Slashdot Mirror


Tiny RC Tanks That Fight

Daniel Rutter writes "I've just reviewed a couple of Konami's Combat DigiQs - tiny little remote controlled tanks that can shoot each other. You can stage a two-, three- or four-tank battle, every tank for himself or in teams of two, on a coffee table. They rock."

236 comments

  1. Those aren't toys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Those are Iraqi tanks!

    1. Re:Those aren't toys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And this isn't Slashdot, it's Canada!

    2. Re:Those aren't toys! by Mohammed+Al-Sahaf · · Score: 5, Funny

      The American claims are lies. The brave loyal men of the Republican Guard today destroyed 500 tanks. I myself crushed over 50 with my bare feet.

      --
      Former Iraqi Information Minister Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf
    3. Re:Those aren't toys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, these tanks fight. Iraqi tanks just blow up.

  2. Awesome! by sixdotoh · · Score: 1
    Dude, that sounds cool. I remember the good old days playing tank games on the computer, doing things like adjusting the angle and force of a shot, taking wind speed into consideration. Then there was the 3d version . . .

    Kids these days are too lucky . . . ;)

    --

    This post was brought to you by the number 584811 and the characters / and .

    1. Re:Awesome! by sixdotoh · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      alright, and my first first post . . .

      --

      This post was brought to you by the number 584811 and the characters / and .

    2. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      nah you must be confused, that was gorilla.bas :)

    3. Re:Awesome! by tadheckaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      wow, I remember that, I think I downloaded it off some website a few years back.

      --
      My potato gun was confiscated by the United Nations. They said I wasn't allowed to have weapons of mash destruction.
    4. Re:Awesome! by Steven+Blanchley · · Score: 1
      I had a friend who made a 3D (wireframe) tank game in QuickBASIC. He called it QBTANK. You had to be the first tank to get to the flag on each level, and you could shoot other tanks to slow them down.

      I don't believe it was ever finished, sadly. Isn't that a pity?

    5. Re:Awesome! by valkraider · · Score: 4, Funny

      FINALLY!

      "Stuff that matters."

      The normal editors must be on vacation...

    6. Re:Awesome! by frankthechicken · · Score: 1

      What I want is cameras attatched to those tanks, that image broadcast back to my computer, and for one hell of a death match going on, with my house and its furniture being the battle arena.

      If you could define the parameters/dimensions of the battlefield, you could easily place virtual powerups, viewable through your monitor, perhaps some kind of radar system. It could be the ultimate in toys. Now instead of tanks, lets use radio controlled, flying cockroaches and you have the potential for one hell of a game.

  3. Cool! by blitzoid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Toys are just getting cooler and cooler these days. Why couldn't I have had RC Tank wars when I was a kid? It's just not fair.

    Oh well. I guess I'll go back to playing with Lego and my good 'ol Speak-n-Spell.

    --
    I am a filthy pirate.
    1. Re:Cool! by plopez · · Score: 3, Funny

      Back in the day we used water baloons and also tomatos. Over ripe tomatos especially rocked...

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Cool! by sixdotoh · · Score: 1
      Over ripe tomatos may be good at being a very nasty attack, but green tomatos and especially crab apples (believe me, i know what i'm talking about) can make for a very painful pelting with.

      hmmm, i'm not *that* old. i don't even really remember the 80's! and i'm definantly not a country boy. do kids still do this?
      hey, you little /.'ers what's it like these days?

      --

      This post was brought to you by the number 584811 and the characters / and .

    3. Re:Cool! by blitzoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure if kids are reading /., they're not playing with water balloons and apples - These kids are making potato guns that can smash through a brick wall.

      --
      I am a filthy pirate.
    4. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe that would be a good open source businessmodel for bush and saddam?

      1: Write free software.
      2: ?
      3: Fight with tiny RC tanks.
      4: Profit!

    5. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I have the schematics?

    6. Re:Cool! by the+eighth+grader · · Score: 1

      i'm fourteen. i am not playing with water balloons, apples _or_ potato cannons (at the moment); i am reading /.

    7. Re:Cool! by therealmoose · · Score: 1

      Hell yeah. Embedding fireworks into the potatos, too. /me cackles hellishly

    8. Re:Cool! by blitzoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      What? Life is too short to be reading /. when you're fourteen! You go outside and you blow out some car windows right now!

      And don't come back in till the cops confiscate all your PVC pipe.

      --
      I am a filthy pirate.
    9. Re:Cool! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      You don't remember the 80's? How old are you, 16, 17? I'm 21 and I remember the 80's vividly.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    10. Re:Cool! by Cruciform · · Score: 1

      Wow, 80 to 82 must have been very traumatic for you. I can't remember my sperm years at all. What did you do to amuse yourself? Learn to swim backwards? :)

    11. Re:Cool! by addaon · · Score: 0, Troll

      Honestly, I've never understood PVC potato guns. I always preferred 2" ID stainless steel piping, buffed inside until it shines, and 2" ball bearings. Maybe that's just me.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    12. Re:Cool! by lommer · · Score: 1

      Who uses PVC!? ABS is vastly superior:

      - it's black
      - when it fails it doesn't shatter, it cracks
      - it is a (very little) bit lighter
      - it's just as strong

      P.S. - I learned about the second benefit of ABS over PVC the hard way - when I was 15. SO GET OUT AND START LEARNING ABOUT MATERIAL SCIENCES :-)

    13. Re:Cool! by Uart · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'm 19 and I remember them vividly too...

      What a fucking great decade.

      Anyone that missed the 80's is lame - the 90's were far to crappy with all their britney spear/*nsync bubblegum-pop-culture bull.

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    14. Re:Cool! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Yeah, 2 years are all of a decade. Right?

      Just like the the "60's" didn't start until half way through the decade, and the 70's didn't start until 73 or so, the 80's didn't either. (Culturally)

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    15. Re:Cool! by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You'd let a child handle something so expensive? Heck, the target market for this stuff is adults. What kid has the cash for this? Even legos are pretty pricey.

      Okay, I know, there are legions of spoiled kids whose parents can't stop buying expensive gifts for them.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    16. Re:Cool! by ccnull · · Score: 1

      Jeez, the memories... As a youth I converted a regular Estes rocket launching kit into a shoulder-mounted rocket launcher by simply putting PVC pipe around the launching stand, gluing the whole thing to a piece of wood, and velcroing the ignition switch the end of it. Presto, instant (suburban) WMD. God, what was I thinking?

    17. Re:Cool! by joshwa · · Score: 1

      man, I ALWAYS wanted to do that, but common sense got the better of me (lots of over-zealous police in my 'burb...)

    18. Re:Cool! by ccnull · · Score: 1

      I believe it's still under my bed at my parents' house. Perhaps an eBay sale is in order.

    19. Re:Cool! by joshwa · · Score: 1

      I hope you like guantanamo... :)

    20. Re:Cool! by Narchie+Troll · · Score: 1

      Yes, and there were absolutely no corporate bubble-gum bands during the '80s. None at all. Not a one.

    21. Re:Cool! by Uart · · Score: 1

      shh... we don't talk about the New Kids... ever. EVER!!!!!

      They didn't happen. - Wait, weren't they early 90's anyway.. ha!

      --

      Opinionated Law Student Strikes Again!
    22. Re:Cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any fundamental law of nature that prevents you from having fun with these NOW? Regardless of your age?

      I'm certainly going to buy one of these if I see then in a store an I'm almost 30.

    23. Re:Cool! by iq+in+binary · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'll agree with that, as long as the potato has a ferrous core.

      Being someone who made his first Rail Gun at 13, sending potatos through brick walls is child's play ;) Just wait until we start getting our hands on Quantum Mechanics books, Gauss guns will looks like pea shooters.

      Then again, pea shooters are still fun as hell (ever see the look on a drop dead gorgeous 17 year old's face when hit in the ass with a small, soft, round projectile? Priceless ;))

      --
      Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
    24. Re:Cool! by iq+in+binary · · Score: 1

      Correction: Life is too short to be reading /. when you actually have a chance at getting laid ;)

      Nothing gets a 14 year old's attention faster than seeing some skin. Everything else, however, seems to make him even more absent minded :-P

      --
      Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
    25. Re:Cool! by gregwbrooks · · Score: 2, Funny
      :::Then again, pea shooters are still fun as hell (ever see the look on a drop dead gorgeous 17 year old's face when hit in the ass with a small, soft, round projectile? Priceless ;)) :::


      Son, I dunno about you, but when I'm in that situation, I'm too, um, engaged to worry about the look on her face.

      And I don't call mine a pea shooter, either.

      --


      "It was a summer's tale: Just a boy, his Linux, and a head full of dreams..."
    26. Re:Cool! by Prog_Burner · · Score: 1

      What, you were too lazy to tweak your potato cannon? Actually, a perfectly fitted block of ice is much better for penetrating walls and such, heh On topic, when I was a kid, we were just content with running our R/C cars into eachother until one died. I would've rather had these though, no more tabletop football on my desk during class, just warfare.

  4. And now for English by Isosonys · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.konami.co.jp/th/micro_ir/combat/english /index.html

    1. Re:And now for English by Cirrius · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually that would be:

      without the space in the title

    2. Re:And now for English by chrisseaton · · Score: 0, Troll

      Watch the spaces there, children.

    3. Re:And now for English by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 2, Funny

      Melodiously and Joyfully will I utilize for very life-pleasure!!

      --
      The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
    4. Re:And now for English by Xerithane · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Please enjoy yourself using this manual. And please utilize."

      God Bless Engrish!

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    5. Re:And now for English by connsmythe96 · · Score: 1

      What's up with the original site having english labels, but everything else is in japanese?? Not even a link for an english version...is it just cool to have english labels or something?

      I don't get it...

      --
      if(!cool) exit(-1);
    6. Re:And now for English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is linked to in the article asshat!

      RTFA.
      -1 redundant

    7. Re:And now for English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Amazing - on the Engrish site:

      Wear House Sexy Cramp

    8. Re:And now for English by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, making racist comments about another culture's language ability is really fucking funny. I'm ashamed this got moderated up. I thought slashdot was more sensitive than this.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:And now for English by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      Suddenly this is making the odd news of the Konami logo change make a lot more sense now...

      Konami's spread out into a number of things of late, including slot machines. Makes sense, if things are as bad economically over there as we've been hearing.

    10. Re:And now for English by El_Froggo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      aww shut up you fuckin bastard.

    11. Re:And now for English by Xerithane · · Score: 1

      Yeah, making racist comments about another culture's language ability is really fucking funny. I'm ashamed this got moderated up. I thought slashdot was more sensitive than this.


      Demo anata ha watashi ga nihonjin ka amerikajin ka. Anata ha aho...

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    12. Re:And now for English by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1
      Good thing that the Japanese are not racist at all.

      "No foreigners allowed"? What the hell is up with that?

      Oh, there's more of this.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    13. Re:And now for English by ehiris · · Score: 1

      Damn /. . It doesn't like long words. That's why it would never succeed in German.

    14. Re:And now for English by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno about you, but I'm Japanese, and I find it funny as hell.

    15. Re:And now for English by The+Limp+Devil · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that today's Engrish sounds just like the Iraqi Information minister:

      You! Invaders!
      Get you the hot bullets of shotguns to die!

      Maybe he'll have a future career after all, writing taunts and insults for video games?

    16. Re:And now for English by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      It's all about the Sports and Hobbits section at the library...

      --
      Rod Taylor
  5. laser tag by ejaw5 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ThinkGeek's had this for a while
    http://www.thinkgeek.com/cubegoodies/toys/5776

    It's laser tag though. Office Fun!

    --

    $cat /dev/random > Sig
    1. Re:laser tag by Catiline · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, those are not the DigiQ tanks. I own a pair of DigiQs, and they are about half that size and quite a bit more historically accurate (the DigiQ line is modeled -- as I said, somewhat accurately -- on WWII tanks). Furthermore, the ThinkGeek tanks are hard-coded to one frequency while the DigiQ can be reprogrammed. DigiQ also have multiple battle modes, including a very fun "simulation" (where different models have different ammo payloads and reload times).

    2. Re:laser tag by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      the neatest parts of the tanks you linked to, which are made by Plantraco, is that they can be controlled by PC (in a simple "move forward, turn left, move forward" setup) and they sell video cameras to go on top of them.

      I play with a small RC car that has a camera attached to it quite often, and its fun as hell to see the world, or my apartment, from that point of view (ever wonder what a cockroach sees?). Playing laser tag like that would rock even more than from overhead.

    3. Re:laser tag by jandrese · · Score: 1

      The only place I've seen these tanks for sale is Hobby Link Japan. They looked really cool, but at ~$50US + shipping they're a little expensive. Way cooler than those little cars though.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  6. WmD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    weapons of minute destruction?

    1. Re:WmD by blitzoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope these things don't get taken away due to a Small Arms Ban

      --
      I am a filthy pirate.
    2. Re:WmD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be a good open source businessmodel that bush could use.

      1: Write free software.
      2: ?
      3: Fight saddam with tiny RC tanks.
      4: Profit!

    3. Re:WmD by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 1

      Cool, that works with both pronounciations.

      These kind of "office toys" play havoc with one's productivity in the office. I have bought a couple of toys (namely a Mini MP5 Gun and a Rubber Band Gun, and both caused much merriment, and less work. I know I could kiss work goodbye if I had one of these babies!

    4. Re:WmD by leonbev · · Score: 1

      Sadly, I could never bring one of those to where I work. Security would take one look and think that I was a terrorist or something, and would have the police drag me off the premises in handcuffs :(

  7. This is stolen off another site.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The writeup of the article with the same text is already on JesusGeeks.

    1. Re:This is stolen off another site.. by darkblade1782 · · Score: 0

      Or, like, maybe it was just submitted both places.

    2. Re:This is stolen off another site.. by RLiegh · · Score: 2, Funny

      Glad it's "mirrored" here, then; since Jesus Geeks appears to be down (at least from where I am at).

    3. Re:This is stolen off another site.. by robi2106 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is an interesting site. What sort of tilt does the average reader over there have? Is it satirical use of "Jesus" or does it have a generally Christian reader base?

      robi

    4. Re:This is stolen off another site.. by parkanoid · · Score: 1

      Didn't you know that slashcode is actually CmdrTaco's secret plot to steal premium content from those foolish enough to use it?

    5. Re:This is stolen off another site.. by Trespass · · Score: 0

      Maybe it's 'hay-SOOS'.

  8. The kids will love it by Radi-0-head · · Score: 5, Funny

    A playground sandbox, a few quarts of 10w40, and you've got your very own miniature Iraq to "liberate"!

    1. Re:The kids will love it by sixdotoh · · Score: 1
      flammable stuff rocks! me, my brother, and friends did all sorts of experiments with highly flammable materials. Dw40, lighting fluid, melting mountain dew bottles with propane torches (not advised, the fumes are nasty!). we even learned that a puff of flour will ignite over a candle. anyone want to comment on how that works?

      then there was the incident of scraping the powder out of model rocket engines . . . no joke!

      --

      This post was brought to you by the number 584811 and the characters / and .

    2. Re:The kids will love it by N0decam · · Score: 4, Funny

      They'll also need a traditional green army man standing on a tiny pedestal that they can hook the tank up to with dental floss to "topple" the regieme.

      If the tanks were a little bigger, they could pretend that the minesweeper guy is Geraldo, and drive him out of the country - finally give that minesweeper a purpose in life (other than to be melted by magnifying glasses)

    3. Re:The kids will love it by Beetjebrak · · Score: 2

      The puff of flour sounds like a dust explosion. I don't know the exact dynamics, but large surface area (fine grains of flour) and lots of oxygen (the cloud is not very dense) and high temperature (the flame) combine to very rapidly combust the flour practically instantaneously creating a dust explosion. For this to occur there's probably a 'sweet spot' in the ratio of flour:air:heat, if either is out of balance nothing happens or individual grains just burn up individually as they hit the flame. Someone who actually does know physics could probably tell you much more, and correct this explanation.. it's been a while since I did that editing job on a fire control training booklet. ;o)

      --
      Learn from the mistakes of others. There isn't enough time to make them all yourself.
    4. Re:The kids will love it by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 1

      Try a box of .22 calibre shells in an outdoor brick fireplace.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    5. Re:The kids will love it by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1, Funny
      And Bush can direct the whole operation from the saftey of his White House bunker!


      Don't forget to throw rocks from hundreds of miles away!

    6. Re:The kids will love it by NeuroBoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah Mr. Wizard did the dust explosion trick way back in the day (episode 16).

      Many different substances can be explosive given the right amount of oxygen surrounding the flammable particles. It's a fairly common trick that middle school science teachers do to wake up their students. :)

    7. Re:The kids will love it by Xerithane · · Score: 3, Interesting

      HowStuffWorks has your answer, and if properly done they can look exceptionally cool. Not that I'm endorsing building a device for it, nor doing it, for education purposes only. Do not try this at home, and I'm not going into design instructions no matter how hard you beg.


      http://www.howstuffworks.com/question150.htm

      --
      Dacels Jewelers can't be trusted.
    8. Re:The kids will love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be a very good open source businessmodel that bush and saddam could use, no real people would get hurt.

      1: Write free software.
      2: ?
      3: Fight each other with tiny RC tanks.
      4: Profit!

    9. Re:The kids will love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God damn!! *blam* *blam* *blam* *blam* *blam* *blam* *blam* *blam* *click* *clatter* *clack* *ka-chak* Motherfucker!! *blam* *blam* *blam* *blam* *blam* *blam* *blam* *blam*

    10. Re:The kids will love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better, a box of .22's and a hammer...

    11. Re:The kids will love it by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 1

      Darwin Award?

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    12. Re:The kids will love it by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

      When do I get my on RC A-10 to take you out?

    13. Re:The kids will love it by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      I did this demo as part of a University Chemistry team when we would go aroudn to grade schools in rural areas and help out the science teachers. We always used a turkey baster filled with flour and then just bashed on the bulb while pointing the thing across the path of a blow torch. Worked like a charm and sent up a 2-4 foot ball of flames.

      robi

    14. Re:The kids will love it by sdo1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Yea, the kids will love it, but here's the pisser...

      If they bring it to show their friends at class, they'll probably be suspended for bringing a weapon to school.

      Sorry to rain on the funniest damn comment I've read in months... but that's the sad fact of "zero tolerance".

      -S

      --
      --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    15. Re:The kids will love it by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      A playground sandbox, a few quarts of 10w40, and you've got your very own miniature Iraq to "liberate"!


      Unfortunately, the tracks are apparently a little more delicate than the M1A1's--you can't run them on sand or on thick pile carpeting. If you really had the army man robots, they could pull the carpet fibers out. I imagine that's the next innovation....

  9. Bzflag is cooler :-) by SuperBanana · · Score: 1, Funny
    BZFlag is cooler :-)

    I think the BZFlag guys get the award for "most modifier goodies"- it made my dizzy, reading all the different kinds of flags there are. Forget a 'gunner', you need a 'flag checker'.

    Driver:"Ooo, ooo! A flag! [steer steer steeer]"
    Flag Checker(slow motion): "nnnooooooOOOO!"
    -BOINK- BROADCAST MESSAGE: "Team A ran over Hippie Flag, now shooting Daisies"

    I wish they'd do collaborative roles, so you really COULD have a driver, gunner, etc..that would ROCK.

    Who remembers playing Bolo on their old Mac, or that crazy wireframe tank game? I forget the name, had a 3-D shaped retail box with a red pyramid or something

    1. Re:Bzflag is cooler :-) by spencerogden · · Score: 1

      I think the wireframe tank game on the Mac was Spectre. When I got it came with a cool plot outline and a copy of Snowcrash. That had me quite hooked for a while. Very simple, but very intense.

    2. Re:Bzflag is cooler :-) by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
      I think the wireframe tank game on the Mac was Spectre. When I got it came with a cool plot outline and a copy of Snowcrash. That had me quite hooked for a while. Very simple, but very intense.

      YES! That's the one! It was sweet. You had a limited budget of "stuff" and could spread it between ammmo capacity, speed, and armour if I remember correctly...and holy cow did the bad guys get tough after a while :-)

      Man, I miss all the cool old Mac games...NetTrek, Bolo, Spectre, Cannon Fodder, Brickles, Solarian II...[siiiigh]. I've been trying to get Ben Haller(Stick Software) to re-do Solarian II for OS X, he seemed to already be leaning towards it himself...

  10. Republican Guard?!? by I'm+Spartacus! · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I thought the U.S. destroyed all the Republican Guard divisions.

    --
    "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." -- Ambrose Bierce
  11. American Tanks by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 1

    can the m10's take 4x the damage?

    --

    "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    1. Re:American Tanks by Moofie · · Score: 1

      The tanks are all World War II era, so no M1A2 vs. T-80. Although with the A2, they'd have to come with a set of thermal night vision goggles for the M1 operator, and a blindfold for the T80 driver.

      That'd be cool.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  12. Realism? by obotics · · Score: 5, Funny

    But do you actually get killed when your tank blows up? I really find the lack of realism in games these days to be disturbing.

    1. Re:Realism? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Realy these are kind of lame, what I want is a Geo metro, striped down, some thin-skin armor attached, the 23mm chain gun from the Bradley's and maybe a M2 50 Cal machine gun for anti-personel work, and a Mark 19 40mm grenade launcher installed. run the whole via reomte control, just beam back video and thermal imaging to the operator. This would give RPV a whole new meaning!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  13. Lions 10, Xtians 0. JESUSGEEKS is 404 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The page you are looking for is currently unavailable. The Web site might be experiencing technical difficulties, or you may need to adjust your browser settings.
  14. I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...I'm not sure I'd trust a review from a guy who looks like this.

    1. Re:I dunno... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice put-down, homo.

    2. Re:I dunno... by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 1

      and how on earth is that worse than reading news from a guy that looks like:
      THIS

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
  15. Re:Playthings of our fears... by kwerle · · Score: 1

    It's sad that given the number of Iraqi civilians crushed underneath the mechanized assault of the supposedly 'enlightened' Western armed forces, that such horror has been trivialised so soon.

    I'll ignore some of your rhetoric, but I will say:

    You're a little late to the party.

    http://www.thortrains.net/armymen/armymen3.htm

  16. Yay War Toys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Prepare your kids for a world in which - finally - the stronger can take what they need! Are you afraid that your son may become a homo peace activist? Give him tiny RC tanks and teach him how the world really works.

  17. Cats! by drooling-dog · · Score: 4, Funny

    If these fire actual projectiles (as opposed to just a light beam), then I want one for my girlfriend's cats!

    1. Re:Cats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on buddy, you left yourself wide open for that crack.

      Just be sure she doesn't strip on a dildo, take you from behind, and leave your crack wide open!

    2. Re:Cats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      DOUBLE BURN!!!!

      ZA! ZA!

    3. Re:Cats! by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 5, Funny

      Duh! Cats have no opposable thumbs! How the HELL do you think they're going to use a remote control?!

    4. Re:Cats! by macragge · · Score: 1

      According to the Engrish .pdf These gizmos only fire an IR beam
      http://www.konami.co.jp/th/micro_ir/combat/english /manual/cd.pdf

    5. Re:Cats! by concept14 · · Score: 1

      My cats step on the phone keys and on the TV remote, so they should have no trouble with this.

      --
      Quis metamoderunt ipses metamoderatores?
    6. Re:Cats! by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 2, Funny
      Here you go. 6mm BB bullets. But you know how cats are ... once the batteries are down and the thing sits in the corner, they'll just pee on it (that is how cats show their discomfort with something - they pee on it). Even the electronics aren't shorted out, you'll still have a $130 toy tank that smells of cat pee.

      What I'm trying to say, just get one of those stun batons.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    7. Re:Cats! by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1
      Make that "Even if" ...

      Note to self: use preveiw next time.

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    8. Re:Cats! by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 1
      I want one for my girlfriend's cats!


      That will save all that time you waste on your girlfriend, too!


      Seriously though, no one with cats could ever play with these. As soon as the cats see one moving around, they'll be on it like monopoly abuse of powers on Microsoft. And someone *did* say they were "a little fragile."

    9. Re:Cats! by Spunk · · Score: 1

      Ha! Maybe yours doesn't. As for mine, we're teaching it to play XBox.

      Extra toes on cats aren't all that rare around Boston, where I live.

    10. Re:Cats! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh thank god, I though we were going to get through these comments without someone bringing up a completely off-topic anti-microsoft flame.

  18. Dans been slashdotted! by TheOneWhoIsMany · · Score: 1

    good to see some Australian sites being linked to on Slashdot

  19. 3D Scorched Earth by Daetrin · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The 3d ones just aren't very much fun in my opinion. Maybe my brain isn't just equiped to handle the math, but i can do an okay job of estimating angles and speeds int he 2D version, and even sometimes do a semi-competent job of judging in the wind factor.

    However i've had massive problems with every 3D version i've tried. Not only is my first guess almost always rather off because of the complications of the third dimension, but adjusting the shot takes a long time as well. It just takes way too long and isn't as much fun.

    Of course hopefully the toy tanks wouldn't take so long to render, and it would be really easy to multi-thread and have them all shooting at once :)

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:3D Scorched Earth by Glonoinha · · Score: 4, Funny

      You always miss the first shot. In fact generally (Today's New Army as the standing exception) they don't even aim the first shot in real life. Just get your fire platform stable and with a good place to start from, let one rip, then figure out how far off you are, do some simple math, fire the second one (which should be MUCH closer), adjust, until you start landing shells where they are supposed to go. Then just keep pumping them down range.

      You quickly get in pointed in the right direction and it becomes 2D again.

      Helps to have RainMan on your team, though. Definately 38.7 degrees with 2.147 kilograms of powder. Definately. Practically 21 seconds to impact. They are definately not going to be happy when this bad boy lands on them. Definately.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    2. Re:3D Scorched Earth by budgenator · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's two kinds of big gun shooting direct fire and indirect fire. Direct fire is aim by the gunner, it's what tanks do aim at the target, add in a little super-elevation to correct for the rounds free fall in flight determined by the targets range, and some defection adjustment to adjust for the round going off course from the wind and let'er rock and roll. In direct fire you want first round kills because when you fire, everybody knows where to shoot back at.

      Indirect fire is what artillery does, the round goes through a high ballistic trajectory, but you want the round to travel in as low a trajectory as possible; the higher the round travels, the more likely that it will be picked up by a counter-mortar radar which can calculate the point of origin so the opposing force can shoot back at you. the FO, Forward Observer see's the traget, and tells the FDC, Fire Direction Computer, the approximate grid co-ordinates of the traget, his direction to the target, and what the target is. The FDC then calculates what direction to point the guns in, what elevation to point at, and what charge to use, how much powder. the guns then aim at a two stakes in the ground and fires, usualy one round from the number two gun in the center. If the round hits with-in the burst-radious of the target, then all the guns fire, if not the FO tells the FDC how many meters to left or right, or to add or subtract, the FDC re-computes and 2 gun re-shoots. as soon as the target is hit the unit moves, and re-sets up. This is called shoot and scoot, because if you're still there, the other guys are going to reach out and touch you if they can.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:3D Scorched Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DEFINITELY, FFS!!!!!!!!

  20. Re:Playthings of our fears... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you see the pictures of these tanks? How could a tank that can be held in your hand crush people?

  21. Logo??? by Sheeplet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Doesn't the logo remind you of ChronoCross/Trigger? Strange....

    --
    -- Breaking Windows: Not just for kids anymore KDE
  22. eeek! by Spoticus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Scary when the tanks are being dwarfed by their remote controls 8-)

  23. Screw LEDs by Mafiew · · Score: 1

    Check this out http://www.arroyorc.com/tank.htm They can conquer the armies of gophers in your yard!

  24. Aw, screw kids! by Fritz+Benwalla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've solved this problem by continuing to buy toys for myself - and now I've got money!

    Fact is that as a kid I don't think I would have appreciated the coolness of this. A friend of mine had one of those helicopters that flew in circles, and model rocketry stuff, and I liked it but I thought it was all part of being a kid.

    Now I own a Vectron Flying Saucer and a bunch of other cool stuff, and I still play with at much as if I were a kid. But now I realized how awesome it is scientifically, and the fact that things weren't always this cool.

    Somehow wanting something for thiry years makes it that much sweeter. Makes me look forward to being eighty.

    -------

    --

    Believe me, I'm as surprised by my comment as you are.
    1. Re:Aw, screw kids! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Somehow wanting something for thiry years makes it that much sweeter. Makes me look forward to being eighty."

      How unfortunate that getting laid at eighty probably isn't as satisfying as it is at thirty.

  25. konami? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if i enter the konami code,

    will i get more lives?

  26. ultimate coolness would be... by newsdee · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...those tiny tanks, connected to a PC, so we can play over the Internet with our distant geek friends. :-)

    Yeah of course we have videogames, but it would be much cooler to have the game happening in real-life 3D on a small table in the living room. :-)

    1. Re:ultimate coolness would be... by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      You need Scorched Earth [the game].

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  27. You, sir, are a fucking loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I regret to inform you that you are in fact an enormous tool, and should kill yourself accordingly.

  28. Re:Playthings of our fears... by swb · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'll buy into this troll.

    I, like a number of other Americans, have had deep misgivings about the war in Iraq. On one had, Saddam is a really brutal dictator with a proven track record of killing tens of thousands of Iraqis, not even counting the empire-building military misadventures of the Iran-Iraq war and the invasion of Kuwait. And the grab for nukes, chemical and biological weapons which are further chilling due to his past regional aggression.

    On the other hand, the US has its own dodgy track record of trying to impose a political and social template that can wreak havoc of its own, and that's when we have been altruistically motivated.

    With that in mind, while not entirely satisified we're doing the right thing for the right reasons, at the end of the day ending Saddam's despotic regime seems like the right thing to do, even though it will cost a lot of suffering because it should prevent the truly evil suffering Saddam was imposing on his own people. The Iraqis will at least get a shot at running their own country in a democratic fashion rather than having a dictator impose further rape, murder and torture on them.

    That being said, what's the "No War In Iraq" camp's answer to Saddam? That's the part I don't get. If toppling his regime through military force isn't the right answer, what is the right answer? I haven't heard one yet, usually there's a lot of shrill, one-sided political analysis of what the US has done in the past and nothing more. I can't help but think that failure to posit alternatives is complicity in Saddam's crimes.

  29. Spectre was too easy to beat by georgewad · · Score: 1

    If you jacked up the speed of your tank, you could outrun pretty much anything and get enough spare tanks to never lose. I once playd a single game for 6 or 7 hours. I wouldn't even pause the game to piss or refill the coffee cup (or pipe...).
    Still a lot of fun, tho.

    --
    Karma: It's not just a good idea. It's the law.
  30. and now, in french by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Réservoirs Minuscules de RC Qui Combattent
    Signalé par Michael le vendredi avril 11, @03:09PM
    du département de la pratiquer-pour-Syrie

    Daniel Rutter m'écrit "ont juste passé en revue un couple du combat DigiQs - les petits réservoirs commandés à distance minuscules de Konami qui peuvent se tirer. Vous pouvez mettre en scène des deux la bataille -, de trois ou de quatre-réservoir, chaque réservoir pour se ou dans les équipes de deux, sur une table de café. Elles basculent."

  31. CHECK the link; there IS NO JG ARTICLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  32. Re:(Off topic) Playthings of our fears... by loadquo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I can't help but think that failure to posit alternatives is complicity in Saddam's crimes.

    Then we are all complicit in Mugabes crimes, in Than Shwe's. Heck we don't even have a solution to North Korea?

    My thinking is that 5-10 years time Iraq will be back as a dictatorship, not because arabs are incapable, but because the Oil that generates the majority of the wealth (and power) in the country is so easy to control.

    The solution, diversify the economy, if that is possible with the western countries sucking up lots of the educated individuals.

    What we could have done was instead of imposing sanctions, encouraged the middle classes to generate non-oil wealth weakening Saddams relative power base, indeed that is the strategy I would employ for Iran.

    Social justice didn't really come about in western europe until the landed gentries monpoly of the money was eroded by the industrial revolution.

  33. Oh bgreat .... by taniwha · · Score: 1

    slashdot the entire pacific rim as 100,000 geeks download a 3Mb pdf from japan ....

  34. ThinkGeek hurry up!!! by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

    To the commenter above, those are Mini R/C rovers, they are bigger and do not fight each other (thoguh they are hella kool too). I know that ThinkGeek is selling the Tiny R/C Digi Q Cars, but Moe Moe wants a tank to help fight in Iraq against Bush's "evil do-ers"!

    --
    Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
    A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
    1. Re:ThinkGeek hurry up!!! by MoeMoe · · Score: 1

      Hey Dipshit just for your information I'm a reserve in Fort Ethan so you can go STFU because I'm sure that I'm doing more for this country than you are JACKASS!!!!

      --
      Business \Busi"ness\, n.;
      A scam in which all people involved perceive as beneficial...
    2. Re:ThinkGeek hurry up!!! by einhverfr · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      He never said whose side he wanted to fight on ;-) Who are Bush's evil-doers? The US Army? Or are we refering to those who Bush calls evil-doers?

      Just get your facts straight before accusing someone like this ;-)

      As for my opinion, I think that Saddam is evil and has been for decades, but he has been most evil when we were supporting him (like in the 1980's for example). And the US government must know he has WMD's because they have the receipts... Why did the DoD and DoC approve those Anthrax samples being sent to the Iraqi Atomic ENergy Agency in the 1980's anyway????? So there is plenty of blame to spread around and a fair amount of it unfortunately falls on my government (in the US). I guess it is far easier to see the evil abroad than see it at home. Lets hope the Iraqi *people* have more perspective as they are being *liberated.*

      --

      LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    3. Re:ThinkGeek hurry up!!! by Machine9 · · Score: 1
      And people wonder WHY the french oppose the war...

      It's because they are aware of the fact that the US military is composed of looneys.

      Take your medicine Moe, it'll help you calm down... then we'll take you to see the nice man, and you can tell him ALLLL about yuor troubles.

  35. [OT] Re:Playthings of our fears... by Craig+Davison · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    I can't help but think that failure to posit alternatives is complicity in Saddam's crimes.

    That's a terrible attitude. And sorry to bring up the past again, but supplying him weapons was literally complicity in Saddam's crimes.
    Here's my suggestion, anyway: should've ended the sanctions, (that would've prevented huge numbers of Iraqi deaths over the last 12 years), and kept up with the inspections.

    Of course, asking that question now is pointless now that the war is in full force. I can only sit back and hope the middle east doesn't fall apart in the next few years, hope that Iraq doesn't become another Islamic theocracy, and hope the US doesn't do anything stupid like invade Syria.

  36. Re:Playthings of our fears... by Telastyn · · Score: 0, Offtopic



    Fix our own problems, and let the Iraqi's fix their own.

    Fix our own problems, and then topple Saddam via military force.

    Wait, and let him die while fixing our own problems.

    Wait, and gather international support for military action.

    Wait, and let arms inspectors find weapons of mass destruction [or not]

    Wait, and preasure the UN [and iraq] on their humanitarian issues [while fixing our own, and doing the same to the dozens of other countries with atrocious humanitatiran records]

    Wait, while sponsoring subversive covert operations in Iraq.

    Wait, while sponsoring enemies of Iraq.

    Assassinate him.

    Wait until bin Laden is captured/killed/tried and threaten/attack Saddam.

    Nuke the entire country and be rid of it.

    Send N'Sync on a cross Iraq tour.

  37. Re:Playthings of our fears... by jmorris42 · · Score: 1

    > I haven't heard one yet, usually there's a lot of shrill,
    > one-sided political analysis of what the US has done in
    > the past and nothing more.

    And you probably won't ever hear one. About the most 'thought' the typical protester can manage is "I hate Bush. Bush wants to topple Saddam. Therefore Saddam has to be good." There ARE reasons to be against Gulf War II but you won't hear any of them from the usual suspects who are still stuck in Jan 2001.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  38. this is alright...i guess....... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 0
    what i really want is mini RC tanks that shoot BB's. Not only would combat be more realistic...but I guarantee that terrifying random lawn critters will NEVER be as fun.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  39. "I read the whole article!" - Sun Tszu by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The turrets are not motorized, you have to manually turn them. They are fitted with a gear on the inside, which means that they *will* be motorized eventually.

    Any /.ers care to take on the challenge?

    "Knowledge is half the battle!" - GI JOE (he would have read the whole article, then gone off to kick Cobra Commander's ass...)

  40. Mini RC's in General by Dr.+Geek · · Score: 1

    You know there's been a lot of mini RC race cars as of late; huge in Japan. But they never really were all that cool to me; I mean they've only got so much of a battery life and a range. But change that car to a tank, add a laser tag feature, and give it the ability to spy capablities (See: http://www.thinkgeek.com/cubegoodies/toys/59eb/ ) then you'll be sure to see me wasting time with these awesome little things.

  41. Enhancing the realism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Dan did some nice review with the DigiQ tanks. The tanks use IR that the IR receiver on any notebook can pick up. Coupled with a small custom application that detects the incoming commands and deciphers them you can play appropriate audio files to enhance the ongoing battle. Run it through your stereo system and it can get pretty noisy. Now I'm wondering if the IR port on my Sony CLIE Palm Pilot can be trained to control these beasties. :-)

    1. Re:Enhancing the realism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if the IR port can be trained to listen to the controller?

  42. I have two of these!!! by DaedalusLogic · · Score: 3, Informative

    My brother and I ordered them from Japan back during Christmas. They are in fact really cool little toys.

    The advantages these little things have over the other MiniRC craze are:

    No ugly/fragile antenna (IR Control)

    Better cosmetic detail of the bodies. A couple little plastic pieces to glue on for added effect are included.

    The IR Weapons onboard complete the ultimate childhood fantasy of having your little plastic army men fight.

    Good control unit with swapable modules so you can use the same radio to control all the different types of tanks...

    The IR control is pretty good as far as range is concerned as long as you have line of sight. You have to mind that you point the control unit in the general direction of the tank... I've been stalled and hit a couple times because I didn't pay attention. There are cool little LED special effects and shaking when your opponent hits you with a shot...

    These things will have you building little obstacles and battlefields pretty soon after playing a couple rounds...

    Glad somebody wrote a review on these Konami tanks... Very cool... There are also hobbyists who make larger 1/15 scale versions but they cost hundreds... You can get two of these for about $100 plus shipping from Japan right now.

    1. Re:I have two of these!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is actually cheaper than that. I bought it online from us distrbuter at minirctoy.com.

  43. Re:Playthings of our fears... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Hi, I'm a troll. The person who wrote this thinks they are a know it all now that they've written enough term papers. We know who you are. ;)

  44. These tanks could be an interesting choice... by bj8rn · · Score: 1

    These are Soviet WWII tanks (not too common, though). It would be interesting to have those models fighting against Shermans etc...

    The T-35: a heavy but quite slow tank with five(!) turrets - a challenge for fire control
    The BT-7: a light tank, but a fast one - max speed 86 km/h (on road, tracks off - no, I'm not kidding). A real winner in a race, and not exactly easy to hit (but if you hit it, it's down...)

    Another fun thing would be rc planes with guns similar to those on these tanks. Imagine a fighter duel between a P-58 Mustang and a Zero, or an Me bf 109 and a Spitfire... (avoiding crashes could be a bit hard, though)

    --
    Hell is not other people; it is yourself. - Ludwig Wittgenstein
    1. Re:These tanks could be an interesting choice... by dougmc · · Score: 4, Informative
      Another fun thing would be rc planes with guns similar to those on these tanks. Imagine a fighter duel between a P-58 Mustang and a Zero, or an Me bf 109 and a Spitfire...
      When you start doing R/C planes, you soon realize that there's three things you can have --

      looks just like a real (scale) plane

      flies well

      is relatively inexpensive and easy to make

      Pick any two!

      Even so, some people do do R/C combat with scale models ... but it's a lot of work making the planes and keeping them flying :)

      R/C plane combat is certainly done. Some is done with infrared `guns', like this, some is done trying to cut a ribbon trailing behind the other plane, and some is done by literally trying to bump the other plane out of the sky.

      In all cases, even when you're not trying to, the planes tend to collide quite often. So you need planes that are very resiliant, and that usually means that they aren't going to be scale models of anything -- instead, you concentrate on them flying reasonably well and being tough.

    2. Re:These tanks could be an interesting choice... by Bob+McCown · · Score: 1

      I've done the ribbon cutting R/C dogfights, and they ROCK! Much fun, but Ive also pranged a couple of planes into 1) ground 2) trees, 3) other plane.

      Still, fun.

    3. Re:These tanks could be an interesting choice... by TummyX · · Score: 1

      Check out this place. I do combat flying with them and they're virtually indestructible. The glider can slam into the ground and you an literally pick it up and go for another fly.

      The port hills and parks around Christchurch (NZ) are really good for flying :-).

  45. Procreation & Marriage Now Justifiable by bedouin · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was going to put off the kids thing a few more years, but I need a justifiable reason to spend $125 on these things. So, if there's any women out there who would like to get married and have my child soon there after, and also provide me with your Visa card so I can order these tanks (for are soon to arrive child), please send me a message.

    Thanks

    1. Re:Procreation & Marriage Now Justifiable by slyxter · · Score: 1

      Your post reminds me of that Hello Future Girlfriend site. Hee Hee Hee. Hooooo.

    2. Re:Procreation & Marriage Now Justifiable by bedouin · · Score: 1

      Dude, thanks for blowing my cover.

      Now I have to register a new /. ID.

  46. I've got 'em, they're sweet by unfortunateson · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cool features I haven't seen mentioned here yet:

    1. Several 'skill levels' that let you handicap a player (limit number of shots, limit firing frequency)
    2. Unlike the mini-RC cars which use a capacitor, these things have quick-charge NiMH batteries. It takes about 10 minutes to charge 'em up, but they last about 20 minutes of continuous play.
    3. A 'hit' tank spins and flashes, so there's some real effects to getting hit. They also slow down as they get hit.
    4. The several tanks they have all have slightly different characteristics: speed, firing speed, number of shots, damage done per shot, 'hit points'. This adds to the fun of the variety of tanks. The characteristics are controlled by a key chip on the controller which can be traded out, or perhaps upgraded?
    5. The turret may turn, but the IR that fires is beneath the turret. A motorized turret would not change the game.

    They are a bit pricey, but the WWII Winter set includes two tanks, plus obstacles to hide behind and decals.

    The only other downside is that they're a little fragile.

    --
    Design for Use, not Construction!
    1. Re:I've got 'em, they're sweet by Moofie · · Score: 1

      5) Nope. The IR LED for the turret is next to, and coaxial with, the gun tube.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:I've got 'em, they're sweet by bob921 · · Score: 1

      Actually #5 isn't right--the LED for the gun is just to the side of the gun, and would move with the turret. There's a picture with the review that confirms this.

      Moving-turret models are on the way, too. There's a link to a video of them on the site. I wonder how expensive they'll be, though.

    3. Re:I've got 'em, they're sweet by unfortunateson · · Score: 1

      Whoops. Sloppy of me. I was looking at them from the top down in the packaging, and there's a large visible divot on each of the tanks below the turret, and I mistakenly identified that as the IR transmitter. It's smaller, and indeed on the turret.

      The turret only moves about 30-40 degrees to the right and left. But since you can back up easily, you can still fire in the opposite direction.

      --
      Design for Use, not Construction!
  47. Alright..... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 1



    Who here has a Warhammer 40k map? I mean, the scale is practically perfect. Certainly close enough to make one heck of a battleground.

    Now if I could only find someone near me.... hmmmmmm.

  48. I think these look better than the thinkgeek ones. by zipwow · · Score: 1

    They're more "tank looking", which is neat.

    From reading the manual, I think the ones linked can change channels, TG's site warns you to get different channel models for multiplayer, which makes me think it can't be changed, which sucks.

    These are farily sophisticated, with changing behavior according to damage taken, and a couple of modes to ignore "friendly fire".

    I don't know how the price compares, the TG ones are $60 each, I think that's in the ballpark.

    The question I have is: are the beams compatible? What if I shoot a tank with my old laser tag pistol? Granted, I haven't come up with a reason I'd want to do that, but I'll bet that someone could.

    -Zipwow

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
  49. Re:Playthings of our fears... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I couldn't agree more.

    Whether the actions of the Bush administration are morally praiseworthy or blameworthy in acting is irrelevant to the issue of whether or not an injustice or justice is done to the people of Iraq. Even if Bush called for the invasion of Iraq only to benefit oil companies and to ensure his re-election, this is irrelevant to the issue of whether injustice or justice is done to the people of Iraq. It has very little to do with "weapons of mass destruction". It has very little to do with "terrorism". It has very little to do with "threatening its neighbors". Whether or not there are other nations of people who also need to be freed is irrelevant to the matter of whether or not an injustice or justice is done to the Iraqi people.

    Whether or not Bush or anyone else in Washington have even a single moral credit to their names, I don't care. A nation of 35 (?) million people matters more than whether or not Bush accrues moral virtue by taking the right actions for the right reasons.

    We as members of the global community believe that people, simply in virtue of being people, have certain inalienable rights. They have a right to own property, to shelter, to nutrition, to have a job, to a livable wage, to equal pay for equal work, to pursue political office, to freely and openly express dissenting opinions about their government, to free and open elections, to commit to a relationship with a person of their choosing, to raise a family, ...and a right to a political, economic, and social situation in which these rights can be be realized.

    Certainly the U.S. does not exemplify all of these qualities and maybe not even most of them, but that does not change the simple fact that we have every reason to believe that the people of Iraq will be signifcantly more free and significantly more able to exercise these inalienable rights than they currently are or would have been in the forseeable future had this action not been taken.

    It is a greater justice that is done to Iraq than in our time has been done to anyone else. Our administration may accrue moral blame by taking this action for the wrong reasons or where they had an obligation to help others in greater need, but again that is irrelevant to the matter of whether or not an injustice or justice is done to the people of Iraq.

  50. I think so... by zipwow · · Score: 1

    From skimming the article, there's an "Advanced mode" that lets you set health and stuff, so I think you could set it up that way. I don't know if you can adjust speed, but that would be interesting as well: slow and powerful vs fast and fragile.

    -Zipwow

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
  51. Re:Playthings of our fears... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

    Amen brother. ;)

    Although I too am not sure that the US is doing this for the right reasons, at the end of the day if the people of Iraq don't like what we are doing, (and this is the important part)

    They can complain without being executed.

    They can take their media out, record what they feel isn't right, and show the world. Again, without being executed. No matter what the US ends up doing there, I think this feature alone will make life a lot more livable for the Iraqi people.

    On the off chance that we do indeed help them build a democratic and stable govt that isn't a pawn of the US govt and or of US oil companies, even better. But the whole "If you complain, your family gets killed." theory of the previous govt was a decent enough reason for us to go in there, WMD, terror ties, or not. IMHO, of course.

    --
    Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  52. Genius ideas... by El+Camino+SS · · Score: 0, Offtopic


    should've ended the sanctions, (that would've prevented huge numbers of Iraqi deaths over the last 12 years)

    Oh, do you mean via starvation? Because Saddam had the UN food and medicine for oil plan. That would end starvation. So what deaths do you mean?

    Oh, I get it... you mean the non-economic deaths based upon the KILLING OF HIS OWN CITIZENS. I think you have no cogent argument about the UN sanctions causing the deaths of Iraqis. Please respond. I would love to hear your justification that the UN caused more deaths of Iraqis after the First Gulf War than Saddam did. Please back it up with facts.

    Saddam kills his own people. I want to see Defense Department documents that prove we were complicit in the death of Iraqis that you claim. I can show you videotape right now that says that Saddam was a killer. You need to get your priorities straight, and stop reading websites that have outrageous claims and no proof.

    1. Re:Genius ideas... by KiahZero · · Score: 1
      Here and here.

      So yeah, we were complicit in the deaths of lots of Iraqi children. The sanctions *weakened* the Iraqi people, forcing them to depend on a brutal dictator to survive. And who's fault was that? Ours. The sanctions made Saddam stronger.

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
    2. Re:Genius ideas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...we were complicit in the deaths...

      You do mean the UN collectively, right ? After all they were UN sanctions.

      Ironic you use UN documentation to prove a point and ignore this fact.

    3. Re:Genius ideas... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...we were complicit in the deaths...

      You do mean the UN collectively, right ? After all they were UN sanctions. Ironic you use UN documentation to prove a point and ignore this fact.

    4. Re:Genius ideas... by KiahZero · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do mean the members of the UN which insisted on continued sanctions. They weren't exactly united behind the idea.

      The UN wanted to end them depending on Saddam's behavior. It was the brilliant move of Bush I and Clinton to give Saddam *no* incentive to change by stating, quite clearly, that the sanctions would remain in power so long as he was in charge.

      I never said that the U.S. was the only country to blame. You assumed that. And you know what happens when you assume things.

      --
      I'm a lawyer, but not yours. I wouldn't represent someone who thinks taking legal advice from Slashdot is a good idea.
  53. Tanks by agrippa_cash · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For some time now I've felt that toys like this (especially the ones with the rotating turrets) could be a cool mall concession. Arcades no longer offer any appreciable advantage over home systems and my local mall has a kiddy train that goes around incircles. Put the two together with some sand and rocks and your have fun for all ages! I have to think a 5 or ten min frag session would make more than some crappy train.

    1. Re:Tanks by crusher-1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      lol. When I lived in San Diego (which was for 30+ yrs). They had an amusement park that had tanks that sat 2 ppl. One drove the tank and the other operated the turret. It had panels on the sides that would disable the drive for a a short time and panels on the turret that would disable the turret gun. You would score points for disabling the tanks. I remember it was an absolute blast. The gun in the turret shot tennis balls. I remember one time I got lucky and shot a ball into the barrel of the other tank (no kidding). The two of use in the turrets just looked at each other cause we could figure out just what had happened. Well, he shot back (that's how we figure out my ball went in the barrel). The gun doesn't work too well when it shoots two balls, it was air powered IIRC.

      It was great fun. I'm moving back to S.D in August. I wonder if that place is still up and running?

      Cheers.

  54. /. progression by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's nice to see that slashdot is continuing it's progression to becoming just a place where people can advertise and peddle garbage to a bunch of geeks for free.

  55. [OT] My answer to Saddam... by zipwow · · Score: 1

    Is this:

    There's no question that, all other things unchanged, the world would be a better place without Saddam Hussein. What I don't like is the other things in the world we've changed by removing him this way. (this quote stolen from another poster, my apologies for not quoting him/her)

    Nobody's arguing that Saddam's a nice guy. What many of the anti-war protesters are arguing is telling the UN security council to "STFU" and plodding ahead just the same.

    That damage to world relations, I believe, is far greater than waiting longer to get people organized.

    And, I don't believe for a minute that the US has any proof of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The two attempts to show this proof we've seen, communications and photographs, were so poor that they were shown to be incorrect (I read: faked) within a week of their release to authorities.

    Claims that "we can't tell, because it would risk lives" are pure smoke. For one, its not like showing Hans Blix and the president of France the information is the same as posting it on the net. For another, if you have the proof and its this important, withdraw or extract those informants.

    I'm not against removing Saddam. I am against ignoring the other residents on this planet. I think its absurd to think that we're going to "bring democracy and conflict resolution" to a nation by ignoring the democratic processes that the world has set up to resolve conflicts.

    -Zipwow

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
    1. Re:[OT] My answer to Saddam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Net injustice accrues to the Iraqi people so long as Saddam's regime remains in power.

      We have every reason to believe that there was no alternative end in sight to Saddam's regime. Executing Saddam would not have brought an end to his regime.

      We have no reason to believe that an interval revolution could have been mounted, or that if it could have it would have been not at least many times more costly in human lives than the war we have fought.

      We have no reason to believe that aid shipments would have righted the injustices which would have continued to accrue to the people of Iraq.

      The regime was violently oppresive. Under no other forseeable circumstances would the hideous violation of the inalienable rights of the Iraqi people have been significantly lessened, expect by the fighting of the war which we have fought.

    2. Re:[OT] My answer to Saddam... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      I think its absurd to think that we're going to "bring democracy and conflict resolution" to a nation by ignoring the democratic processes that the world has set up to resolve conflicts.

      There is nothing even remotely democratic about the UN because to much power is involved with the permanat members of the security concil veto. Considering that France and Russia have an outstanding credit balance of $9 Billion each, it's not hard to imagine that they may have let economic considerations influence their veto threats. Maybe the the other residents on this planet need to realise the this planet isn't that big and they need to put all of their cards on the table, not just the ones that don't embarass them too much.

      don't believe for a minute that the US has any proof of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. whether or not there are WMD's isn't the point, Iraq agree to let the UN inspectors look for them and they were supposed to coopperate, they did not.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    3. Re:[OT] My answer to Saddam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not against removing Saddam. I am against ignoring the other residents on this planet. I think its absurd to think that we're going to "bring democracy and conflict resolution" to a nation by ignoring the democratic processes that the world has set up to resolve conflicts.

      You do understand the US must consider its own best interests before those of France, Germany, Russiaa, etc. Otherwise we will become...well, France, Germany, Russia, etc.

      If you want to speak in terms of democracy than maybe you should consider the democracy put forth by the US. It is the US democracy machine that that has spoken.

      I think its absurd to think that we're going to "bring democracy and conflict resolution"

      This is no more absurd than the WWII postwar rebuilding of Germany and Japan.

      Another way to think of it: You have the luxury of thinking it is absurd, shouldnt those people in Iraq be able to dissent from there government as well.

    4. Re:[OT] My answer to Saddam... by zipwow · · Score: 1
      There is nothing even remotely democratic about the UN because...


      And how democratic is a unilateral decision to invade? I'll admit that its not "everyone is equal", but its a step above anarchy or empire-building.

      ...Iraq agree [sic] to let the UN inspectors look for them and they were supposed to coopperate [sic], they did not


      True enough, but the resolution that sent the inspectors clearly did not authorize the invasion. Even our leaders don't believe that, no matter how much they try to spin it now. Otherwise, why else would they have even discussed the second initiative?

      I'm not sure what you're driving at with economic considerations, considering the UN sanctions on Iraq mean that pretty much nobody's making any significant money from them. Or if your "credit balance" comment is meant to suggest differently, please explain what you mean by that.

      Also, please explain how the United States attacking Iraq despite the reservations of several other major powers allows other residents to "put all of their cards on the table"?

      -Zipwow
      --
      I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
    5. Re:[OT] My answer to Saddam... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Well lets be blunt,
      Sadaam Hussein owes $9 Billion Dollars to France and $9 Billion Dollars Russia and it appears to me that both countries would rather have untold numbers of Iraqis civilians raped, tortured, and murdered than risk not getting their money. I short in my book both countries sold their souls, and many of us will rembember.

      put all of their cards on the table
      in this case it means France and Russia should explain how many Human lives are worth $9 Billion Dollars? Do French or Russian Lives count as say 4 times an Iraqi lives?

      the resolution that sent the inspectors clearly did not authorize the invasion
      Duh they violated the cease-fire from the first war, the resolutions related to inspection supported the cease-fire, not supercede them.
      If you Mortgage your house and don't pay the note, don't cry when you lose the house.
      When you execpt an early out on parole from prison with conditions and you violate the terms of the parole, don't cry when you go back to prison.
      When you except a cease-fire agreement and violate the terms, don't cry when the ass-kicking starts again.
      There is an obvious pattern here.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:[OT] My answer to Saddam... by zipwow · · Score: 2

      Good, you've given more explanation for why France and Russia oppose the action than any news source I've seen yet.

      Still, even if this is their real concern, ignoring them, and the principles the UN was founded on, is not the right course of action. Why hasn't our "fine" president stood forth with this debt as the prime reason for their opinion?

      You also didn't approach the issue of why we've been told there's so much urgency: weapons of mass destruction. We don't have proof of them, no matter how much our president eludes to "sekrit gov'ment files".

      Its true that Iraqis are dying, and that's a tragedy. But again, ignoring the systems set in place to resolve disputes and going directly to war is yet another tragedy, and it isn't going to help things. With no broad coalition in place, with only scant support, and with obvious signs of American imperialism, I don't see a "safe, stable, democratic Iraq" in our future.

      Look at what we did with/to Afghanistan if you want evidence of our abilities at nation building. That attack was about as clearly justified as they come (and I support it). What have we done since then? We have forces stationed there, but they all reside in Kabul, leaving the rest of the countryside to return to the rule of regional warlords. This is exactly the situation that caused people to support the Taliban in the first place. Our president didn't even remember Afghanistan in the most recent budget proposal. I'm supposed to believe that things will be different with Iraq?

      The bottom line for me is: I don't buy it. I don't buy it that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction that can reach us, I don't buy it that we were motivated by altruism, and I don't believe we'll replace Iraq with anything resembling stable. I do believe we've done incredible damage to the systems and principles that give us any hope for peace and freedom.

      -Zipwow

      (and don't even get me started on ignoring the constitution at home... what a fine example to set for new republics...)

      --
      I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
    7. Re:[OT] My answer to Saddam... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zip, you are an idiot

      I wish you could could move to Iraq, as it was, and spout your anti-establishment rhetoric.

      How about a solution or are you just gonna whine?

  56. But, you need AIR SUPPORT! by puddles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What better place to get air support for your ground troops than:

    Interactive Toy Concepts

    This company has everything from blimps to B2 bomber, and more.

  57. one of the games you can play with it... by anonymous+loser · · Score: 1

    is actually called combat sumo. I would pay good money to see actual tanks do that in real life. I'd laugh my ass off.

  58. Marriage maybe, procreation - nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the kids, but if you need a g/f to be your tank opponent, I'm interested.

    1. Re:Marriage maybe, procreation - nah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works for me. We'll just pratice makn` da kids. ; )

    2. Re:Marriage maybe, procreation - nah. by bedouin · · Score: 1

      Call me, this is my number:

      (718) 546-0700

      Ask for Shawn.

  59. Mod +5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish mods could go above 5.
    That's one of the funniest posts I've read all year...

  60. Ogg Support by limekiller4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not getting one until it supports the Ogg format.

    --
    My .02,
    Limekiller
  61. I want the iraqi RG version.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..where the little guys inside jump out and run
    when attack helicopters appear..or when there is
    a report of a B52 strike incoming.

  62. ME SMASH by LOVE+BOAT+CAPTAIN · · Score: 1

    Me Smash you with small foot in head pain very small so brain be squished

  63. Loving the Translation by statikuz · · Score: 2, Funny

    From Konami's OWN English version page:

    Please enjoy yourself using this manual.

    I sure hope you DON'T use that manual to enjoy yourself! You might want to try reading it first. Or maybe printing it out. =)

    1. Re:Loving the Translation by budgenator · · Score: 1

      My favorite was some directions from a Chinese company "put together until looks like picture"

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  64. Sorry but... by jmv · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No wonder the US is always going after a war. I really have a problem when anything related to war is turned into a game (see Sony trademarking "Shock and Awe"). What's next: toy civilians that bleed just like real ones?

    1. Re:Sorry but... by Trespass · · Score: 0

      I think that perhaps you misunderstand the true role of games and simulations among children, as well as among adults.

    2. Re:Sorry but... by mgoff · · Score: 1

      No wonder the US is always going after a war. I really have a problem when anything related to war is turned into a game (see Sony trademarking "Shock and Awe"). What's next: toy civilians that bleed just like real ones?

      Insightful? Um, how about reading the article (or even the Slashdot post) instead of just bashing America? These toys are made by Konami, which, as you might imagine from the .jp and Engrish, is a Japanese company.

      Now, will some moderators give this troll what he deserves?

    3. Re:Sorry but... by jmv · · Score: 1

      My comment was directed at the ones *using* the toys, and not only the ones in the US. It just happens that right now it is the US playing Nintendo war, but it could always apply elsewhere too. And yes, I'm just as disgusted at the company, regardless of where it comes from.

    4. Re:Sorry but... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      US is aways going to war because countries like France, Germany and Russia have been selling 9 Billion dollars of goods on credit (that's each too) to countires like Iraq, and Iraq doesn't seem to have bought things like food or medicine with it either.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    5. Re:Sorry but... by Quill_28 · · Score: 1

      Do you play many games(board or computer)?

      Ever play chess? Checkers?

      About about minesweeper?

      But go ahead and take your pop shots... oops that was a reference to war. Sorry didn't mean to offend.

      mods: you can go ahead and mod me as flamebait, but the above poster is anything but insightful

    6. Re:Sorry but... by jmv · · Score: 1

      If you tell me you really don't see the difference between playing chess and playing "kill the other tank", I'll leave you alone.

    7. Re:Sorry but... by jmv · · Score: 1

      OK, you mean that the US is in Iraq just to "help the world" (in which case, can I just say "no tanks"?)? You might also want to note that the US gave weapons to Iraq too during the Iran-Iraq war (I'm sure you saw the video of Hussein with Chirac, but I hope you also saw the one with Rumsfeld).

      Besides, I'll guess that at least one reason why France/Germany/Russia are against war is that they know what occupation is. Their *population* (not just military) know what war looks like. While the US has participated in many wars (and I don't deny its important role in WW2), it's been a really long time since the last war that took place in the US. On the other hand, there is still an important fraction of the French population that *remember* the horrors of war.

    8. Re:Sorry but... by Dusabre · · Score: 1

      Sorry but its the Japanese who thought these toys up. For their internal market. You know Japan, the country with the pacific consitution and Hiroshima and cartoons about battle robots and kid pilots.

    9. Re:Sorry but... by Cygnusx12 · · Score: 1

      Besides, I'll guess that at least one reason why France/Germany/Russia are against war is that they know what occupation is. Their *population* (not just military) know what war looks like.

      From here, it looks like the coalition of the willing just ENDED 30 yrs of occupation by a ruthless dictator.

      It's hardly true that you need a war on your own soil to witness the horrors and atrocities. It's in your face 24 hrs a day on almost every news channel.

      While you're partially right, that the US & Eurpoe are somewhat at fault for the situations that developed in Afghanistan, & Iraq.. You don't exactly see their neighbors getting invovled in keeping the reigion stable. It looks from here, like most of these countries (some, our own allies) would rather turn a blind eye, than interrupt the cash flows into their wallets.

      If you had turned on even one news channel before this police action started, you would've seen that a good portion of the US population was actually anti-war ; So it's hardly fair to in effect refer to the US population as war-hungry.

    10. Re:Sorry but... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      one reason why France/Germany/Russia are against war is that they know what occupation is
      Well lets see
      1. Germany ocupied France,
      2. Germany occupied Russia
      3. US occupied Germany;
      Germany was occupied but France and Germany were victims of genocide; you would think that French and Russians would identify more with the Kurds and Shites than the facist dictator.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    11. Re:Sorry but... by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      Plus the fact that the US can't seem to develop its own culture and has to keep stealing from others. Just look at that site! It's OBVIOUSLY an exact replica of what a JAPANESE site would look like! Have they no shame?

      toy civilians that bleed just like real ones?

      That would not be permitted. As has been reported by the news media many times, that sort of thing leads directly to uncontrollable urges to commit violent acts against actual human beings, the same way that "Pokemon(tm)" causes animal cruelty...

  65. you know what would kick ass? by awing0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Someone already mentioned hooking up an IR controller to their serial port, but what about for over the net multiplayer? Some strategicly placed cameras, 4 tanks, 4 players. I'd do this to have battles with my friends over fields of 486 hardware. I'm sure you could figure out some cool scenarios too with extra IR receivers/senders on the battle field. Stationary guns for defense, minefields, etc. Maybe a game where one team must defend an IR target while the other attacks. This is a must have toy.

    --
    Cthulhu Saves.
  66. Oooohhhh.... by Whispers_in_the_dark · · Score: 1

    Time for mini, tabletop, real bzflag. How can I get one with the guided missile option?

  67. Turning turret by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone mentioned that the 'firing' LED is not actually on the turret. Assuming it's not too big, couldn't a hole be drilled in the turret and have the LED placed inside the end of it? So if you were to motorize it, it would fire in the direction the turret's facing. And let's admit it, sometimes you just get stuck on the sand dunes.

  68. RC Tanks have been around for ages by Gurezaemon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Radio controlled tanks are nothing new - my neighbor had one 60 years ago.

    He sat inside it, a radio signal came in, and in response to that message, he shot at Germans.

  69. Really. by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    You don't say.

  70. Iraqi Tanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the Iraqi mini tanks catch on fire faster?

  71. Flour Bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The easily ignited flour is simply due to the fact that it's a carbohydrate, a very refined and rather dry one at that.

    It's actually been a long-standing movie trick for big-looking explosions (for those working in smaller budgets) to use dry powders rather than traditional tamped (black powder) explosives or liquids because of the safety in handling it.

    For information only (CYA disclaimer): A bag of white flower, laid flat with a good deal of liquid rubber cement on the up-side (or other suitable difficult to extinguish semi-plasti napalm) thrown from a high place on to something hard and flat will yield a spectacular fire storm. It'll also surprise you how much flour is left afterward - one big firy blast, and then a big white mess on the landing site.

    Again, don't try this at home. Or at your enemies' homes.

  72. Is there a French version? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, with a REALLY FAST reverse?

  73. Jesusgeeks... by lpret · · Score: 1

    As you said, looks interesting. I believe it is a Christian geek site as some of the "Ask Jesusgeek" questions refer to setting up a cyber cafe at a church. Also the Theology section kinda gives it away.

    --
    This is my digital signature. 10011011001
  74. Bolo! by mesach · · Score: 1

    Anyone Remember Bolo?

    That was an awesome Tank Program... anyone that remember it know if there is a more recent version(win or linux)?

    --
    moo.
  75. But is it art? by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

    Yeah. And KMFDM & Doom caused Columbine. And playing D&D leads to Satanism. And hot oatmeal leads to chronic masturbation. And my penchant for Civ 3... too dastardly to mention. Same hype, different day.

    Shall we start burning books?

  76. Re:I think these look better than the thinkgeek on by The+FooMiester · · Score: 1

    Uhmm, they CAN be changed. You're not a geek unless you can figure it out, too.

    Frequencies can ALWAYS be changed, it's just a matter of how much work you're willing to put into it.

    --
    The previous has been a secret message to my comrades.
  77. Cheaper, Smartland version? by HomeGroove · · Score: 1

    Has anybody played with the Smartland combat vehicles? Here's a retailer that has 'em for 16 bucks. Are they any good?

    --

    ----
    Spam subject of the moment: Offshore account secrets -nashville disrupt

  78. Hmmm by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

    Damn internet. I can't read asian text...And whats with this blue puzzle piece that all of these sites are using?

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.