Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Satellite Ground Station

kavachameleon writes "A site called Hobby Space has this article at which there are instructions on how you can build your own satellite weather station! Something I think all of us have wanted to do at one point or another, this site tells us all how to "hack" into the weather satellites and get back usable pictures using our PCs and an AM antenna. There are more instructions for getting geostationary images."

179 comments

  1. Cabin Fever by The_Rippa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fantastic! Now even when Weather.com is down I can still see what the weather is like without having to expose by pasty white skin to the elements.

    1. Re:Cabin Fever by SuDZ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Carefull, it's dangerous out there. You know, past the front door.

      SuDZ

    2. Re:Cabin Fever by SquadBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are bears, bunnies, orcs, vampires and other dangers. The only real answer is to go out heavily armed and frag anything that moves before they can get you. Good advice my friend good advice.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    3. Re:Cabin Fever by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Fantastic! Now even when Weather.com is down I can still see what the weather is like without having to expose by pasty white skin to the elements."

      Oh geez, don't you guys study history? There are several ancient civilizations that had very simple devices for determining the weather without actually having to go outside. All you need is a piece of glass, a rock, a hole in a wall (preferably leading to the exterior of your house), and a piece of glass to fill that hole and prevent everything but light from getting in.

      Hang the rock outside of this piece of glass using a string so that it's visible by peering through the hole. Installation's complete!

      That rock provides all kinds of scientific data you can use:

      - If the rock is bright, it's day.
      - If the rock is dark, it's night.
      - If the rock is wet, it's raining.
      - If the rock is white, it's snowing.
      - If the rock is shaking, there's an earthquake.
      - If the rock is swinging, it's windy outside.
      - If the rock is swinging and wet, it's a hurricane.
      - If the rock is gone, don't open the door.

      Pff who needs fancy schmancy satellites?

    4. Re:Cabin Fever by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      - If the rock is moving, it's a turtle, stupid!

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    5. Re:Cabin Fever by unitron · · Score: 1
      "There are several ancient civilizations that had very simple devices for determining the weather without actually having to go outside."

      Yeah, they were called "slaves".

      Came in handy for all sorts of unpleasant things you didn't want to deal with yourself.

      'Course if you were the slave your appreciation of the system was probably somewhat lacking.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    6. Re:Cabin Fever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if the molecules on the surface of the rock are vibrating at this particular frequency, the air temperature is 23.65C...

    7. Re:Cabin Fever by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, they were called "slaves".
      Came in handy for all sorts of unpleasant things you didn't want to deal with yourself.
      'Course if you were the slave your appreciation of the system was probably somewhat lacking."


      Man, you really sucked the fun out of my light hearted comment. I brought that joke back all the way from the Ozarks!

    8. Re:Cabin Fever by unitron · · Score: 1
      Hey, you got modded up twice as "Funny". I'd say you did alright.

      Next time just don't leave any straight lines lying around for me :-) I lack the character to resist them.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    9. Re:Cabin Fever by Jethro+On+Deathrow · · Score: 0

      You lack a lot more than that, you gay-ass motherfucker.

      If I ever meet you, I will kick 100% of your lame comment spewing head.

  2. Hacking Satellites? by Dukeofshadows · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is it really worth hacking a damn weather satellite when you can turn on any news station or hit weather.com or wunderground.com and get global/regional/local conditions?

    On the other hand it would be pretty cool if you could jury-rig a means of watching the Iraq-US battle via satellite or find a way to make a de facto spy satellite out of it...

    --
    As long as there is a Second Amendment, there will always be a First Amendment.
    1. Re:Hacking Satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They aren't hacking satellites. They are just receiving signals... unencoded ones at that.

      The only way 'hack' applies to this article is that it's kind of neat.

    2. Re:Hacking Satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right, watching war on Television is cool.

    3. Re:Hacking Satellites? by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1

      No more exciting or boring than buying some off the shelf computer and leaving it in 100% factory spec.

    4. Re:Hacking Satellites? by DustMagnet · · Score: 5, Informative
      It's not hacking, since the software and receivers have been available cheaply for years.

      We use it all the time in Antarctica. I'm sure it is useful other places not covered by weather.com. You have to have line of sight on the sat, it has to have line of sight on the weather, so the range is limited, but good enough. The pixel size is huge, so it's no good for spying.

      It does do both IR and visible, so you can get the temp/height of the clouds too.

      --
      'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
    5. Re:Hacking Satellites? by JoshRoss · · Score: 1

      Those images were sooo crappy. I do think it is rather quaint. Getting pictures off of AM radio it's soo ... retro?

    6. Re:Hacking Satellites? by Xzzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > Is it really worth hacking a damn weather
      > satellite when you can turn on any news station

      no, but it's fun.

      Dorking around with technology is the entire point of being a geek. If you have to question why these people shouldn't have done this, I question your geektitude. ;)

      It's like climbing a mountain.. just do it because it's there.

    7. Re:Hacking Satellites? by MerlTurkin · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can already receive sat images off the HF bands if you have the right gear. It's slow but doable.

    8. Re:Hacking Satellites? by tlahoda · · Score: 5, Informative

      You have to remember these are weather satellites. An extreme high resolution image is not yet available, even with professional equipment. The GOES series satellite have a 1km per pixel resolution for the current GOES 8 and GOES 10 satellites. In about 10 years 10m or possibly 1m resolution satellites are going up. With the American Goes satellites it will not be possible to watch the irag decimation. They simply aren't in a place on the Earth where they can view it, and GOES 8 will probably being moving even further away in April. None of the GOES data is encrypted or delayed so an instantaneous feed is available, but keep in mind it can take anywhere from 5 minutes to 45 minutes for an image to be completed depending on the region of the earth being scanned. Also keep in mind that you'll need software that understands the GVAR format in order to see the data from the GOES satellites. I work with these satellites everyday, it is non-trivial without the right software to use the data.

    9. Re:Hacking Satellites? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
      > Dorking around with technology is the entire point of being a geek. If you have to question why these people shouldn't have done this, I question your geektitude. ;)

      Damn straight!

      My biggest pet peeve with weather newscasts is that they only show, say, eight hours of cloud movement. (You know, it looks like a frickin' animated .GIF. Blip, reset, blip, reset, blip.)

      That's all I need to guess what the weather will be like tomorrow.

      For geekitude, I'd like to have a screen saver looping, say, the last year's cloud movement, so I could watch the tropical storms develop over the Atlantic and Pacific, build in power, and dissipate over the coast, or the forest fires lighting up and spreading smoke until late fall.

      To do that and to say "Oh, my world weather time-lapse screensaver? Antenna glued to my flagpole, little dongle and A/D converter, and a cron job."

      Geekitude to the max.

    10. Re:Hacking Satellites? by cyb97 · · Score: 1

      I guess AM (amp.mod) is a form of encoding, you are thinking of encrypted.
      Then again, AM would be a form of weak encryption for somebody not familiar with the concept... ;-)

    11. Re:Hacking Satellites? by GlassHeart · · Score: 4, Funny
      Is it really worth hacking a damn weather satellite when you can turn on any news station or hit weather.com

      This is just version 1, so it's kinda plain. Version 2 will enable writes, so you can modify the weather through the satellite.

    12. Re:Hacking Satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand it would be pretty cool if you could jury-rig a means of watching the Iraq-US battle via satellite or find a way to make a de facto spy satellite out of it...

      If only you had thought of it last year, you could have bought exclusive rights to all of the commercial imaging satellites that would have a view of Iraq... Just like during Afghanistan, the U.S. has bought it all up. Not only to keep those bad ol' enemies we'd be fighting from knowing our movements, but to keep potentially nasty questions to a minimum (who wants to see the U.S. accused of war crimes?). Secrecy is good for America!

    13. Re:Hacking Satellites? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Geekitude to the max
      Indeed.

    14. Re:Hacking Satellites? by 1984 · · Score: 1

      It's "hacking" satellite receivers.

      Yes, really. It's not cracking anything, though. I find it amusing that the Slashdot crowd assumes that "hacking" means "cracking" even given the popular sport of deriding the mainstream press for confusing the two.

    15. Re:Hacking Satellites? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      What happens when the satellite gets slashdotted? Armageddon?

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
    16. Re:Hacking Satellites? by Blaine+Hilton · · Score: 1

      Thats a good point, I hate it when it keeps going back and forth and I'm never quite sure what direction its going. However once you design such a system you will need to collect the data over the period (such as a year) and that can be a lot if you do the whole range of the satalite!

    17. Re:Hacking Satellites? by Sean+Riordan · · Score: 1

      Of course! I get to work with unclassified science satellites i the early integration and development stages but don't get to be involved in orbit ops at all. It would be nice to play with the data once it's up and flying. Lots of good unclassified science birds up there collecting amazing data. Using all these computers for something other than e-mail and fragging is defintely worth it.

      --
      Sig? What if I prefer Glock?
    18. Re:Hacking Satellites? by troc · · Score: 1

      Too true. We were doing this with home made dishes in the mid eighties as a school project.

      We used to get data from the NOAA and Russian (erm Comet? can't remember) satellites. The NOAA ones were good for temperature and things but the Russian ones gave excellent cloud pictures. They also had a much more obvious clock with a real tick-tock to it where as the NOAA ones just went tick tick tick :)

      We had a 1.5m dish made from chickenwire and an LMB made from a coffee jar, all connected to an HF receiver and a BBC microcomputer. As a kid it was quite spooky almost to listen for the clock pulses as the satellites came over the horizon - and then to watch the pictures build up line by line on the screen.

      Hmm, maybe I did actually enjoy school.

      Troc

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    19. Re:Hacking Satellites? by sharkman67 · · Score: 1

      This isn't hacking. The signal is broadcast in the clear. I used to do this 11-12 years ago with an inexpensive scanner, a mag mount antenna and a tnc on my old Mac ][.

      The other thing worth mentioning is that these old satellites are being retired. The new higher resolution ones are being phased in over the next year or so and the transmitters on the current birds are going to be shut off. Don't run out and spend a lot of money as you will be throwing it away.

    20. Re:Hacking Satellites? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Like many hacks, the value is in the hack. Any additional utility value is a bonus.

    21. Re:Hacking Satellites? by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      You are assuming everybody is living near a TV signal, a TV and electricity.

      Before seeing this story, I only knew of two ways to get weather information while boating far from shore: very expensive Internet over a satelite phone or very very expensive custom weather service.

      Weather maps are extremely important when one depends on the weather to blow them from place to place.

  3. Echelon by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 3, Funny



    Now that you've "hacked" a weather satellite, how long till Ashcroft and Co. deem you an enemy combatant?

    You should have just turned to The Weather Channel on digital cable when the site was unavailable. ;-)

    "I am not a number!" - Number Six, The Prisoner

    1. Re:Echelon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember the laugh after that statement ?

    2. Re:Echelon by MrEd · · Score: 1
      --

      Wah!

  4. While you're at it... by Valiss · · Score: 3, Funny

    Along the same lines, a bunch of rich geeks over at SpaceX are building a rocket to go to space. Who needs NASA when you have a huge chunk o cash? Combine these two projects and you can start your very own space program!

    --

    -Valiss
    1. Re:While you're at it... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Who needs NASA when you have a desert, astronaut costumes, and the slow-motion effect in iMovie?

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  5. Much cooler images... by Rorschach1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are available here.

    Takes a bit more equipment, though.

    1. Re:Much cooler images... by Valiss · · Score: 1

      Cooler images? Maybe. Scary looking guy on index page? Definately.

      --

      -Valiss
    2. Re:Much cooler images... by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Incredible. Thanks for the link!

      Yay for comments that are better than the story!

      --
      ...
  6. Live Doppler 7000 by subri · · Score: 1

    Guess we don't need that anymore! Now the networks have to search for new catchy phrases (like live doppler 7000) to get our viewership for their late night weather forecast!

  7. DMCA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If it's illegal to create your own equipment for receiving and decoding satellite television transmissions, then is it legal to do the same for weather satellite transmissions? What about other kinds of satellites that may be beaming all sorts of information through our homes?

    1. Re:DMCA? by devin15 · · Score: 1

      It's not digital though, it's all analog all the time :)

    2. Re:DMCA? by tlahoda · · Score: 0

      The data streams from the US governement owned weather satellites are free for use to the American public. No DMCA wories. You paid for it and they are not military satellites so you have the right to use it. However keep in mind that colorized photos available on other sites might be able to be copyrighted by the owners of those sites. Not sure though.

    3. Re:DMCA? by Matrix2110 · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, it is not illegal to receive any transmission in the United States. Decoding it is a whole separate ballgame.

  8. Could this be illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    First off, I want to clarify that I did not RTFA.

    But Just the synopsis and the fact that it's getting data from a gov't satalite, when your not an "authorized" recipient (i.e. not a gov't satalite station), makes me think that this might be taken as being illegal in some way.

    Just my mode of think from having previous interactions with governmental information systems and running the red tape gauntlets.

    Just my $.02

    1. Re:Could this be illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the govt makes a law tomorrow banning the collection of rainwater (to protect the water utility) will you respect that law too?

    2. Re:Could this be illegal? by Sarcazmo · · Score: 1

      Well, too bad there isn't a -1 wrong mod. In any case, these are unencrypted, publicly available transmissions. Back in grade school our tech lab had a NOAA satellite setup to get satellite images via something similar to ham slow scan TV. The satellites were not geostationary, so sometimes you only got a piece of the image, and it came in at something like 1200 bps.

    3. Re:Could this be illegal? by tlahoda · · Score: 0

      It is not illegal in anyway to receive the data stream for the US government's weather satellites. I work with them everyday.

    4. Re:Could this be illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference between collecting information yourself, through your own means (i.e. collecting rainwater in YOUR backyard weather station), and collection information through someone elses means (i.e. a government owned and controlled satalite).

      Also, many water utilities do not run off of rainfall directly in one area- An example would be LA getting it's water from the Colorado River. Your mode of thinking would equate to it being against the law to eat snow on the left side of the continental divide, else your possibly robbing the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area of water.

      If I were to collect rain water in LA, it wouldn't matter, but if I were to collect rainwater (whatever form) in Golden Co., then I'd be in some serious trouble.

      a big difference in just taking something with out permission (for whatever reason), and freely distributed information.

    5. Re:Could this be illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah Ok...

    6. Re:Could this be illegal? by zapod4 · · Score: 1

      If the government (or anyone else) doesn't want me to collect its satelite signals from its satelites, then they can figure out a way to broadcast radio without passing through my house.

    7. Re:Could this be illegal? by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 2, Interesting
      It is not illegal in anyway to receive the data stream for the US government's weather satellites. I work with them everyday.

      Yep. They are, in effect, a publis service of the U.S. Government. Anybody who wants to can receive their signals and do what they will with them. The signal format itself is based on the 1960s-era TIROS format, but keeping it simple means that even dirt poor countries can get weather satellite data.

      I do my own: have a look at some pretty (if a little stale) pictures of mine. I wrote my own sound card demodulator program. Linux, of course...

      ...laura

  9. This isn't exactly new.... by markana · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've been reading articles about how to decode these pictures since the 60's - I've got ARRL books and magazines going back at least that far. Hobbyists have been doing this with PCs since the late 70's. The transmissions are basically faxes, so it's pretty easy to decode with a sound card.

    I know there have been some old news stories appearing lately, but really now...

    1. Re:This isn't exactly new.... by NickDngr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been reading articles about how to decode these pictures since the 60's - I've got ARRL books and magazines going back at least that far. Hobbyists have been doing this with PCs since the late 70's. The transmissions are basically faxes, so it's pretty easy to decode with a sound card.

      I'll second that. HAMs have been doing this for decades. It's not rocket science. Also, with the easy to find images on the web these days it is at best a way to kill time.

      --
      Yoda of Borg am I! Assimilated shall you be! Futile resistance is, hmm?
    2. Re:This isn't exactly new.... by cryptec · · Score: 1

      Yeah, very true! And your not actually "hacking" a weather satellite these weather maps are broadcasted for the public anyways. Iv been decoding NOAA and GOES maps for the last 20 years.... If you wanna hack anything hack the enigma number stations :P

    3. Re:This isn't exactly new.... by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      I once saw an old article detailing how you could build a circuit to attach to your radio, and then attach it to your oscilloscope to see the image.

      It's called Slow-scan TV, and has been around for ages.

      --
      ...
    4. Re:This isn't exactly new.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it is rocket science..The point being that rocket scince isn't as narror or complex as people seem to think.

    5. Re:This isn't exactly new.... by Trajan's+Horse · · Score: 1

      So what? It's new to a lot of people. And the fact that you can do it with your PC makes it relevant to Slashdot. Besides, the fact that we can get weather satellite pictures off the net doesn't make this hobby irrelevant. We can make voice calls over standard analog telephone lines, yet people still use IM and such. Props to the guy for the cool project.

    6. Re:This isn't exactly new.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      true. my dad made one of these when I was in elementary school. must have been 1982 or so. radio shack color computer and a shortwave radio. some circuit to do a/d which he built.
      it hits /. 20 years later. :)

  10. Screw that.. by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Hacking weather satellites is lame. I want to hack the secret Illuminati Weather Machines and Plate Tectonic Control Grid...

    Damn... where's my tinfoil hat>

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Screw that.. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny
      If you had worn your tinfoil hat in the first place, the orbital mind control lasers wouldn't have been able to erase your knowledge of its location.

      OMCL: We know what's on your mind - we put it there!

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  11. Among Other Things by Davis+Bacon · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...you can build your own satellite weather station! Something I think all of us have wanted to do at one point or another...

    Things I want to do this weekend:

    1) Clean the barbeque grill
    2) Vacuum the living room
    3) Build a weather satellite station

    1. Re:Among Other Things by Bob+Bitchen · · Score: 1

      revised

      Things I want to do this weekend:

      1) Clean the barbeque grill
      2) Vacuum the living room
      3) Build a weather satellite station

      4) Profit....

      --
      http://tinyurl.com/3t236
  12. any porn of these satelittes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    otherwise I don't see the point.

    1. Re:any porn of these satelittes? by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      Shhhhh!! We don't want the secret to get out...

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  13. What good is this??? by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 0
    Even if I build my evil master "weather" satellite station the Department of Homeland Security would not let met launch my evil master "weather" satellite (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) into orbit.

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/20/131825 9&mode=thread&tid=159

  14. OK... by TaranRampersad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now will someone post how I can build my own satellite and get it into orbit? :)

    1. Re:OK... by Smallpond · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here ya go

      www.amsat.org

    2. Re:OK... by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ok.
      1)get satalite companent
      2) build satalit
      3)get large rocket
      4)send satalite to space.
      5)Profit!!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:OK... by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

      6) learn how to spell "satellite"

      And the obligatory:
      In soviet russia, satellites launch YOU!

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  15. Other Resources by Noksagt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Once again slashdot stumbles upon an already popular hobby. http://www.scnt01426.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Articles /WXSAT/wxsat.htm

    1. Re:Other Resources by RestiffBard · · Score: 1

      dude, I've never heard of this. I think its terribly nifty and that slashdot posted it doesn't make slashdot lame.

      I was listening to NPR one day. They did a story on Siberian throat singers. Its terribly popular and has been for generations. I'd never heard of it though. Does that make NPR a stumbler?

      post your link, get your karma but keep the bitching in your journal.

      --
      - /* dead coders leave no comments */
    2. Re:Other Resources by MullerMn · · Score: 1

      Once again slashdot stumbles upon an already popular hobby

      Yeah, well there aren't that many articles on the as-yet-undiscovered hobbies around, are there? Smartass.

  16. What good is this?? by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Even if I did build my evil master "weather" satellite station, the Dept. of Homeland Security would prevent me from launching my evil master "weather" satellite.

    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/20/131825 9&mode=thread&tid=159

    1. Re:What good is this?? by realdpk · · Score: 1

      I agree with the moderation here. Of the two nearly identical posts, this one had one fewer ?. I think we can all agree that two ?'s is better than three ?'s. Although, the (wink, wink, nudge, nudge) of the other post is attractive.

    2. Re:What good is this?? by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Aaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhh

      My plan of subtle diversion and subterfuge has been detected. Come Pinky we must prepare for tommorow


      What are we doing tomorrow, Brain?


      The same thing we do every day Pinky, try to take over the world.

  17. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is lame.

    BUT, how hard would it be to pick up say, CNN's satellite downlink.

    Are the signals enrypted? Obviously DirecTV signals are, but what about CNN's own downlink to their stations?

  18. Building your own space program on $5k a day by Dukeofshadows · · Score: 3, Interesting

    North Korea's major ICBM apparently uses a mix of gasoline and kerosine for most of it's propulsion except for a small solid motor on the uppermost stage. If impoverished North Korea can build and launch a missile 2500 km w/ a theoretical 1000 lb payload (exact stats are at http://www.fas.org, I'm referring to their 1998 test) using aluminum, gasoline, and kerosine, why not apply the same tech and launch your own satellites for much less money than anyone else charges? Hell, if you made a quality pod and did serious testing on it (or just buy one from Russia), you might just be able to get someone into space and back for very low cost...

    --
    As long as there is a Second Amendment, there will always be a First Amendment.
    1. Re:Building your own space program on $5k a day by Rorschach1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The actual cost of rocket fuel is a tiny portion of your launch cost. And we've used kerosene before - the Saturn V F-1 engines burned it with LOX, if I remember right.

    2. Re:Building your own space program on $5k a day by azaroth42 · · Score: 1

      Saturn V used smoked salmon as a propellent? Kewl =)

    3. Re:Building your own space program on $5k a day by Darth+Yoshi · · Score: 1
      Saturn V used smoked salmon as a propellent? Kewl =)

      Which just proves the old adage, "Never design a rocket booster when you're hungry."

      --
      // TODO: fix sig
  19. OTOH by OECD · · Score: 2, Informative

    You could just go to NOAA's Geostationary Satellite Server page and D/L the damn things.

    I guess I have to turn in my geek card now...

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
    1. Re:OTOH by JBird · · Score: 1

      My old engineering school has had a project going since the late 80's receiving GMS weather images. Not as cool as the NOAA images (which, incidentally, were also being received by another project in the departmant).

      The GMS project, JCUMetsat is still going to this day and the custom receiver hardware developed for this was/is still in use by some television stations here in Australia.

      You can look at the images at http://www.jcu.edu.au/JCUMetSat/web/metsat.html

  20. Why rely on a satellite that can fall from a sky? by Noksagt · · Score: 2, Interesting
  21. Great an all I have to do is learn Swedish!!! by 4/3PI*R^3 · · Score: 1
  22. OT: Command line tool for grabbing WX data? by swb · · Score: 1

    Is there a command line tool for grabbing weather data? I'd like to do some MRTG graphs of internal temp sensors vs. external temperatures. Unfortunately I don't have a way to get "outside" at the facilities I want outside temps for. If there was some "wxfetch --temp --site=sna" command that would give me easily parsable basic weather data (no pix, all text) it'd rock.

  23. Next week on Slashdot! by borgdows · · Score: 1

    Learn how to build your own International Space Station (ISS) !

    1. Re:Next week on Slashdot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit, I knew I shouln't have swapped NASA's space shuttle for the one I built in my garage.

    2. Re:Next week on Slashdot! by JDWTopGuy · · Score: 1

      In our next installment, we show you how to score with Natalie Portman by building a beowulf cluster of weather satellites!

      (There goes my Karma.)

      --
      Ron Paul 2012
  24. Amateur radio satellites even cooler.. by KD7JZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those that think that Amateur radio uses
    acient technology, look into the great space
    stuff hams are doing..

    Two way satellite contacts, contacts with the
    space station, hand-held data transmission
    via satellite.. pretty neat stuff..

    check out AMSAT and the ISS radio page.

  25. Those were the days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...when Antic, the Atari magazine, had an article about how to do this with the Atari ST. I think that was in like 198...7?

    Dave

  26. bahh, old news by cryptec · · Score: 1

    this has been done 30 years or so now.

  27. PC controled recievers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    those things are not cheap, not by a long shot...

    as a matter of fact PC controled radio recievers are pretty damn expensive...

    1. Re:PC controled recievers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Icom PCR1000 receiver is only $350 bucks plus shipping from Universal Radio Inc.

      My /. subscription costs more than this so I can get those frist posts!!!!!!!

  28. NOAAPORT? by BSDFreak · · Score: 1

    One could always set up a NOAAPORT system and download images and data.
    http://205.156.54.206/noaaport/html/noaaport.shtml

  29. This is old by DankNinja · · Score: 0

    We were doing this in my 7th grade science class with our superfly 386DX-40.

  30. Seen similar by Upright+Joe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My high school physics teacher had something very similar to this in the classroom in 1993. I think he said the software and antenna cost him $175 if I remember correctly. There may have been an educational discount involved though I suppose.

    The software he had was really slick it would even display IR data from some satelites over a photo so as you drug the mouse around, you could see the temperature of the pixel you were pointing to.

    Just like in the example given in the article, there were times in which there were no satellites overhead to connect to, but I remember there being a large selection of sattelites that it would listen to including a bunch of foreign weather satelites.

    I wish I had more specifics but that's all I can remember right now.

  31. Been doing it for years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Ham radio operators have been doing it for years. I'm sure there are quite a few short wave listeners (SWL) that have been doing it also. All you need is a couple of caps, resistors and the like to build the interface between the radio and the computer.
    I'm sure it's gotten even easier now with the advent of the cheap sound card and processors. Most of the digital modes via ham radio can be done with a sound card.

  32. Should I trust these guys... by redfenix · · Score: 1

    ...with my life if they can't even spell "ascent"?

    (From their flash demo of the Falcon LV Vehicle Explorer, click on Interstage)

    "Houses and protects the 2nd stage engine and Falcon 1st stage recovery system during assent."

    --
    "It's a very tangled subsystem." --Windows kernel guru
    1. Re:Should I trust these guys... by unitron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but what protects it during dissent?

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  33. Not hacking by ckim · · Score: 1

    Technically it's not hacking since the weather satellites are constantly transmitting the images and you are just receiving it and processing them.

    1. Re:Not hacking by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1

      Which is probably why he put "hack" in quites.

      --
      --- Ban humanity.
  34. Re:OT: Command line tool for grabbing WX data? by PatJensen · · Score: 5, Informative
    Buy an Oregon Scientific or compatible weather station, wired or wireless for around $200. Then get wx200d (http://wx200d.sourceforge.net) and install it. It has a plotting engine as well as a live client->server engine for using graphical clients to display live data.

    I ported the wx200d communication code to BSD a year ago. Good software!

    Pat

  35. Forecast! by Bures · · Score: 0

    With this im sure I can make better predictions on the weather then the T.V. weather broadcasters can!

  36. Terrorists.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. will use it to send secret messages by manipulating the weather!

    1. Re:Terrorists.. by WetCat · · Score: 1

      No, by putting large letters on the earth surface by using coal or even pants.

  37. Antic and STart magazine by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Years ago there was an article in the Atari magazines _Antic_ and _STart_ (for 8-bit and STs respectively) that detailed how to make a WEFAX (weather facsimile) device for pulling weather images off a shortwave radio. I was able to built it but never had a shortwave radio so the thing just sat there. You could supposedly purchase cassette tapes of the signal, but that seemed vaguely ridiculous.

    But using computers to do other things besides email and web browsing has always fascinated me. I'm now trying to get the GRASS system working so that I can create maps of my area. No luck so far, but success is imminent (I hope). If anyone knows of other projects that allow computers (running Linux in particular) to map the world, chart the weather, decode satellite images, etc., please let me know.

    1. Re:Antic and STart magazine by Trajan's+Horse · · Score: 1

      I'm working on an article for Ars Technica that details just how to do that. There's some great shortwave/ham software named MixW that allows you to decode weatherfax, SSTV, Hellschreiber etc...

    2. Re:Antic and STart magazine by pa-guy · · Score: 1

      I built that. Very simple, just a 741 op-amp and a few discrete components. It worked surpisingly well. See my post further down for software to do this under linux.

      73 de VE6LSH

  38. sregsth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  39. One problem... by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    without the country and state borders superimposed you can't tell what the heck is going on.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  40. oh, the irony. by mshultz · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article....

    Combined with the bad weather of winter and the short days, the images from home were dark and short...

    This is great- it doesn't work if the weather's rotten! how useful for a weather-watching satellite receiver....

  41. ebay here they come... by ethanms · · Score: 1

    ...and suddenly the price of Icom PCR1000 radio's on ebay skyrockets...

    just like the powerbook 280c after that picture frame article! =)

  42. Interesting, but... by Chromal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is mostly interesting because of it's unusual way of decoding digitally transmitted satellite data. The idea of using a sound card and a short wave receiver to decode satellite imagery is... quaint.

    But why play around with that when you tap into the freely-accessible C-band T-1 National Weather Service downlink, NOAAPORT and get all the international surface obs data, text products, rawinsonde (weather balloons), Nexrad doppler radar, and supercomputing forecast model data for free?

    Well, okay, this approach is less appealing as you need a high-speed RS-422 serial controller, a satellite demodulator, a dedicated Linux system, and a C-band 3.5m dish. :) But it's not as if any of this data is particularly... restricted, or secret.

    Cool hack, nonetheless.

  43. Interesting, but for how long? by showmeshowyoukikoman · · Score: 0

    This character clearly spent more time working on his satellite interception system than he did in enlish class!

    How long until the us government shuts this kind of stuff down though? Consider the implications if terrorists were to stumble across this slashdot web area on AOL. The information is right here, they could take over the weather satellites and move their orbits to help defend their ground troops!

    I recently watched a movie which starred Bruce Willis. He played the role of a US Special Forces Ranger Commando on a Seal Team for the Air Force. They went into a foreign country and removed religeous peoples. While they were talking a walk through the woods, one of Mr. Willis' friends brought his laptop, and used this very same technology to watch for bad guys following them. Now in this case, using the technology was useful in order to defend their party from the roving band of gorilla traders (though they never showed them actually DOING anything with gorillas. Curious!)

    This whole concept is like a bicycle with a two stroke engine. It sounds like a good idea until you hear it. Not to mention the sound of the engine!

    Anyhoo, remember, Kikoman is good on eggs!

  44. I'm in! by Ratbert42 · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...this site tells us all how to "hack" into the weather satellites and get back usable pictures using our PCs and an AM antenna.

    Cool. This site tells us all how to "hack" into the TV stations and get back usable video using our televisions and a broad-band antenna.

  45. Actually, people have been doing this since 1926 by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's one of the first images done in 1926. Of course, this weather image didn't come from a satellite, but they've been doing this stuff for a long time!

  46. Welcome to our hobby by kyllikki · · Score: 1

    The Remote Imaging Group is the place to go for information on all aspects of this hobby.

    1. Re:Welcome to our hobby by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fully agree with you, RIG covers everything, I'm a member there myself.

  47. question by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 1

    surely theres a technical reason, but i'm still curious. whats preventing me from getting any old radio (like my typical home stereo reciever), tuning to AM frequency 137.50mhz or whatever it was, and just doing line out to the soundcard so that little proggy can do its work? i imagine i'd need a big honkin antennae, but is there something different about these special recievers that they do differently than any other AM reciever?

    1. Re:question by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      137MHz...that's a bit above the 1.7MHz where the AM broadcast band ends, and the 108MHz where the FM broadcast band ends...though comsumer radios that receive the "aircraft" band can receive the frequency. Next problem is tapping the IF (the result of mixing signal from a local oscillator to heterodyne with the incoming signal to covert it to a lower frequency (makes sum & difference frequencies, all but difference filtered out)

    2. Re:question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I thought they used an FM downlink...

      Well, if it is FM, you sure can't use an AM antenna for it :-)

      (Note to my fellow hams - the preceding was a joke, OK? I got my BSEE and my Extra over 30 years ago, so just chill...)

      Seriously, a wideband scanner, a pair of crossed dipoles cut for 137.5MHz (that's MegaHertz; "mhz" isn't anything), and some wiring from the low-level audio output of the scanner to the line input on your sound card, and some software, and you've got pictures.

      Visit the ARRL web page and visit their online bookstore for the appropriate books. And, don't worry about John Ashcroft - I'm sure he's got better things to do; most ships, fishing boats and large pleasure boats all get the weather maps in the same way...

    3. Re:question by unitron · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that 137MHz is right there in the cable tv "cable channels" band, so maybe you could hack the tuner from a TV or VCR and the FM detector in its audio section. Lot better chance of finding schematics for one of those than for a motherboard. :-(

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    4. Re:question by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      it's right between cable channels 16 and 17 (in U.S.A.)....actually, it'll be a part of what channel 16 includes, as there's 4.5MHz upper sideband of video that it will pass.

      neat chart including broadcast and standard cable base frequencies here

    5. Re:question by eap · · Score: 1
      surely theres a technical reason, but i'm still curious. whats preventing me from getting any old radio (like my typical home stereo reciever), tuning to AM frequency 137.50mhz or whatever it was, and just doing line out to the soundcard so that little proggy can do its work? i imagine i'd need a big honkin antennae, but is there something different about these special recievers that they do differently than any other AM reciever?
      First of all, no typical AM receiver will tune this high. 137mHz is just above the aircraft band, which is itself just above the 107.9mHz upper limit of FM radio receivers. Second, the reason given in the article for needing a special radio is that the intermediate frequency bandwidth must be tunable to around 42kHz. This is not possible on typical receivers.

      Interestingly, though, there are lots of other data signals out there you can decode with a soundcard and the right radio. There are APRS and PSK31, both are modes of amateur radio digital communication. I even read about a way to hack up a MDT scanner so you can read the digital transmissions used by police to communicate with mobile vehicles.

  48. Re:OT: Command line tool for grabbing WX data? by swb · · Score: 1

    Not an option at all. I cannot get outside at the 45 story highrise downtown building our offices are in. We are tenants of about 6 floors, there is no "outside" that belongs to us or we have access too.

    The same is true in the other sites I manage; tenants of large, otherwise sealed buildings.

    I'd love to do what you suggest, but it is simply not an option. I'd be just thrilled with the nearest airport temperature data.

  49. Well, sure, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those are edited to remove all of the secret government/alien bases and such. Much cooler looking at the original untouched satellite feeds.

  50. Proper Punctation... by Myuu · · Score: 1

    Now that you've "hacked" a weather satellite, how long till Ashcroft and Co. deem you an enemy combatant?

    -needs to be-

    Now that you've hacked a "weather satellite", how long till Ashcroft and Co. deem you an enemy combatant?

    --

    forget it.
  51. Nice try by pvera · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Any

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  52. Any Army 31S/29Y people lurking? by pvera · · Score: 1

    For those wondering, Satellite Comm techs in the USArmy fall under MOS 31S (it used to be 29Y but it was changed when I was still in the service).

    I got to see a few hacks like that when I was in the service. The main problem was that the equipment used to downconvert the RF was too godawful expensive! A 19" rack with just a down converter, a patch panel, a HP spectrum analyzer and a custom DEC drawer was over $300K.

    Later we found out there was a card you could plug into a normal retail PC that allowed us to connect to the IEEE-488 data acquisition bus in the spectrum analyzer. Next step was finding the API for talking to the spectrum analyzer and we eventually built our own system without the need for that damn DEC. Suddenly a $300K rack unit got replaced by a PC (it was an AST Pentium 133, ah, the days!) with a $400 or so IEEE-488 card and a $20-50K spectrum analyzer (no, I still have no clue why it was so damn expensive).

    That was 10 years ago, I would not be surprised if the whole thing can be done for a few grand.

    --
    Pedro
    ----
    The Insomniac Coder
  53. Orbit it is :) by ciroknight · · Score: 1

    Well, this doesn't seem like that hard of a task, but there is a lot to do with launch dynamics. I'm an ameture model rocketist myself, so I'll try my best to explain it.

    First, we list our obsticles: that damned atmotsphere we need to live, the gravity that holds us to the ground, weight-to-fuel ratio.
    The atmostphere is no problem really, just build a rocket with a conic head, besides if you can get anything up to the right speed, the shape won't matter (unless it's an inverted cone or a flat surface...).
    Next, we deal with gravity. It works on all objects on earth at about 9.8m/s^2, which is a royal pain in the A$$ when trying to move heavy objects upwards... therefore, we must keep the weight down. This is done by making our rocket put out a HUGE amount of power per kilogram, because we have to take it up to escape velocity (the speed in which the objects forward force is greater than the force of gravity pulling it down).
    Let's do the math to figure out escape velocity:
    The maximum amount of work done on a falling body that's falling from infinity (no atmosphere), is the GPE of the object: Ma = Mass of rocket, Mb = mass of planet to escape, G = newton's gravitational constant, or 6.67e-11, and r is the radius of the planet.
    -G(Ma)(Mb)/r
    Now, we also know if we want to make an object escape this gravity pit, we have to give it just enough kinetic energy, using .5mv^2 (you should remember this from high school physics). We also know we need a little bit more to escape gravity, since traveling at exactly the same speed as gravity would put you in neutral. so...
    -G(Ma)(Mb)/r + .5mv^2 > 0
    Now, since we need a velocity, let's solve for V.. (take note: the m in .5mv^2 is equal to Ma)
    .5(Ma)v^2 = G(Ma)(Mb)/r,
    (Ma)v^2 = 2G(Ma)(Mb)/r,
    v^2 = 2G(Mb)/r,
    v = sqrt (2G(Mb)) Tada, we have our equation.

    Now, this gives you about 11182 meters per second. Factor in the air resistance, and we probably need to take it up at least another third of that if we can, so about 15k m/s. This represents a HUGE obsticle.. because the heavier the object we present it, the harder we have to work to get it to that speed. For More information, email me, or visit my website, ill have this posted soon. Laterz

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  54. Been doing this for years by pa-guy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The first setup used a geared motor driving a drum (made from a rolling ping) that had tinfoil wrppaed around, with electrostatic fax paper on top of that. It would print the image via a motor driven needle that put a high voltage current to the paper when it recieved a black portion of the image. Omni-directional antenna and a modified scanner completed the rig.

    I wish I still had my copy of "The Weather Satellite Handbook".

    73 de VE6LSH

  55. HamFax by pa-guy · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can use HamFax to do this under linux. Predict will tell you when the bird will be visible.

    http://hamfax.sourceforge.net/
    http://www.qsl.n et/kd2bd/predict.html

    73 de VE6LSH

  56. weatherfax from the parallel port by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I really want is instructions on how to build a radio-wave reciever for (terrestrial based) WeatherFax that I can just plug into my parallel port and decode in the computer.

    The antenna can just be a coilable peice of wire 3m long or so.. That+laptop=weatherfax on the boat!

    But all I lack is software and hardware.
    ?!?!?

    1. Re:weatherfax from the parallel port by Altpersona · · Score: 1

      just buy a weatherfax.. there small and portable.. no need for the laptop

  57. OT (anti-flame) by Noksagt · · Score: 1

    Not bitching & not karma-whoring. I've played with sending and receiving slow-scan tv, which is similar. I haven't been doing it for fity years like some posters, but I don't see you griping about them.

    It is fine that slashdot posted this & the link they had was good. For older stuff like this, it is even cooler when they post a few links to different articles.

  58. this junkie pix by Altpersona · · Score: 1

    hate to burst the bubble... dont know there really is a bubble to burst.... there have been people making pc cards that do this for ages... you take a simple gps style egg antenna.. run in via bnc to the card.. and run some software to plan reception times.. decode the pic and bada bing its done... and btw... the noaa people broad cast these horrid pix via a thing called radiofax... it is indeed a fax format.. nothing to special.. with some creativity.. you should be able to run a gps antenna to your pc , pick a port... an old sound card w/fax capability should work fine with some mods... you should be able to get some good specs using google, and the term radiofax http://www.dolphinmaritime.com/pcwin/wpcradiofax.h tm this place looks promising... says use there software plus a ssb reciever plugged into your sound card..

  59. hacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i hackd in 2 gubmin sadelines an got free pix of ur mom

  60. I never wanted to do that! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Just thought I'd mention it :)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  61. You don't need this complicated a setup.... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Many of you already have what it takes to receive these satellites. Many police scanners such as the Realistic 2006 have an FM wideband mode that works just fine. Take the audio (data) out of the headphone jack. Simply try tuning your scanner into the frequencies in the article and set the scanner for wideband FM. Leave it for a while with the squelch just barely set and it's very likely that as the satellite comes over your horizon, you'll hear the 'tick tick' he speaks of. Usually a lower gain scanner antenna is best (Radio Shack sells a discone for about 60 bucks) because higher gain antennas compress the vertical lobe to get more gain on the horizon (and for space reception you WANT tha antenna to "look up" into the sky.

  62. If anybody finds one of these by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

    Specifically, that will work in X Windows, by all means send me an email. Figure out my email by the username of my URL (which is dead) and the FQDN....send me an email if you ever get one...i'd be really interested in this.

    If there is one, I'm too lazy to look, heh.

    --
    //FIXME: Bad .sig
    1. Re:If anybody finds one of these by elem · · Score: 1

      xplanet can do this. It can be set up to download cloud images every 3 hours and project them over an image of earth. It can create some stunning results.

      Go and look at some of their screenshots, amazing...

    2. Re:If anybody finds one of these by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > xplanet [sourceforge.net] can do this.

      Dude. You rock. That's about 90% of what I want. w00t!

  63. Military by Fembot · · Score: 1

    Damm It I want military satalites not weather ones... I wanna be able to watch myself typing at my own computer

    1. Re:Military by pyrote · · Score: 2, Funny

      you can, it's called a 'mirror'. avoided by most computer geeks, due to undesireable side effect, it can be quite effective as a self monitoring device.

      --
      THE WORLD IS GOING TO END!!!! eventually.
  64. How about stock price am/fm streams? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    This weather satellite stuff is interesting, but until the govt is forced to stop providing weather and satellite info to the citizens because it competes with private business, until then, I won't have to worry about it.

    What I'd like to see is some software and a hardware (antenna) hookup to my computer for me to caputure and process streams of real time stock trades on all markets, NYSE, Nasdaq, CBT, Options, Dow Jones news, other news, etc., basically everything stock related.

    I know the streams are there, as there are receivers that receive and decode the data as am or fm signals. It's just a matter of capuring the signal (easy, hookup to rooftop antenna), and the software to process it. The software is out there, but has anyone hacked it? Gnu/linux please. Windows is no longer used in my network.

  65. well you COULD... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ...well you could launch your own satellite, but because of the new "war on tarism" you would have to build your rocket using one million of those new 62.5 gram rocket motors. Just some minor technical engineering details, that's all....

    And I checked the fine print, those FOOLS left something out, it's NOT illegal to build your own super scalar planeteary defense beams. Those neurally challeneged polidrones, hiring non geek lawyers to write all them new laws....heh heh heh

  66. last... by zogger · · Score: 1

    ..last I knew you could still get raw feeds with a big dish and appropriate receiver. I don't know if any of the major networks scramble their signal, last I watched any was several years ago now. Someone here probably has more up to date knowledge I'm sure. The raw feeds frequently don't (didn't) have commercials, you can see them talking and b.s.ing, etc during that time.

  67. Re:OT: Command line tool for grabbing WX data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yo man! those blue collar guys who ride the scaffoldings up and down and clean the windows? Think they might epoxy glue or drill and expander bolt your outside weather transmitter dealie, with maybe a tiny solar panel and a LiOn batt connected to all that stuff, out on the wall of the building someplace for a sawbuck or two?

    And from that far away, ain't no boss action even gonna see the thing from the ground. Just make sure whatever you decide for a mount WORKS. Over engineer that part.

    And I never saw this post, because it's "academic and research purposes only".

  68. It's not hacking...it's called "radio" by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2, Insightful

    For those that don't want to worry about when the satellite is passing overhead and happen to live in the US (or thereabouts), consider EMWIN, the Emergency Managers' Weather Information Network. You can receive data by satellite, radio, or Internet. NOAA has links to schematics, free software (with source) and other good information.

  69. Google for "National Weather Service" by fizbin · · Score: 1

    You know, the government ought to collect and disseminate the temperature data that the National Weather Service collects in a computer parseable format via anonymous ftp.

    Oh wait, they do. They even provide you with loads of docs that will tell you more than you ever wanted to know about the format of government weather data.

  70. AM Antenna? by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

    What the heck is an AM antenna?

    I believe these are the same antenna's a lot of use for downconverting AO40's 2.4 ghz s2 transponder - which is a passband transponder - usually USB.

  71. Re:OT: Command line tool for grabbing WX data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're kidding. wx200d just reflects data from the serial port out to the clients. If you want the full batch, you have to wait. Just hope you don't have any sensors on the fringe, or you may be waiting a long time to get the whole update.

    The obvious improvement would be for wx200d to decode and cache the data, then provide it to clients upon request. That lets them come and go (think cron jobs) without any delay. What a concept!

  72. It'snothacking.it's called "radio"-Desktop weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is one thing though. I've been wanting to write a full featured weather package compariable to what's available on the Windows side.

    However I've found the technical information to pull this off rather scarce, or widely scattered. i.e Information sources, file formats, etc.

    Any ideas?

  73. Re:OT: Command line tool for grabbing WX data? by swb · · Score: 1

    An appealing idea, but not exactly simple on a glass curtainwall structure.

    Besides, the washers at our building aren't just blue collar, I think they're fresh out of prison or something.

  74. Re:It'snothacking.it's called "radio"-Desktop weat by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 1

    File formats aren't your primary concern (As a meteorologist, when you say "full featured" I think of plotting surface and upper air observations and model output). You should be able to get by with processing text (station and upper air output) and GRIB format data. There are numerous GRIB readers available (except maybe for Java). A couple of places I'd suggest looking are:

    www.weathergraphics.com - I'd make it a link but it's not coming up right now. Tim Vasquez wrote the popular "Digital Atmosphere". You can look to his site to see where to get data.

    Unidata Community Portal (free reg required). Go to "downloads" and look at GEMPAK. The IDV is written in Java and could be a jumping off point but it uses the VisAD library which has a huge learning curve. There are other downloads which may be of interest to you as well.

    Good luck!

  75. Big hairy deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did this in 1988 with a pk232 TNC and a el-cheapo worldband reciever.

    This is nothing new, nothing special, and a much lower quality than most equipment that can already be had for a total of less than $100.00 at any hamfest.

    Why is this news again? Ham radio operators have been doing it cince sattelites existed.

  76. C.H.I.M.P. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about C.H.I.M.P.?