative of the American intellect.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    2. Re:Where have you people been? by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I forgot to mention Baltar is not the betray of humanity on purpose. In this he's seduced by a female cylon robot who looks like a human. Oh yah, the cylons look like humans.
      Don't expect you child to be able to watch this show. The original show could have been watch by people of all ages! This is aimed more for the 18 - 25 range, if I remember the articles correctly, with more sexual content than in the past. I won't recomend you let you kids watch this.
      The sci-fi channel has been censoring any post on the quality of leadership from Bonnie (head of Sci-fi channel)--i.e. the complaints raised by the massive non-scifi content.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    3. Re:Where have you people been? by Bobulusman · · Score: 1

      Well, crap. Last I read, they were considering those changes, but now it's official. Crap.

      I'm too young to remember the show from when it first appeared, but I watched the reruns as a child and, despite the comically overused footage, loved the show. Heck, the was even willing to tolerate Muffit the daggit.

      --
      Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
    4. Re:Where have you people been? by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear! The only reason Galactica is popular enough now for them to consider it in the first place was due to the original cast, most of whom are still alive, and (including the late John Colicos) appeared in the Galactica Second Coming trailer that Richard Hatch put together on credit card money and volunteer special effects. He's shown it at various conventions...I've seen it. It's an amazing piece of work. CGI cylons, Apollo going John Woo with a blaster in each hand, even a Star Wars-style holographic recording of the late Lorne Greene as Adama. If they'd just let Hatch remake the show, then we'd have a Galactica that all ages could enjoy.

      But no. It's in fashion these days to "remake" old properties with no involvement whatsoever from anyone who was involved with the original. Pay lip service to the concept, drag it through the mud, and make it so crappy that neither the old fans nor new curious viewers have any interest in it. Bleah. This new show is just wrong. It's a blatant spit-in-the-face of Hatch, and of all the old-time fans who have been trying to get Hatch's show made.

      Sure, Hatch might be a starry-eyed dreamer, but if it weren't for dreamers, nothing would ever get done. And you have to hand it to him...he's written the stories. Not Shatnerically ghost-written them. He has a lot of creativity, a lot of charisma...if only they would give him the reins.

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    5. Re: Where have you people been? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > ...with more sexual content than in the past.

      "As sensitive as a schoolgirl's ... lips."

      The only line I remember from the original show.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    6. Re:Where have you people been? by jmccay · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree with you. The only thing I didn't like about Hatch's ideas was that the cylons were cyborgs and the 13th tribe is not earth but the people in white from the original series.
      The cylons were robots built the original Cylon race who built their robots smarter than themselves. This is known because Apollo spoke this to Boxy in the original series. This is one of the few facts I remember.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    7. Re:Where have you people been? by jmccay · · Score: 1

      This is a quote from Mr. Moore:
      "We believe you can explore adult themes with adult characters and still tell a ripping good yarn." from this article

      So don't let your kids watch this show! I think sci-fi shows show have classical music for their themes. It just seems better that way. He's going to do away with the original theme music!

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    8. Re:Where have you people been? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      I forgot to mention Baltar is not the betray of humanity on purpose.

      To be fair, this might be an improvement. Baltar just seemed incredibly stupid in the original. 'Oh you want to exterminate humanity? I'll help, if I can have a little bit of humanity to rule. Okay, so I'll be surrounded on all sides by a superior force that hates humans and wants to see them exterminated, but I'm sure it'll all work out in the end...' He was one of the 12 most powerful people in the colonies, and yet he wanted power? Since most of the other 12 were doddering idiots, and Adama (who wasn't) seemed not to be the worlds greatest politician Baltar looked as if he could have been president in a few years time without the Cylons 'help', and then he'd have been in charge of a humanity in a position of strength. Someone intentionally giving up power in order to gain less power just seemed silly.

      In this he's seduced by a female cylon robot who looks like a human.

      On the other hand being seduced by a robot sounds even more silly.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:Where have you people been? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Well, the solution is simple and obvious. Turn the switch on the war to the "off" position.

      There problem solved.

      Now I can return my attention to the *real* war striking fear and terror into the hearts of my fellow Americans.

      The against remaking bad television as *really* bad television.

      Oh the humanity!

      KFG

    10. Re:Where have you people been? by pboulang · · Score: 1
      Frankly, I thought the music was the best part.. which is frequently what makes or breaks a show/movie/etc.

      I'll tune in for first episode, but frankly, it will take a bit to keep me around past the opening credits.. (never can watch Enterprise unless I happily come in late ;)

      --

      This comment is guaranteed*

      *not guaranteed

    11. Re:Where have you people been? by John+Harrison · · Score: 1

      The original Cyclon race was reptilian. I have no idea how I remember that from my childhood, but I do. I believe they showed a pencil sketch of what they looked like.

    12. Re:Where have you people been? by Rakarra · · Score: 1
      I was not a fan of Voyager... but I have to admit they had one of the most beautiful opening sequences (visually and audibly) I've seen.

  44. Heh. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think Comic book guy said it best: "Loren Greene's death pose. Best...death...ever!"

  45. Detailed script review by arturogatti · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...can be found here. (Summary: he pans it; quote: " This remake is a disaster and will be the END of the line for this property.")

  46. I hope it's better than the first one. by spoot · · Score: 1

    I hate to say it, but what an absolutely awfull show. It was embarassingly bad. Oh the horror. I'd rather see Dr. Who reruns. (Actually I would like to see Dr. Who reruns.) But beyond being a really, really bad show, this is proof positive that no one in the entertainment biz has an original idea. Redo a really, really bad SciFi show from the 70's like this. They might as well redo Lost in Space or Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea. (I better be careful, don't want to give them any ideas.) Ballestar Gallactica... oh the humanity.

  47. So... by Icehouseman · · Score: 1

    Instead of making more Farscape episodes, they're going to waste their money on a show that sucked a lot with horrible special effects, bad acting and dull story lines. Thanks Sci-Fi channel. You guys suck ass.

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sci Fi Channel execs are evil.

      They cancelled Farscape because it "cost too much" and because they were "trying to get away from doing shows about space ships".

      So what do they do? They spend money on a show about space ships: a remake of the crappy Battlestar Gallactica!

      The Sci Fi execs aren't just evil: they are openly mocking us.

  48. AICN Script Review by iCharles · · Score: 1
    Ain't It Cool News had a fairly favorable script review a few months ago.


    I remember "Galactica" from my youth, but I just remember the spaceships zooming around. I was like 7 or so, so I don't remember much. I was excited when they were going to bring it back...but then, we don't speak of "Galactica 1980." (My God! It's been over 20 years)


    When I went back in the last few years and caught it on SciFi, I was surprised how detailed the series was--the polictical infighting, the "civilian control of the military" overtones, etc.


    The new script sounds like it picks up on its legacy, and expands on it immencely.


    Remember: twenty-five years ago, SciFi was not nearly as generally accepted as it is today. There is such diversity out there now, and the audiences are much more mature. It could be said that it is much more accepted. So, more sophisticated plotlines can be accepted.

    1. Re:AICN Script Review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but then, we don't speak of "Galactica 1980." (My God! It's been over 20 years)
      That is not dead, which may eternal lie
      And with strange aeons, even death may die.
  49. Female Starbuck? by AugstWest · · Score: 1
  50. stupid robot dog by rve · · Score: 1

    That "stupid robot dog" was the best part!

    1. Re:stupid robot dog by Longshottek · · Score: 1

      yeah! now come on! That dog was pretty cool to me when I was 7. :)

  51. The man's name is Lorn by blakespot · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Lorn Green -- not Loren Green (his sister?).

    Velgarcarb, man!!!


    blakespot

    --
    -- Heisenberg may have slept here.
    iPod Hacks.com
    1. Re:The man's name is Lorn by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      No that's wrong too. His name was Lorne Greene. If you're going to correct someone on spelling, please get it right yourself.

      Lorne Greene...GREEN card! Coincidence?
      Lorne Greene...Lorne Elliot! Coincidence?

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:The man's name is Lorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, the second Lorne is Lorne Michaels, the east coast director of the Canadian Conspiracy.

      And to think it all started with a joke about the Canadian ice fisherman who caught 40 pounds of ice.

      ph33r us, 4m3ric4nz0rs!

    3. Re:The man's name is Lorn by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Oops. Right you are. Lorne Elliot is another Canadian Lorne, who hosted "Madly off in all directions," and wrote such classic songs as "When grandpa played the six-string, he sucked!"

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  52. Insert #Farscape.h by mbourgon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    lovely. They canned Farscape for this crap? Next you know, they'll be doing crap like Candid Camera (http://www.scifi.com/scaretactics/), dream analysis (http://www.scifi.com/dreamteam/), turn some bad made-for-tv movies into a series (http://www.scifi.com/tremors/), give Adrian Paul another show to suck in (http://www.scifi.com/tracker/) and probably some crappy show based on "Chariots of the Gods" (http://www.chariotsofthegods.com/).

    I am _so_ glad that there is a new Science-Fiction-based tv channel being created. Never thought I'd see the day. I used to watch SciFi all the time. Now? One hour, once a week.

    Watch Farscape. Tell your friends. The "We're So Screwed" Trilogy started last night. It'll replay this weekend.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    1. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Actually, the original Tremors movie is quite good -- the story is silly (deliberately so), but it beautifully parodies all sorts of SF icons and redneck cliches, and it's well-written and nicely paced. But that sort of thing is best left as a one-shot, not beaten to death as a series.

      I remember BG very well. The premiere was one of the dullest and most weakly-plotted things I'd ever seen outside of maybe Star Trek: The Motionless Picture, and BG had additional problems with very poor acting and lack of chemistry. It got tolerable after a while, but it was never what I'd call good TV on any level.

      And IMO the whole premise was too weak to begin with, so how does it deserve a second chance now? A: Well, we can't think up our own stuff, so we'll use this one that we already have handy.

      Glah, and then they wonder why SF series tend not to be the big hits they envision.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

      One word: Boxy.

      Hee hee. Can you picture that thing without laughing? They probably had to dub over laughter from the set. I kept hoping the little boy would get vaporized. Remember that one woman, a radar operator or something, who's only job appeared to be counting down to their doom? And then Adama always looked like he needed some Metamucil.

      A friend and I were just yesterday discussing BG euphemism swear words -- I can't remember BG's signature one now, something like frebcolm? Farscape has a much richer pretend vocabulary -- at least, the oaths cut much closer to what the characters really mean!

      BG is campy fun, but it's hard to make money off of that. SciFi just wants to draw attention to themselves, get thirty-something loser like me (with disposable income!) to switch over, etc. But the *real* scifi fans have already come, and soon will be gone. Two words: John Edward.

      Oh yeah, and they f*cked up cancelling Farscape. So there. Let's make it the SciForgotten network.

      Star Trek: The Motionless Picture -- hadn't heard that one, thanks. :)

    3. Re: Insert #Farscape.h by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1


      > Next you know, they'll be doing crap like [...] give Adrian Paul another show to suck in (http://www.scifi.com/tracker/)

      Actually, I liked Tracker. Modulo a few of the episodes.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    4. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Oh lordy, I'd forgotten Boxy, and now you've gone and reminded me... I'm going to hunt you down and HURT you :)

      Yeah, the euphemisms were terrible, like they were trying to make plergb do double duty or something. But it was typical of the whole series -- sortof talked down to the audience as if we were children who shouldn't be exposed to nasty realities (which is kinda in line with the Mormon philosophy at that).

      I haven't seen Farscape. I did finally see an episode of Firefly, and I understand why that one didn't make it. Aside from being poorly directed with that look of "print the rehearsal" timesaving (and where did they get the amateur cameramen who don't know enough to use sun filters??) it has a fundamental lack of balance -- while nominally "serious SF", it's listed over too far toward camp without having a strong enough center line of march, if you get what I mean. (Since I can't seem to find quite the right words to express what's *missing* from the show.) Being exceedingly clever in dialog, and even having some nicely realistic characters, will not save you if overall the series feels like it has holes (indeed, the good dialog and characters may *emphasize* the holes).

      And back to BG: it was *supposed* to be dead serious, with Starbuck as comic relief, not camp. It came off as camp because it was so bloody bad there was no other way to watch it.

      There were many names for ST:TMP, none of them good :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    5. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by MisterMook · · Score: 1

      I suppose canning the Farscape crap for Battlestar Gallactica crap at least means that they're in some sort of rotation of crap over at SciFi. In any case next year everyone will be complaining about some new series that wasn't very good that's getting canned and the networks will be putting out new "crap" that everyone will complain about the year after.

      Let's face it folks, if you're looking for art and culture, television shouldn't be the first place you look anyways. Go to museum.

    6. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by Reziac · · Score: 1

      [goes off, roots around]

      Felgercarb, that's the word you were thinking of.

      IIRC, BG also popularized "kark", which is a real word. (See http://www.abc.net.au/classic/breakfast/index/2002 _08_full.htm, original spelling "cark").

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    7. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they cancel their only good, original series, Farscape - a show far superior to anything they have ever shown on Sci Fi Channel - with the exuses that it costs too much money to make, and that Sci Fi Channel is trying to get away from showing shows about space ships.

      Then they take their money and use it to remake a crappy 70's show about a space ship!

      What's next? Remake of Space: 1999? Remake of that 70's sci fi show about the captain of a space garbage truck the name of which mercifully escapes me?

      Morons.

    8. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think Farscape is crap, that pretty much invalidates anything else you say.

      Moron. Have you seen the kind of crappy "art" that is in museums these days? Please. If we are talking about modern art, there is far more real art on TV (in spite of Sturgeon's 90% rule) than there is in museums.

      You are just an would-be elitist bastard because you want to pretend that you are superior to everyone else because you (allegedly) do not watch TV.

      How do you know it is crap if you have never seen it?

      Moron.

    9. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by cbogart · · Score: 1

      I'd heard so much hype about Farscape, especially on Farscape, that we started renting the episodes on DVD. After watching the first couple episodes, we stopped renting episodes. Is it a) crap in the beginning but give it time it gets better, or b) just not to my tastes?

    10. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure about "kark"? I only remember "frak", typically said by Starbuck as a single expletive most like "shit!". Felgercarb seemed to be a derogatory noun like "bullshit".

      Funny thing: based on early experience with fake cuss words in BG, for a while I thought "fershlugginer" was the same thing, partly because I first saw it in a Spider-man comic. It's a thin line. ;)

    11. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably not to your tastes. I tried it too when a local station started airing them in order on a fast rotation, and kept on trying. It just doesn't do anything for me. I'd rather see a Battlestar Galactica remake...or just the next season of Stargate. In fact I probably liked the first half of the first Farscape season more than what came later, because there was some sense of mystery.

      Farscape still seems like a less-interesting on Lexx - "Lexx for kids" perhaps. I don't mind some of the concepts, but all together it's just hackneyed and strangely irritating. But I generally don't like mainstream attempts at SF - the modern ST series leave me cold, for instance.

      I did like the puppetry though, particularly Pilot. Rigel is just too annoying (in fact all the characters are, and maybe that's part of the irritation - same reason I can't stand Seinfeld).

    12. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by cyko500 · · Score: 0

      Yeah the series did start out slow. I became a bit bored of it after a few episodes, then I started watching it again one night. As the series went on there were more twists in the plot
      that kept the storyline somewhat complex. The characters evolved and so on. I can see why they are canceling it though. The original set of actors was better. Still a good series in my mind and it's too bad they are canceling it.

    13. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what in all hell are you doing here, on /.?

      Hell, even the internet?

      Art and culture my ass. Stuck up idiot--just because you don't like it doesn't mean it's valid that it was crushed.

      btw, TV isn't about art or culture. It's about ENTERTAINMENT.

      Next, you're going to be saying that the only place to see a movie is in a theater (to hell that most theaters don't have a decent selection). Or that the only place to read a book is in a library. Or, wait, the only place to eat is in a restaurant. Or listen to music is in a concert hall, with real instruments.

      Yes, such things are nice. If you have time. Money. The effort.

      Maybe you're job is so lackluster or you are so fortunate that you can burn such things. I don't. Friday night, I pop in a DVD and relax. Or watch TV. Or read a book.

      Farscape was something halfway decent that was a choice and an option.

      No interacting with people (I do that over 100 hours a week), no traffic, no fighting folks on the subway, no gas guzzling, no crying babies, punks on cell phones.

      I like my home. I don't mind TV. Farscape wasn't about culture or art. It was simply a compelling show to some.

      Personally, I think museums suck. Maybe we should crush a few more, just for histories sake. If that statement strikes you as just wrong, think about what idiocy you mentioned above--just because you don't like something doesn't mean everyone else has to think that way to validate your belief. You don't like it, fine. Others might.

    14. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by MisterMook · · Score: 1

      Wow, I'm a moron because I allegedly don't watch tv. That's sort of funny if it weren't so sad too.

      I do watch television, I never said I didn't. Part of knowing how to apply Sturgeons Law properly though is knowing when it applies to oneself my friend. That is if you're not part of the solution, you're probably part of the problem.

      I mean if you think Farscape (muppets, bad guys in S&M outfits, anal humor) is better than Monet ("crappy modern art"), that pretty invalidates everything else you say.

      You sir, are part of the 90%.

    15. Re:Insert #Farscape.h by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      If you think Monet is half as good as Botticelli (The Calumny of Appelles, Primavera), Titian (Venus of Urbino, Flora), or Rembrandt (Storm on the Sea of Galilei, etc.) than that pretty much invalidates everything else you say.

      You see - standards are always a sliding scale. Farscape is a decent fun show that on rare occasions can approach to being art. Monet is halfway decent art that can on occasion approach masterpiece status.

      Saying that Farscape is good is a perfectly valid application of Sturgeon's Law: relative to what television is, it's in the 5%. You will never see a television analog to The Odyssey or to The Calumny of Apelles because the form isn't capable of sustanining that kind of sophistication. But then again, no viewer is really capable of sustaining that degree of attention and appreciation for fine art over every moment of every day. One needs to have a little light fun, and Farscape is perfect for that.

      Looking down your nose at something you don't know much about is easy; really evaluating a work's intentions is hard.

  53. Farscape? by Nick+Fury · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why did they cancel Farscape, a perfectly good SF series, only to redo BSG and show more Stargate? And not only that, what was the Sci-Fi channel showing Braveheart, yes that Braveheart, for? I like Mel and all but Braveheart has nothing to do with SF. I think someone needs to tell whoever is running this channel to ignore ratings and show quality stuff.

    1. Re:Farscape? by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      The scripts are already written. I can't imagine any other reason to revive it.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Farscape? by Exatron · · Score: 1

      My theory is that the Sci-Fi Channel's executives hate science fiction and its fans.

      --
      "I think so, Brain, but 'instant karma' always gets so lumpy." - Pinky
      "Decepticons FOREVER!!!" - Ravage
    3. Re:Farscape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reasons Sci Fi gave for cancelling Farscape: it costs too much money to make, and we are trying to get away from shows about space ships.

      So now they are spending money to remake a show about the suckiest space ship of the 1970's: Battlestar Gallactica.

      Previous poster was right: Sci Fi Channel execs hate science fiction and its fans.

    4. Re:Farscape? by OvertlyPedantic · · Score: 1

      Braveheart? Well it might not be SF, but if you know anything about history it certainly counts as fantasy!

    5. Re:Farscape? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a problem with Stargate? Pretty good SciFi if you ask me.

      I haven't been able to connect with Farscape. Some episodes are pretty interesting but others require that you have seen one or more previous seasons.

      I wish they would can Crossing Over.

      The danger of having shows that are cheap to produce is that they are harder to drop because you get more airtime for your buck.

  54. Where will it start or end? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    They made a new BSG starting when they arrived at earth, it lasted only about 6 episodes before it died.

    Will this be a remake and start from the attack on the colonies, or start with the arrival at earth?

    Or will this start at the cylon attack on earth?

  55. Oh great... by foistboinder · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're so bankrupt of ideas they're starting to remake shows that sucked. On the bright side, it probably can't be any worse than the original.

    1. Re:Oh great... by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      Interesting comment. It seems that 90% of science fiction is regurgitating something from before. One of BG's episodes had Starbuck and a Cylon crashed on a planet. They overcame their differences to become friends. I've so far seen this in Barry Longyear's "Enemy Mine,", on Enterprise, ST:TOS, ST:TNG, Buck Rogers, etc., etc..

      And the original BG was pretty bad. Things like the control yoke in their spaceships having buttons labelled "Turbo" (looking eerily similar to arcade controls of the era) to the names of the characters to Twiki and...well, you know.

    2. Re:Oh great... by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      "Twiki?" Was there ever a Battlestar Galactica character by that name, or are you thinking of Buck Rogers in the 25th Century?

    3. Re:Oh great... by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      Bleah.. It was Buck Rogers. I seem to recall some kid that looked like the "Eight is Enough" kid. It's been twenty years since I've watched an episode so they're starting to meld into this bad science-fiction mass.

    4. Re:Oh great... by unitron · · Score: 1

      That whole "Enemy Mine" thing goes back at least as far as 1968's "Hell in the Pacific" (http://www.imdb.com/Title?0063056) and probably a century or three further back than that.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    5. Re:Oh great... by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      Actually, those plots are almost direct rip-offs of a 50's or 60's movie I watched on TV once. It was set in the South Pacific during World War II. One of the big name 50's/60's action stars (I'm not very familiar with the names of actors from that time period but I've seen this guy before in other major movies from that time) was playing a Navy pilot who gets stranded on a small island with a Japanese pilot. At first they hate each other but they have to work together to survive. By the end of the movie they manage to develop a basic friendship. Of course, this is the point in the movie where the whole thing goes kind of Twilight zonish and they are both killed in a bombing run just after they become friends and just before the end of the war. Personally I found it to be a depressing ending which is why, I guess, most of the examples you gave ended up having a more positive ending where at least someone gets something out of it (as is the case with, at least, Enemy Mine where the alien gets killed but the human goes on to help develop good will between the two cultures).

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
    6. Re:Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, remember, folks, they cancelled a show with brilliant and original writing - Farscape - for a remake of that turd-in-the-punchbowl of TV Sci Fi, Battlestar Gallactica.

      The original excuses for cancelling Farscape was that "it costs too much to make" and "Sci Fi Channel is trying to get away from doing shows about space ships".

      So now they will spend what is by definition too much money, making a show about a space ship.

      Well, at least it isn't a remake of Space: 1999.

    7. Re:Oh great... by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, at least that. Whenever there's a lawsuit about stealing story ideas someone will always show some biblical reference. And there was something like "Enemy Mine" in the Bible too.

    8. Re:Oh great... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Boxey. Later became "Troy" in Battlestar Galactica 1980. I'm terribly embarassed to admit that I not only know that, but remember it. Let's all play the when-I-was-a-kid-I-liked-bad-scifi humiliation game! Remember how k3wl we all thought it was when Count Iblis (Iblis is the Arabic name for the Devil) turned out to have the same voice as the Cylon Imperious Leader?

  56. Re:Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Loren Greene is the new female Adama.....

  57. Maybe this time they'll know not to bother... by garyok · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, in the last series it took them 20 years, and a weedy space albino, to figure out that if they run for Earth then the Cylons can just hang back and fry them and our mostly harmless selves when contact's made. What's a two decade wait to a galactic empire of robots? How's about this time we organise an online petition to tell those dumbass Galacticans to stay the hell away from Earth?

    Also, there's the question of their immigration status. Now, they can't really claim to be asylum seekers 'cos they started the war with the Cylons in the first place by being a big bunch of Buttinskis and not letting the Cylons subjugate a vassal race as they saw fit (subjugation's kinda the point in being Galactic Overlords after all...) It'd be funny of they got to Earth and the Department of Homeland Security just stuck them in a camp.

    Thinking about it that way, the smartest thing we could do when the Galactican's arrive is stick them in a camp. Then when the Cylons turn up we cosy up to them and point out that our most powerful nations are those with the strongest rule of law, and by the way have you thought about extraditing the Galacticans to Cylon as war criminals? Correct me if I'm wrong, but didn't they commit genocide when they destroyed a planet in the movie? "Oh, it was just an 'accident', was it? Well I'm very sure that if you're innocent then you'll have nothing to fear at trial. On Cylon."

    Then we're well in with our new alien masters, obviously being a different, more pragmatic breed of humanity and a bright shining future awaits humanity as the Cylons' premier client race.

    It's what I'd do.

    --
    One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    1. Re:Maybe this time they'll know not to bother... by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > I mean, in the last series it took them 20 years, and a weedy space albino, to figure out that if they run for Earth then the Cylons can just hang back and fry them and our mostly harmless selves when contact's made. What's a two decade wait to a galactic empire of robots? How's about this time we organise an online petition to tell those dumbass Galacticans to stay the hell away from Earth?

      Dude. MOO3 has only been out for three days. Stop with the spoilers already!!!

    2. Re:Maybe this time they'll know not to bother... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's what I'd do."

      Congrats. You qualify as a politican.

    3. Re:Maybe this time they'll know not to bother... by waynemcdougall · · Score: 1
      What makes you think they'd stop here? This Earth? Just because we share the same name (and some mixed up mythological names)...this is not the planet of advanced technology lost colony that will save you from the Cylons...move along.

      The reality is that BG would go right past Sol III and continue searching for the real lost colony of similar (or more advanced) technology and write us off (like the other humanoid planets they passed) as being a side-show.

      --
      Recycle PCs and build a wireless community network www.hillsborough.org.nz
  58. If you listen carefully.... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 2, Funny
    So long as they don't bring back that stupid robot dog,

    I never noticed this, but if you listen carefully to that sound that thing makes, it sounds a lot like "Jar Jar....Jar Jar"

    Coincidence, I think not.

  59. Starbuck('s) by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wait a minute, that chain of coffee shops has nothing to do with Battlestar Galactica? Who knew? Damn, now I have to sell my stock. Send in John Ashcroft!

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:Starbuck('s) by skybozo · · Score: 1

      I guess the new Starbuck character is going to be a caffeine junky.

    2. Re:Starbuck('s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, they are more related in your think - both the coffe chain an the creators of BSG took the name Starbuck from the first mate in Moby Dick.

  60. What OS do Cylons run on??? by Dareth · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm all for NT 4.0 seeing as they how bad they suck, but it would be a bit funny if they said they ran BEOS or something like that *grin*.

    Maybe a poll would be good,
    option D. Cylons are just Cowboy Neal in Metal-Drag

    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
    1. Re:What OS do Cylons run on??? by retro128 · · Score: 1

      Seeing as how the Cylons want to conquer the human race, my money's on MS software, probably Microsoft Subjugation Server 2.0. What is Microsoft Subjugation Server 1.0 then? Think Palladium :)

      --
      -R
    2. Re:What OS do Cylons run on??? by supergiantrobot · · Score: 1

      My guess is that the Cylons use the same OS that the Sleestak used to run their Pylons in the "Land of the Lost." Now there's a series to be remade... well, right after they remake Sigmund and the Sea Monsters.

    3. Re:What OS do Cylons run on??? by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      They were running in 1979. It's gotta be CP/M. Of course, Imperious Leader runs on VMS.

      He he ... maybe they're just out of control DEC Rainbows.

  61. Originality Is Hard...But, Then, You Know That by reallocate · · Score: 0

    Oh, posh. Television is an advertising medium. If it won't make money, no one is going to put it on air. If you want somethng original, go read a book or find a theater. They can be produced with less financial risk.

    Besides, being original is hard. But, from the looks of your post, you know that.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
    1. Re:Originality Is Hard...But, Then, You Know That by youngerpants · · Score: 2, Funny

      sir, you apprear to have dropped your handbag, would you like me to pick it up for you.

  62. Frack! by mcwop · · Score: 1

    Frack Lucifer and frack the cylons.

    --

    "I don't think it's selfish, to eat defenseless shellfish." -NOFX

  63. I Liked the DOG by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    I liked the robot dog. I remember when I was kid wanting one of my own.

    As to hollywood not having any creativity, what else is new. Warner bro's did how many cat people movies. I don't see anyone complaining about the Startrek pictures. Oh theres the ever popular Starwars, boy that broke new ground in narrative fiction.

    To the people that think a woman cant be as conniving and slimey as the original starbuck character, I guess you just don't get out much.

    Crash

  64. Galactica: Girl on Girl Action by YetAnotherName · · Score: 1

    I'm all for a female Starbuck, so long as she too is a womanizer. (Yes, I have the typical fantasies of a straight male.)

  65. Female Starbuck = Stardoe by XNormal · · Score: 1

    Sorry... Bad wordplay puns are a reflexive reaction.

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  66. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by aoteoroa · · Score: 1

    How fast is a 'warp' in Star Trek again?

    The link has a table that lists speeds from 1/4 impulse through to warp 10. It tells you how fast that is in km/hr , relative to light speed, and how long it would take you to travel across the federation (20 light years) at that rate.

  67. Lounge Scene: "No, that's Starbuck's Coffee!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to love the show - that is, before some of the toys were discontinued due to their "you'll shoot your eye out!" spring-loaded missile launchers.
    But here's what I really want to see: scene in the ship lounge: "10 Backward"?

    (Starbuck just excused herself to go to the bathroom)

    Anonymous Shipmate: "Hey, is that your coffee? Can I finish it?"

    Apollo: "No, that's Starbuck's Coffee!"

    rotfl . . .

  68. It's the "a beer after a hard day's work" factor by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because Baywatch got the "relax, turn your brain off, and just cruise" thing right, whereas Cleopatra 2525 couldn't decide if it wanted to be blonde or not. (Blonde defined for this purpose as "needs instructions on breathing".)

    Sometimes it's not just the muscles-and-bimbos thing, it's the atmosphere. Baywatch was a success for the same reason The Fall Guy and The Dukes of Hazzard were successes. The formula was much like drinking a relaxing beer after work. It's no mystery to me why such series do best if given the Friday night slots, when everyone is sick of their 40 hour work week and just wants to vegetate for a while. Hell, I watched 'em myself, mainly for that reason -- they were relaxing and undemanding, without being completely dull. Crap TV if analyzed for content, but great for unwinding at the end of the workweek.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  69. Aiiieeee! by ErikZ · · Score: 1


    They cancel the last season of Farscape and blow their money on THIS!?

    It's official. I hate the Sci-fi channel.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    1. Re:Aiiieeee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They cancel the last season of Farscape and blow their money on THIS!?

      It's official. I hate the Sci-fi channel.
      Yes. May they burn in hell.

      Remember, the excuses for cancelling Farscape were "it costs too much money to make" and "we are trying to get away from making shows about space ships".

      Liars. Assholes.
  70. No, networks unwilling to take risks by MacAndrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That SciFi would be spinning out a 25 y.o. retread when they have fresh, creative series like Farscape is pathetic. They're wary of anything new, perhaps because one flop can end an executive's career. It is a system designed to smother creativity. Remember that the original Star Trek was almost a 2-season job, then limped to 3.

    A friend and I were just discussing BG as a golden example of old hokey TV. What's next, a Fantasy Island remake?

    Anyway, I wouldn't blame the production companies that pitch new ideas and are shot down, but the lumbering networks that choose the same formula over and over. Perhaps too one should look at the advertisers. So many acclaimed series are coming out of a private network I don't subscribe to (HBO) that something is going on here. (Sopranos, Band of Brothers, Six Feet Under, Sex In The City, etc. Quick, name equivalent ad-driven TV creations.)

    And then, there's always the audience. ST:DS9 was the only one of the modern series to attempt a serious departure from formula, and was not widely accepted by audiences looking for, I suppose, the comfort food of the old style. (It looks like Enterprise is twitching for something new; we'll see if it works; but I'd rather flesh out a whole new universe in the uneven but ingenious Farscape.)

    Did I mention I'm pissed at SciFi for dropping Farscape? :) I'm seriously considering boycotting the whole damn network for promoting crap like "Crossing Over With John Edward" in preference to new, innovative series, Stargate being the exception. But should be blame them for reaching for the easy buck? I don't know.

    1. Re:No, networks unwilling to take risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually they did make a re-make of Fantasy Island.

    2. Re:No, networks unwilling to take risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I missed it? Damn!

      I did have the misfortune of seeing one of the Love Boat revivals with Robert Urich. That wasn't SciFi's fault, though it could have been.

    3. Re:No, networks unwilling to take risks by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

      Too late Fantasy Island was remade about several Years ago and flopped.

    4. Re:No, networks unwilling to take risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I almost wept with joy when I read this. Seriously though, reading this post is like reading something I might have hoped to write.

  71. Isn't he in Angel too? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    I mean he's Lorne, and he's.... oh well...

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Isn't he in Angel too? by jmccay · · Score: 1

      No, actually he's dead--at least last time I checked he was still dead. Unless you believe in Elvis like sitings.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
    2. Re:Isn't he in Angel too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Lorne is a demon... so... that's sorta like being dead.

    3. Re:Isn't he in Angel too? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      No, actually he's dead--at least last time I checked he was still dead. Unless you believe in Elvis like sitings.

      Moderation Score:
      -1 No sense of humor

      -2 Doesn't Watch Angel

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  72. No conspiracy theory here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but does anyone recall the actual plotline of the movie (or was it a feature length pilot). "The cylons are dangerous", say some. "Nah, lets be friends" say most. "Nuke em" say Lorne Greene's character. All those that tried to get a peace deal and, er, waited for UN resolution dead, kapput. Only the hawkish Battlestar Galactica folk got away. I remember a scene with lots of folks dancing round a "peace" garden being blown up by those evil chromium critters.

    I don't think you need to be an editor of Social Text magazine to see the parallels between that and a Certain Real World Situation currently hanging in the balance.

  73. Cattlecar Galactica 420 time! by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    was some of the best idle time in college! Now if we could only get back Honeymooners/TwilightZone/StarTrek we'd be set

  74. Bad Aim: An old literary tool. by simetra · · Score: 1

    The Cylons are obviously related to the indians in Mark Twain's "Fenimore Cooper's Literary Offences." I encourage any fans of literature, or the cinema, to read this. Yes, way back then, the bad guys were notoriously bad aims.

    Here's a link I found to some sort of essay about this: http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~jparsons/twain/cooper 1.html.
    This work of Twain's is found in many Twain anthologies and other collections.

    --

    "Would it kill you to put down the toilet seat?" -- Maya Angelou
    1. Re:Bad Aim: An old literary tool. by LMariachi · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's also on Project Gutenberg. link

  75. Series rarely survive being "remade..." by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    Granted, it wasn't the SciFi channel that did this, but... Remember what happened when 'Dinotopia' made the transition from a single 2-hour made-for-TV flick to a series? The movie version was weak enough, but showed lots of potential if they could have gotten better writing.

    The series flopped after (barely) getting through four or so episodes. Why? A complete cast change. None of the original actors got used, with the possible exception of the voice talent for that scaly librarian, and the replacement "talent" had about as many neurons between their collective ears as a cubic centimeter of space dust.

    Look also at "Earth: Final Conflict." Fantastic series until Tribune Entertainment got their grubby mitts on it, and decided (God only knows why) it needed some changes. What'd we get? Death of the leading character(s) and, after a while, nothing but badly-written 'Monster of the Week' episodes. I'm surprised Kevin Kilner even bothered to reappear later on. I wonder if that was a move of desperation, on the part of the producers, to try and revive what they'd already effectively killed?

    Few series survive being re-made. Does anyone really trust the production skills of a studio that has given us such... wonders... as "Crossing Over with John (shyster) Edwards," and the cancellation of their single most popular series (Farscape), to be able to do justice to the original BSG, as campy as it may have been?

    I think SciFi needs to leave well enough alone. Unless, that is, they plan on hiring Richard Hatch as the producer of the thing. Then it might stand a chance.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

    1. Re:Series rarely survive being "remade..." by VPerriello · · Score: 1

      Oh, I can live with this... if they promise to have the Cylons swing by and fry Moonbase Alpha while they're at it.

  76. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by Fjornir · · Score: 1
    Thank you -- good information, especially if I ever find myself in command of a vessel with warp capability. Alas, for my misbehaviour as acting helmsman of the ISS Fubarschnu I'm reading this from the brig on Pen-10 in the Yeahwhatever system, but I'm elligible for conjugal visits with my four metawives (and by an interesting quirk of the Pen-10 legal system any of my semicousins) in 2-4 months.

    The original comment was irony. If there was a secret decoder URL for BSG units, would the original poster have been happy? The world may never care.

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  77. Re:And you still troll slashdot? by stevew · · Score: 1

    Like Dude, yeah I have a wife and son. Maren is a nice person, and I got to see her every weekend when I was in college on the tube - so there are both High school memories and college memories that are invoked here.

    --
    Have you compiled your kernel today??
  78. No "connections" -- straight out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like all Mormon pop culture, it deconstructs itself. At least BG was kind and gentle in its circular self-references. Anton Niel LaBute movies redefined self-loathing... but the cruelest thing I've ever seen (and one of the funniest) was Orgazmo.

    Get it? Orgaz-Mo. If not, you probably thought it was a not-very-funny movie about porno and a goofy cut-rate superhero, because you totally missed the good parts. The movie kicked the Mormon church in the nuts every fifteen to forty-five seconds, VERY HARD, starting with the opening credits ("Now you're a man! A man, man, man!")

    Bring on the Ship of Lights! "We once were what you are. We are as you may become." Remember, Count Iblis can only destroy you if you seek him out and cooperate!

    1. Re:No "connections" -- straight out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Orgazmo" sucked. I "got" it, but it sucked. As for the rest, forget it, you know this part by heart -- magic underwear, polygamy and the SF novel Old Joe cribbed from, ha ha, we're all experts now that we followed a couple links on the WWW. Shallow idiots.

  79. what about that robot? by baywulf · · Score: 1

    goes "bidi bidi bidi" I think its name was twiki or something.

    1. Re:what about that robot? by dlb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Twiki is from from Buck Rogers.

      The kid'd robot dog was named Muffit, but it didn't say "bidi bidi bidi".

  80. So they can just cancel it??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that cool space shows don't last very long these days. Too expensive or something.

  81. Oh, my... by KC7GR · · Score: 1

    My earlier comments on series re-making are hereby suspended -- for now! I should have done this before writing anything, but I just checked the link and saw that Ron Moore is the guy leading the project.

    Considering the quality of "Roswell" and his other accomplishments, I believe I will give his image of what BSG could be a chance before I pan it outright.

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  82. What? Sieze him! by wiresquire · · Score: 1

    "By your command."

    --

    So does Anonymous Coward have good karma?

  83. As long as they don't misuse the units again... by merlyn · · Score: 5, Funny
    One of my favorite lines was "the enemy is closing in! They're only 5 microns away!", to which I yelled back loudly at the screen, "well, then, scrape them off!".

    Sigh. It's OK to invent units. It's not OK to have those units already mean something vastly different in real life.

    1. Re:As long as they don't misuse the units again... by MrWa · · Score: 1
      One of my favorite lines was "the enemy is closing in! They're only 5 microns away!", to which I yelled back loudly at the screen, "well, then, scrape them off!". Sigh. It's OK to invent units. It's not OK to have those units already mean something vastly different in real life.

      Maybe that is why the mini-series is so desperately needed: to explain to viewers that everything they are watching is actually not humans versus cyclons, but tiny, subatomic creatures similiar to humans. This is, of course, the real reason that some are so vehemently opposed to the airing - the truth will be quite devastating.

      Now why can't they bring back Wilma from Buck Rogers - she is what got to love sci-fi as a pre-pubescant teen, not thinking how intellectually superior I was to the show writers.

  84. Oh, man is this going to suck! by iiioxx · · Score: 1

    Just look at the credentials of the people involved:

    Directed by Michael Rymer:

    Queen of the Damned - The worst hack job of a novel in recent memory, and a snooze-enducing piece of crap that made me want to just get up and walk out in the middle of the movie.

    Written by Ronald D. Moore:

    Mission: Impossible II - Your mission (should you choose to accept it) is to make a movie even dumber than Mission: Impossible.

    Produced by David Eick:

    Hercules: The Legendary Journeys - NEED I SAY MORE???

    This is going to be a schlockfest!

  85. What's next? by saddino · · Score: 1

    "Space:1999, The Return Of Moonbase Alpha"?

    1. Re:What's next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember it, it's so cool!

  86. I still have a crush on Sheba by loggia · · Score: 2, Funny

    I still have a crush on Sheba

    1. Re:I still have a crush on Sheba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's so weird. I had a memory of her being blonde.

      Was someone else blonde? Not Cassiopeia, I know she was. Ah well.

  87. I never understood how anyone could trust KITT by William+R.+Dickson · · Score: 1

    ...when it was so obviously a Cylon car.

  88. Lorne Green by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1


    Used to be known as the "voice of doom" during WW2. He was the CBC radio announcer who used to read off the list of the reported dead every day. He was one of those rare personalities you could immediately identify with your eyes shut, from voice alone.

    --
    My rights don't need management.
  89. Fantasy Island remake by Twister002 · · Score: 1

    Funny you should mention that, they did a remake of Fantasy Island with Malcolm McDowell as Mr. Roarke.

    It was....different....Not everything turned out happily every time. It seemed a little darker.

    But it was still a remake of a 20 year old idea.

    --
    "For a successful technology, honesty must take precedence over public relations for nature cannot be fooled." -Feynman
    1. Re:Fantasy Island remake by Sabalon · · Score: 1

      A little darker? In the first episode, Malcolm looked at a closet of white suits and had them all replaced with black ones...probably the single greatest moment in the remake.

      At least that I know of - just watched the one episode.

    2. Re:Fantasy Island remake by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

      The new Fantasy Island died mostly because people's memory of the old show was so filled with Ricardo "Rich Corinthian Leather" Monteblan that there's just no way anyone else could ever fill the suit properly.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  90. Re:It's the "a beer after a hard day's work" facto by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
    . Baywatch was a success for the same reason The Fall Guy and The Dukes of Hazzard were successes.

    Though The Fall Guy had more than a few dumb shows, towards the end of its run it went into a lot of parodies (of other TV shows, movies, books)and odd jokey plots. And the whole idea of a show about a stuntman, where it's obvious that the "stuntman's" stunts are being done by a real stuntman, is a cute self-referential idea.

  91. Re:It's the "a beer after a hard day's work" facto by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Funny


    > ...whereas Cleopatra 2525 couldn't decide if it wanted to be blonde or not. (Blonde defined for this purpose as "needs instructions on breathing".)

    I would have volunteered to help her with her breathing.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  92. Re:Female Starbuck? I bet Erin Gray is available by bobalu · · Score: 1

    She was in Buck Rogers, and still looks great in a flight suit:

    http://www.eringray.com/Photographs/Alexc.jpg

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
  93. ah hollywood by Hubert_Shrump · · Score: 1

    Boy, I'm glad Firefly was cancelled and forgotten about so there'd be room for this.

    Hey, maybe we should cut down on the reruns of shows that sucked when they first aired and actually do something that doesn't suck from the concept up.

    Let's bring back Kolchak: The Night Stalker, too. Oh wait.

    When's Bravo running another Kurosawa fest? My Tivo goes unused.

    --
    Keep your packets off my GNU/Girlfriend!
  94. Family Guy by mlknowle · · Score: 1

    ...Well, that's it for Rhode Island Kiss Forum - now time for Battale Star Galaxtaica forum... WELCOME TO BATTLE STAR GALAXTICA FORUM

  95. Re:Female Starbuck? I bet Erin Gray is available by ericdano · · Score: 1
    Oh yes, Erin Gray from Buck Rogers.........my God, one of the hottest SciFi girls ever!

    But no, you can't have a FEMALE Starbuck. He was my favorite character in the original series!!!

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  96. How to deal with the polite young men. by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

    Mormon door-to-door salesmen are notorious for their persistance but it usually isn't necessary to argue or tell them off. Unless you enjoy that sort of thing that is. You can usually get them to go away by politely saying something like this: "I have my own religious beliefs and am not interested in changing them." If they return say something like this: "I told you last time I wasn't interested and I'm disappointed that you have no consideration." I'm told by a former Mormon that should shame them into leaving you alone. It has something to do with their values and is more effective (though not as much fun) than poking holes in the Book of Mormon and their history.

    If out of politeness, you express any interest or (horrors!) invite them in then be prepared to put your plans for the evening on hold. They are more than willing to "study" with you for several hours.

    1. Re:How to deal with the polite young men. by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Our Mormon landlord (that we had when I was a kid) was more than glad to help us out by squiring us to every public event the church offered, whether we really wanted to go or not. We were all rather well-educated about Mormonism after a few years of this. :)

      I was always very nice to those polite young men. The problem is that the Mormon religion expects its adherents to take its book *seriously* (as literal history) and it's real easy to poke holes in that. My favourite example was about the American Indians fighting battles with *steel swords* ca. 1000 A.D. (yeah, right -- show me the archeological evidence). Anyway -- the missionary teams always consist of one experienced fellow, and one green newbie (who generally didn't know as much about his religion as I did). What they didn't appreciate was that the green newbies would start *listening* to my rational arguments, and that won't do at all!

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:How to deal with the polite young men. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      In the UK we don't have quite such a Mormon problem, our 'polite young men' selling religion tend to be Jehovah's Witnesses. I find the best way of dealing with them is to convert them. To what depends on how I feel at the time. Mainstream christianity is a good fall-back, but Islam or Hindusim can be fun as well. If I have a lot of time on my hands when they call then it's make-up-a-religion-and-try-to-gain-converts time. Most of the techniques which allow you to convert the weak-minded to a particular viewpoint are fairly easy to pick up, and can be learned by watching the clergy at work. After any given church has lost a few souls to your heresy then they will stop sending people to you out of fear. A shame really, I almost miss them.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:How to deal with the polite young men. by On+Lawn · · Score: 1


      Not to speak for all of them but we were told to keep our vists to under 59 minutes. Although we would stay longer when the people seemed were particularly lively in the Bible discussion.

    4. Re:How to deal with the polite young men. by On+Lawn · · Score: 1

      My favourite example was about the American Indians fighting battles with *steel swords* ca. 1000 A.D. (yeah, right -- show me the archeological evidence).

      Where, I wonder will this evidence ever turn up.

      Alas, however its rather futile to use evidence in the world of such politically charged science. While no one expects an archeological proof to arise amidst this tension, the Book of Mormon is more credible after 180 years of research then when it was written. Not many books written by an uneducated 20 year old farmer in the 19th century can say that.

    5. Re:How to deal with the polite young men. by Dan+East · · Score: 1

      Then what explains the corrections and other modifications have been made to the book of mormon over the years?

      Dan East

      --
      Better known as 318230.
    6. Re:How to deal with the polite young men. by On+Lawn · · Score: 1

      Now, mind you explaining is easy. Check out this page, go all the way to the bottom and you'll find a lot of links to people discussing the changes in the Book of Mormon.

      If there's anything I've learned in years of intense religious discussion is that there is no such thing as an easy proof that another religion is wrong. There is not even an easy way to disprove atheism.

    7. Re:How to deal with the polite young men. by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      If I have a lot of time on my hands when they call then it's make-up-a-religion-and-try-to-gain-converts time.

      Ron, I thought you were dead!

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    8. Re:How to deal with the polite young men. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> There is not even an easy
      >> way to disprove atheism.

      There is not an easy way to disprove atheism because there is not /any/ way to disprove it!

      Just try to disprove there are not three tiny green men on top of your head: hard, isn't it?

      QillerPenguin.

    9. Re:How to deal with the polite young men. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is not even an easy way to disprove atheism.

      Maybe because ... they're right?

    10. Re:How to deal with the polite young men. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe because ... they're right?

      If they were, they'd never know it. If anything is disprovable its atheism.

    11. Re:How to deal with the polite young men. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just try to disprove there are not three tiny green men on top of your head: hard, isn't it?

      especially when you hear their voices.

  97. You can't hack C it's #insert "farscape.h" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't hack C it's #insert "farscape.h" what language are you doing? I have never seen what you have in the title.

    1. Re:You can't hack C it's #insert "farscape.h" by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      Yeah yeah yeah. It's been 5 years since I've had to code C... I'm a sql guy now. At least I got the point across, eh?

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    2. Re:You can't hack C it's #insert "farscape.h" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, did you mean #include?

  98. What about? by ericdano · · Score: 1
    What about doing a Blake 7 type series? I think that was some of the best SciFi ever. Especially when they finally got rid of Blake and Avon took over. Avon was da man!

    I think BattleStar Glactica should be redone in the spirit of the original. One of the things that kept the series interesting was StarBuck. His wit, his cool cigars, his womanizing. I think really I watched it in the 80s cause of StarBuck. I can't see how a female is going to work in that role. Maybe the should make Apollo a female (Apolla or something). That character in the series SUCKED.

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:What about? by Kiwi · · Score: 1

      There actually is an attempt to revive Blake's Seven which has been going on for several years now. It looks like nothing serious has come of it yet; it is designed to be post-Guada-Prime (after the end of the series) and will finally give Blake's Seven fans a "canonical" account of what happened after the famous last scene of the original series.

      - Sam

      --

      The secret to enjoying Slashdot is to realize that it should not be taken too seriously.

  99. Re:It's the "a beer after a hard day's work" facto by Reziac · · Score: 1

    ALL of these " beer after work" shows have a fair number of too-dumb and parody episodes -- it goes with the territory, especially when you're endlessly recycling plots and desperate to find a way to refresh 'em.

    The Fall Guy was slightly different in that the entire series was an inside joke, but they pulled it off fairly well. And like most "beer after work" shows, it tended to fall down when they tried to be extra serious or extra funny (tho they did have a couple of really good 'serious' and 'funny' episodes). The credits clips are all from real films. And I still get a kick out of the theme song... in fact it's on my Everyday Playlist. (Remember the episode where Our Hero is revealed to have written it? :)

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  100. Don't forget... by frenchgates · · Score: 1

    get a long term exclusive license to the original Star Trek series and then stop airing it.

    --
    Syntax error: loose != lose, affect != effect, then!=than
  101. Stupid Robot Dog?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >So long as they don't bring back that stupid
    >robot dog, it might be okay.

    Hey, with the magic of CGI, they might just choose to replace him with Gleek!

    Maybe we should start a write-in campaign to bring that dynamic and oft-misunderstood character back to the small screen?

  102. Loren Green was... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a (very unfortunately named) kid I went to high school with. ...that stupid robot dog...

    I always thought it was a stupid robot bear.

  103. Battlestar Galactica saved my house by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 1

    Okay, this is an odd story, but true. Because of this, I will always have a soft spot in my heart for Battlestar Galactica.

    When I was a kid, there was a special episode of Battlestar Galactica. I think it was the one where they got to Earth finally, but regardless it was on an hour before it normally came on. My family was out for dinner and I kept pestering them to leave early just so we could watch the show. They finally gave into my whining and we headed home.

    Once we arrived, we found the dog running around in the front yard, having somehow jumped out the window. There was on odd flickering through our livingroom windows and we all rushed in. In front of the fireplace, a spark had caught the rug on fire and a small blaze had started.

    My parents ran into the kitchen to fill up pots and pans to douse the fire. We kids ran into the t.v. room, ducked under the smoke, and watched our movie.

    The true irony is that a few years later, we had a much more serious house fire in the middle of the night. We were moving in a week and my mother had packed away all the fire alarms. We ended up safe, but it was far more exciting than I'd wish for again. Now my wife wonders why I'm so weird about having many fire extinguishers and fire alarms.

  104. Trivia for the day by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

    In fact, if you talked to the production guys, it really was a Cylon car; they were the inspiration for the sliding red light.

    --
    If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    1. Re:Trivia for the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to love my Blip game (essentially mechanical Pong with an LED "ball") in part because it resembled a Cylon eye. But then I also still have the Battlestar Galactica Space Alert handheld (with the little thumb lever).

      And the Photon Torpedo Estes rocket...

  105. Space Mutiny by GuyMannDude · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not only was that effect used over and over BG, but also in a really awful Z-grade BG-ripoff movie called "Space Mutiny" riffed ever-so-eloquently by Mystery Science Theater 3000.

    What was even funnier is that they used the shot of launching fighters as though there were launching MISSILES at the "space pirates" (whose ships bear a striking resemblance to cylon battleships). You can clearly see that those are fighters being launched, yet the plot claims they are missles. The "battle" lasts about 5 seconds (no exaguration here!) after which they quickly jump to some already-seen footage of the bridge crew partying!

    Sick individual that I am, I actually rented "Space Mutiny" to watch it in its unmitigated awfulness. Picture a space opera filmed almost entirely in an abandoned factory of some sort, and a couple of drop-ceiling offices with surplus late-80's office computer equipment, with costumes consisting almost entirely of lycra.

    Whenever I think of Space Mutiny the words "railing kill" spring to mind! Pretty much every single person who dies in this movie does so by falling off the railings in the factory that is supposed to be the engine room of their ship!

    This is one of the best MST3K episodes ever and you can download it off of KaZaA. The commander looks exactly like Santa Claus, a woman gets killed and then is clearly visible in the background of the next scene, the hero demonsrates his courage by setting his disabled opponent on fire, and the climactic chase scene at the end with in those rediculous golfcart buggies must be seen to be believed. Do yourself a favor and download it today! Best. MST3K. Ever.

    GMD

    1. Re:Space Mutiny by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      What's even better, you get to see the Hula-Hoop Techno-Disco OF THE FUTURE!

      Not to mention the indoor garden complete with astroturf and the infamous dental drilling scene, the same one they show in "That's Entertainment!"

      You can bet your crepe beard this is a great movie.

      Ho. Ho. Ho?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:Space Mutiny by AlienationtodaMAX · · Score: 1

      Definately one of my faves for MST3K but "FUTURE WAR" was the BEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSST! It was just so bad. Kevin Murphy said it was the most inept and stupid movie he had ever seen in a chat transcript. "Ah! The Lutherans made an android!" and they would just show you a scene of a parking garage, cut to a picture of kids playing soccer and then cut to the kickboxer beating up some cyborg. It was so bad. I loved it.

  106. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by uncoveror · · Score: 1

    The big problem is that the network refused to take sci-fi seriously, and wanted to make a chilren's show. Also, they ripped off Star Wars, Star Trek, and every other space opera that had ever been produced. It seemed every episode included "Oh No! Boxie and his daggit are in trouble!" Once the Cylons were replaced by the Eastern Alliance, it was too stupid even for young children. The only space opera that escaped network executives' meddling to any degree was Babylon 5.

    --
    The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  107. About DS9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone here seems so think DS9 is the best thing since sliced bread, and sure, after a few seasons it became a decent show (when they started using longer story arcs, and darker stories), but everyone also seems to forget that for the first three or so seasons it sucked badly.

    In fact the changes in DS9 seemed to be mostly in response to Babylon 5.

    1. Re:About DS9 by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I said that years ago. It apparently stopped sucking about the time they did the alternate-universe war thing... by which time I was happily watching B5 and never looked back at the ST franchise.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
    2. Re:About DS9 by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      The show itself was in response to Babylon 5. JMS pitched B5 to Paramount as a ST series, iirc. But DS9 decided not to be as dark. Frankly, I think the last 4 or so seasons of DS9 were consistently better than all but the best B5 eps (Fall of Centauri Prime, for instance). For one thing, most of the acting was better, and all of the writing (the good actors in B5 got way too cliched lines to deal with).

  108. Confusing series' by Harker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Understandably, since they were both similar.

    Twiki(?) was from Buck Rogers in the 21st Century, not BG.

    --
    When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
  109. Next Up Space 1999 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next Up space 1999

  110. What's especially sad is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today is Dirk Benedict's (58th?) birthday.

    And he hasn't had a decent gig since 1985 or so.

  111. Hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope they use a new hair cut...

  112. Well.. by Visceral+Monkey · · Score: 1

    The recasting of Starbuck as a female is heresy. His character was a womanizing, drinking, gambler who has been neutered for the sake of PC or some other hair-brained idea. There seems to be no end to bad Galactica ideas. Bring on the Hatch script; it's supposedly the best one out there.

    To hell with this garbage.

    --
    *Fortitudo, aequitas, fidelitas.*
  113. s/irony/rhetoric [nt] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/irony/rhetoric

  114. Re:s/rhetoric/"socratic irony" [nt] by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    s/rhetoric/"socratic irony"

  115. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by skybozo · · Score: 1

    Hopefully, costume standards are high enough now that there won't be lights on the *inside* of the space helmets.

  116. Galactica...wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, wait, I get it, it's one of those shows from the eighties.

    Heh, you people are old!

  117. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by Ardias · · Score: 1

    There's a reason why the show's initials are BS. When I saw it as a child, I thought then that it was lame. However, I know a college friend who actually liked it. Can't imagine why.

    Why did the script writers name the home planet of humanity Kobol? If I ever grew up on a planet named Kobol, I'd leave ASAP, and wouldn't even mention it on my resume. I would find my way to something better like Perl or C++.

  118. Starbuck(s) by t0ny · · Score: 1

    You think they will get sued by Starbucks for making this? Maybe they made him a her so they can name the character "Starbuckie"

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  119. This sounds cool by CakerX · · Score: 1

    but a female starbuck, come on! what the fuck!

  120. Cylon Voice? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
    > Forget a Commodore - on the series they used 36" blade fans and swirled a 2ft plastic pipe to make the "eye" swoosh sound - I'm guessing on the second one - that's how they did the "cylon eye" on KIT on Knight Rider.

    Come to think of it, the closest I could get to the Cylon Centurion (robot) voice in 1979 was by speaking into a 36" fan, so maybe I wasn't too far off :)

    Anyone have a circuit diagram for the vocoder they actually used for that robot voice effect, that most of us kids didn't know how to build back then? Gotta be doable for $10 worth of parts these days.

    1. Re:Cylon Voice? by adzoox · · Score: 1
      It really WAS a fan - I saw it on Movie Secrets on Bravo - a lot of people thought the transformer voices were done with same device you mention. Leonard Nimoy often talks about speaking into a fan for the voices he did for the older cartoon. I'm not sure if they still do that for Transformers Armada or not.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    2. Re:Cylon Voice? by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > It really WAS a fan - I saw it on Movie Secrets on Bravo - a lot of people thought the transformer voices were done with same device you mention. Leonard Nimoy often talks about speaking into a fan for the voices he did for the older cartoon. I'm not sure if they still do that for Transformers Armada or not.

      Aaw, smeg!

      Not only was it done with $10 in parts back then... it'll probably cost $100 in DSP prototyping tools to reproduce today. That's inflation for ya.

  121. Re:Galactica without "Loren Green" is easy to imag by IIRCAFAIKIANAL · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was going to make a joke about reading Loren Greene as Lorne Green, but it turns out that Loren Greene is a typo and my favourite wilderness show host also acted in Battlestar Galactica. How ironic, in an Alanis sort of way.

    I never actually made the connection between Bonanza and New Wilderness either, and it turns out he was also known as "The Voice of Doom" from his CBC radio days.

    --
    Robots are everywhere, and they eat old people's medicine for fuel.
  122. Strange but True... by notaknob · · Score: 1

    Today's Dirk's Birthday - 1 March.

  123. A what? by retro128 · · Score: 1

    A female Starbuck? Hahaha! Well if she's anything like the real Starbuck, they're going to have to make her hit up every guy on the ship. They're probably doing this in case this is going to develop into a series. When they run out of ideas they'll just play up the sexual tension between Apollo and Chickbuck and turn the thing into a damned soap opera, just like what happened in just about every permutation of Star Trek. Cripes, even X-Files did this with Fox and Scully towards the end.

    --
    -R
  124. More proof that shit floats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like the subject says.

  125. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by xA40D · · Score: 1

    The only space opera that escaped network executives' meddling to any degree was Babylon 5.

    I always got the impresion that the network execs bought the B5 idea because it was around the same time DS9 got under way and they were looking to compete.

    Okay, so other than a space-station there is very little in common. And IIRC the pilot was made before DS9 was born - but I also remember there was a long delay between making the pilot and the show going into production.

    But on the subject of TV Execs not having a clue

    They almost cancelled B5 Season 5

    And the cancelled the very promising sequal Excalibur part way through season 1 after mucking it about something rotten

    Farscape got cancelled

    As did Dark Angel

    And Enterprise is in trouble.

    Advertising revenue be damned, I'd cough up $2 a pop to get to see some of this stuff on a good-ish quality VCD download.

    --
    Do you mind, your karma has just run over my dogma.
  126. 7 shows per "season" by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    If it's like most SciFi channel programs they'll make about 14 shows a year and divide each year into 2 "seasons". Then if the show is really popular, they'll cancel it after two years.

  127. Firelfy by deragon · · Score: 1

    They should instead resurect FireFly. I liked Firefly. I found it different. And for once, no sound in space travel.

    --
    Remember the year 2000? They promised us flying cars. They delivered the PT Cruiser...
  128. Reminds me of that song... by puppetman · · Score: 1

    that was popular about the same time. I must have been about 10 years old. Boney M - Rivers of Babylon. I swore it went,

    "By the river of Babylon, where we discovered Cylon..."

    I thought, cool, Battlestar Galactica in this song... It didn't make much sense, but not much did at age 10.

  129. What the frelling... by sllim · · Score: 1

    Let me get this straight.
    They won't commit to a season 5 of Farscape. Hell, they won't even commit to a 2 hour series finale to wrap up all the loose ends.
    Us scapers just get left hanging with a part 1 of a 2 part episode that will never see the light of day.

    But they are going to bring Battlestar Galatica back?

    Look at the Farscape website, go there, they have plastered all over it how the critics say it is the best sci-fi on TV.

    That is salt in the wound.

  130. Good god, remember when Slashdot had things first? by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 0

    Vorlonspace.org had this story 2 WEEKS ago!

    --
    But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
  131. Starbuck, 15 and pregnant! by esnible · · Score: 1
    Talk about a poker face!

    I'll raise you 50 cubits, Starbuck!

    Image from http://www.katee-sackhoff.com/ "an unofficial website" for the new future Starbuck.

  132. It isn't going to last... by dokhebi · · Score: 1

    If the "creative" mind behind this project made it as a sequel, it would have a fighting chance. But "re-imaging" the series is going to kill it in the first three weeks.

    RIP, Battlestar Gallactica.

  133. OoooKay... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Sir, I'm going to have to ask you to step away from the television. Just put down the remote, nice and slow...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  134. Isn't it obvious why they choose her for Starbuck? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

    Katee Sackhoff?

    Sackhoff = Sack off?

    Sounds like a way to make a female Starbuck.

  135. Things we DON'T want to see by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

    ...besides that fscking robot dog...

    *Cylons with Vocoder voices

    *Too much use of the Viper launch sequence

    *The same Cylon attack sequences over and over

    *70's hairstyles

    *Baltar holding that light to his chin for that "sinister" look

    *Flying motorcycles

    *Helmets with lights inside

    *Ridiculous sounding units of measurement

    Gotta be other cheesy 70's claptrap. Thoughts, anybody?

    Oh, and kill that annoying kid off, too!

    1. Re:Things we DON'T want to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll be seeing Balthar having sex and more sex with a woman who blackmails him. she's the cylon leader who plants a chip in his brain. Balthar will be a good guy and Apollo and Starbuck the bad guys. Starbuck will go jogging naked in a bra.

    2. Re:Things we DON'T want to see by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it won't be Colicos.

  136. Legal Firefight? by Mulletproof · · Score: 1

    Now I'm wondering how in the heck this one slipped past the already ensuing legal firefight between the original creator and the Richard Hatch/Fan creation already in the works. Supposively, they had a high quality working trailer and everything. Now SciFi is busting out with their version? Huh? Is this a three way now? Was a lawsuit settled?

    It'd be interesting to find out if this is just something on SciFi's wish list or have they somehow trumped everybody else's claim to the franchise...

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  137. It's not a "dog," it's a "daggit." by Macrobat · · Score: 1
    It's not a "dog," it's a "daggit."

    And the main character's name isn't "Luke Skywalker," it's "Commander Apollo."

    And his buddy isn't "Han Solo," it's "Starbuck."

    And his mentor isn't "Obi-wan," it's "Adama."

    And the shiny armor-suit-things aren't "Stormtroopers," they're "Cylons."

    I'm glad to see there's so much interest in such a ground-breaking, original piece of TV science fiction, though.

    --
    "Hardly used" will not fetch you a better price for your brain.
  138. nice aspects to the series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought BSG was a pretty nice series. There was symbolism, religious overtones, and prophecy. This is especially true of the two-part story "War of the Gods". That little cyber-dog was cute! Maybe people wouldn't be so angry with it if they recall that it was made as a "replacement" for the real dog the little boy lost when they fled their homeworld.

  139. Ooh! by Greyfox · · Score: 1
    Maybe they could bring back that Buck Wossisname show too! I think Gary Coleman's available! You can't re-do 70's schlock sci-fi without Gary Coleman! It'll be like the '80's and '90's never happened! The combined social effects of the two shows would result in disco and polyester making come-back! Radio stations would once more play "Stairway to Heaven" no less than once per hour! Timothy Leary would once more do the lecture circuit. Yes, I KNOW he's dead. They'd have to dig him up and have some other old hippy stand behind him moving the corpse's arms and legs as he delivered the lecture. "That 70's Show" would cover current events! Reruns of "The A Team," "Incredible Hulk," "Knight Rider" and "The Dukes of Hazzard" would have a resurgance as we completely re-enter the culutural rennaisance that was the late '70's.

    Or... we could not do that. Yeah. I like that option.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  140. Obligatory Simpsons Quote by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 1

    Indian #1: Thank you. I just wish Ben and Hoss and Little Joe and Hop Sing and Sheriff Roy and all your favorites could be alive today to see this wonderful turnout.

    Indian #2: You know, on the series, we were always trying to kill the Cartwrights. [audience boos] But it looks like Father Time took care of that for us, right? [pause] Am I right, folks?

    [the audience doesn't respond, so the two Indians motion for the theme song to play again, which they dance to]

    Bart: Oh, this sucks.

    Marge: Weren't there three Indians last year?

  141. Lousy? Compared to WHAT, pray tell? by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    Lousy? It held my interest a lot more than B5, Farscape, or any other sci fi crap this side of a Star Trek series.

    Heck, I may have even liked it more than Enterprise, largely because T'Pop looks kind of sickly and I wanna puke when I see her. (More Hoshi please! Now there's a PoA a man can live with.)

    Lexx and Cleopatra 2525 held my interest briefly, but largely because of the big lipped babeage. Xeenia Seeberg r00lz.

    Ehh, Thunderbirds reruns are more interesting than B5. The only sci fi more boring I can think of are old Avengers episodes, black and white, pre Mrs. Peel with Honor Blackmun.

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  142. What crap! by cyko500 · · Score: 0

    So this is what's gonna be replacing Farscape?
    Farscape kicked ass... I don't want no frickin
    chrome painted plastic robots with blinky lights..... I want Farspace dammit..... I want Harvey dammit! :P

  143. BSG + Playboy + Female Starbuck? Conspiracy? by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1

    Hah! Clearly the upcoming "Women of Starbucks" pictoral that Playboy is planning is tied in to the female Starbuck character. I bet you a donut the actress appears in a layout.

  144. braveheart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    among others in months past really made me do a double-take as to the channel I had tuned into. I think that perhaps there was a toxic coolant leak right over the executive coffee maker resulting in Bizarro Brand java.

  145. Gigglestar Batidicta by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    Cattlecar Galactica! I *loved* that series when I was a kid! I had all the episodes on Betamax! Wheee!!! Oh, and it wasn't a dog, it was a robot replica of a "daggit". 'Cause the kid couldn't affoard a real daggit. Well, I expect to be disappointed, but you never know; SciFi channel rocks. By Your Command... (Oh, yeah--B5 was still the greatest skiffy series of all time. And I grew up on ST-TOS reruns)

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  146. words like "irony" are just not enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    your post borders almost on being amusing. Amusing like watching a 18 year old gang banger spout how he is so "tough" yet beats on 11 year old kids. Or perhaps as amusing as watching a couple of monkeys beat each other to death over who can throw their poop the farthest. Perhaps by including more empty sound bites and baiting statements you feel your arguments resemble logical point discussion or are indicative of someone who employs logic and reason and avoids groupthink and other emotional reactive philosophies.

  147. HAHAHA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hadn't thought of that particular reason for it being included. There couldn't have been any LESS realism unless they included elves, Apache helicopters and wookies with "vote for Ike" hats on. But what else do you expect from a recent (well less than 10 years old) movie by Mel Gibson. He does great in those completely fantastical universes but recreating historical events or staging a fictional event that is still in the context of our reality he falls flat. Its probably not his fault though, but he does seem to attract (or be attracted to) those types.

  148. but but but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you mean I can't send in the troops to pacify mean ol nasties at all points of the planet as long as CNN says it is OK? I heard that some pissant country has some people beating on old women... the HORROR. Lets ignore the real threats and go act as policemen once again. Of course I will only support such action if it is by a Democrat.

  149. don't forget HBO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    during the early 90's they had already begun to be useless for showing modern movies. Why pay for a premium channel that shows movies you get for free on USA or TBS and then of course you have the crapheap of shows. Of course now they have that show about gangsters... sensless criminal violence is always a good bet at success.

  150. Re:Galactica was a piece of crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the cancelled the very promising sequal Excalibur part way through season 1 after mucking it about something rotten

    Er, Excalibur was unmitigated crap and not worthy of the B5 name. It was just an incredibly dire attempt at a mechanism that allowed them to have "alien of the week" like any Star Trek series ever made.

    The "techno mage" was badly realised, and the "super weapon" that the ship could manage was over used, and poorly implemented.

    Whilst I agree on some of the others (Dark Angel was marginal. Sometimes it was very very good, sometimes it was just hideous), Excalibur was simply excrement.

  151. Enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is a method of telling a story... then there is using the story based fictional series to create a false universe where illogical ideas proven wrong in reality can actually work. Then they can look back on that first as a simulation and then later as reality itself to justify their political positions. A moral to a story is one thing, using a movie or show to push your agenda is another.

  152. What a waste of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...BG was one of the most worthless excuses that pasts as science fiction - except maybe for "Lost in Space"

  153. Who is Loren Green? by Mad+Man · · Score: 1
    was: And I can't imagine one without

    Lorne Green. Who is Loren Green?


    There is a Lauren Green at Fox News Channel.
    Lauren Green serves as an anchor for FOX News Channel's (FNC) daytime news program "Fox News Live," where she provides daily news updates.

    Prior to joining FNC in 1996, Green served as a weekend news anchor and correspondent at WBBM-TV (CBS) in Chicago. From 1988 to 1993, she was as a general assignment reporter at KSTP-TV (ABC) in St. Paul, Minnesota.

    A graduate of Northwestern University's Medill School of Journalism, Green was named Miss Minnesota in 1984 and was the third runner-up in the 1985 Miss America contest.
  154. I can't believe it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they're cancelling the brilliant Farscape for this shit. They must have shit for brains.

  155. Re:Insert #Farscape.h: It does get better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it starts out hit and miss as they build the characters. But after, say, 8 episodes the plot lines begin to form, and it gets really good. ( Think about ST/TNG season 1! No wait, on second thought: don't. )

    In fact, one of the things Farscape has had going against it was that it's very difficult to pick up on what's going on if you haven't been following it from the beginning. Shows often reference small events that happened in several episodes previous.

    My girlfriend and I have begun collecting the DVDs and are watching them in order, and we're constantly struck by details we missed the first time, how layered the writing is. Sometimes a cliche throw-away line turns out to have been foreshadowing. Give it a chance, and you'll be blown away by how successful the show is at visualizing a large, chaotic universe.

    I still can't believe they're cancelling it before the end...!

  156. That's "segue". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You Dumb-Ass.

  157. Product Placement! by BigJimSlade · · Score: 2, Funny

    So long as they don't bring back that stupid robot dog, it might be okay

    Also staring Aibo(tm) as the Robot Dog
    (Aibo(tm) appears courtesy of Sony(tm) Entertainment)

  158. Farscape by nanoakron · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And they killed farscape to bring us this crap?

    -Nano.

  159. Nice elements to series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought the series was pretty good. Lots of symbolism, religious references, prophecy. This is especially true of the two-part piece, "War of the Gods". The cyber-dog (Moffet?) was pretty cute. Maybe people would be easier on him if they realized he was created to "replace" the little boy's dog, which died in the attack prompting them to leave their home world (I think).

  160. How about they renew Farscape for a few seasons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    instead of throwing money at a show that will suck but will be popular because everyone saw it in their childhood.

  161. Earth's best hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once the Cylons reach Earth,they should use that captured cylon fighter to sneak into the cylon mothership and release that strange virus (the one with the laughing skull and crossbones) to destroy/disable the entire fleet. Hey, it worked before...
    Or we could let them download that new Windows Beta.

    1. Re:Earth's best hope by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      They won't reach earth. The whole mythology thing is out of the window now, thanks to that Star Trek hack. There's going to be no Caprica too. Ah, and they took the "chip in the brain which makes you see visions" concept from Farscape and stole it. Baltar is going to be getting the chip.

  162. best... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Lucite...hardening. Must end life in classic Lorne Greene pose from Battlestar Galactica! Best...death....ever!"

    - Comic book guy

  163. Female Starbuck = 'Stardoe' by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a female Starbuck be a Stardoe?

    Starbuck just isn't a name that should ever be applied to a female. I don't care if the character's a womanizer or not -- the name is distinctly masculine. It's like casting a woman as Superman or a man as Wonder Woman.

    And on a related note, are there no original ideas on the Sci-Fi channel anymore?

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    1. Re:Female Starbuck = 'Stardoe' by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      You folks do realize that the name "Starbuck" comes from Melville's *Moby Dick*, right?

  164. Re:Lousy? Compared to WHAT, pray tell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You my friend are a fucking moron but I don't guess I have to tell people that. Anyone who would say that Lexx and Cleopatra 2525 held thier interest doesn't need my help.

    BG was good for it's time and maybe will be again but to say it was better than B5. You are trully lost. Then to say Thunderbirds was more intresting than B5 trully shows the depth of your stupidty.

    Do us a favor and kill yourself before you have time to multiply and spread your defective genes.

  165. Mormon Doctrine? Not quite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    As a Mormon, let me put forth a couple of ideas from my perspective:


    1) "Space Doctrine" -- this is an area of Mormonism which is taken seriously by crackpots and few others. I'm not saying that we don't believe Abraham was given a vision of the creation, stretching through the Universe as referred to with the above links -- we do. I'm just saying that trying to pinpoint the location of Kolob or put an exact *literal* meaning to it is going way beyond anything you'll ever hear by going to any services of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (unless one of said crackpots somehow manages to take control of a Sunday school class, which isn't likely given that 1- they are rare and 2- since they are crackpots, they aren't likely to be given charge of teaching such a class).


    2) Larson's very loose use of Mormon theology as a framework for his crackpot science fiction shouldn't be interpretted as mainstream Mormonism's Dogma. Sure, its an interesting twisting of a belief system. For most Mormons, Battlestar Galactica is one of those "gee whiz, there's some allusion to our religion there" mixed with a healthy does of "ah gee they really butchered our beliefs badly there."

  166. One thing they better keep... by Erbo · · Score: 1

    The original theme music! It's a strong, martial-sounding composition that can hold its own with the best space opera themes. I saw this story on the front page and, immediately, the opening notes of that theme started sounding in my mind...it's so closely identified with the series, I don't see how they could not include it.

    --
    Be who you are...and be it in style!
  167. Junk TV by The+Shootist · · Score: 1

    Cancel Farscape and air Prattlestar. God, I hate my life.

  168. Hmmm... by Rimbo · · Score: 1

    You're French, aren't you? :)

  169. Your sig: by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 1

    Plege of allegience, original form: One nation, with liberty and justice for all.

    Note what's missing, that got added in the 1950's.

    --

    Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  170. it sucks now that I'm old by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 1

    When I was a teenager it was cool, the Cylons and ships and all. But watching the reruns now it's so cheezy I could throw up..

    I also used to like "Space 1999" I'll bet it's just as corny now. I would like to see the reruns though..

    As for remakes, leave shit alone please. I HATE remakes of ANYTHING. I was appalled at the remake of "The Time Machine", among many others.

    As for SciFi channel, they suck. Too damn many commercials, the commercial breaks are WAY to long and all those "paid programming" crap-a-thons suck.

    Most of the trash on SciFi just plain sucks. Bad actors/actresses, piss poor plots, crappy sets and WAY too much CG..

    They use CG to distract you from the fact that they CAN'T ACT !!!

  171. Will the real Richard Hatch please stand up? by Teancum · · Score: 1

    Of course, I bet some Hollywood lawyer probabally thought that Richard Hatch was the same guy as that guy on the TV Survivor show, thought to settle some of the problems with him, and smoothing stuff out.

  172. Sheba Sheba Sheba Sheba by yerktoader · · Score: 1

    It's all about Sheba. No Sheba no BSG. Meow.

  173. Influence on B5 by kalidasa · · Score: 1

    Anybody else ever notice that the scene with the three raider ships looping into the atmosphere of some planet that used to be shown in the beginning credits of some series of B5 were directly ripped off from a similiar scene of 3 Cylon ships looping in the skies over Capricorn in BG? I wonder what other influences there may have been?

  174. I'm not going to watch this trash by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to watch this trash, attempting to pass off as BSG. It's just trash television, no more. I've signed the petition to boycott this production (bsgboycot.cjb.net) and I urge you to do the same. I want to see a continuation with Richard Hatch, not this remake which is something like Sex and the city.

  175. Re:your sig. by nlinecomputers · · Score: 1

    I don't have a problem with the under God part. I have more of a problem with the whole thing. Why would a FREE nation need such a pledge?

    If we are truly free then are we not free not to pledge or to pledge in any form or fashion that we choose and if we are a free nation the rights we are free to express would mostly guarantee that we are going to be loyal. So what is the point IN the pledge?

    It is no surprise that a socialist wrote it.

    --
    Slashdot, home of supporters of free software, free music, and free speech.Except for Moderators that disagree with you.
  176. And yet they still couldn't pick up FIREFLY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but a lame Star Wars ripoff from the late 70'
    s is OK. Gorrammit.

  177. Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are they going to bring back and old show that was cancelled for a good reason, not even know if it's going to be a success or not?

    They have a great show running now that is a success and they are canceling it. Only a few weeks of Farscape left.

    With such morons running the company, I can't wait until they go under.

  178. Silly Whiners, TV is for the masses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and the masses WILL flock to this show. So will most of you, just so you can flame it in a forum the next day. Networks love that kind of attention.

    Let's face it, this has NOTHING to do with lack of creativity and everything to do with $$$. Your average dad in his early 30's will hear about this, remember how much he enjoyed watching the show, then make a point of watching the remake with his little boy. You could place money on a bet like that.

    Why do you think Lucas took so long to release such a shitty "prequel" (--is that even a real word?).

    One last note: while living in Canada I saw an ad on their "Space" channel (very similar to SCIFI) for BG. It went something like this...

    "Who would have thought the future would look SO much like the '70s?"

    When presented with an ad campaign like that, it's obvious that even networks can have a sense of humour about old crappy shows that we beg them to play.

  179. Re:Lousy? Compared to WHAT, pray tell? by Carnivorous+Carrot · · Score: 1

    > Anyone who would say that Lexx and Cleopatra
    > 2525 held thier interest doesn't need my help.

    Some day you'll go thru puberty, then you'll understand. I know an uberdork who didn't start liking girls until 10th damn grade! Theoretically, some must reach college or even beyond.

    > before you have time to multiply

    Looks like we need not worry about this for you, either (see above.)

    --
    "Has [being a kidnapped teenage girl, raped repeatedly for months] changed you?" - Katie Couric to Elizabeth Smart
  180. Soon they'll be bringing back "Flash Gordon" and showing the movie millions of times over and bringing in "Lost in Space" and showing it's crappy, new age movie with Matt LeBlanc millions of time. Then they'll make Star Wars a television show and show it and uh, uh, do other annoying things! Then Farscape, Stargate SG-1 and other great programming will get cancled! AH!