Slashdot Mirror


Improving Company Morale?

Undaar asks: "I work as a developer for a web development company. We were pretty hard hit (as were many companies that do what we do) by the "economic down-turn". The company went from over 500 people to under 200 in under two years. It's more stable now, but people are consistently laid-off. Consequently people feel like they always have to look over their shoulder to avoid getting fired. Most lunches are spent complaining about lack of enjoyment/challenge from the job and the fact that upper-management seems not to understand what we do. Employers: what have you done to improve employee morale in your company? As an employee, what can I do to improve the morale in the people I work with? How can I make my work environment more enjoyable? What kind of constructive suggestions can I take to management so that they can help improve the situation?"

173 of 595 comments (clear)

  1. Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productivity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People that are happy at work tend to be better workers, so letting them use the internet and phone for some personal business during work can be a "good thing." That's not to say they should be allowed to surf for porn all day, but looking a few websites outside of business during 9-5 can help.

    Also, be flexible with work hours. Not everyone needs to work the same 9-5. Let departments figure out their own policy and be flexible with workers.

  2. Best way to improve morale by corbettw · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whores. Lots and lots of whores.

    And don't be stingy with the cocaine, either.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    1. Re:Best way to improve morale by Bake · · Score: 5, Funny

      But I thought companies already had Sales and Marketting?

    2. Re:Best way to improve morale by Specialist2k · · Score: 5, Funny
      Whores. Lots and lots of whores.

      I am... ehm... uncertain whether this will actually improve productivity ;-)

    3. Re:Best way to improve morale by Randolpho · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Although my armor and weapons are badly in need of repair, I spend my entire reward on ale and whores."

      -- Skull, PVP

      --
      "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
      -Marilyn Manson
    4. Re:Best way to improve morale by ckedge · · Score: 5, Funny

      They screw the customers, not the employees.

    5. Re:Best way to improve morale by Fesh · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, that's HR's job.

      --
      --Fesh
      Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
    6. Re:Best way to improve morale by imaniack · · Score: 2, Funny

      HR = hand release????

    7. Re:Best way to improve morale by Rigor+Morty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You might be surprized. I had friends that worked at a certain car dealership in Columbus, Ohio, where management would take the top monthly saleman out for a "winner dinner", consisting of a meal at their favorite eatery, with the hooker of his choice.

      When those boys hit the doors in the morning, they were ready to sell some cars.

      --
      Remove the spamfreak to speak.
  3. Are you kidding? by ddstreet · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The software (and hardware) market is full of so many highly-qualified people, most with years of experience, that employers have little to no incentive to care whether their current employees are happy or not. If they're not, they can either leave or get fired, and it will be easy to replace them, probably with someone more qualified and/or with more experience, who will work for as much or maybe less money.

    It's gonna be like this, in our job market at least, for a while. Hopefully not too long...!

    1. Re:Are you kidding? by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      that employers have little to no incentive to care whether their current employees are happy or not. If they're not, they can either leave or get fired, and it will be easy to replace them

      Yes, but it still may help productivity if they are a bit happier. Whip-n-row motivational techniques rarely work in the longer run.

    2. Re:Are you kidding? by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Insightful
      If they're not, they can either leave or get fired, and it will be easy to replace them, probably with someone more qualified and/or with more experience, who will work for as much or maybe less money.

      I know there are some bosses who think that way, but it's a bad idea from a couple of aspects.

      First, it takes at least six months to get someone really up to speed in the company, probably a little longer to get them fully effective.

      Second, and more important IMO, there's no entity in business more effective than an honest-to-God *team*. People who know each other, who know how the people around them work and who feel like they owe something to their coworkers. This is a hard thing to pull together, but when you do they can accomplish some really special things. Making employees feel like a commodity is completely counter to this.

      A good manager will understand this; the problem is, simply, there aren't enough "good" mangers out there -- most people who manage are woefully incompetent at actually managing. Beancounters.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    3. Re:Are you kidding? by n3k5 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      The software (and hardware) market is full of so many highly-qualified people [...] If they're not [happy], they can either leave or get fired, and it will be easy to replace them [...]
      Are you kidding? In software development that requires highly qualified people, it is never easy to replace them. It can take months to dive into a new codebase; every day spent on grokking a new project means less constructive work done on it. Sure, you can fire employees all the time and look for cheaper ones, which you treat as lowly development machines that are worth less than the computers they work on. But don't expect them to stay so long that they even get the chance to get any productive work done.
      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    4. Re:Are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The software (and hardware) market is full of so many highly-qualified people, most with years of experience, that employers have little to no incentive to care whether their current employees are happy or not.

      That's a complete and utter myth. The software market is full of loads of utterly incompetent bottom feeders that flowed into the industry during boom time, however there is a MASSIVE lack of actual knowledge or talent. I'd wager that >90% of software developers out there slumber from day to day not really sure what their doing. Greater than half of all software projects are an absolute failure, while of the remaining half most fail to fulfill their mandate.

    5. Re:Are you kidding? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
      You are absolutely correct. A good team of competent people, who have (at least) some experience, can get almost anything done, and usually at a relatively fast pace.

      Unfortunately, almost all management out there is completely clueless; they use unexperienced people to work on projects, either because they're cheap or to "broaden their skills". The project leader usually is the only one with some experience in whatever they're working on, but they are usually so bogged down with meetings they don't do any actual work. The result is crap, for everything that is produced. Once the workers get experience with whatever they were doing, they are either moved to something else that they have no experience with, or they move to management (where they stop doing actual work). It's a vicious cycle... all new development is utter garbage, and management simply refuses to improve it at all (it works! Why should we pay you to change it?) even though maintaining it is an absolute nightmare, especially as more and more fixes get tack-hammered on. Eventually someone (or multiple poeple, depending on how bad it is) is stuck with the awful job of maintaining the spaghetti code, and the company winds up spending 10x more money to maintain the crap than if they had fixed it in the first place...

      I guess the essential points that management always fails to understand are:

      • Keep experienced programmers working. When they are promoted, don't put them into management; they are much more valuable (and probably happier) as programmers. Promote (or 'move', programmers are more important and should make more than management) the bad programmers into management, that's probably where they want to be anyway.
      • You need a prototype. I just can't stress this enough. No matter how good you think your design is, the first implementation (if constrained to any deadlines, which they always are) will be bad. It's unavoidable. A prototype, which can be either throw-away or the base for the real product, is just essential. It's funny that hardware people (including management) have known this for years, but software management (and some inexperienced or just inept programmers) won't accept it.
      • Let inexperienced programmers work on the prototypes and/or programs that won't be maintained (for any extended period of time). It's not their fault, but when you're inexperienced you just don't produce good, maintainable code. You have to learn. But learning by writing code that's going to be sold and maintained is a real bad idea, that only management (who doesn't understand how programming works) would think of.
      • Move bad programmers out, probably into management. The last person that anyone wants to work with is a bad programmer.
      • Don't make experienced programmers spend all their time training inexperienced programmers. This is such a waste. Management thinks that somehow magically good programmers will transform inexperienced programmers into a new good programmer. But what happens is the good programmer never gets to do any work, and the inexperienced programmers are the only ones writing your programs.
    6. Re:Are you kidding? by Doomdark · · Score: 5, Insightful
      No, no and no. You are assuming that any person can be replaced with anyone about as qualified, and the resulting accomplishments are the same. Further, you assume happines and motivation have nothing to do with productivity, related to motivation, experience and skills (and in rougly that order of importance).

      This may be true for simplest of assembly line jobs, although even there I'd doubt that. But for any developer job (or similar, jobs that need skilled professionals) there's huge differences in productivity.

      My estimation is that difference between minimally adequate (below average but still nominally skilled and/or motivated, that is, able to work to some degree) and average ("normal" skills and motivation) worker is in the order of 3 - 5 times, and between average and excellent further 2 - 3 times. So, roughly speaking, best of employees get as much done as 10 or more "sucky" employees. And that's ignoring the fundamental limitations of "bunch of cheap incompetent idiots" approach, which is that there are some demanding tasks where you just can NOT get things done without skilled, talented, motivated individuals (not all tasks, but some key tasks).

      So, if an employer follows tactics you outlined, here's the likely scenario:

      • By treating employees badly, morale goes down, and productivity suffers significantly, easily to less than half of optimal sustainable productivity, in matter of weeks if not days.
      • By making it known everyone considers everyone to be replaceable, most employees (of any level) start looking for new job. Best ones (that are most productive and skilled) find new job more easily, thus there's significant brain leakage. Below-average people try to hang in there and do not leave involuntarily.
      • Replacing people lost to attrition and lay-offs is costly as well as risky; there's no reliable way to make sure person you hire is as good as you think. Only time will tell. Ones you had you had much better understanding of. So, chances are you won't be hiring better people than you had (assuming originally you very succesful in developing and keeping talent).
      • Training people for specific duties they have takes time (few people get a new job that's _exactly_ like they old one). Even highly skilled professionals take a while to adapt.
      • Newcomers have less reason to be loyal to begin with. Their morale is likely to be neutral, which depending on situation may be better or worse than average employee morale. But in case where it's higher, it _quickly_ lowers to average, as person learns what kind of a rathole job is. In case of existing employees having good morale, it takes longer for morale to raise... but it will happen if things stay good.

      Another big mistake is misunderstanding the role of (monetary) compensation to motivation. Rewards are good, almost independent of size of reward (except of insulting small ones, like those Larry Ellison dolls given as annual bonus). But above and beyond that, money is not much of an incentive to otherwise content people. And for uncontent people, well, it's only temporary relief that soon is forgotten.

      However, the opposite (ie. short-changing employees) does affect morale drastically and quickly. Whereas giving a raise helps a bit in short run, and stabilizes things in long run, salary reduction (or "too low" starting salary) is a quick and effective tool of demoralization. No matter what the situation, that's equivalent to middle finger salute.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    7. Re:Are you kidding? by MrResistor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The software (and hardware) market is full of so many highly-qualified people, most with years of experience, that employers have little to no incentive to care whether their current employees are happy or not. If they're not, they can either leave or get fired, and it will be easy to replace them, probably with someone more qualified and/or with more experience, who will work for as much or maybe less money.

      This is an extremely stupid, short-sighted view.

      When you lay someone off you lose their training and experience, and no matter how qualified or experienced their replacement is, it will take them time to get up to speed your product. That's exactly how I got my current job, and after 7 months I'm still figuring out previously known problems that never got documented because the guy I replaced had been working on the product for years. With that kind of experience on a single product there's bound to be a lot of things that don't get documented, simply because from that perspective they seem obvious.

      In the real world, skilled workers are not as easily replaced as the MBAs would like to believe.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    8. Re:Are you kidding? by LibertineR · · Score: 4, Funny

      Give that man a star! Most of you suck.

    9. Re:Are you kidding? by Doomdark · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And actually it's not just "little help", motivated people get much more done, offer good ideas they have, participate, help retain talent and so on. I have worked on both motivated and de-motivated teams (fortunately, currently on a team that's mostly motivated), and I know the difference from employee side.

      On the flip side, de-motivated people are there just to collect their paycheck and sporadically get work done, either to avoid getting fired, or if they would otherwise get too bored.

      Whip-n-row techniques also most likely increase attrition rates a lot, so the only case where they make sense to use is where one wants to get headcount down fast, independent of consequences. In really short-term you may get something done day or two earlier, but cause burn-out for some, and get end product that has lower quality than one produced under more sane leadership.

      --
      I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization -- Oliver Wendell Holmes
    10. Re:Are you kidding? by kent_eh · · Score: 2

      Once the workers get experience with whatever they were doing, they are either moved to something else that they have no experience with, or they move to management (where they stop doing actual work). It's a vicious cycle...

      It's called the Peter Principle.
      It's as true today as it was back in 1969 when Dr. Laurence J. Peter first wrote his book as it is today.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    11. Re:Are you kidding? by len_harms · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the bad programmers into management, that's probably where they want to be anyway

      I have never agreed with moving people into managment that are not TRAINED to do this. Managing things is WAY different than writing code. Writing code you just need to watch the flow of the code. Then if you wrote your code correctly just tweak it once and awhile. Managing people you need to have people skills. You need to know how to handle someone who works hard, who is lazy, who is sick, who is wasting everone elses time, someone who is a bully, someone who is harasing others... You need to know how to do these sorts of things. Last I checked they do not teach that in any comp sci classes.

      Making a 'programmer' a mangager is almost always a bad idea. If he is a bad programmer he probably is not a good manager either. He did not have the motivation to become a decent programmer, which I have always belived is not that hard to do. Also sometimes the reason they are bad programmers is because they simply do not get along with people. Puting them in charge will only make this problem worse. I have witnessed this many times.

      My father used to work for a large insurance company. Before he could even get promoted to be a manager, out of sales, he had to take MANY MANY MANY classes in how to manage people. He then had to prove he could do it. We in the tech industry seem to take almost the exact oposite aproach. We promote people who should never even breathed that pay grade, and then only because they did something cool.

      All your other points I agree with. Just promoting people to get them out of something is usually a bad idea. Its better to put them somewhere where they do no harm, or (i know this is cold) fire them.

    12. Re:Are you kidding? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm curious, how do you prototype software?

      It's simple, really:

      • Gather some requirements - find out what the people want.
      • Build a basic design. From this, you should get some interaction diagrams, state diagrams, and the general functionality of the software, including what's fast, slow, and what's easy to add.
      • From this, you build a paper prototype. take it to the original customers and walk them through it. Go to step 1 until the design closely resembles what they customer wants.
      • This last step is dependent on available resources. Don't break the bank searching for perfection, but don't just throw crap against the wall until something sticks.
      • Build a functioning prototype - it should be implemented quickly and reflect the design. Only implement fully the areas that need to be modelled.
      • Take this to the customer. Modify requirements and design. This should be minor tweaking.
      • Build the software. The overall structure of the code should be clear before you begin, and detailed requirements should be done. This is mainly building code and testing it, both at a fine level and in its interaction.
      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    13. Re:Are you kidding? by BeerSlurpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This isnt funny, but keep modding it up.

      The software market is completely glutted with incompetant morons who are suitable for use as little more than semi-computer-literate go-fers. These are the guys are are having their lunch stolen by the indians and russians who can program as good or likely better for 10x less. A lot of them are finally being forced to leave the software field altogether because they dont have the enthusiasm to do it when it isnt easy money.

      In case you werent aware of this, the current paradigm for making software in this country is to have maybe 3-4 architect/senior developer type guys who design the overall product, make all the hard design decisions. They also do protyping, make libraries and develop tools for the more junior programmers to use, etc. Working with these guys are a large group of more junior guys who do all the hard work of actually writing all the code, using the design and tools that the smart guys have done.

      It has been determined that you dont have to employ americans for the junior level positions, because all that is really required is hardworkingness and an eagerness to learn. You can employ ukrainians, irish, indians or chinese who speak english and if they show true talent, you bring them over on visas so they can pick up english and later become the guru type guys.

      This is bad for americans because it means that you have to eat a lot of crow when youre paying your dues as a junior level guy. Until you have about 5-7 years of experience, employers will not even begin to consider you as a valued asset- until then youre really cannon fodder. You really have to hustle when your compeition considers $100 a month to be a kingly salary. Its possible to succeed (Hey, I did without even a CS degree) but it takes a lot of work to get there.

      It doesnt exactly help that there are all sorts of pitfalls in the industry like clueless employers, consulting firms etc who can take someone with plenty of potential and completely ruin them as a programmer.

    14. Re:Are you kidding? by mystery_boy_x · · Score: 4, Interesting
      By making it known everyone considers everyone to be replaceable, most employees (of any level) start looking for new job. Best ones (that are most productive and skilled) find new job more easily, thus there's significant brain leakage. Below-average people try to hang in there and do not leave involuntarily.

      My experience suggests that things are more two-tiered. In my last IT job, in which I was hired as a new graduate, the company would periodically retrench people during down times and to cut costs. After about a year, I was retrenched also. The HR chick told me that it was nothing to do with performance, but it was obvious to me that they would not retrench people who they considered had performed well.

      These guru programmers - and there was a sizeable number of them - were told, in performance reviews and elsewhere how valuable the company considered them to be. They were frequently given payrises, promotions and bonuses also. The company would charge through the nose for their services. They could have had no fears about losing their jobs.

      While I would have preferred not to have been retrenched (after being hired as a graduate!) this approach has worked wonders for the company, enabling them to produce high quality work and greatly enlarge their client base.

      --
      I am not a lawyer but my sister is, so don't mess with me
    15. Re:Are you kidding? by vsprintf · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are you kidding? In software development that requires highly qualified people, it is never easy to replace them. It can take months to dive into a new codebase; every day spent on grokking a new project means less constructive work done on it.

      Sure, you and I know that, but management is not willing to believe it. They would much rather believe that programmers are plug-and-play widgets that can be replaced at will.

      We once had a coder (call him Joe) who received an offer from another company and gave our employer a chance to match it. They told him no, so he took the other job. Jane was chosen to take over Joe's projects, and she was skilled but had no experience with the projects. A few weeks later, there was a minor-version OS upgrade for security reasons, and a critical application broke. The latest version wouldn't even compile any longer.

      From my office, which was very close to management row, I was able to hear the (very loud) wisdom of the top IT manager. He ranted at length about how it was unforgiveable that things stopped working just because some guy name Joe was gone. He yelled about how if we had proper documentation (which we did) anyone should be able to walk in and perform Joe's tasks. He shouted about having proper processes and how that would make individuals irrelevant. It was quite an eye-opener for me.

      At any rate, Jane called Joe, and he was nice enough to walk her through far enough that she was able to prove it was a problem with COTS software and have it resolved. The end result: four days down-time on a critical application and a whole slew of useless new rules on project documentation that waste a great deal of time. Management is generally clueless.

  4. New company memo by Ed+Random · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Firings will continue until morale improves"
    - The Management

    Sorry, couldn't resist ;)

    --
    -- Gxis! Ed.
    1. Re:New company memo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "For cost-cutting reasons, the light at the end of the tunnel will be switched off until further notice."
      - The Management

    2. Re:New company memo by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or, as Despair.com says, "Sometimes the solution to the morale problem is to fire all the unhappy people."

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    3. Re:New company memo by sluue · · Score: 5, Funny

      isnt that "Beatings will continue until morale improves" ? :)

    4. Re:New company memo by deranged+unix+nut · · Score: 3, Funny

      Custom fortune cookies: "www.monster.com"

  5. How not to do it... by technik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Two years ago I wrote this: Management Techniques of the Bottom 95% of U.S. Corporations.

    Just take all the advice and reverse it. :)

    1. Re:How not to do it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      Your list of managment techniques is spot-on (and hilarious in the Office Space-sense). Here are some additional techniques:
      • Implement cost cutting measures like sharing cubicles and phones. Workers (especially programmers) will fall asleep in quiet environments.
      • Institute low storage limits for email, file servers, etc. Disk space is about $5/Gb, but having your employees efficiently manage this valuable resource is free.
      • Introduce grand new strategic initiatives. Have no vision for how the strategy will help the bottom line. Require worthless training for all employees for whom it would make a difference. Give the good training to people in a position where they cannot make a difference.
  6. Word Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I work for a software dev company down
    here in O.C. It's the same way here.

    The way I relieve my stress is applying
    for better jobs and talking more sh!t
    about management and their crappy decisions
    that landed up the company in this situation.

  7. I left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    what have you done to improve employee morale in your company? As an employee, what can I do to improve the morale in the people I work with? How can I make my work environment more enjoyable?

    I left and went to another company with people that are happy. Much happier when I recognized that I couldn't steer a ship from the White Star Line with a paddle. Just not possible.

  8. Honesty by blastedtokyo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Try extracting a little honesty. You won't improve morale by playing music as the titanic is going down. Find ways to tell people the truth. Blow the whistle on bad practices. Get to know management better so you can find out what is really going on so you can tell your people. Tell them what factors will lead to the success of your company. Tell them where you (mgmt or not) fucked up. Tell them where you plan to change things. Tell employees what role they play in the recovery.

    If the company intends to screw everyone after finishing a couple pieces to make a liquidation plausible, then it's pretty cold to try to improve morale if you know something horrible's about to go down.

  9. HAMMOCKS! by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

    "In fact I know this place called Mary-Anne's Hammocks - the nice thing about it is, Mary-Anne gets in the hammock with you! Hahah, I'm just kidding, Homer."

    Hank Scorpio rules.

    1. Re:HAMMOCKS! by Hank+Scorpio · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hank Scorpio rules.

      Well, it's about time somebody recognized that which I've been saying all along!! :)

  10. Morale is your own responsibility by yellowstone · · Score: 4, Interesting
    You can start by getting over the idea that your morale is the responsibility of the company.
    Most lunches are spent complaining
    If you spend time complaining, you will invariably find plenty to complain about.
    about lack of enjoyment/challenge from the job
    Enjoyment and challenge on the job is not something that is pointed out to you; it is something you must find for yourself.
    --
    150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for slashdot.sig (129323052 bytes).
    1. Re:Morale is your own responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Morale is also management's responsibility, my friend. We do not work in a world where people will keep having crap shoved down their throats and say "Sure, it's crap...but at least I'm not hungry." Management that doesn't know how to pick up marale and inspire employees is really just marking time till the employees sabotage their plans, reduce productivity or just plain leave. Suppose Patton hadn't cared what his troops' morale was, how far do you think he would have gotten? Bottom line: your post is inaccurate and you, obviously, are not in management.

    2. Re:Morale is your own responsibility by efflux · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Enjoyment and challenge on the job is not something that is pointed out to you; it is something you must find for yourself.

      This sort of presupposes that such oportunities/challenges exist in your work place. Their are environments, typically only in small businesses, where management is so clueless that you can actually find yourself in hot water for proposing ways to get the company out of the IT shithole you're in.

      Case in point: I'm currently working for a bookstore at a university. A few years back we purchased a point of sale and inventory management system. The product we purchased so poorly developed it's egregious. In many instances it just doesn't work, and where it does work we have to go through so many hoops to get it to work, it would be better ditching it altogether. Now, this product also has various web services that are meant to run on our AS/400 server. They allow our customers to perform various activities such as: order a textbook, reserve a textbook, request a textbook adoption (for faculty), and so on. Now, as with most of the products supplied to us by our vendors, these products barely work. This is exceptionally damaging to us as an institution as these are programs that our customers interface with directly. So, I have recently proposed an alternative to management. That we set up a linux server running mySQL, apache, and PHP. We could then create web applications to replace the faulty applications we are now using.

      I've spent quite some time with this proposal: In fact it's turned out to be forty-some page memorandum, complete with research and estimates on how this change would effect our company.

      Now, here's the kicker. Management turned out not to be interested in even looking at the proposal. It seems he's more interested in protecting his image than the company. We've spent over a quarter million dollars on equipment and software alone, not to mention outrageous support fees. He's expressed the opinion that since we've invested so much into this product already, he can't just back out now. You see, it would make it look like he made a bad decision. Not just a bad one, but a very costly one. Since the University is considering outsourcing the bookstore, it is important that his image remain intact. Even if it means that we can barely funciton.

      So, for the time being I am stuck with: Data entry, employee training, finding workarounds, and writing shitty reports and query utilities with Visual Basic (the only thing I've been able to use out of concern for future maintenance--it has to be able to be modified by Joe Random Coder). Damn it. I swear, it seems like nothing I do will actually have any impact. Why, then, should I care?

      FYI: I am a graduate student studying mathematics. I've been with this bookstore for 5 years now. I was hired as an undergraduate student studying Comp Sci. I am now working full time and have education benefits for me and my wife, which is what is keeping me with this employer. And yes, I am at work now. :-7

      --
      Do I contradict myself? Very well, then I contradict myself, I am large, I contain multitudes. -- Walt Whitman
    3. Re:Morale is your own responsibility by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sorry, but if continual and frequent layoffs are occuring, you are a) affraid of losing your job, reguardless of how good a worker you are, b) stressed all the time because of this fact, and c) always looking over your shoulder, no matter how good a job you're doing at the time.

      That alone is reason to complain. It's comparable to being a slave and always looking over your shoulder for the angry slavemaster with the whip.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  11. not much hope... by gralem · · Score: 5, Insightful

    #1 *ALWAYS LOOK FOR A BETTER JOB*.

    That is, until you find a job where you don't feel you have to look over your shoulder and wonder why management doesn't get it. When management doesn't get it, there's usually no way to fix it. It becomes entrenched in the fabric of the company.

    There is only one way for such a company to change--promote from within. This brings up the people who already understand the business PLUS understand the real-world problems faced by the little employees. But such companies rarely do this. They usually hire outside people who have no clue as to what goes on day-to-day. And they keep crapping on their own employees.

    I really recommend looking for another job. If jobs in your area are scarce, then think about moving. Being flexible always provides better opportunities. I know the job market is tough right now, and I would not like to be looking for a job. But I've been in that situation many times. And there is not much hope for this type of a company. Unless they promote from within and start investing in their current employees, rather than try to find the next replacement manager who is going to solve all problems, there really is no hope.

    Also, all employers should have incentive programs that are based on performance. If your employer does not offer such incentives--even something as little as free movie tickets for the top-performing departments based on measurable results (like lines of checked code, or # of support issues resolved and verified)--then it is another sign of problems with management.

    ---gralem

  12. Read by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 4, Informative

    Read this. The leader in your company should be the first to take on long hours, pay cuts, all of the worst jobs. Set the example for your employees and most importantly, do it with a smile on your face.

  13. What not to do by Fjord · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's going to be very hard in your present situation. A ping pong table or lunches aren't going to cure the problem: that you've been laying off in stages, causing people to believe that more stages are yet to come. My only suggestion is to open the books a lot, to let people know that you are cash flow positive and that they don't have anything to worry about. If you aren't cash flow positive, then make another cut, but cut very deeply, deeply enough to get the company in a survivable state, and then open the books.

    If you can't cut, then you'll need to readjust salaries. DON'T OVERPROMISE. Don't say things like "you'll take a cut here, but when things get good you'll get this kind of bonus" and then later make projections like "we'll be doing well by 3Q03." People remember this shit and when you don't follow through, every promise you make is suspect.

    If you don't do something drastic, what will happen is this: the best developers will find a new job fairly quickly for today's economy (about two months). You'll be stuck with the worst ones: the inarticulate, the inexperienced, and the difficult to work with. And then your company will really suffer.

    --
    -no broken link
  14. Alcohol by e1en0r · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No, seriously. That really helps at my company. Granted, it's only a small company of around 30 people, but every last Friday of the month (and occasionally others) they bring us beer and sometimes margaritas. Everyone hangs out in the kitchen and lets off some steam and it really does help. There's usually leftovers too, so my friend and I sneak back there about 15 minutes before quitting time on other days and have our own little party. Several times the owners have walked past on the way to the bathroom and occasionally they join us.

    1. Re:Alcohol by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      they bring us beer and sometimes margaritas.

      You must be the Microsoft Outlook Security Development team :-P

      * hic *

    2. Re:Alcohol by zerocool^ · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was just talking about this with my boss yesterday. As to getting tipsy on your lunch break: We don't so much condone it as we ignore it. And we don't so much ignore it as we celebrate it.

      I'm 95% kidding, of course, but alcohol not being on the same list as comming to work on crack definately helps some. You're not afraid to order a draft beer or two with your sandwitch.

      Plus, another big one is how comfortable the employees are in their work environment. We don't have an official uniform. I wear sandals and my Itchy and Scratchy t-shirt to work. BUT I feel more productive because I don't have to deal with wearing a company logo polo shirt and dress shoes.

      A lot of smaller technology firms could benifit from expanding "dress down friday" to everyday. Really, how often do you see your customers? I know of one customer who currently lives in the same town as our office, and he signed up because he knew me. As long as we remain professional on the phone, what does it honestly matter?

      Also: Music. We're allowed to quietly play music at work. Note: QUIETLY, because we have to be able to hear phone conversations, but, we all like different kinds of music (techno, country/classical, punk). Being able to have background music does help.

      Plus, being able to browse websites not strictly related to work helps, too. We just call it "selective trolling" - keep the work URL in the .sig, and that gives us an excuse to read slashdot at work =). We explain to the owner that if we post to slashdot, people will see the link in the .sig file and sign up for service, so he's sort of alright with that.

      --
      sig?
    3. Re:Alcohol by NineNine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Jesus, that was a depressing post. It reminded me what it was like to work. Running your own business is tough, and today's been a shitty day, but good god, it's so much better than a fucking cube job where you have to worry about what you wear, what say, what you browse, and even what you fucking ingest. Mother of god, if I went back to something like that, I'd shoot myself in the fucking head. A bland, lame beer at TGIF ever month? Whoop-de-fucking-do. Is that what passes for "fun" after one has been lobotimized?

  15. Workplace democracy by da · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I read an article about 10 years ago which was about some guy in Brasil, I think it was, whose rubber company was about to go down the toilet financially. So he went to his workforce and said "Here's the situation - we're up shit creek financially, either I make half of you redundant, or we take half pay, until the situation improves - you decide" and put it to the vote. The workforce apparently decided on the half pay option, but productivity soon improved and they could afford to pay their old salary. The guy went on to experiment with introducing worker democracy on a wide scale - salaries, job descriptions etc. and apparently the company became very successful. I've always thought that sounded like an interesting idea, has anyone else heard of this?

    --
    I reserve the right to be wrong.
    1. Re:Workplace democracy by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, nothing says democracy like being forced to join a union.

    2. Re:Workplace democracy by deanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sorry, dude, but you've never worked in a unionized workplace.

      Getting rid of people that aren't doing their job or are complete assholes is a complete bitch.

      Ever been to a tradeshow where they have unions in the convention center? You can't even plug in a freakin computer, let alone carry one in, without a union guy. If you do, and they catch you at it, they'll close the whole show down until the "problem" is fixed. Oh, and as a bonus, all that work costs you BIG bucks for them to do it.

      Oh, yeah...unions..what a GREAT thing...pffft.

    3. Re:Workplace democracy by anonymousman77 · · Score: 2

      Think about what America was like pre-unions.

      Monopolies existed everywhere
      Railroads were allowed to import Chinese folks and pay them literally in rice ...yet fantastic estates were formed by the few who had 99% of the wealth (Hurst, Rockefeller, Kennedy, et al) while everyone else pretty much lived in poverty.

      After the unions formed, a middle class started emmerging in America. Business started paying good wages. Saftey standards started rising. Standard of living rose dramatically.

      While TODAY'S unions help some lazy people keep their jobs, do you want the alternative?

    4. Re:Workplace democracy by bsiggers · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's pretty well known that if you make decisions as a manager, being (or appearing) to be fair, employee motivation improves. There was an article about this in Harvard Business Review (dead tree version), 2 months ago or so, very interesting. Sorry don't have a link.

    5. Re:Workplace democracy by Natalie's+Hot+Grits · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The alternative is already here, and has been getting stronger and stronger by the year. Do you really think we aren't currently, and have been, going back to this alternative the past 5 years?

      The middle class of the United States is shrinking faster than ever, and significantly faster than most other democratic countries. We have the smallest percentage of people in our middle class compared to other top democratic countries. The upper class is also shrinking, but becoming more powerfull. The poor people are increasing in numbers like nobody's business. While this might not have anything to do with unions, they (unions) certaintly aren't preventing it.

      I believe unions had their place, but now are pretty much obsolete considering that the coporations have congress people literally, and legally, on their payroll.

      --
      Two infinite things: your stupidity and mine. But I'm not sure about the latter. If my sig offends you, I'm sorry.
    6. Re:Workplace democracy by ax_42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You might mean the company described in the book Maverick by Ricardo Semler. He took over his dad's company (Semco), started by firing the existing top management and then started experimenting.

      Good read.

  16. Get a purpose by musicmaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can't compensate for customers that don't buy anymore. But you can give the company some kind of purpose - so that people don't feel lost anymore.

    A manager could redefine the company so that people see a future for it. It could specialize. People could get trained so that a department becomes better and better. Such a specialization could even help when the layoff go on, because it will improve the chances for a new job.

    Even a low level employee could help building such a view. Try to find collegues gor exchanging ideas and build your own "center of excellence". With a sense of purpose and collaboration even mediocre employees can achieve good results - provided the motivation is there.

  17. Small gestures and keeping them included by Violet+Null · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Assuming that such things as more money and raises are out, due to budget constraints, you tend to have two options:

    1) Small gestures. If you're a project leader or some other type of manager, take the people who report to you out for lunch whenever a milestone is successfully passed. Or provide free soda. It won't cost that much, compared to, say, the cost of training a replacement. For some companies, it could also be being flexible on the hours slightly (so that people could come in an, and leave, an hour earlier or later). Or allowing them to play Unreal Tournament after business hours. (This may not be a good fit for all companies, though.)

    2) Keeping them included. If something's happening, the employees are going to be hear about it. They can hear about it through the official means, or they can hear about it through rumors. It's better to hear it through official channels; otherwise, rumor-mongering just goes up. If people are going to get laid off, you're much better off being upfront about it -- there'll be uncertainty either way, but at least there won't be the idea that management is hiding something. If possible, present the news with alternatives (see if anyone is willing to work part time instead). The important thing is to let them feel like they have some small amount of control, as opposed to being subject to the whims of fate.

  18. Improving morale? by BoojiBoy0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Obviously you haven't been getting enough floggings.

    --
    I know the secrets of the video game champs
  19. The Art of Management by Verity_Crux · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is an art to managing technical people that makes them feel like their brain is wanted, and their strong, peon-labor back is not the most important part.

    Here are some helps:

    If you assume you know the market better than your technical people, all you'll do is torque them off. Programmers usually know the software market pretty well. They at least can tell the difference from a quality product and a lame one -- something most business people can't seem to figure out.

    If you have to do lame, per-hour contract jobs (ie, SBIR), make sure the people who actually put in the hours get a bit of hourly income in addition to their normal pay. In other words, the management doesn't deserve the Gov's money when I did all the labor for it. And again, nothing motivates people to peon labor like money.

  20. Give 'em all Stickers by big_groo · · Score: 2, Funny
    They'd appreciate these...

  21. Treat your people like professionals by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is an easy one:

    Treat your people like professionals, not children. Tell them what you need them to do by when (set reasonable expectations, not impossibilities), tell them what their assets and resources are, and then leave them the hell alone to work. Don't hold enless status meetings, don't hassle them about what hours they're working, etc. If someone's struggling or not doing their work, you'll have to deal with that, but don't treat that as the default situation.

    My last "bad" company was constantly under deadline pressure. My development VP responded to this my having daily status meetings, wasting an hour a day restating what was happening and getting status info that he could have gotten automatically if he'd just learned to use the damned change tracking system. They'd also give you shit if you tried to go home before 9 PM (even if your work was done; you should be "testing or something"). What did I learn there? Treat people like irresponsible children and that's how they'll act.

    So, basically, don't overmanage and don't be a dick. Treat your people with respect that you'll get it in return.

    There's one more thing I'd suggest, but in my experience this is either something you're good at or something you're not: I'm a firm believer in team building, but in an informal way -- when you go to grab lunch, ask your people to come with you. If you're going to grab a beer after work, invite your people along. In my experience, this works great and has a lot better effect than going to Dave & Busters once a quarter or something.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Treat your people like professionals by n3k5 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Tell them what you need them to do by when (set reasonable expectations, not impossibilities), tell them what their assets and resources are, and then leave them the hell alone to work.
      This can be horribly overdone. I once had a boss who didn't come into my office to see how things are going a single time in months. He didn't reply to e-mails most of the time, so I had to ambush him in the hallway if I needed a desicion from him, to which he usually replied 'do what you want, I'm sure you'll make it right'. The problem with that wasn't that I was unable to work on my own, but that I had the feeling that no one was interested in my output and that it didn't matter wheter I did anything right.
      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    2. Re:Treat your people like professionals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There would seem to be a pretty big difference between "let your people do their thing" and "avoid your own job and go golfing".

    3. Re:Treat your people like professionals by len_harms · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was asked the same question the orginal poster was asking just the other day.

      I gave the person almost exactly the same answer you did. His response, you'll love this. OH thats not possible.

      Give me the choice of what I do with my time. Let me have some say in the crazy deadlines your coming up with. Do not bitch at me when I do not come in on the weekend. For every one of those it was 'oh thats not going to happen'. I looked back at him and said you are not open to any sort of change and little 'fun side' things will not help moral. You do not respect us, or our families, or our time. If I see no respect coming from managment even when I give it to them. I am ending up not really caring what happens.

      Latter on that day he even told me that I do not care what other people have to say. I always listen and am willing to change my views if I am wrong. What I could not get through to him was that NO ones opinions are respected where we work.

  22. freedom by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Perhaps your company already works this way, but my company gives it's workers a lot of freedom. I come in and leave as I please, with no fear of reprisal. This leaves me relaxed in the office, and I have never resented by bosses because of it.

    Another tip is to take your co-workers out to a bar ;)

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  23. Coding contest by srowen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our company's engineering department runs an annual "coding contest" with a nice prize or two. Last time, teams of two had two days to build the fastest-running solution to a series of problems.

    It sounds kind of gimmicky, but there's apparently nothing like a little competition and a prize to get the software engineers' blood pumping. It was really all the discussion about the problems before and after that was so great... it did a lot to get different groups of people talking like they never had before.

    It worked brilliantly as a team-building exercise for engineers. Heh, and maybe it helped the management spot the engineers crazy enough to spend the time on the contest, and win.

    1. Re:Coding contest by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Ask your boss if he/she has read a book called 'Peopleware'. It was out of print when I read it, but a quick google shows that there's a second edition out now. It's the best book on management theory I've ever seen. This was one of the ideas it put forward.

      If you can get hold of a copy, it's well worth the read. It contains some very entertaining stories, some true and some made up to illustrait a point. My favourite is where Alexander Graham Bell is trying to sell his new 'Bell-o-phone', in a modern era which does not have telephones:

      Boss: So, if my employee is busy when this Bell-o-phone rings, what happens? Does it just stop and let them get on with their work?
      Bell: No! That's the best part! It keeps on ringing and ringing until someone answers.
      Boss: Thank you, the door's that way.

      Moral: interrupting your staff is not a good way of making them productive. Another (true) story talks of a CEO who walked into a room full of employees, and signed a major deal without reading it. When queried by one of his lawyers he replied 'I don't read contracts, that's what I pay you guys for.' Moral: Treat your employees with respect. Don't try to do their jobs for them. Your lawyers should know more about contracts than you, and your coders should know more about software development than you. This is why you employ specialists. Their job is to make sure that products work, yours is to make sure the company works.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  24. the beatings will continue until morale improves by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 4, Funny

    Random and capricious firings, demotions, reorganizations, and project cancellations help. So do bamboo canes. I would also look into 50% pay cuts for anyone who isn't management. Keep the staff isolated from each other and the outside world, make sure no one knows how the company is really doing in presales negotiation or postsales execution, and then you'll have a really tight rein on them.

    Oh yeah, mustn't forget Gestapo-like surveillance techniques and frequent reminders that you don't trust your employees not to squander company time and resources! Crack down hard on anyone who likes to mail jokes around, block access to humor sites and job-boards, and occassionally reject or alter outbound mails "by accident". Finish this off by identifying your employees by number first, name second -- a login and email address like jc7385@company.com really lets them know how much you care.

    --
    "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
  25. Hmmm... by Squidgee · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Well, considering you most likely have a small quantity of money, token gestures may be required.

    First off, I'd _allow_ and/or _encourage_ Geek activities (This _is_ a Geek workforce we're talking about, no?). Say, maybe you could have an after hours LAN party? And of course you'd need to allow /.ing, etc, during work hours. of course, not to excess.

    Also, assure the rest of them (Falsely or not) that their jobs are secure, that the company needs them, etc etc. THis tends to be important. Also, reward productivity. Maybe $50 for a good worker? Not expensive, but it will boost moral.

    Hope this helps!

  26. Don't underestimate the little things. by taliver · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When a boss needs to cut things to show he's ding things to keep costs under control, he invariably heads for 'the little things' first. Like that espresso machine. Or the supply of bottled water. Or Mountain Dew. In many cases these are what employees will consider made the place 'livable', and when the perceived quality of life drops, morale soon goes out the door as well. Especially when all the old guys tell all the new guys "Back in the day we had blah-di-blah blah"

    --

    I demand a million helicopters and a DOLLAR!

  27. been there by jhagler · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I worked for a company that dot-comed in a blaze of glory, but even through the layoffs we managed to keep morale relatively high by simply showing the employees that we valued them.

    I was a low level manager in the NOC and found that by keeping the employees up on what was going on in the big picture, allowing them to have input in some of the decisions which directly impacted them, and not being afraid to roll up my sleves and work side-by-side with them they respected me more and were always willing to go the extra mile for me. The most detrimental thing to their morale were the company meetings where the C*O's tried to rah-rah the troops with buzzwords and press releases. People like to feel as though they have some controll over thir future and they know that upper management is the proverbial irresistable force, so keep them away from that and help them focus on the things they can change for the better.

    In short the best thing for morale is the respect of your direct manager and as little of the corporate crap as possible.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity -RAH
  28. Simple Solutions by drayzel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Having problems with negative talk during lunches?

    Get rid of the lunch breaks! If your local labor laws won't alow that, then just make sure each employee has a different lunch time. You may have to vary start times to fit them all in, but that is why the day has 24 hours.

    People complaining around the water cooler?

    Remove the water cooler! If the local health laws require a source of water, then intall a money collection device. People will think twice about gathering around for a BS sessions if it costs them $.25 a swallow.

    Negatiove E-mails making the rounds on your corporate network?

    Are their computers REALLY needed?
    Isn't web development really more of an artistic thing? I think only one person would really need to have a computer, the rest can just draw there ideas on paper with crayons and submit them to the guy with the computer for entry. And those silly PHP or Perl monkeys spend WAY too much time changing code, tweaking , degugging and stuff. I think most bugs are there because they are not careful or they are poor typists. You could hire a touch typists from you local high school to enter all their code for the day in the evening. Tha way they would be sure to be accurate the first time. Your empyees will be so busy they won't have time to have morale.

    You are correct in your assumption that lay offs cause bad morale. NEVER LAY OFF EMPLOYS! Alway make thier job so horrible, so degrading, so painful that they just quit. It will save you a bundle on unemployment fees and severence packages. If you planned ahead you are allready located in an area like Utah, that has a horribly depressed tech sector so a few employees will stay because they know that the only other oppurtunity is flippiung burgers at McD's.

    ~Z

    1. Re:Simple Solutions by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 3, Funny

      One of the best ways to improve the moral of a group of employees is to fire those with low moral. This will obviously increase the average moral level.

      Example. Suppose you have 10 employees, 9 which have a moral level judged to equal 5, and one with a level of 1. The moral level is 4.6. Fire the guy with a moral level of 1, and the average moral level is now 5, roughly a 10% improvement.

  29. Do what you enjoy doing... by vwpau227 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the key to enjoying work is to love what you do. I work for a startup and absolutely enjoy what I do, which includes creating, designing and documenting wireless communications systems. Sure, the pay could be better, and sometimes I wish that the company was better funded, but I think what I get from work is more than just a paycheque. I get to do things that I want to do, and work on special projects where I see I can make an impact. And that has made all the difference.

    So what can employees do to make their working experience beter? How abou finding opportunities in your own position where you can make a contribution. How about finding a different job that you like and where you can do what you want to do? If there aren't any positions around, find new opportunities for your skills and experience and start your own business. Everyone has special skills and knowledge that are applicable to the marketplace. The important step is finding and indentifying these opportunities.

    I figure I've been quite lucky in the grand scheme of things to be where I am, and I acknowledge that. However, I think that we all can do our part to find work that is stimulating and rewarding.

    Kahil Gibran in his piece "The Prophet" wrote that "Work is love made visible. And if you cannot work with love but only with distaste, it is better that you should leave your work and sit at the gate of the temple and take alms of those who work with joy."

    Gibran continues, "For if you bake bread with indifference, you bake a bitter bread that feeds but half man's hunger. And if you grudge the crushing of the grapes, your grudge distils a poison in the wine."

    The key to enjoyment at work is to find a place where you can do what you love to do. And that in turn will enhance your morale.

    --
    These are the good old days you'll be telling your children about. Make them worthwhile.
  30. Re:You answer your own question... by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1) Stop laying people off. If you have to make sacrifices, then make them accross the whole oragnization, temporary pay cuts, etc.

    Or, if you must lay off, act like you don't want to do it.

    I've been through or in six rounds of layoffs at four different companies since I was an intern in '98. The very best handling I've seen was when I was with SGI (the company formerly known as Cray at the time) as an intern.

    First, you could tell that the boss genuinely hated, hated laying off her people and felt like she'd failed them somehow. Second, when the layoffs actually happened, she held a meeting with the survivors to tell us about it so we didn't hear it through the grape vine. Finally, the department took the whole afternoon off. We had the option to go home, but instead we grabbed some beer and a couple of pizzas and went to a local park, played frisbee and hung out (the people who'd gotten laid off were invited too, which I thought was classy).

    At my last company, they laid off like theives in the night. They'd call people in out of the blue, then send out an email apparently designed to scare us all into working harder and longer. One time, we laid off a dozen people and the CEO's wife (who was executive something or other) went out and bought a new Lexus the same day. It's amazing nobody took an AK-47 to that shithole -- they definately had it coming.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
  31. The exceptions... (and they DO exist!) by mekkab · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First, I agree with you totally. However, beoynd the web development/+5 years java experience/visual basic etc. etc. market, there exists a seedy underbelly to the IT world. That is the land of Legacy Systems.

    There exist systems so large and arcane, that it takes a developer the better part of a calendar year just to understand some basics of how the system works (and I've seen others struggle for longer). There is ADA. There may be FORTRAN. And there is a whole lot of assembler.

    These are systems that have their own operating systems written on top of the operating system. These have components that average 100,000 lines of code each- with another 100,000 lines of code for the test harness. Now multiply that by 12 support components. And we haven't even gotten to the actual APPLICATIONS that run on top!

    For projects like these, management does have to watch their back. They don't have lots of money to keep useless developers on, but once a new project ramps up they say 'oh, we need developers who have a lot of experience with our system' hahaha! Hire back those guys you fired!

    It is companies like these (think: big ol' gov't contracts) that have to play this dancing game of shelling out some money for pizza every now and then to keep people happy because if they let go of everyone now (or piss them off enough so they leave), they won't be able to staff up in time when the new projects come, and they won't be able to complete the new projects (because they are aggressively scheduled) and they never make a dime on new projects again.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    1. Re:The exceptions... (and they DO exist!) by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is true, but some of those old legacy systems have evolved into new fancy leading-edge systems. The one loop-whole is that a lot of the legacy code is still under the covers. Even understanding the legacy systems to write applications can be a differentiator when it comes time for employment.

      --
      --------
      Free your mind.
    2. Re:The exceptions... (and they DO exist!) by divisionbyzero · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes, and what is the biggest focus in IT right, now? Getting rid of these exceptions in order to cut costs. I could justify keeping around a couple of extra Java/XML guys for future growth, but my first priority is to get the legacy folks on-board with something standards compliant, or at least less arcane, or get rid of them. And those folks are followed closely to the door by those people that refuse to share knowledge. You make yourself indispensable by being a leader, not by hoarding knowledge. In reality, nobody is indispensable.

      On the other hand, as far as hiring and firing in this market goes... A lot of people seem to have bought into the myth that employees are interchangeable. Maybe to a certain extent someone's technical skills are interchangeable, and that's debatable, but their personality and their "soft skills" are not. Believe it or not, soft skills matter in every part of the company. So, getting the right person is often more important than getting exactly the right skill set.

      It's odd to see how opinion seems to break down into extremes, like indispensable or interchangeable, in adverse conditions, when, really, any good manager with a good sense of perspective doesn't believe in either of those opinions.

    3. Re:The exceptions... (and they DO exist!) by ArsonPanda · · Score: 3, Funny

      really, any good manager with a good sense of perspective...

      wohaaa... those exist? i thought they were just a myth.

      --

      --I don't want the world, I just want your half.
  32. Things to do, and not to by deanj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First off, if the company continues to lay off people in round after round, don't keep your head in the sand because you could be next. Be sure and have some feelers out for a new place to go NOW if it all possible...who knows, you could end up with a better job.

    I've worked at places like you described. Unless the company, or at the very least, your immediate management itself commits to making it a better place to work, it's not going to happen.

    Things the company can do (not in any order here):

    1) Free drinks
    2) Flex time
    3) Comp-time for overtime work
    4) Food brought in
    5) Lighten up on the dress code
    6) Flexibility on web access
    7) Promotions.... even if it's just in title
    8) Explain what the hell the plan is.
    9) Increased vacation time

    Things the company should NOT do:

    1) Organized pot-luck (how depressing)
    2) Hand out company-logoed crap

    I'm sure there are more for each list. I just can't think of any at the moment.

    You and the rest of the folks you work with can do things outside the company (go out to movies, play sports after work, lan-parties...whatever you're all into...you get the idea), and that'll help the moral with the folks you work with, but it's not going to help with the place you work.

    Again, the downside of all this, if moral is great, and the company continues to lay people off, getting ripped out of there at some point for a layoff will hit you like a ton of bricks. And one hell of a lot more because you liked to work there.

  33. Morale by spoonist · · Score: 2, Funny

    Best thing for morale?

    How about you quit?

    After a few months of you still unsuccessfully job searching, everyone at the company will feel really appreciative that they still have their jobs. This will vastly improve morale!

    Also you can return periodically to regale them with hilarious job interview anecdotes.

  34. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by WickedClean · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And don't take away the casual dress policy (if you have one). Nobody wants to have to wear a damn tie just to sit behind a desk all day. It makes no sense.

    I was in a healthcare-related tech company that went under and in the last couple of months, you could see it coming. The bosses had no clue what they were doing and wanted all of us smaller people to come up with AND execute the big ideas.

    Maybe the business should offer some info on how to make a great looking resume.

    --
    ...All I can say is that my life is pretty strange...
  35. Stop trickle layoffs by XNormal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is almost nothing worse for morale.

    Management may make one last round of layoffs, if really necessary, and then set a challenging goal and declare that there will be no more layoffs for one year (unless someone is really not getting any work done, of course).

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  36. Turning around the company...from the small side by Spooker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My own experience is with a company that started with 4 developers and 3 management types...we got up to a whopping 18 people at our highest (only 8 of those webheads) and now we have 3...morale in my company was the lowest that people quit in batches...all thanks to a management that didn't pay attention to what the developers had to say...we were just slaves that cost too much :)

    In a way, thankfully, the owners woke up and ripped the company to shreds after finding out what was happening...now we are three developers...and yes we went from 40 hour weeks to 70 hour weeks along with our salaries dropping by as much as 60%...but we are loving it...we went from being developers with absolutely no control of what we did to developers ready to conquer the world...

    It's not about team-building, it's not about pats on the back, it's not about high salaries (but high salaries don't hurt )...it's about making a difference in a world that is regaining some of the idealism we thought was lost...open-source projects lets everyone be the king of software...watching a feature you dreamed up make it into the site or the software is better any day than having your boss give you a peptalk about doing a good job...

    For those who read this and are not sure where I was going or where I went, you're not alone...I'm not sure either ;) but I think I outlined the points I wanted to share that make me the work-a-holic that I am...one who enjoys giving tech support just as much as getting that new delphi component to work exactly the way I dreamed last night at 3am and then decided to code at 4am...

  37. The solution could be as easy as a box of tic-tacs by Linux-based-robots · · Score: 4, Funny

    [excerpt from Dilbert strip] ...
    Dilbert: Any idea why morale is so low?
    Wally: We think it's your breath.

  38. Do not tolerate "Dead Wood" by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I timed out on big companies and corporate BS about 6 months ago, having worked for 3 big companies ( > 2000 employees each) and never coming particularly close to "job satisfaction".

    The one thing that most annoyed me, considering myself to be a good, honest, hard worker, was the fact that there were people at all these companies who were not, and were not sacked.

    Why should I turn up to work everyday and work my ass off, to pay not only my own salary, but that of idle layabouts who do nothing to earn theirs.

    That and too much documentation.

    I now work for myself, so I only have to worry about myself becoming dead wood, and I don't do any documentation :o)

  39. Try gaming by n1ywb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At my last job, we were required to play at least one game of fooseball per day, and we had an office-wide Counter Strike game almost every day after work. Even the vice prez played. It was really great for morale and team togetherness.

    Also think about what kind of extra services you can easily offer your employees using existing resources. Set up a webserver where employees can host personal web sites, for example.

    --
    -73, de n1ywb
    www.n1ywb.com
  40. Let them work from home from time to time by ubeans · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My boss allows me to work from home on Mondays and Fridays. I avoid a long, stressful commute to work, and I save 40% on gasoline. Overall my productivity has increased, and I feel better.

  41. Demming's work in Japan by mekkab · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Do some reasearch on Demming and the paradigm shift from the factory model of production.

    The more workers feel like they "own" the company; they are proud of it and understand their contributions and sacrifices, the better their output.

    This also has a tie-in with business process. The more that business process reflects the way that workers actually work, the more people are willing to comply with it.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  42. no easy answers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My oberservations (UK)....

    The worst boss is one with a chip on their shoulder because they are a boss; they tend to not talk to their people and make political based decissions to further thier career.

    The best boss is "part of the team", they get involved, understand the problems, make decissions to impove the buisness / team.

    Social activities are great for breaking down cross team walls. I once worked at a company which was stuck in the middle of no-where and everyone drove miles to get to work. There was no social life as a result. I really missed talking to other teams and understanding their problems, and for others to understand my problems.

    I've never understood why people moan about external contractors.
    1. If you think they are getting paid too much stop moaning and be a contractor! Oh you like the stability of a being a a permie...
    2. External contractors generally provide a lot of benefits. They have seen it all before, got the t-shirt etc. You can get a lot of great advice from contractors.
    3. When you hire a crap contractor, sack them! I have worked with too many contractors who cant code for toffee, the management know they cant code and they are kept on until their contract comes to an end.

    by 2p
    Al

    1. Re:no easy answers. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Funny
      I have worked with too many contractors who cant code for toffee

      Have you seen any contractors who will code for toffee? I've known a few people who will code for cola, but never for toffee.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  43. Nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I work for a very large computer and printer manufacturer (can't say which one, but the initials are HP), and it's so far been my experience that the company isn't at all interested in morale. Why? They don't have to be. With so many people unemployed, they can get away with neglecting or even mistreating the employees and hide behind "you're just lucky to have a job". Anyone who gets fed up and quits is a bonus for the company, because they don't have to worry about paying any severance package as they would for a layoff.

    This may save them a few pennies in the short term, but once economic prospects improve, they're going to lose a lot of good employees who have long memories.

  44. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by Gortbusters.org · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is soooo true. I have flex hours, I can work 6am-2pm, 2pm-10pm, or 9-5. I can work at home, or my office, thanks to things like a VPN and Avaya IP Softphone.

    When your work load starts to be equal to that of 2 or 3 (or more!) head count, and you know that if you push yourself that you can do it... there are a few things that happen: 1) you realize that doing this work will save your job for the months to come so you do it, and 2) you realize that your boss doesn't really care if you sit in an office or the recliner in your home... as long as the work gets done the boss will be as happy as pig in shit.

    --
    --------
    Free your mind.
  45. My company's motto by techstar25 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The way to an engineer's heart is through his/her stomach." It'a all about lots and lots of cookies.

    You should also try loosening up the dress code. At my company (govt comm software and hardware, 1000+ employees) the normal dress for engineers is jeans, sneakers, and a polo shirt. A lot of people even get away with jeans and t-shirts.

    Try compressed work weeks which allow employees to work more hours in fewer days than the usual 8-hour per day schedule. The "4/10" work week is where employees work 10 hours per day over four days. My company uses the 9/80 work week which occurs over a 2-week period as follows: employees work seven 9-hour days in a 2-week period, one 8-hour day and then receive one "free" day off every other week. We have every other Friday off. It only takes a couple of weeks working 9 hours a day before you don't even notice that extra hour a day, and you'll never want to go back to the old schedule.

  46. Re:Morale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Most lunches are spent complaining about lack of enjoyment/challenge from the job and the fact that upper-management seems not to understand what we do.

    Welcome to every company everywhere.

  47. I Quit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That turned out to be the best way to improve company moral. It also improved my moral.

    I was such a good complainer, they put me on a team that was directed to manage both the west coast development and east coast sales and support. What did I find out? Improving a corporate structure is a fruitless experience.

    Working for myself IS sometimes a pain in the ass. Too much paperwork and sometimes I'm forced to invent an imaginary boss, as being the sole magilla can get tiring. But at least the fruits of my labor are my own. I can live with myself at night. I wake up to challenges just like before, but the dead-end of tilting at corporate windmills is over.

  48. How To Win Friends and Influence People by shfted! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I highly suggest you read the book How To Win Friends and Influence People . I don't have time to write a review, but there are a couple at the Amazon page. Basically, this book will teach you how to lead people and get them to do what you would like them to do.

    --
    He who laughs last is stuck in a time dilation bubble.
  49. Good companies stick to principles--always by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The software (and hardware) market is full of so many highly-qualified people, most with years of experience, that employers have little to no incentive to care whether their current employees are happy or not. If they're not, they can either leave or get fired, and it will be easy to replace them, probably with someone more qualified and/or with more experience, who will work for as much or maybe less money.

    It costs approximately $10-15k (before you spend dime one in salary) to hire your average full-time employee in America. (This is an average, not a locked-in-cement dollar amount... It includes advertising, agency efforts, the manager's time, the HR manager's time, how much time it takes to sift through 2,000 resumes for a $22k per year helpdesk job, any training they may need to provide to get the new guy up to speed, drug test, background check, reference check, etc...)

    Given this fact, in the long run, it costs MORE to have high turnover in a company than you could ever spend on treating your staff like human beings... I'm not talking about pool tables and six-figure salaries, either. I'm referring to simple things like flex-time so people can actually see their kids and have interests in their lives besides work.

    It seems to me that any company operating under this "Who gives a shit about you?" theory should be avoided... Sadly, in this employment market, the talent (that's us) doesn't have the option of voting "nay" to shitty employers by walking off to other jobs.

    I am quite fortunate that my new employer is a private (profitable) corporation that doesn't have to whack $1,000,000 out of the budget every five minutes to meet short-term proft forecasts and prevent stock price fluctuations. My former employer made $36 billion in PROFIT the year they laid us off. Sorry, but if you have to fire 5,000 people one quarter, then need to have a "massive hiring drive" the next, that is short-sigthed mismanagement by drones in suits who put their 401k balances ahead of the company's long-term stability and reputation.

    It is easy to say "We can cut 30% out of tech support and still field the same number of calls" but "# of calls" is not the same figure as "# of calls handled satisfactorily." As the quality drops, long-term sales prospects of the company's newer products slowly evaporate as CIOs and IT Managers say "Why the hell should we deal with those slow/incompetent jerks, when XYZ Corporation still offers good service?"

    (Ever spend big money with a vendor after their "support staff budget cuts" led to lousy service? Me neither...)

    It's gonna be like this, in our job market at least, for a while. Hopefully not too long...!

    Sadly, I'm afraid you're correct that we're going to have to deal with this sort of idiocy for a while longer... It is amazing to me that in strong economic times, managers complain endlessly about their "free agent" employees, louldy wondering where "loyalty" went?

    Then, in the down times, selfsame managers do their best to shit all over said employees... Perhaps if employers didn't (ab)use their power over their employees in a lousy employment market they wouldn't be so eager to jump ship at the first opportunity.
    --
    Who did what now?
  50. Disagree. by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Just fire all the troublemakers as an example to others. Morale will skyrocket.

    I know you're probably just being sarcastic, but this is a management tactic and one I firmly disagree with.

    Here's something that every university-level management program ought to stress on the first day of class: The real leaders in your organization are not just in the management chain, and all those in the management chain are not real leaders. Effective "troublemakers" are really the natural leaders in your organization who are alienated or dissatisfied for some reason. The smart thing to do it listen to them and recruit them to your side.

    I'm not talking about the know-it-all engineer who runs his mouth constantly (we all know this guy, don't we?) because nobody really listens to him, anyhow. No, I mean the person who seems like they're friends with 90% of the company, who people like and respect. Think about it -- you know the sort of person I mean.

    A good manager will figure out who these natural leaders are and understand that they're the key to guiding whatever organization they manage. These people can either destoy morale or make your team a team. As a manager, it's your choice.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Disagree. by jafiwam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wanker may not be posting sarcasm. Firing is not always bad, there ARE people who deserve it. The trick for management is to figure out who/when to make it effective. I admit though, mine is the only company that I know of where the firings were good and imediately positive.

      My company pulled itself out of a big financial hole, turned around in 8 months, became profitable again and remains so. The beginning was the firing. From there, morale improved and more work got done and more money was made.

      The remains of this can be seen in my journal if you want to take a peek at some of the negative attitude that is now gone due to firings.

      Firings improved morale, a lot. They just gotta hit the right targets.

  51. In other words "How can we deceive?" by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If things are bad then trying to raise morale is nothing but an attempt to deceive employees. To try to convince them things are OK when they're not. But employees aren't so stupid. Nothing tells an employee that their company is in trouble more than morale boosting exercises from management.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  52. Re:Morale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hell, moral at our company is as low as it goes. I thought it couldn't get worse, then they said they were cancelling the biscuit supply! (major cost saving, apparently). Never mind saving money by sacking all our crappy IT managers who have no technical knowledge and keep buying new servers for every 3rd party app we get (on the 3rd party company advice - so their margins go up).

    Free meals? Whe had a christmas meal and our boss insisted we have 7 pizzas between 8 of us (I wish I were kidding!!).

    I improve my moral by bitching about them *and* doing everything I can to move! My boss tried to improve my moral by asking if I could work this Sunday!

    Sorry, had to get that off my chest...I *do* feel better now.

  53. You need to read, "First Break all The Rules" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We have grown from 4 employees in 1999 to 270 in March of 2003. Employee morale and engagement is incredibly important to us as managers in the company.

    There are no shortcuts to creating employee morale and engagement. Free lunches won't do it, pep talks won't do it, even stopping the layoffs won't improve morale and engagement.

    Creating an environment where people know what is expected of them, where they can grow, where management cares about them, where they are recognized, where they are valued and where they have the tools to do there work will improve morale and engagement.

    Accomplishing this is hard work and it is up to your company's managers to make this happen. As with most things in life there are no shortcuts. It is hard work. Hope you are up to it.

    Here is a list of the 12 key items that you need to discover from your employees from the Gallup book.

    Look here:

    http://gmj.gallup.com/book_center/FBATR/

    Item 12: Opportunities to Learn and Grow
    Item 11: Talk to Me About My Progress
    Item 10: I Have a Best Friend at Work
    Item 9: Doing Quality Work
    Item 8: My Company's Mission or Purpose
    Item 7: My Opinions Seem to Count
    Item 6: Someone Encourages My Development
    Item 5: My Supervisor Cares About Me
    Item 4: Recognition or Praise
    Item 3: Doing What I Do Best
    Item 2: Materials and Equipment
    Item 1: Knowing What's Expected
    What Is a Great Workplace?

  54. As an employer, I'd say... by Loundry · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Granted, I own a retail shop with only a few employees, but I have worked as a programmer and have seen both the best and the worst of management. It has helped me know how to treat (and how not to treat) my employees:

    What to do:
    • Make it very clear to each individual employee what she/he needs to do to be promoted. Do this openly, consistently, and frequently.
    • Your employees' families are much more important than your job your you are to them. If you respect and show concern for and interest in their families, then they will like working for you. If you do the opposite, you will get the opposite result.
    • Always be ready to take a few for the team. My business for a while was making money, but not that much. After I took my draw, I realized that I was paying my part-time hourly employee more than I was paying myself. Your employees are more likely to make sacrifices for your company if you make sacrifices for your company.
    • Be positive even in the face of disaster.
    • Praise your employees for specific behaviors. Focus on their strengths.
    • If your employee has a problem, be a grown-up about it and help them problem solve. Do not criticize. If they can't fix the problem even with your help, then you should probably be looking to replace them. Your talented and hard-working employees won't tolerate your coddling a poor performer.
    • Be honest and honorable with your customers. Your employees will know it if you are not, and they will think, "If he will do that to his customer, then what will he do to me?"


    What NOT to do:
    • Do not lie.
    • Do not accuse, berate, criticize, condemn, complain, or condescend to an employee, coworker, customer, hell, anyone. Those are childish, unprofessional choices, and you will never have good morale if you are unprofessional.
    • Do not express worry, even if you are (of course, worrying is violating the "be positive" rule ).
    • Do not tolerate employees who behave unprofessionally. Problem-solve or fire them.


    Just a few thoughts. I'm still a newbie. If you're an employee, and you want to increase your company morale, forget it. I suggest finding a new employer.
    --
    I don't make the rules. I just make fun of them.
  55. Re:Lol, I do the same thing. by tang · · Score: 2, Funny

    "For fun I go to the interview, they offer me the job, then I drop a bomb on their stupid asses. I want 95k/year, 6 weeks paid vacation"
    He met to end this with:
    And then my mom comes and picks me up in her minivan and takes me to my real job at McDonalds.

  56. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by pivo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Flexible work hours and an open plolicy regarding internet and telephone use is a very good policy, but the absence of this type of policy is a symptom of a deeper problem within corporate "culture," by that I mean the treatment of employees like any other "just-in-time" business resource.

    Many companies today layoff and re-hire (euphamistically called "contract hire") employees as they're needed. Contract prices today are generally no where near where they were a few years ago because of the surplus number of contract workers and the new rage to outsource work to drastically cheaper overseas labor pools. Corporations spent the 80's and 90's trying to convince people that it really was in their best interest to function as resource units, even suggesting that it put the individual worker in the driver's seat, but in realitiy of course it was always in the corporations best interest. An excellent book on this subject is Thomas Frank's One Market Under God which chronicles the enormous PR and marketing resources expended by big companines to cultivate thier self-serving pseudo-populist image. Great insight also into the backgroud behind all those MCI and IBM commercials featuring throngs of third world looking people and the proverbial work-at-home CEO mom. Does Microsoft really stand in awe of us? I don't think so.

    Few people are doing well contracting today. Employers need to realize that paying employees well and not treating them like children, indentured servants or worse as a simple "resource" like computers or other equipment but instead like fellow human beings, is the best way to make everybody happy and productive.

  57. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree with the internet and phone use for personal business. Most of the time I have to take a vacation day to compelete such tasks and no work gets done. On the flex hours, I would agree to a degree. In the past I have had a question for someone only to realize the that person would not be at work for another two hours (or has already left for the day). But I do not have a problem with 30 minutes to maybe an hour. 30 minutes can drastically affect commute time because you are no longer in sync with everyone else.

  58. Re:Morale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Robbie? Dwayne? Is that you? If so, please report to the IT Director for Summary Firing.

  59. My Brush w/ Morale Improvement. by Art_XIV · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The company I work for had a new salesperson. This guy had previously sold ERP systems, and now he was going to try to sell our companies development services.

    This really happened - I was walking by his office and spotted him reading a copy of Java for Dummies. Yes -- a salesperson.

    He explained that he felt he should know at least a little something about programming if he was going to try to sell our services as developers.

    Un-freakin'-believable!

    How many of you have spent endless hours explaining geek crap to sales/marketing/management nitwits who didn't have a clue and didn't care that they didn't have a clue?

    Well... needless to say... he was canned a few months later by a clueless superior.

    --
    The only thing that we learn from history is that nobody learns anything from history.
    1. Re:My Brush w/ Morale Improvement. by FreshFunk510 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What exactly is your point?

      I'm a coder but, in some ways, it would be good to see that salespeople are taking the least bit effort to understand what it is you're doing. By understanding the technology better they can sound more educated about the stuff they are selling. Perhaps it behooves you to read a book or two about management, sales and marketing (I recommend Sales for Dummies).

      --


      "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." - Martin Luther King, Jr.
    2. Re:My Brush w/ Morale Improvement. by kruczkowski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like the other guy said, what is your point? Not eveyone is a coder, and the coders I do know don't know how to sell shit.

      You should congrat the guy for taking initative. Most sales guys talk the shit and have no idea what anything is. Thats why companys like MS and Cisco have special traning for the sales people.

      Think, do you want to code and sell?

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    3. Re:My Brush w/ Morale Improvement. by scaramush · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just wanted to join in on the "Hey Asshole" Chorus.

      That guy was trying to get a better holistic picture of your organization. Maybe if you learned a bit about sales, you'd come to understand the types of features the customers want, or how to "sell" your suggestions to management.

      *Shakes head sadly*. No wonder non-techies think techies are such assholes...

      --
      "...you can steal my woman, but you ain't done nuthin' smart."
    4. Re:My Brush w/ Morale Improvement. by lordaych · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I find it absolutely amazing that everyone who's replied to your posting so far has interpreted it as if to mean that you were ridiculing this salesperson for wanting to understand Java when in fact it's obvious that you respected his behavior, especially when you referred to the superior who canned him as "clueless." I'm pretty sure this has been pointed out already, but not in a direct reply.

  60. One++ Words by Bombcar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Free. (as in Beer)

    As in lots of it. :)

  61. Have everyone rent Office Space. by neo654 · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's guaranteed to improve morale.

  62. Management Doesnt Care by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why should they care about your morale?

    The market is different, they have the upper hand currently with the high unemployment rates.

    If you are not productive, or a trouble maker, they can find a replacement for you.

    A few years ago it was different, and they had to keep people at any cost. But that is not the case now. Be happy you are even employed.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Management Doesnt Care by Apotsy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, but at many companies, they seem to know (even if many people are too bummed out to acknowledge this) that the business cycle will come around again. And they are terrified that all the good people will scatter as soon as times get better. At my company, HR was even holding focus groups to find out what employees thought the company could do to keep morale up.

  63. Inspiration from Hollywood by heli0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Peter Gibbons: So I was sitting in my cubicle today, and I realized, ever since I started working, every single day of my life has been worse than the day before it. So that means that every single day that you see me, that's on the worst day of my life.
    Dr. Swanson: What about today? Is today the worst day of your life?
    Peter Gibbons: Yeah.
    Dr. Swanson: Wow, that's messed up!

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
  64. Reduce layers of management by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find that morale is driven by common purpose. When layoffs are occuring each individual must decide whether to try and find a job elsewhere or to become part of a solution.

    Workers at the coal face have a lot of comments to make, and after may long bitchy lunches often have some very good ideas on how to get the company out of it's financial woes. These workers working as an integrated team to bring the company back into the black are the key to sucess and morale.

    I think the keys to making this work though are honesty (If the workers aren't given a realistic view of what's going on up at the top then they won't come up with good solutions at the lowest levels) and responsive management. Responsive management is tricky, and particularly when the number of employees drops significantly in an organisation management is looking after it's own collective butt, and often not concentrating on getting out of the rut. Management is usually a lot quicker to drop actual productive workers than they are the management group which made the poor decisions in the first place. In an example in my own company we had an office lose 20 software developers out of 30 while only one token management position fell. To compound the problem the key management individual who was responsible for the group's downfall was hired into a more lucritive group to save him from his self-made destruction.

    Management can't be responsive to the front-line workers when there are too many of them, or when they're worrying about their own positions. They may come to see the situation as the same "us and them" battle that the productive employees see. Management and general employees must take hits in equal and honest poritions, and must communicate effectively to save jobs at every level.

    Benjamin.

  65. the management won't like it... by koekepeer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    in the current economical climate, you have to be flexible. a good idea is to have plenty of redundancy among the programmers/functional people and have a mean, very slim sales team and some supportive personell (secretary). the main costs in IT companies are salary costs, so pay the people that do the work.

    now in real life, this will never happen. what you see is management that stays and "lower" employees who get fired. therefore, the people who have to do "the real work": functional design, programming, implementation, customer support are getting overworked and are underpayed to support the huge cars and salaries of management.

    the only real solution is to cut down the amount of management positions, and have many employees that can do "the real work"...

    i know this isn't of much help. all you can *really* do is to sit back, work like mad, and hope economy will be rising soon, and clients will want to invest again.

    now, for some basic personal improvement lessons: stop complaining. the amount of energy you put into worrying about things you cannot do anything about is enormous -> think about it. focus on what you can achieve (how little these achievements may be). as Covey says (recommended reading!): enlarge your circle of influence. and be "proactive" (the most annoying buzzword ever ;-). if you see a solution, just propose it to your manager casually. if you focus on that kind of strategies,and put energy into discussing improvement, you have at least a higher chance to enlarge your influence on the situation.

    do it nicely though, the managers are in huge stress, covering their ass all the time. don't say "i think this is wrong, we better do...", but instead use formulations like: "we thought a bit about the idea you proposed the other day. it was very interesting (blah blah blah), and then slowly introduce your opinion about it. make it seem as if it's his/her idea, with just some minor optimisations. you will fail a dozen times, but the 13th time something might stick. and if a lot of ideas start sticking, you and your co-workers might even be able to really change something.

    and don't worry about being acknowledged. what you and your co-workers want is a better environment, and not a management position, right? (at least not for now :)

    trust me it works :) personal experience!

  66. Re:What do you expect? by fmayhar · · Score: 2, Insightful
    On the other hand, what kind of performance do you get from people who are afraid and are constantly looking over their shoulders? Not to mention the fact that a layoff hurts not just those who are hit but those who are left behind. Sometimes morale (and therefore performance) never comes back to what it was.

    I really think that the layoff business has grown past the point of absurdity. The companies that will do well are those who are just hunkered down and are hanging in there.

    Of course, I was laid off recently, so what do I know, right?

  67. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Flexible hours... Some companies have flexible hours. However, there are so many related issues it is not even funny.

    The notion of flexible hours in startups has become "come late, leave late". If someone wants to start the work day at 7am in the hopes of getting out by 4 or 5 and get a life, there is almost palpable tension from the glares of coworkers who amble into work sometime at 10am or 10:30am. More so, if the bosses themselves are late comers.

    The flexible hours thing is almost abused in some places. It is much less pressure, if people are asked to be in at certain time, get out at a certain time (unless there are deadlines and other situations).

    Imagine having no work to do and still having to sit till 7pm because the dudes that come at 11am will stare you into submission...

    S

  68. One layoff per year by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A company can only survive about one layoff per year. It's much better for morale to have one big one than lots of little ones. It takes more planning by management, but that's what management is for.

  69. Classic line by armer · · Score: 2, Funny

    This reminds me of our "official" company motto: The random firings will continue until morale improves"

  70. Workers Self Management. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.che-lives.com/cgi/community/topic.pl?fo rum=13&topic=485

    That's how you improve moral, comrade ;-)

  71. been there, done that by audionoom · · Score: 2

    hey,

    I have got to admit > I've experienced it two times now, and I don't want to sound to pessimistic or anything - but here is my view of the situation where you're in

    1. the overall morale is bad, and personally I don't think there is anything that will be able to change that - as long as one person remains in the company that has experienced the bad time and bad morale ; someone will always refer to the other times ...

    2. once people are giving up, there is almost nothing, that can change that, except the people themselves ; there will be events from management to boost morale, there will be team meeetings and whatever other things managers will come up with - it will not help, unless the people themselves are ready for it

    3. after some time, management changes will start happening - since upper management does not see a lot of changes in attitude settling in
    Sadly enough - this will only add to the frustration and wondering of the cublicle dwellers - since they will most probably not be informed about the changes and the reasons thereof ...

    4. because of all frustrations getting the upperhand - more people will leave - and less work will be done because of employers talking to each other etc etc ...

    I think what I'm referring to is a spiral > I'm afraid there is nothing much that can be done about it, especially with so many people involved - you talk about a company with 500 people in the past, and 200 remaining ... I don't think there is a way people can be motivated enough, to make them forget what happened in the past ...

    Dilbert comics come to mind by the way ...

    In the two times I experienced this - I remained until the end - until the complete demise : I got fired, and the company went bankrupt both times, in some way ...

    What I learned from this - jump ship when you can, especially if yout got some serious qualities, unless it is a small firm and you got a really innovating product or service worth losing your own motivation for ...

    good luck !

    mentor

    --
    Knowledge first. Social contact later.
  72. Be Thankful and Patient by Alethes · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Those are the two things everyone has to do to be happy.

    1) Be thankful that you have a job at all. There are a lot of guys that would kill for your job right now -- even if it's not exactly fun.

    2) Be patient and wait for the economy to pick up. It HAS to pick up at some point.

    Being thankful and patient are a choice. They are contagious, and when you, as an individual, apply them to your own job, your co-workers will eventually pick up on it as well. Conversely, if you choose to complain and make that the norm, your co-workers will also pick up on that and morale will suffer accordingly.

  73. The Hacker FAQ by Jonah+Hex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All companies should make reading the Hacker FAQ mandatory for all employees. Even IBM uses the Hacker FAQ!

    My personal favorite:
    0.2: How should I manage my hacker?
    The same way you herd cats. It can be a bit confusing; they're not like most other workers. Don't worry! Your hacker is likely to be willing to suggest answers to problems, if asked. Most hackers are nearly self-managing.

    Jonah Hex

  74. Why must it be a "geek" activity? by barzok · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The last large "activity" our company's IT department put together was a BBQ & game at the local AAA baseball stadium. I can't stand the game of baseball itself (and I'm sure there were more non-fans than fans there), but the act of going out to the park and hanging out there was fun. The last thing I want the company doing to "improve morale" is to ask me to stay in the office and stare at the screen for several more hours - regardless of what's on the screen.

    Your job does not define who you are. Being "computer geeks" does not mean we should not do anything outside that realm.

    Oh, and don't BS me that my job is secure. A lot of really good people got let go in the last round of layoffs. If more are coming, tell me. If they're over, tell me that too. But don't ever "assure" me that my job is "secure" - there is no such thing anymore.

  75. Be Careful by CarlDenny · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember that you are just a developer, and it is not your job to improve morale. You may want sales to improve, but it's not your job to go poking into improving sales.

    Management will notice your attempts, and if they are failing to address the morale problem, and you are trying to edge into their turf by trying to address it yourself (from their perspective, questioning their policies and pointing out their inadequacies.) You are likely to be the next one laid off if you try to push for change.

    That might not be a bad thing, I don't know what your severance package is (I really liked mine.) When the company is going downhill, IMHO the only way to raise employee morale is to disconnect that morale from the company. The one constructive thing I would suggest you do is network with your fellow employees. Get to know as many of them as you can, especially those doing things unrelated to you. And once you or them are laid off, keep in touch.

    I had a similar experience, although it was coupled with years of re-orgs and muddled direction. I tried to push for change, but my morale broke, and I just accepted things and hoped for severance. I'd been marked as a trouble-maker, so once things got tight enough, I was out. They had to re-hire me as a contractor, and I am 10 times happier about working, and probably 3 times more effective than when I was dragging my feet from low morale (paying me almost 3 times as much too ;).)

  76. How this for a moral buster! by louissypher · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Taken from Fuckedcompany.com in Dec. (Jo Anne was soon fired afterwards, go figure).

    From: Jo Anne Miller
    To: Gluon - Site - All
    Sent: 12/6/2002 3:03 PM
    Subject: Commitment Message from the ALL HANDS MEETING
    Importance: High

    As those who were present at the All Hands Meeting this morning already
    know, I am seeking the PERSONAL Commitment of everyone at Gluon to the
    Release 2.1 development schedule. I expect a return email from all the
    staff to tell me if they can step up and make the commitment to DO
    EVERYTHING IT TAKES, INCLUDING POSTPONING DECEMBER VACATIONS to hit the
    2.1 ready for field trial milestone of January 20, 2003 and ready to
    deploy milestone of February 21, 2003. I also need to know if you will
    volunteer to be here the week of December 23-27 and Dec. 30-Jan. 4.

    Please consider this decision carefully. Don't say yes if you don't
    believe that you and your fellow Gluon teammates can make this happen.
    Don't say yes, if you aren't ready to find bugs, fix bugs, document the
    product and get this ready to go out the door. Don't say yes if you are
    too burned out to look forward to continued late nights, long hours and
    stretch milestones.

    Now more than ever, the Gluon team must have the start-up/do whatever it
    takes mentality. If any of you are not of that mentality anymore, have
    personal/family issues that prohibit you from making the full
    commitment, please tell me that as well and I will do whatever I can to
    assist you to find a job outside of Gluon.

    I am attaching the four key slides from the all hands related to our
    commitment to refresh your memory of what is required and why.

    Looking forward to hearing back from everyone

    Jo Anne Miller
    Gluon Networks, Inc.
    5401 Old Redwood Hwy.
    Petaluma, CA 94954
    707-285-4001
    www.gluonnetworks.com

    --
    www.bleepyou.com
  77. Simple, stop the Layoffs!!! by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You want to increase morale in the company?

    Stop laying off people. This has proven to be a serious morale booster. If your company has faith in our employees by not laying off people, they will respond exponentially.

    Find other ways to cut spending. Start with Voluntary leadership salary cuts instead of laying off people. Have the CEO not take the yearly fatty bonus or have the upper management take a voluntary pay cut.

    Also, start investing in research and development into new technologies and new money making ventures for the company.

    Watch your morale grow after this.

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
  78. Promote internally by fleener · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Recognize the quality veteran employees you have by promoting them.

    Nothing distresses the rank and file more than to have a new manager every one or two years who appears, changes the direction of a project (or kills it outright), and then leaves and is replaced by another manager who shakes things up.

    You need people who know the company's history, its people and abilities, and have a vested interest in the company's future.

  79. Re:You answer your own question... by Jamesie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Second, when the layoffs actually happened, she held a meeting with the survivors to tell us about it so we didn't hear it through the grape vine.

    I can see how that works

    "Can everyone who still works here come to my office for a meeting?"
    "Where are you going Skyshadow?"

  80. ages ago by Bowdie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I worked a summer job in a laundry. One day midweek, I looked up from the %meaningless task% I was doing to see the owner of the entire chain helping fold sheets.

    I asked how often he does this, to which he replied "Whenever I feel like a change".

    The girls on the line really liked it. He didn't have his own table at mealtimes, didn't have his own parking space, and you could call him "dave".

    Ace fella. And even though the job was shit, most people were happy at it.

    --
    yes, www.dotcomforwardslash.com is my real URL.
  81. Just Let Me Do My Job by Salo2112 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Memo to management:
    1. I want to be left alone to do my job. No OSHA training (I can use a fire extinguisher without any explanation from the "Risk Manager," thank you), no safety training (I could not care less about the MSDS sheets - I'm in an office, for God's sake), no sexual harassment/sensitivity training and no drug awareness in the workplace meetings. Do not waste my time on bullshit meetings/classes that have nothing to do with my job.
    2. I come in early, work late and work on weekends. If you see me leaving or arriving outside of my scheduled hours, don't worry about it: you're way ahead on the deal.
    3. If I can only use my email or web connection for business use, fine: quit allowing people to send broadcast emails about Relay for Life, Blood Drives and Girl Scout Cookies. Either it's for business, or it isn't. Don't allow other people to clutter up my mailbox for "good causes" if I can't send/receive jokes.
    4. I am low maintenance, but is it too much to ask that you *not* turn off the fucking hot water heaters and ac units to save money at 4:00 pm every day? Some of us work outside normal hours.
    5. If one of my cow-orkers misbehaves, I expect that he be punished. I do not expect that new policies be put in place that have the effect of punishing those of use who did not cause the problem to begin with.
    6. Don't lie to me. I'm a big boy, I can handle the truth.
    7. Don't get mad at me when I tell the truth.

  82. UT by HBI · · Score: 4, Funny

    I manage a small infrastructure team (6 people). We take time out at lunch and at the end of the day (after 5) to play a couple maps of UT.

    We name the bots after users we hate, or French presidents.

    After 15 or 20 minutes of intense fragging, morale is restored.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  83. 11 things developers can do... by javabandit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    11 things developers can do

    (not in any particular order)

    1) Read "Code Complete" and "Design Patterns". Others will be thankful... trust me.

    2) Have pride in what you do. Programming IS an art. It requires talent, practice, motiviation, inspiration, creativity, and experience to write good code. Know your craft.

    3) Eliminate the KINGDOMS on your team. That is, one person should not solely own one part of the system... hence a "king". Make sure at least two people are knowledgeable about one part of a system.

    4) Utilitize tried-and-true design patterns. These are your brushes and your paints.

    5) Be politically aware in code reviews. Take constructive criticism constructively and remove your ego. If a reviewer is suggesting that you make a minor change, and the change doesn't harm anything... DO IT. Being inclusive of others' ideas in your code will make everyone happy.

    6) When reviewing other people's code, don't be superficially critical. Programmers have different styles. A car, on the outside, may not appeal to you, but it doesn't mean that it isn't a well built/designed vehicle.

    7) When designing (or refactoring) portions of code, have design reviews (informal or formal) with at least one other developer. Bounce all your ideas and thoughts. Get ideas and thoughts in return. Use your whiteboard for goodness sakes. That's what it is there for.

    8) Praise other developers when they do well. Programmers need to know when they're doing good as well as bad. Programmers appreciate praise from other programmers more than they do from anyone else.

    9) When you have to be critical of someone else's code, be constructive. Apply honesty with a feather... not with a sledge hammer. Instead of saying, "What the fuck??? You're not threadsafe and possibly creating multi-tons."... say... "Do you think that synchronizing this singleton might work here better... so we're threadsafe?"... for example.

    10) Be consistent in your code. It makes your code more easily maintained by others.

    11) Document. Please write comments. Don't be so egotistical to think that your code is self-documenting. Even in COBOL and Eiffel... the two most verbose languages on the planet... this isn't the case.

  84. Ounce of prevention worth a pound of cure by ddt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Before you hire on to a company, please, for the love of Pete, find out how it's funded.

    If they started from nothing, got three rounds totalling $100Mish from VC over the past 2-3ish years and don't have a shipping product to show for it, absolutely don't work there. VC money means that the company needs to be on the fast track to acquisition or IPO, which means that layoffs that cut burn rate will make the company more attractive to investors while the product is busy slipping.

    If it's funded by an angel investor or angel pool, then find out everything you can about their personalities, their investment portfolios, how much they're worth and how much this venture, based on its burn rate, is likely to be straining them.

    If it's funded by the people managing it, these, in my experience, are usually the best companies to work for. It's their daily routine on the line, in addition to their cash.

    Find out if management has worked at companies where they've conducted layoffs before. They will likely do it again.

    Find out if the company has ever missed payroll. If they have, do not assume this is a bad thing. Particularly if everyone stayed on board, this can be a positive thing, and it means management doesn't fire people at the first sign of cashflow problems. If missed payrolls happen all the time, then figure out, based on how often it happens, what your actual salary would be, counting the missed paychecks. It's really no different from saying that you are going to be paid a lower salary. As long as you are planning for missed payrolls, they won't really be missed.

    Find out how you are going to split profits on the product. If it's just an ephemeral hand-waving promise that profits will be split, don't take the job. If it's just stock options, don't take the job. If it's going to be a subjective percentage of a pool based on performance, consider taking it if the deciding personalities strike you as fair, well-balanced people. If it's going to be a fixed percentage base with subjective bonuses, then absolutely take the job. None of this is real unless you get it on paper. So make sure you have that piece of paper the day you show up for work.

    Most employees believe in the myth of salaries, and their precious, surprised little faces when they learn that there is no Santa Claus never cease to amaze me. Income comes into most companies in large, unwieldy piles of cash, not perfectly metered little bundies of biweekly love. So understand that salaries are a fiction, that exist to create the illusion of stability while lowering the employee's compensation for work over the long haul. We have come to depend on them because we, as individuals, have lost the discipline to save and manage money.

    Always, always, always ask how much cash is in the bank right now. Always, always, always ask what the company burn rate is. Do the simple math, and plan to start looking for a job 2-3 months before that money runs out, assuming that they won't make a single penny in the interim or enjoy any further loans or investment.

    Watch company growth. Ask every month or two what the new burn rate is. Do curve-fitting to get a more accurate idea of when the bank account goes empty.

    Most people take salaried jobs because they don't want to sweat over the company bank account. Sweat it. You're just burying your head in the sand if you don't. Let the fear of that going zero motivate you. And let the excitement of seeing a percentage of those proceeds motivate you.

    Morale is usually a function of how well the product is coming together. If it's making exciting progress, catching up, or God forbid, surpassing the competition, investors will usually continue to jump on until the product ships. This is always the first-order response for morale. People love working on good product.

    Odds are, if you're in a web development company, your demand has dried up, you're competing with several other development companies also desperate for wo

  85. My Great Suggestion! by bugs_me_too! · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Try working for a real employer, like the government. You can gain much more satisfaction by knowing what you do is of service to your country. Be a public servant!

  86. IT Employee Burnout at Critical Levels by Sounder40 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    According to this article in E-Commerce Times the Meta Group has just published a paper saying that IT employee burnout is reaching critical levels:
    A majority of IT managers say IT employee burnout is now a serious issue in their organizations, according to a recent study by research firm Meta Group. Among the many areas of high concern to IT departments this year, few are as evident as employee morale, the report states.

    Before I lost my job to a layoff, (my job was outsourced oversees) I was doing the work of several, and constantly worried that layoffs and outsourcing were coming.

    I'm now considering a whole new career in a completely unrelated field...

    --
    A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
  87. Yeah. by Renraku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I got fired from ClientLogic without warning. The morale of the place among the workers wasn't very good. Seems everyone I talked to had some bitchfest about the place daily. The turnover rate was very high, because they were being bitchslapped around by Bellsouth. Their rules were archaic, and we were stuffed into cubicles, not one, but two at a time. Forced to run programs that crash every five minutes, and forced to be tech support, sales AND customer service. Not to mention that promotion was only a $.10/hr increase in pay. Add to that the fact that the vending machines were always broken and that they regularly lay off half of their staff where I worked, and you get low morale. I heard through the grapevine that we were getting paid $5 less than what we should have. And we were missing benefits. All so the company could profit a little more. ClientLogic was getting paid almost as much for giving us the privilige of working for them as we were busting our asses for them! And they slashed our benefits.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  88. What not to do. by marhar · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If your management team is truly clueless, they are probably not going to appreciate any management hints you are going to provide. If there's some specific details about situations they can address, that's fine, but "here's some tips on how to run a company" are not going to be appreciated.


    So be careful what you say and don't come across as implying they're clueless managers. That's not going to help them and it could hurt you.

  89. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It is much less pressure, if people are asked to be in at certain time, get out at a certain time (unless there are deadlines and other situations).

    Two points:

    1) There may be less work pressure, but some of us have lives outside of work. Where I work right now, my ay typically runs from 10-6 or so, with a couple of extra hours work in the evening. So I'm putting in more than 40 hours a week - but I get to avoid the morning and evning traffic, and spend more time with my family. It's a heck of a benefit to me, and has cost my company little or nothing.

    2) In today's economy, there are always deadlines and "other situations". If you haven't read it already, go find a copy of Yourdon's "Death March". It's an easy read, and the final chapter - "Death March as a Way of Life" - it pretty much on-target, in my experience. Whatever you're working on is always absolutely, vitally, critical anymore... because if you won't treat it that way, there's someone else who will.

  90. Just remember... by stienman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just remember, it's your employer's job to make sure you are happy and have meaningful, challenging and fun projects. You are the customer, and they must do all within their power to satisfy you so you'll deign to come to work the next day.

    Come off it. This is a job. It is only as lifeless and painful as you yourself make it. There is fun to be had in debugging someone else's work, if you decide to have fun with it, or even the most tedious/boring projects.

    Please note that those employees who are happy are generally more productive, and get fired last.

    If you're waiting for your employer to "make" you happy, it'll never happen, you jaded cynic.

    If you feel you cannot be happy without them being proactive about it then you'd best look for a job elsewhere.

    Believe me, they'll say "Good riddance."

    -Adam

  91. Re:Morale? by zootread · · Score: 2, Funny

    Most lunches are spent complaining about lack of enjoyment/challenge from the job and the fact that upper-management seems not to understand what we do.

    Welcome to every company everywhere.


    Ummm.. No. I spend my lunch eating.

    --
    Zoot!
  92. You think that's downsizing? by hacker · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The company went from over 500 people to under 200 in under two years.

    My last job (incidentally, 70 weeks ago, unable to find work since) required me to relocate 3,100 miles from the Right coast to the Left coast, to work for them, leaving a very stable job behind. A week after I got there, my hiring manager was fired, along with 76 other people. We were 250 people at the time.

    Over the next 14 months, we went through 5 rounds of layoffs, including the last one which liquidated my entire department, leaving me as the only person standing. Even my boss was let go.

    In 18 months time, we had gone from 250 people to 30, and were on our 4th CEO. All three founders had resigned, two failed merger deals (one with a company that just recently bit the dust themselves), two sexual harassment suits pending against the first CEO and his team, and it only got worse from there.

    We originally had free vending machines, but those were soon turned into pay-only machines. The senior management team had free parking in a mostly-empty garage space, and we had to pay $20.00-per-day to park across the street. The middle-management groups were internally promoting themselves, laying off more and more people, and making the remaining people work longer and longer hours, for less pay. We were earning (as developers) roughly 1/4 of what the managers were earning at the time. They were working 4-day weeks, 5 hour days, feet up on the desks, while we were camping in the offices overnight sometimes to meet customer deliverables.

    Every day, people would come in wondering if "..they were next". That's not a nice way to come to work, not wondering if you're going to lose your job, but when.

    In November 2001, I decided to pack up my things, and resign. The company wasn't going to survive a 6th round of layoffs, and now with the board in control, they had changed direction, completely tarnishing their name with the Open Source community. I moved back 3,100 miles to the Right coast, and haven't been able to find a job since (yes, it's incredibly tough out here).

    After I left, they worked on a product, and after the remaining developers completed version 1.0 of the product, and delivered it, they were all fired, en-masse.

    How's that for morale for you?

  93. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by weeboo0104 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The key to flex time is to notify your co-workers when you will be arriving. I have co-workers who arrive at 6am and leave at 2 or 3 and other co-workers (boss included) who arrive at 10am and leave at 6 or 7pm. As long as everybody knows when people will be around, everybody seems to be very understanding.

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  94. Icing does nothing without cake by wdr1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's more stable now, but people are consistently laid-off.

    This is the problem. You have to lump the bad news and spread out the good. Employees are willing to understand layoffs. People are surprisingly understanding of how a buisness needs to adapt, and how that adapation can, unfortunetly, lead to layoffs. As long as you take care of those being laid off (e.g., solid serverence pay, extension of health benifits, assistance finding a new job, etc.), both those let go and those staying behind will show suprising resiliance.

    However, if your consistently laying off people, that means upper management does not have a clue of what is going on, and will undercut any confidence in the company. People need to be able to focus on their day to day responsiblities and get their job done; not worry if they're going to have a job in 48 hours.

    All the other suggestions, flex-time, etc. are great, but you have to fix the fundamental problem before you can get to those. If you have a bad transmission, you don't try to fix it by getting a pair of fuzzy dice.

    -Bill

    --
    SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
  95. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by Fesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Heh. I don't have to imagine that because the staring into submission doesn't work on me. The easiest way to get me to dig in my heels is to try to exert peer pressure.

    They chose to come in late. Screw them guys, I'm going home.

    --
    --Fesh
    Kill -9 'em all, let root@localhost sort 'em out.
  96. no, it's "firings" by Erris · · Score: 2, Insightful
    isnt that "Beatings will continue until morale improves" ? :)

    What, are you nuts? You can't break an employee by beating them. They just get all upity about their dignity and what not. No, as long as everyone keeps their jobs no one is really scared.

    Look at it this way: It takes 20 years and a pension to make truely loyal employees. It takes about two years, regardless of beatings, to make a technically competent employee. It only takes about six months of unemployment to turn a man into the cynical, sniviling yes man that management desires. Which do you think management prefers?

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  97. Generally easy for techno people by IanBevan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A couple of simple rules have always helped me with the morale of my team. If morale is poor, I nearly always point at one of these things and realise that I/my company is not doing it: 1. Clear, achievable deadlines
    2. The best tools and equipment for the job (within reason obviously)
    3. Insulation from the most insideous company politics and hopeless project managers.
    4. Wages in the upper bracket of the industry for each role

  98. how about not trying to destroy morale by zackbar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My current client seems to not understand this.

    They have been implementing actively stupid policies.

    First, they outlawed accessing email from yahoo and other web email services. Rationale? They couldn't enforce virus scanning on those systems. Why is this stupid? Because the same email virus scanners that our exchange server uses is also on every machine, so that the same scan gets performed on our exchange email OR our web email. (Policy states that if we don't keep up on the latest scanner patch, we will get fired.) Since I never run javascript and I've been paranoid about viruses before anyone else there, I'm ticked. Even worse, for the first 6 months there, they hadn't given me email on their system, so I had to use web email (before they implemented this policy.) I had signed up for various developer forums using my yahoo address. Various developer emails have been sent to me at that address that I can't access from work anymore.

    Recently, I discovered that they decided that people don't need to be able to change their own network passwords. If we need to change it, we have to talk to the help desk. The help desk has total domain control of the network. We don't, although we're the ones who actually set up the web and sql servers, did various maintainence on them, and are the ones that the help desk come to when they can't figure out how to clear the cache on their machines. (I exaggerate on that last bit, but not too much.)

    Why did they decide to not allow password changing? Rationale, according to the network admin (the little hitler) is that users can't remember their passwords if they change them. Rationale according to the cio is that management needs to know everyone's passwords in case anything happens. When I tried to explain that the domain admin can login to any machine regardless, and even change our password, it was waved away. I was asked if it's really all that inconvient to have the help desk change it. Even more annoying, the help desk doesn't know our passwords. They simply let us change them on their machines. All I can figure is that I'm either being lied to, or management has no clue what they are doing. Not a morale boost.

  99. Promotion? Also, read "Peopleware" by mib · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm amazed to see so many suggestions regarding promotion possibilities -- I wonder if you all work in a different IT industry to me. I'm only 30 (don't laugh), but I'm already as high up the technical career ladder as it's possible to be at my workplace (and changing jobs would be a demotion based on the job ads I've seen). To get any higher I'd have to become a manager, which doesn't yet excite me. Isn't there more to a career than just climbing the ziggurat?

    Anyway, if you are a manager, the best advice I can give is to find a copy of Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams, read it, and use its advice. It's a thin book, but it is +100 Insightful when it comes to employees. Some links on the book:

  100. Improving company morale? by Linknoid · · Score: 2, Funny
    Well, if you put a magician in a support slot, it gives +4 base morale. You could also put a paladin to reduce the morale loss rate. Here is where you can get more info on other units.

    (This is supposed to be a humorous Kohan reference, in case any moderators think this is offtopic)

  101. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by sonali · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I wonder how many hours does an employee really work in a 9-5 work shift? To name some things that can't be categorised under "work": surfing the net(reading /. for example), reading mail, lunch hours.

    So instead the employee should be given a free reign to decide when he wants to work. IMO, flexible hours lead to better productivity as it gives the employee the chance to choose a work schedule that suits him the best.

  102. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by cmacb · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "The notion of flexible hours in startups has become "come late, leave late". If someone wants to start the work day at 7am in the hopes of getting out by 4 or 5 and get a life, there is almost palpable tension from the glares of coworkers who amble into work sometime at 10am or 10:30am. More so, if the bosses themselves are late comers."

    More often, in my experience, it is the other way around. I've always been a night owl. My last job had an equal number of late comers and early birds. I was almost always the last one out of the office at night, sometimes including the night guard who locked up everything around 10PM.

    I envy the person who can work at home whenever they feel like it. I had this luxury for about 2 years. The trick of course is that both you and your manager (or customer) must have a good idea of what the job is that you are doing so that you can agree on when it is 10 percent done, 50 percent done, or finished. These days, there are way too many manager that have never done any of the technical work that they manage. They don't have a clue what you are doing or how you do it. They don't know good quality from bad quality until the end user complains. I would rather work as a greeter at Walmart than work in one of these organizations again. I have no respect for the managers involved, and if you sign on to one of their projects you are doomed to fail even if your own work is beyond comparison.

    At some point, and maybe we have already reached it, production of good software must be it's own reward, since the captains of industry don't seem to know good from bad. Results are slowly comming in from projects farmed out to cheap labor overseas and it ain't pretty. This has nothing to do with intelligence or talent of those workers who do work over there for a fraction of what we are used to getting paid. It has instead to do with the total inability of management to conceptualize (much less document) the products that they are trying to turn out.

    It is unfortunate but true, these failures will not result in the perpetrators getting fired for incompetence. Rather they will be so monumental that they will cause businesses or at least divisions to be closed down entirely. As poor as mid management is at evaluating the quality of our work as programmers and technicians, top management is even *worse* at evaluating the results of mid-level managers. In almost every case the solutions will be too-little too-late.

  103. Do the opposite of my company by theirpuppet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My Company:
    - Long Hours (all employees are salaried and must work a minimum of 50 scheduled hours per week).
    - Low pay (because of the economy, you are told from the beginning that they will pay you less than you're worth)
    - Little Vacation (1 week per year, 3 sick days)
    - Psycho Managers (very senior management love to fire people, even have one that brags about it)

    Your Company:
    - Expect more (schedule 40, if possible, higher more people especially if you're profitable or economically well off)
    - Pay what they deserve. A little less, due to the economy is fine, but not a lot less. As soon as the econ picks up, they're history.
    - Time off is essential. The more you hedge them in, the more they notice and want to get out.
    - Management must care, and be open. We do have many (if not most) that genuinely care. You can't fake it - you're employees are not rats in a cage.

  104. Re:Morale? As Drew Carey once said... by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 5, Funny


    Aww, you hate your job?

    There's a support group for that. It's called everybody, we meet at the bar.

    See you there!

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
  105. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by tgburrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work at a 24-7 operations center where people are constantly arriving and leaving. To coordinat work and projects asynchronos communication, such as email, voicemail, and ticket tracking software are used. 30 minutes is nothing and can easily be worked around if you do it properly.

  106. How to make your employees happy: by crazyphilman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As a currently very happy employee myself, I can tell you what specific conditions exist at my job that make me happy. Most of these conditions are a function of the job being A) unionized, and therefore solid with good benefits and a living wage, and B) in government, so there is a well-thought out bureaucracy in place to keep things running smoothly. BUT, the specific happiness inducing effects shouldn't be too hard to replicate in private industry -- IF the bosses want them to be. So, as a public service message from moi, here are the factors which lead to happiness:

    1. Pay your employees a living wage, and AT LEAST give them medical and dental. Note that this doesn't mean you have to make them rich! But if you're not paying them at LEAST in the 40K range, they're going to be too busy worrying about getting their rent money together, to worry about YOUR work. In places like NYC or Boston, better make that 60K or your employees will be living in cardboard boxes.

    2. Don't breathe down your employees' necks. Where I work, the bosses leave you alone as long as you produce. So, if your employees aren't missing deadlines, leave them alone and let them do their stuff. When managing programmers (as with herding cats) less == more. Just tell them to keep you posted on their progress, at least once a week (say, Friday before COB). If you need to find out how something is doing, ask casually (this is good because it shows interest and lets the programmer know he's not forgotten). The trick is to LET the programmers produce instead of trying to force it. You'll find they come to YOU to tell you how things are going, because people like to talk about what they're doing. And they'll like you more (this does matter).

    3. Don't be anal about when programmers come and go. We're not the most precise people when it comes to getting up in the morning, or going home at night. We may get in a half hour late and leave two hours late at night -- you get a free hour and a half, and we barely notice. But if you enforce business hours, we get pissed and come in and leave on a much more exact schedule.

    4. Casual dress code. This means, generally, something comfortable but tasteful, like jeans and a polo shirt. Don't enforce the whole "dockers and sky blue shirt" thing (god, that is SO over), or (worse) suits. If you're uncomfortable, you're worried about stretching your shirt collar, not coding that loop. This doesn't mean you have to let them walk in in a kilt and a see-through rubber shirt, either. But, let them be comfy.

    5. Cubicle decoration (within the limits of good taste) should be encouraged. A cluttered, chaotic cubicle is a happy, productive cubicle. A pile of paper on a desk is a sign of activity. Don't sweat stuff like this.

    6. Coffee. Lots of coffee. Don't skimp on the sugar and half-and-half, either, or no one will drink the coffee and that's like no coffee. Any old coffee pot will do as long as the coffee is a reasonable, good brand and when people notice the pot is empty, they can set a new one on to brew. I can't stress the importance of caffeine and sugar to programmers enough. They WILL find ways of acquiring it; if you don't supply it, they'll be taking breaks to make coffee runs. Which do you prefer; three minutes to fill the mug at the office coffee pot, or fifteen minutes to walk a block to the Starbucks, with you playing Spy Games to figure out who's going where and when?

    7. When nothing serious is going on, let the programmers do pilot projects that will eventually be good for the department. You can direct this a little; if you know, say, that you're going to be using some specific set of email tools, mention it to a programmer who isn't too busy and ask him to fiddle around with it and see what he can make it do. Then, keep the source code around for when the project ramps up. Remember: idle hands are the devil's playthings.

    That's about all you have to do, really, to keep people happy. Leave them alone, let them do their thing, keep up the supply of interesting things to do, don't push them unless you really have to, feed them lots of coffee, and let them dress comfortably.

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  107. Play games and get drunk. by supabeast! · · Score: 2

    When I was working at a dying dotcom that was on its way out, we found plenty of ways to keep out spirits up. "After hours" games of Counterstrike and StarCraft were a must. Some of us went out every night to drink and play pool. Then on weekends we would all go get totally plastered at the local pub, walk to someone's place and crash.

    It worked really, really well.

  108. there's no cure to your companies problems by mcguyver · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How to improve your companies morale:
    Step 1: Be part of a successful company.
    Step 2: Do not lay people off.
    Step 3: See Step 1.

    Although you already answered your question, people feel like they always have to look over their shoulder to avoid getting fired. Bottom line - your company is the problem. No amount of booze, yoga, flex hours, massages or magic pixie dust are going to increase morale. Odds are the stigmatism from laying off 300 people is still in the air. My suggestion is do one of two things - find a new job or be content with your situation.

  109. Re:Morale? by mbogosian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Welcome to every company everywhere.

    Actually, that's not entirely true. To the original poster's questions:

    Employers: what have you done to improve employee morale in your company? As an employee, what can I do to improve the morale in the people I work with? How can I make my work environment more enjoyable? What kind of constructive suggestions can I take to management so that they can help improve the situation?

    Here's what I've learned in my brief time spent on this earth about management and leadership. I've learned most of what I know from real-world inferences derived from what not to do. However, I have read a fair amount of leadership, management and sales literature (it should probably be said that I'm a software engineer by training/trade). I've found it boils down to a few things along one main theme:

    1. The more closely the dynamic of company (and in turn, each of it's sub groups) resembles that really fun softball/basketball/water polo/lacrosse team you played on before high school (before sports got really competitive) or that club team you played on in college, the better and more productive it will be. Companies that have a strong family dynamic will always be more productive than those that don't. People want to belong, but they have to have something to want to belong to. The less the company acts like a high school and the more it acts like a volunteer community center the more vested everyone will be in making sure things go well.
    2. Ownership by every member of the company is essential. I've learned that ownership does not mean stock options. Ownership means getting to make decisions, realizing the importance of those decisions and getting to make more decisions, even when mistakes are made. On a side note, if everyone feels ownership, the person most critical of the mistake will be the person who made it. Don't fuck with this dynamic or try to compete with it or your will harbor resentment.
    3. There is no "by the numbers". Managers who stress numerical measurements as the sole method for advancement, and process and documentation as the sole way to solve problems are shitty managers. I'm not saying process (and to a very minimal extent documentation) and measurements are not tools which can be effectively applied, I'm saying that managers should be somewhat protective and nurturing mothers first and save the accounting for the accountants.
    4. People are your most important asset, so treat them like it, damn it. Processes, products, service offerings, any kind of innovation/change in business practice or offerings can be copied (most often at a fraction of the cost incurred by the initial innovator). Your people are what allow you to maneuver more quickly than the competition. If you've got good people and good teams, and you're still tempted to down-size or (a personal favorite) "right"-size, you're doing something wrong. Not only will it cost you a buttload to get rid of them, you will have just sold your company (and your long-term shareholders/investors) down the tubes. This is a good way to demonstrate you don't give a flying fuck about the people "beneath" you.

    You've probably already spotted the theme here: people, people and people. Unfortunately, if upper management doesn't buy into this, you're fucked. There's very little you can do (unless you're in a leadership position yourself) to combat this.The best you can hope for is to be laid off so you can collect unemployment while you search for a new job. Think of it as bozo cancer which has metastasized. If you are in a position of leadership, here's some things you can do:

    1. Make sure everyone in your team gets a sincere compliment (doesn't have to be from you) at least once every couple of weeks (once a week is better). For engineers, compliments that start with, "
  110. Re:Don't take away freedoms to "improve" productiv by penguin_dance · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Know what your people DO. Probably not a problem at the company in the question. But it amazes me how many managers don't have a clue about the type of work people under them do.

    You expect us to learn all about the company business. Well then find out about what we do for you. That way you know if someone is blowing smoke or if the task/deadline you set is unrealistic.

    It also builds resentment when you discover your manager is an example of the Peter Principle and drawing $$$ while you know more than he/she does about what's going on.

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
  111. I got hired by such a company. by aepervius · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finished school 30 june, got hired 1st july after i told I learnt fortran. There is such a lack of skilled people wanting/knowing fortran 77 that they hire foreigner not speaking a bits of the language but a bit of english.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  112. suggestions... by john_uy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i have things in my mind, though i am not a programmer, i do technical and management at the same time :) (and we are a team)

    1. treat people with respect. they'll treat you and your company with respect back.
    2. don't overwork the employees. though at times, they will really need to do a lot of things for days and days, treat them to a small out of town trip even for one night. makes everyone relax and forget work.
    3. managers should mingle with the employees more. see their status and talk to them. avoid asking techies to make paper work (i'm sure a lot of you don't want to spend a day typing a report.)
    4. as a team member, try to delegate tasks. this will avoid conflicts.
    5. there should be a "war room" where everyone can put in their ideas and be seen or listened.
    6. try to put an incentive program to the employees. it doesn't need to be expensive. a simple recognition award will do.
    7. management should be a little flexible with time. they should try to understand if people will be needing an 8-5 shift (like secretaries) or a flexible shift (like programmers.) allow breaks during work. if the time shifts for different employees are different, everyone should be required to keep their mobile phones on.
    8. employees should be set up as team based and not on a hierarchical manner. each member of the mean is responsible for the success of all. whether it is a manager, secretary, programmer, technician, they will be treated almost equally.
    9. teams should be allowed to set their own goals. for example, a technical group decides that there is an increased number of support calls for a particular problem. they will find ways to solve it. (they do things on their own without having someone to tell them too - you don't want people to order you around do you?)
    10. your team should go out from time to time, after office for some recreational activities.
    11. don't order around other people (see related item # 9.) although there may times when a particular task needs to be done. these may be exceptions, but for basic stuff, try to ask.
    12. find ways of making people do things at work not because of money but because they are challenged with what they are doing. for example, try to challenge your employees from time to time to do a difficult task. remember that they should find ways to grow. work should not be monotonous day in and out.

    there are more. basically try to think that the employees are the company similarly the church is to the people and not the physical structure. employees are people - they are not robots to which management orders them around (see item # 1.)

    johnlaw :)

    p.s. read my signature. i hope you have that job.

    --
    Live your life each day as if it was your last.
  113. We all have problems ..., an old system that works by OldHawk777 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Three types of employees:

    (1) those that make all things possible (hardware, software, science, technology, art, literature, commitment, loyalty, satisfaction, drive, profit, ...),

    (2) those that clock-punch, do-a-job, are socially functional, expects a $ for a $ effort, will plagiarize (Type-1's subordinates' work) for career advantages.

    (3) those that are pet-rocks of CEO/SES/..., have exceptional (almost sociopathic) social skills, will take all the credit whenever things go right, point the finger at others when things go wrong, their prime purpose is to manage their career, because (they believe) only Type-3's can be successful bosses/managers (right, they know not their job).

    I have known all three types at every position in Government and Business. Sometimes the Type-3 will be the CEO/SES, have other pet-rocks for affirmation, and believe that Type-2 folks do everything that is needed, because of Type-3 management ability, and Type-1 jerks/fools are the cause of all problems.

    Following the above logic (THIS IS TRUE!): [A] Management says: (1) everyone is replaceable (get rid of the problems), (2) worker-bees cannot be promoted into management, because we need them to do the work, (3) pack-mules are great they get the work done and you can load them up with the important task. [B] Employees say: (1) screw-up move-up, (2) It is not what you know, but who you blow, (3) give head to get ahead. I have heard both "A&B" quotes from Type-3 management people, but employees (all three types) stick to the "B" quotes.

    My observation is that a Capitalist Republic is little better than a Ferengi Republic, though either can be camouflaged as a Democratic Republic, Capitalism remains an economic model, (thank the gods) the Ferengi are fiction, and Democracy maintains the "Great Expectations" for all.

    Any of these models/philosophies are better than all previous governing or ruling attempts by humanity. Kings/Emperors (Louie, Caesar, Napoleon, ...), Dictators (Mao, Marcos, IdiAmin, ...), Megalomaniacs (Hitler, Stalin, Caligula, ...), Democracy (USA, Australia, Britain, ...) proves that we (humanity) can all do better without business, religion, dictators, ... running a country or subjugating people.

    Now back from the abstract to the concrete topic. It is not in the interest of some management teams to have (as equals) mutual respect with employees. Firing a few employees every now/then proves to anyone who may consider themselves equal that they are totally replaceable by other subordinate worker-bees, pack-mules, sub-human. Many capitalist businesses and religious institutions today (globally) are still fascist institutions. Religious institutions (all faiths) around the world continue to fall into three groups (1) the good and pious (I like and protect them) that do their best to help educate, feed, house, ... humanity, (2) the pick-pocket (take the money/people and live well) evangelist always knowing the words of god and asking for money, and (3) the shake-&-bake (shake'em down and bake'em when done, [EM=Evil/Enemy Mankind]) religious leaders that can always justify murder in the name of god. Consensus communities (Democracy) like "Open Source", WWW, ... are now proving that there may be better more profitable (to the company, economy, ecology, humanity) economic models. Dang again, there appears to be only one in three people that I will ever respect, trust, or care about (luckily that third, of humanity, cares about me and the rest of US).

    These consensus communities, using inter/intranet collaboration technologies in the future, will create the stronger, more competitive, and profitable businesses. Network sciences and knowledge-bases of the future will keep track of who is doing what and providing success for US. Business (to stay competitive) will promote the (then disco

    --
    Unaccountable leaders are masters, and unrepresented people are slaves. How do US and EU fare?
  114. Part of the growing class division in the US by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The phenomena you describe I think is part of a larger (and growing!) class division in America. People who do real work (ie, that can point to a product and show their specific contribution, whether design, programming, manufacturing, etc) are being seperated from people whose real work consists solely of "managing".

    People who "manage" have set themselves up as a self-ruling class that sets the rules and rewards for not only the the people they manage but for themselves as well. The important thing to note is the self-ruling aspect -- the management class very nearly always gets bonuses when workers get paycuts, for example.

    The other aspects of the management class that trouble me is the way that the work done my managers is structured in such a way that many expenses are subsidized for the "managers". Many managers travel extensively and during this time have all of their expenses recouped, they dine out extensively and many often private expenses are paid for by the company (home office setups, club memberships).

    It's not that any of the justifications for paying for these things (ie, meals on company trips) are illogical or wrong, but that the work is structured in such a way that an entire class of workers spends much of their working time in situations where logic dictates that their otherwise personal expenses are paid for by their employers, which is not an insignificant decrease in their overall financial burden, in spite of often exponentially larger salaries justified by the demands of "travel" and "evening dinner meetings."

    Meanwhile the "do-ers" are forced to dine at the company cafeteria (short lunch periods) or brown bag it, pay for their own parking and justify office supply purchases for trivial items. Essentially they are required to bear the full costs associated with going to work, while the management class has them heavily subsidized.

    What also concerns me about this is the social aspect of this; people spend so much time at work that they transfer the implied power and priviledge of their work places to the rest of their lives, presuming that a seperate set of rules applies to them vis-a-vis taxes, schools, residences, and even law enforcement and access to government decision making.

    People who belong to the management classes tend to cluster in McMansions in the same wealthy suburbs and make effective use of their affluence to influence the political process to ensure their continued viability (undermining worker protections, tax cuts only they seem to benefit from, public works projects that they derive a preponderance of benefit from such as new highways to their suburbs).

    I believe its just the further Brazilification of our economy and way of life.

    1. Re:Part of the growing class division in the US by dvk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      >>> those who make the rules do so to assure their continued rule-making.

      Wold you please site a specific rule which proibits the setting up of a new executive-less company as I have described? The only stopblock I can see would be funding, and as I stated, in the "everyone trades" environment of post-late-1990s, it's no longer valid as the "not in the in" little people can invest in such company even if big shots could theoretically conspire not to (and for that matter, given the strategic blindness of big trading houses vs. short-term gains, i'm 99% sure they'd invest too, as it would mean better ROI which is their mantra).

      >>> Democracy doesn't just happen, either -- lots of dictators argue that the little people can't make decisions without the inspired leadership of their betters as well.

      Invalid example - in a dictatorship, one of your first freedoms to go is the ability to escape. If a dictatorship has free emigration (whether by choice, or due to porous borders), people will jump ship to a better neighbour. As an immigrant from fUSSR, I can personally confirm that trend ;)

      In case of a company, nothing stops the people to jump ship and organize a new one.

      >>> distinct class with a seperate set of privileges that are not granted to others.

      Such as? Other than perhaps a membership in some exclusive golf club, what exactly are those priviledges? Remember, you can say the same thing, for example, about "privildges" of computer-savvy to have the perks of online auctions, comparison-shopping online or stealing^H^H^H^H^H^Hsharing digital content... or reading /. at work :))))

      >>> Coupled with the repeal of the estate tax,

      OK, so if I came to this country, worked my ass off to start - literally - from zero, and made some money that i'm hoping I can leave to my kids, what exactly makes you think that some lazy welfare-sitting bum who has had MORE opportunities in this country than I ever did has more rights to what I earned than my family?

      >>> increasingly expensive college tuition at "good" schools and we have all the fixings for a new American aristocracy.

      Anyone smart enough to pass tests decently can get a bunch of scolarships. And anyone determined enough can get VERY good education from a cheaper, good - if not Ivy League quality - college. Look at the amount of first/second generation immigrants in graduate Math or CS departments at Princeton, for example.

      Yes, you may have to work harder than some rich guy's child born in silver shirt, but other than this requirement to work really hard, there are no other barriers. You may not likely to get to be the President of the USA or Ford CEO, but the reasonably high executive position is quite possible for just about anyone with appropriate qualities.

      -DVK

      --
      "The right to figure things out for yourself is the only true freedom everyone shares. Go use it"-R.A.Heinlein
  115. Cash, flextime, recognition, VPN, culture.... by websensei · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There are MANY things good companies do to attract and keep the best folks in the industry. Performance-based cash bonuses a couple times a year go a long way. Flexible hours are key. Public recognition of hard work / successful projects is good for everyone. Encouraging developers to work from home as needed, 1 or 2 days a week, is great. And establishing a culture of trust and teamwork and sense of shared purpose is also very important.

    This may sound like a fantasy, but my company provides all of these things, at least to some degree. Yes there have been layoffs -- but it is management's responsibility to make sure that its talent pool remains strong. So they eliminate the weak, and reward the strong, and amazing things happen. My coworkers and I work 50-60 hours a week on average, and more often than not finish the week feeling good about what we accomplished.

    Also, while most of the corporate HR cultural initiatives have been somewhat bland and, well, corporate, individuals are fully empowered to take initiative themselves to make it a cool place to work. For example I started an indoor soccer team, and we've had several foozball tourneys, etc.

    Anyway I wanted to share some thoughts on how some companies (mine at least) are doing it right.

    --

    La via sola al paradiso incommincia nel inferno
  116. Who Owns Work? by gmkenney · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Jobs are interesting things, the product of capitalism and industrialism. The important thing to remember is that jobs are owned by the bosses not the workers. And although they come with attractive bait, i.e., decent paychecks, privileges, benefits, etc., they are still totally temporary and can disappear for reasons known only to the owners.

    The work, however, is owned by the workers! This is not new. But after some five or six American generations in which a huge proportion of the population - especially the highly educated population and more especially the highly privileged population - have relied on jobs to provide their opportunity to work, it is difficult to unpack the work from the job.

    Those who manage to keep the job separated from the work will also manage to find satisfaction regardless of the conditions of employment. It isn't easy. But it will liberate you from anxiety over why your boss is such an obvious fool.

  117. Morale Advice by Gleef · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First, the free stuff (often gone into in other posts). Having a liberal dress code and flex time policy costs a company nothing and can greatly help morale. Don't go too far, though, there are good reasons for having people who meet clients/customers to dress up, and you can't have regular progress meetings if flex time has destroyed all overlap in people's schedules; but back office staff should be able to where whatever they find comfortable, and those who must crawl under desks to plug in wiring should not be forced to wear a tie and slacks.

    Next, talk to the employees. If the company is having difficulty, make sure they know exactly what the problems are, so the rumor mill is quieted down. Equally important, make sure they know the plan to get the company back on track. Set goals and tell employees how they can help. Reward the help too, if an employee does something major to help, give them an on-the-spot bonus, or a contract protecting them from layoffs.

    Next, if more layoffs are needed, do it humanely and fairly. First, ask for volunteers, and offer incentives for volunteering (better severance package), why screw A's life over if B wanted to leave anyway? Second, if at all possible, offer a decent severance package, some people don't have a financial safety net, and if they see people cut off with just their last paycheck, they will panic. If layoffs have several weeks severance, and some access to company equipment for job hunting, those who remain will be less demoralized anticipating the next round of layoffs.

    Finally, management must make visible sacrifices too. If staff is looking at a 10% paycut plus triple the workload due to layoffs, and they see management with unchanged salary and perqs (or worse, more) and no layoffs, staff will be upset. If staff takes a 10% paycut, management should take 20% (and tell staff they're doing so). If there are layoffs, make sure management is not immune. If staff loses health insurance, so should management. It makes a huge difference for morale to know that everyone is in the same boat.

    --

    ----
    Open mind, insert foot.